Keeping ahead of financial crime

Similar documents
Market Abuse Regulation (MAD II)

ALERT. Market Abuse Regulation. London Asset Management. June 15, 2016

EBF POSITION ON THE REVIEW OF THE MARKET ABUSE DIRECTIVE

A new European framework: MAR and CSMAD

Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks in the E-Money Sector

Market Abuse Regulation: Have you completed your Checklist for 3 July 2016?

Market Abuse Regulation. NEVIR & AFM Webinar 13 October 2016

Anti-Money Laundering Update Domestic and European developments

Market Abuse Regulation Extends the Scope and Application of the Market Abuse Regime

Practice Pointers on EU Market Abuse Regulation: Requirements for U.S. Issuers

TM Group Consulting. MAR - Market Abuse Regulation Recap

Anti-money laundering Annual report 2017/18

EU Market Abuse Regulation and asset managers six months to go

Summary of feedback received

TRANSPOSITION TABLES OF MARKET ABUSE DIRECTIVE AND ITS IMPLEMENTING MEASURES

FRG Breakfast Briefing 219. Thursday 15 October 2015

Questions and Answers. On the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR)

MARKET ABUSE DIRECTIVE INSTRUMENT 2005

The Wolfsberg Correspondent Banking Due Diligence Questionnaire (CBDDQ) Completion Guidance 22 February 2018

FCA Business Plan 2017/18

FINANCIAL CRIME GUIDE (AMENDMENT NO 3) INSTRUMENT 2015

Anti-Money Laundering Policy June 2017

DFSA Annual Supervision Outreach Breakout Group # 3 Financial Crime Risks. 25 June 2018

Anti Money Laundering - Financial Crime Compliance

The AML Challenge. Arab Bankers Association 2 December 2014

Financial Regulation Monthly Breakfast Seminar

Policy on Anti Money Laundering and Countering Terrorist Financing

The new EU regulatory framework for commodity derivatives & MiFiD II/MiFIR implementation Brussels, 20 September 2017

FINAL NOTICE. Ground Floor, 10 Chiswell Street, London, EC1Y 4UQ

Financial Crime Governance, Risk and Compliance Fund Managers & Fund Administrators. Thematic Review 2017

STATEMENT OF ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) AND COMBATING THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM (CFT) POLICIES AND PRINCIPLES

The Market Abuse Regulation in Belgium

European Parliament and Council Formally Approve Fifth Update to AML Directive

1. ENTITY & OWNERSHIP 1 Full Legal Name

AML/CTF and Sanctions Policy

Detailed Contents. 1 Foundations of Capital Markets Legislature in Europe. 1 History 1 I. Introduction 2 II. Segré Report (1966) 2 III.

Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) (Amendment) Act 2018

OVERVIEW OF THE QFC AML REGIME

Platts Kingsman EU Sugar Seminar MiFID II & MAR: what does increased international regulatory scrutiny mean for sugar?

Regulation & Compliance for UK Financial Services This course is presented in London on: 02 March 2018, 11 October 2018

Public Consultation on a Revision of the Market Abuse Directive (MAD)

Market Abuse A New Regime for Debt Issuers

Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Guidelines for the Financial Sector

1. ENTITY & OWNERSHIP 1 Full Legal Name

4th Anti-Money Laundering Directive and 2d Fund Transfers Regulation- General overview and impact on payments

DUE DILLIGENCE QUESTIONNAIRE Anti-Money Laundering & Anti-Terrorist Financing

THE CODE OF MARKET CONDUCT [Draft version 16 April 2018]

Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism

OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN SECURITIES AND MARKETS AUTHORITY (ESMA) Of 27 September 2017

The new anti-money laundering directives Summarizing the changes and providing an update

GOV POL Anti Money Laundering Policy

FINAL NOTICE. Sonali Bank (UK) Ltd, Osborn Street, London E1 6TD. (1) imposes on Steven Smith a financial penalty of 17,900; and

MARKET ABUSE REGULATION

CONSULTATION PAPER NO JUNE 2016 PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING, COUNTER- TERRORIST FINANCING AND SANCTIONS MODULE

aml Bulletin Autumn 2016 Regulatory News Update from DLA Piper

Insider Dealing Regulations. Short description. Scope

Introduction to AML/CFT in New Zealand

ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING IN

The Market Abuse Regulation - Impact on AIM Companies

MiFID II. Algorithmic trading TECC Chris Beuze Carlos Conceicao

The Risk Factors Guidelines

The incoming Market Abuse Regulation (MAR)

