Reasons for Decision. Harness Racing New South Wales ( HRNSW ) Steward s Inquiry Mr Greg Bennett
|
|
- Gertrude Powell
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Reasons for Decision Harness Racing New South Wales ( HRNSW ) Steward s Inquiry Mr Greg Bennett Stewards Panel: R Sanders (Chairman), M Prentice & C Paul The Charges: 1. On 7 February 2014, Mr Bennett was charged pursuant to Rule 187 (2) which provides; A person shall not refuse to answer questions or to produce a horse, document, substance or piece of equipment, or give false or misleading evidence or information at an inquiry or investigation. The particulars are that Mr Greg Bennett did on 7 September 2011, give false and misleading evidence to HRNSW, during the course of its investigation into possible corrupt activity by licensed persons and former HRNSW Stewards. The relevant evidence alleged to be given by Mr Bennett for the purpose of those particulars was the provision by Mr Bennett to HRNSW of a Samsung mobile telephone in response to a direction from HRNSW dated 7 September 2011 and at that time he advised HRNSW that such telephone was his regular mobile telephone and was related to the mobile telephone number XXX. The evidence was false in that the said mobile telephone was not Mr Bennett s regular mobile telephone, and was not connected to the mobile telephone number XXX 1. Referred to as Charge On 8 May 2015, Mr Bennett was issued with a further charge pursuant to Rule 187 (2), the particular being that on Wednesday, 29 April 2015, at a Steward s inquiry he refused to answer questions subject to that inquiry. Referred to as Charge 2. Background: 3. In the week commencing 1 August 2011, HRNSW commenced its investigation into allegations that more than one of its employed Stewards had been involved in corrupt activity including the accepting of bribes from, inter alia, owners, trainers, licensed people, and unlicensed people in exchange for assurances that particular horses would be excluded from the drug testing regime in specific harness races. 4. Mr Bennett was identified by HRNSW as a person of interest in the investigation and via correspondence dated 12 August 2011 he was directed by HRNSW to provide records relating to his mobile telephone. 5. On 3 September 2011, Mr Bennett was directed to attend the offices of HRNSW, at Meredith Street, Bankstown on 7 September On 7 September 2011, Mr Bennett attended as did other numerous persons. Mr Bennett was then directed in writing to provide to a Forensic Specialist his mobile 1 Last 3 digits deleted by Stewards intentionally 1
2 telephone associated with his registered mobile telephone number XXX. Mr Bennett handed over a mobile telephone for forensic imaging. 7. In late November 2011, Mr Bennett was arrested by NSW Police in relation to a criminal investigation into corruption within the harness racing industry. On 25 November 2011, Mr Bennett s licence with HRNSW was suspended pending the outcome of its investigation. 8. Mr Bennett was found not guilty of six (6) criminal charges in the NSW District court on 7 December On 7 February 2014, via written correspondence, HRNSW issued the charge against Mr Bennett pursuant to Rule 187(2). 10. On 26 May 2014, the inquiry was commenced at HRNSW Offices and Mr M Higgins of Counsel was granted leave to represent Mr Bennett. An application was made at this time for the Chairman of Stewards, Mr Reid Sanders to step aside from the inquiry. The inquiry was adjourned to enable further evidence to support the application to be provided to HRNSW. No such evidence was provided to HRNSW. 11. The inquiry reconvened on 18 May 2015 at the offices of HRNSW, where Mr Bennett confirmed his plea of not guilty to the charge issued on 7 February Decision 12. Mr Bennett has requested that the Chairman of Stewards disqualify himself from the panel of Stewards inquiring into charge 1. Stewards have determined that the application should be refused. 13. That the charge against Mr Bennett issued on 7 February 2014, pursuant to Rule 187 (2), be proven. 14. That the charge issued against Mr Bennett on 8 May 2015, pursuant to Rule 187 (2), be proven. Reasons for Decision Application against Chairman of Stewards 15. The application that Mr Sanders disqualify himself for apprehension of bias has been made in four tranches: (i) That Mr Sanders was the representative for HRNSW in dealing with the NSW Police in relation to their investigation into corruption in harness racing (ii) That HRNSW had engaged in a joint strategy with the NSW Police (iii) That a representative from NSW Police was present on 7 September 2011, and lastly (iv) The Notice to Produce the handset on 7 September 2011 was with a view to assisting the NSW Police. 2
3 16. It is important to note at the outset that any HRNSW Steward s inquiry is conducted in accordance with the Australian Harness Racing Rules, and any HRNSW Local Rules of harness racing (collectively the rules ), as well as the relevant provisions of the Harness Racing Act This is not a court of law. Stewards do not sit as judges or judicial officers. It is not an adversarial process, but rather an inquisitorial process. Stewards hold multiple functions, including supervision of harness races; taking of evidence; testing of horses; and, in certain circumstances, investigating and inquiring into matters arising out of harness races. In those circumstances stewards are also called upon to make decisions under the rules. These inquisitorial procedures are not bound by the rule of evidence. 17. A fair minded impartial observer would of course be understood to be aware of the unique aspect of Steward s Inquiries. 18. HRNSW has assisted the NSW Police where legally possible for the purpose of their investigation. It must be stated that HRNSW was somewhat limited in its knowledge of what was occurring in the Police investigation including the application for telephone intercepts and the taking of statements from certain witnesses. 19. Mr Sanders was the HRNSW representative dealing with its own investigation and therefore it was responsible for him to be the liaison person with the NSW Police. The telephone device provided by Mr Bennett was provided to an independent forensic expert engaged by HRNSW. The information downloaded from the device was only provided to HRNSW. This information has not been provided to any other party. 