REINSURANCE OVERVIEW. Mary Bahna-Nolan, MAAA, CERA, FSA Richard Daillak, MAAA, FSA Arnold Dicke, MAAA, FSA, FCA, CERA Sheldon Summers, MAAA, FSA

Similar documents
Modeling by the Ceding Company and/or Reinsurer

2016 American Academy of Actuaries. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced without express permission. STOCHASTIC, DETERMINISTIC AND NPR RESERVES

Advanced Reinsurance Seminar August 15 16, 2016 Hyatt Rosemont Hotel Rosemont, IL

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE LCB FILE NO. R188-18I. The following document is the initial draft regulation proposed

PBR for Regulatory Actuaries

PBR Resources from the Life Practice Council of the American Academy of Actuaries

VALUATION MANUAL. NAIC Adoptions Through. April 6, 2016

Katie Campbell, FSA, MAAA

Life Insurance Update

Session 04PD: Statutory Life and Annuity Issues. Moderator: Thomas A Campbell FSA,MAAA,CERA

Session 102 PD - Impact of VM-20 on Life Insurance Pricing. Moderator: Trevor D. Huseman, FSA, MAAA

Impact of VM-20 and 2017 CSO on Life Insurance Pricing

NAIC 2015 Spring Meeting

PBR: What does it mean for smaller companies. Alexandre Lemieux, FSA, MAAA March 23 rd, 2016

Life Principle-Based Reserves (PBR) Under VM-20

NAIC s Center for Insurance Policy and Research Summit: Exploring Insurers Liabilities

Mike Boerner, ASA, MAAA, Director Actuarial Office Financial Regulation Division, Texas Department of Insurance Chair: NAIC Life Actuarial (A) Task

Session 189 PD - Impact of PBR on Financial Reinsurance. Moderator: Dale J. Mensik

With the adoption of Valuation Manual 20 (VM-20) on

REINSURANCE ALLOCATION ISSUE

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE. LCB File No. R October 5, AUTHORITY: 1-15, NRS 679B.130, 681A.130 and 681A.145.

Session 20, Professionalism and PBR: Adapting to a New Environment. Moderator: Jerry F. Enoch, FSA, MAAA

Session 10, AG 48 and Beyond: What Does the Future Hold for Captive Reinsurance in the PBR Era? Moderator: Russell B.

Article from. Small Talk. September 2016 Issue 46

US Life Insurer Stress Testing

Post-NAIC Update/PBA Webinar

SI/Accelerated Underwriting VM20 Practice Work Group Update

Session 48PD: PBR - Real Life Applications. Moderator: Alberto A Abalo FSA,MAAA,CERA

NAIC Update Southeastern Actuaries Conference June 20, 2014 Clearwater, FL

Advanced Seminar on Principle Based Capital September 23, 2009 Session 1: C3P3 Overview

Session 70, PBR, VM 20, AG 48, and Investment Strategy: Are Changes Ahead? Moderator: Alan J. Routhenstein, FSA, MAAA

Analysis of Proposed Principle-Based Approach

LIFE PRINCIPLE-BASED RESERVES (PBR) ASSUMPTIONS RESOURCE MANUAL

Life Actuarial (A) Task Force/ Health Actuarial (B) Task Force Amendment Proposal Form*

Session 03PD: PBR Reporting and Disclosures Thinking About the End at the Beginning. Moderator: James Russell Collingwood ASA,MAAA

Impact of VM-20 on Life Insurance Product Development

RE: Comment Letter on APF to Keep Term and ULSG Separate in VM-20 Calculation to Reduce Allocation Concerns

Principle Based Reserves Ohio Chapter IASA. November 21, 2016 Columbus, OH

ACCELERATED UNDERWRITING

Session 29, PBR is Coming Soon! Moderator: Kerry A. Krantz, FSA, MAAA

Use of Qualified Actuary in the Valuation Manual

Practical Advice on PBR Implementation Where are we, and how are companies preparing?

PBA DON T YOU JUST LOVE IT!