So you think all your clients property is clean? 25 October 2017

To whom it may concern. Implementation of the 4th EU Anti Money Laundering Directive

Prudential issues seminar

Anti-Money Laundering. Renu Kiran

Spotlight Test: Compliance Worked Solutions

Obligation to notify market abuse

A review of recent developments and trends in FCA Enforcement

1. ENTITY & OWNERSHIP 1 Full Legal name

Draft Privacy Impact Assessment - Amendments to Chapter 4 of the AML/CTF Rules 25 November 2015

CONTINENTAL REINSURANCE ( C Re ) ANTI-MONEY LAUDERING/COUNTERING THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM (AML/CFT) POLICY

New Zealand s AML/CFT Regime: Impact on AFMA members. Presented by Lloyd Kavanagh June 2013

FBF S RESPONSE. The FBF welcomes the opportunity to comment EC consultation on a revision of the Market Abuse directive.

The Information about People with Significant Control (Amendment) Regulations 2017 (PSC 2017) also came into force on 26 June2017.

ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING/ COUNTERING THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM STRATEGY GROUP

A PRESENTATION AT THE 4 TH ANNUAL INSITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS OF KENYA (ICPAK) FINANCIAL CONFERNCE HILTON HOTEL, NAIROBI

Banco General, S.A. Panama, Republic of Panama. Banco General, S.A.

1. ENTITY & OWNERSHIP 1 Full Legal Name

3: Equivalent markets

1. ENTITY & OWNERSHIP 1 Full Legal name

1. ENTITY & OWNERSHIP 1 Full Legal Name

1. ENTITY & OWNERSHIP 1 Full Legal name

TRUST COMPANY BUSINESS

FINAL NOTICE Alpari confirmed on 22 April 2010 that it would not refer the matter to the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber).

Regulatory developments and hot topics. BVCA Regulatory Committee

AUSTRAC Guidance Note. Risk management and AML/CTF programs

SFC consultation paper on proposed anti-money laundering and counterterrorist

Building Awareness of Procedure & Practice to Recognise & Prevent Money Laundering

TRUST COMPANY BUSINESS

JC/2011/096 AMLTF/2011/05 EBA, ESMA and EIOPA s

DEVELOPMENT BANK OF IRAN (EDBI)

Continuing obligations for companies listed in the UK

AML & KYC. The Crime Prevention Compliance Course. This course can be presented in-house for you on a date of your choosing

Horizon scanner Financial Crime and Cyber-security RISK RATING. Potential impact

Re: Compliance with the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Act 2010 ( CJA 2010 )

Response to FCA Consultation Paper GC 18/1 Proposed guidance on financial crime systems and controls: insider dealing and market manipulation

AML & KYC. The Crime Prevention Compliance Course. This course can be presented in-house for you on a date of your choosing

POLICIES FOR PROPER IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FOURTH ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING DIRECTIVE

Anti Money Laundering Webinar Monday 20 November am

Transcription:

Keeping ahead of financial crime 7 September 2016 www.moorestephens.co.uk PRECISE. PROVEN. PERFORMANCE.

Agenda Introduction Tim West, Partner Market Abuse Regulation Giovanni Giro, Senior Manager The Fourth Money Laundering Directive Darren Johal, Manager Insights of a Skilled Person Andrew Jacobs, Director Conclusion Tim West, Partner

Market Abuse Regulation Giovanni Giro www.moorestephens.co.uk PRECISE. PROVEN. PERFORMANCE.

What is Market Abuse? Market abuse is a concept that encompasses unlawful behaviour to gain an unfair profit in the financial markets and consists of insider dealing, unlawful disclosure of inside information or market manipulation Occurs in relation to Financial Instruments whether traded on a regulated market or other the counter Market abuse prevents market transparency, which is a prerequisite for trading in integrated financial markets May amount to criminal offences and civil offences Recognised as unlawful in most jurisdictions

What s new? Market Abuse Regulation (EUMAR) EU Regulation reforming the Civil Market Abuse Regime Harmonised market abuse rules across all EEA countries Some elements depend on MiFID II (Jan 2018) In the UK Took effect in the UK on 3 July 2016 EUMAR is directly applicable Amendments to FSMA and MAR sourcebook Note: Criminal offences unchanged in CJA 1993 and FS Act 2012

Scope of application of EU MAR Territorial scope EUMAR applies exterritorialy to a market abuse offence relevant to financial instruments traded in the EEA even if committed outside the EEA or by a non-eea entity Three levels of responsibility Issuers and exchange / MTF / OTF operators disclosure / notification Regulated Firms trading on / off exchange MA prevention Individuals behaviour

