EXPANDING FOREIGN CREDITORS TOOLKIT: THE PRESUMPTION AGAINST EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION
|
|
- Ella Lisa Fitzgerald
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 EXPANDING FOREIGN CREDITORS TOOLKIT: THE PRESUMPTION AGAINST EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION Craig R. Bergmann * I. INTRODUCTION II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY III. THE PRESUMPTION AGAINST EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION IV. FOCUS OF CONGRESSIONAL CONCERN V. DECIPHERING CONGRESSIONAL INTENT VI. PUBLIC POLICY COMPELS EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION VII. COMITY PRECLUDES EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION VIII. CONCLUSION * The author is an associate at Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, LLP in New York City, New York. Mr. Bergmann focuses his practice on capital markets, corporate law, and corporate governance. The author is a graduate of the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law. 83
2 84 BUSINESS & BANKRUPTCY LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 2:1 I. INTRODUCTION In the latest saga of the trustee s attempt to administer the estate of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (BLMIS), the trustee, pursuant to 550(a)(2), commenced adversary proceedings against foreign BLMIS investors to recover distributions they received from foreign feeder funds, which invested in BLMIS. 1 The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the Court ) held that applying 550(a)(2) in this case would be an extraterritorial application that Congress did not intend, and assuming arguendo that it did, principles of comity preclude extraterritorial application in this case. 2 II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY In October 2011, the trustee commenced adversary proceedings against, among others, CACEIS Bank Luxembourg and CACEIS Bank (collectively, the foreign defendants ), to recover transfers and subsequent transfers of BLMIS property. 3 The foreign defendants moved to withdraw the reference to the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, which the Court granted. 4 Additionally, the foreign defendants filed a motion to dismiss the trustee s complaints, alleging that 550(a)(2) does not apply extraterritorially, and thus, the trustee could not recover transfers which occurred predominately in foreign countries among foreign parties. 5 III. THE PRESUMPTION AGAINST EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION The presumption against extraterritorial application embodies the principle that congressional legislation, unless a contrary intent appears, is meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the [U.S.] 6 According to the United States Supreme Court, this presumption serves to protect against unintended clashes between our laws and those of other nations which could result in international discord. 7 In order to trigger the presumption, a court must determine whether the facts of a particular case require extraterritorial application and, if so, 1. Sec. Investor Prot. Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC (In re Madoff Sec.), 513 B.R. 222, 225 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). 2. Id. at 226, Id. at Id. at Id. 6. Id. (citing Morrison v. Nat l Australia Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. 247, 255 (2010) (quoting EEOC v. Arabian Am. Oil Co., 499 U.S. 244, 248 (1991))). 7. Arabian Am. Oil Co., 499 U.S. at 248.
3 2014] EXPANDING FOREIGN CREDITORS TOOLKIT 85 whether Congress intended for such application. 8 In this case, the Court began its analysis by determining that the presumption against extraterritorial application of federal statutes applied and held that the trustee failed to rebut it. 9 IV. FOCUS OF CONGRESSIONAL CONCERN In order to determine whether applying 550(a)(2) in this case would be extraterritorial, the Court first looked to the focus of congressional concern, or... the transactions that [ 550(a)(2)] seeks to regulate. 10 Here, the trustee and the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) argued that the Securities Investor Protection Act (SIPA) sought to regulate SIPC-member U.S. broker-dealer[s]. 11 Thus, SIPA s provisions that are incorporated into the Bankruptcy Code are inherently domestic. 12 In other words, any relationship a party has with a domestic debtor being administered under SIPA, no matter how attenuated, transforms every use of the various provisions... into [a] purely domestic application[]. 13 The Court, relying on Second Circuit precedent which established that a mere connection to a U.S. debtor, be it tangential or remote, is insufficient on its own to make every application of the Bankruptcy Code domestic, dismissed both the trustee s and SIPC s arguments. 14 Second, the Court looked at the focus of the Bankruptcy Code s avoidance and recovery provisions, specifically 548 and 550(a). Section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code states, in pertinent part, that the trustee may recover... the property transferred from subsequent transferees. 15 Indeed, 550(a) seeks to regulate transfers of property from an initial transferee to subsequent transferees and not the relationship of that property to a perhaps-distant debtor. 16 Accordingly, the Court, after analyzing the locations and components of the transfers at issue, determined that the transfers and transferees in this case are predominantly 8. Id. 9. In re Madoff Sec., 513 B.R. at Id. at 226 (quoting Morrison, 561 U.S. at ) (internal citation omitted)). 11. Id. at 227. See 15 U.S.C. 78ccc(a)(2)(A)(i) (2012) ( SIPC shall be a membership corporation the members of which shall be all persons registered as brokers or dealers... other than (i) persons whose principal business... is conducted outside the United States and its territories and possessions.... ). 12. In re Madoff Sec., 513 B.R. at Id. 14. Id U.S.C. 550(a) (2012). 16. In re Madoff Sec., 513 B.R. at 227.