20. The submission that due to certain actions undertaken by HRNSW, that assistance was provided to the NSW Police through the causation of conversations amongst parties is rejected. HRNSW was not aware nor should it have been that the NSW Police had obtained Telephone Interception Warrants. Even if it had been, it is not accepted, in light of the multiple facets of Steward s roles and the multiple functions of HRNSW, under the Harness Racing Act and the Australian Harness Racing Rules, that this would lead to Mr Sanders being biased against Mr Bennett in any way. 21. Stewards are not convinced that the matters complained of by Mr Bennett invite the logical conclusion that the Chairman of Stewards has closed his mind to the possibility that Mr Bennett may not be guilty of a particular offence. Mr Sanders being the HRNSW representative dealing with the NSW Police does not lead to a conclusion that he will be biased towards Mr Bennett in this matter and therefore that aspect of the application is refused. 22. Mr Sanders being the HRNSW representative dealing with the NSW Police does not lead to a conclusion that he will be biased towards Mr Bennett in this matter and therefore that aspect of the application is refused. Stewards will therefore proceed to consider the two charges proffered against Mr Bennett. Charge 1: Rule 187 (2) which provides; A person shall not refuse to answer questions or to produce a horse, document, substance or piece of equipment, or give false or misleading evidence or information at an inquiry or investigation. 3
4 23. Mr Bennett attended the offices of HRNSW on 7 September 2011, and was handed a Notice to Produce Mobile Telephone for Inspection. 24. Mr Bennett proceeded to produce to the forensic expert a Samsung mobile telephone. This mobile telephone device underwent imaging and the following information was extracted: 25. HRNSW continued its investigation, which included exercising its powers under the Telecommunication (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (C th) and sought information from the Optus Law Enforcement Liaison Unit on 19 December 2013 to identify information pertaining to the IMSI details downloaded from the Samsung handset. 26. IMSI is a unique number that only relates to one sim card. Optus Law Enforcement provided details of the telephone number relating to the IMSI obtained from the Samsung Handset, and that number was XXX. This number was not and is not the number related to the telephone records provided by Mr Bennett in August Telephone number XXX was not registered in the name of Mr Bennett. HRNSW further requested the call charge records (CCR s) for this number. 27. The information provided by Optus revealed that the number XXX was only connected on 17 August 2011 and was disconnected on 16 April The CCR s revealed that in the short period of 18 August to 9 September 2011 this number calls known associates of Mr Bennett. 28. Finally the IMSI number associated with the mobile telephone number XXX, has never been used for Mr Bennett s mobile number XXX. 29. There was a submission put by Mr Higgins of Counsel as to why HRNSW should not proceed with charge 1. MR HIGGINS: That's the close of the evidence on the application. The first application is that the stewards do not proceed with this inquiry, and the basis of that is that the stewards wish to rely upon evidence which is improperly obtained, and because it's improperly obtained, the stewards should not be entitled to have regard to it. 30. The finding by the District Court that the information was improperly obtained was made in the context of the consideration by that Court of the six criminal charges proceeding before it. The judgment of Bennet J was relied on by Mr Higgins. 4
5 31. HRNSW does not accept that it is bound by that judgment, or by the finding that for the purpose of those different proceedings, constituted by different parties, and pursuant to adversarial not inquisitorial principles, and subject to the rules of evidence. 32. HRNSW was entitled to issue the Notice to Produce for the purposes permitted by the Harness Racing Act and enabled by the Rules. The material was only improperly produced, on the Court s reasoning, for purposes other than the regulation and control of the harness racing industry in New South Wales. This Inquiry is now being conducted for the purpose of, inter alia, determining whether Mr Bennett committed a breach of the Rules while purporting to comply with a direction properly issued by HRNSW. It has not been suggested, and could not be, that the Inquiry has not been properly commenced pursuant to HRNSW s statutory powers. 33. Therefore the submission made by Mr Higgins that HRNSW could not rely on the evidence obtained by their forensic expert, due to a Ruling by the District Court in the criminal proceedings against Mr Bennett, which does not flow to the Stewards inquiry. 34. The evidence obtained was done so by HRNSW during the course of its investigation. 35. Further, the evidence clearly depicts that the mobile telephone provided by Mr Bennett on 7 September 2011 to HRNSW, was not the mobile telephone nor the correct sim card that related to his telephone records provided to HRNSW. This was not in dispute between the parties. 36. We are therefore comfortably satisfied that charge 1 against Mr Bennett is proven. Charge 2: That Mr Bennett refused to answer questions relating to the investigation at the inquiry (2) A person shall not refuse to answer questions or to produce a horse, document, substance or piece of equipment, or give false or misleading evidence or information at an inquiry or investigation. (7) A person who fails to comply with any provision of this rule is guilty of an offence. The particulars of the charge are that Mr Bennett, on Wednesday the 29 th of April 2015 at a Steward s Inquiry did refuse to answer questions subject of that Inquiry. 37. Mr Bennett is compelled to answer questions by the provision of the Rules. The clear and unequivocal language of the Rules A person must not refuse to answer questions indicates a clear intention of the rule makers that a person appearing before a Steward s Inquiry cannot rely on the right to silence. 38. There is no basis for a stay of the Steward s Inquiry on the basis that there are pending or current criminal investigations into the matter the subject of the Steward s Inquiry. The criminal investigation into Mr Bennett s activities appears to have concluded with his acquittal at trial, and there is no evidence to the contrary. 5
