LATHAM LJ, ANDREW SMITH J, JUDGE SCOTT-GALL QC (sitting as a judge of the CACD)
|
|
- Belinda Cain
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 R v Smallshire Sentence Imprisonment Length of sentence Wounding with intent Six years' imprisonment Defendant's state of mind at time of offence affected by medication for depression Whether sentence manifestly excessive [2008] EWCA Crim 3217, COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL DIVISION) LATHAM LJ, ANDREW SMITH J, JUDGE SCOTT-GALL QC (sitting as a judge of the CACD) 17 DECEMBER 2008 D Lyons for the Appellant/Applicant J Gau for the Crown Registrar of Criminal Appeals; Crown Prosecution Service ANDREW SMITH J: (reading the judgment of the court) [1] Ronald Smallshire pleaded guilty on 29 August 2006 to a charge of causing grievous bodily harm with intent and on 22 September 2006 he was sentenced to 78 months' imprisonment. He appeals against sentence by leave of the single judge, to which appeal we shall come in due course, but he has also applied for an extension of time of some 20 months to appeal against his conviction and the single judge has referred that application to this court. [2] The incident that led to the conviction took place on 16 December 2005, some time after 10.00pm. That evening a 23-year-old man called Michael Oakley was walking two dogs. His three stepsisters were with him. One of the dogs, an Alsatian, was off the lead and attacked Mr Smallshire's dog. It seems that Mr Smallshire might have been bitten as he rescued the dog. Mr Smallshire took his dog back into his nearby house.
2 [3] He came back out of the house and attacked Mr Oakley. Mr Smallshire had brought a knife, an old steak knife with a serrated blade and wooden handle, from the house. His account was that he took the knife from the kitchen drawer because he could not find a broom, which, as we understand it, he might have used to ward off the dogs. When outside he put Mr Oakley to the ground with a blow or blows to the head and then, in a frenzied attack, he repeatedly stabbed Mr Oakley to the head and back, inflicting nearly 20 wounds and breaking the knife in doing so. Mr Smallshire returned to his house and the police were telephoned. The Applicant was arrested. [4] Mr Oakley suffered a pneumothorax and stab wounds. He stayed in hospital overnight. He made a good recovery but he and his stepsisters suffered psychological effects. [5] Mr Smallshire was aged 56 when this incident took place. He is a hard working family man, with no previous convictions and his good character was described in numerous references before the court. It is quite apparent that this conduct was quite out of character. [6] There was evidence before the court that Mr Smallshire was suffering from an adjustment disorder by way of a response to major stressful events in his life and the attack reflected an acute stress reaction. In 1996 he had suffered from irritable bowel symptoms and medical treatment had been largely ineffective. In June 2005 he had had depressants for a short period but stopped taking them because they appeared to aggravate his condition. [7] On 5 December 2005, after Mr Smallshire had stated that he felt increasingly paranoid, his general practitioner prescribed an anti-depressant, Citalopram. It was a small dose of ten milligrams, described in one medical report as half the usual starting dose, for what was recorded as irritable bowel syndrome, with anxiety and depression features. He continued to take the medicine until 16 December That evening he took his dose at about eight o'clock. At about 9.00pm he had a meal with his wife and they shared a bottle of wine. [8] The basis for the application for leave to appeal against conviction is that as a result of the medication, at the time of the attack Mr Smallshire was in a state of automatism. For present purposes that state can be described as a complete loss of voluntary control that is not caused by what the person could reasonably foresee and is not a self-induced incapacity or one that was a result of a disease of the mind. It is said that therefore notwithstanding the guilty plea the conviction is unsafe. The court does have jurisdiction to determine an appeal against conviction in these circumstances (see R v Boal [1992] QB 591, [1992] 3 All ER 177, (1993) 95 Cr App Rep 272).
