No CR. JESUS MANUEL GASPAR, Appellant. vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee APPELLANT S BRIEF
|
|
- Agatha Young
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 No CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 06/12/ :00 Lisa Matz, Clerk JESUS MANUEL GASPAR, Appellant vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On appeal from the 195 th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas In Cause No. F N APPELLANT S BRIEF Counsel of Record: Lynn Richardson Julie Woods Chief Public Defender Assistant Public Defender Dallas County, Texas State Bar No Frank Crowley Courts Building 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB-2 Katherine A. Drew Dallas, Texas Chief, Appellate Division (214) (phone) Dallas County Public Defender s Office (214) (fax) Julie.Woods@dallascounty.org Attorneys for Appellant
2 LIST OF PARTIES APPELLANT Jesus Manuel Gaspar DEFENSE COUNSEL AT TRIAL Jorge Sanchez 100 Crescent Ct., Suite 700 Dallas, Texas STATE S ATTORNEY AT TRIAL Danielle Uher Dallas County District Attorney s Office Frank Crowley Courts Building 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB-19 Dallas, Texas APPELLANT S ATTORNEY ON APPEAL Julie Woods Dallas County Public Defender s Office Frank Crowley Courts Building 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB-2 Dallas, Texas STATE S ATTORNEY ON APPEAL Craig Watkins (or his designated representative) Dallas County District Attorney s Office Frank Crowley Courts Building 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB-19 Dallas, Texas ii
3 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF PARTIES...ii INDEX OF AUTHORITIES... iv STATEMENT OF THE CASE... 1 ISSUE PRESENTED... 2 POINT OF ERROR The evidence is legally insufficient to support the trial court s deadly weapon finding. STATEMENT OF FACTS... 2 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT... 2 ARGUMENT... 3 CONCLUSION PRAYER CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE iii
4 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES Cases Bahr v. State, 295 S.W.3d 701 (Tex. App. Amarillo 2009, pet. ref d)... 5 Brooks v. State, 323 S.W.3d 893 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010)... 3 Coleman v. State, 145 S.W.3d 649 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004)... 5 Dinnery v. State, 592 S.W.2d 343 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980)... 6 Dowdle v. State, 11 S.W.3d 233 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000)... 4 Escobedo v. State, No CR, CR, and CR, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 9589 (Tex. App. Fort Worth December 2, 2010, no pet.) (not designatedfor publication)... 5, 6 Hooper v. State, 214 S.W.3d 9 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007)... 3 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979)... 3 Patterson v. State, 769 S.W.2d 940 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989)... 4 Torres v. State, 233 S.W.3d 26 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.] June 28, 2007, no pet.) United States v. Ceballos-Torres, 218 F.3d 409 (5th Cir. 2000)... 4 iv
5 White v. State, No CR, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 9332 (Tex. App. Dallas November 22, 2011, no pet.) (not designated for publication)... 3 Statutes TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art G(a)(2)... 4 TEX. PENAL CODE 1.07(a)(17)... 4 v
6 TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: COMES NOW Appellant, Jesus Manuel Gaspar, and submits this brief on appeal from a conviction in the 195 th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, the Honorable Fred Tinsley, judge presiding. STATEMENT OF THE CASE A grand jury indicted Appellant for possession with intent to deliver methamphetamine in an amount of 4 grams or more but less than 200 grams, and he went open to the judge for punishment. 1 (CR1 2 : 5; RR2: 7). The indictment contained an enhancement paragraph for a prior felony conviction and a deadly weapon allegation. (CR1: 5). Appellant judicially confessed to the charge. (CR1: 66). He entered a plea of true to the enhancement paragraph for his prior felony conviction, but entered a plea of not true to the deadly weapon allegation. (RR2: 8). The court accepted Appellant s guilty plea and plea of true to the enhancement paragraph and made a finding of true to the deadly weapon allegation. (RR3: 71-72). The court sentenced Appellant to 35 years imprisonment. (CR1: 67; RR3: 71-72). Appellant timely filed his notice of appeal. (CR1: 70). 1 The open plea hearing for this case was held in conjunction with five other cases: Trial Cause No. F N, F N (Appellate Cause No CR), F N (Appellate Cause No CR), F N (Appellate Cause No CR), and F N. (RR2: 4; RR3: 4). Appellant did not file a notice of appeal in Trial Cause No. F N or F N. Appellant filed a notice of appeal in F N (Appellate Cause No CR), F N (Appellate Cause No CR), F N (Appellate Cause No CR) and has filed with this Court a separate brief in those causes. 2 The Clerk s Record in this cause is referred to as CR1. 1
