INTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update
|
|
- Phillip Douglas
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CA Tarunkumar Singhal & Sunil Moti Lala, Advocate INTERNATIONAL TAXATION A. SUPREME COURT RULINGS 1. Where the transfer pricing addition made in the final assessment order pursuant to original assessment proceedings was set aside to the Assessing Officer to consider fresh evidence filed by the assessee, the Assessing Officer was obligated to first pass a draft assessment order under Section 144C of the Act prior to passing a final assessment order, failing which the final assessment order under Sections 143(3)/254 read with Section 144C(13) of the Act and consequential demand notice issued under Section 156 of the Act are liable to be set aside / quashed DCIT vs. Control Risks India Pvt. Ltd. TS-170- SC-2018-TP Special Leave Petition 7090 / The assessee was engaged in the business of providing consultancy services. For the year under review i.e. AY , the Assessing Officer passed a draft assessment order proposing a transfer adjustment as well as an adjustment on account of disallowance of interest paid on late deposit of TDS, which was 130 confirmed by the DRP, pursuant to which the Assessing Officer passed a final assessment order under Section 143(3) read with Section 144C of the Act. 2. Aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before the Hon ble Tribunal and filed certain fresh evidences, pursuant to which the Tribunal remitted the matter to the TPO to consider the additional details filed by the assessee and to pass a speaking order upon such consideration. 3. The TPO undertook a fresh benchmarking analysis and proposed an adjustment to the arm's length price determined by the assessee. 4. Thereafter, instead of passing a draft assessment order, the Assessing Officer passed a final assessment order under Sections 143(3) / 254 read with Section 144C and also issued a consequential notice of demand under Section 156 of the Act. 5. Aggrieved, the assessee filed a Writ Petition before the Hon ble Delhi High Court. The Hon ble High Court observed that it was incumbent on the Assessing Officer to pass a draft assessment order under Section 144C of the Act prior to passing a final assessment order. Noting that by directly passing a final assessment order, the Assessing Officer had denied the assessee of an opportunity of approaching the DRP and relying on the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench in Turner International ML-504
2 India Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT (2017) 82 taxmann.com 125 (Del.) set aside the assessment order and quashed the notice of demand. 6. Aggrieved, the Revenue filed an SLP before the Hon ble Apex Court. The Hon ble Apex Court dismissed the Revenue s SLP. B. AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS 2. Non-resident availing the benefit of the first proviso to Section 48 was entitled to the benefit of lower tax rate of 10 per cent under the first proviso to Section 112 of the Act Finnish Fund for Industrial Cooperation Ltd. TS- 110-AAR-2018 AAR No of The Applicant, a company registered in Finland was a non-resident under the provisions of the Act. It was a development finance company and provided long-term risk capital for private projects. It did not actively trade in stocks of Indian companies but pursued a longterm growth oriented strategy. It had acquired 21,25,005 shares of Andhra Pradesh Power Paper Mills Ltd. ( APPML ), a listed company and subsequently sold the shares either on the stock exchange or pursuant to an open offer from a company named IP Holdings as a result of which it earned long term capital gains of ` crore. The Applicant filed an application under Section 197 of the Act for determining the rate of tax to be withheld on the impugned capital gains and pursuant to the order of the Assessing Officer, IP Holdings withheld tax at per cent on such long term capital gains. 2. The Applicant raised the following question before the AAR: Whether the tax on the long term capital gains earned by the Applicant on sale of shares of ML-505 Andhra Pradesh Paper Mills Ltd. an Indian listed company, pursuant to an open offer, is required to be computed at % as per the proviso to Section 112(1)? 1. The AAR dismissed the contention of the Revenue that since the assessee was a nonresident, the first proviso to Section 48 of the Act would apply and consequently the second proviso to Section 48 (providing for the benefit of indexation) would not apply and therefore the non-resident was liable to tax at per cent and the benefit of the first proviso to Section 112(1) would not apply. 2. The AAR accepted the contention of the Applicant that the entire issue was squarely covered by the decision of the High Court in Cairn UK Holdings vs. DIT [359 ITR 268] wherein it was held that as per a literal interpretation, the proviso to Section 112(1) of the Act does not state that a person availing the benefit of the first proviso (as so in the Applicant s case) was not entitled to avail the benefit of lower 10 per cent under Section 112 of the Act. Accordingly, it held that the long term capital gains on sale of shares to APPML under the open offer would be taxable at the rate % (inclusive of surcharge and cess) under the proviso to Section 112(1) of the Act. C. HIGH COURT 3. The Court upheld Tribunal s order excluding 6 companies from the list of comparables on account of high brand value, functional difference and inadequate segmental results Pr CIT vs. Evalueserve SEZ Pvt. Ltd. TS-125-HC- 2018(DEL)-TP ITA No. 241 / 2018 Delhi High Court 1. The assessee was engaged in the business of providing IT enabled services i.e. provision 131
