Balanced Budget, Unbalanced Effects: Serbia`s Good Intentions to Save Money are Paid for by its Most Vulnerable Citizens

Similar documents
GRB in Central, Southern and Western Serbia Women NGOs influence on local budgeting policies experience from Republic of Serbia

2018 NATIONAL PLATFORM ON ROMA INTEGRATION MONTENEGRO

Central Training TRIALOG Annual Exchange Meeting SERBIA Marija Dimitrijevic Miskovic Civic Initiatives Prague April 24-25, 2012

General Assembly resolution 65/182 of December 2010 entitled Follow-up to the Second World Assembly on Ageing

Legislative Environment Regulating Charity Activities in Georgia

CZECH REPUBLIC Overview of the tax-benefit system

Social Inclusion Foundation in Bosnia and Herzegovina

3 The Pension System and Public Assistance

SERBIA. Support to participation in Union Programmes INSTRUMENT FOR PRE-ACCESSION ASSISTANCE (IPA II) Action summary

1. Receipts of the social protection system in Bulgaria,

Country: Serbia. Initiation Plan. Development of Youth Employment Bond

Roma Integration National Policy Workshop on Budgeting for Roma Integration Policies

Comparative analysis of the role of NGOs and the State in Social Inclusion of Older Adults in Russia

CSR POLICY OF MAX LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

Testimony for Public Hearing on the FY 2014 Budget of the Department of Human Services

SERBIA. Support to participation in EU Programmes. Action Summary INSTRUMENT FOR PRE-ACCESSION ASSISTANCE (IPA II)

28 September 2018, Sarajevo

Content. 05 May Memorandum. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs Sweden. Strategic Social Reporting 2015 Sweden

ESPN Thematic Report on integrated support for the long-term unemployed

Long-term care the problem of sustainable financing (Ljubljana, November 2014) 1

A Society for All-the Key to Sustainable Social and Economic Development

Position Paper to the European Union. in Preparation for the next. Multiannual Financial Framework

CZECH REPUBLIC Overview of the tax-benefit system

The Finnish social security system October 2014

EU Funds for Road Safety Multiannual Financial Framework Saving Lives on EU Roads until 2020 January 2012

BUDGET SYSTEM LAW. / Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No. 9, 26 February 2002/ I. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Article 1

PERMANENT MISSION OF THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF TIMOR-LESTE TO THE UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS IN GENEVA

Policies Designed to Secure Employment for Older and Disabled Workers

Conditional Cash Transfer Programs in South Africa

European Economic and Social Committee OPINION. of the European Economic and Social Committee on. (exploratory opinion)

Social Security Schemes,Pension and Elderly policy in Lao P.D.R

GOVERNMENT OF MONTENEGRO. Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare. The first annual report on the implementation of obligations from

Unemployment Insurance and Social Welfare in Cyprus Statements and Comments

BACKGROUND PAPER ON COUNTRY STRATEGIC PLANS

European Pillar of Social Rights

Assessment of Results of the Social Innovation Fund. Pavle Golicin, Galjina Ognjanov

Scottish Third Sector European Structural Funds

SUMMARY OF THE CHILDREN S BILL COSTING

Conception of Reform on Social Services Provision (Official Gazette, No , 2002);

MALAWI. 2016/17 Social Welfare Budget Brief. March 2017 KEY MESSAGES

EU financial assistance to Turkey

Kelowna Vancouver Surrey Edmonton Calgary Regina Whitehorse Yellowknife WINTER 2017

ANNEX 1: Data Sources and Methodology

INSTITUTIONAL SYSTEMS OF THE SOCIAL SAFETY NET PROGRAMMES IN THE OIC MEMBER COUNTRIES

UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA NATIONAL AGEING POLICY

February earnings.

i) Projects or programs relating to activities specified in Schedule VII to the Companies Act, 2013; or

Mutual Learning Programme

1. Key provisions of the Law on social integration of the disabled

Western Balkans and Europe 2020 Supporting Convergence and Growth

Corporate Social Responsibility

Working poor in Japan

SOCIAL PROTECTION BUDGET SWAZILAND 2017/2018 HEADLINE MESSAGES. Swaziland

A NOTE ON CARING AND MALTESE SOCIAL SECURITY LEGISLATION

OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME under THE FUND FOR EUROPEAN AID TO THE MOST DEPRIVED

Warm Home Discount Scheme

Protection of Vulnerable Customers in Serbia

APPLICATION FORM PERSONAL INFORMATION. First Name: Last Name: Middle Name: Previous Surname: Preferred Name: Title: Address: Alternative

