2009 NTN 40) [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT]
|
|
- Clinton Nicholson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2009 NTN (Vol. 40) [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] Hon ble R.K.Agarwal & Hon ble S.K.Gupta, JJ. Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 943 of 2000 M/s Swati Menthol and Allied Chemicals Pvt. Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner (Assessment)-II Trade Tax Rampur Date of Decision : 15th July, 2009 For the Petitioner : Shri Rakesh Ranjan Agarwal, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri U.K. Pandey, Standing Counsel Re-assessment - On the basis of informations received - Validity of proceedings - U. P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 Section 21 - Petitioner disclosed tax paid purchases of Menthol oil against Form III-C(2) - Purchases of tax paid menthol oil was made from M/s Laxmi Trading Company, Bijnor by means of three invoices - At the time of original assessment the Assessing officer verified the three invoices and also signed the same by putting his signatures on it - The payment of the aforesaid purchases aforesaid three bills were made by the petitioner by means of Account payee cheques and entry regarding such payments were recorded in the ledger of the account of M/s Laxmi Trading Company - Reassessment proceedings initated on the basis of a letter of Trade Tax Officer Bijnor that M/s Laxmi Trading Company neither has disclosed the sale of Menthol oil in its return nor has deposited any tax thereon - In the said letter it was admitted that Form III-C(2) No was issued by the office of Trade Tax Officer, Chandpur to M/s Laxmi Trading Company and the said form has not been either reported to have been used or lost till the date of issuance of letter - Some information was also received by the respondent from the Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) Trade Tax, Khatima which disclosed the issuance of Form 3 Kha by the petitioner against the purchases Polythene bags - Validity of proceedings challanged before High Court - Hon'ble High Court quashed the proceedings and held as under : Held : The only basis for issuance of notice under Section 21 of the Act was the information received from the Trade Tax Officer, Chandpur district Bijnor and Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) Trade Tax Khatima district Udham Singh Nagar. It is not disputed that Form III-C2 bearing serial no was issued by the Trade Tax Officer, Chandpur to M/s Laxmi Trading Company and the sale of menthol oil for Rs.51 lacs by M/s Laxmi Trading Company to the petitioner was accompanied by the said Form III-C2 and at the time of regular assessment of the petitioner, the entire material relating to the purchase of the said menthol oil for Rs.51 lacs was duly verified by the respondent. The said purchase of menthol oil was also duly recorded in the books of account and supported by the invoices and Form III-C2 as well as by the statement of account issued by the Bank of Baroda which clearly indicates that the said commodity was purchased by the
2 petitioner from M/s Laxmi Trading Company in accordance with the Act and Rules made thereunder. It appears that M/s Laxmi Trading Company neither disclosed the sale of menthol oil made to the petitioner nor the issuance of Form III-C2 to its assessing authority. However, this fact was communicated to the respondent and consequently the notices dated and were issued under section 21 of the Act to the petitioner to verify the transaction. The Trade Tax Officer,Chandpur however, has admitted in his letter dated that the said Form III-C2 No was issued to M/s Laxmi Trading Company. It is neither the case of the respondent department that M/s Laxmi Trading Company was a fictitious concern nor does the respondent say that Form III-C2 No was a forged one. The record of the case shows that it was issued by the Trade Tax Officer, Chandpur to M/s Laxmi Trading Company in accordance with the rules. If the selling dealer does not submit account of user of the Form III-C2 issued to him that can never be a valid ground for rejection of the claim of the petitioner since there was no fault of the petitioner if the selling dealer does not disclose the transaction in its books of account and furnish details to its assessing officer. We are fortified in our view by the decision of this Court in M/s Om Trading Company Vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax, 2000 UPTC 227, wherein it has been held that there was no fault of the assessee if other dealer who issued the form did not furnish the details to its assessing officer. This apart, assessment under section 21 of the Act has already been made against M/s Laxmi Trading Company on imposing tax on the purchases of menthol oil after taking into consideration the information sent by the respondent to the Trade Tax Officer, Chandpur. Thus, the tax has already been imposed on the sale of menthol oil to the tune of Rs.51 lacs in the hands of M/s Laxmi Trading Company and the said firm has been held responsible for paying the tax on the sale of menthol oil for Rs.51 lacs to the petitioner, as such the petitioner cannot be held liable for any tax on the purchase of menthol oil for Rs.51 lacs against Form III-C2 issued by M/s Laxmi Trading Company. Form III-B bearing serial No which was used for the purchase of Polythene bags for Rs.46,39,940/- has been annexed as ANNEXURE-SCA2 to the supplementary counter affidavit. A bare perusal of the said form clearly shows that the form was issued by the Trade Tax Officer on (during the assessment year ) to the petitioner and the petitioner had used the said Form on A Division Bench of this Court in Deoki Nandan Vs. M.L.Gupta, Sales Tax Officer, Etawah, (1969) 23 STC 481 has held that existence of reasons on the part of Trade Tax Officer that certain turnover has escaped assessment is a condition precedent for acquiring jurisdiction under section 21 of U.P. Trade Tax Act. The belief of the officer is not purely subjective but has to be based upon relevant material. Therefore it is not open to the officer concern to initiate proceeding under Section 21 of the Act with a view to launch a fishing and roving enquiry on the
