The Midland Metro (Wolverhampton City Centre Extension) Order
|
|
- Trevor Sims
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Transport and Works Act 1992 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Transport and Works (Applications and Objections Procedure) (England and Wales) Rules 2006 Transport and Works (Inquiries Procedure) Rules 2004 The Midland Metro (Wolverhampton City Centre Extension) Order CLOSING SUBMISISONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT 1. The fact that the inquiry has been short, and that there is little opposition to the making of the order, is a clear indication that there is widespread recognition of the benefits of the scheme. 2. There is no dispute that the scheme will deliver the key benefits which I set out in my opening. I do not repeat that opening but do rely upon it, and ask you to consider it when writing your report. 3. When making your report, you will wish to address the matters identified in the Secretary of State s statement of matters 1. The evidence presented by the Applicant addresses those matters 2 and I do not intend to repeat it in these closing submissions. I will provide brief submissions on each matter, but rely on the unchallenged evidence, which I would ask you to consider in detail when writing your report. 1. The aims and the need for, the proposed Midland Metro Wolverhampton City Centre extension ("the scheme"). 4. The aims of the scheme are identified in the concise statement of aims The WCCE forms part of the wider Wolverhampton Interchange Project ( WIP ). The WIP will deliver a multi-modal transport hub, commercial floorspace and improve the strategic gateway to Wolverhampton and the Black Country. 1 INSP/4 2 Table 9.1 in Peter Adams PoE sets out where each matter is covered in the evidence. APP/P1.1/SCH 3 WCCE/A3 1
2 6. It is anticipated that the WIP will facilitate the development of 73,862 sq ft of office/leisure/retail floor space providing 278 jobs. A further 321,000 sq ft of floorspace will be created over subsequent years providing 1,590 jobs. 7. The need for the scheme is explained by Mr Adams in his proof of evidence The lack of connectivity between Midland Metro Line 1 and the railway and bus stations is a serious deficiency. That lack of connectivity disadvantages the travelling public and undermines the Black Country LEP strategy of enhancing public transport connectivity between the four strategic centres of Brierley Hill, Walsall, West Bromwich, and Wolverhampton The analysis conducted indicates that providing such linkages will prove attractive to the travelling public and as a result patronage levels on Midland Metro will increase by 4.6% by 2016 and by 5.4% by There can be little doubt that there is a need to improve the connection between the Metro and the existing bus and rail services. The WCCE will achieve that connection and, as part of the WIP, will make a significant contribution towards regeneration and job creation in Wolverhampton city centre. 11. I invite you to conclude that the need is established, and that the order if made will enable that need to be met. 2. The main alternative options considered by Centro and the reasons for choosing the proposals comprised in the scheme. 12. The environmental statement identifies the main alternatives considered by Centro A number of alternative means of linking the Metro and the railway station have been considered since at least In 2001 the Wolverhampton to Walsall via Wednesfied (5W s) route was given priority 8. 4 Adams PoE APP/P1.1/SCH 5 Adams PoE 6.1 APP/P1.1/SCH 6 Adams PoE 6.3 APP/P1.1/SCH 7 WCCE/A15 section WCCE/A15 section
3 15. The 5W s route was endorsed in the 2006 Local Transport Plan the route envisaged for Wolverhampton was a city centre loop A series of plans showing the options considered was submitted to the inquiry. Mr Adams explained those options. Options 1 and 4 are longer and affect more stakeholders. Option 2 does not go to the station. Option 5 would also be longer, would affect more stakeholders and would not interchange with the railway station. 17. In 2011/2012 the city centre loop proposals were replaced with the current more direct twin track route along Piper s Row The May 2013 proposals would have required demolition of the Old Steam Mill. That proposal was revised following objections from English Heritage and others A summary assessment of the options is set out at page A17 of the Business Case for the WIP 12. As Mr Adams 13 explained it was considered disproportionate to prepare a full business case for each option (with resultant BCR). However it is Mr Adams view that the alternative options would be likely to have a lower BCR as benefits would be similar whereas the route would be longer (and therefore cost more). 20. The alternatives considered have not been restricted to the route. Examination of alternatives has also included detailed consideration of the stops on Piper s Row, and in particular the northbound stop. Mr Gardner produced the Aecom technical note which considered such options There can be little doubt that there has been a thorough consideration of alternatives including extensive consultation over a considerable period, and that there is no preferable alternative to the scheme now proposed. 22. Alternatives are often relevant in decision making when the preferred scheme is held to cause some harm or has some other disadvantage. In those circumstances it can be appropriate to consider whether the aims of the scheme could be achieved without causing the harm complained of. This is not such a case, as there is no 9 WCCE/A15 section WCCE/A15 section WCCE/A15 section WCCE/D1 table 2.1 page A Oral explanation 14 Gardner Ap.3 APP/P3.3 3
4 suggestion that the proposals will cause such harm that it becomes desirable or necessary to search for alternative means of achieving the desired objective. 23. To the extent that the scheme does cause harm, such as the less than substantial harm to the setting of certain heritage assets, it is not suggested by any objector that such harm could be overcome by an alternative alignment or other alternative. 24. I ask you to report to the Secretary of State that: a. any harm is not such as to require alternatives to be considered any further. b. there has been careful and detailed consideration of alternatives c. there is no realistic alternative means of achieving the desirable outcomes that the scheme will bring. 3. The extent to which the scheme would be consistent with the National Planning Policy Framework, national transport policy, and local transport, environmental and planning policies. 25. There is no dispute that the proposals are consistent with, and will advance the objectives of the NPPF, national transport policy, and local transport, environmental and planning policies. 26. All the relevant policies are identified in the evidence of Mr Ellingham. Mr Ellingham also considers whether the scheme proposals comply with those policies. He concludes that they do 15. I do not repeat that analysis in these submissions, but I do rely on it, and ask that you accept it. 27. Mr Young, in his representation, does allege conflict with Core Strategy policy TRAN4 which seeks to create coherent networks for cycling and for walking. 28. There is no conflict with that policy. a. Specific consideration has been given to impact on cyclists. b. As explained by Mr Gardner crossing facilities have been provided allowing cyclists to cross the tram tracks. c. Further as demonstrated by Mr Gardner s plan there are alternative convenient and safe routes are available for cyclists enabling them to avoid 15 Ellingham PoE APP/P7.1/TOW 4
