Pay-for-Performance Pilot Conceptual Framework

Similar documents
FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY

NJCEP Financing Program. TRC Pilot Proposal for a Multi-family Financing Program

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

DOCKET NO. 13A-0773EG DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS OF LEE E. GABLER

Financing Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Projects

Executive Director s Summary Report

The Road to Residential On-Bill Repayment

(b) There are no additional key aspects of program performance goals. (c) There are no updates to the forecast of net energy and demand impacts.

Executive Director s Summary Report

DEC CDM Innovation for Success Themes and Outcomes

Executive Director s Summary Report

On-Bill Repayment: Expanding the Reach of Energy Efficiency. Presented by: Vincent Wynne May 21, 2018

(b) There are no additional key aspects of program performance goals. (c) There are no updates to the forecast of net energy and demand impacts.

Proposal Concerning Modifications to LIPA s Tariff for Electric Service

Final Version October 19, ENERGY EFFICIENCY PLAN TERM SHEET

California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority (CAEATFA) Sales and Use Tax Exclusion Program

Commonwealth Edison Company Energy Efficiency and Demand Response Plan Settlement Stipulation

RENOVATE AMERICA GREEN BOND

Request for Comments Proposed NJCEP FY19 True-Up Budget and Budget Revisions

Presentation to Government Finance Officer Association

Proposition 39 is a Catalyst:

SUBSTANTIVE RULES APPLICABLE TO ELECTRIC SERVICE PROVIDERS. ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CUSTOMER-OWNED RESOURCES.

STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

MASSACHUSETTS CROSS-CUTTING BEHAVIORAL PROGRAM EVALUATION INTEGRATED REPORT JUNE 2013

Jenine Windeshausen Placer County Treasurer Tax Collector California Municipal Treasurer s Association Inn at Squaw Creek April 14, 2016

Options for Raising Capital (and Leveraging Public Funds) for Residential Energy Loan Programs 1 1/25/2011 UNC Environmental Finance Center

Procurement models for District Energy System Projects

Commercial PACE: Program Development & Implementation

INNOVATE project. WP2, D.2.2 Local Development Plan Linnaeus University

USA Palm Desert Energy Independence Program

EEAC EM&V Briefing. Ralph Prahl EEAC Consultant EM&V Team Leader July 9th, 2013

SOCALGAS ENERGY EFFICIENCY SOLICITATIONS WEBINAR

Executive Director s Summary Report

A Canadian Loan Fund for Residential Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

MASSACHUSETTS CROSS-CUTTING BEHAVIORAL PROGRAM EVALUATION

How Do We Pay For It? Special Financing Mechanisms for Energy Management Projects

REVIEWING THE SUSTAINABLE FINANCE LANDSCAPE INSIGHT BRIEF October 2015

Quarterly Performance Report For the period January March 2018

16 th Revision of Sheet No. 83 Canceling 15 th Revision of Sheet No. 83, 7 th Revision WN U-60 of Sheet No. 255 and 2 nd Revision of Sheet No.

Community-Solar Utility Programs

PUTTING YOUR MONEY WHERE YOUR METER IS A STUDY OF PAY FOR PERFORMANCE ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS IN THE UNITED STATES

Evolution of Residential Loan Programs: Building Markets by Reducing Risk & Fostering Collaboration

ARTICLE 24. SECTION 1. Sections and of the General Laws in Chapter 24-18

Evaluation and Research Plan

ENERGY DIVISION Resolution E-4663 June 26, 2014 RESOLUTION

Energy Web Foundation blockchain and digital security in energy. OECD workshop, 15 February 2018

Scaling-up energy efficiency investment in buildings. Part of the Investor Confidence Project Europe Presentation for UK stakeholders 17 June, 2015

Illinois Adjustable Block Program PV System Purchase Disclosure Form

Executive Director s Summary Report

Growing Nevada s Clean Energy Markets Quickly with Green Bank Financing

MASS SOLAR LOAN FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Illinois Grid Mod by Formula Rate & Next Grid

(b) There are no additional key aspects of program performance goals. (c) There are no updates to the forecast of net energy and demand impacts.

