KOREA S EXPERIENCE WITH UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE IN THE 1998 ASIAN FINANCIAL CRISIS AND ITS ADJUSTMENTS IN THE CURRENT CRISIS.

Similar documents
Changes in the Welfare Policy Environment 2016 and Their Implications

If the Economy s so Bad, Why Is the Unemployment Rate so Low?

ENFORCEMENT DECREE OF THE EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACT

Chapter 9 Labour Insurance

Global Economic Prospects and the Developing Countries William Shaw December 1999

Financial Crisis and Global Recession: At a Turning Point?

6-8 September 2011, Manila, Philippines. Jointly organized by UNESCAP and BANGKO SENTRAL NG PILIPINAS. Country Experiences 1: ASEAN Economies

Viet Nam GDP growth by sector Crude oil output Million metric tons 20

Social Welfare in Korea. Young Jun Choi Dept. of Public Administration Korea University

The Argentine Economy in the year 2006

The fiscal response to the currency crisis and the challenges ahead - Korea s experience

PUBLIC PENSION SYSTEMS AND THE ELDERLY POVERTY IN KOREA

"Opportunities and Challenges of Demographic Change in Europe"

Economic Crisis and Female Workers:

World Social Security Report 2010/11 Providing coverage in times of crisis and beyond

Overcoming Poverty in Korea

LABOUR MARKET DEVELOPMENTS IN THE EURO AREA AND THE UNITED STATES SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS

9. Country profile: Central African Republic

Forecast of Louisiana Unemployment Insurance Claims. September 2014

Gender Sensitive. Indicators in Seoul ~ Policy Research-033

LABOUR MARKET DEVELOPMENTS IN LESOTHO. The Bureau of Statistics (BOS) has released preliminary results of the 2008 Integrated Labour Force Survey

Georgia: Emergency Assistance for Post-Conflict Recovery

The Asian Face of the Global Recession

Lars Heikensten: Monetary policy and potential growth

The 2 nd Midterm 12. Job Search. Explaining the Natural Rate: An Overview. Explaining Structural Unemployment. U.S. Unemployment Since 1960

CHAPTER 4. EXPANDING EMPLOYMENT THE LABOR MARKET REFORM AGENDA

National Economic Conditions. Cheyenne AIA Meeting February 25th, 2011 Rob Godby

Increase in Life Expectancy: Macroeconomic Impact and Policy Implications

PRESENTATION BY PROF. E. TUMUSIIME-MUTEBILE, GOVERNOR, BANK OF UGANDA, TO THE NRM RETREAT, KYANKWANZI, JANUARY

Japan s Economy: Monthly Review

STRUCTURAL REFORM PROSPECTS FOR INCREASING LABOR MARKET FLEXIBILITY IN KOREA

WORKING PAPER. How to Improve Older Workers Job Security and Increase Demand for Their Labor WORKING PAPER I.

Change and Continuity in Social Policy Responses to Economic Crises in South Korea: 1979~81 vs. 1997~98

Employment crisis in Europe and EU response. From pragmatism to Europe Maria Karamessini, Panteion University (Athens)

FIRST LOOK AT MACROECONOMICS*

The labor market in South Korea,

JUNE Living Standards REPORT HIGHLIGHTS. ANDREW SHARPE AND JEAN-FRANÇOIS ARSENAULT Centre for the Study of Living Standards (CSLS)

Mr Thiessen converses on the conduct of monetary policy in Canada under a floating exchange rate system

NAV facts and figures 2015

Banking on Turkey, October 21, 2008

Macroeconomic Risks for Farmer Cooperatives

Inclusive Growth in Korea

6-8 September 2011, Manila, Philippines. Jointly organized by UNESCAP and BANGKO SENTRAL NG PILIPINAS. Country Experiences 1: ASEAN Economies

Japan s s Lost Decade: From Crisis to Recovery

Global Financial Crisis. Econ 690 Spring 2019

Beyond the Basics of Exemptions and Special Enrollment Periods

Lessons of the Financial Crisis for the Design of the New International Financial Architecture

December Employment Report: Further Deterioration of Labor Market Conditions January 9, 2009

Testimony before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Heather Boushey, Senior Economist, Center for American Progress Action Fund

Financial Crisis and Global Recession: At a Turning Point?