4 86 BUSINESS & BANKRUPTCY LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 2:1 foreign. 17 Consequently, the Court held that the trustee s use of 550(a)(2) in this case would require extraterritorial application. 18 V. DECIPHERING CONGRESSIONAL INTENT In order for the trustee to apply 550(a)(2) extraterritorially, he must demonstrate that Congress intended for such application. 19 Utilizing canons of statutory interpretation, the Court first looked to the text of 550(a), which did not evidence an intent for its extraterritorial application. 20 Thereafter, the Court looked to context, such as other provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, for evidence of Congress s intent that 550(a)(2) should apply extraterritorially. 21 As evidence of congressional intent, the trustee argued that the definition of property of the estate pursuant to 541(a)(1), which includes all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property, mirrors language found in 548(a)(1), which allows the trustee to avoid any transfer... of an interest of the debtor in property. 22 Consequently, the definition of property of the estate is incorporated by reference into the avoidance and recovery powers. 23 As support for extraterritorial application, the trustee focused on the preamble in 541(a), which states that property of the estate includes certain property wherever located and by whomever held According to the trustee, the reference [in 541] to wherever located and by whomever held is thereby indirectly incorporated into the avoidance and recovery provisions at issue. 25 The Court, labeling the trustee s argument clever, found it neither logical nor persuasive because including fraudulent transfers in the definition of property of the estate pursuant to 541(a)(1) would render 541(a)(3) superfluous. 26 Section 541(a)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code states that [s]uch estate is comprised of all the following property, wherever located and by whomever held... [a]ny interest in property that the trustee recovers under section 329(b), 363(n), 543, 550, 553, or 723 of [title 11 of the United States Code]. 27 The Court identified the operative language in 541(a)(3) and distinguished between property actually recovered (i.e., an 17. Id. at Id. at Id. 20. Id. 21. Id. (quoting Morrison, 561 U.S. at 265). 22. Id. at 229 (quoting 11 U.S.C. 541(a) and 548(a) (1988)). 23. Id. at U.S.C. 541(a) (2012). 25. In re Madoff Sec., 513 B.R. at 229 (quoting 11 U.S.C. 541(a)). 26. Id. (quoting In re Colonial Realty Co., 980 F.2d 125, 131 (2d Cir. 1992)) U.S.C. 541(a)(3) (emphasis added).
5 2014] EXPANDING FOREIGN CREDITORS TOOLKIT 87 avoided transfer) and property subject to recovery. 28 This distinction is critical because the avoidance provisions operate independent of 541, and 541 cannot be used to supply the avoidance provisions with extraterritorial application. 29 Thereafter, the Court invoked the maxim of statutory interpretation known as expressio unius est exclusio alterius (the express mention of one thing excludes all others) in holding that Congress s express mention of wherever located and by whomever held in 541 negates the extraterritorial application of all other provisions lacking similar language. 30 The trustee also argued that 78fff-2(c)(3) of SIPA, which allows the trustee to recover customer property through the Bankruptcy Code s avoidance provisions, establishes congressional intent for extraterritorial application. 31 This argument also failed to rebut the presumption because (1) 78fff-2(c)(3) merely incorporates the Bankruptcy Code provisions discussed above, and (2) SIPA has a predominantly domestic focus because SIPC excludes broker-dealer membership whose primary business is conducted outside the U.S. and excludes as a customer any person whose claim arises out of transactions with a foreign subsidiary of a SIPC member. 32 Similar to the trustee s 541 argument, the trustee also argued that SIPA s grant of exclusive jurisdiction of such debtor and its property wherever located provides congressional intent for extraterritorial application. 33 This argument fails for the same reasons discussed above, namely, that transferred property only becomes property of the estate once it is recovered. 34 VI. PUBLIC POLICY COMPELS EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION The trustee also contended that public policy dictates extraterritorial application because debtors will fraudulently transfer assets to foreigners who, in turn, will retransfer those assets to avoid the reach of U.S. bankruptcy law. 35 Invoking a balancing test, the Court found that such loopholes must be weighed against the presumption against extraterritoriality, which serves to protect against unintended clashes between [U.S. laws] and those of other nations which could result in 28. In re Madoff Sec., 513 B.R. at Id. 30. Id. See generally Passenger Corp. v. Passengers Assoc., 414 U.S. 453, 458 (1974). See also BLACK S LAW DICTIONARY 701 (10th ed. 2014). 31. In re Madoff Sec., 513 B.R. at Id. at 230. See 15 U.S.C. 78ccc(a)(2)(A)(i), 78lll(2)(C)(i). 33. In re Madoff Sec., 513 B.R. at 230 (citing 15 U.S.C. 78eee(b)(2)(A)(i)). 34. Id. at Id. at 231.
