Taxation (Bright-line Test for Residential Land) Bill
|
|
- Heather James
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Taxation (Bright-line Test for Residential Land) Bill Report of the Specialist Tax Adviser to the Finance and Expenditure Select Committee Therese Turner Turner & Associates September 2015
2
3 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Summary of the proposed bright-line rule for residential land Key decisions that the Committee will need to make Submissions Main home exemption Specific deductions Ring-fencing losses Order and placement of new section CB 6A Status of Section CB 6A International tax issues Start date for two-year period Sales off the plan Farmland Exceptions for circumstances outside of seller's control Deduction for holding costs Trusts...15
4 1.0 Introduction I have studied and analysed all submissions and have discussed them with officials. I have paid particular attention to "matters raised by officials" as these have not been subjected to the scrutiny of the submissions process. The formulation of this report follows extensive discussions with officials in which we have attempted to arrive at workable solutions to any problems identified with the proposals contained in the Bill. I would like to commend the officials for their co-operation in this regard and for their willingness to consider views which differ from conclusions that they may have already reached. It has been a pleasure working with them. In this report I have commented only on those submissions where either: My views differ from those of officials; or I concur with the officials view but wish to provide further comment or suggestions. In respect of all submissions on which I have made no comment, I concur with both the officials view and the reasons that they have set out in their report to this committee. Where I have identified issues that were not the subject of submissions, I have noted these as being a matter raised by advisor. 1
5 2.0 Summary of the proposed bright-line rule for residential land The bill proposes to tax the proceeds of the sale of residential land that is sold within two years of acquisition. Only residential land would be taxable. Residential land would include bare land on which the owner planned to erect a dwelling. It would not include farmland or business premises. These would remain subject to the existing land sale rules which can tax them in certain circumstances. There would be an exemption for a person's main home. Where the person has more than one home, it is the home with which they have the greatest connection that would be exempt. The sale of a second home, such as a beach property or flat in town would not be exempt. In order for a home to be exempt, the home would be required to have been occupied as the person's main home for the majority of the period over which it has been owned. It is possible, however, for a person to concurrently own two homes both of which would be exempt. This would occur, for example, where a person had vacated their main home having purchased another home, but were awaiting settlement of the sale of the first home. Under some circumstances, trusts would qualify for the main home exemption. There is an exemption for inherited land. Land transferred pursuant to a relationship property agreement is also exempt from the rules but a subsequent transfer would fall within the rules. Where a loss occurs, it would be ring-fenced and would be able to be offset against only income from land sales which was subject to tax under any of the land sales provisions. Loss ring-fencing occurs only where the transaction is taxable under the brightline rule and is not also taxable under any of the other land sales rules. The proposals contain anti-avoidance rules for land-rich companies and trusts. 2
6 3.0 Key decisions that the Committee will need to make The key decisions that the Committee will need to address are as follows: Turner & Associates 1. Whether the brightline rules should be subservient to or, alternatively, over-ride the existing land sales rules. The answer to this question will derive from the decisions that the Committee makes in respect of the other issues. 2. Whether the brightline rules should be incorporated into the existing intention test in section CB 6 or whether they should stand alone in a new subsection (currently drafted as section CB 6A which precedes section CB 6). Again, the answer to this question will derive from the decisions that the Committee makes in respect of the other issues. 3. Whether the exemption from the brightline rules for a person's main home should be the same as, or tighter than, the exemption for a person's residence under the existing land sales provisions. 4. Whether or not a specific deduction in addition to the cost of the land should be allowed under the brightline rules where it is allowed in an otherwise applicable provision of the existing land sale rules. 5. Whether or not losses from the disposal of land that is subject to the brightline rules should be ring-fenced under some, any or no circumstances. These matters along with other important, but less fundamental, questions are addressed below. 3
7 4.0 Submissions A number of submissions were made on the technical detail of the proposal. These are discussed below. 4.1 Main home exemption Some submitters were of the view that the principal residence exemption in existing section CB 16 should be used instead of the proposed main home exception. They felt that this would align it with the intention test which bright-line test is intended to supplement, and remove uncertainty and be more simple. Officials are of the view that the existing test would apply to any dwelling that was used by the person as a residence, including a bach or holiday home. It would also allow exemption of multiple homes that the person owned but did not reside in. They recommend that the submissions be declined. I agree with the officials' recommendation and their reasons for it. That the submissions be declined. 4.2 Specific deductions (Matter raised by advisor) There are many circumstances under which both the brightline rules and another existing land sales provision could apply. One of these circumstances relates to section CB 14 which taxes gains from the sale of land within ten years of acquisition where the value of the land is affected by a change. The types of change that are covered by the provision are, for example, changes under the operative district plan (such as zoning changes) and changes under the Resource Management Act to allow or disallow certain activities to be conducted on the land. The change does not need to have occurred, it needs only to be likely to occur. Twenty percent or more of the gain in value needs to be attributable to the change in order for the provision to apply. Where it does apply, a deduction of the greater of $1,000 or 10% of the gain for each year or part year (up to a maximum of ten years) that the land has been held is available in addition to the original cost of the land. 4
8 The provision applies only where no other provision of the existing rules applies. Turner & Associates The brightline rules will apply in situations where previously no existing provision would apply. For example, a sale of residential land that is not the person's main home will be caught even though the person may not have acquired with the intention of resale and nothing exists which would bring it within the scope of the other existing land sale provisions. The reason that I raise the issue of deductions under section CB 14 is that I am not privy to any plans that the Government or local authorities may have in relation to the current housing shortage. However, it is feasible that an owner of land that is intended to be held for future development or commercial use may be rezoned to residential and leave the owner unable to use it for its intended purpose. It may also be subject to compulsory acquisition. The question is not whether the sale should be taxable. To exempt such circumstances would give rise to argument that there are many more circumstances under which a person is caught by the brightline rules where previously any gain would have been on capital account. The question is merely whether the person should be able to get the deduction that is currently available where zoning or other changes have given rise to a greater gain than is attributable to normal market value increases. That the Committee considers the matter. 4.3 Ring-fencing losses Under the proposed ring-fencing rule, losses that are attributable only to the brightline test (and not any other existing land sales provision) would be ring-fenced and only be available to be offset against income from land sales either in the same year or a future year. Most submitters did not support the proposal to ring-fence losses arising from sales taxable solely under the bright-line test. Their reasons were as follows: Gains and losses that arise under the bright-line test should be treated in the same manner as other gains and losses that arise under the other sections of subpart CB. Taxpayers will have an incentive to argue that they had an intention of resale for any losses, which will increase compliance costs and render ring-fencing ineffective. Ring-fencing losses will distort investment decisions and will encourage economically inefficient behaviour. The bright-line test will capture many situations where the taxpayer is forced to sell due to financial strife. Losses in these cases should be dealt with on the same footing as gains. Ring-fencing would mean that many people will have unusable losses. 5