The Impact of the Recession on Employment-Based Health Coverage

PURSUING SHARED PROSPERITY IN AN ERA OF TURBULENCE AND HIGH COMMODITY PRICES

Presentation. Global Financial Crisis and the Asia-Pacific Economies: Lessons Learnt and Challenges Introduction of the Issues

Japan s Economy: Monthly Review

Income and Wealth Inequality in OECD Countries

The Growth of In-Work Housing Benefit Claimants: Evidence and policy implications

Notes on the monetary transmission mechanism in the Czech economy

How to Fix The Canadian Recession

State of the Turkish Economy. Emre Deliveli TOBB ETU, October

Hong Kong Economy: Recovering from Recession?

International Monetary and Financial Committee

New Hampshire Medicaid Program Enrollment Forecast SFY Update

The Future of European and Asian Economy after the Euro-zone Crisis

Research & Policy Brief Number 4 December 2009

SHORT-TERM EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR MARKET OUTLOOK AND KEY CHALLENGES IN G20 COUNTRIES. A statistical update by ILO and OECD 1

Robert D. Cruz, PhD, Chief Economist

"Reducing poverty, not inequality"

What Drives Changes in Business and Consumer Sentiment?

Economic Outlook Professor Paul A. Spindt Tulane University

Global Economic Prospects: Navigating strong currents

Education, training, life-long learning and capacity-building

Educational Attainment and Economic Outcomes

Social Security Schemes,Pension and Elderly policy in Lao P.D.R

A European Unemployment Insurance Scheme? An Interview with Sebastian Dullien

SPP 542 International Financial Policy South Korea s Next Step

Dynamic Change, Economic Fluctuations, and the AD-AS Model

The Forty-Second Annual Meeting of Governors of the Board of the Asian Development Bank (Indonesia, Bali, May 4 (Monday), 2009)

The Hong Kong Economy in Contraction Mode

Social Protection and Informal Economy: Formalize the Informal Sector

GLOBAL EMPLOYMENT TRENDS 2014

Global Financial Crisis and Policy Response in Mauritius: Key Lessons

Social Protection Index Brief: Labor Market Programs in Asia and the Pacific

Unemployment Insurance Primer: Understanding What s At Stake as Congress Reopens Stimulus Package Debate. Wayne Vroman January 2002

Poverty, Inequity and Inequality in New Zealand

Lessons from previous US recessions and recoveries

STRUCTURAL REFORM REFORMING THE PENSION SYSTEM IN KOREA. Table 1: Speed of Aging in Selected OECD Countries. by Randall S. Jones

Examples of active labour market policies

Appendix 2 Basic Check List

Inflation in IRAN Overview & Forecast

Japanese Stock Market Outlook. SMAM monthly comments & views - November

CECIMO Statistical Toolbox

Results from the South Carolina ERA Site

The Urgent Need for Job Creation

Can Active Labour Market Programmes reduce Long-Term Unemployment?

Emerging Markets Debt: Outlook for the Asset Class

Social Development in Estonia: Choices

VIII. BANK LOANS TO MICRO-ENTERPRISES, SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES AND POOR HOUSEHOLDS IN THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA

An overview of the South African macroeconomic. environment

The fiscal adjustment after the crisis in Argentina

Progress towards the EU 2020 goals. Reforms introduced in

Transcription:

KOREA S EXPERIENCE WITH UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE IN THE 1998 ASIAN FINANCIAL CRISIS AND ITS ADJUSTMENTS IN THE CURRENT CRISIS 2009. 9. 29 Kim, Sung-Teak KLI Background Paper for Conference on the " The Impact of the Global Economic Slowdown on Poverty and Sustainable Development in Asia and the Pacific", 28-30 Sept 2009, Hanoi 1

Introduction - Challenge : Global financial crisis 10 years after 1998 Asian financial crisis - 1998 shock on Korean labor market: mass unemployment, widening of the income-gap, deterioration of the structure of employment, and spending of huge social costs - Korean government tried to solve the problems by several temporary welfare programs and active labor market policies, because the social safety net was not developed well in 1998. - After the crisis, Korea tried to build up a systematic social safety net continuously. e.g. the Employment Insurance system (EIS) - The impact on Korean labor market from the 2008 Global financial crisis is not as much as that of 1998 s crisis. 2

