Choices for retirement income products and financial advice: Appendices

Similar documents
Choices for retirement income products and financial advice

Drivers of investment decisions in the decumulation phase

Luxembourg Rail Protocol: estimated impact on rolling stock financing cost in South Africa

Increasing consumer engagement in the annuities market: can prompts raise shopping around?

Benchmarking ASX s post-trading services

Response to CMA consultation document: guidance on the CMA s approval of voluntary redress schemes

MasterCard interchange fees damages cases

Developments in the allowed cost of capital

Raising the minimum wage: economic and fiscal impacts

Defined-contribution pension schemes in Europe Risks and advantages for occupational retirement provision

The need to know: FSCS protection makes a difference

Non-household retail competition

What is the right discount rate for an ALF?

Stamp duty: its impact and the benefits of its abolition

TomTom/Tele Atlas: navigating DG COMP s decision

Investor Competence, Information and Investment Activity

Third review of submissions on the WACC for UCLL/UBA

Beliefs in Technology and Support for Environmental Taxes: An Empirical Investigation

Electronic Supplementary Material (Appendices A-C)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - Study on the performance and adequacy of pension decumulation practices in four EU countries

Investment Platforms Market Study Interim Report: Annex 7 Fund Discounts and Promotions

Web Appendix Figure 1. Operational Steps of Experiment

Investment in rail: the economic benefits

Data Bulletin March 2018

Can Information Change Personal Retirement Savings? Evidence from Social Security Benefits Statement Mailings. Susan Payne Carter William Skimmyhorn

Data Appendix. A.1. The 2007 survey

Online Appendix for Does mobile money affect saving behavior? Evidence from a developing country Journal of African Economies

Interviewer-Respondent Socio-Demographic Matching and Survey Cooperation

Have the Australians got it right? Converting Retirement Savings to Retirement Benefits: Lessons from Australia

Violence, Non-violence, and the Effects of International Human Rights Law. Supplemental Information

FIGURE A1.1. Differences for First Mover Cutoffs (Round one to two) as a Function of Beliefs on Others Cutoffs. Second Mover Round 1 Cutoff.

Online Appendices Practical Procedures to Deal with Common Support Problems in Matching Estimation

DYNAMICS OF URBAN INFORMAL

A new age for accessing DC retirement savings moves a step closer

Americans AV Preferences: Dynamic Ride-Sharing, Privacy & Long-Distance Mode Choices. Dr. Kara Kockelman & Krishna Murthy Gurumurthy

Internet Appendix. The survey data relies on a sample of Italian clients of a large Italian bank. The survey,

Making DC work for a diverse membership

Supporting Information for:

a. Explain why the coefficients change in the observed direction when switching from OLS to Tobit estimation.

Econometrica Supplementary Material

Review questions for Multinomial Logit/Probit, Tobit, Heckit, Quantile Regressions

Labor Participation and Gender Inequality in Indonesia. Preliminary Draft DO NOT QUOTE

How exogenous is exogenous income? A longitudinal study of lottery winners in the UK

Consumers quantitative inflation perceptions and expectations in the euro area: an evaluation (*)

Online Appendix for: Behavioral Impediments to Valuing Annuities: Evidence on the Effects of Complexity and Choice Bracketing

Final Exam, section 1. Tuesday, December hour, 30 minutes

Econometric Methods for Valuation Analysis

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Statistics and Information Department

For adviser use only not approved for use with clients. Aegon Adviser Attitudes Report A spotlight on advisers clients

Retirement Plan Coverage of Baby Boomers: Analysis of 1998 SIPP Data. Satyendra K. Verma

Online Appendix from Bönke, Corneo and Lüthen Lifetime Earnings Inequality in Germany

2. Temporary work as an active labour market policy: Evaluating an innovative activation programme for disadvantaged youths

The New Retirement Market: Challenges and Opportunities

HOUSEHOLDS INDEBTEDNESS: A MICROECONOMIC ANALYSIS BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE HOUSEHOLDS FINANCIAL AND CONSUMPTION SURVEY*

Egyptian Married Women Don t desire to Work or Simply Can t? A Duration Analysis. Rana Hendy. March 15th, 2010

Thierry Kangoye and Zuzana Brixiová 1. March 2013

Customers experience of the Tax Credits Helpline

Online Appendix Long-Lasting Effects of Socialist Education

Public sector pay and pensions

The Role of Exponential-Growth Bias and Present Bias in Retirment Saving Decisions

Financial Literacy and Subjective Expectations Questions: A Validation Exercise

2. Employment, retirement and pensions

THE PERSISTENCE OF UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AUSTRALIAN MALES

What is the impact of ORR s inflation proposals on Network Rail?

Interviewers influence on bias in reported income

Asset Management Market Study Interim Report: Annex 5 Institutional Demand Side

Lecture 10: Alternatives to OLS with limited dependent variables, part 1. PEA vs APE Logit/Probit

A COMPARISON OF INFLATION EXPECTATIONS AND INFLATION CREDIBILITY IN SOUTH AFRICA: RESULTS FROM SURVEY DATA

The Effect of the Change in the income Tax Deduction System on the Labor Supply in Korea

Norwegian Citizen Panel

Public-private sector pay differential in UK: A recent update

Data Bulletin. In focus: Financial Conduct Authority

COMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION

Final Exam, section 2. Tuesday, December hour, 30 minutes

THE EFFECT OF DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS ON HOUSEHOLDS INDEBTEDNESS* Luísa Farinha** Percentage

October Belgium: another increase in overdue B2B invoices. Atradius Payment Practices Barometer

Norwegian Citizen Panel

Logistic Regression Analysis

Table 4. Probit model of union membership. Probit coefficients are presented below. Data from March 2008 Current Population Survey.

Supporting Online Material for

Smarter Scheme Design In a Drawdown Environment

David Newhouse Daniel Suryadarma

COMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION

Retirement Annuity and Employment-Based Pension Income, Among Individuals Aged 50 and Over: 2006

Public Opinion about the Pension Reform in Albania

Mobile Financial Services for Women in Indonesia: A Baseline Survey Analysis

How Does Education Affect Mental Well-Being and Job Satisfaction?

Investors Attitude towards the Stock Market: A Study in Dhaka City, Bangladesh

CSO Research Paper. Econometric analysis of the public/private sector pay differential


Social identity in online microfinance: A field experiment at Kiva

REPRODUCTIVE HISTORY AND RETIREMENT: GENDER DIFFERENCES AND VARIATIONS ACROSS WELFARE STATES

CFCM CFCM CENTRE FOR FINANCE AND CREDIT MARKETS. Working Paper 12/01. Financial Literacy and Consumer Credit Use. Richard Disney and John Gathergood

Solvency and Financial Condition Report 20I6

To What Extent is Household Spending Reduced as a Result of Unemployment?