6 88 BUSINESS & BANKRUPTCY LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 2:1 international discord. 36 Nonetheless, the trustee can attempt to recover from these subsequent transferees in foreign jurisdictions under the laws governing the transfers. 37 Lastly, the trustee argued that failing to allow extraterritorial application in this case frustrates SIPA s purpose of equitable distribution of customer funds to customers of the debtor. 38 Unfortunately, in a prior BLMIS proceeding, the trustee adopted the position that investors in feeder funds were not customers within the meaning of 78lll-2(A) (C), and thus, were not entitled to a distribution from the customer-property estate pursuant to 78lll VII. COMITY PRECLUDES EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION Although the Court held that the trustee did not rebut the presumption against extraterritorial application and, therefore, could not use 550(a) to pursue recovery of purely foreign subsequent transfers, it posited an alternative holding which also denied the relief requested by the trustee. 40 The Court held that international comity precluded the trustee s recovery of these purely foreign transfers. 41 In reaching its conclusion, the Court engaged in a choice of law analysis (interest analysis) to determine which country had a greater interest regarding the recovery of these transfers. 42 First, certain foreign feeder funds were already in liquidation proceedings, and in one case, a foreign court held that a feeder fund could not recover a distribution made to its customer. 43 If the Court allowed the trustee to proceed, it would directly conflict with the foreign court s ruling. Second, the foreign investors did not have any reasonable expectation that U.S. law would apply to their relationships with the feeder funds. 44 Third, a majority of the transfers at issue occurred outside the U.S., and the transferees and subsequent transferees were predominantly foreign. Consequently, foreign jurisdictions would have a greater interest in regulating the transactions Id. (quoting Midland Euro Exch. Inc. v. Swiss Fin. Corp. (In re Midland Euro Exch. Inc.), 347 B.R. 708, 718 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2006)). 37. Id. 38. Id. (emphasis added). 39. Id. (citing In re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC, 708 F.3d 422, 427 (2d Cir. 2013)). 40. Id. 41. Id. 42. Id. at 231 (citing In re Maxwell Commc n Corp., 93 F.3d 1036, (2d Cir. 1996) (hereinafter referred to as Maxwell II)). 43. Id. at Id. (citing Maxwell II, 93 F.3d at 1051). 45. Id.
7 2014] EXPANDING FOREIGN CREDITORS TOOLKIT 89 VIII. CONCLUSION While the Court dismissed the trustee s claims to recover purely foreign transfers, it remanded the case to the bankruptcy court to afford the trustee the opportunity to factually demonstrate that other transfers at issue were domestic. 46 Foreign investors are now armed with this decision and should take solace that certain purely foreign transfers are immune from avoidance and recovery by a trustee operating in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code. It remains to be seen how this decision will implicate other provisions of the Bankruptcy Code (and SIPA), specifically 524(g) and 1141, which relate to non-debtor releases and discharges. 46. Id. at 232 n.4.
FATALLY FOREIGN: EXTRATERRITORIAL RECOVERY OF AVOIDABLE TRANSFERS AND PRINCIPALS OF COMITY IN THE MADOFF SECURITIES SIPA LIQUIDATION PROCEEDING
FATALLY FOREIGN: EXTRATERRITORIAL RECOVERY OF AVOIDABLE TRANSFERS AND PRINCIPALS OF COMITY IN THE MADOFF SECURITIES SIPA LIQUIDATION PROCEEDING Timothy Graulich, Brian M. Resnick, and Kevin J. Coco* Bernie
More informationsmb Doc Filed 09/27/18 Entered 09/27/18 13:05:26 Main Document Pg 1 of 12
Pg 1 of 12 Baker & Hostetler LLP Hearing Date: October 31, 2018 45 Rockefeller Plaza Hearing Time: 10:00 a.m. (EST) New York, New York 10111 Objections Due: October 23, 2018 Telephone: (212) 589-4200 Objection
More informationHow Foreign is Too Foreign? Extraterritorial Limits on the Recovery of Fraudulent Transfers
1 How Foreign is Too Foreign? Extraterritorial Limits on the Recovery of Fraudulent Transfers Timothy Graulich and Elliot Moskowitz 1 Introduction Section 550(a)(2) of the US Bankruptcy Code allows a trustee
More informationsmb Doc 50 Filed 06/27/15 Entered 06/27/15 12:26:33 Main Document Pg 1 of 7
Pg 1 of 7 Baker & Hostetler LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, New York 10111 Telephone: (212) 589-4200 Facsimile: (212) 589-4201 Attorneys for Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Substantively Consolidated
More informationLimiting the Scope of the Value Defense under 11 U.S.C. 548(c) in Avoidance Litigation. Allison Smalley, J.D. Candidate 2018
Limiting the Scope of the Value Defense under 11 U.S.C. 548(c) in Avoidance Litigation Introduction 2017 Volume IX No. 25 Limiting the Scope of the Value Defense under 11 U.S.C. 548(c) in Avoidance Litigation