6 39. HRNSW has awaited the finalisation of the criminal investigation and trial before resuming the Inquiry out of fairness to Mr Bennett. 40. A submission has been made for Mr Bennett that it constitutes an abuse of process to recommence the Inquiry. Stewards are not persuaded that the circumstances of this case involve oppression or unfairness to Mr Bennett. It is appropriate for HRNSW to act for the protection of the harness racing industry by concluding the inquiry into Mr Bennett s conduct. The relevant delay was for Mr Bennett s own protection and to allow the conclusion of the criminal prosecution. 41. There is no argument raised against the charge itself. Mr Bennett cannot deny that he refused to answer the questions, and does not do so. Therefore the Stewards are comfortably satisfied that charge 2 against Mr Bennett is proven. GENERAL MATTERS 42. The submissions for Mr Bennett do not address the charges individually. Those submissions raise some matters which might be understood as relating to one or both of the charges. 43. The first of those matters is the suggestion that there is some double jeopardy involved by HRNSW pursuing this Inquiry and/or the two charges, in circumstances where he has been acquitted at trial. The principle of finality of acquittal is also called upon. 44. Stewards do not consider that those principles affect these matters. The criminal prosecution related to criminal charges of corruption. It was conducted by the state, and not by HRNSW (a non government statutory body). These are different matters, conducted by a different body, and for different purposes. PENALTY 45. This is was very serious investigation being undertaken by HRNSW, into corruption by licensed persons and officials, which struck at the core of the harness racing industry. 46. The production of false and misleading evidence to Stewards affects the integrity of the harness industry and its control In this sense, the matter is directly analogous with the case of Ben Sarina, who was charged with the same offence. On appeal from a penalty of warning-off imposed by the Special Stewards panel, the Tribunal said in that case: The findings on the key facts bearing in mind there was no contest the Tribunal has referred to in some detail. As to the investigation into corruption itself, it was of the most serious kind and touched upon the key and fundamental points of integrity of the industry. That corruption and the actions of the people involved in it could not be worse. It might be said in a criminal law sense a worse-case scenario cannot be imagined. In a civil disciplinary sense, a worse-case scenario cannot be imagined. As to what he, Mr Sarina, did, he lied to the investigators. As was said in Clements, the case just quoted, he was not charged with corruption, but what he did related to 6
7 inquiries dealing with corruption. His conduct therefore, as in Clements, had the capacity to thwart the investigation. The findings on the key facts bearing in mind there was no contest the Tribunal has referred to in some detail. As to the investigation into corruption itself, it was of the most serious kind and touched upon the key and fundamental points of integrity of the industry. That corruption and the actions of the people involved in it could not be worse. It might be said in a criminal law sense a worse-case scenario cannot be imagined. In a civil disciplinary sense, a worse-case scenario cannot be imagined. As to what he, Mr Sarina, did, he lied to the investigators. As was said in Clements, the case just quoted, he was not charged with corruption, but what he did related to inquiries dealing with corruption. His conduct therefore, as in Clements, had the capacity to thwart the investigation. 48. Although Mr Bennett s offending has those aspects in common with that of Mr Sarina, Stewards believe that a lesser penalty is warranted for Mr Bennett. Several matters should be regarded as more favourable in the current case. Mr Sarina s conduct was exacerbated by a finding that he lied again at the inquiry into his conduct. The manner in which Mr Sarina conducted the inquiry and appeal put HRNSW to significant expense, and required a complex hearing on the merits. That criticism cannot be made of Mr Bennett s conduct of the Inquiry. Although Mr Bennett refused to give evidence at the Inquiry, that has been charged as a separate breach, and will not be considered in relation to this offence. Stewards take into account the fact that Mr Bennett faced the expense and stress of facing significant criminal charges, of which he was acquitted (albeit in connection with rather than as a result of his production of the telephone). The submissions made for Mr Bennett made certain concessions on the facts, which was a responsible and helpful way to approach the hearing of the matter. Some reduction of penalty will be allowed for that. Stewards acknowledge that there was some partial compliance with other orders to produce. Stewards also acknowledge the financial effect of Mr Bennett s suspension to date, and any further disqualification or period of warning-off which might apply. 49. Stewards conclude that in light of the decision in Sarina, the appropriate starting point for an offence of giving false or misleading evidence, in connection with an investigation of the utmost importance to the industry, is one of indefinite warning-off. However, in light of the manner in which Mr Bennett has conducted the Inquiry; the onerous financial effect of any warning-off or disqualification; the lack of previous offences of this character; and the degree of hardship encountered by Mr Bennett in relation to the police investigation, Stewards consider it appropriate to reduce the penalty to a fixed term disqualification. 50. For charge 1, the Stewards order that Mr Bennett be disqualified for a period of 7 years back dated to the date on which he was stood down. The period of disqualification will commence on 25 November 2011 and expire on 24 November In respect of Charge 2, Stewards have had regard to the matters of Mark Vallender and Robbie Byrnes for similar offences. Those charges also arose in connection with directions issued to further the corruption investigations. 52. It is noted that Mr Bennett has not cured his decision to refuse to give evidence. Mr Bennett can choose to do so at any time, by approaching HRNSW Stewards. 53. Stewards order that Mr Bennett be warned off until such time as he appears and answers questions in relation to the Inquiry. The term of that warning-off is therefore in Mr Bennett s hands. 7