(b) There are no additional key aspects of program performance goals. (c) There are no updates to the forecast of net energy and demand impacts.

(b) There are no additional key aspects of program performance goals. (c) There are no updates to the forecast of net energy and demand impacts.

E-1 HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE AZUSA UTILITY BOARD GEORGE F. MORROW, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES

Cost effective the present value of the energy saved is more than the cost of the energy package (including maintenance) The maximum mortgage amount

Executive Director s Summary Report

(b) There are no additional key aspects of program performance goals. (c) There are no updates to the forecast of net energy and demand impacts.

2016 Statewide Retrocommissioning Policy & Procedures Manual

Evolution of Residential Loan Programs: Building Markets by Reducing Risk & Fostering Collaboration

Executive Director s Summary Report

Energy Efficiency Feed-in-Tariff: Key Policy & Design Considerations

SUMMARY OF MAIN TASKS COVERED IN EACH SECTION OF THE REPORT

PSE&G Solar Loan III Program General Q&A

Executive Director s Summary Report

Demand-Side Management Annual Status Report Electric and Natural Gas Public Service Company of Colorado

CFC s Financial Webinar Series. How to Submit Your Question. The Rise of Prepaid Metering. Financial Webinar Series. Financial Webinar Series

CASE 17-M-0178 Draft Discussion Document, November 2017 Session, Publicly Released November 15, 2017 STATE OF NEW YORK PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

NASEO On-Bill Financing Programs. Andrea Schroer / State Energy Program Manager February 2, 2012

Unleashing the Full Potential of the DU

On-Bill Financing. For Business Customers and Trade Professionals. (V1.4) Utility Administrator

(b) There are no additional key aspects of program performance goals. (c) There are no updates to the forecast of net energy and demand impacts.

Making the most of GRESB Real Estate

Third-Party Administrators for Energy Efficiency: Funding & Contract Design Considerations

There were no additional key aspects of program performance goals. There were no updates to the forecast of net energy and demand impacts.

Technical Summary of Proposals Regarding Net Metering in New York

Lessons Learned: Construction Bidding & Procurement Item D.1

BPPA s Zero Energy Now Program

Province-Wide Whole Home Pilot Program Design: IESO response to input received

Financing Energy Efficiency: Overview and Lessons

ONTARIO S GREEN BUTTON CONNECT MY DATA PILOT PROGRAM FINAL EVALUATION REPORT

Best Practices in Energy Performance Contracting for State Agencies

Energy Efficiency Fund: A Model for Financing Energy Efficiency Improvements

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation d/b/a National Grid Residential Building Practices and Demonstration Program: Impact Evaluation Summary

Province-Wide Pay-For-Performance (P4P) Draft Program Documents Webinar: IESO response to input received

How Do We Pay For It? Special Financing Mechanisms for Energy Management Projects

Distributed PV and Third-Party Financing 101 for Utilities August 8, 2013

IMPACT AND PROCESS EVALUATION OF AMEREN ILLINOIS COMPANY BEHAVIORAL MODIFICATION PROGRAM (PY5) FINAL OPINION DYNAMICS. Prepared for: Prepared by:

For personal use only

RESIDENTIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY FINANCING MARKET TRENDS. Presented: 5/23/2016

PACE: A World Changing Green Financing Tool Oct 10, 2018

Procurement Functional Leadership Quarterly Report, January to March 2014

Where Do We Go From Here

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

On-Bill Financing: Exploring the Energy Efficiency Opportunities and Diversity of Approaches

Exhibit DAS-1. Tucson Electric Power Company Demand-Side Management Program Portfolio Plan

The Transformation of Commercial &Industrial Energy Efficiency Programs: A Whole-Building Approach to Energy Savings

These regulations are issued pursuant to the following Sections of the Municipal Code of Chicago:

BEFORE THE MARYLAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION CASE NO IN THE MATTER OF BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY

Transcription:

Pay-for-Performance Pilot Conceptual Framework Home Performance Conference February 14, 2018

