Case 1:17-cr AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of X X. COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act)

Similar documents
Case 1:09-cr RJL Document 3 Filed 12/11/09 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:14-cr JEI Document 28 Filed 05/09/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID: 105 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THEDISTRICTOFNEW JERSEY

us OJ $TRICT COUR-1 RIO/\

Case 3:13-cr AWT Document 2 Filed 05/21/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Criminal NO. 3:13CR~S (llwrj -'"

Case 4:15-cr Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 11/27/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 3:12-cr HZ Document 25 Filed 04/24/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division

2G17 SEP 2 6 Prl 3 22 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,('--,,; _.._ "9RIMINAL NO. 3:17CFJ:lj._J_/ftfn

- - X CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE IEEPA AND THE ITR AND TO CONDUCT AN UNLICENSED MONEY TRANSMITTING BUSINESS. Background

- against- Cr. No. (T. 18, U.S.C., 371 and 3551 JEFFERY CHOW, At all times relevant to this Information, unless otherwise stated:

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/20/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/20/2017 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:08-cr Document 3 Filed 08/07/2008 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

COUNT ONE (The Tax Shelter Fraud Conspiracy) Background

Case 1:18-cr LY Document 3 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 9. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS jp PH 1: 21 AUSTIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : Hon. INDICTMENT

DAVID B. CHALMERS, JR., : S1 05 Cr. 59 (DC) JOHN IRVING, LUDMIL DIONISSIEV, : BAYOIL (USA), INC., and BAYOIL SUPPLY & TRADING LIMITED, : COUNT ONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 1:17-cr AT-CMS Document 7 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 18

Case 4:09-cr Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/0,9/2009 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ) )

THE GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

CRIINAL INFORMATION The United States charges:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. The United States Department of Justice alleges that:

Case 1:14-cr PLM Doc #1 Filed 07/24/14 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. No. INDICTMENT UNDER SEAL COUNT ONE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * * * * * ****** INDICTMENT. COUNT ONE (Wire Fraud)

Case 3:13-cr KI Document 1 Filed 07/16/13 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT. Introduction

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Kansas City Docket) Case No. 09- I N D I C T M E N T COUNT ONE THE CONSPIRACY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (TOPEKA DOCKET)

IRIZARRY GOLD, M.J. * OCT t8 -A

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * * * * * * * * * * ******* SECOND SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT

Case 2:18-cr JS Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 INTRODUCTION

FILED IN OPEN COURT U.S.D.C. Atlanta

Case 2:13-cr ES Document 11 Filed 11/18/13 Page 1 of 35 PageID: 62

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN (WATERLOO) DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 18-CR-2058.

Case 1:06-cr Document 3 Filed 04/11/2006 Page 1 of 26. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at CHATTANOOGA

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA I N F O R M A T I O N

Case 1:09-cr MGC Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT SOUTHERN DIS,,!,CT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THE UNITED STATES GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT: INTRODUCTION

Case 1:06-cr EWN Document 169 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 1 of 39 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, (Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. 371) STATEMENT OF OFFENSE

Case 1:10-cr BEL Document 1 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 16

Case 1:10-cr RJL Document 1 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION INDICTMENT. COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud) A.

Case 1:05-cr RWR Document 1 Filed 08/04/2005 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION INFORMATION. General Allegations

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:13-cr LDD Document 24 Filed 06/19/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:17-cr GMS Document 3 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

3:06-ar Date Filed 11/01/2006 Entry Number 259 (Court only) Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINE SVILLE DIVISION

Case 4:15-cr WTM-GER Document 1 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION

Case 3:18-cr BTM Document 1 Filed 06/29/18 PageID.9 Page 1 of 11. saf/\laif;\ co CASE UNSEALED PER ORDER OF COURT

Case 1:17-mj UA Document 1 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INDICTMENT COUNT ONE BACKGROUND

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. For the Western District of New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INFORMATION. 1. The United States Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Fraud Section,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 3:06-cr JWS-JDR Document 149 Filed 12/15/2006 Page 1 of 27

INTRODUCTION. At all times relevant to this Superseding Indictment: 1. The defendants MATTHEW BURSTEIN, ELIAS COMPRES,

Case 2:13-cr KOB-TMP Document 1 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION FRANKFORT V. INDICTMENT NO. * * * * * COUNT 1 18 U.S.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") alleges:

Case 1:13-cr CMH Document 12 Filed 09/19/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 39

Case 1:10-cr REB Document 5 Filed 06/08/10 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

