EY s attractiveness survey. Scotland 2016 Scotland moves into the global fast lane

Transcription

1 EY s attractiveness survey Scotland 016 Scotland moves into the global fast lane

2 EY 016 attractiveness survey Scotland Contents Welcome Performance in 015 A big increase in FDI job creation Perceptions of Scotland as an FDI location slip back Sectors Origins of FDI into Scotland

3 EY s attractiveness surveys are widely recognised by our clients, the media and major public stakeholders as a key source of insight on foreign direct investment (FDI). Examining the attractiveness of a particular region or country as an investment destination, the surveys are designed to help businesses to make investment decisions and governments to remove barriers to future growth. A two-step methodology analyses both the reality and perception of FDI in the respective country or region. Findings are based on the views of representative panels of international and local opinion leaders and decision-makers. Scotland attractiveness report is part of the EY Economics for Business programme which provides knowledge, analysis and insight to help business understand the economic environments in which they operate. ey.com/uk/economics ey.com/ukas economics@uk.ey.com Follow: markgregoryeconomics.ey.com FDI activities National performance being driven by regional powerhouses The FDI performance of Scottish cities Methodology Conclusion

4 Welcome EY s annual study of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) into Scotland reveals the country s most impressive performance on record and I m delighted to introduce our findings in the 016 Scottish Attractiveness report. Our research and analysis demonstrates in no uncertain terms that Scotland is a commanding economic force within the UK and beyond.

5 The results are outstanding. In 015 Scotland achieved its highest number of projects in any year since EY s FDI database was launched in With a phenomenal growth rate of 51%, Scotland secured an increased share of total UK projects as well as a significant rise in the number of FDI jobs. This data proves that Scotland has been resilient in managing to weather the oil and gas price volatility storm whilst also being able to flourish in other sectors. Business services, software, scientific research and food sectors offer strength and diversity for Scotland. Scotland s perceived attractiveness for foreign investors remains at a reassuring level: 7% of companies who are yet to invest in the UK ranked Scotland as the most attractive region; a particularly encouraging sign. This is of significant note given that the halo effect, created by the landmark events in 014, appears to be ebbing, with Scotland s attractiveness slipping back to 4% from 6%. There are also important opportunities open for exploitation. Scotland could focus on developing stronger relationships among the newer and emerging origin sources of FDI. Although China and India rank among the UK s top five original sources, they did not appear in Scotland s top 10. Scotland also trails behind other UK regions in terms of where Headquarters are established. Manufacturing in the UK performed well, predominantly driven by the North of England and the Midlands. The picture for this sector in Scotland, however, has not been as strong. There has been a decline in machinery and equipment projects, creating fewer jobs per project in comparison to England s Northern Powerhouse. Collectively, the regions have performed extremely well and are largely responsible for the UK s 0% growth in FDI projects with almost 90% of the UK s growth coming from outside London and the South East. Leading the pack is Scotland with the greatest number of projects outside London. The UK s agenda to devolve power has resonated positively with investors who are helping to rebalance economic activity across the country. However, awareness of UK devolution appears to be limited, and knowledge of regional changes could bring further benefits. Growth in regional economies and the latest FDI figures should not be taken for granted. Now is not the time for Scotland to rest on its laurels. Regional performance is also increasing across European countries, posing greater competition for Scotland and the UK. Continued improvements to infrastructure and skills development will be necessary in order for Scotland to attract more inward investment in the future. Mark Harvey EY Senior Partner, Scotland EY 016 Scotland attractiveness survey 3

6 Performance in 015 Scotland puts in a record-breaking performance in attracting FDI EY s Global Investment Monitor (GIM) on FDI projects into Scotland in 015 reveals that the number of inward investments into Scotland surged by more than half over the previous year. This confirms that the ability of the Scottish economy to attract and secure cross-border investments remains both strong and growing. The headline figures show that the total number of FDI projects secured by Scotland in 015 increased significantly to 119 investments, representing an increase of 51% on projects recorded in 014. The number of projects into the UK as a whole also increased but Scotland outpaced the rate of growth at a UK level, enabling it to increase its share of all UK FDI projects from 9% to 11%. This market share of 11% represents the highest proportion of UK projects secured by Scotland over the past decade. The 015 total of 119 FDI projects is also the highest number secured by Scotland in any year since the European (now Global) Investment Monitor (EIM) database began in Scotland s previous high point was 88 in Number of FDI projects into the UK and Scotland s market share, Number of FDI projects into Scotland, Projects UK Scotland Share Scotland & market share Projects Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor 016 Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor 016 4