Data Bulletin September 2017

Westpac Corporate Lending Portal

Supporting Information: Preferences for International Redistribution: The Divide over the Eurozone Bailouts

ESG AND DC THE GROWING. Investors with long time horizons need to consider FOR ESG IN DC PLANS

Friendship at Work: Can Peer Effects Catalyze Female Entrepreneurship? Erica Field, Seema Jayachandran, Rohini Pande, and Natalia Rigol

Transcription:

Choices for retirement income products and financial advice: Appendices The role of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme Prepared for the Financial Services Compensation Scheme 18 January 2018 www.oxera.com

Consulting LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England no. OC392464, registered office: Park Central, 40/41 Park End Street, Oxford OX1 1JD, UK; in Belgium, no. 0651 990 151, registered office: Avenue Louise 81, 1050 Brussels, Belgium; and in Italy, REA no. RM - 1530473, registered office: Via delle Quattro Fontane 15, 00184 Rome, Italy. Consulting GmbH is registered in Germany, no. HRB 148781 B (Local Court of Charlottenburg), registered office: Rahel-Hirsch- Straße 10, Berlin 10557, Germany. Although every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the material and the integrity of the analysis presented herein, accepts no liability for any actions taken on the basis of its contents. No entity is either authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority or the Prudential Regulation Authority within the UK or any other financial authority applicable in other countries. Anyone considering a specific investment should consult their own broker or other investment adviser. accepts no liability for any specific investment decision, which must be at the investor s own risk. 2018. All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism or review, no part may be used or reproduced without permission.

Contents A1 Experimental methods 1 A1.1 Recruitment methodology 1 A1.2 Group assignment 1 A1.3 Sample characteristics 2 A2 Experiment materials 5 A3 Regression tables 28 A3.1 Regression results products 30 A3.2 Regression results advice 55 Figures and tables Figure A1.1 Age distribution of the sample 3 Figure A1.2 Socio-demographic characteristics of the sample 4 Figure A2.1 CESS introduction and question 1 5 Figure A2.2 Welcome screen 6 Figure A2.3 Demographics (questions 2 5) 7 Figure A2.4 Task instructions 8 Figure A2.5 Information on factors to consider in retirement income decisions 9 Figure A2.6 Main screen 10 Figure A2.7 Product 1: Leave your pension pot untouched 11 Figure A2.8 Product 2: Lifetime income (annuity) 11 Figure A2.9 Product 3: Adjustable annual income (income drawdown product) investment fund 12 Figure A2.10 Product 4: Adjustable annual income (income drawdown product) peer-to-peer lending 13 Figure A2.11 Product 5: Take your pension pot out as cash to spend 13 Figure A2.12 Product 6: Take money out to invest in property 14 Figure A2.13 Product 7: Take money out to put into a savings account / cash ISA 14 Figure A2.14 Product 8: Take money out to invest in stocks and shares 15 Figure A2.15 Tax pop-up 15 Figure A2.16 Financial advice pop-up 16 Figure A2.17 FSCS pop-up: Advice 16 Figure A2.18 FSCS pop-up: Product 1 17 Figure A2.19 FSCS pop-up: Product 2 17 Figure A2.20 FSCS pop-up: Product 3 17 Figure A2.21 FSCS pop-up: Product 4 18 Figure A2.22 FSCS pop-up: Product 5 18 Figure A2.23 FSCS pop-up: Product 6 18 Figure A2.24 FSCS pop-up: Product 7 19 Figure A2.25 FSCS pop-up: Product 8 20

Figure A2.26 Retirement income selections (questions 6 9) 20 Figure A2.27 Confirmation 21 Figure A2.28 Confirmation of choices picked 21 Figure A2.29 Allocation of pot among product choices (questions 10 12) 21 Figure A2.30 Instructions for questions 13 18 22 Figure A2.31 Multiple-choice questions (questions 13 18) 23 Figure A2.32 Disclaimer 23 Figure A2.33 FSCS awareness and importance (questions 19 25) 24 Figure A2.34 Previous experience considering retirement income (questions 26 29) 25 Figure A2.35 Tests of financial understanding (questions 30 33) 26 Figure A2.36 Behavioural indicators (questions 34 37) 27 Figure A2.37 Performance award and payment screen 27 Table A1.1 Socio-demographic characteristics of participants across treatment groups 2 Table A1.2 Distribution of earnings by age group 3 Table A3.1 Variable definitions 29 Table A3.2 Logistic regression on whether participants chose product A: leave pension pot untouched 30 Table A3.3 Logistic regression on whether participants chose product B: pension annuity 33 Table A3.4 Logistic regression on whether participants chose product C: income drawdown investment funds 36 Table A3.5 Logistic regression on whether participants chose product D: income drawdown P2P lending 40 Table A3.6 Logistic regression on whether participants chose product E: spend the pot 43 Table A3.7 Logistic regression on whether participants chose product F: property 46 Table A3.8 Logistic regression on whether participants chose product G: savings 49 Table A3.9 Logistic regression on whether participants chose product H: stocks and shares 52

1 A1 Experimental methods A1.1 Recruitment methodology The experiment recruited 2,056 participants from the UK population of people aged 45+. 1 This age bracket, along with the residency requirement, were the only variables that qualified potential subjects for participation in the experiment. The experimental subjects were recruited by Respondi, a large online panel in the UK with 45,000 registered subjects, 48% of whom are older than 45. 2 Respondi uses many types of invitation to bring in people with diverse motivations to take part in research. These include email invitations, text messages, telephone alerts, and banners and messaging on websites and in online communities. The messages themselves are also varied, and include invitations to give your opinion or let your voice be heard. This diversity of motivations is likely to have contributed to a high-quality sample. To avoid selfselection bias, specific project details were not included in the invitation. Rather, participants were invited to take a survey, with the details disclosed later. A1.2 Group assignment Participants were assigned to treatment and control groups using block randomisation. This method divides participants into sub-groups ( blocks ) based on observable characteristics (e.g. their gender and education level). Then, within each block, participants are randomly assigned to treatment and control groups. This method ensured that any characteristics of the participants that might influence the outcome were accounted for. For example, if highly educated people are more likely to choose the lowest-cost product, the objective was to prevent any one of the treatment groups containing too many highly educated people. The blocking variables used for the experiment were gender, education (high and low) and income (high and low). There were two categories in each group for a total of eight blocks (e.g. block 1 would be male, high income, high education). Information on each of these variables was collected before the participant started the experiment. Once the participant had submitted this information, they were assigned to the appropriate block and then randomly assigned to one of the treatment or control groups. The probability of assignment into each treatment group varied according to the number of participants within each block who had been assigned to that group. This was done to maintain a balance across all treatment groups within each block. For example, if there were too many men in the Salient treatment group relative to the other groups, the probability of being assigned to that group was reduced for the next male participant. The likelihood of this occurring was typically 1/3 or 1/4. This method is called biased coin. To show how the groups were balanced, Table A1.1 below gives the breakdown in the three blocking variables across the nine treatment groups. 1 A total of 2,391 participants received the treatment, but only 2,056 completed the full survey and formed the sample. Two respondents were aged under 45, so were excluded. Of the 333 who dropped out during the survey, 257 did so before choosing products, and 76 dropped out on the % allocation page or during the follow-up questions. 2 Respondi is an ISO 26362-certified survey company.