5 using Pipers Row 16. Those routes form part of the coherent network desired by TRAN4, and provide safe, direct links for cyclists. 29. The clear conclusion that I invite you to draw is that the proposals accord fully with the objectives of national and local transport and planning policies. 4. The adequacy of the Environmental Statement submitted with the application for the TWA Order, having regard to the requirements of the Transport and Works (Applications and Objections Procedure) (England and Wales) Rules 2006, and whether the statutory procedural requirements have been complied with. 30. In considering this issue it is necessary to consider the environmental statement ( ES ) as submitted together with the further environmental information contained in the April 2015 Addendum Mr Ritchie has considered whether the requirements contained in the 2006 Rules have been complied with. He concludes that not only have the rules been complied with but good practice has also been followed 18. No other party contests Mr Ritchie s conclusion or makes any submission alleging a failure to comply with the requirements. 32. I invite you, in your report, to endorse Mr Ritchie s view. 5. The likely impact on the public, businesses and the environment of constructing and operating the scheme, including: (a) impact of the proposed works on storage, access and servicing arrangements to premises; (b) effect on Piper s Row and Fryer Street car parks and the City ring road; (c) impact on pedestrian, cycle and motor traffic during construction and operation; and (d) ecological impacts and whether any licences are likely to be required 16 WCCE/C2 paragraph 4.2, and Gardner Ap.2, APP/P3.3/ENG 17 WCCE/A15/6 18 Ritchie PoE 5.9 APP/P5.1/ENV 5
6 from Natural England. 5(a) 33. Control of road closures during construction is provided for by Article 43 of the draft order. Article 43(2) could be relied upon to put in place temporary traffic regulation measures they can only be exercised with the consent of the traffic authority (the City Council). 34. Impact of the proposed works on storage, access and servicing arrangements to premises are considered in the transport assessment 19 and by Mr Gardner in his proof of evidence 20. Specific construction impacts are considered by Mr Gardner at paragraphs 5.13 to The inspector raised questions in relation to access to premises on Piper s Row, in particular access to the courts and to the Wulfrun Hotel. As explained by Mr Adams, during construction: a. It is proposed that alternative arrangements be made for Judges parking at the Combined Court Centre. b. It is proposed that vehicles transporting those in custody to the court will be able to access the court from the bus station. c. Alternative loading arrangements are available in Queen Street which allow the Wulfrun Hotel to be serviced. 36. The access to the alleyway adjacent to the Wulfrun Hotel will not be accessible for a limited period during the construction works. However the disadvantage to the operation of the hotel is not great as alternative servicing is available using the Queen Street loading bay. 37. Mr Lunt also considers transportation impact during construction (section 4) and addresses matter 5 at his section WCCE/C7 section APP/P3.1/ENG 21 APP/P4.1/TRA 6
7 38. The conclusion of the transport assessment is, that with the mitigation proposed, the proposals are not considered to have an unacceptable impact on the accessing and servicing requirements of existing operations and businesses During operation of the tramway existing operations and businesses may be affected by changes to traffic regulation. Those changes are made in schedule 7 to the order; these include controlling the use of Railway Drive 23 (as raised by the inspector during the course of the inquiry). Physical measures will be put in place to restrict the use of eastbound traffic over Railway Drive by use of rising bollards. 40. I invite you to conclude that, on the basis of the construction activities envisaged, the changes to traffic regulation and other changes during operation, and the assessment of those activities and changes to traffic regulation set out in the evidence, there will be no unacceptably adverse impact. 5(b) 41. Impacts on Piper s Row and Fryer Street car parks and on the road network are also considered by Mr Lunt. Access to both car parks will be maintained during construction 24 and operation Agreement has been reached with NCP in relation to the Piper s Row car park and the Fryer Street Car Park. 43. The Applicant has agreed not to exercise its powers in relation to the Fryer Street Car Park (Plot 25). 44. In relation to Piper s Row car park, the Applicant has agreed that the new car park entrance on to Tower Street will be opened simultaneously with the closure of the current Piper s Row access. At the same time new signage will be provided to direct people to the Tower Street entrance. 22 WCCE/C7 paragraph Draft order Schedule 7 Part 2 Table 7 No Lunt PoE 5.4 APP/P4.1/TRA 25 Lunt PoE and 5.11 APP/P4.1/TRA 7
8 45. The proposals will lead to a reduction in the number of parking spaces at the Piper s Row car park, however the reduction in number (15) is not significant when compared to the approximately 3,800 parking spaces in the WV1 postcode area The benefit to be derived by siting the northbound tramstop in Piper s Row in such a position as to avoid impeding right turning bus movements out of the bus station 27 far outweighs any minor detriment arising as a result of the loss of 15 parking spaces. 47. Mr Lunt considers impact on the City Ring Road during construction 28 and operation Impact during construction will depend upon whether the Corn Hill access to the railway station car park has been opened; this access is likely to be provided at an advanced stage of the works, even if not already in place as a result of the WIP project. Mr Lunt s judgement on this issue is set out at his Table Based on the modelling report, Mr Lunt concludes that impact attributable to the WCCE during operation is likely to be negligible 31. The most appropriate information to consider (in relation to northbound and southbound journey times) is that in Tables 4.5 and 4.6 in Mr Lunt s Appendix 3 as that is the product of the average of 15 model runs. 50. On the basis of Mr Lunt s evidence I invite you to conclude that there will be no unacceptably detrimental impact on the Ring Road, whether during construction or operation. 5(c) 51. Matter 5(c) is also considered by Mr Lunt. He considers impact during construction to be acceptable Applicant s rebuttal to NCP paragraph 29, APP/R1/1/OBJ10 27 Gardner PoE APP/P3.1/ENG 28 Lunt PoE 5.5, APP/P4.1/TRA 29 Lunt PoE 5.12, APP/P4.1/TRA 30 Lunt PoE page 11 APP/P4.1/TRA 31 Lunt PoE 5.12, APP/P4.1/TRA, and see Lunt Appendix 3 Tables 4.5 and Lunt PoE 5.6, APP/P4.1/TRA 8
9 52. Mr Lunt has based his assessment during operation on the outputs of a VISSIM micro simulation model as reported in the Transport Assessment 33. The conclusion of the traffic impact section of the TA is that the proposals are acceptable 34. The same conclusion is reached in relation to pedestrians 35. The TA concludes that, with mitigation, impact on cyclists will be negligible During the course of the inquiry Mr Lunt explained the model outputs. It is clear from the average delay times to all traffic 37 that the delays attributable to the WCCE (as distinct from the wider WIP project) cannot be described as unacceptable. The reference to an average masks the fact that there will be an improvement to bus journey times. Furthermore, even if there is some delay attributable to the WCCE it has to be balanced against the advantages of the scheme; those advantages far outweigh the delays identified. 5(d) 54. Matter 5(d) is considered by Mr Ritchie in his proof of evidence 38. When the ES was prepared it was not possible to gain access to the tunnel and void at the Old Steam Mill and therefore there was some uncertainty as to whether bats were present. That uncertainty has been resolved. A survey has been conducted, as reported in the ES Addendum at paragraphs It was discovered that the void space and tunnel are not suitable for bats. As a result the prohibitions imposed by Article 12 of the Habitats Directive are not engaged and no European Protected Species licence will be required. 55. The evidence I have referred to has not been contradicted and should be accepted. I invite you to conclude that there will be no unacceptable impact on impact on the public, businesses and the environment of constructing and operating the scheme. 33 Lunt PoE 5.7, APP/P4.1/TRA 34 WCCE/C7 paragraph WCCE/C7 paragraph WCCE/C7 paragraph Lunt PoE Table 3.3, APP/P4.1/TRA 38 Ritchie PoE APP/P5.1/ENV 39 WCCE/A15/6 9
