FACILITY NAME. CONSIDERATIONS FOR COMPLETING THE ANALYSIS FORMS The following instructions were modified from the Kaiser Permanente HVA tool

Similar documents
Section II: Vulnerability Assessment and Mitigation

Evaluate every potential event in each of the three categories of probability, risk, and preparedness. Add additional events as necessary.

Hazard Vulnerability Assessment for Long Term Care Facilities

Assessing Risk: Shifting Focus from Hazards to Capabilities. Jane Coolidge Kara Walker CMRHCC April 2017

Emergency Preparedness. Emergency Preparedness & the Senior Housing Provider. The Speakers LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

Prerequisites for EOP Creation: Hazard Identification and Assessment

Southwest Florida Healthcare Coalition

EvCC Emergency Management Plan ANNEX #11 Hazard Assessment

The Mississippi State Department of Health EOPs and HVAs Presented By: Lillie Bailey

A Practical Framework for Assessing Emerging Risks

SUMMARY NOTES OF THE FEBRUARY 13, 2018 MEETING OF THE OZAUKEE COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN LOCAL PLANNING TEAM

GUIDE BUSINESS & INDUSTRY A STEP-BY-STEP APPROACH TO EMERGENCY PLANNING, RESPONSE AND RECOVERY FOR COMPANIES OF ALL SIZES

Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. Data Collection Questionnaire. For School Districts and Educational Institutions

DRAFT Revised Guide to the National CDEM Plan 2015 July 2015

2. Hazards and risks. 2 HAZARDS AND RISKS p1

Design Challenges and Solutions

REGIONAL HAZARD VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS REPORT

Emergency Resilience Risk Assessment

IBTTA Facilities Management and Maintenance Workshop October 23-25, 2011 Nashville, TN Ray Szczucki ACE USA Inland Marine ACE USA

Contents. Copyright The City of Calgary. All rights reserved. Reprinted with Permission.

Multi-Hazard Risk Management Project The Smithsonian Institution (SI)

SOUTH CENTRAL REGION MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN. Advisory Committee Meeting September 12, 2012

Hazard Mitigation Planning

Natural Hazards Risks in Kentucky. KAMM Regional Training

COMMUNITY SUMMARY LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN CITY OF CENTRAL CITY

Introduction to Disaster Management

Handout 1.1 Essential Records

Detailed Identification and Classification of Hazards and Disasters for Effective Hazard. Vulnerability Assessments. Abstract

Sussex County All Hazard Mitigation Plan. Plan Executive Summary

COMMUNITY SUMMARY LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN CITY OF LISBON

2. Hazards and risks 2. HAZARDS AND RISKS. Summary

SURVIVE. Ready NOW! Business Continuity Planning

HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING

Hazard Mitigation FAQ

Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. Data Collection Questionnaire. For Local Governments

Appendix E: Mitigation Action Worksheet Template

Regional Healthcare Hazard Vulnerability Assessment

Memorandum of Understanding Between Atchison County, Kansas And Atchison County Community Schools USD 377

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

APPENDIX D PLANNING PROCESS DOCUMENTATION

BY Sri D. K. Goswami OIL INDIA LIMITED

SUMMARY NOTES OF THE APRIL 22, 2015 MEETING OF THE KENOSHA COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN LOCAL PLANNING TEAM

Executive Summary. Introduction and Purpose. Scope

REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA

ITEM 9 STAFF REPORT. TO: Mayor and City Council. FROM: Tom Welch, Interim Fire Chief. SUBJECT: City ofmill Valley All-Hazard Mitigation Plan

PLEASE PRINT AND RETAIN FOR REFERENCE BEFORE CONTINUING

STATE AND LOCAL MITIGATION PLANNING how-to guide

Best Practices for Transforming Physical Environment Compliance

World Meteorological Organization Role of WMO and National Meteorological and Hydrological Services in Disaster Risk Reduction

Risk Assessment Planning Team Meeting April 5, 2016

VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

Disasters and Localities. Dr. Tonya T. Neaves Director Centers on the Public Service Schar School of Policy and Government

IVANS 2008 XCHANGE CONFERENCE Key Communications Issues Facing the Property/Casualty Insurance Industry in 2008

Disaster resilient communities: Canada s insurers promote adaptation to the growing threat of high impact weather

Assessing and Managing Risk of Natural Disasters for a Workplace

Section 9. Emergency Management Accreditation Program

Downloaded from Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION TO DISASTER MANAGEMENT

WHS Risk Assessment and Control Form

Northeast Florida Healthcare Coalition Multi-Year Strategic Plan ( )

