REPORT TO THE NATIONS 2018 GLOBAL STUDY ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE

Similar documents
REPORT TO THE NATIONS 2018 GLOBAL STUDY ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE

REPORT TO THE NATIONS 2018 GLOBAL STUDY ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE

REPORT TO THE NATIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE 2016 SOUTHERN ASIA EDITION

Figure 1: Occupational Frauds by Category Frequency

Figure 1: Breakdown of Cases by Country

Table 1: Historical Summary of Revenue Lost to Fraud. Estimate of Revenue Lost to Fraud

Figure 1: Geographical Location of Victim Organizations

REPORT TO THE NATIONS 2018 GLOBAL STUDY ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE

In-House Fraud Investigation Teams: 2017 Benchmarking Report

Mitigating Fraud. June 22, Sept. 21, 2014

Fraud in Government. Mike Nolan, CPA, CFE, CGMA. CCACC & CCA&RMC Conference Monterey, CA September 2014

REPORT TO THE NATIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE GLObAL FrAUD STUDy

Analyzing a Potpourri of Fraud in Higher Education. Calvin Wendelboe, CPA, CIA, CFE

AGA Risk and Fraud Webinar

REPORT TO THE NATIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE 2016 GLOBAL FRAUD STUDY

REGIONAL MATTERS ARISING FROM REPORTS OF THE WHO INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL AUDITS. Information Document CONTENTS BACKGROUND

Africa: An Emerging World Region

Fraud in the Government Realm. Introduction. What is Fraud? My career began with a local government fraud in 1993

FRAUD: A Web Of Deceit

African Financial Markets Initiative

30% DEPOSIT BONUS FOR OUR TRADERS IN AFRICA PROMOTION. Terms and Conditions

A c f e. Report to. the Nation. on Occupational Fraud & Abuse

Ascoma, your insurance solutions in Africa

Improving the Investment Climate in Sub-Saharan Africa

Pension Patterns and Challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa World Bank Pensions Core Course April 27, 2016

OAPT June 9, Deterring Fraud and the Latest Fraud Schemes in Public Entities TAKE AWAY #1

Reduce Your Risk: Understanding Internal Controls and Fraud Risks and Prevention

IIA Fraud Conference. Case studies from recent investigations. 8 April 2015

1/24/14. Fraud Detec/on and Preven/on. Agenda. Fraud Cases in Minnesota - Schools

FINANCIAL INCLUSION IN AFRICA: THE ROLE OF INFORMALITY Leora Klapper and Dorothe Singer

Fraud Prevention & Detection. Eric Conforti, CPA, CFE April 17, 2018

World Bank Group: Indira Chand Phone:

Paying Taxes 2019 Global and Regional Findings: AFRICA

Africa Business Forum, Energy Industry Session

FRAUD EXAMINERS MANUAL INTERNATIONAL EDITION

Incident Response. We ve had a privacy breach now what?

1/3/2013. Months. Other $75,000. Government $81,000. Non-Profit $100,000. Dollars. Public Company $127,000. Private Company $200,000

FRAUD AWARENESS & PREVENTION

FAQs The DFID Impact Fund (managed by CDC)

MMAAA Annual Meeting. Conducting an Investigative Audit June 13, Presented by: John J. Sullivan, CFE Melanson Heath

AFRICAN MINING: POLITICAL RISK OUTLOOK FOR 2017

NABCA 23 rd Annual Administrators Conference The Forensics of Fraud: Conducting Financial Investigations

Financial Development, Financial Inclusion, and Growth in Africa

Africa Evacuation Benefit

Chapter 2 Skimming. 2. To a fraudster, the principle advantage of skimming is the difficulty with which the scheme is detected. a. True b.

The State of the Art of Fraud. Glenn L. Helms, Ph.D., CPA, CIA, CITP, CISA, CFF

The Landscape of Microinsurance Africa The World Map of Microinsurance

Chapter 4. Vector control

HOW TO SPOT AND MITIGATE FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES

Let s look at the life cycle of a gold project from discovery to closure

PwC Tax Calendar 2016

11/9/15. Fraud in Non-profit Organizations: What You Need to Know NOW!

