Backtesting. Introduction

Similar documents
Backtesting. Introduction

Margin Methodology. Margin Overview. There are two main elements to the overall margin liability. Initial Margin. Variation Margin

Margin Collateral Framework

Validation of Nasdaq Clearing Models

Guidance consultation FSA REVIEWS OF CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT BY CCPS. Financial Services Authority. July Dear Sirs

Default Fund and Stress Testing

FIFTH THIRD BANCORP MARKET RISK DISCLOSURES. For the quarter ended March 31, 2016

FIFTH THIRD BANCORP MARKET RISK DISCLOSURES

FIFTH THIRD BANCORP MARKET RISK DISCLOSURES. For the quarter ended March 31, 2014

Matching Rules. Defined Terms

FIFTH THIRD BANCORP MARKET RISK DISCLOSURES. For the quarter ended September 30, 2015

Standard Initial Margin Model (SIMM) How to validate a global regulatory risk model

ESMA, EBA, EIOPA Consultation Paper on Initial and Variation Margin rules for Uncleared OTC Derivatives

Razor Risk Market Risk Overview

Content. International and legal framework Mandate Structure of the draft RTS References Annex

Comments on the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision s Consultative Document Fundamental review of the trading book: outstanding issues

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (Release No ; File Nos. SR-DTC ; SR-FICC ; SR-NSCC )

Initial Margin Back-testing

Annex 8. I. Definition of terms

Order Handling and Execution Policy Asset Class Specific Appendices Foreign Exchange (FX) Appendix

REGULATION (EU) 2015/1599 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

Margin Requirements for Non-Centrally Cleared Derivatives

CALCULATING CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK

UK Action Plan to reduce reliance on CRA Ratings

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently asked questions on Basel III monitoring

Methodological Framework

Clearing Capital at Risk ( CCaR ) Model at NASDAQ OMX. Model Validation 2016

Pillar III Disclosure Report 2017

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently asked questions on Basel III monitoring

Discussion Paper on Margin Requirements for non-centrally Cleared Derivatives

FS PERSPE PER C SPE TIVES C

Two issues were raised in your letter, which we address in turn below. 1. Resolution of differences between The Associations and RMA

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently asked questions on Basel III monitoring

Guidance Note Capital Requirements Directive Financial derivatives, SFTs and long settlement transactions

Official Journal of the European Union

CONSOLIDATED NOTICE FOR TRADED OPTIONS PROCEDURES UPDATED AND RESTATED

Please respond to: LME Clear Market Risk Risk Management Department

Contents. Supplementary Notes on the Financial Statements (unaudited)

1.1. Funded credit protection

Pillar 3 Regulatory Disclosure (UK) As at 31 December 2012

12 June Errata to the Technical Specifications for the Preparatory Phase

Fundamental Review of the Trading Book

Market Risk Guidance Notes

Supplementary Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)

The Modified Davis Method, by Frank Roellinger. First posted September 11, 2013 INTRODUCTION

National Australia Bank Limited, Mumbai Branch (Incorporated in Australia with limited liability)

A Guide to LME Clear THE WAY FORWARD IS CLEAR

Credit Card Market Study Annex 2: Further analysis. July 2016

LME Clear Board has minimal tolerance for the company to fail to meet its payment obligations within pre-committed timescales.

Citigroup Inc. Basel II.5 Market Risk Disclosures As of and For the Period Ended December 31, 2013

Public disclosure of CCP.A s Risk Management Systems, Test Policy and Model Validation

Guideline. Capital Adequacy Requirements (CAR) Chapter 4 - Settlement and Counterparty Risk. Effective Date: November 2017 / January

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of

Consultation Paper: Basel III Enhanced Risk Coverage: Counterparty Credit Risk and related issues

CESR s Guidelines on Risk Measurement and the Calculation of Global Exposure and Counterparty Risk for UCITS

ABI Response to EBA Discussion Paper On Defining Liquid Assets in the LCR under the draft CRR

Overview of ISDA Standard Credit Support Annex (SCSA)

Advanced Concepts in Capturing Market Risk: A Supervisory Perspective

BBVA COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. MARKET RISK DISCLOSURES

Citadel Securities (Europe) Limited

Interim financial statements (unaudited)

JSE CLEAR. IOSCO Disclosure Document. 11 April 2017

BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY GUIDELINES ON STRESS TESTING FOR THE BERMUDA BANKING SECTOR

Pillar 3 Disclosure Report For the First Half 2013

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision

CONSOLIDATED NOTICE FOR TRADED OPTIONS PROCEDURES

MEASURING TRADED MARKET RISK: VALUE-AT-RISK AND BACKTESTING TECHNIQUES

IRC / stressed VaR : feedback from on-site examination

ESMA CONTRIBUTION TO THE EBA S DRAFT REGULATORY TECHNICAL STANDARDS ON CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CCPs

June 20, Japanese Bankers Association

ISDA SIMM TM,1 GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK September 19, 2017

Appendix CA-15. Central Bank of Bahrain Rulebook. Volume 1: Conventional Banks

NFA Response to CPMI- IOSCO Consultative Report. Harmonisation of key OTC derivatives data elements (other than UTI and UPI) first batch

GARCH vs. Traditional Methods of Estimating Value-at-Risk (VaR) of the Philippine Bond Market

BBVA COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. MARKET RISK DISCLOSURES

Final Report. Guidelines on the management of interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities EBA/GL/2018/02.

