THE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING

Similar documents
2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation ( the Investigation ) in the conduct of Shaun Wayne Howell.

NOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

ON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:

NOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Dealer Member Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:

THE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING

INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

THE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING

NOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE HENRY COLE

The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada

THE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING

ON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:

NOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA NOTICE OF HEARING IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

ON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:

TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 6.2 of the Dealer Member Rules of Practice and Procedure, the hearing shall be designated on the:

INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING

TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of the Dealer Member Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of the Dealer Member Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:

JEREMY NICHOLAS DREW AUSTIN

RE: WARREN J. McCAFFREY NOTICE OF HEARING

NOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

11 ROC OCRCVM nov o2 2017

INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA NOTICE OF HEARING

INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA NOTICE OF HEARING

THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA NOTICE OF HEARING

IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: GUS ANASTASIO DIMAS

THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA STATEMENT OF ALLEGATIONS

IN THE MATTER OF THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA. Re: KELLY JOHN CAMPBELL HUSKY

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA MARKET REGULATION SERVICES INC. IN THE MATTER OF: THE MARKET INTEGRITY RULES OF THE

RE: Paul Joseph PALIOTTI NOTICE OF HEARING

Re Toh. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation (the Investigation ) into Cole s conduct.

(1) Misappropriated funds in the amount of $150,000 from the account of the N.B.O.

NOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE

INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA ANDRÉ BERGERON NOTICE OF HEARING

IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

RE: MAURICE GUY BRAZEAU

THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA NOTICE OF HEARING

AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING

Re Nieswandt REASONS FOR DECISION

Re Jones. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)

IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

Re Mendelman REASONS FOR ACCEPTANCE OF SETTLEMENT

Re Klemke. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

NOTICE OF HEARING. Unofficial English Translation INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE

RE: JOHN CRAIG DUNN NOTICE OF HEARING IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20

Re Mackie & Leadbeater

RE: HUGH DAMIAN BAGNELL NOTICE OF HEARING IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20

Self-Regulatory Standards and Enforcement Practices

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation ( the Investigation ) in the conduct of Samuel Kloda.

IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

Re: ROBERT SCOTT RITCHIE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT DECISION

MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: SHAWN SANDINK DISCIPLINARY HEARING. Hearing: June 22, 2006 Decision: July 19, DECISION and REASONS

Re Industrial Alliance Securities

IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED -AND- IN THE MATTER OF MARK STEVEN ROTSTEIN AND EQUILIBRIUM PARTNERS INC.

Re Gebert REASONS AND DECISION

Re Elue. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada ( IIROC ) 2014 IIROC 39

INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Re Watts DECISION AND REASONS

THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION

INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

Re Dunn & Wimble. The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) Thomas William Dunn and Gordon Joseph Wimble

Decision on Settlement Agreement

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

Re Assante Capital Management REASONS FOR DECISION

Making a Complaint A Guide for Investors

Re Lewis. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) 2016 IIROC 01

Re Clarke. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada 2016 IIROC 12

2. IIROC s Enforcement Department has conducted an investigation into Mackie s conduct (the Investigation ).

Discipline Penalties Imposed on Michael Joseph Puccini; Violations of By-laws 29.1 and 19.5

Re Kloda DECISION ON SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION

2. IIROC s Enforcement Department has conducted an investigation (the Investigation ) into the Respondents conduct.

THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION

IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA. Re: ESTHER INGLIS DECISION AND REASONS

IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED. - and -

RE: EDWARD PAUY KIM ING NOTICE OF HEARING I. BACKGROUND IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20

THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION

RE: ROCHE SECURITIES LIMITED and FRANCIS ROCHE

MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA DISCIPLINARY HEARING

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

Re Smith. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)

ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

Why IIROC Matters to You, the Investor

2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation ( the Investigation ) in the Respondent s conduct.

Notice to Public. Contested Hearing. April 7, 2008 No Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance STEVE HORROCKS

JAMES ALEXANDER MOON, MICHAEL EDWARD COMEAU AND MITCHELL TORCH

Transcription:

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND SHAUN WAYNE HOWELL NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Part 10 of Dealer Member Rule 20 of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada ( IIROC ), a hearing will be held before a hearing panel of IIROC ( Hearing Panel ) on November 21-23, 2016 at Bow Valley Square Conference Center, Hamilton Room, Calgary, Alberta at 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the hearing can be heard. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Dealer Member Rules of Practice and Procedure ( Rules of Practice and Procedure ), that the hearing shall be designated on the: The Standard Track The Complex Track THE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING is to determine whether ShaunWayne Howell ( the Respondent ) has committed the following contraventions that are alleged by the Staff of IIROC ( Staff ): a. Between November, 2008 and February, 2015, the Respondent solicited clients to invest in a variety of securities and then misappropriated the funds received, thereby engaging in conduct unbecoming or detrimental to the public interest, contrary to Dealer Member Rule 29.1;

- 2 - b. In February, 2013, the Respondent engaged in personal financial dealings with a client when he borrowed money from a client without his Dealer Member firm s knowledge, contrary to Dealer Member Rule 29.1. PARTICULARS TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the following is a summary of the facts alleged and to be relied upon by Staff at the hearing: Overview 1. Between 2008 and 2015, while Howell was a Registered Representative with RBC Dominion Securities Inc. ( RBC-DS ), Howell solicited funds from clients to invest in the amount of approximately $692,000. 2. However, instead of investing the funds, Howell misappropriated the funds by depositing them directly into a personal bank account. 3. Over the course of several years, he paid a total of approximately $290,000 to certain clients for what he falsely represented to them was an investment return. In addition, he provided one client with a falsified account statement. 4. Howell also borrowed $50,000 from one client without the knowledge of his firm. Background 5. At all material times, Howell was employed as a Registered Representative with a branch of RBC-DS located in Red Deer, Alberta. He was employed by that firm since 1999. 6. Howell has not been an IIROC Registrant since March 12, 2015, when his employment was terminated by RBC-DS. Howell s actions 7. Between approximately November 2008 and February 2015, Howell solicited investments from clients by representing to them that he had access to certain attractive investment opportunities such as initial public offerings and new issues of securities. 8. Eight clients (the Clients ) delivered personal cheques, or bank drafts, payable to Howell personally, totaling $692,584 (the Funds ). 9. However, the Funds were not invested as represented by Howell. Instead, he misappropriated the Funds by depositing them into his personal bank account and using them for his own benefit.