More informationsmb Doc Filed 11/15/18 Entered 11/15/18 18:35:23 Main Document Pg 1 of 7
Pg 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Adv. Pro. No. 08-1789 (SMB)
More informationKatharine B. Gresham (pro hac vice pending) Hearing Date: February 2, 2010
Katharine B. Gresham (pro hac vice pending) Hearing Date: February 2, 2010 Securities and Exchange Commission Hearing Time: 10:00 a.m 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20548 Telephone: (202) 551-5148
More information: : Plaintiff, : : Defendants. : : REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW REGARDING DETERMINATION OF FOR VALUE AND NET EQUITY DECISION
Irving H. Picard v. Saul B. Katz et al Doc. 70 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------- x IRVING H. PICARD, Plaintiff, - against - SAUL B. KATZ, et
More informationbrl Doc 55 Filed 04/30/12 Entered 04/30/12 18:10:59 Main Document Pg 1 of 8
Pg 1 of 8 BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10111 Telephone: (212) 589-4200 Facsimile: (212) 589-4201 Hearing Date: May 10, 2012 at 10:00 AM Attorneys for Irving H. Picard, Trustee
More informationENTERED TAWANA C. MARSHALL, CLERK THE DATE OF ENTRY IS ON THE COURT'S DOCKET
Case 14-42974-rfn13 Doc 45 Filed 01/08/15 Entered 01/08/15 15:22:05 Page 1 of 12 U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ENTERED TAWANA C. MARSHALL, CLERK THE DATE OF ENTRY IS ON THE COURT'S DOCKET
More informationObjection Deadline: August 5, 2004 at 5:00 pm Hearing Date: August 10, 2004 at 10:00 am
Bonnie Steingart (BS-8004) FRIED, FRANK, HARRIS, SHRIVER & JACOBSON LLP Attorneys for Och-Ziff One New York Plaza New York, New York 10004 (212) 859-8000 Objection Deadline: August 5, 2004 at 5:00 pm Hearing
More informationLitigation Trustees Not Allowed to Wear Their Non-Bankruptcy Hats to Avoid Swap Transactions as Fraudulent Conveyances
2014 Volume VI No. 15 Litigation Trustees Not Allowed to Wear Their Non-Bankruptcy Hats to Avoid Swap Transactions as Fraudulent Conveyances Aura M. Gomez Lopez, J. D. Candidate 2015 Cite as: Litigation
More informationsmb Doc 33 Filed 04/24/15 Entered 04/24/15 13:00:30 Main Document Pg 1 of 14
10-05235-smb Doc 33 Filed 04/24/15 Entered 04/24/15 13:00:30 Main Document Pg 1 of 14 Baker & Hostetler LLP Hearing Date: May 20, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. 45 Rockefeller Plaza Objection Deadline: May 13, 2015
More informationcase 2:09-cv TLS-APR document 24 filed 03/26/10 page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
case 2:09-cv-00311-TLS-APR document 24 filed 03/26/10 page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA THOMAS THOMPSON, on behalf of ) plaintiff and a class, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.
More informationTRUSTEE S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO REARGUE THE COURT S ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS
Pg 1 of 21 Baker & Hostetler LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10111 Telephone: (212) 589-4200 Facsimile: (212) 589-4201 David J. Sheehan Attorneys for Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Substantively
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 16 1422 & 16 1423 KAREN SMITH, Plaintiff Appellant, v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. and KOHN LAW FIRM S.C., Defendants Appellees. Appeals
More informationPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2209 In Re: JAMES EDWARDS WHITLEY, Debtor. --------------------------------- CHARLES M. IVEY, III, Chapter 7 Trustee for the Estate
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re Electra D. Rice-Etherly, Case No. 01-60533 Debtor. Chapter 13 Hon. Marci B. McIvor / Electra D. Rice-Etherly, Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION PIKEVILLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) *** *** *** ***
Case: 7:15-cv-00096-ART Doc #: 56 Filed: 02/05/16 Page: 1 of 11 - Page ID#: 2240 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION PIKEVILLE In re BLACK DIAMOND MINING COMPANY,
More informationPension Benefit Guaranty Corporation s Termination Premiums Constitute Dischargeable Pre-Petition Contingent Claims
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation s Termination Premiums Constitute Dischargeable Pre-Petition Contingent Claims Thomas Rooney, J.D. Candidate 2010 A. Introduction In Oneida Ltd. v. Pension Benefit
More informationsmb Doc Filed 07/22/15 Entered 07/22/15 15:18:16 Main Document Pg 1 of 7
Pg 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Applicant, v. BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Adv. Pro. No. 08-1789
More informationBankruptcy Court Recognizes the Doctrine of Reverse Preemption
Bankruptcy Court Recognizes the Doctrine of Reverse Preemption Written by: Gilbert L. Hamberg Gilbert L. Hamberg, Esq.; Yardley, Pa. Ghamberg@verizon.net In In re Medical Care Management Co., 361 B.R.
