IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Similar documents
Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv JBS-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/02/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:10-cv WHW -MAS Document 23 Filed 03/18/11 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 97

Case 1:15-cv RGA Document 167 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 9250 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:09-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/23/09 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 11/05/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 4:10-cv TSH Document 1 Filed 07/09/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/19/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:12-cv LO-JFA Document 1 Filed 04/26/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID# 64

Case KG Doc 1 Filed 08/10/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/ :43 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2017

Case 2:18-cv Document 3 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:12-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 08/21/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION. Civil Action No. 09-CV-367

Case 3:16-cv MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 1

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/10/16 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:13-cv DAK Document 2 Filed 07/23/13 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:18-cv Document 3 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 15

Case 1:18-cv MKB-RML Document 5 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv Document 3 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CIVIL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ECF CASE DEFENDANTS ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2015 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:12-cv ELH Document 1 Filed 03/30/12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/19/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Defendant. Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 2:17-cv JMV-SCM Document 1 Filed 08/01/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : :

Case 2:18-cv SJF-AYS Document 3 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 7

Case 4:18-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 01/04/18 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

Case 2:17-cv SDW-LDW Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : :

Case 0:13-cv RNS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/01/2013 Page 1 of 21

Case 3:12-cv HZ Document 23-1 Filed 11/25/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID#: 87

Case 0:14-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2014 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 10

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP

Case: 3:15-cv wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/28/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C SCHEDULE 13D. Under the Securities Exchange Act of ADMA Biologics, Inc.

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/30/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 1:99-mc Document 465 Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:19-cv DLI-SJB Document 1 Filed 02/12/19 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 8:18-cv PWG Document 1 Filed 08/21/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv NLH-KMW Document 1 Filed 08/30/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 62 Filed: 01/22/18 Page 1 of 35 PageID #:1692

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 3:18-cv B Document 1 Filed 05/08/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID 1

Case CSS Doc 179 Filed 12/23/15 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, v. Case No. COMPLAINT

Case 1:16-cv BCW Document 2 Filed 05/26/16 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. Plaintiff, CAUSE NO.

Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission"), for its Complaint against

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/05/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv JAW Document 1 Filed 05/21/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:12-cv CCC-JAD Document 1 Filed 06/15/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case: 0:17-cv HRW Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/13/17 Page: 1 of 16 - Page ID#: 1

Case 4:14-cv DW *SEALED* Document 3 Filed 09/05/14 Page 1 of 23

Case No.: CLASS ACTION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES PURSUANT TO THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT, 15 U.S.C. 1692, ET SEQ.

Case 3:09-cv N-BQ Document 201 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID 3204

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/20/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA Northern Division COMPLAINT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF SOUGHT

Information & Instructions: Response to a Motion To Lift The Automatic Stay Notice and Proof of Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff R.J. Zayed ( Plaintiff or Receiver ), through his undersigned counsel

Case MFW Doc 665 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/09/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/09/2014

Filing # E-Filed 05/23/ :26:50 PM

Case 1:13-cv PLM Doc #8 Filed 12/23/13 Page 1 of 17 Page ID#44

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 7:18-cv NSR Document 1 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED vs.

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/14 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PALM BEACH DIVISION. CASE NO.: 9:15-cv-81685

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/27/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Courthouse News Service

Case: 3:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/20/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No.

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/25/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/25/2014 EXHIBIT

Case 1:17-cv VSB Document 1 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VERIFIED COMPLAINT UNDER 6 DEL. C

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:18-cv STV Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 1:11-cv-00569-LPS Document 6 Filed 08/15/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 87 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PFIZER INC., PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS, WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY, and WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 11-569-LPS AUROBINDO PHARMA LIMITED, and AUROBINDO PHARMA USA INC., Defendants. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Pfizer Inc., Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals, and Warner-Lambert Company LLC, formerly Warner-Lambert Company (collectively, Pfizer, by their attorneys, for their Complaint against Aurobindo Pharma Limited ( Aurobindo Pharma and Aurobindo Pharma USA Inc. ( Aurobindo USA (collectively, Defendants, allege as follows: 1. This is an action by Pfizer against Defendants for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,969,156 and its Reexamination Certificate (collectively the 156 patent. A copy of the 156 patent with the 156 Reexamination Certificate is attached hereto as Exhibit A. PATENTS IN SUIT 2. On October 19, 1999, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the USPTO issued the 156 patent, entitled Crystalline [R-(R*,R*]-2-(4-Fluorophenyl-ß, - Dihydroxy-5-(1-Methylethyl-3-Phenyl-4-[(PhenylaminoCarbonyl]-1H-Pyrrole-1-Heptanoic Acid Hemicalcium Salt (Atorvastatin, on an application filed by Christopher Briggs, et al., and