7.0 RISK MANAGEMENT. Table of Contents

in coordination with Peoria County, Planning and Zoning Department

VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MONTANA STATE PARKS INCIDENT MANAGEMENT PLAN TEMPLATE

Business Case for Using a Numbered Logarithmic Risk Severity Scale. Don Swallom U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command Redstone Arsenal, Alabama

Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan 5-Year Update Progress Report Chippewa County Taskforce Committee January 29, 2013

APPENDIX 1 FEMA MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAMS

4.1 Risk Assessment and Treatment Assessing Security Risks

LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW WORKSHEET FEMA REGION 2 Jurisdiction: Jurisdiction: Title of Plan: Date of Plan: Address:

APPENDIX H TOWN OF FARMVILLE. Hazard Rankings. Status of Mitigation Actions. Building Permit Data. Future Land Use Map. Critical Facilities Map

Client Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance. Risk solutions for Retail. Start

January 23, Yours sincerely, (Mrs. Tarisa Watanagase) Governor

SECURITY MANAGEMENT Manage critical incidents as a security practitioner

Village of Blue Mounds Annex

Risk management procedures

South Lincolnshire NHS Clinical Commissioning Group Business Continuity Policy

BULLETIN OREGON MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY TO: January 29, Northwest Regional Office. New Homeowners. All Oregon Agents

SMALL BUSINESS. Guide to Business. Continuity Planning. Ensure your business continues to operate in the event of a disruption.

This document contains the following topics:

Emergency Preparedness

ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT (ERM) The Conceptual Framework

Japanese Government General Indemnity Contract (English translation)

NATIONAL UNIT FOR DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT (UNGRD) Republic of Colombia. National System for Disaster Risk Management

HAZARD MANAGEMENT POLICY Page 1 of 7 Reviewed: October 2018

Fundamentals of Catastrophe Modeling. CAS Ratemaking & Product Management Seminar Catastrophe Modeling Workshop March 15, 2010

Hillsborough County Local Mitigation Strategy and the Community Rating System

REDUCING DISASTER RISK a challenge for development

Catastrophe Risk Modelling. Foundational Considerations Regarding Catastrophe Analytics

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Hazard Identification

Presentation to the National Hurricane Conference

Planning Process Documentation

French Protection Covers Against Natural Disasters. P. Tinard Sr. Cat Modeler R&D Technical Studies Public Reinsurance

2019 preliminary operating and capital budgets

This discussion provides information related to the damage assessment process and discusses the roles and impact of local and county government.

GUIDELINE ACTIVITY RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE

Mike Waters VP Risk Decision Services Bob Shoemaker Sr. Technical Coordinator. Insurance Services Office, Inc

2017 New County Officers School Iowa State Association of Counties

10/23/2014. Presented by: Erike Young, MPPA, CSP, ARM-E. Public Sector Disaster Planning/Emergency Response

QUICK GUIDE. An Introduction to COPE Data. Copyright 2017 AssetWorks Inc. All Rights Reserved. For more information visit,

Community Disaster Preparedness Index

Transcription:

FACILITY NAME CONSIDERATIONS FOR COMPLETING THE ANALYSIS FORMS The following instructions were modified from the Kaiser Permanente HVA tool 1) Change "Facility Name" at the top of this Instruction Tab to populate your facility's name throughout. 2) Facilities using this tool shall complete each worksheet as it pertains to their organization. 3) When completing the individual risk tabs (Natural, Technological, Human): - Complete all worksheets, including Natural, Technological, and Human - If a hazard does not pertain to you (e.g., "volcanic eruption", "mass casualty") simply score the "probablity" as a zero (0) - Assume each event occurs at the worst possible time (e.g, during peak census, lowest staffing levels) when considering Impact and Response 4) The Facility Summary tab will automatically provide general overall relative risk by risk type (Natural, Tech or Human). 5) The Top 10 Hazards tab will automatically provide the Top Ten by risk type (Natural, Tech or Human) and the Top Ten Overall. 6) These top relative risks will help to determine priorities for mitigation efforts, planning efforts and / or needed exercises or training. Issues to consider for probability include, but are not limited to: Issues to consider for preparedness include, but are not limited to: Known Risk Status of current plans Historical Data (10 Year Time Frame) Frequency of drills Training and implementation status Insurance Issues to consider for human impact include, but are not limited to: Acuity and volume of injury/death to staff, patients, & visitors Availability of alternate sources for critical supplies/services Issues to consider for property impact include, but are not limited to: Cost to replace Cost to set up temporary replacement Cost to repair Time to recover Cost to repair/replace based on past incidents Issues to consider for business impact include, but are not limited to: Business interruption Employees unable to report to work Customers unable to reach facility Company in violation of contractual agreements Imposition of fines and penalties or legal costs Interruption of critical supplies Interruption of product distribution Reputation and public image Financial impact/burden Loss of business Revenue lost during past incidents Issues to consider for internal resources include, but are not limited to: Types of supplies on hand/will they meet need? Volume of supplies on hand/will they meet need? Staff availability Coordination with Memorandums of Understanding Availability of back-up systems Internal resources ability to withstand disasters/survivability Issues to consider for external resources include, but are not limited to: Types of agreements with community agencies/drills Coordination with local and state agencies Coordination with proximal health care facilities Coordination with treatment specific facilities Community resources Time to marshal an on-scene response Scope of response capability Historical evaluation of response success Local emergency response availability