3 off chance of finding some escapement of tax. He must have in his possession some material pointing towards the escapement of turn over before he can entertain a belief about the escapement and can assume jurisdiction under section 21 of the Act and it is open to this Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution to scrutinize the material on record to ascertain the truth or otherwise of the challenge by the assesee of the existence of the belief on the part of officer on the escapement of turnover. It is also notable that while issuing notices under section 21 of the Act on the assessing authority has not recorded any reasons for his satisfaction. The material on which the Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) Trade Tax formed its belief must be on record and those material should be relevant for forming the belief that the turnover had escaped assessment to tax. In view of the foregoing discussions the impugned notices issued under section 21 of the U.P.Trade Tax Act as well as under Central Sales Tax Act cannot be sustained and are accordingly quashed. Cases referred : Om Trading Company vs. C.T.T UPTC 227 Deoki Nandan vs. M.L.Gupta, S.T.O., Etawah 1969 (23) STC 481 (Hon ble Shashi Kant Gupta, J.) JUDGMENT This writ petition has been filed inter- alia for the following reliefs: (a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing notice no.710 dated (Annexure-9), Notice nos.844 and 845 dated (Annexure-10 & 11) under Section 21 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act for the assessment year (U.P) and (Central) issued by the Assistant Commissioner (Assessment)- II, Trade Tax, Rampur, respondent. (a1) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the notices dated issued by the respondent no.1 under section 21 of the U.P. Trade Tax act for the assessment year (U.P.) and (Central) (Annexur4e Nos. 12 and 13 respectively to the writ petition). (b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent not to proceed with the proceeding under Section 21 of U.P. Trade Tax Act for the assessment year (U.P.) and (Central). 2. The background facts of the case in a nutshell essentially are as follows: 3. The petitioner is carrying on the business of manufacture of Menthol and D.M.O. etc. after purchasing Mentha oil. The regular
4 assessment under Rule 41 of U.P. Trade Tax Rules, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as Rules ) was framed by the respondent on for the assessment year ( U.P). The petitioner disclosed tax paid purchases of Menthol oil against Form III-C(2) for Rs.51 lacs. The purchases of tax paid menthol oil was made from M/s Laxmi Trading Company, Noorpur Bijnor by means of three invoices. In each of the invoices issued by M/s Laxmi Trading Company it was mentioned that menthol oil are tax paid and it is against Form III- C(2). At the time of original assessment the assessing officer verified the three invoices and also signed the same by putting his signatures on it. The payment of the aforesaid purchases of Menthol oil covered with the aforesaid three bills was made by the petitioner by means of Account payee cheques and entry regarding such payments were recorded in the ledger of the account of M/s Laxmi Trading Company maintained by the petitioner and the statement of account issued by the Bank of Baroda also recorded the said entries. The assessing officer after verifying the materials available on record, passed the assessment order on under Rule 41(8) of the Rules for the assessment year accepting the tax paid purchases of Menthol oil disclosed by the petitioner for Rs.51 lacs as well as purchases of the packing material against Form III-B 4. It appears that the Trade Tax Officer, Chandpur,district Bijnor vide letter dated wrote to the respondent that M/s Laxmi Trading Company neither has disclosed the sale of Menthol oil in its return nor has deposited any tax thereon. It was also mentioned that assessment for the year against M/s Laxmi Trading Company was framed, however, the proceedings under section 21 of the Act for the said assessment year is still pending. In the said letter it was admitted by the Trade Tax Officer Chandpur that Form III-C(2) no was issued by the office of Trade Tax Officer, Chandpur to M/s Laxmi Trading Company and the said form has not been either reported to have been used or lost till the date of issuance of letter. 5. Some information was also received by the respondent from the Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) Trade Tax, Khatima which disclosed the issuance of Form 3 Kha by the petitioner against the purchases of Rs.46, of Polythene bags from M/s Shyam Plastic Industry, Udham Singh Nagar. As such separate notices under section 21 of the U.P.Trade Tax Act ( in short Act ) dated , and were issued against the petitioner, purported to have been issued on the basis of aforesaid information. The said notices are being sought to be challenged through this writ petition. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the proceedings under section 21 of the Act initiated by the respondent is wholly illegal and without jurisdiction and is based on his whims and he has no reasons to believe that whole or any part of the turnover of tax paid menthol oil has escaped assessment, specially when the purchases of menthol oil and Form III-C(2) were duly verified and signed by the respondent on 30th March at the time of regular assessment. It has been further submitted that the notices issued