Are We Ready For PBR

Session 110 PD - VM-20 for Senior Management. Moderator: Carrie Lee Kelley, FSA, MAAA

Insurance Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER LIFE AND HEALTH REINSURANCE AGREEMENTS

Actuarial Guideline VA CARVM

PBR Implementation Update and Other Valuation Related Issues

Investment Symposium March F7: Investment Implications of a Principal-Based Approach to Capital. Moderator Ross Bowen

Article from Taxing Times. October 2017 Volume 13, Issue 3

NAIC Fall Meeting. December Issues & Trends. kpmg.com/us/frv

Session 10, Statutory Life and Annuity Valuation Issues. Moderator: Donna R Claire FSA, CERA, MAAA

Session 030 PD - PBR Stochastic Reserve - Challenges and Possible Solutions. Moderator: Sebastien Cimon Gagnon, FSA, CERA, MAAA

Valuation Manual. Jan. 1, 2018 Edition

PBR Regulatory Update and Implementation Challenges

Session 88 PD, PBR: Practical Implementation and Governance Issues. Moderator: Helen Colterman, FSA, CERA, ACIA

In December 2015, the NAIC adopted the 2017 Commissioners

Post-NAIC Update Webinar

Life and Health Actuarial Task Force

Synthetic GIC Reserve Proposal Supplement to November 2012 Proposal. Deposit Fund Subgroup of the. Annuity Reserves Work Group (ARWG)

Mortality Margins. Mortality Development and Margins Update Society of Actuaries & American Academy of Actuaries Joint Project Oversight Group

STATE REGULATION OF CAPTIVE REINSURANCE TRANSACTIONS

Session 118 PD - VM-20 Impact on Product Development: Research Study Phase 2. Moderator: Kelly J. Rabin, FSA, MAAA

Small Company Asset Adequacy

At the time that this article is expected to appear in print,

Session 16 PD, Principle-Based Reserves and Taxation. Moderator: Cindy D. Barnard, FSA, MAAA

Advanced Reinsurance Seminar August 15 16, 2016 Hyatt Rosemont Hotel Rosemont, IL

United of Omaha Life Insurance Company A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of (Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company)

PBR in the Audit: What to Expect Michael Fruchter, FSA, MAAA Emily Cassidy, ASA, MAAA

Session 79 PD, Regulatory Update. Moderator: Francis de Regnaucourt, FSA, CERA, FCIA, MAAA

Response to Society of Actuaries Analysis of Proposed Principle-Based Approach From the American Academy of Actuaries Life Reserves Work Group

Statutory Valuation. Individual Life. Annuity Contracts

Question and Commentary regarding application of VM-20 mortality to business issued under an Accelerated Underwriting program

AFTERNOON SESSION. Date: Thursday, April 26, 2018 Time: 1:30 p.m. 3:45 p.m. INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES

Principle Based Reserves

2013 NAIC ANNUAL STATEMENT INSTRUCTIONS LIFE DEC 2013 REVISIONS

1. Tables of select mortality factors and rules for their use;

REPORT OF THE JOINT AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ACTUARIES/SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES PREFERRED MORTALITY VALUATION TABLE TEAM

Mortality Table Update on the 2015 VBT/CSO

11/17/2009. Introduction. Outline. Principles-Based Reserving Education Session 7:30-9:00 Maryland Ballroom D. NAIC 2009 Fall National Meeting

PACIFIC MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Post-NAIC Update/PBA Webinar

INSURANCE REGULATION 93 VALUATION OF LIFE INSURANCE POLICIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis

Asset Adequacy Analysis

Aggregate Margin Task Force: LATF Update

The New Risk-Based Capital

Impact of VM-20 on Life Insurance Product Development Phase 2

MIKE BOERNER Director, Actuarial Office, Financial Texas Department of Insurance

SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES Individual Life & Annuities United States Company/Sponsor Perspective Exam CSP-IU MORNING SESSION

SEPARATE ACCOUNTS LR006

PBR Reserve Movement and Earnings Analysis

Consistency Work Group September Robert DiRico, A.S.A., M.A.A.A., Chair of the Consistency Work Group

Session 51 PD, VM31 - PBR Actuarial Report - Which ASOPs Matter? Moderator: Leonard Mangini, FSA, FALU, FRM, MAAA

Actuarial Standard of Practice No. 24: Compliance with the NAIC Life Insurance Illustrations Model Regulation

Original SSAP and Current Authoritative Guidance: SSAP No. 66

Supplemental Background Material. Course CFE 3. Reinsurance. (Passing grade for this exam is 74%)

Revised Appendix 6, Policyholder Behavior Data Format

LIFE RISK-BASED CAPITAL (E) WORKING GROUP Monday, March 9, :00 PM ET / 12:00 PM CT / 11:00 AM MT / 10:00 AM PT ROLL CALL

MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Transcription:

