Statement of Daniel Hauser, Policy Analyst in Support of SB 398 Senate Committee on Workforce February 20, 2017

Similar documents
Oregon: Where Taxes Are Low, Fees Are High and Revenue Is Slightly Below Average

Older consumers and student loan debt by state

Property Tax Relief in New England

Comparative Revenues and Revenue Forecasts Prepared By: Bureau of Legislative Research Fiscal Services Division State of Arkansas

2016 Workers compensation premium index rates

PRODUCER ANNUITY SUITABILITY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS BY STATE As of September 11, 2017

ehealth, Inc Fall Cost Report for Individual and Family Policyholders

Who s Above the Social Security Payroll Tax Cap? BY NICOLE WOO, JANELLE JONES, AND JOHN SCHMITT*

TCJA and the States Responding to SALT Limits

Cost and Coverage Implications of the ACA Medicaid Expansion: National and State by State Analysis

The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company Term Portfolio

State Trust Fund Solvency

Florida 1/1/2016 Workers Compensation Rate Filing

State Treatment of Social Security Treatment of Pension Income Other Income Tax Breaks Property Tax Breaks

Tax Freedom Day 2018 is April 19th

Tax Breaks for Elderly Taxpayers in the States in 2016

Taxing Investment Income in the States New Hampshire Fiscal Policy Institute 2 nd Annual Budget and Policy Conference Concord, NH January 23, 2015

2018 National Electric Rate Study

Eye on the South Carolina Housing Market presented at 2008 HBA of South Carolina State Convention August 1, 2008

The Acquisition of Regions Insurance Group. April 6, 2018

DOWNLOAD OR READ : DEVELOPMENT OF THE INCOME SMOOTHING LITERATURE VOL 4 A FOCUS ON THE UNITED STATES PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

SIGNIFICANT PROVISIONS OF STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE LAWS JANUARY 2008

Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center

Local Anesthesia Administration by Dental Hygienists State Chart

Unemployment Insurance Benefit Adequacy: How many? How much? How Long?

Zions Bank Economic Overview

Yolanda K. Kodrzycki New England Public Policy Center Federal Reserve Bank of Boston

Alternative Paths to Medicaid Expansion

Age of Insured Discount

Report to Congressional Defense Committees

2016 GEHA. dental. FEDVIP Plans. let life happen. gehadental.com

SCHIP: Let the Discussions Begin

Obamacare in Pictures

WELLCARE WINS BID IN EVERY REGION FOR 2007 AND INTRODUCES CLASSIC PLAN WITH LOWER PLAN PREMIUMS

Obamacare in Pictures. Visualizing the Effects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

2018 ADDENDUM INSTRUCTIONS

Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act

MEMORANDUM. SUBJECT: Benchmarks for the Second Half of 2008 & 12 Months Ending 12/31/08

Patient Protection and. Affordable Care Act: The Impact on Employers

Uniform Consent to Service of Process

State of the Automotive Finance Market

Charles Gullickson (Penn Treaty/ANIC Task Force Chair), Richard Klipstein (NOLHGA)

September Turning 65. Beyond a Rite of Passage. A nonprofit service and advocacy organization National Council on Aging

States and Medicaid Provider Taxes or Fees

Tax Freedom Day 2019 is April 16th

Please print using blue or black ink. Please keep a copy for your records and send completed form to the following address.

Fiduciary Tax Returns

The Affordable Care Act (ACA)

< Executive Summary > Ready Mixed Concrete Industry Data Report Edition

Comments and Thoughts on Senate Tax Legislation Senate Hearing March 4, 2015

Federal Tax Reform Impact on 2019 Legislative Sessions: GILTI

Application Trade Credit Insurance Multi Buyer

SCHIP Reauthorization: The Road Ahead

Corporate Income Tax and Policy Considerations

medicaid a n d t h e How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief

Medicare Alert: Temporary Member Access

Percent of Employees Waiving Coverage 27.0% 30.6% 29.1% 23.4% 24.9%

2017 Supplemental Tax Information

The State of Children s Health

The State Tax Implications of Federal Tax Reform Legislation

COMPARISON OF ABA MODEL RULE FOR REGISTRATION OF IN-HOUSE COUNSEL WITH STATE VERSIONS

NOTICE OF FEDERAL AND STATE TAX INFORMATION FOR PSA PLAN PAYMENTS YOUR ROLLOVER OPTIONS

The Economic Stimulus and Health Chairs

Indexed Universal Life Caps

Domestic violence funding reduced from $1,253,000 to $1,000,000. $53,000 to fund elder law hotline eliminated.