10 6. The effects of the scheme on statutory undertakers and other utility providers, and their ability to carry out undertakings effectively, safely and in compliance with any statutory or contractual obligations. 56. Article 45 and schedule 8 of the draft order make provisions relating to statutory undertakers. The standard provisions are included which enable, in relation to land acquired under the order, statutory undertakers rights to be extinguished subject to payment of compensation. 57. Mr Gardner considers the effects of the scheme on statutory undertakers at section 4 of his proof of evidence 40. I rely upon, but do not repeat, that evidence. 58. As the majority of the construction works will take place within existing public highways, the New Roads and Street Works Act 1991 regime applies, and the stages set out under that regime have been and will continue to be followed. 59. Notice of the TWA order was served on all the statutory undertakers and other utility providers and no objections were made 41. It should be noted that no utility company objected. 60. There will be no undue impact on statutory undertakers and in cases where there is an impact, appropriate measures are in place to protect the interests of statutory undertakers. 7. The effects of the scheme on the statutory obligations, waterway operations and navigational management of the Canal and River Trust, and proposals to mitigate these effects. 40 APP/P3.1/ENG 41 Gardner PoE 4.6, APP/P3.1/ENG 10
11 61. No significant works are anticipated to be required to the existing bridge over the Birmingham Canal. The arch bridge over the Birmingham Canal will have its waterproofing renewed as part of the project Agreement has been reached with the Canal and River Trust, who have withdrawn their objection. 63. The protective provisions which the Applicant requests are included in the order will protect the Canal and River Trust s interests. The protective provisions prevent the Applicant from exercising certain powers conferred on it by the order, unless consent is given by the Trust. 64. I invite you to report to the Secretary of State that the order contains appropriate and adequate provisions to mitigate impact upon, and to afford protection to, the Canal and River Trust. 8. The implications for rail users, train operators, Network Rail and businesses located at Wolverhampton Railway Station of works to the station in connection with the scheme (including safety, parking, staff facility, and access issues). 65. The effect on rail users, train operators, Network Rail and businesses located at Wolverhampton Railway Station is considered in the evidence of Mr Adams The fact that Network Rail, the station facility owner, the train operating companies, and businesses located at the station have reached agreement with the Applicant can and should be taken as indicating that, so long as the relevant protective provisions are included in the order, adequate arrangements are in place to protect those interests. 67. Any scheme to improve facilities at a railway station is likely to cause some degree of interference with existing arrangements. As a result all works have to be carried out with care so as to avoid unnecessary disruption to rail operators and passengers. 68. The main protection for rail interests is that works will be undertaken in accordance with the agreements reached with rail companies, which provide for standard 42 Gardner PoE 5.12, APP/P3.1/ENG 43 Adams PoE APP/P1.1/SCH 11
12 template rail industry agreements regulated by the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) to be entered into at a later date, and by the inclusion of protective provisions in the TWA order. The rail companies will have the ability to exercise control so as to ensure that the works are carried out in such a way as to avoid undue interference with their interests. Those agreements will also ensure that passengers can access and exit the station safely and efficiently while construction works are underway. 69. The WCCE will have no impact on operational train services On completion of the works: a. The new tram stop at the railway station will provide a significant benefit to rail station accessibility and interchange 45. b. The environment for rail users accessing the station will be improved by the changed arrangements for traffic; vehicular access will be relocated from Railway Drive to Corn Hill 46. c. There is likely to be a positive impact on the business of West Coast Trains I invite you to conclude that, subject to the inclusion of the proposed protective provisions, the interests of rail users, train operators, Network Rail and businesses located at Wolverhampton Railway Station will be adequately protected. 9. The effects of the scheme on the Old Steam Mill (though noting that listed building consent has been sought separately and granted for this element of the works). 72. The alignment of the proposed tramway in the vicinity of the Old Steam Mill was the subject of careful consideration. In May 2013 consultation was undertaken on a proposed alignment which would have required demolition of the Old Steam Mill. English Heritage (now Historic England) and others raised objections Adams PoE 10.26, APP/P1.1/SCH 45 Lunt PoE 3.16, APP/P4.1/TRA 46 Gardner PoE 2.22, APP/P3.1/ENG 47 Adams PoE 10.28, APP/P1.1/SCH 48 WCCE/A15/2 ES Main volume paragraph
13 73. In response to those objections the alignment of the tramway in the vicinity of the Old Steam Mill was revised and the current alignment put forward. That change of alignment was endorsed by English Heritage Some 727 sq m of land will be taken to provide space for the new access to the revised Network Rail car parking spaces and for the new taxi drop off and turnaround area The 20 th century steel clad north-west corner of the Old Steam Mill will be demolished (for which listed building consent has been obtained), and the remainder of the building will be stabilised and made safe The current scheme has been considered by English Heritage who have stated that they are fully satisfied by the amendments which have been made to address their concerns about the alignment of the extension adjacent to the Old Steam Mill and Corn Hill 52. The fact that EH now raise no objection, and have expressed their satisfaction with the changes should be given considerable weight. 77. The heritage impacts are considered by Mr Surfleet who concludes that the proposals will have a positive effect on the significance and setting of the Old Steam Mill I ask that you report Historic England s position, and the views of Mr Surfleet to the Secretary of State and that you conclude that the impact on the Old Steam Mill will be positive. 10. The measures proposed by Centro for mitigating any adverse impacts of the scheme, including: (a) the proposed Code of Construction Practice; (b) any measures to avoid, reduce or remedy any major or significant adverse environmental impacts of the scheme; and 49 WCCE/A15/2 ES Main volume paragraph Gardner PoE 7.6, APP/P3.1/ENG 51 Gardner PoE 7.6, APP/P3.1/ENG 52 WCCE/A16 53 Surfleet PoE 8.1(6) APP/P6.1/CUL 13
14 (c) whether, and if so, to what extent, any adverse environmental impact would still remain after the proposed mitigation. 79. A draft Code of Construction Practice has been prepared 54, and the imposition of condition 6 would ensure that a code in substantial accordance with the draft is adhered to. 80. Mr Gardner describes the construction process in section 5 of his proof of evidence. 81. The measures to avoid, reduce or remedy environmental impacts of the scheme and an analysis of the residual effects are described in the environmental statement in each of the specialist chapters. The mitigation measures are summarised in chapter 16 of the ES. The proposed mitigation measures are also identified and described, and an assessment of the significance of any residual effect provided, in Mr Ritchie s table at his Appendix The conclusions to be drawn are that: a. A range of appropriate mitigation measures are proposed, and where appropriate will be secured by the conditions proposed or by the terms of the order. b. The residual effects are, in the main neutral, negligible or beneficial. c. Where residual effects are adverse, they are slight or minor save in the case of views during construction activity 56, and in relation to construction noise and vibration which will be short term and can be regulated by the code of construction practice. d. The environmental effects are acceptable. 11. Whether there is a compelling case in the public interest for conferring on Centro powers compulsorily to acquire and use land for the purposes of the scheme, having regard to the guidance on the making of compulsory purchase 54 WCCE/A15/3 55 APP/P5.3/ENV 56 Major adverse effect on the view from Wolverhampton Railway Station is identified during construction in scenario B, Ritchie Ap.2 page 55 of APP/P5.3/ENV, and Item 9 in Table 16.4 of the ES WCCE/A15/2 14
