Convergence Long/Short Strategies Q Review and Commentary

Similar documents
Convergence Long/Short Strategies Q Review and Commentary

DIVIDEND GROWTH STRATEGY

A Compelling Case for Leveraged Loans

Why Dividends? Market Commentary January 2018

Smart Beta and the Evolution of Factor-Based Investing

Summit Strategies Group 8182 Maryland Avenue, 6th Floor St. Louis, Missouri

Factor Performance in Emerging Markets

Dividend Growth as a Defensive Equity Strategy August 24, 2012

(SEIC-NASDAQ) Risk Level *

Smart Beta and the Evolution of Factor-Based Investing

2016 Review. U.S. Value Equity EQ (Gross) +16.0% -5.0% +14.2% +60.7% +19.7% -0.2% +25.2% +80.0% %

Invesco Ltd. NEUTRAL ZACKS CONSENSUS ESTIMATES (IVZ-NYSE)

MANAGED FUTURES INDEX

Another Milestone on the Road to Policy Normalization

Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund

2007 Outlook & Opportunities Terry Sandven & Christian Heitzman Portfolio Strategy Group January 2007

Fundametrics Small Cap Equity Q Performance Summary and Observations

How Investment Managers Use Active Share to Win New Business, Retain Clients and Justify Fees

Nuance Concentrated Value Composite Perspectives

MOST RECENT 3-MO. trend TYPICAL range EXTREME range. Typical Typical. Typical Typical

U.S. Equities LONG-TERM BENEFITS OF THE T. ROWE PRICE APPROACH TO ACTIVE MANAGEMENT

MANAGED FUTURES INDEX

Diversifying with the Defined Risk Strategy Executive Summary. Marc Odo, CFA, CAIA, CIPM, CFP

MANAGED FUTURES INDEX

Nasdaq Chaikin Power US Small Cap Index

Causeway Convergence Series: Value and Earnings Estimates Revisions A Powerful Pairing

An All-Cap Core Investment Approach

SMALL-CAP VALUE: THE CASE FOR DEFENSIVE QUALITY

The Q2 Factor Winner? Small Cap.

Passive Opportunities for Master Limited Partnerships (MLP) Investors: The Morningstar MLP Index Family

Asset Allocation Model March Update

FIVE FORECASTERS: FEW WARNING SIGNS

Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund RMEAX Q4 2018

Gateway Active Index-Option Overwrite Composite Commentary

Adverse Active Alpha SM Manager Ranking Model

U.S. Equities: Navigating a Slow Growth Environment

4 th Quarter 2017 Webcast. Diversified Large Cap Value Equity. Presented by. Joseph Kirby Portfolio Manager

Market Volatility & SGA s Active Returns By Pat Holway, CFA, CAIA, CIC & Steve Skatrud, CFA Client Portfolio Managers

How to evaluate factor-based investment strategies

STRATEGIC ACTIVE TAX MANAGEMENT

MANAGED FUTURES INDEX

OUT OF THE WOODS? COMMENTARY STRONG FUNDAMENTALS KEY TAKEAWAYS LPL RESEARCH WEEKLY MARKET. February

The Conversation We ll Be Having for Years to Come

An Economic Perspective on Dividends

Catalyst Macro Strategy Fund

Factor Investing: Smart Beta Pursuing Alpha TM

Baker s Dozen Monthly Portfolios

Q&A. An Interview with Richard Shuster on Robeco Weiss, Peck & Greer Micro Cap Opportunities

forward PERSPECTIVES The Next Chapter: Lower Returns and Higher Volatility Bruce Cooper, CFA TD Asset Management Ken Miner, CFA TD Asset Management

STRATEGY OVERVIEW. Opportunistic Growth. Related Funds: 361 U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (ASFZX)

Proceed With Caution: Higher Probability for Normalized Market Returns Ahead

Managed Futures: Staying the Course

April The Value Reversion

H1 2018: First Half of 2018

Lazard Insights. Capturing the Small-Cap Effect. The Small-Cap Effect. Summary. Edward Rosenfeld, Director, Portfolio Manager/Analyst

