SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN P. DAIS (WORKING CASH) October 6, 2017 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JACK S. LEWIS ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN (WORKING CASH) APRIL 6, 2018

REVISED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JACK S. LEWIS ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

PUBLIC VERSION WORKPAPERS TO PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ORA DATA REQUEST ORA-SDG&E-DR-007-CL8 SDG&E 2019 GRC A SDG&E RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: OCTOBER 26, 2017 DATE RESPONDED: NOVEMBER 8, 2017

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE RATE BASE. November 2014

SECOND REVISED SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KENNETH J. DEREMER (POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING) April 6, 2018

SOCALGAS / SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JAMES VANDERHYE (SHARED SERVICES & SHARED ASSETS BILLING, SEGMENTATION & CAPITAL REASSIGNMENTS)

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RANDALL G. ROSE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JAWAAD A. MALIK (POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING) April 6, 2018

CHAPTER VII DIRECT TESTIMONY OF PATRICK MOERSEN (OVERHEADS) ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RYAN HOM (UPDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS REPORT) January 2018

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JONATHAN B. ATUN CHAPTER 4 ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

SECOND REVISED SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RAGAN G. REEVES (TAXES) April 6, 2018 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE CHAPTER VII SOCALGAS AMI BUSINESS CASE MODELING METHODOLOGY AND REVENUE REQUIREMENT

TURN Data Request Number 1 A SoCalGas Response

CHAPTER 13 AMI FINANCIAL MODELING. JULY 14, 2006, AMENDMENT Prepared Supplemental, Consolidating, Superseding and Replacement Testimony of SCOTT KYLE

Company: Southern California Gas Company (U 904 G) Proceeding: 2019 General Rate Case Application: A Exhibit: SCG-37-2R SECOND REVISED

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MARK A. DIANCIN SHARED SERVICES AND SHARED ASSETS BILLING POLICIES AND PROCESS. November 2014

REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RONALD M. VAN DER LEEDEN POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING. March 2015

CHAPTER III PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF EDWARD J. REYES

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF AMANDA D. WHITE SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MICHELLE A. SOMERVILLE MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES. November 2014

UPDATE TESTIMONY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AUGUST 2018

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KHAI NGUYEN ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

REVISED WORKPAPERS TO PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RONALD M. VAN DER LEEDEN ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SDG&E REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF NORMA G. JASSO (REGULATORY ACCOUNTS) June 2015

REVISED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RANDALL G. ROSE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

Company: Southern California Gas Company (U 904 G) Proceeding: 2019 General Rate Case Application: A Exhibit: SCG-37 SOCALGAS

CHAPTER IV DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

APPENDIX X FORMULA FOR CALCULATING THE ALLOCATED COSTS TO THE CITIZENS BORDER EAST LINE RATE UNDER SDG&E S TRANSMISSION OWNER TARIFF

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Jeffrey L.

2015 General Rate Case

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

SOCALGAS REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF CHRISTOPHER R. OLMSTED (INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY) JUNE 18, 2018

NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DANIEL T. NAWAZELSKI LEAD-LAG STUDY EXHIBIT DTN-1. New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission

For information relating to , please see attachment TURN-SCG-DR-001_Q1.xls.

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF ROBERT C. LANE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

TURN DATA REQUEST-058 SDG&E-SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A /8 SDG&E_SOCALGAS RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: APRIL 23, 2018 DATE RESPONDED: MAY 7, 2018

REVISED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF TODD J. CAHILL ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

2018 General Rate Case

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF EDWARD J. REYES ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

Company: Southern California Gas Company (U 904 G) Proceeding: 2019 General Rate Case Application: A Exhibit: SCG-46-R REVISED SOCALGAS

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL W. FOSTER ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF NORMA G. JASSO (REGULATORY ACCOUNTS) November 2014

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UPDATED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF S. NASIM AHMED SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

CHAPTER XII DIRECT TESTIMONY OF SHARIM CHAUDHURY ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA (REGULATORY ACCOUNTS) November 2014

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF TODD J CAHILL ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SoCalGas Response 01: a & b. Please refer to the schedule on next page.

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF IFTEKHARUL (SHARIM) CHAUDHURY (PRESENT AND PROPOSED GAS TRANSPORTATION REVENUE AND RATES) April 6, 2018

Residential Line and Service Extension Allowance Testimony. Application No.: Witnesses: C. Silsbee S. Reed J. Schichtl L. Vellanoweth (U 338-E)

REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARY G. LENART (REVENUES AT PRESENT AND PROPOSED RATES) March 2015

THIRD REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF IFTEKHARUL (SHARIM) CHAUDHURY (PRESENT AND PROPOSED GAS TRANSPORTATION REVENUE AND RATES) July 31, 2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY ) DOCKET NO.

RR1 - Page 181 of 518

CHAPTER III COST TRACKING & REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JOHNNY M. HULEIS

Exhibit D-1 Page1 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

CHAPTER VIII DIRECT TESTIMONY OF NEIL CAYABYAB (INSURANCE) ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF IFTEKHARUL (SHARIM) CHAUDHURY (PRESENT AND PROPOSED GAS TRANSPORTATION REVENUE AND RATES)

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF SANDRA K. HRNA (ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE/LEGAL/REGULATORY AFFAIRS/ EXTERNAL AFFAIRS) October 6, 2017

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

TURN DATA REQUEST-016 SDG&E-SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A /8 SDG&E_SOCALGAS RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: FEBRUARY 9, 2018 DATE RESPONDED: FEBRUARY 26, 2018