15 orders in ODPM Circular 06/2004, paragraphs 16 to 23; and whether the land and rights in land for which compulsory acquisition powers are sought are required by Centro in order to secure satisfactory implementation of the scheme. 83. The need for the scheme is established in Mr Adams evidence. 84. For the reasons set out above there are no realistic alternatives. 85. Mr Adams also identifies the transport benefits 57 and the regeneration benefits The scheme is an integral part of the WIP, which is predicted to deliver commercial development which will result in the provision of over 1,500 jobs The economic case is established by Mr Chadwick. The Benefit Cost Ratio of 2.5:1 demonstrates that the scheme is high value for money 60. Although such a BCR is simply stated it is the product of detailed analysis, and clearly establishes the economic benefits of the proposals. Those economic benefits cannot be secured unless the order is made. 88. Mr Gardner produces a schedule in which he identifies each plot of land and explains the purpose for which it is to be acquired or used 61. It is clear from Mr Gardner s schedule that each plot of land is required in order to carry the scheme into effect. 89. The disadvantages of the scheme (e.g. some less than substantial harm to the significance of heritage assets as a result of impact on setting), such as they are, are minor (although that less than substantial harm should be given considerable weight and importance when considering whether to direct that planning permission be deemed to be granted 62 ). 90. The very significant economic, transport, and regeneration benefits cannot be secured unless the order is made and compulsory acquisition of land and rights is authorised. Those benefits far outweigh any negative impact. 57 Adams PoE APP/P1.1/SCH 58 Adams PoE APP/P1.1/SCH 59 Adams PoE APP/P1.1/SCH 60 Chadwick PoE 2.52 APP/P2.1/ECO 61 Gardner Ap.4, APP/P3.3/ENG 62 Surfleet Ap. 5 Barnwell Manor v. East Northamptonshire [2014] EWCA Civ 137 at paragraph 29, APP/P6.3/CUL 15
16 91. To the extent that the rights afforded by Article 1 Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights are engaged, the deprivation of possessions is clearly justified in the public interest, and I invite you to so find in making your report. 92. There is a compelling case in the public interest for the order to authorise the promoter to acquire the necessary land and rights and to use land temporarily, without such authorisation the very many benefits will not be realised in the public interest. 12. Having regard to section 25 of the TWA, whether the relevant Crown authority has agreed to the compulsory acquisition of interests in, and/or the application of provisions in the TWA Order in relation to, the Crown Land identified in the book of reference. 93. I repeat the submissions made in opening. 94. The Wolverhampton Combined Courts Centre is land held by the Ministry of Justice ( MoJ ) and is land in which there is a Crown interest for the purposes of section 25 of the Transport and Works Act 1992 ( TWA ). The Crown land can be acquired compulsorily under a TWA order if the appropriate authority agrees. In this case the appropriate authority is the MoJ who are the government department having management of the land. 95. The MoJ, through their solicitors 63, have indicated that whilst a legal agreement has not yet been entered into the MoJ have agreed in principle to the acquisition of those parts of the Crown land which will form new public highway. The MoJ have also indicated that they agree in principle to measures to mitigate impact during construction. The applicant requests that, when making your recommendations to the Secretary of State, you proceed on the basis that, in due course, the agreement which has been given in principle, will result in formal agreement. 63 Letter from Michelmores to the programme officer dated 27 th May
17 13. Centro s proposals for funding the scheme. 96. As required 64 the application was accompanied by an estimate of the costs of the works 65 and a funding statement The total outturn cost of the Wolverhampton Interchange Project is stated to be 39.4m, which includes the 18m 67 cost of the WCCE. 98. The approach to capital funding is set out in the Financial Case section of the business case and the funding position is as follows 68 : LTB Major Schemes (BCLEP) 9m ITB 3m BCLEP (SEP) 4.5m Wolverhampton City Council 1m Prudential Borrowing 21.9m Total 39.4m 99. As the expenditure on the WCCE is planned to fall towards the end of the overall construction programme for the WIP it is likely that the majority of its funding will come from the prudential borrowing funding stream It is anticipated that Centro will use the income derived from the station car park to finance the loan repayments When Mr Adams wrote his proof of evidence, the arrangements necessary to allow the car parking income to fund the borrowing were still dependent upon the Secretary of State giving his agreement. On 29 th May the Secretary of State 64 Transport and Works (Applications and Objections Procedure) (England and Wales) Rules 2006, Rule 10(3)(b)(ii) estimate of costs. Rule 10(3)(a) proposals for funding 65 WCCE/A5 66 WCCE/A6 67 Adams PoE APP/P1.1/SCH Table Adams PoE APP/P1.1/SCH Table Appendix 1 to Peter Adams Supplementary Proof of Evidence APP/P1.4/SCH 17
18 confirmed his support of the arrangements proposed. The Secretary of State s support for that agreement provides significant additional grounds for concluding that the funding streams relied upon are likely to deliver the necessary funds to ensure that the scheme proceeds No objector has sought to question the fact that funding will be forthcoming to allow the scheme to be delivered. 14. The conditions proposed to be attached to the deemed planning permission for the scheme, if given, and in particular whether those conditions satisfy the six tests referred to in Planning Practice Guidance, Use of Conditions (Section ID:21a) The proposed planning conditions are those set out in Mr Ellingham s evidence 70 (with amendments discussed at the inquiry) and accord with established TWA precedent The relevant policy test for use of conditions is that set out at paragraph 206 of the NPPF, namely that conditions should be necessary, relevant to planning and to the development to be permitted, enforceable, precise and reasonable in other respects Both the City Council and Mr Ellingham conclude that the relevant policy tests are met Any other relevant matters which may be raised at the inquiry Mr Young has raised concerns about the impact of the scheme on cyclists. The Applicant has provided a written response to Mr Young s points APP/P7.3/TOW Appendix 1 71 Ellingham PoE 6.83 APP/P7.1/TOW 72 APP/GEN7 18
19 107. Mr Gardner has produced a plan which shows two alternative routes for cyclists In their letter of support 74 Wolverhampton City Council expressed the view that: At this stage, Centro, in partnership with Wolverhampton City Council (WCC), have done everything reasonable to accommodate cyclist s needs within the WCCE proposals 109. I invite you to endorse the comment made by the City Council and to find that Mr Young s criticisms, whether in relation to alleged lack of information or failure to make adequate provision for cyclists are wholly unjustified. Conclusions 110. There is no serious challenge to the Applicant s case 75 (supported by the evidence of the witnesses including Mr Ellingham 76 ) that the WCCE will deliver the following key benefits: a. Improved integration between Metro, bus and rail modes providing new and improved journeys for the travelling public. b. Encouraging modal shift from private to public transport. c. Enhancing railway station accessibility. d. Providing a connection between the bus station and the railway station and to all areas along the Metro line 1 route. e. Facilitating access to HS2 in the future via line 1 and the proposed Metro Birmingham Eastside Extension to Curzon Street Station. f. Improving access to investment opportunities in the Black Country and more widely in the West Midlands region. g. Encouraging and facilitating the regeneration of land either side of Railway Drive and the rail station as part of the WIP leading to the provision of over 73 Gardner Ap.2 APP/P3.1/ENG 74 quoted and repeated in SUPP/1/GEN6 75 Centro Statement of Case paragraph Ellingham PoE 4.24 and 4.34 APP/P7.1/TOW 19
