Report of the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee
|
|
- Betty Pitts
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 International treaty examinations of the Exchange of Letters Constituting an Agreement to Amend Article 3 (Rules of Origin) of the Australia New Zealand Closer Economic Relations Trade Agreement (ANZCERTA) and of the Agreement to Amend the Product Specific Rules in Annex G of the ANZCERTA Report of the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee Contents Recommendation 2 Background 2 Rules of origin 2 Implementation 3 Related matters 3 Conclusion 3 Appendix A 4 Appendix B 5
2 International treaty examinations of the Exchange of Letters Constituting an Agreement to Amend Article 3 (Rules of Origin) of the Australia New Zealand Closer Economic Relations Trade Agreement (ANZCERTA) and of the Agreement to Amend the Product Specific Rules in Annex G of the ANZCERTA Recommendation The Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee has conducted international treaty examinations of the Exchange of Letters Constituting an Agreement to Amend Article 3 (Rules of Origin) of the Australia New Zealand Closer Economic Relations Trade Agreement (ANZCERTA) and of the Agreement to Amend the Product Specific Rules in Annex G of the ANZCERTA, and recommends that the House take note of its report. Background The Australia New Zealand Closer Economic Relations Trade Agreement (ANZCERTA) entered into force on 1 January The rules of origin pertaining to ANZCERTA were revised in 2005/06 and changed to implement a change in tariff classification method, which recognised the production of a product undertaken by the trading party regardless of the origin of inputs. These revised rules entered into force on 1 January Provision was made to review them within three years to address any issues arising from their implementation and to ensure their relevancy in the wider context of each country s agreements with other trading partners. Accordingly, the rules were reviewed in early Rules of origin Under Article 3 of ANZCERTA, the rules of origin are designed to protect the integrity of free trade between New Zealand and Australia by preventing exporters in other countries from shipping their product through one party to get preferential access to the market of the other. The rules of origin determine which products count as Australian or New Zealand and are thus eligible to enter the markets in either country at a zero tariff. Changes to rules of origin Negotiations regarding Article 3 of ANZCERTA have resulted in several changes. The main changes set out to simplify the tariff classification rules and remove most of the dual requirements regarding products that need to meet both a tariff requirement and a regional value content threshold. These changes mainly affect the regional value content of textiles, apparel, carpets, and made up textile articles. 2
3 We are satisfied that the proposed changes to the rules of origin would facilitate trans- Tasman trade, resulting in economic gains to both countries and advancing their integration into a single economic market. They would also reduce compliance costs deriving from the rules of origin governing trans-tasman trade. Furthermore, they would bring the ANZCERTA rules of origin into line with other free trade agreements concluded since 2007 by Australia and New Zealand with other trading partners, particularly the Agreement Establishing the ASEAN Australia New Zealand Free Trade Area. Implementation We note that the proposed rules would enter into force when New Zealand and Australia had aligned and completed their domestic legislative processes. New Zealand s domestic process will occur in two stages, the first involving the making of regulations to implement Annex G, the second the passage of legislation to implement Article 3. Related matters We have widened our examination of the international treaty examination of the amendments to ANZCERTA to include consideration of the effect of rules of origin on the capacity and ability of South Pacific Island countries and exporters to trade with Australia and New Zealand, with particular reference to the South Pacific Regional Trade and Economic Cooperation Agreement (SPARTECA). We understand that the SPARTECA rules of origin have remained largely unchanged since the agreement was signed in 1981, and that requests have been made to change the rules. The value of the rules of origin preferences in SPARTECA are being eroded by changes to the global economy and particularly the increasing use of integrated global commodity chains in the production of manufactured goods. The value-added component of the rules of origin is becoming both technically and practically difficult to meet. Changes to the rules of origin will be addressed in the negotiations of the Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations Plus (PACER Plus). However, these negotiations face challenges. We understand that New Zealand, Australia, and Pacific Island countries are discussing ways to improve the rules of origin to facilitate trade for Pacific Island countries and exporters but the issues facing them need to be clarified. We note that the tariff rates on goods imported into New Zealand or Australia are low. We recommend that the New Zealand Government continue to engage with their Australian counterparts to make the necessary changes to the rules of origin pertaining to SPARTECA while negotiations regarding PACER Plus continue. These changes could then be included in the final PACER Plus agreement. We believe that changes to these rules could lead to certainty of access to Australian and New Zealand markets for the South Pacific Island countries, and thus improve their economic prosperity. Conclusion We have conducted an examination of the treaties and believe that the revised ANZCERTA rules reflect the realities of regional and global supply chains and manufacturing processes. The revised rules would enhance trade and economic growth opportunities for New Zealand businesses in the trans-tasman market. 3
4 Appendix A Committee procedure The committee called for public submissions on the treaties. The closing date for submissions was 15 July The committee received and heard one submission. The committee met between 24 June and 29 July to consider the treaties. Committee members John Hayes (Chairperson) Hon Chris Carter (until 21 July 2010) Jacqui Dean Hone Harawira (non-voting member) Hon Pete Hodgson Dr Paul Hutchison Keith Locke Todd McClay Hon Maryan Street Phil Twyford (from 21 July 2010) 4
5 Appendix B Amendment of Article 3 of the Australia New Zealand Closer Economic Relations Trade Agreement - Rules of Origin National Interest Analysis Executive summary 1 Rules of Origin (ROO) are the means by which goods qualify for preferential tariff rates under free trade agreements (including, for Australia and New Zealand, under the Australia New Zealand Closer Economic Relations Trade Agreement (ANZCERTA)). 2 A major revision of the ANZCERTA rules of origin was undertaken in 2005/06 to allow a move from the traditional regional value content approach to rules of origin to a change in tariff classification approach 1. The new rules entered into force on 1 January Review provisions were written into the amended Article 3 of ANZCERTA to accommodate an early review of the new rules, particularly in those areas that retained an added value component. The major proposals arising from the review provide for: the immediate removal of supplementary added value requirements across a range of products but in particular for textile, clothing and carpet product lines; the removal of added value requirements for men s and boys structured apparel of tariff heading 6203 in 2012; the addition of alternative rules for textile products which allow the combined processes of printing/dyeing and finishing to confer origin; the removal of complex exclusions from some change in tariff classification rules; and the addition of new minimal processes for which origin cannot be claimed. 4 The proposed amendments to Article 3 will simplify the existing rules and will consist primarily of a simple change in tariff classification rule, or where desirable, an alternate regional value content rule based on a free on board (FOB) calculation. The revisions ensure that the ANZCERTA rules of origin continue to reflect the realities of regional and global supply chain manufacturing processes. New Zealand (and Australian) firms will more easily be able to meet rules of origin and/or face less compliance costs in establishing compliance with the origin rules governing trans-tasman trade. 1 1 Under a change in tariff classification (CTC) approach, origin is conferred if the non-originating materials used in the production of a good have undergone a specified change in tariff classification within the territory of the parties. For example origin is conferred when imported third party cotton fabric of tariff heading 5208 is transformed into a woman s shirt of tariff heading Under a regional value content (RVC) approach, origin is conferred if the value added within the territory of the parties meets a specified threshold (for example 40%). 5