3 [9] In support of the application for an extension of time to appeal against conviction, there is before the court an affidavit of Mr Ian Brazier, a solicitor whose firm was first instructed by Mr Smallshire shortly after he was sentenced. Mr Brazier sets out the history of his firm's conduct of the matter until the appeal papers were lodged in June In particular, he explains the need to find medical expert evidence. If there is merit in the application for leave, we would not think it right for it to be refused because of the delay in bringing it. We grant the necessary extension of time. [10] Mr Smallshire relies, in support of his challenge to conviction, upon evidence of Dr Andrew Herxheimer, a consultant clinical pharmacologist, experienced in the investigation and evaluation of the adverse effects of drug therapy and who in recent years has studied a large number of reports of effects relating to SSRI (Select Seroxat Inhibitors) antidepressant drugs, of which Citalopram is one. [11] Dr Herxheimer wrote a report dated 12 February 2008 and a supplementary report dated 14 March In the former he concluded that:... citalopram very likely contributed decisively to Mr Smallshire's actions on 16 December He had started taking this antidepressant medication 11 days earlier; its concentration in his brain would have been steadily increasing from about seven days. It is highly probable that alcohol augmented the effect of the drug: on its own alcohol would not account for his behaviour. [12] In his supplementary report Dr Herxheimer stated that in his opinion that it was more likely than not that because of a mixture of medication and alcohol, Mr Smallshire would have been in a state of non insane automatism at the time of the incident. [13] It is said that the evidence of Dr Herxheimer should be admitted on an appeal against conviction. The questions to which the court has to have regard in deciding whether to receive evidence include whether it appears capable of belief; whether it appears that it would afford any grounds for allowing the appeal; whether it would have been admissible in the lower court and whether there is a reasonable explanation for a failure to adduce the evidence in the lower court proceedings. [14] We should say something about this last point. Psychiatric reports had been prepared about Mr Smallshire before he pleaded guilty in August They were prepared by Dr Anwar El-Komy and Dr Jane Ewbank. In a report dated 7 February 2000 Dr El-Komy simply stated that Mr Smallshire was unable to give the name of the antidepressant that he was taking but he, Dr El-Komy, did not believe that any available anti-depressant could have any major impact on his behaviour on the day of the incident.
4 [15] In a report dated 3 August 2006 Dr Ewbank, who had been specifically asked whether Citalopram had affected his behaviour, reported that Mr Smallshire said that, having started to take the medication, he felt agitated and unreal and confused. She opined that Whilst Mr Smallshire's actions are to some extent understandable within the context in which they occurred... it is impossible to rule out that the Citalopram... had affected his presentation in some way. She concluded, however, that Mr Smallshire was able to form intent at the point he took the knife from his kitchen and began the alleged attack on the victim. [16] In his supplementary report Dr Herxheimer dealt with the question: What was the general state of medical knowledge at the time of the earlier reports were written?, the earlier reports being those of Dr El-Komy and Dr Ewbank. He replied that at the time little or nothing definite was known by psychiatrists and GPs about the behavioural and emotional adverse affects of SRRI antidepressants and that the papers cited in his first report were not directly concerned with Citalopram and attracted little attention when published. He said that a more directly relevant paper was published only in 2006, after the earlier reports, that is to say the reports of Dr El-Komy and Dr Ewbank. That is a paper which Dr Herxheimer himself had not cited in his main report. We have seen the paper. It identifies as possible mechanisms of anti depressant induced violence (i) apathesia and emotion blunting, which could not give rise to a state of automatism, (ii) somnambulism, which is not suggested in this case, and (iii) mania and psychosis, which again would not generally amount to a state of automatism. Reference is made to the possibility of delirious states reflecting brain disturbances, rather than a function psychosis or mania. Dr Herxheimer does not support delirium as a mechanism giving rise to Mr Smallshire's violent behaviour and that would not be supported by the factual evidence. [17] We are prepared to accept that there was not available to Mr Smallshire, when he pleaded guilty to the offence, medical evidence to support a defence of automatism. However, the question of the affect of the medication upon Mr Smallshire had undoubtedly been examined and the plea was entered in the light of the advice received. Undoubtedly further research and further publications have been produced since August 2006 but the important question is whether this explains why Mr Smallshire seeks only now to advance a defence of automatism. [18] It is against this background that we turn to the question as to whether Dr Herxheimer's evidence is capable of belief and whether it affords grounds for allowing the appeal on the basis of a defence of automatism. The account given by Mr Smallshire to the police who went to his house on 16 December 2008, after the incident, was that after the trouble between the dogs, he went inside my house and took a knife from the kitchen drawer. I went outside and stabbed the man who was with the dogs. The knife broke and I had no idea where it is. He said after arrest: I know I have done wrong. What I have done is totally out of proportion to what happened.
