EU Budget for the future ERDF/CF. June 2018 EVALNET. #CohesionPolicy #EUinmyRegion #ESIFOpendata

Similar documents
EU Budget for the future New legislative package for cohesion policy #CohesionPolicy #EUinmyRegion

Lisboa, 19 junho Altis Grand Hotel Sala Roma

Regional development & cohesion & cooperation 7 June IPA-CBC

Programming Period. European Social Fund

Cohesion Policy

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on the European Regional Development Fund and on the Cohesion Fund

DRAFT TEMPLATE AND GUIDELINES FOR THE CONTENT

Draft template and guidelines on the content of the Partnership Agreements (PAs) (Article 14 of the CPR) CLLD aspects

The funding possibilities to build up adaptation capacities and take action

Financial management: comparing and

DRAFT TEMPLATE AND GUIDELINES ON THE CONTENT PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OF THE

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. European Structural and Investment Funds. Guidance Note on

European Union Regional Policy Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. EU Cohesion Policy Proposals from the European Commission

MARITIME AFFAIRS & FISHERIES. EMFF Strategic Programming

Summary of the Partnership Agreement for Hungary,

Key elements of the Commission proposal for the future European Social Fund

EU Cohesion Policy

FICHE 4A. Version 1 4 April 2013

Opinion No 6/ CH2OPI. 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi - L Luxembourg T (+352) E eca.europa.eu

ESF Evaluation Partnership 17 November Key elements of the Commission proposal for the future ESF

Launch Event. INTERREG IPA CBC Croatia- Serbia

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Summary of the Partnership Agreement for Croatia,

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Committee on Regional Development

Com (2018) 372. Information Note

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

The ESF+: A Fund for a More Social Europe. #EUBudget Maria Iglesia

The urban dimension. in the legislative proposals for the future cohesion policy. Zsolt Szokolai DG REGIO C.2 Urban development, territorial cohesion

Template for EMMF operational programme (CLLD elements) FARNET MA meeting, 25 March 2014

PLANNING BUREAU SUMMARY. December 2009

MARITIME AFFAIRS & FISHERIES. European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF)

European Commission. The European Social Fund Plus

Annual Implementation Report 2015

Obecné nařízení Přílohy obecného nařízení Nařízení pro ERDF Nařízení o podpoře EÚS z ERDF Nařízení pro ESF Nařízení pro FS

Marche Region. Ex Ante Evaluation report. Executive summary. Roma, June 2015

Guidance for Member States on Performance framework, review and reserve

GUIDANCE FICHE PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK REVIEW AND RESERVE IN VERSION 1 9 APRIL 2013 RELEVANT PROVISIONS IN THE DRAFT LEGISLATION

CAP post 2020 Overview of proposals for LEADER and state of play of discussions

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on the European Social Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006

Investing inregions and cities: EU Cohesion Policy Cohesion policy

Articles 42 to 44 - LEADER. Articles 58-66

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

FICHE 1B - DRAFT MODEL FOR THE COOPERATION PROGRAMME UNDER THE EUROPEAN TERRITORIAL

Tracking climate expenditure

***I DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/0197(COD)

INTERREG EUROPE Cooperation Programme document

Urban Mobility within Sustainable Urban Development supported by the European Structural and Investment Funds

EU Cohesion Policy Proposals from the European Commission

COHESION POLICY

EU Cohesion Policy- ESF

Ensuring result-orientation in Operational Programmes

PART 1: DANUBE TRANSNATIONAL PROGRAMME

Programme Manual

Prospects for the review of the EU 2020 Strategy, the Juncker Plan and Cohesion Policy after 2020

Part I COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Elements for a Common Strategic Framework 2014 to 2020

Mainstreaming of Horizontal Principles: art. 7-8 CPR. Peter Berkowitz ESIF SD - 17 November 2015

EU Funding for Sustainable Energy

What s in EU budget proposals and what will they bring for the local energy transition?