7 consolidating Scotland s second place in UK FDI, behind London Number of projects secured by all areas of the UK over the past ten years Total Greater London South East Scotland West Midlands North West North East Yorkshire and Humberside South West Wales East Midlands Northern Ireland East Anglia Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor 016 These buoyant FDI figures for 015 indicate that Scotland has now decisively overtaken the South East of England as the UK s second biggest area for FDI projects after London. In last year s report, we highlighted that while the South East had outpaced Scotland on FDI until 009, the positions had been reversed in four years out of the past five. That record has now extended to five years out of the past six: the 015 FDI figures show Scotland outperforming the South East by a huge margin of some 47 projects, once again securing the highest number of projects of any UK region after London. On a longer-term perspective, the South East of England s historical lead over Scotland means it has still secured more projects than Scotland over the past decade. But the gap is now narrowing, with projects in the South East broadly in decline year-on-year, and Scotland powering ahead, registering a record number of projects in three of the past four years. Total number of projects secured by UK regions over the past 10 years East Anglia Northern Ireland East Midlands Wales South West Yorkshire and Humberside North East North West West Midlands Scotland South East Greater London Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor EY 016 Scotland attractiveness survey 5

8 A big increase in FDI job creation Scotland s sterling performance in terms of securing projects in 015 was translated into a similarly strong showing in terms of FDI jobs. Reported employment generated though FDI in 015 rose to 5,385 jobs, representing an increase of 5% on the previous year. However, unlike the record-breaking story on project numbers in 015, these employment figures were not of landmark significance: Scotland has recorded similarly high levels of employment in the past; the most recent high point being reached in 011, when recorded FDI employment in the year reached 5,96. In securing 5,385 FDI jobs during 015, Scotland achieved a 1.7% market share of UK-wide FDI employment. Despite the rise in Scotland s FDI job numbers in 015, this 1.7% market share is actually lower than the average share of UK FDI employment that Scotland has recorded over the past decade, which stands at 14.. The lower share of UK FDI jobs may reflect the relatively high proportion of sales and marketing investments coming into Scotland in 015. These tend to produce fewer jobs that other types of projects such as headquarters, and research and development investments. Employment created through FDI into Scotland, Employment Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor 016 6

9 Perceptions of Scotland as an FDI location slip back after last year s strong rise An interesting perspective on the 015 GIM FDI statistics for Scotland is provided by the survey of international investors perceptions. In 016 this annual study involved interviews with 444 decision-makers from companies across the world that have invested, or could invest, in the UK in general and/or Scotland in particular. The study viewed to gauge these companies perceptions of the relative merits and attractiveness of different FDI locations. At a headline level, the survey results appear to run counter to Scotland s strong FDI performance in 015. Last year we highlighted how, when asked to name the most attractive area of the UK in which to establish operations, the proportion of respondents citing Scotland had risen from 4% to 6%. This has been reversed in 016, with the number putting Scotland first slipping back to 4% effectively taking the figure back to its level in 014. Which region in the UK do you see as the most attractive to establish operations? London South East of England West Midlands North West of England South West of England Scotland North East of England East Midlands Yorkshire East of England Wales 47% 1% 7% 6% 5% 4% % % 1% Source: EY 016 UK attractiveness survey. Total sample (n=444) EY 016 Scotland attractiveness survey 7

10 Perceptions of Scotland as an FDI location slip back after last year s strong rise but Scotland s fundamentals remain strong However, a closer look reveals a number of reasons why this change should not be regarded too negatively. One is that the findings on regional perceptions are by their nature, volatile year-onyear. Another is that last year s result, as we noted at the time, was undoubtedly influenced by the short-term halo effect from Scotland s high-profile events in 014, such as the Commonwealth Games and Ryder Cup. Indeed, 015 s record-breaking crop of FDI projects may partly reflect the continued follow-through from that landmark year. Also, the proportion of international investors in our 016 survey citing Scotland as the UK s most attractive FDI location is significantly higher than the 4% headline figure among two key groups of businesses: financial intermediation firms (6%), and those companies that have yet to invest in the UK (7%). All of this points to the continued strength of Scotland s global FDI brand; a resilience that has manifested itself both in the country s expanding flow of FDI projects in 015, and also in the rising proportion of new as opposed to expansion investments within that continued strong project flow. What are your investment criteria when considering investing in the regional locations in the UK? Availability and skills of local workforce Transport infrastructures Local labour costs Availability of business partners and suppliers Telecommunications and technology infrastructures Cost and availability of real estate locally Strength of local education both trade and academic Strength of business networks locally Access to regional grants and incentives for investment Local quality of life such as local schools, housing, cultural and sporting events Support from regional economic advisory bodies Total 7% 6% 18% 17% 15% % 9% 9% 5% 015 reminder 1% 5% 16% 0% 1% 15% 9% 1% 10% 1% 10% Source: EY 016 UK attractiveness survey. Total sample (n=444) 8