5 [19] The next day, when arrested on suspicion of attempted murder, he responded that he had flipped but did not say anything indicative of the loss of voluntary control that would be required for a defence of non insane automatism to be available to him. [20] In his interview on 19 December 2005, he said that he just went absolutely berserk. Again, there is nothing that would amount to an assertion of automatism. He described choosing the knife as a split second decision and that he ploughed into the bloke because: I saw the situation that I had got to get the upper hand. He spoke of his intention being to get Mr Oakley away from his wife. He said that when he struck with the knife: My main concern was to get the situation under control. [21] These are not accounts that amount to an assertion of automatism or state anything indicative of the loss of voluntary control that would amount to a defence of automatism. Dr Herxheimer's opinion that Mr Smallshire's actions are more likely than not the result of automatism do not explain these accounts of what happened. Without that, we are unable to accept that the evidence affords any grounds to allowing the appeal. The bald assertion that Mr Smallshire was more likely than not in a state of automatism is not, without attributing to Dr Herxheimer any intention to mislead whatsoever, capable of belief. The question is not whether the effects of Citalopram are capable of giving rise to a state of automatism in other circumstances, but whether there is a credible evidence that they did so in this case. Dr Herxheimer's reports do not provide credible evidence that they did. [22] In these circumstances the evidence of Dr Herxheimer is not evidence that should be received on the appeal. Without it, the appeal is hopeless. The application for leave to appeal against conviction is, for that reason, refused. ANDREW SMITH J: (Submissions re: sentence) [23] We have set out the facts of this case in our judgment giving our reasons for dismissing the application for leave to appeal against conviction. We come to the appeal against sentence.
6 [24] This was a frenzied attack. Although the physical injuries to Mr Oakley were less serious than they might have been, very much less serious, nevertheless they were significant. The psychological effect on him and his sisters was undeniably profound. [25] Against that the judge recognised that Mr Smallshire is a man of impeccable character. The judge also recognised that his psychological state is an explanation for what he did. The judge having decided that he could properly pass a determinate sentence, concluded that the appropriate sentence, after a trial, would have been one of nine years custody and that a discount of 25% should be made by way of credit for the guilty plea and so imposed a sentence of six-and-a-half years. [26] The sentence is criticised on the basis that it does not properly take account of the medication likely to have had on Mr Smallshire. A sentence of nine years custody, after a trial, for an attack of this ferocity might sometimes be appropriate but it was, in our judgment, severe, given the Appellant's character and the background to this incident with the trouble between the dogs. It is also clear to our mind that the frenzied nature of the attack was attributable to Mr Smallshire's mental turmoil, which was likely to have been influenced to some degree by his medication, albeit admittedly together with the alcohol that he had drunk. [27] Whilst Mr Smallshire went outside with the knife, it is not clear that he went out intending to use it aggressively. His account of taking the knife as an alternative to a broom suggests otherwise, that it was taken for protection. Again, we readily accept that his thinking was confused and the confusion of thought too was probably referable to the medication. [28] In these circumstances and bearing in mind the Appellant's character, we are persuaded that the sentence was too long. In light of the information before us, not all of which was available to the sentencing judge, we consider that a sentence of six years would have been appropriate after a trial. Giving discount for the plea, the sentence would then be one of four-and-a-half years in custody. We reduce the sentence from six-and-a-half years to four-and-a-half years and allow the appeal against sentence to that extent. Appeal allowed. Source [All England Official Transcripts ( )] Date/Time Sunday, February, 26, 2012, 15:57 GMT
7
Before :
Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWCA Crim 2616 Case No: CAO REF: 201401608 A6 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT HIS HONOUR JUDGE PONTIUS LOWER NC 201401608
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v M [2003] QCA 380 PARTIES: R v M (applicant/appellant) FILE NO/S: CA No 92 of 2003 DC No 334 of 2003 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: Court of Appeal Appeal
More informationUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/35017/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 10 January 2018 On 11 January Before
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/35017/2015 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision Promulgated On 10 January 2018 On 11 January 2018 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE
More informationSENTENCE (subject to editorial corrections)
Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWCA Crim 325 Case No: 2016/05551/B1 & 2016/05552/B1 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL DIVISION) ON A REFERENCE FROM THE CRIMINAL CASES REVIEW COMMISSION ON APPEAL FROM A