Committee on Transport and Tourism. of the Committee on Transport and Tourism. for the Committee on Regional Development

EU Cohesion Policy ERDF programmes

Com (2018) 375. Information Note

EUSALP Annual Forum 2018 Workshop VI summary

EU COMMON STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FUNDS IN ENGLAND INITIAL PROPOSALS FROM HMG NOVEMBER 2012

INTERACT III Draft Cooperation Programme

Guidance for Member States on Performance framework, review and reserve

Guidance for Member States on Integrated Sustainable Urban Development (Article 7 ERDF Regulation)

Integration of biodiversity into EU Funding

HEADING 1B ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND TERRITORIAL COHESION

European Funding Joy Holland West Midlands European Service

Official Journal of the European Union L 347/259

FICHE NO 25 APPLICABILITY OF FLAT RATES FOR FINANCING INDIRECT COSTS IN OTHER UNION POLICIES VERSION 1 22/10/2013. Version

Financing Climate Action by the ESIF

Health in the ESF

Programming Period

COHESION POLICY AND PARIS AGREEMENT TARGETS

Integrating Europe 2020 in European Territorial Cooperation programmes and projects in the new programming period

ESF Programming Round CATEGORISATION OF EXPENDITURE. Informal Technical Working Group May 2007, Prague

'Smart rural' in the programming period

FAQ ON EX ANTE CONDITIONALITIES RELATING TO TRANSPORT

Investing in regions: The reformed EU Cohesion Policy

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2015/2282(INI)

Factsheet n. 1 Introduction and Background

Working Paper Elements of strategic programming for the period

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document

EN 1 EN. Rural Development HANDBOOK ON COMMON MONITORING AND EVALUATION FRAMEWORK. Guidance document. September 2006

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS, THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Portugal Norte Region View

CAP, including rural development, and IPARD post-2013

Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. European Regional Development Fund and on the Cohesion Fund

Horizon 2020 & Smart Specialisation

Funding opportunities

Thematic Smart Specialisation Platforms

Major projects in the programming period

THE EUROPEAN SEMESTER: AN INTRODUCTION

EU Regional Policy. EU Structural Funds

Solidar EU Training Academy. Valentina Caimi Policy and Advocacy Adviser. European Semester Social Investment Social innovation

Amended proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+)

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Curentul Juridic Juridical Current. 2018, Vol. 73, No. 2, pp

Transcription:

EU Budget for the future ERDF/CF June 2018 EVALNET #CohesionPolicy #EUinmyRegion #ESIFOpendata

Overview

Key themes Modern Focus on smart, low carbon Enabling conditions Link to Economic Goverance Performance framework and review Open Data Simple & flexible 50% shorter regulations Adapts to emerging socio economic needs (i.e. migration) Programming period in 5+2 Return to N+2 discipline For all regions Balanced and fair "Berlin method" 75% to poorest regions, where most needed Tackling emerging needs and economic transition across the EU

7 funds, 1 regulation CPR covers delivery. 1 set of rules is: More coherent Shorter + simpler to learn Simpler to combine

Key elements What's new? Simplified, more focused, more strategic in structured form Performance-oriented: Mid-term review in 2025 Synergies: Closer link with the European Semester Clarity: PA and programme models as part of CPR Annexes: to replace some 40 empowerments from 2014-2020 What we will not do anymore? No more changes of the PA during period Eliminated overlaps between PA and programmes Fewer procedures: i.e. combining technical adjustment with performance review

Progamming architecture

Policy objectives 1/2 11 Thematic Objectives are simplified and consolidated to 5 (41 investment priorities reduced to 21 specific objectives) 1. A smarter Europe (innovative & smart economic transformation) Enhancing RTDI Digital services Growth of SMEs Skills for RIS3 2. A greener, low-carbon Europe (including energy transition, the circular economy, climate adaptation and risk management) Energy Efficiency - Renewable energy - Smary energy grids - Climate change adaptation and risk prevention Water Management Circular Economy Biodiversity and green infra

