DARBA DOKUMENTS. LV Vienoti daudzveidībā LV
|
|
- Jesse Ellis
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 EIROPAS PARLAMENTS Budžeta kontroles komiteja DARBA DOKUMENTS par Eiropas Revīzijas palātas Īpašo ziņojumu Nr. 2/2014 (2013. finanšu gada budžeta izpildes apstiprināšana) Vai preferenciālie tirdzniecības režīmi tiek pienācīgi pāvaldīti Budžeta kontroles komiteja Referents: Bart Staes DT\ doc PE v01-00 Vienoti daudzveidībā
2 Introduction Preferential trade arrangements (PTAs) are an essential instrument of EU trade policy and allow trading partners to grant preferential terms in the context of their trade with each other. PTAs can be either reciprocal or unilateral. The former reduce tariff barriers with the objective of increasing trade, economic growth, employment and consumer benefits for both parties. Through unilateral arrangements, the EU grants preference without reciprocity with the objective of providing developing countries tariff-free access to the EU market, thereby contributing to poverty eradication and to promoting sustainable development in developing countries. End 2013, 39 PTAs cover trade between the EU and 180 countries and territories were in force. In 2011, the value of goods imported in the EU under these agreements amounted to more than 242 billion, representing 14% of EU imports. According to the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, common commercial policy is the exclusive competence of the Union and the procedure for establishing PTAs is set out in its Articles 206 and 207. The Commission is responsible for negotiating preferential trade arrangements, assessing and evaluating their economic, social and environmental impacts and supervising their implementation by Member States and partner countries. The Member States customs authorities bear the main responsibility for overseeing the EU s international trade by implementing measures to safeguard the financial interests of the EU and to protect it from unfair or illegal trading practices, while encouraging legitimate trade. The authorities of the beneficiary/partner countries are responsible for checking that the arrangements are adhered. The effects of PTAs by the Commission are assessed through two types of ex ante assessments used to support decision-making in trade matters i.e. impact assessments (IAs) and sustainability impact assessments (SIAs) conducted by external consultants and used as a policy tool for an ex ante assessment of the economic, social and environmental implications of a trade negotiation. Interim and ex post evaluations are also carried out to assess the actual impacts of the PTAs as a result of their implementation. Supervision and controls on PTAs rest with the customs authorities of the Member States, the authorities of the beneficiary countries and the Commission which jointly manage PTAs and cooperate to ensure that the conditions required to benefit from the preferential treatment are met thereby protecting the EU's financial interests from losses due to import of goods under PTAs not entitled to preferential tariff treatment. Audit Scope and Objectives The objective of the Court s audit was twofold: to evaluate whether the Commission has appropriately assessed the economic effects of PTAs; to assess whether the controls thereon are effective in ensuring that imports cannot wrongly benefit from a preferential tariff, resulting in the loss of EU revenue. PE v /8 DT\ doc
3 The Court examined the ex-ante and ex post evaluations carried out by, or on behalf of, the Commission of the economic effects foreseen or realised. To this end the Court analysed the documentation available at the Commission in respect of a sample of 44 PTAs, notably any IA reports, SIA studies, ex post evaluations and the arrangements for future monitoring. Particular attention was paid to how the Commission ensured the robustness of data sources used in these evaluations. The Court also verified whether ex post evaluations show that the PTAs are delivering their intended benefits and examined as well the effectiveness of the supervision arrangements and of the controls performed on PTAs by the competent authorities in five Member States (Germany, Spain, France, Italy and the United Kingdom), their control strategies and risk management, the functioning of administrative cooperation arrangements and their procedures for the recovery of any traditional own resources (TOR) due. Commission's prior evaluation, ex post monitoring function in the beneficiary countries, supervisory and control activities on PTAs were also assessed. Court's Findings and Observations The assessment of the economic effects of PTAs The Court found that the Commission has not appropriately assessed all the economic effects of PTAs. Indeed the Court stated that impact assessment or ex ante evaluations were not always carried out (only for 7 of the 13 PTAS where there was a legal requirement or a formal commitment to do so). Likewise, SIAs were only prepared for 5 of the 28 PTAs and interim and ex post evaluation for 16 out of 27 PTAs. In addition, the revenue foregone i.e. the revenue that the EU forfeits due to the tariff preferences granted to beneficiary/partner countries of PTAs was only estimated for the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) 1 but not in SIAs. The Court's work also revealed that the various assessments contained inaccuracies, were not always useful or comprehensive and based on robust methods and reliable data. Even though the use of the impact assessment tool has increased, the review of IAs showed that only the IA on the GSP regulation included a comprehensive analysis of economic impacts for beneficiary countries based on robust data sources and there was a need to better defined monitoring indicators and actions to measure the effectiveness and to strengthen the linkage to fraud and customs