Matching Rules. Defined Terms

Decision on liquidity risk management. General provisions Article 1

Instructions for EBA data collection exercise on CVA

Report EU-wide CCP Stress Test 2017

Supplementary Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently asked questions on Basel III monitoring ad hoc exercise

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. TLAC Quantitative Impact Study Report

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. Revisions to the minimum capital requirements for market risk

Opinion Draft Regulatory Technical Standard on criteria for establishing when an activity is to be considered ancillary to the main business

Final Draft Regulatory Technical Standards

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently asked questions on Basel III monitoring

EMIR Update - ESMA Publishes Finalised Technical Standards

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative document. Guidelines for Computing Capital for Incremental Risk in the Trading Book

Tests of significance for between year comparisons

Loco London precious metals

Market Risk Capital Disclosures Report. For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2014

Response of the AFTI. Association Française. des Professionnels des Titres. On European Commission consultation

Fundamental Review of The Trading Book The road to IMA

The law of unintended consequences from current regulatory reform

CC&G Risk Disclosure

EBF response to the EBA consultation on prudent valuation

Transcription:

Introduction A CCP shall assess its margin coverage by performing an ex-post comparison of observed outcomes with expected outcomes derived from the use of margin models. Such back testing analysis shall be performed each day in order to evaluate whether there are any testing exceptions to margin coverage. Coverage shall be evaluated on current positions for financial instruments, clearing members and take into account possible effects from portfolio margining and, where appropriate, interoperable CCPs. ESMA Article 49 paragraph 1 LME Clear will execute a number of back tests using different parameters and assumptions. Where applicable this will be performed via factor backtesting and on Clearing Member accounts using portfolio back testing. LME Clear will also use the methodology on back testing the performance of collateral haircuts. LME Clear will use the BASEL traffic light approach (BASEL II coverage test) and Kupiec-POF test to analyse the results of backtesting. 2

Governance - Generic Backtesting will be performed on a daily basis. Any breaches will be analysed and reported to the Executive Risk Committee on a monthly basis. At the point at which the number of breaches in a historical look-back period exceeds pre-determined thresholds then this will be immediately escalated to the Executive Risk Committee with a full explanation and where appropriate the proposed actions. A quarterly report will be provided to the Board Risk Committee. The results of backtesting will be made available to Clearing Members on a regular basis. 3

BASEL Traffic Light and Kupiec POF tests - Generic The coverage test has been derived from BASEL II practices to estimate the maximum number of breaches allowed per time window. LME Clear chose a traffic light approach that is derived from the Basel II regulation Annex 10a (page 315) which defines three zones; Green, Yellow and Red. The Basel Traffic Light approach uses a yellow zone beginning at the confidence interval at 95% of not achieving the stated margin methodology. The red zone begins at the point such that the probability exceeds 99.99%. Instead of calculating the start of the red zone as defined by the Basel approach, LME Clear will utilise the more conservative Kupiec-POF test at a 99% confidence interval to provide a more statistically robust measure. LME Clear will calculate the maximum number of breaches allowed per time window derived from the rules above. 4

Factor Margin Backtesting LME Clear will perform the backtesting of all SPAN margin parameters using one and two day nonoverlapping returns over a rolling period of 500 data points. This will be carried out by comparing price returns over a one day and two day period against the margin parameter set by LME Clear. Margin parameters will be compared to a forward absolute return, mirroring what would happen in the event of a Member default where LME Clear Initial Margin would need to cover the price moves on the subsequent days. This will test the appropriateness of the rates set by LME Clear and ensure those rates cover both one and two day returns sufficiently. 5

Factor Margin Backtesting January 2018 results The table below summarises the results. Margin backtesting performance continues to perform well, with no significant changes in the past quarter. The number of breaches for NASAAC inter-prompt has remained stable and within acceptable thresholds. Since the review for zinc inter-prompts was completed, and parameters increased, there have been no changes to the level of backtesting breaches. 6

Portfolio Margin Backtesting The LME Clear risk appetite states that LME Clear s margining model seeks to ensure that at each position account level a minimum 99.5% of observed losses will be less than the initial margin held. LME Clear will perform daily portfolio backtesting on all Members, for each position account. LME Clear will look to pass portfolio backtesting at a confidence interval of 99.5% on both one day and two day clean P&L. All portfolio backtesting will use 500 data points on each account to analyse backtesting results. For any new Member accounts, LME Clear will analyse and report on any breaches. However a minimum number of data points are required for the account level portfolio backtesting to be statistically relevant. LME Clear deems 250 data points to be sufficient. 7

Portfolio Margin Backtesting assumptions While analysing the backtesting results, the known SPAN margin algorithm limitations will be taken into account. Where breaches at an account level are caused by a known limitation, which are managed outside of the Initial Margin calculation, these will be documented. This may require no action to be taken or new model proposed, even if the number of breaches falls into the Red threshold. While the backtesting data will use a significant and realistic spread of real portfolios covering a substantial range of instruments and strategies, LME Clear will identify specific hypothetical strategies to prove the effectiveness of the algorithm and backtest these in conjunction with real portfolios. For the purpose of further validating the model LME Clear has included fixed representative portfolios within the analysis. This allows LME Clear to perform some relevant statistical analysis. Portfolio Backtesting January 2018 results The maximum number of breaches on a single member portfolio is one and there are currently no breaches on any hypothetical or representative portfolios. Therefore all results are in the green threshold. 8

Collateral Backtesting Member collateral back testing follows the same reporting and governance process as cleared positions. Back testing performed in 2 areas; Risk Factor; Securities zero coupon curves with volatility converted to prices, Gold spot prices, FX spot rates, LME Warrants cash price Member Portfolio Position account level, clean portfolio Results measured on same Basel II combined with Kupiec-POF basis as margin collateral against a 99.5% confidence level Results capture 1,000 data points of 1 day historical movements, 500 data points of non-overlapping 2 day historical movements. 9