5 under section 21 of the Act is based on the letter dated of the Trade Tax Officer, Chandpur indicating that M/s Laxmi Trading Company has not disclosed the sale of menthol oil in its returns, although the Trade Tax Officer, Chandpur Bijnor has admitted that Form III-C(2) No was issued by him and it was not a forged one. It was further submitted that provisions of Section 21 of the Act cannot be resorted to for the purposes of inquiry or verification which has no direct nexus or live-link between the material coming to the notice of the assessing officer. It was further submitted that before the issuance of notice under Section 21 of the Act dated No reasons for arriving at his satisfaction was recorded ; hence the entire re-assessment proceedings are liable to be quashed. 7. It was also submitted that Form 3-B No was issued on by the respondent. As such, the said form was not shown to have been used in the assessment year Thus the basis of issuance of notice under Section 21 of the Act for not mentioning the use of form in the assessment in question is totally groundless. 8. It was also submitted that the Trade Tax Officer, Chandpur district Bijnor has already passed an order on imposing tax on the purchases of menthol oil in the hand of M/s Laxmi Trading Company under section 21 of the Act after taking into consideration the information sent by the respondent regarding sale of menthol oil for Rs.51 lacs against Form3C Learned Standing counsel Sri U.K. Pandey appearing on behalf of department has supported the issuance of notice under section 21 of the Act and has submitted that the notices have been issued in accordance with law. 10. Heard Sri Rakesh Ranjan Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri U.K. Pandey learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of respondent. 11. The only basis for issuance of notice under section 21 of the Act was the information received from the Trade Tax Officer, Chandpur district Bijnor and Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) Trade Tax Khatima district Udham Singh Nagar. It is not disputed that Form III-C2 bearing serial no was issued by the Trade Tax Officer, Chandpur to M/s Laxmi Trading Company and the sale of menthol oil for Rs.51 lacs by M/s Laxmi Trading Company to the petitioner was accompanied by the said Form III-C2 and at the time of regular assessment of the petitioner, the entire material relating to the purchase of the said menthol oil for Rs.51 lacs was duly verified by the respondent. The said purchase of menthol oil was also duly recorded in the books of account and supported by the invoices and Form III-C2 as well as by the statement of account issued by the Bank of Baroda which clearly indicates that the said commodity was purchased by the petitioner from M/s Laxmi Trading Company in accordance with the Act and Rules made thereunder. It appears that M/s Laxmi Trading Company neither disclosed the sale of menthol oil made to the petitioner nor the issuance of Form III-C2 to its assessing authority. However, this fact was communicated to the respondent
6 and consequently the notices dated and were issued under section 21 of the Act to the petitioner to verify the transaction. The Trade Tax Officer,Chandpur however, has admitted in his letter dated that the said Form III-C2 No was issued to M/s Laxmi Trading Company. 12. It is neither the case of the respondent department that M/s Laxmi Trading Company was a fictitious concern nor does the respondent say that Form III-C2 No was a forged one. The record of the case shows that it was issued by the Trade Tax Officer, Chandpur to M/s Laxmi Trading Company in accordance with the rules. If the selling dealer does not submit account of user of the Form III-C2 issued to him that can never be a valid ground for rejection of the claim of the petitioner since there was no fault of the petitioner if the selling dealer does not disclose the transaction in its books of account and furnish details to its assessing officer. We are fortified in our view by the decision of this Court in M/s Om Trading Company Vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax, 2000 UPTC 227, wherein it has been held that there was no fault of the assessee if other dealer who issued the form did not furnish the details to its assessing officer. 13. This apart, assessment under section 21 of the Act has already been made against M/s Laxmi Trading Company on imposing tax on the purchases of menthol oil after taking into consideration the information sent by the respondent to the Trade Tax Officer, Chandpur. Thus, the tax has already been imposed on the sale of menthol oil to the tune of Rs.51 lacs in the hands of M/s Laxmi Trading Company and the said firm has been held responsible for paying the tax on the sale of menthol oil for Rs.51 lacs to the petitioner, as such the petitioner cannot be held liable for any tax on the purchase of menthol oil for Rs.51 lacs against Form III-C2 issued by M/s Laxmi Trading Company. 14. The another notice dated under section 21 of the Act was purported to have been issued on the basis of the information received from Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) Trade Tax, Khatima, Udham Singh Nagar, vide letter dated wherein it was stated that the petitioner purchased Plastic Polythene bags from M/s Shyam Plastic Company, Sitarganj for an amount of Rs.46, by issuing Form-B bearing serial No , as to avail the benefit of concessional rate of tax. At the time of original assessment proceeding, purchase of Rs.16,429/- and Rs.29,970/- amounting to Rs.46, from M/s Shyam Plactic Industry, Sitarganj were disclosed in the purchase list. No use of Form IIIB was mentioned in the assessment year for the purchases of Polythene bags for a sum of Rs.46, Form III-B bearing serial No which was used for the purchase of Polythene bags for Rs.46,39,940/- has been annexed as ANNEXURE-SCA2 to the supplementary counter affidavit. A bare perusal of the said form clearly shows that the form was issued by the Trade Tax Officer on (during the assessment year ) to the petitioner and the petitioner had used the said Form
