OTC derivatives: Reporting exemption for certain foreign entities in Australia

Similar documents
MAS consults on proposed regulatory framework for OTC Derivatives Intermediaries

NDRC replaces approval regime with filing regime for foreign debt control and other legal updates from China

MAS publishes proposals to enhance regulatory safeguards for investors

MIFID2 ASIAN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS BEST EXECUTION SEPTEMBER 2017

China extends foreign exchange cash pooling pilot programme to multinationals

MIFID2 FOR ASIAN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS POSITION LIMITS: HARMONISATION, MONITORING AND REPORTING DECEMBER 2017

UAE securities regulator creates regime for promotion and introduction to UAE investors

New Listing Rules of the Moscow Exchange come into force

THE EUROPEAN UNION (WITHDRAWAL) ACT CHRIS BATES

The EU regulation on reporting and transparency of securities financing transactions another piece in the jigsaw of shadow banking regulation

Proposed changes to Australia's foreign investment regime

Article 55 of the BRRD: contractual recognition of bail-in what you need to do

Modernisation of Luxembourg Company Law

HKMA IMPLEMENTS MEASURES TO REFINE MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTABILITY

ABS New Markets Japan

TAXING CAPITAL GAINS MADE BY NON- RESIDENTS DISPOSING OF UK COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FROM APRIL A BOMBSHELL

Article 55 of the BRRD: contractual recognition of bail-in what you need to do

1. Changes to the cash equivalent transfer value legislation

International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.

Amendment to the Real Estate Joint Enterprise Act - Possible Expanded Application of the TK/GK Scheme

New product documentation for Wiqayah Min Taqallub As'aar Assarf (Islamic Foreign Exchange Forwards)

CRA3: Commission Adopts Detailed Disclosure Rules for Structured Finance Instruments

Investment funds and REITs new rules

Qatar's Corporate Legal Framework

The SCA approves Regulations concerning Securities Lending and Borrowing, Short Selling, Market Making and Liquidity Providers

Key issues. Client memorandum. February CFTC Exemptions 1

CHANGES TO THE UK NUCLEAR LIABILITY REGIME: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE INDUSTRY

Particular disclosure duties regarding the acquisition and disposal of participations in German banks and insurance companies.

Mandatory tax strategies, a code of practice and "special measures" a new era for corporates?

DUTCH BILL IMPLEMENTING REVISED SHAREHOLDERS' RIGHTS DIRECTIVE SENT TO PARLIAMENT

SECOND CONSULTATION ON PROPOSED PAYMENTS REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

MAJOR CHANGES TO SINGAPORE CAPITAL MARKETS REGULATORY FRAMEWORK IMPLEMENTED

Remuneration voting 2015 AGM season. CA Brochure_Remuneration Voting (Dinesh Rajan).indd 1

Marketing of AIF by non-eu AIFM / Third Country Managers in Germany after 21 July 2013

China Opens for Mobile Virtual Network Operator

THE TAX IMPACT OF BREXIT: WHAT STEPS SHOULD UK AND EU BUSINESSES TAKE NOW?

Singapore s new personal data protection legislation and how it compares to data protection legislation in other jurisdictions

DC flexibility: providing DC access through external providers.

Introduction to Islamic Financial Risk Management Products

Foreign direct investments in Polish Special Economic Zones

Public-to-private implementation in Poland

New Circular to Relax the Filing Process

Renminbi Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor Scheme Scaled Up

New product documentation for Mubadalatul Arbaah (Profit Rate Swaps)

PRC STATE COUNCIL ISSUES GUIDELINES ON OVERSEAS INVESTMENTS

Liability Management in Russia

THE REGULATORY LANDSCAPE OF BREXIT FOR CLOs: WHERE TO FROM HERE?

HONG KONG NEW OPEN-ENDED FUND COMPANY STRUCTURE GOES LIVE IN JULY 2018

Samurai Bonds. What are Samurai Bonds? Are any securities filings required to issue Samurai Bonds? Key issues

THE FUTURE UK CORPORATE ENERGY AND CARBON REPORTING FRAMEWORK AND THE END OF THE CRC SCHEME

BREXIT: WHAT NEXT FOR UK PENSIONS?

Saudi Arabia opens Stock Market to Foreign Investors. May 2015

Highlight on solar energy tariffs in France

FAILURE TO PREVENT THE FACILITATION OF TAX EVASION THE NEW EXTRA-TERRITORIAL UK CRIMINAL OFFENCE AND ITS IMPACT ON PRIVATE EQUITY

Capital Requirements Directive IV Framework Liquidity Requirements. Allen & Overy Client Briefing Paper 15 January

New AML Regime for the DIFC

ALTERNATIVE FINANCING: CREATING THE NEW GENERATION OF "FINANCING" FUNDS

Saudi Arabia opens Stock Market to Foreign Investors. May 2015

Our Financial Services Regulatory practice

Pensions Group. Employment & Benefits.