7 ISSUE PRESENTED POINT OF ERROR The evidence is legally insufficient to support the trial court s deadly weapon finding. STATEMENT OF FACTS In June 2009, the Grand Prairie Police Department executed a search warrant at an apartment. (RR3: 5). Prior to executing this search warrant, police conducted surveillance on the apartment. (RR3: 17). While conducting this surveillance, police saw Appellant exit the apartment along with a woman. (RR3: 17). Appellant got inside a car and the woman entered a separate vehicle with a neighbor. (RR3: 17). The vehicles drove away. (RR3: 17). Police then executed the search warrant and found two men, Tomas and Jose, inside the apartment. (RR3: 18). Tomas told officers that there were drugs in the master bedroom closet. (RR3: 19). The officers found marijuana in a pink suitcase inside the master bedroom closet, empty baggies in the master bedroom closet, a digital scale and calculator in the kitchen area, and a gun on the top shelf of the master bedroom closet. (RR3: 7-9). The gun contained one bullet. (RR3: 22-23). The officers also found what appeared to be a cutting agent for methamphetamine in a Pasta Roni box in the kitchen cabinet. (RR3: 8). As a result of this search, police arrested Appellant. (RR3: 5). SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT The State did not sufficiently prove that Appellant used or exhibited the gun while committing the offense. Therefore, the court s deadly weapon finding should be deleted from the judgment. 2
8 ARGUMENT Standard of Review Legal sufficiency of the evidence is measured by the standard enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Virginia, i.e., whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. 443 U.S. 307, 319, n.12 (1979). The Jackson standard is the only standard a reviewing court should apply to determine if the State proved each and every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. Brooks v. State, 323 S.W.3d 893, 895 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010) (plurality op.). The reviewing court must defer to the fact finder s credibility and weight determinations since the trier of fact is the sole judge of the credibility of a witness s testimony. Id. at 899; see also White v. State, No CR, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 9332, at *3 (Tex. App. Dallas November 22, 2011, no pet.) (not designated for publication). The reviewing court determine[s] whether the necessary inferences are reasonable based upon the combined and cumulative force of all the evidence when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict. Hooper v. State, 214 S.W.3d 9, (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). A court s review of the evidence includes all admitted evidence regardless of whether the admission of evidence was erroneous. White, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 9332, at *2. Applicable Law A deadly weapon is defined as (1) a firearm or anything manifestly designed, made, or adapted for the purpose of inflicting death or serious bodily injury; or 3
9 (2) anything that in the manner of its use or intended use is capable of causing death or serious bodily injury. TEX. PENAL CODE 1.07(a)(17). If the trial court makes an affirmative finding that a defendant used or exhibited a deadly weapon during the commission of a felony offense or during the immediately flight therefrom or was a party to the offense and knew a deadly weapon would be used or exhibited, the court is required to enter that finding in the judgment. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art , 3G(a)(2). The Court of Criminal Appeals has addressed what constitutes using or exhibiting a deadly weapon during the commission of an offense. Use and exhibit do not have the same meaning. Patterson v. State, 769 S.W.2d 940 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989). To use a deadly weapon means to employ or utilize the deadly weapon in order to achieve its purpose. Id. at 941. To exhibit a deadly weapon means to consciously show or display the deadly weapon while committing the offense. Id. A person can use a deadly weapon without exhibiting it, but cannot exhibit a deadly weapon without using it. Id. Possession of a firearm may be sufficient to establish that a person used a deadly weapon. Dowdle v. State, 11 S.W.3d 233, 237 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). However, the possession of the firearm must facilitate the commission of the felony. Patterson, 769 S.W.2d at 941. Although guns and drugs often go together, the fact that a drug dealer has a gun does not automatically establish that he used the gun during the commission of a felony offense. Rather, the State must show that the gun was used to further the offense. See United States v. Ceballos-Torres, 218 F.3d 409, 414 (5th Cir. 2000) (rejecting the notion 4
10 that any time a drug dealer possesses a gun the possession is automatically in furtherance of the felony offense and instead requiring evidence specific to show that the accused s possession of the gun furthered the offense); Coleman v. State, 145 S.W.3d 649, 658 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (Cochran, J., concurring) (noting that guns and drugs cases are not so clear-cut, and courts should require evidence showing that the particular defendant s possession of the gun furthered the drug trafficking operation). Judge Cochran s concurring opinion in Coleman identified a list of factors useful in determining whether the accused used a deadly weapon in the commission of a felony: (1) the type of gun involved (noting that a handgun is more likely to be considered a deadly weapon), (2) whether or not the gun was loaded, (3) whether or not the gun was stolen, (4) the proximity of the gun to the drugs, drug paraphernalia, or other items used to manufacture drugs, (5) accessibility of the gun to the person who controlled the premises, (6) the quantity of drugs involved, and (7) evidence that established another reason for the presence of the gun. Id. at Several courts of appeals have relied on this list of factors for guidance in evaluating the sufficiency of a deadly weapon finding. See, e.g., Bahr v. State, 295 S.W.3d 701, (Tex. App. Amarillo 2009, pet. ref d) (holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the deadly weapon finding because there were two loaded weapons in the defendant s office, one of which was a few feet from defendant, the defendant was present during the search, there was additional ammunition in the office, and the officers located drugs, drug paraphernalia, and cash in the office); Escobedo v. State, No CR, CR, and CR, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 5