7 on At this stage it will be useful to refer paragraphs 3 & 4 of the Supplementary rejoinder affidavit which is as under: 3- That in reply to the contents of para 3 of the supplementary counter affidavit it is submitted that the dealer had filed the details of Form 3B issued during the assessment year to various parties for the total amount of Rs.32, The purchases relating to the Form 3B No of Rs.12, was related to assessment year and the purchase of relating to Form No of Rs.20,026/- is related to assessment year The purchases of these packing materials has been shown in the assessment proceeding at the time of hearing. 4- That in reply to the contents of para 4 of supplementary counter affidavit it is submitted that the dealer company has issued the Form No.3B No to M/s Shyam Plastic Industry, Sitarganj district Udham Singh Nagar for Rs.46, for the purchases related to A.Y This Form was issued by department on and dealer company had issued said Form on The purchase of bill mentioned in this form has been shown in the purchase of Packing material for the assessment year , the list of purchase was filed along with other details at the time of assessment and was on assessment record. The information received from ACTT Khatima is verifiable from the assessment record itself. The purchase list of packing material for the assessment for is enclosed herewith as annexure- SRA1 to this affidavit." 16. The aforesaid averments clearly shows that two forms No and were used by the petitioner for the purchase of Polythene bags from M/s Jain Plastic Industries and M/s Anurag Plastic Product respectively. One form was used in the assessment year and the other form was used in the assessment year and the said transaction were duly recorded in the books of account of the petitioner and were also duly accepted by the respondents. So far as the dispute of Form III-B No is concerned, that was issued by the respondent itself on i.e. in the assessment year and which in turn was issued on by the petitioner for the purchase of Polythene bags which was made by the petitioner in the assessment year but the form issued later on. Since Form 3B was issued on by the respondent, the use of the said form could not have been shown in the year Therefore the issuance of notice under section 21 of the Act on the information received from the Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) Khatima has no foundation as form 3B itself was issued by the department on which was used for the purchase of packing material for Rs.4,63,994/ A Division Bench of this Court in Deoki Nandan Vs. M.L.Gupta, Sales Tax Officer, Etawah, (1969) 23 STC 481 has held that existence of reasons on the part of Trade Tax Officer that certain turnover has escaped assessment is a condition precedent for acquiring jurisdiction under section 21 of U.P. Trade Tax Act. The belief of the officer is not purely subjective but has to be based upon relevant
8 material. Therefore it is not open to the officer concern to initiate proceeding under Section 21 of the Act with a view to launch a fishing and roving enquiry on the off chance of finding some escapement of tax. He must have in his possession some material pointing towards the escapement of turn over before he can entertain a belief about the escapement and can assume jurisdiction under section 21 of the Act and it is open to this Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution to scrutinize the material on record to ascertain the truth or otherwise of the challenge by the assesee of the existence of the belief on the part of officer on the escapement of turnover. 18. It is also notable that while issuing notices under section 21 of the Act on the assessing authority has not recorded any reasons for his satisfaction. The material on which the Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) Trade Tax formed its belief must be on record and those material should be relevant for forming the belief that the turnover had escaped assessment to tax. 19. In view of the foregoing discussions the impugned notices issued under section 21 of the U.P.Trade Tax Act as well as under Central Sales Tax Act cannot be sustained and are accordingly quashed. 20. In the result this petition succeeds and is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD. SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2349 of 2014 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH sd/ and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.J.THAKER sd/ =============================================
More informationA FORTNIGHTLY VAT/GST LAW REPORTER 2003 NTN 22)-7 [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT]
2003 (Vol. 22)-7 [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] Hon'ble Shyamal Kumar Sen, C.J. & Hon'ble R.K. Agrawal, J. Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 1338 OF 1991 M/s Mukund Lal Banarasi Lal vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax,
More informationCORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5848 of 2010 TO SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5850 of 2010 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI and HONOURABLE
More informationBombay High Court IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO OF 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2314 OF 2015 Nivi Trading Limited } A company incorporated under } the Companies Act, 1956 having } its office at
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD. SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No of CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD - Petitioner(s) Versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 15566 of 2011 CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD - Petitioner(s) Versus ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME- TAX(OSD) & 1 - Respondent(s) Appearance :
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ASN 1/15 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Nickunj Eximp Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Sir Joravar Bhavan. 93, Maharshi Karve Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400 020. PA
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH E : NEW DELHI VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER. ITA No.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH E : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.D.AGRAWAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.1116/Del/2011 Assessment Year : 2001-02 02 Income
More informationAkshar Builders and Developers. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax 28(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 14490 OF 2018 Akshar Builders and Developers.. Petitioner v/s. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax 28(1) Mumbai &
More informationA FORTNIGHTLY VAT/GST LAW REPORTER 2002 NTN
2002 (Vol.20)-385 [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] Hon'ble R.B. Misra, J. Trade Tax Revision No. 6 of 2002 M/s Jagannath Prasad Kailash Chandra Allahabad vs. The Commissioner of Trade Tax, U.P. Lucknow. Date of