8 54. Against the Stewards decision Mr Bennett s has his right of appeal to the NSW Racing Appeals Tribunal within 7 days of this decision accompanied with the appropriate deposit. 23 June
RACING APPEALS TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF A STAY APPLICATION BY NEIL DAY
RACING APPEALS TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF A STAY APPLICATION BY NEIL DAY 1. Mr Day a licensed trainer, has lodged an appeal against the decision of 13 March 2015 of the Stewards appointed under The Australian
More informationRACING APPEALS TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF A STAY APPLICATION BY DEAN MCDOWELL
RACING APPEALS TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF A STAY APPLICATION BY DEAN MCDOWELL 1. Mr McDowell a licensed trainer, has lodged an appeal against the decision of 12 March 2015 of the Stewards appointed under
More informationRACING APPEALS TRIBUNAL NEW SOUTH WALES
RACING APPEALS TRIBUNAL NEW SOUTH WALES TRIBUNAL MR DB ARMATI PENALTY DECISION 21 MARCH 2017 LICENSEE GREG BENNETT AUSTRALIAN HARNESS RACING RULE 187(2) X 2 DECISION: 1. First charge- disqualified for
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Stephen Jeremy Bache Heard on: 27 July 2015 Location: Committee: Legal Adviser: Persons
More informationUkrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Legal Acts. THE LAW OF UKRAINE ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION
Page 1 of 10 THE LAW OF UKRAINE ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION (As amended in accordance with the Laws No. 762-IV of 15 May 2003, No. 2798-IV of 6 September 2005) The present Law: - is based on
More informationArticle 7 - Definition and form of arbitration agreement. Article 8 - Arbitration agreement and substantive claim before court
UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985) (as adopted by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law on 21 June 1985) CHAPTER I - GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 - Scope
More information2. Your conduct in relation to charge 1a took place at Grosvenor Dental Practice where you worked as a dentist.
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC AGHAEI, Khosrow Registration No: 75287 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE DECEMBER 2014 Outcome: Fitness to Practise is impaired; erasure with an immediate suspension order Khosrow
More informationIN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 15 ARC 84/12. VULCAN STEEL LIMITED Plaintiff. KIREAN WONNOCOTT Defendant
IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 15 ARC 84/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN AND VULCAN STEEL LIMITED Plaintiff KIREAN WONNOCOTT
More informationDISCIPLINE CASE DIGEST
DISCIPLINE CASE DIGEST Member: Jurisdiction: John Slawko Petryshyn Winnipeg, Manitoba Case 17-07 Called to the Bar: June 29, 1971 Particulars of Charges: Professional Misconduct (28 Charges): Breach of
More informationTHE COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION LAW OF THE KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA
KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA NATION RELIGION KING THE COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION LAW OF THE KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA Adopted by The NATIONAL ASSEMBLY Phnom Penh, March 6 th, 2006 THE COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION LAW OF THE KINGDOM
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2006
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 5 OF 2006 BETWEEN: LAURIANO RAMIREZ Appellant AND THE QUEEN Respondent BEFORE: The Hon. Mr. Justice Mottley President The Hon. Mr. Justice
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Giles Barham Heard on: 11 March 2015 Location: ACCA Offices, 29 Lincoln s Inn Fields,
More informationMr S complains about Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund Limited s decision to withdraw funding for his claim.
complaint Mr S complains about Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund Limited s decision to withdraw funding for his claim. background I issued a provisional decision on this complaint in December 2015. An extract
More informationRACING APPEAL PANEL OF NEW SOUTH WALES APPEAL OF MR PAUL MURRAY. Mr R. Beasley SC Principal Member; Mr R Clugston; Mr J Murphy; Mrs J Foley
RACING APPEAL PANEL OF NEW SOUTH WALES APPEAL OF MR PAUL MURRAY Appeal Panel: Mr R. Beasley SC Principal Member; Mr R Clugston; Mr J Murphy; Mrs J Foley Date of hearing: 26 February 2018 Date of decision:
More informationBEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZREADT 78 READT 042/16 IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND An application to review a decision of the Registrar pursuant to section 112 of the Real
More informationSchedule 10 describes, and sets out specifications in respect of, Warrants traded on ASX s market.
SCHEDULE 10 WARRANTS Schedule 10 describes, and sets out specifications in respect of, Warrants traded on ASX s market. 10.1 WARRANT RULES 10.1.1 Warrant Rules This schedule 10 applies to Warrants. 10.1.2
More informationPAPADIMOS, P Professional Conduct Committee May 2015 Page -1/6-
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC PAPADIMOS, Panagiotis Registration No: 100797 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE MAY 2015 Outcome: Erasure and Immediate Suspension Panagiotis PAPADIMOS, a dentist, DipDS Thessaloniki
More informationTHE ARBITRATION ACT, 2001
THE ARBITRATION ACT, 2001 [Act No. I of 2001] [24th January, 2001] An Act to enact the law relating to international commercial arbitration, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral award and other
More informationARBITRATION ACT NO. 4 OF 1995 LAWS OF KENYA
LAWS OF KENYA ARBITRATION ACT NO. 4 OF 1995 Revised Edition 2012 [2010] Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org [Rev. 2012] No.
