Flood Smart Communities

Similar documents
Community Incentives for Nature-Based Flood Solutions

Flood Smart Action Plan. Town of Greece, Town of Parma and Village of Hilton

The Community Rating System in Coastal New England: Regional Approaches and Lessons Learned

Action Items for Flood Risk Management on Wildcat Creek Interagency success with floodplain management plans and flood forecast inundation maps

Georgia Silver Jackets Team

State of South Carolina Five-Year Floodplain Management Work Plan

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Five-Year Floodplain Management Work Plan

Findings/Debrief Meeting September 9, CDOT R4 Headquarters Big Thompson Conference Room W 10 th St. Greeley, CO 80634

Use of FEMA Non regulatory Flood Risk Products in Planning

FEMA FLOOD MAPS Public Works Department Stormwater Management Division March 6, 2018

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)

Non Regulatory Risk MAP Products Flood Depth and Probability Grids

SILVER JACKETS: TEAMING TO MITIGATE AND MANAGE STATE FLOOD HAZARD PRIORITIES

Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council

Flood Risk Resilience in Alabama: Challenges and Successes

County of Kaua'i Multi-Hazard Mitigation and Resilience Plan, 2015 Update

Delaware River Basin Commission s Role in Flood Loss Reduction Efforts

The Changing NFIP, the CRS & Local Governments. Scott Pippin, J.D., M.E.P.D.

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

Kentucky Risk MAP It s not Map Mod II

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

Public Meeting 28 November Presented by: Deepa Srinivasan, Vision Planning and Consulting, LLC Dr. Michael Scott, ESRGC, Salisbury University

Volusia County Floodplain Management Plan 2012

10/5/2015. What Makes a Sound Floodplain Management Program? What are the Flood Problems in your Community?

HOW PLANNING FOR SEA LEVEL RISE CREATES FLOOD INSURANCE REDUCTIONS: THE GEORGIA CONTEXT. Hunter Jones 1 I. INTRODUCTION

G318 Local Mitigation Planning Workshop. Module 2: Risk Assessment. Visual 2.0

Flood Plain Management Services (FPMS) Program

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

California s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State s Flood Risk. BAFPAA Briefing February 21, 2013

Role of Disaster Insurance in Improving Resilience: An Expert Meeting The Resilient America Roundtable

LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW TOOL

Crediting Adaptation Strategies through the National Flood Insurance Program s Community Rating System Coordinator s Manual

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW TOOL

Federal Floodplain Mapping Guideline Series. CRHNet 2017 Symposium Halifax, Nova Scotia October 25, 2017

Community Resilience & NFIP s Community Rating system

Floodplain Management Services Baltimore District Studies

STATE OF MARYLAND FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN FIVE-YEAR WORK PLAN DRAFT SEPTEMBER, 2004

David A. Stroud, CFM AMEC Earth & Environmental Raleigh, NC

Leveraging the Community Rating System for Climate Adaptation. Southeast and Caribbean Climate Community of Practice Webinar Series 23 March 2015

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Meeting the Nation s Levee Challenges

Flood Risk Review and Resilience Meeting: Allegheny County

Flood Risk Review (FRR) Meeting. Cumberland County, Pennsylvania Carlisle, Pennsylvania December 5, 2016

Planning Commission April 19, 2017 Erin Cooper, Floodplain Specialist Varda Blum, Floodplain Program Manger

Thurston County, WA Flood Hazard Mitigation Plan Annual Progress Report CRS Activity 510

GAFM Showcase: Multiple Agencies Combating Georgia s Flood Risk Together: Proven Results Gained by Strong Partnerships

Community Rating System. National Flood Insurance Program

Silver Jackets - Flood Risk Management Program

Chapter 7 Appendix B: National Flood Insurance Program Summary for Kaua'i County, 2015 Update

***EXPEDITED REVIEW***

SECTION V THE LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY BLUEPRINT

MUNICIPAL LAND USE STRATEGIES for Improving Flood Resilience

Hazard Mitigation & Resiliency

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

NFIP Program Basics. KAMM Regional Training

National Institute of Building Sciences

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Mapping Flood Risk in the Upper Fox River Basin:

Floodplain Management Plan State of Utah

Best Practices. for Incorporating Building Science Guidance into Community Risk MAP Implementation November 2012

5/25/2017. So why don t more communities participate in the Community Rating System (CRS)? Agenda. What is CRS? Community Rating System

LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW TOOL

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

ASFPM Partnerships for Statewide Mitigation Actions. Alicia Williams GIS and HMP Section Manager, Amec Foster Wheeler June 2016

Suwannee River Water Management District

New Tools for Mitigation & Outreach. Louie Greenwell Stantec

C APABILITY A SSESSMENT

T-318. Hazard Mitigation Section TDEM Recovery, Mitigation, and Standards

CITY OF PLANTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM NO

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

2018 FMA Annual Conference in Reno, NV:

Monroe County Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) 2015 Update Working Group Meeting #1

SOUTH CENTRAL REGION MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN. Advisory Committee Meeting September 12, 2012

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS) Together North Jersey Resilient Task Force Meeting

Technical Appendix: Protecting Open Space & Ourselves: Reducing Flood Risk in the Gulf of Mexico Through Strategic Land Conservation

Justification for Floodplain Regulatory Standards in Illinois

ASFPM RECOMMENDED TASK FORCE ACTIONS

Municipal Natural Assets Initiative (MNAI): Watershed-level pilot implementation in British Columbia. Call for Expressions of Interest

National Flood Risk Management Program

FEMA s Flood Map Modernization Preparing for FY09 and Beyond: Integrated Flood Data Update, Risk Assessment, and Mitigation Planning