SDG&E REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF CYNTHIA S. FANG (ELECTRIC RATES AND BILL COMPARISON) JUNE 18, 2018

Southern California Edison Company s Supplemental Exhibit in Response to Administrative Law Judge s May 6, Ruling

PREPARED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

TURN DATA REQUEST-014 SDG&E-SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A /8 SDG&E_SOCALGAS RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: FEBRUARY 8, 2018 DATE RESPONDED: FEBRUARY 27, 2018

2015 General Rate Case

(U 338-E) 2018 General Rate Case A Workpapers REVISED. RO- Rate Base SCE-09 Volume 02, Chapter IV, Book A

2018 General Rate Case

SAFETY POLICE PLAN OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (CalPERS ID: ) Annual Valuation Report as of June 30, 2015

CHAPTER X DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MARJORIE SCHMIDT-PINES (RATES) ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

CHAPTER V PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

SOCALGAS REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF RENE F. GARCIA (ADVANCE METERING INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY) JUNE 18, 2018

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Testimony of Stephen E. Pickett

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RICHARD R. SCHRUBBE. on behalf of

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Direct Testimony of Michael G. Wilding

CHAPTER 4 COST RECOVERY AND REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

TURN DATA REQUEST-036 SDG&E-SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A /8 SDG&E_SOCALGAS RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: MARCH 22, 2018 DATE RESPONDED: APRIL 5, 2018

MISCELLANEOUS PLAN OF THE CITY OF OCEANSIDE (CalPERS ID: ) Annual Valuation Report as of June 30, 2015

2018 General Rate Case

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARY LENART ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

2018 General Rate Case. Tax Update Rebuttal

RR9 - Page 229 of 510

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

a. Of materials procured over the last three years, what proportion of the amount spent was for products produced in California? Please explain.

Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC Docket No. RP Exhibit No. TPC-0079

Southern California Gas Company (U 904 G)/San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902 M) SOCALGAS AND SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DEBBIE S.

ORA ORAL DATA REQUEST ORA-SDGE/SCG-ORAL-DR-001-LL 2019 GRC A /008 SDG&E/SCG RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: DECEMBER 19, 2017 DATE RESPONDED: JANUARY

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DAVID L. CHONG

STATE OF CONNECTICUT PUBLIC UTILITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY DOCKET NO

2015 General Rate Case

REVISED UPDATED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JASON BONNETT SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

Pacific Gas and Electric Company. Statement of Estimated Cash Flows April 20, 2001

TURN DATA REQUEST TURN-SEU-004 SDG&E 2019 GRC A SDG&E RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: 5, 2018 DATE RESPONDED: 25, 2018

TURN DATA REQUEST-038 SDG&E-SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A /8 SDG&E_SOCALGAS RESPONSE PARTIAL #1 DATE RECEIVED: MARCH 28, 2018 DATE RESPONDED: APRIL

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Sheet 1. J. Pole Loading and Deteriorated Pole Programs Balancing Account

FILED JUL COURT CLERK'S OFFICE - OKC CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA

Transcription:

Company: San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 0 M) Proceeding: 01 General Rate Case Application: A.1-- Exhibit: SDG&E- SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN P. DAIS (WORKING CASH) October, 01 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Doc #1

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 1 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST... 1 B. Organization of Testimony... 1 II. METHODOLOGY UNDER SP U-1... A. Working Cash Requirement for Balancing Sheet Accounts... B. Working Cash Requirement for Income Statement Accounts... 1. Revenue Lag.... Expense Lag... C. Derivation of the Total Working Cash Requirement... III. SUMMARY REPORTS... IV. WORKING CASH DETAILS... 1 A. Balance Sheet Accounts... 1 1. Operational Cash Requirements... 1. Working Capital Not Supplied by Investors... 1 B. Income Statement Accounts (Lead/Lag Working Cash Requirements)... 1 1. Revenue Lag... 1. 01 Expense Lag Categories... 1. TY 01 Expense Components... 1 V. CONCLUSION... 1 VI. WITNESS QUALIFICATIONS... 1 APPENDICES APPENDIX A - GLOSSARY OF TERMS... SPD-A-1 SPD-i

SUMMARY Describes the methodology used by San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) to prepare its working cash request in compliance with CPUC Standard Practice (SP) U-1. Requests adoption of a Test Year (TY) 01 working cash of $1 million. SPD-ii