Describe Fraud in the Context of Financial

Effects of Transfer Pricing in developing countries: Cases in Africa

NEPAD-OECD AFRICA INVESTMENT INITIATIVE

Paying Taxes An African perspective. Paying Taxes An African perspective 1

Building Resilience in Fragile States: Experiences from Sub Saharan Africa. Mumtaz Hussain International Monetary Fund October 2017

Financial Market Liberalization and Its Impact in Sub Saharan Africa

Geneva, March Capacity Building for Effective Infrastructure Regulation

Assessing Fiscal Space and Financial Sustainability for Health

Challenges and opportunities of LDCs Graduation:

Red Flags of Fraud. What we will cover. Solutions Conference. Sarah L. Jennings, CPA, CFE Principal Maner Costerisan. The Problem Defined

COMPENSATION GUIDE FOR ANTI-FRAUD PROFESSIONALS

Internal Controls over Expenditures

5 SAVING, CREDIT, AND FINANCIAL RESILIENCE

HIPC DEBT INITIATIVE FOR HEAVILY INDEBTED POOR COUNTRIES ELIGIBILITY GOAL

Complexities of using African comparable companies

C-SUITE S DIRTY LITTLE FRAUD SECRET

Lusaka, 7 May Note: The original of the Agreement was established by the Secretary-General of the United Nations on 2 June 1982.

Subject: UNESCO Reformed Field Network in Africa

CSMFO CONFERENCE 2018

Innovative Financing for Energy Projects

Homebuyer Education: An Opportunity for Collaboration African Union for Housing Finance Conference Johannesburg, South Africa 7 September 2011

Trade Note May 16, 2005

Innovative Approaches for Accelerating Connectivity in Africa. - One Stop Border Post (OSBP) development-

4 th Session of the Continental Steering Committee (CSC) for the African Project on the Implementation of the 2008 System of National Accounts

in Africa since the early 1990s.

Fraud & Forensic Accounting Update for CPAs

Investing in Zimbabwe: An investor s experience

Fraud Prevention for Nonprofits

REPORT ON REGIONAL MANAGERIAL COMPLIANCE ACTIVITIES AND MATTERS ARISING OUT OF INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL AUDITS. Report of the Secretariat

Looking for Fraud Through Rose-Colored Glasses

International Comparison Programme Main results of 2011 round

PARIS CLUB RECENT ACTIVITY

WIPO s Cooperation With LDCs In Appropriate Technology Project Harare, Zimbabwe October, 2014

Financial Crime - Early Warning Signs the role of Internal Audit in recognizing red flags

Road Maintenance Financing in Sub-Saharan Africa: Reforms and progress towards second generation road funds

Managing Reputational Risk for Nonprofit Organizations. Best Practices for Fraud Prevention. July 14, Christopher W. Truman, CPA, Manager

T H E A S S O C I A T I O N

International Investment Arbitration in Africa: Year in Review 2016

2007 global economic crime survey

G20 Leaders Conclusions on Africa

Everything You Didn t Want To Know About Employee Crime

Part One Introduction

Perspectives on Global Development 2012 Social Cohesion in a Shifting World. OECD Development Centre

Living Conditions and Well-Being: Evidence from African Countries

A F R I C A R E G I O N A L T R E N D S

Appendix 3 Official Debt Restructuring

STRUCTURING INVESTMENTS INTO AFRICA THROUGH MAURITIUS/ESTATE PLANNING AND WEALTH MANAGEMENT FOR HIGH NET WORTH INDIVIDUALS IN EAST AFRICA (KENYA)

SOCIAL POLICY AND SOCIAL PROTECTION SECTION EASTERN AND SOUTHERN AFRICA REGION. Working Paper

Transcription:

REPORT TO THE NATIONS 2018 GLOBAL STUDY ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE S U B - SAHAR AN AF R I CA E DI T I O N

CONTENTS Introduction 3 How Occupational Fraud Is Committed 4 Detection 6 Victim Organizations 8 Profile of a Fraud Perpetrator 14 Case Results 16 Methodology 18 About the ACFE 20 2 Contents Report to the Nations: Sub-Saharan Africa Edition

