Slaying the Dragon Improving Company and Individual Returns on Investments in Actuarial Education. Mike McDougall

Similar documents
December 2008 Graduate Exit Survey FINDINGS

1. Personal Details and Academic History Compulsory

The South African Qualification

YOUTH EMPOWERMENT ORGANISATION APPLICATION FOR STUDY FUND: 2018

2017 Gender pay gap report

Commission District 4 Census Data Aggregation

Northwest Census Data Aggregation

Riverview Census Data Aggregation

Zipe Code Census Data Aggregation

Zipe Code Census Data Aggregation

TOTAL READERSHIP: 1,635,000 CIRCULATION: 149,608 RACE GENDER AGE 41% 59% S E M HOUSEHOLD INCOME R14,882 69%

METROPOLITAN POLICE SERVICE: ETHNICITY PAY GAP ANALYSIS 2018

Discussion of financial metrics for simple model points - IFRS Phase 2

Quarterly Labour Force Survey Q1:2018

1. Personal Details and Academic History Compulsory

Blackstone Falls Application for Subsidized Housing

The Needs of Employers - Actuarial Degrees - about right or are there gaps?

Labour. Labour market dynamics in South Africa, statistics STATS SA STATISTICS SOUTH AFRICA

2018:IIIQ Nevada Unemployment Rate Demographics Report*

MAKE A MEANINGFUL DIFFERENCE BECOME AN ACTUARY

Romero Catholic Academy Gender Pay Reporting Findings

Washington, DC. HFA Performance Data Reporting- Borrower Characteristics

The Affordable Care Act Has Led To Significant Gains In Health Insurance Coverage And Access To Care For Young Adults

Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018

Benefits India. Welcome to the Twelfth edition of Benefits India, the first in the new Indian fiscal year.

Maritime Community Development Fund

Who cares about regional data?

METROPOLITAN POLICE SERVICE: ETHNICITY PAY GAP ANALYSIS Executive Summary

2018 BURSARY APPLICATION

Homebuyer Application

Workforce Equality profile

Maryland Petroleum Council January 2017

Income and Non-Income Inequality in Post- Apartheid South Africa: What are the Drivers and Possible Policy Interventions?

City of Modesto Homeowner Rehabilitation Program

City of Modesto Homebuyer Assistance Program

Make it Fair in Sudbury! Regional Perspective Who would improvements to employment laws directly affect?

Young People in South Africa

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean. Population Entire MSA

2015 Salary Survey. Survey developed in cooperation with: Media partner: Copyright 2015 Institute of Packaging Professionals

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

Amended B BBEE Codes What you need to know!

Masterclass on Portfolio Construction and Optimisation

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

The certificate programme in managing social security and pensions

Demographic, Labor Market and Economic Trends in Oregon: Labor Supply and Workforce Development Implications Population

When comparing this study s results with the HMDA data to the results found in the previous 2001 report, small changes have been found.

Trend Analysis of Changes to Population and Income in Philadelphia, using American Community Survey (ACS) Data

Gender Pay Gap Report. April

Gender Pay Gap Report 2017

2018 APPLICATION FORM PLEASE READ THE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION FORM CORRECTLY PAYMENT PLAN

Monitoring the Performance of the South African Labour Market

Public Issues Survey Wave 6 PAGE 1

REGISTRAR S DIVISION EMPLOYMENT EQUITY PLAN AND REPORT

Wage Progression in the UK

What has happened to inequality and poverty in post-apartheid South Africa. Dr Max Price Vice Chancellor University of Cape Town

Homebuyer Application

CONSTRUCTION MONITOR Employment Q3 2017

The Case 0f Sri Lanka

2017 Financial Need Bursary Application Form

What America Is Thinking On Energy Issues February 2016

What America Is Thinking About Energy Issues February 2016 Presented by: Harris Poll

South African Baseline Study on Financial Literacy

Unemployment Rates - May 2011

Equality Information. The British Library Workforce Statistics. Introduction

2017 Gender Pay. 4 April 2018

WE RE PROUD TO SAY THAT ESTABLISHING SASRIA WAS A STRUGGLE

COMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION

The Bayt.com Middle and North Africa Salary Survey May 2014

Gender Pay Gap Report. 2016/17 Report

KENTUCKY BOARD of EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES

Transcription:

Slaying the Dragon Improving Company and Individual Returns on Investments in Actuarial Education Mike McDougall

01 Presentation agenda 1. The business case 2. Performance summary 3. Performance analysis 1. Uncontrollable 2. Previously controllable 3. Controllable 4. Cost and benefits 5. Return PG 1

02 The Business Case Excellent low risk investment for able students Benefits Low unemployment risk High financial returns High job satisfaction and range reward Costs Direct costs of education Time and opportunity costs Risks Failure Sub optimal performance Opportunity cost PG 2

03 Performance summary The preparation 800 enter university actuarial programmes 400 join ASSA The quest 1 300 exemptions granted per year 3 000 exam attempts per year 1 250 exam passes per year (41%) The victory 80 new Fellow members per year PG 3

04 Performance summary Subjects Attempts Passes % A1 1 152 606 53% A2 6 191 3 059 49% A301 1 680 534 32% A302 1 722 657 38% F1 2 892 874 30% F2 1 674 467 28% Total 15 311 6 197 41% Pass rates do not include exemptions Only students registered through ASSA included in F1 results PG 4

05 Performance analysis Uncontrollable factors Gender Race Previously controllable factors University SAADP Exemptions Controllable factors Region Session Employer Interventions PG 5

06 Uncontrollable factor - Gender Female Male Exemptions 4.2 4.4 Attempts 5 029 10 280 Index +4-2 Female students outperform male Not significant except at A301 level Persistence or obstinance? PG 6

07 Uncontrollable factor - Race Black Coloured Indian White Other Exemptions 3.3 4.0 4.7 4.9 4.6 Attempts 5 549 430 2 554 6 205 573 Index -25 +10 +6 +22-3 Race is a significant factor in exam performance Significant difference in number of exemptions Correlation not causation PG 7

08 Previously controllable factor - University Alpha Bravo Charlie Delta Echo Foxtrot Other Exemptions 5.1 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.6 3.9 3.5 Attempts 2 475 3 796 3 476 1 278 726 755 2 805 Index +17-1 -7 +36-17 -4-13 Marked performance differences between universities Not significant when allowing for uncontrollable factors Alpha best performer when allowing for uncontrollable factors Different performance hubs PG 8

09 Previously controllable factor - SAADP SAADP Comparable Exemptions 4.5 3.8 Attempts 1 053 7 480 Index -5-16 South African Actuaries Development Programme SAADP perform well in subjects covered at universities SAADP underperform at F2 level Support vs selection PG 9

10 Previously controllable factor - Exemptions 0 1-2 3-5 6-8 9-10 11+ Students 600 300 695 720 232 96 Attempts 2 878 1 925 4 124 4 118 1 001 310 Index -4-12 +2 +8 +14 +43 Students with more exemptions perform better Zero exemption group PG 10

11 Controllable factor - Region Gauteng Western Cape Other Attempts 10 510 4 130 671 Index -5 +15-6 Western Cape out performs Gauteng at all subject levels Difference most marked at A2 level Significant at A2 even after allowance for uncontrollable and previously controllable PG 11

12 Controllable factor - Session Session 1 Session 2 Attempts 7 612 7 699 Index +1-1 In aggregate no marked difference A301 significantly better in 1 st session F1 significantly better in 2 nd session PG 12

13 Controllable factor Employer (1) Audit Bank Consult L/T insure Reinsure S/T insure Exemptions 5.4 3.9 4.1 4.3 4.3 4.6 Attempts 1 350 2 029 1 365 5 530 611 351 Index +27-6 -14 +0-6 +12 Marked differences in performance across sectors Marked differences in student university performance (exemptions) PG 13

14 Controllable factor Employer (2) A B C D E F G M Self Un Exempt 4.7 4.9 4.7 4.0 4.2 5.7 4.9 6.3 6.0 3.0 Attempts 1 159 1 229 1 025 863 975 666 702 160 72 778 Index +7 +8-30 -6 +2 +38 +21 +52-11 +10 Marked and consistent difference between employers Some differences statistically significant Self employed amongst the brightest but underperform in exams Unemployed perform at A1 and A2 levels Need to assess against uncontrollable & previously controllable factors PG 14