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN RE: JAMES WESLEY GRADY, III JOCELYN VANIESA GRADY Debtors. CASE NO. 06-60726CRM CHAPTER 13 JUDGE MULLINS ORDER THIS MATTER
More informationAlert. Lower Courts Wrestle with Debtors Tuition Payments. December 12, 2018
Alert Lower Courts Wrestle with Debtors Tuition Payments December 12, 2018 Two courts have added to the murky case law addressing a bankruptcy trustee s ability to recover a debtor s tuition payments for
More informationCase cjf Doc 35 Filed 03/30/18 Entered 03/30/18 13:46:32 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 11
Document Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN In re: Case No.: 17-14180-13 VICTORIA SUE FISHEL, Debtor. MEMORANDUM DECISION Victoria Sue Fishel ( Debtor ) is a consumer
More informationSIPA Liquidation OBJECTION TO TRUSTEE S DETERMINATION OF CLAIM
SEEGER WEISS LLP Stephen A. Weiss Christopher M. Van De Kieft Parvin K. Aminolroaya One William Street New York, NY 10004 Tel: (212) 584-0700 Fax: (212) 584-0799 Attorneys for Melvyn I. Weiss and Barbara
More informationChapter VI. Credit Bidding s Impact on Professional Fees
Chapter VI Credit Bidding s Impact on Professional Fees American Bankruptcy Institute A. Should the Amount of the Credit Bid Be Included as Consideration Upon Which a Professional s Fee Is Calculated?
More informationmg Doc 5285 Filed 10/04/13 Entered 10/04/13 16:34:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 7
Pg 1 of 7 STORCH AMINI & MUNVES PC 2 Grand Central Tower, 25 th Floor 140 East 45 th Street New York, New York 10017 Tel. (212 490-4100 Noam M. Besdin, Esq. nbesdin@samlegal.com Counsel for Simona Robinson
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY In re: DANIEL WILBUR BENNETT and CASE NO. 04-40564 SANDRA FAYE BENNETT, CHAPTER 13 JOHN W. JOHNSON and CASE NO. 04-40593 KATHY S. JOHNSON, CHAPTER
More informationCase 2:16-cv CCC-SCM Document 13 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 94
Case 2:16-cv-04422-CCC-SCM Document 13 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 94 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY RAFAEL DISLA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
More informationsmb Doc Filed 05/26/16 Entered 05/26/16 09:29:46 Main Document Pg 1 of 23
Pg 1 of 23 Baker & Hostetler LLP Hearing Date: June 15, 2016 45 Rockefeller Plaza Hearing Time: 10:00 A.M. (EST) New York, New York 10111 Objection Deadline: June 8, 2016 Telephone: (212) 589-4200 Facsimile:
More informationsmb Doc Filed 07/13/18 Entered 07/13/18 16:10:00 Main Document Pg 1 of 8
Pg 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Adv. Pro. No. 08-1789 (SMB)
More informationSUPREME COURT RULES ON REACH OF SECURITIES FRAUD STATUTE AND VIABLITY OF F-CUBED CLASS ACTIONS
SUPREME COURT RULES ON REACH OF SECURITIES FRAUD STATUTE AND VIABLITY OF F-CUBED CLASS ACTIONS By: Bryan Erman 1 The United States Supreme Court recently held, in Morrison v. National Australia Bank, Ltd.
More informationCase Document 1035 Filed in TXSB on 09/07/18 Page 1 of 12
Case 17-36709 Document 1035 Filed in TXSB on 09/07/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re: COBALT INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC., et
More informationbrl Doc 5230 Filed 02/13/13 Entered 02/13/13 16:03:29 Main Document Pg 1 of 27
Pg 1 of 27 Baker & Hostetler LLP Hearing Date: March 13, 2013 45 Rockefeller Plaza Hearing Time: 10:00 A.M. (EST) New York, New York 10111 Objection Deadline: March 6, 2013 Telephone: (212) 589-4200 Facsimile:
More informationbrl Doc 5508 Filed 09/23/13 Entered 09/23/13 20:41:57 Main Document Pg 1 of 8
Pg 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Applicant, v. BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Adv. Pro. No. 08-1789
More informationArticle. By Richard Painter, Douglas Dunham, and Ellen Quackenbos
Article [Ed. Note: The following is taken from the introduction of the upcoming article to be published in volume 20:1 of the Minnesota Journal of International Law] When Courts and Congress Don t Say
More informationsmb Doc 252 Filed 06/10/09 Entered 06/10/09 09:16:57 Main Document Pg 1 of 8
Pg 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Applicant, Adv. Pro. No. 08-1789 (BRL) SIPA Liquidation v. BERNARD L. MADOFF
More informationSecond and Fifth Circuits Split on Who is Entitled to Whistleblower Protection Under Dodd-Frank
H Reprinted with permission from the Employee Relations LAW JOURNAL Vol. 41, No. 4 Spring 2016 SPLIT CIRCUITS Second and Fifth Circuits Split on Who is Entitled to Whistleblower Protection Under Dodd-Frank
More informationCase 1:11-cv DLC Document 11 Filed 01/04/12 Page 1 of 27. : : Appellant,
Case 111-cv-05683-DLC Document 11 Filed 01/04/12 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------X AOZORA BANK LTD., ----------------------------------------
More informationNOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0911n.06. No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0911n.06 No. 14-5212 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT THOMAS EIFLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILSON & MUIR BANK & TRUST CO.,
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
Nos. 11-968, 11-969 and 11-986 In the Supreme Court of the United States STERLING EQUITIES ASSOCIATES, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. IRVING H. PICARD, ET AL. THERESA ROSE RYAN, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. IRVING H.
