September 30, 2003 Ruling on Defendants Motions to Dismiss

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No.

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/21/2008 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Trustees: Independent vs. Internal and Directed vs. Non-Directed Legal Aspects

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. This action involves the Wells Fargo & Company 401(k) Plan (the 401(k) Plan ), which

Case 3:11-cv WGY Document 168 Filed 01/10/13 Page 1 of 53 IN THE UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/18 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:1

Insurance Coverage and the Subprime Crisis: A Broad Overview

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION: DO THE TWO COINCIDE IN THE POST- ENRON ENVIRONMENT? Dana M. Muir * and Cindy A.

Stakes Are High For ERISA Fiduciaries

ERISA Causes of Action *

January 2005 Bulletin Labor Department Issues Guidance on Fiduciary Responsibilities of Directed Trustees

Case 1:15-cv PKC Document 1 Filed 10/13/15 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:16-cv UU Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2016 Page 1 of 14

The Impact of Dudenhoeffer on Lower Court Stock-Drop Cases

: : Plaintiffs Ramon Moreno and Donald O Halloran ( Plaintiffs ) bring this putative class

Case 1:15-cv MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2015 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Insights for fiduciaries

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG DIVISION

IN RE MERIDIAN FUNDS GROUP SECURITIES AND EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY ACT : 09 M.D (ERISA) LITIGATION, OPINION

DIRECTORS & OFFICERS AND FIDUCIARY LIABILITY INSURANCE FOR ESOPS: The Exposure, the Solutions, the Marketplace

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 141 Filed: 12/06/17 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:1455

BAILEY CAVALIERI LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. ) Civil Action No. ) CV-03-J-0615-S. Defendants. )

ERISA Stock Drop Litigation Against Financial Institutions

EXCESSIVE OR HIDDEN FEES ERISA LITIGATION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 12/08/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE JUDGMENT

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. July 11, 2007

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS LIABILITY ERISA ENTERS THE SPOTLIGHT

ERISA Overpayments Claims & Defenses

PLF Claims Made Excess Plan

U.S. Supreme Court Considering Fiduciary Responsibility For 401(k) Plan Company Stock Funds and Other Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOP)

Recent Plan Litigation and the Impact on Legislative, Regulatory and Plan Sponsor Activity

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION

Third Circuit Affirms Dismissal of 401(k) Stock-Drop Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Will The Real Fiduciary Please Stand Up: In Most Court Cases The Plan Sponsor is Left Standing Alone

August 14, Winston & Strawn LLP

PREEMPTION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

: : PLAINTIFF, : : : : : DEFENDANT : Plaintiffs are hedge funds that invested in the Rye Select Broad Market

Case 1:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/16/19 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 111 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1029

ALI-ABA Course of Study Current Developments in Employment Law: The Obama Years July 23-25, 2009 Santa Fe, New Mexico

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/05/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

404(c) and OTHER ISSUES

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Case 4:16-cv RGE-SBJ Document 59 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 14

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Enron Victim Trust P.O. Box 6979 Syracuse, NY

Fiduciary Training: ERISA Duties & Obligations Seyfarth Shaw LLP

In re AUSTIN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LTD, SECURITIES & EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY ACT : 09 M.D (ERISA) LITIGATION OPINION

ACTUARIAL SERVICES AGREEMENT. THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this day of,

OAKLAND DIVISION CASE NO.:

AXIS PRO MULTIMEDIA LIABILITY COVERAGE RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR INSURANCE

Learning the True Meaning of Fiduciary, the Hard Way Sub: As 401(k) values plummet, pensioners look to employers and question their performances

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

Case: 2:16-cv JLG-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/14/16 Page: 1 of 14 PAGEID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

CASE NO.: 10-""Jt{t--6"J 9 0 2CA

Chapter XX TRUSTEES CONDENSED OUTLINE

Hot Topics in Cases Involving Distressed Companies

Employee Relations. Palmason v. Weyerhaeuser Company, et al.: Allegations of Imprudent Investment Strategy in the Defined Benefit Context

Managing Fiduciary Risk Under ERISA: A Primer for Employers, HR Directors, and Plan Administrators. Copyright

Best Practices for Retirement Plan Fiduciaries

Case 0:06-cv JMR-FLN Document 1-1 Filed 06/02/2006 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 3:17-cv L Document 14 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 51 PageID 71 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

DC: AVNET, INC. VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEE SEVERANCE PLAN

Courthouse News Service

Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 1 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. v. ) Civil Action No.