3 of business information, market research and intellectual property research to its AEs and benchmarked its international transactions under TNMM. 2. The TPO conducted the exercise of determination of ALP afresh and arrived at 10 comparables. 3. Aggrieved with the inclusion of 6 of the comparables viz. TCS E-Serve Ltd., TCS-E Service International Ltd., Infosys BPO Ltd., Accentia Technologies Ltd., ICRA Techno Analysis Ltd. and Eclerx Services, the assessee filed objections before the Hon ble DRP. The DRP rejected the assessee s contentions and confirmed the draft assessment order. 4. The Tribunal accepted the assessee s plea and directed the exclusion of the six comparables. 5. Aggrieved, the Revenue filed an appeal before the Hon ble Court. 1. Vis-à-vis the Tribunal s exclusion of TCS E-Serve Ltd., TCS E-Serve International Ltd. and Infosys BPO Ltd., the Court following the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench in Pr CIT vs. BC Management Services Pvt. Ltd. 89 taxmann. com 68 (Del.) held that the Tribunal had correctly excluded the said companies as these entities had a high brand value as compared to the assessee and were therefore able to command greater profits and also since they operated on economic upscale. 2. As regards Accentia Technologies Ltd. it held that the Tribunal had rightly excluded the said company as comparable as it was engaged in providing various activities and did not have adequate segmental results. 3. Further, it upheld the exclusion of ICRA Techno Analysis observing that the company was functionally dissimilar to the assessee it was engaged in providing business intelligence, software development, consultancy services, engineering services, web development and 132 hosting services and did not have adequate segmental results. 4. It held that Eclerx was also rightly excluded by the Tribunal as it performed KPO services whereas the assessee was a BPO. 5. Observing that no substantial question of law arose, it dismissed the Revenue s appeal. 4. Infosys BPO Ltd. could not be considered as comparable owing to its huge brand value. R Systems Ltd. could not be excluded merely because it followed a different financial year ending where the results of the relevant financial year could be reasonably extrapolated from the data available on record Pr CIT vs. MMTC Ltd. TS-135-HC-2018(DEL)-TP - ITA No. 260 / 2018 Delhi High Court 1. The assessee was engaged in the business of providing ITES and benchmarked its transactions under TNMM. The TPO carried out his own search and included various comparables out which the assessee was aggrieved with the inclusion of three comparables i.e. TCS E Serve Ltd., Infosys BPO Ltd. and Excel Infoways Ltd. The TPO also excluded R Systems as comparable 2. On appeal, the Tribunal accepted the plea of the assessee and directed exclusion of the three companies and the inclusion of R Systems. 3. Aggrieved, the Revenue filed an appeal before the Hon ble Court 1. Vis-à-vis the exclusion of Infosys BPO and the inclusion of R Systems, the High Court held that no substantial question of law arose. Relying on the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench ML-506
4 in Baxter India Pvt. Ltd. ITA 408/2017, it held that Infosys BPO was rightly excluded as it had huge brand value. As regards R System, the Court relying on its decision in CIT vs. McKinsey Knowledge Centre Pvt. Ltd. ITA 217 / 2014 held that the company could not be excluded merely on account of different financial year ending where the financial data for the year could be reasonably extrapolated from the data available on record. Accordingly, it dismissed the appeal of the Revenue. 2. It admitted the Revenue s appeal vis-à-vis the Tribunal s exclusion of TCS E Serve Ltd. and Excel Infoways. D. TRIBUNAL DECISIONS 5. As per Article 5(5) for determining the independence of an agent one should only look at the whether the agent has only one principal for whom it works for exclusively and the fact that the principal has only agent in India would not be relevant ADIT (IT) vs. Bay Lines (Mauritius) (2018) 91 taxmann.com 110 (Mum.-Trib.) ITA No / Mum. / The assessee, a shipping company incorporated in Mauritius claimed 100 per cent relief under Article 8 of the India-Mauritius DTAA, in support of which it furnished a Tax Residency Certificate issued by the authorities of Mauritius. 2. The Assessing Officer denied the assessee relief under Article 8 observing that the place of effective management was in the UAE and not in either India or Mauritius and therefore the provisions of the India-Mauritius DTAA would not be available to the assessee. The AO noted that i) two of the assessee s directors who took majority of the decisions were situated in UAE, ii) the main agent of the assessee in India was appointed on the letter head of the assessee at UAE and iii) the letter to the AO by the assessee also originated from UAE, Dubai. Accordingly, it held that the place of effective management of the assessee was in the UAE and therefore was not eligible to the India-Mauritius DTAA. Further, the AO noted that the assessee had an agent in India viz. FCIPL which was doing all the work in all the Indian ports and habitually concluded contracts on behalf of the assessee and therefore held that the assessee had a Dependent Agent Permanent establishment in India. 3. On appeal to the CIT(A), the CIT(A) upheld the AO s findings vis-à-vis the nonavailability of deduction under Article 8 of the DTAA. However, it held that the AO erred in holding that the assessee had a DAPE in India and observed that FCIPL only earned per cent of its total commission from the assessee whereas per cent of the commission earned by it was from other parties which proved that FCIPL was not the exclusive agent of the assessee. Accordingly, it held that the assessee was not liable to tax in India. 4. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the Revenue filed appeals before the Hon ble Tribunal 1. Vis-à-vis the existence of DAPE, the Tribunal, relying on the decision of the Bombay High Court in DIT vs. B4U International Holdings Ltd. 374 ITR 453 (Bom.), dismissed the contention of the Revenue that since the assessee had only one agent in India viz. FCIPL, FCIPL constituted a DAPE of the assessee and held that as per Article 5(5) for determining the independence of an agent one should only look at the whether the agent has only one principal for whom it works for exclusively and the fact that the principal has only agent in India would not be relevant. 2. Vis-à-vis the applicability of Article 8 of the DTAA, the Tribunal dismissed the contention of the assessee that the effective place of management could only be in one of the two contracting States and relying on the ML
