Before the Authority for Advance Rulings (Income-tax) New Delhi
|
|
- Pierce Carpenter
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Before the Authority for Advance Rulings (Income-tax) New Delhi 28 th Day of March, 2011 Present Mr. Justice P.K.Balasubramanyan (Chairman) Mr. J. Khosla (Member) Mr. V.K. Shridhar (Member) AAR No. 871 of 2010 Name and address of the applicant Commissioner concerned Present for the Applicant VNU International B.V., The Netherlands Diemerhof 2, 1112 XL, Diemen The Netherlands Director of Income-tax (International Taxation), Mumbai Percy Pardiwalla, Sr.Advocate R.Muralidharan, Advocate Bhavin Shah, Manager Arpit Kabra, Asstt.Manager Present for the Commissioner Chandrajit Singh, Additional DIT (International Taxation) Mumbai R U L I N G (By Mr. V.K.Shridhar) The applicant, VNU International B.V., is a company incorporated in the Netherlands. The applicant states that it is a tax resident of the Netherlands and does not have any permanent establishment in India. It is a subsidiary of the Nielsen Company 1
2 B.V. The applicant holds 100 per cent shares of AC Nielsen ONG-MARG Pvt Ltd. (ACNOM), a company incorporated in India. It is stated that ACNOM is a solution provider of syndicated and non syndicated information services in India that examines health care, consumer products, financial, retail, and business to business and media performance trends. ORG-IMS Research Pvt. Ltd. (ORG-IMS) is an Indian company which had entered into a scheme of arrangement with ACNOM in the year 2003 whereby the pharmaceutical industry retail research business of ACNOM got demerged. In the year 2004, the applicant transferred 50% shares of ORG-IMS to IMS-AG, a company incorporated in Switzerland. After the said transfer, the applicant was left with 50,756 shares of ORG-IMS. The details of acquisition of 50,765 shares of ORG-IMS held by the applicant as per letter dated are as under: Date of acquisition Number of shares Cost of acquisition 30 December ,615 shares Rs.3,61, February ,000 shares Rs.1,00, September ,150 shares Nil (issued as bonus) Total 50,765 shares Rs.4,61, The applicant executed a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) whereby it sold these 50,765 shares of ORG-IMS to IMS-AG & Interstatistik AG (purchasers) for a consideration of USD 74,08,643. Earlier, in the proposed SPA, the sale consideration was of USD 70,00,000 plus additional payment. However, as per the executed SPA, 2
3 the clause relating to additional payment was removed and the purchase consideration was revised to USD 74,08,643. Thus, shares of the Indian company ORG- IMS acquired at a cost of Rs 4,61,500 were sold for a consideration of USD 74,08, In this background, the applicant seeks the ruling of this Authority on the following questions: 1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, whether any capital gain earned by VNU International on transfer of 50,765 shares of ORG-IMS to the purchasers would be liable to tax in India as per the provisions of the Act and the Tax Treaty between India and the Netherlands. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, if the capital gain is not taxable in India, whether the applicant is required to file any return of income under section 139 of the Act? 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case, whether the proposed transfer of shares by the applicant to IMS AG attracts the transfer pricing provisions of section 92 to 92F of the Act? 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case, whether IMS AG would be liable to withhold taxes under section 195 of the Act and if so, on what amount would the tax have to be deducted? As the applicant had already transferred shares of ORG-IMS to the purchasers, a request was made through letter dt seeking to amend questions at sr. no 3 and 4 as under: 3. Based on the facts and circumstances of the case, whether the transfer of shares by the applicant to the purchasers would attract transfer pricing provisions under sections 92 to 92F of the Act? 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case, whether the purchasers were liable to withhold tax at source under section 195 of the Act and if so, on what amount should the tax have been deducted? 4 The applicant submits that income which is received/deemed to be received in India or which accrues or arise/deemed to accrue or arise in India to a non-resident is liable to tax in India in view of section 5(2) of the Income tax Act 1961 (Act). Section 9(1) of the Act is a deeming provision which treats certain categories of income as 3
4 accruing in India and therefore liable to tax in India. As per sub-clause (i) of section 9(1), all income accruing or arising, whether directly or indirectly, through or from any business connection in India, or through or from any property in India, or through or from any asset or source of income in India, or through the transfer of capital asset in India, will be taxable in India. The applicant submits that as ORG-IMS is an Indian company, the situs of its shares would be in India. Accordingly, any capital gain earned by the applicant on the transfer of shares of ORG-IMS would be taxable in India. The applicant submits that under section 90(2) of the Act, an assessee has an option to be governed by the provision of the Tax Treaty, if they are more beneficial than the provision of the Act. India has entered into a tax Treaty with the Netherlands. The benefits of the Tax Treaty will be available to the applicant as it is a resident of the Netherlands as per Article 4(1) of the tax Treaty. Accordingly, the applicant would be eligible to claim benefit of the tax Treaty, where the same is favourable than the provision of the Act. The applicant submits that transfer of shares of ORG-IMS by the applicant would be governed by Article 13(5) of the Tax Treaty. Any capital gain earned by it would be taxable only in Netherlands. The said capital gain would not be taxable in India, as the shares of ORG-IMS are transferred to the purchasers who are residents of Switzerland. The applicant further submits that as per section 92 of the Act, any income arising from an international transaction has to be computed at the arm s length price. Sections 92 to 92F of the Act are merely machinery sections and 4