More informationADVOCACY IN MEDIATION: WHAT IS ITS ROLE? WHAT ARE ITS LIMITS? by Robert Angyal SC
CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ADVOCACY IN MEDIATION: WHAT IS ITS ROLE? WHAT ARE ITS LIMITS? by Robert Angyal SC Wednesday, 17 March 2010 THE ROLE OF ADVOCACY IN MEDIATION 1 Difficulties in exploring
More informationDisciplinary Panel Hearing. Case of. Mr A Wellington MRICS [ ] London, SE12. Wednesday 10 October 2018 at 1000 hours BST
Disciplinary Panel Hearing Case of Mr A Wellington MRICS [ 1102408 ] London, SE12 On Wednesday 10 October 2018 at 1000 hours BST At 55 Colmore Row, Birmingham, B3 2AA Panel Gillian Seager (Lay Chair) Patrick
More informationArbitration Act of Bangladesh People's Republic of Bangladesh (Bangladesh - République populaire du Bangladesh)
Arbitration Act of Bangladesh People's Republic of Bangladesh (Bangladesh - République populaire du Bangladesh) THE ARBITRATION ACT, 2001 [Act No. I of 2001] [24th January, 2001] An Act to enact the law
More informationArbitration CAS 2010/A/2046 Samir Ibrahim Ali Hassan v. National Anti-Doping Committee of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), award of 5 October 2010
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration Samir Ibrahim Ali Hassan v. National Anti-Doping Committee of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Panel: Mr Gerhard Bubnik (Czech Republic),
More informationArbitration and Conciliation Act
1 of 31 20-11-2012 21:02 Constitution of Nigeria Court of Appeal High Courts Home Page Law Reporting Laws of the Federation of Nigeria Legal Education Q&A Supreme Court Jobs at Nigeria-law Arbitration
More informationHEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE
HEARING PARTLY HEARD The Committee has made a determination in this case that includes some private information. That information has been omitted from this text. GARNETT, Dean Andrew Registration No:
More informationGREYHOUND RACING NSW INQUIRY 17S035. in relation to allegations of offences under Rule 86B of the GRNSW Greyhound Racing Rules DECISION
GREYHOUND RACING NSW INQUIRY 17S035 in relation to allegations of offences under Rule 86B of the GRNSW Greyhound Racing Rules DECISION DATE: 3 November 2017 A. BACKGROUND 1. The GRNSW Inquiry Panel (Inquiry
More informationAppeal Panel Hearing. Case of. Mr Alexander Banyard. Thursday 15 June RICS Parliament Square, London. Panel
Appeal Panel Hearing Case of Mr Alexander Banyard On Thursday 15 June 2017 At RICS Parliament Square, London Panel Julian Weinberg (Lay Chair) Ian Hastie (Surveyor Member) Helen Riley (Surveyor Member)
More informationJUDGMENT. [1] In the Court a quo the appellant was refused bail by the Port Elizabeth
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, PORT ELIZABETH Case no: CA&R15/2016 Date heard: 25 th January 2017 Date delivered: 2 nd February 2017 In the matter between: LUTHANDO MFINI
More informationProposed Palestinian Law on International Commercial Arbitration
Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 32 Issue 2 2000 Proposed Palestinian Law on International Commercial Arbitration Palestine Legislative Council Follow this and additional works
More informationHONORABLE SERVICE. All Funds
HONORABLE SERVICE All Funds New Jersey law (N.J.S.A. 43: 1-3 et seq.) stipulates that the receipt of retirement benefits is expressly conditioned upon the rendering of honorable service by the member (i.e.
More informationIN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT COMMUNICATION WORKERS - PARTY NO. 1 UNION TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES - PARTY NO. 2 OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LIMITED
23 TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO E.S.D. T.D. No. 52 OF 2006 IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT Between COMMUNICATION WORKERS - PARTY NO. 1 UNION And TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES - PARTY NO. 2 OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LIMITED
More informationc t PAYDAY LOANS ACT
c t PAYDAY LOANS ACT PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 2, 2015. It is intended for information and reference
More informationCOUNSEL Ms Paterson (February) and Mr Hodge (July) for the Standards Committee Mr Godinet for the Practitioner
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZLCDT 23 LCDT 011/15 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 5 Applicant AND ROBERT
More informationARBITRATION ACT 2005 REVISED 2011 REGIONAL RESOLUTION GLOBAL SOLUTION
ARBITRATION ACT 2005 REVISED 2011 REGIONAL RESOLUTION GLOBAL SOLUTION According to Section 3(1) of the Arbitration (Amendment) Act 2018 [Act A1563] and the Ministers appointment of the date of coming
More informationUNIFORM ACT ON ARBITRATION
UNIFORM ACT ON ARBITRATION TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I: SCOPE OF APPLICATION CHAPTER II: CONSTITUTION OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL CHAPTER III THE ARBITRAL HEARING CHAPTER IV THE ARBITRAL AWARD CHAPTER V RECOURSE
More informationJOHN ARCHIBALD BANKS Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA361/2016 [2017] NZCA 69 BETWEEN AND JOHN ARCHIBALD BANKS Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: Court: Counsel: Judgment: 15 February 2017 (with an application
