Beaver Dam Unified School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2016

Similar documents
76% The comprehensive solution put forward by the Community Steering Committee addresses a wide variety of needs at the high school:

School District of West De Pere Community Survey Results. Fall 2017

Sheboygan Area School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2016

Lake Mills Area School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

Freedom Area School District Community Survey Results. Fall 2018

Marathon School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

School District of Somerset Community Survey Results. Fall 2015

School District of Horicon Community Survey Results. Fall 2017

Muskego Norway Schools Community Survey Results. Fall 2015

Oakfield School District Community Survey Results. Fall 2018

Barneveld School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2017

Burlington Area School District Community Survey Results. Winter 2016

West Bend School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

Gillett School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

Tomah Area School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2015

DISTRICT HISTORY Referendum ($585,000) Purchase of 10 Acres / Football Field Original junior high building (present old section of MS)

OXNARD SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY COUNTY COUNSEL* BOND MEASURE R OXNARD SCHOOL DISTRICT TAX RATE STATEMENT BOND MEASURE R

Proposed Final Budget Presentation (May 14, 2018) SELINSGROVE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

BERKELEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Berkeley, California. MEASURE I GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS PERFORMANCE AUDIT June 30, 2013

School District of Manawa Community Survey Results. Winter

Bond Update Presentation Azusa Unified School District

INTRODUCTION. Summary of revenue/expenditures available for new construction and remodeling projects only. CERTIFICATION

CH-UH Board of Education Meeting. June 27, 2017

Ballot Measures-T Section

2017 Bond Program Summary

School District of Slinger Community Survey Report

Measure A Oxnard Union High School District

Contents. Ballot Measure Full Text Ballot Proposition Tax Rate Statement Impartial Analysis Statement in Favor of Measure...

Contents Ballot Measure... 2 Full Text Ballot Proposition... 3 Tax Rate Statement... 7 Impartial Analysis... 8 Statement in Favor of Measure...

Hayfield Community Schools Bond Referendum. Vote Monday, September 11, Our Schools Our Communities Our Future

APPENDIX A FULL TEXT OF BOND MEASURE

Bond Amount: $18,470,000. Proposed I&S Tax Rate Increase: $.3180

HUENEME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY COUNTY COUNSEL* BOND MEASURE T

Barnesville Public Schools Proposed Building Program

Total Revenues $27,158,867 $1,800,000 $2,400,000 $2,600,000 $3,600,000 $37,558,867

INTRODUCTION. Summary of revenue/expenditures available for new construction and remodeling projects only. CERTIFICATION

Understanding the Costs: Frequently Asked Questions

Public Presentation Capital Bond November 27, 2017

Progress Update Identified Needs & Capital Plan

Barnesville Public Schools Proposed Building Program

Region: Year Total Expense Total Revenue Difference ,377,200 2,377, ,795,300 24,795, Prior Years

Ballot Measures-N 7. Centralia Elementary School District, Building Strong Neighborhood Schools

Tumwater University School District Budget Myths Bond Project Update. February 2016 Mel Murray, Director of Capital Projects John Bash, Superintendent

Local ballot measure: B. Redding School District Bond Measure

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AS CONSTRUCTOR

COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS 2016 TO 2021

Action Item. Sid Albaugh, Assistant Superintendent Business Services. Consideration of Approval of 2018 Measure A - Facilities Project List

SEQUOIA UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSITION 39/MEASURE A BOND AUDIT REPORT. For the Year Ended June 30, 2016 * * *

CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT $265 MILLION BOND MEASURE July 2018

MUROC JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT KERN COUNTY NORTH EDWARDS, CALIFORNIA

(TOTAL MANASSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS PROJECTS DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS I

School Referendum Results School Amount Type of Debt Description Arrowhead UHS Failed

Page Item 174 Overview 175 Revenue 177 Expenditures 178 Elementary School Allocation 180 Middle School Allocation 181 High School Allocation 182

Capital Projects Completed since 1988

PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT LEVY

November 7, 2017 Sinking Fund Election FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

INTRODUCTION. Summary of revenue/expenditures available for new construction and remodeling projects only. CERTIFICATION

CANDIA SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNITY USE OF SCHOOL FACILITIES

SOMIS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY COUNTY COUNSEL* BOND MEASURE S SOMIS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT TAX RATE STATEMENT BOND MEASURE S

FY 2014/ /24 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM MAINTENANCE/REPLACEMENT PROJECTS DETAIL

INTRODUCTION. Summary of revenue/expenditures available for new construction and remodeling projects only. CERTIFICATION

Two Ballot Proposals. August 8, 2017

Use of State and District Construction Funds

POJOAQUE VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT October 12, 2016

Fort Wayne Community Schools. Capital Projects Planning March 15, 2011

BERKELEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Measure I Construction Oversight Committee

Frequently asked questions on the Ridgewood Public School Budget. 2. Why does the Board approve a preliminary budget?