5 would apply only where the transaction entered by the foreign assesses is liable to tax in India. As the said transfer of shares of ORG-IMS by the applicant is not liable to tax in India, the transfer pricing regulation would not apply. The applicant then submits that Section 195 of the act would have no application as the capital gains on transfer of shares of ORG-IMS by the applicant is not taxable in India. If the Authority is of the view that capital gain earned is taxable in India, then the income-tax deducted by purchasers should be on the capital gain earned and not on entire sale consideration. 5. Article 13 of the Tax Treaty between India and the Netherlands is extracted below: Article 13 CAPITAL GAINS 1. Gains derived by a resident of one of the States from the alienation of immovable property referred to in Article 6 and situated in the other State may be taxed in that other State. 2. Gains from the alienation of movable property forming part of the business property of a permanent establishment which an enterprise of one of the States has in the other State or movable property pertaining to a fixed base available to a resident of one of the States in the other state for the purpose of performing independent personal services, including such gains from the alienation of such permanent establishment (alone or with the whole enterprise) or of such fixed base, may be taxed in that other State. 3. Gain from the alienation of ships or aircraft operated in international traffic or movable property pertaining to the operation of such ships or aircraft, shall be taxable only in the State in which the place of effective management of the enterprise is situated. For the purposes of this paragraph, the provisions of paragraph 3 of Article 8A shall apply. 5
6 4. Gains derived by a resident of one of the State from the alienation of shares (other than shares quoted on an approved stock exchange) forming part of a substantial interest in the capital stock of a company which is a resident of the other State, the value of which shares is derived principally from immovable property situated in that other State other than property in which the business of the company was carried on, may be taxed in that other State. A substantial interest exists when the resident owns 25 per cent or more of the shares of the capital stock of a company. 5. Gains from the alienation of any property other than that referred to in paragraphs 1,2,3 and 4 shall be taxable only in the State of which the alienator is a resident. However, gains from the alienation of shares issued by a company resident in the other State which shares from part of at least a 10 per cent interest in the capital stock of that company, may be taxed in that other State if the alienation takes place to a resident of that other State. However, such gains shall remain taxable only in the State of which the alienator is a resident if such gains are realized in the course of a corporate organization, re-organization, amalgamation, division or similar transaction, and the buyer or the seller owns at least 10 per cent of the capital of the other. 6. The provisions of paragraph 3 shall not affect the right of each of the States to levy according to its own law a tax on gains from the alienation of the shares or jouissance rights in a company, the capital of which is wholly or partly divided into shares and which under the laws of that State is a resident of that State,. Derived by an individual who is resident of the other State and has been a resident of the first-mentioned State in the course of the last five years preceding the alienation of the shares or jouissance rights. 6. The learned Advocate contended that as the shares of ORG-IMS are not immovable property or movable property forming part of the business property of a PE or any gain from alienation of ships or aircraft operated in international traffic or movable property pertaining to such business, the transfer of shares of ORG-IMS by the applicant would not be governed by Article 13(1) to (3) of the Tax Treaty. As the shares of ORG-IMS do not derive its value from any immovable property situated in India, Article 13(4) would 6
7 also not apply to any capital gain earned by the applicant from sale of shares of ORG- IMS. The learned Advocate further contended that the capital gains earned by the applicant on transfer of shares would be covered by Article 13(5) of the Tax Treaty and shall be taxable only in the state in which the transferor is a resident. As the applicant is a resident of the Netherlands, any capital gain earned by it would be taxable in the Netherlands. Further condition under Article 13(5) that gains from alienation of shares issued by an Indian company forming part of at least 10% interest in the capital stock of that Indian company can be taxed in India, if the transfer takes place to a resident of India is not attracted as the shares of ORG-IMS have been transferred to the purchasers who are residents of Switzerland. 7. Conceding the applicant s contentions to questions no.1, 3 and 4, the revenue submits that as per the facts provided by the applicant, it is apparent that Article 13(5) would be applicable as the purchaser companies are not the residents of India. The taxability of the capital gains would arise only in the Netherlands and the transaction would not be liable to tax in India. The transfer pricing provisions from section 92 to 92F of the Act would not be attracted as the sale and purchase of shares is between non- resident companies of the Netherland and Switzerland. Since there is no income chargeable to tax, there would be no liability to deduct tax u/s.195 of the Act. 8. We are in agreement with the Learned Advocate that the capital gains earned by the applicant on transfer of shares would be covered by Article 13(5) of the Tax Treaty and shall be taxable only in the Netherlands, the state in which the transferor is a resident. The revenue 7