FACILITY NAME SCORING SCALE Category Definition Score Scoring Scale Max Score The probability of an event occurring 0 No Relative Risk incurred and the impact it will have on the 1% to 25% Low Relative Risk Risk Relative Risk facility, based on current mitigation 25% to 50% Moderate Relative Risk 1.00 capabilities of the facility. Relative Risk = 51% to 75% High Relative Risk Probablity x Severity (Impact & 76% to 100% Highest Relative Risk 0 No probability to occur/not Applicable Probability Probability 1 likelihood that the event will occur 2 Likely to occur at least once in 10 yr period 4 Historical review of last 10 years and the 1 Unlikely to occur, but possible in 10 yr period within the next 10 years. 3 Will occur several times within 10 yr period 4 Will likely occur frequently in 10 yr period Human Impact 0 No injuries or death/ Not applicable The total number of patients and the 1 Low Acuity/Low Volume injuries acuity of injury and/or the potential for 2 Low Acuity/High Volume injuries death to employees, patients, and 3 High Acuity/Low Volume injuries or death visitors caused by an incident occurring. 2 4 High Acuity/High Volume injuries or death The extent of damage and/or loss of 0 No property damage/ Not applicable infrastructure that could limit or 1 Minor damage, recovery less than 2 weeks Property Impact eliminate medical care and impact the 2 Moderate damage, recovery less than 1 month ability to provide care and the financial 3 Severe damage, recovery less than 6 months cost to resume normal operations. 4 Total losses likely, recovery greater than 1 year 0 No service disruption/ Not applicable The loss resulting from the extent of 1 Disruption to non-essential services service interruption or termination of Business Impact 2 Disruption to non-essential services, possibility of interruption to essential services services that may impair the facility's 3 Termination of non-essential services, Interruption to essential services ability to provide care. 4 Termination of both non-essential and essential services Severity 24 0 Not applicable The plans, policies, and procedures 1 Plan(s) in place, training up to date Preparedness implemented by the facility that will be 2 Update to plan(s) & training required implemented should the incident occur. 3 Plan(s) and training in development 4 No plan(s) or training in place 0 Not applicable The ability of the facility to coordinate 1 Sufficient resources available Internal Response resources in the event an incident 2 Limited resources, mustering additional internal staff viable occurs. 3 Limited resources, mustering additional internal staff not likely 4 No resources available, external response required 0 Not applicable/ Not needed External resources available to the 1 Resources readily available External Response facility to aid in incident response and 2 Resources available, prolonged response likely recovery operations. 3 Limited resources available, prolonged response likely 4 No external resources available 1 Historical analysis based on a ten (10) year trend 2 Acuity: Low : minor injuries; High : moderate to severe injuries Impact Mitigation

FACILITY NAME FACILITY SUMMARY OF HAZARD ANALYSIS Instructions for Summary Worksheet -The data table and graphs are formatted to auto-fill as the Hazard Worksheets are completed -Cell C6 will change colors automatically depending on the calculated risk OVERALL RISK TO THE FACILITY #DIV/0! Color Scale Natural Technological Human FACILITY Low Relative Risk Probability #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Moderate Relative Risk Severity #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! High Relative Risk Hazard Specific Risk #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Highest Relative Risk 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 Hazard Specific Risk to the Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Natural Technological Human Probability Severity 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 Probability and Severity of Hazards to the Facility 0.00 0.00 Probability Severity

XYZ SAMPLE FACILITY Natural Disaters Technogical Disasters Human Events TOP 10 HVA RANK Risk TOP 10 HVA RANK Risk TOP 10 HVA RANK Risk #NUM! 1 #NUM! #NUM! 1 #NUM! #NUM! 1 #NUM! #NUM! 2 #NUM! #NUM! 2 #NUM! #NUM! 2 #NUM! #NUM! 3 #NUM! #NUM! 3 #NUM! #NUM! 3 #NUM! #NUM! 4 #NUM! #NUM! 4 #NUM! #NUM! 4 #NUM! #NUM! 5 #NUM! #NUM! 5 #NUM! #NUM! 5 #NUM! #NUM! 6 #NUM! #NUM! 6 #NUM! #NUM! 6 #NUM! #NUM! 7 #NUM! #NUM! 7 #NUM! #NUM! 7 #NUM! #NUM! 8 #NUM! #NUM! 8 #NUM! #NUM! 8 #NUM! #NUM! 9 #NUM! #NUM! 9 #NUM! #NUM! 9 #NUM! #NUM! 10 #NUM! #NUM! 10 #NUM! #NUM! 10 #NUM!

XYZ SAMPLE FACILITY Only enter 0-4 in white cells below, the rest auto-fills TRUE Hazard Vulnerability Assessment RISK PROBABILITY SEVERITY NATURAL HAZARDS #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! SEVERITY MITIGATION PROBABILITY HUMAN PROPERTY BUSINESS PREPARED- INTERNAL EXTERNAL HAZARD NESS RESPONSE RESPONSE Relative Risk (0-4) Time, Community/ Possibility of Physical losses Interruption of Preplanning effectiveness, Mutual Aid staff death or injury and damages services resources and supplies Avalanche Blizzard Coastal Tsunami / Erosion Dam Failure Drought Dust / Sand Storm Earthquake Flooding (External) Damaging Winds Hail Storm Hurricane Infection Disease (SARS, Flu, etc) Landslide Severe Thunderstorm Snow / Ice Storm Temperature Extremes Tornado Volcanic Eruption Wild Fire Other 1 (provide hazard name) Other 2 (provide hazard name) Other 3 (provide hazard name) Average Score #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Comments

HAZARD Hazard Vulnerability Assessment TECHNOLOGICAL HAZARDS PROBABILITY (0-4) HUMAN Possibility of death or injury Only enter 0-4 in white cells below, the rest auto-fills PROPERTY Physical losses and damages XYZ SAMPLE FACILITY BUSINESS Interruption of services SEVERITY PREPARED- NESS Preplanning RISK PROBABILITY SEVERITY #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! MITIGATION INTERNAL RESPONSE Time, effectiveness, resources EXTERNAL RESPONSE Community/ Mutual Aid staff and supplies Relative Risk Carbon Monoxide Release (Internal) Commercial Power Failure Communications Systems Failure Contamination of Outside Air Cyber Attack EHR/Information Systems Disruption Fire Alarm System (Detection) Failure Fire Protection System Loss (Suppression) Fire, Internal Flood, Internal Fuel Shortage Generator Failure Hazmat Exposure, External Hazmat Exposure, Internal HVAC Failure Medical Gas Failure Medical Vacuum Disruption Natural Gas Failure Natural Gas Odor/Leak Nuclear Facility EPZ Public Transportation Disruption Sewer Disruption Steam Disruption Vendors: Inability to deliver supplies Vendors: Inability to respond for repairs Water Supply Disruption (Potable) Other 1 (provide hazard name) Other 2 (provide hazard name) Other 3 (provide hazard name) Average Score #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Comments

XYZ SAMPLE FACILITY Only enter 0-4 in white cells below, the rest auto-fills Hazard Vulnerability Assessment HUMAN HAZARDS RISK PROBABILITY SEVERITY #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! SEVERITY MITIGATION PROBABILITY HUMAN PROPERTY BUSINESS PREPARED- INTERNAL EXTERNAL HAZARD NESS RESPONSE RESPONSE Relative Risk (0-4) Time, Community/ Possibility of Physical losses Interruption of Preplanning effectiveness, Mutual Aid staff death or injury and damages services resources and supplies Active Shooter / Person with a Weapon Bomb Threat (Called in) Civil Disturbance Community Surge Forensic Admission Hostage Situation Labor Dispute/Strike Mass Casualty Incident < 5 Patients Mass Casualty Incident < 5 Patients needing Decon Mass Casualty Incident > 5 Patients Mass Casuatly Incident > 5 Patients needing Decon Missing Patient (NH Resident) Sheltering in Place (Staff, Staff Families, Pets) Suspicious Package or Substance Surge or Influx or Patients (NH Residents) Community or Regional Terrorism (CBRN) VIP Admission Workplace Violence Other 1 (provide hazard name) Other 2 (provide hazard name) Other 3 (provide hazard name) Average Score #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Comments