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Ioannis Andronikou Heard on: Tuesday, 25 July 2017 and Wednesday, 26 July 2017 Location:
More informationDISCIPLINE CASE DIGEST
DISCIPLINE CASE DIGEST Case 16-10 Member: Jurisdiction: James Graeme Earle Young Winnipeg, Manitoba Called to the Bar: June 16, 2005 Particulars of Charges: Professional Misconduct (11 Counts): Breach
More information1985 UNCITRAL MODEL LAW ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION (WITH AMENDMENTS AS ADOPTED IN 2006)
APPENDIX 2.1 1985 UNCITRAL MODEL LAW ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION (WITH AMENDMENTS AS ADOPTED IN 2006) (As adopted by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law on 21 June 1985
More informationFinal report by the Complaints Commissioner dated 2nd January 2018 Complaint number FCA00269
Final report by the Complaints Commissioner dated 2 nd January 2018 Complaint number FCA00269 The complaint 1. On 24 July 2017 you asked me to investigate a complaint about the Financial Conduct Authority
More informationHearing held in public. Summary. For the remainder of the duration of the High Court extension
Hearing held in public Summary Name: SAFDAR, Nadim [Registration number: 71868] Type of case: Outcome: Duration: Interim Orders Committee (review) Conditions varied For the remainder of the duration of
More informationARBITRATION ACT. Act No: 10/2013 ARBITRATION ACT Maldivian Government Gazette Volume 42 Edition rd July 2013
ARBITRATION ACT Act No: 10/2013 ARBITRATION ACT Maldivian Government Gazette Volume 42 Edition 102 3 rd July 2013 Chapter I Preamble Introduction & Title 1 (a) This Act lays out the principles for the
More informationMANCHESTER POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE, INC. P.O. Box 191 Manchester, CT
MANCHESTER POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE, INC. P.O. Box 191 Manchester, CT 06045-0191 APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT Please answer all questions fully and accurately. Applications may be rejected or receive lower
More informationIn the Matter of Dumis Barreau, Judiciary, Vicinage 5, Essex County CSC Docket No (Civil Service Commission, decided February 24, 2010)
In the Matter of Dumis Barreau, Judiciary, Vicinage 5, Essex County CSC Docket No. 2010-822 (Civil Service Commission, decided February 24, 2010) Dumis Barreau, a Senior Probation Officer with the Judiciary,
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Lee Martin Holberton Heard on: Wednesday, 13 April 2016 Location: ACCA Offices, The
More informationARBITRATION ACT B.E.2545 (2002) BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ, REX. Given on the 23rd Day of April B.E. 2545; Being the 57th Year of the Present Reign.
ARBITRATION ACT B.E.2545 (2002) ------- BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ, REX. Given on the 23rd Day of April B.E. 2545; Being the 57th Year of the Present Reign. His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej is graciously pleased
More informationIMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL
ar Appeal No. HX08203-2002 SA (Fair Trial-Prison Conditions) Pakistan CG [2002] UKIAT 0563 IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL Before: Mr M W Rapinet (Chairman) Mr C A N Edinboro Date of Hearing : 4 October 2002
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS. 29 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3EE
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Adrian David Neave Thompson Heard on: Tuesday, 6 January 2015 Location: Committee:
More information110th Session Judgment No. 2993
Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal 110th Session Judgment No. 2993 THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, Considering the complaints
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC RAMSAY, Laura Jo Registration No: 175661 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE SEPTEMBER 2017 Outcome: Erased with immediate suspension Laura Jo RAMSAY, a dental nurse, Qual- National
More informationNASD OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS
NASD OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, v. Complainant, Disciplinary Proceeding No. CLI050016 Hearing Officer DMF Respondent. ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY HEARING
More informationTable of Contents Section Page
Arbitration Regulations 2015 Table of Contents Section Page Part 1 : General... 1 1. Title... 1 2. Legislative authority... 1 3. Application of the Regulations... 1 4. Date of enactment... 1 5. Date of
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM. CIVIL APPEAL NO.19 OF 2004 (Appeal from Kisutu Court Employment Case No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO.19 OF 2004 (Appeal from Kisutu Court Employment Case No.24 of 2002) SECURITY GROUP (T) LTD APPELLANT VERSUS 1. KURWAJOSEPH) 2. SALUM KITUA
More informationMotorhome legal expenses policy
Motorhome legal expenses policy Helplines Motor legal expenses provides: 24/7 legal advice Insurance for legal costs for certain types of disputes Helpline services Legal helpline You can use the helpline
More informationDOUBLE JEOPARDY. Is a municipality compelled to accept the ruling made by a disciplinary appeal tribunal?