Volatility as a Tradable Asset: Using the VIX as a market signal, diversifier and for return enhancement

BROAD COMMODITY INDEX

BROAD COMMODITY INDEX

9/1/ /1/1977 9/1/ /1/ /1/1963

2016 April Financial Market Update

Inflows, indexes, and the future: Trends in active and passive. Key takeaways

Addition Through Subtraction: Thinking Strategically About Managing Tax Liabilities

BROAD COMMODITY INDEX

March 07, Dear Friends and Investors,

The Benefits of Dynamic Factor Weights

Can You Time Managed Futures?

INSIGHTS. The Factor Landscape. August rocaton.com. 2017, Rocaton Investment Advisors, LLC

Lessons from the Sixties

Structured Small Cap Equity

Dividends, Buybacks and the Prospect of Future Returns

Hypothetical Growth of $100,000 August 1, 2013 June 30, 2016

Goldman Sachs Asset Allocation Portfolios Investment Outlook

Carl Nadwodny, CFA Chief Investment Officer 460 East Swedesford Rd, Suite 2010 Wayne, PA (484)

SunTrust Advisory Services, Inc. Market Perspective The Pain Trade. Keith Lerner, CFA, CMT Director, Chief Market Strategist March 6, 2017

The Case for Growth. Investment Research

NOT WORTH BEING CUTE SELLING OUT OF EXPENSIVE MARKETS HASN T ADDED VALUE HISTORICALLY

U.S. Stocks: Can We Capture Acceptable Returns From Here?

Economic recovery dashboard

Sabrient Leaders In Investment Research PSYCHIATRIC SOLUTIONS INC. Company Profile. Sabrient Analysis. Stock Fundamentals as of July 27, 2009

MANAGED FUTURES INDEX

Lazard Insights. Growth: An Underappreciated Factor. What Is an Investment Factor? Summary. Does the Growth Factor Matter?

2017 was a Banner Year Look for a More Normal 2018

Amajority of institutional

Lessons from the Sixties

MANAGED FUTURES INDEX

Playing The Bull Market s Final Inning(s)

POST-ELECTION ACTIVE MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE

The Compelling Case for Value

Why Quality Matters in Mid Cap Investing

Trailing PE 9.2. Forward PE 8.5. Hold 15 Analysts. 1-Year Return: -10.8% 5-Year Return: 20.4%

Wells Fargo & Company

LPL RESEARCH PRIVATE CLIENT INSTITUTIONAL INSIGHTS THOUGHT LEADERSHIP. August 2016 DIVERSIFICATION MAY BE POISED FOR A COMEBACK MEMBER FINRA/SIPC

52-Week High Trailing PE Week Low Forward PE -- NA 0 Analysts. 1-Year Return: -1.8% 5-Year Return: 3.6%

BROAD COMMODITY INDEX

Value Equity Q Commentary. Market Review: Performance Analysis:

Portable alpha through MANAGED FUTURES

Commentary. "How ridiculous and how strange to be surprised at anything which happens in life." - Marcus Aurelius, Stoic philosopher

Retirement Funds. SEMIANNual REPORT

Economic indicators dashboard

Value versus Growth: History Stands on the Side of Value Investing

Transcription:

Convergence Long/Short Strategies Q3-217 Review and Commentary Q3-217 Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity. - Roman philosopher Seneca At Convergence, we have been successfully managing Long-Short equity products for over 12 years, and our firm s founders have been managing and refining our systematic investment process, rooted in fundamentals, for over two decades. Our core tenets of providing competitive, long-term returns, by ranking companies within each industry group by their relevant fundamental characteristics have remained steadfast. Since inception, each of Convergence s Long-Short strategies has outperformed its respective benchmarks and has generated a positive return spread of the long versus short holdings (net of fees). Those return spreads have also been accompanied by a negative correlation of the return spread versus the overall market return, thereby boosting the power of diversification in investor portfolios. We are also excited to announce the launch of two new levered versions of our fundamental ranking process this past quarter. These strategies have approximately 35% total gross exposure with roughly a 5% net exposure. Utilizing our fundamental ranking methodology, we introduced a Large/Mid-capitalization Long-Short levered product, as well as a SMID cap Long-Short levered product. Both products are off to a strong start as we apply the same disciplined process that we have successfully employed in our other Long-Short equity structures. Odds and Probabilities The phrase, Nobody knows nuttin is often used by our friends at Empirical Research as they describe macro-economic and exogenous forces that professionals try to predict, but are proven wrong the majority of the time. That phrase seems appropriate as we ponder the many predictions that are made about certain asset classes, expectations for various economic variables, or predictions of the performance of individual stock names. As we reflect on the year that has transpired, we are reminded of the varied predictions by experts. Opinions from a year ago ranged wildly, from an armageddon 5% drop in equities should one particular presidential candidate win, to others who were convinced that interest rates would skyrocket because the growth rate of the economy would be stupendous! Fortunately, at Convergence we do not have to guess or speculate on bold predictions. Instead, we focus our efforts on probable outcomes based on the stock fundamentals emphasized within each industry group. We are like fundamental farmers who are Convergence Investment Partners, LLC 1245 Cheyenne Ave. Suite 12, Grafton, WI 5324 Page 1

constantly planting our long and short positions into favorably ranked companies within each industry group. Over time, the market environment provides the conditions to generate a spread in long-short returns due to the underlying fundamental tilts of our long versus short portfolio holdings. It is that fundamental spread that we work to harvest within each strategy year after year. As history has shown, there is indeed a meaningful amount of fundamental spread to take advantage of within the markets. The following chart measures the spread in returns between the top and bottom ranked stocks over the past 2 years from some of our major factor composite categories. As evidenced here, a strategy that is based on sound economic principles and positioned to tilt long versus short portfolios based on those principles can provide meaningful value over time. Composite Spread Returns (Annualized) 12% 8% 4% % Source: Convergence Investment Partners. Quintile Spread, Sector neutral. 2 years ended 12/31/21* *The chart is presented for informational purposes and does not represent performance of any product or strategy, nor do returns take into account fees and expenses. It should also be noted that utilizing a broad set of fundamental metrics is also central to the ability to harvest value over time. We incorporate a multitude of fundamental signals to determine the relative attractiveness of a given company within each industry group. This factor diversification is beneficial as the market tends to reward different fundamental metrics to a varying degree over smaller time frames. Convergence Investment Partners, LLC 1245 Cheyenne Ave. Suite 12, Grafton, WI 5324 Page 2

5 Spread (Q1-Q5) Efficacy Factors (12 Month) returns 5.171 4 3 3.357 3.34 2.779 2 1-1.9 1.731 -.439 1.341 1.35. -1.85-1.199 -.13-1.484 -.757-2 -3 Accruals Accelerating Capital Discipline Expected Risk Historical Profits Reversal RISK RiskON Relative Economic Size Traditional Looking at a shorter period of time such as the recent quarter, we see that much of the positive spread or differentiation in stocks has been a combination of quality, growth (both top and bottom line growth), price momentum and profitability. Separately, there has not been much production or benefit from fundamental tilts in valuation or risk measures in the recent period. This demonstrates the benefit of the fundamental factor diversification that we employ at Convergence. While it is unlikely for all fundamental tilts to generate a positive spread in short time periods, these fundamental spreads, based on sound economic principles, produce real wealth for investors over time (shown by our research) as they provide their complimentary attributes. Economic backdrop We continue to witness confidence from both consumers and businesses (particularly given where we were 9 years ago). Inflation has remained subdued as global competition and technology innovation have kept have kept a lid on wages and prices as Dr. Ed Yardeni of Yardeni Research points out. Recent economic growth has been robust, as measured by the ISM Manufacturing Index, with a 13 year high reading of.8. Housing continues to strengthen as borrower credit scores have recovered and interest rates have remained favorable. Finally, short term interest rates have begun to rise as the central banks are on a path of normalizing rates via rate hikes and balance sheet reduction. 15 12 9 3 Consumer Confidence 1 14 12 1 8 4 2-2 -4 Consumer Index (YOY) Feb-7 Feb-77 Feb-87 Feb-97 Feb-7 Feb-17 Jan-5 Jan- Jan-7 Jan-8 Jan-9 Jan- Jan-1 Jan-17 Convergence Investment Partners, LLC 1245 Cheyenne Ave. Suite 12, Grafton, WI 5324 Page 3