8 has also conceded the applicant s contentions to questions no.1, 3 and 4. We accordingly answer questions no.1, 3 and 4 in favour of the applicant. 9. Regarding filing of return of income, the applicant is of the view that as the income is not taxable in India, it is not under any obligation to file the return of income under section 139(1) of the Act. The learned Advocate argued that section 139(1) of the Act is merely a machinery section and would apply only where the transaction entered into by the foreign assessee is liable to be taxed in India. In this connection, reliance is placed on the AAR Rulings in the cases of Venenburg Group B.V., AAR No. 727 of 2006 and reported in 289 ITR 464; Dana Corporation, AAR No.788 of 2008 and reported in 321 ITR 178; Amiantit Intl.Holding Ltd., AAR No.879 of 2009 and reported in 322 ITR 678. It is submitted that in all these Rulings, the Authority took the view that section 139(1) is a machinery provision and would not apply in the absence of liability to tax. The learned Advocate further stated that the very purpose of coming before the AAR would be defeated if the applicant is faced with the hardship of filing of return. 10. In response, the learned CIT appearing on behalf of the revenue strenuously urged that first step to proceed is to see whether a particular source of income is taxable in India. If that particular source of income is also taxable in the other country, then the second step is to see whether there is a compromise between tax claims of the two concerned governments. The relief by way of compromise is then achieved by referring to DTAA. According to the learned CIT, this exercise, from start to finish, is carried out under the Act. While doing so, the compliance to machinery provisions under section 139(1) assumes importance 8
9 especially when the non-resident applicant raises questions on the basis of a single transaction. The argument that it would be burdensome to comply with the formalities of filing the return is not a valid excuse. 11. We think that submissions made by the learned CIT are sound and need to be accepted. It appears to us that this Authority formed the view in the rulings cited supra on the basis that the expression income appearing in section 139 is not used in a sense wider than or different from its scope and connotation elsewhere in the Act. A ruling under the Act is confined to the facts projected in the application leading to the ruling and binding only on that party and the Revenue. In a case where, there is a liability to tax under the Income-tax Act and that liability is removed only by virtue of the provision in the Treaty, we think it proper to re-examine the question. 12. Let us refer to section 139(1) which deals with the filing of return of income. The relevant portion of section 139(1) of the Act is extracted below: Return of income. 139.(1) Every person (a) being a company [or a firm]: or (b) being a person other than a company [or a firm], if his total income or the total income of any other person in respect of which he is assessable under this Act during the previous year exceeded the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income-tax, 9
10 shall, on or before the due date, furnish a return of his income or the income of such other person during the previous year, in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner and setting forth such other particulars as may be prescribed: Provided that.. Provided further Provided also that every company [or a firm] shall furnish on or before the due date the return in respect of its income or loss in every previous year. 13. As is noticed, while casting obligation to file return of income by a company, the legislature in its wisdom has omitted to include the expression exceeded the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income-tax. Then, as per the third proviso, every company is required to file its return of income, whether it has an income or a loss. The applicant being a foreign company, is covered within the definition of a company under section 2(17) of the Act. The applicant does not dispute that the income arising from the sale of shares is liable to be taxed in India by virtue of section 5(2) of the Act, though no tax is actually paid in India. It is a different matter that by virtue of DTAA the applicant is actually paying tax in the Netherlands. If the power to tax be granted it is difficult to appreciate the argument that when the resulting income is nil, there is no obligation to file return of income. It may be mentioned that where it is not necessary for a non- resident to furnish return under section 139(1) of the Act, the statue has specifically provided, as is the case under section 115AC(4) of the Act. Apart, it is necessary to have all the facts 10
11 connected with the question on which the ruling is sought or is proposed to be sought in a vide amplitude by way of a return of income than alone by way of an application seeking advance ruling in Form 34C under IT Rules Instead of causing inconvenience to the applicant, the process of filing of return would facilitate the applicant in all future interactions with the Income tax department. 14. We are therefore not inclined to accept the contention of the applicant and accordingly answer the questions no.2 against the applicant. Accordingly ruling is given and pronounced on 28 th Day of March, Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- (J. Khosla) (P.K.Balasubramanyan) (V.K.Shridhar) Member Chairman Member 11
Before the Authority for Advance Rulings (Income-tax) New Delhi
Before the Authority for Advance Rulings (Income-tax) New Delhi 28 th Day of March, 2011 Present Mr. Justice P.K.Balasubramanyan (Chairman) Mr. J. Khosla (Member) Mr. V.K. Shridhar (Member) AAR NO. 878
More informationBEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS NEW DELHI
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS NEW DELHI 29 th Day of January, 2018 A.A.R. No 1299 of 2012 PRESENT Mr. R.S. Shukla, Incharge-Chairman Mr. Ashutosh Chandra, Member (Revenue) Name & address of
More informationBEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI. A.A.R. Nos & 1031 of Present
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI 2nd Day of May, 2011 A.A.R. Nos. 1006 & 1031 of 2010 Present Mr. Justice P.K.Balasubramanyan (Chairman) Mr. J. Khosla (Member) Mr. V.K. Shridhar
More informationBefore the Authority for Advance Rulings (Income-tax) New Delhi
Before the Authority for Advance Rulings (Income-tax) New Delhi 22 nd Day of February, 2011 Present Mr. Justice P.K.Balasubramanyan (Chairman) Mr. J. Khosla (Member) Mr. V.K. Shridhar (Member) AAR No.
More informationBEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS NEW DELHI
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS NEW DELHI 29 th Day of January, 2018 A.A.R. No 1217 of 2011 PRESENT Mr. R.S. Shukla, In-charge Chairman Mr. Ashutosh Chandra, Member (Revenue) Name & address of
More informationR U L I N G (By Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri)
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI =========== P R E S E N T Hon ble Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri (Chairman) Mr. A.S. Narang (Member) Friday, the Twenty-fifth February
More informationWHITE PAPER - WHETHER NON-RESIDENT FOREIGN COMPANIES ARE REQUIRED TO FILE RETURN OF INCOME IN INDIA.
WHITE PAPER - WHETHER NON-RESIDENT FOREIGN COMPANIES ARE REQUIRED TO FILE RETURN OF INCOME IN INDIA www.rsmindia.in 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 Taxation of non-residents has been a vexed issue for a long time.
More informationBEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI. A.A.R. No.866 of 2010 PRESENT
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI 14 th Day of November, 2011 A.A.R. No.866 of 2010 PRESENT Justice Mr. P.K.Balasubramanyan (Chairman) Mr. V.K. Shridhar (Member) Name & address
More informationBEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) PRESENT. Mr Justice P.K. Balasubramanyan (Chairman) Mr. V.K.
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) 22 nd Day of March, 2012 PRESENT Mr Justice P.K. Balasubramanyan (Chairman) Mr. V.K.Shridhar (Member) A.A.R. No. P of 2010 Name & address of the applicant
More informationR U L I N G (By Mr. A.S.Narang)
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI ========== P R E S E N T Hon ble Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri (Chairman) Mr. A.S.Narang (Member) Mr. A.Sinha (Member) Monday, the
More informationR U L I N G [By Justice P.K. Balasubramanyan)
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX), NEW DELHI 5 th December, 2011 PRESENT Mr Justice P.K. Balasubramanyan (Chairman) Mr. V.K. Shridhar (Member) A.A.R. No.953 of 2010 Name & address of
More informationCase studies International Taxation - Business Re-organisation and Share Transfers CHYTHANYA K.K., B. Com, FCA, LLB
Case studies International Taxation - Business Re-organisation and Share Transfers CHYTHANYA K.K., B. Com, FCA, LLB Chythanya Law Chambers Advocates #1109, 9 th Main, Vijayanagar, Between Metro Pillar
More informationBEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS NEW DELHI RULING
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS NEW DELHI 28 th Day of November, 2017 A.A.R. No 1232 of 2012 PRESENT Mr. R.S. Shukla,In-chargeChairman Mr. Ashutosh Chandra, Member (Revenue) Name & address of
More informationJh jktsunz flag ys[kk lnl;,oa Jh foods oekz U;kf;d lnl; ds le{k BEFORE SHRI RAJENDRA SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI VIVEK VARMA JUDICIAL MEMBER
vk;dj vihyh; vf/kdj.k ^^,y^^ U;k;ihB eqacbz esaa IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL L BENCH, MUMBAI Jh jktsunz flag ys[kk lnl;,oa Jh foods oekz U;kf;d lnl; ds le{k BEFORE SHRI RAJENDRA SINGH, ACCOUNTANT
More informationR U L I N G (By Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri)
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI ========== P R E S E N T Hon ble Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri (Chairman) Mr. K.D. Singh (Member) Monday, eighteenth October two
More informationINTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update
Advocate INTERNATIONAL TAXATION Tribunal s I. India-Israel DTAA Most Favored Nation (MFN) Clause in the Protocol to the Treaty Held : The MFN clause under the India- Israel tax treaty is automatic and
More informationIn the High Court of Judicature at Madras. Date : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Sudhakar and The Honble Ms. Justice K.B.K.
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Date : 14.07.2015 The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Sudhakar and The Honble Ms. Justice K.B.K. Vasuki T.C.A. No: 398 of 2007 M/s. Anusha Investments Ltd. 8 Haddows Road
More informationTHE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI. A.A.R. No.1077 of 2011 PRESENT
THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI 10 th Day of January, 2014 A.A.R. No.1077 of 2011 PRESENT Justice Dr. Arijit Pasayat (Chairman) Mr. TBC Rozara (Member) Name & address of the applicant
More informationBEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) PRESENT. Justice Dr.Arijit Pasayat (Chairman) Mr. T.B.C. Rozara (Member)
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) 6 th Day of December, 2013 PRESENT Justice Dr.Arijit Pasayat (Chairman) Mr. T.B.C. Rozara (Member) A.A.R. Nos. 1075 of 2011 Name & address of the applicant
More informationPASSIVE INCOMES DIVIDEND, INTEREST & CAPITAL GAINS BASIC CONCEPTS. CA Kusuma Yathish B.Com, LLB, FCA PARTNER M/S. SHEKAR & YATHISH 1/23/2010
DIVIDEND, INTEREST & CAPITAL GAINS BASIC CONCEPTS Workshop on Basics of International Taxation Institute of Chartered Accountants of India CA Kusuma Yathish B.Com, LLB, FCA PARTNER M/S. SHEKAR & YATHISH
More informationBEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI. A.A.R. No.977 of 2010 PRESENT RULING
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI 7 th Day of May, 2012 A.A.R. No.977 of 2010 PRESENT Justice Mr. P.K.Balasubramanyan (Chairman) Name & address of the applicant Present for
More informationR U L I N G [By Justice P.K. Balasubramanyan]
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI 3rd Day of May, 2011 PRESENT Mr Justice P.K. Balasubramanyan (Chairman) Mr. J. Khosla (Member) Mr. V.K.Shridhar (Member) A.A.R. No. 840 of
More informationIs Ware House Agent A PE??