6 5 The impact of the changes to the rules will be to facilitate greater trans-tasman trade, bringing economic gains for both countries from trade and in turn enhance Single Economic Market integration. Competitive adjustment impacts on business are not likely to be significant, because while the potential change in tariff levels is in the order of 5% 10%, many New Zealand and Australian textile and apparel exports already meet the current more onerous origin requirements and enter each others markets duty free. Also, New Zealand firms will tend to gain more from the shift to the change in tariff classification approach, as the regional value approach favours firms in economies with higher labour costs. There will be a small fiscal cost in term of forgone tariff revenues and there will be minor transition adjustment costs for business in moving from the complex regional value compliance regime to a change in tariff classification approach. 6 The revised rules also bring the CER ROO into line with other free trade agreements concluded since 2007 by both Australia and New Zealand with other trading partners, and in particular with the joint undertaking in the Agreement Establishing the ASEAN Australia New Zealand Free Trade Area (AANZFTA). Nature and timing of proposed treaty action 7 The ANZCERTA entered into force between Australia and New Zealand on 1 January New Zealand proposes that, subject to successful completion of the Parliamentary treaty examination process and passage of implementing legislation, Article 3 of ANZCERTA: Rules of Origin be formally amended through an Exchange of Letters ( the Amending Agreement ) between the Ministers of Trade of Australia and New Zealand. 9 The anticipated implementation date for Annex G is October 2010, although this is subject to alignment with the Australian regulation-making process. The implementation date for the Article 3 text will depend upon the Australian legislative process. It is expected that legislation will be passed in The ANZCERTA does not apply to Tokelau, the Cook Islands or Niue, therefore consultation on the Amending Agreement is not required. Reasons for New Zealand taking the treaty action 10 Under ANZCERTA s Article 3, the rules of origin are designed to protect the integrity of free trade between the countries by preventing exporters from third countries shipping their product through one party to benefit from preferential access to the market of the other. Rules of origin determine which products count as Australian or New Zealand products and thereby are eligible to enter the markets in either country at a zero tariff rate. 11 Major revision of the ANZCERTA rules of origin was undertaken in 2005/06 to allow a move from the traditional regional added value approach to rules of origin to a change in tariff classification approach. The new rules entered into force on 1 January Review provisions were written into Article 3 of ANZCERTA to accommodate an early review of the new rules, particularly in those areas that retained an added value component. Section C (27) states The Member States shall complete a review within three 6
7 years of entry into force of this Article to address any differences between the Member States arising from the operation of this Article. 13 Since 2007 New Zealand and Australia have concluded separate bilateral free trade agreements as well as the plurilateral ASEAN - Australia - New Zealand Free Trade Agreement (AANZFTA). It is important that the CER ROO keep pace with these developments to ensure that trans-tasman exporters continue to enjoy the best access to each others markets and also to minimise the associated costs of having different rules applying to different markets. Key limitations of the current regime 14 The major limitation of the current regime is the imposition of supplementary regional value content requirements across most textile, apparel and carpet product lines. Regional value content requirements in any form (but especially those calculated on an exfactory cost method) impose significant compliance costs for exporters and administrative costs for agencies charged with enforcing such rules. 15 Under the current CER ROO many textile and apparel items must meet supplementary regional value content thresholds that range from 40 to 55%. In the case of men s and boys structured apparel the regional value content requirement is 50% based on the ex-factory cost method. The 50% regional value content threshold based on the exfactory cost method is too constraining for many New Zealand businesses operating in an open economy in a rapidly globalising world. The regional value content threshold constrains the degree to which firms can maximise the use of cost competitive inputs from the global supply chain. Also the ex-factory cost method only permits a narrow set of qualifying costs associated with local labour, overhead and material costs of the manufacturer. Profits, the costs of capital and transporting goods from the factory to the point of export and so forth are excluded from the manufacturer s local cost calculation, as are most costs associated with its out-sourcing to other local manufacturers. 16 The regional value content approach does not provide ongoing certainty for firms that exports will continue to gain preferential duty free access. Businesses operating on the margins of the regional value content threshold risk losing the tariff preference if there is movement in the exchange rate. Businesses on the margins also lose incentives to seek efficiency improvements in their production models, as these efficiency gains could see them fail to meet the regional value content threshold and lose access to the tariff preference. 17 Another limitation is the complexity of some of the change in tariff classification rules which can constrain manufacturing process options or add to business compliance costs. (For example some rules in the existing CER ROO are expressed as change of tariff heading xxxx except from headings yyyy to zzzz). In more recently concluded FTAs New Zealand has successfully negotiated simpler rules without these complex exceptions. 7