9 Turner & Associates Taxpayers are unlikely to accelerate property sales to realise losses as the benefit from the tax losses would give rise at most to a 33 percent recovery, while the true economic loss is much greater. Ring-fencing creates a one-way bet for government. Officials have recommended that the submissions be declined. Their reasons, as outlined in their (draft) report, are as follows: A significant revenue risk if unrestricted losses were allowed. An incentive for people with unrealised losses to accelerate sales and an incentive for those with unrealised gains to defer sales. It is unlikely that anyone would intentionally realise a loss merely to take advantage of a tax deduction. At best, a deduction of 33% would be obtained, leaving the remaining 67% of the loss to be borne by the seller. It is more likely that taxpayers would hold in an effort to recoup the loss as the market rose again or at least postpone the sale until the two years had passed so that the loss would not be ring-fenced. The taxpayers who would be more likely to be caught by the ring-fencing are those who have no option but to sell before the expiry of the two-year period for which the brightline rules apply. This could be due to financial hardship, or to other circumstances such as a single rental property that had become chemically contaminated by a bad tenant and had to be demolished. As these taxpayers are unlikely to invest in another property having had the bad experience, the loss will be unlikely to ever be utilised. Under the existing land sales rules, such a loss would be on capital account. However, a gain would also be on capital account. Under the brightline rules as drafted, a loss will be ring-fenced and possibly never be deductible, while a gain will be taxable in full. In other words, it may become a black-hole loss. To avoid this consequence, taxpayers are likely to argue that they acquired the property with the intention of resale. This is because ring-fencing applies where the brightline rules are the only land sales provision that applies to the disposal. The reason that the brightline rules are being introduced is that the intention test is difficult to enforce and often leads to lengthy disputes. That the Committee consider whether losses should be ring-fenced in circumstances where a gain on the same sale would have been taxable. 6
10 4.4 Order and placement of new section CB 6A Some submitters questioned the placement of section CB 6A which contains the brightline rules. Some were of the view that it should follow, rather than precede section CB 6 (the existing intention test). Others were of the view that the brightline rule should be contained in a paragraph of existing section CB 6 in such a way that it would contain words to the effect of for the purposes of this section, residential land disposed of within two years of acquisition is treated as having been acquired with the intention of resale. They were of the view that, where the exemptions from the brightline rules differed from the existing rules, they could simply be dealt with in the same way as currently applies with other exemptions from the various provisions of the existing land sale rules. The new provisions are included in new section CB 6A which precedes the existing intention test which is contained in section CB 6. The placement of 6A before 6 is correct under drafting convention. Treating the brightline rules as a deeming provision within the intention test seems logical, particularly in light of the fact that, as stated in the Regulatory Impact Statement at page 4, the first objective of the brightline rule is to provide an easier to enforce rule to supplement the current intention test. The officials are of the view that, if the exemptions are different from those applying to the existing intention test, it may be clearer if the brightline rules stood alone in their own section. However, stating an exemption to apply for the purposes of a particular paragraph of a section would be unlikely to cause any confusion for users of the Act. Therefore, the decision that the Committee will need to make regarding the structure of the legislation will depend mainly on the decisions that are made in respect of the other matters set out above, being: The main home exemption. Deductions for gains arising under, for example, a district plan or Resource Management Act change. The ring-fencing of losses. In summary, if the Committee decides: That tighter exemptions for the brightline rules should apply, That deductions should not be allowed; and That losses should be ring-fenced and potentially never be deductible in circumstances where a gain would have been taxable, a separate section for the brightline rules is justified. 7
11 Turner & Associates That the committee's decision on the section numbering be based on its decisions regarding the other rules that should apply to the brightline rules. 4.5 Status of Section CB 6A Some submitters were of the view that the brightline rules should apply only where other provisions under the current land sales rules do not apply. In most cases, it will not matter which provision brings the transaction into the tax net as the outcome would be the same in terms of whether or not the amount of a gain is taxable, the quantum of the gain for tax purposes, and the treatment of a loss. In no cases can a gain be taxed twice or a loss be deducted twice. However, if the exemptions differ, or if the existing provisions give greater deductions from a taxable gain than would be available under the brightline rules, it will be important that a strict hierarchy is established. Therefore, the Committee needs to decide whether the brightline rules should be subservient to the existing provisions (as is the current drafting of the loss ring-fencing) or whether the brightline rules should over-ride the other provisions where the tax result would be different. If it is decided that the brightline rules should take precedence, all of the existing provisions, including the intention test, should be stated as applying only if section CB 6A does not apply. If this was not done, users of the Act who are not tax specialists would be likely to find the application of the brightline rules difficult and confusing. An exception would need to be made for the loss ring-fencing rules if it proceeds in its current form. I have discussed this issue at length with officials. They agree that more certainty is warranted to avoid confusion. Officials have stated their preferred option is to make the brightline rules subservient to sections CB 6 to CB 12. This means that it would be subservient to all of the existing land sales provisions other than two provisions. These are: Section CB 13 which relates to major subdivisions and developments which would, in any case, be covered by section CB 12 which relates to development and subdivisions undertaken within ten years of acquisition. Section CB 13 is also subservient to section CB 14 and, is therefore, the last possible section to apply to any disposal of land; and Section CB 14 which taxes gains from the sale of land within ten years of acquisition where the value of the land is affected by a change. 8
