Flood Hazard Risk Mapping:

Similar documents
Kentucky Risk MAP It s not Map Mod II

Flood Risk Review (FRR) Meeting. Cumberland County, Pennsylvania Carlisle, Pennsylvania December 5, 2016

Flood Risk Resilience in Alabama: Challenges and Successes

Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program Risk MAP Plenary Session GAFM 2011

FEMA s Flood Map Modernization Preparing for FY09 and Beyond: Integrated Flood Data Update, Risk Assessment, and Mitigation Planning

Tarrant County, TX Monthly Progress Report No. 33 (FEMA Contract No, HSFEHQ-09-D-0369) Task Order 01

Cameron County, TX. Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting. Please sign in (sheet at front of the room) Meeting will begin at 9:00

Findings/Debrief Meeting September 9, CDOT R4 Headquarters Big Thompson Conference Room W 10 th St. Greeley, CO 80634

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014

Use of FEMA Non regulatory Flood Risk Products in Planning

Planning Process---Requirement 201.6(b): An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan.

Preliminary DFIRM Community Coordination (PDCC) Meeting Gilchrist & Levy Counties, FL. April 30, 2015

David A. Stroud, CFM AMEC Earth & Environmental Raleigh, NC

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Five-Year Floodplain Management Work Plan

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

ASFPM Partnerships for Statewide Mitigation Actions. Alicia Williams GIS and HMP Section Manager, Amec Foster Wheeler June 2016

Natchitoches Parish, Louisiana Flood Insurance Study Update Risk Analysis March 3, Shona Gibson Project Monitor, FEMA Region VI

USACE Levee Safety Meeting FEMA Overview

NFIP Program Basics. KAMM Regional Training

Flood Risk Review and Resilience Meeting: Allegheny County

Durham County Preliminary Flood Hazard Data Public Meeting. July 28, 2016

Now You re Cooking! Recipes for Resilience. Jerri Daniels, Dewberry Diane Howe, FEMA Region 6

Coordinating CRS Success on a County Scale. Presented at the 41st Annual ASFPM Conference Managing Flood Risk in the Heartland

Floodplain Manager s Toolkit Unlocking the Hidden Potential of Floodplain Data for Your Community

What Was Updated in 2004 in Hennepin Countywide Maps?

Door County Floodplain Program Informational Meeting

Chemung HUC-8 Watershed Project. February 1, 2011

AGENDA. Floodplain Manager s Toolkit Unlocking the Hidden Potential of Floodplain Data for Your Community

LOCAL OFFICIALS MEETING Lake Wausau Physical Map Revision MARATHON COUNTY, WISCONSIN FEBRUARY 9, 2017

Wyoming s Five-Year Floodplain Management Work Plan

BEING PREPARED FOR MAP CHANGES What to Know; What to Say National Flood Conference May 16, 2016

Modernization, FEMA is Recognizing the connection between damage reduction and

ASFPM REGION 6 DIRECTOR ANNUAL REPORT. Annual Conference-Atlanta, Georgia

Outreach Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program. GAFM Technical Conference Flood Risk Outreach and Policy Session

Taylor County, Florida Community Coordination and Outreach (CCO) Meeting

New Tools for Mitigation & Outreach. Louie Greenwell Stantec

Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program

Flood Risk Assessment in the

Abington Township Public Meeting

Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting

Flood Risk in the Schuylkill Watershed. Planning for Resilient Communities

Are Risk MAP Products Really on Our Mind?

Bullitt County, Kentucky Preliminary DFIRM Community Open House. October 8, 2014 Shepherdsville, Kentucky

Changes Coming to the National Flood Insurance Program What to Expect. Impact of changes to the NFIP under Section 205 of the Biggert-Waters Act

Chapter 7 Appendix B: National Flood Insurance Program Summary for Kaua'i County, 2015 Update

Repetitive Loss Area Revisit # 6 Walter Road Area Jefferson Parish

February 18, 2005 NFIP-NCEM 5-Year CAP Plan, Sections I-III Page 1 of 6

Leveraging HAZUS for Risk Assessment Analysis within Risk MAP

Discovery Meeting: Middle Potomac- Catoctin Watershed. FEMA REGION III September 26, 2012 Rockville, MD and Fairfax, VA

FEMA s Flood Mapping Program

CITY OF PLANTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM NO

FEMA FLOOD MAPS Public Works Department Stormwater Management Division March 6, 2018

in coordination with Peoria County, Planning and Zoning Department

Oklahoma High Water Marks. CTP Community of Practice April 20, 2017

Plan Maintenance Procedures

History of Floodplain Management in Ascension Parish

Using Non-Regulatory RiskMAP Products in Floodplain Management. Ferrin Affleck, PE, CFM, Water Resources Engineer Project Manager Atkins

The National Flood Insurance Program A Model for Risk Management

King County, WA DFIRM Update and Seclusion Process. Webinar June 14, 2016

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Southwest Florida Discovery Kick-Off Meeting. February 4, 2014

Section 19: Basin-Wide Mitigation Action Plans

Floodplain Management 101. Mississippi Emergency Management Agency Floodplain Management Bureau

Herkimer County, New York Flood Hazard Mapping Status Report for Property Owners

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

National Flood Insurance Program. Jennifer Gilbert, CFM, ANFI New Hampshire NFIP State Coordinator

10/5/2015. What Makes a Sound Floodplain Management Program? What are the Flood Problems in your Community?

