LIVE WEBCAST UPDATE ON BEPS PROJECT. 26 May :00pm 2:00pm (CEST)

Transcription

1 LIVE WEBCAST UPDATE ON BEPS PROJECT 26 May :00pm 2:00pm (CEST)

2 Speakers Pascal Saint-Amans Director, Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Raffaele Russo Head of BEPS Project Marlies de Ruiter Head of Tax Treaty, Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions 2

3 Join the discussion Ask questions and comment throughout the webcast Directly: Enter your question in the space provided Via Via Twitter: Send a tweet with the hashtag #BEPS 3

4 UPDATE & OVERVIEW

5 The BEPS Project Coherence Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements (2) Interest Deductions (4) CFC Rules (3) Harmful Tax Practices (5) Substance Preventing Tax Treaty Abuse (6) Avoidance of PE Status (7) TP Aspects of Intangibles (8) TP/Risk and Capital (9) TP/High Risk Transactions (10) Transparency Methodologies and Data Analysis (11) Disclosure Rules (12) TP Documentation (13) Dispute Resolution (14) Digital Economy (1) Multilateral Instrument (15) 5

6 Where are we? Publication of Discussion Drafts Followed by 4 public consultations (streamed live) attended by business representatives, NGOs and academics Further work being done at level of working groups based on input received 6

7 Stakeholders input Total comments received: 462 Total number of pages: 3587 Non Member Source of comments: 1 0 Digital Economy (63) Academia TP Documentation (183) Treaty Abuse (79) NGO and civil society Digital Economy (63) Treaty Abuse (79) TP Intangibles (67) Business and Lobby Hybrids (70) Hybrids (70) TP Intangibles (67) MNE TP Documentation (183) Law & Account Firms

8 ENGAGEMENT WITH DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

9 Developing countries input Based on regional events and Global Fora G20 Developing Working Group Report (8-9 May 2014) BEPS Project priorities: excessive payments to foreign affiliated companies in respect of interest, service charges, management and technical fees and royalties; supply chain restructuring that contractually reallocates risks, and associated profit, to affiliated companies in low tax jurisdictions; significant difficulties in obtaining the information needed to assess and address BEPS issues, and to apply their transfer pricing rules; use of techniques to obtain unintended treaty benefits; and Also, key for developing countries: wasteful tax incentives designed to attract investment; techniques used to avoid tax paid when assets situated in developing countries are sold. 9

10 DIGITAL ECONOMY

11 Discussion Draft and Public Consultation Discussion draft issued 24 March 2014 Public consultation held April Uniform agreement that digital economy cannot be ring-fenced General agreement on description of digital economy and its key features and business models Agreement that BEPS Action Plan will address BEPS in digital economy Agreement that VAT options should be pursued Concern about options proposed with respect to direct taxation, and about interaction with BEPS Additional options suggested Comments discussed at 3rd meeting of Task Force April 11

12 Task Force: May Finalise description of the digital economy, key features, business models Finalise description of BEPS issues, how they will be tackled through work under Action Plan Identify specific features of the Digital Economy that warrant attention Describe broader tax challenges and perform initial analysis of options Reach conclusions on how to address interaction between work in the BEPS Project and broader tax challenges 12

13 HYBRID MISMATCH ARRANGEMENTS

14 Update Discussion draft released for public consultation on 19 March; public consultation on 15 May. Recommendations for changes to domestic law (plus treaty rules) Linking rules that seek to align the tax treatment of instrument or entity with the tax outcomes in the counterparty jurisdiction Primary and secondary rule, plus need to avoid importation of mismatches. Some technical issues still under discussion 14

15 PREVENTING TAX TREATY ABUSE

16 Update Discussion draft issued 14 March 2014 Public consultation held 14/15 April 2014 Agreement that LOB alone will not address all situations of treaty abuse and treaty shopping (especially not conduit financing situations) Concerns about combined approach (LOB/Main Purpose Test) Design issues related to the LOB rule Treatment of CIVs, pension funds and dual listed companies Derivative benefits Discretionary relief Interaction domestic anti abuse rules and treaty anti abuse rules 16

