EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Delhi HC rules on AOP constitution and taxability of offshore supply and services. 28 April 2014
|
|
- Sherilyn Hunter
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 28 April 2014 EY Tax Alert Delhi HC rules on AOP constitution and taxability of offshore supply and services Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation that affect Indian businesses. They act as technical summaries to keep you on top of the latest tax issues. For more information, please contact your EY advisor. This Tax alert summarizes a recent Delhi High Court (HC) ruling [1] in the case of Linde AG (Taxpayer), wherein the HC was required to rule on (i) whether the consortium formed by the Taxpayer, a German Company and a Korean company (KCo) for the purpose of bidding for a contract floated by an Indian company (ICo) would constitute an Association of Person (AOP) under the provisions of Indian Tax Laws (ITL) and assessable on its global income as a tax resident of India; (ii) whether the income receivable for offshore supply and offshore services under the contract is taxable in India. Based on the facts of the case and having regard to the separate and independent scope of responsibilities of the Taxpayer and K Co, the HC held that the consortium, so formed, cannot be treated as an AOP under the ITL. On taxability of income for offshore supply, the HC, on principle held that, the same is not taxable in India if all the activities in relation to the supply of equipment are carried out overseas. [1] [TS-226-HC-2014(DEL)]
2 Facts A pictorial representation of the arrangement is given below: not taxable in India as all the activities in relation to the above components were performed outside India and the fee for the contract was also received outside India. However, the Tax Authority did not agree with the Taxpayer s stand and directed ICo to withhold taxes on the amounts paid. Thereafter, the Taxpayer filed an application before the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) [2] for determining whether the consortium was taxable in India in the status of AOP and whether fee receivable for offshore supply of equipment and offshore services was liable to tax in India under the ITL and the respective Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The Taxpayer, a German company, entered into an Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with KCo to form a consortium, with an objective of submitting a joint bid to secure a turnkey contract for design, engineering, procurement, construction, installation, commissioning and handing over of the plant for the Dual Feed Cracker floated by ICo (Project). Subsequently, the Taxpayer and K Co (collectively members ) also entered into an internal consortium agreement (ICA) to record their understanding. The Project was awarded to the consortium formed by the members pursuant to which a written contract was entered into between ICo and the members (Contract). The work to be performed under the Contract by the members was separately identified and was allocated based on each member s technical expertise. Accordingly, the Taxpayer was responsible for the procurement and offshore supply of equipment, basic and detailed engineering and drawings and onshore services such as pre and post commissioning and training of personnel. Likewise, the scope of responsibility of K Co was clearly defined. The Contract also provided split of consideration for diverse responsibilities of the Taxpayer and K Co separately. The Taxpayer made an application for nil withholding order from the Tax Authority for offshore supply and offshore service component on the basis that the income was Ruling of the AAR In response to application, the AAR ruled as follows: The consortium constituted an AOP under the ITL as: The Contract was awarded in the name of the consortium The liability of the members towards performance of the Contract was joint and several Further, since the Contract with ICo was indivisible, the entire fee receivable under the Contract for both offshore supply of equipment, materials and spares and for offshore supply of drawings and designs was taxable in India in the hands of the consortium as a separate person. Aggrieved, the Taxpayer filed a writ petition with the HC [3]. [2] [TS- 170-AAR-2012 (AAR No f 2010)] [3] The SC, in the case of Columbia Sportswear Company (TS- 549-SC-2012), after considering various provisions under the ITL and the constitutional law, held that the AAR is a quasi-judicial authority and is similar to a Tribunal and, accordingly, the ruling of the AAR is appealable not just before the SC, but before the High Court as well.