duties evasion to better check the GSP's vulnerability to fraud. For SIAs, the model used for quantifying the impacts (the General Equilibrium modelling - CGE) used insufficiently verified statistical data for consistency and reliability including the risk to lead to wrong conclusions in the SIAs. Timeliness and completeness of economic sectors assessed in SIAs are other elements that must be ensured to be useful for negotiators. As regards interim or ex post evaluations, the Court noted some weaknesses concerning their completeness since the analysis of economic impacts was limited to trade flows without any sectorial analysis. For the GSP, mixed results were shown by the interim evaluation insofar the policy has not 1 For the period, the impact (revenue foregone) on the EU budget amounted 8.6 billion euro amounting nearly 14% of the customs duties collected in that period. DT\ doc 3/8 PE v01-00
4 yet fully delivered its intended benefits notably the increase export diversification, economic growth or sustainable development in developing countries. The controls and supervision on PTAs The controls performed by the competent authorities (Member States, beneficiary/partner countries and the Commission) as well as the management of the administrative cooperation should ensure the correct implementation of PTAs, thereby protecting legitimate economic and financial interests. The Court reviewed the overall control strategy and risk management applied to PTAs by customs authorities and identified some weaknesses in customs controls applied leading to potential losses to the EU budget. The main weaknesses identified by the Court consist in manual, complex and time consuming interventions required in order to assess the results of the risk profiles, the low number of new local risk profile introduced in the control system in , the fact that the criteria of preferential origin was taken into account in combination with others and was not a priority in the risk management system and the absence or acceptance of copies of the movement and origin certificates by customs authorities instead of using only originals when they perform documentary checks on imports under PTAs. According to the extrapolation of the errors found in its sample of 2009, the Court has estimated the amount of duties at stake in these Member States to be 655 million euro 1 (or 6% of the gross amount of import duties collected in the 5 Member States in 2009). Shortcomings were also identified by the Court in the management of the administrative cooperation 2 by the authorities of the Member States. The review showed that Member states authorities have not started post-clearance recovery of the debt when the tariff preferential treatment received by beneficiary countries was unjustified. Following mutual assistance communications issued by OLAF in Member States when operations appear to constitute breaches of PTA provisions, the audit found too that certain Member States have not introduced the relevant information into their risk management systems. The Court identified two cases, amounting to over 2 million euro, where Member States have not reacted promptly to OLAF reports dedicated to origin investigations that may lead them to identify imports that may not be entitled to preferential tariff treatment and to proceed to the recovery of the customs debt. With regard to the Commission s supervision of Member States and beneficiary/partner countries in respect of PTAs, shortcomings have been addressed. The Commission should evaluate the continuing capacity of the country benefiting from preferential treatment to administer the arrangement and the related rules and procedures on a risk basis. The Court noted that the Commission has made prior evaluation only in respect of a limited number of partner countries and has not conducted monitoring visits to the countries benefiting from preferential treatment to check the correct implementation of the scheme as it should be. The Court then verified whether a periodical reporting system by beneficiary countries on their 1 The breakdown by Member States of this amount is the following: up of 167 million euro in respect of Germany, 176 million euro for France and 312 million euro in respect of the United Kingdom. 2 Administrative cooperation requests are sent by Member states' authorities to partner countries in case of reasonable doubts about the preferential tariff treatment they receive. PE v /8 DT\ doc
5 management and control of preferential origin has been set up in GSP countries and found that this was not the case. Difficulties were also identified in the chain of communication of the necessary information under administrative cooperation between the Member States, the beneficiary countries and the Commission notably for getting good quality and timely information from partner countries. To verify the effectiveness of OLAF s role in the protection of the financial interests of the EU concerning PTAs 1, the Court reviewed a sample of 10 preferential origin investigations and stated that, except for one investigation, OLAF was successful in demonstrating that the imported goods were not eligible for preferential tariff measures but the financial follow-up of these investigations was not enough effective. Moreover, the use of preventive and reactive measures to protect the financial interests of the EU by the Commission and Member States has to be improved by using precautionary and safeguard measures such as suspension of preferences according to the anti-fraud clause and the management of administrative errors clause introduced in the PTAs, especially in case of unsatisfactory control, bad administrative cooperation, administrative errors by the beneficiary party or fraud. Concerning the legal provisions of the PTAs, the Court observed that PTAs did not contain sufficient safeguards to protect the