THE CHAMBER OF TAX CONSULTANTS
|
|
- Clifton Gallagher
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 THE CHAMBER OF TAX CONSULTANTS 3, Rewa Chambers, Ground Floor, 31, New Marine Lines, Mumbai Tel.: / Fax: office@ctconline.org Website: CA DINESH R SHAH Study Group Meeting RECENT DIRECT TAXES JUDGEMENTS 30/03/ Business Expenditure Penalty, fine etc. Shyam Sel Ltd V/s Dy CIT (Calcutta HA) (2017) 148 DTR 167 (52) Payment for failure to install pollution control device payment recovered from the Assessee by the State Pollution Control Board for the Assessee s failure to install pollution control device within the prescribed time was expenditure incurred for the purpose of business not hit by explanation 1 to Se.37 (1). 2. Income- Cash Credit:- Lakshmanan Magendiran V/s ITO (2017) 148 DTR (Madras H.C) 158 (51) Opportunity of being heard vis-à-vis deposits in bank account- No opportunity was given to the assessee to explain the amount standing to the Assessee s credit in a bank in a bank account, hence order of A.O making addition by recourse to Se. 115BBE was not sustainable. 3. Intangible Asset: Goodwill:- Hinduja Foundries Ltd V/s Asst CIT (2017) 148 DTR (Tribunal) Chennai A) 158 (51) Depreciation is allowable on the payment relatable to goodwill. 4. Applicability of Explanation to Se.73 vis-à-vis derivative transactions. Sucon India Ltd V/s Asst. CIT Del G. (2017) 148 DTR (Tribunal) 145 (51) Loss Incurred on derivative transactions is not a speculative Loss and is to be adjusted against business Income. 1
2 5. Depreciation. Additional Depreciation under Se.32 (1) (iia) Asst. CIT V/s D.A Jhaveri (2017) 148 DTR (Mumbai Tribunal) 132 (50) Cutting and Polishing of diamonds: Activity of cutting and Polishing of diamonds amounts to manufacture eligible for additional depreciation u/s 32 (1) (iia) 6. Income- Cash Credit: Genuineness:- Hero s Education and Welfare Society V/s Asst. CIT (2017) 148 DTR (Indore ITAT) 119 (50) Assessee- Society is eligible for exemption under Se. 10 (23c) (iiiad). Further, assessee has filed confirmations of the creditors explaining the source of source, who in turn, obtained loans from the persons, who are also facing court cases for non return of such loans. That apart the amount has been invested by the society in land and building- Therefore, addition made on account of unexplained cash credit is deleted. 7. Charitable Trust- Registration Under S.12A:- Cancellation under s.12aa(3):- CIT V/s Institute Management Committee of Industrial Training Institute. (2017) 148 DTR (Bombay H.C) 74 (49) Cancellation of the Registration on the ground that the Institutions do not satisfy the meaning of charitable purpose as given in Se.2 (15) was not justified. Excise of power u/s 12AA(3) can only be done. If at least one of the two conditions specified therein- i.e. activities of the trust or is not genuine or activities of the trust is not being carried on accordance with the object of the trust are found satisfied. 8. Recovery: Attachment of immovable Property: Validity. Prajakta M.Shah V/s TRO (2017) 148 DTR (Gujarat H.C) 101 (49) Petitioner being a bonafide purchaser of property for consideration without notice of arrears of tax or erstwhile owners, attachment of such property by the Department was invalid. More so, when the property was under mortgage with bank long before service of notice of arrears on defaults. 9. Applicability of Se.50C vis a vis of Development Rights Voltas Ltd V/s ITO (2017) 148 DTR Mumbai (Tribunal F) 84 (48) Term Capital Asset mentioned in Se.50C. Specifically refers and confines its meaning to land or building or both sale of developments right in land is not covered by Se.50C. Assessee having transferred development rights in the land, to the developer and not the land itself provisions of Se.50C can not be applied for computing the Capital gains:- 2
3 10. Rent and Lease Rent or lease premium:- Rajesh Projects (India) (P) Ltd V/s CIT (2017) 148 DTR (Delhi H.C) 33 (47) Amounts paid as part of the lease premium in terms of the time- schedule(s) to the lease deeds executed between the assessee and Gnoida- (Authority) or biannal or annual payments for a limited / specific period towards acquisition of lease hold rights are not subject to TDS being capital payments. However, amounts constituting annual lease rent, expressed in terms of percentage (e.g. one percent) of the total premium for the duration of the lease, are rent, and therefore subject to TDS. 11. Income from undisclosed source: Addition under Se.69C: Alleged Bogus Purchases:- Asst CIT v/s Mahesh K. Shah (2017) 148 DTR (Mumbai B)O Tribunal] Page 1 (46) Assessee having filed copies of purchase Invoices. Extracts of Stock Registrar Ledger Showing entry/ Exist of materials copies of bank statements evidencing that the payments for the impugned purchases were made through normal banking channels and the A.O having not doubted the sales effected by the assessee, said purchases could not be treated as bogus and, therefore, A.O was not justified in making addition under Se.69C by merely relying on some information received from the sales tax Department. 12. Se.14A: Share hold as Stock in trade: Principal CIT V/s State Bank of Patiala. (2017) 147 DTR (P& H High Court) 290 Se 14A was not applicable to the assessee bank whose dividend or interact Income was earned from Shares and Securities held as stock in trade. 13. Share hold as Stock in trade:- CIT V/s. GKK Capital Markets (P) Ltd. (2017) 147 DTR (Calcutta H C) 330 In view of the clear finding of fact regarding the exempt Income claimed treated to be business Income and shares held by the assessee having been treated as Stock- in trade. 14. Capital gains Agricultural Land:- How to measure distance. CIT V/s Smt. Shakunthala Rangrajan (2017) 147 DTR (Madras H.C) 220 Measurement of distance under 2 (14) (iii) (b) For the purposes of Se 2 (14) (iii) (b) distance between agricultural land and nearest municipal council has to 3
4 be measured only through the public access road and not in a straight line or horizontal plane. 15. Income from undisclosed Sources. Addition on money Parmanand Builders (P) Ltd. V/s CIT (2017) 147 DTR (Bombay H.C) 248 On- money received on sale of flat vis-à-vis accounting method. Where the assessee offered on-money for last two years on the basis of project completion Method but the A.O spread over the on money to eight years of project and also adopted a different rate of on-money assessed by AO being Rs.1,25,78,000 Rs.66,00,000 offered by assessee stood. Substituted and could not be assessed in addition. 16. TDS Credit for TDS. CIT V/s Ganesh Narayan Brijlal Ltd. (2017) 147 DTR (Calcutta H.C) 136 Income passed on to Co-owners. Assessee owner of part of building after deduction of tax at source and paying the share of Co. owners inclusive of amount of TDS is entitled to benefit of entire tax deducted at source through it offered for tax only its own share of rental Income Account Rejection. Deluxe Enterprises V/s ITO (2017) 147 DTR (Tribunal) (Chd) 247 Estimation of net profit,. Assessee having neither produced books of Account despite repeated opportunities nor furnished any reasonable basis for estimating the net profit, nor demonstrated with comparable instances as to how The net profit rate of 5 percent estimated by the A.O was incurred it has to be held that the same is not unreasonable and therefore the impugned addition made by applying the said net profit is upheld. 18. Disallowance u/s 40 A (3) Anurag Radheshyam Attal V/s ITO (2017) 147 DTR (Tribunal) (Pune ITAT) 207 Applicability of 6DD (K) In view of report of A.O made to CIT (A) that cash payment was made by assessee to formers through four persons whom he was paying commission CIT (A) was justified in deleting the addition., 4
5 19. Income tax Authorities: Territorial jurisdiction of ITO. Deluxe Enterprises V/s ITO(2017) 147 DTR Tribunal (Chd) 247 Place of business vis-à-vis filing of return- ITO at SOLAN had requisite jurisdiction to make assessment of the assessee firm by virtue of Se 124 (1) as it is carrying on business only at SOLAN. Merely because the assessee has given address at Delhi and files return there. The territorial jurisdiction is not conferred on the AO located in Delhi. 20. Re-assessment validity:- Absence of notice u/s 143 (2). Dy CIT V/s Indo American Hybrid Seeds India (P) ltd. (2017) 147 DTR (Tribunal) (Bangalore C Bench) 265 A.O having given categorical finding in the assessment order that notice u/s 143 (2) was issued and the assessee having participated in the assessment proceedings and raised no objection before the completion of the assessment about non- Service of notice under Se 143 (2) the Provision of Se 292 BB are squarely applicable and therefore, the assessee is precluded from taking this objection at a later stage. There was valid issue and service of notice u/s 143 (2). 21. Return Revised Return:- Validity. Original Innovative Logistic India (P) Ltd V/s Jt. CIT (2017) 147 DTR (Chennai) A 89. Revised filed by assessee to claim Loss from conversion of Stock of shares from Investment to Stock in trade as business loss instead of Loss under head Capital Gains was valid when the auditor and chartered Accountant appeared before A.O and confirmed such conversion through in Audit report, against relevant column No 12A. Such conversion was shown as NIL but in the notes on account it was stated that the assessee had converted certain Investment in to stock in trade. 22. Charitable Purpose registration of trusts:- Chamber of Commerce Trust V/s CIT (2017) 54 ITR (Tribunal) 19. Cancellation of Registration Commissioner not considering explanation given by assessee in respect of donations. Commissioner not verifying property whether function hall used only for general Public or particular section of people CIT to verify donation received and utilization of function hall. 23. Co-operative Society Special deduction. K. Service Co-operative Bank V/s ITO (2017) 54 ITR Tribunal 6. Cochin. Primary agricultural Credit Society entitled to special deduction u/s 80P. Belated filing of return does not disentitle society to benefit of deduction. 5
6 24. Deduction of tax at source:- Condition precedent for provisions to apply: Apollo tyres Ltd V/s Dy CIT (2017) 54 ITR (Tribunal Delhi) Page1. Identification of person from whose account Income tax deducted at Source- Person to whose account credit for such tax deducted at source to be given not identifiable- Provisions of tax deduction at source not applicable- AO to verify whether payee identifiable and amount payable to him ascertainable. 25. Exemption: L Charitable Trust. Momjeet Kaur Memorial Premier Institute of Education V/s ITO. (2017) 54 ITR Tribunal (Delhi) 3 Capital asset built with borrowed fund generating Income from enabling trust to perform charitable activities- Provisions applicable for computing Income from House Property not attracted while determing Income of trust for purpose of claiming exemption u/s 11 Expenditure incurred on blood donation repayment of Loan and depreciation amounted to application of Income for Charitable purpose. 26. Income tax Survey:- Additional Income:- Narendra Kothari (Late) V/s ITO (2017) 54 ITR Tribunal (Chennai Bench) 30 No evidence with A.O other than letter from purchaser. Third Party evidence without opportunity to Cross examine. A.O accepting offer made by assesse3e in his statement during course of Survey- can not enquire with purchaser- Addition not sustainable Se.133A. 27. Attachment and sale of Property:- Arvindkumar Kuberbhai Patel V/s Deputy CIT (2017) 391 ITR (Gujarat H.C) 103 Recovery of tax Transfer to defraud Revenue Bonafide purchase without notice and for adequate consideration order declarating purchase void in breach of principles of natural justice and is to be quashed. 28. Block Assessment: Search and Seizure. Notice failure to Serve notice u/s 143 (2):- Effect (?) Kiran Prakshan V/s Department of I.T. (2017) 391 ITR (Patna H.C) 31 Commissioner (Appeal) upholding assessment relying on Supreme Court decision on different subjects and holding decision in Asst. CIT V/s Hotel Blue Moon (2010) 321 ITR 362 per in curium- untenable order to be set aside. 6
7 29. Cash Credit Share Application Money:- Principal CIT V/s N.C. Cables Ltd. (2017) 391 ITR Delhi (HC) 11 Assessee furnishing documents to evidence genuineness of transaction and identity and credit worthiness of parties - failure by A.O to conduct adequate and proper inquiry in to materials while invoking 68. No addition can be made under Section C.B.D.T Circular:- Karnataka State Beverages Corp. Ltd V/s CIT (2017) 391 ITR (Karnataka H.C) 185 Circular binding on Income tax authorities. 31. Concealment of Income or furnishing in accurate particulars thereof:- Penalty:- Principal CIT V/s Atotech India Ltd (2017) 391 ITR (P&H) 117 Penalty set off of Loss- Assessing claiming set off under different head in course of assessment proceedings- Appellant Tribunal not finding anything clandestine in manner of seeking opinion from Chartered Accountants does not amount to furnishing inaccurate or concealment of Income. 32. Higher compensation received on compulsory of agricultural land:- Balkrishnan V/s Union of India. (2017) 391 ITR (Supreme Court) 178 Compensation received on compulsory acquisition of agricultural land. Notification under section 4 and declaration u/s 6 of Land acquisition Act issued in respect of assessee s Land Acquisition Act issued in respect of assessee s land Award passed thereafter by collector fixing compensation Assessee entering into negotiations for higher compensation Does not change character of transaction to voluntary sale. Assessee entitled to exemption I.T Act 1961 Se.10 (37). 33. Hindu Undivided Family Gopal and Sons (HUF) V/s CIT (2017) 391 ITR (SC) Page 1. Deemed Dividend. Loan to shareholder- Payment made by family for purchase of shares constituting substantial interest in company share certificates issued in name of karta. Karta having more than 20 percent interest in and entitled to not less than 20 percent of Income of family Loan from company is deemed dividend in hands of family. 7
8 34. Income tax General Principles:- Kanaiyalal Dhanshukhlal Sopariwala V/s District Valuation Officer. (2017) 391 ITR (Gujarat H.C) 56 Income tax Authority having jurisdiction- Reference to wrong provision of law would not invalidate jurisdiction. 35. Loss:- Business Expenditures- Business Set up of Business. CIT V/s Axis (P) Equity Ltd. (2017) 391 ITR (Bombay H C) Finding whether business set up is finding of fact. Assessment management company finding that assessee took steps for commencing business engaged legal and financial advisors incurred expenditure to decide approximate tax efficient structure for funds and employed necessary personnel for running business- finding that assessee set up business in relevant previous year. Expenditure allowable as business loss. 36. Power of High Court:- Dix Francis V/s ITSC (2017) 391 ITR Madras H.C 401 High Court will interfere only in case of violation of provisions of Income tax Act or violation of principle of natural justice. 37. Cash Credits: Gift:- State of Karnataka V/s Selvi J. Jayalalitha. (2017) 392 ITR (S.C) Gift- Process of Income tax Assessment only determines. Whether or not receipt is Income from undisclosed Sources- not related to lawfulness of sources or of receipt- IT Act 1968 prevention of corruption Act 1988 Se Business Income. Commencement of business:- CIT V/s Green Infra Ltd. (2017) 392 ITR 7 (Bombay) (1) Business Income. Business Income or Income from Other Sources. Commencement of Business- Funds placed in Short term Deposit till deployed in business- finding that business had commenced. Interest from short term deposits Assessable as Business Income. Se.28 & 56 (CIT V/s Indo Swiss Jewels Ltd. (2006) 284 ITR 389 (Bombay H.C) 39. Co-operative Society Special deduction under Section 80P. Principal CIT V/.s Totagars Co-operative sale Society. (2017) 392 ITR (Karnataka H C) 74 Meaning of Co-operative Society- Co. operative Society includes Co-operative Bank- Interest earned from deposits in Co-operative Bank- deductible I.T Act S. 80P (2) (d). 8
9 40. Penalty u/s 271 (1) ( c) of I.T Act CIT V/s Samson perinchery (2017) 392 ITR (Bombay) 4. Concealment of Income- furnishing of inaccurate particulars of Income. AO initiating penalty proceeding for furnishing of inaccurate particulars of Income and imposing penalty for concealment of Income order imposing penalty to be made only on ground on which penalty proceedings initiated and not on fresh grounds of which assessee had no notice- Penalty to be deleted. 41. Return Revised Return:- CBDT Circular Sevugan Chettiar V/s Principal CIT. (2017) 392 ITR (Madras H C) 63. Revised return- Writ Limitation- Assessee claiming exemption in terms of supreme court decision and CBDT Circular Revised return filed beyond time- High Court has power to direct condonation of delay and granting of exemption I.T Act 1961 SS10, 119, Appeal to Appellate Tribunal Ottar Club V/s DIT (Exemptions) 392 ITR (Bombay H.C) 244 (2) Orders of Appellate Tribunal- Rule requiring order to be pronounced within ninety days of conclusion of hearing Tribunal passing order beyond period of 90 days from date of conclusion of its hearing- Assessee seeking rectification on ground delay operated to its prejudice- Tribunal to consider rectification application a fresh I.T Act 1961 Se 254 (1) I.T Rule (Appellate Tribunal) Rules 1963 rule 34 (5) (c ) 34 (8) 43. Business: Business Income or Income from House Property. Principal CIT V/s Sri Bharathi Warehousing Corporation. (2017) 392 ITR (T & AP) 160 Main business activity of assessee consisting of construction of different types of building and leasing them out. Not Exploitation of property- as owner- Income will fall under head Income from business- I.T Act Representative Assessee- Trustee. CIT V/s India Advantage Fund VII (2017) 392 ITR (Karnataka H.C) 209 (2) Trustee Assessment- Effect of Section 164 (1) and circular No 281 dated Sufficient if beneficiaries identifiable and share capable of being determined based on trust deed I.T Act 1961 SS.161 &
10 45. Se.50: Capital Gains Depreciable Assets. CIT V/s V.S Dempo Company Ltd (2016) 387 ITR 354 (S.C) Block of Assets- Restricted to made of computation of gains does not alter entitlement to exemption where asset held for more than Thirty Six month [SS 2 (29b)] 45,48,49,54E] 46 Scope of total Income Interest on compensation. Shivanna M. V/s ACIT (2016) 142 DTR 319 (Karnataka H C) Interest on compensation under dispute- Chargeable to tax only upon resolution of dispute by High Court. 47 Se. 37 (1 Bogus Purchase: [ Se 69C & 260A] CIT V/s Anju Jindal (Smt) (2016) 387 ITR 418 (P & H) (H>C) Business Expenditure Bogus Purchases- paid by account payee s cheques- Sales were accepted G.P was normal. Deletion of addition by Tribunal was upheld to be justified. 48. Se.50C:- Capital Gains:- transfer of Leasehold Rights. CIT V/s. Green field Hotels and estate (P) Ltd. (2016) 389 ITR 68 (Bombay H C) Full Value of consideration- Stamp duty valuation provision will not be applicable while computing capital gains on transfer of leasehold rights in land and Buildings. (Se.2 (14) Se.143 (2) Assessment Notice. CIT V/s Abacus Distribution System (India) (P) Ltd (Bombay H C) (www itatonline.org) Assessment- Notice- Notice Served on the old address. Assessment was held to be void (Se 282, 292BB, General clauses Act S Se. 143 (3) Bogus Purchases: CIT V/s Ashish International (Bombay H C) ( Bogus Purchases Cross Examination- A Statement by the Alleged Vendor that the transactions with the assessee was only accommodation entries and that there are no sales or purchases cannot be relied upon by the A.O unless the assessee is given the opportunity to cross- examine the vendor Se.131]. 51 S.145: Method of Accounting: Weighted Averaged Method cost of valuing Stock. CIT V/s Uday M. Ghare (Bombay H.C) 10
11 Method of Accounting: Weighted average cost of valuing of accounting. Which is approved by Accounting Standard issued by the ICAI- AO is not entitled to disregard the Method if the assessee has consistently followed the said Method:- 52. Penalty under Se.271 (1) (c ) of I..T Act:- If quantum appeal is admitted in High Court. CIT V/s Advita Estate Development (P) Ltd. (Bombay High Court) If the quantum appeal is admitted by the High Court, it means that the issue is debatable and penalty cannot be levied (S.260A) 53. Se.2 (22) (e) Deemed Dividend: Inter corporate transactions:- Chandrasekhar Maruti V/s ACIT (2016) 159 ITD 822 (2017) 183 TTJ 459 (Mumbai Tribunal) Deemed dividend- Inter corporate transactions- Loans given by companies to each other in course of inter se business transactions could not be regarded as deemed dividend. 54. Penny Stocks. ACIT V/s Viineet Sureshchandra Agarwal Ahmedabad Tribunal. Se 30 (38) Long term Capital gains from Equity Penny Stocks Shares transactions can not be held to be bogus. 55. Se.41(1) Remission or cessation of trading Liabilities. Dy CIT V/s JSR Constructions (P) Ltd (2016) 159 ITD 749 (Bangalore (Tribunal) Best Judgement assessment- where the books of Accounts is rejected and net profit is assessed, there can not be separate additions in respect of creditors appear in such books on the basis that they ceased to exist (S.144) 56. Se 45: Capital Gains Long term or Short term (?) Letter of allotment: Anita D. Kanjani V/s ACIT (Mumbai) Letter of allotment for considering whether a n asset is a long term Capital Asset the period of holding must be computed on a defects basis. The letter of allotment, even though not ownership must be taken as the date of holding the Asset. Se. 2 (14) 2 (29A) 2 (42A) 2 (47) 54 & 54F. 57. Capital Gains: Penny Stock. Dolarri Hemani V/s ITO (Kol) Tribunal ( 11
12 The fact that the stock in thinly traded and there is unusually high gain is not sufficient to treat the long-term capital gain as Bogus when all the paper work is in order. The Revenue has to bring material on record to support its finding that there has been collusion/ connivance between the broker and the assessee for the introduction of its un accounted money. 58 Se.206AA. Requirement to Furnish PAN Number. Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd V/s ACIT (Hydrabad Tribunal) (S.B) Section does not have an overriding effect over the other provisions of the Act. Consequently the payer can not be held liable to deduct tax at a higher of the rates prescribed in Se.206AA in the case of payments made to non- resident persons in spite of their failure to furnish the PAN (Se. 90 (2) 59. Asst CIT V/s Bhavik Bhartbhai Padia. (2017) 78 taxmann.com 133 (Ahmedabad Tribunal) Where assessee had shown capital gain in share transactions and A.O concluded that purchase of shares by assessee was bogus and accordingly treated Capital gain as cash credit u/s 68 since sale of shares had been confirmed by BSE question of raising doubt as to purchase of shares did not arise and addition not justified. 60 Asst. CIT V/s Sachin R. Tendulkar. (2017) 77 taxmann.com 305 (Mumbai Tribunal) (a) Investment in shares with Portfolio Managers being a merge percentage of assessee s total Investments. Income on sale of shares was taxable under head Capital Gains and not business Income. (b) Where assessee had not claimed any Expenditure relating to exempt Income. There could not have been disallowance of expenditure under Section14A. 61. Mr. Shahrukh Khan V/s Asst. CIT Central Circle 29. ITA 623/ Mum / 2013 A.Y ITA 4763 /Mum / A,Y, Date of order 17/3/2017) (I) Where the Assessee received fees in advance for 104 Episode and some were offered as Income in the year of receipt. But out of 104 Episodes, for 52 Episodes no shooting took place and project for cancelled and the assessee returned back fees for such 52 Episodes. Where no shooting took place and no services were rendered on the principles of commercial Expediously and same is allowable under Section 37 (1) of I.T Act
13 (II) The Assessee was having Second residential house in Dubai. A.O taxed Second house deemed Annual letting value within the meaning of Section 23 (1) (a) of the Income tax Act The CIT (A) confirmed the A.O s action and the ITAT Mumbai also confirmed the AO s order. This was taxed in view of the notification No.90 and 91/ 2008 dated 28/08/2008. In fact, the entire controversy is arising from the understanding of the expression may be taxed in that other state. As mentioned in Para I of articles 6 of the DTAA between India and UAE. In view of the aforesaid precedent. It has to be held that Income from the Dubai villa is liable to taxed in India as much as the same is includible in the return of Income and whatever taxes that may have been levied in the other contracting state, the credit thereof is required to be allowed as per law. Therefore, in view thereof we hold the issue against the assessee and direct The A.O to rework the final tax liability in accordance with aforesaid direction. 62. Collection of tax at source:- Time limit of furnishing Form 27C:- (2018) 78 taxmann.com 295 (S.C) SLP granted against High Court s ruling that no time limit is provided in section 206C (1A) to make a declaration in Form 27C collected from buyers and mere minor delay in furnishing Form 27C would not make assessee liable for noncollection of TCS. 63. Expenditure incurred in relation to Income not includible in total Income. (2017) 79 taxmann.com 39 (Mumbai Tribunal) Rule 8D of 1962 Rule is not attracted automatically to an assessee who earns exempt Income, rather, in a case where A.O after examination of books of Account under Section 14A(2) records his satisfaction that disallowance or nil disallowance made by assessee is found to be unsatisfactory, he is authorized to compute amount to be disallowed under rule 8D of 1962 Rules. 64. How to calculate period of holding Assets for Long term Capital Gain (?) Whether Registration is must (?) Anita D. Kanjani V/s ACIT 23 (1) Mumbai (H. Bench) ITA No 2291/ Mum / 2015 A.Y Date of order 13/02/2017. Date of allotment- The date of Agreement and date of Registration of the document (?) 13
14 For the purpose of calculating period of holding u/s 2 (42A) of I.T Act The legal ownership is not materials the holding period is to be determined in view of Se 2 (42A) issue of ownership is not issue. The Tribunal held that (Para 16) we find that holding period should be computed from the date of issue of allotment letter if we do so, the holding period becomes more than 36 months and consequently, the property sold by the assessee would be long term Capital asset in the hands of the assessee. 14
DIRECT TAXES Tribunal
Jitendra singh & sameer dalal Advocates DIRECT TAXES Tribunal REPORTED 1. TDS under section 194I provision for rent vis-à-vis actual payment assessee making provisions for disputed rent payable to landlord
More informationRANCHI CLUB LTD. IS STILL GOOD LAW [Published in 267 ITR (Jour.) p.40 (Part-5)]
1 RANCHI CLUB LTD. IS STILL GOOD LAW [Published in 267 ITR (Jour.) p.40 (Part-5)] - By S.K. Tyagi The Patna High Court in the case of Ranchi Club Ltd. Vs. C.I.T. [1996] 217 ITR 72 (Pat.), rendered a very
More informationA COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF THE FINANCE ACT, 2013 PART - VI (Chapter XIII & XIV of the IT Act)
A COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF THE FINANCE ACT, 2013 PART - VI (Chapter XIII & XIV of the IT Act) Prepared by Advocates of M/s Subbaraya Aiyar, Padmanabhan & Ramamani (SAPR) Advocates 13. CHAPTER XIII Income Tax
More informationCommissioner of Income Tax 24
vikrant 1/16 6 ITXA 1709 2014+.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1709 OF 2014 Commissioner of Income Tax 20 Shri. Deepak Kumar Agarwal
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL L BENCH: MUMBAI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL L BENCH: MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R. S. PADVEKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.442/Mum/2009 (Assessment year: 2005-06), Devidas Mansion,
More informationTDS under section 195 of the Income-tax Act. CA Vishal Palwe 16 December 2017 Seminar on International Taxation at WIRC
TDS under section 195 of the Income-tax Act CA Vishal Palwe 16 December 2017 Seminar on International Taxation at WIRC Overview of section 195 Overview of section 195 195(1) Any person paying to non-resident
More informationSTUDY GROUP MEETING. Thursday, 14 th December, 2017 SNDT, Committee Room, Churchgate, Mumbai. RECENT JUDGMENTS ON DIRECT TAX
THE CHAMBER OF TAX CONSULTANTS 3, Rewa Chambers, Ground Floor, 31, New Marine Lines, Mumbai - 400 020 Tel.: 2200 1787 / 2209 0423 / 2200 2455 E-mail: office@ctconline.org Website: www.ctconline.org STUDY
More informationDIRECT TAX REVIEW VERENDRA KALRA & CO OCTOBER Inside this edition. Like always, Like never before
VERENDRA KALRA & CO CHARTERED A CCOUNTANTS Like always, Like never before DIRECT TAX REVIEW OCTOBER 2018 Inside this edition AO's order rejecting ITR without providing opportunity to rectify defect u/s
More informationRECOVERY PROCEEDINGS UNDER INCOME TAX ACT, 1961
RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS UNDER INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 By Shri Jitendra Singh, Advocate M-3, Mezzanine Floor, Court Chambers, 35, New Marine Lines, Mumbai 400020 Telephone No: (022) 49737379 Mobile No.: +91 9975750130
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: G NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G. D. AGRAWAL, PRESIDENT AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER
1 ITA Nos. 6675 & 6676/Del/2015 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: G NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G. D. AGRAWAL, PRESIDENT AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 6675/DEL/2015 ( A.Y 2013-14)
More informationTax Wire. Bollywood Badshah's tryst with the tax department!
Tax Wire Bollywood Badshah's tryst with the tax department! 07th April, 2017 Bollywood Badshah's tryst with the tax department! Background Mr. Shahrukh Khan (hereinafter referred to as Mr. Khan/the assessee
More informationPayment of Export commission to Non-Resident Agent :-
Common Disputes:- Payment of Export commission to Non-Resident Agent :- Relevant Bare Act, Rules & Circulars:- Other Sums 195. [(1) Any person responsible for paying to a non-resident, not being a company,
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: E : NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: E : NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2006-07 M/s. Ujagar Holdings Pvt. Ltd., 8-D,
More informationAll about Section 269SS & 269T of Income Tax Act,1961
All about Section 269SS & 269T of Income Tax Act,1961 Section 269SS No Person shall, take or accept from any other person (herein after called depositor)any loans or deposits otherwise than by an account
More informationTHE CHAMBER OF TAX CONSULTANTS
THE CHAMBER OF TAX CONSULTANTS 3, Rewa Chambers, Ground Floor, 31, New Marine Lines, Mumbai - 400 020 Tel.: 2200 1787 / 2209 0423 Fax: 2200 2455 E-mail: office@ctconline.org Website: www.ctconline.org
More informationIn order to answer the aforesaid queries, the following issues will have to be examined :
1 Tax-treatment of the share of a company in the income of an AOP [Published in 351 ITR (Jour) 16] - By S.K.Tyagi Recently, an Opinion was sought by a company relating to the tax-treatment of its share
More informationA legitimate expenditure or relief not claimed in the return of income can be claimed ONLY by revising the return of income under section
Fresh Claim Outside The Return of Income BY:- CA. (Dr.) Gurmeet S. Grewal B. Com (Hons.), FCA, PhD., CLA (IIAM) Grewal & Singh Chartered Accountants New Delhi, Chandigarh, Yamuna Nagar, Jammu Phones: 09811242856
More informationSEMINAR ON SECTION 14A DISALLOWANCE AND DEEMED DIVIDEND
SEMINAR ON SECTION 14A DISALLOWANCE AND DEEMED DIVIDEND Deemed Dividend-Legislative Intent The insertion of section 14A in 2001 was mainly done to make the following Supreme Court judgments non functional:
More informationA Fresh look at disallowances u/s 14A of Income Tax Act - By CA. K.K.Chhaparia
A Fresh look at disallowances u/s 14A of Income Tax Act - By CA. K.K.Chhaparia Now a days, every assessee who is doing investment or trading in shares are getting hit hard by the impact of section 14A.
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES, D, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.S.SYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES, D, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.S.SYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 2210/Mum/2010 (Assessment Years: 2006-07) Renu Hingorani
More informationA Fresh look at disallowance under section 14A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961
A Fresh look at disallowance under section 14A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 [Published in 332 ITR (Jour) 49] 1 - By S.K.Tyagi Section 14A, the heading of which is Expenditure incurred in relation to income
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "F" Bench, Mumbai. Before Shri B.R. Baskaran, Accountant Member and Shri Pawan Singh, Judicial Member
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "F" Bench, Mumbai Before Shri B.R. Baskaran, Accountant Member and Shri Pawan Singh, Judicial Member (Assessment Year: 2014-15) 801/806, 8th Floor, Elite Square 274,
More informationTransfer fees received by a co-operative housing society are exempt from income-tax under the principle of mutuality
Transfer fees received by a co-operative housing society are exempt from income-tax under the principle of mutuality 188 CTR (ART.) P.284 [The judgement of the Special Bench of the ITAT, Mumbai, in the
More informationAt the time of Sec. 80G approval object of trust needs to be examined without considering application of income
At the time of Sec. 80G approval object of trust needs to be examined without considering application of income Citation: Commissioner of Income-tax, Rajkot-III v. Vipassana Trust Court: HIGH COURT OF
More informationSection 14A and Rule 8D
Special Story recent Controversies in income tax assessments Sameer G. Dalal, Advocate Section 14A and Rule 8D When the case of an assessee is selected for scrutiny, it is always the endeavour of the Assessing
More informationImportant Judgment s on TDS CA. MAHENDRA SANGHVI
Important Judgment s on TDS CA. MAHENDRA SANGHVI 1 Section 192 : Salary Commission to Managing Director Commission to Managing Director as fixed percentage of profit. Accrual of commission in the year
More informationAppellant :- Commissioner Of Income Tax, Meerut And Another
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Court No. - 33 Case:- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 73 of 2001 Appellant :- Commissioner Of Income Tax, Meerut And Another Respondent :- M/S Jindal Polyester & Steel Ltd.
More information[Published in 406 ITR (Journ.) p.73 (Part-3)]
1 Valuation of residential accommodation as a perquisite [Valuation of perquisite in respect of residential accommodation provided by the employer to the employee] [Published in 406 ITR (Journ.) p.73 (Part-3)]
More informationISSUES IN CAPITAL GAIN. NIHAR JAMBUSARIA 25 July, 2010
ISSUES IN CAPITAL GAIN NIHAR JAMBUSARIA 25 July, 2010 BUSINESS INCOME VS. CAPITAL GAINS Whether the assessee whose substantial income comprises long term capital gain can be said to be a trader of shares
More informationmore than the capital gains and the new residential asset was purchased within 2 years from the date of sale of residential property. 3. The Learned C
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad B Bench, Hyderabad Before Smt. P. Madhavi Devi, Judicial Member AND Shri S.Rifaur Rahman, Accountant Member ITA No.1707/Hyd/2016 (Assessment Year: 2013-14)
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad A Bench, Hyderabad
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad A Bench, Hyderabad Before Smt. P. Madhavi Devi, Judicial Member AND Shri S.Rifaur Rahman, Accountant Member Smt. Nama Chinnamma Hyderabad PAN: ABKPW 1887
More informationSection 44AD of The Income Tax Act,1961
Section 44AD of The Income Tax Act,1961 Special provision for computing profits and gains of business on presumptive basis By: CA Sanjay Kumar Agarwal CA Sidharth Jain Assisted By : CA Neha khurana Applicability
More informationINTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update
CA Tarunkumar Singhal & Sunil Moti Lala, Advocate INTERNATIONAL TAXATION A. SUPREME COURT RULINGS 1. Where the transfer pricing addition made in the final assessment order pursuant to original assessment
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI BEFORE SHRI N.S. SAINI, HON BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, HON BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER (Asst. Year : 2009-10) DCIT, Circle-1(1), Panaji.
More informationCORPORATE UPDATE IN THIS ISSUE DIRECT TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION TRANSFER PRICING DOMESTIC TAXATION. September, 2018
CORPORATE UPDATE DIRECT TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION I. High Court upholds grossing up for withholding tax purpose where taxes are borne by customer on fees for technical services paid to non-resident even
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCH 'B' NEW DELHI. ITA Nos.2337 & 4337/Del/2010 Assessment Years: &
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCH 'B' NEW DELHI ITA Nos.2337 & 4337/Del/2010 Assessment Years: 2006-07 & 2007-2008 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-11(1), NEW DELHI Vs M/s ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2016 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO OF 2015) VERSUS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 12274 OF 2016 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22059 OF 2015) REPORTABLE GOPAL AND SONS (HUF) CIT KOLKATA-XI VERSUS...APPELLANT(S)...RESPONDENT(S)
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ASHWANI TANEJA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ASHWANI TANEJA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2005-06 DCIT, Cir. 6(1), R.No.506, 5 th
More informationDIRECT TAX REVIEW AUGUST 2016 VERENDRA KALRA & CO. Inside this edition. Like always, Like never before
VERENDRA KALRA & CO CHARTERED A CCOUNTANTS Like always, Like never before DIRECT TAX REVIEW AUGUST 2016 Inside this edition CBDT clarifies on Income Declaration Scheme, 2016. Sum received from developer
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCHE A, PUNE BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI R.S. PADVEKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCHE A, PUNE BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI R.S. PADVEKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER M/s Malpani Estates, S.No.150, Malpani House, Indira Gandhi Marg,
More informationO/TAXAP/561/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD. TAX APPEAL NO. 561 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD TAX APPEAL NO. 561 of 2013 ================================================================ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VI...Appellant(s) Versus MADHAV ENTERPRISE
More informationCA SHARAD A SHAH. 21/06/2014 DTRC - Pune WIRC
CA SHARAD A SHAH 21/06/2014 DTRC - Pune WIRC-2014 1 Relevant Part of Section 271 (1) If the Assessing Officer] or the [Commissioner (Appeals)][or the Commissioner] in the course of any proceedings under
More informationINCOME ESCAPING ASSESSMENT Landmark Judicial Pronouncements
INCOME ESCAPING ASSESSMENT Landmark Judicial Pronouncements Prashanth G S, ACA Chartered Accountant Bangalore 1 Definition Section 2(8) -"assessment" includes reassessment 2 1 Section 147 Income escaping
More informationCircular No.4 / 2011, relating to section 281, which deals with certain transfers to be void - S.K.Tyagi
Circular No.4 / 2011, relating to section 281, which deals with certain transfers to be void - S.K.Tyagi 1 The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has recently issued Circular No.4 / 2011, dated 19.7.2011,
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH B, PUNE BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.2220
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH B, PUNE BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER (Assessment Years : 2009-10 & 2010-11) Asstt. Commissioner of Income
More informationSUMMARY OF JUDGEMENTS
JUNE, 2015 DIRECT TAX UPDATE SUMMARY OF JUDGEMENTS KNAV is a firm of International Accountants, Tax and Business Advisors. Presence in INDIA USA UK FRANCE NETHERLANDS SWITZERLAND CANADA E: admin@knavcpa.com
More informationJ.B. NAGAR CPE STUDY CIRCLE STUDY GROUP MEETING RECENT IMPORTANT JUDGMENTS IN DIRECT TAX
J.B. NAGAR CPE STUDY CIRCLE STUDY GROUP MEETING 03.09.2016 RECENT IMPORTANT JUDGMENTS IN DIRECT TAX - BY SHRI JITENDRA SINGH, ADVOCATE A. SUPREME COURT DECISIONS: (i) Sec. 148 r.w.s. 22 Notice issued under
More informationBEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI RAJENDRA, AM
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI G BENCH MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI RAJENDRA, AM ITA No. 5994/Mum/2010 (Asst Year 2005-06) 23 Atlanta - Nariman Point Mumbai
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs OF 2010 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2009)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs.7541-7542 OF 2010 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 34306-34307 of 2009) GE India Technology Centre Private Ltd.. Appellant(s) Versus
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES A, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI D. MANMOHAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI B. RAMAKOTAIAH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES A, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI D. MANMOHAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI B. RAMAKOTAIAH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 1149/HYD/2015 Assessment Year: 2008-09,
More informationDIRECT TAX REVIEW VERENDRA KALRA & CO FEBRUARY Inside this edition. Like always, Like never before
VERENDRA KALRA & CO CHARTERED A CCOUNTANTS Like always, Like never before DIRECT TAX REVIEW FEBRUARY 2019 Inside this edition Substantial expansion would make an assessee claim 100% deduction afresh SC
More informationALL GUJARAT FEDERATION OF TAX CONSULTANTS
ALL GUJARAT FEDERATION OF TAX CONSULTANTS PRE-BUDGET MEMORANDUM FOR 2015-16 1. Section 2(22)(e) : Deemed Dividend As per the present provision, even if advance or loan is given to a share holder for one
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI I.P. BANSAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, ACCOUNTAT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI I.P. BANSAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, ACCOUNTAT MEMBER Shri Irfan Abdul Kader Fazlani, 21 A Nirmal, Nariman Point,
More informationSUPREME COURT RULING (INCOME TAX)
SUPREME COURT RULING (INCOME TAX) 2016-TIOL-245-SC-IT MM Aqua Technologies Ltd Vs CIT (Dated: December 5, The assessee preferred this SLP challenging the judgment of High Court, whereby it was held that
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. Dated this the 17 th day of June 2014 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N KUMAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE Dated this the 17 th day of June 2014 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MANOHAR ITA No. 578 of 2008 BETWEEN: 1. The Commissioner
More informationITA No.129 & 329/Kol/2016 M/s Bhoruka Investment Ltd. A.Y [Before Hon ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, JM & Dr.Arjun Lal Saini, AM]
ITA No.129 & 329/Kol/2016 M/s Bhoruka Investment Ltd. A.Y.2012-13 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH : KOLKATA [Before Hon ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, JM & Dr.Arjun Lal Saini, AM] I.T.A No.129/Kol/2016
More informationCIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 516-527 OF 2004 Brij Lal & Ors.... Appellants versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar... Respondents with Civil
More information/TRUE COPY/ PS TO JUDGE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JULY 2015/12TH ASHADHA, 1937 ITA.No. 278 of
More informationCA DINESH R SHAH Study Group Meeting on RECENT DIRECT TAXES JUDGEMENTS
THE CHAMBER OF TAX CONSULTANTS 3, Rewa Chambers, Ground Floor, 31, New Marine Lines, Mumbai - 400 020 Tel.: 2200 1787 / 2209 0423 Fax: 2200 2455 E-mail: office@ctconline.org Website: www.ctconline.org
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21 ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR BETWEEN: ITA NOS.251/2016 & 390/2016
More informationTHE CHAMBER OF TAX CONSULTANTS
THE CHAMBER OF TAX CONSULTANTS 3, Rewa Chambers, Ground Floor, 31, New Marine Lines, Mumbai - 400 020 Tel.: 2200 1787 / 2209 0423 Fax: 2200 2455 E-mail: office@ctconline.org Website: www.ctconline.org
More informationFutures, Options and other Derivatives
Overview of Accounting, Reporting and Taxation of Futures, Options and other Derivatives By: Sanjay Agarwal Founder of Voice of CA, NGO Email: agarwal.s.ca@gmail.com Accounting aspects Accounting Aspects
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 Date of decision: ITA 232/2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 Date of decision: 22.11.2012 ITA 232/2012 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IV Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel... Appellant
More informationInsight of Few Sections
Insight of Few Sections Relevant for Handling Income Tax Assessments - C.A. Mehul Thakker SECTION 2(14) SECTION 2(14) CAPITAL ASSET [W.E.F A.Y.2014-15] Modification in parameters defining scope of land
More informationHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD. Judgment reserved on Judgment delivered on Income Tax Appeal No.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Judgment reserved on 10.10.2011 Judgment delivered on 25.11.2011 Income Tax Appeal No.241 of 2008 Commissioner of Income-tax (Central), Kanpur v. Smt. Shaila Agarwal
More informationControversies surrounding Section 14A of the Income Tax Act
Controversies surrounding Section 14A of the Income Tax Act CA Vivek Newatia vnewatia@sjaykishan.com CA Puja Borar pujaborar@sjaykishan.com Background and Rationale for introduction Section 14A introduced
More informationITA no. 3279/Mum./2008 (Assessment Year : ) Revenue by : Mr. Ajit Kumar Jain Assessee by : Mr. Firoze B. Andhyarujina
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL L BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI B.R. MITTAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA no. 3279/Mum./2008 (Assessment Year : 2003-04) Dy. Commissioner
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH B BEFORE SMT. ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH B BEFORE SMT. ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.971/Bang/2015 (Asst. Year 2011-12 ) M/s Sevasadan
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH : BANGALORE. BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER and SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER and SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.726/Bang/2014 (Assessment year: 2005-06) M/s.B & B Infotech
More information2 O R D E R PER SAKTIJIT DEY, J.M. Instant appeals by the assessee are directed against separate orders passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) 4
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA no.5271/mum./2013 (Assessment Year : 2010 11) Plot no.612, Junction
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH B BENCH BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI RAJENDRA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH B BENCH BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI RAJENDRA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Assessment Year: 1999-2000 Bennett Coleman & Co.Ltd., The Times
More informationTAX AUDIT POINTS TO BE CONSIDERED
TAX AUDIT POINTS TO BE CONSIDERED Contributed by : CA. Tejas Gangar As per section 44AB of the Income tax act, 1961 ( the Act ), certain persons are required to get their accounts audited till 30th September
More informationCNK Knowledge Tracker
CNK Knowledge Tracker Be a Step Ahead Direct Tax October 2013 Contractor Nayak & Kishnadwala, Mumbai, Vadodara CNK Kaid Auditing, Dubai Contents Domestic Tax Notification / Circulars 3 Recent judicial
More informationVs. Date of hearing : Date of Pronouncement : O R D E R
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH F, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJENDRA SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 5720/Mum/2011 Assessment Year : 2004-05 M/s. Forever
More informationSource - ITA Nos 1667 & 1765 of 2010 Pfizer Ltd Mumbai IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "C" Bench, Mumbai Before Shri D.K. Agar
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "C" Bench, Mumbai Before Shri D.K. Agarwal, Judicial Member and Shri B. Ramakotaiah, Accountant Member ITA No.1667/Mum/2010 (Assessment year: 2007-08) Pfizer Ltd.,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION No OF 2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 3314 OF 2004 wp-3314-2004.sxw M/s. Eskay K'n' IT (India) Ltd... Petitioner. V/s. Dy. Commissioner of Income
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD TAX APPEAL NO. 637 of 2013 With TAX APPEAL NO. 1711 of 2009 With TAX APPEAL NO. 2577 of 2009 With TAX APPEAL NO. 925 of 2010 With TAX APPEAL NO. 949 of 2010 With
More informationDIRECT TAX REVIEW JUNE 2017 VERENDRA KALRA & CO. Inside this edition. Like never before
VERENDRA KALRA & CO CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS Like always, Like never before DIRECT TAX REVIEW JUNE 2017 Inside this edition Supreme Court Judgement on Aadhaar-PAN Linkage CBDT clarified that seized assets
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH D, NEW DELHI Before Sh. N. K. Saini, AM And Smt. Beena A. Pillai, JM
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH D, NEW DELHI Before Sh. N. K. Saini, AM And Smt. Beena A. Pillai, JM : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Income Tax Officer, TDS Rohtak (APPELLANT) PAN No. RTKPO1586E
More informationDilution of Section 14A
Dilution of Section 14A A ready reckoner - R.Dhiraj, Advocate, SAPR Advocates INTRODUCTION Section 14A has been introduced by the Finance Act 2001 with retrospective effect from 1962. The provision was
More informationIMPORTANT DECISIONS INCOME TAX
IMPORTANT DECISIONS INCOME TAX S. Sathiyanarayanan Partner 18 Feb 2017 ICAI SIRO Scheme of Morning Talk Recent Decisions (Dec 2016 to Feb 2017) Section 14A Section 50B CIT vs. Vinzas Solutions India Private
More information25 Penalties Introduction Penalties
25 Penalties 25.1 Introduction The Income-tax Act, 1961 provides for the imposition of a penalty on an assessee who wilfully commits any offence under the provisions of the Act. Penalty is levied over
More informationSUMMARY OF MUMBAI HIGH COURT JUDGMENTS FOR JUNE, 2017
SUMMARY OF MUMBAI HIGH COURT JUDGMENTS FOR JUNE, 2017 By: P. Kanthi Visalakshi, Associate - SAPR Advocates 1. Rajiv Yashwant Bhale vs. The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 2017-TIOL-1109-HC-MUM-IT Writ Petition
More informationFINANCE BILL 2017-DIRECT TAX PROPOSALS AT GLANCE
FINANCE BILL 2017-DIRECT TAX PROPOSALS AT GLANCE COMPILED BY: CA.ARUN GUPTA ca.arungupta77@gmail.com A. Rates of Taxes: 1. It is proposed to make the following changes in tax rates: In case of Resident
More informationTotal turnover/ Gross receipts 30% 30% of FY > Rs 50 Cr No change in rate of Surcharge
1. Income Tax Rates: Category of Income New rate of tax Old rate Taxpayer for FY 2017-18 of tax Individuals/ Upto Rs 2.5 L Nil Nil HUF/ BOI/ Rs 2.5 to 5 L 5% 10% AOP/ Rs 5 to 10 L 20% 20% Artificial Above
More informationIn the High Court of Judicature at Madras. Date : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Sudhakar and The Honble Ms. Justice K.B.K.
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Date : 14.07.2015 The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Sudhakar and The Honble Ms. Justice K.B.K. Vasuki T.C.A. No: 398 of 2007 M/s. Anusha Investments Ltd. 8 Haddows Road
More informationFINAL May PAPER 7: DIRECT TAX LAWS Test Code: FTP 7 Branch : Date: 31.3.
FINAL May 2018 PAPER 7: DIRECT TAX LAWS Test Code: FTP 7 Branch : Date: 31.3. (100 Marks) Note: Question No.1 is compulsory. Candidates are required to answer any five questions from the remaining six
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: SMC NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: SMC NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A.No.-856/Del/2014 (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2006-07) Global Realty Heritage Venture (Cochin) (P.) Ltd.,
More information[2016] 68 taxmann.com 41 (Mumbai - CESTAT) CESTAT, MUMBAI BENCH. Commissioner of Service Tax. Vs. Lionbridge Technologies (P.) Ltd.
[2016] 68 taxmann.com 41 (Mumbai - CESTAT) CESTAT, MUMBAI BENCH Commissioner of Service Tax Vs. Lionbridge Technologies (P.) Ltd.* M.V. RAVINDRAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER ORDER NO. A/85873/16/SMB AND OTHERS FEBRUARY
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA 607/2015. versus AND ITA 608/2015. versus
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 12. + ITA 607/2015 PR. COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX... Appellant Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Senior Standing counsel with Mr. Raghvendra Singh and Mr.Shikhar Garg,
More informationTax Deduction and Collection at Source
(iii) Ravi Kumar aged 67 years derived ` 6,00,000 as salary from his employer, XYZ Ltd. for the year ended 31-03- 2019. The following details are provided by him to the employer: Particulars ` Loss from
More informationin NBFCs Presented by : Hitesh R. Shah Chartered Accountant 28 January
Typical Tax issues in NBFCs Presented by : Hitesh R. Shah Chartered Accountant 28 January 2013 1 It is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of financing whether
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT. Judgment delivered on : ITA Nos. 697/2007, 698/2007 & 699/2007.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT Judgment delivered on : 06.03.2009 ITA Nos. 697/2007, 698/2007 & 699/2007 ESTER INDUSTRIES LIMITED... Appellant versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
More informationDIRECT TAX REVIEW JUNE 2018 VERENDRA KALRA & CO. Inside this edition. Like always, Like never before
VERENDRA KALRA & CO CHARTERED A CCOUNTANTS Like always, Like never before DIRECT TAX REVIEW JUNE 2018 Inside this edition SC dismisses SLP, no penalty u/s 271C for TDS default on debatable nature of payments
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD. SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No of CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD - Petitioner(s) Versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 15566 of 2011 CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD - Petitioner(s) Versus ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME- TAX(OSD) & 1 - Respondent(s) Appearance :
More informationBefore Sh. J. S. Reddy, AM And Sh. George George K., JM
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH A, NEW DELHI Before Sh. J. S. Reddy, AM And Sh. George George K., JM : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-7 New Delhi
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: C NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H. S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ORDER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: C NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H. S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 100/Del/2015 Assessment Year: 2010-11 HARISH NARINDER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO.
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.11080 OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 25257 OF 2015) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, PUNE...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS
More informationAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Celerity Power LLP [2018] 100 taxmann.com 129 (Mum ITAT)
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Celerity Power LLP [2018] 100 taxmann.com 129 (Mum ITAT) No taxable capital gains arises on conversion of a private company into LLP at book-value, notwithstanding
More informationC.R. Building, I.P. Estate
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: D NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R. P. TOLANI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI J. S. REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 364/Del/2012 Assessment Years: 2008-09 ACIT Vs.
More information