INTRODUCTION In April 2018, the ACFE released the 2018 Report to the Nations, which provided a global analysis of the costs and effects of occupational fraud (i.e., fraud committed against the organization by its own officers, directors, or employees). The 2018 Report to the Nations, which was based on 2,690 cases of occupational fraud reported from 125 countries, highlighted the tremendous impact occupational fraud has on organizations throughout the world. With this report, we now focus more closely on how occupational fraud impacts organizations in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study is based on the 267 cases of occupational fraud in Sub-Saharan Africa that were reported in our 2017 Global Fraud Survey. Collectively, these cases, which accounted for 13% of all cases in our global study, caused a median loss of USD 90,000 and lasted a median 12 months before they were detected. This report contains information on fraud losses in the Sub-Saharan Africa cases we analyzed 1, along with the methods of fraud committed, the ways in which the frauds were detected, the characteristics of the victim organizations and their anti-fraud controls, the characteristics of the fraud perpetrators, and the results of the cases after the frauds had been discovered. 2 We hope this report will be of value to our readers in the Sub-Saharan Africa region, helping them tailor fraud prevention, detection, and investigation strategies to the specific fraud risks faced by their clients and employers. FIG. 1 Cases by country in Sub-Saharan Africa Country MEDIAN LOSS: usd 90,000 Number of cases Angola 3 Botswana 1 Cameroon 1 Central African Republic 1 Chad 3 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 3 Congo, Republic of the 1 Cote d Ivoire 5 Equatorial Guinea 1 Gambia 1 Ghana 8 Guinea 1 Kenya 34 Liberia 8 Madagascar 2 Malawi 3 Mali 4 Mauritania 1 Mauritius 2 Mozambique 1 Namibia 4 Nigeria 55 Rwanda 1 Senegal 1 Somalia 2 South Africa 87 Sudan 1 Swaziland 1 Tanzania 5 Uganda 11 Zambia 5 Zimbabwe 10 Total cases: 267 1 Readers should note that all losses in this report are presented in U.S. dollars (USD), which is how respondents reported this information in our 2017 Global Fraud Survey. 2 For a glossary of terms used in this report, please see pg. 78 of the 2018 Report to the Nations. 267 CASES 13% OF ALL CASES Median duration of a fraud scheme 12 months Introduction Report to the Nations: Sub-Saharan Africa Edition 3

HOW OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD IS COMMITTED FIG. 2 How is occupational fraud committed in Sub-Saharan Africa? 90% As part of our ongoing research, we examine the methods by which occupational fraudsters perpetrate their schemes. Our results have consistently shown that occupational fraud cases can be broken down into three broad categories. The most common of these is asset misappropriation; 90% of cases in Sub-Saharan Africa involved the misappropriation of assets. These cases are also the least costly, causing a median loss of USD 90,000. On the other end of the spectrum in both frequency and median loss is financial statement fraud. This category accounted for 9% of cases in the region and had a median loss of USD 3,350,000. Corruption schemes fell in the middle in both respects, occurring in 49% of cases and causing a median loss of USD 143,000. PERCENT OF CASES 49% 9% Asset misappropriation Corruption Financial statement fraud $90,000 $143,000 MEDIAN LOSS 4 How Occupational Fraud Is Committed Report to the Nations: Sub-Saharan Africa Edition $3,350,000

Because asset misappropriations account for such a large percentage of occupational fraud cases, we further divided that category into sub-schemes based on the specific mechanism used to misappropriate assets. Figure 3 shows the breakdown of the cases in Sub-Saharan Africa among the nine sub-categories of asset misappropriation, along with corruption and financial statement schemes for comparison purposes. Corruption schemes were more than twice as common as any other fraud type, followed by the misappropriation of cash on hand, which occurred in more than one-fifth of the cases reported to us from the region. FIG. 3 What are the most common occupational fraud schemes in Sub-Saharan Africa? Corruption Cash on hand Noncash Billing Check and payment tampering Cash larceny Expense reimbursements Skimming Financial statement fraud Payroll Register disbursements 49% 21% 18% 17% 15% 14% 12% 10% 9% 6% 2% How Occupational Fraud Is Committed Report to the Nations: Sub-Saharan Africa Edition 5

DETECTION We asked respondents to provide information about how frauds were initially detected. The importance of tips as a fraud detection method is clear; Figure 4 shows that more cases were discovered this way in Sub-Saharan Africa than the next three detection methods combined. Our data also shows that organizations can increase the amount of cases detected by tips by implementing hotlines 48% of cases were detected by tip when a hotline for reporting misconduct was in place, compared to 25% in organizations without one. FIG. 4 How is occupational fraud initially detected in Sub-Saharan Africa? Tip Internal audit Management review Account reconciliation By accident Other Document examination External audit Surveillance/monitoring Notification by law enforcement IT controls 40% 19% 12% 7% 6% 4% 4% 2% 1% 1% 1% 6 Detection Report to the Nations: Sub-Saharan Africa Edition