COUNT ONE. (Conspiracy to Commit Securities Fraud) RELEVANT PERSONS AND ENTITIES

-v.- : 10 Cr. ( ) Defendant. : COUNT ONE (Bank Fraud) THE DEFENDANT AND HIS ACCOMPLICE, HASSAN NEMAZEE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. No. 1 : 18 - C R - Q 74. Count One

#"WrBr, :1'ly3':lT:i9iI1YI95.!. rmk:sss MAtsuMoTO, J. ---x. Derendan. tt;l&#iuti,u,u;:etljfr'i!t'j*, I F\A/ [/ I

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cr RWS-ECS Document 1 Filed 02/19/13 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Department of Justice. U.S. Attorney s Office. Southern District of New York. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Thursday, September 10, 2015

Case 1:17-cr NGG Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 1. - against - Cr. No. (T. 15, U.S.C., 80b-6, 80b-I4 and 80b-17;

Case 5:18-cr DDC Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 7. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Topeka Docket)

INDICTMENT COUNT ONE. The Grand Jury for the District of Maryland charges that: Introduction

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

FILED JAN ~ ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

Case 2:12-cr CM Document 1 Filed 04/18/12 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (KANSAS CITY DOCKET)

Case 3:15-cr JRS Document 1 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE~ EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 2:12-cr SD Document 1 Filed 04/10/12 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division. Count 1: Count 2: CRIMINAL INFORMATION.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE. INDICTMENT v. NO. 18 U.S.C. 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (KANSAS CITY DOCKET) STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

RECEIVED SEP Case 3:18-cr MAS Document 64 Filed 09/25/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 89 WILLAM T. WALSHJ.D STATES DISTRICT COURT

Sealed pubhe and wi1 NOW-.r-= Waril STATES CHARGES:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:10-cr PLF Document 1 Filed 11/09/10 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 5:09-cr D Document 1 Filed 04/16/09 Page 1 of 8

Case 8:18-cr TDC Document 6-3 Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 14 ATTACHMENT A STATEMENT OF FACTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:12-cr WHW Document 1 Filed 01/12/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 1

INTRODUCTION TO ALL COUNTS. At all times relevant to this Indictment, unless otherwise indicated:

Case 1:05-cr EWN Document 1 Filed 12/20/2005 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

2:11-cr MPM -DGB # 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Defendant. information, accuse the defendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

COUNT ONE (Conspiracy - Peter Iulo and James Murray) BACKGROUND

Transcription:

Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. - - - - - - X - - USDC SD~Y DOCCME1...;T ELECTRONIC ALLY FILED DOC#: D~TE!~'ILED~OE INFORMATION i J:-~l=- COLIN STEVEN, Defendant. - - - X 17 Cr. 7R8 The United States Attorney charges: COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act) Overv:i.ew 1. From in or about November 2009, up to and including in or about April 2011, COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, engaged 1n an international conspiracy to bribe an official of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (the "Saudi Arabia Official") in connection with the $93 million sale of jets from STEVEN's employer, Embraer S.A. ("Embraer"), to a company located J..n Saudi Arabia (the "Saudi Arabia Company"). As part of the scheme, STEVEN caused approximately $1.5 million in bribe payments to be made by Embraer to the SaudJ.. Arabia Officlal through an intermediary company located in South Afrlca (the "South Africa Company"). In exchange for those payments, the Saudi Arabia Offic1al provided more favorable terms to Embraer in a sale of jets to the Saudi Arabia Company. As a further p~rt of the scheme, 1 JUDGE NATHAN

Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 2 of 21 STEVEN arranged to and did receive a kickback from a portion of the bribe proceeds. Re1evant Persons and Entities 2. At all times relevant to this Information, Embraer was an aircraft manufacturer based in Brazil, with operations and subsidiaries in various locations around the world, including the United States and the Middle East. Embraer manufactured commercial, executive, and defense aircraft for governmental and private customers throughout the world. Embraer's American depositary shares were listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange, and Embraer was required to file per1odic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, Title 15, United States Code, Section 78o(d). Accordingly, Embraer was an issuer within the meaning of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA"), T1tle 15, United States Code, Sections 78dd-l and 78m. Embraer Representations LLC ("Embraer RL") was a subsidiary wholly owned by Embraer and incorporated in Delaware. Embraer RL maintained a bank account in Manhattan, New York. 3. At all times relevant to this Information, COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, was a British national. Until December 2013, STEVEN was an executive in Embraer's Executive Jets Division and had responsibility for overseeing the generat1on of sales in regions that included the Middle East. Accordingly, 2

Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 3 of 21 STEVEN was an "employee" and "agent" of an issuer within the meaning of the FCPA, Title 15, United States Code, Section 78dd- 1. 4. The Saudi Arabia Company was the state-owned and state-controlled national oil company of Saudi Arabia, and performed a function that Saudi Arabia treated as its own. Accordingly, the Saudi Arabia Company was an "instrumentality" of a foreign government within the meaning of the FCPA, Title 15, United States Code, Section 78dd-l(f) (1). The Saudi Arabia Official was a high-level official at the Saudi Arabia Company who had influence over aircraft purchasing decisions. 5. The South Africa Company was an industrial valve and pump manufacturer partially owned by friends of COLIN STEVEN,. the defendant. As of the time of the events described in this Information, the South Africa Company had no experience in the aircraft industry or in Saudi Arabia. The FCPA Br1bery Scheme 6. From in or about November 2009 through in or about April 2011, COLIN STEVEN, with others, agreed to pay, and caused and alded and abetted Embraer's actual payment of, approximately $1.5 million in bribes to the Saudi Arabia Official in order to obtain a contract between the Saudi Arabia Company and Embraer for the sale of three business jets, valued at approximately $93 million. 3

Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 4 of 21 7. In his capacity as an executive with Embraer's Executive Jets Division, COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, oversaw staff who were responsible for selling new and used Embraer aircraft. Both Embraer's revenue and employees' sales commissions, including for STEVEN and the sales agents he supervised, were significantly higher for sales of new aircraft compared to used aircraft. 8. In or about 2006, COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, and others at Embraer learned that the Saudi Arabia Company was interested in purchasing aircraft. Thereafter, and unt1l in or about the fall of 2009, STEVEN and a salesperson who reported to him had occasional contact with employees of the Saudi Arabi~ Company, and periodically discussed the potential sale of Embraer aircraft. Durlng that period, STEVEN learned that the Saudi Arabia Company was interested in purchasing. used aircraft. ' 9. In or about late 2009, COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, met with the Saudi Arabia Official in London, England. The Saudi Arabla Official offered to help Embraer win the aircraft contract from the Saudi Arabia Company, and to change the deal from used jets to new jets if Embraer paid the Saudi Arab1a Official. STEVEN knew that the Saudi Arabia Official was a high-level official at the Saudi Arabia Company and believed that the Saudi Arabia Official could dellver on the promlse. 4

Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 5 of 21 10. Over the course of multiple discussions in London, England, and with the approval of his supervisor ("Embraer Executive A"), COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, and the Saudi Arabia Official agreed on a per-aircraft payment of $550,000 to be paid to the Saudi Arabia Official, for a total bribe amount of $1.65 million. 11. On or about December 10, 2009, COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, sent an email to Embraer Executive A and another Embraer execut1ve ("Embraer Executive B"), in which STEVEN wrote, in part, that the Saudi Arabia Official "has budget[ed] for used [aircraft] only and w1ll have to lobby for more funds to take new [aircraft] over used." Defendant STEVEN added, "[t]here is more to come to replace the entire fleet they have with [Embraer model] 170, s [sic] [Saudi Arabia Official] sees. this as long term." Embraer Executive A approved offering a per-aircraft payment of $550,000 to the Saudi Arabia Official. 12. In or about late 2009 and early 2010, COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, developed a plan to use the South Africa Company as a purported agent on the transaction with the Saudi Arabia Company. As a result, Embraer would pay $1.65 million in "finders fees" to the South Africa Company. In truth and in fact, the South Africa Company would perform no work on the transaction and would be used to facilitate and to disguise the payment to the Saudi Arabia Offic1al. 5

.. Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 6 of 21 13. Between in or about late 2009 and in or about early 2010, COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, had a telephone conversat1on with an executive at Ernbraer ("Ernbraer Executive C"), in which STEVEN described the planned bribery scheme and the plan to use the South Africa Company as the ent1ty that would pass the payments to the Saudi Arabia Offic1al. Embraer Executive c reassured STEVEN that South Africa Company could be trusted to pass on the money to the Saudi Arabia Official. 14. In or about early 2010, acting on the Saudi Arabia Official's recommendation, a committee at the Saud1 Arabia Company approved the Saudi Arabia Company's purchase of three new a1rcraft from Embraer for $93 m1llion. 15. On or about March 5, 2010, Embraer RL executed an agreement with the South Africa Company, pursuant to wh1ch the South Africa Company would purportedly "promote sales of.. ; aircraft manufactured by Embraer.. solely and specifically to" a subsidiary of the Saudi Arabia Company. In reality, the South Africa Company provided no services to Embraer other than serving as a conduit to funnel payments to the Saud1 Arab1a Official. The agreement did not disclose that the payments were ultimately bound for the Saudi Arabia Official. 16. Less than two weeks later, on or about March 15, 2010, Embraer and a U.S.-based subsidiary of the Saudi Arabia Company entered into an aircraft purchase agreement, pursuant to which 6

Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 7 of 21 the subsidiary agreed to purchase three new aircraft for approximately $93 million. The aircraft were delivered in or around November and December 2010. 17. In or about December 2010, the South Africa Company submitted three invoices to Embraer, each in the amount of $550,000, for its purported commission, even though it had not rendered any services to Embraer in connection with the sale. Executives at Embraer approved paying the invoices. The payments were made through two Wlre transfers from Embraer RL's bank account in Manhattan, New York, to the South Africa Company's bank account in South Africa: $550,000 on or about December 22, 2010, and $1.1 million on or about February 18, 2011. 18. Between on or about February 2, 2011, and on or about April 5, 2011, the South Africa Company made three wire transfers totaling $1,434,100 to bank accounts in Switzerland and Bahrain held by an indlvidual who was acting as an intermediary for the Saudi Arabia Offic1al ("Intermediary A"). Intermediary A kept a portion of the funds and transferred the remainder to the Saudi Arabia Official. 7

Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 8 of 21 The Kickback Scheme 19. As set forth below, COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, caused a port1on of the fraudulent payment that Embraer RL made to the South Africa Company to be paid to STEVEN as a kickback. In total, STEVEN received approximately $129,935 in kickbacks. 20. In or about late 2009 and early 2010, while COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, with others, was arranging to pay the Saudi Arabia Official, STEVEN also developed a plan to take a portion of the money as a kickback. STEVEN d1scussed this plan with Embraer Executive C, and the two agreed that STEVEN, Embraer Executive C, and the South Afr1ca Company would each take a portion of the $1.65 million to be paid by Embraer RL. 21. At the direction of COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, and unbeknownst to Embraer, the South Africa Company transferred to STEVEN's United States bank account $129,935 of the $1.65 m1llion it had received from Embraer RL: $97,465 on or about October 21, 2011, and $32,470 on or about December 1, 2011. Those w1re transfers passed through a bank in Manhattan, New York. 22. COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, and Embraer Executive C, who had recently been promoted with1n the company, subsequently had a telephone conversation in which Embraer Executive C informed STEVEN that Embraer Executive C no longer wanted his 8

Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 9 of 21 share of the money. As a result, STEVEN kept all of the $129,935 he received from the South Africa Company. 23. In or about March 2010 and November 2010, Embraer paid COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, a total of $44,000 in commissions based on the sale of the three new aircraft to Saudi Arabia Company. 24. On or about December 19, 2014, COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, was interviewed by an agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI"). During that interview, when asked about one of the wire transfers he recelved from the South Africa Company in 2011, STEVEN falsely stated that the funds had been transferred to hlm by an executive of the South Africa Company for the purpose of buying real estate in connection with a potential business venture between STEVEN and the executive. Statutory Allegations 25. From in or about November 2009, up to and including in or about April 2011, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere, COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, and others known and unknown, willfully and knowingly did combine, conspire, confederate, and agree together and with each other to commit an offense against the United States, to wit, a v~olation of the FCPA, Title 15, United States Code, Section 78dd-1. 26. It was a part and object of the conspiracy that COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, being an employee and agent of an issuer, 9

Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 10 of 21 and aiding and abetting an issuer, together with others known and unknown, would and did.willfully make use of the mails and means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce corruptly in furtherance of an offer, payment, promise to pay, and authorization of the payment of any money, and offer, gift, promise to g1ve, and authorization of the giving of anything of value to a foreign official, and to a person, while knowing that all and a portion of such money and thing of value would be and had been offered, given, and promised, directly and indirectly, to a foreign official, for purposes of: (i) influencing acts and decisions of such fore~gn official in that foreign official's official capacity; (ii) inducing such foreign official to do and omit to do acts in violation of the lawful duty of such foreign official; (iii) securing any improper advantage; and (iv) inducing such foreign official to use that foreign official's influence with a foreign government and instrumentalities thereof to affect and influence acts and decisions of such government and instrumentalit1es, in order to assist Embraer in obtaining and reta1n1ng business for and with, and directing business to, Embraer and others. 10

Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 11 of 21 Overt Acts 27. In furtherance of the conspiracy and to effect the illegal object thereof, the following overt acts, among others, were committed in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere: a. In or about late 2009, COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, met with the Saudi Arabia Official in London, England, and discussed the payment of money to the Saudi Arabia Official in exchange for that official's help in causing the Saudi Arabia Company to award Embraer a contract for the sale of three aircraft and in changing the terms of the deal from used jets to new jets. b. In or about late 2009, STEVEN met with the Saudi Arabia Official in London and agreed on a per-aircraft bribe amount of $550,000, for a total amount of $1.65 million, in exchange for the Saudi Arabia Official's assistance on the deal. c. On or about January 5, 2010, STEVEN sent an ema1l to other Embraer employees, including his supervisor, in which STEVEN summarized information and advice that he had received from the Saudi Arab1a Official concerning the negotiat1on of the sale of new aircraft to the Saudi Arabia Company. d. On or about December 22, 2010, STEVEN, with others, caused Embraer RL to transfer $550,000 from its bank account in Manhattan, New York, to the South Africa Company. 11

Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 12 of 21 e. On or about February 18 1 2010 1 STEVEN 1 with others/ caused Embraer RL to transfer $1.1 million from its bank account in Manhattan/ New York 1 to the South Afr2ca Company. (Title 18/ United States Code 1 Section 371.) COUNT TWO (Violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act) The United States Attorney further charges: 28. The allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 24 are repeated and realleged as if fully set forth herein. 29. On or about February 18 1 2011 1 in the Southern Distr1ct of New York and elsewhere 1 COLIN STEVEN, the defendant 1 being an employee and agent of an issuer, and by aiding and abetting an issuer, willfully used and caused to be used the mails and means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce corruptly in furtherance of an offer, payment, promise to pay, and authorization of the payment of money, and offer, gift, promise to g1ve 1 and authorization of the giving of anything of value to a foreign official, and to a person 1 while knowing that all and a portion of such money and th2ng of value would be and had been offered 1 given, and promised, directly and indirectly 1 to a foreign official, for purposes of: ( i) influencing acts and decisions of such foreign official in that foreign official's off1cial capacity; (ii) inducing such foreign official to do and om2t to do acts in v1olation of the lawful duty of such foreign 12

Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 13 of 21 official; (iii) securing any improper advantage; and (iv) inducing such foreign official to use that foreign official's influence with a foreign government and instrumental1ties thereof to affect and influence acts and decisions of such government and instrumental1ties, to wit, STEVEN caused and aided and abetted the transfer of $1.1 million from Embraer RL's bank account in Manhattan, New York to the South Africa Company's bank account in South Africa, in order to assist Embraer in obtain1ng and retaining bus1ness for and with, and directing business to, Embraer and others. {Title 15, United States Code, Sections 78dd-l and 78ff(c)(2)(A); and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2.) COUNT THREE (Wire Fraud Conspiracy) The United States Attorney further charges: 30. The allegation set forth 1n paragraphs 1 through 24 are repeated and realleged as if fully set forth herein. 31. From in or about December 2009, up to and including in or around December 2011, 1n the Southern District of New York and elsewhere, COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, and others known and unknown, willfully and knowingly did combine, conspire, confederate, and agree together and with each other to commit wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343, to wit, STEVEN, with others, caused Embraer RL to 13

Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 14 of 21 wire approximately $1.65 million to the South Africa Company, with STEVEN concealing that he would receive approximately $129,935 of that money. 32. It was a part and an object of the conspiracy that COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, and others known and unknown, willfully and knowingly, having devised and intending to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud, and for obtaining money and property by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, would and did transmit and cause to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, and television communication in interstate and foreign commerce, writings, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme and artifice, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343. (Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349.) COUNT FOUR (Wire Fraud) The United States Attorney further charges: 33. The allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 24 are repeated and realleged as if fully set forth herein. 34. From in or about December 2010, up to and including in or about December 2011, in the Southern Distr1ct of New York and elsewhere, COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, willfully and knowingly, having devised and intend1ng to devise a scheme and artifice to 14

' Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 15 of 21 defraud, and for obtaining money and property by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, transmitted and caused to be transm1tted by means of wire, radio, and television communication in interstate and fore1gn commerce, writings, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme and artifice, and did aid and abet the same, to wit, STEVEN caused Embraer RL to wire approximately $1.65 mill1on to the South Africa Company, with STEVEN concealing that he would and did receive approximately $129,935 of that money. (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2.) COUNT FIVE (Money Launder1ng Conspiracy) The United States Attorney further charges: 35. The allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 24 are repeated and realleged as if fully set forth herein. 36. From in or about December 2009, up to and includ1ng in or about December 2011, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere, COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, and others known and unknown, willfully and know1ngly d1d comb1ne, conspire, confederate, and agree together and with each other to commit money laundering, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956 (a) (2) (A). 15

Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 16 of 21 37. It was a part and an object of the conspiracy that COLIN STEVENr the defendant, and others known and unknown 1 would and did knowingly transport 1 transmit, and transfer 1 and attempt to transportr transmit 1 and transfer a monetary instrument and funds from a place in the United States to and through a place outside the United States 1 and to a place in the United States from and through a place outside the United States 1 with the intent to promote the carrying on of specified unlawful activity 1 to wit 1 the FCPA violations charged in Counts One and Two of this Information and the wire fraud violations charged in Counts Three and Four of this Information. (Title 18 1 United States Code 1.Section 1956(h).) COUNT SIX (Money Laundering) The United States Attorney further charges: 38. The allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 24 are repeated and realleged as if fully set forth hereln. 39. From in or about December 2010r up to and including' in or about December 2011 1 elsewhere, COLIN STEVEN 1 transmit, and transfer 1 in the Southern District of New York and the defendantr did knowingly transportr and aid, abet, and cause others to transport/ transmit/ and transfer, and attempt to transport, transmit, and transfer a monetary instrument and funds, from a place in the United States to and through a place outside the 16

.. Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 17 of 21 United States, and to a place in the United States from and through a place outside the United States, with the intent to promote the carrying on of specified unlawful activity, to wit, the FCPA violations charged in Counts One and Two of this Information and the wire fraud violat1ons charged in Counts Three and Four of this Information. (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1956(a)(2)(A) and 2.) COUNT SEVEN (False Statement) The United States Attorney further charges: 40. The allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 24 are repeated and realleged as if fully set forth herein. 41. On or about December 19, 2014, in the Southern District of Florida and elsewhere, COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, in a matter within the jurisdiction of the executive branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully made a materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statement and representation, to wit, during an interview with the FBI, STEVEN falsely stated that funds he had received from the South Africa Company in 2011 had been transferred to him by an executive of the South Africa Company for the purpose of buying real estate in connection with a potential business venture between himself and the executive when, in truth and in fact, 17

... Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 18 of 21 those funds constituted a kickback of a portion of bribery payments from Ernbraer. (Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001.) FORFEITURE ALLEGATION AS TO COUNTS ONE THROUGH FOUR 42. As a result of cornrn~tting the offenses alleged in Counts One through Four of this Information, COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981 (a) (1) (C), and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), any and all property, real and personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the cornrniss~on of the offenses alleged in Counts One through Four of this Informat~on that the defendant personally obtained. 18

Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 19 of 21 FORFEITURE ALLEGATION AS TO COUNTS FIVE AND SIX 43. As a result of committing the offenses alleged in Counts Five and Six of this Information, COLIN STEVEN, the defendant, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a) (1), any and all property, real and personal, involved in the offenses alleged in Counts Five and Six of this Information, or any property traceable to such property, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency represent1ng the amount of property involved 1n said offenses that the defendant personally obtained. Substitute Assets Provision 44. If any of the property described above as being subject to forfeiture, as a result of any act or omission of COLIN STEVEN, the defendant: a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court; d. has been substantially diminished in value; or e. has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without difficulty; 19

Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 20 of 21 it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p); and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), to seek forfe1ture of any other property of said defendant up to the value of the forfeitable property described above. (Title 18, Un1ted States Code, Sections 981 and 982; Title 21, United States Code, Section 853; Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461.) JOON H. KIM Acting United States Attorney SANDRA MOSER Acting Chief, Fraud Section Criminal Division United States Department of Justice 20

Case 1:17-cr-00788-AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 21 of 21 Form No. USA-33s-274 (Ed. 9-25-58) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISRTICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - v. - COLIN STEVEN, Defendant. 17 Cr. INFORMATION (18 u.s.c. 371, 1343, 1349, 1956(h), 1956(a) (2) (A), 1001, 2; 15 u.s.c. 78dd-1, 78ff(c) (2} {A).) Joan H. Kim Acting United States Attorney Sandra Moser Acting Chief, Fraud Section 21