REINSURANCE OVERVIEW Mary Bahna-Nolan, MAAA, CERA, FSA Richard Daillak, MAAA, FSA Arnold Dicke, MAAA, FSA, FCA, CERA Sheldon Summers, MAAA, FSA 2016 American Academy of Actuaries. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced without express permission. PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Caveats The opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the individual presenters, and do not necessarily represent those of their employers or of the American Academy of Actuaries. It should also be also noted that there may be exceptions to some of the statements made in this presentation. 2 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

What Will Be Covered Reinsurance Risk Transfer (Sheldon) Treatment of Reinsurance in PBR (Sheldon) Assets held by Another Party (Richard) Stochastic Exclusion Test YRT (Richard) Use of counter-party reserves and data (Mary) Incorporating reinsurance in the cash flows (Arnold) Relationship of AG48 and Draft XXX/AXXX Regulation to VM-20 (Richard) 3 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Reinsurance Agreements Types subject to risk transfer - Yearly Renewable Term (YRT) - Coinsurance - Coinsurance with funds withheld - Modified coinsurance (ModCo) - Combination coinsurance/modco 4 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Reinsurance Agreements YRT - Company transfers mortality risk to the Reinsurer - Reinsurance premiums typically guaranteed for one year - Example: YRT on ULSG policies; company pays surrender benefits; reinsurer reimburses company for death claims 5 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Reinsurance Agreements Coinsurance - Reinsurer assumes proportional share of risks - Company takes a reserve credit for the proportion of the risk ceded; Reinsurer sets up a reserve for the risk it assumes - Company pays proportional amount of premiums, less an expense allowance typically designed to cover the price of the arrangement - If in-force business ceded, initial premium is proportional amount of reserves less an initial expense allowance - Reinsurer reimburses company for proportional amount of claims - Example: 75% coinsurance on ULSG policies 6 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Reinsurance Agreements Coinsurance with funds withheld Similar to coinsurance except company holds some or all of the funds supporting the reinsurer s share Modified coinsurance - Similar to coinsurance except company holds all of the funds supporting the reinsurer s share and sets up all the reserves 7 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Risk Transfer Applicable Documents: - Life and Health Reinsurance Agreements Model Regulation - Statement of Statutory Accounting Principles (SSAP) No. 61R - Appendix A-791 of the Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual 8 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Life and Health Reinsurance Agreements Model Regulation Subsection 3 Regulation excludes assumption reinsurance, yearly renewable term reinsurance, stop loss reinsurance, and catastrophe reinsurance SSAP 61R YRT is subject to certain provisions of the regulation Appendix A-791 defines YRT that is exempt 9 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Life and Health Reinsurance Agreements Model Regulation Per SSAP 61R, a reinsurance agreement that violates risk transfer criteria shall follow the guidance for deposit accounting. Surplus enhancement must be permanent - Adequate renewal expense allowances, unless a liability for any deficiency is held by the company - No possible deprivation of surplus, with some exceptions 10 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Life and Health Reinsurance Agreements Model Regulation Surplus enhancement must be permanent (cont.) - No reimbursement for negative experience, unless nonperformance by ceding company or recapture - No payments from amounts other than earnings of ceded business - No representations or warranties regarding future performance 11 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Life and Health Reinsurance Agreements Model Regulation Transfer of risks requirement - Table in regulation - Morbidity, mortality, lapse, credit quality, reinvestment, disintermediation - Segregation of assets if funds withheld or ModCo and asset risk is significant 12 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Life and Health Reinsurance Agreements Model Regulation Questions: - Payment of profit and risk charge? - Renewal expense allowances higher than anticipated? - Policy loan participation? - Payment of financing fees? 13 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Life and Health Reinsurance Agreements Model Regulation Commissioner discretion to recognize reinsurance credit - Not in Appendix A-791 Recognition of surplus relief as income 14 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Treatment of Reinsurance in PBR When to include a reinsurance agreement in the PBR calculation of the minimum reserve - Reinsurance agreement meets risk transfer requirements - Reinsurance agreement does not meet risk transfer requirements, but including it results in lower surplus 15 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Treatment of Reinsurance in PBR What reduction is made to the Net Premium Reserve (NPR) on account of ceding mortality risk under YRT agreements? What assumption to use regarding future YRT premiums in stochastic and deterministic reserves? - Current premium rate scale? Add a margin? - Assume immediate increase? How much? - Assume gradual increase? When and how much? 16 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

YRT Premium Assumption in PBR VM20-8.C.3.c: Consistency among assumptions - 8.C.7: Counterparties likely to exercise terms of a reinsurance agreement to their respective advantage 17 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

YRT Premium Assumption in PBR VM20 (cont.) - 8.C.10: Assumptions used by the ceding company should account for any actions that the assuming company has taken or is likely to take that could affect the expected cash flows of the reinsured business 18 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