2 A1.3 Sample characteristics Participants were recruited so as to be representative of the UK population of people aged over 45 in terms of gender, education and income. The sociodemographic characteristics of the sample are shown in Table A1.1. As can be seen, the characteristics of those in each treatment were broadly the same (due to the group assignment process, as detailed above). The age distribution and socio-demographic characteristics of the sample are also shown in Figure A1.1 and Figure A1.2. Table A1.1 Socio-demographic characteristics of participants across treatment groups Product pages Control Plain Plain Plain Plain Salient Salient Salient Salient FSCS pop-ups Plain Plain Salient Salient Plain Plain Salient Salient Investment limit 50k 100k 50k 100k 50k 100k 50k 100k Age 59.83 60.54 59.74 59.53 57.61 60.26 59.20 59.95 60.01 (8.58) (7.78) (8.28) (8.25) (8.80) (8.52) (8.67) (8.93) (8.71) Gender 1 0.539 0.549 0.503 0.456 0.543 0.511 0.556 0.563 0.554 (0.499) (0.499) (0.502) (0.500) (0.500) (0.501) (0.499) (0.498) (0.499) Income 2 2.429 2.611 2.497 2.544 2.503 2.420 2.524 2.613 2.566 (0.897) (0.900) (0.878) (0.981) (1.006) (0.919) (0.846) (0.883) (0.917) Education 3 2.820 2.981 3.000 2.864 3.066 2.904 2.690 2.913 2.982 (0.934) (0.902) (0.924) (0.998) (0.921) (0.960) (0.899) (0.927) (0.931) Observations 627 162 151 147 151 188 126 160 166 Note: Standard deviations in parentheses. 1 0 = Male; 1 = Female. 2 1 = < 12,000; 2 = 12,000 24,999; 3 = 25,000 49,999; 4 = > 50,000. 3 1 = No qualification; 2 = Secondary education; 3 = Post-secondary education; 4 = University degree. Source: and CESS. According to the 2011 UK census, of those aged 40 89, 52% were female. 3 The experiment sample was 53% female. Also, according to the 2011 UK census, 53% of those aged 65+ did not have any qualifications (25% for those aged 50 64). 4 However, the experiment sample had only 15% without any qualifications: the sample is over-educated relative to the population. Table A1.2 shows the income distribution of the age groups in question in the UK according to the 2016 Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings. 5 As can be seen, while the sample is not unrepresentative of the population, it has a slightly higher income distribution than the general population. 3 Office for National Statistics (2012), 2011 Census, Population and Household Estimates for the United Kingdom, December, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160105160709/http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/rereference-tables.html?edition=tcm%3a77-270247, accessed 26 September 2017. 4 Office for National Statistics (2014), Over 4 in 10 People Aged 25 to 34 had a Degree Level or Above Qualification, 7 March, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160105160709/http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/census/2011- census-analysis/local-area-analysis-of-qualifications-across-england-and-wales/sty-qualification-levels.html, accessed 26 September 2017. 5 Office for National Statistics (2016), Dataset: Age Group - ASHE: Table 6, provisional, 26 October, https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/earningsandworkinghours/datasets/ageg roupashetable6, accessed 26 September 2017.

Number of participants Choices for retirement income products and financial advice: Appendices 3 Table A1.2 Distribution of earnings by age group Population aged 40 49 and 50 59 < 12,000 12,000 24,999 24,99 50,000 > 50,000 10 20% 25 35% 30 40% 10 20% Population aged 60+ 30 40% 30 40% 25 35% <10% The experiment sample 15% 34% 37% 14% Source: Office for National Statistics, The 2016 Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings ; and and CESS. Bearing this in mind, the analysis employed methods to control for sociodemographic characteristics. To test the robustness of the results, multivariate regressions controlled for a number of demographic characteristics. Figure A1.1 Age distribution of the sample 400 350 300 335 308 368 370 292 250 200 150 100 50 0 152 38 12 3 45-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 66-70 71-75 76-80 81-85 86-90 Age Source: and CESS.

4 Figure A1.2 Socio-demographic characteristics of the sample 60% 50% 53% 47% 40% 34% 37% 33% 33% 30% 26% 20% 15% 14% 10% 6% 0% Source: and CESS.

5 A2 Experiment materials Below are screenshots of the whole experiment. We have assigned question numbers to each question for ease of reporting, but these were not seen by participants. Each figure is a different screen, and all the content within each figure was within a single screen. The screenshots below relate to the treatment with Plain product pages; Salient FSCS pop-ups; and 100k investment compensation limit. Figure A2.1 CESS introduction and question 1 Source: and CESS.

6 Figure A2.2 Welcome screen Source: and CESS.

7 Figure A2.3 Demographics (questions 2 5) Source: and CESS.

8 Figure A2.4 Task instructions Source: and CESS.

9 Figure A2.5 Information on factors to consider in retirement income decisions Source: and CESS.

10 Figure A2.6 Main screen Source: and CESS.

11 Figure A2.7 Product 1: Leave your pension pot untouched Source: and CESS. Figure A2.8 Product 2: Lifetime income (annuity) Source: and CESS.

12 Figure A2.9 Product 3: Adjustable annual income (income drawdown product) investment fund Source: and CESS.

13 Figure A2.10 Product 4: Adjustable annual income (income drawdown product) peer-to-peer lending Source: and CESS. Figure A2.11 Product 5: Take your pension pot out as cash to spend Source: and CESS.

14 Figure A2.12 Product 6: Take money out to invest in property Source: and CESS. Figure A2.13 Product 7: Take money out to put into a savings account / cash ISA Source: and CESS.

15 Figure A2.14 Product 8: Take money out to invest in stocks and shares Source: and CESS. Figure A2.15 Tax pop-up Source: and CESS.

16 Figure A2.16 Financial advice pop-up Source: and CESS. Figure A2.17 FSCS pop-up: Advice Source: and CESS.

17 Figure A2.18 FSCS pop-up: Product 1 Source: and CESS. Figure A2.19 FSCS pop-up: Product 2 Source: and CESS. Figure A2.20 FSCS pop-up: Product 3 Source: and CESS.

18 Figure A2.21 FSCS pop-up: Product 4 Source: and CESS. Figure A2.22 FSCS pop-up: Product 5 No pop-up for Product 5 (take your pension pot out as cash to spend), as it is not covered by the FSCS. Figure A2.23 FSCS pop-up: Product 6 Source: and CESS.

19 Figure A2.24 FSCS pop-up: Product 7 Source: and CESS.

20 Figure A2.25 FSCS pop-up: Product 8 No pop-up for Product 8 (investing in stocks and shares), as it is not covered by the FSCS. Figure A2.26 Retirement income selections (questions 6 9) Source: and CESS.

21 Figure A2.27 Confirmation Source: and CESS. Figure A2.28 Confirmation of choices picked Source: and CESS. Figure A2.29 Allocation of pot among product choices (questions 10 12) Source: and CESS.

22 Figure A2.30 Instructions for questions 13 18 Source: and CESS.

23 Figure A2.31 Multiple-choice questions (questions 13 18) Source: and CESS. Figure A2.32 Disclaimer Source: and CESS.

24 Figure A2.33 FSCS awareness and importance (questions 19 25) Source: and CESS.

25 Figure A2.34 Previous experience considering retirement income (questions 26 29) Source: and CESS.

26 Figure A2.35 Tests of financial understanding (questions 30 33) Source: and CESS.

27 Figure A2.36 Behavioural indicators (questions 34 37) Source: and CESS. Figure A2.37 Performance award and payment screen Source: and CESS.

28 A3 Regression tables Regression analysis was conducted to assess the impact of the treatments on people s retirement income choices, controlling for other factors. This appendix sets out the results of the regression analysis. In the tables in this appendix, t statistics are shown in parentheses, and the confidence intervals are denoted as follows: * significant at the 10% level; ** significant at the 5% level; *** significant at the 1% level. The omitted dummy variables in the regressions are the control treatment, Plain FSCS pop-ups, and the 50k compensation limit. Some of the variables are explained in the table below.

29 Table A3.1 Variable definitions Variable Treatment = 2 Treatment = 3 Popup = 2 PotsizeK = 100 Total Duration priorfca Q3 age Q5 Q6 bat_ball interest understanding viewed_tax viewed_advice dd_reward Explanation Plain product pages Salient product pages Salient FSCS pop-up 100k compensation limit Time spent completing the experiment Whether the participant had also taken part in a previous pensions-related experiment for the FCA Gender Age Income Qualifications Bat and ball question Whether the participant got the correct answer on the compound interest questions Viewed tax pop-up Viewed advice pop-up Follow-on question reward Q70 Comprehension question 1 Q158 Comprehension question 2 Q159 Comprehension question 3 Q160 Comprehension question 4 Q161 Comprehension question 5 Q75 Q170 Q173_1 Q174_1 Q175_1 Q64 Q104 Q105 Q87 Q81 Previous FSCS knowledge FSCS understanding FSCS importance in product choice FSCS importance for advice choice Advice if not FSCS-protected Whether taken previous advice Whether has a DC pension pot Whether has a DB pension pot Whether planning retirement Finds Financial Services confusing Q82 Risk appetite question 1 Q83 Risk appetite question 2 Q20 Risk appetite question 3 Constant Observations R-squared Adjusted R-sq Pseudo R-sq Constant Source: and CESS. Number of observations Indicator of the explanatory power of the regression Indicator of the explanatory power of the regression Indicator of the explanatory power of the regression

30 A3.1 Regression results products The product selection variable indicates whether the product was selected. This was regressed against dummy variables for the treatments, plus other explanatory variables that may determine product selection. Logistic regressions were conducted on the binary product selection or financial advice choice variables. Regression coefficients report the difference in choices between the treatments and the control. OLS regressions were also conducted. Table A3.2 VARIABLES Logistic regression on whether participants chose product A: leave pension pot untouched (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) logit - untouched 123-1 logit - untouched 123-2 logit - untouched 123-3 logit - untouched 1-1 logit - untouched 12-1 ols - untouched n - 1 ols - untouched p - 1 Treatment = 2 0.165 0.184 0.193 0.071 0.048 0.967 0.064 [0.269] [0.206] [0.115] [0.668] [0.727] [0.525] [0.339] Treatment = 3 0.219 0.253* 0.273** 0.265* 0.244* 3.143** 0.147** [0.135] [0.077] [0.023] [0.093] [0.067] [0.037] [0.026] Popup = 2 0.204* 0.199* [0.084] [0.089] PotsizeK = 100-0.177-0.184 [0.134] [0.114] Q_TotalDuration 0.000 [0.177] priorfca 0.018 [0.865] Q3-0.050 [0.622] age -0.001 [0.922] Q5-0.001 [0.986] Q6-0.137** -0.140*** -0.138*** -0.102-0.148** -1.479** -0.075** [0.016] [0.009] [0.009] [0.145] [0.012] [0.027] [0.010]

31 VARIABLES (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) logit - untouched 123-1 bat_ball -0.019 [0.882] Hyperbolic discounting 0.085 [0.393] av_discount_rate -0.000 [0.986] Interest understanding 0.063 [0.578] loss_aversion -0.010 [0.367] dd_reward -0.416 [0.234] viewed_products 0.009 [0.643] viewed_fscs_popups_i 0.156 [0.505] logit - untouched 123-2 logit - untouched 123-3 logit - untouched 1-1 logit - untouched 12-1 ols - untouched n - 1 ols - untouched p - 1 viewed_advice -0.466** -0.470*** -0.476*** -0.251-0.355* -4.429** -0.210** [0.011] [0.008] [0.007] [0.289] [0.072] [0.040] [0.028] viewed_tax 0.444*** 0.458*** 0.471*** 0.119 0.348** 4.330** 0.194** Q70-0.116 [0.008] [0.004] [0.003] [0.574] [0.046] [0.032] [0.028] [0.778] Q158 0.140 [0.505] Q159 0.552** 0.295** 0.291** -0.018 0.151 1.219 0.093 [0.023] [0.038] [0.041] [0.919] [0.345] [0.477] [0.222] Q160 0.406** 0.191* 0.198** 0.099 0.070 0.722 0.073 Q161 0.078 [0.048] [0.057] [0.048] [0.459] [0.532] [0.568] [0.189]

32 VARIABLES (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) logit - untouched 123-1 [0.757] logit - untouched 123-2 logit - untouched 123-3 logit - untouched 1-1 logit - untouched 12-1 ols - untouched n - 1 ols - untouched p - 1 Q75-0.209* -0.251** -0.256** -0.283** -0.031-2.375* -0.105* [0.077] [0.024] [0.021] [0.049] [0.805] [0.088] [0.088] Q170-0.191-0.222* -0.217* -0.310** -0.257** -4.709*** -0.145** Q173_1 0.006 [0.106] [0.054] [0.059] [0.034] [0.041] [0.001] [0.023] [0.907] Q174_1-0.033 [0.485] Q175_1-0.085** -0.082** -0.084*** -0.076* -0.102*** -0.755* -0.049*** Q64 0.098 [0.014] [0.012] [0.010] [0.078] [0.005] [0.065] [0.006] [0.378] Q104-0.023 [0.822] Q105 0.230** 0.185* 0.182* 0.259** 0.305*** 1.289 0.135** Q87-0.069 [0.027] [0.063] [0.066] [0.048] [0.006] [0.300] [0.013] [0.390] Q81 0.061 [0.190] Q82-0.039 [0.642] Q83 0.054 [0.470] Q84_1_TEXT 0.005 [0.562] Q20-0.048 [0.184]

33 VARIABLES (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) logit - untouched 123-1 logit - untouched 123-2 logit - untouched 123-3 logit - untouched 1-1 logit - untouched 12-1 ols - untouched n - 1 ols - untouched p - 1 Constant 0.456 0.043 0.044-0.954*** -0.522** 22.314*** 1.135*** [0.625] [0.849] [0.848] [0.001] [0.039] [0.000] [0.000] Observations 1,874 1,878 1,878 1,878 1,878 1,574 1,878 R-squared 0.023 0.021 Adjusted R-sq 0.0290 0.0207 0.0187 0.0127 0.0154 0.0157 0.0155 Pseudo R-sq Source: and CESS. Table A3.3 Logistic regression on whether participants chose product B: pension annuity (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) VARIABLES logit - annuity 123-1 logit - annuity 123-2 logit - annuity 123-3 logit - annuity 123-4 logit - annuity 123-5 Treatment = 2-0.121-0.082-0.084-0.024 [0.439] [0.578] [0.569] [0.848] Treatment = 3-0.083-0.062-0.056-0.005 [0.588] [0.672] [0.700] [0.969] Popup = 2-0.048-0.063-0.068 [0.697] [0.609] [0.576] PotsizeK = 100 0.181 0.191 0.191 [0.145] [0.120] [0.119] Total Duration 0.000 [0.179] priorfca -0.112 [0.308] Q3-0.038 [0.723]

34 (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) VARIABLES logit - annuity 123-1 logit - annuity 123-2 logit - annuity 123-3 logit - annuity 123-4 logit - annuity 123-5 age 0.000 [0.994] Q5-0.222*** -0.239*** -0.239*** -0.240*** -0.240*** [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] Q6-0.091 [0.130] bat_ball 0.006 [0.965] hyperbolic discounting -0.108 [0.304] av discount rate -0.000 [0.979] interest understanding -0.216* [0.074] loss_aversion 0.019 [0.109] dd_reward -0.287 [0.459] viewed_products -0.017 [0.386] viewed fscs popups i -0.319 [0.184] viewed_advice -0.100 [0.588] viewed_tax 0.009 [0.960] Q70 0.272 [0.532] Q158 0.156

35 (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) VARIABLES logit - annuity 123-1 logit - annuity 123-2 logit - annuity 123-3 logit - annuity 123-4 logit - annuity 123-5 [0.493] Q159 0.003 [0.992] Q160 0.049 [0.825] Q161 0.345 [0.208] Q75 0.088 [0.479] Q170 0.077 [0.536] Q173_1 0.154*** 0.112*** 0.127*** 0.125*** 0.125*** [0.003] [0.004] [0.001] [0.001] [0.001] Q174_1-0.038 [0.436] Q175_1 0.069* 0.049 [0.059] [0.165] Q64-0.386*** -0.419*** -0.405*** -0.401*** -0.401*** [0.001] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] Q104 0.323*** 0.322*** 0.322*** 0.319*** 0.318*** [0.003] [0.002] [0.003] [0.003] [0.003] Q105 0.300*** 0.246** 0.247** 0.247** 0.247** [0.006] [0.017] [0.017] [0.016] [0.016] Q87 0.012 [0.885] Q81 0.087* 0.097** 0.103** 0.102** 0.103** [0.073] [0.032] [0.022] [0.022] [0.022] Q82 0.106 [0.241]

36 (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) VARIABLES logit - annuity 123-1 logit - annuity 123-2 logit - annuity 123-3 logit - annuity 123-4 logit - annuity 123-5 Q83-0.015 [0.852] Q84_1_TEXT -0.003 [0.516] Q20-0.073* -0.074** -0.073** -0.071* -0.071* [0.051] [0.046] [0.047] [0.052] [0.052] Constant 0.417 0.574** 0.651** 0.654** 0.646** [0.674] [0.045] [0.020] [0.020] [0.018] Observations 1,874 1,878 1,878 1,878 1,878 R-squared Adjusted R-sq 0.0420 0.0273 0.0265 0.0254 0.0254 Pseudo R-sq Source: and CESS. Table A3.4 VARIABLES Logistic regression on whether participants chose product C: income drawdown investment funds (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) logit - investment fund 123-1 logit - investment fund 123-2 logit - investment fund 123-3 logit - investment fund 123-4 logit - investment fund 1-1 logit - investment fund 12-1 ols - investment fund n - 1 ols - investment fund p - 1 Treatment = 2-0.104-0.116-0.116-0.094-0.102-0.111 0.616-0.047 [0.500] [0.438] [0.439] [0.453] [0.551] [0.403] [0.636] [0.468] Treatment = 3-0.268* -0.263* -0.265* -0.233* -0.236-0.264** -1.213-0.125** [0.078] [0.076] [0.074] [0.060] [0.172] [0.046] [0.349] [0.048] Popup = 2 0.170 0.163 0.162 [0.166] [0.177] [0.179] PotsizeK = 100-0.109-0.122-0.120 [0.375] [0.313] [0.320]

37 VARIABLES (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) logit - investment fund 123-1 Total Duration -0.000 [0.276] priorfca 0.135 [0.207] Q3-0.138 [0.186] age -0.002 [0.768] Q5 0.028 [0.630] logit - investment fund 123-2 logit - investment fund 123-3 logit - investment fund 123-4 logit - investment fund 1-1 logit - investment fund 12-1 ols - investment fund n - 1 ols - investment fund p - 1 Q6 0.183*** 0.230*** 0.230*** 0.231*** 0.173** 0.255*** 1.921*** 0.119*** [0.002] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.026] [0.000] [0.001] [0.000] bat_ball 0.251** 0.385*** 0.388*** 0.391*** 0.098 0.348*** 3.309** 0.183*** hyperbolic discounting -0.024 [0.047] [0.001] [0.001] [0.001] [0.538] [0.005] [0.012] [0.004] [0.815] av discount rate -0.000 [0.983] interest understanding 0.156 [0.190] loss_aversion 0.009 [0.444] dd_reward 1.000** 0.602*** 0.575*** 0.571*** 0.433** 0.568*** 4.709*** 0.276*** viewed_products -0.023 [0.012] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.020] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.249] viewed fscs popups i 0.035 [0.884]

38 VARIABLES (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) logit - investment fund 123-1 viewed_advice 0.047 [0.796] viewed_tax 0.084 [0.624] logit - investment fund 123-2 Q70-0.794* -0.353 Q158-0.290 [0.073] [0.356] [0.208] Q159-0.387 [0.143] logit - investment fund 123-3 logit - investment fund 123-4 logit - investment fund 1-1 logit - investment fund 12-1 ols - investment fund n - 1 ols - investment fund p - 1 Q160-0.482** -0.298** -0.286** -0.277** 0.029-0.174-1.531-0.084 Q161-0.299 [0.035] [0.023] [0.029] [0.034] [0.874] [0.209] [0.264] [0.211] [0.284] Q75 0.333*** 0.463*** 0.462*** 0.457*** 0.391** 0.455*** 4.110*** 0.221*** Q170 0.141 [0.007] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.025] [0.000] [0.001] [0.000] [0.259] Q173_1 0.042 [0.397] Q174_1 0.114** 0.125*** 0.126*** 0.127*** 0.087* 0.074* 0.808** 0.054*** [0.016] [0.001] [0.001] [0.000] [0.077] [0.052] [0.035] [0.004] Q175_1 0.075** 0.073** 0.074** 0.072** 0.017 0.120*** 0.306 0.042** [0.034] [0.032] [0.031] [0.036] [0.722] [0.001] [0.397] [0.017] Q64 0.408*** 0.426*** 0.429*** 0.424*** 0.753*** 0.385*** 4.759*** 0.281*** [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] Q104 0.321*** 0.359*** 0.356*** 0.356*** -0.001 0.298*** 1.087 0.139*** [0.002] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.994] [0.005] [0.308] [0.008]

39 VARIABLES (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) logit - investment fund 123-1 Q105 0.130 [0.222] Q87 0.013 [0.874] Q81-0.068 [0.153] Q82 0.012 [0.898] Q83-0.016 [0.839] Q84_1_TEXT -0.029 [0.182] Q20-0.019 [0.616] logit - investment fund 123-2 logit - investment fund 123-3 logit - investment fund 123-4 logit - investment fund 1-1 logit - investment fund 12-1 ols - investment fund n - 1 ols - investment fund p - 1 Constant -2.234** -2.879*** -3.176*** -3.168*** -4.063*** -3.800*** -9.407*** -0.553*** [0.024] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.002] [0.000] Observations 1,874 1,877 1,877 1,877 1,877 1,877 1,574 1,877 R-squared 0.071 0.094 Adjusted R-sq 0.0864 0.0727 0.0724 0.0714 0.0515 0.0690 0.0646 0.0890 Pseudo R-sq Source: and CESS.

40 Table A3.5 VARIABLES Logistic regression on whether participants chose product D: income drawdown P2P lending (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) (26) (27) (28) logit - p2p 123-1 logit - p2p 123-2 logit - p2p 123-3 logit - p2p 123-4 logit - p2p 1-1 logit - p2p 12-1 ols - p2p n - 1 ols - p2p p - 1 Treatment = 2-0.088-0.003 0.007 [0.651] [0.986] [0.968] Treatment = 3-0.238-0.157-0.146 [0.223] [0.401] [0.396] Popup = 2 0.046 0.023 [0.766] [0.880] PotsizeK = 0 0.073-0.097-0.009 0.318 0.005 [0.639] [0.802] [0.964] [0.659] [0.909] PotsizeK = 100 0.309** 0.308** 0.310** 0.316** 0.558 0.404** 1.848** 0.092** [0.044] [0.041] [0.040] [0.036] [0.104] [0.038] [0.010] [0.020] Total Duration -0.000* -0.000* -0.000* -0.000* -0.000-0.000-0.000* -0.000* [0.081] [0.084] [0.084] [0.086] [0.528] [0.121] [0.064] [0.054] priorfca 0.287** 0.317** 0.317** 0.318** 0.829*** 0.491*** 2.355*** 0.114*** [0.030] [0.014] [0.014] [0.014] [0.005] [0.003] [0.000] [0.001] Q3-0.250* -0.322** -0.322** -0.326*** 0.163-0.262-1.011* -0.062* [0.058] [0.010] [0.010] [0.009] [0.579] [0.111] [0.088] [0.059] age -0.005 [0.604] Q5 0.150** 0.174** 0.175** 0.174** 0.235 0.103 0.626* 0.039** [0.043] [0.013] [0.013] [0.013] [0.157] [0.261] [0.060] [0.033] Q6 0.184** 0.228*** 0.228*** 0.230*** 0.242 0.112 0.636* 0.047*** [0.015] [0.001] [0.001] [0.001] [0.142] [0.215] [0.051] [0.008] bat_ball 0.217 [0.155] hyperbolic discounting 0.027 [0.838]

41 VARIABLES (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) (26) (27) (28) logit - p2p 123-1 av discount rate -0.000 [0.986] interest understanding 0.208 [0.181] loss_aversion -0.006 [0.681] dd_reward -0.420 [0.369] viewed_products 0.006 [0.807] logit - p2p 123-2 logit - p2p 123-3 logit - p2p 123-4 logit - p2p 1-1 logit - p2p 12-1 ols - p2p n - 1 ols - p2p p - 1 viewed fscs popups i -0.714** -0.684** -0.683** -0.673** -1.287-0.661-2.434* -0.156** [0.036] [0.037] [0.037] [0.040] [0.222] [0.124] [0.068] [0.039] viewed_advice 0.354 0.329* 0.329* 0.326* -0.038 0.326 0.325 0.074 viewed_tax -0.073 [0.120] [0.064] [0.064] [0.065] [0.934] [0.155] [0.713] [0.131] [0.739] Q70-0.073 [0.889] Q158 0.417 [0.128] Q159 0.208 [0.519] Q160 0.087 [0.749] Q161 0.055 [0.869] Q75 0.228 [0.159] Q170-0.534*** -0.475*** -0.474*** -0.474*** -0.700** -0.512*** -1.416** -0.130***

42 VARIABLES (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) (26) (27) (28) logit - p2p 123-1 Q173_1 0.019 logit - p2p 123-2 logit - p2p 123-3 logit - p2p 123-4 logit - p2p 1-1 logit - p2p 12-1 ols - p2p n - 1 ols - p2p p - 1 [0.000] [0.001] [0.001] [0.001] [0.027] [0.005] [0.044] [0.001] [0.766] Q174_1 0.037 [0.534] Q175_1 0.067 [0.137] Q64-0.003 [0.983] Q104 0.017 [0.899] Q105-0.208 [0.121] Q87-0.048 [0.652] Q81-0.071 [0.231] Q82-0.025 [0.833] Q83-0.044 [0.658] Q84_1_TEXT -0.004 [0.563] Q20 0.037 [0.420] Constant -1.249-2.312*** -2.314*** -2.391*** -4.895*** -2.669*** 1.478 0.130* [0.318] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.270] [0.083] Observations 1,874 1,878 1,878 1,878 1,878 1,878 1,574 1,878

43 VARIABLES (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) (26) (27) (28) logit - p2p 123-1 logit - p2p 123-2 logit - p2p 123-3 logit - p2p 123-4 logit - p2p 1-1 logit - p2p 12-1 ols - p2p n - 1 ols - p2p p - 1 R-squared 0.029 0.029 Adjusted R-sq 0.0575 0.0340 0.0230 0.0239 Pseudo R-sq 0.0501 0.0348 0.0348 0.0342 Source: and CESS. Table A3.6 Logistic regression on whether participants chose product E: spend the pot (29) (30) (31) (32) (33) (34) VARIABLES logit - spend 123-1 logit - spend 123-2 logit - spend 123-3 logit - spend 123-4 logit - spend 123-5 logit - spend 123-6 Treatment = 2 0.167 0.115 0.088 0.112 0.009 [0.325] [0.473] [0.580] [0.481] [0.946] Treatment = 3 0.142 0.084 0.068 0.083-0.016 [0.390] [0.591] [0.662] [0.593] [0.901] Popup = 2-0.136-0.102-0.088-0.090 [0.318] [0.447] [0.510] [0.499] PotsizeK = 100-0.152-0.118-0.114-0.123 [0.265] [0.376] [0.392] [0.357] Total Duration 0.000 [0.793] priorfca -0.010 [0.937] Q3 0.156 [0.180] age -0.013 [0.131] Q5-0.022 [0.728] Q6-0.286*** -0.336*** -0.332*** -0.344*** -0.345*** -0.345***

44 (29) (30) (31) (32) (33) (34) VARIABLES logit - spend 123-1 logit - spend 123-2 logit - spend 123-3 logit - spend 123-4 logit - spend 123-5 logit - spend 123-6 [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] bat_ball -0.140 [0.350] hyperbolic discounting -0.030 [0.794] av discount rate 0.000 [0.985] interest understanding -0.094 [0.453] loss_aversion -0.013 [0.294] dd_reward -0.633* -0.286** -0.149 [0.094] [0.032] [0.153] viewed_products 0.027 [0.218] viewed fscs popups i 0.201 [0.473] viewed_advice 0.022 [0.920] viewed_tax -0.237 [0.236] Q70 0.582 [0.229] Q158 0.165 [0.479] Q159 0.386 [0.141] Q160 0.350 0.219 [0.122] [0.126]

45 (29) (30) (31) (32) (33) (34) VARIABLES logit - spend 123-1 logit - spend 123-2 logit - spend 123-3 logit - spend 123-4 logit - spend 123-5 logit - spend 123-6 Q161 0.391 [0.168] Q75-0.039 [0.767] Q170 0.285** 0.174 [0.038] [0.184] Q173_1-0.124** -0.134** -0.127** -0.188*** -0.188*** -0.188*** [0.030] [0.012] [0.017] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] Q174_1-0.098* -0.087* -0.085 [0.078] [0.098] [0.102] Q175_1-0.047 [0.235] Q64-0.150 [0.255] Q104-0.098 [0.412] Q105-0.105 [0.382] Q87-0.140 [0.121] Q81-0.035 [0.511] Q82 0.054 [0.549] Q83-0.055 [0.506] Q84_1_TEXT -0.002 [0.779] Q20-0.018