More informationManagement Alert. How Long and Strong is Trustee Piccard s Claw?
How Long and Strong is Trustee Piccard s Claw? On December 10, 2008, Bernard Madoff confessed to his two sons that he had been running what amounted to a massive Ponzi scheme on the scale of approximately
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 5:16-cv JSM-PRL
Case: 16-17126 Date Filed: 09/22/2017 Page: 1 of 12 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 16-17126 D.C. Docket No. 5:16-cv-00387-JSM-PRL STACEY HART, versus CREDIT
More information11 Civ (LBS) Bankruptcy Case: No (ALG) BCP Securities, LLC ( BCP ) appeals from a September 19, 2011 Order entered by Hon.
Case 1:11-cv-07865-LBS Document 13 Filed 06/25/12 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: MILLENNIUM GLOBAL EMERGING CREDIT MASTER FUND LIMITED, et al., Debtor in
More informationto bid their secured debt at the auction.
Seventh Circuit Disagrees With Philadelphia Newspapers And Finds That Credit Bidding Required For Asset Sales In Bankruptcy Plans By Josef Athanas, Caroline Reckler, Matthew Warren and Andrew Mellen the
More informationSupreme Court Holds Section 546(e) Safe Harbor Does Not Apply To All Transfers Made Through Financial Institutions
Supreme Court Holds Section 546(e) Safe Harbor Does Not Apply To All Transfers Made Through Financial Institutions March 1, 2018 Earlier this week, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision
More informationCase: 1:18-cv Document #: 39 Filed: 02/04/19 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:282
Case: 1:18-cv-01015 Document #: 39 Filed: 02/04/19 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:282 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PATRICIA RODRIGUEZ, v. Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT IN AND FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION
Case 09-11191-PGH Doc 428 Filed 04/01/09 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT IN AND FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION IN RE: MERCEDES HOMES, INC., et. al., Debtors.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Main Document Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE CHAPTER THIRTEEN FRANK HARRISON BIEGE, BANKRUPTCY NO. 5-01-bk-03669 DEBRA ANN BIEGE, DEBTORS
More informationCase AJC Doc 10 Filed 02/26/13 Page 1 of 7. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division
Case 13-13954-AJC Doc 10 Filed 02/26/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division www.flsb.uscourts.gov In re: BANAH INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. Case No. 13-13954-AJC
More informationCase 1:10-cv TPG Document 16 Filed 05/23/11 Page 1 of 5. Plaintiff, : : against : : Defendant in rem. :
Case 110-cv-09398-TPG Document 16 Filed 05/23/11 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
More informationDEBTORS, LOOK BEFORE YOU LEAP!
THE ORANGE COUNTY BANKRUPTCY FORUM presents its June 29, 2017 "Brown Bag"* Program: DEBTORS, LOOK BEFORE YOU LEAP! SECTION 724 DECODED; A PRIMER FOR CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEES AND ATTORNEYS This program will address
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re ) Chapter 11 ) SP NEWSPRINT HOLDINGS LLC, et al., ) Case No. 11-13649 (CSS) ) Debtors. ) Jointly Administered ) Hearing Date: February
More informationsmb Doc Filed 03/15/19 Entered 03/15/19 16:37:03 Main Document Pg 1 of 7
Pg 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Adv. Pro. No. 08-1789 (SMB)
More informationA (800) (800)
No. 13-455 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS OF QUEBECOR WORLD (USA) INC., v. AMERICAN UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., Petitioner, Respondents.
More informationA Significant Expansion Of Section 546 In Madoff Ruling
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com A Significant Expansion Of Section 546 In Madoff Ruling
More informationCase jal Doc 41 Filed 04/22/16 Entered 04/22/16 12:41:09 Page 1 of 7
Case 15-11023-jal Doc 41 Filed 04/22/16 Entered 04/22/16 12:41:09 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION IN RE: LARRY W. WILLIAMS CASE NO.:
More informationA Prime Brokers Good Faith Defense to Fraudulent Transfers
A Prime Brokers Good Faith Defense to Fraudulent Transfers Michael Maffei, J.D. Candidate 2010 The exposure of Madoff Ponzi scheme, and others like it, will undoubtedly have an impact on the way that bankruptcy
More informationMinutes of Proceedings
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Minutes of Proceedings Date: Sept 22, 2011 ----------------------------------------------------------------X SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 13-2084, 13-2164, 13-2297 & 13-2351 JOHN GRUBER, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CREDITORS PROTECTION SERVICE, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Argued: June 16, 2014 Decided: August 14, 2014) Docket No.