12 Officials concede that making the brightline rules subservient in this manner would leave open the opportunity for taxpayers to argue that ring-fencing did not apply as they had acquired the land with the intention of resale. However, they are of the view that taxpayers would be unlikely to argue intention as it would expose them to a challenge that any earlier disposal which resulted in a gain should also be looked at under the intention test, thereby rendering those gains taxable. I agree with their analysis but have pointed out to them that it would apply only where a person had other land transactions which could be caught under the intention test. It would still leave the argument of intention available to the one-off transaction such as the beach house. The number of taxpayers involved in this potential dispute is could be quite significant. To summarise: Making the brightline rules over-ride the existing provisions would remove the intention test as an argument against the application of ring-fencing of losses and would not change the tax outcome under any of the existing provisions other than section CB 14 being a change in the value of land that is affected by a change. Making the brightline rules subservient to to all other provisions other than sections CB 13 and CB 14 would have the same result but would leave the door open for taxpayers to argue intention in order to circumvent the loss ring-fencing rules. That the Committee consider whether it wishes to leave open the argument that the loss ringfencing rules do not apply due to the land having been acquired with the intention of resale. 4.6 International tax issues Some submitters were concerned about the international tax implications of the brightline rules and, in particular, the potential for income to be taxed twice. They were of the view that the rules should apply only to land situated in New Zealand. They were also concerned that including land situated outside New Zealand could result in a foreign tax resident being taxed in New Zealand on the proceeds of land situated offshore. New Zealand tax residents are taxable on their worldwide income. Persons who are not tax resident in New Zealand are taxable only on income that has a New Zealand source. Under international tax convention, the country of source has the first right to tax. The country of residence (if different) can also impose tax. However, the country of residence will normally give a tax credit for the amount of tax paid in the country of source up to the amount of the domestic tax. A simple example to illustrate: 9
13 Taxpayer A is a tax resident of New Zealand and earns $100 income in country X. Country X is the country of source and has the first taxing right. Tax is levied at the rate of 20% being $20. The taxpayer's marginal tax rate in New Zealand is 33%. New Zealand will impose tax of $33 less the $20 paid in country X. If the tax rate in country X was 40%, New Zealand would give a credit for tax of $33 being the amount payable in New Zealand. If a person who is not tax resident in New Zealand earns income in New Zealand, New Zealand has the first right to tax and a credit will normally be given in the person's home country for the New Zealand tax paid. Where the subject of the tax is land, the situation is a little more complex. In many countries, the disposal of land is subject to capital gains tax. Where the capital gains tax is incorporated into the country's income tax legislation (such as in Australia) the double tax relief works as outlined above. However, if the country has a separate capital gains tax with its own taxing statute separate from income tax, the credit for tax paid in the country of source is unlikely to be applicable, resulting in double taxation. This effect arises because the credit for tax paid in the country of source is generally only available for tax of the same kind as that payable on the gain in the country of residence. To illustrate: Taxpayer B is a tax resident of New Zealand and disposes of a residential rental property in country Z. The property has been owned for less than two years. Country Z is the country of source and has the first taxing right. Capital gains tax is imposed. New Zealand will impose income tax under the brightline rules. New Zealand would not give a credit for the capital gains tax paid in country Z as it is not tax of the same kind as that imposed in New Zealand. The result for a resident of another country selling land in New Zealand would be likely to be the same. The problem will not arise for new immigrants to New Zealand as, under the transitional residence rules, they are not subject to tax in New Zealand on foreign-sourced income for the fist 48 months following their arrival in New Zealand. However, it could impact quite harshly on New Zealand tax residents investing overseas or foreign tax residents investing in New Zealand. This is not a new problem. Capital gains tax can apply to many things other than land depending on the scope of the CGT regime in a particular country. Art works and other collectable would be subject to capital gains tax under some of the regimes with the result ususallybeing the same as above. That the submission to include in the brightline rules only land situated in New Zealand be declined. 10
14 4.7 Start date for two-year period Several submitters were of the view that the start date for the two-year bright-line period should be the date that a person enters into an agreement to purchase the land rather than the date on which they obtain registered title to the land. The reasons given for this included: The current land sale rules regard the acquisition date as the date a person enters into an agreement to purchase the land. Using the date of registration unfairly shortens the bright-line period; Consistency with existing rules would give a fairer result under the bright-line test; There is no difficulty in accessing the data for the date on which the contract was entered into; Using it as the start date would mean that there does not need to be a separate rule for sales off the plan ; Using the registration date is a policy reversal from the section CB 15B approach enacted in Officials have recommended that the submissions be declined. Submitters are correct when they state that using the date on which the transfer of title is registered for the acquisition and the date on which an agreement for sale and purchase is entered in to for the disposal date does result in the shortest possible period of ownership for the brightline rules. This is likely to result in more transactions being taxed than would otherwise be the case. However, as the only date recorded on Landonline is the registration date, using this date would make it easier for officials to enforce the brightline rules. An exception is proposed for property acquired off the plan where registered title is subsequently obtained (see 4.8 below). Therefore, the Committee will need to decide whether consistency with other land sales rules and fairness for taxpayers is, or is not, more important than having easy to enforce brightline rules. As one of the objectives of the brightline rules is to provide an easily enforced rule, I would recommend that the legislation as drafted be accepted as the preferred position. That the submission be declined. 11
15 4.8 Sales off the plan Submitters were of the view that the proposed separate rule for sales off the plan leads to unduly harsh outcomes that are likely to cause confusion for taxpayers.they give the following example: 1 July 2016: Person enters into a contract to purchase 1 September 2018: Person obtains registered title 1 March 2019: Person enters into contract to sell In this situation the person will be captured by the proposed bright-line rule because they entered into a contract to sell (1 March 2019) within two years of obtaining registered title (1 September 2018). In contrast, if the person had entered into a contract to sell on 1 August 2018 (which is earlier), they would not be covered by the proposed bright-line rule because they entered into a contract to sell (1 August 2018) more than two years after entering into a contract to purchase (1 July 2016). Following our extensive discussions, officials now agree that the situation outlined by the submitter would be anomalous. They have suggested that the start date be amended for situations where a person has acquired a property off the plan and they later obtain registered title for the property. This amendment would result in the two-year period starting on the date on which the person entered into a contract to purchase the property. This is what submitters have asked for in respect of all acquisitions (see 4.7 above) and may impact on the Committee's decision regarding the general rule. s 1. That the submission be accepted and that the officials' proposed amendment be agreed to. 2. That the general rule outlined in 4.7 above be considered in light of the decision made in respect of this proposed change for sales off the plan. 12
16 4.9 Farmland Submissions regarding farmland included: Lifestyle blocks should be eligible for the farming exclusion. This is consistent with the current taxing rules which treat small farm ventures as businesses. The proposed definition is uncertain and many farms currently would not earn sufficient income to meet the test. If officials main concern is to exclude hobby farms and lifestyle blocks, then it should be defined by reference to that rather than using this definition. If the current definition of farmland is retained, there should be further guidance provided in the Tax Information Bulletin.Farmland should be defined simply as land that is capable of being worked on as a farming or agricultural business. Officials have agreed economic unit is not the appropriate test for farmland. The propose that, instead, it be defined as land that is capable of being worked on as a farming or agricultural business. Following intense discussions they have further agreed that the exception should be available where a person is operating a farming business on several plots of land, but the individual plot of land that they own is not capable of being used on its own for a farming business. The example that I outlined to officials was of a farmer who owns a small plot of land on which they run a farm. The plot of land by itself is too small to be capable of being enough to support a farming business. However, the farmer is able to run a successful farming business on the land because the farmer s neighbours allow the farmer to use their land for the business. This farmer would not be able to use the current farming exclusion for the block that they own even though they are actually running a successful farming business on it. Officials have suggested that an amendment be made to the effect that the farmland exclusion be available where the owner of the land uses the land for a farming business. That the submission be accepted and the officials' recommended solution be accepted. 13