20 1,500 jobs and the provision of mixed leisure and commercial facilities for Wolverhampton The WCCE is deliverable, there is no challenge to the feasibility of introducing it, and funds are in place This scheme will deliver very significant benefits to Wolverhampton without causing any unduly adverse impacts. I urge you to recommend to the Secretary of State that he should make the order with the modifications put forward and give the associated planning direction. Landmark Chambers, Neil Cameron QC 180, Fleet Street, London EC4A 2HG 9 th June
APP/P2.1/ECO. Economic Case Main Proof of Evidence Neil Chadwick
Economic Case Main Proof of Evidence Neil Chadwick PROOF OF EVIDENCE NEIL CHADWICK ECONOMIC CASE/VALUE FOR MONEY TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 MIDLAND METRO (WOLVERHAMPTON CITY CENTRE EXTENSION) ORDER
More informationCEN/P2.1/ECO. Economic Case / Value for Money Main Proof of Evidence Neil Chadwick
Economic Case / Value for Money Main Proof of Evidence Neil Chadwick PROOF OF EVIDENCE NEIL CHADWICK ECONOMIC CASE / VALUE FOR MONEY CASE TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 MIDLAND METRO (BIRMINGHAM CITY CENTRE
More informationAPP/P2.1 Neil Chadwick Economic Case/Value for Money Main Proof of Evidence
APP/P2.1 APP/P2.1 Neil Chadwick Economic Case/Value for Money Main Proof of Evidence PROOF OF EVIDENCE FOR WEST MIDLANDS COMBINED AUTHORITY NEIL CHADWICK, DIRECTOR STEER DAVIES GLEAVE ECONOMIC CASE/VALUE
More informationCEN/P2.2/ECO. Economic Case / Value for Money Summary Proof of Evidence Neil Chadwick
Economic Case / Value for Money Summary Proof of Evidence Neil Chadwick SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE NEIL CHADWICK ECONOMIC CASE / VALUE FOR MONEY CASE TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 MIDLAND METRO (BIRMINGHAM CITY
More informationBefore : LORD JUSTICE GOLDRING LORD JUSTICE AIKENS and LORD JUSTICE McCOMBE Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2013] EWCA Civ 585 Case No: C1/2012/1950 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM QUEEN S BENCH (ADMINISTRATIVE COURT) MR JUSTICE HOLMAN [2012] EWHC 1303 (Admin)
More informationCity of Wolverhampton Council Decisions taken by the Cabinet on Wednesday, 13 September 2017
Part 1 items open to the press and public Item 5 Wolverhampton Interchange Programme 1. That Council be recommended to approve the utilisation of the existing borrowing provision to support the Interchange
More informationAPP/P1.3/SCH. Scheme Overview Proof of Evidence - Appendices Peter Adams
APP/P1.3/SCH Scheme Overview Proof of Evidence - Appendices Peter Adams APP/P1.3/SCH PROOF OF EVIDENCE - APPENDICES Peter Adams Scheme Overview TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 MIDLAND METRO (WOLVERHAMPTON
More informationThis update fully addresses the issues raised by DfT in its response to the February 2008 submission.
Executive Summary Introduction 1. This document forms the Major Scheme Business Case (MSBC) submission to the Department for Transport (DfT), seeking Programme Entry for Croxley Rail Link. It is the culmination
More informationEastside Extension Business Case
Eastside Extension Business Case Financial Case May 2017 Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this work for Transport for West Midlands. This work may only be used within the context and scope of work for
More informationREPORT TO THE CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT BOARD MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2010
REPORT TO THE CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT BOARD MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2010 SUBJECT City of Victoria Request for General Strategic Priorities Funding Application Support Johnson Street Bridge
More informationMarsh Barton Rail Station Draft Benefits Realisation Plan and Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
Draft Benefits Realisation Plan and Monitoring and Evaluation Plan May 2014 Devon County Council County Hall Topsham Road Exeter Devon EX2 4QD Contents 1 Scheme Background and Context... 3 1.1 Description
More informationCROSSRAIL INFORMATION PAPER H2 RAILWAY COMPENSATION
CROSSRAIL INFORMATION PAPER RAILWAY COMPENSATION This paper explains how the Promoter intends that Network Rail and passenger and freight operators will be compensated for the loss of, or disruption to,
More informationArven Chemicals Limited (AC/0/1WR)
HBC/19/5R THE MERSEY GATEWAY PROJECT (MERSEY GATEWAY BRIDGE) Land Acquisition &Assembly Arven Chemicals Limited (AC/0/1WR) Rebuttal by Alan W Scarisbrick Dip (Est Man) FRICS 1 MERSEY GATEWAY LAND ASSEMBLY
More informationTRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 TRANSPORT AND WORKS (INQUIRIES PROCEDURES) RULES 2004 NETWORK RAIL (WERRINGTON GRADE SEPARATION) ORDER
The Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order NR/PoE/5.1 TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 TRANSPORT AND WORKS (INQUIRIES PROCEDURES) RULES 2004 NETWORK RAIL (WERRINGTON GRADE SEPARATION) ORDER PLANNING
More informationWMCA Board Meeting Combined Authority Budget
Agenda Item 5.1 WMCA Board Meeting Date 10 June 2016 Report title 2016-2017 Combined Authority Budget Accountable Chief Executive Responsible Officer Originating Council Report to be/has been considered
More informationTHE RIVER MERSEY (MERSEY GATEWAY BRIDGE) DECISION LETTER
THE RIVER MERSEY (MERSEY GATEWAY BRIDGE) DECISION LETTER To: DLA Piper UK LLP 3 Noble Street London EC2V 7EE From: Ellis Harvey Head of TWA Orders Unit Department for Transport Zone 1/31, Great Minster
More informationBUS SERVICES BILL [HL] EXPLANATORY NOTES
BUS SERVICES BILL [HL] EXPLANATORY NOTES What these notes do These Explanatory tes relate to the Bus Services Bill [HL] as introduced in the House of Lords on 19 May 2016. These Explanatory tes have been
More information14 March 2017 Corporate Report Format
14 March 2017 Corporate Report Format To the Chair and Members of Cabinet APPROVAL TO ENTER INTO A FUNDING AGREEMENT WITH SHEFFIELD CITY REGION TO BE ABLE DRAW DOWN SCRIF APPROVED FUNDING FOR THE DELIVERY
More informationNorthern Corridor Area Transport Plan. Contents
Northern Corridor Area Transport Plan Page 1 of 16 Northern Corridor Area Transport Plan Contents 1. Introduction... 3 Strategic Transport Schemes... 4 2. Policy Background... 4 3. The Northern Corridor
More informationDecision by Richard Dent, a reporter appointed by the Scottish Ministers
Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals Appeal Decision Notice T: 01324 696 400 F: 01324 696 444 E: dpea@scotland.gsi.gov.uk Decision by Richard Dent, a reporter appointed by the Scottish Ministers
More informationRAILTRACK THE RAILWAY GROUP STANDARDS CODE
RAILTRACK THE RAILWAY GROUP STANDARDS CODE June 1998 Explanatory Introduction Railtrack, by virtue of the 1993 Railways Act, its control of the network and the law relating to health and safety, has a
More informationEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CROSSRAIL (FEES FOR REQUESTS FOR PLANNING APPROVAL) REGULATIONS No. 2175
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CROSSRAIL (FEES FOR REQUESTS FOR PLANNING APPROVAL) REGULATIONS 2008 2008 No. 2175 1. Introduction 1.1. This explanatory memorandum has been prepared by the Department for
More informationDraft Lichfield Local Plan Allocations Document Part 2 Examination. Inspector s Matters, Issues and Questions Discussion Note
Draft Lichfield Local Plan Allocations Document Part 2 Examination Inspector s Matters, Issues and Questions Discussion Note Introduction This note provides a summary of the matters and issues identified