Request for Disbursement Vermont State Teachers Retirement System 403(b) Plan

Administrative handbook Aetna Funding Advantage SM

Just The Facts: On The Ground SIF Utilization

Federal Personal Income Tax Restructuring and State Responses to Date

IRA Distribution Form

36 Million Without Health Insurance in 2014; Decreases in Uninsurance Between 2013 and 2014 Varied by State

PLEASE NOTE: Required American Equity specific Product Training must be completed PRIOR to soliciting an Application to A

RLI TRANSPORTATION A Division of RLI Insurance Company 2970 Clairmont Road, Suite 1000 Atlanta, GA Phone: Fax:

Presented by: Matt Turkstra

Zions Bank Economic Overview

Current Trends in the Medicaid RFP Procurement Landscape

Presentation to Southern Employee Benefits Conference

Experts Predict Sharp Decline in Competition across the ACA Exchanges

COMMUNITY CREDIT CHART BOOK

Insured Deposit Program. Updated 03/31/2017

Aviva Announcing Changes to Products and Annuity Rates

IRA Distribution Request Instructions and Form

Texas Economic Outlook: Cruising in Third Gear

Property Tax Deferral: A Proposal to Help Massachusetts Seniors

The Economics of Homelessness

State Tax Preferences for Elderly Taxpayers

Taxing Food for Home Consumption

Insured Deposit Program Updated 10/17/2016

Charts with Analysis: Tax Tax Type: Sales and Use Tax Topic: Cash for Clunkers Payments

While one in five Californians overall is uninsured, the rate among those who work is even higher: one in four.

Alaska Transportation Finance Study Alaska Municipal League

Sub Plan number. area code

Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board and Business Advisory Council Update

ACORD Forms Updated in AMS R1

Plunging Crude Prices: Impact on U.S. and State Economies

Attention; Benefits/Human Resources office - Please send completed form to our address or fax number. Questions?

Exhibit 1. The Impact of Health Reform: Percent of Women Ages Uninsured by State

Long-Term Care Education Requirements Prior to Selling

PORTFOLIO REVENUE EXPENSES PERFORMANCE WATCHLIST

Marilyn Tavenner, CMS Administrator Don Moulds, Acting Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation

Transcription:

Statement of Daniel Hauser, Policy Analyst in Support of SB 398 Senate Committee on Workforce February 20, 2017 The Oregon Center for Public Policy (OCPP) supports Senate Bill 398 and its effort to increase the use of the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) among eligible working families in Oregon. We have a couple of suggestions for improving the bill, as well. The EITC helps hundreds of thousands of low-income families in Oregon lift themselves out of poverty and toward self-sufficiency. Research shows children in families receiving the EITC are healthier, perform better in school, and have higher earnings as adults. Unfortunately, Oregon consistently has one of the lowest EITC participation rates when compared to other states. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) data indicates Oregon had the 3rd worst rate in 2013, with only Colorado and the District of Columbia below our 74 percent participation rate (in 2012, Oregon was dead last in the nation). This means one in four working Oregonians who are eligible for this significant tax subsidy are not claiming it. One might ask: why? First and foremost, many taxpayers are unaware they are even eligible for the benefit. SB 398 helps address this problem. This poor participation adds up to real money. OCPP estimates that Oregon workers eligible for the EITC, but not claiming it, left $130 million on the table in 2013. 1 Our state can and should do more to promote the EITC and ensure more Oregonians are benefitting from this important work subsidy. SB 398 takes an important first step in increasing the use of the EITC by helping working Oregonians see their eligibility clearly and consistently on their paystubs, and provides a path toward learning more about this benefit. We would recommend two improvements to the bill. First, the notice and promotion of awareness should emphasize eligibility for both the state and the federal EITC, not just the federal. Second, the requirement for three state agencies to promulgate rules to increase awareness of the EITC should be stronger. These agencies should not just work together on rules; they should be directed to actively encourage more use of the EITC by working families in Oregon in ways other than adding information to paystubs and posters that employers must display. Regrettably, there s no state agency responsible for boosting 1 Oregon s Low EITC Participation Leaves Over $100 Million Unclaimed, Oregon Center for Public Policy, January 27, 2017, available at http://www.ocpp.org/2017/01/24/fs20170124-oregon-eitc-participation-use-rate/.