13 4385 cv Liu v. Siemens AG UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2013 (Argued: June 16, 2014 Decided: August 14, 2014) Docket No. 13 4385 cv LIU MENG LIN, v. Plaintiff Appellant,
More informationCase 1:16-cv WGY Document 14 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:16-cv-10148-WGY Document 14 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE: JOHAN K. NILSEN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-10148-WGY MASSACHUSETTS
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC DCA Case No. 2D WILMA SMITH, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY and AMERICAN FEDERATION INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioners, v. Case No. SC04-2003 DCA Case No. 2D03-286 WILMA SMITH, individually, and on behalf of all others
More informationDelaware Bankruptcy Court Applies Safe "Safe Harbor Harbor" Protections to Repurchase Agreement; Article 9
M 0 R R I S 0 N I FOERSTER Legal Updates & News Bulletins Delaware Bankruptcy Court Applies "Safe Safe Harbor" Harbor Protections to Repurchase Agreement; Article 9 Deemed Inapplicable July 2008 by Norman
More informationCase 1:14-cv AJP Document 73 Filed 03/13/15 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:14-cv-02294-AJP Document 73 Filed 03/13/15 Page 1 of 13 Max Folkenflik, Esq. FOLKENFLIK & McGERITY LLP Attorneys for the Fastenberg Intervenors 1500 Broadway 21 st Floor New York, New York 10036
More information4 of 7 DOCUMENTS. DAVID LEWIS OLIVER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICES, LLC, Defendant. CASE NO. C BHS
Page 1 4 of 7 DOCUMENTS DAVID LEWIS OLIVER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICES, LLC, Defendant. CASE NO. C12-5374 BHS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 2013 U.S.
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:09-cv-00579-MHT Document 16 Filed 09/24/10 Page 1 of 19 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION IN RE: ) ) ROBERT L. WASHINGTON, III ) and
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS WESTERN DIVISION In re: Chapter 7 THOMAS J. FLANNERY, Case No. 12-31023-HJB HOLLIE L. FLANNERY, Debtors JOSEPH B. COLLINS, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE, Adversary
More informationsmb Doc Filed 03/23/16 Entered 03/23/16 16:06:50 Main Document Pg 1 of 8
Pg 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Adv. Pro. No. 08-1789 (SMB)
More informationThe Effect Of Philly News On Credit Bidding
Portfolio Media, Inc. 860 Broadway, 6 th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 reprints@portfoliomedia.com The Effect Of Philly News On Credit Bidding Law360, New York (July 08,
More information: : : : : : : Plaintiff : : : : : : : : ANSWER OF BANK J. SAFRA (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED. Banque Jacob Safra (Gibraltar) Limited, answering the Complaint:
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 125 Broad Street New York, New York 10004 (212) 558-4000 Attorneys for Defendant Bank J. Safra (Gibraltar) Limited UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -
More informationCase: 1:10-cv Document #: 56 Filed: 12/06/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:261
Case: 1:10-cv-00573 Document #: 56 Filed: 12/06/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:261 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION VICTOR GULLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) )
More informationCase 1:09-cv JTN Document 13 Filed 02/23/2010 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:09-cv-00044-JTN Document 13 Filed 02/23/2010 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: QUALITY STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. / UNITED STATES
More information(214)
Case 17-1330, Document 1, 04/28/2017, 2024269, Page1 of 242 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 Telephone: 212-857-8500
More informationSemCrude, Setoff, and the Collapsing Triangle: What Contract Parties Should Know
SemCrude, Setoff, and the Collapsing Triangle: What Contract Parties Should Know NORMAN S. ROSENBAUM, ALEXANDRA STEINBERG BARRAGE, AND JORDAN A. WISHNEW Recently, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 14-2811 H & Q Properties, Inc., a Nebraska corporation; John Quandahl; Mark Houlton lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants v. David E. Doll;
More informationsmb Doc 7761 Filed 08/22/14 Entered 08/22/14 11:31:58 Main Document Pg 1 of 15
Pg 1 of 15 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION : CORPORATION, : Plaintiff, : : against
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship 1993 From the Bankruptcy Courts: Eighth Circuit Protects Seller's Reclamation Rights
More informationbrl Doc 5463 Filed 09/10/13 Entered 09/10/13 14:17:37 Main Document Pg 1 of 30
Pg 1 of 30 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------X SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, BERNARD L.