DOUBLE JEOPARDY 1. Introduction Is a municipality compelled to accept the ruling made by a disciplinary appeal tribunal? 2. Background An employee was charged with two counts of misconduct. The case was
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Alan Goddard Heard on: 30 August 2016 Location: The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI [2013] NZHC Appellant. CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI-2013-409-000006 [2013] NZHC 2388 BETWEEN AND CIRCLE K LIMITED Appellant CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Respondent Hearing: 11 September 2013 Appearances:
More information969. Pursuant to Article 95 item 3 of the Constitution of Montenegro, I hereby adopt DECREE ON THE PROMULGATION OF THE LAW ON ARBITRATION
969. Pursuant to Article 95 item 3 of the Constitution of Montenegro, I hereby adopt DECREE ON THE PROMULGATION OF THE LAW ON ARBITRATION I hereby promulgate the Law on Arbitration adopted by the 25 th
More informationEnvironmental Appeal Board
Environmental Appeal Board APPEAL NO. 92/23 WILDLIFE In the matter of appeal under s103 Wildlife Act, SBC Chap. 57 Index Chap. 433.1, 1982 BETWEEN Byron Dalziel APPELLANT AND Deputy Director of Wildlife
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV [2014] NZHC ASTRID RUTH CLARK Appellant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV-2013-404-004873 [2014] NZHC 1611 BETWEEN AND ASTRID RUTH CLARK Appellant REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 2004) Respondent Hearing: 13 June 2014
More informationB e f o r e: LORD JUSTICE DAVIS MR JUSTICE CRANSTON
Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWHC 2937 (Admin) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION DIVISIONAL COURT CO/3452/2007 Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL Thursday, 31 July 2014
More informationClient Update Hong Kong s Market Misconduct Tribunal Imposes Largest Ever Disgorgement Order
1 Client Update Hong Kong s Market Misconduct Tribunal Imposes Largest Ever Disgorgement Order HONG KONG Mark D. Johnson mdjohnson@debevoise.com INTRODUCTION On 23 June 2017, the Hong Kong Market Misconduct
More informationARBITRATION ACT, B.E (2002) BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ, REX. Given on the 23rd Day of April B.E. 2545; Being the 57th Year of the Present Reign.
ARBITRATION ACT, B.E. 2545 (2002) BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ, REX. Given on the 23rd Day of April B.E. 2545; Being the 57th Year of the Present Reign. Translation His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej is graciously
More informationWHAT DOES THE INSURER HAVE TO PROVE IN A FRAUD INVESTIGATION? WHAT CAN I DO IF I AM INVESTIGATED FOR FRAUD ON AN INSURANCE CLAIM?
WHAT CAN I DO IF I AM INVESTIGATED FOR FRAUD ON AN INSURANCE CLAIM? This fact sheet is for information only. It is recommended that you get legal advice about your situation. Investigations by insurers
More informationUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/02026/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/02026/2017 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 30 August 2017 On 11 September 2017 Before DEPUTY
More informationUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/01880/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/01880/2015 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 12 January 2018 On 08 February 2018 Before DEPUTY
More informationTHE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL & ORS Respondents
NOTE: ORDER OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL AND OF THE HIGH COURT PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAMES, ADDRESSES OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE SECOND, THIRD AND FOURTH RESPONDENTS AND THE SECOND RESPONDENT'S
More informationArbitration and Conciliation Act
Arbitration and Conciliation Act Chapter A18 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004 Arrangement of Sections Part I 1 Form of arbitration agreement. 3 Death of party. Arbitration 2. Arbitration agreement
More informationREAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE DECISION
REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO BY-LAW NO. 10 OF THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO John Van Dyk Respondent This document also
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION)
A NO: 18/2002 C IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the matter between:- ALEX DHIKUSOOKA and THE STATE APPELLANT RESPONDENT APPLICATION MMABATHO LEEUW J COUNSEL FOR
More informationARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT
ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT Arrangement of Sections Part I Arbitration Arbitration Agreement 1 Form of arbitration agreement. 4 Arbitration agreement and substantive claim before Court. 2 Arbitration
More informationDECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZREADT 53 READT 053/13 IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 PAUL C DAVIE of Auckland, Real Estate
More informationAppellant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent. Miller, Cooper and Winkelmann JJ. A Shaw for Appellant A M Powell and E J Devine for Respondent
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA600/2015 [2016] NZCA 420 BETWEEN AND DINH TU DO Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 24 August 2016 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Miller, Cooper and Winkelmann
More informationPart VII. Part V of the Polish Code of Civil Procedure Arbitration. [The following translation is not an official document]
Part VII Part V of the Polish Code of Civil Procedure Arbitration [The following translation is not an official document] 627 Polish Code of Civil Procedure. Part five. Arbitration [The following translation
More informationWCAT Decision Number: WCAT
Noteworthy Decision Summary Decision: WCAT-2010-00928 Panel: J. Callan Decision Date: March 30, 2010 Section 7 of the Workers Compensation Act Appeal Regulation Invoice for Expense Tariff Occupational
More informationPolicies, Procedures, Guidelines and Protocols
Policies, Procedures, Guidelines and Protocols Document Details Title Anti-Crime Specialists and Human Resources Advisory Team Protocol Trust Ref No 1580-36302 Local Ref (optional) Main points the document
More informationBRAAMFONTEIN CASE NO: JS 274/01. THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Respondent J U D G M E N T
Sneller Verbatim/MLS IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA BRAAMFONTEIN CASE NO: JS 274/01 2003-03-24 In the matter between M KOAI Applicant and THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Respondent J U D G
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. WM Appellee Trial Court No.