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 13.05.2013 + W.P.(C) 8562/2007 & CM Nos. 16150/2007 & 17153/2007 MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD... Petitioner versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGNAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1017 OF 2011
PNP 1 WP1017-8.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGNAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1017 OF 2011 The Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd...Petitioner. versus The Assistant Commissioner
More informationBEFORE THE FULL BENCH: ODISHA SALES TAX TRIBUNAL: CUTTACK
BEFORE THE FULL BENCH: ODISHA SALES TAX TRIBUNAL: CUTTACK S.A. No. 253 (V) of 2013-14 (Arising out of the order of the learned JCST, Cuttack II Range, Cuttack, in First Appeal Case No. AA/37OVAT/CUII/2010-11,
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH B : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG,, JUDICIAL MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH B : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG,, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.4281/Del/2010 Assessment Year : 2001-02 02 Income
More informationCapgemini India Pvt. Ltd. } Petitioner versus Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax } Circle 14(1)(2), Mumbai and Ors. } Respondents
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 944 OF 2015 Capgemini India Pvt. Ltd. } Petitioner versus Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax } Circle
More informationNo reassessment on basis of info of DDIT (Investigation) that cash seized from director belonged to him
No reassessment on basis of info of DDIT (Investigation) that cash seized from director belonged to him Krown Agro Foods (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 5(1), New Delhi Judgement:
More informationARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR. TA No.1139 of 2010 (arising out of C.W.P. No.8469 of 2004) Versus
1 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR TA No.1139 of 2010 ( C.W.P. No.8469 of 2004) Kishan Singh Union of India & others For the petitioner For the Respondent(s) Versus : Mr.Arun
More informationLotus Impex. Commissioner, Department of Trade & Taxes, New Delhi and another
[2016] 89 VST 450 (Del) [IN THE DELHI HIGH COURT] Lotus Impex V. Commissioner, Department of Trade & Taxes, New Delhi and another DR. MURALIDHAR AND VIBHU BAKHRU S. JJ. February 19,2016 HF Assessee, including
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2017 VERSUS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.9365 OF 2017 VERSUS WITH
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.15613 OF 2017 M/S. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX APPEALS & ORS. WITH RESPONDENT(S)
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY. WRIT PETITION Nos OF 2015 AND
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 08 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2016 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.33089-33126 OF 2015 AND 4480-4489 BETWEEN: OF 2016
More informationHon'ble Prakash Krishna,J. Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. (Delivered by Prakash Krishna, J.)
RESERVED Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 1357 of 2012 Petitioner :- Vijay Prakash Agrawal And Others Respondent :- Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) And Another Petitioner Counsel :- Parv Agrawal,Shubham Agrawal
More information- 1 - W.P.Nos /2012
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BETWEEN: DATED THIS THE 11 TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH Writ Petition Nos.40885-886/2012 (T-RES) 1. MINDLOGICX INFOTECH
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO OF 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2502 OF 2015 M/s. Bayer Material Science Pvt Ltd Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax-10(3) and Others..Petitioner..Respondents
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: G NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G. D. AGRAWAL, PRESIDENT AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER
1 ITA Nos. 6675 & 6676/Del/2015 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: G NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G. D. AGRAWAL, PRESIDENT AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 6675/DEL/2015 ( A.Y 2013-14)
More informationARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 537 of Friday, this the 16 th day of November, 2018
1 RESERVED ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 537 of 2018 Friday, this the 16 th day of November, 2018 Hon ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon ble Air Marshal
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY WRIT PETITION NO.2468 OF 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2468 OF 2008 Cartini India Limited, ) (Formerly Godrej Appliances Ltd. ) Pirojshanagar, Vikhroli (East),
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. LPA No.101/2010 and LPA No.461/2010 & CM Appl. Nos /2010. Date of Hearing:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT LPA No.101/2010 and LPA No.461/2010 & CM Appl. Nos.11988-11989/2010 Date of Hearing: 27.02.2012 Date of Decision: 07.03.2012 1) LPA
More informationCIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 516-527 OF 2004 Brij Lal & Ors.... Appellants versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar... Respondents with Civil
More informationREVISIONAL APPLICATION NO ) & 122 OF 2011 M/S. KHADI GRAMODYOG DEVELOPMENT
ASSESSMENT Khadi & Village Industries benefit not granted after 1-4-06 - Decisions of Kishorekumar Prabhudas Tanna 23 VST 298 (Guj.) and Jan Seva Khadi Gramodyog (SCA No. 1863 of 2011) dt. 29-4-11 discussed
More informationNATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.91 of 2017
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.91 of 2017 (arising out of Order dated 04.05.2017 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, in C.P.
More informationPRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22 ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA STA Nos.2/2016 & 22-32/2016 C/w.
More informationNATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) No of 2018
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI IN THE MATTER OF: Ariizona Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Versus Union of India Present : Appellants Respondent For Appellants : Mr. Mihir Thakore, Senior
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Advocate. Versus
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1990/2010 PREM KUMAR Judgment delivered on:08 th February, 2016 Represented by: Advocate. Versus... Petitioner Mr. Yogesh Verma, CUSTOMS... Respondent
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: E : NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: E : NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2006-07 M/s. Ujagar Holdings Pvt. Ltd., 8-D,
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH H, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. G.C.GUPTA, V.P. AND SH. PRASHANT MAHARISHI, AM
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH H, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. G.C.GUPTA, V.P. AND SH. PRASHANT MAHARISHI, AM : Asstt. Year: 2008-09 Universal Product (P) Ltd., Dholki Mohalla, Sadar Meerut (APPELLANT)
More information[2014] CESTAT) CESTAT, NEW DELHI BENCH
Service Tax : Contention that 'assessee was not service-provider but was service-recipient' is not 'a piece of evidence', it is a 'pleading, a ground of appeal' and goes to root of jurisdiction; hence,
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7313/2010 Date of decision: December 08, 2011 RRB CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS PVT LTD... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.Krishnan with Mr. Nishank Singh,
More informationBEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL (WESTERN ZONE) BENCH, PUNE APPEAL No. 72/2013
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL (WESTERN ZONE) BENCH, PUNE APPEAL No. 72/2013 CORAM: Hon ble Shri Justice V.R. Kingaonkar (Judicial Member) Hon ble Dr. Ajay.A.Deshpande (Expert Member) B E T W E E N:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT. Reserved on: 19th March, Date of Decision: 25th April, 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3891/2013 SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT Reserved on: 19th March, 2014 Date of Decision: 25th April, 2014 SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD... Petitioner Through
More informationVersus P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR This writ application has been filed for the following. reliefs:
CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 33 of 1994 (R) In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ---- M/S Tata Engineering & Locomotive Company Limited,Singhbhum(East),
More information2 sake of congruence, brevity and convenience these are being disposed off by this common order. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that Lat
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JODHPUR BENCH: JODHPUR (BEFORE SHRI HARI OM MARATHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI N.K. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) ITA No. 228/Jodh/2014 [A.Y. 1998-1999] ITA No. 229/Jodh/2014
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18 th September, 2015 + W.P.(C) 110/2015 & CM No. 170/2015 M/S BLISS REFRIGERATION PVT. LTD.... Petitioner Through Mr.Sushant Kumar, Advocate
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 10 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NOS. 11535 37 OF 2013 (T-IT) BETWEEN: IBM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment Reserved on: 11 th December, 2015 Judgment Delivered on: 12 th May, 2016.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: 11 th December, 2015 Judgment Delivered on: 12 th May, 2016 + WP(C) 2526/2015 ALLIED STRIPS LIMITED... Petitioner versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: SWASTIK INDUSTRIAL POWERLINE LTD. versus COMMISSIONER TRADE & TAXES DELHI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 28.08.2015 + ST.APPL. 25/2013 SWASTIK INDUSTRIAL POWERLINE LTD versus COMMISSIONER TRADE & TAXES DELHI... Appellant... Respondent Advocates
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 4. + W.P.(C) 1358/2016 JAIN MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.... Petitioner Through: Mr Vinod Srivastava, Mr Ravi Chandhok and Ms Vertika Sharma, Advocates. versus
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD. SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No of 2011
SCA/17056/2011 7/7 JUDGMENT Print IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 17056 of 2011 With SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 17057 of 2011 With SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. ITA No.3209 of 2005 ITA No.3165 of ITA No.3209 of 2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE ITA No.3209 of 2005 ITA No.3165 of 2005 ITA No.3209 of 2005 1) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX C R BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE 2) JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA. Commissioner of Income tax (TDS), Chandigarh. Petitioner. Versus State Bank of Patiala Sectt.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA ITA No.17 of 2014 Date of Decision: 31.12.2014 Commissioner of Income tax (TDS), Chandigarh. Petitioner. Versus State Bank of Patiala Sectt. Shimla Coram: The
More informationCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (T) No.5523 of 2013 M/s. Amit Enterprises having its place of business at West Market Road, Upper Bazar, Ranchi through its proprietor Shri Amit Kejriwal
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER. ITA No-160/2005. Judgment reserved on: 12th March, 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER ITA No-160/2005 Judgment reserved on: 12th March, 2007 Judgment delivered on: 24th May, 2007 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-I, NEW DELHI...
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES : I : NEW DELHI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES : I : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, AM AND SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K. JM ITA No.282/Del/2012 Assessment Year : 2003-04 DCIT, Circle 11(1), Room No.312,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE PRESENT. THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE AND. STRP Nos OF 2013*
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 17 TH DAY OF JULY, 2014 PRESENT THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE N. KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE B. MANOHAR STRP Nos.774-794 OF 2013* BETWEEN: M/S
More informationBar & Bench ( IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: Coram
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.11.2017 Date of Reserving the Order Date of Pronouncing the Order 09.10.2017 13.11.2017 Coram The Hon'ble Mr.Justice T.S. SIVAGNANAM W.P.Nos.1589, 1590,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA ITA NO.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016 BETWEEN: PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA ITA NO.205 OF 2015 1.