More informationLiu Meng-Lin v. Siemens AG, 763 F.3d 175 (2014) Opinion LIU SIEMENS AG Synopsis Background: *177 Holdings: BACKGROUND Liu Siemens Siemens AG Siemens
763 F.3d 175 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. LIU MENG LIN, Plaintiff Appellant, v. SIEMENS AG, Defendant Appellee. Docket No. 13 4385 cv. Argued: June 16, 2014. Decided: Aug. 14, 2014.
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Harvey R. Miller Stephen Karotkin Joseph H. Smolinsky WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10153 Telephone: (212) 310-8000 Facsimile: (212) 310-8007 Attorneys for Debtors and
More informationCase Study: In Re Visteon Corp.
Portfolio Media, Inc. 860 Broadway, 6 th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 reprints@portfoliomedia.com Case Study: In Re Visteon Corp. Law360, New York (August 12, 2010) --
More informationCase , Document , 05/08/2018, , Page1 of (L)
Case 17-2992, Document 1090-1, 05/08/2018, 2297698, Page1 of 46 17-2992(L) 17-2995(CON), 17-2996(CON), 17-2999(CON), 17-3003(CON), 17-3004(CON), 17-3005(CON), 17-3006(CON), 17-3007(CON), 17-3008(CON),
More informationThe Possibility of Discharging Student Loan Debt and Assessing the Differing Standards Applied by the Courts. Maria Casamassa, J.D.
The Possibility of Discharging Student Loan Debt and Assessing the Differing Standards Applied by the Courts 2017 Volume IX No. 5 The Possibility of Discharging Student Loan Debt and Assessing the Differing
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship 1994 From the Bankruptcy Courts: When Money Mistakenly Paid to the Debtor Is Transferred
More informationUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel For the Eighth Circuit
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel For the Eighth Circuit No. 13-6023 In re: Wilma M. Pennington-Thurman llllllllllllllllllllldebtor ------------------------------ Wilma M. Pennington-Thurman llllllllllllllllllllldebtor
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2008 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 11-13-2008 Ward v. Avaya Inc Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 07-3246 Follow this and additional
More informationCircuit Split Continues: The Application of Section 523(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code to Statutory Fiduciary Duties
Circuit Split Continues: The Application of Section 523(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code to Statutory Fiduciary Duties Ri c h a r d J. Co r b i Introduction Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari
More informationA Notable Footnote In High Court Merit Management Decision
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com A Notable Footnote In High Court Merit Management
More informationAttorneys for Nortel Networks Inc.
Gary S. Lee (GL 6049) Karen Ostad (KO 5596) Dina Gielchinsky (DG 6054) LOVELLS 900 Third Avenue, 16th Floor New York, New York 10022 Tel. (212) 909-0600 Fax: (212) 909-0666 Hearing Date: January 28, 2004,
More informationIRS Trust Fund Lien (26 U.S.C. 7501) Validity and Priority Issues
IRS Trust Fund Lien (26 U.S.C. 7501) Validity and Priority Issues Joseph M. Selba, Esq. Tydings & Rosenberg LLP Maryland Bankruptcy Bar Association March 2017 Lunch Meeting A 7501 trust is, therefore,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 2:07-cv JRH-JEG, BKCY No. 02bkc21669-JSD.
Case: 11-15079 Date Filed: 01/07/2014 Page: 1 of 20 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 11-15079 D.C. Docket No. 2:07-cv-00122-JRH-JEG, BKCY No. 02bkc21669-JSD
More informationCircuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAL UNREPORTED
Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAL-16-38707 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 177 September Term, 2017 DAWUD J. BEST v. COHN, GOLDBERG AND DEUTSCH, LLC Berger,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI IN RE: ) ) NATHAN L. OSBORN and ) Case No. 06-41015 CATHERINE C. OSBORN, ) ) Debtors. ) ORDER SUSTAINING DEBTORS OBJECTION TO
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS. August Term, (Argued: February 26, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015) Docket No
14 890 CarVal v. Giddens UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2014 (Argued: February 26, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015) Docket No. 14 890 IN THE MATTER OF: LEHMAN BROTHERS,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 0:13-cv BB.
Case: 15-10038 Date Filed: 12/03/2015 Page: 1 of 13 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 15-10038 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 0:13-cv-62338-BB KEVIN
More informationCase: 2:14-cv GLF-NMK Doc #: 40 Filed: 03/04/15 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 423
Case: 2:14-cv-00414-GLF-NMK Doc #: 40 Filed: 03/04/15 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 423 NANCY GOODMAN, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:14-cv-414
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D. C. Docket No CV-3-LAC-MD
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 09-15396 D. C. Docket No. 05-00401-CV-3-LAC-MD FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPTEMBER 8, 2011 JOHN LEY
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Civil No (MJD/TNL) Admiral Investments, LLC,
CASE 0:16-cv-00452-MJD-TNL Document 26 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Brianna Johnson, Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Civil No. 16 452 (MJD/TNL)
More information