8 Advantages and disadvantages to New Zealand of the treaty actions Objectives 18 The review of CER ROO aims to ensure that the ROO facilitate and enhance trade in goods between New Zealand and Australia in line with the Single Economic Market objective of closer trans-tasman integration. 19 While the CER ROO implemented in 2007 were relatively liberal, there was room to enhance trans-tasman trade in goods through a more efficient trading environment. The review aimed to achieve this by removing undue barriers to preferential access such as supplementary the regional value content requirements, and by reducing compliance costs to business by extending the change in tariff classification approach across the vast majority of product lines. 20 Accordingly, the objective of the treaty amendments is both the enhancement of gains in preferential access for New Zealand exports to Australia and, in line with our SEM objectives, that we enhance trans-tasman integration. The review therefore required not only gains to New Zealand, but also to enhance trans-tasman market integration. Advantages 21 The proposed new rules bring the majority of textile, apparel and carpet product lines properly within the change in tariff classification regime and remove the supplementary regional value content requirements. 22 The advantages of the change in tariff classification approach: reduces compliance costs for businesses. Generally all the exporter needs to do is ensure that the imported inputs are classified differently from the goods being exported (as specified under the rules). Many will have customs brokers doing this for them and costs will depend on the complexity of the product; how many parts are imported etc. But unlike under the RVC approach there is no need for recording the value of each imported component, exchange rates at the time of importation, share of overheads per unit etc. This reduction in compliance costs is especially advantageous for small and medium enterprises; provides a much higher degree of certainty for exporters of preferential market access for business. The simple change in tariff classification approach removes uncertainties associated with price movements, such as exchange rate fluctuations, on the ability to qualify; allows manufacturers to plan ahead with confidence, allowing them to extract further production efficiencies and develop their business model in the face of global competition; removes the constraint on exploiting production efficiencies that may be created by regional value content requirements. It supports increasingly integrated cross border production models where manufacturing operations are split up amongst several countries; 8
9 is easier and cheaper to administer (the respective Customs administrations do not have to explore or verify complex accounting systems) thereby facilitating trade and trans Tasman integration; and is consistent with emerging international practice in Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) and with the approach under the New Zealand Thailand Closer Economic Partnership (NZTCEP), the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership (Trans- Pacific SEP), the China New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, and the Asean- Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement (AANZFTA). 23 While both economies will benefit from increases in trade, the removal of supplementary regional value content requirements will tend to better support competitive advantage for some New Zealand firms. This is because the relative differences in trans- Tasman labour costs means that it may be easier for Australian firms to meet an regional value content approach relative to New Zealand firms operating on the margin of the threshold. It should be noted however that many factors affect competitive advantage and the rules of origin may not be the main constraint in many instances. Disadvantages 24 The liberalisation of the CER ROO poses a risk that New Zealand industry will be adversely affected as a result of an increase in Australian products entering the New Zealand market duty free. 25 However, this risk to New Zealand industry is believed to be minor: There is no evidence suggesting that a large number of Australian firms are failing to qualify for duty free access as a result of constraining rules of origin. The supplementary regional value content requirements were removed from women s apparel in 2007; and in the three years to date there has been no evidence of a significant increase in imports of women s apparel from Australia. Arguably the imposition of supplementary regional value content requirements has been more advantageous to Australian exporters. Higher labour costs in Australia relative to New Zealand may have made it easier for Australian firms to meet the supplementary regional value content requirement. The supplementary regional value content requirements may therefore have acted as less of a constraint to Australian exporters in gaining preferential access. Other changes in the New Zealand s tariff regime will also lessen any adverse impact of increased duty free access for Australian imports. Unilateral tariff reductions over recent years now allow textiles to be imported into New Zealand at a 5% tariff rate without any need for compliance with a rule of origin. This 5% rate does not impose a significant barrier to the New Zealand market. However in terms of apparel there may be some advantage to New Zealand garment makers. The lower tariff for textiles provides New Zealand garment makers with a slight advantage in relation to their cost of imports over Australian garment makers who continue to face a 10% tariff on their imported textile inputs. 26 There will be a fiscal cost associated with the amendment. The liberalised rules mean that there is the potential for more Australian products to enter the New Zealand market 9
10 under preference of a zero tariff rate. This cost is expected to be minor and the foregone revenue is expected to be countered by the dynamic gains associated with the reduction in costs to New Zealand consumers and the removal of Australian tariffs faced by New Zealand exporters. A more complete analysis of the fiscal costs is contained in the Economic, Social, Cultural and Environmental Costs and Effects of the Amendment section of this NIA. Legal obligations which would be imposed on New Zealand by the amendment action, the position for reservations to the amendment, and an outline of any dispute settlement mechanisms Provision of information and verification 27 The specific obligations under Article 3 of ANZCERTA to provide that an importer may make a claim for preferential treatment based on a declaration by the exporter; to supply written determinations with reasons for any denial of preferential treatment; and to consult and exchange information in regard to goods claiming preference are currently already in operation in both Parties and are not affected by the proposed amendments. Rather the changes impact on the rules and methodologies for calculating any particular goods entitlement to preference. Consultation and modification 28 New Zealand and Australia have agreed to consult on the operation of this agreement as and when necessary. Reservations 29 As ANZCERTA is a bilateral treaty which has already entered into force there is no provision for reservations. Amendments can be made with the consent of both parties, subject to their necessary domestic procedures required to bring such amendments into force. Dispute settlement in ANZCERTA 30 There are no specific dispute resolution procedures under ANZCERTA. Measures which the Government could or should adopt to implement the treaty action, including specific reference to implementing legislation 31 Regulations by way of an Order in Council will need to be made under section 65 of the Customs and Excise Act 1996 to implement the Amending Agreement. There are no other options as to how to implement the Amending Agreement. The anticipated implementation date for Annex G is October 2010, although this is subject to alignment with the Australian regulation-making process. The implementation date for the Article 3 text will depend upon the Australian legislative process. Given that the upcoming Australian Federal election will reduce the number of parliamentary sitting days in 2010, it is most likely that legislation allowing implementation of the Article 3 text will be passed in Australian officials advise that it is extremely unlikely that implementation would take place after