17 4.10 Exceptions for circumstances outside of seller's control Turner & Associates Submitters sought exceptions from the bright-line test for various circumstances where the seller is forced to sell property due to circumstances outside of their control. These included: Sales due to financial hardship; Compulsory acquisitions; Mortgagee sales; and Corporate and personal insolvencies. Officials have recommended that the submissions be declined. Most of the sales that will be subject to tax under the brightline rules will result from sales in circumstances outside of the control of the person concerned. Most people would, if possible, hold the property for the full two years to ensure that they were not caught by the rules. In circumstances of insolvency or bankruptcy, falling within the brightline rules would impact on the funds available to pay creditors. However, providing a list of exceptions for circumstances outside of the control of the person would lead to complexity. Inevitably, there would be calls for more and more exceptions. It will be important to monitor the situation to ensure that taxpayers are not being too adversely affected. That the submissions be declined but that officials be asked to monitor the situation carefully Deduction for holding costs A number of submitters were of the view that holding costs for property subject to the bright-line test should be deductible. Their reasons were as follows: This would be the result if the standard deductibility rules applied to the property An explicit provision would be consistent with how deductions are treated for other revenue account property and would ensure that only the gain on the sale is taxed. 14
18 Holding costs are incurred irrespective of whether the property was used or available for use for private purposes. Current rules provide a deduction for holding costs as holding costs do not exclusively relate to living as an individual and therefore are not subject to the private limitation. Officials are of the view that current deductibility rules would not allow for holding costs to be deductible for revenue account property when the property is used only for private purposes. They state further that the deductibility of holding costs is a current issue, which is not created or limited to the bright-line test. Officials intend to consider this area further. Holding costs are incurred over the same period as the increase in value of the property occurs. Therefore, there is some argument that it is a cost necessarily incurred in deriving the income. However, as the issue is currently being considered from a policy perspective for all tax purposes, I believe that the issue in respect of the brightline rules should be resolved as part of that review. That the submission be declined Trusts Officials and I are in agreement regarding the proposal to exclude non-active trusts from the requirement to file tax returns where they have acquired land had have been required to obtain an IRD number. The officials' report covers a number of issues that have been brought up by submitters. Officials have recommended that, in the main, the submissions be accepted subject, in some cases, to changes in the details such as dollar amounts. I agree that the officials have reached a workable position on all of these issues. That the officials' recommendations be accepted. 15
Taxation (Bright-line Test for Residential Land) Bill
Taxation (Bright-line Test for Residential Land) Bill Officials Report to the Finance and Expenditure Committee on s on the Bill October 2015 Prepared by Policy and Strategy, Inland Revenue CONTENTS Bright-line
More informationRegulatory Impact Statement
Regulatory Impact Statement Bright-line test for sales of residential property Agency Disclosure Statement This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) has been prepared by Inland Revenue. It provides an analysis
More informationTaxation (Bright-line Test for Residential Land) Bill
Taxation (Bright-line Test for Residential Land) Bill Commentary on the Bill Hon Todd McClay Minister of Revenue First published in August 2015 by Policy and Strategy, Inland Revenue, P O Box 2198, Wellington
More informationKPMG submission: Bright-line test for sales of residential property Issues Paper
KPMG 10 Customhouse Quay P.O. Box 996 Wellington New Zealand Telephone +64 (4) 816 4500 Fax +64 (4) 816 4600 Internet www.kpmg.com/nz Deputy Commissioner Policy and Strategy Inland Revenue PO Box 2198
More informationRing-fencing rental losses
Ring-fencing rental losses An officials issues paper March 2018 Prepared by Policy and Strategy, Inland Revenue, and the Treasury First published in March 2018 by Policy and Strategy, Inland Revenue, PO
More informationTaxation (Bright-line Test for Residential Land) Bill
Taxation (Bright-line Test for Residential Land) Bill Government Bill As reported from the Finance and Expenditure Committee Recommendation Commentary The Finance and Expenditure Committee has examined
More informationTaxation (Land Information and Offshore Persons Information) Bill
Taxation (Land Information and Offshore Persons Information) Bill Officials Report to the Finance and Expenditure Committee on s on the Bill July 2015 Prepared by Policy and Strategy of Inland Revenue
More informationCoversheet: Ring-fencing rental losses
Coversheet: Ring-fencing rental losses Advising agencies Decision sought Proposing Ministers The Treasury and Inland Revenue Agreement to key design features of a rental loss ring-fencing policy Hon Grant
More informationPolicy concerns implementation should be deferred
KPMG Centre 18 Viaduct Harbour Ave PO Box 1584 Auckland 1140 New Zealand T: +64 9 367 5800 Our ref: 180516KPMGsubRingFencing Ring-fencing rental losses C/- Deputy Commissioner, Policy and Strategy Inland
More informationTax and Property Dealing Guidance on Recent Reforms. Tax statements, the bright-line test and residential land withholding tax
Tax and Property Dealing Guidance on Recent Reforms Tax statements, the bright-line test and residential land withholding tax May 2018 Contents Introduction 2 1. Tax statement rules 3 Tax statement rules
More informationSession three: Revenue Raising and Base Broadening 16 September 2009
VICTORIA UNIVERSITY TAX WORKING GROUP Session three: Revenue Raising and Base Broadening 16 September 2009 The day: The framework in which to consider tax reform; Presentations from Len Burman, Arthur
More informationRegulatory Impact Statement
Regulatory Impact Statement GST: change in use adjustments, supply of accommodation, transactions involving nominations, and application of section 19D to non-profit bodies Agency Disclosure Statement
More informationKPMG Centre 18 Viaduct Harbour Avenue P.O. Box 1584 Auckland New Zealand
KPMG Centre 18 Viaduct Harbour Avenue P.O. Box 1584 Auckland New Zealand Telephone +64 (9) 367 5800 Fax +64 (9) 367 5875 Internet www.kpmg.com/nz GST - Current issues Deputy Commissioner, Policy and Strategy
More informationNon-resident companies chargeable to Income Tax and non-resident CGT Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Non-resident companies chargeable to Income Tax and non-resident CGT Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The CIOT responds to this Stage 1 1 consultation exploring the case
More informationUpdate on HMRC s consultation on the modernisation of the corporate debt and derivative contract regimes
Tax Services Update on HMRC s consultation on the modernisation of the corporate debt and derivative contract regimes The consultation on reform of the loan relationships and derivative contract rules
More informationQB 16/07 : Income tax land sale rules main home and residential exclusions regular pattern of acquiring and disposing, or building and disposing
Vol 28 No 9 October 2016 CONTENTS 1 In summary 3 New legislation Order in Council FIF deemed rate of return set for 2015 16 4 Questions we ve been asked QB 16/07 : Income tax land sale rules main home
More informationNew Zealand s International Tax Review
New Zealand s International Tax Review Extending the active income exemption to non-portfolio FIFs An officials issues paper March 2010 Prepared by the Policy Advice Division of Inland Revenue and the
More informationHMT: Reforms to the taxation of nondomiciles. The Law Society's response November The Law Society. All rights reserved.