DIVAKAR VIJAYASARATHY & ASSOCIATES Is Ware House Agent A PE??. Divakar Vijayasarathy 10 Does Demarcated Space in a Warehouse constitute a PE?? The term permanent establishment has been the subject of matter
More informationBEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI ========== P R E S E N T
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI ========== P R E S E N T Hon ble Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri (Chairman) Mr. K.D. Singh (Member) Mr. K.D. Gupta (Member) Monday,
More informationThe Swiss Federal Council and the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People s Republic of China,
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SWISS FEDERAL COUNCIL AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION OF THE PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF CHINA FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES
More informationA.A.R. Nos of Mr Justice. P.K. Balasubramanyan (Chairman) Mr. V.K. Shridhar (Member)
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI 26 th Day of July, 2011 A.A.R. Nos. 858-861 of 2009 PRESENT Mr Justice. P.K. Balasubramanyan (Chairman) Mr. V.K. Shridhar (Member) Name &
More informationForeign Collaboration
CHAPTER 17 Foreign Collaboration Some Key Points (a) The tax liability of a foreign collaborator and the Indian counter part is dependent on their residential status and the applicable provisions of DTAA,
More informationBEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) PRESENT. Justice Dr.Arijit Pasayat (Chairman) Mr. T.B.C. Rozara (Member)
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) Friday, 14 th February, 2014 PRESENT Justice Dr.Arijit Pasayat (Chairman) Mr. T.B.C. Rozara (Member) A.A.R. Nos. 1321 of 2011 Name & address of the
More informationBEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS NEW DELHI
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS NEW DELHI 7 th Day of February, 2018 A.A.R. No 1200 of 2011 PRESENT Mr. R.S. Shukla,In-chargeChairman Mr. Ashutosh Chandra, Member (Revenue) Name & address of the
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER. Income Tax Appeal No. 1167/2011. Reserved on: 21st October, 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER Income Tax Appeal No. 1167/2011 Reserved on: 21st October, 2011 Date of Decision: 8th November, 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-IV,
More informationMost Favored Nation. Certificate Course on International Taxation, Chennai. Arpit Jain. Director International Tax
Most Favored Nation Certificate Course on International Taxation, Chennai Arpit Jain Director International Tax MFN Principle State A binds itself to State B with respect to favorable treatment afforded
More information1980 Income and Capital Gains Tax Convention
1980 Income and Capital Gains Tax Convention Treaty Partners: Gambia; United Kingdom Signed: May 20, 1980 In Force: July 5, 1982 Effective: In Gambia, from January 1, 1980. In the U.K.: income tax and
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATER. Judgment delivered on: ITA 243/2008. versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATER Judgment delivered on: 26.11.2008 ITA 243/2008 SUBODH KUMAR BHARGAVA... Appellant versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX... Respondent Advocates
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL L BENCH: MUMBAI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL L BENCH: MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R. S. PADVEKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.442/Mum/2009 (Assessment year: 2005-06), Devidas Mansion,
More informationUK/KENYA DOUBLE TAXATION AGREEMENT SIGNED 31 JULY 1973 Amended by a Protocol signed 20 January 1976 and notes dated 8 February 1977
UK/KENYA DOUBLE TAXATION AGREEMENT SIGNED 31 JULY 1973 Amended by a Protocol signed 20 January 1976 and notes dated 8 February 1977 Entered into force 30 September 1977 Effective in United Kingdom from
More informationSharing insights. News Alert 8 August, 2012
www.pwc.com/in Sharing insights News Alert 8 August, 2012 Capital gains on direct and indirect transfer of shares of Indian company by Mauritius tax resident not taxable in India under the India-Mauritius
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH L MUMBAI. ITA No.7349/Mum/2004 Assessment year Mumbai. Vs. ITA No.7574/Mum/2004. Vs.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH L MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI P.M. JAGTAP (AM) AND SMT. ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN (JM) PAN-AABCS 9229H ITA No.7349/Mum/2004 Assessment year-2003-04 ITA No.7574/Mum/2004
More informationConvention between Canada and the Republic of Chile for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the...