ERISA: THOU SHALL NOT PAY EXCESSIVE FEES! By: José M. Jara, Esq.

Financial Accounting Standards Board to Issue Final Guidance on Variable Interest Entities

AVOIDING FIDUCIARY DUTY FOR DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS. Brian T. Ortelere Charles C. Jackson

401(k) Fee Litigation Update

Case 2:17-cv CCC-CLW Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID: 1

THE FACTS THE DECISION

Case 4:16-cv A Document 1 Filed 02/10/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Case No.

Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 08/02/16 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

MUTUAL FUND SCANDALS

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/21/17 Page 1 of 21. ECF Case I. INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

REPORTER. Exempt Organizations

Who Are the Fiduciaries and What Are Their Key Responsibilities?

Fiduciary Liability Insurance

Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 1 Filed 03/07/13 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Will The Real Fiduciary Please Stand Up: In Most Court Cases The Plan Sponsor is Left Standing Alone

GUIDELINES. On Preventing and Combating Fraud and Corruption in Projects Financed by IBRD Loans and IDA Credits and Grants. Dated October 15, 2006

Application for Management Liability Insurance for Not for Profit Organizations

Employee Relations. Lytle v. Lowe s Home Centers, Inc.: A Case Study in ERISA and Employee Classification Issues. Craig C. Martin and Amanda S.

FORCEFIELD SM PRIVATE COMPANY MANAGEMENT LIABILITY PACKAGE POLICY Fiduciary Liability Coverage Section

Editor s Overview. by Robert Rachal and Aaron Reuter. September In this month s issue: Editor s Overview...1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

VERIFIED SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT - 1 -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Plaintiffs Case No. 16-CV-1678 CLASS ACTION AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 3:06-cv D Document 33 Filed 03/05/2007 Page 1 of 93 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO (WESTERN DIVISION) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

GUIDELINES. On Preventing and Combating Fraud and Corruption in Projects Financed by IBRD Loans and IDA Credits and Grants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. COMPLAINT

ERISA Compliance and Monitoring 401(k) Investments: Safe Harbor Rules and Appointing Advisers

APPENDIX I PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION ANNUAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND OPERATING DATA REPORT

Transcription:

September 30, 2003 Ruling on Motions to Dismiss Members of Enron s Board of Directors Compensation Committee (who appointed members to the administrative committees) Count I Surviving Breach of Fiduciary Duty Allegations Regarding Investment of Plan Assets in Enron Stock Induced participants to invest assets in Enron stock or to direct or allow fiduciaries of Savings Plan and ESOP to maintain investment in Enron stock Caused or allowed Savings Plan to purchase and accept Enron s matching contributions in the form of stock Enron and the Compensation Committee failed to provide material information regarding Enron s financial condition to the Administrative Committees The Administrative Committees failed to investigate Enron s financial condition or, knowing of accounting malfeasance, did not timely act to protect plan participants Failed to disclose to plan participants what they knew, or through prudent investigation, should have known was a threat to the plan s investments or failed to correct material misinformation Lay and the Compensation Committee failed to monitor and remove the members of the Administrative Committees Co-fiduciary liability Count I Allegations Dismissed Allegations challenging the plan design; e.g., age and other restrictions on the ability of plan participants to direct their investments out of Enron stock; Enron s initial decision to give participants the ability to direct investments into Enron stock Allegation against for fraudulent promotion of Enron stock (dismissed as requested by plaintiffs) 1

Defendant Count I Surviving Party-in Interest Claim Arthur Andersen Knowingly participated in other defendants fiduciary breaches by actively concealing from plan fiduciaries and participants Enron s actual financial condition and the imprudence of investing in Enron stock Compensation Committee Northern Trust Company Potential relief limited to restitution in equity, disgorgement, or other types of equitable relief Count II - Surviving Breach of Fiduciary Duty Allegations Regarding Blackout Imposed a scheduled blackout period in spite of extraordinary circumstances and despite the ability to postpone or shorten the duration of the blackout period Failed to provide timely notice of blackout to Savings Plan participants so that they had an opportunity to review their investment strategy in light of the extraordinary circumstances Northern Trust had duty to determine whether instructions it received were in compliance with ERISA and, if improper, disregard the instructions Northern Trust had a duty to disclose all material facts that it knew or should have known regarding the blackout when plaintiffs objected to it Co-fiduciary liability as to Administrative Committees and Northern Trust 2

Northern Trust Company Count III- -Surviving Breach of Fiduciary Duty Allegations Regarding Failure to Diversify Investments Failed to diversify investments in accordance with the terms of the Savings Plan requiring diversification. Enron stock comprised 60% of plan assets Administrative Committee did not investigate prudence of investing plan assets in Enron stock; committee member Olson had prior warnings about Enron s financial condition Because matching contributions were to be made primarily in the form of Enron stock, Administrative Committee had fiduciary duty to monitor prudence of allowing Enron to continue to match employee contributions with Enron stock Future motion for leave to assert similar claims with respect to ESOP to be filed by plaintiffs Northern Trust had a duty not to follow Administrative Committee directions that were contrary to ERISA Co-fiduciary liability as to Administrative Committee and Northern Trust Count III Allegations Dismissed ERISA does not impose a duty to diversify 401(k) and other individual account plans to the extent assets are invested in company stock 3

Compensation Committee Count IV - Surviving Breach of Fiduciary Duty Allegations Regarding Cash Balance Plan Offset Based on Inflated ESOP Account Balance breached fiduciary duty to the cash balance plan participants and beneficiaries by not disclosing artificially inflated price of stock Can recover monetary relief only if plaintiffs can trace some or all to which they claim entitlement through Enron s business and into the bonuses and salaries of the individual defendants Count V Surviving Breach of Fiduciary Duty Allegations Relating to Failure to Appoint and Monitor Fiduciaries as well as Failure to Disclose Material Information Appointed and failed to remove investment fiduciaries that they knew or should have known were not qualified Failed to monitor fiduciaries Co-fiduciary liability 1. Failed to disclose to investing fiduciaries material information regarding Enron s financial condition 2. Knowingly participated in investing fiduciaries breach of fiduciary duty by accepting benefits thereof 3. Knowingly undertook to hide acts and omissions of other fiduciaries and failed to remedy known breaches Count IV Allegations Dismissed did not have a duty to affirmatively compute real value of stock and use it as a permanent component of the plan Since offset calculation was a prior practice and was done in accordance with terms of the plan, no need for injunctive relief 4

Enron Officers and Directors Arthur Andersen Vinson & Elkins Investment Banks (Merrill Lynch, J.P. Morgan Chase, Credit Suisse, Citigroup) Defendant Count VIII Surviving Common Law Claim for Negligent Misrepresentation Arthur Andersen ERISA does not preempt claim that Arthur Andersen performed improper accounting and negligently certified the accuracy of the financial statements and audit reports Enron Officers and Directors Arthur Andersen Vinson & Elkins Investment Banks Counts VI and VII Allegations Dismissed RICO claims dismissed barred under Section 107 of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, which eliminates securities fraud as a predicate act for a private cause of action under RICO Count IX Allegations Dismissed ERISA and SLUSA preempt common law claim that defendants conspired to conceal Enron s true financial condition and deceive Enron Employees into: (a) accepting over-valued stock; (b) maintaining their plan investments in Enron stock; and (c) continuing to work at Enron Please contact Mike Prame, Steve Saxon, or Ted Scallet at (202)857-0620 with any questions. 5