Oregonians use of the EITC. SB 398 takes an important first step and is an opportunity to get these agencies, and others, working to improve Oregon s participation rate. By boosting federal EITC participation, lawmakers would be drawing millions in federal dollars into the Oregon economy. The working families who get the EITC tend to spend their dollars, and spend them locally, not save or invest out of state. Thank you for considering this important piece of legislation, and we encourage your support of SB 398 with the suggested changes.

Fact Sheet January 24, 2017 Oregon s Low EITC Participation Leaves Over $100 Million Unclaimed Of all working families across the country, Oregon working families are among the least likely to claim the federal Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). About a quarter of eligible families in Oregon did not claim the credit in 2013. Underuse of EITC that year meant that working families in Oregon collectively left $130 million on the table. Lawmakers should charge a state agency with promoting the EITC and dedicate resources toward outreach to working families. With a modest investment, Oregon could pull into Oregon millions of federal dollars that would help working families better make ends meet and stimulate local economies. Oregon EITC use among worst of all states MS SD FL TN NY IN WV PA DE NM OH MI VT SC AL AR RI VA KY NC GA MN LA ND ID MO NH U.S. MA KS IA TX IL CT WI MD AK WY NE WA ME OK NJ AZ MT UT NV CA OR CO D.C. Oregon: 74.4% 2013 share of eligible population claiming Earned Income Tax Credit by state. Source: OCPP analysis of Internal Revenue Service data. U.S. average: 79.9% Oregon Center for Public Policy www.ocpp.org In 2013, the year with most recent data on EITC participation, about 299,000 Oregon families claimed the tax credit. 1 This accounted for 74.4 percent of all Oregon working families that were eligible that year. Oregon s participation rate ranked third worst among all states and the District of Columbia. Only Colorado and Washington D.C. performed worse in terms of EITC use in 2013. This low ranking is not unusual, as Oregon for several years has ranked at or near the bottom nationally in terms of EITC participation. 2 About 88,000 Oregon working families who were eligible for the EITC did not claim it in 2013. The Center conservatively estimates that these families left a total of $130 million in federal EITC dollars on the table that year.

Oregon s Low EITC Participation Leaves Over $100 Million Unclaimed Oregon s poor performance is even more striking considering that Oregonians have an added incentive to claim the federal EITC: the state s own EITC. Families that qualify for the federal EITC automatically qualify for the Oregon EITC. In 2013, the Oregon tax credit amounted to 8 percent of the federal tax credit. 3 Working families in western states are less likely to claim the EITC, according to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). 4 The IRS also observes that working families that live in rural areas, are self-employed, do not have a qualifying child, or are not proficient in English, are some of those less likely to claim the credit. 5 The EITC helps working families make ends meet The EITC is one of the most effective tools for supporting working families and reducing poverty. It does this by helping low- and moderate-income families keep more of the income that they earn in the form of a refundable tax credit. For working families, this means being better able to meet the rising costs of child care or catching up on a car payment. In fact, the EITC is one of the most effective tools for alleviating poverty. When combined with the federal Child Tax Credit, the federal EITC helped lift 129,000 Oregonians, including 65,000 children, out of poverty each year between 2011 and 2013. 6 The federal EITC adds dollars to the Oregon economy by giving working people more money to spend. Despite Oregon s poor participation, the federal credit injected $586 million into the Oregon economy in 2013. 7 Lawmakers must do something to boost EITC participation Lawmakers should charge a department, such as the Department of Revenue, with the responsibility of providing information about the EITC to potentially eligible families. Research has shown that providing families with information about the credit in simple and accessible language, highlighting the size of the tax credit they may be eligible for, and sending them a reminder notice can help encourage more eligible families to claim their EITC. 8 By boosting EITC participation, lawmakers would not only be improving the lives of working Oregonians, they would also be drawing millions in federal dollars into Oregon s economy that are otherwise left in Washington, D.C. A note on methodology To estimate the total amount of unclaimed EITC dollars, we considered participation rates by the number of dependents in a worker s household, since participation varies by number of dependents. While it is unclear exactly which workers are less likely to claim their EITC, childless workers are perhaps the least likely because their credits are much smaller. Simply multiplying the estimated number of eligible workers not claiming the credit by the average EITC dollar amount would likely overestimate the total number of unclaimed dollars. Instead, we use national 2009 EITC participation rates by number of dependents from a Census Bureau working paper as a proxy measure for Oregon s participation rate for childless workers, 2 January 24, 2017