11 Economic, social, cultural and environmental costs and effects of the amendment 32 Since the inception of ANZCERTA in 1983 both countries have moved progressively towards a deeper and broader integration of policies, laws and regulatory regimes through coordination, mutual recognition and harmonisation instruments. This has been strengthened by frequent communication and contact between Ministers and government agencies of both countries. The amendments to Article 3, which allow Australian and New Zealand businesses alike to purchase their inputs from the most internationally competitive source, complement Governments objectives to develop a trans-tasman single economic market (SEM). 33 The amendments to Article 3 of ANZCERTA fine-tune the CTC approach adopted in the 2005/06 review. Further liberalisation of the ANZCERTA ROO under a CTC approach will allow manufacturers to evolve their business practices in the light of international competition and will offer considerable dynamic benefits. They will support continued growth in New Zealand exports and our manufacturer s competitive position in our largest trading market. 34 The amendments to Article 3 of the ANZCERTA have no perceived adverse effects on Maori interests or inconsistencies with our human rights obligations. The costs to New Zealand of compliance with the amendment 35 Costs of implementing the amendments to Article 3 of the ANZCERTA (principally the removal of supplementary regional value content requirements across textile and apparel lines) will be negligible. Given the rules will be broadly similar to the AANZFTA and the China NZ FTA, implementation costs (preparing new training material and information material) are expected to be low. 36 Financial implications arising from this amendment are expected to be small. The changes to the product specific rules of origin are either: neutral because New Zealand s MFN tariff is zero (the rule of origin is irrelevant where the MFN rate is zero); neutral because although some rules may be phrased in a different way, they do not necessarily change the fundamental criteria for achieving preference; more liberal because the new rules lower the threshold to confer origin either by lowering or removing the added value threshold or by allowing more third party sourcing of inputs. 37 As the outcome of most consequence for this review resulted in more liberal access to preferential tariff rates between Australia and New Zealand, the main financial cost will be a potential loss of tariff duties paid to the New Zealand Government. 38 Due to the reasons outlined above, it is not anticipated that a larger number of products will now enter tariff free into New Zealand than previously. Trade between New Zealand and Australia under the headings where rules have been changed averaged around NZ$1.204 billion in exports to Australia annually over the three years Imports from Australia were similar, averaging NZ$1.240 billion annually over the same three years. 11
12 The actual trade affected by the revised rules should be expected to be less than this however, as these figures include re-exports on which the revised rules will have no impact. 39 The area where the rules will have the greatest potential impact is in the textiles and apparel sector where regional value content thresholds are being lowered and in most cases removed. The majority of exports/imports between Australia and New Zealand will have been meeting the relevant thresholds anyway (the major benefit for these products is that a compliance step has been removed). For those operating on the margins of the regional value content threshold it will create certainty in the event of price movements such as those associated with exchange rate fluctuations or more competitive sourcing options. 40 Exports to Australia in these products over the period averaged NZ$ 368 million annually and imports from Australia averaged $NZ 125 million annually. Figures supplied by Customs New Zealand show that the actual duty collected from these lines was NZ$ 936,367 in 2008, down from NZ$ 1,392,023 in This tariff revenue equates to less than 1% of the value of these imports, indicating that most of the imports are indeed entering duty free. This figure should be viewed as a ceiling of lost revenue to the government. 41 Revenue foregone by the New Zealand Government is expected to be at least neutralised by dynamic gains to the New Zealand economy associated with the liberalisation, such as the reduction in costs to consumers and to manufacturers who would benefit by: increasing access to duty free tariff rates into the Australian market for these products. (The window of opportunity and margin of preference - is reduced as Australia s tariff rates under their other FTAs move closer to zero (e.g. United States, Chile); being able to use these duty free products as inputs into their production; having more liberal access to global supply chains in order to source the most cost efficient inputs to aid their trade to Australia; and providing more scope for economies of scale in production, as these rules are now closely aligned with the origin requirements of other New Zealand agreements such as the ASEAN Australia New Zealand Free Trade Agreement. Completed or proposed consultation with the community and parties interested in the amendment 42 The following Government agencies have been consulted in the preparation of this paper and concur with its recommendations: the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, the New Zealand Customs Service, the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and the Treasury. 43 Revision proposals were published on MED s website and stakeholders were invited to make submissions. Further consultation with individual industry representatives was conducted on a case by case basis as required. While for some proposals in the textile and clothing sector there were mixed views, all submissions were generally supportive of further liberalisation of the CER ROO. 12
13 Subsequent protocols and/or amendments to the treaty and their likely effects 44 As mentioned above, the amended Article 3 has a specific consultation and modification section. The close and long-standing political relationship between Australia and New Zealand means that any issues of grievance or concern are addressed through discussion between the two Governments. As with this proposed amendment, any future amendments will be subject to the necessary domestic procedures, including Cabinet approval, before entry into force. Withdrawal or denunciation provision in the treaty 45 As this proposal is for an amendment to be made to an existing treaty, there is no withdrawal or denunciation provided for. The ANZCERTA itself can be terminated at any time by mutual agreement of the parties. 13
Tariff (New Zealand Hong Kong, China Closer Economic Partnership Agreement) Amendment Bill
Tariff (New Zealand Hong Kong, China Closer Economic Partnership Agreement) Amendment Bill 148 1 Report of the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee Contents Recommendation 2 Introduction 2 Advantages
More informationReport of the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee. Contents Recommendation 2 Appendix A 3 Appendix B 4
International treaty examination of the Convention between Japan and New Zealand for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income Report of the
More informationNational Interest Analysis
National Interest Analysis Date of proposed binding Treaty action Scope Reasons for New Zealand to become party to the Treaty Impacts on New Zealand of the Treaty entering into force Obligations Economic,
More informationPROTOCOL ON INVESTMENT TO THE NEW ZEALAND AUSTRALIA CLOSER ECONOMIC RELATIONS TRADE AGREEMENT NATIONAL INTEREST ANALYSIS
PROTOCOL ON INVESTMENT TO THE NEW ZEALAND AUSTRALIA CLOSER ECONOMIC RELATIONS TRADE AGREEMENT NATIONAL INTEREST ANALYSIS CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1 NATURE AND TIMING OF PROPOSED TREATY
More informationoverview FACT SHEET trans-pacific partnership TPP
CANADA JAPAN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MEXICO VIET NAM BRUNEI MALAYSIA SINGAPORE PERU AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND CHILE trans-pacific partnership overview FACT SHEET will give New Zealand better access to globally
More informationAGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE ASEAN AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND FREE TRADE AREA (and associated instruments) NATIONAL INTEREST ANALYSIS
AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE ASEAN AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND FREE TRADE AREA (and associated instruments) NATIONAL INTEREST ANALYSIS AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE ASEAN AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND FREE TRADE AREA (and
More informationAGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE ASEAN-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND FREE TRADE AREA (AANZFTA) Making Use of AANZFTA to Export or Import Goods
AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE ASEAN-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND FREE TRADE AREA (AANZFTA) Making Use of AANZFTA to Export or Import Goods Contents 1. Introduction 2. AANZFTA s Tariff Commitments 2.1 Overview of
More informationNEW ZEALAND MALAYSIA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT
NEW ZEALAND MALAYSIA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT (and associated instruments) NATIONAL INTEREST ANALYSIS CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 1 NATURE AND TIMING OF PROPOSED TREATY ACTIONS 10 2 REASONS FOR NEW ZEALAND
More informationFREE TRADE AGREEMENTS ANALYSIS
FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS ANALYSIS F R E E T R A D E A G R E E M E N T S I N F O R C E Free Trade Agreement About the Free Trade Agreement ASEAN-Australia-NZ Free Trade Agreement (AANZFTA) The AANZFTA is Australia
More informationinformation about THE rules
ISSN 1175-396X 42 Customs Fact Sheet Important information ASEAN-Australia-new zealand free trade area (aanzfta): information about THE rules of origin IMPORTS This fact sheet outlines the rules of origin
More informationInternational treaty examination of the Treaty on Cooperation in Fisheries Surveillance and Law Enforcement in the South Pacific Region
International treaty examination of the Treaty on Cooperation in Fisheries Surveillance and Law Enforcement in the South Pacific Region Report of the Primary Production Committee The Primary Production
More informationInternational treaty examination of the Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations (PACER) Plus
International treaty examination of the Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations (PACER) Plus Report of the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee Contents Recommendation 2 The agreement and
More informationNATIONAL INTEREST ANALYSIS
Attachment 2 NATIONAL INTEREST ANALYSIS International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage (Bunkers Convention) Executive Summary 1. It is proposed that New Zealand become party
More informationNEW ZEALAND HONG KONG CEP DISCUSSION PAPER SUBMISSION BY BUSINESS NEW ZEALAND MAY 2001
1. Introduction NEW ZEALAND HONG KONG CEP DISCUSSION PAPER SUBMISSION BY BUSINESS NEW ZEALAND MAY 2001 1.1 With 76,000 members, Business New Zealand is the leading national organisation representing the
More informationA comparison of New Zealand s trade agreements in SE Asia
A comparison of New Zealand s trade agreements in SE Asia Key considerations for New Zealand exporters Report to MFAT July 2010 About NZIER NZIER is a specialist consulting firm that uses applied economic
More informationInternational treaty examination of the Protocol of 1996 to Amend the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims 1976
International treaty examination of the Protocol of 1996 to Amend the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims 1976 Report of the Transport and Industrial Relations Committee Contents
More informationSummary of negotiating objectives
Summary of negotiating objectives On 29 October 2015 New Zealand and European Union (EU) leaders announced the intention to start the process for negotiations to achieve swiftly a deep and comprehensive
More informationJAPAN BRUNEI DARUSSALAM AUSTRALIA
MALAYSIA SINGAPORE VIET NAM BRUNEI DARUSSALAM CANADA JAPAN AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND MEXICO Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership PERU CHILE VIET NAM. JAPAN. NEW ZEALAND. AUSTRALIA.
More informationProductivity Commission Study into Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements. ANZ Submission
Productivity Commission Study into Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements ANZ Submission 2 Executive Summary ANZ has a long-standing, substantial and growing presence in the Asia-Pacific region, including
More informationSSEK Legal Consultants
2018 International Commercial Legal Cooperation Forum: CHINESE TRADE AND INVESTMENT INTO INDONESIA THE IMPACT OF AFTA Michael S. Carl michaelcarl@ssek.com SSEK Legal Consultants November 28, 2018 History
More informationEconomic Impact of Canada s Participation in the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership
Economic Impact of Canada s Participation in the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Office of the Chief Economist, Global Affairs Canada February 16, 2018 1. Introduction
More informationStudy of Regional and Bilateral Agreements by the Productivity Commission. Analysis of Recent Developments Commissioned and reviewed by the BCA
Study of Regional and Bilateral Agreements by the Productivity Commission Analysis of Recent Developments Commissioned and reviewed by the BCA ITS Global April 2010 1 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary
More informationTrần Thanh Hải (Mr.) Deputy Director General Agency of Foreign Trade Ministry of Industry and Trade of Viet Nam
Trần Thanh Hải (Mr.) Deputy Director General Agency of Foreign Trade Ministry of Industry and Trade of Viet Nam Major content Consecutive growth of Viet Nam s textile and garment industry FDI s growth
More informationReport of the Finance and Expenditure Committee. February Contents. Recommendation... 2 Appendix A... 3 Appendix B... 4
International treaty examination of the Second Protocol to amend the agreement for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income with the Government
More informationReport of the Finance and Expenditure Committee. Contents Recommendation 2 Appendix A 3 Appendix B 4
International treaty examination of the Third Protocol to the Convention between the Government Republic of India and the Government of New Zealand for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention
More informationZEALAND NEW EMBARGO: On 2-3 August 1990, the GATT Council will consider reports on the
EMBARGO: NOT FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE 1200 HOURS GMT FRIDAY 3 AUGUST 1990 GATT TRADE POLICY REVIEW NEW ZEALAND GATT/1487 16 July 1990 On 2-3 August 1990, the GATT Council will consider reports on the trade
More informationREGULATORY IMPACT STATEMENT 2002 MINIMUM WAGE REVIEW
REGULATORY IMPACT STATEMENT 2002 MINIMUM WAGE REVIEW Statement of the problem and the need for action Subsection 5(1) of the Minimum Wage Act 1983 states that The Minister of Labour shall, in each year
More informationPrinciples for cross-border financial regulation
REGULATORY GUIDE 54 Principles for cross-border financial regulation June 2012 About this guide This guide sets out ASIC s approach to recognising overseas regulatory regimes for the purpose of facilitating
More informationREGULATORY IMPACT STATEMENT
REGULATORY IMPACT STATEMENT BACKGROUND In November 2002 Cabinet [CAB Min (02) 31/9 refers] agreed that complementary medicines should be regulated as therapeutic products under a risk-based regulatory
More informationSubmission to the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties inquiry to the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement March 2016
Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties inquiry to the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement March 2016 Cheryl Kalisch Gordon cheryl.kalischgordon@graingrowers.com.au A p p e n d i x P a g
More informationTRANSITIONAL GUIDELINES FOR COMPLETING THE INFORMATION ON THE ORIGIN CONFERRING CRITERION ON THE CERTIFICATE OF ORIGIN (CO) FORM OF THE AANZFTA