YRT Premium Assumption in PBR VM20 (cont.) - 8.C.11: Ceding company shall consider all elements of a reinsurance agreement that the assuming company can change and assumptions for those elements are subject to Section7.C. Appropriate assumptions for these elements may depend on the scenario being tested 19 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

YRT Premium Assumption in PBR VM20 (cont.) - 7.C.2: The projected Non-Guaranteed Element (NGE) shall reflect: * the nature of contractual guarantees * past practices and established policies * timing of changes relative to date of recognition of a change in experience * benefits/risks of continuing to authorize NGE 20 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

YRT Premium Assumption in PBR VM20 (cont.) - 7.C.3: Projected NGE shall be established based on projected experience consistent with how actual NGE are determined - 7.C.4: Projected NGE must be consistent with scenario experience assumptions. Policyholder behavior must be consistent with the NGE assumed in the model. 21 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Assets Held by Another Party Should assets backing the reserve that are held by another party be modeled? If so, how? 8.C.14.a: In deciding, the company should consider: degree of linkage between portfolio performance and calculation of the reinsurance cash flows sensitivity of the valuation result to asset portfolio performance 8.C.14.b: If the decision is that such assets need not be modeled, one must document the testing and logic 22 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Assets Held by Another Party 8.C.14.c: If the decision is to model those assets, comply with 7.E (reinvestment and disinvestment), 7.F (cash flows from invested assets), and 9.F (asset assumptions) taking into account: [Note 8.C.14.c cites only 7.E and 9.F. Likely typo.] investment strategy for the assets, as specified in the reinsurance agreement or other current documentation of the holder actions the may be taken by either party that would affect the net reinsurance cash flows, for example, change in strategy within the agreed guidelines 23 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Modified Coinsurance Under modified coinsurance, it may not be necessary to model the ModCo reserve itself but the ModCo cash flows (ModCo interest and ModCo adjustment) should be modeled, and that may require modeling assets held by a counterparty See 8.C.14.c guidance note 24 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

SERT When YRT Has Been Ceded Exclusion tests are elective tests that, if passed, let the company skip calculating Deterministic Reserve or Stochastic Reserve or both. YRT reinsurance ceded may cause a policy block to fail the Stochastic Exclusion Ratio Test (SERT) when it would otherwise pass YRT reinsurance ceded reduces the SERT denominator but may have little impact on the numerator, with the effect that YRT ceded makes the ratio higher, perhaps exceeding the 6% test threshold If a block passes SERT before taking into account YRT ceded, but fails after including YRT ceded, VM20 6.B.2.c allows further analysis that may avoid the need to compute a stochastic reserve 25 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

SERT When YRT Has Been Ceded 6.B.2.c: The block may be deemed to pass the SERT if the company can demonstrate that the sensitivity of the adjusted deterministic reserve to the SERT scenarios is comparable before and after YRT ceded 6.B.2.c.i: Offers an example of an acceptable demonstration that is in effect a second level numerical test and safe-harbor 6.B.2.c.ii: Allows other, unspecified qualitative approaches to the demonstration 26 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

SERT When YRT Has Been Assumed If a block of YRT reinsurance is aggregated with a block of other policies in calculating the SERT, the aggregate may pass SERT when the other policies would otherwise fail Mechanics: YRT-assumed increases the SERT denominator but might have little impact on the numerator Note, however, that such aggregation may violate 6.B.2.b.iv, which provides that a company may not group together contract types with significantly different risk profiles for purposes of calculating the SERT 27 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Determining the Minimum Reserve Making Use of Counterparty s Reserve Calculations or Data