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8273/2015 & CM No /2015 (for stay) versus
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 17. + W.P.(C) 8273/2015 & CM No. 17434/2015 (for stay) VIPIN WALIA... Petitioner Through: Mr. S. Krishnan, Advocate. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER... Respondent
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EXTRA ORDINARY CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EXTRA ORDINARY CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2015 IN THE MATTER OF: 1. Avinash Gupta, S/o Shri J.P Gupta, A-2/89, LGF, Safderjung Enclave,
More information[ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. PKB/AO 37/2011]
BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA [ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. PKB/AO 37/2011] UNDER SECTION 15-I OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 READ WITH RULE 5 OF
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX. Judgment reserved on : Judgment delivered on : ITA No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX Judgment reserved on : 08.09.2008 Judgment delivered on : 06.11.2008 ITA No. 428/2007 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-II... Appellant -versus-
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Present: The Hon ble Justice Arindam Sinha W.P. no. 457 of 2005 With W.P. no.458 of 2005 P & O Nedlloyd Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Assistant
More informationBEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 11 th DAY OF MARCH, 2013 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 16136 OF 2011 (T-IT) BETWEEN: M/S. UB GLOBAL CORPORATION
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction) IN APPEAL NO. OF IN THE MATTER OF: The Income-tax Act, 1961
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction) IN APPEAL NO. OF 2014 IN THE MATTER OF: The Income-tax Act, 1961 And IN THE MATTER OF: Section 260A of the Income-tax Act,
More informationREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF Tapan Kumar Dutta...
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2014 OF 2007 Tapan Kumar Dutta... Appellant(s) Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal... Respondent(s) J U
More informationIN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 485 of 2018
IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL [arising out of Order dated 6 th July, 2018 by National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench in C.P (IB) No. 35/CHD/HP/2018] IN THE MATTER OF : Lalan Kumar
More informationNATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) No.236 of 2018
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI [Arising out of orders dated 1 st June, 2018 passed by National Company Law Tribunal, Guwahati Bench, Guwahati in I.A. No.17 of 2018 in T.A. No.40 of 2016
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE Dated this the 20 th day of June, 2012 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE D V SHYLENDRA KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE B MANOHAR Between: Sales Tax Revision
More informationCentral Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi. OA No.571/2017
Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi OA No.571/2017 Hon ble Mr. K.N. Shrivastava, Member (A) Order Reserved on: 13.02.2018 Pronounced on:17.04.2018 G.C. Yadav, S/o late Kamal Singh
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6732/2015 T.T. LTD. Versus Through: Date of Decision: 7 th January, 2016... Petitioner Ms.Shilpi Jain Sharma, Adv. UNION OF INDIA & ANR... Respondents
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22 nd DAY OF APRIL 2015 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA WRIT APPEAL NO.4900/2011 & WRIT APPEAL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION No OF 2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 3314 OF 2004 wp-3314-2004.sxw M/s. Eskay K'n' IT (India) Ltd... Petitioner. V/s. Dy. Commissioner of Income
More informationKhandelwal Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax 6(3)(2), Mumbai & Ors... Respondents. DATED : 17 th MARCH, 2016.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 710 OF 2016 Khandelwal Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. v/s... Petitioner Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax 6(3)(2),
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL. W.P.No.4857/2013 (SC/ST)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL W.P.No.4857/2013 (SC/ST) BETWEEN SHRI R VAMSIDHAR S/O SHIR RAMACHANDRA NAIDU
More information2 5. STATE TAX OFFICER, ANTI EVASION-I, BHIWADI, DIVISION- ALWAR RAJASTHAN RESPONDENTS. IN THE MATTER OF PROTECTION, REMEDY, REDRESS UNDER ARTICLE 226
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. /2018 SHAN MOHAMMAD S/O. FAUJDAR VILLAGE POST- PURE, AMIYA, TILOI, RAEBARELI (U.P.) PETITIONER. Versus
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH B BENCH BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI RAJENDRA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH B BENCH BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI RAJENDRA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Assessment Year: 1999-2000 Bennett Coleman & Co.Ltd., The Times
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Print SCA/15836/2010 25/25 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 15836 of 2010 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI & HONOURABLE MS
More information13 TH NANI PALKHIVALA MEMORIAL NATIONAL TAX MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2017 MOOT PROPOSITION
MOOT PROPOSITION In the year 2002, State X imposed Entry Tax vide TAX ON ENTRY OF GOODS INTO LOCAL AREA ACT, 2002 (known as the 2002 Act ). However, the High Court struck down the Act as being non-compensatory
More informationCase No. 129 of Shri V.P. Raja, Chairman Shri Vijay L. Sonavane, Member
Before the MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION World Trade Centre, Centre No.1, 13th Floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai 400 005 Tel. 022 22163964/65/69 Fax 22163976 Email: mercindia@mercindia.org.in
More information2010 NTN 43) - 55 [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT]
2010 NTN (Vol. 43) - 55 [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] Hon ble Rajes Kumar & Hon ble Pankaj Mithal, JJ. Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 1410 of 2007 M/s Asian P.P.G. Industries Ltd., B-7, Meerut Road, Industrial
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH G, NEW DELHI)
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH G, NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI J. S. REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI A. T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No.1423 /Del/2013 Assessment year : 2008-09 Simran
More informationPetition No. 816 of 2012
Petition No. 816 of 2012 BEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION LUCKNOW Date of Order : 16.07.2015 PRESENT: 1. Hon ble Sri Desh Deepak Verma, Chairman 2. Hon ble Smt. Meenakshi Singh,
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE A BENCH, BANGALORE
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE A BENCH, BANGALORE BEFORE SMT P.MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ABRAHAM P GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.220 & 1043(BNG.)/2013 (Assessment year
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 28.11.2011 + ITA 938/2011 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX... Appellant versus AMADEUS INDIA PVT LTD... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA 605/2012. CIT... Appellant. Through: Mr Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA 605/2012 CIT... Appellant Through: Mr Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT LTD... Respondent Through: Mr Rajat Navet
More informationMs. PAURAMI B SHETH, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 2. ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6726 of 2013 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH and HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI VAGHJIBHAI S BISHNOI...Petitioner(s) Versus INCOME
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : FINANCE ACT, 1994 Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 4456/2012 & C.M.No.9237/2012( for stay)
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : FINANCE ACT, 1994 Judgment delivered on: 01.02.2013 W.P.(C) 4456/2012 & C.M.No.9237/2012( for stay) DELHI CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS SOCIETY (REGD.)...Petitioner
More informationNATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI Company Appeal (AT) No. 421 of M/s. Manila Resorts Pvt. Ltd.