5 commentary of Dr. Klaus Vogel held that where the effective place of management was not in either of the contracting States, the benefit of Article 8 of the DTAA could not be extended to the assessee. 6. Opportunity of hearing before referring the matter to TPO was to be read into Sec. 92CA(1) where the very jurisdiction to tax under Chapter X was challenged by the assessee Omni Active Health Technologies Ltd. vs. DCIT TS 146- ITAT-2018 (Mum.) TP - ITA No. 638 / The assessee, Omni Active Health Technologies Ltd. was engaged in the manufacture and supply of natural ingredient products to its AE. Occasionally, it also sourced raw material from third parties based in USA. Since its AE was situated in the USA, such sourcing was done via AE and who charged the assessee on cost-to-cost basis. During the year the assessee imported raw material via its AE amounting to only ` 1.03 crore and finished goods of ` 7.56 lakh which was miniscule as compared to overall volume of assessee s business. Thus, both its international transactions i.e. export of goods to AE as well as import of materials from AE were clubbed together and benchmarked under Transitional Net Margin Method (TNMM). 2. The TPO inferred that the assessee sold the goods at a much lower rate to the AE visa-vis non-ae entities. Accordingly, rejecting the application of TNMM (even though it was followed and accepted by the Revenue in the prior years), the TPO applied CUP method as MAM and proposed an adjustment of ` crore, which was confirmed by the DRP. 3. Aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before the Hon ble Tribunal. Further, it raised an additional ground that that AO s action of 134 making reference to TPO without giving any opportunity of being heard to the assessee, was in violation of the provisions of Sec. 92CA of the Act and thus the reference and order ought to have been quashed. 1. The Tribunal observed that in the decision of the Bombay High Court in Vodafone India Services P. Ltd. [TS-320-HC-2013(BOM)-TP], the Court had held that the grant of opportunity of hearing before referring the matter to TPO was to be read into Sec. 92CA(1) where the very jurisdiction to tax under Chapter X was challenged by the assessee and that where no objection was raised by the assessee to the applicability under Chapter X, then the prima facie view of the AO would be sufficient before referring the matter to the TPO for ALP determination. Further, it also referred to CBDT Instruction No. 15 of 2015 which enumerated 3 situations, where the AO must, as a jurisdictional requirement, record his satisfaction that there was an income or potential of an income arising and/or being affected on determination of the ALP of an international transaction before he proceeded to determine the ALP. Noting that the assessee neither challenged the applicability of Chapter X nor contended that the AO had not recorded requisite satisfaction, the Tribunal dismissed the assessee s additional ground of appeal. 2. Vis-à-vis the merits of the case, the Tribunal held that the TPO had rejected the consistently applied TNMM method without bringing on record any cogent reason. It held that Section 92C did not provide for an order of preference of method for determining arm s length price and therefore considering that the TNMM method was accepted to be the MAM in the past, there was no justification in applying CUP for the year under review. Noting that the PLI of the assessee came to 15.21% which was higher than the PLI of the 2 comparable companies, the Tribunal deleted the TP adjustment. 2 ML-508
INTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update
CA Tarunkumar Singhal & Sunil Moti Lala, Advocate A. HIGH COURT 1. The Court confirmed Tribunal s Order holding that the commission payments made to Indian agent of non-resident in India was taxable in
More informationINTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update
Advocate INTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update A] HIGH COURT JUDGMENTS I. ALP of interest on amounts advanced to German AE was to be determined based on EURIBOR rate of interest and not the lending rate
More informationINTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update
Advocate INTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update A. SUPREME COURT 1) Apex Court admits SLP on whether for computing arm s length price only the value of international transactions and not the assessee s
More informationINTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update
CA Tarunkumar Singhal & Sunil Moti Lala, Advocate HIGH COURT therefore that the TPO erred in considering the excess expenditure beyond the Bright Line as an international transaction. Accordingly, the
More informationINTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update
Advocate INTERNATIONAL TAXATION A. HIGH COURT 1. The Court deleted the disallowance of technical knowhow fees paid in respect of services unavailed by the assessee by relying on its earlier year judgment
More informationLandmark Decisions on Transfer Pricing
Landmark Decisions on Transfer Pricing CITC Amol Tibrewal Vispi T. Patel & Associates 11 April 2014 Global Vantedge - Delhi Tribunal (ITA No 2763 & 2764/DEL/2009) Facts of the case Assessee provided IteS
More informationINDIA TRANSFER PRICING UPDATES MARCH 2019
Uday Ved Global Tax Partner INDIA TRANSFER PRICING UPDATES MARCH 2019 KNAV Thought Leadership has started an initiative to publish a monthly newsletter dedicated to transfer pricing updates and amendments
More informationITAT Bengaluru reaffirms payment for Adwords program as royalty in case of Google India* Global Business Tax Alert Sharp Insights
India Tax & Regulatory For private circulation only 17 May 2018 p Global Business Tax Alert Sharp Insights ITAT Bengaluru reaffirms payment for Adwords program as royalty in case of Google India* *[2018]
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 9. + W.P.(C) 6422/2013 & CM No.14002/2013 (Stay) versus. With W.P.(C) 4558/2014.