HMT: Reforms to the taxation of nondomiciles The Law Society's response November 2015 2015 The Law Society. All rights reserved. 1. The Law Society is the professional body for solicitors in England and
More informationNew information requirements to improve tax compliance in the property investment sector
September 2015 A special report from Policy and Strategy, Inland Revenue New information requirements to improve tax compliance in the property investment sector Sections 2AA, 156A, 156B, 156C, 156D, 156E,
More informationKPMG Submission - PUB00260: Land acquired for a purpose or with an intention of disposal
KPMG 10 Customhouse Quay P.O. Box 996 Wellington New Zealand Telephone +64 (4) 816 4500 Fax +64 (4) 816 4600 Internet www.kpmg.com/nz Team Manager, Technical Services Office of the Chief Tax Counsel National
More informationBEPS nears the finish line. The inevitable BEPS changes are close to the final stages of implementation.
13 December 2017 Regular commentary from our experts on topical tax issues Issue 2 The inevitable BEPS changes are close to the final stages of implementation. BEPS nears the finish line Snapshot The Taxation
More informationTAX LAWS AMENDMENT (CROSS BORDER TRANSFER PRICING) BILL 2013: MODERNISATION OF TRANSFER PRICING RULES EXPOSURE DRAFT - EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
2012 TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (CROSS BORDER TRANSFER PRICING) BILL 2013: MODERNISATION OF TRANSFER PRICING RULES EXPOSURE DRAFT - EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM (Circulated by the authority of the Deputy Prime Minister
More informationUK PROPERTY TAXES COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL UPDATE JUNE 2018
UK PROPERTY TAXES COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL UPDATE JUNE 2018 TIMELINE OF TAX CHANGES The last few years have seen a transformation in the landscape for the taxation of property ownership in the UK with
More informationYEAR END - TAX PLANNING CHECKLIST
YEAR END - TAX PLANNING CHECKLIST FOR YEAR ENDING 31 MARCH 2018 Below is a checklist of matters relevant to all business entities which you should consider, some of which may help you reduce the amount
More informationTaxing securities lending transactions: substance over form
Taxing securities lending transactions: substance over form A government discussion document Hon Dr Michael Cullen Minister of Finance Minister of Revenue First published in November 2004 by the Policy
More informationINTEREST ON USE OF MONEY RECENT DETERMINATIONS MADE BY THE COMMISSIONER PROVISIONAL TAX RECALCULATIONS FIRE LOSSES - SECTION 108 INCOME TAX ACT 1976
RECENT DETERMINATIONS MADE BY THE COMMISSIONER Six determinations were issued by the Commissioner on the 4th of December 1989. Below is a short explanation of each. The full determinations are printed
More informationOccupational Certificate: Tax Professional
Occupational Certificate: Tax Professional External Integrated Summative Assessment (EISA) Personal Taxation Question EXEMPLAR Part A Aspect of the answer Details of aspects to be included in answer Comp
More informationTaxation (GST and Remedial Matters) Bill
Taxation (GST and Remedial Matters) Bill Officials Report to the Finance and Expenditure Committee on s on the Bill October 2010 Prepared by the Policy Advice Division of Inland Revenue and the Treasury
More informationRegulatory Impact Statement
Regulatory Impact Statement Exempting councils from the land tainting tax rules Agency Disclosure Statement This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) has been prepared by Inland Revenue. It provides an analysis
More informationNETHERLANDS SOCIAL SECURITY PENSIONS - TAXATION WHEN THE RECIPIENT IS A NEW ZEALAND RESIDENT
NETHERLANDS SOCIAL SECURITY PENSIONS - TAXATION WHEN THE RECIPIENT IS A NEW ZEALAND RESIDENT PUBLIC RULING - BR Pub 98/6 This is a public ruling made under section 91D of the Tax Administration Act 1994.