TRANSITIONAL GUIDELINES FOR COMPLETING THE INFORMATION ON THE ORIGIN CONFERRING CRITERION ON THE CERTIFICATE OF ORIGIN (CO) FORM OF THE AANZFTA The following tables are a transitional guide for users of
More informationMINERALS COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA SUBMISSION TO DEPARTMENT OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE ON PROPOSED PACIFIC ALLIANCE FREE TRADE AGREEMENT
MINERALS COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA SUBMISSION TO DEPARTMENT OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE ON PROPOSED PACIFIC ALLIANCE FREE TRADE AGREEMENT JULY 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 AUSTRALIA S MINING TRADE
More informationImplication of Australia s measures for its non-discrimination obligations under the OECD Codes of Liberalisation
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development DAF/INV(2017)33/FINAL DIRECTORATE FOR FINANCIAL AND ENTERPRISE AFFAIRS INVESTMENT COMMITTEE English - Or. English 9 February 2018 Implication of Australia
More informationTrade Note May 29, 2003
Trade Note May 29, 2003 Rules of Origin in Free Trade Agreements The World Bank Group www.worldbank.org International Trade Department By Paul Brenton These notes summarize recent research on global trade
More informationAssociate Professor, Dr Pham Thi Hong Yen Central Economic Commission Viet Nam
Welcoming the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans- Pacific Partnership Agreement (CPTPP) Vietnam continue to promote broader international economic integration Associate Professor, Dr Pham
More informationRestricting Foreign Ownership of Auckland International Airport
Treasury Report: Restricting Foreign Ownership of Auckland International Airport Date: 29 February 2008 Report No: T2008/297 Action Sought Minister of Finance (Hon Dr Michael Cullen) Action Sought Consider
More informationPayroll giving: providing a real-time benefit for charitable giving
Payroll giving: providing a real-time benefit for charitable giving A government discussion document Hon Dr Michael Cullen Minister of Finance Hon Peter Dunne Minister of Revenue First published in November
More informationGuide for Business: Using the First Protocol
Guide for Business: Using the First Protocol Guide to using the First Protocol Table of Contents Guide to the First Protocol for Business... 1 Which Certificate of Origin (COO) should I use?... 4 1. Which
More informationREGULATORY IMPACT STATEMENT 2003 MINIMUM WAGE REVIEW. Statement of the nature and magnitude of the problem and the need for government action
REGULATORY IMPACT STATEMENT 2003 MINIMUM WAGE REVIEW Statement of the nature and magnitude of the problem and the need for government action 1 Subsection 5(1) of the Minimum Wage Act 1983 states that The
More informationASEAN-Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Area (AANZFTA) Ms Foo May Yan Manager (FTA Division) Trade Services and Policy Group 9 July 2010
ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Area (AANZFTA) Ms Foo May Yan Manager (FTA Division) Trade Services and Policy Group 9 July 2010 THE SINGAPORE PUBLIC SERVICE: INTEGRITY SERVICE EXCELLENCE 1 Outline
More informationBRIEFING ON The TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (TPPA)
BRIEFING ON The TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (TPPA) BY SYAHRIL SYAZLI GHAZALI Strategic Negotiation Division MITI 21 January 2016 1 BRIEF BACKGROUND 2005 (P4) - Brunei, Chile, Singapore & New Zealand.
More informationAPEC AND PROGRESS TOWARD BOGOR GOALS
APEC AND PROGRESS TOWARD BOGOR GOALS Inter-American Development Bank March 2010 This document was prepared by the Integration and Trade Sector (INT) of the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) for the
More informationPEPANZ Submission: New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme Review 2015/16
29 April 2016 NZ ETS Review Consultation Ministry for the Environment PO Box 10362 Wellington 6143 nzetsreview@mfe.govt.nz PEPANZ Submission: New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme Review 2015/16 Introduction
More informationAUSTRALIA S POLICIES TOWARDS PROTECTION AND FREE TRADE
AUSTRALIA S POLICIES TOWARDS PROTECTION AND FREE TRADE Tim Riley Director Economic Literacy Centre PROTECTION: TARIFFS AND SUBSIDIES Economic Arguments: Protect infant industries Protect employment during
More informationEconomic Impact of Canada s Potential Participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
Economic Impact of Canada s Potential Participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement Office of the Chief Economist Show table of contents 1. Introduction The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
More informationOPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR VIETNAM S TEXTILE AND GARMENT EXPORTS IN TPP AND EU-VIETNAM FTA
OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR VIETNAM S TEXTILE AND GARMENT EXPORTS IN TPP AND EU-VIETNAM FTA International Trade and Economics Series June 2016 DISCLAIMER We endeavour to report accurate information
More informationo by banning the production, use, or trade of certain persistent organic pollutants:
Imports and Exports (Restrictions) Amendment Bill Government Bill Explanatory Note General policy statement This Bill amends the Import Control Act 1988 "(the principal Act") to provide for the making
More informationChina / Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA) Maximising Opportunities. December 2014
China / Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA) Maximising Opportunities December 2014 FTAs UTILISED BY ONLY 19% OF AUSTRALIAN EXPORTERS 75% OF EXPORTERS THAT USE FTAs EXPERIENCE EXPORT GROWTH Topics 1.
More informationSingapore 17 AUG 2012.
RESEARCHERS AT SINGAPORE S INSTITUTE OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN STUDIES SHARE THEIR UNDERSTANDING OF CURRENT EVENTS Singapore 17 AUG 2012. RCEP: Going Beyond ASEAN+1 FTAs Sanchita Basu Das During the 21 st ASEAN
More informationTrans-Tasman Regulatory Framework for Patent Attorneys
OFFICE OF THE MINISTER OF COMMERCE The Chair Cabinet Economic Growth and Infrastructure Committee Trans-Tasman Regulatory Framework for Patent Attorneys Proposal 1. This paper reports back on submissions
More informationThe Next-Generation Interactive APEC Tariff Database
The Next-Generation Interactive APEC Tariff Database A tool to help SMEs access trading markets in Asia Pacific Initiative by USCIB, NC-APEC, US-ASEAN Business Council, TradeMoves LLC & Mercor Consulting
More informationThe Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)
The Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) Making History Complete CETA text reached in August 2014, marking the end of negotiations. Canada and the EU finished the legal
More informationOur position. Towards a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement between the EU and Indonesia
Towards a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement AmCham EU speaks for American companies committed to Europe on trade, investment and competitiveness issues. It aims to ensure a growth-orientated
More informationTAX LAWS AMENDMENT (CROSS BORDER TRANSFER PRICING) BILL 2013: MODERNISATION OF TRANSFER PRICING RULES EXPOSURE DRAFT - EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
2012 TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (CROSS BORDER TRANSFER PRICING) BILL 2013: MODERNISATION OF TRANSFER PRICING RULES EXPOSURE DRAFT - EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM (Circulated by the authority of the Deputy Prime Minister
More informationCLOSER ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP
The New Zealand Hong Kong, China CLOSER ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT General Review 1 January 2011 31 December 2012 Page 2 of 45 Executive Summary New Zealand and Hong Kong, China have enjoyed long-standing,
More information5. I intend to bring a further paper to this committee in August 2016 to start the process to ratify the Paris Agreement.