financial interests of the EU, in particular when complex cumulation rules of origin were at stake, certain beneficiary countries lacking of administrative capacity to manage them. More, an increased use of self-certification by means of invoice declaration to certify origin would present advantages from the own resources point of view even though the use of certificates of origin and movement certificates is still widespread. Finally, it was observed that the EU's position in reciprocal FTAs did not adequately protect its financial interests. Summary of the Commission and European External Action Service Replies The Commission underlined that the economic gains associated with trade liberalisation are well known in the entire economic literature available and specified that since 1999 all major multilateral/bilateral trade negotiations have been accompanied by a SIA. Moreover, since 2010, with one exception, all important trade negotiations have been also preceded by an IA. To perform SIAs, the Commission indicated that different modelling techniques were used, mainly General Equilibrium modelling (CGE), and drawn on data from Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) database which is widely accepted worldwide by virtually all similar international organisations such as the WTO, World Bank, OECD, UN, IMF. To date, these are the best available tools to best quantify the economic impact of trade policy changes. For the timeliness of SIAs, the Commission has committed to launch them no later than 6 months after the start of negotiations to ensure they can usefully feed into the negotiating. Eurostat is now systematically invited to the steering groups monitoring SIAs and the Commission is seeking to intensify cooperation on the quality of statistical data sources within an on-going update of the service-level agreement between DG Trade and Eurostat. 1 In addition to mutual assistance communications, OLAF carries out origin investigations to ascertain, in cooperation with the competent authorities, whether goods imported into the EU are indeed eligible for preferential tariff measures. DT\ doc 5/8 PE v01-00
6 While the Commission accepted the Court's observation on the mixed results on GSP, the Commission considered the GSP as only one of the elements contributing to the full delivery of intended benefits and stated that the new GSP regulation, entered into force on 1 January 2014, has made substantial reforms with a view to better targeting the countries most in need. As regards control activities, the Commission will further evaluate in which particular cases the usefulness of risk profiles and how they should be implemented in the area of rules of origin under PTAs. In the course of its inspections in recent years, the Commission has placed a special focus on the effectiveness of the Member States risk management systems and control strategies. The Commission will continue to encourage Member States to take all appropriate precautionary measures upon receipt of MA communications. The evaluation of the capacity of a beneficiary country is an integral part of the negotiation process with each partner. It is not, however, reflected in a formal evaluation report. The Commission will include an assessment of this capacity in the formal scoping exercises that precede new negotiations. With regard to monitoring visits, the Commission acted within the framework of the existing legal basis and in line with the respective provisions of the reciprocal trade arrangements approved by the Council and the Member States and, as appropriate, the European Parliament. However, a Commission action plan on monitoring of preferential rules of origin has been elaborated, under which visits to a beneficiary country are one of the suggested activities. The action plan will cover both unilateral arrangements such as GSP and bilateral agreements with partner countries. Since 2001, the Commission has proposed that all EU preferential trade regimes include the possibility of temporary withdrawal of preferences in the event of particular problems with the management of the preferences and/or other significant breaches of customs legislation or non-cooperation. The Commission considered that these safeguards have proved to be sufficient and will continue to propose their inclusion in all future preferential trade arrangements. At the end of 2013, the possibility of temporary withdrawal of preferences was already included in four autonomous arrangements (including GSP) covering almost 200 countries and preferential agreements with more than 30 countries. The Commission will continue to provide Member States competent authorities with all necessary information to facilitate their recovery actions and will continue promoting the replacement of origin and movement certificates with exporters self-certification. Referenta ieteikumi iespējamai iekļaušanai ikgadējā ziņojumā par budžeta izpildes apstiprinājuma sniegšanu Komisijai [Eiropas Parlaments] 1. atzinīgi vērtē īpašo ziņojumu, kurā izvērtēta preferenciālo tirdzniecības režīmu pārvaldība ES ekskluzīvās kompetences kontekstā, uzskatot šo ziņojumu par nozīmīgu ieguldījumu vispārējā politiskajā diskusijā par Eiropas Savienības ārējās tirdzniecības un attīstības politiku; pieņem zināšanai konstatējumus un ieteikumus un turpmāk tekstā izklāsta savas piezīmes un ieteikumus; PE v /8 DT\ doc