Strategies for Data Sharing

Biggert-Waters The Changing Script

Best Practices. for Incorporating Building Science Guidance into Community Risk MAP Implementation November 2012

Association of State FloodPlain Managers 2809 Fish Hatchery Road, Madison, WI Phone: Fax:

FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

Non Regulatory Risk MAP Products Flood Depth and Probability Grids

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

The National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System: An Introduction and Discussion of the RDO Role. October 2, :00-3:15 pm ET

Testimony of the National Association of Flood And Stormwater Management Agencies. Water Resources Development Act of 2012

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

COLLIER COUNTY FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT

Changes to the National Flood Insurance Program What to Expect

State of South Carolina Five-Year Floodplain Management Work Plan

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Flooding and the Public: Experiences from SC flooding events in 2015 and 2016

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Biggert-Waters Act 2012 (BW12)

Planning Process---Requirement 201.6(b): An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan.

Changes to the National Flood Insurance Program What to Expect

*How Federal Policy. Causes Flood Disasters. Leslie A. Bond, CFM LA Bond Associates

Flood Risk Products. New Techniques for Identifying and Communicating Flood Risk

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

National Flood Insurance Program s Community Rating System:

State of Missouri Five-Year Floodplain Management Plan

Cumberland County, NJ. Risk MAP Project Status Update April 22, 2013

Questions about the National Flood Insurance Program

Updated Total Exposure in Floodplain (TEIF) Method. Cynthia McCoy, FEMA Region X James Mawby, RAMPP (Dewberry)

FLOODPLAIN FAQ s. Last Update: June 2017

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

RichSmith_slate-FEMA_320x240.wmv.

Floodplain Management Plan State of Utah

National Flood Insurance Program BW-12

Transcription:

Mitigation Division Flood Hazard Risk Mapping: Past, Present and Future Oklahoma Floodplain Management Association Ron Wanhanen, PE FEMA Region 6 Risk Analysis Branch

Overview The Past The Present Risk MAP The Process Path Watershed Selection & Discovery The Future Mitigation Actions Partnerships Communicating Risk 2

The Past Prior to National Flood Insurance Program Flood insurance coverage was not available No national flood mapping program No Federal minimum standards for floodplain management Escalating costs to taxpayers for flood disaster relief

The Past National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Created by congress National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 National Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994 Identify and map flood hazard areas Provide a framework for floodplain management regulations Make flood insurance available in communities that participate in the NFIP 4

The Past NFIP Goals Decrease loss of life and property Increase importance of hazard mitigation Restore and protect natural resources and functions of floodplains Decrease taxpayer-funded disaster costs Decrease insurance cost Increase sustainability/livability

The Past Prior to Map Modernization Panels updated primarily by Letters of Map Revision (LOMRs) Two Part Maps BFEs on one Floodways on other Community Based maps Large scale revisions 6

The Past Map Modernization Move to Countywide Mapping Transformation of flood hazard inventory from paper to digital format Working towards seamless datasets Overlay of flood data with community datasets Map Mod projects working towards effective issuance Nine studies in final appeal/protest resolution 41 studies prepared in digital format in Oklahoma during Map Mod 7

The Past Successes: Map Modernization After completion of Map Modernization studies, DFIRMs will be available for 92% of population Digital data has heightened flood risk awareness by: Providing new tools to be used for risk awareness such as the National Flood Hazard Layer Triggering a national conversation on flood risk and mitigation Identified need for increased coordination between Federal Agencies

The Past Lessons Learned : Map Modernization Elevation Data FEMA acquiring and using more precise elevation data in future studies Digital conversion of SFHAs Ease of incorporation of future studies Local use of datasets Realizing the need for more communication during the process By modernizing our flood inventory, FEMA has laid the groundwork for Risk MAP.

The Past Lessons Learned : Map Modernization Surveys show that citizens expect to hear about flood risk from their local official. More local involvement during the process could lead to: Reviewing of maps by communities before they are effective Emphasis on communicating risk to citizens Trust of flood hazards identified and risk information

The Present: Risk MAP Risk MAP is not Map-Driven, it is Action-Driven through local ownership of risk.

The Present: Risk MAP Risk MAP offers opportunities for change the way FEMA and Local communities interact Risk MAP empowers communities to identify natural hazard risk communicate risk recognize and embrace the benefits of floodplain management understand and work to mitigate identified risks prepare residents for potential natural hazard risks

The Present: Risk MAP Change is a process, not an event.