Building and Site Sinking Fund Millage. Election Date: November 7th 2017

Richland School District

BELLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

PROPOSITION FARMINGTON SCHOOLS. April 8, 2014 Bond Issue

SPOTLIGHT FORSYTH COUNTY BOND REFERENDA. Three bonds totaling $430 million. Taxpayers should get the facts. CITY AND COUNTY GOVERNMENT #481

Construction Total. Subtotal: $ 863,540 $ 172,708 $ 124,350 $ 1,160,598 $ 232,120 $ 1,392,717

Overview of Public Schools CIP

There hasn t been a bond referendum in our district since building the original facility in 1977.

INTRODUCTION. Summary of revenue/expenditures available for new construction and remodeling projects only. CERTIFICATION

Total Revenues $8,736,837 $4,574,443 $2,066,211 $2,198,858 $2,528,962 $20,105,311

Orange Unified School District (C) Copyright March 2018 All Rights Reserved

MERIDIAN COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #15 DISTRICT OFFICE, 728 S. WALL STREET, MACON, IL TEL: (217)

Baldwinsville Central School District. Capital Project Proposal November 9, 2015 Board of Education Meeting

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

$4,701,440 $2,727,355 $2,596,419 $447,703 $11,216,598 $21,689,515

FY 2017 Stockton University Expenditure Report as of May 31, 2017

7th Draft Projected Adopted Proposed. Summary

Welcome. Dr. Buck Gilcrease Alvin ISD Superintendent. David Becker Paul Ingamells CAC Co-Chairs

Performance Audit on 2008 and 2013 SPLOST Revenues For the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2012

RECOMMENDATION. c. Approve a total project cost of $3,300,000

INTRODUCTION. Summary of revenue/expenditures available for new construction and remodeling projects only. CERTIFICATION

DESERT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT PROPOSITION 39, GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (MEASURE B, MARCH 2004) PERFORMANCE AUDIT JUNE 30, 2008

$115,492 $2,963,834 $7,464,804 $7,856,304 $8,404,085 $26,804,519

Oshtemo Township Citizen Engagement and Priority Survey

INTRODUCTION. Summary of revenue/expenditures available for new construction and remodeling projects only. CERTIFICATION

INTRODUCTION. Summary of revenue/expenditures available for new construction and remodeling projects only. CERTIFICATION

Okaloosa County District School Board

Los Angeles Unified School District Page 1 of 3

BANNING UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BUILDING FUND GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (MEASURE R) FINANCIAL AND PERFORMANCE AUDITS MARCH 31, 2017

Governing Board Bond Update. Measure G Bond Program. for. Solano Community College District

APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY USE OF SCHOOL FACILITIES

SEQUOIA UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSITION 39/MEASURE A BOND AUDIT REPORT. For the Year Ended June 30, 2015 * * *

2019 Capital Projects Plan

Transcription:

Beaver Dam Unified School District Community Survey Results Spring 2016

Survey Summary The community survey was conducted in May of 2016. Residents within the District were mailed a paper survey. Each survey included a unique survey access code for those who preferred to take the survey online. Total responses = 1,855 (512 paper) Response rate = 18% Margin of error for the full sample +/- 2.3%

Respondent Information

What is your age? 45% 44% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 19% 25% 15% 10% 10% 5% 0% 2% 18-25 26-34 35-54 55-64 65 and over

Do you live in the Beaver Dam Unified School District? 7% Yes No 93%

Are you an employee of the Beaver Dam Unified School District? 21% 79% Yes No

Do you currently have child(ren) attending the District? 42% 58% Yes No

If you have school-aged children, what 44% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% school(s) do they attend? 34% 18% 10% 8% 7% 7% 4% 4% 3% 1% 1% 1% 0.49% 0.12%

In which city or township do you reside? 70% 60% 61% 50% 40% 30% 20% 21% 10% 5% 5% 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 0.33% 0%

How often have you attended an event in our school district in the past year? 45% 44% 40% 37% 38% 38% 35% 30% Parents (Non-Staff) 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 4% 20% 9% 10% Non-Parents (Non-Staff) 0% 0 1-5 6-10 More than 10

How would you like to receive school/district information? Email School and District websites District mailings School newsletters Text Messaging Facebook Automated phone notification Beaver Dam Daily Citizen WBEV/WXRO Radio Meetings at school Twitter Cable Channel Board of Education meetings 11% 3% 11% 5% 4% 10% 3% 6% 6% 3% 4% 2% 20% 24% 30% 29% 26% 26% 21% 50% 46% 43% 43% 49% 67% 79% Non-Parents (Non-Staff) Parents (Non-Staff) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