11 9589, at *13-16 (Tex. App. Fort Worth December 2, 2010, no pet.) (not designated for publication) (applying the Coleman factors in finding that the evidence was sufficient to support a deadly weapon finding because the defendant s black bag contained drugs, digital scales, a grinder, an unloaded pistol, an unloaded revolver, and two magazines with six bullets each, and the defendant had methamphetamine and a significant amount of cash in his pocket and admitted to possessing the guns). Analysis Appellant recognizes that a judicial confession, standing alone, is sufficient to support a conviction. Dinnery v. State, 592 S.W.2d 343, 353 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980). Appellant acknowledges that he signed a judicial confession to the charge. (CR1: 66). However, the record is clear that Appellant entered a plea of not true to the deadly weapon allegation. (RR2: 8). The prosecuting attorney acknowledged Appellant s plea of not true to the deadly weapon allegation. (RR2: 8). Appellant s defense centered on the deadly weapon allegation. (RR3: 16-24, 34-45, 53-58, 63-70). Thus, the judicial confession in Appellant s case does not stand alone, and the record clearly reveals that he intended to, and did, enter a plea of not true to the deadly weapon allegation. The prosecuting attorney recognized his plea of not true and specifically asked the court to make a finding of true or not true as to the deadly weapon allegation. (RR2: 8). Consequently, the State was required to prove that a deadly weapon was used or exhibited during the commission of the offense. The State failed to meet its burden. 6
12 Appellant did not exhibit the gun during the commission of the offense. Appellant was not inside the apartment when the police officers executed the search warrant. (RR3: 17). He was, therefore, nowhere near the gun found on the top shelf of the closet. The State offered no evidence that Appellant consciously showed or displayed the gun. Thus, he did not exhibit the gun for purposes of a deadly weapon finding. Appellant did not use the gun during the commission of the offense. In Appellant s case, there was one handgun with no bullets in the chamber and a magazine containing only one bullet. 3 (RR3: 22-23). There were no other firearms or weapons found, and there was no additional ammunition located in the apartment. (RR3: 23). The expert police officer who testified that guns and drugs go together also conceded that in his 27 years as a police officer he had never seen a situation where a person engaged in drug dealing had a weapon with only one bullet and no other ammunition. (RR3: 57-58). Appellant s counsel and the expert police officer engaged in the following exchange: Q [BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY] Would you expect a drug dealer to have one bullet in the gun? A [BY EXPERT POLICE OFFICER] Yes. Loaded with one bullet? Yes. 3 Under cross-examination, the responding officer testified that the gun was loaded and there was one bullet in the chamber. (RR3: 22). However, when defense counsel refreshed his memory using his police report, he corrected his mistake and testified that the chamber did not have any bullets, but the magazine contained a bullet. (RR3: 22-23). 7
13 Q Detective Junker, come on now. Are you telling me under oath that you re expecting a drug dealer who s going to ward off law enforcement, ten or twelve officers, or home invaders, it s common that they have only bullet in the gun? A Let me make sure you re asking this right. Are you talking about one round in the chamber? Q A Q No. I m talking about one bullet. One bullet altogether? Altogether. A That s rarely seen. I can t say that I have seen that. Now that I m on your question, then yes. The answer is have I seen that? No, not that I can recall. (RR3: 56-57). The expert police officer s testimony does not prove, but rather contradicts the notion that Appellant used the gun to facilitate the felony offense. Therefore, his testimony does not sufficiently support a deadly weapon finding in Appellant s case. There was no evidence of who owned the gun or to whom it was registered. There was no evidence that the gun belonged to or was previously used by Appellant. The gun was not located near the drugs or drug paraphernalia found in the apartment. The gun was on the top shelf of Ms. Quiles s closet. There was no testimony concretely establishing that methamphetamine was located in the suitcase. The officer testified that illegal narcotics were found in the suitcase, but only specifically identified marijuana in the pink suitcase. (RR3: 7). Because the deadly weapon allegation was pleaded in the indictment that charged Appellant with possession with intent to deliver methamphetamine, the State was required to establish that Appellant used or exhibited 8