11 as investors focus on skills and transport links EY also looked at the factors that attract FDI at a regional level. When asked what drives investment in regional locations in the UK, investors cited local skills and transport infrastructure as the two most significant areas by some margin. For investors not established in the UK, the availability of business partners and suppliers, as well as the strength of local business networks, were relatively more important, in comparison to established investors. It is interesting that Scotland s mix of FDI projects in 015 saw a shift towards new, rather than expansion, investments. When we asked investors what types of transport links have the strongest influence on their decisions about investing in the UK, roads are mentioned most often in investors top three, but more investors (6%) cite London airports in first place than roads (4%). Regional airports have also increased in importance in the past year, possibly because investors transport priorities evolve as they become more become familiar with the UK regions. All of this points to a pressing need to provide a clear plan for UK regional airports and to build more roads. These priorities may provide valuable guidance for Scotland as it seeks to use its devolved powers to boost its attractiveness to FDI. Which transport infrastructure is most important when considering investing in the UK? Total 015 reminder Road 4% 4% 55% London Airports 6% 40% 36% Regional Airports 15% 34% 6% Ports 17% 30% 7% Regional rail 8% 0% 1% Rail to London 5% 16% 15% Rail in London 8% 8% Can t say 4% First Total Source: EY 016 UK attractiveness survey. Total sample (n=444) EY 016 Scotland attractiveness survey 9

12 Sectors A surge in utility supply, business services and software FDI projects Each of the 10 leading sectors for FDI in 015 across Scotland either generated the same number of projects or recorded an increase over their 014 performance. The sole exception was of machinery and equipment, which decreased. The most significant sector generating investment into Scotland in 015 was software, whose projects rose by 170%. However, eclipsing this in terms of the rate of increase was business services, which recorded a six-fold increase in project numbers, and utility supply, which recorded a five-fold increase. On the downside, machinery and equipment projects declined by 60%. In addition, while oil & gas was still in the top 10 sectors generating investment projects in Scotland in 014, the 015 GIM figures show that the malaise in the industry meant that only one project was recorded in Scotland from the oil and gas sector during the year. When the overall increase in FDI employment recorded across Scotland is broken down by sector, those sectors showing the largest actual growth in employment were business services (a 16-fold increase in FDI jobs), software (up by 9%), food (an 18-fold rise) and scientific research (up fourfold). These five sectors accounted for employment growth of,48 out of the total of 5,385 jobs created through FDI into Scotland during the year. Contribution of leading sectors to FDI projects in Scotland, 015 Changes in FDI employment creation in Scotland by sector, 015 Projects Food Automotive Assembly Electrical Machinery & Equipment Electronics Financial Intermediation Scientific Research Utility Supply Business Services Software Employment Business Services Software Food Scientific Research Telecommunications & Post Automotive Assembly Utility Supply Health & Social Work Plastic & Rubber Cultural Activities Non-metallic mineral products Chemicals Publishing Miscellaneous increase Miscellaneous decrease Other Transport Services Paper Oil&Gas Electrical Machinery & Equipment Increase Decrease Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor 016 Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor

13 Origins of FDI into Scotland Proven strengths need to be extended to newer FDI markets An analysis of the countries of origin for FDI projects in 015 reveals some interesting differences between the sources of FDI into Scotland and into the UK as a whole. While both Scotland and the UK secured the highest proportion of their investment from the US, after this the rankings and some of the sources of investment differ. For the UK generally, the next most important sources of investment after the US included China and India, with Germany and France also ranking in the top five sources. In Scotland, China and India were replaced in the top five by Norway and Canada. Countries of origin for FDI projects into the UK, 015 US Germany 9% 31% China France India Japan Netherlands % Australia 7% Spain Canada 6% 4% Other 6% 6% Countries of origin for FDI projects into Scotland, 015 US France 18% Germany Norway 36% Canada Australia Japan Singapore Sweden Denmark Switzerland 4% 1% Other 5% 7% Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor 016 Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor 016 These findings indicate that Scotland has not yet established as strong a reputation as some other areas of the UK with the newly emerging countries for FDI projects, such as China and India. To date, most of the investment projects from these less established countries of origin have focused on London. Partly as a result, neither China nor India ranks within the top 10 origins for investment in Scotland, despite being in the UK s top five. That said, Scotland does significantly better than the UK as a whole at securing Scandinavian investment: Norway, Sweden and Denmark all rank in Scotland s top 10 origins of investment, but do not feature in the UK s top 10. Additionally, France is a more frequent investment origin than Germany for investment into Scotland; this reverses the position recorded at a UK level. Taken together, these trends underline the need for Scotland to build on its existing strengths and secure closer relationships with the newer and emerging sources of FDI around the world. EY 016 Scotland attractiveness survey 11

14 FDI activities A strong rise in sales and marketing projects as new projects overtake expansion investments In terms of the activities undertaken by FDI projects across Scotland in 015, the number of R&D projects and contact centres both rose slightly. The number of manufacturing projects recorded declined, albeit after a strong response in 014, when they rose strongly. However, the most significant movement by type of activity was a strong rise in projects established to undertake a sales and marketing function, which roughly doubled in number. This reflects a wider shift in Scotland s mix of FDI projects in 015 towards investments from the service sector. Activities of FDI projects in Scotland, 015 A further notable change in 015 was that the majority of FDI projects secured by Scotland were new investments rather than expansions of existing investments. This is a significant and positive shift for Scotland, where expansions have historically outnumbered the new projects established in the country. In fact, 015, which saw 5 of investments recorded as new, was one of only two years in the past decade when new projects in Scotland have outstripped expansions, (the previous case being 013). The fact that this has now happened in two of the past three years suggests that Scotland is succeeding in attracting a higher proportion of new, first-time investors, a positive sign for the future The split between expansion and new FDI projects in Scotland, Projects Sales and Marketing Manufacturing Logistics Projects HQ R&D Other Contact Centres Expansion New Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor 016. Total sample (n=444) Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor 016. Total sample (n=444) 1

15 Looking at the biggest FDI projects in terms of job creation, 10 projects announced across Scotland in 015 reported that they would each create 00 or more jobs. These included several manufacturing investments as well as an announcement of an R&D centre investment. The remaining large-scale projects were recorded as being driven by sales/ marketing-type activities or call-centre operations. In reality, some administrative back office functions are often recorded as sales and marketing activities, which can provide a slightly different impression from the actual function undertaken. Largest projects in Scotland in 015 in terms of job creation Company name City Origin country Jobs Project type Activity JP Morgan Glasgow City USA 500 Expansion Sales & Marketing Webhelp Groupe Argyll and Bute France 400 New Contact Centre Lockheed Martin UK Glasgow City USA 37 New Research & Development Webhelp East Ayrshire France 300 Expansion Contact Centre Marine Harvest Fife Norway 60 Expansion Manufacturing Jabil Circuit Inc West Lothian USA 1 Expansion Sales & Marketing Concentrix Renfrewshire USA 00 Expansion Sales & Marketing ThyssenKrupp AG South Lanarkshire Germany 00 Expansion Manufacturing HGS Europe Scottish Borders India 00 Expansion Contact Centre CGI France Edinburgh City Canada 00 Expansion Shared Services Centre Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor 016 EY 016 Scotland attractiveness survey 13