Introduction - Objective : to analyze the reason of the different influence on the Korean labor market from the 1998 Asian financial crisis and from the 2008 financial crisis - Chapter 2 : Brief history of the Employment Insurance system in Korea and the changes in the coverage and the contents - Chapter 3 : 1. Explain the impacts from 1998 Asian financial crisis on Korean labor market and government efforts to reduce the negative effects 2. Analyze the statistics of labor market and the EIS to show the trends and the changes of them. 3. Compare the 1998 and the 2008 financial crisis in order to draw the differences between those two cases and to find what has been the proper measures to overcome the problems in Korean labor market. - Chapter 4 : Summary and Policy Implications. 3

History of EIS in Korea - The Employment Insurance system (EIS) of Korea was introduced in July 1, 1995, after a debate that began at the end of the 1960s - The objective of the EIS is to prevent joblessness, to promote employment and vocational competency, and to provide financial support and employment assistance to the unemployed workers (EIS also serves as a source of comprehensive labor market policies and a social security system) - The coverage of Korean EIS has expanded step by step and now it includes all businesses with one or more employees theoretically. - In practice the coverage rate of the Employment Insurance for wage workers reaches around 56.8% in August 2008 due to the large number of irregular workers. The coverage rate only for regular workers is approximately 80% in 2008. 4

Table 1: Extended Coverage of Employment Insurance in Korea Type of the EI Program Ordinary Businesses (Number of Regular Employees) Construction Business (Total Construction Price in Million Won). ~ Dec. 31, 1997 Jan. 1 ~ Feb. 28, 1998 Mar 1 ~ June 30, 1998 July 1 ~ Sep. 30, 1998 Oct. 1, 1998 ~ Present ~ June 30, 1998 July 1 ~ Dec. 31, 2003 Jan. 1 ~Dec. 31, 2004 Jan. 1, 2005 ~ Present UB 30 or more 10 or more 5 or more 5 or more 1 or more 3,400 or more 340 or more 20 or more All Workers Undertaken by Licensed Constructors ES & VCD 70 or more 50 or more 50 or more 5

Table 2: Contents of the Employment Insurance system in Korea Employment Adjustment Assistance, Regional Employment Promotion Grant, Employment Promotion Subsidy for Elderly, Employment Promotion Facilities Subsidy, Provision of Labor Market Information Employment Stabilization Program Employment Promotion Subsidy, Shift-work Change Assistance, S & M Expertise Employment Subsidy, S & M Business Working Hour Reduction Assistance, S & M Working Condition Innovation Assistance, S & M New Industry Advancement Subsidy, Employment Maintaining Assistance, Outplacement Assistance Subsidy, Reemployment Subsidy, Construction Worker EI Maintenance Assistance, Construction Worker Installment of Retirement Deduction Assistance, Construction Worker Continuous Employment Assistance, Childcare Leaves Allowance, Post and Prenatal Vacation Allowance, Childcare Facility Assistance, Continuous Employment after Child-bearing and Child-birth Assistance, Peak-Wage Preservation Allowance, Job Exhibition Assistance, and other sub-programs 6

Vocational Competency Development Program Unemployment Benefit Program Vocational Competency Development Training(In-House Vocational Training Subsidy, Employee Training Subsidy, Loan for Training Facility, Aid for Reemployment Training of Displaced Workers), Assistance for Training Fee Paid-leave Training, Outplacement Training, Vocational Competency Development Account System, Training Course Assistance, Vocational Competency Development Card System, Female Household-Head Training, Priority Job Training, and other sub-programs Job-seeking Benefit, Distant Area Job-Seeking Benefit, Moving Assistance, Early Reemployment Allowance Injury and Disease Allowance, Job Capability Improvement Allowance, and other sub-programs Note: Upper part of sub-programs is original ones started from the beginning of the EIS in each main program. 7

KLM and 1998 Asian Financial Crisis - Before the 1998 financial crisis, the Korean labor market was near full- employment status with unemployment ratio less than 3%. - Asian Financial Crisis struck in 1997 - the financial market of Korea was totally paralyzed from the impact of the foreign exchange market - high interest rate policy driven by the IMF - series of bankruptcy - Massive layoffs followed in order to reduce the labor costs during the recession. - Unfortunately the social safety net of Korea was not well constructed at that time, even though the Korean government introduced the Employment Insurance system in 1995. - Therefore the government tried to overcome the catastrophic situation by setting out temporary welfare programs and active labor market policies like public works for the unemployed. 8

25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 Trends of Labor Market 9 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 year 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 1980 1985 1990 Employed persons Unemployed persons Employed Persons Unemployed Persons