VM-20 References Section 8.A.1 Section 8.C.1 Section 9.A.2 Section 9.A.6 Section 9.B.2 Section 9.C.2 Section 9.D.1.c Section 9.D.3.c Emphasis has been added throughout to show reference within VM-20 to the use of other party s data or calculations and is highlighted in red. 29 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Making Use of Calculations of the Other Reinsurance Party 8.A.1 Guidance Note: In determining reserves, one party to a reinsurance transaction may make use of reserve calculations of the other party. In this situation if the company chooses assumptions that differ from those used by the other party, the company must either rerun the reserve calculation or be prepared to demonstrate that appropriate adjustments to the other party s calculations have been made. 30 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Making Use of Calculations of the Other Reinsurance Party (cont.) Mirror reserving not required in VM-20 ( 8.C.1) Will reinsurer provide reserves specific for a particular treaty? Reinsurer s model segments or unit of account may be treaty or group of similar treaties from multiple carriers Direct carrier s model segments or unit of account may be policy form or groups of policy forms that may or may not all be reinsured with same carrier 31 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Making use of Calculations of the Other Reinsurance Party (cont.) What if same policy form and/or policy is split between multiple reinsurers? Unlikely assumptions will be the same for all parties What does demonstration to show adjustments to other parties calculations are appropriate look like? 32 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Making Use of Data of the Other Reinsurance Party 9.A.6 - The company shall use its own experience, if relevant and credible, to establish an anticipated experience assumption for any risk factor To the extent that company experience is not available or credible: Company may use industry experience or May use other data to establish the anticipated experience assumption If other data used, make modifications as needed to reflect the circumstances of the company 33 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Making Use of Data of the Other Reinsurance Party (cont.) 9.B.2. Requires that the greater the uncertainty in the anticipated experience assumption, the larger the required margin The company shall use a larger margin when: a. Experience data have less relevance or lower credibility b. Experience data is of lower quality e.g., incomplete, internally inconsistent, or not current c. There is doubt about the reliability of the anticipated experience assumption 34 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Making Use of Data of the Other Reinsurance Party (cont.) 9.A.6.a. For risk factors (such as mortality) to which statistical credibility theory may be appropriately applied, the company shall establish anticipated experience assumptions for the risk factor by combining relevant company experience with industry experience data, tables, or other applicable data in a manner that is consistent with credibility theory and accepted actuarial practice 35 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Making Use of Data of the Other Reinsurance Party Mortality 9.C.2 - For determining company experience mortality, company should first consider its actual experience Company may consider experience data from other sources, if available and appropriate Includes actual experience data of one or more mortality pools in which the policies participate under the term of a reinsurance agreement Data from other sources is appropriate if the source has underwriting and expected mortality experience characteristics that are similar to policies in the mortality segment 36 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Making Use of Data of the Other Reinsurance Party Mortality (cont.) May be difficult to achieve requirements Structure of reinsurance agreement may necessitate differences in expected mortality (e.g., first dollar quota share vs excess of retention) Who has and what is burden to demonstrate mortality from data source based on: Similar underwriting? Similar expected mortality characteristics for the mortality segment? Will reinsurer share this? Can reinsurer share this? Even with similar underwriting requirements, rare expected mortality is same between companies 37 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Making Use of Data of the Other Reinsurance Party Mortality (cont.) How is credibility determined for ceding companies mortality segment? Reinsurer often blends experience from various companies with different average sizes, age distributions, etc. how representative is this? Does reinsurer have consistent pool of experience over consistent period of time? 38 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Making Use of Data of the Other Reinsurance Party Policyholder Behavior 9.A.6.b. - For risk factors that: Do not lend themselves to the use of statistical credibility theory Where statistical credibility theory could be applied but cannot be due to lack of industry data Company shall establish anticipated experience assumptions in a manner that is consistent with accepted actuarial practice and that reflects: Any available relevant company experience must first consider; Any available relevant industry experience; or Any other experience data that are available and relevant 39 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Making Use of Data of the Other Reinsurance Party Policyholder Behavior Techniques listed for use of data other than relevant company experience include: Adopting standard assumptions published by professional, industry, or regulatory organizations; Applying factors to relevant industry experience tables or other relevant data; Blending any available relevant company experience with any available relevant industry experience and/or other applicable data Use weightings established in manner consistent with accepted actuarial practice; Reflects the risk characteristics of the underlying policies; and/or Reflects company practices 40 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Making Use of Data of the Other Reinsurance Party Policyholder Behavior (cont.) Related to assumptions and margins on said assumptions for: Premium funding patterns; Premium payment patterns; Premium persistency, surrenders, withdrawals; and Allocations between available investment and crediting options, benefit utilization, and other option elections 41 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Making Use of Data of the Other Reinsurance Party Policyholder Behavior (cont.) 9.D.1.c Absent directly applicable data: Use available data from any other block of business Similar to the block of business being valued; Similar block of business does not need to be directly written by the company If data from a similar block of business is used Adjust anticipated experience assumption to reflect material differences between the business being valued and the similar block of business Per 9.D.3.c For margins, must reflect the data uncertainty associated with using data from a similar but not identical block of business 42 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Making Use of Data of the Other Reinsurance Party Policyholder Behavior (cont.) More likely that assuming company will utilize assumptions from ceding company than vice versa Reinsurers are more likely to rely on ceding company s funding/premium patterns and net amount at risk projections for universal life plans The party using other reinsurance party data needs to have enough information to support the comparison and differences between the similar and modeled block to adjust assumption and reflect in margins 43 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Determining the Minimum Reserve and Reserve Credit (cont.) Post- and Pre-Reinsurance-Ceded Cash Flows Reflecting Counterparty Impairment Aggregation & Allocation Rules

