Stress Relief: IRS Notice Eases the Implementation Rules for Cross-Border Dividend Equivalent Withholding
|
|
- Dale Benson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Article Stress Relief: IRS Notice Eases the Implementation Rules for Cross-Border Dividend By Mark Leeds 1 The final and temporary regulations promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS ) in 2015 under section 871(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code ), create a new and extraordinary set of withholding rules with respect to dividend equivalents actually or deemed paid to non-us persons. 2 Financial institutions, as the purveyors of equity swaps and other financial products linked to US stocks and securities, are the taxpayers that will be required to implement the new withholding rules. The rules were originally scheduled to become fully effective for financial products issued in With only days to go before the new rules were to take effect, the IRS answered industry pleas to provide more time to retool their withholding systems. The IRS responded in Notice and this article discusses the revised rules for withholding on dividend equivalents contained in the Notice. Brief Background In 1991, the IRS promulgated a regulation providing that income from a swap (notional principal contract, or NPC, in tax parlance) is sourced to the residence of the payee. 3 This rule created the potential for a discontinuity with respect to equity swaps and total return swaps, on one hand, and actual stock ownership, on the other. Specifically, if a non-us person held a US stock directly, dividends paid on the stock would be treated as US-source income. Unless an income tax treaty provided for a total exemption from US federal income tax, the non-us stockholder would be subject to either 15 percent (most tax treaties) or 30 percent US (non-treaty rate) federal income tax withholding. 4 In contrast, a dividend equivalent payment 5 made to a non-us person under a swap in respect of a dividend paid on a US stock included in the specified index 6 would be treated as non-ussource income and not be subject to US federal income tax withholding. Congress and the IRS perceived that banks and non-us taxpayers abused this disparity through a variety of transactions and initiated an audit campaign to curtail these perceived abuses. 7 In March 2010, Congress addressed the perceived abuse through the passage of the HIRE Act. 8 Specifically, Section 541 of the HIRE Act enacted Code 871(m). Code 871(m)(1) provides that a dividend equivalent shall be treated as a dividend from sources within the United States. For the period from the effective date of the HIRE Act, dividend equivalents paid or credited on certain swaps and in securities-lending transactions could be subject to withholding. 9 Accordingly, Code 871(m) reverses the rule contained in the 1991 Treasury Regulation for dividend equivalents on certain swaps. As a result, certain dividend equivalents are subject to the same US federal income tax withholding to which an actual dividend would be subject. Indeed, the IRS issued Temporary Regulations to
2 amend the 1991 regulation to specify that it no longer applied to dividend equivalents. This change has now been finalized. 10 In 2012, the IRS released three sets of rules to implement and expand the rules in Code 871(m). 11 These proposed regulations were pulled by the IRS in August The IRS replaced these regulations with a new set in These regulations, in turn, were replaced with the current final and temporary regulations issued in 2015 (the 2015 Regulations ). 14 The last set of regulations was complemented by the issuance of rules for Qualified Derivatives Dealers ( QDDs ). 15 QDDs are electing financial institutions that issue swaps and equity-linked instruments that are pay or credit amounts subject to withholding under Code 871(m). This article does not discuss the 2015 Code 871(m) regulations. The discussion herein is limited to the changes made to such rules by Notice and assumes a working familiarity with Code 871(m) and the existing regulatory scheme. Effective Date and Other Implementation Changes After some dilly-dallying, the IRS specified in the 2015 Regulations that only specified NPCs and equity-linked instruments issued on or after January 1, 2017 would be subject to the revised rules contained in the 2015 Regulations. 16 This effective date created substantial challenges for withholding agents, mostly financial institutions, that have not been able to develop the systems necessary to determine the correct amount to be withheld and to effectuate the withholding itself. The IRS has issued two rules to help alleviate these challenges. First, the only dividend equivalents paid on specified NPCs and ELIs that will be subject to withholding on or after January 1, 2017 are those that are issued on or after such date and have a delta of A financial product that has a delta of 1.0 very closely tracks the reference security. The theory behind leaving the effective date as of January 1, 2017 for delta one products is that these products do not pose significant computational withholding tax challenges, are easily identified and withholding can be implemented consistent with existing systems. Withholding on dividend equivalents paid on specified NPCs and ELIs with deltas of less than 1.0 (but 0.80 or greater) is required only if the transaction is opened or issued on or after January 1, The IRS has cautioned taxpayers that an anti-abuse rule will apply with respect to this delayed effective date. 19 This admonition should prevent taxpayers issuing financial products that come very close to being delta one transactions in 2017 and taking the position that such products are entitled to the delayed effective date. Second, the IRS stated that it will audit withholding agents under specified NPCs and ELIs in 2017 and 2018 with a light touch if they have made good-faith efforts to comply with Code 871(m). The IRS laid out four goodfaith efforts that will support enforcement relief for a taxpayer: (1) it has made efforts to update its withholding systems, (2) it has attempted to determine whether transactions should be combined, (3) it has issued section 871(m) information on ELIs that it issued and (4) it has implemented the substantial equivalent test (the SET ). In addition, the IRS eased the deposit requirements for withheld tax on dividend equivalents by allowing deposits to be made on the last day of a calendar quarter. Retention of the QSL System Through 2017 The final Code 871(m) regulations specified that the qualified securities lending rules would expire at the end of 2016 and the QDD regime would be the only avenue for securities lenders to avoid cascading withholding taxes. 20 In a single sentence in Notice , the IRS extended, through the end of 2017, the three regimes in Notice available to securities 2 Mayer Brown Stress Relief: IRS Notice Eases the Implementation Rules for Cross-Border Dividend