What is Pay-for-Performance (P4P)? 2 Simple Idea: Pay for ACTUAL energy savings

What is Pay-for-Performance (P4P)? 3 How? Conceptual pilot approach: Work with P4P Aggregators key NYSERDA partners on small commercial and residential customer projects Advanced M&V methods applied to calculate savings from meter data and take advantage of advanced metering infrastructure Track savings and provide financial incentives over time 5 years for demonstrated energy savings, rather than payment at project completion Focus on portfolio performance to manage risk and to overcome performance volatility at the individual project level The ultimate objective of the P4P Program is to establish a scalable model for residential energy efficiency by incentivizing market actors (Aggregators) to deliver energy savings through a variety of effective retrofits that are attractive to eligible residential customers.

What is Advanced Measurement & Verification (M&V)? 4 Also known as M&V 2.0 Two keys features: 1. Automated analytics that can provide ongoing, near-real time savings estimates 2. Increased data granularity in terms of frequency, volume, or enduse detail Another key term: Advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) systems May offer opportunities to lower M&V costs through automated calculation of savings

What is NYSERDA trying to learn? 5 Does the program structure result in greater energy savings? Deeper retrofits? Does customer participation increase? Does customer satisfaction increase? Do customer bill savings increase? What is the persistence of the energy savings from installed projects over time? Does project performance data and standardized measurement allow aggregators to predict savings for their portfolios and more accurately assess business model risk? Can AMI data be leveraged with this model to deliver energy savings that address grid needs?

Questions for the Audience 6 Before today Had you heard of the Pay-for-Performance? Had you heard of advanced M&V? Has anyone had experience with P4P or advanced M&V prior to today? What were your experiences?

Who will be involved? 7 Utilities Contractors Distributor s/vendors Aggregators Customers Financers and Insurers

Customers 8 Conceptual Requirements: Single-family residential Located in one of the defined pilot territories Willing to release utility data to NYSERDA and aggregators One year of electric and gas account history At least two years of oil delivery records if using fuel oil Cannot have multiple meters at one house Solar panels need to have been installed at least one year prior NOTE: Participating customers will not be able to receive utility residential energy efficiency rebates

Aggregators 9 Who are they? Key partners with NYSERDA in this program Will be qualified via an RFQ process, and subsequently selected through an RFP process Can be program administrators or implementers, contractors, distributors, vendors, etc. Have a demonstrated track record of implementing residential projects that have energy efficiency benefits Strong financial standing What will they do? Develop offerings/packages for customers that meet their energy needs Work closely with contractors and vendors/distributors to implement customer projects Mutually beneficial partnerships Direct incentives received from NYSERDA to customers and contractors as per agreements and Aggregator defined business models

Contractors 10 Primary installers of projects and energy efficiency measures Provide market feedback on customer reactions to offers Collect and electronically submit project and customer data using standardized forms Relationship with Aggregators Aggregators and Contractors will determine their own working agreements Contractors will be paid by aggregators Contractors will be bound by the terms of Aggregator contracts

Other Stakeholders 11 Distributors and Vendors Providers of equipment and materials installed Financers and Insurers Provide upfront capital for project implementation and underwrite portfolio performance Utility Partners Work with NYSERDA to develop and launch P4P pilots

Program Administration 12 RFQ Those interested invited to seek qualification as Aggregators RFP Qualified Aggregators submit proposals o Estimated savings, market intervention plan, and bid price Projects Selected Aggregators work with contractors to install projects 2-year window to install Data Customers release utility data to Aggregator and NYSERDA Aggregators provide project data Advanced M&V NYSERDA compares pre-and postintervention models Models are weather normalized, and total savings are calculated Payment Aggregators paid based on total calculated savings for 5 years Can re-intervene during payment period to improve performance and install other measures

Questions for the Audience 13 Do you have questions do regarding roles? Do you have questions regarding customer eligibility? What questions do you have regarding process/program administration?

