as of July 1, 2006 Copyright October 2006 THE SEGAL GROUP, INC., THE PARENT OF THE SEGAL COMPANY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Actuarial Valuation Report

Similar documents
University of California Retirement Plan. Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, Copyright October 2005

ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPOR

University of California Retirement Plan

The Water and Power Employees' Retirement Plan of the City of Los Angeles Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2014

The Water and Power Employees' Retirement Plan of the City of Los Angeles Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2012

The Water and Power Employees' Retirement Plan of the City of Los Angeles Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2017

Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2005

The Water and Power Employees' Retirement Plan of the City of Los Angeles Insured Lives Death Benefit Fund

Actuarial Valuation and Review as of June 30, 2009

AGENDA EBMUD EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM January 17, 2013 Training Resource Center (TRC1) 8:30 a.m.

The Water and Power Employees' Retirement Plan of the City of Los Angeles Insured Lives Death Benefit Fund for Noncontributing Members

Fresno County Employees Retirement Association

Actuarial Valuation and Review as of June 30, 2009

Imperial County Employees Retirement System

San Bernardino County Employees Retirement Association

Orange County Employees Retirement System

Ventura County Employees Retirement Association

The Water and Power Employees Retirement Plan of the City of Los Angeles

City of Los Angeles Fire and Police Pension Plan

Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2004

Actuarial Valuation and Review as of December 31, 2010

Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2002

Copyright 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

The Water and Power Employees Retirement, Disability and Death Benefit Insurance Plan

The Water and Power Employees Retirement, Disability and Death Benefit Insurance Plan

Fire and Police Pension Fund, San Antonio Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2017

Employees' Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth Revised Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2014

The next regular meeting of the Retirement Board will be held at 8:30 a.m. on Thursday, March 15, 2018.

Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota. Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, Copyright 2004

Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund. Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, Copyright 2004

Fire and Police Pension Fund, San Antonio

Kern County Employees Retirement Association

Orange County Employees Retirement System

The Water and Power Employees Retirement, Disability and Death Benefit Insurance Plan

Orange County Employees Retirement System

August 13, Segal Consulting, a Member of The Segal Group, Inc. By: JB/hy

Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund. Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, Copyright 2007

Sacramento County Employees Retirement System (SCERS)

100 Montgomery Street Suite 500 San Francisco, CA T

Minnesota State Retiement System Legislators Retirement Fund. Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2006

Special Study to Provide Adopted Retirement Benefits for County General Tier 4 and County Safety Tier 4 Employees. Copyright 2012

DISCUSSION ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

City of Orlando Police Officers' Pension Fund

100 Montgomery Street, Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94104

AGENDA BOARD OF FIRE AND POLICE PENSION COMMISSIONERS. December 1, :30 a.m.

Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Employees Retirement System

Proposed New Tier of Benefit for New Entrants Based on Union Proposal (Pension Plan and Retiree Medical Plan) Copyright 2011

CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE

City of Jacksonville General Employees Retirement Plan

City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power

Proposed New Tiers of Benefit for New Entrants Based on Proposals from the City (Pension Plan and Retiree Medical Plan) Copyright 2011

Alameda County Employees Retirement Association

City of Holyoke Retirement System Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2016

Proposed New Tier of Benefit for New Entrants Based on Union Proposal (Pension Plan and Retiree Medical Plan) Copyright 2011

Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2010

Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands

FRESNO COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION

Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund. Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, Copyright 2009

City of Jacksonville General Employees Retirement Plan Actuarial Valuation and Review as of October 1, 2016

Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2012

Automotive Industries Pension Plan

Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern California

Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund

CITY OF SAN JOSE FEDERATED CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM POSTEMPLOYMENT HEALTHCARE PLAN. Audit of June 30, 2016 OPEB Actuarial Valuation

Proposed New Tiers of Benefit for New Entrants (Pension Plan and Retiree Medical Plan) Copyright 2010

International Union of Operating Engineers Local 487 Pension Trust Fund Actuarial Valuation and Review as of April 1, 2014

SEIU Affiliates Officers and Employees Pension Plan

Alameda County Employees Retirement Association

ORANGE COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM MEMORANDUM. DATE: June 3, Audit Oversight Committee Members

Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund

Discussion of Valuation Results

As requested, we are providing the following information regarding the December 31, 2015 valuation.

TO MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMITTEE: DISCUSSION ITEM

Acton-Boxborough Regional School District and Town of Acton

AGENDA BOARD OF FIRE AND POLICE PENSION COMMISSIONERS. September 3, :30 a.m.