5. I intend to bring a further paper to this committee in August 2016 to start the process to ratify the Paris Agreement. Background 6. The Paris Agreement is the world s response to addressing climate
More informationPLAN A+ Creating a prosperous post-brexit U.K. Executive Summary. Shanker A. Singham Radomir Tylecote
PLAN A+ Creating a prosperous post-brexit U.K. Executive Summary Shanker A. Singham Radomir Tylecote 1 Executive Summary Delivering the Brexit Prize The opportunity before the UK as a result of Brexit
More informationC Foreign direct investment
C Foreign direct investment There is a range of barriers to foreign direct investment (FDI) between Australia and New Zealand (box C.1). The main types of barriers are: restrictions on inward investment
More informationIn Confidence. Amendments to the Financial Markets Conduct Regulations 2014
Chair Cabinet Economic Growth and Infrastructure Committee OFFICE OF THE MINISTER OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS Amendments to the Financial Markets Conduct Regulations 2014 Proposal 1 This paper seeks
More informationINSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR PRUDENTIAL REGULATION
13 June 2007 Office of the Minister of Finance Office of the Minister of Commerce Chair CABINET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR PRUDENTIAL REGULATION Proposal 1. This paper
More informationANZ Submission to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade White Paper Public Consultation
ANZ Submission to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade White Paper Public Consultation February 2017 A. INTRODUCTION 1. ANZ welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the Department of Foreign Affairs
More information1. OVERVIEW OF RULES. (1) Rules of Origin
CHAPTER 9 RULES OF ORIGIN 1. OVERVIEW OF RULES (1) Rules of Origin Rules of origin are used to determine the nationality of goods traded in international commerce, however, there are no internationally
More informationThe Coalition s Policy for Trade
1 The Coalition s Policy for Trade September 2013 2 Key Points As one of the world s leading trading nations, Australia depends on open and transparent international markets for jobs and economic growth.
More informationImpact Summary: GST on low-value goods
Impact Summary: GST on low-value goods Section 1: General information Purpose Inland Revenue, the New Zealand Customs Service and The Treasury are responsible for the analysis and advice set out in this
More informationCHAPTER 2 NATIONAL TREATMENT AND MARKET ACCESS FOR GOODS ARTICLE 2.1. Objective
CHAPTER 2 NATIONAL TREATMENT AND MARKET ACCESS FOR GOODS ARTICLE 2.1 Objective The Parties shall progressively liberalise trade in goods and improve market access over a transitional period starting from
More informationGovernment Policy Statement on land transport 2018 release for public engagement
In Confidence Office of the Minister of Transport Chair, Cabinet Economic Development Committee Government Policy Statement on land transport 2018 release for public engagement Proposal 1. This paper seeks
More informationThe Future of WTO-Plus Provisions in Preferential Trade Agreements
The Future of WTO-Plus Provisions in Preferential Trade Agreements Andrew L. Stoler Executive Director Institute for International Trade The University of Adelaide 2010 International Trade Law Symposium
More informationReport of the Finance and Expenditure Committee
International treaty examination of taxation agreements with the Republic of South Africa, the United Arab Emirates, the Republic of Chile, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the
More informationReport of the Finance and Expenditure Committee
International treaty examination of the Agreement between the Kingdom of Spain and the Government of New Zealand for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to
More informationSINGAPORE AND COSTA RICA SIGN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT
SINGAPORE AND COSTA RICA SIGN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT SINGAPORE, 6 April 2010 - Singapore and Costa Rica today signed the Singapore-Costa Rica Free Trade Agreement (SCRFTA), strengthening bilateral ties between
More informationOFFICE OF THE MINISTER OF COMMERCE. The Chair CABINET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REGULATION OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES PROPOSAL
OFFICE OF THE MINISTER OF COMMERCE The Chair CABINET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REGULATION OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES PROPOSAL 1 This paper outlines the final report of the Financial Intermediaries
More informationTrans-Pacific Partnership
Trans-Pacific Partnership Advantages & Disadvantages for Vietnam Based Businesses November 2015 HCMDMS#184365 TPP Impact on Vietnam s Prospects 2015 Baker & McKenzie LLP 2 12 Countries: - Asia: Brunei,
More informationTaxation (Annual Rates, Maori Organisations, Taxpayer Compliance and Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill
Taxation (Annual Rates, Maori Organisations, Taxpayer Compliance and Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill Officials Report to the Finance and Expenditure Committee on Submissions on the Bill Supplementary report
More informationInconsistencies in treatment of foreign investment in trade agreements
AOIF Paper 5 Inconsistencies in treatment of foreign investment in trade agreements Kristen Bondietti Australian APEC Study Centre, Monash University December 2008 AUSTRALIA S OPEN INVESTMENT FUTURE INCONSISTENCIES
More informationPROTOCOL ON INVESTMENT TO THE NEW ZEALAND AUSTRALIA CLOSER ECONOMIC RELATIONS TRADE AGREEMENT
PROTOCOL ON INVESTMENT TO THE NEW ZEALAND AUSTRALIA CLOSER ECONOMIC RELATIONS TRADE AGREEMENT Preamble New Zealand and Australia ( the Parties ), Conscious of their longstanding friendship and close historic,
More informationISSUES ON TRADE IN GOODS
CHAPTER 1 Chapter 1: Issues on Trade in Goods ISSUES ON TRADE IN GOODS The economic partnership agreements that have been entered into by Japan are unique in nature for their comprehensiveness. The provisions
More informationSUMMARY OF THE 2015 NEW ZEALAND BUSINESS OPERATIONS SURVEY: INTERNATIONAL ENGAGEMENT
SUMMARY OF THE 2015 NEW ZEALAND BUSINESS OPERATIONS SURVEY: INTERNATIONAL ENGAGEMENT REPORT PREPARED BY: RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS UNIT ECONOMIC DIVISION MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE FEBRUARY 2016
More informationTaxation of non-controlled offshore investment in equity
Taxation of non-controlled offshore investment in equity An officials issues paper on suggested legislative amendments December 2003 Prepared by the Policy Advice Division of the Inland Revenue Department
More informationImproving market access for agricultural. other preferential treatments
WTO/ESCAP/UPSE Regional Seminar on Trade in Agriculture And Agriculture Negotiations 16-18 October 2012 Quezon City, Philippines Improving market access for agricultural products: RTAs and other preferential
More informationComprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. National Interest Analysis
Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership National Interest Analysis February 2018 [This page is intentionally left blank] Table of Contents Table of Contents Frequently Used
More informationASEAN Framework Agreement on Services
ASEAN Framework Agreement on Services The Governments of Brunei Darussalam, the Republic of Indonesia, Malaysia, the Republic of the Philippines, the Republic of Singapore, the Kingdom of Thailand, and
More informationStatement to the House of Commons Standing Committee on International Trade
Statement to the House of Commons Standing Committee on International Trade Regarding the Canada-Korea Free Trade Agreement Ailish Campbell, Vice President, Policy, International and Fiscal Issues Mr.
More informationProposals for the New Zealand Accounting Standards Framework
Proposals for the New Zealand Accounting Standards Framework Incorporating the Draft Tier Strategy and Presented to the Minister of Commerce in accordance with Section 34A of the Financial Reporting Act
More informationSubmission to the Federal Tax Discussion Paper. Prepared by the Urban Development Institute of Australia (UDIA)
Submission to the Federal Tax Discussion Paper Prepared by the Urban Development Institute of Australia (UDIA) June 2015 Contents Contents... 2 UDIA in Brief... 3 Introduction... 4 Recommendations... 5
More informationReviewing the Importance. for Indonesia
Review of Indonesian Economic Policies Reviewing the Importance of Free Trade Agreements for Indonesia Yose Rizal Damuri This policy brief is the result of an activity entitled Economic Policymaking in
More information2016/17 Annual review of New Zealand Trade and Enterprise
2016/17 Annual review of New Zealand Trade and Enterprise Report of the Economic Development, Science and Innovation Committee March 2018 Contents Recommendation... 2 Introduction... 2 Financial and service
More informationFree Trade Agreement Utilisation Study
February 2018 Free Trade Agreement Utilisation Study www.pwc.com.au Free Trade Agreement Utilisation Study 3 Contents Executive summary... 04 Glossary... 07 Overview of Australia s FTA network... 08 Key
More informationRaising Standards of Regional Liberalisation
Raising Standards of Regional Liberalisation Re-shaping APEC for the Asia-Pacific Century 11-12 December 2006 Melbourne, Australia Andrew L. Stoler 1 Introduction In the first six years of the Twenty-first
More informationTax incentives for giving to charities and other non-profit organisations
Tax incentives for giving to charities and other non-profit organisations A government discussion document Hon Dr Michael Cullen Minister of Finance Hon Peter Dunne Minister of Revenue First published
More informationNEW ZEALAND THAILAND CLOSER ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (NZTCEPA): INFORMATION ABOUT THE RULES OF ORIGIN - IMPORTS
ISSN 1175-396X 30 CUSTOMS FACT SHEET» IMPORTANT INFORMATION NEW ZEALAND THAILAND CLOSER ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (NZTCEPA): INFORMATION ABOUT THE RULES OF ORIGIN - IMPORTS This fact sheet outlines
More informationRequirements on Livestock Improvement Corporation and the role of the Access Panel
Requirements on Livestock Improvement Corporation and the role of the Access Panel Regulatory Impact Statement ISBN No: 978-0-478-43762-1 (online) July 2014 Disclaimer While every effort has been made
More informationNorthern Ireland and Customs
Northern Ireland and Customs We understand there is an assumption in Whitehall and Brussels that there are no technical obstacles to NI goods being classified as British or Irish, with businesses potentially
More informationCFRED The Trans Pacific Partnership Impact and Implications. Assessing the content from a business perspective
CFRED The Trans Pacific Partnership Impact and Implications. Assessing the content from a business perspective 1 M I C H A E L M U D D S E C R E TA R Y G E N E R A L, A PA C T H E O P E N C O M P U T I
More informationRules of Origin. And why they matter to SME exporters in developing countries. UNCTAD Executive Training on Negotiating and drafting rules of origin
And why they matter to SME exporters in developing countries UNCTAD Executive Training on Negotiating and drafting rules of origin Florence, April 20th 2015 Who are we? - Centre for the Promotion of Imports
More informationTaxing Income Across International Borders. A Policy Framework
Taxing Income Across International Borders A Policy Framework 30 July 1991 PREFACE Minister of Finance, Hon Ruth Richardson Minister of Revenue, Hon Wyatt Creech TAXING INCOME ACROSS INTERNATIONAL BORDERS
More informationFederation of East African Freight Forwarders Associations (FEAFFA) INFORMATION BOOKLET ON THE 2015 REVISED EAC RULES OF ORIGIN
Federation of East African Freight Forwarders Associations (FEAFFA) INFORMATION BOOKLET ON THE 2015 REVISED EAC RULES OF ORIGIN Federation of East African Freight Forwarders Associations (FEAFFA) The Federation
More informationFinancial Services Liberalization and its Sequencing in the APEC Region: WTO and RTAS
2003 August PECC INTERNATIONAL SECRETARIAT 4 Nassim Road Singapore 258372 Tel: 65-6737 9823 Fax: 65-6737 9824 Email: peccsec@pacific.net.sg Home page: http://www.pecc.net PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION COUNCIL
More informationImpact Summary: Making Tax Simpler Improvements to the administration of tax for individuals.
Impact Summary: Making Tax Simpler Improvements to the administration of tax for individuals. Section 1: General information Purpose Inland Revenue and Treasury are solely responsible for the analysis
More informationCase Studies from WTO Chair Holders
WTO Public Forum, WTO Chairs Programme Session: Case Studies from WTO Chair Holders "Impact of Regional Integration on Inclusive Trade Liberalisation, Competitiveness and Welfare: The Case of Turkey-EU
More informationSession 3: ATIGA and Rules of Origin
TRAINING PROGRAMME ON NEGOTIATING PREFERENTIAL TRADE AGREEMENTS Session 3: ATIGA and Rules of Origin 29-31 August Phnom Penh, Cambodia Rajan Sudesh Ratna Economic Affairs Officer Trade, Investment and
More information