THE OECD S REPORT ON HARMFUL TAX COMPETITION JOANN M. WEINER * & HUGH J. AULT **
|
|
- Anna Stone
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 THE OECD S REPORT ON HARMFUL TAX COMPETITION THE OECD S REPORT ON HARMFUL TAX COMPETITION JOANN M. WEINER * & HUGH J. AULT ** Abstract - In response to pressures created by the increasing globalization of the world economy, the OECD has issued a report titled Harmful Tax Competition: An Emerging Global Issue that provides an analysis of the phenomenon known as harmful tax competition. The Report identifies factors that characterize tax havens and harmful preferential tax regimes and recommends numerous measures in the areas of domestic legislation, tax treaties, and international cooperation, that countries may pursue to counter harmful tax competition. As part of intensifying international cooperation, the Report recommends that Member countries adopt a set of Guidelines endorsing the 3 R s: to refrain, to review, and to remove. By adopting the Report, Members are agreeing to undertake a political commitment to refrain from adopting new measures or strengthening existing measures, to review existing measures that constitute harmful tax practices, and to remove harmful features of preferential tax regimes within a five-year period. In addition, * International Tax Staff of the Office of Tax Analysis, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Washington, D.C ** OECD, Paris, France, and Boston College Law School, Newton Centre, MA the Report establishes a new international body, the Forum on Harmful Tax Practices, to implement the measures outlined in the Report. INTRODUCTION: THE OECD TAX COMPETITION REPORT The globalization of national economies has increased the challenges of harmful tax competition. In this increasingly integrated global economy, one country s tax policies have a greater potential to impose spillover effects on other countries. While tax competition has many positive effects, and the Report stresses the benefits of fair tax competition, the Report also recognizes that tax policies can have harmful external effects on other countries. The recently released OECD Report on Harmful Tax Competition represents a first step in attempting to curb the harmful effects that may occur when one country s tax policies influence either the policy decisions of another country or the location decisions of financial services and other highly mobile activities. The recommendations presented in the Report set out a 601
2 NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL VOL. LI NO. 3 number of ways that countries can curb the harmful tax practices that distort trade and investment flows, cause undesirable shifts in the tax burden, impose constraints on governments fiscal choices, increase compliance costs to taxpayers, and undermine the fairness and integrity of tax systems. This Report helps obtain international support for strengthening the unilateral, bilateral, and multilateral efforts against harmful tax competition that will result in improved global economic wellbeing. ORIGINS AND SUMMARY OF THE REPORT In the face of the increased globalization of national economies, the OECD Ministers, in May 1996, called upon the organization to develop measures to counter the distorting effects of harmful tax competition on investment and financing decisions and the consequences for national tax bases, and report back in In response to this request, the OECD s Committee on Fiscal Affairs launched its project on harmful tax competition. The project was directed by the Special Sessions on Tax Competition, which prepared the Report under the joint chairmanship of France and Japan. The project garnered high-profile support. At their 1996 Summit in Lyon, the G7 Heads of State endorsed this project, noting that, Tax schemes aimed at attracting financial and other geographically mobile activities can create harmful tax competition between States, carrying risks of distorting trade and investment and could lead to the erosion of national tax bases. The Heads of State urged the OECD to vigorously pursue its work in this field, aimed at establishing a multilateral approach under which countries could operate individually and collectively to limit the extent of these practices. The OECD Council of Ministers released the Report Harmful Tax Competition: An Emerging Global Issue, on April 29, The OECD Council had approved the Report on April 9, with the abstention of Luxembourg and Switzerland. 1 This paper discusses the recommendations made in the Report and the ongoing work that the OECD will be undertaking in the area of attempting to curb harmful tax competition. It also briefly discusses some implications for the United States. SCOPE OF THE REPORT The Report focuses on geographically mobile activities, such as financial and other service activities, including the provision of intangibles. Although tax incentives aimed at attracting real investment in plant and equipment and savings can also have harmful effects, in the interest of creating a manageable work plan, it was decided to focus the first efforts at the most mobile activities. These represent in some ways the most pressing problem given their relatively high sensitivity to tax rate differentials. In terms of the type of taxes covered, the Report addresses the impact of a jurisdiction s income tax policies on financial investment. Thus, it does not examine how variations in taxation of consumption, labor, or property, for example, may lead to harmful tax competition. Furthermore, although many economic and political factors may influence the location of economic activities, these broad issues were not the focus of the Report. The Report makes explicit the fact that countries must remain free to choose 602
3 THE OECD S REPORT ON HARMFUL TAX COMPETITION their own tax policies, provided that they abide by international standards in so doing. As a result, policies that one country may view as harmful may not necessarily be viewed the same way by another, nor found to be harmful, under the circumstances outlined in the Report. For example, countries may provide investment incentives to stimulate additional investment. This investment may occur internally, or through attracting foreign investment. Whether these incentives are harmful depends on their design, and the determination must be based on an analysis of all the facts and circumstances. Merely offering a relatively low tax rate is not sufficient to be labeled harmful tax competition. Certain practices, however, can appropriately be termed harmful. Policies that deliberately attempt to divert investment or that serve principally to reduce the tax base of other jurisdictions may be considered as harmful and an appropriate target for elimination. These practices do not reflect different judgments about the desired mix of taxes and spending. By contrast, they represent an attempt to attract savings and investment originating elsewhere or to facilitate the avoidance or evasion of other jurisdictions taxes. Since the problems addressed in the Report are inherently global, the OECD attempted to draw as many non- Member countries as possible into the project. Although non-member countries did not participate in the actual drafting of the Report, the OECD held three separate regional seminars during the course of the project that were designed to involve non-member countries in the dialogue. The Report proposes holding a high-level meeting in 1999 for the purpose of associating non-member countries more closely with the aims of the Report. IDENTIFYING TAX HAVENS AND HARMFUL PREFERENTIAL TAX REGIMES Chapter 2 of the Report discusses the factors used to identify tax havens and harmful preferential tax regimes. The Report does not attempt to identify any particular country regimes, as the point of this Report was to provide an analytical framework for identifying such regimes. Future work, discussed below, will create lists naming actual harmful preferential regimes and tax havens. The Report draws an important distinction between jurisdictions that tax income generally at a relatively low rate, but are not engaged in harmful tax competition, and those where the existence of a low rate is coupled with other factors and special features, which in combination constitute harmful tax competition. Jurisdictions in the first case are countries that collect significant revenues from the income tax, but whose generally applicable effective tax rate is lower than that levied in other countries. Jurisdictions in the second situation, however, are either tax havens and generally impose no or only nominal taxation on income, and thus collect little revenue from the income tax, or are countries with preferential regimes that provide favorable tax treatment in the context of a general income tax system. In the latter case, the tax haven or preferential tax regime has significant undesirable spillover effects on other countries and, as a result, may be categorized as harmful. The Report characterizes these latter two situations as harmful tax practices. Identifying factors that may characterize tax havens is one of the primary objectives of the Report. Tax havens can be described as jurisdictions that have 603
4 NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL VOL. LI NO. 3 no or only nominal taxation and a reduction in regulatory or administrative constraints, and that refuse to share information with tax authorities, all of which reduce the effective taxation of income located in the jurisdiction. While a number of factors must be evaluated, no or nominal taxation is a necessary condition to identify a tax haven. Other key factors include a lack of effective exchange of information; a lack of transparency in the operation of the legislative, legal, or administrative provisions; and an absence of any substantial activities. An unwillingness by the tax haven to share information not only allows investors to avoid their taxes, but also facilitates illegal activities, such as tax evasion and money laundering. For these reasons, the Report identifies a failure to provide for effective exchange of information as particularly troublesome. Identifying factors that characterize harmful preferential tax regimes is another key objective of the Report. As with tax havens, the Report discusses factors that may help identify such harmful regimes without naming any particular regimes. In general, the preferential tax regimes under evaluation have the effect of diverting income from passive, mobile investment rather than from active, relatively immobile investment. Four key factors help identify these regimes. They include a low or zero effective tax rate on the relevant income, the regime being ring fenced, the operation of the regime being nontransparent, and the jurisdiction operating the regime not effectively exchanging information with other countries. As with tax havens, the first factor to examine is the tax rate. In the case of preferential regimes, the relevant issue is the effective tax rate on the item of income. If a regime applies a zero rate, or if it applies a positive rate but has narrowed the base to such an extent that the effective rate is much lower than the statutory rate, then the regime might be classified as harmful. Once the rate of effective taxation has been identified, then an evaluation of all of the other factors takes place. As with tax havens, a low effective rate of taxation is a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition for identifying a harmful preferential tax regime. All of the factors must be evaluated. Again, lack of effective exchange of information is one of the key factors in identifying a harmful tax policy. Countries may be unwilling or unable to exchange information due to administrative policies, limited access to banking information, or other practices that allow an investor to shield the financial account from potential examination by tax authorities interested in preventing fiscal evasion and avoidance. Lack of transparency is also an important factor. In general, a regime is nontransparent when taxpayers may receive special administrative treatment that allows a particular activity to operate with a low effective tax rate or when the details of the low tax regime are not made available to tax authorities of other countries. If a country operates a regime that is nontransparent, then the tax burden on certain income may be artificially reduced, thus leading to harmful tax competition. With tax regimes, ring fencing is a key factor. A regime is said to be ring fenced when residents are prevented from benefiting from the regime or when nonresidents are prevented from accessing the domestic market. In either case, the country offering the regime is 604
5 THE OECD S REPORT ON HARMFUL TAX COMPETITION able to protect its revenue base by limiting the tax break to certain areas or certain investors. The Report describes additional factors that should be taken into consideration, for both tax havens and harmful preferential regimes. These include, among others, failure to adhere to international transfer pricing principles, negotiable tax rates or tax bases, existence of secrecy provisions, and regimes that are promoted as tax minimization vehicles. The common characteristic of these factors is that they allow the income to bear a lower tax burden than would otherwise be the case. In the case of both tax havens and harmful preferential regimes, there is no single determinative factor, although low effective taxation is necessary, and each case must be evaluated on the basis of a combination of the factors in a particular context. COUNTERACTING HARMFUL TAX COMPETITION Following the background discussion and the identification of factors to identify tax havens and harmful preferential tax regimes, the Report turns to the means available to counteract harmful tax competition. It provides 19 detailed recommendations in three areas domestic legislation, tax treaties, and international cooperation that, if pursued by OECD countries, will help curb harmful tax practices worldwide. In the area of domestic legislation, the Report recommends actions that will strengthen the efforts that countries can take unilaterally. The recommendations concerning domestic legislation have a similar purpose. By scaling back the tax benefits available to income arising in a tax-privileged setting, countries can discourage the shifting of income to locations due primarily for tax minimization purposes. As with all of the recommendations in this area, the effectiveness of such unilateral countermeasures will be strengthened if they are adopted by a wide range of countries. For example, the first recommendation is that countries consider adopting rules equivalent to the Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) rules that 16 OECD Member countries have now adopted. The CFC rules are intended to tax currently the income of multinational investors that is most easily moved. The recommendations encourage countries to extend their CFC regimes to income arising in tax havens or harmful preferential regimes and would coordinate the legislation in terms of their effectiveness in counteracting harmful tax practices. The recommendations concerning tax treaties focus on bilateral efforts countries can undertake to curb harmful tax competition. These recommendations build on the bilateral arrangements already in place between countries. They aim at ensuring that tax treaties are not improperly used to facilitate harmful tax practices. Perhaps the most important of these recommendations is the one concerning greater and more efficient use of exchanges of information. One of the most effective ways to curb tax evasion is to make it clear to investors that relevant information about financial accounts will be shared with tax authorities from the residence country. Another important recommendation in the treaty area is to exclude from treaty benefits those entities or income covered by measures identified as constituting harmful tax practices. Thus, for example, the normally reduced rates of withholding would not apply in 605
6 NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL VOL. LI NO. 3 situations where harmful tax practices were present. While the Report makes a series of practical recommendations in the area of domestic legislation and tax treaties, the innovative recommendations fall in the area of intensifying international cooperation. These recommendations, in particular the Guidelines, focus on encouraging countries to work together to curb the spread of harmful tax practices, among both OECD Members and non-members. The Guidelines promote the 3 R s : Countries will refrain from adopting new, or strengthening existing, measures; will review existing measures; and will remove the harmful features of their preferential tax regimes. The review period covers two years and the removal period covers five years, both from April 9, 1998, the date on which the OECD Council approved the Report. (An additional two years is allowed for removing benefits to taxpayers currently subject to the preferential regime.) The Report also recommends creation of a Forum on Harmful Tax Practices that will coordinate implementation of the recommendations and guidelines. The Forum will be responsible for monitoring implementation of the guidelines, for drawing up a list of countries that fall into the tax haven category, and for taking forward the wider mandate. THE FORUM ON HARMFUL TAX PRACTICES In some ways, the most important achievement of the Report is the establishment of the Forum on Harmful Tax Practices. This Forum is the first broadly mandated international institutional structure directly responsible for the evaluation and coordination of existing and proposed tax measures. The Forum will perform a number of different functions. During the initial two-year period, the Forum will carry on a series of crosscountry reviews that will provide an overview of how different types of preferential regimes operate and help identify those factors that make them harmful. Countries will be asked to provide details of the operation of generic preferential regimes in their jurisdictions and, if the measures are not classified as harmful in the self-review process, the justification for that treatment. This process will allow the Forum to put reviews of specific regimes in a broader context and ensure that uniform standards are being applied. More important, under the structure set up in the Report, after the initial period of self-review, a country that believes a measure in another country may constitute a harmful tax practice may request the Forum to examine the measure in that country. Under procedural rules to be established, the Forum will apply the criteria set out in the Report and make a determination as to whether harmful tax competition is involved, and may release an opinion on the issues. If a harmful tax practice is found to be present, the measure will be subject to the same requirements regarding listing and removal as those measures identified as harmful in the self-review process. The opinions of the Forum would be nonbinding, as indeed are all of the undertakings in the recommendations. Nonetheless, the existence of an opinion by an international body that a domestic measure is in violation of important political commitments undertaken by a Member country should have a strong impact. In particular, since the procedure will apply to proposed as well as existing measures, it may well discourage the 606
7 THE OECD S REPORT ON HARMFUL TAX COMPETITION enactment of distorting forms of harmful tax practices. In any event, it gives an additional argument to opponents of these sorts of measures. In addition to its quasi-judicial function, the Forum also will play an important role in providing a setting for improving international cooperation in the areas covered by the Report. This work will extend beyond OECD Member countries and it is intended that non-member countries be associated with the recommendations to the extent possible. This dialogue is an extremely important part of the process and is intended to ensure that the application of the Guidelines by Member Countries will not simply result in the displacement of investment to harmful preferential regimes in non-member countries. One of the first tasks of the Forum will be to draw up a (nonexhaustive) list of jurisdictions meeting the definition of tax haven set out in the Report. That list is intended to allow participating countries to coordinate their policies toward jurisdictions identified as havens. For example, one of the recommendations is to consider the termination of tax treaties with jurisdictions found to be tax havens. The tax haven list would allow that action to be taken on a coordinated international basis. THE EUROPEAN UNION REPORT On December 1, 1997, European Union (EU) Finance Ministers, under the presidency of Luxembourg, agreed to a package of measures to tackle harmful tax competition. 2 This package includes a political agreement on a Code of Conduct for business taxation and a commitment to remove harmful tax regimes as soon as possible following a review process, with exceptions granted under special circumstances. The EU Code and the OECD Guidelines have many similarities, and the EU Members of the OECD worked carefully to ensure that the commitments made under the individual Reports remained consistent. Both Reports share the goal of attempting to limit the harmful effects of tax competition, and each Report attempts to do so in a manner consistent with its institutional framework. However, as the non-eu Members of the OECD did not have a role in the EU Report, the scope and objectives of each project are not identical. Moreover, the institutional structure of each organization influenced the type of recommendations that it was possible to make. Thus, EU Member countries have entered into certain obligations through the EU Report that do not bind the non- EU Members of the OECD. In addition, the OECD Report deals specifically with tax havens and stresses the importance of exchange of information. Taken together, the Code and the Guidelines are broadly compatible and mutually reinforcing. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UNITED STATES The United States strongly supported the OECD Report for several reasons. First, since the United States already has implemented strong antiabuse measures, by encouraging other countries to adopt strong antiabuse rules in their domestic legislation and their tax treaties, it helps preserve the competitive position of U.S. multinational companies as they increasingly expand their investment worldwide. Second, by recommending that countries improve their exchange of information provisions in their treaties and to review their bank secrecy laws, it helps prevent the tax evasion that is made possible by jurisdictions that fail to 607
8 NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL VOL. LI NO. 3 provide the relevant information to the tax authorities. Moreover, the recommendation to improve the sharing of information leads to a related initiative, proposed by the G7 Heads of State at the Birmingham Summit, to undertake coordinated international action in curbing money laundering and other financial crimes. This initiative will further assist efforts to eliminate tax havens as a place to evade taxes. Finally, the international efforts promoted by the Report help encourage worldwide cooperation in creating an efficient and fair competitive field for investment. In particular, the Guidelines, under which OECD Member countries undertake a political commitment to eliminate their harmful preferential tax regimes, will help eliminate some of the features of countries tax policies that create the greatest distortions. These features cause a misallocation of investment and may lead companies to choose a location primarily for tax purposes. Conclusions The OECD Report represents a first step toward attempting to halt the race to the bottom that can arise when countries engage in tax practices that have negative externalities on other countries. These adverse effects may take the form of altering the location of investment, increasing the tax burden on less-mobile factors, or encouraging tax evasion and facilitating tax avoidance. All of these effects can be termed harmful as they lead to a misallocation of resources that reduces world welfare below its optimum point. As the OECD s efforts unfold in the next few years, countries may very well see a reduction of these harmful effects and an improvement in the global economic environment. ENDNOTES Any views expressed in the paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the policies of the U.S. Treasury Department, the OECD, or its Member Countries. The authors thank Jeffrey Owens, Lowell Dworin, and Bill Randolph for helpful comments. 1 The Report was published by the OECD on April 28, 1998, under the title Harmful Tax Competition: An Emerging Global Issue. 2 See Conclusions of the ECOFIN Council Meeting on December 1, 1997 concerning taxation policy, Official Journal of the European Communities (98/C 2/01), January 2, The Report from the Commission is titled A Package to Tackle Harmful Tax Competition in the European Union. REFERENCES Commission of the European Communities. A Package to Tackle Harmful Tax Competition in the European Union. COM(97) 564 Final, Brussels, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Harmful Tax Competition: An Emerging Global Issue. Paris: OECD,
EUROPEAN COMMISSION PRESENTS ANTI-TAX AVOIDANCE PACKAGE
EUROPEAN COMMISSION PRESENTS ANTI-TAX AVOIDANCE PACKAGE tax.thomsonreuters.com On January 28, 2016, the European Commission presented its Communication on the Anti-Tax Avoidance Package (ATA Package).
More informationOECD releases final BEPS package
6 October 2015 Tax Flash OECD releases final BEPS package On 5 October 2015, the OECD published the final reports of the OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting ( BEPS ) project, which consist of a package
More informationCompetition for R&D tax incentives in the European Union how an optimal R&D system shall be designed
Competition for R&D tax incentives in the European Union how an optimal R&D system shall be designed 1. Introduction Investments in R&D are widely seen as providing employment, boosting exports and stimulating
More informationTowards Global Standards in Transparency and Exchange of Information: Do Tax Havens Still Exist? Pietro Selicato
Master in International Taxation (University of Hamburg) Master in Pianificazione Tributaria Internazionale (Università di Roma Sapienza) Corso Superiore di Polizia Tributaria (Guardia di Finanza) 2 nd
More informationBase erosion & profit shifting (BEPS) 25 May 2016
Base erosion & profit shifting (BEPS) 25 May 2016 Introduction Important to distinguish between: Tax avoidance Using legal provisions to minimise tax liability Covers interventions that are referred to
More informationA package to tackle harmful tax competition in the European Union
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 05.11.1997 COM(97) 564 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT A package to tackle harmful tax competition in
More informationTax Policy and Foreign Direct Investment in Open Economies
ISSUE BRIEF 05.01.18 Tax Policy and Foreign Direct Investment in Open Economies George R. Zodrow, Ph.D., Baker Institute Rice Faculty Scholar and Allyn R. and Gladys M. Cline Chair of Economics, Rice University
More informationSpeech at the International tax symposium "Dynamics of International Tax Competition: Opportunity or Threat?"
Speech at the International tax symposium "Dynamics of International Tax Competition: Opportunity or Threat?" Tax policy coordination for more growth and employment the EU agenda Introduction Ladies and
More informationIP BOX TAX REGIMES. Rod Donnelly Thursday, September 14, 2017
IP BOX TAX REGIMES Rod Donnelly Thursday, September 14, 2017 AGENDA 2 IP Box basics Tax sticks and carrots International landscape harmful tax practices OECD BEPS 2015 action final report topics OECD BEPS
More informationOECD issues Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS)
22 July 2013 OECD issues Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Executive summary On 19 July 2013, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) issued its much-anticipated
More informationTAX EVASION AND AVOIDANCE: Questions and Answers
EUROPEAN COMMISSION MEMO Brussels, 6 December 2012 TAX EVASION AND AVOIDANCE: Questions and Answers See also IP/12/1325 Tax Evasion Why has the Commission presented an Action Plan on Tax fraud and evasion?
More informationTax harmonisation versus tax competition in Europe
SPEECH/05/624 László Kovács European Commissioner for Taxation and Customs Tax harmonisation versus tax competition in Europe Conference «Tax harmonisation and legal uncertainty in Central and Eastern
More informationThe OECD s 3 Major Tax Initiatives
The OECD s 3 Major Tax Initiatives 1. The Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes Peer review of ~ 100 countries International standard for transparency and exchange of
More informationThe EU draft anti-avoidance directive (ATAD) A focus on CFC rules from a Swiss perspective
The EU draft anti-avoidance directive (ATAD) A focus on CFC rules from a Swiss perspective Prof. Dr. Robert Danon Professor of Swiss and International Tax Law at the University of Lausanne Of counsel,
More informationSam Bucovetsky und Andreas Haufler: Preferential tax regimes with asymmetric countries
Sam Bucovetsky und Andreas Haufler: Preferential tax regimes with asymmetric countries Munich Discussion Paper No. 2006-30 Department of Economics University of Munich Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität
More informationG8/G20 TAXATION ISSUES : Tax Training Day, ODI, London 16 September 2013
G8/G20 TAXATION ISSUES : Tax Training Day, ODI, London 16 September 2013 BASE EROSION AND PROFIT SHIFTING 2 OECD Work on Taxation Focus has historically been on the development of common standards to eliminate
More informationInternational Tax Cooperation
UK Sets Out Its Priorities for the OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Project SUMMARY The UK government has published a paper setting out in detail its position on the OECD s Action Plan on Base
More informationPresentation by Shigeto HIKI
Presentation by Shigeto HIKI Co-chair of Forum on Harmful Tax Practices Director International Tax Policy Division, Tax Bureau Ministry of Finance, Japan The Fifth IMF-Japan High-Level Tax Conference For
More information9452/16 FC/df 1 DG G 2B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 25 May 2016 (OR. en) 9452/16 FISC 85 ECOFIN 502 OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS From: On: 25 May 2016 To: General Secretariat of the Council Delegations No. prev. doc.: 8792/1/16
More informationHow to cope with tax havens? Michel Aujean Former Director of Tax Policy EU Commission, Associé Taj, France
How to cope with tax havens? Michel Aujean Former Director of Tax Policy EU Commission, Associé Taj, France What is a tax haven? A non transparent, non cooperative place? A zero tax place (which taxes?)
More informationProtecting the Tax Base of Developing Countries: An Overview
Papers on Selected Topics in Protecting the Tax Base of Developing Countries Draft Paper No. 1 May 2013 Protecting the Tax Base of Developing Countries: An Overview Hugh J. Ault Professor Emeritus of Tax
More informationOECD meets with business on base erosion and profit shifting action plan
4 October 2013 OECD meets with business on base erosion and profit shifting action plan Executive summary On 1 October 2013, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) held a meeting
More informationa) Title of proposal Proposal for a Council Directive amending Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1164 as regards hybrid mismatches with third countries
Unofficial translation of the assessment by the Dutch government of the proposal of the European Commission regarding hybrid mismatches with third countries Leaflet 2: Directive on hybrid mismatches with
More informationMoving Forward on the Global Transparency and Tax Information Exchange Agenda. Remarks by Angel Gurría, Secretary-General OECD
Moving Forward on the Global Transparency and Tax Information Exchange Agenda Remarks by Angel Gurría, Secretary-General OECD Berlin, 23 June 2009 Ladies and Gentlemen, distinguished Ministers: The last
More informationUnited Nations Practical Portfolio. Protecting the Tax Base. of Developing Countries against Base Erosion: Income from Services.
United Nations Practical Portfolio Protecting the Tax Base of Developing Countries against Base Erosion: Income from Services asdf United Nations New York, 2017 Copyright January 2017 United Nations All
More informationRecent and expected tax changes in Bulgaria and Greece important for cross-border operations
Baker Tilly in South East Europe Cyprus, Bulgaria, Greece, Romania, Moldova Recent and expected tax changes in Bulgaria and Greece important for cross-border operations November 2016 Agenda Implementation
More informationComments on Public Consultation Document Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digitalisation of the Economy
Ernst & Young, LLP 1101 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20005-4213 Tel: +202-327-6000 ey.com 6 March 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Centre for Tax Policy and Administration
More informationBusiness sets out key principles for digital tax measures
Media Release Business sets out key principles for digital tax measures Paris, 21 st January 2019 Business at OECD has released a list of eleven principles for designing digital tax measures. At this crucial
More informationTRANSNATIONAL TAX NETWORK 2015 HONG KONG CONFERENCE. Hong Kong 9 February David Russell QC Outer Temple Chambers London and Dubai
TRANSNATIONAL TAX NETWORK 2015 HONG KONG CONFERENCE Hong Kong 9 February 2015 David Russell QC Outer Temple Chambers London and Dubai B.E.P.S. for BEGINNERS OR MISERY LOVES COMPANY A TALE OF TWO CITIES
More informationEuropean Commission releases package on taxation of the digital economy
European Commission releases package on taxation of the digital economy On March 21, 2018, the European Commission issued a package on a Fair and Effective Tax System in the EU for the Digital Single Market,
More informationMeeting Report Code of Conduct Group 20 March 2013
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Direct taxation, Tax Coordination, Economic Analysis and Evaluation Company Taxation Initiatives Meeting Report Code of Conduct Group
More informationTHE TAX TREATY TREATMENT OF SERVICES: PROPOSED COMMENTARY CHANGES Public discussion draft 8 December 2006
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT THE TAX TREATY TREATMENT OF SERVICES: PROPOSED COMMENTARY CHANGES Public discussion draft 8 December 2006 CENTRE FOR TAX POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION
More informationGeneral Comments. Action 6 on Treaty Abuse reads as follows:
OECD Centre on Tax Policy and Administration Tax Treaties Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions Division 2, rue André Pascal 75775 Paris France The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise: Comments on
More informationG20 Leaders communiqué demonstrates continued support on tax issues, highlights new developments
10 July 2017 Global Tax Alert G20 Leaders communiqué demonstrates continued support on tax issues, highlights new developments EY Global Tax Alert Library Access both online and pdf versions of all EY
More informationProposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 21.6.2017 COM(2017) 335 final 2017/0138 (CNS) Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the
More informationReport from the EU Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation) to the ECOFIN Council of 4 December European Council (comments by Nouwen)
Vindplaats H&I 2013/1.6 Auteur Council of the European Union 23 November 2012, no. 16488/12 Report from the EU Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation) to the ECOFIN Council of 4 December 2012. European
More informationMANUAL ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION PROVISIONS FOR TAX PURPOSES UNCLASSIFIED MODULE 5 ON CONDUCTING SIMULTANEOUS TAX EXAMINATIONS
MANUAL ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION PROVISIONS FOR TAX PURPOSES Approved by the OECD Committee on Fiscal Affairs on 23 January 2006 UNCLASSIFIED MODULE 5 ON CONDUCTING SIMULTANEOUS
More informationReport by Finance Ministers of the Euro Plus Pact on Tax Policy Coordination. European Council (comments by Nouwen)
Highlights & Insights on European Taxation, Report by Finance Ministers of the Euro Plus Pact on Tax Policy Coordination. European Council (comments by Nouwen) Vindplaats H&I 2012/2.2 Bijgewerkt tot 01-01-2012
More informationRef: PSA/WP/DO(2012)32 06 February Dear Alex,
The Director CENTRE FOR TAX POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION Mr. Alexander Trepelkov Director, Financing for Development Office Department of Economic and Social Affairs United Nations E-mail: trepelkov@un.org
More informationInternational regulation and transparency to support Domestic Budget Revenues
International regulation and transparency to support Domestic Budget Revenues Issue brief Prepared by the SDSN Secretariat May 18, 2015 This issue brief summarizes the key propositions put forward in the
More information7148/16 HG/NT/kp,vm DGG 2B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 11 May 2016 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2016/0010 (CNS) 7148/16 FISC 39 ECOFIN 231 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS Subject: COUNCIL DIRECTIVE amending
More information5. Ireland is Countering Aggressive Tax Planning
CONTENTS 1. Foreword by the Minister for Finance 2. Introduction 3. Ireland s International Tax Charter 4. Ireland s Corporate Tax Strategy 5. Ireland is Countering Aggressive Tax Planning 6. Conclusion
More informationDelegations will find attached the abovementioned opinion. Please note that other language versions should be available at :
Council of the European Union Brussels, 17 October 2017 (OR. en) 13306/17 FISC 227 COVER NOTE From: To: Subject: General Secretariat of the Council Delegations OPINION of the European Economic and Social
More informationDelegations will find attached the text of the draft Directive, resulting from the discussions held at the ECOFIN Council of 8 March 2016.
Council of the European Union Brussels, 15 March 2016 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2016/0010 (CNS) 6949/16 FISC 38 ECOFIN 216 NOTE From: To: General Secretariat of the Council Delegations No. prev.
More informationA8-0189/ Proposal for a directive (COM(2016)0026 C8-0031/ /0011(CNS)) Text proposed by the Commission
3.6.2016 A8-0189/ 001-091 AMDMTS 001-091 by the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Report Hugues Bayet Rules against tax avoidance practices A8-0189/2016 (COM(2016)0026 C8-0031/2016 2016/0011(CNS))
More informationEuropean Investment Bank. EIB Policy towards weakly regulated, non-transparent and uncooperative jurisdictions
EIB Policy towards weakly regulated, non-transparent and uncooperative jurisdictions EIB Policy towards weakly regulated, non-transparent and uncooperative jurisdictions 15 December 2010 page 1 / 11 EIB
More informationHong Kong s OECD BEPS Associate status requires implementation of BEPS minimum standards
28 June 2016 International Tax and TP Alert Hong Kong s OECD BEPS Associate status requires implementation of BEPS minimum standards Executive summary On 20 June 2016, Hong Kong announced that it will
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 19.12.2006 COM(2006) 824 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document. Proposal for a Council Directive
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Strasbourg, 25.10.2016 SWD(2016) 345 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive (EU) 2016/1164 as regards
More informationCh apter 6. Treaty Relief from Juridical Double Taxation
Ch apter 6 Treaty Relief from Juridical Double Taxation 6.1. Introduction We saw in chapter 2 that countries often provide their residents with relief from juridical double taxation unilaterally through
More informationAnalysis of New Law UK CORPORATE TAX REFORM. Nikol Davies *
70 Analysis of New Law UK CORPORATE TAX REFORM Nikol Davies * INTRODUCTION The long anticipated consultation document for corporate tax reform was published by the government on 29 November 2010. The document
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 18.3.2015 SWD(2015) 60 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Technical analysis of focus and scope of the legal proposal Accompanying the document Proposal for a Council
More informationEU Finance Ministers reach conclusions on new rules for Code of Conduct
14 March 2016 Global Tax Alert News from EU Tax Services EU Finance Ministers reach conclusions on new rules for Code of Conduct EY Global Tax Alert Library Access both online and pdf versions of all EY
More informationTax Havens: Tax Fairness Action Plan THE QUÉBEC ECONOMIC PLAN
Tax Havens: Tax Fairness Action Plan THE QUÉBEC ECONOMIC PLAN Tax Havens: Tax Fairness Action Plan The québec Economic Plan Tax Havens: Tax Fairness Action Plan The Québec Economic Plan Legal deposit November
More informationAllowing a zero percent tax rate for non-residents investing in a PIE
Allowing a zero percent tax rate for non-residents investing in a PIE An officials issues paper April 2010 Prepared by the Policy Advice Division of Inland Revenue and by The Treasury First published in
More informationCOMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 21.3.2018 COM(2018) 146 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL Time to establish a modern, fair and efficient taxation standard
More informationAutomatic Exchange of Financial Account Information
Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information BACKGROUND INFORMATION BRIEF Updated: 13 February 2014 For more information please contact: Pascal Saint-Amans, Director, OECD Centre for Tax Policy
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 17.10.2003 COM(2003) 613 final 2003/0239 (CNS) Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE amending Directive 90/434/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation
More informationNON-DISCRIMINATION IN BILATERAL TAX CONVENTIONS
Unclassified DAFFE/MAI/EG2/RD(96)1 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 19 April 1996 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Negotiating Group on the Multilateral
More information5814/18 AR/sk 1 DG G 2B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 20 February 2018 (OR. en) 5814/18 FISC 44 ECOFIN 75 NOTE From: To: General Secretariat of the Council Delegations Subject: Agreed guidance by the Code of Conduct
More informationWORKING PAPER. Financial Counsellors - ECOFIN preparation Presidency Issues Note on 'Tax Certainty in a Changing Environment'
Brussels, 29 March 2017 WK 3787/2017 INIT LIMITE ECOFIN WORKING PAPER This is a paper intended for a specific community of recipients. Handling and further distribution are under the sole responsibility
More informationTAX TREATY ISSUES ARISING FROM CROSS-BORDER PENSIONS PUBLIC DISCUSSION DRAFT
DISCUSSION DRAFT 14 November 2003 TAX TREATY ISSUES ARISING FROM CROSS-BORDER PENSIONS PUBLIC DISCUSSION DRAFT Important differences exist between the retirement pension arrangements found in countries
More informationResumption of Application of Substantial Activities Factor to No or only Nominal Tax Jurisdictions. Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 5
Resumption of Application of Substantial Activities Factor to No or only Nominal Tax Jurisdictions Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 5 INCLUSIVE FRAMEWORK ON BEPS ACTION 5 www.oecd.org/tax/beps/resumption-of-application-of-substantial-activities-factor.pdf
More informationRevenue Arrangements for Implementing EU and OECD Exchange of Information Requirements In Respect of Tax Rulings
Revenue Arrangements for Implementing EU and OECD Exchange of Information Requirements In Respect of Tax Rulings Page 1 of 21 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...3 2. Overview of Council Directive (EU)
More informationProposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE. amending Directive (EU) 2016/1164 as regards hybrid mismatches with third countries. {SWD(2016) 345 final}
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Strasbourg, 25.10.2016 COM(2016) 687 final 2016/0339 (CNS) Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE amending Directive (EU) 2016/1164 as regards hybrid mismatches with third countries {SWD(2016)
More informationRelease of BEPS discussion draft: Make Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective
from Tax Controversy and Dispute Resolution Release of BEPS discussion draft: Make Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective December 22, 2014 In brief On December 18, 2014, the Organisation for Economic
More informationAmCham EU s position on the Commission Anti-Tax Avoidance Package
AmCham EU s position on the Commission Anti-Tax Avoidance Package Executive summary AmCham EU welcomes attempts to ensure that adoption of the OECD s recommendations is consistent across the EU and with
More informationAustralia s Future Tax System- Consultation Paper
5 May 2009 AFTS Secretariat The Treasury Langton Crescent PARKES ACT 2600 Email: AFTS@treasury.gov.au Dear Sir/Madam Australia s Future Tax System- Consultation Paper The Australian Financial Markets Association
More informationBEPS: What does it mean for funds and asset managers?
BEPS: What does it mean for funds and asset managers? Client Seminar Martin Shah René van Eldonk Malcolm Richardson, M&G 10 March 2015 Overview Background to and progress to date of BEPS Action Plan More
More informationEngaging title in Green Descriptive element in Blue 2 lines if needed
BEPS Impact on TMT Sector January 2016 Engaging title in Green Descriptive element in Blue 2 lines if needed Second line optional lorem ipsum B Subhead lorem ipsum, date quatueriure Let s be crystal clear:
More informationUN HANDBOOK ON SELECTED ISSUES IN PROTECTING THE TAX BASE OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
UN HANDBOOK ON SELECTED ISSUES IN PROTECTING THE TAX BASE OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES Brian J. Arnold Hugh J. Ault http://www.un.org/esa/ffd/ UN Handbook: Protecting the Tax Base of Developing Countries supplement/complement
More informationDRAFT COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION ON THE USE OF THE OECD MODEL MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON AUTOMATIC EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION FOR TAX PURPOSES
DRAFT COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION ON THE USE OF THE OECD MODEL MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON AUTOMATIC EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION FOR TAX PURPOSES Note by the Secretary-General 1. In order to improve the efficiency
More informationAMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/0011(CNS) Draft report Hugues Bayet (PE578.
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs 2016/0011(CNS) 18.4.2016 AMDMTS 40-237 Draft report Hugues Bayet (PE578.569v01-00) Rules against tax avoidance practices that directly
More informationLIVE WEBCAST UPDATE ON BEPS PROJECT. 26 May :00pm 2:00pm (CEST)
LIVE WEBCAST UPDATE ON BEPS PROJECT 26 May 2014 1:00pm 2:00pm (CEST) Speakers Pascal Saint-Amans Director, Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Raffaele Russo Head of BEPS Project Marlies de Ruiter
More informationTaxing Income Across International Borders. A Policy Framework
Taxing Income Across International Borders A Policy Framework 30 July 1991 PREFACE Minister of Finance, Hon Ruth Richardson Minister of Revenue, Hon Wyatt Creech TAXING INCOME ACROSS INTERNATIONAL BORDERS
More informationThe End of Switzerland s Cantonal Tax Regimes Is Near: What s Next?
Volume 71, Number 7 August 12, 2013 The End of Switzerland s Cantonal Tax Regimes Is Near: What s Next? by Thierry Obrist Reprinted from Tax Notes Int l, August 12, 2013, p. 647 The End of Switzerland
More informationReviewing the OECD s and the EU s Assessment of Singapore s Development and Expansion Incentive
Reviewing the OECD s and the EU s Assessment of Singapore s Development and Expansion Incentive Prepared by: Dr Frederik Boulogne, Tax Lawyer at Lubbers, Boer & Douma and Researcher at VU University Amsterdam
More informationFlash News. PwC Luxembourg BEPS Series- What it means for the Luxembourg Asset Management industry
www.pwc.lu/tax Flash News PwC Luxembourg BEPS Series- What it means for the Luxembourg Asset Management industry On Monday 5 October 2015, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
More informationSCOPE OF THE FUTURE REVISION OF CHAPTER VII OF THE TRANSFER PRICING GUIDELINES ON SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR INTRA-GROUP SERVICES
Tax Treaties, Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions Division Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development By email SCOPE OF THE FUTURE REVISION OF
More informationIMF and OECD deliver report addressing Tax Certainty, including practical recommendations for countries
27 March 2017 Global Tax Alert IMF and OECD deliver report addressing Tax Certainty, including practical recommendations for countries EY Global Tax Alert Library Access both online and pdf versions of
More informationThe Anti Tax Avoidance Package Questions and Answers
European Commission - Fact Sheet The Anti Tax Avoidance Package Questions and Answers Brussels, 28 January 2016 1. Why has the Commission made the fight against corporate tax avoidance a priority? Corporate
More informationGlobal Financial Services
Global Financial Services Bank levies an update In light of bank tax or levy proposals from several countries, as well as supranational bodies such as the EU and the IMF, this bulletin gives an update
More informationA COMMON CORPORATE TAX BASE IN ORDER TO IMPROVE THE EUROPEAN SMES BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
A COMMON CORPORATE TAX BASE IN ORDER TO IMPROVE THE EUROPEAN SMES BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT Mihaela GÖNDÖR * ABSTRACT: The political and social preferences of each country require independence in creating national
More informationThe UAE has joined the Inclusive Framework on BEPS
The UAE has joined the Inclusive Framework on BEPS May 2018 In brief The United Arab Emirates ( UAE ) joined the OECD Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting ( BEPS ) on 16 May 2018, bringing
More informationProposal for amending the Parent-Subsidiary Directive: European Commission is waging war against double non-taxation
Proposal for amending the Parent-Subsidiary Directive: European Commission is waging war against double non-taxation David Ledure/Frederik Boulogne/Pieter Deré On 25 November 2013, the European Commission
More informationEuropean Parliament resolution of 6 April 2011 on the future European international investment policy (2010/2203(INI))
P7_TA(2011)0141 European international investment policy European Parliament resolution of 6 April 2011 on the future European international investment policy (2010/2203(INI)) The European Parliament,
More informationBEPS ACTION 11: Establish methodologies to collect and analyse data on BEPS and the actions to address it
Request for input BEPS ACTION 11: Establish methodologies to collect and analyse data on BEPS and the actions to address it 4 August 2014 19 September 2014 REQUEST FOR INPUT ON ACTION 11 OF THE BEPS ACTION
More informationEIB stakeholders engagement seminar
EIB stakeholders engagement seminar Non-Compliant Jurisdictions 29 November, 2017, Brussels Office of the Group Chief Compliance Officer European Investment Bank 29/11/2017 1 Table of contents EIB and
More informationBack from the Dead: How to Revive Transfer Pricing Enforcement
University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository Law & Economics Working Papers 1-1-2013 Back from the Dead: How to Revive Transfer Pricing Enforcement Reuven
More informationREQUEST FOR INPUT ON WORK REGARDING THE TAX CHALLENGES OF THE DIGITALISED ECONOMY
OECD c/o Mr. David Bradburry 2 Rue André Pascal 75775 Paris France Author Phone Telefax E-Mail Date Pe/JT E 09/17 +49 30 278 76 310 +49 30 278 76 799 trommer@dstv.de 18.10.2071 REQUEST FOR INPUT ON WORK
More informationIMF Revenue Mobilizations and Development Conference: Session on Business Taxation. Alan Carter (ITD) Washington DC, April 18, 2011
IMF Revenue Mobilizations and Development Conference: Session on Business Taxation Alan Carter (ITD) Washington DC, April 18, 2011 International Business Tax Issues - Why are international tax issues important?
More informationBEPS Action 14: Making dispute resolution mechanisms more effective
BEPS Action 14: Making dispute resolution mechanisms more effective The Panel Achim Pross, Head, International Cooperation and Tax Administration Division, OECD Doug O Donnell, LB&I Commissioner, IRS Martin
More informationTHE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT BOX Public Consultation JANUARY 2015
THE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT BOX Public Consultation JANUARY 2015 Public Consultation Paper: The Knowledge Development Box Department of Finance January 2015 Tax Policy Division Department of Finance Government
More information10472/18 JC/NC/jk ECOMP.2.B. Council of the European Union Brussels, 14 September 2018 (OR. en) 10472/18. Interinstitutional File: 2017/0248 (CNS)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 14 September 2018 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2017/0248 (CNS) 10472/18 FISC 276 ECOFIN 667 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS Subject: COUNCIL REGULATION
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES
5.6.2018 L 139/1 I (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES COUNCIL DIRECTIVE (EU) 2018/822 of 25 May 2018 amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation
More informationThe Commission s Study on Company
HOME STATE TAXATION VS. COMMON BASE TAXATION jurisdictions by an automatic formula, and taxed at the national tax rates, which member states will continue to establish themselves. A comprehensive solution
More informationTrends I Netherlands moves away from fiscal offshore industry
1 Trends I Netherlands moves away from fiscal offshore industry The Netherlands is slowly but surely steering away from facilitating the use of its corporate income tax system by companies that are set
More informationWHY CAPITAL FLIGHT? HOW PLUGGING THE LEAKS COULD CONTRIBUTE TO POVERTY ALLEVIATION
NEW RESOURCES FOR DEVELOPMENT FINANCE TAXATION MECHANISMS FOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE MILLENIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS United Nations, New York, Tuesday 25 th April 2006 WHY CAPITAL FLIGHT? HOW PLUGGING THE LEAKS
More informationLuxembourg transfer pricing legislation at a glance
2017 EY TAX Alert Luxembourg Luxembourg transfer pricing legislation at a glance Executive summary The law of 23 December 2016 on the budget for the year 2017 ( Budget Law ) has introduced a new article
More informationPrepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
BOPCOM-04/16A Seventeenth Meeting of the IMF Committee on Balance of Payments Statistics Pretoria, October 26 29, 2004 Draft Summary of the Meeting of the OECD Workshop on International Investment Statistics
More information