Poverty and social exclusion. The Dutch situation THE NETHERLANDS. Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment

Mirae Asset Global Investments (India) Pvt. Ltd. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Policy

SERBIA. Support to participation in EU Programmes. Action Summary INSTRUMENT FOR PRE-ACCESSION ASSISTANCE (IPA II)

THE QUEST FOR ACHIEVING SOCIAL PROTECTION FOR ALL IN NEPAL: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) POLICY OF KALYANI FORGE LIMITED

WONDERLA HOLIDAYS LIMITED CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY POLICY

Policy Brief. Monitoring and Evaluation A Roadmap to Results on Roma Inclusion

Pension and Social Security Systems in Palestine

1. This report seeks approval to provide 100% exemption from the payment of Council Tax from 1 April 2018 to care leavers who:

SERBIA. Support to participation to the EU Programmes INSTRUMENT FOR PRE-ACCESSION ASSISTANCE (IPA II) Action summary

Policy: SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN GAMBLING

PROMOTING GENDER EQUALITY FOR OLDER PEOPLE IN THE EU AGE STATEMENT FOR THE 2007 EUROPEAN YEAR OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL

Calgary Urban Project Society (CUPS) Financial Statements March 31, 2016

Universal Credit The Children s Society key concerns

Branch Neighbourhood and Community Development

The Government Debt Committee in Austria

by Dilli Raj Khanal, PhD Presented to the Seminar on Income Security to Old Persons in South Asia Organized by ESCAP 27 Feb 2017, New Delhi

Coordination of Social Security Systems

Framework Programmes

REGIONAL COOPERATION NEWSLETTER SOUTH ASIA JANUARY-FEBRUARY-MARCH 2012

Executive Summary. Findings from Current Research

Evaluation of the Active Labour. Severance to Job. Aleksandra Nojković, Sunčica VUJIĆ & Mihail Arandarenko Brussels, December 14-15, 2010

CONTENTS SL. NO. PARTICULARS PAGE NOS. 1 Preamble 3. 2 CSR Mission 3. 3 Objectives 3. 4 Focus Areas 4. 5 Approach to Implementation 5.

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

SERVICES AGREEMENT (Effective 7/6/15) Julie A. Pelletier, PhD Licensed Clinical Psychologist 454 Rolling Ridge Drive State College, PA 16801

POLICY BRIEF Gender Analysis of the Ministry of Gender, Children, Disability and Social Welfare Budgets,

Republika e Kosovës Republika Kosovo - Republic of Kosovo Kuvendi - Skupština - Assembly

CZECH REPUBLIC Overview of the tax-benefit system

The Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007 The Protecting Vulnerable Groups Scheme (PVG Scheme)

RS Official Gazette, Nos 31/2012, 71/2013, 98/2013, 125/2014, 102/2015 and 37/2018

CONCORD EU Delegations Report Towards a more effective partnership with civil society

Terms of Reference (ToR) for a Short-Term assignment

STATUTE OF THE EDUCATION REFORM INITIATIVE OF SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE (ERI SEE) Article 1

The Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and the Territories

Communication agenda of SECO mechanism

Locating Cash Transfers in the Broader National Policy Framework

TITLE OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL CANADA S FIRST POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY. OECD Policy Workshop on Enhancing Child Well-being: From Ends to Means?

Government Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. Vol. 478 Cape Town 1 April 2005 No

ESPN Flash report 2015/26. Poverty impact of fiscal consolidation measures

Helping vulnerable populations and. communities to manage risks

Finar Limited. Corporate Social Responsibility Policy

BRIEFING ON THE FUND FOR EUROPEAN AID FOR THE MOST DEPRIVED ( FEAD )

Transcription:

Balanced Budget, Unbalanced Effects: Serbia`s Good Intentions to Save Money are Paid for by its Most Vulnerable Citizens