More informationApplying IFRS Uncertainty over income tax treatments
Applying IFRS Uncertainty over income tax treatments November 2017 Contents Contents... 1 1. Introduction... 3 2. Scope of IFRIC 23... 4 2.1 Interest and penalties... 5 2.2 Other taxes and levies... 6
More informationStudent Loan Scheme Bill
Student Loan Scheme Bill Officials Report to the Finance and Expenditure Committee on submissions on the Bill May 2011 Prepared by the Policy Advice Division of Inland Revenue CONTENTS Overview 1 Significant
More informationUnited Kingdom. I. Taxes on Corporate Income
OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital (Condensed version 2010) and Key Tax Features of Member countries 2011 United Kingdom 1. Corporate income tax I. Taxes on Corporate Income Corporate profits
More informationHMRC Consultation Document Tackling Offshore Tax Evasion: A Requirement to Correct Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
HMRC Consultation Document Tackling Offshore Tax Evasion: A Requirement to Correct Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This is the latest in a series of consultations by
More informationReform of the Non-Dom Regime - December 2016
19 December 2016 Note: The government finalised the reform of the non-dom regime, and this was part of the second Finance Act of 2017 which gained Royal Assent on 16 November 2017 - please see our technical
More informationRegulatory Impact Statement
Regulatory Impact Statement GST Current Issues Agency Disclosure Statement This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) has been prepared by Inland Revenue. It provides an analysis of options to address four
More informationTaxation (Annual Rates for , Employment and Investment Income, and Remedial Matters) Bill 05/07/2017
Taxation (Annual Rates for 2017-18, Employment and Investment Income, and Remedial Matters) Bill 05/07/2017 Taxation (Annual Rates for 2017-18, Employment and Investment Income, and Remedial Matters) Bill
More informationTaxation of non-controlled offshore investment in equity
Taxation of non-controlled offshore investment in equity An officials issues paper on suggested legislative amendments December 2003 Prepared by the Policy Advice Division of the Inland Revenue Department
More informationMAJOR INSOLVENCY REFORM: GETTING THE (IPSO) FACTOS STRAIGHT
MAJOR INSOLVENCY REFORM: GETTING THE (IPSO) FACTOS STRAIGHT 19 May 2016 Australia Legal Briefings By Paul Apáthy, Rowena White and James Myint IN BRIEF In its Improving Bankruptcy and Insolvency Laws Proposal
More informationCapital Gains Tax: Payment window for residential property gains (payment on account) Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Capital Gains Tax: Payment window for residential property gains (payment on account) Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This Stage Two 1 consultation follows the government
More informationSelling a business: some tax issues
Selling a business: some tax issues This paper was presented at the Tasmania State Convention, 19 & 20 October 2017 by Dr Keith Kendall Overview This paper canvasses some of the tax issues that may arise
More informationPROJECT TITLE UK PROPERTY TAXES UPDATE
PROJECT TITLE UK PROPERTY TAXES UPDATE 2017 TIMELINE OF TAX CHANGES The last few years have seen a transformation in the landscape for the taxation of property ownership in the UK with further changes
More informationUK Tax Bulletin May 2018
UK Tax Bulletin May 2018 Contents May 2018 Current Rates... Latest rates of inflation and interest Security for PAYE.....A new decision on these penal rules Trust Notifications........ Some clarification
More informationPart 1B - amalgamations
Part 1B - amalgamations Section 29 of the Income Tax Amendment Act 1994 inserts a new section 191WD into the Act. Amalgamation - Companies Act The Companies Act 1955 (CA 1955) and Companies Act 1993 (CA
More informationMcGladrey files comments on new 3.8 percent investment income tax
McGladrey files comments on new 3.8 percent investment income tax Prepared by: Don Susswein, principal, Washington National Tax Moshe Metzger, partner, New York, N.Y. Rich Nichols, partner, New York, N.Y.
More informationProfessional Level Options Module, Paper P6 (ZAF)
Answers Professional Level Options Module, Paper P6 (ZAF) Advanced Taxation (South Africa) December 2016 Answers Note: ACCA does not require candidates to quote section numbers or other statutory or case
More informationTax & Property Seminar Property development and tax a practical guide...1
Property development and tax a practical guide...1 1. Understanding the tax treatment of a property development business...2 1.1 When will land held by a taxpayer in the business of property development
More informationAnnual residential property tax and capital gains tax rules for non-natural persons
Annual residential property tax and capital gains tax rules for non-natural persons STEP is the worldwide professional association for practitioners dealing with family inheritance and succession planning.
More informationCAPITAL GAINS TAX: PAYMENT WINDOW FOR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY GAINS (PAYMENT ON ACCOUNT) Issued 6 June 2018
ICAEW REPRESENTATION 64/18 CAPITAL GAINS TAX: PAYMENT WINDOW FOR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY GAINS (PAYMENT Issued 6 June 2018 ICAEW welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Capital gains tax: Payment window
More informationDEALING WITH YOUR VACATION PROPERTY
DEALING WITH YOUR VACATION PROPERTY REFERENCE GUIDE For many families, the vacation property evokes fond memories of vacations past and strong sentimental attachments. These feelings can often make it
More informationMay 2017 Examination
May 2017 Examination PAPER 1 Personal Taxation Part II Suggested Answers ANSWER Q1 Sarah Bray Income Tax computation 2016/17 1) Non-Savings income Savings income Dividend income Employment income (W1)
More informationBritish Bankers Association
PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE DISCUSSION DRAFT ON THE ATTRIBUTION OF PROFITS TO PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENTS PART II (SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR APPLYING THE WORKING HYPOTHESIS TO PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENTS
More informationTaxation (International Taxation, Life Insurance, and Remedial Matters) Bill
Taxation (International Taxation, Life Insurance, and Remedial Matters) Bill Officials Report to the Finance and Expenditure Committee on s on the Bill Supplementary Paper to Volume 3 Non-disclosure right
More informationSTEP comments on Reforms to the taxation of non-domiciles draft legislation issued on 5 December 2016
STEP comments on Reforms to the taxation of non-domiciles draft legislation issued on 5 December 2016 Inheritance Tax on UK Residential Property New Schedule A1 IHTA 1984 STEP is the worldwide professional
More informationTAX TREATY ISSUES ARISING FROM CROSS-BORDER PENSIONS PUBLIC DISCUSSION DRAFT
DISCUSSION DRAFT 14 November 2003 TAX TREATY ISSUES ARISING FROM CROSS-BORDER PENSIONS PUBLIC DISCUSSION DRAFT Important differences exist between the retirement pension arrangements found in countries