Case 1:11-cv-00569-LPS Document 6 Filed 08/15/11 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 88 assigned to Warner-Lambert Company. On September 26, 2006, the USPTO issued an Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate for the 156 patent. PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. Pfizer Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware and has a place of business at 235 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10017. 4. Warner-Lambert Company is a corporation formerly organized under the laws of the State of Delaware with offices for service of process at 235 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10017. Warner-Lambert Company has been the owner of record of the 156 patent since its issuance. 5. Warner-Lambert Company became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pfizer Inc. effective June 19, 2000. 6. Warner-Lambert Company was converted into a Delaware limited liability company and changed its name to Warner-Lambert Company LLC on December 31, 2002. Warner-Lambert Company LLC has offices located at 235 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10017. 7. Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals is an Irish unlimited liability company having its registered office at Operations Support Group, Ringaskiddy, Co. Cork. Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Pfizer Inc. 8. Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals is the exclusive licensee of the 156 patent. 9. Pfizer has all the right, title, and interest in the 156 patent and the right to sue for infringement thereof. 2

Case 1:11-cv-00569-LPS Document 6 Filed 08/15/11 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 89 10. Pfizer holds an approved New Drug Application for atorvastatin calcium formulations, including 10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, and 80 mg dosage strengths, which it sells under the registered name Lipitor. 11. The 156 patent is identified pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 355(b(1 and (j(7 by the United States Food and Drug Administration ( FDA as covering Pfizer s Lipitor product. 12. On information and belief, Defendant Aurobindo Pharma is a corporation operating and existing under the laws of India with its principal place of business at Plot # 2, Maitri Vihar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad 500 038, Andhra Pradesh, India. 13. On information and belief, Defendant Aurobindo USA is a corporation operating and existing under the laws of Delaware with its principal place of business at 2400 Route 130 North, Dayton, New Jersey 08810 USA. 14. On information and belief, Defendant Aurobindo USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Aurobindo Pharma, and is controlled by Aurobindo Pharma. 15. On information and belief, Aurobindo Pharma and/or Aurobindo USA participated in the preparation and/or filing of ANDA No. 202854 ( Aurobindo ANDA. 16. This action arises under the Patent Laws of the United States, Title 35, United States Code. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to the provisions of Title 28, United States Code, Sections 1331 and 1338. 17. On information and belief, Aurobindo Pharma is in the business of developing and manufacturing generic pharmaceutical products. On information and belief, Aurobindo Pharma sells and delivers its pharmaceutical products to Aurobindo USA in New Jersey. On information and belief Aurobindo USA is the agent, affiliate, representative, and/or alter ego of, and/or acts in concert with, Aurobindo Pharma for the purposes of marketing, distributing, and 3

Case 1:11-cv-00569-LPS Document 6 Filed 08/15/11 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 90 selling generic pharmaceutical products within the United States, including the State of Delaware. 18. This Court has previously denied Aurobindo Pharma s motion for summary judgment of no personal jurisdiction in In re Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litigation, No. 08- mdl-1949-jjf-lps (D. Del.. 19. On information and belief, Aurobindo USA, as the authorized agent of Aurobindo Pharma and/or in its own capacity, participated in the preparation and filing with the FDA of the Aurobindo ANDA for approval to market generic atorvastatin calcium in the United States. 20. On information and belief, Aurobindo Pharma has developed a complete infrastructure in terms of marketing, sales, administration, finance and distribution in the United States. On information and belief, that infrastructure includes Aurobindo USA. On information and belief, Aurobindo Pharma develops and manufactures generic drugs and, directly or indirectly through Aurobindo USA, markets, distributes, and sells its generic drugs throughout the United States, including the State of Delaware. 21. Personal jurisdiction over Aurobindo Pharma is proper because it purposefully avails itself of the privilege of selling its generic products in the State of Delaware and can therefore reasonably expect to be subject to jurisdiction in courts in Delaware. Among other things, upon information and belief, Aurobindo Pharma, directly or through its subsidiary Aurobindo USA, places goods in the stream of commerce for distribution throughout the United States, including the State of Delaware. 22. Personal jurisdiction over Aurobindo USA is proper because Aurobindo USA is incorporated in Delaware and has purposely availed itself of the privilege of doing business in 4