14 the deadly weapon while possessing with intent to deliver methamphetamine. The gun was nowhere near the methamphetamine found in the kitchen. Even if a court found that the gun was close enough to the drugs in the enclosed suitcase to establish that the gun was used to protect the methamphetamine, which Appellant does not concede, the State still failed to meet its burden because the totality of the circumstances do not connect Appellant to the gun. Although mere possession of a firearm may be sufficient to establish that a person used a deadly weapon during the commission of an offense, the State did not prove that Appellant possessed the gun. The evidence does not establish that Appellant had possession of the gun. First, the apartment where police executed the search warrant and found drugs, drug paraphernalia, and the gun was leased to Appellant s aunt or mother/stepmother 4 and Appellant s girlfriend/common law wife. 5 (RR3: 24, 29). Appellant occasionally stayed in the apartment, but did not live there full time. (RR3: 24, 29). Officer Clark testified that the apartment was not leased to Appellant, but rather to Appellant s aunt and girlfriend. (RR3: 24). Ms. Quiles, Appellant s girlfriend, also testified that the apartment was hers and that she lived there with her daughter and Appellant stayed with her sometimes, but not all the time. (RR3: 29, 38). Second, Ms. Quiles testified that the master bedroom was her bedroom and that Appellant did not sleep in that bedroom when he stayed at the apartment. (RR3: 39). 4 The exact designation is unclear from the record as both terms were used during testimony. (RR3: 24, 29). 5 Defense counsel referred to her as Appellant s common law wife. (RR3: 17). She testified that she was his onand-off girlfriend. (RR3: 29). 9
15 Therefore, the closet in her bedroom where the gun was located belonged to her. Officer Clark testified that the gun was found in Appellant s roommate s bedroom. (RR3: 14). Although he did not identify the roommate, it is clear that the gun was found in a bedroom closet that did not belong to Appellant. Not only did the bedroom closet not belong to Appellant, three people other than Appellant had access to the closet that day: Miss Quiles and the two men, Tomas and Jose, who were present during the execution of the search warrant. (RR3: 18). The only two people in the apartment when the officers executed the search warrant were Tomas and Jose. (RR3: 18). There was no evidence that Appellant was in and out of the closet at any time close to the day the officers searched the apartment. Third, the pink suitcase in which the police found drugs belonged to Ms. Quiles. (RR3: 39). She testified that the pink suitcase was hers and that she used the suitcases for her beauty school supplies and accessed the suitcases on a daily basis. (RR3: 39-40). Fourth, the officers found the gun on the top shelf of the master bedroom closet. (RR3: 8). Although the gun was found in the same closet as the suitcase containing marijuana, the gun was not located close to those drugs or situated in a place where someone could easily access it to protect the drugs. (RR3: 7). The gun was on the tall top shelf of the closet. 6 (RR3: 21). The gun was clearly not in a place where it could have been easily accessed and used to protect the methamphetamine paraphernalia found in the kitchen cabinet. 6 The responding police officer first testified that the gun was in plain view, but then conceded that the top shelf was high and a person would have to be at least six feet four inches tall to see the gun on that shelf. (RR3: 21). 10
16 Fifth, there was no evidence or testimony connecting Appellant to the gun. There was no evidence that the gun had Appellant s fingerprints. (RR3: 23). There was no evidence that the gun was registered to Appellant. Although Ms. Quiles testified that Appellant usually had a gun, she did not testify nor did the State establish that Appellant ever owned or used that particular gun on the top shelf of the closet. (RR3: 33). Finally, when the officers executed the search warrant, Appellant was not inside the apartment. (RR3: 17-18). He had already exited the apartment. (RR3: 17). The gun was not easily accessible to him that day. CONCLUSION The State did not establish that Appellant used or exhibited the handgun found in the closet to facilitate the commission of the offense of possession with intent to deliver methamphetamine. The State failed to sufficiently connect Appellant to the handgun and did not establish that Appellant used the gun to facilitate the felony offense. Thus, the judgment should be reformed to remove the deadly weapon finding. Torres v. State, 233 S.W.3d 26, 32 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.] June 28, 2007) (no pet.). PRAYER Appellant prays that this Court reform the judgment to delete the deadly weapon finding. 11
17 Respectfully submitted, Lynn Richardson Julie Woods Chief Public Defender Assistant Public Defender Dallas County, Texas State Bar No Frank Crowley Courts Building 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB-2 Katherine A. Drew Dallas, Texas Chief, Appellate Division (214) (phone) Dallas County Public Defender s Office (214) (fax) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing brief was served on the Dallas County Criminal District Attorney s Office (Appellate Division), 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., 10th Floor, Dallas, TX by hand delivery on June 7, Julie Woods 12
No CR No CR. FREDDY GONZALEZ, Appellant. vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee APPELLANT S BRIEF
No. 05-12-00071-CR No. 05-12-00072-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 06/27/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk FREDDY GONZALEZ, Appellant vs.