ISM Manufacturing NAHB Housing Market Index 9 9 8 8 7 7 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 Jan-5 Jan- Jan-7 Jan-8 Jan-9 Jan- Jan-1 Jan-17 Jan-85 Jan-87 Jan-89 Jan-91 Jan-93 Jan-95 Jan-97 Jan-99 Jan-1 Jan-3 Jan-5 Jan-7 Jan-9 Jan-11 Jan-13 Jan-15 Jan-17 3 Month T-bill US Generic Govt 1 Year Yield 12 1 8 4 2-2 18 1 14 12 1 8 4 2 Jun-7 Jun-77 Jun-87 Jun-97 Jun-7 Jun-17 Jan-2 Jan-7 Jan-72 Jan-77 Jan-82 Jan-87 Jan-92 Jan-97 Jan-2 Jan-7 Jan-12 Jan-17 All Charts Sourced: Convergence Investment Partners, Bloomberg Finance L.P Where does this leave investors? While the economic backdrop continues to look solid, there are some extremes that are beginning to seep into the equity market, which usually lead to opportunities in sourcing alpha-generating anomalies. As an example, we have seen the market chug higher like a freight train, without even a hint of a modest pullback throughout the first 3 quarters of this year. In fact, unless something shakes investor confidence in the remaining weeks of the year, the 2.8% pullback earlier this year will go into the record books as one of the lowest drawdowns in the past 4 years! 5. 4. 3. 2. 1.. -1. -2. -3. -4. -5. -. 2-1 -18-19 -18 14 17-7 -14 Russell 1 Index Calendar Year Total Returns and Max drawdown 27 14-8 -9-1 -33 13 2-7 -8-8 -2 29 7 - -7-5 -2-9 38-3 22 33-8 -1 27-2 21-8 -12-12 -18-22 -3-34 3-14 11 15-9 -7-8 -1-38 -5 28-27 1 1-1 -2 1 33 13 1 1 12-3 - -8-1 -12-11 Return Drawdown 198 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 198 1987 1988 1989 199 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 199 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 25 2 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 21 YTD All Charts Sourced: Convergence Investment Partners, Bloomberg Finance L.P Convergence Investment Partners, LLC 1245 Cheyenne Ave. Suite 12, Grafton, WI 5324 Page 4

In addition, volatility, as measured by the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX), continues to smash historical records from the low levels of fear being priced into the markets. This record low estimate for future volatility (low investor fear) might also be interpreted as potential complacency building into the mindsets of investors. 7 CBOE SPX Volatility Index (VIX) 5 4 3 2 1 Jan-9 Jan-91 Jan-92 Jan-93 Jan-94 Jan-95 Jan-9 Jan-97 Jan-98 Jan-99 Jan- Jan-1 Jan-2 Jan-3 Jan-4 Jan-5 Jan- Jan-7 Jan-8 Jan-9 Jan-1 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 Jan-15 Jan-1 Jan-17 All Charts Sourced: Convergence Investment Partners, Bloomberg Finance L.P Furthermore, equity valuations based on nearly every metric or measurement choice are elevated both from an absolute and relative standpoint. With higher average valuations come increased opportunities for shorting attractively ranked candidates at higher prices (a.k.a. sell high, buy back low). 3 25 Median P/E Ratio: Russell 1 2.3 2 15 1 5 Dec-82 Jun-84 Dec-85 Jun-87 Dec-88 Jun-9 Dec-91 Jun-93 Dec-94 Jun-9 Dec-94 Jun-9 Dec-97 Jun-99 Dec- Jun-2 Dec-3 Jun-5 Dec- Jun-8 Dec-9 Jun-11 Dec-12 Jun-14 Dec-15 Aug-17 All Charts Sourced: Convergence Investment Partners, Bloomberg Finance L.P Convergence Investment Partners, LLC 1245 Cheyenne Ave. Suite 12, Grafton, WI 5324 Page 5