62 60 58 56 54 52 50 10 1980 1985 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 year 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Employment/Population (%) Unemployment rate (%) Employment/Population 15 years old or more Unemployment Rate

EIS in 1998 Asian Financial Crisis - The Employment Insurance system of Korea was in the stage of infancy in 1998, so the system didn t cover the majority of workers - especially the workers in small business - In December 1999, the EIS covered 46.5% of dependent workers and only 15.5% of the unemployed who had been dependent workers. Thus the unemployment benefit program couldn t effectively provide a definite level of income for the majority of the unemployed at that time - On the other hand, some scholars argue that the unemployment benefit program produced a somewhat positive impact on the labor market because it helped many unemployed people in desperate times. 11

ALMP in 1998 Asian Financial Crisis - The active labor market policies like the temporary welfare programs and public works for the unemployed were evaluated as more effective than the Unemployment benefit program in terms of the coverage of the programs during the crisis. - Those programs can be classified as follows; assistance for employment stabilization, provision of temporary jobs like public works, provision of job training and job placement service, assistance for the living cost like loan program for the unemployed and cash transfer for the poverty family. - The Korean government maintained reliable budget levels in those programs in order to overcome the problems in the labor market from 1998 to 2002. 12

Policy Implication from the 1998 AFC - The Korean economy started to rebound rapidly from the recession in 2000 thanks to the recovery of global economy, but the V-shape economic recovery makes it difficult to evaluate the influence of those programs on the labor market. - Nevertheless, the steep reduction of unemployment rate (from 7.0% in 1998 to 3.8% in 2001) shows that the policy mix of Korean government successfully overcame the mass unemployment situation whether the contribution was small or great. - Moreover, the experience emphasized the importance of constructing a good social safety net in the long run to prepare this type of economic crisis. 13

Changes in the Korean EIS - The size of covered establishments and insured persons has been increasing continuously as the coverage of the EIS expands. - The number of establishments covered by the EIS increase 3.6 times for 10 years from 1998 to 2008 and the number of insured persons increased 1.8 times for the same period. - The proportion of establishments covered by the EIS out of total establishments was 14.4% in 1998, but that is 44.7% in 2008 and the proportion of insured persons out of total workers was 26.4% in 1998, but it increased to 47.1% in 2008. - So the coverage of the EIS is expanding continuously and it turns into a sure social safety net for insured workers. - However about 53% of workers still not inside the EIS. - However the number of total establishments used here includes the number of selfemployed business without employee which is excluded from the application of the EIS. When Korea Employment Information Service calculates the proportion of insured establishments out of only qualified businesses is about 78% in 2008. 14

Number of Establishments Covered by Employment Insurance System( EIS) : Annual Data 5,500,000 5,000,000 4,500,000 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 y ear Number of Establishments Covered by the EIS New ly Insured Persons by ETS 15

Trends of Unemployment Benefit - The number of the UB recipients and the amount of benefits are increasing continuously as the coverage of EIS expands - When the number of UB recipients is divided by the number of the unemployed, that ratio could be considered as an indicator implying the relative coverage of UB over the unemployed. (This number cannot be percentage proportion but is just a relative indicator.) - The calculated indicator was 0.29 in 1998, 0.24 in 1999 and 0.29 in 2000, but it is 0.94 in 2007 and 1.09 in 2008. - It means that, in 2008, the UB plays a role three times more than the role in 1998 as an income support for the unemployed. 16

Number of Recipients and and Amount of Benefits for Unemployment Benefit (Annual Data) person 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 year 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 million won Number of Approved Persons Number of Persons Amount of UI(Million Won) 17

1.200 1.000 ratio 0.800 0.600 0.400 0.200 0.000 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 y ear Ratio of Number of Approved Persons/ Number of the Unemployed 18

Emplo yment Stabilization Program( Annual Data) 500000 450000 400000 350000 300000 250000 200000 150000 100000 50000 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 y ear To tal Job Creation Assistance Employment Pro mo tion Assistance Construction Workers Assistance Employment Adjustment Assistance Maternity Pro tectio n Allo wance Childcare Facility Assistance 19

Vocational Competency Development Programs(Annual Data) 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 year 29,000 27,000 25,000 23,000 21,000 19,000 17,000 15,000 13,000 11,000 9,000 7,000 5,000 3,000 1,000 Female Household Head Training, Paid-leave Training Total Outplacement Training Priority Job Training Female Household Head Training Vocational Competency Development Training Training Course Assistance Paid-leave Training 20

Impact on KLM from 2008 Financial Crisis - Even though recent Global financial crisis started at the end of 2007, the impact on the Korean economy and labor market got worse after the second half of 2008. - The unemployment rate at the end of 2007 was 3.1%, and the second quarter of 2009 it reached at 3.9% - while the GDP growth rate on the second quarter of 2008 ; 4.3%, on the fourth quarter; -3.4%, the first quarter of 2009; -4.2%, and the second quarter of 2009; -2.2%. - However the recent trends of the GDP growth rate and the unemployment rate seem to recuperate from the bottom, thus the damage in the Korean labor market from the current financial crisis could be evaluated as less serious than that from the 1997 Asian financial crisis. 21

Recent Trends of Labor Market Employed persons 24,200 24,000 23,800 23,600 23,400 23,200 23,000 22,800 2007. 12 2008. 11 2008. 12 2009. 6 2009. 7 year 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Unemployed persons Employed Persons Unemployed Persons 22

Employment (%) 60.5 60 59.5 59 58.5 58 57.5 2007. 12 2008. 11 2008. 12 2009. 6 2009. 7 year 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Unemployment (%) Employment/Population 15 yrs old or more Unemployment Rate 23

Rapid Reaction against 2008 FC - At the beginning, the 2008 Global financial crisis draw concerns as much as the 1998 Asian financial crisis because the initiating countries for the crisis were mostly the advanced countries. - This current crisis could drop the business cycle of most other countries into a long recession especially one like Korea whose economic growth depends on foreign trade completely. - With a valid reason to be concerned about an even worse situation than that of the 1998 crisis, the Korean government was forced to act quickly with a strong policy-mix to prevent most ill effects from the crisis. - The policy-mix has wide coverage from the financial market to the labor market. - Comparing to 1998~2000 major labor policies, 2008~2009 labor policies becomes more specific and target-oriented. 24

Table 9: Comparison of Major Labor Policy between two financial crises Notes: * These programs are included in EIS partly or fully. 1998~2000 Major Labor Policy 2008~2009 Major Labor Policy Provision of Public Works, Employment Subsidy, Promotion of Employment Abroad, Assistance for New Venture Enterprise, Assistance for Returning Farmer, Assistance for New Small Businesses, Job Creation Expansion of Provision of Jobs for the Youth(Internship Assistance and etc.), Provision of Public Work('Hope-Work' Project), Expansion of Social Service, Expansion of Self- Support Work Assistance, Expansion of Provision of Jobs for the Olds Job Sharing and Maintaining Avoidance of Lay-Off Effort Assistance, Job Maintaining and Reemployment Assistance, Expansion of Employment Maintaining Program*(Closed Business Assistance, On-Leave without Pay Assistance, Shift-system Change Assistance) Expansion of Provision of Training Program Expansion of Unemployment Benefit*, Assistance of Livelihood Support for the Poors, Provision of Loan for the Unemployed, Miscellaneous Building Employment Service Network, Construction of Labor Market Information System Providing Education and Training Programs Stay-in-School Program, 'New Start' Program for the Youth, Vocational Training Program for the Daily Workers, Large-S & M Business Cooperative Training Program Livelihood Support and Employment Promotion Expansion of Unemployment Benefit*, Expansion of New Employment Assistance*, Provision of Vacant Job Allowance, Assistance of Regional Employment Promotion 25

Reasons of Difference between two Crises - The level of the GDP growth rate has been higher in 2009 than in 1998, but the disparity in the unemployment rates between the two periods shows a significantly different performance in the Korean labor market. Reasons for the difference - Macroeconomic policies over interest rate, foreign exchange rate and etc. - Financial status of the overall businesses - A different way of lowering labor costs (flexibility in working time and in wage under the agreement with workers side) - mandatory use of additional leaves without pay, reduction of overtime work, reduction of regular working hours, return of partial wage, lowering starting salary level, introduction of peak-wage rate for the olds, adjustment of wage system 26

20 15 10 5 0-5 -10 Trends of Macro Indicators (Annual until 2008 & Quarterly from 2008) 27 2009/ 1/4 2009 2/4 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2008 1/4 2008 2/4 2008 3/4 2008 4/4 year 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 1993 1994 1991 1992 % Dishonored Ratio (%) GDP Growth Rate Interest Rate of Loans & Discounts(Year%) Dishonored Ratio (%)

Table 11: Recent Growth Rates of Selected Programs in Korean EIS Note: (.) are growth rate of new qualified applicants for UB. Number of Recipients 2008/2007 2008.12 /2008.11 Amount of Benefits 2008/2007 2008.12 /2008.11 Total -2.0-18.0-18.4-18.4 Employment Stabilization Program Employ ment Maintai ning Assista nce Closed Business Assistance Training Assistance On-Leave Assistance 147.7-16.7 118.9-16.7-13.4-23.0 180.6 139.6-54.0 60.8-60.7 114.8 Vocational Competency Development Program Unemployment Benefit Program Total -13.5 12.6-26.9 18.6 Total 25.1 (84.4) 10.3 (40.5) 30.2 12 28

Table 12: Record of Employment Maintaining Assistance Program 2007 2008 2009 Aug. Number of Establis hment Number of Workers Amount of Assistance (Million Won) Number of Establis hment Number of Worker s Amount of Assistance (Million Won) Number of Establis hment Number of Workers Amount of Assistance (Million Won) Annual Total 4,425 84,856 32,533 4,274 88,012 30,642 - - - Monthly Average 416 8,190 2,711 339 6,116 2,464 4,750 107,987 33,969 First Half of the Year 2,497 49,138 19,519 2,036 36,694 14,783 28,498 647,922 203,815 29

Income Distribution - The extent of effect from the current crisis on income distribution is not clear, because the income distribution is deteriorated consistently since the early 1990s. - The 1998 Asian financial crisis precipitate the deterioration as the Gini s Coefficient in 1998 rose to 0.303 from 0.268 in 1997 and dropped to 0.286 in 2000 in terms of market income and the relative poverty rate increased to 13.1% in 1999 from 9.3% in 1997 and dropped to 10.8% in 2000. - This implies that the 1998 Asian financial crisis widened the gap of income distribution significantly. - Furthermore several empirical papers argue that the 1998 Asian financial crisis was the main factor that caused faster spread of poverty in Korean labor market through the change of labor market structure as well as the mass unemployment. 30

Income Distribution - Comparing the Gini s Coefficient and the relative poverty rate in 2008 to those of 2006 and 2007, it is hard to figure out if the major cause of the increase is the current financial crisis or not, because of the increasing trend of those indicators during 2001~2007. - It is too early to analyze the effect of the current financial crisis on the income distribution in Korea. - The effect would not be positive for sure but it is hard to distinguish the effect from the present trend of deteriorating income distribution, so it is the issue for the further study after accumulating concerning data. 31

2008 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 Trend of Income Distribution(Annual Data) 32 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 1994 year 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1993 1992 1991 Gini's coefficient Relative poverty rate (%) Gini's Coefficient Relative Poverty Rate

Conclusion and Policy Implication The two financial crises let the Korean government officials realize how a quick and effective response is important, but also the prevention of financial problem at the national level is important as well. The trade-depending countries like Korea needs a stable and sizable domestic market to overcome the case of global recession. A country should have a control over macroeconomic policies like interest rate and foreign exchange rate to avoid the problems of labor market from the effect of financial crisis. The government should supervise the financial status of large companies and financial intermediaries carefully in order to prevent from facing the desperate financial situation. 33

Conclusion and Policy Implication Each country needs to develop systematic welfare programs including the Employment Insurance system to cope with the change of uncertain economic surroundings autonomously. The expansion of social safety net coverage helps the disadvantaged persons from the impact of financial crisis The delivery system for the benefit should be efficient and effective. The businesses should learn how to use the flexibility of working hours, wage and inside labor market before to use layoff method. Finally the cooperation and coordination of departments of government are important to overcome the crisis in labor market because it is necessary to solve the employment problems that the macroeconomic policy, the labor market policy including social safety net, and the industrial policy including industrial relation should work together. 34

Conclusion and Policy Implication Even though the Korean government and the businesses put serious efforts to avoid mass unemployment situation during the current crisis, the possibility of losing job for irregular workers who are used to have bad working condition and low income level is getting higher. After losing their job, in general their chance of reemployment is not good during the recession period. Eventually the income distribution would be deteriorated and the number of families below poverty level will increase continuously. A large portion of that group of workers is still outside of the Employment Insurance system, so they are not getting most of the benefits from the system despite of the high demand for the benefits. Thus it is necessary to reinforce the labor policies for the irregular workers and to involve them into the social system. 35

Thanks! 36