More informationPUBLIC INQUIRY QUESTION
M4 Corridor around Newport PUBLIC INQUIRY QUESTION REFERENCE NO. : PIQ/164 RAISED BY: The Inspector DATE: 26/02/2018 RESPONDED BY: Matthew Jones DATE: 20/03/2018 SUBJECT: List of questions from the Inspectors
More informationMetrolinx-City of Toronto-Toronto Transit Commission Master Agreement for Light Rail Transit Projects
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Metrolinx-City of Toronto-Toronto Transit Commission Master Agreement for Light Rail Transit Projects Date: October 23, 2012 To: From: Wards: City Council City Manager All
More informationYORKSHIRE DALES NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY ITEM 8
YORKSHIRE DALES NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY ITEM 8 Date: 29 September 2015 Report: Outcome of Publication of the Local Plan: Yorkshire Dales Local Plan, pre submission Publication version July 2015. to emerging
More informationLocal Development Scheme
Local Development Scheme Colchester Borough Council s Local Development Scheme 2017-2020 1 November 2017 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Planning context... 4 3. Documents to be prepared during 2017 to
More informationWeston Package Phase 1 Major Scheme Business Case. The Financial Case. Scheme cost, financial risk and funding sources
Weston Package Phase 1 Major Scheme Business Case 6 The Financial Case Scheme cost, financial risk and funding sources 6.1 Introduction This Section sets out how the council proposes to finance the Weston
More informationIrish Rail Kildare Route Project
Irish Rail Kildare Route Project Supplementary Development Contributions Scheme (SDCS) Planning and Development Act 2000 December 2007 South Dublin County Council Comhairle Chontae Atha Cliath Theas CONTENTS
More informationChairman of the Policy and Resources Committee. Appendix 1 - Draft Local Implementation Plan Enclosures. Summary
Policy & Resources Committee 23 October 2018 Title Report of Wards Status Urgent Key Local Implementation Plan submission of draft to TfL and public consultation Chairman of the Policy and Resources Committee
More informationOverview. Appendix No. Description. Appendix B1
Appendix B1 Overview Appendix No B1 B2 Description Overview Capital Monitoring Summary This report takes each Directorate in turn, in the format : a) capital budget changes b) forecast variations from
More informationSwords/ Airport to City Centre BRT Consultation Submission For Coach Tourism and Transport Council of Ireland (CTTC)
- Swords/ Airport to City Centre BRT Consultation Submission For Coach Tourism and Transport Council of Ireland (CTTC) Final Submission November 2014 Email:- info@transportinsights.com Telephone:- + 353
More informationCommunity Infrastructure Levy Neighbourhood Planning Toolkit
Community Infrastructure Levy Neighbourhood Planning Toolkit Written by Lorraine Hart, Community Land Use Table Of Contents Introduction... 3 Essential background... 4 The links between neighbourhood planning
More informationEnterprise Act Lender s perspective
Lawyers to the finance industry Enterprise Act Lender s perspective Summer 2003 pqlm=mobpp=kkk=pqlm=mobpp=kkk==pqlm=mobpp=kkk============fjmibjbkq^qflk=a^qb=nr=pbmqbj_bo=ommp= KKKpqlm=mobpp=KKKpqlm=mobpp=KKK=pqlm=mobpp
More informationCompulsory purchase orders. Resolving disputes
Compulsory purchase orders Resolving disputes Compulsory purchase of property is an essential tool in a modern democratic society. It facilitates planned and orderly development Hand in hand with the power
More informationGreater Bristol Bus Network Major Scheme Business Case. Chapter 1. Developing the Full Approval Major Scheme Business Case
Greater Bristol Bus Network Major Scheme Business Case Chapter 1 Developing the Full Approval Major Scheme Business Case i ii 1. The Case for Full Approval INTRODUCTION 1.1.1 Bath and North East Somerset,
More informationELLESMERE PORT ONE PUBLIC ESTATE. Summary
ELLESMERE PORT ONE PUBLIC ESTATE Summary 1. At its meeting on 21 November, the P&I Committee had a short report on progress with the Ellesmere Port One Public Estate (OPE) programme and concluded that
More informationTest Valley Borough Council Cabinet 13 January 2016
ITEM 7 Test Valley Revised Local Plan Report of the Planning Policy & Transport Portfolio Holder Recommended: 1. To note the outcome of the Test Valley Revised Local Plan Inspector s report as shown in
More information2A Alverstone Avenue Barnet EN4 8DS
Location 2A Alverstone Avenue Barnet EN4 8DS Reference: 17/6096/FUL Received: 26th September 2017 Accepted: 27th September 2017 Ward: East Barnet Expiry 22nd November 2017 Applicant: Mr KANESU ATHITHAN
More informationUpdated Economic Case for HS2. August 2012
Updated Economic Case for HS2 August 2012 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION...1 2 WHAT HAS CHANGED?...1 3 WHAT HAS BEEN MODELLED?...2 4 THE ECONOMIC CASE FOR THE Y NETWORK...2 5 THE ECONOMIC CASE FOR HS2 LONDON
More informationan Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Appeal Decision Hearing held on 7-8 September 2016 Site visit made on 7 September 2016 by Roger Catchpole DipHort BSc(hons) PhD MCIEEM an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and
More informationAppendix J Western Corridor Regeneration Scheme. Benefits Realisation Plan & Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
Appendix J Western Corridor Regeneration Scheme Benefits Realisation Plan & Monitoring and Evaluation Plan April 2014 [Final Report] Strategic Transportation Planning Torbay Council 2nd Floor Electric
More informationEnvironmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation
Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 4.14 Economic and Fiscal Impacts This section evaluates potential impacts to local and regional economies during construction and operation of each project alternative.
More informationWEST MIDLANDS COMBINED AUTHORITY
WEST MIDLANDS COMBINED AUTHORITY TRANSPORT ACT 2000 Travel Concession Reimbursement Arrangements To be valid From 1 st April 2018 Page 1 of 20 WEST MIDLANDS COMBINED AUTHORITY TRANSPORT ACT 2000 TRAVEL
More informationan Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Appeal Decision Site visit made on 29 November 2016 by David Cliff BA Hons MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date: 22 nd December
More informationKeswick to Penrith Railway
Keswick to Penrith Railway Stage 2 Report: Business Case Executive Summary Stage 2 Report Business Case Executive Summary 11 1 Introduction Background 1.1 The railway between Keswick and Penrith was part
More informationSOUTH NORTHAMPTONSHIRE COUNCIL STATEMENT OF CASE ON BEHALF OF THE LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY
SOUTH NORTHAMPTONSHIRE COUNCIL STATEMENT OF CASE ON BEHALF OF THE LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY Appeal by Mrs. S Biddle against the decision by South Northamptonshire Council to refuse planning permission for
More informationCancelled. Final Action
RESOLUTION NO. R2018-16 Baseline Budget and Schedule for the Lynnwood Link Extension MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: Capital Committee Board PROPOSED ACTION 05/10/2018 05/24/2018 Cancelled
More informationProposed Changes to the National Energy Board Electricity Regulations 1
Proposed Changes to the National Energy Board Electricity Regulations 1 SHORT TITLE 1. These Regulations may be cited as the National Energy Board Electricity Regulations. INTERPRETATION 2. In these Regulations,
More informationTravel and Expenses. Employee Policy HR Consult
Travel and Expenses Employee Policy HR Consult 1. Policy Statement NHSBT will reimburse expenses actually incurred on authorised business travel to a temporary work place. This policy applies to all employees
More informationCommunity Infrastructure Levy
Woking Borough Council Local Development Framework Community Infrastructure Levy Draft Charging Schedule May 2013 Produced by the Planning Policy Team. For further information please contact: Planning
More informationNew Policy Document for Planning Obligations
New Policy Document for Planning Obligations Consultation questions We are seeking your views on the following questions on the Government s proposal for a new policy document on the use of planning obligations.