Town of Medway. Copyright 2012 THE SEGAL GROUP, INC., THE PARENT OF THE SEGAL COMPANY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2017

Wyoming Law Enforcement Retirement Fund Actuarial Valuation Report for the Year Beginning January 1, 2018

WYOMING STATE HIGHWAY P A T R O L, G A M E & F I S H WARDEN AND CRIMINAL I N V E S T I G A T O R R E T I R E M ENT FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2016

State of Wyoming Retirement System Actuarial Valuation Report for the Year Beginning January 1, 2018

Teachers Retirement System of the State of Illinois

Local 25 S.E.I.U. and Participating Employers Pension Plan Actuarial Certification of Plan Status as of October 1, 2014 under IRC Section 432

Review of October 1, 2017 Actuarial Valuation Results

Monroe County Employees Retirement System

WYOMING JUDICIAL RETI R E M E N T S Y S T E M ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R T FOR T H E Y E A R B E G I N N I N G J A N U A R Y 1,

D R A F T. Palm Tran, Inc. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1577 Pension Plan. Actuarial Valuation as of January 1, 2018

Impact of DC Choice Plan on UCRP s Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability and Normal Cost

ACTUARIAL SECTION (UNAUDITED)

CITY OF BARTLETT, TENNESSEE RETIREMENT PLAN. Results of Actuarial Valuation As of June 30, 2016

ORANGE COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM. Review of Economic Actuarial Assumptions for the December 31, 2012 Actuarial Valuation

November Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota General Employees Retirement Plan St. Paul, Minnesota

A Presentation of UCOP Unclassified

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A G E N E R A L E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T P L

MEMORANDUM. Current Plan (For eligible retirees hired prior to 1/1/2009 and retired prior to 7/1/2016)

Massachusetts Water Resources Authority

The Water and Power Employees Retirement Plan of the City of Los Angeles ACTUARIAL EXPERIENCE STUDY

March 24, Board of Trustees Houston Municipal Employees Pension System 1201 Louisiana Suite 900 Houston, TX 77002

Wyoming Volunteer Firefighter and Emergency Medical Technician Pension Fund Actuarial Valuation Report for the Year Beginning January 1, 2018

Transcription:

Benefits, Compensation and HR Consulting University of California Retirement Plan Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2006 Copyright October 2006 THE SEGAL GROUP, INC., THE PARENT OF THE SEGAL COMPANY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

The Segal Company 120 Montgomery Street, Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94104 T 415.263.8200 F 415.263.8290 www.segalco.com October 16, 2006 Ms. Judith W. Boyette Associate Vice President, Human Resources and Benefits University of California 1111 Franklin Street, 7 th Floor Oakland, California 94607-5200 Dear Associate Vice President Boyette: We are pleased to submit this Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2006 for the University of California Retirement Plan ( UCRP or Plan ). It summarizes the actuarial data used in the valuation, recommends contribution rates for the 2006-2007 Plan Year and analyzes the preceding year s experience. The census and financial information on which our calculations were based was provided by the UC HR/Benefits Staff. That assistance is gratefully acknowledged. The actuarial calculations were completed under the supervision of John Monroe, ASA, MAAA, Enrolled Actuary. This actuarial valuation has been completed in accordance with generally accepted actuarial principles and practices. To the best of our knowledge, the information supplied in this actuarial valuation is complete and accurate. Further, in our opinion the assumptions as approved by the Regents are reasonably related to the experience of and future expectations for the Plan. We look forward to reviewing this report at the November 2006 Regents meeting and to answering any questions. Sincerely, THE SEGAL COMPANY By: Paul Angelo, FSA, EA, MAAA John Monroe, ASA, EA, MAAA Senior Vice President and Actuary Associate Actuary JZM/gxk

SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3 SECTION 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VALUATION RESULTS SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REPORTING INFORMATION Purpose... i Significant Issues in Valuation Year... i Summary of Key Valuation Results... iv Five-Year History of Recommended Contributions and Funded Status... v A. Member Data... 1 B. Financial Information... 4 C. Actuarial Experience... 6 D. Recommended Contribution. 10 E. Information Required by the GASB... 12 EXHIBIT A Table of Plan Coverage...13 EXHIBIT B Members in Active Service and Average Compensation as of July 1, 2006...15 EXHIBIT C Reconciliation of Member Data...19 EXHIBIT D Summary Statement of Income and Expenses...20 EXHIBIT E Summary Statement of Assets...21 EXHIBIT F Development of Unfunded/(Overfunded) Actuarial Accrued Liability ($ in 000s)...22 EXHIBIT G Actuarial Liabilities...23 EXHIBIT H Full Funding Limitations...24 EXHIBIT I Section 415 Limitations...25 EXHIBIT J Definitions of Pension Terms...26 EXHIBIT I Supplementary Information Required by GAS 25 Schedule of Employer Contributions... 28 EXHIBIT II Supplementary Information Required by GAS 25 Schedule of Funding Progress ($ in 000s)... 29 EXHIBIT III Supplementary Information Required by GAS 25 and 27... 30 EXHIBIT IV Actuarial Assumptions and Methods... 31 EXHIBIT V Summary of Plan Provisions... 40