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 9. + W.P.(C) 6422/2013 & CM No.14002/2013 (Stay) INDORAMA SYNTHETICS (INDIA) LTD.... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha
More informationDIRECT TAX UPDATE MARCH, Print SUMMARY OF JUDGEMENTS. Transfer pricing and International taxation issues
Print MARCH, 2015 DIRECT TAX UPDATE SUMMARY OF JUDGEMENTS Transfer pricing and International taxation issues KNAV is a firm of International Accountants, Tax and Business Advisors. Presence in INDIA USA
More informationThe latest guidelines from the ICAI reaffirm specific responsibilities on various stakeholders of Indian companies
Page 1 The latest guidelines from the ICAI reaffirm specific responsibilities on various stakeholders of Indian companies India tax newsletter October, 2016 In this edition of our thought leadership publication,
More informationLoreal India P. Ltd, Mumbai vs Department Of Income Tax on 12 April, 2012
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Loreal India P. Ltd, Mumbai vs Department Of Income Tax on 12 April, 2012 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH 'L' BENCH BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL
More informationFacts of the case: Tribunal's decision:
March 2014 1. Transfer Pricing DIRECT TAX UPDATE a. Case law - Panasonic AVC Networks India Co. Limited [ITA No. 4620/Del/2011] KNAV is a firm of International Accountants, Tax and Business Advisors. Presence
More informationINTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update
Advocate INTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update A. AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS 1) Payment of Penalty to the US Government is not liable to deduction of tax at source under section 195 of the Income-tax
More informationUday Ved Global tax partner INDIA TAX DECEMBER 2018
Uday Ved Global tax partner INDIA TAX DECEMBER 2018 In this edition of our thought leadership publication, we have tracked the progress of some significant cases decided by the appellate forums across
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA 607/2015. versus AND ITA 608/2015. versus
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 12. + ITA 607/2015 PR. COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX... Appellant Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Senior Standing counsel with Mr. Raghvendra Singh and Mr.Shikhar Garg,
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: G NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G. D. AGRAWAL, PRESIDENT AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER
1 ITA Nos. 6675 & 6676/Del/2015 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: G NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G. D. AGRAWAL, PRESIDENT AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 6675/DEL/2015 ( A.Y 2013-14)
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ASHWANI TANEJA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ASHWANI TANEJA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2005-06 DCIT, Cir. 6(1), R.No.506, 5 th
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: E : NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: E : NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2006-07 M/s. Ujagar Holdings Pvt. Ltd., 8-D,
More informationDispute Resolution, Legal Remedies available against GAAR proceedings
Sunil Moti Lala, Advocate Dispute Resolution, Legal Remedies available against GAAR proceedings 1. Introduction and would need to seek suitable redressals. General Anti Avoidance Rule ( GAAR ) Keeping
More informationIN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH G MUMBAI. BEFORE SH. A.D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. RAJENDRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH G MUMBAI. BEFORE SH. A.D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. RAJENDRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.5335/M/2014 Assessment Year: 2007-08 PAN : AABCA8679F Dy. Commr.