HOTLINES AND REPORTING MECHANISMS Respondents provided information about hotlines and reporting mechanisms that can help us understand who is reporting fraud, how they are doing so, and how effective such mechanisms are in Sub-Saharan Africa. of victim organizations had hotlines Organizations without hotlines were almost TWICE AS LIKELY to detect fraud by internal audit and more than twice as likely to detect it by accident Tips from employees are by far the MOST COMMON initial detection method, but over a quarter of tips came from customers and 15% were anonymous 48% of tips are from EMPLOYEES 26% of tips are from CUSTOMERS 15% of tips are ANONYMOUS Telephone hotlines are most popular, but whistleblowers use various reporting mechanisms Telephone hotline 57% 31% Web-based/ online form 16% Email Other Mailed letter/form 20% Fax 8% 2% NOT ALL TIPS COME THROUGH HOTLINES When a reporting mechanism is not used, whistleblowers are most likely to report to: DIRECT SUPERVISOR 25% FRAUD INVESTIGATION TEAM 20% EXECUTIVE 18% INTERNAL AUDIT 18% COWORKER 10% Detection Report to the Nations: Sub-Saharan Africa Edition 7

VICTIM ORGANIZATIONS To gain a better understanding of the victim organizations in our study, we asked respondents to provide information about the victims type, size, and industry. Participants also described the types of controls that were in place to prevent and detect fraud at the time the schemes occurred. Type of Organization As shown in Figure 5, 61% of the frauds in Sub-Saharan Africa occurred at for-profit organizations, with 39% of the victim organizations being private companies and 22% being public companies. Government organizations accounted for 22% of the cases in our study and suffered the greatest median loss, at USD 250,000. Not-for-profits accounted for 12% of cases reported to us and had a median loss of USD 20,000. FIG. 5 What types of organizations are victimized by occupational fraud in Sub-Saharan Africa? 39% PERCENT OF CASES 22% 22% 12% 5% Private company Public company Government Not-for-profit Other $20,000 MEDIAN LOSS $59,000 $123,000 $58,000 $250,000 8 Victim Organizations Report to the Nations: Sub-Saharan Africa Edition

Size of Organization Figure 6 shows the frequency and median loss of fraud schemes in Sub-Saharan Africa based on the size of the victim organization. Large organizations (those with more than 10,000 employees) represented 10% of cases in the region and suffered the greatest median loss of USD 500,000. Small businesses (those with fewer than 100 employees) were victimized in 19% of the cases in Sub-Saharan Africa and suffered a median loss of USD 53,000. FIG. 6 How does an organization s size relate to its occupational fraud risk in Sub-Saharan Africa? 41% PERCENT OF CASES 19% 30% 10% <100 employees 100 999 employees 1,000 9,999 employees 10,000+ employees $53,000 $60,000 $108,000 MEDIAN LOSS $500,000 Victim Organizations Report to the Nations: Sub-Saharan Africa Edition 9

Industry of Organization Figure 7 illustrates the breakdown of the cases reported to us based on the industry of the victim organization. The greatest number of cases in Sub-Saharan Africa occurred in the banking and financial services, government and public administration, and manufacturing sectors. Banking and financial services reported 27% of cases and suffered a median loss of USD 81,000. The government and public administration sector suffered the greatest median loss of USD 640,000. Readers should note that this data most likely represents industries that tend to employ the greatest number of CFEs, rather than the industries that are most susceptible to fraud. FIG. 7 What industries were victimized by occupational fraud in Sub-Saharan Africa? Banking and financial services Government and public administration Manufacturing Religious, charitable, or social services Insurance Energy Transportation and warehousing Health care Other Telecommunications Education Utilities Construction Services (professional) Food service and hospitality Technology Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting Real estate Communications and publishing Retail Mining Wholesale trade Services (other) 27% (72 cases) 11% (29 cases) 8% (20 cases) 6% (15 cases) 6% (15 cases) 6% (15 cases) 5% (14 cases) 5% (14 cases) 4% (11 cases) 4% (10 cases) 3% (8 cases) 2% (6 cases) 2% (6 cases) 2% (5 cases) 2% (5 cases) 2% (4 cases) 2% (4 cases) 1% (3 cases) 1% (3 cases) 1% (2 cases) 1% (2 cases) <1% (1 case) <1% (1 case) 10 Victim Organizations Report to the Nations: Sub-Saharan Africa Edition