Why Pay-for-Performance? Goal P4P approach GHG reductions Paying for realized energy savings improves achievement per dollar spent towards state GHG reduction goals Scalable energy efficiency model with measurable savings Simplified administration that does not impede the sales cycle Utilize electronic data collection and advanced M&V to simplify program administration, creating a consistent and streamlined approach Standardize the measurement of energy efficiency to facilitate procurement similar to other distributed energy resources (DERs) 14 Increase customer participation, satisfaction and bill savings Mobilize private investment Aggregator designed offers/packages that are responsive to market conditions Aggregators and contractors can re-intervene with participating customers to achieve or inspire greater savings Encourages long term relationships with customers, repeat business Customer bill savings = future cash flows Working with the Green Bank and other financing entities Additional data to demonstrate that energy efficiency savings are predictable and stable at the portfolio level

P4P v. Existing Programs Key Elements Existing Programs P4P Opportunities Compensation Allowable measures Paid a percentage of project cost or fixed rate for specific measures Only permitted energy efficiency measures eligible for funding Contracted value for delivered energy savings Measure agnostic and fuel neutral approach, packages designed for impact & uptake Timing of payments One-time payment Paid over five years based on realized savings Measurement of energy savings Not required for payment Savings are calculated using weathernormalized meter data Entity receiving the incentive Homeowner and contractor separately Contracted aggregator Portfolio performance Not considered when making incentive payments Aggregator performance will be assessed at the portfolio level Program administrator Separate NYSERDA and utility programs Jointly administered NYSERDA and utility programs 15

P4P Relationship to Existing Programs 16 Existing programs will continue to operate during the pilot period, but Participating customers in P4P will not be able to receive utility residential energy efficiency rebates Contractors working with participating customers will not be able to receive Home Performance with ENERGY STAR incentives Aggregators designed offerings/packages could include: Free/reduced-cost audits Loans through NYSERDA s programs

Aggregator Designed Options 17 EE Offerings Aggregators will be free to select the measures included in customer offerings: Standard retrofits Smart devices and controls Behavioral initiatives

Aggregator Designed Options 18 Business Models Based on estimated payments and cashflows, Aggregators can determine customer and contractor financial arrangements Flat rates Upfront discounts Performance contracts Low-interest financing

19 Questions for the Audience What elements of the P4P model do you prefer over existing programs? What elements of existing programs do you prefer over the P4P model? What packages of EE measures could work under this P4P model? Where do you see potential for your company in P4P?

20 Pilot Approach NYSERDA intends to issue multiple pilots over the next several years Pilots are intended to test different approaches and use cases and learn what method(s) are most effective Pilots will likely be geographically targeted with utility partners

21 P4P elsewhere The concept of P4P is not new some energy efficiency programs have paid for energy savings for many years What is new is the concept of leveraging advanced M&V to implement P4P with mass market customers In California, PG&E is running a residential P4P Program 2-year implementation period and annual incentive payments made to Aggregators Aggregators are responsible for managing a customer portfolio consisting of numerous, single-family residential homes PG&E will pay Aggregators a set price per MMBtu (kwh conversion provided), based on weather-normalized pre-/post-energy usage analysis Aggregators work directly with contractors and residential PG&E gas and electric customers to achieve energy savings through retrofits in addition to operational and/or behavioral interventions

Why should you be interested? 22 NYSERDA is scoping a $20 million pilot for residential P4P Pay-for-Performance allows you to design and sell projects that address the needs of your customers Measuring savings can increase accountability and increase customer confidence in results Additional cash flow stream for market actors who are confident their business model will result in customer uptake and deliver energy savings

What are the risks? Depends on the business model, offer to the customer, and modeled savings assumptions used to obtain financing 23 Not every project will save energy at the meter Need to understand what types of projects will likely result in negative savings HPwES data set with realized energy savings will be provided

Timing 24 Q2 2018 NYSERDA and utility partners seek approval from DPS Q3 2018 RFQ is released Q4 2018 RFP for qualified bidders is released Q1/2 2019 Contracts executed Implement projects

How to Prepare 25 Contact NYSERDA staff to be added to the P4P distribution list Megan Fisher megan.fisher@nyserda.ny.gov Laura Geel laura.geel@nyserda.ny.gov In the meantime 1. Consider what role you d like to play 2. Think about business models and partnerships that could be successful 3. Stay in touch with NYSERDA

26 THANK YOU! Questions & Answers