1 1 1 1 1 SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN P. DAIS (WORKING CASH) I. INTRODUCTION A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST I sponsor the Test Year 01 working cash requirement. My direct testimony describes the methodology used by SDG&E to prepare its working cash request and provides the facts supporting a working cash requirement to compensate investors for providing funds that are committed to the business for paying operating expenses in advance of receiving the offsetting revenues from customers. The net outcome of the timing of these transactions results in SDG&E s average revenue lag being greater than its average expense lag, resulting in a net working cash requirement of $1 million. 1 As described in further detail below, my showing is mainly based on SDG&E s working cash study and the resulting TY 01 working cash requirement. TABLE SPD-AA Test Year 01 Summary of SDG&E Working Cash Requirement ($ in millions) Operational Cash Requirement $ Lead-Lag Working Cash Requirement $1 Total Working Cash Requirement $ Working cash provided by non-investors ($) Net Working Cash Requirement $1 1 1 1 0 1 B. Organization of Testimony In my testimony, I describe the purpose of working cash and the methodology under SP U-1 to determine the working cash allowance. I also provide a narrative and summary reports to describe the steps that SDG&E used to prepare its working cash study. Lastly, I 1 A late reduction in SDG&E s proposed TY 01 revenue requirement is reflected in the Summary of Earnings testimony of Khai Nguyen (SDG&E-). Due to the timing of the TY 01 revenue requirement change, SDG&E has updated only certain witness testimonies to reflect this reduction prior to filing its application. SDG&E s Working Cash testimony proposal has not yet been updated to reflect this reduction. The Working Cash revenue requirement reduction will be provided and updated in the testimony and workpapers at SDG&E s earliest opportunity. SPD-1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 provide detailed descriptions of the key accounts and activities that support SDG&E s TY 01 request. II. METHODOLOGY UNDER SP U-1 The following narrative generally describes the steps used to prepare the working cash study that determined SDG&E s TY 01 request. More details on each account category and specifics relevant to each step in the process are provided later in this testimony, as well as in the accompanying workpapers (Ex. SDG&E--WP). Working cash is a component of rate base under SP U-1, and is described as the funding supplied by investors to meet day-to-day utility operational requirements, and to cover the time that expenditures are made for services until the time revenues are collected for those services. When practical, SP U-1 calls for a detailed analysis of working cash referred to as the weighted average or lead-lag days method. SDG&E employs this method for calculating its working cash allowance. Accordingly, the calculation is comprised of items related to the balance sheet and items related to the income statement as described in SP U-1. A. Working Cash Requirement for Balancing Sheet Accounts SDG&E s requested balance sheet related working cash allowance is based on the sum of the monthly balances from December 01 through December 01, less one-half of each December balance, divided by 1 (i.e., a mid-month convention), and then escalated into 01 dollars. This practice of averaging month-end balances for determining the balance sheet-related working cash allowance is outlined in Chapter of CPUC SP U-1. Working cash requirements for balance sheet accounts that require or provide working cash were quantified using 01 as-recorded account balances and a mid-month convention as described above, to determine weighted-average annual account balances (see Tables SDG&E- SPD-, SDG&E-SPD-, and SDG&E-SPD-). These balances were allocated between electric distribution, gas service, and generation based on the allocation percentages described in the Segmentation and Re-Assignment Rates testimony of Jim Vanderhye (Ex. SDG&E-). The See CPUC SP U-1-W, March 00, Chapter, section 1, which compares the detailed method to the simplified method (defined in Chapter, section 1). It states: The detailed basis of determining working cash allowance is normally referred to as the weighted average or lead-lag days method. Fundamentally, the same principles apply for the detailed basis as for the simplified basis. That is, first the operational requirement is determined and then amounts of monies available through tax accruals and other funds not supplied by the investor are deducted from the operational requirement. SPD-

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 01 electric distribution, gas service, and generation average balances were then escalated to 01 dollars using the shared services escalation factor index (1.00), which reflects the weighted-average of labor and non-labor Operations & Maintenance (O&M) indexes, as noted in the escalation testimony of Scott R. Wilder (Ex. SDG&E-). B. Working Cash Requirement for Income Statement Accounts The working cash allowance for income statement items involved performing a lead-lag study. This study quantifies the timing difference between revenue lag and expense lag, using 01 recorded revenues and expenses: 1. Revenue Lag Revenue lag is the average number of days for all utility customers between the midpoint of their monthly service and receipt of payment by SDG&E (line 1 of Tables SDG&E- SPD-, SDG&E-SPD-, and SDG&E-SPD-). Because SDG&E customers pay for all categories of service (both electric distribution and gas service) with a single bill, the lead/lag study uses a single value for revenue lag days.. Expense Lag Expense lag is the number of days between the time the utility s expenses are incurred and the time SDG&E pays its suppliers (column A of Table SDG&E-SPD-l). Because SDG&E pays separately for each categories of service, each expense category has its own value for lead/lag days. The expense lag analysis reflects 01 as-recorded expenses and the associated average expense lag days. To determine the number of expense lag days, SDG&E analyzed 1 months of invoices from calendar year 01 for account categories that represent the types of expenses forecasted in the GRC (e.g., accounts payable records, O&M expenses, payroll expense, taxes, and benefits, among others). The weighted-average number of expense lag days for each category was derived by the following: For the total population of invoices for 01, determine lag days for each expense category by comparing the service date (either the date service was provided or the midpoint of the service period) to the date cash payment was made; 0 1 For each category, multiplying the lag days by the associated dollar amount for the payment, deriving dollar-days ; and Summing the dollar-days for each payment and dividing that total by the total of the 01 payment amounts to derive the average expense lag. SPD-

1 (Note: the same approach for calculating expense lag was also used for energy commodity purchases, which have no provision for working cash in their specific tariffs). The account category totals were associated with electric distribution, gas service, and generation based on the segmentation factors described in the testimony of Jim Vanderhye (Ex. SDG&E-). The overall weighted-average number of expense lag days for electric distribution, gas service, and generation for all non-commodity expense categories was calculated, and applied to the total 01 O&M costs forecasted in the GRC using the following steps: annual 01 electric distribution, gas service, and generation expenses for each account category were multiplied by total lag days, generating dollardays (columns c, e, and g in Table SDG&E-SPD-1); 1 1 1 1 1 dollar-days and total expenses for all account categories except commodities were summed; and total dollar-days were divided by total expenses to determine noncommodity weighted-average lag days (lines 1b, 1d, and 1f of Table SDG&E-SPD-1). 1 1 0 1 0 1 To generate dollar-days on non-commodity expenses, I used weighted-average lag days and multiplied them by the sum of the total 01 O&M costs forecasted in the GRC, forecasted deferred taxes, franchise fees on commodities, pass-through taxes, and refundable program costs (represented as All Other Expenses on line of Tables SDG&E-SPD-, SDG&E-SPD-, and SDG&E-SPD-). For commodity purchases, specific, rather than weighted-average, expense lag days were applied to the forecasted dollars to generate dollar-days. The sum of the Commodity and All Other Expenses dollar-days were divided by total forecasted expenses to determine overall weighted-average expense lag days (line of Tables SDG&E-SPD-, SDG&E-SPD-, and SDG&E-SPD-). In the last step of the lead/lag study, overall weighted-average expense lag days for electric distribution, gas service, and generation were subtracted from revenue lag days to produce net revenue lag days (line of Tables SDG&E-SPD-, SDG&E-SPD-, and SDG&E- SPD-), which is the average number of days between payment of expenses and collection of revenue. This value was then multiplied by total forecasted expenses and divided by days to determine the total working cash requirement associated with revenue and expenses (line of Tables SDG&E-SPD-, SDG&E-SPD-, and SDG&E-SPD-). SPD-