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN AND
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Mag. Appeal No. 13 of 2011 BETWEEN DAVENDRA OUJAR Appellant AND P.C. DANRAJ ROOPAN #15253 Respondent PANEL: P. WEEKES, J A R. NARINE, J A Appearances: Mr. Jagdeo
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE AD 2017 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 5 OF 2014
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE AD 2017 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 5 OF 2014 MAY BUSH Appellant v THE QUEEN Respondent BEFORE The Hon Mr Justice Sir Manuel Sosa The Hon Mr Justice Samuel Awich The Hon Mr Justice
More informationAlexander Blackman. In the Court Martial Appeal Court. Judgment. 21 st December 2016
JU Alexander Blackman In the Court Martial Appeal Court Judgment 21 st December 2016 Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd CJ and Sweeney J : 1. The court has before it this afternoon three applications. First an application
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 7 th December, 2017 On 15 th January, Before
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: PA/01407/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 7 th December, 2017 On 15 th January, 2018 Before
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN. CASE NO: CA&R 361/2014 Date heard: 5 August 2015 Date delivered: 13 August 2015
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION,
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA MEDIA SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT DELIVERED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL FROM The Registrar, Supreme Court of Appeal DATE 29 September 2015 STATUS Immediate Negondeni
More informationUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/03707/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/03707/2016 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On August 24, 2017 On September 1, 2017 Before DEPUTY
More informationNo: D4 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand London, WC2A 2LL. B e f o r e: LORD JUSTICE MOSES
Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWCA Crim 2055 No: 201102990 D4 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand London, WC2A 2LL Thursday, 14 June 2012 B e f o r e: LORD JUSTICE
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KEKIĆ. Between GLEZIER PALMER-LUIS (ANONYMITY ORDER NOT MADE) and
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA/00604/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 20 July 2017 On 25 July 2017 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE
More informationDECISION AND REASONS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/17105/2012 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 21 April 2015 On 10 June 2015 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2006
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 5 OF 2006 BETWEEN: LAURIANO RAMIREZ Appellant AND THE QUEEN Respondent BEFORE: The Hon. Mr. Justice Mottley President The Hon. Mr. Justice
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA305/2008 [2008] NZCA 415 THE QUEEN ALISTAIR MARK STUART LYON. Robertson, Cooper and Winkelmann JJ
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA305/2008 [2008] NZCA 415 THE QUEEN v ALISTAIR MARK STUART LYON Hearing: 20 August 2008 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Robertson, Cooper and Winkelmann JJ Appellant in
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at: Field House Determination Promulgated On: 18 December 2014 On: 13 August Before
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/39272/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at: Field House Determination Promulgated On: 18 December 2014 On: 13 August 2015 Before DEPUTY UPPER
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Hoet [2016] QCA 230 PARTIES: R v HOET, Reece Karaitana (appellant) FILE NO/S: CA No 64 of 2016 DC No 548 of 2016 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: Court of Appeal Appeal against
More informationUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/12694/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CHAPMAN.
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/12694/2016 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 8 June 2017 On 18 July 2017 Before DEPUTY UPPER
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CRAIG. Between MR ABDUL KADIR SAID. and. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent
IAC-FH-NL-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA/00950/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Royal Courts of Justice Oral determination given immediately following the hearing
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA 196/97
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA 196/97 THE QUEEN v IAN CHARLES PHIPPS Coram: Hearing: Counsel: Gault J Anderson J Robertson J 19 August 1997 (at Auckland) R. Asher QC and J.H. Wiles for Appellant
More informationBefore: The Honourable Mr. C. M. Dennis Byron Chief Justice (Ag.) The Honourable Mr. Satrohan Singh Justice of Appeal
ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 3 OF 1997 BETWEEN: IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CONFESOR VALDEZ FRANCO APPELLANT and RESPONDENT THE QUEEN Before: The Honourable Mr. C. M. Dennis Byron Chief Justice (Ag.)