16 National performance being driven by regional powerhouses The key driver of the UK s FDI growth in 015 was the performance of the regions outside of the South East. Scotland had its most successful year ever, recording a 51% rise in projects and securing 35% more projects than its previous highest level (in 1997). Only three regions in the UK saw a decline in projects secured during the year. The South East of England recorded a significant fall of %, but Northern Ireland saw an even bigger decline, with project numbers falling by 6% and just 15 projects secured in 015. Wales saw a relatively small decline with %. The major success stories among the English regions were the North West (118% increase), North East (8 increase), Yorkshire (66% increase), the West Midlands (46% increase), South West ( increase), East of England (40%) and East Midlands (8%). London s modest rise of 7% in project numbers was outpaced by the UK as a whole, meaning London s market share of UK projects declined to 38% in 015, having been as high as 46.5% in 013. Given that in previous years we ve commented on the negative risks of the UK s FDI projects being overly concentrated in London, this rebalancing towards the regions should be seen as a positive development: London continued to grow but many other regions grew even faster. The performances of the recently created Northern Powerhouse and Midlands Engine have improved markedly. The Northern Powerhouse in particular has recorded a 17% increase in projects over the two years since the phrase was coined. Aside from Scotland, the performance of the Devolved administrations has been mixed. While most areas of the UK have recorded modest rises in projects since 013, Wales has seen a substantial increase (albeit flat in 015), and Northern Ireland has declined. Table 3: Number of FDI projects secured by selected areas of the UK since Scotland Wales Northern Ireland Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor 016 The success of the regions in part reflects the moves to devolve power form central government. Foreign investors view this policy very favourably. The UK Government is giving more control over economic policy to the UK regions. Are you aware of this policy? 4% 1% 39% 7% More attractive Same as today Less attractive Can t say Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor 016. Total sample (n=444) 14

17 Projects recorded by regions of the UK in 015, and percentage change on 014 Scotland 51% Region 015 projects % of UK FDI projects % change on 014 London % +6.6% Scotland % +50.6% North West 98 9.% % West Midlands 9 8.6% +46.0% Yorkshire & Humberside % +66.0% Northern Ireland 6% North West 118% North East 8 Yorkshire 66% South East 7 6.8% -1.7% North East % +83. Wales % -.4% East Midlands % +7.6% South West % +3.1% East of England 1.0% +40.0% Northern Ireland % -61.5% East Midlands 8% Wales % South West West Midlands 46% London South 7% East % East of England 40% EY 016 Scotland attractiveness survey 15

18 16

19 The FDI performance of Scottish cities Of the top 10 UK cities in terms of numbers of FDI projects secured in 015, Scotland had three cities represented: Edinburgh, which ranked third in the UK with 41 projects; Glasgow, ranked sixth with projects; and Aberdeen, ranked joint 10th with nine projects. UK cities securing the highest numbers of FDI projects 015 Rank City London 398 Manchester 54 3 Edinburgh 41 4 Leeds 31 5 Birmingham 4 6 Glasgow 7 Coventry 11 =8 Newcastle upon Tyne 10 =8 Solihull 10 =10 Aberdeen 9 =10 Bristol 9 =10 Cambridge 9 Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor 016 Over the past decade, these three cities Edinburgh, Glasgow and Aberdeen have consistently been Scotland s most successful cities in attracting FDI, but Glasgow and Edinburgh have regularly swapped places as Scotland first and second-ranked locations. While Edinburgh was ranked top in 015, since 006 it has held the number one position outright in only three years including 014, and joint first once. However, Edinburgh s strong lead over Glasgow in 015 may indicate the beginning of a new trend in Scotland one in which the country s rising proportion of service sector projects may have a greater likelihood of locating in Edinburgh. Number of FDI projects in Edinburgh, Glasgow and Aberdeen, Edinburgh Glasgow Aberdeen Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor 016 Looking across the leading regional locations for investment in Scotland, the Central Belt is the most prevalent region for FDI. However, locations in the Highlands and Islands area do also feature, with Caithness, Inverness and Dunoon all located within the boundaries of Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE). Scottish cities/towns securing two or more FDI projects in 015 City 015 Edinburgh 41 Glasgow Aberdeen 9 Livingston 4 Caithness Dundee Dunoon East Kilbride Glenrothes Greenock Inverness 4 16 Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor EY 016 Scotland attractiveness survey 17