References Section 8 of VM-20 2015 Pending Draft of PBR ASOP 45 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

VM-20 Minimum Reserve Aggregate Net of reinsurance Pre-PBR Commissioners Reserve Valuation Method (CRVM) reserves were per policy and were calculated on a before-reinsurance basis Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 46 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

VM-20 Minimum Reserve If agreement meets risk transfer criteria Include reinsurance cash flows in cash flow model for DR and SR [Section 8.C] ANPR = Aggregate NPR = NPR - (SSAP61 credits) Coinsurance: credit calculated like NPR for percentage coinsured Term: credit is one-year term mean reserve for net amount at risk See sections 2.B and 8.B Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 47 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Reinsurance Cash Flows Assumptions and margins appropriate for the company [Section 8.C.1] No mirror reserving requirement Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 48 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Risks Not Captured by Deterministic Assumptions For example, stop-loss Either Include in cash flow model, or Perform separate stochastic analysis Adjust prudent estimates or Make addition to Stochastic Reserve See Section 8.C.2 Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 49 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Cash flows Reinsurance Ceded Reflect terms of reinsurance and other assumptions used for the policies E.g., mortality consistent with retained mortality If knowledge of reinsurer impairment, reflect in margins Look at ratings, RBC ratios, etc. Take account of security Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 50 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Cash flows Reinsurance Assumed Reflect terms of reinsurance and experience for business segment Separate assumptions not required for each agreement If knowledge of impairment of ceding company, reflect in margins But if has right to terminate for non-payment, margin can be reduced Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 51 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Section 2.G Permits approximations and simplifications Company must demonstrate reserve not understated Could be useful for immaterial blocks Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 52 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Pre-PBR Reserves If Reinsurance Present Calculated policy-by-policy gross of reinsurance and summed (can do this because formulaic) Then reserve credit per SSAP 61 is subtracted Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 53 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