IN THE MATTER OF: NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI M/s. Manila Resorts Pvt. Ltd. Appellant Versus BAHL Paper Mills Ltd. & Ors. Present: For Appellant : Respondents Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra and
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCHE A, PUNE BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI R.S. PADVEKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCHE A, PUNE BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI R.S. PADVEKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER M/s Malpani Estates, S.No.150, Malpani House, Indira Gandhi Marg,
More informationARDEE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD... Appellant Through: Mr.Anil Kr.Mishra, Advocate alongwith Mr.Saurabh Mishra, Advocate. versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Arbitration and Conciliation Act ARB.A. 21/2014 Judgment reserved on: 01.12.2014 Judgment pronounced on: 09.12.2014 ARDEE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.... Appellant
More informationMeta Plast Engineering P. Ltd. vs Income-tax Officer. Appellant by: Shri P.C. Yadav Respondent by: Shri S.R. Senapati, Sr. DR
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH C NEW DLEHI BEFORE SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No.5780/Del/2014 Assessment Year: 2004-05
More information2011 NTN (Vol. 45)-81 [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] Hon ble Yatindra Singh and Hon ble Prakash Krishna,JJ. WRIT TAX No to 61 of 2007 Manohar Lal Hira
2011 NTN (Vol. 45)-81 [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] Hon ble Yatindra Singh and Hon ble Prakash Krishna,JJ. WRIT TAX No. - 358 to 61 of 2007 Manohar Lal Hira Lal Ltd. vs. State Of U.P. & Others Date of Decision
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 03
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 18.12.2015 + ITA 719/2015 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -03 + ITA 728/2015 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -03 + ITA 730/2015 PR. COMMISSIONER
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH B, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI. A. K. GARODIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBE
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH B, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI. A. K. GARODIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.195/LKW/2011 Assessment Year:2006-07 Income
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT R A N C H I ---- Tax Appeal No. 04 of I.T.O., Ward NO.1, Ranchi. Appellant. Versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT R A N C H I ---- Tax Appeal No. 04 of 1999 ---- I.T.O., Ward NO.1, Ranchi. Appellant. Versus Shri Jay Poddar Respondent. ---- CORAM : HON BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON BLE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE 18 TH DAY OF MARCH 2015 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA WRIT APPEAL NOS. 989-1009/2015 (T-RES)
More informationAdditional Pension on the basis of Contribution over and above Wage Limit of either Rs.5,000/- or Rs.6,500/- per Month.
CIRCULAR No.02/2019 To All Members of the Association Off : 26613091 / 26607167 42103360 / 26761877 Email : kea@kea.co.in Web : www.kea.co.in KARNATAKA EMPLOYERS' ASSOCIATION NO.74, 2 nd FLOOR, SHANKARA
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ASHWANI TANEJA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ASHWANI TANEJA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2005-06 DCIT, Cir. 6(1), R.No.506, 5 th
More informationAt the time of Sec. 80G approval object of trust needs to be examined without considering application of income
At the time of Sec. 80G approval object of trust needs to be examined without considering application of income Citation: Commissioner of Income-tax, Rajkot-III v. Vipassana Trust Court: HIGH COURT OF
More information/TRUE COPY/ PS TO JUDGE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JULY 2015/12TH ASHADHA, 1937 ITA.No. 278 of
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR. ITA No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF MARCH, 2015 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR ITA No.483/2007 BETWEEN: 1. The
More informationCase No. 113 of Shri V. P. Raja, Chairman Shri Vijay L. Sonavane, Member
Before the MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION World Trade Centre, Centre No.1, 13 th Floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai 400005. Tel. 022 22163964/65/69 Fax 22163976 Email: mercindia@mercindia.org.in
More informationBEFORE THE CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM B.E.S. & T. UNDERTAKING. Representation No. S-D dt. 27/10/2009
BEFORE THE CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM B.E.S. & T. UNDERTAKING (Constituted under section 42(5) of Electricity Act 2003) Ground Floor, Multistoried Annex Building, BEST s Colaba Depot Colaba, Mumbai
More information