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES : I : NEW DELHI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES : I : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, AM AND SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K. JM ITA No.282/Del/2012 Assessment Year : 2003-04 DCIT, Circle 11(1), Room No.312,
More informationITA No.1495/Hyd/10 Four soft Limited, Hyd. ============================
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD A BENCH, HYDERABAD Before Shri. G.C. Gupta, Vice President and Shri. Akber Basha, Accountant Member ITA No. 1495/HYD/2010 (Assessment year 2006-07) M/s. Four
More informationThe latest guidelines from the ICAI reaffirm specific responsibilities on various stakeholders of Indian companies
Page 1 The latest guidelines from the ICAI reaffirm specific responsibilities on various stakeholders of Indian companies India tax newsletter September, 2016 In this edition of our thought leadership
More informationBefore Sh. N. K. Saini, AM And Sh. Kuldip Singh, JM
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH A, NEW DELHI Before Sh. N. K. Saini, AM And Sh. Kuldip Singh, JM ITA No. 4052/Del./2015 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Signature Towers, 11 th Floor Tower-B, South
More informationMay WHAT'S INSIDE... Direct Tax Transfer Pricing Indirect Tax
May 01-15 WHAT'S INSIDE... Direct Tax Transfer Pricing Indirect Tax What s inside DIRECT TAX 1. Stock Appreciation Rights taxable as perquisites, even if received from parent company 2. Offshore supply
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH B BENCH BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI RAJENDRA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH B BENCH BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI RAJENDRA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Assessment Year: 1999-2000 Bennett Coleman & Co.Ltd., The Times
More informationINTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update
Advocate INTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update A. AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS ('AAR') 1) Settlement amount received by FIIs in lieu of right to sue was a capital receipt and in the absence of the cost
More informationDIRECT TAXES Tribunal
Jitendra singh & sameer dalal Advocates DIRECT TAXES Tribunal REPORTED 1. TDS under section 194I provision for rent vis-à-vis actual payment assessee making provisions for disputed rent payable to landlord
More informationAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Celerity Power LLP [2018] 100 taxmann.com 129 (Mum ITAT)
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Celerity Power LLP [2018] 100 taxmann.com 129 (Mum ITAT) No taxable capital gains arises on conversion of a private company into LLP at book-value, notwithstanding
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH B BEFORE SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI N V VASUDEVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER
Page 1 of 13 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH B BEFORE SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI N V VASUDEVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER (Asst. year 2005-06) M/s Synopsys International
More informationCommissioner of Income Tax Appellant. Versus. M/s. Global Appliances Inc. USA Respondent
11 TH NANI PALKHIVALA MEMORIAL NATIONAL TAX MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction) IN APPEAL NO. OF 2014 IN THE MATTER OF: The Income-tax
More informationTax Bulletin. Vispi T. Patel & Associates. Chartered Accountants. #10, 3rd Floor, Dwarka Ashish Apartment,
Tax Bulletin Vispi T. Patel & Associates Chartered Accountants #10, 3rd Floor, Dwarka Ashish Apartment, Jambul Wadi, Opp. Edward Cinema, Kalbadevi Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400 002 Email ID: vispitpatel@vispitpatel.com
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI BEFORE SHRI N.S. SAINI, HON BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, HON BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER (Asst. Year : 2009-10) DCIT, Circle-1(1), Panaji.
More informationCORPORATE UPDATE IN THIS ISSUE DIRECT TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION TRANSFER PRICING DOMESTIC TAXATION. September, 2018
CORPORATE UPDATE DIRECT TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION I. High Court upholds grossing up for withholding tax purpose where taxes are borne by customer on fees for technical services paid to non-resident even
More informationdirect TaXES High Court
ashok Patil, Mandar Vaidya & Priti Shukla Advocates direct TaXES High Court Reported 1. Power of Commissioner appeals Sec. 112(1) Legal issue raised for first time during appeal proceedings Held that Commissioner
More informationTax - Heads Up. 07 March Contents Page Judicial Updates 2-6 Other Updates 7
Tax - Heads Up 07 March 2014 Contents Page Judicial Updates 2-6 Other Updates 7 1 Virola International ITAT Agra Context: Under the Indian tax laws, certain specified business expenditures including all
More information(ASSESSMENT YEAR ) Whirlpool of India Ltd. Vs. DCIT Whirlpool House, Plot No.40,
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: I NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R. S. SYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI C. M. GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2008-09) Whirlpool of India Ltd. Vs. DCIT Whirlpool
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH H : NEW DELHI VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH H : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.D.AGRAWAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.1580/Del/2010 Assessment Year : 2004-05 05 M/s
More informationTRANSFER PRICING INDIA TAX
Kartik Mehta Senior Manager & Practice Leader, India Direct Tax INDIA TAX July 2018 In this edition of our thought leadership publication, we have tracked the progress of some significant cases decided
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL H BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ब म/
आयकर अप ल य अध करण H न य यप ठ म बई म IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL H BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अप ल स./ (न रण वर / Assessment
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH F, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH F, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARSD 15(3), NEW DELHI ROOM NO.