More informationSTATE'S RESPONSE BRIEF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT ANGEL AGUILAR, 05-12-00219-CR APPELLANT V. NOS. & THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 05-12-00220-CR 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 06/27/2012 14:00
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS
The State Requests Oral Argument Only if Appellant Argues No. 05-11-00149-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 05/29/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk
More informationNo CR. RICHARD HARRIS, Appellant. vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee APPELLANT S BRIEF
No. 05-11-01006-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 02/01/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk RICHARD HARRIS, Appellant vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS,
More informationNo CR. JOSE RAUL REYNA, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee APPELLANT S BRIEF
Oral argument requested. No. 05 09 00261 CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS JOSE RAUL REYNA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District
More informationNos CR & CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. ANTHONY CHARLES GARRETT, Appellant
Nos. 05-11-00304-CR & 05-11-00305-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 8/10/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk ANTHONY CHARLES GARRETT, Appellant v. THE
More informationSTATE'S RESPONSE BRIEF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT EDGAR CARRASCO, APPELLANT NO. 05-11-00681-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 12/28/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk
More informationCASE NO CR CASE NO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS
CASE NO. 05-11-01170-CR CASE NO. 05-11-01171-CR IN THE 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 03/09/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS ALFONSO
More informationNo CR STATE S BRIEF
Appellant Has Not Requested Oral Argument; State Waives Argument No. 05-09-00321-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS JASON WESLEY WILLINGHAM, APPELLANT vs. THE STATE OF
More informationIn the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
In the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 3/11/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk Amar Rashad Britton, Appellant v. No. 05-10-01148-CR The State of Texas, Appellee
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS. BRIAN ALLEN MORROW, Appellant. vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
NOS. 05-11-00439-CR, 05-11-00440-CR, 05-11-00441-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 11/14/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk BRIAN ALLEN MORROW,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS. * * * * Cause No CR. * * * * CORNELL CORDELL DALLAS, Appellant. vs.
ACCEPTED 225EFJ016914678 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12 June 6 P12:34 Lisa Matz CLERK ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 06/07/2012 9:56:43 Lisa Matz, Clerk IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
More informationNo CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS STEVEN TYRONE DEAMON, Appellant THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
No. 05 10 00458 CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS STEVEN TYRONE DEAMON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-05-00349-CR Matthew Shane Cox, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO.
More informationIn The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO CR. DERRICK CARDELL MCLEOD, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Opinion issued May 29, 2008 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-07-00337-CR DERRICK CARDELL MCLEOD, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 232nd District
More informationNo CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. VICTOR HUGO MARTINEZ, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
No. 05-10-00829-CR The State Does Not Request Oral Argument. 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 12/5/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS VICTOR HUGO MARTINEZ,
More informationCASE NO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS. JAMES ALLEN BALL, JR.