Executive Summary of the Valuation for the University of California Retirement Plan

Purpose This report has been prepared by The Segal Company to present a valuation of the University of California Retirement Plan ( UCRP or Plan ) as of July 1, 2006. The valuation was performed to determine if the assets and contributions are sufficient to provide the prescribed benefits. The contribution requirements presented in this report are based on: The benefit provisions of the Plan, The characteristics of covered active members, terminated vested members, retired members, disabled members and beneficiaries as of July 1, 2006, The assets of the Plan as of June 30, 2006, Economic assumptions regarding future salary increases and investment earnings; and Other actuarial assumptions, regarding member terminations, retirement, death, etc. Significant Issues in Valuation Year LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY TRANSFER OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES The University of California contract to manage the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) expired on May 31, 2006. The Department of Energy (DOE) executed a new management and operations contract effective June 1, 2006 with Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS). Under the terms of the LANS contract, LANS will sponsor a defined benefit pension plan that is substantially equivalent to the provisions of the UCRP. Assets and liabilities will be transferred from UCRP to the LANS defined benefit plan for the LANL employees who elected to transfer to the new plan, provided the necessary and advisable rulings on the plans and proposed transactions are obtained from the appropriate regulatory agencies. There are 6,532 active members who elected to transfer to the LANS defined benefit plan. Their actuarial accrued liability as of July 1, 2006 is approximately $1.4 billion, excluding the liability for their CAP benefits that will be retained by UCRP. This liability is reflected in our valuation results and included with the UCRP active member liabilities. This liability is based on the current UCRP actuarial assumptions, methods and plan provisions. The liability for these members as determined for the LANS defined benefit plan will almost certainly be different, as it will be based on the LANS benefit provisions and the actuarial assumptions and methods used by the LANS actuary. i

Significant Issues in Valuation Year (continued) The LANL transfer elections reflected in this valuation are based on the transfer election data provided by the University as of August 24, 2006. We anticipate minor changes to the election file information, but we do not believe these changes will have a material impact on the valuation results. The amount of assets to be retained in the UCRP for LANL members who have retired or are inactive, and the amount of the assets that may be transferred to the LANS defined benefit plan for the transitioning employees who elected to participate in the LANS defined benefit plan, are not currently known. These amounts will depend on the assumptions used, future discussions with the DOE and appropriate regulatory approvals. For that reason, while this valuation includes results reflecting the LANL transfer elections, it does not reflect the actual transfer of assets and liabilities to the LANS defined benefit plan. This means that the results of this valuation include liabilities even for members who have elected to transfer to the LANS defined benefit plan. As noted above, we have continued to value these members as active UCRP members and their UCRP liabilities are shown as active in the results. LANL employees who elected not to transfer to the LANS defined benefit plan are included in the valuation results either as terminated vested or nonvested members, or as retired members if they have retired by July 1, 2006. ASSETS The UCRP investment portfolio consists of approximately 65% equities and 35% fixed income investments. During the 2005-2006 Plan Year, the rate of return on the market value of assets was 7.2%. Due to the recognition of prior investment losses, the rate of return on the actuarial value of assets was 5.9%, which is below the expected return of 7.5%. FUNDED RATIO The Plan s funded ratio on an actuarial basis decreased from 110% as of July 1, 2005 to 104% as of July 1, 2006. This decrease in funded ratio is a result of the investment loss on the actuarial value of assets, an actuarial loss due to salary increases being greater than expected and the fact that no contributions are being made to offset the Plan s normal cost. The Plan is still in an overfunded position as the actuarial value of assets exceeds the actuarial accrued liability by $1.7 billion. The actual average increase in salary for UCRP members that were active in both this valuation and the previous valuation was 5.9%. When compared to the average assumed increase of approximately 3.4%, this produces an actuarial loss due to salary increases greater than expected. There is one year remaining of a temporary three-year reduction in the salary increase assumption that models the effect of budgetary constraints. This temporary reduction will be phased out by the July 1, 2007 valuation. ii