New prohibitions in EUMAR Under EUMAR there are two primary offences: Art 14 Prohibition of Insider Dealing and of Unlawful Disclosure of inside information Attempting or succeeding to deal on the basis of inside information or passing inside information to other person, either directly or indirectly Art 15 Prohibition of Market Manipulation Attempting or succeeding in manipulating prices of instruments or supply or demand of instruments in financial markets FCA can take enforcement action against civil offence

Behaviours that amount to Market Abuse Insider dealing: dealing or trying to deal on the basis of inside information Unlawful disclosure: insider improperly discloses inside information Manipulating transactions: trading or placing orders that give a false or misleading impression of supply or demand and affect price

Behaviours that amount to Market Abuse Manipulating devices: trading, or placing orders through fictitious devices or any other form of deception or contrivance Dissemination: knowingly giving false or misleading impression about a Financial Instrument or an issuer Misleading behaviour and distortion: behaviour that gives a false or misleading impression of either supply or demand or otherwise distorts the market in a financial instrument

Broader effects of EUMAR Extended definition of financial instruments Affects emissions allowances and commodity derivatives More extensive requirements around systems and controls New rules on market abuse through electronic trading and high frequency trading platforms New market abuse offence for manipulation of benchmarks Offences extended to attempted behaviour Cooperation between financial and commodity regulators

Attempted behaviours Under the EUMAR, it is an offence to even just attempt market manipulation, insider dealing or unlawful disclosure For example: Sending emails with highly sensitive Merger and Acquisition information to a friend may amount to improper disclosure even if the friend does not read or act on it Placing very specific orders to manipulate the price of instruments could amount to market manipulation even if the desired price change does not occur

Safe harbours Some legitimate behaviours in situations where activities do not amount to a Market Abuse offence due to legitimate exceptions Price stabilisation: price support activities carried out in accordance with the price stabilisation rules by buying the securities in the secondary market for a limited time after their issue Share buy-back: a purchase by a company of its own shares Accepted Market Practices: specific exceptions to potential Market Manipulation

Key FCA requirements for all firms Market Abuse prevention policies and controls Suspicious transaction and order reports (STORs) Managers transactions (PDMR Notifications) Buy-back programmes and stabilisation measures Accepted market practices Insiders lists and Chinese walls

Key FCA requirements for all firms Monitoring of investment recommendations Whistleblowing PA dealing Transaction Reporting Telephone recording Training

In summary Concept of Market Abuse remains similar but has broader scope EUMAR directly applicable from 3 July 2016 New definitions with reference to MiFID II Extended to OTC trades and attempted behaviour Criminal offences remain unchanged FCA expects accurate disclosures, notifications and reporting Firms must demonstrate that they have adopted effective measures to prevent Market Abuse

The Fourth Money Laundering Directive Darren Johal PRECISE. PROVEN. PERFORMANCE.

Overview of the Fourth Money Laundering Directive (MLD4) MLD4 is a EU Directive designed to bring a more risk-based approach to the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing Have a more coherent approach to AML & CTF rules across the EEA whilst also removing any ambiguities in previous legislation Takes into account the recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force ( FATF ) from 2012 Designed to reduce compliance costs in relation to AML over the long term Came into effect in June 2015 Firms have until 26 June 2017 to be compliant

What are the core areas of the MLD4 The core areas of MLD4 remain somewhat in line with the Third Directive, but it introduces changes and updates to some key components: Risk Based Approach / EEA wide AML and CTF Risk Assessment Beneficial Ownership & Public Directories Sanctions and Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) Simplified and Enhanced Due Diligence Policies and Procedures Penalties Payments / High Value Traders in goods

Other MLD4 key updates for consideration Early Transposition The Commission has proposed to bring the MLD4 into national law by 1 January 2017. Crypto Currency Currently virtual currencies are not monitored in any way by public authorities in the EEA. Virtual currency platforms and e-wallet providers will become subject to the obligations to implement preventative measures and report suspicious transactions under MLD4. Lower Thresholds for Pre-Paid Cards The Commission has proposed to lower the thresholds form 250 to 150 for nonreloadable pre-paid payment instruments to which CDD measures must be applied. The Commission also proposes to suppress the CDD exemption for online use of prepaid cards.