CASE NO. 05-11-01534-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 01/06/12 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS JAMES ALLEN BALL, JR., Appellant
More informationFourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00356-CR Daniel CASAS, Appellant v. The State of The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County,
More informationIn The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO CR. MATTHEW JAMES ACHEAMPONG, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Opinion issued October 8, 2009 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-08-00907-CR MATTHEW JAMES ACHEAMPONG, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 209th District
More informationNo CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. VERNON TURNER, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
No. 05 09 00718 CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS VERNON TURNER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5 of Dallas County,
More informationSTATE OF OHIO LAVELLE COLEMAN
[Cite as State v. Coleman, 2008-Ohio-2806.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 89358 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. LAVELLE COLEMAN
More informationNo CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. EDUARDO ESCOBAR GARCIA, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
No. 05 10 01122 CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS EDUARDO ESCOBAR GARCIA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the 203d Judicial District Court of Dallas
More informationNO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. BRADFORD D. SIMS, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
NO. 05 10 00460 CR The State Requests Oral Argument if Appellant Requests Oral Argument. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS BRADFORD D. SIMS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS,
More informationNo CR. BENJAMIN GERROD MURPHY, Appellant. vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee APPELLANT S BRIEF
No. 05-12-00364-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 07/02/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk BENJAMIN GERROD MURPHY, Appellant vs. THE STATE
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued May 6, 2010 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-09-01040-CR WALLACE C. LEDET, IV, Appellant V. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 239th District Court
More informationIn the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
In the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JOHN PAUL CHARO, Appellant No. 05-11-00423-CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Lisa Matz, Clerk 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 07-16-2012 Trial
More informationNO CR NO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS. KENNETH BAZE, Appellant v.
NO. 05-08-00672-CR NO. 05-08-00673-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS KENNETH BAZE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On appeal from the 283 rd Judicial
More informationCAUSE NOS CR and CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS
CAUSE NOS. 05-11-01408-CR and 05-11-01409-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 02/07/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk DANIEL LEE MORLEY
More informationNo CR No CR No CR No CR No CR
No. 05-09-00244-CR No. 05-09-00245-CR No. 05-09-00246-CR No. 05-09-00247-CR No. 05-09-00248-CR The State Requests Oral Argument Only If Appellant Requests Oral Argument IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
More informationNo CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. LAKEITH FOWLER, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
No. 05 10 00893 CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 4/15/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk LAKEITH FOWLER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
More informationNO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
NO. 12-16-00139-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS ROY EDWARD SMITH, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE 114TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SMITH
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued June 9, 2011 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-10-00733-CR TIMOTHY EVAN KENNEDY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 338th Judicial
More informationNos CR, CR, CR, CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS
Nos. 05 11 00799 CR, 05 11 00800 CR, 05 11 00801 CR, 05 11 00802 CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 11/1/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk CODY ANTHONY
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS. VS. NOS CR and CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS RONALD DEMOND JOHNSON, Appellant VS. NOS. 05-09-00494-CR and 05-09-00495-CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 363RD
More informationNos CR & CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS CURTIS HEATH, Appellant.
Nos. 05 10 01084 CR & 05 10 01085 CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 6/15/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk CURTIS HEATH, Appellant v. THE STATE OF
More informationNo CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. RICHARD DAVID EASON, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
No. 05 10 01232 CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 11/10/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk RICHARD DAVID EASON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
More informationRENDERED: AUGUST 30, 2002; 10:00 a.m. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED NO CA MR COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY OPINION AFFIRMING ** ** ** ** **
RENDERED: AUGUST 30, 2002; 10:00 a.m. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED C ommonwealth Of K entucky Court Of A ppeals NO. 2001-CA-002226-MR JAMES ROBINSON APPELLANT APPEAL FROM FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE JOHN
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF TEXAS CAUSE NUMBER CR. ROBERT AMARO, JR., Appellant. vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF TEXAS CAUSE NUMBER 05-10-00508-CR ROBERT AMARO, JR., Appellant vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law Number 1 Grayson
More informationNo CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. LOLISHA RENEE ALIU, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
No. 05 10 00787 CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS LOLISHA RENEE ALIU, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 6 of Dallas County,
More informationNOS CR CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
NOS. 12-17-00298-CR 12-17-00299-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS DONALD RAY RUNNELS, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE APPEALS FROM THE 123RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CR. ANTHONY SHANE KILLEBREW, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
MODIFY and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed March 16, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01511-CR ANTHONY SHANE KILLEBREW, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued July 25, 2013 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-12-01096-CR EDUARDO CRUZ RAMIREZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from County Criminal Court