1 C. Derivation of the Total Working Cash Requirement The final working cash allowance was determined by adding the balance sheet related working cash requirements to the lead/lag related working cash requirements for electric distribution, gas service, and generation (line of Tables SDG&E-SPD-, SDG&E-SPD-, and SDG&E-SPD-). III. SUMMARY REPORTS Table SDG&E-SPD-1 summarizes 01 expense lag days, commodity expenses, noncommodity expenses, and associated dollar-days by account category for electric distribution, gas service, and generation. The overall 01 weighted-average non-commodity expense lag days are 0. days for electric distribution,. days for gas service, and 1. days for generation. These values were developed to apply to 01 expense forecasts. Table SDG&E-SPD-1 San Diego Gas & Electric Company 01 Expense Lag Days Summary - Electric Distribution, Gas Service, and Generation ($000) [a] [b] [c] [d] [e] [f] [g] Expens e Total Company Total Company Total Company Line Lag Electric Distribution Gas Service Generation No. Description Days Expenses Dollar-Days Expenses Dollar-Days Expenses Dollar-Days [ a ]*[ b ] [ a ]*[ d ] [ a ]*[ f ] Commodity Expense: 1 Purchased Electric Costs.0 $ 1,1, $,, - - - - Purchased Gas Costs. - - $, $,0, - - Purchased Generation Costs. - - - - $ 1, $,, Non-Commodity Expense: Payroll Expense 1.0 1,,, 1, 1,0,1 1,1 1,0 F.I.C.A. & Medicare Expense 1. 1,0,,, 1,0 1, Federal/State Unemployment Insurance.0, 1 1,0, Incentive Compensation Plan.0 1,,,1,0,1,1 1,1,0 Employee Benefits. 1, 1,0 1,,, 1, Goods & Services., 1,,0,0,,1,1,0 Payments by Corporate Center. 0,0 1,1,1,0 0,1,, Real Estate Rental (.) 1, (0,), (,) 1,0 (1,) 1 Materials Issued from Stores -,1-01 - - 1 Property/Ad Valorem/Pass-Through Taxes. 1,00 1,0,0 1,,1,0 1,0 1,1,1 1 Federal Income Taxes--Current (.), (,,0) 0,0 (1,,0),1 (1,01) 1 CA Corporate Franchise Taxes (.0) 1, (,0,0) 1,1 (1,,0), (1,1) 1 Federal Income Taxes - Deferred - (1,) - (1,0) - (,0) - 1 Depreciation Provision - 1, -, -, - 1 Amortization of Insurance Premiums -,0 -, -, - 1 EXPENSES EXCLUDING COMMODITY $ 1,1, $,1,0 $ 0,1 $,0, $ 1, $,1,1 1 1 0 TOTAL EXPENSES INCLUDING COMMODITY $,,1 $,1,1 $ 1,00 $ 1,,0 $, $,, 1 Weighted Average Non-Commodity Expense Lag Days 0. [1c/1b]. [1e/1d] 1. [1g/1f] Weighted Average Expense Lag Days (including Commodity) 0.1 [0c/0b].1 [0e/0d]. [0g/0f] Note: Values may not add to totals due to rounding. SPD-

Tables SDG&E-SPD-, SDG&E-SPD-, and SDG&E-SPD- summarize the calculations of the 01 lead/lag working cash requirements of $. million for electric distribution, $. million for gas service, and $1. million for generation. As is shown, the calculation is based on 01 lag days and forecasted 01 revenues and expenses. Table SDG&E-SPD- San Diego Gas & Electric Company Lead-Lag Study Summary - Electric Distribution ($000) [a] [b] [c] 01 01 01 Line Expense Expense Calculated No. Description Lag Days Forecast Dollar-Days [ a ]*[ b ] 1 Revenue.1 Expenses Commodity Purchases - Electric.0 $ 1,1,0 $,, Commodity Purchases - Core Gas. - - Commodity Purchases - Generation Fuel. - - All Other Expenses 0. 1,,1 0,,1 Total Expenses - a: c/b; b&c: (+++). $,,0 $,0, Net Revenue Lag Days [1a-a] * 1.1 Total Lead-Lag Working Cash Requirement [a*b/] $, Note: Values may not add to totals due to rounding. * Represents 01 net revenue lag days based on 01 expense forecasts. SPD-

Table SDG&E-SPD- San Diego Gas & Electric Company Lead-Lag Study Summary - Gas Service ($000) [a] [b] [c] 01 01 01 Line Expense Expense Calculated No. Description Lag Days Forecast Dollar-Days [ a ]*[ b ] 1 Revenue.1 Expenses Commodity Purchases - Electric.0 - - Commodity Purchases - Core Gas.,,,00 Commodity Purchases - Generation Fuel. - - All Other Expenses. 1,,, Total Expenses - a: c/b; b&c: (+++). $,0 $ 1,1,0 Net Revenue Lag Days [1a-a] * 1. Total Lead-Lag Working Cash Requirement [a*b/] $,0 1 1 1 1 Note: Values may not add to totals due to rounding. * Represents 01 net revenue lag days based on 01 expense forecasts. SPD-