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE COKER. Between SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT. And SELIM MACASTENA
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 19 th January 2016 On 20 th January 2016 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE COKER
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at: Field House Decision and Reasons Promulgated On: 20 November 2017 On: 5 December Before
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: PA/04213/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at: Field House Decision and Reasons Promulgated On: 20 November 2017 On: 5 December 2017 Before
More informationLR (Roma-Remedies-Police Brutality) Romania CG [2002] UKIAT. Appeal No. CC IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL
Heard at FIELD HOUSE On 10th July 2002 BETWEEN: IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL Before: Mr. D. J. Parkes (Chairman) Mrs. E. Hurst J.P. Mr. A. Smith MRS. LINA ROSTAS - and - THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME
More informationRoyal Courts of Justice London. 7 th April Regina v Maurice Kirk
Criminal Court of Appeal Royal Courts of Justice London Case Number 20104016C1 7 th April 2011 Regina v Maurice Kirk 12 th April 2011 Appeal for a Contempt of Court conviction in Cardiff Crown Court on
More informationNOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANT PROHIBITED BY S 139 OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1985.
NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANT PROHIBITED BY S 139 OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1985. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA82/2014 [2014] NZCA 304 BETWEEN AND TOESE
More informationBENZILE McDONALD ZWANE B A I L A P P E A L J U D G M E N T. 1]The appellant applied for bail before the Magistrate, Port Elizabeth and his
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE PORT ELIZABETH) In the matter between: Case No.: CA&R08/2011 Date heard: 12 May 2011 Date delivered: 17 May 2011 BENZILE McDONALD ZWANE Appellant and THE
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v MCE [2015] QCA 4 PARTIES: R v MCE (appellant) FILE NO: CA No 186 of 2014 DC No 198 of 2012 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: Court of Appeal Appeal against
More informationCARL KIATIKA NGAWHIKA Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. J U Mooney for Appellant JEL Carruthers for Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA297/2017 [2017] NZCA 535 BETWEEN AND CARL KIATIKA NGAWHIKA Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 15 November 2017 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Harrison, Lang and
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI GEORGE MICHAEL SUNNEX Appellant. POLICE Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI-2010-409-000043 GEORGE MICHAEL SUNNEX Appellant v POLICE Respondent Hearing: 22 April 2010 Appearances: A Bailey for Appellant K Basire for Respondent
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH WEST DIVISION, MAHIKENG)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH WEST DIVISION,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN)
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE
More informationConduct and Competence Committee. Substantive Meeting. 08 December Nursing and Midwifery Council, George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4LH
Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting 08 December 2016 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 114-116 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4LH Name of Registrant: NMC PIN: Part(s) of the register: Bernard
More informationS18A1609. STANFORD v. THE STATE. evidence was presented to support a finding of guilt. For the reasons that
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: March 4, 2019 S18A1609. STANFORD v. THE STATE. BENHAM, Justice. In February 2015, Appellant Larry Stanford was convicted of two counts of malice murder in connection
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE HADDON-CAVE UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KOPIECZEK. Between MR BAZADI MOHAMMADI.
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA/01628/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 3 July 2014 On 28 th July 2014 Before THE HONOURABLE
More informationJOSEPH MWAMBA KALENGA. SAKALA, CJ, MUYOVWE and MUSONDA, JJS On the 6 th December, 2011 and 8 th May, 2012
IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR ZAMBIA HOLDEN AT NDOLA (Criminal Jurisdiction) SCZ/103/2011 BETWEEN: JOSEPH MWAMBA KALENGA APPELLANT VS THE PEOPLE RESPONDENT Coram: SAKALA, CJ, MUYOVWE and MUSONDA, JJS On the
More informationB e f o r e: MR JUSTICE KING. HIS HONOUR JUDGE WARWICK MCKINNON (Sitting as a judge of the Court of Appeal Criminal Division) R E G I N A
Neutral Citation Number: [2007] EWCA Crim 2715 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL DIVISION No: 200704326 A4 Royal Courts of Justice Strand London, WC2A 2LL Thursday, 25th October 2007 B e f o r e: MR JUSTICE
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 22 December 2014 On 8 January Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HANBURY. Between
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/03806/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 22 December 2014 On 8 January 2015 Before DEPUTY UPPER