Page 1 of 11 Français Contact Us Help Search Canada site Home What's New Site Map Glossary HotLinks About Us FAQ Media Room Publications Legislation - Notices of Tax Treaty Developments - Status of Tax
More informationA G R E E M E N T BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND THE SWISS FEDERAL COUNCIL
A G R E E M E N T BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND THE SWISS FEDERAL COUNCIL FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME AND ON CAPITAL The Government of the
More informationR U L I N G (By Mr. A.S.Narang)
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI ========== P R E S E N T Hon ble Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri (Chairman) Mr. A.S.Narang (Member) Mr. A.Sinha (Member) Wednesday,
More informationOECD Model Tax Convention on Income and Capital An overview. CA Vishal Palwe, 3 July 2015
OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and Capital An overview CA Vishal Palwe, 3 July 2015 1 Contents Overview of double taxation 3 Basics of tax treaty 6 Domestic law and tax treaty 11 Key provisions of
More information1993 Income and Capital Gains Tax Convention
1993 Income and Capital Gains Tax Convention Treaty Partners: Ghana; United Kingdom Signed: January 20, 1993 In Force: August 10, 1994 Effective: In Ghana, from January 1, 1995. In the U.K.: income tax
More informationUK/IRELAND INCOME AND CAPITAL GAINS TAX CONVENTION Signed June 2, Entered into force 23 December 1976
UK/IRELAND INCOME AND CAPITAL GAINS TAX CONVENTION Signed June 2, 1976 Entered into force 23 December 1976 Effective in the UK for: i) Income Tax (other than Income Tax on salaries, wages, remuneration
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH : BANGALORE. BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER and SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER and SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.726/Bang/2014 (Assessment year: 2005-06) M/s.B & B Infotech
More information2005 Income and Capital Gains Tax Convention and Notes
2005 Income and Capital Gains Tax Convention and Notes Treaty Partners: Botswana; United Kingdom Signed: September 9, 2005 In Force: September 4, 2006 Effective: In Botswana, from July 1, 2007. In the
More informationAGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF THAILAND AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF THAILAND AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION OF THE PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF CHINA FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND
More informationCyprus Italy Tax Treaties
Cyprus Italy Tax Treaties AGREEMENT OF 24 TH APRIL, 1974 AS AMENDED BY PROTOCOL OF 7 TH OCTOBER, 1980 This is a Convention between Cyprus and Italy for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: INCOME TAX MATTER. Judgment delivered on : ITR Nos. 159 to 161 /1988
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: INCOME TAX MATTER Judgment delivered on : 09.07.2008 ITR Nos. 159 to 161 /1988 M/S DELHI INTER EXPORTS PVT LTD... Appellant versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
More informationKey Summary: Delhi HC ruled
Limited (Canada) Nortel NetworksInc (Luxemburg) SA India International Inc. (Taxpayer) International Finance &Holding Key Summary: Delhi HC ruled that offshore supply of equipments neither lead to attribution
More informationR U L I N G (By Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri)
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI ========== P R E S E N T Hon ble Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri (Chairman) Mr. A.S. Narang (Member) Mr. A. Sinha (Member) Friday,
More informationNews Alert* pwc. Tax & Regulatory Services. 2 March, *connectedthinking
Tax & Regulatory Services News Alert* 2 March, 2010 Taxability of consideration received upon assignment of rights and obligations under an assignment agreement - held to be business profits not taxable
More informationBEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI 5th Day of March, R U L I N G (By Hon ble Chairman)
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI 5th Day of March, 2010 PRESENT Mr. Justice P.V. Reddi (Chairman) Mr. J. Khosla (Member) A.A.R. No.844 of 2009 Name & address of the applicant
More informationbetween the Swiss Confederation and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income
Convention between the Swiss Confederation and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income The Swiss Federal Council and the Government of the
More informationBEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI. 14th Day of August, A.A.R. No. 999 of 2010 PRESENT
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI 14th Day of August, 2012 A.A.R. No. 999 of 2010 PRESENT Justice Mr. P.K.Balasubramanyan (Chairman) Name & address of the applicant : Castleton
More informationCharltons. Hong Kong. August Hong Kong And Russia Double Taxation Agreement Comes Into Force Introduction SOLICITORS
And Russia Double Taxation Agreement Comes Into Force Introduction The Russia - agreement for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income ( Russia
More informationTax Wire. Bollywood Badshah's tryst with the tax department!
Tax Wire Bollywood Badshah's tryst with the tax department! 07th April, 2017 Bollywood Badshah's tryst with the tax department! Background Mr. Shahrukh Khan (hereinafter referred to as Mr. Khan/the assessee
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT. Reserved on: Pronounced on:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT Reserved on: 18.02.2014 Pronounced on: 14.03.2014 ITA 55/2014, C.M. APPL. 2383/2014 & 2384/2014 SH. GULSHAN MALIK..Appellant Through: Sh.
More informationPROTOCOL BETWEEN IRELAND AND THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA
PROTOCOL BETWEEN IRELAND AND THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA AMENDING THE CONVENTION FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME, SIGNED AT VIENNA ON 24 MAY, 1966. Ireland and the Republic
More informationPoland. Chapter I. Scope of the Convention. Chapter II. Definitions
Poland Convention between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Republic of Poland for the avoidance of double taxation with respect to taxes on income and capital Done at Warsaw, on 13 February 2002
More informationAGREEMENT OF 22 ND MARCH, The Netherlands. This Agreement shall apply to persons who are residents of one or both of the Contracting Parties.