3 HC ruling A. On whether consortium constitutes AOP i. Factors constituting an AOP The term AOP has not been defined under the ITL and, hence, has to be given an ordinary meaning. Relying on various decisions, the HC held that following factors are essentially required to be present for the constitution of an AOP: It must be constituted by two or more persons. They must join together for a common purpose and intention. The association must move by a common action and there must be some scheme of common management. The cooperation and association amongst the constituent members must not be perfunctory and/or merely in form. The association amongst members must be real and substantial, which is sufficient to treat the association as a separate homogenous taxable entity. The intention of the legislature was to treat the combinations of persons, who were engaged together in some joint enterprise, but did not, in law, constitute partnerships, as a separate taxable entity [4]. A mere cooperation of one person with another in serving one s business objective would not be sufficient to constitute an AOP. Neither of the members had any role to play with respect to the scope of work which was allocated to the other member. Therefore, as far as the execution of the project was concerned, each party had to work independent of the other. The only area of cooperation between the members was to share the information, data and material necessary to enable the other member to perform its work as per the work schedule provided in the Contract. This kind of cooperation is important and is generally present in the execution of work wherein multiple agencies are involved. The fees paid for each item of work was separately specified in the Contract with ICo. The fee corresponding to the work of the Taxpayer was directly paid by ICo to the Taxpayer. Also separate invoices were raised by the Taxpayer and KCo. Thus, even ICo recognized that different items constituting the contract would be performed independently by the members. There was no arrangement for sharing of profits and losses between the members. Each of them would earn profits or incur losses based on the prices agreed by them and costs incurred by them in performance of the allocated work under the Contract. Further, none of the members was liable for losses and damages incurred by other member on account of nonpayment by ICo. Thus, the risk to be borne by the members was restricted only to the extent of their allocated responsibility and work. ii. Application of the factors to the present facts iii. Certain specific objections of the Tax Authority The following features of the Contract, MOU as well as the ICA indicated that the arrangement between the members was not an AOP: Each member was separately required to perform a specific part of the Contract which was clearly demarcated and separately identified in the Contract entered into with ICO. The allocation of work among the members of the consortium was such that each member performed the work which was within their respective technical expertise. [4] B.N. Elias [(1939) 3 ITR 408 (Cal HC)] Before the HC, the Tax Authority raised following arguments to support that members constituted an AOP in the facts of the case: a) In terms of the Contract, the members were described as contractor and for the purpose of obligations under the Contract, they were considered as forming consortium. b) As per the Contract with ICo, the members were jointly and severally liable for performance of the Contract. c) ICA provided for certain level of cooperation by way of appointing Project Directors and Manager for the execution of the Project, who would
4 represent the consortium in interaction with I Co. While holding that the members did not form AOP, above contentions of the Tax Authority were considered as below by the HC. (a)term consortium, used to refer to the members, does not indicate existence of an AOP Although the manner in which a third party deals with the members of a consortium is relevant for determining whether the members constitute an AOP, the same cannot be regarded as conclusive. One will have to evaluate the extent of collaboration as agreed between the members. Both the members had agreed to present themselves as a consortium to bid for the contract, however, the ICA clearly provided that except for providing a common face and complying with the terms of the contract with ICo, they would conduct their business independently with no interference from the other. The ICA clearly stipulated that the members did not intend to form an association. Though, a plain reading of the Contract indicated that the consortium members were treated as a single entity for imposing liability for due performance of the Contract, the annexures to the Contract which provided for the split of the contract work between the members indicated that ICo also recognized that each member would perform the items of work allocated to them separately and independently. common enterprise or an association and are moved by joint action for a common purpose. It is similar to a director of a company who provides personal guarantee for the loan taken by the company. Although the director and the company may become jointly and severally liable to the lender, they continue to be independent of each other, and merely the joint liability does not result in constitution of AOP between the director and the company. One must exhibit features of a partnership in relation to the common enterprise, to constitute an AOP. (c) On joint management of the contract As per the ICA, each of the members was responsible for managing and executing the allocated portion of the Project through their own personnel and their independent resources. The cooperation among the members in the form of sharing information and material was merely to enable each other to perform their respective work. It is akin to the level of cooperation as expected from independent agencies executing a project. Neither of the member had any control over the quality of the work done or equipment supplied by the other member. Although the members worked towards a common contract with a certain level of cooperation, they cannot be considered as AOP, as they do not work as a single cohesive entity but perform their independent allocated works. Their activities do not indicate a sufficient degree of joint action. (b) On jointly and severally liable Impact of earlier ruling of the AAR Although the Contract provides that the members would be jointly and severally liable to ICo for the performance of the Contract, it only means that the members accepted a contractual obligation towards a third party, which cannot lead oneself to state that the same is an AOP. Further as per the ICA, members had clearly agreed that their risks and liability was limited only to the extent of their responsibility and allocated work. Any entity may agree to accept a liability for due performance of an obligation of another for its business purposes. However, that, by itself, cannot lead to a conclusion that parties have formed a The HC also observed that the facts in the present case are similar to the AAR decision in the case of Hyundai Rotem and Mitsubishi Co [5] where it was held that an AOP was not constituted. Based on the Supreme Court (SC) decision in the case of Columbia Sportswear, although the AAR ruling is binding only on the applicant and the Tax Authority in respect of a transaction in relation to which the ruling has been [5] [2010] 323 ITR 277 (AAR)