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT NOT REPORTABLE Case No: 100/13 In the matter between: GEOFFREY MARK STEYN Appellant and THE STATE Respondent Neutral citation: Geoffrey Mark Steyn v
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2008
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2008 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 31 OF 2005 BETWEEN: HARVEY LEE HENDERSON Appellant AND THE QUEEN Respondent BEFORE: The Hon. Mr. Justice Mottley President The Hon. Mr. Justice
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CRAIG PROFESSOR N M HILL QC DEPUTY JUDGE OF THE UPPER TRIBUNAL. Between
IAC-FH-NL-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA/01503/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Oral determination given following hearing on 7 July 2015 Decision &
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Dawson v Jewiss; Thompson v Jewiss [2004] QCA 374 PARTIES: STUART BEVAN DAWSON (plaintiff/respondent) v HENRY WILLIAM JEWISS also known as HARRY JEWISS (defendant/appellant)
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 3 February 2015 On 6 February Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE PITT. Between MR SAULIUS VITAS. and
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 3 February 2015 On 6 February 2015 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE PITT Between MR
More informationH.C.Cr. Appeal No. 621 of 2001) ****************************** JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OMOLO, GITHINJI & DEVERELL, JJ.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 120 OF 2004 BETWEEN ALBANUS MWASIA MUTUA APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC... RESPONDENT (Appeal
More informationB e f o r e: MR JUSTICE JEREMY BAKER MR JUSTICE GOSS R E G I N A ISAAC OLARINOYE
Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWCA Crim 1503 No: 2015/2745/A3 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand London, WC2A 2LL Friday, 7 August 2015 B e f o r e: MR JUSTICE JEREMY
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI [2016] NZHC 2730 THE QUEEN TEVITA MAFI FILO
NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAMES, ADDRESSES, OCCUPATIONS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS, OF COMPLAINANTS PROHIBITED BY S 203 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011. ORDER SUPPRESSING THE NAMES, ADDRESSES, IMAGES AND
More informationIMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL
Appeal No: HX/55044/2001 FC (Article3- Medical Facilities-Psychiatric) Kosovo CG [2002] UKIAT 04608 Between: IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL Before: Mr C M G Ockelton (Deputy President) Mr A R Mackey Mr R
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Liverpool Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 25th April 2017 On 6 th July Before
The Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA136432015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Liverpool Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 25th April 2017 On 6 th July 2017 Before DEPUTY
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 17 June 2015 On 15 July Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CLIVE LANE. Between ENTRY CLEARANCE OFFICER - ISTANBUL.
IAC-AH-VP-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: OA/02752/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Bradford Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 17 June 2015 On 15 July 2015 Before UPPER
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 29 October 2014 On 3 November Before. Upper Tribunal Judge Southern. Between FATEH SIAMER. and
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA/02423/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 29 October 2014 On 3 November 2014 Before Upper Tribunal
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 17 December 2015 On 5 January Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE DOYLE. Between
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 17 December 2015 On 5 January 2016 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE DOYLE Between
More informationRespondent. Counsel: Paul Heaslip for the Appellant Sarah Mandeno for the Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY A193/00 BETWEEN R LYON Appellant AND THE NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Date of hearin g : 14 November 2000 Counsel: Paul Heaslip for the Appellant Sarah
More informationIMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL. Before: Mr D K Allen (Chairman) Mrs M L Roe Mrs E Hurst JP MUSTAPHA TAALAH. and
AJB Heard at Field House On 11 March 2002 MT (Risk-Return-GIA) Algeria CG [2002] UKIAT 01166 CC34833-2001 IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL Date Determination notified: 18.04.2002 Before: Mr D K Allen (Chairman)
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 28 th September 2015 On 21 st December Before
st Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS At Field House Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 28 th September 2015 On 21 st December 2015 Before DEPUTY JUDGE OF THE UPPER TRIBUNAL
More informationDAVID STANLEY TRANTER Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. The appeal against conviction and sentence is dismissed.
NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAMES, ADDRESSES, OCCUPATIONS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS, OF COMPLAINANTS PROHIBITED BY S 139 OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1985 AND S 203 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011. IN THE
More informationFor the appellant : Mrs. K. Simfukwe, Legal Aid Counsel Legal Aid Board
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ZAMBIA SCZ/APPEAL 162/2011 HOLDEN AT LUSAKA (Criminal Jurisdiction) BETWEEN: PATRICK HARA APPELLANT AND THE PEOPLE RESPONDENT CORAM: PHIRI, WANKI, JJS AND LENGALENGA, Ag JS On 9
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE GLEESON. Between M I M. and. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: PA/00734/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision sent to parties on On 16 th June 2017 On 26 th July 2017 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL
More informationCotton, T. (2010) 'Court of appeal: Confession evidence and the circumstances requiring a voir dire', Journal of Criminal Law, 74 (5), pp
TeesRep - Teesside's Research Repository Court of appeal: Confession evidence and the circumstances requiring a voir dire Item type Authors Citation DOI Publisher Journal Additional Link Rights Article
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as State v. Glenn, 2009-Ohio-375.] COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. John W. Wise, J. Hon. Patricia
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 16 June 2017 On 6 July Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CHAPMAN
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/30759/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 16 June 2017 On 6 July 2017 Before DEPUTY UPPER
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision and reasons Promulgated On: 5 June 2017 On: 17 August Before
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: PA/04137/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision and reasons Promulgated On: 5 June 2017 On: 17 August 2017 Before DEPUTY
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 22, 2005
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 22, 2005 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. EARL D. MILLS - July 5, 2005 Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No.78215
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 31 March 2016 On 19 April Before
IAC-FH-AR-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/06365/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 31 March 2016 On 19 April 2016 Before
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 9 February 2016 On 7 March Before
IAC-AH-KEW-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 9 February 2016 On 7 March 2016 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 21 September 2015 On 18 December Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KOPIECZEK. Between
IAC-FH-NL-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DC/00018/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Royal Courts of Justice Determination & Reasons Promulgated On 21 September 2015
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 14 August 2015 On 19 August Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE FROOM. Between S E Y (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) and
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision Promulgated On 14 August 2015 On 19 August 2015 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE FROOM Between S E Y
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE, GRAHAMSTOWN) CASE NO: CA&R 303/2009 DATE HEARD: 25/08/2010 DATE DELIVERED: 13/9/10 NOT REPORTABLE
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE, GRAHAMSTOWN) CASE NO: CA&R 303/2009 DATE HEARD: 25/08/2010 DATE DELIVERED: 13/9/10 NOT REPORTABLE In the matter between MZAMO NGCAWANA Appellant and THE
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KEKIĆ. Between MOHAMMED KHURAM SHEZAD (ANONYMITY ORDER NOT MADE) and
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 20 July 2017 On 31 July 2017 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KEKIĆ Between MOHAMMED
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case No: 300/2013 Not reportable In the matter between: LEEROY BENSON Appellant and THE STATE Respondent Neutral citation: Benson v the State (300/13)
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND THE QUEEN PETER CHARLES HALLMOND. Fisher J Potter J. W N Dollimore for appellant K Raftery for Crown
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA42/01 THE QUEEN V PETER CHARLES HALLMOND Hearing: 21 June 2001 Coram: Appearances: Blanchard J Fisher J Potter J W N Dollimore for appellant K Raftery for Crown
More informationThe appellant was convicted by the District Court of Monduli at. Monduli in absentia for the offence of unlawful possession of government
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA (CORAM: KIMARO,J.A., LUANDA,J.A., And MJASIRI,J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.396 OF 2013 LONING O SANGAU.APPELLANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC.RESPONDENT (Appeal from the
More informationCharles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Sherri T. Rollison, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA GERALD YARBROUGH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 26 November 2015 On 5 January Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE L J MURRAY. Between S H (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) and
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/01237/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Columbus House, Decision & Reasons Promulgated Newport On 26 November 2015 On 5 January 2016 Before
More informationCASE NAME: v. Registrar, Motor Vehicle Dealers Act 2002
Licence Appeal Tribunal Tribunal d'appel en matière de permis DATE: 2016-12-02 FILE: 10311/MVDA CASE NAME: 10311 v. Registrar, Motor Vehicle Dealers Act 2002 An Appeal from a Notice of Proposal by the
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at the Royal Courts of Justice Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 1 st February 2016 On 18 th March 2016.