More informationNO CR. RAFAELA DAVILA, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Opinion issued February 11, 2010 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-08-00176-CR RAFAELA DAVILA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 400th District Court
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-14-00473-CR ADAM GENE CAMPBELL APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------- FROM THE 43RD DISTRICT COURT OF PARKER COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS MARISOL ZUNIGA MURILLO, Appellant NO. 05-10-00869-CR VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NUMBER
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS RUSSELL TERRY McELVAIN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. No. 08-11-00170-CR Appeal from the Criminal District Court Number Two of Tarrant
More informationBRIEF OF THE APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Jul 30 2015 11:00:44 2015-KA-00218-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOE M. GILLESPIE APPELLANT V. NO. 2015-KA-00218-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No CR * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 05-08-01635-CR * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CARLUS DEMARCUS GATSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee * * * * * * * *
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00688-CR Sammie Meredith, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 2020286,
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
NO. PD-0712-15 PD-0712-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 7/8/2015 1:19:53 PM Accepted 7/9/2015 4:28:04 PM ABEL ACOSTA CLERK IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS DYLAN JEZREEL
More informationFourteenth Court of Appeals
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 16, 2010. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-09-00868-CR NO. 14-09-00869-CR ARRINGTON FLOYD BURLEY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal
More informationIn The FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS. Dallas, Texas )( )( )( )( BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW
In The FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS Dallas, Texas 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 3/21/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk KAAREAM G. WASHINGTON, Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee Nos. 05-10-00571-CR, 05-10- 00572-CR,
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED
NO. 05-11-00824-CR ERIC GERARD WIEGAND IN THE VS. 5TH COURT STATE OF TEXAS OF APPEALS ACCEPTED 225EFJ016642337 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 11 December 17 A11:28 Lisa Matz CLERK 5th Court of Appeals
More informationNO CR IN THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS LINH PHUONG NGUYEN, APPELLANT VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
NO. 05-10-01204-CR IN THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 3/29/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS LINH PHUONG NGUYEN, APPELLANT VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 16, 2005
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 16, 2005 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROBERT GENE MAYFIELD Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. 40300798
More informationNO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS IN THE MATTER OF A.C., A CHILD
NO. 05-11-01469-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 02/21/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk IN THE MATTER OF A.C., A CHILD th On appeal from
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Graham, 2008-Ohio-3985.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 90437 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. CHRISTOPHER GRAHAM
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-07-258-CR RODNEY PERKINS APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ------------ FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM
More informationNo CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. INOCENCIO M. VILLASENOR, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
No. 05 10 00969 CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS INOCENCIO M. VILLASENOR, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 3 of Dallas
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-06-00305-CR Jorge Saucedo, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-DC-06-904023,
More informationNO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A OCTOBER 20, 2011 JASON EUGENE WALKER, APPELLANT
NO. 07-10-0299-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A OCTOBER 20, 2011 JASON EUGENE WALKER, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE FROM THE 396 TH DISTRICT
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0227-16 CESAR ALEJANDRO GAMINO, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON STATE S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SECOND COURT OF APPEALS TARRANT COUNTY
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CR. DAVID CARL SWINGLE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed February 27, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00430-CR DAVID CARL SWINGLE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from
More informationIn The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO CR. BRUCE GLENN MILNER, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Opinion issued December 18, 2008 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-07-00501-CR BRUCE GLENN MILNER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 239th District
More informationNO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 5TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS. RANDALL JOSEPH DAWSON, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
NO. 05-10-00488-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 5TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS RANDALL JOSEPH DAWSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ON APPEAL IN CAUSE NUMBER 058504 FROM THE 15TH DISTRICT COURT
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-15-00360-CR DARRELL CRAIG ADAMS, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 21st District Court Burleson County, Texas
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-00-00408-CR Hue-Jun Yandell, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 50,635,
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE. STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DOUGLAS BOWERS
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DOUGLAS BOWERS Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lincoln County No. S99900047 Charles Lee, Judge No. M1999-00778-CCA-R3-CD
More informationNO CR. ALBERTO CONTRERAS, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Opinion issued August 13, 2009 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-08-00424-CR ALBERTO CONTRERAS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 179th District
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON OCTOBER 1995 SESSION
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON OCTOBER 1995 SESSION FILED November 15,1995 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, APPELLEE, No. 02-C-01-9503-CC-00093 Gibson