AgroInvest Foundation Serbia and World Vision International WORLD VISION is a child focused relief and development organisation working in more than 100 countries, including ten EU countries, and a number of offices in countries of the EU Neighbourhood and Enlargement Policy area, including Serbia. In Serbia, World Vision (through its presence in Serbia: AgroInvest Foundation) has been active in the past few years as a donor of community services for children with disabilities, a supporter of Serbia's national child rights coalition, the Network of Organizations for Children (MODS), and has initiated research to evaluate both government and NGO service delivery for vulnerable children in 15 communities throughout Serbia. This research was conducted in partnership with the Provincial Institute for Social Welfare. AGROINVEST FOUNDATION is currently a privileged partner of EUROPEAID in collaboration with World Vision Austria and the Austrian Development Agency in the following project: Networking for a Community Child-Oriented Model. 1 For more information or interviews contact Tijana Moraca, tijana_moraca@wvi.org AgroInvest Fondacija Srbija/ World Vision International Tel: + 381 11 397 2828, Fax: +381 11 397 0781 www.wvi.org/meero; www.agroinvest.rs 1: Budget Basis: BGUE-B2012-22.020701-C8-ELARG DELSRB. World Vision International and AgroInvest Foundation Serbia, May 2014 AUTHORS Tijana Moraca and Jocelyn Penner CONTRIBUTOR Iva Kljakic ALL RIGHTS RESERVED No portion of this publication may be reproduced in any form, except for brief excerpts in reviews, without prior permission from the publisher. PUBLISHED by World Vision's Middle East and Eastern Europe Office on behalf of World Vision International. PHOTOGRAPHY 2008 Andrea Amosson/World Vision (cover) 2009 Dejan Drobnjak/World Vision

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sustainability of services for Serbia's most vulnerable groups (for example, families living in poverty, the elderly, victims of violence and exploitation, and children with disabilities) is one of the biggest social protection reform challenges facing the country. Civil society organisations are most often impacted by this challenge when international donor funding ends and local government funding options are minimal. 2 service allowed parents to maintain employment while keeping their children out of large-scale residential care. It is not the lack of money that forced the day care to shut its doors. The day care first opened with financial support from the European Union (EU); in 2013, local government then took on the financial responsibility of operating the day care. Local government budgets extend funding until the end of 2014's budget cycle. This was a model of sustainable development to be applauded. Public sector service providers now face this same challenge. Under new national cost-saving regulations put in place in 2013, locally operated Centres for Social Work cannot hire needed temporary and permanent staff, even though local government budgets for these staff and services are in place. The national government's good intentions to save money have been paid for by Serbia's most vulnerable citizens. World Vision International calls on Serbia's National Government to remedy this unintended consequence and provide an exception to the cost-savings regulations for currently budgeted social protection services. A Day Care Shuts its Doors A day care for children with disabilities in the South East Serbia town of Aleksinac shut its doors on December 31, 2013 due to new government regulations. Connected to the government-operated Centre for Social Work, the day care had offered care to children from the area five days a week, eight hours a day, for the last two years. With organised meals and educational and creative activities provided, this National Cost-Savings Regulations are Responsible Local government b u d g e t s t h a t included support for day cares was a model of s u s t a i n a b l e development to be applauded. However, the new national cost-savings regulations that bans employment of new permanent staff until the end of 2015 and limits the total number of temporary staff to 10% of the total number of staff effectively shut the doors of the day care, because the service relies on temporary staff. The policy responsible for this result is Serbia's Budget System Law reform 3 that introduced new savings and minimised expenditures in the public sector. Although the Law provides exemptions to the ban on temporary hires for some public sector institutions (e.g., National Parliament, Republic Broadcasting Agency, the Commission for the Protection of Competition, etc.), 4 the social protection sector is not among them. Yet, these very problems for Serbia's social protection field were foreseeable prior to the Law's implementation. The Government's Centres for Social Work rely heavily on engaging temporary staff to extend 2: This is due to various reasons: a lack of available funds, more confidence in public sector providers by local government than private or civil society sectors, and delayed publication of regulatory provisions associated with the work of civil society organisations in service provision. In its recent contribution to the EU Progress Report on Serbia, World Vision provided information on the problem encountered by civil society service providers impacted by funding cuts. 3: Law on Amendments to the Budget System Law, "Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", no. 108/2013. 4: Article 6.