The Beaver Dam Difference

How well are we doing in each of the following areas? Great (4), Good (3), Fair (2), Poor (1) Spending tax dollars wisely 2.86 3.00 2.90 2.77 Item All Residents Staff Residents Parent Residents (Non-Staff) Non-Parent Residents (Non-Staff) Delivering a high-quality educational experience 3.01 3.17 2.92 3.00 Keeping the public informed 2.94 3.16 2.92 2.87 Preparing students for life after high school 2.90 2.99 2.86 2.88 Providing a welcoming environment 2.90 2.96 2.88 2.88 Providing opportunities for community input 2.90 3.11 2.89 2.82 Building pride in our community 2.88 2.91 2.83 2.90

Overall, how satisfied are you with the Beaver Dam Unified School District? (All Respondents) 60% 56% 50% 40% 30% 21% 20% 10% 9% 3% 11% 0% Very Satisfied Satisfied Not Satisfied Very Unsatisfied No Opinion

Facility Planning Background

The comprehensive facility study completed in 2011 by Plunkett Raysich Architects identified critical facility needs throughout the District. To date, the District has completed $10 million of the priority 1 projects, including: Upgraded the District-wide technology infrastructure Added 6 classrooms onto Prairie View Elementary Replaced roof sections Repaired parking lots Remodeled the high school science-wing (as seen below left) Upgraded heating, cooling and electrical systems at our middle school (as seen below right) It has been over 20 years since the community made an investment in our schools through a referendum. While the District continues to work hard and make cuts in order to balance its operating budget, we cannot fund the remaining projects without district taxpayers supporting a referendum.

What advice would you give the Board of Education? 87% 90% 78% 80% 73% All Residents 70% 65% 60% 50% 40% Staff Residents 30% 20% 10% 0% Pursue a referendum to fund the remaining projects 10% 17% 13% 14% 6% 8% 7% Do nothing at this time 22% Not sure/no opinion Parent Residents (Non-Staff) Non-Parent Residents (Non-Staff)

What might be included in the referendum?

How likely would you be to support a plan to Very likely (3), Somewhat likely (2), Not likely (1) Item All Residents Non-Parent/Non- Staff Residents improve school safety and security at all schools ($2.2 million) address high school infrastructure/accessibility needs ($6.2 million) renovate the high school career and technical education and manufacturing classroom areas ($15.9 million) renovate the high school general education and music classrooms ($13.9 million) 2.62 2.54 2.53 2.43 2.44 2.32 2.43 2.28 renovate the cafeteria and kitchen area ($4.9 million) 2.39 2.25 expand/remodel the high school gym space, locker room areas and add outdoor restrooms ($5.8 million) 2.30 2.12

Comprehensive Plan

The image below is a conceptual plan of the proposed high school projects. The proposed comprehensive plan would include all of the high school projects identified in this survey as well as the District-wide safety and security updates. The total cost of the comprehensive plan is $48.9 million.

Would you support a $48.9 million referendum for the comprehensive plan? Representing an estimated mill rate increase $1.68 for each $1,000 of assessed property value ($168 for each $100,000 of assessed property value) for the duration of the 20 year bond. All Residents Definitely yes 41% Probably yes 27% 68% Yes Undecided 14% Probably no Definitely no 8% 10% 18% No 0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75%

Would you support a $48.9 million referendum for the comprehensive plan? Representing an estimated mill rate increase $1.68 for each $1,000 of assessed property value ($168 for each $100,000 of assessed property value) for the duration of the 20 year bond. Staff Residents Definitely yes 64% Probably yes 23% 87% Yes Undecided 8% Probably no Definitely no 1% 4% 5% No 0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75%

Would you support a $48.9 million referendum for the comprehensive plan? Representing an estimated mill rate increase $1.68 for each $1,000 of assessed property value ($168 for each $100,000 of assessed property value) for the duration of the 20 year bond. Parent Residents (Non-Staff) Definitely yes 45% Probably yes 30% 75% Yes Undecided 12% Probably no Definitely no 6% 7% 13% No 0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75%

Would you support a $48.9 million referendum for the comprehensive plan? Representing an estimated mill rate increase $1.68 for each $1,000 of assessed property value ($168 for each $100,000 of assessed property value) for the duration of the 20 year bond. Non-Parent Residents (Non-Staff) Definitely yes 30% Probably yes 27% 57% Yes Undecided 16% Probably no Definitely no 11% 16% 27% No 0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75%

Thank you!