More informationGovernment Law College, Mumbai
Government Law College, Mumbai 10 th Nani Palkhivala National Tax Moot Court Competition 2013 3 rd 5 th October, 2013 In association with ITAT Bar Association Mumbai All India Federation of Tax Practitioners
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH B, HYDERABAD
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH B, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI P.MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 503/Hyd/2012 Assessment Year: 2008-09,
More informationMay WHAT'S INSIDE... Direct Tax Transfer Pricing Indirect Tax
May 16-31 WHAT'S INSIDE... Direct Tax Transfer Pricing Indirect Tax What s inside DIRECT TAX 1. Interest on refund under 244A not taxable as per Indo-Italy DTAA 2. Indian subsidiary will not constitute
More informationCORPORATE UPDATE 10/2018
CORPORATE UPDATE 10/2018 DIRECT TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION I. Tax Tribunal upholds application of provision of the domestic taxation law for one source of income and tax treaty for the other source. (Dimension
More informationINDIA TAX TRANSFER PRICING
Kartik Mehta Senior Manager & Practice Leader, India Direct Tax INDIA TAX May-June, 2018 In this edition of our thought leadership publication, we have tracked the progress of some significant cases decided
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH A, HYDERABAD
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH A, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 842/HYD/2012 Assessment Year: 2007-08,
More informationControversies surrounding Section 14A of the Income Tax Act
Controversies surrounding Section 14A of the Income Tax Act CA Vivek Newatia vnewatia@sjaykishan.com CA Puja Borar pujaborar@sjaykishan.com Background and Rationale for introduction Section 14A introduced
More informationKey Transfer Pricing Rulings
Key Transfer Pricing Rulings 8 Sept 2017 - Prasad Pardiwala Presenters : Rahul & Pranav Case Law - 1 Instrumenterium Special bench on Base Erosion Facts/ Issue: The taxpayer advanced an interest free loan
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH : BANGALORE. BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER and SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER and SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.726/Bang/2014 (Assessment year: 2005-06) M/s.B & B Infotech
More informationCORPORATE UPDATE DIRECT TAX IN THIS ISSUE INTERNATIONAL TAXATION TRANSFER PRICING. Page 1 of 7 DIRECT TAX
Tel. 91-11-47102200 www.mpco.in August 2017 CORPORATE UPDATE DIRECT TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION I. No capital gains on the sale of shares deriving its value from immovable property to Netherlands entity
More informationIndia s High Court of Delhi rules on transfer pricing aspects of intra-group service transactions
30 May 2014 Global Tax Alert News from Transfer Pricing EY Global Tax Alert Library Access both online and pdf versions of all EY Global Tax Alerts. Copy into your web browser: http://www.ey.com/gl/en/
More informationDIRECT TAX UPDATE JULY, SUMMARY OF JUDGEMENTS KNAV is a firm of International Accountants, Tax and Business Advisors. Domestic case laws:
JULY, 2015 DIRECT TAX UPDATE SUMMARY OF JUDGEMENTS KNAV is a firm of International Accountants, Tax and Business Advisors. Presence in INDIA USA UK FRANCE NETHERLANDS SWITZERLAND CANADA E: admin@knavcpa.com
More informationRecent Important Decisions on International Tax in India. BY- Mr. Salil Kapoor, Advocate.
Recent Important Decisions on International Tax in India BY- Mr. Salil Kapoor, Advocate. 1 DIT v. OHM Ltd. Citation- (2013) 352 ITR 406 (Delhi HC) Issue- interpretation of the amendment in proviso to S.
More informationC.R. Building, I.P. Estate
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: D NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R. P. TOLANI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI J. S. REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 364/Del/2012 Assessment Years: 2008-09 ACIT Vs.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT. Reserved on: 19th March, Date of Decision: 25th April, 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3891/2013 SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT Reserved on: 19th March, 2014 Date of Decision: 25th April, 2014 SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD... Petitioner Through
More informationDIRECT TAX REVIEW VERENDRA KALRA & CO OCTOBER Inside this edition. Like always, Like never before
VERENDRA KALRA & CO CHARTERED A CCOUNTANTS Like always, Like never before DIRECT TAX REVIEW OCTOBER 2018 Inside this edition AO's order rejecting ITR without providing opportunity to rectify defect u/s
More informationCA SHARAD A SHAH. 21/06/2014 DTRC - Pune WIRC
CA SHARAD A SHAH 21/06/2014 DTRC - Pune WIRC-2014 1 Relevant Part of Section 271 (1) If the Assessing Officer] or the [Commissioner (Appeals)][or the Commissioner] in the course of any proceedings under
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGRA BENCH, AGRA. ITA No.450/Ag/2015 Assessment Year:
1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGRA BENCH, AGRA BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND MS. ANNAPURNA MEHROTRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.450/Ag/2015 Assessment Year:2009-2010 ITO (TDS),
More informationMethods of determining ALP
3 rd Intensive Study Course on Transfer Pricing Methods of determining ALP CA Vishwanath Kane 16 February 2013 Agenda Introduction Transfer Pricing Methods Overview Applicability of Transfer Pricing Methods
More informationTaxpayers TPO's computation Post Tribunal's rulings. No. of comparab les % 2.05% % (Excellence Data) 3