Significant Issues in Valuation Year (continued) FUTURE EXPECTATIONS No contributions are recommended for the 2006-2007 Plan Year. This is due to the application of the full funding policy that The Regents adopted in 1990. See Section 2D of this report for a description of that policy. Member contributions are all currently being redirected to the UC Defined Contribution Plan. It is expected that the Plan s surplus will run out in the next few years and may run out as early as July 1, 2008. As indicated on page 4 of this valuation report, the total unrecognized investment gain as of July 1, 2006 is about $1.4 billion. This investment gain will be recognized in the determination of the actuarial value of assets for funding purposes in the next few years, and will serve to offset any investment losses that may occur after July 1, 2006. This implies that if the Plan earns the assumed rate of investment return of 7.50% per year (net of investment expenses) on a market value basis, that will result in investment gains on the actuarial value of assets in the next few years. The normal cost rate calculated in this valuation includes the second of three expected gradual increases. This is due to phasing out the temporary three-year reduction in the salary increase assumption that models the effect of current budgetary constraints. We expect that there will be another modest increase in the normal cost rate in the next valuation as the period of temporary reduction in the salary increase assumptions is completely phased out. DEMOGRAPHIC EXPERIENCE The number of active members decreased by 1.9% from 124,642 as of July 1, 2005 to 122,317 as of July 1, 2006. Total covered payroll increased by 1.3%, to a level of $8.26 billion. The Plan has 45,442 members currently receiving benefits, an increase of 9.6% from 2005. Total annual benefits in pay status increased by 18.4%, to a level of $1.3 billion. There are also 52,548 terminated members in the Plan who are entitled to future benefits. Within this group of terminated members there are 25,570 terminated vested members who are entitled to a deferred or immediate vested monthly benefit and 26,978 terminated nonvested members who are entitled to a refund of member contributions or payment of their Capital Accumulation Provision (CAP) balance. iii

Summary of Key Valuation Results Contributions for plan year beginning July 1: 2006 ($ in 000s) 2005 ($ in 000s) Recommended $ 0 $ 0 Percentage of payroll 0.00% 0.00% Funding elements for plan year beginning July 1: Normal cost (beginning of year) $ 1,305,390 $ 1,250,061 Percentage of payroll (beginning of year) 15.81% 15.34% Percentage of payroll (middle of year) 16.39% 15.90% Market value of assets $43,362,224 $41,857,500 Actuarial value of assets (AVA) 41,972,476 41,084,862 Actuarial accrued liability (AAL) 40,301,708 37,252,384 Unfunded/(Overfunded) actuarial accrued liability (1,670,768) (3,832,478) Current liability 33,267,573 30,329,325 GAS* 25/27 for plan year beginning July 1: Annual required contributions $ 0 $ 0 Actual contributions 0 0 Percentage contributed 100.00% 100.00% Funded ratio (AVA / AAL) 104.1% 110.3% Covered payroll $8,258,985 $8,149,640 Demographic data for plan year beginning July 1: Number of retired members and beneficiaries 45,442 41,477 Number of vested terminated members** 52,548 47,123 Number of active members 122,317 124,642 Average covered payroll (actual dollars) $67,521 $65,384 * Governmental Accounting Standards which requires certain reporting information for public sector plans. ** Includes terminated nonvested members due a refund of member contributions or CAP balance payment. iv

FIVE-YEAR HISTORY OF RECOMMENDED CONTRIBUTIONS AND FUNDED STATUS Beginning with the 1990 plan year, the Regents adopted a full funding policy. Under that policy, the University will suspend contributions when the smaller of the market value or the actuarial value of Plan assets exceeds the lesser of: The actuarial accrued liability (including normal cost), or 150% of the estimated current liability (including normal cost). Normal cost as a percentage of pay has remained relatively stable over the past 5 years ranging from a low of 15.04% for 2004-2005 to a high of 15.81% for 2006-2007. The Plan remains fully funded for 2006-2007 under the UCRP funding policy shown above as once again the assets exceed the actuarial accrued liability. The Plan s funded percentage (actuarial value of assets divided by actuarial accrued liability) has steadily declined over the past five years as shown below: Plan Year AAL AVA Funded Beg. 7/1 $ in Billions $ in Billions Percentage 2002 30.1 41.6 138 2003 33.0 41.4 126 2004 35.0 41.3 118 2005 37.3 41.1 110 2006 40.3 42.0 104 The actuarial accrued liability has shown a steady increase while the actuarial value of assets has remained relatively level as prior investment losses are being recognized over a five-year period and no contributions are being made. The first graph shows a five-year history of the normal cost as a percent of pay along side the recommended contributions. The second graph shows the five-year history of the funded status actuarial accrued liability versus the actuarial value of assets. Five-Year History of Normal Cost and Recommended University Contributions for Plan Years Beginning July 1 % of Covered Pay 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Normal Cost Recommended Contributions Five-Year History of Actuarial Accrued Liability and Actuarial Value of Assets for Plan Years Beginning July 1 $ in Billions 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 AAL AVA v