7 Vispārīgas piezīmes 2. pauž nopietnas bažas par to, ka Komisija nav pienācīgi un visā pilnībā novērtējusi preferenciālo tirdzniecības režīmu ekonomisko ietekmi un ka nav nodrošināta pilnīga ieņēmumu iekasēšana; 3. atgādina, ka ir ārkārtīgi svarīgi pienācīgi informēt politikas veidotājus, daudzās ieinteresētās puses un Eiropas nodokļu maksātājus par dažādo tirdzniecības politikas variantu un scenāriju galveno pievienoto vērtību, kā arī par to negatīvajiem aspektiem; 4. uzskata par nepieņemamu to, ka ilgtspējas ietekmes novērtējumi (IIN) dažos gadīijumos nav veikti vispār, dažos gadījumos ir nepilnīgi vai balstās uz senu vai novecojušu informāciju, savukārt citos gadījumos (Čīle) ir pieejami tikai pēc nolīguma parakstīšanas; 5. uzstāj, ka pirms ikviena jauna nolīguma parakstīšanas ir jābūt izstrādātam attiecīgajam ilgtspējas ietekmes novērtējumam un šis novērtējums jāpublisko; 6. pauž nožēlu par to, ka ne visos gadījumos vispārējā preferenču sistēmā iesaistītie partneri bija pievienojušies starptautiskām konvencijām par cilvēktiesībām un darba ņēmēju tiesībām, un aicina Komisiju piešķirt lielāku nozīmi vides un labas pārvaldības jautājumiem preferenciālās tirdzniecības režīmos; 7. vēlētos līdz gada oktobrim saņemt informāciju par pasākumiem, ko Komisija veikusi, pamatojoties uz Parlamenta un Revīzijas palātas ieteikumiem un piezīmēm; Turpmākā virzība Lai uzlabotu PTR ekonomiskās ietekmes novērtējumu, Komisijai ieteicams: 8. izņemot gadījumos, kad ir pamatoti rīkoties citādi, veikt ietekmes novērtējumu (IN) un ilgtspējas ietekmes novērtējumu (IIN) katram PTR, šajos novērtējumos sniedzot padziļinātu, vispusīgu un skaitlisku gaidāmās ekonomiskās ietekmes analīzi, kā arī precīzu aplēsi par negūtajiem ieņēmumiem; 9. pastāvīgi iesaistīt Eurostat IIN izmantoto statistikas datu avotu kvalitātes novērtēšanā un nodrošināt laikus veiktu analīzi sarunu dalībnieku vajadzībām; 10. veikt starpposma un ex post novērtējumus visiem PTR, lai novērtētu, cik lielā mērā PTR, kuru ietekme ir nozīmīga, atbilst izvirzītajiem politiskajiem mērķiem un kā var uzlabot to darbības rezultātus svarīgākajās nozarēs, minētajos novērtējumos iekļaujot arī negūto ieņēmumu aplēsi; Lai uzlabotu ES finansiālo interešu aizsardzību, Komisijai ieteicams: 11. izstrādāt ES riska profilus attiecībā uz PTR, lai dalībvalstīm būtu kopēja pieeja riska analīzei, tā samazinot zaudējumus ES budžetā; 12. pārliecināties, vai dalībvalstis uzlabo savu riska pārvaldības sistēmu un kontroles stratēģijas efektivitāti, lai samazinātu zaudējumus ES budžetā; DT\ doc 7/8 PE v01-00
8 13. mudināt dalībvalstis pieņemt piemērotus piesardzības un aizsardzības pasākumus, kad tās saņem savstarpējās palīdzības paziņojumus; 14. izvērtēt un veikt uz riska novērtējumu balstītus uzraudzības apmeklējumus valstīs, kurām tiek piemērots preferenciāls režīms, jo īpaši attiecībā uz izcelsmes un kumulācijas noteikumiem; 15. prasīt no dalībvalstīm, lai tās sniegtu kvalitatīvāku informāciju par administratīvo sadarbību; 16. uzlabot OLAF izmeklēšanu finansiālās pēcpārbaudes, lai nepieļautu zaudējumu rašanos ES budžetā noilguma dēļ; 17. nostiprināt ES pozīciju savstarpējos PTR un izmantot vairāk piesardzības un aizsardzības pasākumu, iekļaujot tos visos turpmākajos tirdzniecības nolīgumos; 18. uzstāj, ka vēlas nekavējoties saņemt pārskatu par laikposmā no līdz gadam atgūtajiem līdzekļiem; 19. vēlas saņemt informāciju par Globālā ilgtspējas pakta iniciatīvas īstenošanas rezultātiem Bangladešā. PE v /8 DT\ doc
DARBA DOKUMENTS. LV Vienoti daudzveidībā LV
EIROPAS PARLAMENTS 2014-2019 Budžeta kontroles komiteja 8.9.2014 DARBA DOKUMENTS par Eiropas Revīzijas palātas Īpašo ziņojumu Nr. 18/2013 (2013. gada budžeta izpildes apstiprināšana). Dalībvalstu lauksaimniecības
More informationEIROPAS PARLAMENTS Budžeta kontroles komiteja DARBA DOKUMENTS
EIROPAS PARLAMENTS 2014-2019 Budžeta kontroles komiteja 26.3.2015 DARBA DOKUMENTS par Eiropas Revīzijas palātas Īpašo ziņojumu Nr. 3/2015 (2014. finanšu gada budžeta izpildes apstiprināšana) ES garantija
More informationEIROPAS PARLAMENTS Budžeta kontroles komiteja DARBA DOKUMENTS
EIROPAS PARLAMENTS 2014-2019 Budžeta kontroles komiteja 3.9.2014 DARBA DOKUMENTS par Eiropas Revīzijas palātas Īpašo ziņojumu Nr. 13/2013 (2013. gada budžeta izpildes apstiprināšana) "ES attīstības palīdzība
More informationCOMMISSION DECISION. of ON THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF THE SCHENGEN FACILITY IN CROATIA. (only the English text is authentic)
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 22.4.2013 C(2013) 2159 final COMMISSION DECISION of 22.4.2013 ON THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF THE SCHENGEN FACILITY IN CROATIA (only the English text is authentic) EN EN
More informationPotential Risks to Avoidance of Customs Duties: Research in Kosovo
European Journal of Sustainable Development (216), 5, 2, 67-74 ISSN: 2239-5938 Doi: 1.1427/ejsd.216.v5n2p67 Potential Risks to Avoidance of Customs Duties: Research in Kosovo Prof. Dr. Isuf Lushi 1, Ramadan
More informationGlobal value chains, Commission trade policy priorities and data needs
Global value chains, Commission trade policy priorities and data needs Seminar on Accounting for Global Value Chains, Luxembourg 6-8 June 2017 Lars Nilsson Deputy Head of Unit, Associate Professor Chief
More informationCOMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. Towards robust quality management for European Statistics
EN EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 15.4.2011 COM(2011) 211 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL Towards robust quality management for European Statistics
More informationCommission to recover 493 million euro of CAP expenditure paid out by the Member States for 1995.
IP/99/71 Brussels, 3 February 1999 Commission to recover 493 million euro of CAP expenditure paid out by the Member States for 1995. The European Commission adopted a decision approving agricultural expenditure
More informationA. Context, Subsidiarity Check and Objectives
TITLE OF THE INITIATIVE LEAD DG RESPONSIBLE UNIT AP NUMBER LIKELY TYPE OF INITIATIVE INDICATIVE PLANNING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION INCEPTION IMPACT ASSESSMENT Possible change in the methodology to establish
More informationMore benefits from preferential trade tariffs for countries most in need: Reform of the EU Generalised System of Preferences