5 sought, the judicial authority is necessarily required to follow the principle of law already accepted by it. Thus in the situation where the facts are similar to its earlier decision, the same law has to be applied. CBDT instruction on non-constitution of AOP The CBDT instruction [6],which supported the view that the foreign companies, forming a consortium for execution of a turnkey contract relating to power projects, will not be treated as an AOP, though withdrawn, represented the correct understanding of the law. B. On taxability of income receivable by the Taxpayer i. Contract was divisible one The Taxpayer was responsible for procurement and offshore supply of equipment, basic and detailed engineering and drawings and onshore services such as pre and post commissioning and training of personnel to be performed in India. The offshore supply was to be performed entirely overseas. Although the Contract provided for a lump sum consideration, annexure to the Contract separately indicated the breakup of the amounts payable for various activities. Hence, such split can be adopted for taxation of various components. The AAR was incorrect in ruling that the Contract is indivisible and, hence, the Contract as a whole was the subject of taxation. Subject matter of taxation is not the contract between the members, but the income that was derived from the contract. The AAR was not correct in placing reliance on the SC ruling in the case of Vodafone International Holdings B.V [7] to arrive at a conclusion that since the liability for performance of the project by members was joint and several, the contract must be read as an indivisible [6] Instruction No dated 21 September 1989 [7] [(2012) 6 SCC 613]. See EY tax alert The Vodafone case: SC rules transfer of shares of a foreign company that indirectly held underlying Indian assets not taxable, dated 20 January 2012 one. The SC observations in case of Vodafone are contextual and are required to be read into the facts of the case. Observations on look at vs. look through approach were rendered in context of dealing with tax avoidance scheme and would be incorrect to generalize the same and to apply to every case, regardless of its context. The present case, being that of a genuine commercial transaction, the SC decision in the case of Vodafone is not applicable. To tax income arising from a contract, it will be necessary to evaluate if any income accrued or deemed to accrue or arise in India. Merely because the obligation of the taxpayer is not limited to supply of equipment, but extended to performance of the other components of the contract, it would not mean that the entire income relating to those components of the contract could be deemed to accrue or arise in India. ii. On offshore supply Based on the below reasoning, the HC held that consideration for offshore supply was not taxable in India: The ownership of the equipment was to be transferred by the Taxpayer to the ICo on Free on Board (FOB) shipment, which clearly indicates that the ownership passes to the ICo, the moment the equipment are placed for shipment overseas. Although the members were fully responsible for damage or loss during the transportation of the equipment due to contractual arrangement, the same does not contradict the fact that the ownership therein was passed to the ICo overseas. As per the provisions of the ITL, where all the operations of business are not carried out in India, only that portion of income that is attributable to business connection in India are taxable in India. Mere sale of goods simplicitor outside India does not give rise to any taxable income in India even though the said goods are to be utilized within India. Reliance was placed on the SC decision in the case of Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries [8] wherein it was held that [8] [(2007) 288 ITR 408 (SC)]
6 execution of a contract in India cannot result in a business connection. iii. On offshore services The Taxpayer was also responsible for preparing drawings and designs for manufacturing and fabricating equipment to be supplied to the ICo, which was performed outside India. Such offshore services, if rendered on standalone basis, can trigger source taxation in India, in terms of special rules applicable to taxation of fees for technical services (FTS). The HC observed that to fall outside the scope of FTS under the ITL, the link between the supply of equipment and the services must be so strong that the services are not capable of being considered as services on a standalone basis. The contention that the offshore services are inextricably linked to offshore supply of equipment was not considered by the Tax Authority. However, in the facts of this case, a separate fee was specified for the supply of equipment. In case the Tax Authority conclude that the services are not an integral/inextricable part of equipment, then it would be treated as FTS under the ITL, in which case it would be relevant to examine if any relief is available to the Taxpayer under the DTAA. Accordingly, matter was remanded back for a close scrutiny of facts by the Tax Authority. Comments The decision provides useful guidance about factors which are relevant for determining AOP under the ITL. Whether or not a particular arrangement triggers AOP assumes significance particularly for foreign companies which participate in execution of projects in India. Under the ITL, an AOP is assessable at an entity level and presence of any part of control and management of AOP in India makes such AOP a tax resident person liable to global taxation. Also, such AOP or its members may find it challenging to access treaty benefits, as, such AOP may not be a treaty resident of other jurisdiction while there is no tax trigger in the hands of the members in India. Certain other tax consequences including deductibility of cost incurred in favor of the members may arise even when such AOP is comprised only of Indian residents. As a consequence, generally, the parties to the consortium arrangement would desire to mitigate the emergence of AOP. The decision is significant as it supports/reiterates a well-accepted proposition that AOP emergence is based on common enterprise, purpose and intention of the parties and reflects an understanding which exhibits features of a partnership. Also, presence of certain cooperation covenants or joint and several liability to the customer are not sufficient to trigger AOP emergence unless the arrangement results in execution of the project as a single cohesive entity. The HC also advocated the principle of consistency in the rulings by the judicial authority, including AAR. It also upheld that in absence of any operations in India, offshore supply would not trigger tax in the hands of the foreign supplier.