The pension scheme master trust market in 2018/19

Implications of Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA)

Shareholder Rights Directive II is it on your radar?

EMIR: the path to mandatory clearing June Sea of Change Regulatory reforms charting a new course

UK covered bonds a head start on the key considerations and possible implications

1. Clifford Chance Qatar team 3. Corporate practice... 3 Projects and Finance practice... 3

Restructuring Across Borders

Opportunities and challenges for new investors in Myanmar

Restructuring Across Borders

CLAIMANTS UNBOUND DIRECT ACTIONS AGAINST INSURERS UNDER THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION

MiFID II 31 December MiFID II. Derivatives: trade execution

INTRODUCTION OF A NEW LUXEMBOURG RENEWABLE ENERGY COVERED BOND REGIME

BELGIAN TAX REFORM WHAT'S THE IMPACT ON THE INVESTMENT FUND SECTOR?

Beyond April 2015: action list for pension scheme trustees.

CHINA S ONE BELT, ONE ROAD: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES

Impact of a break up of the Eurozone on Credit Derivatives Transactions

Guide to becoming a self-employed lawyer

Recent Developments in Assets Securitisation in the PRC

M&A The Global Picture

SMALL CHANGE: LITTLE MOVEMENT IN LATEST APAC TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL RANKINGS

WITHHOLDING TAX REVOLUTION? THE EFFECT OF THE BEPS MULTILATERAL CONVENTION ON CROSS-BORDER DEBT AND EQUITY INVESTMENTS

Germany upfront fees in syndicated lending in light of recent Federal Court of Justice judgements

Our Asset Management practice

EU PROPOSAL FOR SCREENING OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS

Derivatives: trade execution

WHITE PAPER: APPLICABILITY OF U.S. RISK RETENTION RULES TO STRUCTURED AIRCRAFT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS

The Greek debt crisis and loan agreements

The TOKYO PRO-BOND Market

Sea of Change Regulatory reforms charting a new course. When does EMIR apply to commodity and other non-financial derivatives?

MiFID II 31 December MiFID II. Third country access

The Spanish National Court exonerates Avis in the car rental cartel

FSMA Consults on New Rules on the Marketing of Financial Products in Belgium and on Product Bans 1

CRYPTO-TRADING IN THE ABU DHABI GLOBAL MARKET READY FOR BUSINESS

Revised prudential framework for investment firms. February allenovery.com

What's in a Name? The Volcker Rule's Impact on ABS Issuers that are Covered Funds. Contents. November 17, 2011

Two recent pro-arbitration cases from Indian courts continue the judicial trend towards recognition of arbitral independence

THE FUTURE OF BANK FINANCE NEW EU RULES FOR LOSS ABSORBENCY, SUBORDINATION AND HOLDING COMPANIES

MiFID II 31 December MiFID II. Commodity derivatives

Capital Requirements Directive IV Framework Introduction to Regulatory Capital and Liquidity. Allen & Overy Client Briefing Paper 1 January 2014

Shadow banking and recent regulatory developments in China

Transcription:

HKG-1- #1063339- v1-ella Cli ent_briefi ng_- _OTC _reporting_- _Class_wai ver_for_certain_foreig n_entities_- _Feb_2015-2/4/2015 4:01:56 PM OTC derivatives: Reporting exemption for certain foreign entities in Australia 1 Briefing note February 2015 OTC derivatives: Reporting exemption for certain foreign entities in Australia The latest class exemption published by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) may exempt certain foreign entities from reporting trades entered into in Australia but not booked to the profit or loss account of a branch in Australia. Background Currently a foreign bank with a branch located in Australia, or a foreign company that is required to be registered as a foreign company in Australia 1 (each a Relevant Reporting Entity) are required under Australian trade reporting rules 2 (the Rules) to report information about transactions and outstanding positions for certain classes of over the counter derivatives 3 (OTC Derivatives) that are either entered into by such entity in Australia or are booked to the profit or loss account of a branch of the entity located in Australia. ASIC provided guidance that ordinary principles of Australian contract law will apply to determine whether a transaction was entered into by a Relevant Reporting Entity in Australia. This means that a Relevant Reporting Entity has to apply the principles of Australian contract law to each of its OTC Derivative transactions in order to establish whether it is entered into in Australia. This will be expensive, time consuming and complicated as different parties are entering into the transactions across different jurisdictions and making use of different methods of communication. The International Swaps and Derivative Association (ISDA) made an application to ASIC on behalf of Relevant Reporting Entities for relief from the requirement to report reportable transactions and outstanding positions in OTC Derivatives entered into in Australia. Temporary relief previously in place for Phase 2 entities expired on 1 February 2015. 4 The new class exemption 5 Following consultation with ISDA, ASIC has now provided relief to Relevant Reporting Entities (the Class Exemption) from reporting reportable transactions and outstanding positions for OTC Derivatives which are entered into in Australia and not booked to the profit or loss account of a branch of the Relevant Reporting Entity in Australia. The relief is however subject to the condition that if a reportable transaction has a nexus with Australia (as set out in the Class Exemption and explained below), then the transaction will be known as a nexus transaction (Nexus Transaction) and it must be reported as if it were a reportable transaction under the Rules. Outstanding positions must also be reported for Nexus Key issues ASIC has introduced a new class exemption, excusing certain foreign entities from reporting trades which are entered into in Australia. Such entities must still report transactions and outstanding positions with a nexus to Australia, unless these transactions fall within the scope of an alternative reporting exception. Eligible entities must opt-in to take advantage of this relief with a deadline of 25 February 2015 for Phase 2 reporting entities to opt-in. Transactions. These are known as nexus positions under the Class Exemption (Nexus Positions). There is an exception to reporting Nexus Transactions and Nexus Positions. Where a Relevant Reporting Entity is subject to reporting requirements in one or more foreign jurisdictions that are substantially equivalent to the reporting requirements of the Rules, then, provided the Relevant Reporting

2 OTC derivatives: Reporting exemption for certain foreign entities in Australia Entity is reporting Nexus Transactions and Nexus Positions in compliance with the alternative reporting requirements in one or more of the foreign jurisdictions and designated (or tagged) the information reported as being reported under the Rules or under the Class Exemption, the Relevant Reporting Entity is not required to report its Nexus Transactions or Nexus Positions. Eligibility for relief The Class Exemption only applies to Relevant Reporting Entities who notify ASIC of their decision to opt-in to the relief. It does not apply to a foreign subsidiary of an Australian entity, where the Australian entity is an Australian ADI or AFS licensee. Once the Relevant Reporting Entity opts-in, the test for whether an OTC Derivative transaction is entered into in Australia will be based on the alternative test set out in the Class Exemption which determines whether a reportable transaction in the opt-in class is a Nexus Transaction or a Nexus Position. The test focuses on the location of persons performing certain functions in relation to OTC Derivatives as opposed to the test based on ordinary principles of Australian contract law. Opting-in A Relevant Reporting Entity may submit a written notice (Opt-In Notice) to ASIC in order to take advantage of the Class Exemption. The Opt-In Notice must include: the name of the Relevant Reporting Entity; the name of each class or classes of OTC Derivatives (Opt- In Class) in relation to which the Relevant Reporting Entity seeks relief; and the date (Effective Date) from which the Relevant Reporting Entity will rely on the Class Exemption in relation to each Opt-In Class. The Effective Date may not be earlier than the date of the Opt-In Notice. The Opt-In Notice may be withdrawn at any time by submitting a written withdrawal notice to ASIC which follows similar formal requirements. Notice must be provided at least 30 days before the proposed withdrawal date. Nexus Transaction A Nexus Transaction refers to the entry into of an arrangement that is an OTC Derivative (Nexus Derivative) to which the Relevant Reporting Entity is a counterparty where one or more of the functions in relation to the Nexus Derivative is or will be performed by a person who is (i) ordinarily resident in or employed in Australia, or (ii) acting as part of a desk, office or branch of the Relevant Reporting Entity or its associate, located in Australia. The reference to an associate is to an 'associate' as defined in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) 6 and includes a related body corporate of the Relevant Reporting Entity. The functions specified in the Class Exemption are intended to capture functions which would typically be performed by a salesperson or trader, including communications between salesperson and client, and include determining the economic terms of the Nexus Derivative, communicating such terms, and offering and agreeing to enter into the Nexus Derivative, along with managing the financial risk arising from the Nexus Derivative. The test is not intended to capture functions performed by persons sitting in non-sales or trader functions such as management, counterparty risk, operational risk, finance and treasury and the persons' role or job title is not definitive. A Nexus Transaction also covers Nexus Derivatives executed through an automated electronic trading facility in circumstances where the economic terms are determined by, or consequent financial risk will be managed by, a person who meets the location criteria referred to above. It further includes the modification or termination of an arrangement that is a Nexus Derivative and the assignment, by a party to an arrangement that is a Nexus Derivative, of some or all of that party's rights and obligations under the arrangement if the Relevant Reporting Entity has actual knowledge of the assignment. Nexus Position A Relevant Reporting Entity must also by or on the Relevant Reporting Date (as defined below) report information about each outstanding position in a Nexus Derivative outstanding as at the Relevant Reporting Date and that was entered into on or after 25 February 2015 and also before the Relevant Reporting Date. Alternative Reporting Exception A Relevant Reporting Entity will not be required to report information on either Nexus Transactions or Nexus Positions if it is subject to reporting requirements (Alternative Reporting Requirements) in one or more foreign jurisdictions that are substantially equivalent to the reporting requirements under the Rules 7 and cover OTC Derivatives of the same Opt-In Class.