Case 1:11-cv-00569-LPS Document 6 Filed 08/15/11 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 91 this State. Further, Aurobindo USA maintains continuous and systematic contacts with the State of Delaware so as to reasonably allow jurisdiction to be exercised over it. 23. On information and belief, personal jurisdiction over Defendants is also proper because Defendants have sought affirmative relief in this jurisdiction by answering a complaint and filing counterclaims in Sanofi-Aventis v. Actavis South Atlantic LLC, No. 07-572-GMS (D. Del., and because Defendants have employed Delaware counsel to assist in obtaining that relief. Further, in its Answer in Sanofi-Aventis v. Actavis South Atlantic LLC, No. 07-572-GMS (D. Del., Aurobindo Pharma stated it would not contest personal jurisdiction to conserve resources of the parties and to promote judicial efficiency. 24. Personal jurisdiction over Aurobindo Pharma and/or Aurobindo USA is also proper because, by filing ANDA No. 202854 for generic atorvastatin calcium tablets, they have committed the tort of patent infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(e(2(A and the location of that tort is where the patent holder, Pfizer, resides, i.e., in Delaware. 25. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to the provisions of Title 28, United States Code, Sections 1391(c and (d, and 1400(b. 26. On information and belief, Aurobindo Pharma and/or Aurobindo USA filed with the FDA, in Rockville, Maryland, Abbreviated New Drug Application ( ANDA No. 202854 under 21 U.S.C. 355(j to obtain FDA approval for the commercial manufacture, use, importation, offer for sale, and sale in the United States of atorvastatin calcium tablets in 10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, and 80 mg dosage strengths, which are generic versions of Plaintiffs Lipitor tablets. 27. By letter dated May 17, 2011 (the ANDA Notice Letter, Aurobindo Pharma notified Pfizer that it had filed ANDA No. 202854 seeking approval to market atorvastatin 5

Case 1:11-cv-00569-LPS Document 6 Filed 08/15/11 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 92 calcium tablets in 10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, and 80 mg dosage strengths, and that Defendants were providing information to Pfizer pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 355(j(2(B(ii and 21 C.F.R. 314.95. A copy of the ANDA Notice Letter is attached hereto as Exhibit B. fully herein. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF: INFRINGEMENT OF THE 156 PATENT 28. The allegations of paragraphs 1-27 above are repeated and realleged as if set forth 29. The expiration date for the 156 patent is July 8, 2016. 30. Patents associated with Lipitor, including the 156 patent, have been granted a further period of pediatric exclusivity under section 505a of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C. 355a]. 31. The pediatric exclusivity period associated with the 156 patent will expire January 8, 2017. 32. The ANDA Notice Letter notified Pfizer that Aurobindo Pharma and/or Aurobindo USA, by filing ANDA No. 202854, seek approval from the FDA to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, and sale of products containing the 10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, and 80 mg strengths of atorvastatin calcium prior to the expiration of the 156 patent. 33. The ANDA Notice Letter addressed the 156 patent and asserted that the patent was not infringed by Defendants proposed ANDA No. 202854 atorvastatin calcium product. 34. The ANDA Notice Letter did not provide an explanation of any grounds supporting a contention that any claim of the 156 patent is invalid, as would be required by 21 CFR 314.95(c(6(ii if Defendants contended that any of the claims were invalid. 35. Defendants have infringed the 156 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(e(2(A by filing their ANDA No. 202854 seeking approval from the FDA to engage in the commercial 6

Case 1:11-cv-00569-LPS Document 6 Filed 08/15/11 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 93 manufacture, use, or sale of a product containing atorvastatin calcium prior to the expiration of the 156 patent. 36. Pfizer will be irreparably harmed if Defendants ANDA No. 202854 is approved prior to the expiration date of the 156 patent. 37. Pfizer will be irreparably harmed if Defendants are not enjoined from infringing the 156 patent. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Pfizer requests the following relief: A. A judgment providing that pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(e(4(A, the effective date of any FDA approval of Defendants ANDA No. 202854 be no earlier than January 8, 2017, the date of expiration of the 156 Patent, including the period of exclusivity granted to Lipitor under section 505a of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; B. A judgment pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(e(4(B permanently enjoining Defendants, each of their officers, agents, servants, employees and attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation with it or any of them, from making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing the atorvastatin calcium product described in Defendants ANDA No. 202854 until January 8, 2017, the expiration date of the 156 patent including the period of exclusivity granted to Lipitor under section 505a of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; C. Attorneys fees in this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285; D. Costs and expenses in this action; and E. Such further and other relief as this Court may deem just and proper. 7

Case 1:11-cv-00569-LPS Document 6 Filed 08/15/11 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 94 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, /s/ Rudolf E. Hutz Rudolf E. Hutz (#484 Jeffery B. Bove (#998 Mary W. Bourke (#2356 Daniel C. Mulveny (#3984 CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP 1007 North Orange Street P.O. Box 2207 Wilmington, DE 19899-2207 (302 658-9141 (telephone (302 658-5614 (telefax OF COUNSEL: William E. McShane CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP 1875 Eye Street, NW Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20006 (202 572-0335 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Pfizer Inc., Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals, Warner-Lambert Company LLC, and Warner-Lambert Company Dated: August 15, 2011 4424055v1 8