KPMG FLASH NEWS KPMG IN INDIA The Hyderabad Tribunal adjudicates on rejection of certain comparables from the standard ITES set selected by the TPO in three different rulings, consequentially dropping
More informationIndia. Vispi T. Patel and Kejal P. Visharia*
India Vispi T. Patel and Kejal P. Visharia* Ruling in Marubeni Case on Benchmarking and Determining Arm s Length Consideration for the International Provision of Agency and Marketing Support Services The
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH B, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI B. RAMAKOTAIAH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH B, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI B. RAMAKOTAIAH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 1743/Hyd/2013 Assessment Year : 2009-10 Bellwether
More informationRecent Judicial Decisions & Developments in Transfer Pricing in India
Recent Judicial Decisions & Developments in Transfer Pricing in India Presented at International Tax Conference, Mumbai 5 th Dec 2009 By Ms Alpana Saksena Indian Revenue Service Commissioner Income Tax
More information2 the order passed by the AO dated for AY , on the following grounds:- 1 : Re.: Treating the reimbursement of the expenses as income
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "L" Bench, Mumbai Shri C.N. Prasad (Judicial Member) & Before Shri Ashwani Taneja (Accountant Member) ITA No.4659/Mum/2014-2009-10 ITA No.385/Mum/2016-2011-12 Dy.CIT
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH `E : NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI U.B.S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI J.S. REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH `E : NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI U.B.S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI J.S. REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.698/Del./2012 (Assessment Year : 2008-09) DDIT,
More informationSUPREME COURT RULING (INCOME TAX)
SUPREME COURT RULING (INCOME TAX) 2016-TIOL-245-SC-IT MM Aqua Technologies Ltd Vs CIT (Dated: December 5, The assessee preferred this SLP challenging the judgment of High Court, whereby it was held that
More information$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON: versus
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON: 25.02.2015 + ITA 117/2015 JOINT INVESTMENTS PVT LTD... Appellant Through: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX...
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES A, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI D. MANMOHAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI B. RAMAKOTAIAH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES A, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI D. MANMOHAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI B. RAMAKOTAIAH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 1149/HYD/2015 Assessment Year: 2008-09,
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH G NEW DELHI SHRI I.C. SUDHIR, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH G NEW DELHI BEFORE : SHRI I.C. SUDHIR, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 2976/Del./2013 Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Silicon Graphics
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCH 'B' NEW DELHI. ITA Nos.2337 & 4337/Del/2010 Assessment Years: &
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCH 'B' NEW DELHI ITA Nos.2337 & 4337/Del/2010 Assessment Years: 2006-07 & 2007-2008 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-11(1), NEW DELHI Vs M/s ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI D BENCH MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI RAJENDRA, AM
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI D BENCH MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI RAJENDRA, AM Reliance Industrial Infrastructure Ltd 5 th Floor, NKM International House 178
More informationTRANSFER PRICING DEVELOPMENTS IN INDIA
TRANSFER PRICING DEVELOPMENTS IN INDIA T. P. Ostwal & Associates LLP Nanubhai Desai & Co. D T S & Associates For private circulation & internal use only This publication does not constitute professional
More informationJanuary 16 - January 31 WHAT'S INSIDE... Direct Tax Transfer Pricing Indirect Tax
January 16 - January 31 WHAT'S INSIDE... Direct Tax Transfer Pricing Indirect Tax What s inside DIRECT TAX 1. CBDT issues clarifications for implementation of GAAR 2. Revisions proceedings under section
More informationITA No.129 & 329/Kol/2016 M/s Bhoruka Investment Ltd. A.Y [Before Hon ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, JM & Dr.Arjun Lal Saini, AM]
ITA No.129 & 329/Kol/2016 M/s Bhoruka Investment Ltd. A.Y.2012-13 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH : KOLKATA [Before Hon ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, JM & Dr.Arjun Lal Saini, AM] I.T.A No.129/Kol/2016
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH D, NEW DELHI Before Sh. N. K. Saini, AM And Smt. Beena A. Pillai, JM
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH D, NEW DELHI Before Sh. N. K. Saini, AM And Smt. Beena A. Pillai, JM : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Income Tax Officer, TDS Rohtak (APPELLANT) PAN No. RTKPO1586E
More informationAn overview of Transfer Pricing
An overview of Transfer Pricing WIRC of ICAI Vispi T. Patel Vispi T. Patel & Associates 19 th June, 2013 Agenda Transfer Pricing Origin, Evolution and Basic Concepts TP Indian Perspective Indian Transfer
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: H : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI I.C. SUDHIR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: H : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI I.C. SUDHIR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 1322 /Del/2012 Assessment Year: 2003-04 Asstt.