More informationA51 Tarvin-Chester Improvements Scheme
A51 Tarvin-Chester Improvements Scheme Outline Business Case Independent Review Cheshire West and Chester Council March 2018 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Timothy Vincent Senior
More informationImplementing the UK s Exit from the European Union
A picture of the National Audit Office logo Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Department for Transport Implementing the UK s Exit from the European Union HC 1125 SESSION 2017 2019 19 JULY 2018
More informationSOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION) Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement
SOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION) Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement Quarterly Report No. 9 (June 1, 2018 August 31, 2018) Prepared by: Minnesota Department of Transportation
More informationWoking Borough Council
Woking Borough Council Development Management Policies Development Plan Document Duty to Cooperate Statement February 2016 Produced by the Planning Policy Team For further information please contact: Planning
More informationSOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION) Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement
SOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION) Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement Quarterly Report No. 6 (September 1 November 30, 2017) Prepared by: Minnesota Department of Transportation
More informationabcdefghijklmnopqrstu
for Planning and Environmental Appeals abcdefghijklmnopqrstu Claim for an Award of Expenses Decision Notice T: 01324 696 400 F: 01324 696 444 E: dpea@scotland.gsi.gov.uk Decision by Janet M McNair, a Reporter
More informationSeptember 2014 Pagham Neighbourhood Plan
September 2014 Pagham Neighbourhood Plan 2014-2029 Basic Conditions Statement Published by Pagham Parish Council for Consultation under the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012. 1 Pagham Neighbourhood
More informationNATIONAL LAND TRANSPORT PROGRAMME / INformation sheet / october 2012
NATIONAL LAND TRANSPORT PROGRAMME 2012 15 / INformation sheet / october 2012 Creating transport solutions for a thriving New Zealand The NZ Transport Agency Board has adopted the 2012 15 National Land
More informationGreenlane East Interchange/Great South Road Improvements. Approved Organisation: NZTA (HNO) and Auckland Transport (Auckland City Council)
Post implementation reviews completed in 2011/12 Reviews represent the views of independent consultants and are used by the NZTA to identify potential opportunities for improvements. Greenlane East Interchange/Great
More informationTariff Risk Management Plan
Tariff Risk Management Plan June 2012 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... PRINCIPLES OF THE TARIFF...2 SUCCESS OF THE TARIFF...4 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DELIVERY...7 CURRENT HEADLINE TARIFF POSITION...7
More informationSOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION) Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement. Quarterly Report No. 4 (March 1 May 31, 2017)
SOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION) Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement Quarterly Report No. 4 (March 1 May 31, 2017) Prepared by: Minnesota Department of Transportation 395
More informationSCR Local Enterprise Partnership Expenses Policy
SCR Local Enterprise Partnership Expenses Policy Document Properties Document Approval Approving Body or Person Role (review, approve) Date LEP Board Approve 05/02/2018 1. Purpose 1.1 This policy provides
More informationPUBLIC INQUIRY DOCUMENT
M4 Corridor around Newport PUBLIC INQUIRY DOCUMENT REFERENCE NO. : PIQ/152 RAISED BY: The Inspectors DATE: 05/11/17 RESPONDED BY: Stephen Bussell DATE: 30/01/18 SUBJECT: Updated Economic Appraisal of Objectors
More informationMeeting of the City Council 18 September 2013
Agenda Item No: 8 Meeting of the City Council 18 September 2013 Report Title Approval of Financial Close and Contract Award for Building Schools for the Future (BSF) Phase 3C Scheme Schools Referring Body
More informationRAC Business Breakdown
RAC Business Breakdown Notice of Variation Terms and conditions with effect from 20/04/2015 Plus Policy Booklet Full Terms & conditions with effect from 29/09/2014 Please read and keep for your records
More informationProgress on the Channel Tunnel Rail Link
DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT Progress on the Channel Tunnel Rail Link LONDON: The Stationery Office 11.25 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 18 July 2005 REPORT BY THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR
More informationDecision Statement Regarding Longdon Neighbourhood Plan Proceeding to Referendum
Decision Statement Regarding Longdon Neighbourhood Plan Proceeding to Referendum 1. Summary 1.1 Following an Independent Examination, Lichfield District Council has recommended that the Longdon Neighbourhood
More informationCAMBRIDGESHIRE GUIDED BUSWAY OPERATIONS POLICY
CAMBRIDGESHIRE GUIDED BUSWAY OPERATIONS POLICY Page 1 of 7 CGB OPERATIONS POLICY Contents: 1. Introduction 2. Contents 3. General Policy 4. Safety Inductions 5. Access 6. Requirements and Restrictions
More informationReport of Deputy Chief Executive on behalf of Director of Resources
CHIEF OFFICER IN CONSULATION WITH COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN DELEGATED POWERS REPORT Title The acquisition of 23 Morris Court, Enfield, London, EN3 6GX Report of Deputy Chief Executive on behalf of Director of
More informationLocal Highway Panels Members Guide. Introduction
Local Highway Panels Members Guide Introduction The toolkit is intended to help you talk to residents about local highways issues and manage their expectations with regards to deliverability of schemes
More informationScheme Decision Sought Scheme Description Rail Park and Ride Programme Garforth Rail Station Car Park Project Leeds Scheme
Report to: West Yorkshire & York Investment Committee Date: 21 March 2018 Subject: Director(s): Author(s): Capital Spending and Project Approvals Melanie Corcoran, Director of Delivery Caroline Coy 1 Purpose
More informationSection 106 & CIL. Chapter 10. new pedestrian bridge across the river. new social infrastructure. new linear park. improved road environment
Chapter 10 Section 106 & CIL Mayor of London 141 new pedestrian bridge across the river new social infrastructure Chapter 10 Section 106 & CIL new linear park improved road environment improved river walk
More informationFlood Risk Sequential Test
Flood Risk Sequential Test Assessment of Proposed Development Sites Stroud District Council Evidence Base (December 2013) Development and Flood Risk Sequential Test 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This document considers
More informationTRAVEL & SUBSISTENCE (T&S) CODE
TRAVEL & SUBSISTENCE (T&S) CODE Updated 30/08/14 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 3 2. BKA POLICIES AND PRINCIPLES APPLYING TO T&S... 4 General Policies & Principles... 4 Specific Policies In Respect of Travel-Related
More informationTerms and Conditions of Parking at Upper Street Car Park
Terms and Conditions of Parking at Upper Street Car Park THESE ARE THE TERMS ON WHICH YOU AGREE TO USE OUR CAR PARK. IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU READ THEM AND UNDERSTAND THEM. THEY EXPLAIN YOUR RIGHTS AND
More informationEnvironmental Minimum Requirements General Principles
Environmental Minimum Requirements General Principles CR/HB/EMR/0001 Custodian REVISION HISTORY 5.0 22/07/08 SP CLRL RP Final version 4.0 12/05/08 SP CLRL RP Consultation Draft 3.0 02/11/07
More informationS Evans & Sons Limited (SE/0/1WR)
HBC/19/7R THE MERSEY GATEWAY PROJECT (MERSEY GATEWAY BRIDGE) Land Acquisition &Assembly S Evans & Sons Limited (SE/0/1WR) Rebuttal by; Alan W Scarisbrick Dip (Est Man) FRICS MERSEY GATEWAY LAND ASSEMBLY
More informationHOW PLANNING APPEAL DECISIONS ARE INTERPRETING THE GUIDANCE 18 MONTHS ON. SASHA WHITE Q.C.