OTC derivatives: Reporting exemption for certain foreign entities in Australia 3 In addition, the Relevant Reporting Entity (or another entity) must either: report information about the Nexus Transaction or Nexus Position to a prescribed repository, in compliance with Alternative Reporting Requirements in at least one foreign jurisdiction, as well as 'tag' such information as information reported under the Rules or under the conditions of this Class Exemption; or be exempt from reporting information about a Nexus Transaction or Nexus Position in all of the foreign jurisdictions, or no such reporting requirement exists in any of those jurisdictions. Timing The new Class Exemption applies to all Relevant Reporting Entities, regardless of whether they have opted-in, from 2 February 2015 to 24 February 2015 (inclusive) and thereafter only if they have opted-in. Relevant Reporting Entities may optin at any stage. However, to take advantage of the Class Exemption, such entities should opt-in before their reporting obligations under the Rules commence. 8 Eligible Phase 2 reporting entities relying on current ASIC relief 9 should consider opting-in no later than 25 February 2015 with an Effective Date of no later than 25 February 2015. Failure to do so means the Phase 2 entity will be required to report transactions entered into by the Relevant Reporting Entity in Australia from 25 February 2015. Where a Relevant Reporting Entity has opted-in, it only has to begin reporting Nexus Transactions from the later of (i) 25 May 2015 and (ii) the Effective Date specified in the Opt-In Notice (the Relevant Reporting Date). By or on the Relevant Reporting Date the Relevant Reporting Entity must report a Nexus Position in a Nexus Derivative that is outstanding as at the Relevant Reporting Date and that was entered into by the Relevant Reporting Entity on or after 25 February 2015 and also before the Relevant Reporting Date. Tagging exemption Previously, Phase 2 Relevant Reporting Entities could rely on a class order 10 to excuse them from reporting OTC Derivative transactions and outstanding positions entered into in Australia on the conditions that such transactions be reported from 2 February 2015 and outstanding positions as at 2 February 2015 (in an OTC Derivative entered into in Australia on or after 1 October 2014) be reported by or on 1 August 2015, as well as 'tagged' under the Rules during the period from 2 February 2015 to 1 August 2015 (Phase 2 Class Order Conditions). Exemption 2 provides that a Relevant Reporting Entity does not have to comply with the Phase 2 Class Order Conditions provided it complies with the conditions of the Class Exemption. Timing Exemption 2 grants Phase 2 Relevant Reporting Entities a grace period from 2 February 2015 to 24 February 2015, during which time these entities will not have to comply with the Phase 2 Class Order Conditions. If, however, a Phase 2 Relevant Reporting Entity wishes to extend this relief beyond 24 February 2015, it must submit an Opt-In Notice with an Effective Date of no later than 25 February 2015 and comply with the conditions of the Class Exemption. Regional comparison The new Class Exemption sets out a definition for Nexus Derivatives based on the location of the salesperson or trader, which more closely reflects the approach taken by regulators in Hong Kong and Singapore to determine whether an OTC Derivatives transaction is reportable in the jurisdiction. Nevertheless, Relevant Reporting Entities should be aware that the scope of the Australian nexus contained in the Class Exemption is wider than its Singapore or Hong Kong equivalent.