7 Our offices Ahmedabad 2nd floor, Shivalik Ishaan Near. C.N Vidhyalaya Ambawadi, Ahmedabad Tel: Fax: Bengaluru 6th, 12th & 13th floor U B City Canberra Block No.24, Vittal Mallya Road Bengaluru Tel: Fax: Prestige Emerald, No. 4, 1st Floor, Madras Bank Road, Lavelle Road Junction, Bangalore Chandigarh 1st Floor SCO: Sectr 9-C, Madhya Marg Chandigarh Tel: Fax: Chennai Tidel Park, 6th & 7th Floor A Block (Module 601, ) No.4, Rajiv Gandhi Salai Taramani Chennai Tel: Fax: Hyderabad Oval Office 18, ilabs Centre, Hitech City, Madhapur, Hyderabad Tel: Fax: Kochi 9th Floor ABAD Nucleus NH-49, Maradu PO, Kochi Tel: Fax: Mumbai 14th Floor, The Ruby 29 Senapati Bapat Marg Dadar (west) Mumbai Tel Fax th Floor Block B-2, Nirlon Knowledge Park Off. Western Express Highway Goregaon (E) Mumbai Tel: Fax: NCR Golf View Corporate Tower B Near DLF Golf Course, Sector 42 Gurgaon Tel: Fax: th floor, HT House Kasturba Gandhi Marg New Delhi Tel: Fax: th & 5th Floor, Plot No 2B, Tower 2, Sector 126, Noida Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P. India Tel: Fax: Pune C 401, 4th floor Panchshil Tech Park Yerwada (Near Don Bosco School) Pune Tel: Fax: Ernst & Young LLP EY Assurance Tax Transactions Advisory About EY EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities. EY refers to the global organization and may refer to one or more of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com. Ernst & Young LLP is one of the Indian client serving member firms of EYGM Limited. For more information about our organization, please visit Ernst & Young LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership, registered under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 in India, having its registered office at 22 Camac Street, 3rd Floor, Block C, Kolkata Ernst & Young LLP. Published in India. All Rights Reserved. ED None This publication contains information in summary form and is therefore intended for general guidance only. It is not intended to be a substitute for detailed research or the exercise of professional judgment. Neither Ernst & Young LLP nor any other member of the global Ernst & Young organization can accept any responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any material in this publication. On any specific matter, reference should be made to the appropriate advisor. Kolkata 22, Camac Street 3rd Floor, Block C Kolkata Tel: Fax:
Mumbai Tribunal rules reimbursement of expenses on secondment of employees not FTS
20 September 2013 2013mber 2012 EY Tax Alert Mumbai Tribunal rules reimbursement of expenses on secondment of employees not FTS Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Chennai Tribunal upholds salary taxation of SARs benefits received from foreign parent of employer.
11 May 2016 EY Tax Alert Chennai Tribunal upholds salary taxation of SARs benefits received from foreign parent of employer Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
10 October 2014 EY Tax Alert CBDT Circular on threshold limit for transfer of technical manpower to new SEZ unit for availing profit-linked deduction Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
3 July 2015 EY Tax Alert SC rules on presumptive taxation; activities inextricably linked with prospecting, extraction or production of mineral oil eligible for presumptive taxation Executive summary Tax
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. CBDT sets up a Committee to deal with retroactive indirect transfer taxation. 1 September 2014
1 September 2014 EY Tax Alert CBDT sets up a Committee to deal with retroactive indirect transfer taxation Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
01 September 2016 EY Tax Alert AAR affirms availability of India-Mauritius treaty benefit on sale of shares of Indian company, distinguishes Bombay High Court ruling of Aditya Birla Nuvo Executive summary
More informationHigh Court rules that in-transit sale in turnkey contracts not eligible for exemption under Section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act
23 September 2015 EY Tax Alert High Court rules that in-transit sale in turnkey contracts not eligible for exemption under Section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant
More informationDelhi Tribunal rules income of non-resident that is not attributable to PE in India shall still be taxable in India as FTS
12 October 2016 EY Tax Alert Delhi Tribunal rules income of non-resident that is not attributable to PE in India shall still be taxable in India as FTS Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
21 April 2015 EY Tax Alert Delhi High Court declines to interfere with order of lower authorities rejecting Taxpayer s tax holiday claim that units approved under a single license are distinct Executive
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
7 October 2015 EY Tax Alert Karnataka HC rules on availability of foreign tax credit relief where the income is exempt from Indian taxes under incomelinked incentive scheme Executive summary Tax Alerts
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
19 September 2014 EY Tax Alert Bombay HC decides - CENVAT credit refund ineligible in respect of onsite services provided by foreign subsidiaries to overseas clients prior to 27 February 2010, as the same
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
25 January 2016 EY Tax Alert AAR rules that transfer of shares of Indian subsidiary by a Mauritius company to a Singapore group entity is not a tax avoidant transaction Executive summary Tax Alerts cover
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. SC settles certain controversies on profit-linked deduction for export units. 21 December 2016
21 December 2016 EY Tax Alert SC settles certain controversies on profit-linked deduction for export units Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation
More informationBombay HC upholds non-taxability of deferred consideration on transfer of shares in the absence of accrual
18 April 2016 EY Tax Alert Bombay HC upholds non-taxability of deferred consideration on transfer of shares in the absence of accrual Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments
More informationCBDT amends rules relating to furnishing information in respect of payments to nonresidents
18 December 2015 EY Tax Alert CBDT amends rules relating to furnishing information in respect of payments to nonresidents Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Mumbai Tribunal rules on legality and taxability of certain gift transactions by corporates.