VM-20 Minimum Reserve Post-reinsurance-ceded by definition Modeled reserves (DR, SR) based on postreinsurance cash flows Economic and accounting effects are postreinsurance, so Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 54 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Why Are Pre-Reinsurance Reserves Needed? Reporting requirement regulator concerns: Risk concentration Risk of counterparty impairment Risk of overestimating reinsurance recoverables Impact of transactions Collateral Actual financial consequences Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 55 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Pre-Reinsurance Ceded DR and SR Redo the calculations of DR and SR, including exclusion tests, on a pre-reinsurance basis using methods and assumptions consistent with methods and assumptions used for (post-reinsurance) minimum reserve calculations Reflect company experience in the absence of reinsurance Reflect known differences Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 56 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Pre-Reinsurance-Ceded DR and SR Starting assets Hypothetical portfolio Pending PBR ASOP Return on assets available at the time Return on retained policies Pro-rata slice of reinsurer assets backing ceded reserves Collar applies (see sections 8.D.2.c and 7.D.1.c) Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 57 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Section 2.A Process Post-Reinsurance Separate calculations for Term, ULSG, Other SET not passed: MR = max(anpr, DR + DDPA, SR + DDPA) SET passed; DET not passed: MR = max(anpr, DR + DDPA) SET and DET passed (only for Other): MR = ANPR = NPR(i) - SSAP61 Reserve Credit DDPA is post-reinsurance-ceded Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 58 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Section 2.A Process Pre-Reinsurance Separate calculations for Term, ULSG, Other Pre-reins SET not passed: PreReinsMR = max(prereinsanpr, PreReinsDR + DDPA, PreReinsSR + DDPA) Pre-reins SET passed; pre-reins DET not passed: PreReinsMR = max(prereinsanpr, PreReinsDR + DDPA) Pre-reins SET and pre-reins DET passed : PreReinsMR = PreReinsANPR = NPR(i) [no SSAP 61reserve credit] DDPA is pre-reinsurance-ceded Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 59 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Section 2.A Is applied to ALL non-excluded policies Is applied separately post- and pre-reinsurance-ceded Sorts Term Group and ULSG Group into 2 subgroups each and Other Group into 3 subgroups: Group 1: Term did pass SET: MR = max(anpr, DR*) Group 2: Term did not pass SET: MR = max(anpr, DR*, SR*) Group 3: ULSG did pass SET: MR = max(anpr, DR*) Group 4: ULSG did not pass SET: MR = max(anpr, DR*, SR*) Group 5: Other did not fail either SET or DET: MR = ANPR Group 6: Other did pass SET; did not pass DET: MR = max(anpr, DR*) Group 7: Other did not pass SET: MR = max(anpr, DR*, SR*) DR* = DR + DDPA; SR* = SR + DDPA; DDPA is post- or pre-reinsurance-ceded Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 60 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Section 2.A Aggregation Rules Possible combinations (a given policy may be in different groups post-reinsurance and prereinsurance): Term: ULSG: Other: ((1), (2)) = (ANPR, ANPR) ((3), (4)) = (ANPR, ANPR) ((5), (6), (7)) = (ANPR, ANPR, ANPR) (ANPR, DR*) (ANPR, DR*) (ANPR, ANPR, DR*) (ANPR, SR*) (ANPR, SR*) (ANPR, ANPR, SR*) (DR*, ANPR) (DR*, ANPR) (ANPR, DR*, ANPR) (DR*, DR*) (DR*,DR*) (ANPR, DR*, DR*) (DR*, SR*) (DR*, SR*) (ANPR, DR*, SR*) Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 61 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Credit for Reinsurance Max (0, PreReinsMR PostReinsMR) Defined for all policies in the aggregate Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 62 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Section 2.C Allocation (Post-Reinsurance) MR(i) = MR(Policy i s Group) * [NPR(i) RC(i)]/ [NPR(j) RC(j)] (Sum is over Policy i s Group (1), (2), (7)) Recall that the minimum reserve (MR) is post-reinsurance by definition. NPR(i) RC(i) is the allocation net premium reserve The MR being allocated is max(anpr, DR +DDPA) if Policy i is in Group (1), (3), (5) max(anpr, DR+DDPA, SR+DDPA) if Policy i is in Group (2), (4), (6) ANPR if Policy i is in Group (7) Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 63 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Section 2.C Allocation (Pre-Reinsurance) MR(i) = MR(Policy i s Group) * [NPR(i)]/ [NPR(j)] (Sum is over Policy i s Group (1), (2), (7)) NPR(i) is the pre-reinsurance net premium reserve The MR being allocated is max(prereinsanpr, PreReinsDR +DDPA) if in Group (1), (3), (5) max(prereinsanpr, PreReinsDR+DDPA, PreReinsSR+DDPA) if in Group (2), (4), (6) PreReinsANPR if in Group (7) Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 64 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Allocation Example #1 Two Blocks within Term or ULSG or Other Group E.g., 5 15 year term, 20 30-year term Block 1: ANPR(1) = 100; ModRes(1)+DDPA(1) = 110: MR(1) = 110 Block 2: ANPR(2) = 100; ModRes(2)+DDPA(2) = 130: MR(2) = 130 240 Combined: ANPR = 200; ModRes+DDPA = 240: MR = 240 Allocated: MR(1) = 120; MR(2) = 120 Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 65 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Allocation Example #1 Coinsure 50% of a block of business: Block 1: ANPR (1) = 100; ModRes (1)+DDPA (1) = 110: MR (1) = 110 Block 2: ANPR (2) = 100; ModRes (2)+DDPA (2) = 130: MR (2) = 130 Combined: ANPR = 200; ModRes +DDPA = 240: MR = 240 Allocated: MR (1) = 120; MR (2) = 120 Block 1: ANPR(1) = 50; ModRes(1)+DDPA(1) = 55: MR(1) = 55 Block 2: ANPR(2) = 100; ModRes+DDPA(2) = 130: MR(2) =130 Combined: ANPR = 150; ModRes+DDPA(2) = 185: MR = 185 Allocated: MR(1) = 61.7; MR(2) = 123.3 Reserve Credit: RC(1) = 58.3; RC(2) = -3.3; Total = 240 185 = 55 Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 66 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Allocation Example #2 Two Blocks within Term or ULSG or Other Group Block 1: ANPR(1) = 150; ModRes(1)+DDPA(1) = 110: MR(1) = 150 Block 2: ANPR(2) = 50; ModRes(2)+DDPA(2) = 130: MR(2) = 130 280 *** Combined: ANPR = 200; ModRes+DDPA = 240: MR = 240 Allocated: MR(1) = 180; MR(2) = 60 Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 67 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Allocation Example #2 Add reserves to a block with NPR > ModRes; increase risk offset Block 1: ANPR (1) = 150; ModRes (1)+DDPA (1) = 110: MR (1) = 150 Block 2: ANPR (2) = 50; ModRes (2)+DDPA (2) = 130: MR (2) = 130 Combined: ANPR = 200; ModRes +DDPA = 240: MR = 240 Allocated: MR (1) = 180; MR (2) = 60 Block 1: ANPR(1) = 200; ModRes(1)+DDPA(1) = 120: MR(1) = 200 Block 2: ANPR(2) = 50; ModRes(2)+DDPA(2) = 130: MR(2) = 130 Combined: ANPR = 250; ModRes+DDPA = 250: MR = 250 Allocated: MR(1) = 200; MR(2) = 50 Reserve change: Block 1: +20; Block 2: -10 Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 68 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Implications Aggregation rules could have important effect on Minimum Reserve for company Transactions can have important effects on other blocks of business Be sure transaction calculations are broad enough Immediate effects on other blocks of business Longer term effects on pricing assumptions Be cautious about pricing to assumed aggregation advantages Current allocation procedures can result in surprising changes in allocated minimum reserves for product groups when transactions occur Because of aggregation and allocation procedures, reserve credit does not act like it did pre- PBR Alternative calculations may be needed for collateral Content AADicke LLC. All rights reserved 69 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