20 The FDI performance of Scottish cities Spotlight on Edinburgh and Glasgow Drilling down into the FDI performance of Scotland s top two FDI cities in 015, Edinburgh and Glasgow, some interesting trends emerge in terms of both the sectors and countries contributing FDI. While both cities secured their largest proportion of investment from software projects in 015, with software representing % of FDI projects in both cities, after that there are significant differences in terms of FDI sectors. In Edinburgh, the next most important FDI sectors after software were electronics, scientific research, and utility suppliers, each providing 10% of the total projects. In Glasgow, by contrast, the most important sectors after software were business services, financial intermediation, and scientific research, which each provided 14% of projects. Turning to the sources of FDI in the two cities, the FDI statistics for both Edinburgh and Glasgow show that the largest proportion of investment projects originated from the US, with US companies accounting for 50% of investments into Glasgow and 49% of investments into Edinburgh. This proportion of FDI projects from the US is far higher than the percentage of investments originating from the US into the UK as a whole, which stood at 31% in 015. After the US, investments into both Edinburgh and Glasgow were split between several other countries, with a small number for each. Leading sectors for FDI into Edinburgh, 015 Leading origins of investment into Edinburgh in Software Electronics Scientific Research Utility supply Business Services Computers Electrical Financial Intermediation Machinery & Equipment Other USA Germany Canada Denmark France Singapore Other Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor 016. Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor 016. Leading sectors for FDI into Glasgow, 015 Leading origins of investment into Glasgow in Software Business Services Financial Intermediation Scientific Research Telecomms & Post Other USA France Japan Australia Bermuda Canada Germany India Israel Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor 016. Source: EY s Global Investment Monitor

21 Investor views of the EU referendum The EU referendum may be influencing investor views of the UK s future attractiveness Since our survey in 015, the UK Government has decided to hold a referendum on the UK s membership of the European Union (EU). Some 78% of all respondents to our perception survey were aware of the upcoming referendum on the UK s membership of the EU when asked in early 016, compared to only 55% of investors who were aware of the possibility in 015. Access to the European Single Market (ESM) has consistently been identified by as an important element of the UK s overall attractiveness by foreign investors in our surveys since 014. In 016, 79% of investors cited access to the ESM as a key feature of the UK s attractiveness, up from 7% last year and 6 the year before. It is possible therefore that a decision by the UK to leave the EU could, if it changes the terms of access to the ESM for UK based businesses, potentially impact the UK s future FDI performance. Depending on the nature of the change, the impact could be in either a positive or negative direction. When asked about how either a significant or substantial decline in the terms of access to the ESM would impact the UK s attractiveness over 50% of investors in both cases said it would have a negative effect whereas only 7% viewed it positively. It seems clear therefore that a risk of change in the terms of access to the ESM is a significant concern for investors. Interestingly, the degree of change is less important, any reduction in the terms of access currently enjoyed has a significant negative impact on perceptions of the UK s attractiveness for FDI, which suggest this is a very important issue for the majority of investors. and this seems to be feeding through into lower investor perceptions of future attractiveness. The scale of change in future perceptions of the UK goes beyond what we would expect from the decline in the UK s score on its key attributes. As the UK s ranking has fallen in relative as well as absolute terms, there appears to be a UK specific effect related in part at least to the upcoming EU referendum. It seems reasonable to conclude that, without any future actions taken by the UK Government to mitigate any adverse effects of the UK leaving the EU, a poorer level of access to the ESM would reduce UK FDI in future. There may be scope for increased FDI from investors attracted by changes to the UK investment regime but the UK s relatively high attractiveness ranking on most attributes suggests the scope for additional stimulation of FDI may be limited. Action needs to be taken now to secure the UK s leadership position. Whatever the outcome of the EU referendum vote, our analysis has identified a number of areas for action to strengthen the UK s attractiveness as a destination for FDI. Our recommendations are set out on the next page. In line with official UK Government policy, we have assumed that the UK will vote to remain in the EU on June 3rd. Should the UK vote to leave, we would expect to prepare updated recommendations once the implications of the change in the status become clearer. EY 016 Scotland attractiveness survey 19

22 Conclusion Our research and analysis demonstrates in no uncertain terms that Scotland is a commanding economic force within the UK and beyond. However, it is important that Scotland builds on the exceptional FDI performance showcased in this report. The nation should not expect to continue to achieve similar results into the future without determined efforts to keep improving its attractiveness to inward investors and secure more FDI. Given the right actions, there are sound reasons for believing this can be achieved. Already, a significant rise in FDI projects in regions across the UK has been accomplished with less than 40% of investors around the world being aware of the UK s devolution agenda. With increased knowledge of the opportunities on offer in the UK s regions, Scotland is superbly placed to boost its performance further. A closer analysis of Scotland s mix of FDI in 015 reveals further grounds for optimism while also highlighting areas where more can be done. In terms of sectors, Scotland s sparkling performance in attracting software projects and business services bodes well for the economy and skills base. But the drop in manufacturing projects admittedly following a very strong 014 suggests Scotland maybe losing out to the revitalised Northern Powerhouse in this area, and suggests a fresh look may be needed at how to redress the competitive balance. Equally positive for Scotland s skills base is its impressive showing in R&D projects. However, its relative underperformance in attracting Headquarters investments indicates that Scotland might benefit from renewing its offer for these projects. And in terms of the countries contributing to FDI, Scotland has some proven strengths in attracting projects from territories such as the US, Canada and continental Europe. But the country needs to build on this base by continuing to promote its advantages as an FDI location with investors from the newer and emerging FDI sources such as China and India. Turning to actions to take, investments in transport infrastructure and skills development will clearly be key to Scotland s marketability for FDI and we are already seeing a return on these. At least in part, Scotland s strong performance appears to reflect the strength of its universities and their growing collaboration with business, providing a foretaste of the substantial benefits a concerted skills rebalancing programme could create. As Scotland looks at how to sustain the outstanding results reported in this study, it s important to bear in mind that the increased importance of regional economies is not unique to the UK, but is happening across Europe and brings more competition for Scotland and other UK regions. So, while we ve had a great year for FDI, now is not the time for Scotland to rest on its laurels. 0