More informationProfessional Level Options Module, Paper P6 (ZAF)
Answers Professional Level Options Module, Paper P6 (ZAF) Advanced Taxation (South Africa) June 2011 Answers Note: The ACCA does not require candidates to quote section numbers or other statutory or case
More informationCHAPTER 3 - NON-CONCESSIONARY OPTIONS. 3.1 Taxed/Taxed/Exempt
- 17 - CHAPTER 3 - NON-CONCESSIONARY OPTIONS 3.1 Taxed/Taxed/Exempt The Consultative Document proposed that contributions to superannuation schemes should be from tax paid income, rather than being deductible
More informationCoversheet: BEPS transfer pricing and permanent establishment avoidance rules
BEPS documents release - August 2017: #18 Coversheet: BEPS transfer pricing and permanent establishment avoidance rules Advising agencies Decision sought Proposing Ministers The Treasury and Inland Revenue
More informationControlled Foreign Companies (CFC) Reform - a guide to the legislation
16 December 2011 Controlled Foreign Companies (CFC) Reform - a guide to the legislation Key points The policy aims and the broad scope of the revised proposals are welcomed but the legislation is complex
More informationTaxation (Annual Rates, Maori Organisations, Taxpayer Compliance and Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill
Taxation (Annual Rates, Maori Organisations, Taxpayer Compliance and Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill Officials Report to the Finance and Expenditure Committee on Submissions on the Bill Supplementary report
More informationRegulatory Impact Statement
Regulatory Impact Statement Requiring non-resident IRD number applicants to have a New Zealand bank account Agency Disclosure Statement This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) has been prepared by Inland
More informationCOMMERCE COMMISSION Regulation of Electricity Distribution Businesses Review of the Information Disclosure Regime
COMMERCE COMMISSION Regulation of Electricity Distribution Businesses Review of the Information Disclosure Regime Process Paper: Implementation of the New Disclosure Requirements 30 April 2008. Network
More informationInformation Being Released
Reference: 20150050 7 May 2015 Thank you for your Official Information Act request, received on 24 February 2015. You requested the following: Any reports, briefings, analysis or opinions undertaken, held
More informationTax Working Group Information Release. Release Document. September taxworkingroup.govt.nz/key-documents
Tax Working Group Information Release Release Document September 2018 taxworkingroup.govt.nz/key-documents This paper contains advice that has been prepared by the Tax Working Group Secretariat for consideration
More informationThe study expands and delves deeper into an earlier presentation in Ekonomisk Debatt 2015, nos. 7 and 8. 7
Summary Introduction This study presents a box model for uniform capital income and property taxation. 6 What, then, is a box model? The name is taken from the Dutch model for standard taxation of financial
More informationTAXING GAINS MADE BY NON-RESIDENTS ON UK IMMOVABLE PROPERTY
TAXING GAINS MADE BY NON-RESIDENTS ON UK IMMOVABLE PROPERTY Response by the Association of Taxation Technicians 1 Introduction 1.1 The Association of Taxation Technicians (ATT) is pleased to have the opportunity
More informationINTERNATIONAL ASPECTS OF AUSTRALIAN INCOME TAX
INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS OF AUSTRALIAN INCOME TAX Chartered Accountants Business Advisers and Consultants Suite 201, Level 2 65 York Street, Sydney NSW 2000 Australia Telephone: 61+2+9290 1588 Facsimile:
More informationGST on low value imported goods: an offshore supplier registration system. CA ANZ Submission, June 2018
GST on low value imported goods: an offshore supplier registration system CA ANZ Submission, June 2018 2 Contents Cover letter... 4 General comments... 7 Offshore supplier registration: scope of the rules...10
More informationThank you for your request made under the Official Information Act 1982 (OJA), and received on 18 February You requested the following:
Inland Revenue Te Tari Taake 5 March 2018 Ms Andrea Black Dear Andrea Thank you for your request made under the Official Information Act 1982 (OJA), and received on 18 February 2018. You requested the
More informationTax Working Group Information Release. Release Document. September taxworkingroup.govt.nz/key-documents
Tax Working Group Information Release Release Document September 2018 taxworkingroup.govt.nz/key-documents This paper contains advice that has been prepared by the Tax Working Group Secretariat for consideration
More informationICAEW REPRESENTATION 108/16 TAX REPRESENTATION
ICAEW REPRESENTATION 108/16 TAX REPRESENTATION STRENGTHENING THE TAX AVOIDANCE DISCLOSURE REGIMES FOR INDIRECT TAXES ICAEW welcomes the opportunity to comment on the consultation document Strengthening
More informationSummary of UK tax changes coming into force from 6 April 2017
Summary of UK tax changes coming into force from 6 April 2017 In the Summer Budget 2015 it was announced that there would be significant changes to the way those who were not domiciled in the UK and living
More information25 October Draft Ruling on the Taxation of Earn out Arrangements. 1. Sale on credit v. a sale for an earn out right
25 October 2007 Draft Ruling on the Taxation of Earn out Arrangements On 17 October 2007, the Australian Taxation Office (the ATO ) released a new Draft Taxation Ruling (the Draft Ruling ) on the tax treatment
More information5. RATING FOR 2003/04 REMISSION, POSTPONEMENT AND OTHER RATES POLICIES
5. RATING FOR 2003/04 REMISSION, POSTPONEMENT AND OTHER RATES POLICIES Officer responsible Authors Director of Finance Associate Director of Finance Geoff Barnes, DDI 941-8447, Rates Policy Manager Wayne
More informationMobility matters The essential UK tax guide for individuals on international assignment abroad
www.pwc.co.uk Mobility matters The essential UK tax guide for individuals on international assignment abroad December 2017 Contents 1 Determining your UK tax liability 1.1 What impact will my overseas
More informationBRICOM HOLDINGS LIMITED. - v - THE COMMISSIONERS OF INLAND REVENUE
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BRICOM HOLDINGS LIMITED - v - THE COMMISSIONERS OF INLAND REVENUE LORD JUSTICE MILLETT: This is an appeal by Bricom Holdings Limited ("the taxpayer") from a decision of the Special
More informationUK REITS. Penny, begin by describing to us what a REIT exactly is.
UK REITS Investment trends, the economic environment and regulatory changes favour success of UK REITs following their official launch on the 1 st of January 2007. Real estate investment trusts, or REITs
More informationCHAPTER 6 - HOW SUPERANNUATION AND LIFE INSURANCE SAVINGS ARE TO BE TAXED
87 CHAPTER 6 - HOW SUPERANNUATION AND LIFE INSURANCE SAVINGS ARE TO BE TAXED 6.1 Introduction For the reasons given in Chapter 5, the preferential tax treatment of superannuation cannot be justified on
More informationThe non-dom newsletter
December 2016 Tax Services The non-dom newsletter Twelfth edition - Draft Finance Bill Special 8 December 2016 Introduction Welcome to the Draft Finance Bill Special edition of the non-dom newsletter.
More informationATTRIBUTION OF GAINS TO MEMBERS OF CLOSELY CONTROLLED NON- RESIDENT COMPANIES AND THE TRANSFER OF ASSETS ABROAD
TAXREP 53/12 (ICAEW REP 160/12) ICAEW TAX REPRESENTATION ATTRIBUTION OF GAINS TO MEMBERS OF CLOSELY CONTROLLED NON- RESIDENT COMPANIES AND THE TRANSFER OF ASSETS ABROAD Comments submitted on 22 October
More informationPlan Change A: Removal of Opening Hour Rules for Activities Involving the Sale of Alcohol
Plan Change A: Removal of Opening Hour Rules for Activities Involving the Sale of Alcohol 1. Section 32 Report 2. Section 11 Business Zones 3. Section 12 Industrial Zones 4. Technical Report Contents Palmerston
More information1. Chapter 1 Preliminary. 1.1 Terms used in this Act Sec th September 2007
24 th September 2007 The Stamp Duty Rewrite Project Team Office of State Revenue GPO Box T1600 Perth WA 6845 Dear Sir/Madam, Exposure Draft of the Duties Bill 2007 (WA) The Taxation Institute of Australia
More informationOECD releases final BEPS package
6 October 2015 Tax Flash OECD releases final BEPS package On 5 October 2015, the OECD published the final reports of the OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting ( BEPS ) project, which consist of a package
More informationSimplifying Transactions in Securities Legislation. Consultation Document 31 July 2009
Simplifying Transactions in Securities Legislation Consultation Document 31 July 2009 Subject of this consultation: Scope of this consultation: Whether a package of proposals aimed at simplifying the Transactions
More informationRewriting the Income Tax Act 1994
Rewriting the Income Tax Act 1994 Exposure Draft Part I Rewrite Project Team First published in September 2004 by the Policy Advice Division of the Inland Revenue Department, P O Box 2198, Wellington.
More informationCompany distributions
Company distributions Response to the HMRC consultation document of 9 December 2015 3 February 2016 1. Introduction 2 1.1 Overarching objectives 2 2. Executive summary 2 3. General comments 2 4. Responses
More informationIntroduction 1 5. Who we are 6 8. General Comments Further contact 32. Ten Tenets for a Better Tax System Appendix 1
TAXREP 7/12 ICAEW TAX REPRESENTATION PATENT BOX: CORPORATION TAX REFORM Comments submitted on 10 February 2012 by ICAEW Tax Faculty in response to the publication on 6 December 2011 of draft clauses Profits
More informationAdministrative measures
August 2018 A special report from Policy and Strategy, Inland Revenue Administrative measures DEFINITION OF LARGE MULTINATIONAL GROUP Section YA 1 The new legislation introduces the term large multinational
More informationPublic Rulings Unit Work Programme
Public Rulings Unit Work Programme 2016-17 Monthly update - position as at 30 June 2017 Public items are summarised below based on their current status. Items we have completed are at the bottom of the
More informationB.4. Intra-Group Services
B.4. Intra-Group Services Introduction B.4.1. This chapter considers the transfer prices for intra-group services within an MNE group. Firstly, it considers the tests for determining whether chargeable
More informationProperty Issues: Avoiding the Pitfalls
86 Property Issues: Avoiding the Pitfalls Introduction Property Issues: Avoiding the Pitfalls Mary Gara Partner, Gara Ryan Although the Irish obsession with property investment may have waned over the
More informationSupplementary Regulatory Impact Statement: A New Trusts Act Commercial and Financial Trusts
Supplementary Regulatory Impact Statement: A New Trusts Act Commercial and Financial Trusts Agency Disclosure Statement This supplementary Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) has been prepared by the Ministry
More informationCountdown to 6 April 2017 for non-uk domiciliaries
PRIVATE CLIENT Countdown to 6 April 2017 for non-uk domiciliaries December 2016 In July 2015, the Government announced significant changes to the taxation of resident non-uk domiciled individuals and their
More informationDIRECTOR : Enderstein Van der Merwe Inc. Law firm with offices in Cape Town & Johannesburg
DIRECTOR : Enderstein Van der Merwe Inc. Law firm with offices in Cape Town & Johannesburg LL.B (University of Stellenbosch) Postgraduate Diploma in Financial Planning (University of Stellenbosch) B.Compt
More informationEveryone is talking about tax 2018 Latest Tax Developments seminar
Everyone is talking about tax 2018 Latest Tax Developments seminar June 2018 Deloitte speakers Melanie Meyer Partner Having worked exclusively in transfer pricing for over 16 years, my goal is to provide
More informationHigh net worth individuals. Migrate to New Zealand by investing or doing business in New Zealand
High net worth individuals Migrate to New Zealand by investing or doing business in New Zealand New Zealand is the easiest country in the world to do business in 1. With New Zealand s stable democratic
More informationQualifying companies: implementation of flow-through tax treatment
Qualifying companies: implementation of flow-through tax treatment An officials issues paper May 2010 Prepared by the Policy Advice Division of the Inland Revenue Department and the New Zealand Treasury
More informationDISCUSSION DRAFT POSSIBLE TREATMENT OF OFFSHORE SETTLEMENTS FOR NON- DOMICILIARIES AFTER 6 APRIL 2017
DISCUSSION DRAFT POSSIBLE TREATMENT OF OFFSHORE SETTLEMENTS FOR NON- DOMICILIARIES AFTER 6 APRIL 2017 Background This paper has been prepared by representatives of the CIOT, Law Society, STEP and ICAEW
More informationOECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital (Condensed version 2010) and Key Tax Features of Member countries 2010
OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital (Condensed version 2010) and Key Tax Features of Member countries 2010 Sample excerpt United Kingdom 1. Corporate income tax I. Taxes on Corporate Income
More informationCapital Gains Tax. Foreign and Temporary Residents - Changing Residency Status. Prepared and Presented by:
Capital Gains Tax Foreign and Temporary Residents - Changing Residency Status Prepared and Presented by: Tom Delany Tax Partner Pty Ltd 3 Inadale Court Toowoomba Queensland 4350 Mobile: 0428 357413 Email:
More information