MEMO/11/284 Brussels, 10 May 2011 More benefits from preferential trade tariffs for countries most in need: Reform of the EU Generalised System of Preferences The Generalised System of Preferences (GSP)
More informationINTERREG - IPA CBC ROMANIA-SERBIA PROGRAMME
ANTI-FRAUD STRATEGY INTERREG - IPA CBC ROMANIA-SERBIA PROGRAMME VERSION 2016 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRINCIPLE 4 FOREWORD 4 LEGAL BASIS 4 DEFINITIONS 5 I. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 5 I.1. AIM 5 I.2. MISSION 6
More informationANNUAL REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES FUNDED BY THE 8TH, 9TH AND 10TH EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENT FUNDS (EDFs)
10.11.2011 Official Journal of the European Union 251 ANNUAL REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES FUNDED BY THE 8TH, 9TH AND 10TH EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENT FUNDS (EDFs) (2011/C 326/02) 10.11.2011 Official Journal of the
More informationANTI-FRAUD STRATEGY INTERREG IPA CBC PROGRAMMES BULGARIA SERBIA BULGARIA THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA BULGARIA TURKEY
ANTI-FRAUD STRATEGY INTERREG IPA CBC PROGRAMMES 2014-2020 BULGARIA SERBIA BULGARIA THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA BULGARIA TURKEY VERSION NOVEMBER 2016 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRINCIPLE 3 FOREWORD
More informationMID-TERM REVIEW OF EU GSP REGULATION FERM COMMENTS FEBRUARY 2017
MID-TERM REVIEW OF EU GSP REGULATION FERM COMMENTS FEBRUARY 2017 SUMMARY Rice is recognised to be one of the European Union's most vulnerable agricultural sectors. Particular attention is paid in bilateral
More informationMID-TERM EVALUATION OF THE EU S GSP: PRESENTATION OF THE MAIN FINDINGS
MID-TERM EVALUATION OF THE EU S GSP: PRESENTATION OF THE MAIN FINDINGS Civil Society Dialogue Wednesday 7 November 2018 This project is financed by and executed by DEVELOPMENT Solutions. Any views expressed
More informationEuropean Parliament resolution of 6 April 2011 on the future European international investment policy (2010/2203(INI))
P7_TA(2011)0141 European international investment policy European Parliament resolution of 6 April 2011 on the future European international investment policy (2010/2203(INI)) The European Parliament,
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT ON THE COHESION FUND (2003) (SEC(2004) 1470)
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 15.12.2004 COM(2004) 766 final. REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT ON THE COHESION FUND (2003) (SEC(2004) 1470) EN EN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Budget
More informationCase Studies from WTO Chair Holders
WTO Public Forum, WTO Chairs Programme Session: Case Studies from WTO Chair Holders "Impact of Regional Integration on Inclusive Trade Liberalisation, Competitiveness and Welfare: The Case of Turkey-EU
More informationTowards a Stronger EMU: Recent Developments in Monetary Policy and EMU Governance Reform
Towards a Stronger EMU: Recent Developments in Monetary Policy and EMU Governance Reform Gilles Noblet Deputy Director General DG International and European Relations European Central Bank Presentation
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 23 July 2018 (OR. en) Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union
Council of the European Union Brussels, 23 July 2018 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2018/0291(NLE) 11392/18 PROPOSAL From: date of receipt: 23 July 2018 To: No. Cion doc.: Subject: ACP 64 WTO 200 COASI
More informationCredit Rating Agencies ESMA s investigation into structured finance ratings
Credit Rating Agencies ESMA s investigation into structured finance ratings 16 December 2014 ESMA/2014/1524 Date: 16 December 2014 ESMA/2014/1524 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary... 4 2 Who should
More informationAction Fiche for Syrian Arab Republic. 1. IDENTIFICATION Support to the EU-Syria Association Agreement Programme (SAAP I)
Action Fiche for Syrian Arab Republic 1. IDTIFICATION Title/Number Support to the EU-Syria Association Agreement Programme (SAAP I) Total cost EU contribution: EUR 5 000 000 Beneficiary contribution: tbc
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION DECISION. Of
EN REC 01/07 EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 4-7-2008 COM(2008) 3262 final COMMISSION DECISION Of 4-7-2008 finding that post-clearance entry in the accounts of import duties is justified
More informationSecretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 19 March 2014 (OR. en) 7859/14 JUSTCIV 70 COVER NOTE From: date of receipt: 12 March 2014 To: No. Cion doc.: Subject: Secretary-General of the European Commission,
More informationThe control system for Cohesion Policy
EN The control system for Cohesion Policy How it works in the 2007 13 budget period Canarias Guyane Guadeloupe Martinique Réunion Açores Madeira giis REGIOg Structural Funds 2007-2013: Contents Foreword
More informationT HE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS D EFINITION & T REATMENT OF DAS ERRORS
T HE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS D EFINITION & T REATMENT OF DAS ERRORS E N G L II S H Introduction 4 Error definition & classification concerning the different DAS Sources 5 General situation 5 Weaknesses
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union DECISIONS
6.7.2018 L 171/11 DECISIONS DECISION (EU) 2018/947 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 4 July 2018 providing further macro-financial assistance to Ukraine THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND THE COUNCIL
More informationThe Economics of European Integration
The Economics of European Integration Chapter 5 Essential Economics of Preferential Liberalisation The PTA Diagram Studying European integrations e.g. EEC s customs union which were discriminatory, i.e.