46 (29) (30) (31) (32) (33) (34) VARIABLES logit - spend 123-1 logit - spend 123-2 logit - spend 123-3 logit - spend 123-4 logit - spend 123-5 logit - spend 123-6 [0.668] Constant 1.477 0.867*** 0.773*** 0.434** 0.437** 0.434** [0.161] [0.007] [0.008] [0.040] [0.038] [0.031] Observations 1,874 1,877 1,877 1,878 1,878 1,878 R-squared Adjusted R-sq Pseudo R-sq 0.0557 0.0327 0.0309 0.0289 0.0282 0.0282 Source: and CESS. Table A3.7 Logistic regression on whether participants chose product F: property (35) (36) (37) (38) (39) VARIABLES logit - property 123-1 logit - property 123-2 logit - property 123-3 logit - property 123-4 logit - property 123-5 Treatment = 2 0.006-0.014-0.018-0.076 [0.968] [0.929] [0.904] [0.548] Treatment = 3 0.164 0.123 0.122 0.056 [0.294] [0.408] [0.412] [0.651] Popup = 2-0.190-0.175-0.179 [0.137] [0.164] [0.156] PotsizeK = 100 0.042 0.053 0.054 [0.739] [0.677] [0.669] Total Duration -0.000* [0.100] priorfca 0.028 [0.803] Q3 0.079

47 (35) (36) (37) (38) (39) VARIABLES logit - property 123-1 logit - property 123-2 logit - property 123-3 logit - property 123-4 logit - property 123-5 [0.468] age -0.002 [0.818] Q5 0.119** 0.122** 0.122** 0.119** 0.118** [0.049] [0.036] [0.037] [0.041] [0.042] Q6 0.098 [0.110] bat_ball -0.060 [0.657] hyperbolic discounting -0.047 [0.661] av discount rate 0.002** 0.001* 0.001* 0.001* 0.001* [0.037] [0.063] [0.055] [0.056] [0.056] interest understanding -0.041 [0.738] loss_aversion 0.025** 0.022* 0.022* 0.021* 0.021* [0.032] [0.054] [0.051] [0.055] [0.060] dd_reward 0.019 [0.961] viewed_products -0.012 [0.544] viewed fscs popups i 0.034 [0.894] viewed_advice 0.008 [0.967] viewed_tax 0.006 [0.975] Q70-0.283 [0.512]

48 (35) (36) (37) (38) (39) VARIABLES logit - property 123-1 logit - property 123-2 logit - property 123-3 logit - property 123-4 logit - property 123-5 Q158-0.231 [0.312] Q159 0.136 [0.602] Q160-0.089 [0.690] Q161-0.018 [0.947] Q75-0.067 [0.596] Q170 0.049 [0.701] Q173_1-0.108** -0.060 [0.042] [0.112] Q174_1 0.074 [0.147] Q175_1 0.007 [0.847] Q64-0.043 [0.721] Q104-0.191* -0.209* -0.218** -0.217** -0.218** [0.089] [0.053] [0.043] [0.044] [0.043] Q105-0.267** -0.260** -0.266** -0.263** -0.262** [0.018] [0.014] [0.012] [0.013] [0.013] Q87 0.018 [0.831] Q81-0.003 [0.959] Q82-0.107

49 (35) (36) (37) (38) (39) VARIABLES logit - property 123-1 logit - property 123-2 logit - property 123-3 logit - property 123-4 logit - property 123-5 [0.231] Q83 0.026 [0.742] Q84_1_TEXT 0.004 [0.404] Q20-0.012 [0.767] Constant -0.348-0.890*** -1.054*** -1.048*** -1.050*** [0.727] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] Observations 1,874 1,875 1,875 1,875 1,875 R-squared Adjusted R-sq Pseudo R-sq 0.0217 0.0130 0.0119 0.0109 0.0104 Source: and CESS. Table A3.8 Logistic regression on whether participants chose product G: savings (40) (41) (42) (43) VARIABLES logit - savingsaccount 123-1 logit - savingsaccount 123-2 logit - savingsaccount 123-3 logit - savingsaccount 123-4 Treatment = 2 0.139 0.081 0.095 [0.356] [0.571] [0.420] Treatment = 3 0.056-0.010-0.002 [0.702] [0.942] [0.988] Popup = 2-0.084-0.091 [0.486] [0.439] PotsizeK = 100 0.116 0.121 [0.334] [0.308] Total Duration -0.000

50 (40) (41) (42) (43) VARIABLES logit - savingsaccount 123-1 logit - savingsaccount 123-2 logit - savingsaccount 123-3 logit - savingsaccount 123-4 [0.741] priorfca -0.091 [0.388] Q3 0.415*** 0.478*** 0.479*** 0.477*** [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] age 0.015* 0.020*** 0.019*** 0.019*** [0.059] [0.001] [0.001] [0.001] Q5-0.089 [0.117] Q6-0.046 [0.422] bat_ball -0.288** -0.405*** -0.409*** -0.406*** [0.021] [0.001] [0.000] [0.000] hyperbolic discounting 0.052 [0.609] av discount rate 0.000 [0.970] interest understanding -0.183 [0.113] loss_aversion -0.018 [0.108] dd_reward 0.189 [0.602] viewed_products 0.021 [0.282] viewed fscs popups i -0.003 [0.990] viewed_advice 0.015 [0.933]

51 (40) (41) (42) (43) VARIABLES logit - savingsaccount 123-1 logit - savingsaccount 123-2 logit - savingsaccount 123-3 logit - savingsaccount 123-4 viewed_tax 0.091 [0.590] Q70 0.336 [0.426] Q158-0.119 [0.580] Q159-0.570** -0.501*** -0.501*** -0.499*** [0.022] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] Q160-0.104 [0.624] Q161-0.223 [0.393] Q75-0.132 [0.273] Q170-0.146 [0.230] Q173_1 0.044 [0.375] Q174_1-0.058 [0.215] Q175_1 0.005 [0.888] Q64-0.248** -0.318*** -0.315*** -0.312*** [0.026] [0.002] [0.003] [0.003] Q104-0.104 [0.318] Q105-0.070 [0.504] Q87 0.035

52 (40) (41) (42) (43) VARIABLES logit - savingsaccount 123-1 logit - savingsaccount 123-2 logit - savingsaccount 123-3 logit - savingsaccount 123-4 [0.666] Q81 0.208*** 0.248*** 0.247*** 0.246*** [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] Q82 0.045 [0.603] Q83 0.029 [0.701] Q84_1_TEXT 0.011 [0.528] Q20 0.078** 0.079** 0.079** 0.080** [0.033] [0.029] [0.028] [0.026] Constant -1.433-1.714*** -1.705*** -1.664*** [0.134] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] Observations 1,874 1,878 1,878 1,878 R-squared Adjusted R-sq Pseudo R-sq 0.0628 0.0510 0.0504 0.0501 Source: and CESS. Table A3.9 VARIABLES Logistic regression on whether participants chose product H: stocks and shares (44) (46) (47) (48) (49) (50) (51) logit - shares - 123-1 logit - shares - 123-3 logit - shares - 123-4 logit - shares 1-1 logit - shares 12-1 ols - shares n - 1 ols - shares p - 1 Treatment = 2-0.319* -0.318* -0.371*** 0.179-0.203-0.720-0.069 [0.081] [0.066] [0.010] [0.520] [0.259] [0.417] [0.124] Treatment = 3-0.138-0.144-0.193 0.154-0.166 0.078-0.035 [0.437] [0.396] [0.168] [0.586] [0.354] [0.930] [0.428]

53 VARIABLES (44) (46) (47) (48) (49) (50) (51) logit - shares - 123-1 logit - shares - 123-3 Popup = 2 0.020 0.033 [0.892] [0.821] PotsizeK = 100-0.158-0.145 Total Duration 0.000 [0.286] [0.322] [0.160] priorfca -0.201 [0.119] logit - shares - 123-4 logit - shares 1-1 logit - shares 12-1 ols - shares n - 1 ols - shares p - 1 Q3-0.350*** -0.350*** -0.352*** -0.885*** -0.483*** -2.447*** -0.146*** age 0.000 [0.005] [0.004] [0.003] [0.000] [0.002] [0.001] [0.000] [0.996] Q5 0.120* [0.085] Q6 0.173** 0.193*** 0.193*** 0.317** 0.316*** 1.235*** 0.074*** bat_ball 0.070 hyperbolic discounting [0.014] [0.003] [0.003] [0.016] [0.000] [0.002] [0.000] [0.632] 0.040 [0.744] av discount rate -0.000 [0.983] interest understanding 0.254* 0.179** 0.182** -0.059 0.123 0.378 0.041 loss_aversion -0.010 [0.085] [0.028] [0.025] [0.706] [0.236] [0.452] [0.103] [0.460] dd_reward 0.843* [0.095] viewed_products -0.003

54 VARIABLES (44) (46) (47) (48) (49) (50) (51) logit - shares - 123-1 [0.902] viewed fscs popups i 0.496* [0.086] logit - shares - 123-3 logit - shares - 123-4 logit - shares 1-1 logit - shares 12-1 ols - shares n - 1 ols - shares p - 1 viewed_advice 0.387* 0.415** 0.419** 0.471 0.255 1.625 0.113* [0.075] [0.050] [0.047] [0.233] [0.333] [0.213] [0.089] viewed_tax -0.646*** -0.596*** -0.595*** -0.460-0.329-2.364* -0.139** Q70 0.006 [0.003] [0.004] [0.004] [0.251] [0.199] [0.051] [0.022] [0.992] Q158-0.367 [0.201] Q159-0.515 [0.113] Q160-0.454 [0.112] Q161-0.494 [0.151] Q75-0.108 [0.469] Q170 0.259* [0.096] Q173_1-0.070 [0.233] Q174_1 0.005 [0.926] Q175_1-0.082* -0.102*** -0.103*** -0.075-0.105** -0.448* -0.032*** [0.050] [0.009] [0.009] [0.326] [0.036] [0.070] [0.010] Q64 0.355*** 0.342*** 0.342*** 0.030 0.492*** 0.894 0.114*** [0.006] [0.007] [0.007] [0.903] [0.002] [0.283] [0.006]

55 VARIABLES (44) (46) (47) (48) (49) (50) (51) logit - shares - 123-1 logit - shares - 123-3 logit - shares - 123-4 logit - shares 1-1 logit - shares 12-1 ols - shares n - 1 ols - shares p - 1 Q104-0.334*** -0.303** -0.301** -0.280-0.437*** -0.703-0.108*** Q105-0.184 [0.009] [0.014] [0.015] [0.236] [0.006] [0.356] [0.005] [0.146] Q87 0.238** 0.219*** 0.219*** 0.051 0.091 0.553 0.043* [0.021] [0.004] [0.004] [0.732] [0.349] [0.225] [0.061] Q81-0.279*** -0.271*** -0.270*** -0.374*** -0.320*** -2.060*** -0.100*** Q82-0.087 [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.446] Q83-0.049 [0.600] Q84_1_TEXT -0.002 [0.716] Q20 0.081* 0.079* 0.077* 0.027 0.043 0.341 0.019 [0.056] [0.060] [0.066] [0.732] [0.418] [0.207] [0.169] Constant -0.931-0.870** -0.871** -2.281*** -1.590*** 11.236*** 0.612*** [0.453] [0.011] [0.011] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] Observations 1,874 1,878 1,878 1,878 1,878 1,574 1,878 R-squared 0.060 0.071 Adjusted R-sq 0.0728 0.0762 0.0523 0.0646 Pseudo R-sq 0.0810 0.0689 0.0683 Source: and CESS. A3.2 Regression results advice Similar regressions to those for product choices were also conducted for the choice about advice.

56 (52) (53) (54) (55) (56) VARIABLES logit - 1 logit - 2 logit - 3 logit - 4 ols Treatment = 2-0.070-0.135 0.058 [0.720] [0.474] [0.709] Treatment = 3-0.186-0.247-0.066 [0.335] [0.183] [0.666] Popup = 2 0.152 0.161 [0.325] [0.292] PotsizeK = 100 0.220 0.214 [0.153] [0.160] Q_TotalDuration -0.000 [0.557] priorfca 0.351*** 0.354*** 0.347*** 0.348*** 0.053*** [0.009] [0.007] [0.008] [0.008] [0.006] Q3 0.285** 0.301** 0.306** 0.302** 0.042** [0.030] [0.019] [0.017] [0.018] [0.023] age -0.008 [0.409] Q5 0.041 [0.575] Q6 0.227*** 0.225*** 0.240*** 0.241*** 0.030*** [0.003] [0.002] [0.001] [0.001] [0.002] bat_ball 0.104 [0.515] hyperbolic_discounting -0.036 [0.784] av_discount_rate -0.000 [0.986] interest_understanding -0.015 [0.920] loss_aversion 0.027* 0.025* 0.028** 0.028** 0.005**

57 (52) (53) (54) (55) (56) VARIABLES logit - 1 logit - 2 logit - 3 logit - 4 ols [0.058] [0.067] [0.041] [0.039] [0.018] dd_reward 1.045** 0.479* [0.028] [0.081] viewed_products 0.041* 0.046* 0.051** 0.051** 0.007** [0.088] [0.053] [0.024] [0.025] [0.026] viewed_fscs_popups_i 0.587** 0.566** 0.570** 0.570** 0.118*** [0.033] [0.033] [0.030] [0.026] [0.005] viewed_advice 0.379* 0.344* 0.326* 0.328* 0.052* [0.085] [0.058] [0.070] [0.069] [0.058] viewed_tax -0.033 [0.874] Q70-3.191*** -2.849*** -2.685*** -2.689*** -0.474*** [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] Q158-0.470* -0.192 [0.092] [0.350] Q159-0.450 [0.163] Q160-0.512* -0.230 [0.062] [0.254] Q161-0.884*** -0.604** [0.007] [0.018] Q75-0.244 [0.110] Q170-0.125 [0.402] Q173_1-0.369*** -0.399*** -0.399*** -0.397*** -0.052*** [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] Q174_1 0.808*** 0.804*** 0.808*** 0.807*** 0.118*** [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000]

58 (52) (53) (54) (55) (56) VARIABLES logit - 1 logit - 2 logit - 3 logit - 4 ols Q175_1 0.249*** 0.242*** 0.236*** 0.234*** 0.031*** [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] Q64 0.591*** 0.527*** 0.550*** 0.553*** 0.082*** [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] Q104 0.368*** 0.403*** 0.390*** 0.389*** 0.054*** [0.006] [0.002] [0.002] [0.002] [0.004] Q105-0.044 [0.741] Q87-0.039 [0.706] Q81 0.475*** 0.486*** 0.479*** 0.479*** 0.059*** [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] Q82 0.006 [0.955] Q83-0.015 [0.878] Q84_1_TEXT -0.000 [0.984] Q20-0.018 [0.712] Constant -3.284*** -3.912*** -3.762*** -3.754*** 0.037 [0.007] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.649] Observations 1,874 1,877 1,878 1,878 1,878 R-squared 0.225 Adjusted R-sq 0.231 0.225 0.221 0.221 0.219 Source: and CESS.

www.oxera.com