Other MLD4 key updates for consideration Enhanced Powers for the Financial Intelligence Units In order to assist Financial Intelligence Units ('FIUs') the Commission has proposed a number of additional measures to assist FIUs to collect and analyse information about suspicious transactions, money laundering and terrorist financing Tax Crimes will be included in the list of crimes relevant to money laundering Correspondent relationship the definition will be extended beyond traditional correspondent interaction to all relationships between two financial / credit institutions, regardless of their purpose

Financial Crime Reporting The FCA have confirmed the launch of an annual Financial Crime return known as REP-CRIM, to collect data and notifications through one reporting tool Firms will be required to submit a REP-CRIM only for areas of their business subject to Money Laundering Regulations (MLRs) Proportionality rule firms in scope with total revenue of less than 5m are exempt from reporting REP-CRIM to be submitted through GABRIEL Reporting obligations take effect from 31 December 2016, and affected firms have a submission period of 60 business days from year end

Insights of a Skilled Person Andrew Jacobs PRECISE. PROVEN. PERFORMANCE.

An overview of our Skilled Person s work Skilled Person s Lot Area Client number Client Assets Governance & Individual accountability Controls & Risk Management Conduct Financial Crime Regulatory Returns 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

The content of Financial Crime Requirement Notices 7 Areas of Financial Crime 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Based upon five Financial Crime Reviews where we have acted as the Skilled Person and 2 other Financial Crime related Requirement Notices seen.

Root causes May be a target of Money Laundering Third Party payments Failing to identify / report SARs Concerns arising which lead to a S166 Notice Client Take-on In effective policies and procedures Concerns about monitoring systems and controls Resources May not be detecting Market Abuse Identification and application of EDD Inadequate Risk Assessment Lack of tailored policies Lack of documented procedures Concerns about Sanctions / Adverse Media hits Infrequent refresh of KYC Suitability of oversight by Executive & Board Competence of Second Line of Defence Knowledge of competitor reporting Concerns about surveillance

1) Governance & Oversight This topic features in every Requirement Notice, whether implicitly or explicitly. The top three areas where the Regulator is likely to focus: How information permeates the governance structure Evidence of Board Member knowledge of issues within the Business How oversight is applied and evidenced

2) Key individuals The focus in this area has shifted over the last 18 months, with a widened onus on key individuals responsible for areas of Financial Crime detection and prevention: No longer homing in solely on Significant Influence Function holders (SIFs) The knowledge, experience, competence and involvement of individuals The level and appropriateness of resource committed to key functions

3) Risk Assessment Identification, quantification and assessment of risk are key areas where the Regulator will focus within firms. The prevalent trends in terms of review scopes are: Enterprise-wide Risk Assessment & Risk Appetite Client / Customer Risk assessment: Source of Funds Source of Wealth Changing / emerging risks..of increasing interest

4) Due Diligence Some of the themes around Due Diligence are longstanding, some are coming under heightened focus. The middle theme is one where we know thematic regulatory work is planned: Customer / Client Due Diligence Third Party Due Diligence Acquisition Due Diligence

5) Market Abuse issues Scrutiny in respect of Market Abuse risk is an areas where more Regulatory resources are being applied to monitor emerging and increasing risks. The areas of greatest interest from our experience are: Suspicious Transaction and Order Reporting Surveillance Activities of employees: Gifts, Entertainment and Hospitality guidelines Personal Account Dealing (PAD) Telephone Recording

6) Ongoing Monitoring A number of points continue to be recurring themes consistently arising in Requirement Notices when it comes to established relationships and Business As Usual (BAU) activity: Abdication v delegation Reliance on customer / client information => KYC Refresh Transaction Monitoring

Other issues arising from S166 Financial Crime Requirement Notices.. Payment Screening Remittances Ongoing Screening Training & Competence Best Execution Suspicious Activity Reports Bribery Act compliance Management of Conflicts Disclosure Guidance and Transparency

Our biggest revelations as a Skilled Person What we have learned.. Intelligence Focus on the Board & Senior Management Risk Assessment Due Diligence Reviews coming in two phases Acting upon Final Notices and Dear CEO letters The importance of not making purely cost driven decisions The Expanding universe and what s expected of Firms FCA Financial Crime Guides MLR 2007 JMLSG Note Dear CEO Letters EU MAR Final Notices ESMA Guidelines Market Watch documents Code of market Conduct CEO Letters

Conclusion Tim West PRECISE. PROVEN. PERFORMANCE.

Helping to keep up-to-date Financial Insight our quarterly newsletter E-alerts subscribe via fs@moorestephens.com Regular seminars Follow us on Twitter: @MSFinSec Visit our website: www.moorestephens.co.uk/sectors/financialservices

Keeping ahead of financial crime 7 September 2016 www.moorestephens.co.uk PRECISE. PROVEN. PERFORMANCE.