23 Methodology The real attractiveness of Europe for foreign investors Our evaluation of the reality of FDI in Europe is based on EY Global Investment Monitor (GIM). This database tracks those FDI projects that have resulted in the creation of new facilities and new jobs. By excluding portfolio investments and M&A, it shows the reality of investment in manufacturing and services by foreign companies across the continent. Data is widely available on FDI. An investment in a company is normally included in FDI data if the foreign investor acquires more than 10% of the company s equity and takes a role in its management. FDI includes equity capital, reinvested earnings and intracompany loans. But our figures also include investments in physical assets, such as plant and equipment. And this data provides valuable insights into: How FDI projects are being undertaken What activities are being invested in Where projects are located Who is carrying out these projects The GIM is a leading online information provider, tracking inward investment across Europe. This flagship business information tool from EY is the most detailed source of data on cross-border investment projects and trends throughout Europe. The GIM is frequently used by government bodies, private sector organizations and corporations looking to identify significant trends in employment, industry, business and investment. The GIM database focuses on investment announcements, the number of new jobs created and, where identifiable, the associated capital investment. Projects are identified through the daily monitoring of more than 10,000 news sources. To confirm the accuracy of the data collected, the research team aims to directly contact more than 70% of the companies undertaking these investments. The following categories of investment projects are excluded from GIM: M&A and joint ventures (unless these result in new facilities or new jobs being created) License agreements Retail and leisure facilities, hotels and real estate* Utilities (including telecommunications networks, airports, ports and other fixed infrastructure)* Extraction activities (ores, minerals and fuels)* Portfolio investments (pensions, insurance and financial funds) Factory and other production replacement investments (e.g., replacing old machinery without creating new employment) Not-for-profit organizations (charitable foundations, trade associations and government bodies) The perceived attractiveness of Europe and its competitors for foreign investors We define the attractiveness of a country or area as the combination of its image, investors level of confidence in it as an investment destination and the perception of its ability to provide the most competitive benefits for FDI. The research was conducted by the CSA Institute from February to April 016, via telephone interviews with a representative group of 1,469 international decision-makers. Our sample group included representatives from: European businesses 48% North American businesses 3 Asian businesses 15% South American businesses 1% Middle Eastern businesses 1% Businesses from other regions % Overall, 65% of the 1,469 companies surveyed have a presence in Europe. And of the non-european companies, 30% have established operations in Europe. * Investment projects by companies in these categories are included in certain instances e.g. details of a specific new hotel investment or retail outlet would not be recorded, but if the hotel or retail company were to establish a headquarters facility or a distribution centre, this project would qualify for inclusion in the database. EY 016 Scotland attractiveness survey 1

24 EY Assurance Tax Transactions Advisory About EY EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities. EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com. Ernst & Young LLP The UK firm Ernst & Young LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC and is a member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited. Ernst & Young LLP, 1 More London Place, London, SE1 AF. 016 Ernst & Young LLP. Published in the UK. All Rights Reserved. ED None In line with EY s commitment to minimise its impact on the environment, this document has been printed on paper with a high recycled content. Information in this publication is intended to provide only a general outline of the subjects covered. It should neither be regarded as comprehensive nor sufficient for making decisions, nor should it be used in place of professional advice. Ernst & Young LLP accepts no responsibility for any loss arising from any action taken or not taken by anyone using this material. ey.com/uk