24 March 2015 EY Tax Alert Mumbai Tribunal rules on legality and taxability of certain gift transactions by corporates Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes
More informationMumbai Tribunal rules charterer includes slot charter arrangement for availing treaty benefit under Article 8 of India Malaysia DTAA
22 July 2014 EY Tax Alert Mumbai Tribunal rules charterer includes slot charter arrangement for availing treaty benefit under Article 8 of India Malaysia DTAA Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Supreme Court rules on year of deductibility of debenture interest paid upfront. 26 March 2015
26 March 2015 EY Tax Alert Supreme Court rules on year of deductibility of debenture interest paid upfront Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation
More informationKarnataka High Court rules that implementation of customized software is a service and cannot be subject to VAT
14 September 2015 EY Tax Alert Karnataka High Court rules that implementation of customized software is a service and cannot be subject to VAT Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments
More informationCBDT revises rules relating to furnishing information in respect of payments to nonresidents
12 August 2013 2013mber 2012 EY Tax Alert CBDT revises rules relating to furnishing information in respect of payments to nonresidents Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments
More informationPune Tribunal upholds tax deductibility of MTM exchange fluctuation loss on forex loan borrowed to reduce interest cost and hedge export receivables
19 May 2016 EY Tax Alert Pune Tribunal upholds tax deductibility of MTM exchange fluctuation loss on forex loan borrowed to reduce interest cost and hedge export receivables Executive summary Tax Alerts
More informationAmendments to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, Executive summary
23 September 2013 August 2013 EY Regulatory Alert Amendments to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012 Executive summary Regulatory Alerts cover significant
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
8 June 2016 EY Tax Alert Delhi HC rules that Service tax shall not be leviable on under construction flats if contract price includes value of land Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news,
More informationAAR rules that provision of business support services to US affiliate are naturally bundled and are not intermediary services
17 March 2016 EY Tax Alert AAR rules that provision of business support services to US affiliate are naturally bundled and are not intermediary services Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Delhi HC rules payment towards live telecast is not royalty. 1 December 2014
1 December 2014 EY Tax Alert Delhi HC rules payment towards live telecast is not royalty Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation that affect Indian
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. CBDT notifies ITR Forms for Company/ Firms/ LLP/ Trusts and others. 05 August 2015 October 2014
05 August 2015 October 2014 EY Tax Alert CBDT notifies ITR Forms for Company/ Firms/ LLP/ Trusts and others Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation
More informationMumbai Tribunal rules on DAPE in case of marketing and distribution activities carried out by an Indian branch for group companies
4 July 2013 2013mber 2012 EY Tax Alert Mumbai Tribunal rules on DAPE in case of marketing and distribution activities carried out by an Indian branch for group companies Executive summary Tax Alerts cover
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
19 August 2015 EY Tax Alert Delhi Tribunal (Larger Bench) rules that interchange fees and merchant establishment discounts earned in respect of credit card transactions not subject to Service tax prior
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
23 July EY Tax Alert Government issues Notifications to restrict benefit in respect of CVD exemption for certain goods under exemption notifications, to domestic manufacturers Executive summary Tax Alerts
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
5 April 2016 EY Tax Alert CESTAT rules that Service tax is not leviable under reverse charge mechanism on salary and other costs reimbursed by the Indian head office to its foreign branch Executive summary
More informationEY Tax Alert. J&K HC rules that contract receipts of a JV result in diversion of income to JV members; receipt not an income of the JV
21 September 2017 EY Tax Alert J&K HC rules that contract receipts of a JV result in diversion of income to JV members; receipt not an income of the JV Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments
More informationOperational, prudential and reporting norms for Alternative Investment Funds. Executive summary
1 August 2013 EY Regulatory Alert Operational, prudential and reporting norms for Alternative Investment Funds Executive summary This Regulatory Alert summarizes the operational, prudential and reporting
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Bangalore Tribunal rules on deductibility of employee share reward discount cross-charged by foreign parent company
22 October 2013 2013mber 2012 EY Tax Alert Bangalore Tribunal rules on deductibility of employee share reward discount cross-charged by foreign parent company Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant
More informationCBDT introduces form for employee investment declarations and extends due date for quarterly withholding statements
4 May 2016 EY Tax Alert CBDT introduces form for employee investment declarations and extends due date for quarterly withholding statements Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments
More informationIndian Equalization Levy on digital services to be effective from 1 June 2016, administrative rules notified
31 May 2016 EY Tax Alert Indian Equalization Levy on digital services to be effective from 1 June 2016, administrative rules notified Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments
More informationEY Regulatory Alert. Executive summary
21 April 2015 2013mber 2012 EY Regulatory Alert The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India issues draft regulations for registration and operations of branch offices of foreign reinsurers
More informationEY Tax Alert Indian tax administration issues final rules on certain aspects for determining buy-back tax in India Executive summary
18 October 2016 EY Tax Alert Indian tax administration issues final rules on certain aspects for determining buy-back tax in India Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments
More informationSupreme Court rules accumulated losses of amalgamating company to be set off after reducing interest waiver benefit
19 April 2017 EY Tax Alert Supreme Court rules accumulated losses of amalgamating company to be set off after reducing interest waiver benefit Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Hyderabad Tribunal reaffirms the distinction between use of copyright right and copyrighted article.