3 lenders to avoid multiple withholding on the same economic dividend. Specifically, each of the QSL regime, the credit-forward system and presumption rules are extended through 2017 for securities-lending transactions. Combined Transactions The final 2015 Regulations contain rules requiring withholding agents to determine if two or more transactions with a single non-us counterparty, each of which standing alone would not be considered to give rise to dividend equivalents, should be combined and thereby generate taxable dividend equivalents. 21 Notice provides substantial relief to withholding agents to enable them to develop systems to determine if this rule will apply. Under a transitional rule applicable to 2017 only, withholding agents transactions will be required to combine transactions only if they consist of over-the-counter ( OTC ) positions and are priced, marketed or sold in connection with each other. 22 Withholding agents will not be required to combine transactions in listed positions in Furthermore, positions will not be retested for combination after the end of the transitional period unless a reissuance (or other retesting event) occurs after such period. The transitional rule does not apply to long parties, that is, non- US persons who hold the positions. Changes to the QDD Rules The QDD regime was promulgated by the IRS to prevent the phenomenon of cascading withholding taxes. 23 To illustrate, assume that non-us person A owns a share of US stock. A loans the stock to non-us person B. As is typical in securities-lending transactions, B must make payments equal to all dividends paid on the stock during the term of the transaction to A. B holds the stock over the dividend record date. The stock issuer withholds 30 percent of the dividend that it pays to B. If B is then required to withhold 30 percent of the amount of the dividend equivalent that it pays to A, there will have been multiple levels of withholding tax imposed on the same dividend. The QDD rules were promulgated pursuant to a Congressional mandate allowing the IRS to address this overwithholding when it added Code 871(m) to the tax law. 24 The most extensive changes to the Code 871(m) withholding regime by Notice are made to the QDD rules. THE NET DELTA CALCULATION Under the original QI Agreement contained in Notice , QDDs have a section 871(m) tax liability equal to the amount of dividends and dividend equivalents that they receive over the sum of dividends equivalents paid to non-us persons and amounts of dividend equivalents that they pay to US persons that would be treated as dividend equivalents if paid to non-us persons. As a result of the operation of this regime, if a QDD hedged the issuance of an ELI referencing a qualified index by holding the individual components of the index, the QDD would be subject to a withholding tax on dividends paid on the components. Similarly, if a QDD issued a financial product that escaped the dividend equivalent withholding rules by virtue of having a delta of less than 0.80, the QDD would remain subject to US tax on dividends paid on any shares held as a hedge of the low delta transaction. These challenges would have resulted in QDDs being required to hedge transactions using physical shares through their US branches. Thus, the regime would have resulted in tax on those QDDs without US branches or those that were caught unawares. In order alleviate this trap for the unwary, the IRS has changed the methodology to be used by QDDs to determine their section 871(m) tax liability. The change follows a suggestion made by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association ( SIFMA ) in a letter to the IRS. 25 Under the new method, referred to as the Net Delta Method, a QDD will determine its section 871(m) amount by multiplying the net delta exposure by the relevant dividend 3 Mayer Brown Stress Relief: IRS Notice Eases the Implementation Rules for Cross-Border Dividend
4 amount. The net delta exposure includes all physical positions and potential section 871(m) transactions entered into by the QDD in its equity derivatives dealer capacity. 26 Since net delta is determined by reference to potential section 871(m) transactions (and not only actual section 871(m) transactions), the use of the net delta method should eliminate the need for back-to-back transactions through US branches of QDDs. WITHHOLDING ON PAYMENTS TO QDDS Under the original version of the QDD rules, payments of dividends and dividend equivalents to QDDs were not subject to US federal income tax withholding. The QDD selfassessed any tax liability that it might have by calculating its section 871(m) tax liability. Notice presages a significant change to this taxing regime by requiring that withholding agents withhold on actual dividends paid to QDDs. 27 This rule does not require withholding on the payment of dividend equivalents made to QDDs. Although not entirely clear, it strongly appears that this withholding will be in lieu of withholding that the QDD itself would have been required to undertake with respect to specified NPCs and ELIs that it issues, not a second layer of tax. For example, assume that a QDD issues a total return equity swap to a non-us person with respect to 100 shares of a US Stock and purchases 100 shares of such stock as a hedge of its obligations under the equity swap. Under the original QDD regime, the custodian of the hedge shares would not have withheld on dividends paid on the hedge shares and the QDD would have withheld on dividend equivalents paid on the equity swap. The regime would continue to apply if the QDD hedged with a derivative instead of physical shares. Under the revised regime, the custodian of the hedge shares will withhold on dividends paid on the hedge shares. It appears that the QDD will not withhold on the dividend equivalents paid on the equity swap. Since the QDD will provide a Form W-8IMY to the custodian, it can specify the withholding rate applicable to the equity swap counterparty (or holder of an ELI, as the case may be) so that the custodian withholds at the rate applicable to the counterparty and not the QDD itself. The fact that upstream withholding has occurred does not relieve the QDD of residual withholding responsibility. If we are correct that the upstream withholding alleviates the requirement on the part of the QDD to withhold, for many smaller QDDs, the change requiring withholding on actual dividends paid to a QDD will be a welcome change because it will alleviate the necessity of building withholding tax systems. In other words, if the only activities with respect to US stocks and securities undertaken by the QDD is the issuance of structured products that include US stocks and securities and are hedged through the holding of physical shares, the withholding will be undertaken by the upstream withholding agent. As a result, the QDD issuer will not be required to undertake withholding and remittance itself. ELECTING QDD STATUS, TAX REMITTANCES AND OTHER ANCILLARY QDD MATTERS The IRS is aware that many financial institutions will be required to substantially retool their internal processes and procedures to be able meet the requirements specified in Notice to act as a QDD. Thus, Notice provides that the IRS will take into account good-faith efforts to comply with the QDD processes and procedures in auditing QDD compliance for In addition, the IRS will permit prospective QDDs to submit their applications to be QDDs after March 31 st of a given year, and if the applicant has not received any reportable payments before the date that the application was submitted, QDD status will be granted as of the beginning of such year. The IRS will also permit companies 4 Mayer Brown Stress Relief: IRS Notice Eases the Implementation Rules for Cross-Border Dividend
5 that have submitted QDD applications, or intend to submit applications prior to March 31, 2017, to treat themselves as QDDs through the end of the six-month period beginning after the month in which the application has been submitted. (Rules are also included allowing prospective QDDs to note that their QI-EIN is pending.) The rules for the QDD to make deposits of withheld taxes are also eased to allow the QDD to wait until it has received its QI-EIN to make such deposits. Applicable withholding rules permit a withholding agent, under limited circumstances, to satisfy its withholding obligation from cash held on behalf of the payee if the withholding agent fails to withhold on a withholdable payment. 29 In Notice , the IRS has extended these rules to allow withholding agents who fail to withhold on a dividend equivalent payment to adjust its withholding on amounts paid to the payee prior to March 15 th of the succeeding taxable year. This rule applies to all withholding agents and not just QDDs. Grandfathering for Exchange-Traded Notes ( ETNs ) Many banks and other financial institutions issue ETNs on a continuous distribution basis. When ETNs are issued in this manner, the terms are set pursuant to a prospectus and when the issuer receives an order for an issuance of the ETN, it issues the ETN at that time. All ETNs issued pursuant to a single offering are fungible and are assigned the same CUSIP code. Under the pre-notice regime, if an ETN issued pursuant to a continuous distribution scheme was issued prior to January 1, 2017, it would not be subject to dividend equivalent withholding. In contrast, if the same ETN was issued after such date, it would be subject to such withholding. This would have been true even though there was no way to distinguish between the two ETNs. Notice offers relief for continuously distributed ETNs, provided that the original ETN was issued before September 18, 2015, the date of the issuance of the final Code 871(m) regulations. Specifically, ETNs issued pursuant to a continuous distribution originally started before September 18, 2015, but those issued on or after January 1, 2017 will be subject to Code 871(m) withholding only on or after January 1, The relief is qualified, however, because only enumerated ETNs are entitled to this relief. In Notice , the IRS has invited other issuers of ETNs issued pursuant to continuous distribution schemes first offered before September 18, 2015 to apply for exemption. It is worth noting that the same challenge exists with respect to exchange-traded options, but Notice does not offer any relief for such securities. Concluding Observations Notice provides a welcome respite to financial institutions grappling with the implementation of Code 871(m) withholding. In particular, the announcement by the IRS that it understands that financial institutions are likely to experiences some hiccups in their initial year of operation and to excuse such missteps shows that the IRS understands the substantial operational challenges that Code 871(m) has imposed. In addition, the provision of an additional year before non-delta one products become subject to Code 871(m) should assist financial institutions in getting the new withholding regime operational. 5 Mayer Brown Stress Relief: IRS Notice Eases the Implementation Rules for Cross-Border Dividend
6 For more information about the topics raised in this article, contact any of the following lawyers or your regular Mayer Brown contact. Mark H. Leeds James R. Barry Hayden D. Brown Endnotes 1 Mark Leeds (mleeds@mayerbrown.com, (212) ) is a tax partner with the New York office of Mayer Brown LLP. Mark s professional practice includes advising on cross-border withholding tax issues. Mark will be presenting on the rules discussed in this article in the Lorman Education Services Webinar titled, New US Federal Income Tax Withholding Regulations on Cross- Border Equity Derivatives and Related Developments, on December 15, Please see 2 The withholding rules do not apply to dividend equivalents paid to non-us persons in connection with their conduct of trade or business in the United States. Unless otherwise indicated, the discussion in text applies to payments made to non-us persons not in connection with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States. 3 Treas. Reg (b)(1). 4 See Code 871(a)(1)(A). 5 The phrase dividend equivalent as used in this article has the meaning assigned to such term in Code 871(m)(2). 6 See Treas. Reg (c)(2). 7 LMSB Control No. LMSB Impacted IRM (January 14, 2010). Your trusty author reported on the IRS audit guidelines in Leeds, New IRS Guidelines Target Equity Swaps with Non-U.S. Counterparties (January 2010). 8 The Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act, P.L See Code 871(m)(2). 10 Temp. Treas. Reg T(a)(1); now see Treas. Reg (a)(1), effective as of January 23, Please see Leeds, Et Tu Babe: New US Tax Regulations Change the Landscape for Dividend Equivalents, published in Derivatives Report, Vol. 13, No. 6 (Feb. 2012). 12 T.D (Rev.) (August 30, 2012). 13 Please see Leeds, An In-Depth look at the 2013 IRS Final and Proposed Regulations on Cross-Border Dividend Equivalents Paid on Swaps and in Security Lending Transactions (Feb. 2014), reprinted at IRS-Final-and-Proposed-Regulations-on-Cross- Border-Dividend-Equivalents-Paid-on-Swaps-and-in- Security-Lending-Transactions /. 14 Please see Leeds, IRS Releases Final & Temporary HIRE Act Regulations Addressing Section 871(m) Dividend Equivalents (September 2015, reprinted at Temporary-HIRE-Act-Regulations-Addressing-Section- 871m-Dividend-Equivalents /. 15 Please see Leeds, Bits & Pieces: IRS Notice Offers First Glimpse of Qualified Derivatives Dealer Rules (July 2016), reprinted at Pieces-IRS-Notice Offers-First-Glimpse-of- Qualified-Derivatives-Dealer-Rules /. 16 See Treas. Reg (r)(3), as amended upon publication in the Federal Register at 80 FR and Temp. Treas. Reg (4), as amended upon publication in the Federal Register at 80 FR Notice , III(A)(1). 18 Notice , III(A)(2). 19 Notice , I. 20 For a discussion of the QSL rules, please see Leeds, When the Other Shoe Falls: IRS Notice Restricts the Application of Notice for Cross-Border Securities Loans (June 2010), reprinted in Daily Tax Report, Vol. 10, No. 105 (June 3, 2010). 21 See Treas. Reg (n). 22 Notice , III(B). 23 For a discussion of the QDD rules, please see Leeds, Bits & Pieces: IRS Notice Offers First Glimpse of Qualified Derivatives Dealer Rules, reprinted in Daily Tax Report, 137 DTR J-1 (July 18, 2016). 24 See Code 871(m)(6). 6 Mayer Brown Stress Relief: IRS Notice Eases the Implementation Rules for Cross-Border Dividend
7 25 See Letter from Payson Peabody to Various IRS and Treasury Officials, Re: Notice , Proposed Qualified Intermediary Agreement, and Section 871(m) Implementation Delay (August 31, 2016). 26 Notice provides that if a QDD calculates net delta for non-tax purposes, it generally should use that number for purposes of determining its section 871(m) amount. 27 Notice , III(C)(1). 28 Notice , III(C)(2). 29 See Treas. Reg (b). Mayer Brown is a global legal services organization advising many of the world s largest companies, including a significant proportion of the Fortune 100, FTSE 100, CAC 40, DAX, Hang Seng and Nikkei index companies and more than half of the world s largest banks. Our legal services include banking and finance; corporate and securities; litigation and dispute resolution; antitrust and competition; US Supreme Court and appellate matters; employment and benefits; environmental; financial services regulatory & enforcement; government and global trade; intellectual property; real estate; tax; restructuring, bankruptcy and insolvency; and wealth management. Please visit our web site for comprehensive contact information for all Mayer Brown offices. Any tax advice expressed above by Mayer Brown LLP was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any taxpayer to avoid U.S. federal tax penalties. If such advice was written or used to support the promotion or marketing of the matter addressed above, then each offeree should seek advice from an independent tax advisor. Mayer Brown comprises legal practices that are separate entities (the Mayer Brown Practices ). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe-Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC ); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown Mexico, S.C., a sociedad civil formed under the laws of the State of Durango, Mexico; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated legal practices in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. Mayer Brown Consulting (Singapore) Pte. Ltd and its subsidiary, which are affiliated with Mayer Brown, provide customs and trade advisory and consultancy services, not legal services. Mayer Brown and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions. This publication provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest to our clients and friends. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved. 7 Mayer Brown Stress Relief: IRS Notice Eases the Implementation Rules for Cross-Border Dividend
FATCA Transitional Rules Extended
Legal Update September 24, 2015 FATCA Transitional Rules Extended Financial institutions, partner jurisdictions and affected stakeholders have been working to implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance
More informationFractional Taxation: IRS Releases Technical Advice Addressing the 10% Securities Rule Applicable to Foreign Bank Branches
Legal Update June 27, 2013 Fractional Taxation: IRS Releases Technical Advice Addressing the 10% Securities Rule Applicable to Detailed special rules apply to determine whether, and the extent to which,
More informationThe IRS and Treasury Issue New Anti-Inversion Notice
Legal Update November 30, 2015 The IRS and Treasury Issue New Anti-Inversion Notice On November 19, 2015, the US Treasury Department ( Treasury ) and Internal Revenue Service ( IRS ) released Notice 2015-79
More informationLending to Single Investor Funds: Issues in Connection with Subscription Credit Facilities
Article Lending to Single Investor Funds: Issues in Connection with Subscription Credit Facilities By Mark Dempsey, Claire Ragen and Zachary Barnett 1 Fund As the subscription credit facility market continues
More informationIRS and Treasury Issue Long-Awaited Guidance on Corporate Inversions and Disqualified Stock
Legal Update January 27, 2014 IRS and Treasury Issue Long-Awaited Guidance on Corporate Inversions and Disqualified Stock On January 16, 2014, the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS ) and the Treasury Department
More informationBankers Bonus Cap: Where Are We Now?
Article Bankers Bonus Cap: Where Are We Now? By Andrew Stanger and Christopher Fisher 1 We covered the forthcoming bankers bonus cap, as contained in the Fourth Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV),
More informationCapital Commitment Subscription Facilities and the Proposed Liquidity Coverage Ratio
Article Capital Commitment Subscription Facilities and the Proposed Liquidity Coverage Ratio By J. Paul Forrester, Carol Hitselberger, Kiel Bowen and Adam Kanter 1 On November 29, 2013, the Board of Governors
More informationSun Capital Update: US Private Equity Funds Liable for Multiemployer Plan Withdrawal Liability of Portfolio Company
Legal Update May 12, 2016 Sun Capital Update: US Private Equity Funds Liable for Multiemployer Plan Withdrawal Liability of On March 28, 2016, in a much-anticipated decision, the US District Court for
More informationTreasury and IRS Re-Release Proposed Regulations on Implementation of New Centralized Partnership Audit Regime
Legal Update June 13, 2017 Treasury and IRS Re-Release Proposed Regulations on Implementation of New Centralized The increasing use of partnerships has posed administrative challenges for the Internal
More informationThe IRS and Treasury Issue New Anti-Inversion Guidance
Legal Update September 25, 2014 The IRS and Treasury Issue New Anti-Inversion Guidance Following weeks of anticipation and speculation about administrative guidance on corporate inversions, the Internal
More informationThe Drama Continues: Senate Finance Committee Chairman s Mark includes Proposals That Would Dramatically Impact Executive Compensation Programs
Legal Update November 14, 2017 The Drama Continues: Senate Finance Committee Chairman s Mark includes Proposals That Would Dramatically Impact Executive Compensation Programs Background HR 1, the Tax Cuts
More informationUnderstanding the SEC s Pay Ratio Disclosure Rule and its Implications
Legal Update August 20, 2015 Understanding the SEC s Pay Ratio Disclosure Rule and its Implications The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), by a 3 to 2 vote, adopted a pay ratio disclosure rule,
More informationJoint Report Signals Post-Brexit Reciprocal Protection for EU and UK Citizens
Legal Update December 21, 2017 Joint Report Signals Post-Brexit Reciprocal Protection for EU and UK Citizens The European Union agreed on December 15, 2017, to progress Brexit negotiations to the second
More informationFund of Funds Financing: Secondary Facilities for PE Funds and Hedge Funds
Article Fund of Funds Financing: Secondary Facilities for PE Funds and Hedge Funds By Zachary K. Barnett, Todd Bundrant, Mark Dempsey and Ann Richardson Knox 1 Real estate, buyout, infrastructure, debt,
More informationBeginner s Glossary to Fund Finance
Article Beginner s Glossary to Fund Finance By Kristin M. Rylko, Zachary K. Barnett and Mark C. Dempsey The following glossary is intended to serve as a reference tool for those that are new to the private
More informationFATCA Certifications and Notice
Article FATCA Certifications and Notice 2016-08 By Jonathan Sambur and Jared Goldberger 1 In January 2016, the IRS issued Notice 2016-08, which, most importantly, delayed the timing for participating foreign
More informationLegal Update September 21, 2011
Legal Update September 21, 2011 US Securities and Exchange Commission Issues Concept Release and Request for Comments Regarding Investment Company Exclusion under Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company
More informationUS Federal Banking Agencies Recommend Changes to Permissible Banking Entity Activities and Investments
Legal Update September 21, 2016 US Federal Banking Agencies Recommend Changes to Permissible Banking Entity Activities and On September 8, 2016, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the
More information2018 and Onward: The Impact of the House-Senate Compromise Tax Plan on the Renewable Energy Market
Legal Update December 19, 2017 2018 and Onward: The Impact of the House-Senate Compromise Tax Plan on the Renewable Ten days before Christmas 2017, the conference committee released the final text of the
More informationSix Things Every Purchaser of US Commercial Accounts Receivable Should Know
Legal Update June 15, 2017 Six Things Every Purchaser of US Commercial Accounts Receivable Should Know Over the past several years, non-recourse receivables financing has been embraced by many major financial
More informationNew Rules Released: Senior Managers and Certification Regime Extended to All Firms
Legal Update August 2017 New Rules Released: Senior Managers and Certification Regime Extended to All Firms The Financial Conduct Authority ( FCA ) and Prudential Regulation Authority ( PRA ) published
More informationSignificant Revisions to US International Tax Rules
Legal Update August 25, 2010 Significant Revisions to US International Tax Rules The Education Jobs and Medicaid Assistance Act of 2010 (Pub. L. No. 111-226) (the Act ) became law on August 10, 2010. While
More informationUnited States and European Union Reach a Covered Agreement on Cross-Border Insurance and Reinsurance
Legal Update January 20, 2017 United States and European Union Reach a Covered Agreement on Cross-Border Insurance On January 13, 2017, the US Department of the Treasury (Treasury), the Office of the US
More informationSpring 2015 reforms: DC governance and charging
Spring 2015 reforms: DC governance and charging THE REFORMS AT A GLANCE y Legislation came into force on 6 April 2015 that restricts charges and introduces a number of measures to improve governance standards
More informationPreparing for the Annual Shareholders Meeting: Five Practical Matters US Public Companies Should Consider Now
Legal Update January 28, 2016 Preparing for the Annual Shareholders Meeting: Five Practical Matters US Public Companies Should By now, public companies should be actively engaged in preparing for their
More informationPaperwork Initiative: IRS Notice Previews of Life Settlement Reporting Rules
Article Paperwork Initiative: IRS Notice 2018-41 Previews of Life Settlement Reporting Rules By Mark Leeds and Brennan Young 1 Wernher von Braun, the rocket scientist, famously said, We can lick gravity,
More informationDOL Fiduciary Rule: Impact and Action Steps
Legal Update July 11, 2017 DOL Fiduciary Rule: Impact and Action Steps With the survival of the US Department of Labor s (DOL) new fiduciary rule (at least for now) and the applicability date (June 9,
More informationThe Impact of the EU Securitization Regulation on US Entities
Legal Update December 19, 2018 The Impact of the EU Securitization Regulation on US Entities The next phase of the European Union s (the EU ) new regulatory regime for securitizations will become applicable
More informationActivist Investor Settlement Agreements: Negotiating Points
Activist Investor Settlement Agreements: Negotiating Points Andrew J. Noreuil Partner (312) 701-8099 anoreuil@mayerbrown.com May 12, 2016 Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal
More informationSubscription Credit Facility Market Review
Article Subscription Credit Facility Market Review By Ann Richardson Knox, Zac Barnett and Kiel Bowen 1 The past year was an active year for Fund Financings, with positive growth and strong credit performance
More informationThe 2017 Proposed Federal Tax Legislation: A First Look.
Legal Update November 7, 2017 The 2017 Proposed Federal Tax Legislation: A First Look. After months of uncertain progress, tax reform has dramatically accelerated in the past few weeks. On November 2,
More informationNew Tax Case Provides Guidance on Deductions for Fees Incurred by Family Offices
Article New Tax Case Provides Guidance on Deductions for Fees Incurred by Family Offices By Mark Leeds 1 It is said that every culture has a variant on the adage, Rags to rags in three generations. Whether
More informationPension Scheme Governance for Trustees Programme
January 2013 Pension Scheme Governance for Trustees Programme Overview of our Pension Scheme Governance for Trustees Programme Pension Scheme Governance for Trustees Programme at Mayer Brown WHAT IS PENSION
More informationSupply Chain Finance Primer
Article Supply Chain Finance Primer By Massimo Capretta and David A. Ciancuillo Massimo Capretta Chicago Partner mcapretta@mayerbrown.com T +1 312 701 8152 David A. Ciancuillo Chicago Partner dciancuillo@mayerbrown.com
More informationThe Proposed Regulations at a Glance. Legal Update April 7, 2016
Legal Update April 7, 2016 Treasury s New Anti-Inversion Regulations: Do They Go Too Far? THE PROPOSED AND TEMPORARY REGULATIONS WILL AFFECT FUTURE TAX PLANNING FOR ALL MULTINATIONAL BUSINESSES On April
More informationOur Global Corporate Trust & Agency Group. Making a splash
Our Global Corporate Trust & Agency Group Making a splash They are excellent in every respect: quick response times, broad knowledge of international bond markets, carefully considered advice. Chambers
More informationInc. No Longer a Safe Shield Federal Circuit Greatly Expands Officer/Shareholder Liability Resulting from US Customs Violations
Legal Update September 23, 2014 Inc. No Longer a Safe Shield Federal Circuit Greatly Expands Officer/Shareholder Liability Resulting from US Customs Violations On September 16, 2014, an en banc panel of
More informationSubscription Facilities: Analyzing Overcall Limitations Linked to Fund Concentration Limits
Article Subscription Facilities: Analyzing Overcall Limitations Linked to Fund Concentration Limits By Ann Richardson Knox and Kiel Bowen 1 As the subscription credit facility (each, a Facility ) market
More informationThe legal form of a European Stock Corporation is an interesting alternative for mid-sized partnerships and also for large corporations.
The legal form of a European Stock Corporation is an interesting alternative for mid-sized partnerships and also for large corporations. Formation of a European Stock Corporation Organizational Possibilities
More informationSpring 2015 reforms: other changes
Spring 2015 reforms: other changes THE REFORMS AT A GLANCE y The Pension Schemes Act 2015 (the Act ) rewrites the current statutory revaluation provisions to allow for revaluation of the new benefit structures
More informationPoland: The Regulations, Permits and Considerations
Poland: The Regulations, Permits and Considerations Poland has weathered the global financial crisis better than most of its European neighbors, but how easy is it doing business there? AUTHOR Rachel Speight
More informationVA Guaranty for Non-Cash-Out Refinancings Subject to New Conditions in Senate Banking Bill
Legal Update March 19, 2018 VA Guaranty for Non-Cash-Out Refinancings Subject to New Conditions in Senate Banking Bill Characterized as protecting veterans from predatory lending, S.2155, the Economic
More informationIRS issues Notice addressing Section 871(m) regulations phase-in
Global Financial Services Industry IRS issues Notice 2016-76 addressing Section 871(m) regulations phase-in Closing the distance On December 2, 2016, the IRS issued Notice 2016-76 ( Notice ), providing
More informationSummary of Bidding Terms for Mexico Deepwater Areas
Legal Update December 18, 215 Summary of Bidding Terms for Mexico Deepwater Areas On December 17, 215, the Mexican National Hydrocarbons Commission (CNH) published the bidding and contract terms for 1
More informationHong Kong Proposes Changes to Attract Listing of Innovative Companies on the Main Board
Legal Update Hong Kong 20 December 2017 Hong Kong Proposes Changes to Attract Listing of Innovative Companies on the Main Board Listing of innovative companies with weighted voting rights (WVR) has been
More informationAntitrust & Competition
Antitrust & Competition Mayer Brown JSM s multi-disciplinary Antitrust & Competition team offers a seamless, coordinated service throughout the Asia Pacific region, and has the benefit of extensive regional
More informationPrivate Equity Portfolio Company Bulletin
July 2017 Private Equity Portfolio Company Bulletin Employee loans consumer credit pitfalls Many people are aware of the tax issues that can arise when making loans to employees with an interest rate below
More informationMexico s President Unveils Historic Proposal to Open the Country s Energy Sector to Private Investment
Legal Update August 14, 2013 Mexico s President Unveils Historic Proposal to Open the Country s Energy Sector On August 12, 2013, Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto of the current ruling party, the Partido
More informationCalifornia Employers Provide Meal Periods by Making Them Available but Need Not Ensure that Employees Take Them
Legal Update April 18, 2012 California Employers Provide Meal Periods by Making Them Available but On April 12, 2012, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision on the scope of an employer
More informationUS Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service Issue Supplementary FATCA Guidance
Legal Update April 28, 2011 US Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service Issue Supplementary FATCA Guidance On April 8, 2011, the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS ) released Notice 2011-34 (the
More informationWest Africa transaction know-how - Mauritania
Article West Africa transaction know-how - Mauritania By Alban Dorin Overview of legal system (Anglophone, Francophone, civil law v. Common law, etc). In the case of Francophone jurisdictions overview
More informationSpring 2015 reforms: the new DC flexibilities
Spring 2015 reforms: the new DC flexibilities THE REFORMS AT A GLANCE y Under current rules, members usually face serious tax penalties if they do not spend at least 75% of their DC pots on an annuity
More informationCapital Markets Implications of Amendments to Simplify and Update SEC Disclosure Rules
Legal Update August 29, 2018 Capital Markets Implications of Amendments to Simplify and Update SEC Disclosure Rules On August 17, 2018, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) amended certain disclosure
More informationDIVIDEND EQUIVALENTS: EQUITY SWAPS; SECURITIES LENDING AND REPOS
DIVIDEND EQUIVALENTS: EQUITY SWAPS; SECURITIES LENDING AND REPOS John M. Staples Burt, Staples & Maner Institute of International Bankers June 21, 2010 Overview Section 541 of HIRE ACT Dividend Equivalents:
More informationSEC Eliminates General Solicitation and General Advertising Prohibitions from Certain Private Placements
Legal Update July 17, 2013 SEC Eliminates General Solicitation and General Advertising Prohibitions from Certain Private On July 10, 2013, the US Securities and Exchange Commission adopted rules eliminating
More informationThe Volcker Rule: Proprietary Trading and Private Fund Restrictions
Legal Update June 30, 2010 The Volcker Rule: Proprietary Trading and Private Fund Restrictions On June 25, 2010, the House-Senate Conferees agreed to a final version of the Volcker Rule. Along with the
More informationUS IRS Issues Preliminary FATCA Guidance Establishing Due Diligence Procedures and Information Reporting Rules for Foreign Financial Institutions
Legal Update September 16, 2010 US IRS Issues Preliminary FATCA Guidance Establishing Due Diligence Procedures and Information Reporting Rules for Foreign Financial Institutions On August 27, 2010, the
More informationThe Government Consults on Subsidiary Legislation for Implementation of the new Companies Ordinance Phase One
Legal Update Corporate & Securities Hong Kong 12 October 2012 The Government Consults on Subsidiary Legislation for Implementation of the new Ordinance Phase One Quick Read As explained in our previous
More informationA brief overview of mining in Senegal
Article A brief overview of mining in Senegal By Alban Dorin and Lara Welsh Overview of Senegalese legal system Senegal is a civil law jurisdiction, meaning that the core principles of law are codified
More informationThe Volcker Rule: Implication for Private Fund Activities
Legal Update June 10, 2010 The Volcker Rule: Implication for Private Fund Activities On June 25, 2010, the House-Senate Conferees agreed to a final version of the Volcker Rule. Along with the rest of this
More informationBUSINESS DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES Financing Growth through Permanent Capital Vehicles A business development company ( BDC ) is a closedend investment company specifically designed to provide capital to,
More informationUpdated EU Blocking Statute Targeting Reinstated US Iran Sanctions Enters into Force
Legal Update August 7, 2018 Updated EU Blocking Statute Targeting Reinstated US Iran Sanctions Enters into Force Following President Trump s decision to withdraw from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action
More informationIRS Releases Proposed Anti-Hybrid Regulations
Legal Update January 2, 2019 IRS Releases Proposed Anti-Hybrid Regulations The US Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 ( TCJA ) 1 added new sections 245A(e) and 267A to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the
More informationNew Ways to Use Your Offshore RMB: MOFCOM and PBoC Join Hands to Put Finishing Touches on RMB FDI Rules
3 Legal Update Banking & Finance Mergers & Acquisitions Real Estate Hong Kong, Mainland China 24 October 2011 New Ways to Use Your Offshore RMB: MOFCOM and PBoC Join Hands to Put Finishing Touches on RMB
More informationSEC Proposes Conflict-of-Interest Rule for Asset-Backed Securities
Legal Update October 3, 2011 SEC Proposes Conflict-of-Interest Rule for Asset-Backed Securities Executive Summary The SEC has issued proposed Rule 127B pursuant to Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Act. Rule
More informationSEC Adopts Dodd-Frank Hedging Disclosure Rule
Legal Update December 27, 2018 SEC Adopts Dodd-Frank Hedging Disclosure Rule On December 18, 2018, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted a final rule requiring companies to disclose their
More informationIntroduction to Section 871(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC)
Introduction to Section 871(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) 03 August 2017 Error! Introduction No text to Section of specified 871(m) style of the in document. Internal Revenue Error! Code Use (IRC)
More informationUS IRS issues Section 871(m) transition rules
9 December 2016 International Tax Alert US IRS issues Section 871(m) transition rules EY Global Tax Alert Library Access both online and pdf versions of all EY Global Tax Alerts. Copy into your web browser:
More informationComplying with the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (Cap. 486) in the insurance industry
Legal Update Insurance Privacy & Security Hong Kong 19 December 2012 Complying with the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (Cap. 486) in the insurance industry Abstract Last month, the Privacy Commissioner
More informationTaxNewsFlash. KPMG report: Relief provided for looming section 871(m) regulations in Notice
TaxNewsFlash United States No. 2016-556 December 14, 2016 KPMG report: Relief provided for looming section 871(m) regulations in Notice 2016-76 The U.S. Treasury Department and IRS on Friday, December
More informationNever Say Never: Preparing for the Reintroduction of the Withdrawn Centralized Partnership Audit Regulations
Article Never Say Never: Preparing for the Reintroduction of the Withdrawn Centralized Partnership Audit By Mark Leeds 1 On January 18, 2017, the US Internal Revenue Service (the IRS ) released 277 pages
More informationEU Regulation: Cross-border & extraterritorial issues
EU Regulation: Cross-border & extraterritorial issues Alexandria Carr Of Counsel 020 3130 3398 acarr@mayerbrown.com 14 August 2013 Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices
More informationGain Deferral Using Qualified Opportunity Zone Investment Strategies
Legal Update August 2, 2018 Gain Deferral Using Qualified Opportunity Zone Investment Strategies This Legal Update provides an overview of the Qualified Opportunity Zone rules. 1 These rules provide for
More informationWinter 2015 Subscription Credit Facility Market Review
Article Winter 2015 Subscription Credit Facility Market Review By Zachary K. Barnett 1 Capital call subscription credit facilities (each, a Facility ) continued their post-crisis growth and positive credit
More informationEnhanced Antitrust Enforcement Expected in China as Long-awaited Anti-Monopoly Implementing Rules Finalised
3 Legal Update Antitrust & Competition Hong Kong Mainland China 14 January 2011 Enhanced Antitrust Enforcement Expected in China as Long-awaited Anti-Monopoly Implementing Rules Finalised China looks set
More informationThree Key Takeaways from ICANN 59 in Johannesburg
Legal Update July 21, 2017 Three Key Takeaways from ICANN 59 in Johannesburg ICANN 59, the most recent public meeting of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), took place in Johannesburg,
More informationPensions Legal Update
Reproduced with the kind permission of PLC Magazine Pensions Legal Update Legal Update Contents Page 1. Do one thing this month 1. Employer debt legislation: further changes 3. Pensions tax relief: high
More informationBEATen Up (Again): The IRS Issues Proposed Regulations Under the Base Erosion Anti-Abuse Tax
Article December 17, 2018 BEATen Up (Again): The IRS Issues Proposed Regulations Under the Base Erosion Anti-Abuse Tax By Mark Leeds 1 When I was in junior high school, I suffered a particularly humiliating
More informationWhy a Hanjin Fleet Came to Hong Kong
Hong Kong Article August 2017 Why a Hanjin Fleet Came to Hong Kong The role of the Hong Kong court in ship mortgage enforcement This article was jointly written by Dean A. Young, a senior consultant with
More informationDecember 24, Delivered Electronically
December 24, 2010 Delivered Electronically The Honorable Michael F. Mundaca Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy) U.S. Department of the Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Room 3120 Washington, DC 20220
More informationEvery cloud? - Changing regulatory times for commercial lenders to provide significant opportunities for institutional investors
Legal Update May 2017 Every cloud? - Changing regulatory times for commercial lenders to provide significant opportunities for institutional investors We hear consistently about the existence of a funding
More informationMalaysia The Resurrection of Sales and Services Tax
Mayer Brown Consulting Trade Alert 7 August 2018 Malaysia The Resurrection of Sales and Services Tax Introduction The political scene in Malaysia has taken a very dynamic turn and it serves as a timely
More informationBoricua at Heart: Guidance on Establishing a Closer Connection to Puerto Rico
Article Boricua at Heart: Guidance on Establishing a Closer Connection to Puerto Rico By Mark Leeds 1 Many United States individuals have fallen victim to the tropical allure of Puerto Rico. And as savvy
More informationTrustee Quarterly Review
November 2015 Trustee Quarterly Review Quarterly update for pension scheme trustees Introduction Welcome to the November 2015 edition of our Trustee Quarterly Review. The Review is published by the Mayer
More informationEnergy Tax Provisions in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
energy update Energy Tax Provisions in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 February 19, 2009 On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment
More informationUnderstanding and Mitigating Regulatory Risk in Consumer Financial Transactions: Effective Diligence Strategies
Understanding and Mitigating Regulatory Risk in Consumer Financial Transactions: Effective Diligence Strategies Steven M. Kaplan Partner +1 202 263 3005 skaplan@mayerbrown.com Jeffrey P. Taft Partner +1
More informationSEC Adopts Final Rules Related to Representation and Warranties in Asset-Backed Securities Offerings
Legal Update January 31, 2011 SEC Adopts Final Rules Related to Representation and Warranties in Asset-Backed On January 20, 2011, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC ) issued final rules
More informationHong Kong Proposes Rules to Combat Backdoor Listing - Part 2
Legal Update Hong Kong 13 July 2018 Hong Kong Proposes Rules to Combat Backdoor Listing - Part 2 To address concerns about backdoor listings and shell activities in Hong Kong, the Stock Exchange of Hong
More informationUS SEC Amends Custody Rule for Registered Investment Advisers
Financial Services Regulatory & Enforcement Update June 11, 2010 US SEC Amends Custody Rule for Registered Investment Advisers On December 30, 2009, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published
More informationTransfer Pricing: The New Frontier Transfer Pricing Documentation in a Post-BEPS World: Evolution or Revolution? November 8, 2018
Transfer Pricing: The New Frontier Transfer Pricing Documentation in a Post-BEPS World: Evolution or Revolution? November 8, 2018 Today s Speakers Astrid Pieron Partner, Brussels apieron@mayerbrown.com
More informationLeasing Law & Tax 2015/16
Article Leasing Law & Tax 2015/16 By Dean Young 1 Dean Young Hong Kong +852 2843 4366 dean.young@ mayerbrownjsm.com This article first appeared in Leasing Law & Tax 2015/16. From 1 st July 1997, Hong Kong
More informationDerivatives Regulation
Derivatives Regulation Douglas Donahue Partner +1 212 506 2562 ddonahue@mayerbrown.com Jerome Roche Partner +1 202 263 3773 jroche@mayerbrown.com Ed Parker Partner +44 20 3130 3922 EParker@mayerbrown.com
More informationDisguised Payments for Services: Proposed Regulations Review
Disguised Payments for Services: Proposed Regulations Review May 2, 2017 Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices").
More informationMadden in the Supreme Court: Where It Is, and Where It Could Be Going
Legal Update April 15, 2016 Madden in the Supreme Court: Where It Is, and Where It Could Be Going Nearly everyone in the consumer finance industry is familiar with the May 2015 decision of the United States
More informationDemystifying the IRS Appeals Process
Demystifying the IRS Appeals Process Houston TEI Tax School Shawn O Brien Houston, Texas (713) 238-2848 sobrien@mayerbrown.com IRS Audits and Global Controversy Issues May 4, 2017 Mayer Brown is a global
More informationtaxnotes Agreement international by Denise Hintzke and Kelly Cruze Reprinted from Tax Notes Int l, August 29, 2016, p. 789
taxnotes The Impact of the Proposed U.S. QI Agreement by Denise Hintzke and Kelly Cruze Reprinted from Tax Notes Int l, August 29, 2016, p. 789 international Volume 83, Number 9 August 29, 2016 The Impact
More informationSummary of Government Interventions in Financial Markets European Central Bank (and the Eurosystem)
26 May 2009 Summary of Government Interventions in Financial Markets European Central Bank (and the Eurosystem) Overview The co-ordinated efforts of the European Central Bank (the ECB ) and the various
More informationSTRUCTURED AND MARKET-LINKED PRODUCTS
STRUCTURED AND MARKET-LINKED PRODUCTS B Structured and Market-Linked Products We aim to render service so seamless that, perhaps, at times, the necessary coordination and strength required is obscured.
More informationAbusiveness. The CFPB s New Enforcement Tool. Ori Lev Partner Mayer Brown
Abusiveness The CFPB s New Enforcement Tool Ori Lev Partner Mayer Brown olev@mayerbrown.com Christopher Shelton Associate Mayer Brown cshelton@mayerbrown.com Speakers Ori Lev Partner Mayer Brown olev@mayerbrown.com
More informationPensions Legal Update
Reproduced with the kind permission of PLC Magazine Pensions Legal Update Legal Update Contents 1. Do one thing this month. 2. The Regulator s review of pre-retirement literature for occupational DC schemes.
More information