Table SDG&E-SPD- San Diego Gas & Electric Company Lead-Lag Study Summary - Generation ($000) [a] [b] [c] 01 01 01 Line Expense Expense Calculated No. Description Lag Days Forecast Dollar-Days [ a ]*[ b ] 1 Revenue.1 Expenses Commodity Purchases - Electric.0 - - Commodity Purchases - Core Gas. - - Commodity Purchases - Generation Fuel. 1,,1,01 All Other Expenses 1. 1,1,, Total Expenses - a: c/b; b&c: (+++). $ 0,0 $,001, Net Revenue Lag Days [1a-a] * 1. Total Lead-Lag Working Cash Requirement [a*b/] $ 1,0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Note: Values may not add to totals due to rounding. * Represents 01 net revenue lag days based on 01 expense forecasts. SPD-

Tables SDG&E-SPD-, SDG&E-SPD-, and SDG&E-SPD- summarize 01 and forecasted 01 balance sheet sources and uses of working cash, and add the lead/lag working cash requirements to derive the total working cash requirements of $1. million for electric distribution, $0. million for gas service, and $1. million for generation. Table SDG&E-SPD- San Diego Gas & Electric Company Working Cash Summary - Electric Distribution ($000) Line 01 01 No. Description As-Recorded Requirement Balance Sheet Account Uses of Working Cash 1 Cash Balances $, $, Other Receivables,, Prepayments 0,001,1 Deferred Debits,,00 Sub-total Balance Sheet Account Uses of Working Cash, 0,01 Balance Sheet Account Sources of Working Cash Employee Withholdings (1,01) (1,0) Current and Accrued Liabilities (,) (,0) Sub-total Balance Sheet Account Sources of Working Cash (,) (,) Net Balance Sheet Account Working Cash Requirement [+] * $ 0, $, Lead/Lag Working Capital Requirement ** $, Total Working Cash Requirement $ 1, * Proposed 01 amount is derived by escalating the 01 recorded value using the shared service index. ** Proposed 01 working cash requirement is from the previous table (Table SDG&E-SPD-). Note: Values may not add to totals due to rounding. SPD-

Table SDG&E-SPD- San Diego Gas & Electric Company Working Cash Summary - Gas Service ($000) Line 01 01 No. Description As-Recorded Requirement Balance Sheet Account Uses of Working Cash 1 Cash Balances $ 1,1 $ 1, Other Receivables,, Prepayments 1, 1, Deferred Debits,,0 Sub-total Balance Sheet Account Uses of Working Cash 0,1 1,0 Balance Sheet Account Sources of Working Cash Employee Withholdings () () Current and Accrued Liabilities (1,1) (1,1) Sub-total Balance Sheet Account Sources of Working Cash (1,1) (1,00) Net Balance Sheet Account Working Cash Requirement [+] * $,1 $, Lead/Lag Working Capital Requirement ** $,0 Total Working Cash Requirement $ 0, * Proposed 01 amount is derived by escalating the 01 recorded value using the shared service index. ** Proposed 01 working cash requirement is from the previous table (Table SDG&E-SPD-). 1 Note: Values may not add to totals due to rounding. SPD-

Table SDG&E-SPD- San Diego Gas & Electric Company Working Cash Summary - Generation ($000) Line 01 01 No. Description As-Recorded Requirement Balance Sheet Account Uses of Working Cash 1 Cash Balances $ 1 $ 0 Other Receivables 1 Prepayments,,1 Deferred Debits 1 Sub-total Balance Sheet Account Uses of Working Cash,0, Balance Sheet Account Sources of Working Cash Employee Withholdings () () Current and Accrued Liabilities (,) (,) Sub-total Balance Sheet Account Sources of Working Cash (,) (,1) Net Balance Sheet Account Working Cash Requirement [+] * $, $,1 Lead/Lag Working Capital Requirement ** $ 1,0 Total Working Cash Requirement $ 1, * Proposed 01 amount is derived by escalating the 01 recorded value using the shared service index. ** Proposed 01 working cash requirement is from the previous table (Table SDG&E-SPD-). 1 Note: Values may not add to totals due to rounding. SPD-

IV. WORKING CASH DETAILS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 This section contains further details about each account category used in the development of SDG&E s 01 GRC working cash request. A. Balance Sheet Accounts These categories provide an overview of the main components of each operational cash requirement. For a full list of all the components, please see Schedules P and Schedule P Detail in my workpapers (Ex. SDG&E--WP). 1. Operational Cash Requirements The following accounts are funded with cash supplied by investors, thus establishing the working cash requirement. a. Cash Balance - The cash balance represents working cash on hand that is required to be available in SDG&E s bank accounts to operate them economically and efficiently. The amounts fluctuate depending upon anticipated cash outlays and inflows. (See line 1 of Tables SDG&E-SPD-, SDG&E-SPD-, and SDG&E-SPD-) b. Other Receivables - This category includes Sundry Billing, Damage Claims Receivables, and Miscellaneous Receivables. (See line of Tables SDG&E-SPD-, SDG&E- SPD-, and SDG&E-SPD-) SDG&E s Sundry Billings process addresses customer requested construction projects, governmental programs, and marketing services. Receivables for these activities remain on the books until payments are received from third parties. SDG&E does not charge interest on the balances. Damage Claims Receivables represent the amount that SDG&E has not collected from outside parties for their damages to utility properties, such as knocking down power poles or damaging gas pipelines. 0 1 c. Prepayments - This category includes accounts that SDG&E uses to make prepayments, which do not earn interest on the balances. These accounts include Prepaid General and Fire Insurance Premiums and Miscellaneous Prepayments, such as software support and license fees. (See line of Tables SDG&E-SPD-, SDG&E-SPD-, and SDG&E-SPD-) d. Deferred Debits - This account reflects preliminary survey and investigation costs, which are costs incurred for potential capital projects before they are added to rate base, as SPD-1

1 1 1 1 well as the non-current portions of Other Receivables and Prepayments. (See line of Tables SDG&E-SPD-, SDG&E-SPD-, and SDG&E-SPD-). Working Capital Not Supplied by Investors The following accounts represent working cash supplied by sources other than utility investors, thus reducing the total working cash requirement. a. Employee Withholdings - This category includes the employee paid portion of benefit costs and taxes. (See line of Tables SDG&E-SPD-, SDG&E-SPD-, and SDG&E- SPD-) b. Current and Accrued Liabilities - These line items include the following items, among others (see line of Tables SDG&E-SPD-, SDG&E-SPD-, and SDG&E-SPD-): Workers compensation reserves represent estimated future costs payable to employees for work-related injuries already incurred. This amount was tax effected at a rate of 0.% to reflect the fact that the revenues collected are taxed in the year received, and only a portion of this is available as working cash. 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 Accrued Vacation was added to be in accordance with the deductions outlined in Chapter of SP U-1. Goods Received and Invoices Received Clearing Accounts contain amounts that are payable to suppliers on purchases that will eventually be capitalized and included in rate base. Prior to being capitalized these purchases flow through these accounts and are therefore appropriately reflected within these payables accounts and captured for working cash purposes. This does not include accounts payable for O&M expenses, which are instead included in the lead/lag study. CPUC fees are included in workpaper SDGE--WP, Schedule P-.1, and average $1.1 million. Customer Deposits are excluded as a working cash item because the utility pays interest at the Federal Reserve published prime non-financial - month commercial paper rate. This treatment is consistent with SP U-1 whereby interest bearing accounts are excluded from working cash. SDG&E is applying the same methodology it has advocated in past GRC s. SP U-1 states under the Customers Deposits heading that [o]nly non-interest bearing customer deposits are to be considered (see Chapter, Section ). Furthermore, the Customer Deposit balance can decrease depending upon the economy and building demand, and these balances do not have the same characteristics as permanent sources of financing. SPD-1

Customer Advances for Construction (CAC) are excluded because these amounts are already deducted from rate base; consequently, they are appropriately excluded from working cash since treatment again within working cash would result in a duplicative impact. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 B. Income Statement Accounts (Lead/Lag Working Cash Requirements) 1. Revenue Lag (See line 1 of Tables SDG&E-SPD-, SDG&E-SPD-, and SDG&E-SPD ) The 01 actual for revenue lag was.1 days. Overall, revenue lag increased, primarily due to an increase in collection lag. The collection lag is shown on workpaper SDG&E--WP, Schedule C, and uses the accounts receivable (A/R) method as outlined in Chapter of SP U-1. The table below illustrates how total revenue lag days were derived: Table SDG&E-SPD-AB Total Revenue Lag Meter Reading Lag 1.1 days Billing Lag.1 days Collection Lag. days Bank Lag 0. days Total Revenue Lag.1 days a. Collection lag days are based upon an analysis of A/R balances and revenues for 01. Annual revenues divided by the adjusted average monthly accounts receivable balance results in the average number of accounts receivable turnovers per year. Revenue collection lag is equal to days divided by the average number of accounts receivable turnovers per year. b. Meter reading lag reflects the lag from the date the meter is read until the time the bill is prepared and mailed to the customer. SDG&E performed a detailed query of all meter reads in 01, which resulted in 1.1 lag days. c. Billing lag is calculated from the midpoint of each month s consumption to when the meter is read. This study assumes that service is rendered evenly before and after the meter is read, which results in an average lag of.1 days. d. Bank lag reflects the amount of days from the bank inflow until those funds become available, which results in 0. lag days. SPD-1

. 01 Expense Lag Categories a. Purchased Commodities, Electric Generation - The ratemaking mechanisms associated with these costs presume collection of revenues as supply is consumed and payment of expenses when supply is delivered. Therefore, this line item is necessary to recover a working cash allowance for the net revenue lag associated with commodity purchases. See line 1 of Table SDG&E-SPD-1 for summarized information, or see my workpaper (Ex. SDG&E--WP), Schedule D-1, for more detail. Components include: Electric Purchases (Non-California Independent System Operator [Non- CAISO]):. days and reflect electric purchases outside of CAISO. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Electric Purchases (CAISO):. days based on the CAISO calendar. These are payments for purchases of electricity from CAISO. The days were calculated by subtracting the payment due date minus the service period midpoint. The average days were then calculated for all the service period days. Please see my workpaper (Ex. SDG&E--WP), Schedule D, for more detail. Option Premiums: (1.) days. Options are used to hedge gas procurement costs as a risk mitigation measure. Option premiums are paid up front and are either exercised or expire unused. This number is negative because the option payments are made when the options are purchased and the option service period typically extends over several months. 0 1 b. Purchased Commodities, Core Gas - As with purchased electric costs, the ratemaking mechanisms associated with these costs presume collection of revenues as supply is consumed and payment of expenses when supply is delivered. Therefore, this line item is necessary to recover a working cash allowance related to the net revenue lag associated with commodity purchases. The 01 purchased gas costs were derived by summing the payments made each month. Lag days reflect the weighted-average of all core gas commodity payments. Each category has the total invoice amounts and its corresponding dollar weighted days. These dollar-days were calculated by multiplying the invoice amount by the number of lag days. The total dollar-days for all the categories were divided by the total invoice amounts to come up with the number of lag days for this category. See line of Table SDG&E-SPD-1 or my workpaper (Ex. SDG&E--WP), Schedule D-, for more detail. SPD-1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 As proposed by TURN and agreed to by SDG&E in its 01 GRC, SDG&E will unbundle the commodity-related working cash from distribution to sales for rate recovery purposes. c. Purchased Commodities, Generation Fuel - As with purchased electric and gas costs, the ratemaking mechanisms associated with these costs presume collection of revenues as supply is consumed and payment of expenses when supply is delivered. Therefore, this line item is necessary to recover a working cash allowance related to the net revenue lag associated with commodity purchases. The 01 purchased generation costs were derived by summing the payments made each month. Lag days reflect the weighted-average of all core gas commodity payments. Each category has the total invoice amounts and its corresponding dollar weighted days. These dollar-days were calculated by multiplying the invoice amount by the number of lag days. The total dollar-days for all the categories were divided by the total invoice amounts to come up with the number of lag days for this category. See line of Table SDG&E-SPD-1 or my workpaper (Ex. SDG&E--WP), Schedule D-, for more detail. d. Payroll Expense - This category includes O&M and the O&M portion of clearing and refundable labor costs as detailed in the first three lines of Schedule E, and further described below. Payroll expenses are incurred every other Friday and withholding taxes are paid the day before payday to the outsourcing company that makes all tax payments on behalf of SDG&E; therefore, the resulting net lag is 1.0 lag days. See line of Table SDG&E-SPD-1 or my workpaper (Ex. SDG&E--WP), Schedule E, for more detail. e. Federal Insurance Contributions Act Tax (FICA) - As with the tax portion of payroll expenses above, FICA (which includes Old-Age, Survivor s, and Disability Insurance [ OASDI ] and Medicare) expenses are paid the day before payday to SDG&E s payroll outsourcing company. See line of Table SDG&E-SPD-1 or my workpaper (Ex. SDG&E-- WP), Schedule F, for more detail. f. Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) and State Unemployment Insurance (SUI) - These costs are paid electronically to SDG&E s payroll outsourcing company one month after each quarter end. This study reflects both FUTA and SUI, net of capital. See line of Table SDG&E-SPD-1 or my workpaper (Ex. SDG&E--WP), Schedule F, for more detail. A.1--00, Ex. /Foster at 1. SPD-1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 g. Variable Pay / Incentive Compensation Plan (ICP) - This compensation is earned and reflected as an expense in the preceding year (01), but paid out in 01. See line of Table SDG&E-SPD-1 or my workpaper (Ex. SDG&E--WP), Schedule G, for more detail. h. Employee Benefits See line of Table SDG&E-SPD-1 or my workpaper (Ex. SDG&E--WP), Schedule H, for more detail. i. Goods and Services -The Goods and Services expense amount includes other expenses that have not been identified separately on the lead/lag study. See line of Table SDG&E-SPD-1or my workpaper (Ex. SDG&E--WP), Schedule I, for more detail. j. Payments by Corporate Center - SDG&E pays for its share of expenses incurred by Corporate Center on behalf of the utility. The lead/lag days from corresponding expense categories in this lead/lag study are applied to Corporate Center payments to calculate overall lag days. See line of Table SDG&E-SPD-1 or my workpaper (Ex. SDG&E--WP), Schedule J, for more detail. k. Real Estate Lease Payments - Real Estate Leases are typically paid in advance and include such leases as office space, easements, and communication sites. Most of the 01 lease payment dollars were paid monthly. The overall expense lag is negative because payments are made prior to the midpoint of the occupancy period. See line of Table SDG&E-SPD-1 or my workpaper (Ex. SDG&E--WP), Schedule K, for more detail. l. Materials Issued from Stores - This category includes materials issued for O&M. See line 1 of Table SDG&E-SPD-1 or my workpaper (Ex. SDG&E--WP), Schedule L, for more detail. m. Property/Ad Valorem/Pass-through Taxes - Most of these payments are made electronically. This category includes property/ad valorem taxes, franchise fees, and passthrough taxes collected on behalf of government agencies. Although pass-through taxes do not flow through the income statement, they are a source of working cash and are appropriately included in the lead/lag study. The taxes are collected from ratepayers, and payments are made later to taxing authorities. See line 1 of Table SDG&E-SPD-1 or my workpaper (Ex. SDG&E--WP), Schedule Ma and Mb, for more detail. n. Federal Income Taxes, Current - Tax expense lags are based on statutory due dates: April 1 of each year for the first quarter, June 1 for the second quarter, September 1 for SPD-1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 the third quarter, and December 1 for the fourth quarter. The tax lag days of each payment are calculated between the midpoint of the year and the wire payment date. See line 1 of Table SDG&E-SPD-1 or my workpaper (Ex. SDG&E--WP), Schedule N-1, for more detail. o. California Corporate Franchise Taxes, Current - Tax expense lags are based on statutory due dates of April 1, June 1, and December 1. The method of calculating the lag days is the same. California Franchise Taxes also include tax refunds of $. million from previous periods with negative lag days of. These were funds that were held by the state instead of SDG&E and therefore result in negative lag days. See line 1 of Table SDG&E-SPD- 1 or my workpaper (Ex. SDG&E--WP), Schedule N-, for more detail. p. Federal/State Income Taxes, Deferred - This amount reflects the change of deferred federal and state taxes in 01. Accumulated deferred income taxes (ADIT) are deducted from rate base as cost-free funds available for investment. However, the financial recording of deferred income taxes does not produce cost-free capital and the funds do not become available until customers pay their bills. Therefore, the recorded amount of ADIT overstates the actual amount of cost-free funds that are available. The inclusion of deferred income taxes at zero lag days in the overall expense lag weighted-average corrects this condition, in the same manner as depreciation, described below. See line 1 of Table SDG&E-SPD-1 or my workpaper (Ex. SDG&E--WP), Schedule O-1, for more detail. q. Depreciation - When properties are built, the cash cycle begins with cash outlays by investors and ends with cash recovery by investors through depreciation expense. In the interim, such funding is part of SDG&E s rate base. Depreciation expense reduces rate base, but SDG&E s recovery is delayed for the duration of the billing or revenue lag. Weighting these dollars at zero expense lag recognizes that the investor funding has occurred, but it has not been recovered and, consistent with SP U-1, depreciation expense is given 0 lag days. See line 1 of Table SDG&E-SPD-1 or my workpaper (Ex. SDG&E--WP), Schedule O-, for more detail. r. Amortization of Insurance Premiums - SDG&E s insurance premiums are paid in advance and therefore result in a working cash need. Weighting these dollars at zero expense Expense lag for capital purchases is credited to customers through current and accrued liabilities in the balance sheet section of the working cash study. Since book depreciation expense is occurring uniformly day by day and accumulated depreciation is deducted from the rate base, the practice is to include depreciation provisions at zero lag days. (SP U-1, Chapter, p. 1-1.) SPD-1