Oregon s Low EITC Participation Leaves Over $100 Million Unclaimed workers with one dependent and workers with two or more dependents. 9 Given that Oregon s overall participation rate is lower than the national average, the estimates derived using these participation rates are likely on the conservative end. Taking the number of Oregon federal EITC claims by number of dependents, we divide by the respective participation rate to estimate the total number of workers eligible for the EITC by number of dependents. 10 Using those estimates, we subtract the number of actual claims to derive the estimated number of Oregon childless workers, workers with one dependent and workers with two or more dependents who did not claim the federal EITC. We then multiply the number of eligible workers not claiming the EITC for each household type by the average EITC amounts for childless workers, workers with one dependent and workers with two or more dependents. We estimate the EITC unclaimed amount to be $14.4 million for childless workers, $33.2 million for workers with one dependent, and $82.4 million for workers with two or more dependents. Together, these figures provide a conservative estimate of $130 million in unclaimed federal EITC benefits in Oregon in 2013. Endnotes 1 For this fact sheet, unless otherwise noted, all figures are OCPP analysis of Oregon Department of Revenue (DOR) data and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) data. Published IRS data on participation rates include more than 95 percent of all Oregon tax returns claiming the EITC, but are incomplete. To estimate the number of eligible workers not claiming the EITC, we use DOR data of all Oregon tax returns claiming the EITC in tax year 2013 and the IRS s published participation rate for that year. 2 Last in EITC Participation: Oregon Leaves Millions on the Table, Oregon Center for Public Policy, November 5, 2015, available at http://www.ocpp.org/2015/11/05/fs20151105-oregon-eitc-participation/. 3 During the 2016 legislative session, lawmakers increased the Oregon EITC to 11 percent of the federal credit for families with children under age three. 4 Plueger, Dean, Earned Income Tax Credit Participation Rate for Tax Year 2005, Internal Revenue Service, July 2012, available at https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/09resconeitcpart.pdf. 5 Others who may be less likely to claim their EITC include workers who receive certain disability pensions or have children with disabilities, are grandparents raising their grandchildren or, are recently divorced, unemployed, or experience[d] other changes to their marital, financial, or parental status. For more, see Internal Revenue Service, About EITC, January 2015, available at http://www.eitc.irs.gov/eitc-central/abouteitc. 6 Oregon Fact Sheet: Tax Credits Promote Work and Fight Poverty, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, September 2016, available at http://apps.cbpp.org/3-5-14tax/?state=or. 7 OCPP analysis of Internal Revenue Service data. 8 Bhargava, Saurabh and Dayanand Manoli, Psychological Frictions and the Incomplete Take-Up of Social Benefits: Evidence from an IRS Field Experiment, American Economic Review, Vol. 105, No. 11, November 2015: 3489-3529, available at https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.20121493. 9 Jones, Maggie R., Changes in EITC Eligibility and Participation, 2005 2009, U.S. Census Bureau, Table 7, July 2014, available at https://www.census.gov/srd/carra/changes_in_eitc_eligibility_and_participation_2005-2009.pdf. 10 Oregon federal EITC data by number of dependents emailed by Oregon Department of Revenue to Oregon Center for Public Policy. Data are for all filers. January 24, 2017 3