More informationTDS under section 195 of the Income-tax Act. CA Vishal Palwe 16 December 2017 Seminar on International Taxation at WIRC
TDS under section 195 of the Income-tax Act CA Vishal Palwe 16 December 2017 Seminar on International Taxation at WIRC Overview of section 195 Overview of section 195 195(1) Any person paying to non-resident
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH H : NEW DELHI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH H : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI I.C.SUDHIR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI TARVINDER SINGH KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.6092/Del/2012 Assessment Year : 2009-10
More informationINTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update
Advocate INTERNATIONAL TAXATION Tribunal s I. India-Israel DTAA Most Favored Nation (MFN) Clause in the Protocol to the Treaty Held : The MFN clause under the India- Israel tax treaty is automatic and
More informationG.A no.1150 of 2015 ITAT no.52 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE
G.A no.1150 of 2015 ITAT no.52 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata-2 Versus M/s. G K K Capital Markets (P) Limited
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH C : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI C.L. SETHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI K.D. RANJAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH C : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI C.L. SETHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI K.D. RANJAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos. 2763 & 2764/Del/2009 Assessment Years : 2003-04 & 2004-05
More informationCORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R %
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 10. + ITA 102/2015 RAMPGREEN SOLUTIONS PVT LTD... Appellant Through: Mr Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate with Mr Aditya Vohra, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
More informationINTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update
CA tarunkumar Singhal & CA Sunil Lala INTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update A] AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS I. Section 245N and Rule 19 The Authority is not legally permitted to decide new questions
More informationA Fresh look at disallowance under section 14A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961
A Fresh look at disallowance under section 14A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 [Published in 332 ITR (Jour) 49] 1 - By S.K.Tyagi Section 14A, the heading of which is Expenditure incurred in relation to income
More informationSharing insights. News Alert 1 February, 2012
www.pwc.com/in Sharing insights News Alert 1 February, 2012 Sharing of net revenues consistently in controlled and uncontrolled transactions held as a valid comparable uncontrolled price In brief In a
More informationSUMMARY OF JUDGEMENTS
JUNE, 2015 DIRECT TAX UPDATE SUMMARY OF JUDGEMENTS KNAV is a firm of International Accountants, Tax and Business Advisors. Presence in INDIA USA UK FRANCE NETHERLANDS SWITZERLAND CANADA E: admin@knavcpa.com
More informationChambers of Tax Consultants Fundamentals of Transfer Pricing Recent Case Laws on TP concepts & controversies
Chambers of Tax Consultants Fundamentals of Transfer Pricing Recent Case Laws on TP concepts & controversies Sunil Moti Lala, Advocate & CA Tushar Hathiramani SML tax chamber www.smltaxchamber.com November
More informationA legitimate expenditure or relief not claimed in the return of income can be claimed ONLY by revising the return of income under section
Fresh Claim Outside The Return of Income BY:- CA. (Dr.) Gurmeet S. Grewal B. Com (Hons.), FCA, PhD., CLA (IIAM) Grewal & Singh Chartered Accountants New Delhi, Chandigarh, Yamuna Nagar, Jammu Phones: 09811242856
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH `F : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.E. VEERABHADRAPPA, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI C.L.SETHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH `F : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.E. VEERABHADRAPPA, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI C.L.SETHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER. I.T. A. No.4931/Del/2010 Assessment Year: 2007-08 Quippo
More informationINTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update
Advocate INTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update A. HIGH COURT JUDGMENTS 1. Even if TNMM is found acceptable as regards all other transactions, it is open to the TPO to segregate a portion and subject it
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION No OF 2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 3314 OF 2004 wp-3314-2004.sxw M/s. Eskay K'n' IT (India) Ltd... Petitioner. V/s. Dy. Commissioner of Income
More informationITA no. 3279/Mum./2008 (Assessment Year : ) Revenue by : Mr. Ajit Kumar Jain Assessee by : Mr. Firoze B. Andhyarujina
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL L BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI B.R. MITTAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA no. 3279/Mum./2008 (Assessment Year : 2003-04) Dy. Commissioner
More informationDIRECT TAX UPDATE. November, Transfer Pricing
November, 2014 1. Transfer Pricing DIRECT TAX UPDATE KNAV is a firm of International Accountants, Tax and Business Advisors. Presence in INDIA USA UK FRANCE NETHERLANDS SWITZERLAND CANADA E: admin@knavcpa.com
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH K, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI G.S.PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH K, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI G.S.PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 859/MUM/2014 Thomas Cook (India) Limited, Thomas Cook
More informationVs. Vs. Mr. Anuj Kisnadwala, Adv. Date of Hearing 22/06/2016 Date of pronouncement 02/06/2016 O R D E R
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH C : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI S.V. MEHROTRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA A PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.:- 283/Del/2012 Assessment Year: 2005-06 DCIT Circle-11(1),
More informationINTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update
Advocate INTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update A. APEX COURT 1. Notification No. 86 of 2013, dated November 1, 2013, declaring Cyprus as a Non-Jurisdictional Area retrospectively rescinded by CBDT Notifications
More informationThe Chamber of Tax Consultants 3 rd Intensive Study Course on Transfer Pricing KEY CONTROVERSY AREAS: CASE STUDIES MARCH 30, 2013
The Chamber of Tax Consultants 3 rd Intensive Study Course on Transfer Pricing KEY CONTROVERSY AREAS: CASE STUDIES MARCH 30, 2013 CA MILIND KOTHARI milindkothari@mzsk.in Recent judicial updates Case Study
More information