Interagency Nonstructural Flood Risk Management Workshop. Carey Johnson Kentucky Division of Water

FLOOD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN GUIDEBOOK

Integrating Hazard Mitigation and Comprehensive Planning Workshop

Adapting Maine s coastal communities to sea level rise and storm surge (2015 State of the Bay Presentation)

Flood Risk Outreach Tools for Georgia Communities. GAFM 10 th Annual Conference Presented By: Jarrett Mattli

Oyster River/Saratoga Beach Managing the Flood Risk: Vulnerability and Exposure Dialogue

More Legal Quick Takes: SLR, Law & Flooding

North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study: Resilient Adaption to Increasing Risk

Mitigation Strategies

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Board of Thurston County Commissioners. Flood Planning Committee NAME ROLE/TITLE AFFILIATION Community Representatives Scott Boettcher Stakeholder

Hillsborough County Local Mitigation Strategy and the Community Rating System

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014

4 TH ANNUAL CAPE COASTAL CONFERENCE. Adaptation Planning, Environmental Economics and Community Engagement

State of Vermont FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT WORK PLAN

Transcription:

Flood Smart Communities Stevie Adams, Freshwater Specialist, The Nature Conservancy Funding provided by NOAA Coastal Storms Program through Ohio Sea Grant

To conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. We use science and partnerships to find solutions to environmental challenges.

Functioning Floodplains

Functioning Floodplains Conversion of natural floodplains can lead to: At risk development Reduced or eliminated flood storage of the floodplain Altered hydrology downstream

The Flood Smart Approach Watershed approach to floodplain management Community-specific assessments Systematic decision making Wide range of expertise with local needs and knowledge

The Flood Smart Approach 1. Identify the Problem 2. Conduct Community Study Describe Flooding What kind of flooding What are the causes and impacts Community Resilience Building Workshop - Key stakeholders identify top flood hazards, current challenges, strengths, and priority actions 1. Land use and planning environment 2. Natural infrastructure 3. Findings from CRB Workshop 4. Vulnerability assessment to flooding 5. Road/stream crossing assessment 6. Barriers and challenges to flood risk management 7. Local and State policy gap analysis

The Flood Smart Approach 3a. Define the Purpose and Objectives Statement of purpose What do munis want to get out of project? What are their constraints? What is in their power to influence? 3b. Define the Purpose and Objectives Objectives What should the recommendations achieve?

The Flood Smart Approach 4. Develop Recommendations Recommendations What actions can be taken to make communities more resilient to flooding (that will achieve objectives)? 5. Assess Effectiveness Measure effectiveness of implementing recommendations and effectiveness of reducing vulnerability

The Recommendations and Implementing the Plan

Monroe Recommendations 1. Convene intermunicipal work group Meets regularly Is responsible for implementing the Flood Smart Action Plan Provides a forum for communication and information sharing Builds and maintains partnership and collaboration between Greece, Parma, and Hilton and upstream municipalities 2. Develop training requirements or program for municipal boards Power to protect development from the impacts of flooding Empower member with information 3. Adopt intermunicipal floodplain protection overlay district (POD) Acknowledges the upstream-downstream connection of communities Requires additional and intermunicipal review of site plans for building permits Includes floodplains not mapped by FEMA 4. Strengthen local flood damage prevention laws Commit to higher standards that will better protect people and assets Can also secure more Community Rating System points which benefits community resilience and flood insurance policy holders 5. Convene agricultural interests Strengthen relationships with agricultural interests to protect this important component of the local economy Reduce flooding contributions from these lands.

Monroe Recommendations 6. Educate at-risk property owners Help residents be more prepared so that they can respond to and recover from flooding more effectively 7. Prioritize and protect natural infrastructure Helps reduce impacts of flood events by storing water and releasing it more slowly to the stream network and groundwater Protect floodplains and wetlands that lie upstream of population centers so they continue to provide flood attenuation services 8. Share data with municipalities and the public Compiling GIS data and other data produced during this project Make info available to the public so it can used in decision making Improve communication by providing the same info to everyone 9. Utilize the Community Rating System A voluntary incentive program to exceed minimum NFIP requirements Improve public safety, reduce property loss, protect open space and natural resources, and recover better postdisaster A discount of up to 45% off flood insurance premiums

Implementing the Plan 1. Flood work group Subcommittee of Stormwater Coalition of Monroe County 2. Training opportunities Local Government Workshops and Silver Jackets interagency education opportunity and site visit 3. Floodplain Protection Overlay District G/FLRPcC secured grant funds and is in midst of project to develop model local law 4. Local Flood Damage Prevention Law Updating Comprehensive Plan 5. Educate property owners Greece is working with H 2 O Hero program to include flooding messages. 6. Prioritize Natural Infrastructure Completed floodplain function assessment, map of priority areas for flood mitigation/abatement 7. Share data Submitted grant proposals for statewide online mapper 8. Utilize CRS Completed CRS Quick Check as a next step to application

Questions? Stevie Adams, sadams@tnc.org, 845.322.8082 For more information: http://www.gflrpc.org/floodsmartcommunities.htm Funding provided by NOAA Coastal Storms Program through Ohio Sea Grant

The Community Study

Flooding Vulnerability Assessment Physical Soil, hydrological and topographic conditions Social Socioeconomic factors that indicate a higher risk of residents being impacted by flooding, weighted by population density Structural The number of structures located in floodplains and flood prone areas and certain characteristics Economic The value of structures, the contents within and the productivity of local workers and businesses

Composite Vulnerability to Flooding