IAC-CH-SA/LR-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA/01487/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at the Royal Courts of Justice Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 1 st February 2016
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CR. JEFFREY LYNN ADAY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Affirmed and Opinion Filed November 24, 2015 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01593-CR JEFFREY LYNN ADAY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Bradford Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 17 th February 2015 On 24 th February Before
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Bradford Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 17 th February 2015 On 24 th February 2015 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE D E TAYLOR
More informationUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/09516/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/09516/2016 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 29 September 2017 On 13 October 2017 Before DEPUTY
More informationBEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZREADT 78 READT 042/16 IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND An application to review a decision of the Registrar pursuant to section 112 of the Real
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before: DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MCGINTY. Between: AC (Anonymity Direction made) And
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/06922/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House, London Decision & Reasons Promulgated On the 21 st October 2015 On 3 rd November
More informationIn The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO CR. BRUCE GLENN MILNER, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Opinion issued December 18, 2008 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-07-00501-CR BRUCE GLENN MILNER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 239th District
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACT. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 8 th February 2018 On 23 rd February Before
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACT Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 8 th February 2018 On 23 rd February 2018 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 5 January 2016 On 19 January Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HUTCHINSON. Between BN (ANONYMITY ORDER)
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/06347/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 5 January 2016 On 19 January 2016 Before DEPUTY
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO. : O P I N I O N - vs - 1/25/2010 :
[Cite as State v. Peterman, 2010-Ohio-211.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2009-06-149 : O P I N I O N - vs -
More informationUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/08153/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/08153/2017 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 15 March 2018 On 11 May 2018 Before DEPUTY UPPER
More informationCircuit Court for Anne Arundel County Case No. C-02-CR UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2017
Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County Case No. C-02-CR-16-002416 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 772 September Term, 2017 TIMOTHY LEE STYLES, SR. v. STATE OF MARYLAND Woodward
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Manchester Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 14 March 2016 On 31 March Before. Upper Tribunal Judge Southern
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Manchester Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 14 March 2016 On 31 March 2016 Before Upper Tribunal Judge Southern Between THE
More informationThe Court of Appeal for Bermuda
Between: The Court of Appeal for Bermuda CRIMINAL APPEAL No 9 of 2015 JOESHUN RUSSELL -v- THE QUEEN Appellant Respondent Before: Baker, President Bell, JA Kawaley, AJA Appearances: Ms. Aura-Lee Cassidy,
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as State v. Deavers, 2007-Ohio-5464.] COURT OF APPEALS MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO -vs- Plaintiff-Appellee LANCE EDWARDS DEAVERS, AKA, TONY CARDELLO Defendant-Appellant
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE WOODCRAFT. Between
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: IA338292015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated Heard on 10 th July 2017 On 17 th July 2017 Prepared
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 10 June 2015 On 22 June 2015 Prepared on 15 June Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE JM HOLMES.
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/11093/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at North Shields Determination Promulgated On 10 June 2015 On 22 June 2015 Prepared on 15 June 2015
More informationTHE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL & ORS Respondents
NOTE: ORDER OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL AND OF THE HIGH COURT PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAMES, ADDRESSES OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE SECOND, THIRD AND FOURTH RESPONDENTS AND THE SECOND RESPONDENT'S
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On : 2 June 2015 On 8 June Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KEBEDE DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE NORTON-TAYLOR.
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA/01044/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at : Field House Determination Promulgated On : 2 June 2015 On 8 June 2015 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL
More informationIN HER MAJESTY S COURT OF APPEAL IN NORTHERN IRELAND THE QUEEN. -v- SILVANNA ALEXANDER. Before: Morgan LCJ, Deeny J and Maguire J
Neutral Citation No: [2017] NICA 25 Ref: MOR10293 Judgment: approved by the Court for handing down (subject to editorial corrections)* Delivered: 28/4/2017 IN HER MAJESTY S COURT OF APPEAL IN NORTHERN
More informationUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) DC/00014/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) DC/00014/2016 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Bradford Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 12 March 2018 On 27 April 2018 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL
More informationOmbudsman s Determination
PO-4834 Ombudsman s Determination Applicant Mr E Pratt Scheme Armed Forces Pension Scheme 1975 (AFPS 75) Respondent(s) Veterans UK Complaint summary Mr Pratt has complained that his application for the
More informationRajen Hanumunthadu v The state and the independent commission against corruption SCJ 288 Judgment delivered on 01 September 2010 This was an
Rajen Hanumunthadu v The state and the independent commission against corruption. 2010 SCJ 288 Judgment delivered on 01 September 2010 This was an appeal from the Intermediate Court where the Appellant
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Determination & Reasons Promulgated On 11 th December 2017 On 10 th January 2018.
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination & Reasons Promulgated On 11 th December 2017 On 10 th January 2018 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACT. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 15 th February 2018 On 2 nd March Before
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: PA/05613/2017 PA/05616/2017 PA/05618/2017 PA/05621/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACT Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 15 th February
More information