1 1 1 1 1 1 lag recognizes that the investor funding has occurred, but the funds have not been recovered. Amortization is weighted at zero expense lag for the same reason as previously described under depreciation. See line 1 of Table SDG&E-SPD-1 or my workpaper (Ex. SDG&E--WP), Schedule O-, for more detail.. TY 01 Expense Components Forecasted expenditures for commodity costs, O&M non-commodity costs, franchise fees on commodity costs, pass-through taxes, and balancing account costs are utilized in the working cash computation. See line of Tables SDG&E-SPD-, SDG&E-SPD-, and SDG&E-SPD- or my workpaper (Ex. SDG&E--WP), Schedules B-1, B-, and B-, for more detail. a. TY Forecasted Commodity Costs - For commodity costs, 01 actual weightedaverage lag days are applied to forecasted 01 costs. See line b of Table SDG&E-SPD-, line b of Table SDG&E-SPD-, and line b of Table SDG&E-SPD-. Those costs include: Forecasted gas service costs are computed by multiplying the forecasted 01 monthly demand by the monthly weighted-average cost of gas (WACOG). The monthly WACOG reflects purchase and interstate transportation costs. 1 1 Purchased electric costs are based on SDG&E s resource planning forecast. 0 1 0 1 b. Other TY Non-Commodity Costs - The 01 overall weighted-average number of lag days for expenses excluding commodities is applied to projected test year O&M expenses. This category includes non-commodity O&M expenses, deferred income taxes, franchise fees on commodity, pass-through taxes, and refundable program costs. See line b of Tables SDG&E- SPD-, SDG&E-SPD-, and SDG&E-SPD-. V. CONCLUSION The foregoing testimony describes the methodology used by SDG&E to prepare its GRC request for working cash in compliance with SP U-1, based on 01 as-recorded costs and TY 01 forecasts. This testimony relies on SP U-1 as a guide to construct and present SDG&E s working cash requirements, and also presents the major drivers impacting the calculation. My testimony demonstrates how balance sheet items contribute a total of $0. million and the lead/lag analysis contributes an additional $1. million towards SDG&E s forecasted SPD-1

01 working cash requirement. Finally, my testimony illustrates how the resulting working cash requirement is allocated between electric distribution, gas service, and generation. This effort resulted in a total TY 01 working cash request requirement for SDG&E of $1.0 million, which is reasonable and appropriate. This concludes my direct testimony. SPD-0

VI. WITNESS QUALIFICATIONS 1 My name is Steven P. Dais. I am employed by SDG&E as the Operational and Capital Budgets Manager in the Financial Planning & Budgets area. My business address is 0 Century Park Court, San Diego, California 1. My principal responsibilities include managing the operating cost and capital budgets for SDG&E. I possess a Bachelor of Arts degree in Accounting and Economics from Luther College and a Master of Business Administration from the University of Iowa. I worked for the public accounting firms of Greenwood & Crim, LLC, and Clifton Gunderson, LP from 1 until 1, when I acquired my CPA license. Since 1 I have held a variety of accounting and planning positions at Sempra Energy and SDG&E. I have previously testified before the Commission. SPD-1

APPENDIX A GLOSSARY OF TERMS ADIT: A/R: CA: CAC: CAISO: CPUC: Ex.: FICA: FUTA: GRC: ICP: NOI: OASDI: O&M: PBOPs: PLPD: SDG&E: SCG: SP: SUI: TY: WACOG: WP: Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Accounts Receivable California Customer Advances for Construction California Independent System Operator California Public Utilities Commission Exhibit Federal Insurance Contributions Act Federal Unemployment Tax Act General Rate Case Incentive Compensation Plan Notice of Intent Old Age, Survivors, And Disability Insurance Operations and Maintenance Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pension Public Liability and Property Damage San Diego Gas & Electric Company Southern California Gas Company Standard Practice State Unemployment Insurance Test Year Weighted Average Cost of Gas Workpaper SPD-A-1