R+94 R+95 R+89 R+94 R+92 R+94 R+96 To help organizations in the Sub-Saharan Africa region benchmark their fraud risk and loss amounts, Figure 8 provides the median loss caused by the reported frauds in all industries for which we received ten or more cases. FIG. 8 How does occupational fraud affect organizations in different industries in Sub-Saharan Africa? 27+ +73R 11+ 72 Cases 29 Cases 8+ 20 Cases BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Median Loss: $81,000 GOVERNMENT AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Median Loss: $640,000 MANUFACTURING Median Loss: $120,000 6+ RELIGIOUS, CHARITABLE, 15 Cases OR SOCIAL SERVICES Median Loss: $55,000 5+ R+95 TRANSPORTATION AND 14 Cases WAREHOUSING Median Loss: $243,000 6+ INSURANCE Median Loss: $42,000 5+ 7% 14 Cases HEALTH CARE 15 Cases Median Loss: $95,000 6+ ENERGY 15 Cases Median Loss: $49,000 4+ 10 Cases TELECOMMUNICATIONS Median Loss: $245,000 Victim Organizations Report to the Nations: Sub-Saharan Africa Edition 11

Anti-Fraud Controls in Sub-Saharan Africa Internal controls play an important part in protecting organizations against fraud. As part of our research, we examined which anti-fraud controls the victim organizations in the Sub-Saharan Africa region had in place at the time the fraud occurred, as well as what internal control weaknesses primarily contributed to the fraud. FIG. 9 What anti-fraud controls are the most common in Sub-Saharan Africa? Control Percent of cases External audit of financial statements 90% Code of conduct 89% Internal audit department 87% Management certification of financial statements 81% Independent audit committee 73% External audit of internal controls over financial reporting 72% Hotline 70% Management review 69% Anti-fraud policy 60% Fraud training for employees 55% Fraud training for managers/executives 52% Employee support programs 50% Formal fraud risk assessments 46% Surprise audits 46% Dedicated fraud department, function, or team 43% Proactive data monitoring/analysis 40% Job rotation/mandatory vacation 25% Rewards for whistleblowers 20% We compared the median loss and median duration of fraud at victim organizations in the Sub-Saharan Africa region based on whether they had specific anti-fraud controls in place. The presence of several controls was associated with notable reductions in both losses and duration of fraud (see Figure 10). FIG. 10 How does the presence of certain anti-fraud controls relate to the median loss and duration of fraud in Sub-Saharan Africa? 51+49+R 42+58+R 28+72+R 31+69+R 40+60+R 50+50+R 25+75+R 31+69+R 51% 42% 28% External audit of 31% LOWER LOSSES LOWER LOSSES 40% 50% 25% 31% LOWER LOSSES Surprise audits Rewards for whistleblowers FASTER DETECTION FASTER DETECTION LOWER LOSSES internal controls over financial reporting Management review FASTER DETECTION FASTER DETECTION 38+62+R 38% LOWER LOSSES Job rotation/ mandatory vacation 42+58+R 42% FASTER DETECTION 12 Victim Organizations Report to the Nations: Sub-Saharan Africa Edition

FIG. 11 What are the primary internal control weaknesses that contribute to occupational fraud in Sub-Saharan Africa? Override of existing internal controls 27% Lack of internal controls 25% Lack of management review 16% Poor tone at the top 9% Lack of employee fraud education 4% Lack of competent personnel in oversight roles 9% Lack of independent checks/audits 3% Other 6% Lack of reporting mechanism 1% Lack of clear lines of authority 1% Victim Organizations Report to the Nations: Sub-Saharan Africa Edition 13

PERPETRATORS PROFILE OF A FRAUD PERPETRATOR Understanding the common characteristics of fraud offenders can help organizations improve their ability to detect fraud and minimize their risk of loss. The following information is based on the perpetrators in our study who committed fraud in Sub-Saharan Africa. PER CENT OF C A S E S How does the perpetrator s level of authority relate to occupational fraud? 48% 36% 14% Where did perpetrators work within their organizations? These were the five most common departments: Employee Manager Owner/executive Executive/upper management 20% OF CASES Board of directors 15% OF CASES Sales 9% OF CASES $55,000 $73,000 MEDIAN LOSS $2,716,000 Accounting 7% OF CASES Human resources 7% OF CASES Median age for all fraudsters in the region was Losses caused by fraudsters above the median age were much larger than losses caused by those below the median: 20 years old 62 years old $57,000 Median loss: Median loss: Younger than 38 older than 38 $150,000 14 Perpetrators Report to the Nations: Sub-Saharan Africa Edition