Finally, what makes this environment enticing as a long-short manager is that the stronger economic conditions are forcing the hand of the Federal Reserve to begin to normalize its balance sheet (i.e. sell or let bonds roll off) as well as continue to raise interest rates modestly. As noted in our previous commentary, an environment of generally rising interest rates has benefits to investors who utilize shorts: 1. Lower costs; short rebates are linked to interest rates, i.e. higher interest rates» higher rebates. 2. Higher minimum standard, the training wheels are coming off; higher rates, means higher interest expense. Low/no earning companies have an increased likelihood of default. Also, a higher and normalized discount rate means that the differentiation on capital allocation goes up as it becomes more difficult for companies with weak balance sheets and unsustainable business models to endure versus companies with stronger business fundamentals. Therefore, we see a favorable period for fundamentally focused investors to source opportunities found within attractive long and short stock holdings. Overview of performance The equity markets have enjoyed strong gains since the crisis of 29, and the more recent time periods are no exception as shown in the table below. Index returns, ended 9/3/217 Since 3/9/9 5 year 3 year 2 year 1 year S&P 5 Index 19.8% 14.2% 1.8% 17.% 18.% Russell 3 Index 19.34% 14.21% 1.73% 1.81% 18.75% Russell 2 Index 2.34% 13.77% 12.1% 18.% 2.78% Annualized Total Return, including reinvested dividends, sourced from Bloomberg L.P. We are excited to report that over the past year (9/3/21 9/3/217) our strategies have delivered outstanding returns. We are even more pleased that the markets have again shifted to a more fundamental focus in recent months. It s no surprise that this shift has benefited our results and leads us to believe that this trend will provide a tailwind as we close out 217. As shown in the table below, our active extension strategies have handsomely outperformed their respective benchmarks, and our market neutral fund has delivered powerful returns for a strategy that targets a.-.2 beta given, its low net exposure. Trailing 12 month performance, ended 9/3/217 Strategy Benchmark Strategy Benchmark Outperformance Large Cap Core Plus Russell 3 21.31% 18.7% 2.1% Small Cap Russell 2 22.17% 2.78% 1.39% Market Neutral Citi 9-day Bills 9.1%.4% 8.44% **Net of fee strategy returns, dividends reinvested. Source: Convergence Investment Partners. Benchmark returns are total returns dividends reinvested. Source: Bloomberg L.P. & Zephyr Our research shows that the favorable trends we witnessed at the end of Q2-217 have persisted through the third quarter. See the following from our Q2 commentary: the equity market has begun to move from an environment of growth at ANY price to growth at a REASONABLE price. This obviously has positive implications for disciplined investors who favor stocks with strong fundamental characteristics trading at reasonable valuation levels. Convergence Investment Partners, LLC 1245 Cheyenne Ave. Suite 12, Grafton, WI 5324 Page