17 Next steps Redraft of treaty abuse paper by WP1 s Focus Group on Treaty Abuse is finalised: Addresses design issues LOB Issues around inclusion derivative benefits rule clarified Hybrids, preferential regimes and EU compatibility if not included Need for flexibility because of interactions with other work streams is recognised (e.g. introduction of new domestic rules following from the work on hybrids, interest deductibility, transfer pricing) Next steps: approval by WP1 and by the CFA 17

18 TRANSFER PRICING ASPECTS OF INTANGIBLES

19 Update Public releases: 6 June 2012: discussion draft on TP aspects of Intangibles 30 July 2013: revised discussion draft on TP aspects of Intangibles Public consultations in November 2012 and November 2013 Following the 2013 consultation, extensive WP6 meetings took place in March 2014 and from May

20 Status of work/next steps Status: Agreement within WP6 on the revised text of Chapter I and Chapter VI Chapter VI: up-to-date approach to identifying intangibles and how arm s length considerations should be determined The strong interaction between Section B and the work on risk, re-characterisation, capital and the related special measures is recognised in the paper Next steps: Formal approval by WP6 and approval by CFA Work on risk, re-characterisation, capital and the related special measures will be addressed by WP6 with priority. This work stream together with the work on Intangibles will provide guidance on the most challenging TP issues, including excessive capitalisation, low functionality and mere contractual assumption of risk, and will develop approaches to deal with hard to value intangibles The public release of a full draft report on these issues is expected in December

21 TRANSFER PRICING DOCUMENTATION & CBC REPORTING

22 Update White paper on TP documentation released for public comments on 30 July 2013 Consultation on TP documentation and initial consultation on country by country reporting held in November 2013 Discussion draft on TP documentation and CbC reporting released on 30 January 2014 More than 1400 pages of public comments received Public comments discussed by WP6 in March 2014 Developing countries consulted during the Annual Meeting of the Global Forum on Transfer Pricing in March More than 300 delegates from approximately 110 jurisdictions and international organisations participated in the event. The final day of this year s Global Forum meeting was jointly held with the Task Force on Tax and Development. Public consultation meeting held on 19 May 2014 WP6 discussions from May

23 Status Consensus in WP6 that the new approach will greatly improve the access for governments to relevant information for transfer pricing purposes Agreement on a three tier approach (CbC template, Masterfile and Local File) As these are new tools, experience needs to be developed to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the tools. WP6 is uniformly of the view that a monitoring mechanism is needed to assess whether the focus of the mechanism can or should be improved in the future There is also broad recognition within WP6 that a structured and careful implementation is necessary to guarantee: consistency in the approaches by governments that the relevant information is available to governments for which it is relevant on a timely basis that commercially sensitive information is treated confidentially that the costs for both taxpayers and tax administrations are balanced to secure that the information is used as intended WP6 will finalise the document shortly. After that it will be sent to CFA for formal approval 23

24 THE MULTILATERAL INSTRUMENT

25 Multilateral Instrument Focus is on feasibility of use of a multilateral instrument To address treaty-based BEPS issues efficiently while respecting sovereign autonomy in tax matters and preventing uncertainty Multilateral Instrument is not only feasible but also desirable (numerous benefits, also for developing countries) Targeted instrument that coexists with bilateral tax treaties Negotiation through an International Conference and ratification pursuant to national laws Report and technical annex to the G20 Finance Ministers in September

26 NEXT STEPS

27 Next Steps Internal Working Party 11 (May 2014) Task Force on Digital Economy (May 2014) Working Party 2 (June 2014) Committee on Fiscal Affairs (June 2014) External G20 Cairns Finance Ministers (September 2014) G20 Leaders Brisbane Meeting (November 2014) 27

28 JOIN THE DISCUSSION

29 Join the discussion Ask questions and comment Directly: Enter your question in the space provided Via Via Twitter: Send a tweet with the hashtag #BEPS 29

30 Further Information Website: Contact: Tax alerts: