Tax Brief. 7 June GST-Free Supplies of Services to Non Residents Court Supports Commissioner s Draft Ruling. The Facts
|
|
- Elisabeth Cooper
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Tax Brief 7 June 2004 GST-Free Supplies of Services to Non Residents Court Supports Commissioner s Draft Ruling Fiduciary Ltd & Ors v Morningstar Research Pty Ltd & Ors [2004] NSWSC 381 (11 May 2004) For professional advisors, the decision of Gzell J in the New South Wales Supreme Court in Fiduciary Ltd & Ors v Morningstar Research Pty Ltd & Ors [2004] NSWSC 381 may well be of greater interest in the course of administering their own practices than in the resolution of client issues. The case is not directly a GST case. Rather, it arose in relation to the quantification of a costs order after earlier proceedings were decided in favour of Morningstar. The Court, in deciding how much should be awarded by way of legal costs had to determine the issue of whether a foreign company, Morningstar Inc, was in Australia for the purposes of item 2 of the table in section (1) of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 ( GST Act all references are to the GST Act unless otherwise noted). In resolving that issue in a manner supportive of the approach proposed by the Commissioner in draft GST ruling GSTR 2003/D9, Gzell J has provided significant guidance on the perennial question faced by advisors with non-resident clients do we need to include GST on this invoice?. The Facts The relevant facts are these: Morningstar Research, the first defendant, was an Australian company jointly owned by the second defendant Morningstar Inc (a US company), with the majority interest, and the first plaintiff (Fiduciary Ltd ( Fiduciary )). Morningstar Inc appointed four directors to the board of Morningstar Research the third to sixth defendants.
2 Fiduciary brought an action against the defendants for relief against conduct of Morningstar Research s operations which was allegedly oppressive under section 232 of the Corporations Act Two of the directors of Morningstar Research appointed by Morningstar Inc were in Australia in relation to the conduct of the case, as well as an employee of Morningstar Research whom Morningstar Inc wished to appoint as managing director of Morningstar Research.[1] That action was decided in favour of the defendants with an order that Fiduciary pay the defendants legal costs. Morningstar Inc is not an income tax resident of Australia. Its Australian solicitors charged their fees on a GST inclusive basis. The defendants sought an assessment of costs under section 202(1) of the Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW) and the assessor determined that the costs should be GST-free in accordance with section (1) of the GST Act. The plaintiffs sought a review under the costs assessment review process set out in the Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW). The Review Panel determined that Morningstar Inc s costs (ie fees for the solicitor s services) should have been determined on the GST inclusive basis on which they were rendered as by virtue of the presence in Australia of two of the directors and the employee of Morningstar Research in relation to the case, Morningstar Inc was in Australia for the purposes of item 2 of section (1) and GST was properly payable. Other than an acknowledgement that the two directors of Morningstar Research, nominated by Morningstar Inc, and its employee were physically present in Australia in relation to the interlocutory proceedings, no evidence was led as to their actual activities or their relationship with or ability to bind Morningstar Inc (bearing in mind that they were attending in their capacity as directors/employee of Morningstar Research). Fiduciary appealed that decision to the New South Wales Supreme Court on the basis that the review panel had erred in law and the matter was brought before Gzell J. It was stated by the barristers in the case that the defendants had declined the opportunity to seek a private ruling on the matter (although this would presumably need to be obtained by the solicitors) and that the ATO had declined to appear in this matter. The Issue While primarily an argument as to the quantum of costs under the Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW), the question turned on the issue of whether the provision of services to Morningstar Inc by the Australian solicitors was: 2GST-Free Supplies of Services to Non Residents Court Supports Commissioner s Draft R
3 1 a taxable supply for GST purposes, in which case the costs should be assessed based on the GST inclusive invoices as rendered; or 2 a GST-free supply in accordance with item 2 of the table section (1), in which case the costs should be assessed on a GST exclusive basis? The parties agreed that Morningstar Inc was not an Australian resident and that the solicitor s services did not relate to goods or real property. As a result, the only point in issues was whether the presence of the directors and employee of Morningstar Research in Australia in relation to the earlier proceedings were sufficient for Morningstar Inc to be taken to be in Australia when they were provided such that the services could not be GST-free. The Decision Gzell J noted comments in GSTR 2000/31 (par 68) to the effect that in order for Morningstar Inc to not be in Australia for these purposes, it must not itself or via a representative acting on its behalf be in Australia in relation to the supply of the solicitor s services. In a passage sure to warm the heart of taxation advisors, Gzell J then concluded that notwithstanding the terms of section 37 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 ( TAA ) on the effect of GST rulings, the Review Panel had erred in law in considering itself bound by the views expressed on this point by the ATO in GSTR 2000/31, which it considered to be binding notwithstanding the fact that those views had been altered in draft rulings GST 2002/D8 and subsequently GSTR 2003/D9. Gzell J cited with approval the Commissioner s comments in Income Tax Ruling IT 1 that: In using Taxation Rulings it should be recognised that they cannot supplant the terms of the law. It is now well established that statements or declarations by the Commissioner of Taxation or his officers do not have the effect of an estoppel against the operation of the taxation law. [2] He then proceeded to determine the question of whether Morningstar Inc was in Australia for these purposes by reference to a number of cases in relation to whether a company was subject to the jurisdictions of the courts. In his view (at paragraphs 29 and 30): When it comes to determining whether a corporation is or is not in Australia, there is no reason, in my view, for the body of law discussed above not to apply in the determination of that question. The concept of presence in a jurisdiction sufficient to subject a corporation to the jurisdiction of the courts has been developed by reference to activities of sufficient significance to make it appropriate that the corporation be amenable to the local jurisdiction. 3GST-Free Supplies of Services to Non Residents Court Supports Commissioner s Draft R
4 Citing a variety of previous decisions with approval[3], Gzell J particularly noted the following passages: the true test in such cases is whether the foreign corporation is conducting its own business at some fixed place within the jurisdiction, that being the only way in which a corporation can reside in this country. It can only so reside through its agent, not being a concrete entity itself; but, if it so resides by its agent, it must be considered for this purpose as itself residing within the jurisdiction [4]; the best test is to ascertain whether the business is carried on here and at a defined place [5]; First, it must be carrying on its business here and this it can do only by an agent and will not be doing unless the agent has authority on behalf of corporation to make contracts with persons in New South Wales binding on the corporation. Secondly, the business must be carried on at some fixed and definite place within the State. Thirdly, the business must have continued for sufficiently substantial period of time. [6] Gzell J then states that in GSTR 2002/D8 and GSTR 2003/D9 the Commissioner has correctly applied those principles to the question of whether a corporation is in Australia for the purposes of item 2 of the table in section (1) and goes on to note that a not dissimilar approach is adopted in the context of double taxation treaties and whether a taxpayer has a permanent establishment in a given jurisdiction. Having established this legal principle, Gzell J found that on the facts presented to him, the mere presence of the two directors and an employee of Morningstar Research in Australia was not sufficient for Morningstar Inc to be in Australia. Similarly because the solicitors were agents of independent status carrying on their own business, their engagement was not sufficient for Morningstar Inc to be said to be in Australia. Gzell J dismissed submissions that the mere carrying on of a business in Australia is sufficient for the corporation to be in Australia. It is necessary for that business to be conducted from a fixed place and for it to have been conducted for a sufficiently substantial period of time. He considered that this view was consistent with the fact that Parliament deliberately did not choose to use the term an enterprise carried on in Australia in section (1) and the modifications made to the definition of permanent establishment for the purposes of section 9-25(6) of the GST Act. Comments The interpretation of item 2 of the table in section (1) has been one of the more vexed questions facing GST advisors in relation to cross border services. Because of its general nature, this item more than any other in section (1) 4GST-Free Supplies of Services to Non Residents Court Supports Commissioner s Draft R
5 is the gateway through which GST-free status is accorded to such dealings (both in relation to client transactions and the provision of services by advisors). This decision is likely to prove of great benefit. Not only does it provide judicial guidance on the interpretation of this provision, but, importantly, it does so in a manner that is consistent with the approach adopted by the Commissioner (albeit in a draft ruling). It is reasonable to assume that a court would also approve of the related cases that the Commissioner cites in respect of whether non-corporate entities are in Australia. The decision in this case provides a consistent and fairly straightforward test (subject to the availability of information). Importantly, it means that similar factors need to be taken into account by a non-resident corporation when determining whether it is amenable to the jurisdiction of Australian courts, has a permanent establishment here for income tax purposes or is in in Australia for GST purposes. Although the tests are similar, the answers will not always be the same though that usually will be the case. It is surprising that further facts were not elicited by the plaintiffs on the relationship between the two directors and the employee of Morningstar Research on the one hand and Morningstar Inc on the other hand, even though it seems that Morningstar Inc bore the large part of the legal fees in the action. It is very unlikely that the presence in Australia of directors or employees of an Australian subsidiary or joint venture company will be enough to render the foreign parent company or foreign joint venturer present in Australia. There will need to be further facts establishing that the directors or employee are agents of the foreign company and satisfy the presence tests set out above in relation to the foreign company. The decision raises a number of interesting issues which were not in contention and were therefore not considered. The solicitors had as it turned out incorrectly charged a GST amount to Morningstar Inc. A review of the Australian Business Register indicates that Morningstar Inc is not GST registered so it presumably has not claimed an input tax credit. There is no evidence as to why the solicitors considered their clients to be in Australia and hence charged amounts on account of GST. Presumably they did so in reliance on the comments contained in GSTR 2000/31 (although as a point of principle, reliance on a ruling is of no relevance in this instance because section 37 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 only has application if a taxpayer has relied on a ruling and has underpaid GST and the ruling is subsequently altered). It is also interesting that the impact of section (3) was not considered, particularly as, while the legal services were supplied to Morningstar Inc, they may have been provided to the directors whilst they were physically in Australia. 5GST-Free Supplies of Services to Non Residents Court Supports Commissioner s Draft R
6 Although beyond the scope of this decision, it would also be interesting from a practitioner s point of view as to how the solicitor s went about obtaining a refund of the overpaid GST through section 39 of the TAA, particularly in relation to satisfying the ATO that Morningstar Inc had been reimbursed. Assuming that the reimbursements have been made and the refunds obtained, no party should be out of pocket, for GST at least. Practitioners will no doubt welcome the clear statement of principle that this case provides (as well as the endorsement of GSTR 2003/D9). However, in practice, it will invariably be the case that the facts may not be so clear cut as they were in this case. Therein lies the challenge. 6GST-Free Supplies of Services to Non Residents Court Supports Commissioner s Draft R
7 This article written by Rhys Penning appeared in the July 2004 edition Vol 39 (1) of Taxation in Australia, the journal of the Taxation Institute of Australia. References: [1]It also appears that the President of the International Division of Morningstar Inc was in Australia for the hearing of the case but this is not discussed in the present case, Fiduciary v Morningstar [2001] NSWSC [2]While that statement refers to Taxation Rulings, it is also true for GST rulings which have even less weight given that they are issued under an administrative practice of the Commissioner per section 63 of the TAAand only have weight under section 37 of that Act. [3]Such as Actiesselskabet Dampskib Hercules v Grand Trunk Pacific Railway Co [1912] 1 KB 222, Okura & Co Ltd v Forsbacka Jernverks Aktiebolag [1914] 1 KB 715 at 718, Littauer Glove Corp v F W Millington (1920) Ltd (1928) 44 TLR 746, Sfeir & Co v National Insurance Co of New Zealand Ltd [1964] 1 Lloyd s Rep 330 and Vogel v Kohnstamn Ltd [1973] 1 QB 133 [4]Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co v Actien-Gesellschaft Fur Motor Und Motorfahrzeugbau Vorm Cudell & Co [1902] 1 KB 342 at [5]Actiesselskabet Dampskib Hercules v Grand Trunk Pacific Railway Co [1912] 1 KB 222 at 227 [6]National Commercial Bank v Wimborne (1979) 11 NSWLR 156 at 165 These notes are in summary form designed to alert clients to tax developments of general interest. They are not comprehensive, they are not offered as advice and should not be used to formulate business or other fiscal decisions. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation Greenwoods & Freehills Pty Limited (ABN ) Sydney ANZ Tower, 161 Castlereagh Street, Sydney NSW 2000 Australia Ph , Fax Melbourne 101 Collins Street, Melbourne VIC 3000, Australia Ph Fax Perth QV.1 Building, 250 St Georges Terrace, Perth WA 6000, Australia Ph Fax GST-Free Supplies of Services to Non Residents Court Supports Commissioner s Draft R
Tax Brief. 3 March Stamp Duty Tail Wags CGT Dog? The Facts
Tax Brief 3 March 2005 Stamp Duty Tail Wags CGT Dog? Whilst the High Court decision in Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Dick Smith Electronics Holdings Pty Ltd ( Dick Smith ) involves NSW stamp duty,
More informationGST & Property Update End of GST Transitional Relief
Tax Brief 13 October 2005 GST & Property Update Given the volume of cases, legislative change and new or revised rulings relating to GST & property that have issued or been enacted since our last GST &
More informationTax Brief. 5 April A Bet Each Way. Facts. Sherlinc Enterprises Pty Ltd v FCT (2004) AATA 113
Tax Brief 5 April 2004 A Bet Each Way Sherlinc Enterprises Pty Ltd v FCT (2004) AATA 113 The AAT has found that a purported choice to apply the now repealed replacement asset rollover under Div 123 was
More informationTrust losses Remain Idle Background
Tax Brief 6 October 2004 Trust losses Remain Idle The Federal Court has held in Idlecroft Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2004] FCA 1087 that a trust stripping scheme was caught by reimbursement agreement
More informationTax Brief. 3 November Transitionally GST-Free Contracts 1 July 2005 Legislative Fix. STOP PRESS: 11 February Summary
Tax Brief 3 November 2004 Transitionally GST-Free Contracts 1 July 2005 Legislative Fix STOP PRESS: 11 February 2005 The legislation giving effect to the end of GST-free transitional relief passed through
More informationTax Brief. 19 December Foreign Exchange Rules Become Law and the Countdown to 16 January 2004 Begins. The Six Elections and Choices
Tax Brief 19 December 2003 Foreign Exchange Rules Become Law and the Countdown to Begins On Wednesday 17 December, 2003, the Governor General gave Royal Assent to the legislation enacting the new foreign
More informationTax Brief. 29 May New International Tax Measures. Re-written Interest Withholding Tax Exemption. Background
Tax Brief 29 May 2007 New International Tax Measures The Government introduced the Tax Laws Amendment (2007 Measure No 3) Bill 2007 ("the Bill") into Parliament on Thursday 10 May. The Bill contains a
More informationTax Brief. 21 December New ATO Views on Absolute Entitlement. Background
Tax Brief 21 December 2004 New ATO Views on Absolute Entitlement Background It has taken just under 20 years, but the Australian Taxation Office [ ATO ] has finally released a Draft Ruling outlining its
More informationTax Brief. 8 September Withholding Tax on Interest Paid to US and UK Financial Institutions - The ATO's Opening Gambit.
Tax Brief 8 September 2004 Withholding Tax on Interest Paid to US and UK Financial Institutions - The ATO's Opening Gambit On 1 September 2004, the ATO issued its preliminary view in the form of Draft
More informationTax Brief. 11 May Budget Measures - Superannuation. New Personal Income Tax Rates
Tax Brief 11 May 2004 2004-05 Budget Measures - Superannuation The Treasurer s 2004-05 Budget will no doubt be remembered for its generosity to families, not to mention the size and speed of the cash handouts
More informationTax Brief. 15 December Tax Consolidation: Transitional Elections to be Finalised by 31 December More Changes Introduced
Tax Brief 15 December 2004 Tax Consolidation: Transitional Elections to be Finalised by 31 December 2004 - More Changes Introduced STOP PRESS 20 DECEMBER 2004 On Monday 20 September 2004, the Minister
More informationThe Orica decision and its Implications
14 December 2015 The Orica decision and its Implications The first instance decision of Justice Pagone in Orica Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCA 1399 represents a significant win by the ATO
More informationBudget 2006 Personal Tax and Fringe Benefits Tax Personal Income Tax
Tax Brief 9 May 2006 Budget 2006 Every year there is frenzied speculation about the likely content of the upcoming Budget. And, as is usually the case, some of the speculation proved to be close to the
More informationTax Brief. 23 March Indirect Tax Sharing Agreements. Limiting joint and several liability. Main effects of an ITSA
Tax Brief 23 March 2010 Indirect Tax Sharing Agreements From 1 July 2010, indirect tax sharing agreements (ITSAs) will become part of the GST landscape. Under the proposed measures, GST group members and
More informationTax Brief. 20 April The income of a trust Taxation Ruling 2012/D1. 1. The big picture
Tax Brief 20 April 2012 The income of a trust Taxation Ruling 2012/D1 On 28 March, the ATO issued a draft Ruling, TR 2012/D1 ( the Ruling ) dealing with the meaning of the word income in connection with
More informationTax Brief. 8 April Participation Exemption and Reform of the CFC Rules. Summary
Tax Brief 8 April 2004 Participation Exemption and Reform of the CFC Rules On April Fools Day the second tranche of legislation arising out of the Review of International Taxation was introduced into Federal
More informationTax Brief. 9 April Changes to Superannuation. Background. Earnings on assets set aside to meet pension liabilities
Tax Brief 9 April 2013 Changes to Superannuation The Treasurer has put an end to the frenzied pre-budget speculation by announcing the government s plans for changing superannuation. This Tax Brief examines
More informationMore ruminations on valuation issues
4 December 2017 More ruminations on valuation issues The market value of an asset is a pervasive feature of tax law, and when it is in dispute it is almost always problematic. The value of a particular
More informationTax Brief. 23 April Investment Manager Regime Element 3. 1 Background
Tax Brief 23 April 2013 Investment Manager Regime Element 3 Treasury has released an Exposure Draft of the legislation needed to enact Element 3 of the Investment Manager Regime. The major beneficiaries
More informationAdjusting Consolidation, Again 1. Background
Tax Brief 9 October 2012 Adjusting Consolidation, Again The Board of Taxation has released another Discussion Paper in its ongoing review of the consolidation regime. One special focus of this paper is
More informationTax Brief. 18 June Bamford: Taxation of trusts clarified. Facts
Tax Brief 18 June 2009 Bamford: Taxation of trusts clarified In its recent decision in Bamford v Commissioner of Taxation [2009] FCAFC 66, the Full Federal Court has settled (at least at the level of the
More informationTax Brief. 12 August IMR and MIT: A going-away present? 1. Investment Manager Regime
Tax Brief 12 August 2013 IMR and MIT: A going-away present? The centrepiece of business tax policy that the Labor Party carried into the 2007 federal election was to make Australia an Asian funds management
More informationTax Brief. 16 November Exposure Draft on Share Buybacks. Off-market buybacks
Tax Brief 16 November 2011 Exposure Draft on Share Buybacks Treasury has released exposure draft legislation to rewrite the share buyback rules into the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. The draft gives
More informationJOINT SUBMISSION BY. Draft Taxation Ruling - TR 2000/D12 Income tax and capital gains tax: capital gains in pre-cgt tax treaties
JOINT SUBMISSION BY THE TAXATION INSTITUTE OF AUSTRALIA, THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS IN AUSTRALIA, CPA AUSTRALIA, THE TAXPAYERS AUSTRALIA Inc. AND NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ACCOUNTANTS Draft Taxation
More information25 October Draft Ruling on the Taxation of Earn out Arrangements. 1. Sale on credit v. a sale for an earn out right
25 October 2007 Draft Ruling on the Taxation of Earn out Arrangements On 17 October 2007, the Australian Taxation Office (the ATO ) released a new Draft Taxation Ruling (the Draft Ruling ) on the tax treatment
More informationTax Brief. Sovereign Wealth Funds. 8 December, Background. Treasury Paper
Tax Brief 8 December, 2009 Sovereign Wealth Funds The tax treatment of sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) in domestic and international tax law has recently been occupying the minds of tax officials in Australia
More informationTax Time Monthly NOVEMBER 2017 INCOME TAX SUPERANNUATION STATE TAXES
Tax Time Monthly NOVEMBER 2017 INCOME TAX SUPERANNUATION STATE TAXES CONTENTS 1 INCOME TAX pg 3 Reduction in corporate tax rate: Draft TR 2017/D7 and legislation introduced 2 SUPERANNUATION pg 4 Binding
More informationTax Brief. 22 May Final Withholding for Managed Investment Trust Distributions. Background. Proposed legislation and regulations for payers
Tax Brief 22 May 2008 Final Withholding for Managed Investment Trust Distributions The Government has made further progress toward delivering one of its election promises, repeated in last week s Budget
More informationTax Brief. 11 February Amway of Australia v Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2003] FCA Facts
Tax Brief 11 February 2004 Amway of Australia v Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2003] FCA 1533 The Federal Court s judgment in Amway of Australiav Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2003] FCA 1533 (19 December
More informationCAPITAL MANAGEMENT 2019
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT 2019 DIVIDENDS, FRANKING AND LABOR S PROPOSAL 20 MARCH 2019 AGENDA Welcome and Introduction Labor s Franking Policy Pre- 30 June options Corporate law considerations Panel discussion
More informationTax Brief. 24 August ATO continues the distribution confusion
Tax Brief 24 August 2011 ATO continues the distribution confusion The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has released two draft fact sheets relating to the 2010 amendments to corporate law and the income
More informationCR 2017/43. Summary what this ruling is about
Page status: legally binding Page 1 of 7 Class Ruling Goods and services tax: Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads transitional assistance payments made to participants in the Queensland taxi
More informationTAX AND DUTY UPDATE 7 DECEMBER 2017
TAX AND DUTY UPDATE 7 DECEMBER 2017 Manuel Makas, Director Head of Real Estate, +61 9225 5957, manuel.makas@greenwoods.com.au Andrew White, Director, +61 9225 5984, andrew.white@greenwoods.com.au Chris
More informationCR 2017/38. Summary what this ruling is about
Page status: legally binding Page 1 of 12 Class Ruling Fringe benefits tax: employer clients of Community Sector Banking Pty Limited who are subject to the provisions of either section 57A or 65J of the
More informationTaxation. Man Series 6 OM-IP 220 Limited
Taxation AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OPINION The following independent report has been prepared by Greenwoods & Freehills Pty Limited for Man Series 6 OM-IP 220 and outlines the taxation consequences for Australian
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: RJK Enterprises P/L v Webb & Anor [2006] QSC 101 PARTIES: FILE NO: 2727 of 2006 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: RJK ENTERPRISES PTY LTD ACN 055 443 466 (applicant)
More informationTax Brief. 24 March OECD Recommendations on Cross-border Hybrids. 1. Background
Tax Brief 24 March 2014 OECD Recommendations on Cross-border Hybrids Another piece of the base erosion puzzle has appeared with the release of the OECD s recommendations for addressing cross-border hybrids.
More informationDraft ATO Publications GST and Brokerage and Foreign Exchange Products
23 May 2014 Brendan Sheen Director Financial Supplies Compliance Strategy Australian Taxation Office 3 Collins Square DOCKLANDS VIC 3008 Via Email: brendan.sheen@ato.gov.au Dear Brendan, Draft ATO Publications
More informationTax Brief. 28 April The ATO s Approach to Administering the Promoter Penalty Regime. Background
Tax Brief 28 April 2008 The ATO s Approach to Administering the Promoter Penalty Regime Background It is now 5 years since the promoter penalty regime was first mooted by the former government and 2 years
More informationTax Brief. 10 August Minerals Resource Rent Tax. 1. Background
Tax Brief 10 August 2011 Minerals Resource Rent Tax On 10 June, the government released for public comment preliminary and still incomplete Exposure Draft legislation for the proposed minerals resource
More informationTAX ALERT AUSTRALIAN MINING FOR TAX BREAKS? THE EXPLORATION DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE EXPLAINED OCTOBER 2014
OCTOBER 2014 AUSTRALIAN TAX ALERT MINING FOR TAX BREAKS? THE EXPLORATION DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE EXPLAINED The Government has released an exposure draft of the Exploration Development Incentive ("EDI") legislation.
More informationCover sheet for: TR 2017/D8
Generated on: 29 October 2017, 12:02:01 PM Cover sheet for: This cover sheet is provided for information only. It does not form part of the underlying document. - For information about the status of this
More informationTax Brief. 10 April Transfer Pricing Emerges From the Shadows. Facts
Tax Brief 10 April 2008 Transfer Pricing Emerges From the Shadows Over the last 15 years there has been a noticeable discrepancy between word and deed. On the one hand, the Australian Taxation Office (
More informationTax Brief. 27 November Novelties in New Zealand Treaty. Fiscally transparent entities
Tax Brief 27 November 2009 Novelties in New Zealand Treaty International Tax Agreements Amendment Bill (No 2) 2009 was introduced into Parliament on 25 November 2009 to give effect to the new tax treaty
More information20 October Debt-equity Amendments. 1. A bit of history
20 October 2016 Debt-equity Amendments The good news is the Government has finally released a draft of the rules which will repeal the muchmaligned s.974-80. The bad news is that the replacement is a disappointing
More informationGOOD NEWS FOR D&O POLICYHOLDERS ON DEFENCE COSTS - AUSTRALIAN POSITION ON BRIDGECORP CLARIFIED
GOOD NEWS FOR D&O POLICYHOLDERS ON DEFENCE COSTS - AUSTRALIAN POSITION ON BRIDGECORP CLARIFIED 01 February 2017 Australia Legal Briefings By Mark Darwin, Peter Holloway and Sophy Woodward The NSW Court
More informationRevenue Law Journal. GST and Insolvency Practioner Liability: Who Are You? Colin Anderson David Morrison. Volume 11, Issue Article 3
Revenue Law Journal Volume 11, Issue 1 2001 Article 3 GST and Insolvency Practioner Liability: Who Are You? Colin Anderson David Morrison,, Copyright c 2001 Colin Anderson. All rights reserved. This paper
More informationThis Tax Brief analyses the details of the DPT as set out in the Bill and then comments on its broader significance.
16 February 2017 Diverted Profits Tax It is almost impossible these days to get bipartisan policy on anything in Australia from marriage equality to energy with the significant exception of the taxation
More informationCONTENTS. KLRCA ARBITRATION RULES (As revised in 2017) UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES (As revised in 2013) SCHEDULES. Part I. Part II.
CONTENTS Part I KLRCA ARBITRATION RULES (As revised in 2017) Part II UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES (As revised in 2013) Part III SCHEDULES Copyright of the KLRCA First edition MODEL ARBITRATION CLAUSE Any
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Woods v Australian Taxation Office & Ors [2017] QCA 28 PARTIES: SONYA JOANNE WOODS (applicant) v AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE ABN 51 824 753 556 (first respondent) ROBERT
More informationTax Brief. 15 May In-house Finance Companies. 1. Background
Tax Brief 15 May 2009 In-house Finance Companies It is no secret that the Australian Taxation Office ( ATO ) has been concerned for some time about the tax issues arising from in-house finance companies
More informationthere should be a separate taxation regime for qualifying MITs, instead of the current trust rules in Div 6, and
10 April 2015 The New Attribution MIT Regime The government has finally released to the public an Exposure Draft (ED) of the regime for taxing income derived through attribution managed investment trusts
More informationProperty joint ventures - getting them right
Property joint ventures - getting them right March 2013 Greg Cahill Partner T 61 7 3231 2425 E greg.cahill@cgw.com.au Murray Shume Associate T 61 7 3231 2541 E murray.shume@cgw.com.au Level 21, 400 George
More informationProduct disclosure statement
THIS IS DRAFTS Product disclosure statement DRAFTS Product disclosure statement Issue Date: 16 November 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Purpose 2. Issuer 3. General product information 4. Significant product
More information6 February General Manager Law Design Practice The Treasury Langton Crescent PARKES ACT 2600 Attention: Chris Leggett and Simone Abbot
6 February 2015 General Manager Law Design Practice The Treasury Langton Crescent PARKES ACT 2600 Attention: Chris Leggett and Simone Abbot Dear Sir/Madam Improvements to the taxation of employee share
More informationG A U D A L R IN A E G NTE O E E F S H ACI E L R ITE
CASH COVER INDEMNITY HEADLINE GUARANTEE GOES FACILITY HERE ADDITIONAL DESCRIPTION DATE TERMS AND CONDITIONS 09.2017 CONTENTS 1. Indemnity Guarantee Facility 2 1.1 Application of these Terms and Conditions.
More informationTax Insights GST witholding obligation for residential property purchasers
20 February 2018 Australia 2018/04 Tax Insights GST witholding obligation for residential property purchasers Snapshot On 7 February 2018 proposed amendments in relation to the payment of GST on sales
More informationManager, Worldwide Markets (Compliance) LOCATION: 86/GY12 EXTENSION: 5131 DATE: 21 st February 2002 REFERENCE: Y2728 SUBJECT:
Market Bulletin One Lime Street London EC3M 7HA FROM: Manager, Worldwide Markets (Compliance) LOCATION: 86/GY12 EXTENSION: 5131 DATE: 21 st February 2002 REFERENCE: Y2728 SUBJECT: AUSTRALIA: NEW ALTERNATIVE
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: HBU Properties Pty Ltd & Ors v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2015] QCA 95 HBU PROPERTIES PTY LTD AS TRUSTEE FOR THE SHANE MUNDEY FAMILY
More informationIn Focus - Preferences and Secured Debts SEPTEMBER 2017
f In Focus - Preferences and Secured Debts SEPTEMBER 2017 Preferences and Secured Debts This edition of In Focus continues our series with respect to preferential payments. This article addresses the relationship
More informationJOINT SUBMISSION BY. Date: 30 May 2014
JOINT SUBMISSION BY Institute of Chartered Accountants Australia, Law Council of Australia, CPA Australia, The Tax Institute and the Corporate Tax Association Draft Taxation Ruling TR 2014/D3 Income tax:
More informationFEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Zappia v Commissioner of Taxation [2017] FCAFC 185 Appeal from: Zappia v Commissioner of Taxation [2017] FCA 390 File number: NSD 709 of 2017 Judges: ROBERTSON, PAGONE AND BROMWICH
More informationUPDATE LITIGATION DECEMBER 2012 HUNT & HUNT LAWYERS V MITCHELL MORGAN NOMINEES PTY LTD & ORS
DECEMBER 2012 LITIGATION UPDATE HUNT & HUNT LAWYERS V MITCHELL MORGAN NOMINEES PTY LTD & ORS SNAPSHOT On 12 December 2012, the High Court of Australia heard the appeal by Hunt & Hunt Lawyers (Hunt & Hunt)
More informationGoods and Services Tax Determination
Page status: legally binding Page 1 of 5 Goods and Services Tax Determination Goods and services tax: when is the supply of a credit card facility GST-free under paragraph (a) of Item 4 in subsection 38-190(1)
More informationCHEVRON AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS JUDGMENT UPDATE ATO WINS FULL FEDERAL COURT DECISION ON CROSS BORDER FINANCING - CHEVRON AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS CASE
CHEVRON AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS JUDGMENT UPDATE ATO WINS FULL FEDERAL COURT DECISION ON CROSS BORDER FINANCING - CHEVRON AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS CASE 28 April 2017 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW In a major Australian
More informationSAMPLE. Professional Indemnity Insurance (PII) Policy 2018/19. lawcover.com.au Page 1
Professional Indemnity Insurance (PII) Policy 2018/19 Lawcover Insurance Pty Limited ABN 15 095 082 509 Level 13, 383 Kent Street Sydney NSW 2000 DX 13013 Sydney Market Street Telephone: 1800 650 748 (02)
More informationS6 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act Its wings are clipped.
S6 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 - Its wings are clipped. Insurance Update The long awaited decision of whether there is a charge over D & O defence costs was handed down yesterday
More informationTHIRD PARTY CLAIMS ON INSURANCE FUNDS: THE CHARGE IS OVER. Ivan Griscti Level 22 Chambers 22/52 Martin Place
THIRD PARTY CLAIMS ON INSURANCE FUNDS: THE CHARGE IS OVER Ivan Griscti Level 22 Chambers 22/52 Martin Place igriscti@level22.com.au Introduction 1. In the normal course a claim by a third party against
More informationPOLICY WORDING POLICY WORDING BUILDING INDEMNITY INSURANCE - SOUTH AUSTRALIA
POLICY WORDING POLICY WORDING BUILDING INDEMNITY INSURANCE - SOUTH AUSTRALIA GLA RBUA BII SA 1115 Effective Date 01 November 2015 Welcome to the financial security provided by RBUA Building Indemnity Insurance
More informationStandard practice statement SPS 16/06
Standard practice statement SPS 16/06 Disputes resolution process commenced by a taxpayer INTRODUCTION Standard Practice Statements describe how the Commissioner of Inland Revenue (the Commissioner) will
More informationWHICH TRUSTEE IS LIABLE FOR TAX WHEN THERE IS A CHANGE OF TRUSTEE? Review of Practice Statement Law Administration PS LA 2012/2
WHEN THERE IS A CHANGE OF TRUSTEE? Review of Practice Statement Law Administration PS LA 2012/2 1 Introduction The Commissioner issued Practice Statement Law Administration PS 2012/2 on 28 June 2012. PS
More informationCONTENTS. Vol 30 No 3 April In summary
Vol 30 No 3 April 2018 CONTENTS 1 In summary 3 New legislation Order in Council CRS reportable jurisdictions amendment regulations 4 Binding rulings BR Pub 18/01-BR Pub 18/05: Income tax - Australian limited
More informationDeclaration of Independence, Relevant Relationships and Indemnities ( DIRRI )
Deloitte Financial Advisory Pty Ltd ACN 611 749 841 8 Brindabella Circuit Brindabella Business Park Canberra Airport ACT 2609 Australia Tel: +61 (2) 6263 7000 Fax: +61 (2) 6263 7004 www.deloitte.com.au
More informationPotential Construction Defect Claim Site: 100 Eton Road, Lindfield "Dunstan Grove"
3 April 2017 Partner: David Andrews Direct Line: 9233 9023 Direct Facsimile: 9233 9123 Email: dandrews@makdap.com.au Our Ref: DA: BEL: 170658 BY EMAIL: raymond.reg@stratplus.com.au The Secretary The Owners
More informationLatest GST Advice from the Australian Tax Office
Latest GST Advice from the Australian Tax Office After a number of meetings and discussions, the ATO has finally and formally responded to questions arising out of the previous advice concerning PCO s,
More informationOECD Proposals for Mandatory Disclosure of Tax Information Discussion Paper (May 2016)
Mr Robert Raether Division Head Corporate and International Tax Division The Treasury Langton Crescent PARKES ACT 2600 15 July 2016 Matter 87332 By Email BY EMAIL: beps@treasury.gov.au Dear Mr Raether
More informationTHE HIGH COURT AND THE ATO RESHAPE THE TAX LANDSCAPE FOR TRUSTS
THE HIGH COURT AND THE ATO RESHAPE THE TAX LANDSCAPE FOR TRUSTS Author: Simon Tisher Date: 1 November, 2010 Copyright 2010 This work is copyright. Apart from any permitted use under the Copyright Act 1968,
More informationWhat this Ruling is about
Australian Taxation Office Goods and Services Tax Ruling FOI status: may be released Page 1 of 52 Goods and Services Tax Ruling Goods and services tax: supplies connected with Australia Contents Para What
More informationTax Brief. 9 February TOFA: What you need to consider now. Deciding when to apply Division 230. Electing into the TOFA regime
Tax Brief 9 February 2009 TOFA: What you need to consider now The Tax Laws Amendment (Taxation of Financial Arrangements) Bill 2008, ( Bill ) which contains the final stages of the taxation of financial
More informationSmall Business and General Business Tax Break
Small Business and General Business Tax Break Frequently Asked Questions Version 2 19 March 2009 NOTES TO USERS The legislation discussed in this paper is subject to passage through Parliament. The discussion
More informationCover sheet for: GSTR 2017/D1
Cover sheet for: Generated on: 16 December 2017, 10:59:22 PM This cover sheet is provided for information only. It does not form part of the underlying document. For information about the status of this
More informationCharities Alert. The Hunger Project the most significant case ever on what is a PBI? September The Facts. Introduction.
Charities Alert September 2013 The Hunger Project the most significant case ever on what is a PBI? The Federal Court decision in The Hunger Project Australia v FC of T 2013 ATC 20-399 is probably the most
More information1.5 Accordingly, in line with the comments outlined below, AVCAL respectfully recommends that the Commissioner withdraw the draft determination.
29 January 2010 Mr Des Maloney Australian Taxation Office GPO Box 9977 Melbourne VIC 3001 Dear Mr Maloney Response to Draft Tax Determination 2009/D17 1 Introduction 1.1 The Australian Private Equity &
More informationResearch Grants - The Implications of GST
Research Grants - The Implications of GST It is the expectation that most research grants will be GST-liable (there are some exceptions). GST will be payable on taxable supplies such as the supply of goods
More informationSAMPLE LETTER OF ENGAGEMENT - TAXATION SERVICES FOR COMPANIES
,Terms Of Engagement SAMPLE LETTER OF ENGAGEMENT - TAXATION SERVICES FOR COMPANIES Below are sample paragraphs that can be incorporated in a letter of engagement which can serve as a guide for members
More informationFinancial Services Guide
Financial Services Guide Part 2 (Adviser Profile) Date Updated - 12/09/2016 1 FINANCIAL SERVICES GUIDE: PART 2 (Adviser Profile) PART 2 (Adviser Profile) Part 2 (Adviser Profile) contains the following
More informationProfessional Experience
Professional Experience With over 30 years at the Bar, Greg has considerable experience acting for and advising clients globally, in complex cross-border maritime, commercial, building and construction,
More informationTHE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT INCREASES PRESSURE ON MULTINATIONAL TAX AVOIDANCE: 40% DIVERTED PROFITS TAX (DPT) INTRODUCED
THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT INCREASES PRESSURE ON MULTINATIONAL TAX AVOIDANCE: 40% DIVERTED PROFITS TAX (DPT) INTRODUCED 2 DECEMBER 2016 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW The Australian Government released draft
More informationTax and settlements. Dr Philip Bender, barrister, List A Barristers. 1. This paper looks at the impacts of Federal taxes on litigation settlements.
Tax and settlements Dr Philip Bender, barrister, List A Barristers 1. Introduction 1. This paper looks at the impacts of Federal taxes on litigation settlements. 2. The main areas covered by the paper
More informationIn The Supreme Court of Belize A.D., 2010
In The Supreme Court of Belize A.D., 2010 Civil Appeal No. 2 In the Matter of an Appeal pursuant to section 43 (1) of the Income and Business Tax Act, CAP 55 of the Laws of Belize 2000 In the Matter of
More informationPathway Investments Pty Ltd and Doystoy Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Limited. Supreme Court of Victoria proceeding S CI
Pathway Investments Pty Ltd and Doystoy Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Limited Supreme Court of Victoria proceeding S CI 2010 6249 (NAB Class Action) SETTLEMENT SCHEME 1. Background: A. This Settlement
More informationEmployers Indemnity Insurance
Better through experience. Employers Indemnity Insurance Workers Compensation Policy New South Wales Making the choice that s better for you Guild Insurance Workers Compensation insurance gives you the
More informationExploration defined in a PRRT context What are the potential ramifications for you? TaxTalk Alert. September
Exploration defined in a PRRT context What are the potential ramifications for you? TaxTalk Alert September 2013 www.pwc.com.au Introduction Participants in the Australian Oil & Gas industry continue to
More informationAnnual report to members for the year ended 30 June 2015
Annual report to members for the year ended 30 June 2015 Insurance-only division of the Macquarie Superannuation Plan Macquarie Investment Management Limited ABN 66 002 867 003 AFSL 237492 RSEL L0001281
More informationTAX ALERT AUSTRALIAN THE MEANING OF "CREDITABLE PURPOSE" IN THE AUSTRALIAN GST ACT MARCH 2015
MARCH 2015 AUSTRALIAN TAX ALERT THE MEANING OF "CREDITABLE PURPOSE" IN THE AUSTRALIAN GST ACT Justice Davies recently handed down her decision in the case of Rio Tinto Services Ltd v FCT [2015] FCA 94,
More informationCitigroup Property Securities Trust Supplementary Product Disclosure Statement
Citigroup Asset Management Australia Limited ABN 76 004 835 849 AFSL No. 240827 Citigroup Property Securities Trust Supplementary Product Disclosure Statement Issued by Citigroup Asset Management Australia
More informationCommInsure Corporate Insurance. Superannuation Trust. Annual Report 2015
CommInsure Corporate Insurance Superannuation Trust Annual Report 205 Fund CommInsure Corporate Insurance Superannuation Trust ABN 49 968 8 565 R072457 PO Box 282 ALBURY NSW 2640 Phone: 300 767 400 Facsimile:
More informationJOINT SUBMISSION By TR 2001/10 AND SALARY SACRIFICE ARRANGEMENTS WHILE EMPLO YEES ARE O N LEAVE
JOINT SUBMISSION By CPA Australia, The Law Council, The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia, The Taxation Institute of Australia, Taxpayers Australia Inc. and The National Institute of Accountants
More informationFEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Walter Rau Neusser Oel und Fett AG v Cross Pacific Trading Ltd [2005] FCA 1111 WALTER RAU NEUSSER OEL UND FETT AG v CROSS PACIFIC TRADING LTD AND ORS NSD 432 of 2005 15 AUGUST
More informationfinancial services guide
financial services guide CHU Underwriting Agencies Pty Ltd ABN 18 001 580 070 Financial services guide This Financial Services Guide (FSG) describes the insurance services offered by CHU Underwriting Agencies
More information