The following table shows the returns that our strategies delivered in the third quarter of 217. Q3-217 Return Strategy Benchmark Strategy Benchmark Large Cap Core Plus Russell 3.% 4.57% Small Cap Russell 2 7.9% 5.7% Market Neutral Citi 9-day Bills 2.84%.2% Small Cap -2.8% -2.8% -2.8% *Net of fee strategy returns, dividends reinvested. Source: Convergence Investment Partners. Benchmark returns are total returns dividends reinvested. Source: Bloomberg L.P. Beyond looking at the returns for each strategy in total as discussed above, the long-short spread is also extremely important to observe. This spread provides insight into how the market is rewarding/penalizing stocks based on fundamental rankings. As shown below, the largecap and market neutral strategies produced a significant positive spread between the long and short holdings over the past 12 months. Moreover, the small-cap strategy also generated a notable positive spread between its long and short positions over the past 12 months. Strategy 12-Month Spread (Long-Short) Large Cap Core Plus 8.21% Small Cap 5.39% Market Neutral 8.43% What Factors Worked? The following table shows the top and bottom three performing factors over different time periods. We ranked all 15 factor composites by spread return, in order to show that what works over the long term is not always true in the short term, as we summarized above. SHORT TERM LONG TERM 3 months months 12 months 5 years 1 years 2 years Traditional Traditional Reversal Top 3 Expected Historical Capital Discipline Reversal Traditional Expected Capital Discipline Risk Low Risk Bottom 3 RiskOn Traditional Relative Size RiskOn Accruals Low Risk Low Risk Low Risk Accruals Profits Size Relative Expected Expected Expected The table above clearly shows a few important items: What works in the long term does not always match the short term (see arrows). Traditional (one of the best long term factors) is moving out of the basement. Despite a strong pick up in fundamental factors in the past 3 months (12 of 15 factors improved) the leadership didn t change much. Convergence Investment Partners, LLC 1245 Cheyenne Ave. Suite 12, Grafton, WI 5324 Page 7

Let s expand the last bullet point and compare the factor spread returns in Q2-217 and Q3-217. The following chart has a tremendous amount of information. The blue bars are the spread returns for each factor in Q2. Q3 returns are in black, and the difference of the two returns is shown in grey. 12 of our 15 factors improved their spread return from Q2 to Q3. Moreover, factors that showed marked improvement were some of our longer term heavy hitters (e.g. Traditional, Captial Discipline), while those that slipped (e.g. Size, Expected ) are typically some of our least impressive factors..% 5.% 4.% 3.% 2.% 1.%.% -1.% -2.% -3.% -4.% Accel Gwth Mo Cap Disc Trad RiskOff Accruals Rel Erngs Mo RiskOn Profits Reversal Q2 Q3 Difference Exp Gwth Erngs Risk Size Hist Gwth All Charts Sourced: Convergence Investment Partners, Bloomberg Finance L.P In summary, recent factor results seem to validate a move back to what one would expect given the long term averages. A continuation of this mean reversion would bode very well for Convergence investors. How is Convergence positioned? Finally, as in previous quarterly updates, we wanted to share with our investors a summary of the fundamental tilts found within each strategy. The following table illustrates a few of the many fundamental factors that we utilize to rank the relative attractiveness within our investment process. The values shown for each factor represent the weighted average value of that specific factor (long or short component of the portfolio) versus the broader market overall. Our goal is to provide insight into how the strategies are positioned relative to major fundamental metrics. As an example, take a look at Return on Assets. This is a measurement of how much profit is generated from each dollar of assets and gives an idea as to how efficient management is at using its assets to generate earnings. This factor is found in the Quality category below. Most investors would prefer their managers to be more efficient with asset utilization, all else equal; therefore a higher Return on Assets (ROA) is generally preferred. Our long portfolios all have a higher ROA. The Russell 2 Index actually averages a negative return on assets, indicating that on average, smaller companies are not generating a positive net income. Additionally, the names that we are short are, on average, failing to generate income. Generally, this is beneficial for identifying attractive short holdings. Convergence Investment Partners, LLC 1245 Cheyenne Ave. Suite 12, Grafton, WI 5324 Page 8

Average Fundamental statistics of Long & Short holdings for each Strategy: Category Factor LONG MARKET SHORT Market Neutral Core Plus Small Cap Russell 3 Russell 2 Market Neutral Core Plus Small Cap to 15.5 15.8 23. 25.1 8.3 129.5 279.2-4. Profitability to Free Cash Flow Free Cash Flow to Enterprise Net Income Improvement 1.5 11.4 1. 23.5 3.7-11.4-19.1 -.9 7.2% 7.2% 7.5% 4.% 3.% -4.2% -1.3% -4.7% 3.4% 23.8% 28.9% 7.5% 7.7% -1.3% -9.1% -11.% Profitability Cash Flow to Sales 23.7% 22.1% 25.3% -2.3% -288.1% -44.8% -85.2% -148.3% Profitability Internal 15.2% 7.% 13.% -4.1% -.7% -7.9% -8.7% -15.4% Capital Discipline Capital Discipline Quality Quality Sales Change in Shares Outstanding.3-1.3 1.4 1.1 1.4 19.4 22.5 17.9 Dividend 12% 143% 79% 112% 48% 41% 25% 9% Return on Equity (ROE) Return on Assets (ROA) Consecutive Qtrs 1.2% 2.5% 14.9%.1% 1.9% -7.9% -5.9% -12.5% 7.% 7.7%.%.5% -.5% -2.% -4.5% -7.9% 2.3 1.9 2.1 1.4 1.1 -.3 -.5 -.4 Slope of.48.3.54.5.12 -.14 -.8 -.3 Change in Slope of Sales 1.1 1.5 1.8.83.3 -.4 -.2 -.8 As of 9/3/217; Source: Wilshire Analytics & Convergence Investment Partners. As the table above demonstrates, the Convergence fundamental stock picking methodology leads us toward holdings in the long portfolios with strong cash flow, earnings, profits and other desirable financial characteristics. In addition, these favorable portfolio statistics are achieved without overpaying in terms of valuation as shown in the valuation ratios above. Over time, companies with these ingredients have rewarded investors handsomely as these are signs of healthy and growing companies with competitively strong business models. Separately, the Convergence process also identifies companies with weak or declining fundamentals as demonstrated in the statistics, and our research has shown this to be effective in sourcing alpha from shorting. In closing remember, Always stick to fundamentals! Thank you for your support. Convergence Investment Partners, LLC 1245 Cheyenne Ave. Suite 12, Grafton, WI 5324 Page 9

Disclosures Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Source of all factor data: Convergence Investment Partners. No graph, chart, or formula should in and of itself be used to determine which securities to buy or sell. This communication is limited to the dissemination of general information pertaining to Convergence Investment Partners, LLC s (Convergence) services and general economic market conditions. The information contained herein is not intended to be personal legal or investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any security or engage in a particular investment strategy. There is no guarantee that the views and opinions expressed in this letter will come to pass. The views expressed do not take into account any individual personal, financial, or tax considerations. The opinions and forecasts herein are based on information and sources of information deemed to be reliable, but Convergence Investment Partners does not warrant the accuracy of the information that this opinion and forecast is based upon. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. Strategy returns are presented net of fees. Net of fee performance returns are presented after actual standard management fees, actual performance-based management fees and all trading expenses. No other fees are deducted aside from trading and management fees for the calculation of net of fee performance. Returns include the reinvestment of income. Convergence Investment Partners is an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is a majority owned subsidiary of Mariner Holdings, LLC. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any level of skill or training. For additional information about Convergence please refer to the Investment Adviser Public Disclosure website at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov. /earnings (or P/E) is a ratio for valuing a company that measures its current share price relative to its per-share earnings. Return on Assets (ROA) s an indicator of how profitable a company is relative to its total assets, calculated by dividing a company s annual earnings by its total assets. Return on equity (ROE) is a measure of profitability that calculates how many dollars of profit a company generates with each dollar of shareholders equity. The Russell 1 Index, Russell 2 Index and the Russell 3 Index are measures of the performance of the largest 1, 2, and 3 US companies respectively. They are constructed to provide a comprehensive, unbiased, and stable barometer of the broad market and it is reconstituted annually to ensure new and growing equities are reflected. The S&P 5 Index is based on the market capitalizations of 5 large companies having common stock listed on the NYSE or NASDAQ. Comparison to any index is for illustrative purposes only and the volatility of the benchmark may be materially different from the volatility of the strategies due to varying degrees of diversification and/or other factors. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs, or expenses. Indices are unmanaged. You cannot invest directly in an index. Convergence Investment Partners, LLC 1245 Cheyenne Ave. Suite 12, Grafton, WI 5324 Page 1