1 December 2014 EY Tax Alert Hyderabad Tribunal reaffirms the distinction between use of copyright right and copyrighted article Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Delhi High Court rules 50% as the benchmark to evaluate substantial value on taxation of indirect transfers
28 August 2014 EY Tax Alert Delhi High Court rules 50% as the benchmark to evaluate substantial value on taxation of indirect transfers Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Kolkata Tribunal rules on taxability of online advertisement revenues. 18 April mber 2012
18 April 2013 2013mber 2012 EY Tax Alert Kolkata Tribunal rules on taxability of online advertisement revenues Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
9 January 2015 EY Tax Alert Jabalpur Tribunal rules on interplay between provisions of PE and FTS for taxing installation/commissioning activities in composite contracts Executive summary Tax Alerts cover
More informationEY India Real Estate EY s point of view on Amended Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Policy on Construction Development Sector
16 vember 2015 EY India Real Estate EY s point of view on Amended Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Policy on Construction Development Sector Q.1 When will be the proposed changes to the FDI Policy in construction
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Supreme Court upholds initiation of prosecution for failure to file return. 3 February 2014
3 February 2014 EY Tax Alert Supreme Court upholds initiation of prosecution for failure to file return Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
27 July 2015 EY Tax Alert Chennai Tribunal rules on tax withholding obligation on provision for site restoration, year-end expense provisions and roaming charges Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant
More informationEY Regulatory Alert. Executive summary. SEBI releases Discussion Paper on review of framework for Institutional Trading
5 August 2016 EY Regulatory Alert SEBI releases Discussion Paper on review of framework for Institutional Trading Platform for inviting comments from public on the changes proposed Executive summary Regulatory
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Mumbai Tribunal rules write-down of investment loss allowable if a direct and proximate nexus exists with a business
21 April 2014 EY Tax Alert Mumbai Tribunal rules write-down of investment loss allowable if a direct and proximate nexus exists with a business Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news,
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. CBDT notifies guidelines for onshore management of offshore funds. 17 March 2016
17 March 2016 EY Tax Alert CBDT notifies guidelines for onshore management of offshore funds Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation that affect
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
18 March 2014 EY Tax Alert Mumbai ITAT rules on taxability of allotment of additional shares to existing shareholders under the Gift Tax provision Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news,
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Delhi Tribunal rules on advertisement and promotion expenses involving use of trademarks as not royalty.
4 April 2017 EY Tax Alert Delhi Tribunal rules on advertisement and promotion expenses involving use of trademarks as not royalty Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and
More informationKerala HC upholds the constitutional validity of levy of Service tax on admission and access to entertainment event & amusement facilities
3 May 2016 EY Tax Alert Kerala HC upholds the constitutional validity of levy of Service tax on admission and access to entertainment event & amusement facilities Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
3 June 2014 EY Tax Alert CESTAT rules non-compete fee and trademarks licence fee shall be included while determining the assessable value of the goods, under Central Excise Executive summary Tax Alerts
More informationEY Regulatory Alert. Executive summary
12 January 2015 EY Regulatory Alert Central Government notifies the Depository Receipts Scheme 2014 for facilitating issue of Depository Receipts outside India Executive summary Regulatory Alerts cover
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. CBDT provides clarifications on Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, September 2016
13 September 2016 EY Tax Alert CBDT provides clarifications on Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2016 Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation
More informationCBDT releases fifth round of FAQs on Income Declaration Scheme, 2016
19 August 2016 EY Tax Alert CBDT releases fifth round of FAQs on Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation that affect
More informationCBDT releases second round of FAQs on Income Declaration Scheme, 2016
28 June 2016 EY Tax Alert CBDT releases second round of FAQs on Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation that affect
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
5 December 2014 EY Tax Alert Karnataka HC rules discount allowed to distributors for prepaid SIM cards and recharge vouchers not liable for withholding as commission or brokerage Executive summary Tax
More information10 April EY Tax Alert. AAR treats buyback of shares as tax avoidance scheme taxable as dividend under Mauritius DTAA
10 April 2012 EY Tax Alert AAR treats buyback of shares as tax avoidance scheme taxable as dividend under Mauritius DTAA Executive summary This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Authority for
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
27 March 2015 EY Tax Alert SC over-rules AP High Court judgment, holds that beedi leaves purchased in auction by branch in AP and transferred to HO in Maharashtra not to be an inter-state sale Executive
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
5 January 2018 EY Tax Alert Mumbai Tribunal rules stamp duty value cannot be deemed as consideration while computing capital gains arising on contribution of land by a partner to the partnership firm which
More informationGuidance Note on FATCA and CRS dated 30 November Key clarifications
7 December 2016 EY Tax Alert Guidance Note on FATCA and CRS dated 30 November 2016 - Key clarifications Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. CBDT notifies GAAR rules. Background. 27 September mber 2012
27 September 2013 2013mber 2012 EY Tax Alert CBDT notifies GAAR rules Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation that affect Indian businesses. They
More informationEY India Defence EY s point of view on amended Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Policy on Defence Sector
24 June 2016 EY India Defence EY s point of view on amended Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Policy on Defence Sector Further to the FDI policy reforms in a number of sectors (including defence) as introduced
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
21 July 2015 EY Tax Alert India signs the Inter-Governmental Agreement with the United States of America to implement Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act to promote transparency on tax matters Executive
More informationBackground. Facts. produce articles or things or completes. substantial expansion.