More informationConsultation Paper. ESMA Guidelines on enforcement of financial information. 19 July 2013 ESMA/2013/1013
Consultation Paper ESMA Guidelines on enforcement of financial information 19 July 2013 ESMA/2013/1013 Date: 19 July 2013 ESMA/2013/1013 Responding to this paper The European Securities and Markets Authority
More informationINCEPTION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. A. Context, Subsidiarity Check and Objectives
TITLE OF THE INITIATIVE LEAD DG RESPONSIBLE UNIT AP NUMBER LIKELY TYPE OF INITIATIVE INDICATIVE PLANNING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION INCEPTION IMPACT ASSESSMENT Modernisation of the trade part of the EU-Chile
More informationCOMMISSION DECISION. of on technical provisions necessary for the operation of the transition facility in the Republic of Croatia
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 13.6.2013 C(2013) 3463 final COMMISSION DECISION of 13.6.2013 on technical provisions necessary for the operation of the transition facility in the Republic of Croatia EN
More informationThis document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
2008R1235 EN 06.11.2015 017.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1235/2008 of 8
More information*** DRAFT RECOMMENDATION
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on International Trade 2018/0091(NLE) 5.9.2018 *** DRAFT RECOMMDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union
More informationALLEGATO A ANNEX VII Special Conditions Grant Contract Expenditure Verification
ALLEGATO A ANNEX VII Special Conditions Grant Contract Expenditure Verification TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR AN EXPENDITURE VERIFICATION OF A GRANT CONTRACT - EXTERNAL ACTIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY - ANNEX
More informationANNEX ANNEX. to the. Commission Decision
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 16.2.2018 C(2018) 869 final ANNEX ANNEX to the Commission Decision on the adoption of the 2018 work programme for the financing of projects in the area of external trade relations,
More informationDRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/2097(INI)
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Budgetary Control 2016/2097(INI) 18.01.2017 DRAFT REPORT on the 2015 Annual Report 2015 on the protection of the EU s financial interests Fight against fraud
More informationTariffs and employment. A report for Britain Stronger in Europe
Tariffs and employment A report for Britain Stronger in Europe June 2016 2 Disclaimer Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the material in this document, neither Centre for Economics
More informationDG REGIO, DG EMPL and DG MARE in cooperation with OLAF. Joint Fraud Prevention Strategy. for ERDF, ESF, CF and EFF
EUROPEAN COMMISSION REGIONAL POLICY EMPLOYMENT,SOCIAL AFFAIRS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES OLAF MARE DG REGIO, DG EMPL and DG MARE in cooperation with OLAF Joint Fraud Prevention Strategy for ERDF, ESF, CF
More informationBrexit Quick Brief #2. An orderly exit from the EU
Brexit Quick Brief #2 1 An orderly exit from the EU s are a series of short papers intended to inform readers about key commercial, regulatory and political considerations around Brexit. While they are
More informationProposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 12.3.2018 COM(2018) 110 final 2018/0045 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on facilitating cross-border distribution of collective
More informationThe European Union s Generalised System of Preferences GSP
The European Union s Generalised System of Preferences GSP European Commission Directorate-General for Trade Sven Torfinn/Panos Pictures Contents 2 What is GSP? 3 Chronology 4 Structure of the EU's GSP
More informationANNUAL REVIEW BY THE COMMISSION. of Member States' Annual Activity Reports on Export Credits in the sense of Regulation (EU) No 1233/2011
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 17.3.2015 COM(2015) 130 final ANNUAL REVIEW BY THE COMMISSION of Member States' Annual Activity Reports on Export Credits in the sense of Regulation (EU) No 1233/2011 EN EN
More informationFINANCIAL REGULATION
FINANCIAL REGULATION The present Financial Regulation shall enter into force on the 1 st of January 2014 Adopted in Parma on 19 December 2013 For EFSA s Management Board [SIGNED] Sue Davies Chair of the
More informationDischarge 2012: Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking
P7_TA-PROV(2014)0335 Discharge 2012: Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking 1. European Parliament decision of 3 April 2014 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the
More informationWORKING DOCUMENT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Budgetary Control 15.6.2017 WORKING DOCUMT on the certification bodies new role on CAP expenditure: a positive step towards a single audit model but with significant
More informationCOMMISSION DECISION. C(2007)6121 of 12/12/2007
EN EN EN COMMISSION DECISION C(2007)6121 of 12/12/2007 adopting a Programme on financing the participation of Croatia in the ERDF European Territorial Co operation transnational programmes "South East
More informationEnglish Version. Are you ready for Brexit? IHK checklist for businesses
English Version Are you ready for Brexit? IHK checklist for businesses Are you ready for Brexit? IHK checklist for businesses 17 issues that businesses need to consider Introduction 3 Trade / Customs Law
More informationGRANT DECISION APPROVING NATIONAL PROGRAMMES AND ASSOCIATED FUNDING. Decision Number SANTE/2018/ES/SI
Ref. Ares(2018)592514-31/01/2018 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY Food Chain: Stakeholders and International Relations Director GRANT DECISION APPROVING NATIONAL PROGRAMMES
More informationANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS ASKED BY THE INTERESTED SUPPLIERS, PROVIDED BY THE PROCUREMENT COMMISSION ON
ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS ASKED BY THE INTERESTED SUPPLIERS, PROVIDED BY THE PROCUREMENT COMMISSION ON 19.03.2019 Question 1: Referring to point 1.14.8, please confirm that, considering that our jv is made
More informationCHAPTER 2 NATIONAL TREATMENT AND MARKET ACCESS FOR GOODS ARTICLE 2.1. Objective
CHAPTER 2 NATIONAL TREATMENT AND MARKET ACCESS FOR GOODS ARTICLE 2.1 Objective The Parties shall progressively liberalise trade in goods and improve market access over a transitional period starting from
More informationCommittee on Budgetary Control
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Budgetary Control 2017/2154(DEC) 30.1.2018 DRAFT REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Medicines Agency for the financial
More informationGuidance for Member States on the Drawing of Management Declaration and Annual Summary
EGESIF_15-0008-02 19/08/2015 EUROPEAN COMMISSION European Structural and Investment Funds Guidance for Member States on the Drawing of Management Declaration and Annual Summary Programming period 2014-2020
More informationTOOL #26. EXTERNAL TRADE AND INVESTMENT
TOOL #26. EXTERNAL TRADE AND INVESTMENT 1. INTRODUCTION External trade and investment are powerful engines for growth and job creation. As tariffs have largely been dismantled, disproportionate regulatory
More informationREPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS, THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 27.2.2017 COM(2017) 120 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS, THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Member States' Replies to the European
More informationCover Note Authorisation and supervision of branches of thirdcountry insurance undertakings by the Central Bank of Ireland
Cover Note Authorisation and supervision of branches of thirdcountry insurance undertakings by the Central Bank of Ireland Consultation Paper 115 November 2017 [Type here] Consultation on the Authorisation
More informationCommittee on Budgetary Control
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Budgetary Control 2016/2167(DEC) 3.2.2017 DRAFT REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Agency for Safety and Health
More informationTAXATION (CROSS-BORDER TRADE) BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES
TAXATION (CROSS-BORDER TRADE) BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES What these notes do These Explanatory Notes relate to the Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Bill as introduced in the House of Commons. These Explanatory
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 3 April 2018 (OR. en)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 3 April 2018 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2013/0103 (COD) 5700/18 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS Subject: WTO 11 ANTIDUMPING 1 COMER 10 CODEC 106 Position
More informationIII COURT OF AUDITORS
17.8.2018 Official Journal of the European Union C 291/1 III (Preparatory acts) COURT OF AUDITORS OPINION No 1/2018 (pursuant to Article 322(1)(a) TFEU) concerning the proposal of 2 May 2018 for a regulation
More informationESP extension to Indicative roadmap
ESP extension to 2018-20-Indicative roadmap TITLE OF THE INITIATIVE ROADMAP Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council amending Regulation No 99/2013 on the European statistical
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DECISIONS
17.4.2015 L 100/1 I (Legislative acts) DECISIONS DECISION (EU) 2015/601 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 15 April 2015 providing macro-financial assistance to Ukraine THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT
More informationFRAMEWORK PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
NUMBER FPA2016/EIT/CLIMATE-KIC Ref.: 00198.EIT.2016.I FRAMEWORK PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT NUMBER FPA2016/EIT/CLIMATE-KIC This Framework Partnership Agreement is between the following parties: on the one part,
More informationEuropean Commission Directorate General for Development and Cooperation - EuropeAid
European Commission Directorate General for Development and Cooperation - EuropeAid Practical guide to procedures for programme estimates (project approach) Version 4.0 December 2012 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...