AG48 and Draft XXX/AXXX Reg Relationship to VM-20 Calculations

XXX/AXXX Captives Framework Codified initially in Actuarial Guideline 48 (AG48), which sets a minimum traditional-funding standard for XXX/AXXX business ceded to nonexempt re/insurers (captives and some regular re/insurers) To meet the standard, such funding must be in Primary Security, a subset of traditionally admitted assets, that is held as ModCo, funds-withheld, or in trust The Required Level of Primary Security is determined by an Actuarial Method based on VM-20 with modifications (see AG48 5.A) Under AG48, failure to meet the standard results in a qualified actuarial opinion and loss of a portion of the credit for reinsurance 71 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

XXX/AXXX Credit for Reinsurance Regulation NAIC is drafting an XXX/AXXX Credit for Reinsurance Model Regulation 1 that implements requirements similar to AG48, but not identical Once the new regulation is adopted by a state, AG48 would sunset in that state The model regulation is targeted for completion by the NAIC 2016 Summer meeting. State adoptions could begin in 2017 1 The formal title of the regulation is Model Regulation on Credit for Reinsurance of Life Insurance Policies Containing Nonlevel Gross Premiums, Nonlevel Gross Benefits and Universal Life With Secondary Guarantees. We use the shorter phrase for brevity on these slides. 72 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Actuarial Method = Modified VM-20 For term insurance Max (Deterministic Reserve, tabular % of current NPR) No requirement to calculate a Stochastic Reserve No exclusion test to test out of calculating Deterministic Reserve For ULSG Max (Deterministic Rsv, Stochastic Rsv, tabular % of current NPR) No exclusion test to "test out" of calculating Deterministic or Stochastic Tabular % of current NPR is meant as proxy for NPR using 2017 CSO at operative date of PBR 73 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Actuarial Method = Modified VM20 Other modifications in AG48 Asset spread and default tables adopted by December 31 apply to December 31 valuation Pre-PBR: Any other changes adopted by LATF as of Sept. 30 will apply to Dec. 31 valuation Post-PBR: Use the version of VM applicable to that valuation year Applied gross basis to the reserves ceded Specified credit if a portion of the risk is retained, or the risk ceded is net of (that is, after) reinsurance ceded to an exempt re/insurer See AG48 5.A.4 74 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Draft Regulation Key differences in the current draft regulation as compared with AG48 Change in consequence for an unremediated shortfall in primary security. Proposal: Loss in full of the reserve credit Exemption for cessions to professional reinsurers Clarifications to the Actuarial Method to address special issues such as multiproduct treaties, treaties ceding only a portion of the risk under covered policies, and documentation of rationale and steps used to allocate Required Level of Primary Security to treaty Revisions to address the circumstance when PBR is formally operative, but an individual state has not yet adopted PBR 75 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Draft Regulation Among those differences described as non-substantive References in AG48 to specific sections of the Valuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation ( 6, 6.E, 6.F, 6.G, 7) are replaced in the draft Regulation by corresponding text definitions There is the possibility that the exemption for 6E (YRT reinsurance) may be removed a substantive change Grandfathering provisions are defined separately rather than within the definition of covered policies. 76 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Questions? 77 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016

Case Study YRT Reinsurance 78 PBR Boot Camp: Basic Training and Beyond for PBR Implementation June 6-8, 2016