03 June 2015 EY Tax Alert Chandigarh Tribunal denies fresh five year 100% profit-linked deduction to new units undertaking substantial expansion Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news,
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. CBDT modifies returns forms for tax year May mber 2012
7 May 2013 2013mber 2012 EY Tax Alert CBDT modifies returns forms for tax year 2012-13 Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation that affect Indian
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
16 March 2016 EY Tax Alert CESTAT allows credit of Service tax on transportation, treating the place where property in goods is transferred in terms of Sale of Goods Act - as Place of removal Executive
More informationTransfer pricing for Specified Domestic Transactions
Transfer pricing for Specified Domestic Transactions Introduction Since the introduction of Transfer Pricing (TP) provisions in India in 2001, the provisions have applied to international transactions
More informationGovernment of India amends Income Computation and Disclosure Standards and also defers them by one year to tax year
3 October 2016 EY Tax Alert Government of India amends Income Computation and Disclosure Standards and also defers them by one year to tax year 2016-17 Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Protocol signed on 10 May 2016 to amend the 1982 India- Mauritius tax treaty. 12 May 2016
12 May 2016 EY Tax Alert Protocol signed on 10 May 2016 to amend the 1982 India- Mauritius tax treaty Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation that
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
7 November 2014 EY Tax Alert Levy of Service tax on services provided by AC restaurants and services by hotels, guest house etc. in relation to providing of accommodation, held to be unconstitutional by
More informationSecurities and Exchange Board of India and the Reserve Bank of India issue guidelines for international financial services centres
8 April 2015 EY Regulatory Alert Securities and Exchange Board of India and the Reserve Bank of India issue guidelines for international financial services centres Executive summary Regulatory Alerts cover
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Delhi High Court rules 50% as the benchmark to evaluate substantial value on taxation of indirect transfers
25 August 2014 EY Tax Alert Delhi High Court rules 50% as the benchmark to evaluate substantial value on taxation of indirect transfers Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments
More information24 April EY Tax Alert. Mumbai Tribunal rules that itemized sale of assets with an intention to transfer entire undertaking is a slump sale
24 April 2012 EY Tax Alert Mumbai Tribunal rules that itemized sale of assets with an intention to transfer entire undertaking is a slump sale Executive summary This Tax Alert summarises a recent ruling
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Third Protocol amending the India-Singapore tax treaty signed. 31 December 2016
31 December 2016 EY Tax Alert Third Protocol amending the India-Singapore tax treaty signed Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation that affect
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Government of India notifies the entities eligible to issue tax free bonds for financial year
16 August 2013 2013 2013mber EY Tax Alert Government of India notifies the entities eligible to issue tax free bonds for financial year 2013-14 Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news,
More informationReserve Bank of India releases draft guidelines for on tap licensing of Universal Banks in the private sector
11 May 2016 EY Regulatory Alert Reserve Bank of India releases draft guidelines for on tap licensing of Universal Banks in the private sector Executive summary In 2013, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
More informationEY Tax Alert Bangalore Tribunal rules on constitution of service PE for services rendered virtually as well as physically
12 July 2017 EY Tax Alert Bangalore Tribunal rules on constitution of service PE for services rendered virtually as well as physically Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Supreme Court rules on scope of statutory dues allowable as deduction on actual payment.