needed services at crucial times of the year and at crucial times in their beneficiaries' lives. However, the Centre for Social Work in Aleksinac could not extend contracts for needed temporary staff as of January 1, 2014, even though the funds existed. 5 Due to budget cuts at one day care, temporary staff were working for free because they w e r e w o r r i e d about the children missing out on necessary services. Effects across the Country Although no precise information exists to identify the number of beneficiaries from different vulnerable groups who have had to pay for these saving measures in terms of their health, livelihoods or other key components of their wellbeing, media stories suggest the cost is high. In January 2014, media reported that caregivers for the elderly in the municipality of Lucani stopped working because the local Centre for Social Work could no longer offer contracts; this left more than one hundred elderly in surrounding villages without assistance during the winter. According to surveys done by World Vision in six different municipalities, all Centres for Social Work found continued service delivery at the same levels to be impossible because they could not re-hire temporary staff used during the previous period. These services maintain approved budgets to re-hire these same staff, yet frustratingly, the budgets cannot be spent. In three of the six municipalities, the Centres for Social Work shut down services until temporary approvals allowed for further staff hires. These temporary approvals are only valid until June 30th of this year. In another municipality, temporary staff has been working as volunteers without pay since January because they are worried about the consequences for the children they serve if their services ceased. The temporary staff's own livelihood is in jeopardy and pays for the State's cost saving measures. In the remaining two municipalities (Aleksinac and Zitiste), a solution for the engagement of temporary staff is still undetermined. The day care in Aleksinac and home assistance in Zitiste have closed down. The Association of Families and Friends of Children with Disabilities from Aleksinac has succeeded in drawing public attention to the fact that children are left without day care service and physical therapy even though local government funding is available. Dina, a five year-old girl with cerebral palsy from Aleksinac is another Serbian citizen who is paying for these cost-saving measures. Dina has attended the day care in Aleksinac since January 2012 when she was just two years old. The day care provided Dina with a physiotherapist, a special education professional, and allowed for social time with other children. Dina thrived in this environment. The day care shut its doors on December 31, 2013 without prior warning. With Dina at home full time, she does not receive the kind of social, physical and educational interaction necessary to sustain her well-being. With the added expense to find these similar services privately and unable to work without full time care for their child, Dina's parents are the ones who 6 pay for Serbia's cost-saving measures. 5: The possibility of hiring more associates is still possible, but the procedure is complicated, time consuming and it has been changed already twice. Acquiring the approval was first prescribed by Government Regulation from December 20, 2013, which then changed two months later (February 22, 2014). Current regulation requires the provider and local government entity to seek permission from the appropriate line Ministry (for community services it is Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Policy, i.e. Ministry of Regional Development and Local Government). Second, the line Ministry must then obtain the opinion from the Ministry of Finance and further refer to a special Government's Commission. 6: Maja Nesic, on behalf of the Association of Families and Friends of Children with Disabilities (and mother of a girl with cerebral palsy), in a statement given to World Vision on April 29, 2014.

If an 5 exception to t h e B u d g e t System Law is not made, the burden of the c o s t - s a v i n g measures will be o n t h e m o s t v u l n e r a b l e children. Long-term Harm for Short-term Savings World Vision applauds Serbia's investments in community services as a remarkable response to the needs of its citizens. In the case of children with disabilities, these services prevent institutionalization of Serbia's most vulnerable children and keep families together. The communitybased services are also less expensive than the institutionalization of children. Therefore, without social protection services as an exception to the new Budget System Law's ban on temporary staff hires, Serbia risks increased institutionalization of its children, increased costs associated with institutionalization, and a backward step in its efforts to take care of its children in ways that increase child development, health and well-being. Even worse, without the exception, Serbia places the burden of these cost-saving measures on its most vulnerable children. This unintended consequence must be remedied immediately without delay. Further, without an exception to the new Budget System Law for social protection services, Serbia risks prolonging its accession to EU Membership. With EU calls towards child protection reform and significant funding provided by the EU to establish and develop many of these community-based services, Serbia loses the momentum and investments provided by the EU towards human development and human rights. 7 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S 1. World Vision calls on the Government of Serbia to fortify its successes in social protection reform by creating an emergency exception within the new Budget System Law for necessary staff and temporary staff for social protection services according to approved budgets. 2. World Vision also calls on the EU to support this emergency exception by the Government of Serbia with necessary resources and support. 7: One of the last big investments in services was a three million euro donation from the EU for development of community services for children with disabilities and their families in 41 municipalities in Serbia from 2011 to 2013. The grant was part of IPA 2008 Social Inclusion Project 2008 (EuropeAid/130732/L/ACT/RS).

AgroInvest Foundation Pazinska 16, 11000 Belgrade Serbia Tel: +381 11 397 28 28 Tel: +381 11 397 66 45 Fax: +381 11 397 07 81 e-mail: tijana_moraca@wvi.org office@agroinvest.org Website: www.agroinvest.org World Vision Brussels & EU Representation ivzw 18, Square de Meeûs, box 2 B-1050, Brussels, Belgium Tel : +32 (0)2 230 16 21 Fax : +32 (0)2 280 34 26 e-mail: eulo-info@wvi.org Website: www.wvi.org/eu World Vision Middle East and Eastern Europe Regional Office 62 Perikleous Street, 2021 Nicosia, Cyprus Mailing address: P.O. Box 28979, 2084 Nicosia, Cyprus Tel: +357-22-870277 Fax: +357-22-870204 Website: www.wvi.org/meero