4 OTC derivatives: Reporting exemption for certain foreign entities in Australia Reportable trades Comparison of tests Australia Singapore Hong Kong Trades which are: Trades which are: Trades: (a) booked to the profit or loss (a) booked on the balance sheet or (a) to which the reporting entity is account of a branch profit and loss accounts of a a party; or located in Australia; or person whose place of business (b) conducted in Hong Kong. (b) entered into in Australia. is in Singapore; or (b) traded in Singapore. 11 "entered into in Australia": "traded in Singapore": "conducted in Hong Kong": The contract will be entered into in Australia if acceptance of the offer to enter into the contract is received in Australia, where an instantaneous form of communication is used to communicate the acceptance. 12 Alternatively, if the Relevant Reporting Entity has opted-in to the Class Exemption, it must show that prescribed salesperson/trader functions are performed by a person who is: ordinarily resident in or employed in Australia; or acting as part of a desk, office or branch of the Relevant Reporting Entity or its associate, located in Australia. The execution of the derivatives contract is performed by a trader; 13 whose place of employment is located in Singapore and who conducts, on behalf of a specified person, activities relating to the execution of derivatives contracts in Singapore; or who: (i) for a period of not less than 30 days immediately before the date of the execution of the derivatives contract, conducts or is authorised to conduct, on behalf of a specified person, activities relating to the execution of derivatives contracts in Singapore; and (ii) is physically in Singapore at the time of the execution of the derivatives contract. The transaction is recorded in the books of its affiliate (which includes any entity in the same group) and the individual through whom the affiliate enters into the transaction: acts in his or her capacity as a trader 14 ; and performs his or her duty predominantly in Hong Kong. 15

OTC derivatives: Reporting exemption for certain foreign entities in Australia 5 1 Under Division 2 of Part 5B.2 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). 2 Rule 2.2.1 of the ASIC Derivative Transaction Rules (Reporting) 2013. 3 ASIC's reporting regime currently prescribes the following classes: commodity derivatives (that are not electricity derivatives), credit derivatives, equity derivatives, foreign exchange derivatives and interest rate derivatives. 4 ASIC Instrument [14/0234]. 5 ASIC Derivative Transaction Rules (Nexus Derivatives) Class Exemption 2013. 6 Section 9 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). 7 ASIC currently considers the EU (EMIR), US (CFTC) and Japan to be the only foreign jurisdictions with substantially equivalent reporting requirements. 8 For example, Phase 3 Reporting Entities are required to commence reporting on 13 April 2015. Phase 3 Relevant Reporting Entities should optin to the class waiver on or before this date. 9 ASIC Class Order [14/0234]. 10 ASIC Class Order [14/0234]. 11 Securities and Futures (Reporting of Derivatives Contracts) Regulations 2013. 12 ASIC FAQs, available at <http://asic.gov.au/>. 13 Securities and Futures (Reporting of Derivatives Contracts) Regulations 2013 (as amended by the Second Amendment Regulations). 14 "Trader" is intended to have its ordinary meaning, so that only persons who make trading decisions are captured by the test. Persons acting solely in their capacity as salespersons are excluded. 15 The Hong Kong regulators have proposed that any transaction that is executed by a trader who performs his or her duty predominantly in Hong Kong, regardless of the trader's physical location at the time of the transaction, will be considered to have conducted the transaction in. Contacts Sydney Singapore Hong Kong Scott Bache T: +61 2 8922 8077 E: scott.bache@cliffordchance.com Nelda Turnbull Senior Associate T: +61 2 8922 8031 E: nelda.turnbull@cliffordchance.com Alexandra Boxall Associate T: +61 2 8922 8039 E: alexandra.boxall@cliffordchance.com David Wang Associate T: +61 2 8922 8000 E: david.wang@cliffordchance.com Paul Landless T: +65 6410 2235 E: paul.landless@cliffordchance.com Lena Ng Counsel T: +65 4160 2215 E: lena.ng@cliffordchance.com Francis Edwards T: +852 2826 3453 E: francis.edwards@cliffordchance.com Terry Yang Senior Associate T: +852 2825 8863 E: terry.yang@cliffordchance.com This publication does not necessarily deal with every important topic or cover every aspect of the topics with which it deals. It is not designed to provide legal or other advice. HKG#1063339 www.cliffordchance.com Clifford Chance, Level 7, 190 St Georges Terrace, Perth, WA 6000, Australia Clifford Chance, Level 16, No. 1 O'Connell Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia Clifford Chance 2015 Clifford Chance is a law firm with liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation We use the word 'partner' to refer to a member of Clifford Chance LLP, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications Abu Dhabi Amsterdam Bangkok Barcelona Beijing Brussels Bucharest Casablanca Doha Dubai Düsseldorf Frankfurt Hong Kong Istanbul Jakarta* Kyiv London Luxembourg Madrid Milan Moscow Munich New York Paris Perth Prague Riyadh Rome São Paulo Seoul Shanghai Singapore Sydney Tokyo Warsaw Washington, D.C. *Linda Widyati & s in association with Clifford Chance.