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DANIEL MEDINA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D17-358 [September 5, 2018] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
More informationIn the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
In the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas TEOFILIA ALEJANDRO SALGADO Appellant v. No. 05-10-00638-CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Trial Number 004-88060-09 in the County Court at
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-11-00186-CR Ramiro Rea, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-DC-10-301285,
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Senior Judge Cole Argued at Richmond, Virginia
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Senior Judge Cole Argued at Richmond, Virginia ARTHUR RAMBERT v. Record No. 0559-94-2 MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY JUDGE MARVIN F. COLE COMMONWEALTH
More informationNO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C JULY 3, 2002
NO. 07-01-0258-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C JULY 3, 2002 AARON LYNN KINCANON AKA AARON LYNN KINCANNON, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE FROM
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued December 18, 2014. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-14-00167-CR ABRAHAM CAMPOS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 149th District
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT RISTO JOVAN WYATT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D12-4377 [ May 20, 2015 ] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 19, 2012
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 19, 2012 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TERRANCE GABRIEL CARTER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marshall County No. 2011-CR-44
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NOS. 2-08-119-CR 2-08-120-CR DANIEL ELI ARANDA A/K/A DANIEL ARANDA THE STATE OF TEXAS V. ------------ APPELLANT STATE FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS NORMAN LEHR, Appellant, NO. 05-09-00381-CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ON APPEAL FROM THE 282ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CR. JEFFREY LYNN ADAY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Affirmed and Opinion Filed November 24, 2015 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01593-CR JEFFREY LYNN ADAY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the
More informationS17A0077. HOLMES v. THE STATE. Appellant Martin Napoleon Holmes appeals his convictions from a
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: May 15, 2017 S17A0077. HOLMES v. THE STATE. BENHAM, Justice. Appellant Martin Napoleon Holmes appeals his convictions from a multi-victim crime spree which included
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued March 1, 2012 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-11-00414-CR KIMBERLY EVETTE BUTLER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 230th District
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued October 17, 2013 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-12-00664-CR NO. 01-12-00665-CR JUNIOR GARVEY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the
More informationSTATE S RESPONSE BRIEF
IN THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 12/9/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk HENRY STEVENSON, APPELLANT NO. 05-11-00295-CR 05-11-00296-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE APPEALED
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Nixon, 2007-Ohio-160.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 87847 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. LAKISHA NIXON DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationNO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS ON APPEAL FROM THE 401 ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
NO. 05-10-01325-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 7/19/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS NATHAN JOHN ELLIS APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-00-00579-CR Saul Isaac Flores, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 0975372,
More informationNOS CR CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
NOS. 12-18-00174-CR 12-18-00175-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS EX PARTE: MATTHEW WILLIAMS APPEALS FROM THE 273RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SAN AUGUSTINE COUNTY,
More informationCASE NO. 1D Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Kathleen Stover, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA MARKEL LATRAE BASS, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D12-3284
More informationS18A1609. STANFORD v. THE STATE. evidence was presented to support a finding of guilt. For the reasons that
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: March 4, 2019 S18A1609. STANFORD v. THE STATE. BENHAM, Justice. In February 2015, Appellant Larry Stanford was convicted of two counts of malice murder in connection
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. WM Appellee Trial Court No.
[Cite as State v. Robbins, 2012-Ohio-3862.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. WM-11-012 Appellee Trial Court No. 10 CR 103 v. Barry
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas MEMORANDUM OPINION
AFFIRM; and Opinion Issued April 18, 2013. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-11-01572-CR VICTOR RAMOS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00393-CR Merril Leroy Jessop, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SCHLEICHER COUNTY, 51ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
More informationCASE NO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS. GEORGE WILLIS LAWRENCE, Appellant
CASE NO. 05-11-01115-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 12/16/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS GEORGE WILLIS LAWRENCE, Appellant
More informationNo CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS. JOSE MANUEL MORALES, Appellant
No. 05-09-00182-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 03/12/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk JOSE MANUEL MORALES, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON APPEAL
More informationNo CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS INOCENCIO M. VILLASENOR, APPELLANT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
No. 05-10-00969-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS The State requests oral argument if Appellant argues. 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 4/8/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk INOCENCIO
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO
[Cite as State v. Platt, 2012-Ohio-5443.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : O P I N I O N Plaintiff-Appellee, : - vs - : CASE NO. 2012-P-0046 MATTHEW
More information: : CRIMINAL DIVISION : : QUION BRATTEN, :
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH : No. CR-1402-2011 : vs. : CRIMINAL DIVISION : : QUION BRATTEN, : Appellant : 1925(a) Opinion OPINION IN SUPPORT OF ORDER IN COMPLIANCE
More informationFourteenth Court of Appeals
Affirmed and Opinion filed July 16, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-14-00389-CR ERIC LOPEZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 337th District Court Harris County,
More information