AGREEMENT OF 22 ND MARCH, 2010 The Netherlands Chapter I Scope of the Agreement Article 1 Persons Covered This Agreement shall apply to persons who are residents of one or both of the Contracting Parties.
More informationR U L I N G (By Mr. A. Sinha )
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME-TAX) NEW DELHI Wednesday, the 30 th Day of April, 2008 P R E S E N T Mr. Justice P.V. Reddi (Chairman) Mr. A. Sinha (Member) Mr. Rao Ranvijay Singh (Member)
More informationHow to read Tax Treaties Salient features of select Indian DTAA. Arpit Jain Chartered Accountant
How to read Tax Treaties Salient features of select Indian DTAA Arpit Jain Chartered Accountant Introduction Salient Features India has signed more than 90 DTAAs till date India does not have Model DTAA
More informationR U L I N G (By Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri)
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME-TAX) NEW DELHI ========== Hon ble Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri (Chairman) Mr. A.S. Narang (Member) Wednesday, the Fourteenth December Two Thousand
More informationOverview of Taxation of Non Residents
Overview of Taxation of Non Residents CTC Vispi T. Patel Vispi T. Patel & Associates 13 th December, 2013 Scheme of Taxation for Non Residents under Income-tax Act, 1961 Section 4 (Charge of Income-tax)
More informationHIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT Commissioner of Income-tax-I v. Aditya Medisales Ltd. M.R. SHAH AND MS. SONIA GOKANI, JJ. TAX APPEAL NO. 730 OF 2013 SEPTEMBER 2, 2013 JUDGMENT Ms. Sonia Gokani, J. - The Tax Appeal
More informationC O N V E N T I O N BETWEEN THE SWISS FEDERAL COUNCIL AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA
C O N V E N T I O N BETWEEN THE SWISS FEDERAL COUNCIL AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME AND ON CAPITAL AND THE PREVENTION
More informationThe applicant Mrs.Smita Anand is an Indian citizen and a person of. Indian origin. She was working with Hewitt Associates(India) Private
THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI Wednesday, 19 th February, 2014 A.A.R. No. 1091 of 2011 PRESENT Justice Dr. Arijit Pasayat (Chairman) Mr. TBC Rozara (Member) Name & address of
More informationUK/FIJI DOUBLE TAXATION CONVENTION SIGNED 21 NOVEMBER Entered into force 27 August 1976
UK/FIJI DOUBLE TAXATION CONVENTION SIGNED 21 NOVEMBER 1975 Entered into force 27 August 1976 Effective from 1 April 1975 for corporation tax and from 6 April 1975 for income tax and capital gains tax Effective
More informationPROTOCOL. The Government of Ireland and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;
PROTOCOL BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF IRELAND AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AMENDING THE CONVENTION FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE PREVENTION
More informationCONVENTION BETWEEN IRELAND AND THE REPUBLIC OF GHANA FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES
CONVENTION BETWEEN IRELAND AND THE REPUBLIC OF GHANA FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME AND CAPITAL GAINS The Government of Ireland
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ITA No.116/2011 Date of Decision : 13th February,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ITA No.116/2011 Date of Decision : 13th February, 2012. ARUN SHUNGLOO TRUST Through: Mr.S.Krishanan, Advocate versus... Appellant
More informationW.P.No.39548/2012 (T-IT)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE G.NARENDAR W.P.No.39548/2012 (T-IT) BETWEEN : M/s
More informationHOW TO READ A TREATY Introduction (India UK Treaty) Kishor Karia
BOMBAY CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS SOCEITY BASIC STUDY COURSE ON DOUBLE TAXATION AVOIDANCE AGREEMENT HOW TO READ A TREATY Introduction (India UK Treaty) 1 UK Agreement for avoidance of double taxation and prevention
More informationCONVENTION. between THE GOVERNMENT OF BARBADOS. and THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF GHANA
CONVENTION between THE GOVERNMENT OF BARBADOS and THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF GHANA FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME AND ON
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.4380 OF 2018 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4380 OF 2018 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 24888 OF 2015) Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax... Appellant(s)
More informationFB.COM/SUPERWHIZZ4U Income Tax Amendment for the Assessment
FB.COM/SUPERWHIZZ4U Income Tax Amendment for the Assessment Year 2014-15 - SIPOY SATISH Highlights of Change in Direct Taxes in the Union Budget 2013 1. Rate of Income Tax for Individual a) Slab Rate Assessment
More informationM.L. Verma, P.S. Narasimha and Ms. Sushma Suri for the Appellant. Joseph Vellapally, S. Rajappa, V. Balaji and P.N. Ramalingam for the Respondent.
Commissioner of Income-tax v. Grace Collis Supreme Court of India S.P. Bharucha, N. Santosh Hegde and Y.K. Sabharwal, JJ. Civil Appeal Nos. 4437-45 of 1997 February 23, 2001 Counsels appeared: M.L. Verma,
More informationHungary - Singapore Income Tax Treaty (1997)
Hungary - Singapore Income Tax Treaty (1997) Status: In Force Conclusion Date: 17 April 1997. Entry into Force: 18 December 1998. Effective Date: 1 January 1999 (see Article 29). AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Central Excise Act, 1944 DECIDED ON: CEAC 22/2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Central Excise Act, 1944 DECIDED ON: 23.07.2012 CEAC 22/2012 COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (EXPORT)... Petitioner Through: Dr.Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate versus
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT. INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 171/2001. Date of decision: 18th July, 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 171/2001 Date of decision: 18th July, 2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX... Petitioner Through Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr.