Policy objectives 2/2 3. A more connected Europe (mobility and ICT connectivity) Digital Infrastructure TEN-T networks National + Regional Transport Sustaibable intermodal urban mobility 4. A more social Europe (the European Pillar of Social Rights) Social innovation and infra Training and education infra Infra for intergration of marginalised groups Health care 5. A Europe closer to citizens (sustainable development of urban, rural and coastal areas and local initiatives) Integrated urban rural development (incl. cultural heritage) Horizontal issues: administrative capacity building,

ERDF THEMATIC CONCENTRATION Maintaining spending in the key areas for growth and jobs At national level based on GNI per head => flexibility For countries minimum % PO1 minimum % PO2 ("greener, with: ("smarter Europe") low carbon Europe") GNI below 75% 35% 30% GNI 75-100% 45% 30% GNI above 100% 60% PO1 + PO2 min. 85% 6% of budget to urban development, delivered through local development partnerships

2021-2027 Programming architecture 1. Shorter intervention chain => policy objectives + specific objectives (vs Thematic Obj. + Investment priorities + Sp. Objectives) 2. All financial input (categorisation) and indicator data reported by specific objective to ensure transparency (addressing a major weakness in 2014-2020) 3. Updating of categorisation system, with climate + *new* green tracking 4. More frequent reporting of inputs and outputs (bi-monthly) feeding public open data

More flexible New transfer possibility: Member State may request the transfer of up to 5 % of programme resources to any other Fund under shared management or to any instrument under direct or indirect management. Simpler reprogramming: up to 5% of a priority (3% of programme) without Commission decision. "5+2" Programming: 5 years programmed initially 2026-27 programmed after mid-term review in 2025 (basis: emerging needs, performance, CSRs) Technical adjustment to feed in (modifying allocations starting from 2025)

Evaluation

EVALUATION... Fewer articles: same importance Member states (art. 39): What stays.. Evaluations during the programming period Functional independence of evaluators MS to guarantee procedures necessary to produce and collect data needed for evaluations Evaluation plans to be submitted within 1 year of programme adoption MCs to examine progress in evaluations (art. 35) Commission (art.40) Retrospective evaluation by 31.12.2031

Evaluation What's new? What s gone? MS s evaluations to assess programmes relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, relevance and added value Obligatory ex-ante evaluation Programme impact evaluation by June 2029 MS to publish all evaluations on Programme website Commission s mid-term evaluation by end 2024

Performance Framework

2021-2027 Performance framework and review 1. Performance framework defined in programmes: milestones for all output indicators for end-2024 2. (Commission Mid term evaluation 2024) 3. Mid-term review in 2025 (03/2025 MS proposes review) 4. Review to take account of performance relevant CSRs new socio-economic needs 5. Performance reserve (14-20) replaced with 5+2 programming approach

Performance, monitoring and evaluation What's new? Performance framework will cover all output and result indicators Open data to follow progress every 2 months What s gone? Performance reserve (replaced by the 5+2) Annual implementation and progress reports for cohesion policy Structured and dynamic policy dialogue between COM and MS in the annual review meeting

Categorisation of inputs

2021-2027 Categorisation Principles and key elements: 1. Continuity: climate tracking 2. Simplification 3. Modernisation / alignment with contents of *new* specific objectives 4. ESF change in approach (intervention field codes) 5. Lessons drawn from practice of 2014-2020

2021-2027 Monitoring - Categorisation 2014-2020 dimensions 2021-2027 dimensions Intervention field Form of finance Territorial dimension Territorial delivery mechanism Intervention field Form of finance Territorial delivery mechanism and territorial focus Thematic objective - ESF secondary theme Economic activity Location ESF secondary theme Economic activity Location Macro-regional and sea basin strategies