- 3-10. Over the relevant 7 year time period, Howell paid $290,021 to five of the Clients which he told them represented an investment return. 11. The amounts provided by the Clients (which includes spousal couples) to Howell, together with amounts paid to them, are as follows: Provided Paid by Client to Howell Howell MP/JP $23,000 0 TB/SB $87,480 0 SS/DS $104,850 $111,373 KH/TH $65,600 $43,958 RB $25,000 0 EM $285,654 $43,540 PC $90,000 $45,000 DT $11,000 $46,150 Total $692,584 $290,021 Client PC was not listed as a client of Howell in RBC s records, but he believed that he was investing with Howell through RBC. The remaining Clients all held accounts with Howell through RBC. Client EM - Borrowed Funds/RRSP Withdrawal 12. One Client, EM, was 60 years of age at the time that Howell encouraged her to withdraw funds from her RRSP and to draw against a personal line of credit in order to provide him with funds. As a result, she borrowed approximately $50,000 from a line of credit and provided these funds to Howell. Clients MP and JP - Falsified Account Statement 13. In approximately February of 2015, Howell provided a falsified account statement to Clients MP and JP following their request for documentation evidencing their investment.

- 4 - Fraud and Breach of Trust 14. Many of the Clients were long-term personal friends of Howell s, and as a result they reposed a great deal of trust in him as their investment advisor. They relied on him to act in their best interests. 15. Howell s acts as outlined above constitute a fraud on the Clients as well as a breach of their trust. As such, his actions constitute conduct unbecoming or detrimental to the public interest contrary to IIROC Dealer Member Rule 29.1. Borrowing from clients 16. In or about March 14, 2013, Howell borrowed $50,000 from his client, DM. This loan was evidenced by a Promissory Note between Howell and DM, and was subject to quarterly payments over a 3 year period. 17. This personal loan was entered into without the knowledge of Howell s firm. It amounted to personal financial dealings with a client and is a violation of Dealer Member Rule 29.1. 18. Howell did make some interest only payments to DM in the amount of $8,736 but has not repaid any of the principal amount of $50,000. GENERAL PROCEDURAL MATTERS TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the hearing and related proceedings shall be subject to the Rules of Practice and Procedure. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 13.1 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure, the Respondent is entitled to attend and be heard, be represented by counsel or an agent, call, examine and cross-examine witnesses, and make submissions to the Hearing Panel at the hearing. RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Respondent must serve upon the Staff of IIROC a Response to the Notice of Hearing in accordance with Rule 7 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure within twenty (20) days (for a Standard Track disciplinary proceeding) or within thirty (30) days (for a Complex Track disciplinary proceeding) from the effective date of service of the Notice of Hearing. FAILURE TO RESPOND OR ATTEND HEARING

- 5 - TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that if the Respondent fails to serve a Response or attend the hearing, the Hearing Panel may, pursuant to Rules 7.2 and 13.5 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure: (a) proceed with the hearing as set out in the Notice of Hearing, without further notice to the Respondent; (b) accept as proven the facts and contraventions alleged by Staff in the Notice of Hearing; and (c) order penalties and costs against the Respondent pursuant to Dealer Member Rules 20.33, 20.34 and 20.49. PENALTIES & COSTS TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that if the Hearing Panel concludes that the Respondent did commit any or all of the contraventions alleged by Staff in the Notice of Hearing, the Hearing Panel may, pursuant to Dealer Member Rules 20.33 and 20.34, impose any one or more of the following penalties: Where the Respondent is/was an Approved Person: (a) (b) a reprimand; a fine not exceeding the greater of: (i) $1,000,000 per contravention; and (ii) an amount equal to three times the profit made or loss avoided by such Approved Person by reason of the contravention. (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) suspension of approval for any period of time and upon any conditions or terms; terms and conditions of continued approval; prohibition of approval in any capacity for any period of time; termination of the rights and privileges of approval; revocation of approval; a permanent bar from approval with the IIROC; or any other fit remedy or penalty.

- 6 - Where the Respondent is/was a Dealer Member: (a) (b) a reprimand; a fine not exceeding the greater of: (i) $5,000,000 per contravention; and (ii) an amount equal to three times the profit made or loss avoided by the Dealer Member by reason of the contravention; (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) suspension of the rights and privileges of the Dealer Member (and such suspension may include a direction to the Dealer Member to cease dealing with the public) for any period of time and upon any conditions or terms; terms and conditions of continued Membership; termination of the rights and privileges of Membership; expulsion of the Dealer Member from membership in the IIROC; or any other fit remedy or penalty. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that if the Hearing Panel concludes that the Respondent did commit any or all of the contraventions alleged by the Staff in the Notice of Hearing, the Hearing Panel may pursuant to Dealer Member Rule 20.49 assess and order any investigation and prosecution costs determined to be appropriate and reasonable in the circumstances. DATED at Vancouver, this 22 day of August, 2016. WARREN FUNT WARREN FUNT VICE-PRESIDENT, WESTERN CANADA INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA Suite 2800 - Royal Centre 1055 West Georgia Street Vancouver, B.C. V6E 3R5