THE NPPF IN PRACTICE HOW PLANNING APPEAL DECISIONS ARE INTERPRETING THE GUIDANCE 18 MONTHS ON. SASHA WHITE Q.C. 1. INTRODUCTION. STRUCTURE OF LECTURE 2. KEY SECRETARY OF STATE DECISIONS. 3. KEY INSPECTOR
More informationACTION TAKEN UNDER DELEGATED POWERS BY OFFICER 1 st December 2014
ACTION TAKEN UNDER DELEGATED POWERS BY OFFICER 1 st December 2014 Title Highway Licence for a Crane Oversailing Licence. Report of Lead Commissioner for Housing and Environment. Wards Totteridge and Mill
More informationan Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Appeal Decisions Site visit made on 25 November 2014 by R J Marshall LLB DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date: 23 January 2015
More informationEardisland Neighbourhood Development Plan
Eardisland Parish Council Eardisland Neighbourhood Development Plan A Report to Herefordshire Council of the Independent Examination of the Eardisland Neighbourhood Development Plan Independent Examiner
More informationDRAFT TRANSPORT ACT The Tyne and Wear Quality Contracts Scheme for Buses [date] ARRANGEMENT OF THE SCHEME ARTICLE
DRAFT TRANSPORT ACT 2000 The Tyne and Wear Quality Contracts Scheme for Buses [date] Made [date] ARRANGEMENT OF THE SCHEME ARTICLE 1. CITATION AND COMMENCEMENT 2. INTERPRETATION 3. THE QCS AREA 4. DESIGNATION
More informationFinancing the London Plan. Planning Gain and Viability
Financing the London Plan Planning Gain and Viability Financing and Planning Gain Much of the policy in the Plan will need to be implemented through S106 and CiL charge agreements, including transport,
More information(a) Bicycle Storage Facility: 26,150. (b) Camley Street Natural Park Centre: 176,550. (c) Community Meeting Facilities: 448,500
King s Cross Development Forum Extracts from the Section 106 Agreement for King s Cross Central The relevant Facilities and the amount of the Facility Bond for each such Facility are as follows: (a) Bicycle
More informationInterCity East Coast franchise award
1 InterCity East Coast franchise award Analyst and investor presentation Stagecoach Group plc 27 November 2014 Cautionary statement 2 This document is solely for use in connection with a briefing on the
More informationTRANSMISSION CHARGING STATEMENT
TRANSMISSION CHARGING STATEMENT 1 September 2016 1 September 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction... 1 2 General System Charges... 4 3 Site Specific Charges... 5 4 Connection Assets... 8 5 Least
More informationINVESTMENT & DEVELOPMENT (COUNCILLOR RUSSELL GOODWAY)
CARDIFF COUNCIL CYNGOR CAERDYDD CABINET MEETING: 15 FEBRUARY 2018 INDOOR ARENA INVESTMENT & DEVELOPMENT (COUNCILLOR RUSSELL GOODWAY) AGENDA ITEM:9 REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Appendices
More informationFinancing Transport Infrastructure. September 2014
Financing Transport Infrastructure September 2014 Financing Transport Infrastructure PPP Definition Project Risks Contract Structures Case Studies Key Issues Conclusions 2 PPP Definition Public Private
More informationPROJECT INITIATION DOCUMENT (PID)
Appendix to Agenda Item 5 Project Documentation PROJECT INITIATION DOCUMENT (PID) Local Plan Review Release: Fourth Draft Date: 19 April 2016 Author: Approved by: Mike Allgrove Andrew Frost Note: the completion
More informationSupplementary Regulatory Impact Statement: A New Trusts Act Commercial and Financial Trusts
Supplementary Regulatory Impact Statement: A New Trusts Act Commercial and Financial Trusts Agency Disclosure Statement This supplementary Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) has been prepared by the Ministry
More informationREPORT OF MEETING DATE SAND DUNES RE-MODELLING AT NORTH BEACH CAR PARK / SUMMERFIELDS
DECISION ITEM REPORT OF MEETING DATE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTORATE PUBLIC ITEM TOURISM AND LEISURE COMMITTEE 12 JANUARY 2017 5 SAND DUNES RE-MODELLING AT NORTH BEACH CAR PARK / SUMMERFIELDS This item
More informationMalvern Hills Local Development Scheme November 2017 Update
Appendix 1 Malvern Hills Local Development Scheme 2017-2020 November 2017 Update Produced jointly with the South Worcestershire Councils Planning Policy Economic Development and Planning Policy The Guildhall
More informationWELSH GOVERNMENT INQUIRY DOCUMENT
WELSH GOVERNMENT INQUIRY DOCUMENT REFERENCE NO. : WG ID 016 RAISED BY: Merthyr Motor Auctions DATE: 18/04/2018 RESPONDED BY: Welsh Government DATE: 02/05/2018 (document dated 27 th April 2018) SUBJECT:
More informationROYAL BOROUGH OF WINDSOR & MAIDENHEAD PLANNING COMMITTEE
ROYAL BOROUGH OF WINDSOR & MAIDENHEAD PLANNING COMMITTEE MAIDENHEAD DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PANEL 26 October 2016 Item: 1 Application 16/01449/FULL No.: Location: Kingfisher Cottage Spade Oak Reach Cookham
More informationan Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Appeal Decisions Inquiry held on 13 January 2015 Site visit made on 12 January 2015 by J A Murray LLB (Hons), Dip.Plan.Env, DMS, Solicitor an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities
More informationMaking it fit: applying development standards in London
Making it fit: applying development standards in London Sasha White QC Anjoli Foster Landmark Chambers 1 June 2017 ACCEPTABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS? 1 The nub of the issue The ground and first floor flats
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HANSON. Between. SANDEEP SINGH (anonymity direction not made) and
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: HU/04772/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Birmingham Employment Decision & Reason Tribunal Promulgated On 14 June 2017 On 21 June 2017 Before
More informationDiscretionary Investment Management Services: Financial Adviser and Financial Markets Conduct Regulations
OFFICE OF THE MINISTER OF COMMERCE The Chair Cabinet Business Committee Discretionary Investment Management Services: Financial Adviser and Financial Markets Conduct Regulations Proposal 1 That Cabinet
More information