More informationFree Trade Agreement between China and Switzerland
Switzerland/China - Trade and Customs Client Alert July 2013 Free Trade Agreement between China and Switzerland Switzerland - Ahead of the Curve www.bakermckenzie.com Contacts Geneva Serge Pannatier International
More informationA8-0183/ Proposal for a decision (COM(2018)0127 C8-0108/ /0058(COD)) AMENDMENTS BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT *
7.6.2018 A8-0183/ 001-001 AMDMTS 001-001 by the Committee on International Trade Report Jarosław Wałęsa Further macro-financial assistance to Ukraine A8-0183/2018 Proposal for a decision (COM(2018)0127
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 31.1.2003 COM(2003) 44 final 2003/0020 (COD) Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing a general Framework for
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 16.10.2009 COM(2009)526 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT on the follow-up to 2007 Discharge Decisions (Summary) - European
More informationINTERREG IIIC West Zone. Programme Complement
INTERREG IIIC West Zone Table of Content 1. Description of Measures... 1 1.1 Operation Type (a) Regional Framework Operations (RFO)... 2 1.2 Operation Type (b) Individual Co-operation Project:... 3 1.3
More informationReport on the annual accounts of the European Environment Agency for the financial year together with the Agency s reply
Report on the annual accounts of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2015 together with the Agency s reply 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi - L - 1615 Luxembourg T (+352) 4398 1 E eca-info@eca.europa.eu
More informationReport on the annual accounts of the Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking for the financial year Together with the Joint Undertaking s reply
Report on the annual accounts of the Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2017 Together with the Joint Undertaking s reply 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi - L - 1615 Luxembourg T (+352)
More informationFrench German roadmap for the Euro Area
French German roadmap for the Euro Area To ensure a strong economy, the European Union needs a strong currency union. This currency is the Euro, which is open to all Member States and which nearly all
More informationEncl.: Report on the annual accounts of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2015 together with the Joint Undertaking's reply.
Council of the European Union Brussels, 17 November 2016 (OR. en) 14055/16 FIN 760 COVER NOTE From: date of receipt: 17 November 2016 To: Subject: Mr Klaus-Heiner LEHNE, President of the European Court
More informationAre you ready for BREXIT? IHK checklist for companies
Are you ready for BREXIT? IHK checklist for companies English Translation provided by IHK checklist for companies: Are you ready for Brexit? 18 topics that companies should consider Contents Introduction...
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 26.01.2006 COM(2006) 22 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE
More informationREPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. on the quality of fiscal data reported by Member States in 2016
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 9.3.2017 COM(2017) 123 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on the quality of fiscal data reported by Member States in 2016 EN EN REPORT
More informationThe EU s approach to Free Trade Agreements Investment
5 The EU s approach to Free Trade Agreements This paper forms part of a series of eight briefings on the European Union s approach to Free Trade Agreements. It aims to explain EU policies, procedures and
More informationBrexit and Strategic Trade Controls: key implications Prof. dr Quentin Michel ESU- Liège University
Brexit and Strategic Trade Controls: key implications Prof. dr Quentin Michel ESU- Liège Introduction On 24/25 April, a small group of government officials, academics, and industry practitioners were invited
More informationCOMMISSION DECISION. C(2007)6376 on 18/12/2007
COMMISSION DECISION C(2007)6376 on 18/12/2007 adopting a horizontal programme on the Energy Efficiency Finance Facility for Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, Serbia including Kosovo
More informationEuropean Commission proposal for a Council Regulation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office
Initial appraisal of a European Commission Impact Assessment European Commission proposal for a Council Regulation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office Impact Assessment (SWD
More information9228/18 SBC/sr 1 DGG 1A
Council of the European Union Brussels, 24 May 2018 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2018/0058 (COD) 9228/18 'I' ITEM NOTE From: General Secretariat of the Council ECOFIN 477 CODEC 826 RELEX 443 COEST
More informationBUDGET AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS SERVICE OP/EUI/BFA/2017/001
Annex I Tender specifications BUDGET AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS SERVICE OP/EUI/BFA/2017/001 Open Call for Tender for the management of the investment portfolio of the YEAR 2017 Index CHAPTER I GENERAL INFORMATION...