15 Controllable factor Employer (3) A B C D E F G M Self Un Index +7 +8-30 -6 +2 +38 +21 +52-11 +10 Attributed +6 +1-6 +6 +6 +18 +5 +15 +20 +3 Balance +1 +7-24 -12-4 +20 +16 +37-31 +7 Attribute determined by uncontrollable and previously controllable factors Marked differences Possible factors: Study benefits Success culture Breadth of experience and exposure PG 15

16 Controllable factor Employer (4) Study benefits Time Financial Acknowledging success Financial Promotion Recognition Culture Failure not an option Students are expected to pass every exam they sit An honourable failure is acceptable Passing an exam is an exceptional achievement PG 16

17 Controllable factor Education Interventions A301 A302 F1 F2 Counselling +87 +41 +31 +59 Courses & mock exams No intervention Only 2016-17 exam sessions included +22 +20 +7-7 -1-17 Counselling follows prior failure Possible selection effect Small numbers but clear performance impact PG 17

18 Performance analysis - Factors summary Impact Comment Uncontrollable factors Gender Minor Most significant at A301 Race Significant White students outperform Black Previously controllable factors University Clear differences Differs by subject range SAADP Significant Strong performance in A subjects Exemptions Marked More exemptions better performance Controllable factors Location Marked Significant at A2 level Session Not overall A301 & F1 have clear differences Employer Marked Some consistent variances Intervention Marked Small numbers but clear difference PG 18

19 Costs and Benefits : Costs R 000 All exemptions No exemption star Average student Direct costs 89 137 186 Time cost to employer 216 902 1 090 Time cost to student 81 391 886 Total cost 386 1 430 2 162 Average student as summarised in section 6.1 of paper Time cost to employer median study leave as per Table 16 in paper @ 3x salary 100% study leave for 1 st attempt, 50% for 2 nd then zero Student time cost different between recommended hours and study leave @ 1x salary PG 19

20 Costs & Benefits : Benefits to Student PV of earnings over 40 year career PV (R m) Premium Base (actuarial graduate no exemptions) 8.6-15 years to TASSA 12.8 4.2 15 years to AMASSA 17.4 8.8 15 years to FASSA 22.8 14.2 10 years to FASSA 27.0 18.4 7 years to FASSA 30.3 21.7 3 years to FASSA 34.0 25.4 TASSA Technical member of ASSA; pass all A1 & A2 subjects AMASSA Associate member of ASSA; TASSA plus A3 subjects FASSA Fellow member of ASSA; AMASSA plus F1 & F2 subjects Calculations include salary but no bonus, 13 th cheque or other earnings PG 20

21 Costs & Benefits : Benefits to Employer Value components Increased billable hours Increased billable rate / value of work Considerations Continued tenure One year flow vs present value 1 year consulting value R 000 Successful senior student Newly qualified Change Hourly rate 860 1 160 15% Net billable hours 996 1 238 24% Net revenue 341 740 124% PG 21

22 Optimising return on investment Key drivers of return Exam pass rate Revenue enhancement on pass Key investment components Direct cost of exams Opportunity cost of time Cost of additional support Assumptions Causal link between interventions and performance Benefit only realised in the next session no carry over PG 11

23 Optimising return on investment value to student F2 exam (Values R 000) 1 st attempt 2 nd attempt 3 rd attempt No interventions 1 031 976 822 Online tuition (R5 100) 1 887 1 890 1 655 Counselling (R2 830) 1 780 1 557 Measure of incremental increase in value of life time earnings Significant increase in value for small outlay PG 23

24 Optimising return on investment value to employer F2 exam (Values R 000) 1 st attempt 2 nd attempt 3 rd attempt No interventions 223 223 202 Online tuition (R5 100) 398 409 370 Counselling (R2 830) 388 351 Measures incremental value of 2 years net consulting revenue Cost of study leave and opportunity cost of unpaid leave exceeds cost of intervention PG 24

25 In conclusion Exam performance Differences by race University and SAADP have impact Controllable factors impacting performance Region Employer Interventions Return on investment Opportunity and indirect costs Revenue enhancement Optimised through boosting pass rate PG 25

26 Thank you & comments PG 26