2021-2027 Monitoring - Categorisation 2014-2020 dimensions 2021-2027 dimensions Intervention field Form of finance Territorial dimension Territorial delivery mechanism Intervention field Form of finance Territorial delivery mechanism and territorial focus Thematic objective - ESF secondary theme Economic activity Location ESF secondary theme Economic activity Location Macro-regional and sea basin strategies Indicative breakdown of the programme resources in the OPs for 4 dimensions Bi-monthly reporting of financial data broken down by categories for each dimension

Intervention filed dimension: Codes grouped by policy objectives Codes marginally used were eliminated or merged 2021-2027 Monitoring - Categorisation Wording was adjusted to reflect the scope of the specific objectives Climate tracking weights were adjusted Environment tracking weights were added Territorial delivery mechanism and territorial focus dimension: Combination of two dimensions from the 2014-2020 categorisation system OPs must set out the specific territories targeted (Territorial dimension) and the planned use of integrated territorial instruments (Territorial delivery mechanism dimension) Territorial delivery mechanism dimension: covers the instruments mentioned by the CPR (ITI, CLLD, other national territorial tool) Territorial dimension: does not follow strictly statistical definitions but leaves definition to Member States

Indicator system

2021-2027 Monitoring - Indicators 1. Common concepts for output and result indicators across cohesion policy (ERDF, CF, ESF+) 2. More complete and comprehensive list of common output indicators = measuring the specific deliverables of the intervention 3. New common result indicators = measuring the (short term) effects of the interventions supported (with particular reference to the direct addressees, population targeted or users of infrastructure)

2021-2027 Monitoring - Indicators Guided Tour of Legislative Provisions (https://ec.europa.eu/commission/publications/regional-development-and-cohesion_en ) Common Provisions Regulation Preamble (10)-(13): definitions Art 12 Performance Framework Indicators linked to specific objectives Milestones outputs 2024 Targets for outputs and results 2029

2021-2027 Monitoring - Indicators Guided Tour of Legislative Provisions Common Provisions Regulation (continued) Art 13 Methodologies Criteria for selection of indicators Calculation method and assumptions Art 17 Content of programmes Outputs and results with milestones and targets Categories of intervention by specific objective

2021-2027 Monitoring - Indicators Guided Tour of Legislative Provisions Common Provisions Regulation (continued) Art 37 Transmission of data for indicators: Data reported by specific objective and category of region Outputs and results project selection and achieved Annex V Template OP (2.1.1.2 Indicators) Annex VII Templates data transmission

2021-2027 Monitoring - Indicators Guided Tour of Legislative Provisions ERDF and Cohesion Fund Regulation Preamble 22 Annex I and Annex II Art 7 Indicators Common and programme specific Baselines 0 for outputs Milestones and targets cumulative Annex I indicators to be used by Member States Annex II performance information reported by the Commission to European Parliament and Council

2021-2027 Monitoring - Indicators Main principles for the common indicators Focus on achievements of interventions direct results Match outputs with results Increase policy coverage by common indicators Continuity build on cumulated experience Flexibility use indicators in any specific objective, whenever relevant Increase comparability use of common methodologies

2021-2027 Monitoring - Indicators Annex I Indicators used in programmes Types of indicators: Generic indicators Example: RCO 01 Enterprises supported Indicators linked to specific objective Example: RCO 13 Digital services and products developed by enterprises Horizontal indicators Example: RCR93 Average time for project implementation Interreg specific indicators (Table 2 in Annex I)

2021-2027 Monitoring - Indicators Annex II Performance information for European Parliament and Council Representative indicators for each specific objective Output + Result Enterprises supported to innovate Enterprises introducing innovations Indicators in Annex II aggregation of indicators in Annex I Example: Rail TEN-T new and upgraded based on two indicators from Annex I (RCO47 and RCO49)

Next steps

Timeline

Thank you! Questions?