More informationPROTOCOL. The Government of Ireland and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;
PROTOCOL BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF IRELAND AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AMENDING THE CONVENTION FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE PREVENTION
More informationDOUBLE TAX TREATIES: COMPANIES ICAZ TAX SEMINAR. Presented by M. NGORIMA 22 February 2018
DOUBLE TAX TREATIES: COMPANIES ICAZ TAX SEMINAR Presented by M. NGORIMA 22 February 2018 DISCUSSION POINTS 1. What are double tax treaties? 2. Model Treaties 3. OECD Model Treaty Basic template 4. Model
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA C BENCH, KOLKATA. Before Shri Shamim Yahya (Accountant Member), and Shri George Mathan (Judicial Member)
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA C BENCH, KOLKATA Before Shri Shamim Yahya (Accountant Member), and Shri George Mathan (Judicial Member) I.T.A. No. 718/Kol. / 2014 Assessment year : 2011-2012
More informationInsight of Few Sections
Insight of Few Sections Relevant for Handling Income Tax Assessments - C.A. Mehul Thakker SECTION 2(14) SECTION 2(14) CAPITAL ASSET [W.E.F A.Y.2014-15] Modification in parameters defining scope of land
More informationSri Lanka - Switzerland Income and Capital Tax Treaty (1983)
Page 1 of 12 Sri Lanka - Switzerland Income and Capital Tax Treaty (1983) Status: In Force Conclusion Date: 11 January 1983. Entry into Force: 14 September 1984. Effective Date: 1 April 1981 (Sri Lanka);
More informationDouble Taxation Treaty between Ireland and
Double Taxation Treaty between Ireland and Turkey Convention between Ireland and the Republic of Turkey for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on
More informationCyprus Kuwait Tax Treaties
Cyprus Kuwait Tax Treaties AGREEMENT OF 15 TH DECEMBER, 1984 This is a Convention between the Republic of Cyprus and the Government of the State of Kuwait for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention
More informationGOVERNMENT NOTICE SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICE INCOME TAX ACT, 1962
GOVERNMENT NOTICE SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICE No. 391 18 May 2007 INCOME TAX ACT, 1962 CONVENTION BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF GHANA FOR
More informationDesiring to conclude an Agreement for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income,
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION OF THE PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF CHINA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 28.11.2011 + ITA 938/2011 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX... Appellant versus AMADEUS INDIA PVT LTD... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH H : NEW DELHI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH H : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI I.C.SUDHIR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI TARVINDER SINGH KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.6092/Del/2012 Assessment Year : 2009-10
More informationBEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI 10 th Day of August, 2016 A.A.R. No 1017 of 2010 PRESENT Justice Mr V.S. Sirpurkar (Chairman) Mr. A.K. Tewary, Member (Revenue) Mr. R.S.
More informationCyprus Bulgaria Tax Treaties
Cyprus Bulgaria Tax Treaties AGREEMENT OF 30 TH OCTOBER, 2000 This is the Convention between the Republic of Cyprus and the Republic of Bulgaria for the avoidance of double taxation with respect to taxes
More informationLITHUANIA. ARTICLE 1 PERSONS COVERED This Agreement shall apply to persons who are residents of one or both of the Contracting States.
LITHUANIA Agreement for Avoidance of double taxation and prevention of fiscal evasion with foreign countries Lithuania Whereas an Agreement and the Protocol between the Government of the Republic of India
More informationCommissioner of Income-tax v. Artex Mfg. Co. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPEAL NO (NT) OF 1981 JULY 8, 1997
Commissioner of Income-tax v. Artex Mfg. Co. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2276 (NT) OF 1981 JULY 8, 1997 S.C. AGRAWAL AND G.B. PATTANAIK, JJ. Counsels appeared Mr. Ganesh on behalf of the assessee.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs OF 2010 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2009)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs.7541-7542 OF 2010 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 34306-34307 of 2009) GE India Technology Centre Private Ltd.. Appellant(s) Versus
More informationBEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI. 18 th Day of February 2010 P R E S E N T
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI 18 th Day of February 2010 P R E S E N T Mr. Justice P.V. Reddi (Chairman) Mr. J. Khosla (Member) A.A.R. NO. 793/2008 Name & address of :
More informationConvention. between. New Zealand and Japan. for the. Avoidance of Double Taxation. and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion
Convention between New Zealand and Japan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income New Zealand and Japan, Desiring to conclude a new Convention
More informationIncome from business as computed in the assessment order
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax Y.V. CHANDRACHUD, CJ. AND V.D. TULZAPURKAR, J. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 785 AND 783 OF 1977 APRIL 11, 1978 S.T.
More informationTHE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL;
Convention between the Government of Canada and the Government of the State of Israel for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income THE GOVERNMENT
More information