15 May 2015 EY Tax Alert Supreme Court rules on scope of statutory dues allowable as deduction on actual payment Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation
More informationReserve Bank of India releases final guidelines for on tap licensing of Universal Banks in the private sector
5 August 2016 EY Regulatory Alert Reserve Bank of India releases final guidelines for on tap licensing of Universal Banks in the private sector Executive summary In 2013, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
12 January 2016 EY Tax Alert Updated Guidance Note on Implementation of Reporting Requirements under Rules 114F to 114H of the Income-tax Rules, 1962- Key additions/ clarifications Executive summary Tax
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
26 July 2016 EY Tax Alert Services provided by SEZ unit to the DTA unit of the same legal entity held liable to Service tax, however no tax payable in absence of consideration Executive summary Tax Alerts
More informationMadras High Court rules Indian tax provision notifying Cyprus as non-cooperative jurisdiction is not unconstitutional
14 April 2016 EY Tax Alert Madras High Court rules Indian tax provision notifying Cyprus as non-cooperative jurisdiction is not unconstitutional Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news,
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
07 June 2016 EY Tax Alert Mumbai Tribunal rules contractually agreed fixed return on equity investment is akin to interest on fixed deposit taxable on year-on-year basis Executive summary Tax Alerts cover
More informationEY Tax Alert Delhi High Court upholds weighted R&D deduction for recognized inhouse R&D facility from the date prior to recognition and approval
8 August 2017 EY Tax Alert Delhi High Court upholds weighted R&D deduction for recognized inhouse R&D facility from the date prior to recognition and approval Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments
More informationSecurities and Exchange Board of India notifies regulations for Share Based Employee Benefits
31 October 2014 EY Regulatory Alert Securities and Exchange Board of India notifies regulations for Share Based Employee Benefits Executive Summary Regulatory Alerts cover significant regulatory news,
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
27 August 2015 EY Tax Alert CESTAT rules that licence fees shall be included in the assessable value of commercial import of packaged software under Customs Act, 1962 Executive summary Tax Alerts cover
More informationEY Regulatory Alert. Executive summary. ECB Policy- revised framework. 04 December 2015
04 December 2015 EY Regulatory Alert ECB Policy- revised framework Executive summary Regulatory Alerts cover significant regulatory news, developments and changes in legislation that affect Indian businesses.
More informationSpecial Bench rules ESOP discount is deductible on vesting of options
19 July 2013 2013mber 2012 EY Tax Alert Special Bench rules ESOP discount is deductible on vesting of options Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
13 November 2016 EY Tax Alert Place of Provision of Services Rules, Mega Exemption Notification and Service tax Rules amended to tax Online Information and Database Access or Retrieval Services received
More informationEY Alert. Executive summary
29 May 2013 2013mber 2012 EY Alert Clarifications provided by SEBI on circular prohibiting framing of employee benefit schemes involving acquisition of shares from the secondary market Executive summary
More informationEY Tax Alert. Delhi Tribunal rules guarantee fee income received by foreign parent from Indian subsidiary is taxable in India.
12 December 2017 EY Tax Alert Delhi Tribunal rules guarantee fee income received by foreign parent from Indian subsidiary is taxable in India Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes
More informationDelhi Tribunal rules on indirect transfer of shares on transaction undertaken in 2006
15 March 2017 EY Tax Alert Delhi Tribunal rules on indirect transfer of shares on transaction undertaken in 2006 Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation
More informationClarifications on Indirect transfer provisions under the Incometax Act, 1961
22 December 2016 2013mber 2012 EY Tax Alert Clarifications on Indirect transfer provisions under the Incometax Act, 1961 Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes
More informationIndian Administration issues draft Exit Tax Rules for charitable organisations; invites comments from stakeholders
26 October 2016 EY Tax Alert Indian Administration issues draft Exit Tax Rules for charitable organisations; invites comments from stakeholders Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news,
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Supreme Court rules on characterization of property rental income as income from house property.
16 May 2017 EY Tax Alert Supreme Court rules on characterization of property rental income as income from house property Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes
More informationEY Alert. Kerala High Court quashes 2014 notification amending the Employees Pension Scheme, 1995
31 December 2018 EY Alert Kerala High Court quashes 2014 notification amending the Employees Pension Scheme, 1995 Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation that affect
More informationEY Tax Alert. Supreme Court reaffirms constitutional validity of Aadhaar PAN linking requirement. Executive summary
27 September 2018 EY Tax Alert Supreme Court reaffirms constitutional validity of Aadhaar PAN linking requirement Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation that affect
More informationEY Tax Alert. Executive summary
5 June 2015 EY Tax Alert India joins the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement to facilitate standardized Automatic Exchange of Information Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news,
More informationEY PAS Alert. Finance bill proposes tax on long-term gains arising on sale of listed equity shares Impact on employee stock option plans
27 February 2018 EY PAS Alert Finance bill proposes tax on long-term gains arising on sale of listed equity shares Impact on employee stock option plans Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments
More information