The Process Path

The Process Path Community mitigation action and map revision is cyclical Decision points along the Path occur there is always action that can be taken locally identification of risk may not result in a map revision, but hazard identification is still useful Movement for communities to be more proactive in reduction of risk Acts to assist in the streamline of interaction with FEMA

Watershed Selection Projects are selected for funding based on a number of factors: Risk Need Elevation data availability Regional knowledge / issues CTP/State input State business plans

Watersheds & Discovery Once the HUC-8 watershed is selected: FEMA works to partner with the State throughout the process All communities within the watershed will be engaged in the Discovery Process Data collection to assist watershed evaluation for possible Risk MAP project in the future

Watersheds & Discovery Watershed approach will review flood risk and require interaction of multiple parties Discovery Project Maps Discovery will be initiated in five Region 6 watersheds with FY10 funding Lake O Cherokees Lower North Canadian Risk MAP products will assist communities to: Identify project areas Strengthen Mitigation Plans/Actions

Lake O Cherokees

Lower North Canadian

Watersheds & Discovery What data and resources are already out there? What do the FEMA/State/Local records indicate?

Watersheds & Discovery Internal team to compile records to prepare watershed profile to Better engage with areas selected for Discovery/Study/Revision There are multiple opportunities to determine the message throughout processes (with State input) Indicators Mitigation Plans Projects to reduce risk? Outreach projects to assist efforts? Active and Historic Grants? Number of Policies?

Watersheds & Discovery Once a watershed is identified, FEMA will work with the State to: Validate Discovery areas Determine Discovery meeting locations Develop Community Engagement Strategies Up front coordination Ahead of Discovery Leverage State/FMI CACs & CAVs Joint preparation for meeting

Watersheds & Discovery Prior to the meeting FEMA and State discuss known issues FEMA and State leverage local knowledge to set tone for the pending interaction State and FEMA reach out to inform and educate the Discovery communities on impending process Data needs Local issues and concerns Delivery formats needed for data use Areas of Mitigation Interest

Watersheds & Discovery Partnership and coordination with the State Participation of local communities Comprehensive understanding of risk in the Watershed

Watersheds & Discovery Once data is collected and analyzed FEMA will touch base with the State on proposed scope FEMA will solicit input from the Discovery communities Those selected will continue along the path towards a Kick-Off meeting Those not selected will be engaged for potential mitigation actions and plan updates

Kick Off Meeting Intended to assure that communities understand project scope for update Discussion to revolve around Risk Potential Mitigation Actions Areas for Mitigation Interest Recent local decisions that influence flood risk in community

The Future Every flood starts with a single raindrop. Every Mitigation Action starts with a single idea.

The Future Adopting mitigation planning Communicating risk to its residents Utilize Risk MAP tools Enacting mitigation action to reduce risk Maintaining maps through LOMRs Utilizing mitigation plans to secure grant funding for mitigation action Emergency management, floodplain management and planning officials interacting

LOMRs as Map Maintenance Floodplains are constantly changing Development Changes to land use Channelization and naturalization projects Resulting in the continuous need for map update Don t wait for the next mapping project FPAs: Understand the requirements for FIRM updates Without good representation of the flood hazards, you can t reduce your risk

Risk MAP Products Flood Risk Database Flood Risk Assessment Data Flood Depth & Analysis Grids Changes Since Last FIRM Data Areas of Mitigation Interest Flood Risk Map Enhanced Products Flood Risk Report Ad-Hoc Flood Risk Analyses

Risk Awareness leading to Action Assessment of the natural hazards will help communities evaluate the problems, set goals, and review possible strategies and measures for their hazard mitigation plans.

Risk MAP Products http://rampp-team.com County-specific information on current Risk MAP Projects Intended for local official project updates and links to resources http://riskmap6.com Interactive mapping portal for Risk MAP studies Intended for public More to come soon!

How can you help? Inform local planners, engineers and community officials of the flood hazard areas you protect Review the current effective flood hazard maps with Emergency Management personnel provide input for areas that you service and are not shown as vulnerable Assist in the identification of residents at risk (low water crossings) Alert the public to flood hazard risk and promote preparedness

How can you help? Public Education and Awareness of Risk Outreach projects Speaker series/ demonstration events Hazard map information Real estate disclosure Library materials School children educational programs Hazard expositions Fire-wise Communities Utilize Risk MAP Outreach Products

How can you help? Your valuable information and experience will lead to: Better flood risk assessment More accurate flood risk identification Risk MAP products Flood Insurance Rate Maps Stronger State and Local Hazard Mitigation Plans Increased use of grant programs to reduce risk in your State

Conclusion Mapping Identification of areas of natural hazard risk Assessment Review and analysis of hazard areas Planning Mitigation activities to reduce risk Partnering with you will help us communicate these risks to your residents consistently. Ronald.Wanhanen@dhs.gov