More informationRisk Concentrations Principles
Risk Concentrations Principles THE JOINT FORUM BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SECURITIES COMMISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS Basel December
More informationDelegations will find attached the partially declassified version of the above-mentioned document.
Council of the European Union Brussels, 15 December 2015 (OR. en) 9036/09 EXT 2 WTO 80 SERVICES 21 CDN 13 PARTIAL DECLASSIFICATION of document: dated: 24 April 2009 new status: Subject: 9036/09 WTO 80
More informationProposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 25.5.2018 COM(2018) 298 final 2018/0150 (CNS) Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax as regards the period
More informationMultiple Framework Contract TRADE2014/01/01; request for services REVISED-TRADE2016/C2/C06
Ref. Ares(2017)4234139-30/08/2017 TERMS OF REFERENCE Related to a contract to provide Sustainability Impact Assessments (SIAs) in support of free trade agreement (FTA) negotiations between the European
More informationGuidance for Member States on Performance framework, review and reserve
EGESIF_18-0021-01 19/06/2018 Version 2.0 EUROPEAN COMMISSION European Structural and Investment Funds Guidance for Member States on Performance framework, review and reserve This version was updated further
More information2,2TRN USD.$ 182,7 20MLN.SQ. THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION. The Republic of Armenia joined the EAEU on 2 January 2015
Vienna 2017 THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION The Republic of Armenia joined the EAEU on 2 January 2015 GDP 2,2TRN USD.$ The Kyrgyz Republic joined the EAEU on 12 August 2015 POPULATION
More informationL 201/58 Official Journal of the European Union
L 201/58 Official Journal of the European Union 30.7.2008 DECISION No 743/2008/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 9 July 2008 on the Community s participation in a research and development
More informationANNUAL REVIEW BY THE COMMISSION. of Member States' Annual Activity Reports on Export Credits in the sense of Regulation (EU) No 1233/2011
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 7.2.2017 COM(2017) 67 final ANNUAL REVIEW BY THE COMMISSION of Member States' Annual Activity Reports on Export Credits in the sense of Regulation (EU) No 1233/2011 EN EN
More informationGRANT AGREEMENT for a: Project with multiple beneficiaries under the ERASMUS+ Programme 1. AGREEMENT NUMBER [EPLUS LINK Generated No.
GRANT AGREEMENT for a: Project with multiple beneficiaries under the ERASMUS+ Programme 1 AGREEMENT NUMBER [EPLUS LINK Generated No.] This Agreement ( the Agreement ) is concluded between the following
More informationņemot vērā Līgumu par Eiropas Savienības darbību un jo īpaši tā 127. panta 2. punkta pirmo un ceturto ievilkumu,
14.11.2017. L 295/89 EIROPAS CENTRĀLĀS BANKAS LĒMUMS (ES) 2017/2081 (2017. gada10. oktobris), ar ko groza Lēmumu ECB/2007/7 par TARGET2-ECB noteikumiem un nosacījumiem (ECB/2017/30) EIROPAS CENTRĀLĀS BANKAS
More informationor institution which in turn is a member of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).
Terms of Reference for an Expenditure Verification of a Grant Contract for Estonia - Latvia- Russia Cross Border Cooperation Programme within the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument 2007-2013
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 20 June 2018 (OR. en)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 20 June 2018 (OR. en) Interinstitutional Files: 2017/0251 (CNS) 2017/0249 (NLE) 2017/0248 (CNS) 10335/18 FISC 266 ECOFIN 638 NOTE From: To: No. Cion doc.: Subject:
More informationAMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2015/0263(COD) Draft opinion Curzio Maltese (PE582.
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Culture and Education 2015/0263(COD) 1.7.2016 AMDMTS 28-150 Draft opinion Curzio Maltese (PE582.075v01-00) Establishment of the Structural Reform Support Programme
More informationRevised 1 Guidance Note on Financial Engineering Instruments under Article 44 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006
REVISED VERSION 08/02/2012 COCOF_10-0014-05-EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL REGIONAL POLICY Revised 1 Guidance Note on Financial Engineering Instruments under Article 44 of Council Regulation
More informationAleksandra Dyba University of Economics in Krakow
61 Aleksandra Dyba University of Economics in Krakow dyba@uek.krakow.pl Abstract Purpose development is nowadays a crucial global challenge. The European aims at building a competitive economy, however,
More informationEuropean Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research (EMPIR) Multi-beneficiary Model Grant Agreement. (EMPIR MGA - Multi)
European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research (EMPIR) Multi-beneficiary Model Grant Agreement (EMPIR MGA - Multi) Version 5.0 12 March 2018 Version Publication Date 1.0 16.07.2015 Initial version
More informationGUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON THE FUNCTIONS OF THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY. for the programming period
Final version of 25/07/2008 COCOF 08/0014/02-EN GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON THE FUNCTIONS OF THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY for the 2007 2013 programming period Table of contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Main functions
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 19.12.2008 COM(2008) 877 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 26th annual report on the community's anti-dumping, anti-subsidy and
More informationGUIDANCE FICHE PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK REVIEW AND RESERVE IN VERSION 1 9 APRIL 2013 RELEVANT PROVISIONS IN THE DRAFT LEGISLATION
GUIDANCE FICHE PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK REVIEW AND RESERVE IN 2014-2020 VERSION 1 9 APRIL 2013 RELEVANT PROVISIONS IN THE DRAFT LEGISLATION Regulation Articles Article 18 Performance reserve Article 19 Performance
More information