[Cite as State v. Robbins, 2012-Ohio-3862.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. WM-11-012 Appellee Trial Court No. 10 CR 103 v. Barry
More informationBefore : THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE GRIFFITH WILLIAMS MARK WEST LUCINDA BARNETT Between :
Case No: PC 2013/0480 APPEAL TO THE VISITORS TO THE INNS OF COURT ON APPEAL FROM THE DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL OF THE COUNCIL OF THE INN OF COURT Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 28/02/2014
More informationBEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. A charge laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act Defendant
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZREADT 8 READT 032/17 IN THE MATTER OF A charge laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BROUGHT BY COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE
More informationGovernment crackdown on employing illegal immigrants
Government crackdown on illegal immigrants Q. What does the haulage industry need to be aware of? Given the recent announcement of the Government s intention to crackdown on Companies illegal immigrants,
More informationPayday Loans Act. BE IT ENACTED by the Lieutenant Governor and the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Prince Edward Island as follows:
Consultation Draft Payday Loans Act September 30, 2008 Payday Loans Act BE IT ENACTED by the Lieutenant Governor and the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Prince Edward Island as follows: PART I
More informationIn the application between: Case no: A 166/2012
In the application between: Case no: A 166/2012 DEREK FREEMANTLE PUMA SPORT DISTRIBUTORS (PTY) LTD First Appellant Second Appellant v ADIDAS (SOUTH AFRICA) (PTY) LTD Respondent Court: Griesel, Yekisoet
More informationQUARTERLY REPORT: COMPLAINTS, MISCONDUCT & OTHER MATTERS
QUARTERLY REPORT: COMPLAINTS, MISCONDUCT & OTHER MATTERS Report of the Chief Constable Contact: Superintendent Cat Barrie 1. Purpose of Report 1.2 This report outlines the data and background to Complaints,
More informationArbitration Act of Angola Republic of Angola (Angola - République d'angola)
Arbitration Act of Angola Republic of Angola (Angola - République d'angola) VOLUNTARY ARBITRATION LAW (Law no. 16/03 of 25 July 2003) CHAPTER I THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT ARTICLE 1 (The Arbitration Agreement)
More informationHIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
- - ------------------- HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) CASE NO: A200/2016 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: ~ / NO. (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES:,$ I NO. (3)
More informationUNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED STATES. Senior Airman JOSEPH R. FEARS United States Air Force ACM S32331.
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED STATES v. Senior Airman JOSEPH R. FEARS United States Air Force ACM S32331 3 January 2017 Sentence adjudged 9 April 2015 by SPCM convened at Lajes
More informationSEVENTY-SIXTH SESSION
Registry's translation, the French text alone being authoritative. SEVENTY-SIXTH SESSION In re GAUTREY Judgment 1326 THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, Considering the complaint filed by Mr. Michael Leslie Howard
More informationUNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2015 ARTHUR LAMAR RODGERS STATE OF MARYLAND
UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 2879 September Term, 2015 ARTHUR LAMAR RODGERS v. STATE OF MARYLAND Beachley, Shaw Geter, Thieme, Raymond G., Jr. (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned),
More informationRajen Hanumunthadu v The state and the independent commission against corruption SCJ 288 Judgment delivered on 01 September 2010 This was an
Rajen Hanumunthadu v The state and the independent commission against corruption. 2010 SCJ 288 Judgment delivered on 01 September 2010 This was an appeal from the Intermediate Court where the Appellant
More informationKindertons Motor Legal Expenses Insurance Master Certificate Number LES/1007/1012
Kindertons Motor Legal Expenses Insurance Master Certificate Number LES/1007/1012 IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE OPERATION OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THESE TERMS COULD MEAN THAT WE DECLINE
More informationArbitration Law no. 31 of 2001
Arbitration Law no. 31 of 2001 Article 1: General Provisions This law shall be called (Arbitration Law of 2001) and shall come into force after thirty days of publishing it in the Official Gazette (2).
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, RSO 1990, c S.5 - AND -
Ontario Commission des 22nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CRAIG. Between MR ABDUL KADIR SAID. and. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent
IAC-FH-NL-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA/00950/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Royal Courts of Justice Oral determination given immediately following the hearing
More informationCRIME DEPARTMENT FACT SHEET Criminal legal aid
CRIME DEPARTMENT FACT SHEET - 4.24 - Criminal legal aid Making an Application In order to obtain criminal Legal Aid (a Legal Aid), you must complete the legal aid forms CRM14 (and often CRM15 as well)
More informationIN THE MATIER OF a Proceeding under The Certified General Accountants Act, 2010 and the Bylaws. IN THE MATIER OF Bhavesh Patel, a member of
IN THE MATIER OF a Proceeding under The Certified General Accountants Act, 2010 and the Bylaws IN THE MATIER OF Bhavesh Patel, a member of The Certified General Accountants Association of Ontario BETWEEN:
More informationOmbudsman s Determination
Ombudsman s Determination Applicant Scheme Respondent(s) Mr X Police Injury Benefit Scheme (Northern Ireland) Northern Ireland Policing Board (NIPB) Complaint summary Mr X has complained that the NIPB
More informationArbitration CAS 2007/A/1367 FC Metallurg v. Leo Lerinc, award of 14 May Panel: Mr Otto de Witt Wijnen (the Netherlands), Sole Arbitrator
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration FC Metallurg v. Leo Lerinc, Panel: Mr Otto de Witt Wijnen (the Netherlands), Sole Arbitrator Football Disciplinary sanction against
More informationAQUA PRODUCTS AND THE AQUA TRADING MARKET
SCHEDULE 10A AQUA PRODUCTS AND THE AQUA TRADING MARKET Schedule 10A describes, and sets out specifications in respect of, AQUA Products and the trading of those products on ASX s market. AQUA Products
More information