On behalf of the Public Affairs Executive (PAE) of the EUROPEAN PRIVATE EQUITY AND VENTURE CAPITAL INDUSTRY
|
|
- Amanda Jocelyn McDaniel
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 On behalf of the Public Affairs Executive (PAE) of the EUROPEAN PRIVATE EQUITY AND VENTURE CAPITAL INDUSTRY 9 April 2014 To Re Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Consultation on Public Discussion Draft BEPS Action 6: Preventing the Granting of Treaty Benefits in Inappropriate Circumstances. Introduction: The Public Affairs Executive (PAE) of the European Private Equity and Venture Capital industry is pleased to provide its comments on the public discussion draft released by the OECD on Action 6 ( the Consultation Document ). We write on behalf of the representative national and supranational European private equity (including venture capital) 1 bodies. Our members cover the whole industry, from the institutional investors who provide the capital for investment to the private equity firms who invest the capital in European companies at all stages of their development. Importance of Private Equity in Financing the Real Economy: Private equity provides patient and engaged investment for the long-term, providing finance to businesses across OECD countries, and particularly to SMEs. The private equity industry participated in the process that led to G20/OECD High-Level Principles of Long-term Investment Financing by Institutional Investors in As set out in Principle 1.4, a pre-condition for long-term investment is tax neutrality towards different forms and structures of financing. This Principle also adds that investment frameworks should as far as possible be made consistent across countries to facilitate the cross-border flow of long-term financing. Any standards for addressing the issue of Treaty Abuse under the BEPS Action Plan must also be examined against this backdrop therefore. 1 The term private equity is used in this paper to refer to all segments of the industry, including venture capital. The term venture capital is used in specific contexts where there are issues that relate particularly to this segment. 2 G20/OECD High-Level Principles of Long-term Investment Financing by Institutional Investors, September 2013.
2 As confirmed in the recent European Parliament Report on Long-term Financing of the European Economy 3, private equity firms can provide valuable non-financial support, including consultancy services, financial advice, advice on marketing strategy, and training to investee companies. This sentiment has been echoed in the recent European Commission Communication on Long-term Financing 4, which acknowledges the private equity industry as an important source of financing to pension funds and SMEs. Private equity represents all these qualities on a global, not just European basis. We would also like to highlight Principle 6.2 which states that governments should avoid introducing or maintaining unnecessarily barriers to international investment inward and outward by institutional investors, especially when targeted to long-term investment. They should cooperate to remove, whenever possible, any related international impediments. How Private Equity Operates: Private equity funds raise capital from institutional investors such as pension funds, insurance companies, or family offices These private equity funds are managed by specialist investment managers who invest the capital in companies across a wide variety of sectors, including consumer, industrial, engineering, life sciences, bio-technology, computer software, infrastructure, etc, at various stages of the life of the company. Most private equity funds have an international investor base. The investors are either subject to corporate income tax in their country of residence (insurance companies, family offices), or are exempt from such tax by their nature (pension funds, charities). The choice for the private equity fund s location is normally made on the basis of various factors (residence of the management team, investment objective, regional focus). From a tax perspective, it is key that the location and structure of the fund is tax neutral for the investors. In other words, the pooling of the investments via the fund entity should not trigger additional tax for investors when compared with a situation in which the investors invest directly in those companies. 3 European Parliament Own-initiative Report on Long-term Financing of the European Economy, 26 February Paragraph European Commission Communication on Long-term Financing of the European Economy, 27 March 2014, pp 6 & 13 2
3 Context of the Consultation: The private equity industry fully appreciates the concerns of the OECD that action is needed to effectively prevent double non-taxation, as well as cases of no or low taxation associated with practices that artificially segregate taxable income from the activities that generate it. We also support a coordinated and comprehensive international approach to tackle these important issues. We note that the Consultation Document refers to the 2010 OECD Report 5 on the treatment of Collective Investment Vehicles (hereinafter: the CIV Report ) and the Commentary to article 1 of the OECD Model Convention regarding the Application of the Convention to CIVs. The policy objective in this provision is to achieve tax neutrality between direct investment versus investment via funds, also referred to as collective investment vehicles or CIVs. The OECD made several proposals to grant treaty benefits to CIVs in their own right. This is because it is recognised that it is not obvious to expect that treaty benefits are being granted to the investors in a CIV on a transparent or look through basis in practice. The private equity industry is concerned that the BEPS Action 6 Draft Plan (the Treaty Abuse Draft ), if implemented, will disallow treaty access to many CIVs (and their holding entities) used in the private equity industry. The Abuse Draft is likely to affect many funds that invest cross border because most CIVs will simply not pass the proposed Limitations on Benefits (LOB) test. As a result, the tax burden of investing via funds is likely to substantially increase. This would clearly bring the investment environment further away from the policy objective - adopted by the OECD Council - of tax neutrality between direct investments and investments via a CIV. Disallowing funds from treaty access may easily result in double (or even triple) taxation. As a result, institutional investors may stop investing in private equity if the tax burden associated with cross-border investing becomes too high. The application of the Treaty Abuse Draft would be a major setback for the aim of creating a level playing field. 5 The Granting of Treaty Benefits with respect to the income of Collective Investment Vehicles, public discussion draft 9 December 2009 to 31 January 2010, released by the CFA-OECD (2010) and the Commentary to the OECD Model Convention regarding CIVs. 3
4 Proportionality & Impact on Collective Investment Vehicles: Many of the challenges presented to the private equity industry by the Consultation Document are borne of the fact that the document does not consider the position of CIVs to any extent (private equity being one of many classes of CIV). This is perhaps to be expected, given that CIVs are not a particular focus of BEPS, but it remains the case that the failure to consider the position of CIVs has directly led to many of the issues noted in this response. It is clear from previous OECD publications such as the 2010 OECD Report on the treatment of collective investment vehicles 6, and the January 2013 TRACE implementation package 7, that the OECD is aware of the particular challenges faced by CIVs in relation to treaties. This recognition is to be welcomed, but we strongly urge the OECD to turn this recognition into a workable plan for the treatment of CIVs. We see two alternatives in this regard: Firstly, CIVs of all descriptions can be explicitly excluded from the current Treaty Abuse Draft, and provision made in the proposed amendments to the model treaty to make clear that the LOB provision and/or purpose test will not act to restrict the ability of a CIV (or associated investment structure) from accessing treaty benefits. A new work stream could be created to address the particular circumstances of CIVs, building on the past OECD CIV initiatives. This is our preferred approach. Alternatively, the position of CIVs of all descriptions could be taken into account as part of the Action 6 work, and actions to address the particular circumstances of CIVs should be adopted at the same time as and as part of the output of the Treaty Abuse Draft work. Limitation on Benefits (LOB) Test: The private equity industry does not consider that the LOB provision is proportionate or necessary to meet the policy objective of preventing treaty shopping. As such, we are of the view that the LOB provision should be abandoned. Not least, this is in recognition of the significant cost and complexity which will arise if new arrangements have to take into account both an LOB provision and a main purpose provision (in addition to existing concepts such as beneficial ownership). Taken together, these provisions would represent a considerable burden and will ultimately act as a disincentive to international investment. 6 The Granting of Treaty Benefits with respect to the Income of Collective Investment Vehicles, 23 April Treaty Relief and Compliance Enhancement (TRACE)- January
5 As currently drafted, many private equity funds and holding companies owned by such funds would not meet the LOB test for several reasons: (i) the fund and the holding companies will not be listed,; (ii) neither the fund nor the holding companies will be treated as carrying on an active trade or business for the purposes of the proposed LOB test. Under the formulation of the LOB test currently proposed, the making or managing of investments will be deemed not to satisfy this test unless carried on by a bank, insurance company or securities dealer. (iii) the derivative benefits provision as currently proposed is very narrow. The proposed LOB test, as drafted, would disqualify a fund entity (including holding companies of a fund entity) as a qualified person, and would therefore deny tax treaty protection to the fund. This is because at least 50% of the beneficial interests in a fund are often not owned by persons that are resident in the country where the investment vehicle is resident. This is inherent to the nature of many private equity funds that raise capital from investors in many different jurisdictions. Holding companies in certain jurisdictions can ensure that CIV investors are afforded greater certainty regarding insulation from legal liabilities that might flow out of a domestic structure to non-domestic parents. This matter is particularly relevant where shareholder consent outside of the investee jurisdiction is given, or entities are deemed to be subject to a controlling parent which can give rise to liabilities arising in the controllers hands. An intermediate holding jurisdiction can often provide the only meaningful shield to these risks. Investors in private equity funds are often entitled to treaty benefits in their home jurisdiction. We believe that an expanded derivative benefit provision could afford some relief from the double taxation which certain investors in private equity are likely to suffer should the proposals proceed as drafted. However, there will be significant challenges to applying a derivative benefits provision in certain circumstances, for example, in the case of investment into private equity funds by other fiscally transparent funds such that the treaty status of ultimate beneficiaries is not apparent to the private equity fund. It is important to note that the implementation of FATCA will not result in fund managers having access to information about the treaty status of each ultimate beneficiary of investment returns from the fund. 5
6 Even if it were decided to include a so-called derivative benefits test, there would still be uncertainty in many cases whether the LOB clause would allow treaty access. We provide some examples below to illustrate these problems. Example 1: A venture capital fund ( VC fund ) is organized as a limited partnership in country X. Among its investors are pension funds, endowments, family offices and insurance companies from 10 different countries, all of which are OECD member countries. The VC Fund invests in expansion capital of a start-up company in the life sciences business ( Target ) established in country Y. The VC fund owns all its investments, including the equity interest in Target, through a wholly-owned holding company ( Holding ) in country Z. After 6 years of growth and development, the VC fund s investment in Target is sold successfully. Under its domestic tax law, country Y imposes a capital gains tax on the disposal of shares by foreign shareholders. Generally, this capital gains tax cannot be imposed on foreign shareholders under article 13 OECD Model Treaty if the foreign shareholder of Target is a tax resident of a country with which country Y concluded a tax treaty based on the OECD Model Treaty. Country Z and Country Y concluded such a tax treaty which is in effect. Under the proposed LOB test however, the VC fund and Holding would be disqualified from obtaining treaty benefits. If the investors in the VC fund would have invested directly in Target however, it is likely that all investors would have qualified for treaty benefits under the proposed LOB test. This demonstrates that the proposed LOB affects many CIVs and the wholly-owned holding companies through which the CIVs make their investments. In addition, the proposed LOB test works out even worse as it may create triple taxation because the investee companies in which the VC fund makes investments may be denied treaty benefits as well as a result of the proposed LOB. Example 2: In the same scenario as Example 1 above, let us consider what happens when the VC fund invests together with another (similar) VC fund established in country A in the life sciences business of Target, established in country Y. The two VC funds jointly acquire 60% of the shares in Target. The business of Target is developing very successfully and it is going to license patents to unrelated parties worldwide, receiving royalties in return. Target wants to claim tax treaty relief for withholding tax on the royalty payments. If Target were domestically owned by 6
7 investors established in country Y, it would qualify for treaty benefits under Article X(2)(e) of the proposed LOB. Target, however, needed funding from the VC funds for the development of its business to the next stage, including further development of the patents. As a result of the funding by the VC funds, Target cannot rely on article X(2)(e) anymore, and can claim treaty benefits only if it passes the substantial business test of Article X(3) of the proposed LOB. There are however too many uncertainties to rely on the substantial business test. We foresee a lot of discussion and debate as to the question of what exactly qualifies as substantial in relation to the trade or business activity carried on by the resident or associated enterprise in the other Contracting State? If a multinational pharmaceutical in country B pays royalties to Target, the business activity of Target must be substantial in relation to the trade or business of the multinational in order to pass the test. This will mean that Target will often be disqualified and face full withholding tax liabilities. Given the above, while we do not support the concept of an LOB provision, if this aspect of the proposals does proceed then we would urge the OECD to include specific provision for CIVs (including the holding entities through which CIVs invests if such holding entities are controlled by the CIV) in the derivative benefit concept, recognising that this would have to work as part of a wider framework for treaty access for CIVs. In particular, consideration should be given to including a CIV (and the aforementioned holding companies) in the definition of a qualifying person, provided that certain conditions are met (for example, that the CIV is not controlled by one or a small number of investors, and/or that the CIV is registered or is managed by a registered fund manager Main Purpose Test: Even if the LOB test is satisfied, the Main Purpose Test will be another major obstacle for claiming tax treaty protection by CIVs. The examples given at paragraph 33 of the Consultation Document make clear that it is acceptable to take treaty access into account when making investment decisions. On the face of it this would seem at odds with the paragraph 6 test. We agree with the text of paragraph 30 of the Consultation Document, which broadly explains that in order for the test to not apply, it is not sufficient to merely assert that access to treaty benefits was not a main purpose of an 7
8 arrangement; it must be so that all available evidence is taken into account in determining the purpose of an arrangement. However, we do not consider that the objective approach described under Paragraph 29 is appropriate. In answering the question of the main purpose of an arrangement, it is the facts and circumstances which the parties actually took into account in arriving at that arrangement - not what an independent third party believes that they should have taken into account - which should be relevant. To do otherwise would be disproportionate and likely to affect normal commercial arrangements as parties will have no appetite for engaging in protracted discussions over what facts and circumstances are relevant to establishing purpose. As such, the test should be subjective, not objective. Finally, it is unclear how the Main Purpose test, if applied objectively, would work out in practice for a typical European private equity fund. The Treaty Abuse Draft states that [t]o determine whether or not one of the main purposes of any person concerned with an arrangement or transaction is to obtain benefits under the Convention [a tax treaty], it is important to undertake an objective analysis of the aims and objects of all persons involved in putting that arrangement or transaction in place or being a party to it. In combination with the recommendation to confirm that a tax treaty will not prevent a state from applying its domestic anti-abuse rules, we fear that many countries may take the position that a typical investment vehicle of a fund is not entitled to treaty benefits, as not all of the investors in a given fund would be entitled to exactly the same treaty benefits, had they invested directly. Conclusion: Private equity funds are not in the business of treaty shopping. The primary purpose of private equity, just like other CIVs, is a business purpose, i.e. pooling of capital to make investments. As long as different countries interpretations of what constitutes a permanent establishment are not harmonised across the globe, tax treaty access will remain crucial in order to achieve tax neutrality for funds, and to avoid double or even triple taxation in otherwise genuine bona fide investment structures. The position of CIVs in relation to treaty access must be considered and addressed before the Treaty Abuse Draft work stream continues. We do not consider that the proposed LOB test is proportionate or necessary in order to meet the policy objective. 8
9 Contact Thank you in advance for taking our comments into account as part of the consultation process. We would be more than happy to further discuss any of the comments made in this paper. For further information, please contact Danny O Connell at the European Private Equity & Venture Capital Association (EVCA). Phone Mobile danny.oconnell@evca.eu 9
10 The Public Affairs Executive (PAE) consists of representatives from the venture capital, midmarket and large buyout parts of the private equity industry, as well as institutional investors and representatives of national private equity associations (NVCAs). The PAE represents the views of this industry in EU-level public affairs and aims to improve the understanding of its activities and its importance for the European economy. About EVCA The EVCA is the voice of European private equity. Our membership covers the full range of private equity activity, from early-stage capital to the largest private equity firms, investors such as pension funds, insurance companies, fund-of-funds and family offices and associate members from related professions. We represent 650 member firms and 500 affiliate members. The EVCA shapes the future direction of the industry, while promoting it to stakeholders such as entrepreneurs, business owners and employee representatives. We explain private equity to the public and help shape public policy, so that our members can conduct their business effectively. The EVCA is responsible for the industry s professional standards, demanding accountability, good governance and transparency from our members and spreading best practice through our training courses. We have the facts when it comes to European private equity, thanks to our trusted and authoritative research and analysis. The EVCA has 25 dedicated staff working in Brussels to make sure that our industry is heard. 10
On behalf of the EUROPEAN PRIVATE EQUITY AND VENTURE CAPITAL INDUSTRY
On behalf of the EUROPEAN PRIVATE EQUITY AND VENTURE CAPITAL INDUSTRY 5 November 2012 To European Commission, Directorate-General Taxation and Customs Union, Unit D2 - Direct Tax Policy and Cooperation
More informationGeneral Comments. Action 6 on Treaty Abuse reads as follows:
OECD Centre on Tax Policy and Administration Tax Treaties Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions Division 2, rue André Pascal 75775 Paris France The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise: Comments on
More informationE/C.18/2018/CRP.10. Distr.: General 2 October Original: English. Summary
Distr.: General 2 October 2018 Original: English Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters Seventeenth session Geneva, 16-19 October 2018 Item 3 (c) (iv) of the provisional agenda
More informationWe would welcome any further discussion on any of the points that we have raised.
22 April 2016 Tax Treaties, Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions Division OECD/CTPA Submitted via email to: taxtreaties@oecd.org RE: Public Discussion Draft on Treaty Entitlement of Non-CIVs Dear
More informationOn behalf of the Public Affairs Executive (PAE) of the EUROPEAN PRIVATE EQUITY AND VENTURE CAPITAL INDUSTRY
On behalf of the Public Affairs Executive (PAE) of the EUROPEAN PRIVATE EQUITY AND VENTURE CAPITAL INDUSTRY May 2014 Position Paper on the European Commission Proposal for a Regulation on structural measures
More informationCommittee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters Fourteenth session
Distr.: General * March 2017 Original: English Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters Fourteenth session New York, 3-6 April 2017 Agenda item 3(a)(ii) BEPS: Proposed General Anti-avoidance
More informationPROPOSED GENERAL ANTI-AVOIDANCE RULE COMMENTARY FOR A NEW ARTICLE
Distr.: General 30 November 2016 Original: English Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters Thirteenth Session New York, 5-8 December 2016 Item 3 (a) (iii) of the provisional agenda*
More informationTO: Tax Treaties, Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions Division, OECD/CTPA
TO: Tax Treaties, Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions Division, OECD/CTPA Electronic transmission: taxtreaties@oecd.org 3 February 2017 Comments on the OECD Public Discussion Draft BEPS Action
More informationOECD DISCUSSION DRAFT ON BEPS ACTION 6: PREVENTING THE GRANTING OF TREATY BENEFITS IN INAPPROPRIATE CIRCUMSTANCES
Paris, 9 April 2014 OECD DISCUSSION DRAFT ON BEPS ACTION 6: PREVENTING THE GRANTING OF TREATY BENEFITS IN INAPPROPRIATE CIRCUMSTANCES Dear Marlies, Please find below BIAC s comments on the OECD Discussion
More informationComments on Discussion Draft on Follow Up Work on BEPS Action 6: Preventing Treaty Abuse
9 January 2015 Marlies de Ruiter Head Tax Treaties, Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions Division Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development 2,
More informationHMRC consultation on tax deductibility of corporate interest expense
Submitted via email to: BEPSinterestconsultation@hmtreasury.gsi.gov.uk 4 August 2016 RE: HMRC consultation on tax deductibility of corporate interest expense Dear Sirs, BlackRock [1] is pleased to have
More informationE/C.18/2018/CRP.7. Distr.: General 11 May Original: English
Distr.: General 11 May 2018 Original: English Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters Sixteenth session New York, 14 17 May 2018 Item 3 (c) (iv) of the provisional agenda Treatment
More informationDiscussion draft on Action 6 (Prevent Treaty Abuse) of the BEPS Action Plan
Tax Treaties, Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions Division Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development By email: taxtreaties@oecd.org 9 April
More informationProposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE. amending Directive (EU) 2016/1164 as regards hybrid mismatches with third countries. {SWD(2016) 345 final}
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Strasbourg, 25.10.2016 COM(2016) 687 final 2016/0339 (CNS) Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE amending Directive (EU) 2016/1164 as regards hybrid mismatches with third countries {SWD(2016)
More informationOECD DISCUSSION DRAFT: FOLLOW UP WORK ON BEPS ACTION 6, PREVENTING TREATY ABUSE
Marlies de Ruiter Head, Tax Treaties, Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions Division Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development 2 rue André-Pascal
More informationEuropean Commission publishes Anti Tax Avoidance Package
28 January 2016 - Number 65 Brazil Desk e-mail bulletin European Commission publishes Anti Tax Avoidance Package On 28 January 2016 the European Commission published an Anti Tax Avoidance Package containing
More informationOctober 14, Via
October 14, 2016 Via email: taxpolicy@finance.gov.ie Consultation on Double Tax Treaty with the United States of America Tax Policy Division Department of Finance Government Buildings Upper Merrion Street
More informationUnited States Tax Alert
International Tax United States Tax Alert Contacts Harrison Cohen harrisoncohen@deloitte.com Christine Piar cpiar@deloitte.com Dan Skoczylas dskoczylas@deloitte.com June 5, 2015 OECD Releases a Discussion
More informationPwC s comments on Action 6
PwC welcomes the opportunity to comment on the OECD Public Discussion Draft regarding BEPS Action 6: Preventing the Granting of Treaty Benefits in Inappropriate Circumstances. As a global professional
More informationWilliam Morris Chair, BIAC Tax Committee 13/15, Chaussée de la Muette, Paris. France
Tax Treaties, Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions Division Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development 2 rue André-Pascal 75775, Paris, Cedex 16 France February 3, 2017 Ref: DISCUSSION
More informationFlash News. PwC Luxembourg BEPS Series- What it means for the Luxembourg Asset Management industry
www.pwc.lu/tax Flash News PwC Luxembourg BEPS Series- What it means for the Luxembourg Asset Management industry On Monday 5 October 2015, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
More informationComments on Public Discussion Draft: Clarification of the Meaning of Beneficial Owner in the OECD Model Tax Convention
Deloitte & Touche LLP Certified Public Accountants Unique Entity No. T080LL0721A 6 Shenton Way #32-00 DBS Building Tower Two Singapore 068809 Our Ref: 2944/MD Tel: +65 6224 8288 Fax: +65 6538 6166 www.deloitte.com/sg
More informationOECD releases final report under BEPS Action 6 on preventing treaty abuse
20 October 2015 Global Tax Alert EY OECD BEPS project Stay up-to-date on OECD s project on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting with EY s online site containing a comprehensive collection of resources, including
More informationRe: Managed Funds Association Comments on Discussion Draft, Treaty Entitlement of Non-CIV Funds
Via email: taxtreaties@.org Tax Treaties Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions Division /CTPA 2, rue André Pascal 75775 Paris Cedex 16 France Re: Managed Funds Association Comments on Discussion
More informationInside the (Patent) Box: UK Government introduces beneficial tax regime on patent income
30 April, 2012 Inside the (Patent) Box: UK Government introduces beneficial tax regime on patent income By Alistair Maughan and Trevor James Beginning on 1 April 2013, the UK Government will reduce the
More informationAmCham EU s position on the Commission Anti-Tax Avoidance Package
AmCham EU s position on the Commission Anti-Tax Avoidance Package Executive summary AmCham EU welcomes attempts to ensure that adoption of the OECD s recommendations is consistent across the EU and with
More informationTREATY RESIDENCE OF PENSION FUNDS
TREATY RESIDENCE OF PENSION FUNDS 29 February 2016 DISCUSSION DRAFT ON CHANGES TO THE OECD MODEL TAX CONVENTION CONCERNING THE TREATY RESIDENCE OF PENSION FUNDS Paragraph 12 of the final version of the
More informationRe: BEPS Action 4: Interest Deductions and Other Financial Payments
OECD Committee on Fiscal Affairs Working Party No. 11 By email: interestdeductions@oecd.org 6 February 2015 Dear Sirs, Re: BEPS Action 4: Interest Deductions and Other Financial Payments We are writing
More informationOverview of OECD Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS)
Overview of OECD Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Monia Naoum, IBFD Research Associate Emily Muyaa, IBFD Research Associate 18 June 2015 1 Introduction: Globalization and its impact
More informationComments on Revised Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 6: Prevent Treaty Abuse
17 June 2015 Marlies de Ruiter Head Tax Treaties, Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions Division Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development 2,
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION PRESENTS ANTI-TAX AVOIDANCE PACKAGE
EUROPEAN COMMISSION PRESENTS ANTI-TAX AVOIDANCE PACKAGE tax.thomsonreuters.com On January 28, 2016, the European Commission presented its Communication on the Anti-Tax Avoidance Package (ATA Package).
More informationThe OECD s 3 Major Tax Initiatives
The OECD s 3 Major Tax Initiatives 1. The Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes Peer review of ~ 100 countries International standard for transparency and exchange of
More informationa) Title of proposal Proposal for a Council Directive amending Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1164 as regards hybrid mismatches with third countries
Unofficial translation of the assessment by the Dutch government of the proposal of the European Commission regarding hybrid mismatches with third countries Leaflet 2: Directive on hybrid mismatches with
More informationGrant Thornton discussion draft response. BEPS Action 7: Preventing the artificial avoidance of PE status
Grant Thornton discussion draft response BEPS Action 7: Preventing the artificial avoidance of PE status Grant Thornton International Ltd, with input from certain of its member firms, welcomes the opportunity
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document. Proposal for a Council Directive
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Strasbourg, 25.10.2016 SWD(2016) 345 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive (EU) 2016/1164 as regards
More informationOn behalf of the Public Affairs Executive (PAE) of the EUROPEAN PRIVATE EQUITY AND VENTURE CAPITAL INDUSTRY
On behalf of the Public Affairs Executive (PAE) of the EUROPEAN PRIVATE EQUITY AND VENTURE CAPITAL INDUSTRY February 1, 2013 To Re ESMA Response to ESMA Consultation paper on Guidelines on key concepts
More informationPUBLIC CONSULTATION PAPER. Problems that arise in the direct tax field when venture capital is invested across borders
` EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Direct taxation, Tax Coordination, Economic Analysis and Evaluation Direct tax policy and cooperation 3 August 2012 PUBLIC CONSULTATION
More informationBIAC Comments on the. OECD Public Discussion Draft: Draft Comments of the 2008 Update to the OECD Model Convention
The Voice of OECD Business BIAC Comments on the OECD Public Discussion Draft: Draft Comments of the 2008 Update to the OECD Model Convention 31 May 2008 BIAC appreciates this opportunity to provide comments
More informationApril 9, Comments on Public Discussion Draft, BEPS Action 6: Preventing the Granting of Treaty Benefits in Inappropriate Circumstances
April 9, 2014 By email Ms. Marlies de Ruiter Head of the Tax Treaty, Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions Division Centre for Tax Policy and Administration OECD/CTPA taxtreaties@oecd.org Re: Comments
More informationCompany distributions
Company distributions Response to the HMRC consultation document of 9 December 2015 3 February 2016 1. Introduction 2 1.1 Overarching objectives 2 2. Executive summary 2 3. General comments 2 4. Responses
More informationOECD BEPS final reports have implications for sovereign wealth and pension funds
14 January 2016 Global Tax Alert OECD BEPS final reports have implications for sovereign wealth and pension funds EY Global Tax Alert Library Access both online and pdf versions of all EY Global Tax Alerts.
More informationChanging the OECD Model Tax Convention
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Changing the OECD Model Tax Convention Mary Bennett Head of Tax Treaty & Transfer Pricing Division OECD Centre for Tax Policy & Administration Mary
More informationEFAMA Position Paper Draft Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive
EFAMA Position Paper Draft Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive I. GENERAL REMARKS EFAMA fully supports the aim of eliminating tax abuse enshrined in the draft Anti-Tax Avoidance (ATA) Directive which the European
More informationOECD releases final BEPS package
6 October 2015 Tax Flash OECD releases final BEPS package On 5 October 2015, the OECD published the final reports of the OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting ( BEPS ) project, which consist of a package
More informationEuropean Business Initiative on Taxation (EBIT)
European Business Initiative on Taxation (EBIT) Comments on the OECD Public Discussion Draft entitled Make Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective 18 December 2014 16 January 2015 At the time of writing
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 19.12.2006 COM(2006) 824 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE
More informationGERMANY GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION
GERMANY 1 GERMANY INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 1. WHAT ARE RECENT TAX DEVELOPMENTS IN YOUR COUNTRY WHICH ARE RELEVANT FOR M&A DEALS AND PRIVATE EQUITY? Germany has recently seen some legislative developments
More informationRecent BEPS related legislation/guidance impacting Luxembourg
Recent BEPS related legislation/guidance impacting Luxembourg Recently a set of BEPS related draft legislation/guidance has been published: (i) on 21 June 2016, the Council of the European Union ( EU )
More informationMULTILATERAL CONVENTION TO IMPLEMENT TAX TREATY RELATED MEASURES TO PREVENT BASE EROSION AND PROFIT SHIFTING
MULTILATERAL CONVENTION TO IMPLEMENT TAX TREATY RELATED MEASURES TO PREVENT BASE EROSION AND PROFIT SHIFTING The Parties to this Convention, Recognising that governments lose substantial corporate tax
More informationTAX EXECUTIVES INSTITUTE, INC. INCOME TAX QUESTIONS. Submitted to DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE DECEMBER 6, 2017
TAX EXECUTIVES INSTITUTE, INC. INCOME TAX QUESTIONS Submitted to DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE DECEMBER 6, 2017 Tax Executives Institute Inc. ( TEI or the Institute ) welcomes the opportunity to present the following
More informationBEPS Action 12: Mandatory disclosure rules Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
BEPS Action 12: Mandatory disclosure rules Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) is pleased to respond to the Public discussion draft
More informationTax Planning International Review
Tax Planning International Review Source: Tax Planning International Review: News Archive > 2018 > 04/30/2018 > Articles > Anti abuse legislation: The Importance of Substance in a Private Equity Fund Context
More information*******************************************
William Morris Chair, BIAC Tax Committee 13/15, Chaussée de la Muette, 75016 Paris France The Platform for Collaboration on Tax Submitted by email: GlobalTaxPlatform@worldbank.org October 20, 2017 Ref:
More informationACTL Conference on REITs
ACTL Conference on REITs Recent tax treaty developments and their implications for REITs November 14, 2014 Prof. Arnaud de Graaf degraaf@law.eur.nl 0.0- Introduction 1. REITs in cross-border context 2.
More informationThe definitive source of actionable intelligence on hedge fund law and regulation
FATCA Steps That Alternative Investment Fund Managers Need to Consider to Comply With the Global Trend Toward Tax Transparency (Part Two of Two) By Dmitri Semenov, Jun Li, Lucas Rachuba and Carter Vinson
More informationTHE FUTURE OF TAX PLANNING: TRANSPARENCY AND SUBSTANCE FOR ALL? Friday, 26 February AM PM Conrad Hotel, Hong Kong
THE FUTURE OF TAX PLANNING: TRANSPARENCY AND SUBSTANCE FOR ALL? Friday, 26 February 2016 9.00AM - 12.00PM Conrad Hotel, Hong Kong THE DRIVE TOWARDS TRANSPARENCY: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN INTERNATIONAL
More informationCOMMENTARY ON THE ARTICLES OF THE ATAF MODEL TAX AGREEMENT FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION WITH RESPECT TO
COMMENTARY ON THE ARTICLES OF THE ATAF MODEL TAX AGREEMENT FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME 2 OVERVIEW The ATAF Model Tax Agreement
More informationTransparent Entities and Elimination of double taxation Article 3 and 5 of MLI
Transparent Entities and Elimination of double taxation Article 3 and 5 of MLI October 5, 2018 Vispi T. Patel & Associates Index Background of BEPS BEPS Action Plan 15 (MLI) Constitutional Framework MLI
More informationStéphane Buydens VAT Policy Advisory Consumption Taxes Unit OECD 2, rue André Pascal Paris France. 24 September 2012
Stéphane Buydens VAT Policy Advisory Consumption Taxes Unit OECD 2, rue André Pascal 75775 Paris France 24 September 2012 Comments on OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines Draft Commentary on the International
More informationEuropean Business Initiative on Taxation (EBIT)
European Business Initiative on Taxation (EBIT) Comments on the OECD's Discussion Draft on FOLLOW UP WORK ON BEPS ACTION 6: PREVENTING TREATY ABUSE At the time of writing this submission, EBIT Members
More informationBase Erosion Profit Shifting (BEPS)
Base Erosion Profit Shifting (BEPS) Base Erosion Profit Shifting (BEPS) The world continues to evolve and nations are becoming increasingly connected. Domestic tax laws have not kept pace with the evolution
More informationOverview. Preserving domestic law restrictions on the deduction of rent or royalties. Introduction
Overview Negotiation of tax treaties to prevent base erosion with respect to rent and royalties (I) Wednesday, 8 November 2017 (Session 3) Capacity Building Unit Financing for Development Office Department
More informationThe Knowledge Development Box ( KDB ) Public Consultation Paper. We are writing to respond to the above named document issued on 14 January 2015.
47 49 Pearse Street, Dublin 2, IRELAND The Knowledge Development Box Public Consultation Tax Policy Division Department of Finance Government Buildings Upper Merrion Street Dublin 2 by email to KDBconsultation@finance.gov.ie
More information24 NOVEMBER 2009 TO 21 JANUARY 2010
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVISED DISCUSSION DRAFT OF A NEW ARTICLE 7 OF THE OECD MODEL TAX CONVENTION 24 NOVEMBER 2009 TO 21 JANUARY 2010 CENTRE FOR TAX POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION
More informationEuropean Business Initiative on Taxation (EBIT)
European Business Initiative on Taxation (EBIT) Comments on the OECD Public Discussion Draft on BEPS ACTION 4: INTEREST DEDUCTIONS AND OTHER FINANCIAL PAYMENTS 18 December 2014-6 February 2015 At the time
More informationRe: Taxand Comments on the Clarification of the Meaning of 'Beneficial Owner' found in Articles 10, 11 and 12 of the OECD Model Tax Convention
14 July 2011 Mr Jeffrey Owens Director, CTPA OECD 2, Rue André Pascal 75775 Paris France Dear Mr Owens, Re: Taxand Comments on the Clarification of the Meaning of 'Beneficial Owner' found in Articles 10,
More informationOn behalf of the European Private Equity and Venture Capital Association (EVCA)
6 January 2012 For the attention of: Emily McMahon Acting Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy Manal Corwin Deputy Assistant Secretary (Int'l Tax Affairs) Michael Caballero Deputy International Tax Counsel
More informationWORKING PAPER. Brussels, 03 February 2017 WK 1119/2017 REV 1 LIMITE FISC ECOFIN
Brussels, 03 February 2017 WK 1119/2017 REV 1 LIMITE FISC ECOFIN WORKING PAPER This is a paper intended for a specific community of recipients. Handling and further distribution are under the sole responsibility
More informationCorporate tax and the digital economy Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Corporate tax and the digital economy Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 We refer to the government s position paper on Corporate tax and the digital economy published in
More informationPreventing the Granting of Treaty Benefits in Inappropriate Circumstances
OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project Preventing the Granting of Treaty Benefits in Inappropriate Circumstances ACTION 6: 2014 Deliverable OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project
More informationBEPS ACTION 2: NEUTRALISE THE EFFECTS OF HYBRID MISMATCH ARRANGEMENTS
Public Discussion Draft BEPS ACTION 2: NEUTRALISE THE EFFECTS OF HYBRID MISMATCH ARRANGEMENTS (Treaty Issues) 19 March 2014 2 May 2014 Comments on this note should be sent electronically (in Word format)
More informationSpeech: Priorities for EU tax policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Algirdas Šemeta Commissioner responsible for Taxation and Customs Union, Audit and Anti-fraud Speech: Priorities for EU tax policy Irish Parliament Committee on Finance / Dublin 10
More information15/09/2017. Conseil des barreaux européens Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe
Conseil des barreaux européens Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe Association internationale sans but lucratif Rue Joseph II, 40 /8 1000 Bruxelles T. : +32 (0)2 234 65 10 Email : ccbe@ccbe.eu
More informationPiet Battiau Head of Consumption Taxes Unit Centre for Tax Policy and Administration
MEMORANDUM To: From: Piet Battiau Head of Consumption Taxes Unit Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Jonathan Evan-Hughes (Senior Consultant Indirect Taxes) Premal Mehta (Indirect Tax Advisor) BP
More informationUK response to European Commission consultation on a new European regime for Venture Capital
UK response to European Commission consultation on a new European regime for Venture Capital The UK welcomes the Commission s consideration of measures to improve access to venture capital by EU small
More informationCPA Esther Wahome. Thursday, 16 August 2018
Current trends in international tax planning (focus on BEPS). Presentation by: CPA Esther Wahome Senior Manager Taxation Services Deloitte & Touche Thursday, 16 August 2018 Uphold public interest Contents
More informationUNITED KINGDOM GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION
UNITED KINGDOM 1 UNITED KINGDOM INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 1. WHAT ARE RECENT TAX DEVELOPMENTS IN YOUR COUNTRY WHICH ARE RELEVANT FOR M&A DEALS AND PRIVATE EQUITY? The main developments in the UK relevant
More informationGlobal Tax Alert. OECD releases final report on Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements under Action 2. Executive summary
11 October 2015 Global Tax Alert EY OECD BEPS project Stay up-to-date on OECD s project on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting with EY s online site containing a comprehensive collection of resources, including
More informationTAXREP 34/15 (ICAEW REPRESENTATION 92/15)
TAXREP 34/15 (ICAEW REPRESENTATION 92/15) PREVENT TREATY ABUSE: OECD PUBLIC DISCUSSION DRAFT ICAEW welcomes the opportunity to comment on the public discussion draft Prevent Treaty Abuse published by OECD
More informationCorporate interest restriction (clause 20 and schedule 5)
Corporate interest restriction (clause 20 and schedule 5) Briefing Note from the Chartered Institute of Taxation for Finance Bill 2017-19 Summary Notwithstanding that the delay as a result of the general
More informationOECD releases draft changes to be incorporated in 2017 update to OECD Model Tax Convention
28 July 2017 Global Tax Alert OECD releases draft changes to be incorporated in 2017 update to OECD Model Tax Convention EY Global Tax Alert Library Access both online and pdf versions of all EY Global
More informationOXFORD CENTRE FOR BUSINESS TAXATION
OXFORD CENTRE FOR BUSINESS TAXATION Oxford, 23 March 2006 "The European Commission's business taxation agenda" SPEAKING NOTES Ladies and gentlemen, It is a great pleasure to be here tonight. I am grateful
More informationLIVE WEBCAST UPDATE ON BEPS PROJECT 2015 DELIVERABLES AND BEYOND. 8 June :00pm 6:00pm (CET)
LIVE WEBCAST UPDATE ON BEPS PROJECT 2015 DELIVERABLES AND BEYOND 8 June 2015 5:00pm 6:00pm (CET) INTRODUCTION Speakers Pascal Saint-Amans Director, Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Achim Pross
More informationCA T. P. OSTWAL. T. P. Ostwal & Associates LLP
CA T. P. OSTWAL BEPS strategies may not necessarily be illegal Increased globalisation enables companies to exploit gaps arising on interaction of domestic tax systems and treaty rules within the boundary
More informationSubject: Proposed Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive
EBF_021164 20 May 2016 Commissioner Pierre MOSCOVICI Economic and Financial Affairs, Taxation and Customs European Commission Email: cab-moscovici-webpage@ec.europa.eu Dear Commissioner, Subject: Proposed
More informationAction 6 Preventing the granting of treaty benefits in inappropriate circumstances
KPMG FLASH NEWS KPMG in India 30 October 2015 Action 6 Preventing the granting of treaty benefits in inappropriate circumstances Introduction Analysis of the Action 6 On 5 October 2015, the Organisation
More information2017 UPDATE TO THE OECD MODEL TAX CONVENTION. 2 November 7
2017 UPDATE TO THE OECD MODEL TAX CONVENTION 2 November 7 21 November 2017 THE 2017 UPDATE TO THE OECD MODEL TAX CONVENTION This note includes the contents of the 2017 update to the OECD Model Tax Convention
More informationAnalysis of New Law UK CORPORATE TAX REFORM. Nikol Davies *
70 Analysis of New Law UK CORPORATE TAX REFORM Nikol Davies * INTRODUCTION The long anticipated consultation document for corporate tax reform was published by the government on 29 November 2010. The document
More informationProvisional translation
Provisional translation Principles for Responsible Institutional Investors Japan s Stewardship Code Summary of Comments on the English Translation of the Draft of the Revised Version of the Code and Our
More informationAMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/0011(CNS) Draft report Hugues Bayet (PE578.
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs 2016/0011(CNS) 18.4.2016 AMDMTS 40-237 Draft report Hugues Bayet (PE578.569v01-00) Rules against tax avoidance practices that directly
More informationSection 894. Income Affected by Treaty
46876, 46877) under section 894 of the Code relating to eligibility for benefits under income tax treaties for payments to entities. A notice of proposed rulemaking (REG 104893 97, 1997 2 C.B. 646) cross-referencing
More informationRoyalties Withholding Tax Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Royalties Withholding Tax Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 We refer to consultation document on Royalties Withholding Tax published on 1 December 2017. We welcome the
More informationGuidance for Tax Administrations on the Application of the Approach to Hard-to-Value Intangibles INCLUSIVE FRAMEWORK ON BEPS: ACTION 8
Guidance for Tax Administrations on the Application of the Approach to Hard-to-Value Intangibles INCLUSIVE FRAMEWORK ON BEPS: ACTION 8 June 2018 GUIDANCE FOR TAX ADMINISTRATIONS ON THE APPLICATION OF THE
More informationCYPRUS GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION
CYPRUS 1 CYPRUS INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 1. WHAT ARE RECENT TAX DEVELOPMENTS IN YOUR COUNTRY WHICH ARE RELEVANT FOR M&A DEALS AND PRIVATE EQUITY? The most recent developments which are relevant to M&A
More informationCooperation Framework for Promotion of Japan-EU Two-Way Investment
June 22, 2004 Cooperation Framework for Promotion of Japan-EU Two-Way Investment Two-way flows of foreign direct investment reinvigorate economies by, inter alia, introducing new technologies and innovative
More informationCommon Corporate Tax Base (CCTB) and Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB)
POSITION PAPER 22 nd February 2017 Common Corporate Tax Base (CCTB) and Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) 1 2 3 KEY MESSAGES A Common EU Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB), has the potential,
More informationNote from the Coordinator of the Subcommittee on Tax Treatment of Services: Draft Article and Commentary on Technical Services.
Distr.: General 30 September 2014 Original: English Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters Tenth Session Geneva, 27-31 October 2014 Agenda Item 3 (a) (x) (b)* Taxation of Services
More informationNetherlands. Wouter Vosse & Servaas van Dooren Hamelink & Van den Tooren N.V.
Wouter Vosse & Servaas van Dooren Hamelink & Van den Tooren N.V. Overview of corporate tax work over last year The last year showed a significant increase in transactional work. Next to that, multinationals
More informationOn behalf of the Public Affairs Executive (PAE) of the EUROPEAN PRIVATE EQUITY AND VENTURE CAPITAL INDUSTRY
On behalf of the Public Affairs Executive (PAE) of the EUROPEAN PRIVATE EQUITY AND VENTURE CAPITAL INDUSTRY Friday, 3 October 2014 To Re European Commission - Directorate-General for Competition Response
More informationAnalysis - BEPS Action 6 and Private Equity Funds
Analysis - BEPS Action 6 and Private Equity Funds Speed read: Since BEPS Action 6 was introduced, the OECD and the private equity industry have been grappling with how to apply anti-treaty abuse provisions
More information