76% OF FRAUDS were COMMITTED BY MEN 36% of cases MEDIAN LOSSES WERE FAR GREATER WHEN FRAUDSTERS COLLUDED ONE PERPETRATOR $99,000 MEDIAN MEDIAN LOSS $63,000 LOSS Losses caused by men were 57% larger than losses caused by women 64% of cases $37,000 TWO OR MORE PERPETRATORS $120,000 MEDIAN LOSS MEDIAN LOSS FRAUDSTERS WHO HAD BEEN WITH THEIR ORGANIZATIONS FOR MORE THAN FIVE YEARS STOLE SIGNIFICANTLY MORE MORE THAN 5 YEARS TENURE $140,000 MEDIAN LOSS 5 YEARS' TENURE OR LESS $52,000 MEDIAN LOSS In 89% of cases fraudsters displayed at least one behavioral red flag. The five most common red flags were: 15% 13% 24% 23% 49% Living beyond means Unusually close association with vendor/customer Financial difficulties Control issues, unwillingness to share duties Irritabiity, suspiciousness, or defensiveness Only 4% OF PERPETRATORS HAD A PRIOR FRAUD CONVICTION Perpetrators Report to the Nations: Sub-Saharan Africa Edition 15

CASE RESULTS We also asked respondents what actions the victim organizations took against the perpetrators after the frauds had been detected. Figure 12 shows that 74% of perpetrators in Sub-Saharan Africa were either terminated or permitted or required to resign. However, some perpetrators remained at the organization, with 20% receiving probation, suspension, or no punishment. FIG. 12 How do victim organizations in Sub-Saharan Africa punish fraud perpetrators? Termination 64% Probation or suspension 14% Permitted or required resignation 10% Settlement agreement 10% Perpetrator was no longer with organization 10% No punishment 6% Other 4% 16 Case Results Report to the Nations: Sub-Saharan Africa Edition

LITIGATION AND RECOVERY OF LOSSES Victim organizations might refer fraud cases for prosecution or commence civil litigation to recover their losses. Our data indicate that almost two-thirds of cases in Sub-Saharan Africa are referred to law enforcement, while civil suits to recover fraud losses were less common. 65% of cases were referred for criminal prosecution 31% pleaded guilty or no contest 31% were convicted at trial 18% were not prosecuted 4% resulted in acquittal 17 cases (28%) resulted in a civil suit against the fraudster 53% judgment for victim 18% settled 18% judgment for perpetrator After a fraud has been detected, the victim might try to recover its losses from the fraudster or other sources. Our data shows that almost half of victims were unable to recover any of their losses. 48% Recovered NOTHING 12% Recovered ALL LOSSES 39% MaDe a Partial Recovery Case Results Report to the Nations: Sub-Saharan Africa Edition 17

METHODOLOGY The 2018 Report to the Nations is based on the results of the 2017 Global Fraud Survey, an online survey opened to 41,573 Certified Fraud Examiners (CFEs) from July 2017 to October 2017. As part of the survey, respondents were asked to provide a narrative description of the single largest fraud case they had investigated since January 2016. Respondents were then presented with 76 questions to answer regarding the particular details of the fraud case, including information about the perpetrator, the victim organization, and the methods of fraud employed, as well as fraud trends in general. (Respondents were not asked to identify the perpetrator or the victim.) Additionally, after completing the survey the first time, respondents were provided the option to submit information about a second case that they investigated. Cases submitted were required to meet the following four criteria: 1. The case must have involved occupational fraud (defined as fraud committed by a person against the organization for which he or she works). 2. The investigation must have occurred between January 2016 and the time of survey participation. 3. The investigation must have been complete at the time of survey participation. We received 7,232 total responses to the survey, 2,690 of which were usable for purposes of our global study. Of these usable responses, 267 involved occupational fraud cases perpetrated against organizations in Sub-Saharan Africa; the data contained in this report is based solely on the information provided in these 267 responses. Analysis Methodology In calculating the percentages discussed throughout this report, we used the total number of complete and relevant responses for the question(s) being analyzed. Specifically, we excluded any blank responses or instances where the participant indicated that he or she did not know the answer to a question. Consequently, the total number of cases included in each analysis varies. In addition, several survey questions allowed participants to select more than one answer. Therefore, the sum of percentages in many figures throughout the report exceeds 100%. The sum of percentages in other figures might not be exactly 100% (i.e., it might be 99% or 101%) due to rounding of individual category data. 4. The respondent must have been reasonably sure the perpetrator(s) was (were) identified. 18 Methodology Report to the Nations: Sub-Saharan Africa Edition

Unless otherwise indicated, all loss amounts discussed throughout the report are calculated using median loss rather than mean, or average, loss. Average losses were skewed by a limited number of very high-dollar frauds. Using median loss provides a more conservative and we believe more accurate picture of the typical impact of occupational fraud schemes. Additionally, we excluded median loss calculations for categories for which there were fewer than ten responses. Because the direct losses caused by financial statement frauds are typically spread among numerous stakeholders, obtaining an accurate estimate for this amount is extremely difficult. Consequently, for schemes involving financial statement fraud, we asked survey participants to provide the gross amount of the financial statement misstatement (over- or under-statement) involved in the scheme. All losses reported for financial statement frauds throughout this report are based on those reported amounts involved in the scheme. All losses reported for financial statement frauds throughout this report are based on those reported amounts. Methodology Report to the Nations: Sub-Saharan Africa Edition 19

ABOUT THE ACFE Founded in 1988 by Dr. Joseph T. Wells, CFE, CPA, the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) is the world s largest anti-fraud organization and premier provider of anti-fraud training and education. Together with nearly 85,000 members in more than 180 countries, the ACFE is reducing business fraud worldwide and providing the training and resources needed to fight fraud more effectively. The ACFE provides educational tools and practical solutions for anti-fraud professionals through events, education, publications, networking, and educational tools for colleges and universities. Certified Fraud Examiners The ACFE offers its members the opportunity for professional certification with the Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) credential. The CFE is preferred by businesses and government entities around the world, and indicates expertise in fraud prevention and detection. CFEs are anti-fraud experts who have demonstrated knowledge in four critical areas: Financial Transactions and Fraud Schemes, Law, Investigation, and Fraud Prevention and Deterrence. Membership Members of the ACFE include accountants, internal auditors, fraud investigators, law enforcement officers, lawyers, business leaders, risk/compliance professionals, and educators, all of whom have access to expert training, educational tools, and resources. Whether their career is focused exclusively on preventing and detecting fraudulent activities or they just want to learn more about fraud, the ACFE provides the essential tools and resources necessary for anti-fraud professionals to accomplish their objectives. To learn more, visit ACFE.com or call (800) 245-3321 / +1 (512) 478-9000. Contact Association of Certified Fraud Examiners Global Headquarters 716 West Ave Austin, TX 78701-2727 USA Phone: (800) 245-3321 / +1 (512) 478-9000 ACFE.com info@acfe.com 20 About the ACFE Report to the Nations: Sub-Saharan Africa Edition

Terms of Use The Report to the Nations and any accompanying charts, graphs, PowerPoint slides, or related content (collectively the Materials ) are available for use free of charge as a public service of the ACFE. You may download, copy and/or distribute the Materials for personal or business use on the following conditions: 1. No portion of the Materials may be sold or otherwise licensed, shared or transferred to any party for a fee, or included in any work that is to be sold, licensed, shared or transferred to any party for a fee, without the express written consent of the ACFE. The foregoing notwithstanding, you are permitted to use the materials as part of a speech or presentation for which an admission fee is charged. 2. The Materials must be properly attributed to the ACFE, including the name of the publication. An example of proper attribution is: 2018 Report to the Nations. Copyright 2018 by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. ACFE, CFE, Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, the ACFE Seal, and the ACFE Logo are trademarks owned by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. ( ACFE ) and registered in the Republic of South Africa. These marks, along with Certified Fraud Examiner, Report to the Nations and other related trademarks, names and logos are the property of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc., and are registered and/or used in the U.S. and countries around the world. About the ACFE Report to the Nations: Sub-Saharan Africa Edition 21

ACFE.com/RTTNresources