NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P"

Transcription

1 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P ESTATE OF THOMAS W. BUCHER, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DECEASED : PENNSYLVANIA : : APPEAL OF: WILSON BUCHER, : CLAIMANT : No. 96 MDA 2013 Appeal from the Order Entered December 14, 2012 In the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County Orphans Court at No(s): BEFORE: GANTMAN, J., ALLEN, J., AND MUNDY, J. MEMORANDUM BY GANTMAN, J.: FILED OCTOBER 28, 2013 Appellant, Wilson Bucher, claimant, 1 appeals from the order entered in the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, which denied his oral contract claim and confirmed the first and partial account filed on behalf of the Estate of Thomas W. Bucher, deceased ( Estate ). 2 We affirm. This Court previously summarized the relevant facts and procedural history of this case as follows. Decedent was a lifelong bachelor and lived with his parents from age thirty-one to fifty-one. He executed a will in 1991, leaving his estate to his parents and siblings, and another will in 1998, leaving his estate to his niece and nephews, to be held in trust and not distributed until On April 10, 2003, Decedent executed the will at issue, which left his entire estate to the Lancaster County Public Library (Library). 1 Appellant is a retired Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas judge. 2 This order is appealable as of right per Pa.R.A.P. 342(a)(1).

2 On July 20, 2008, Decedent died by suicide at age fiftynine, just days before his scheduled retirement from twenty-two years of service as a probation officer. His family did not know of the 1998 will and 2003 will until the latter was presented for probate. On August 19, 2008, a decree of register denied letters of administration to Appellant and granted them to Karen Field (Administratrix), a nominee of the Library. On August [21, 2008], Appellant filed a notice of intention to appeal from the decree of register and a petition for citation sur appeal. Administratrix filed an answer and new matter to Appellant s petition sur appeal, and Appellant filed a reply to the new matter. Appellant also filed a motion for summary judgment, which was denied [on June 30, 2009]. On November 17 and 18, 2009, a hearing was held on Appellant s petition for citation sur appeal. The parties submitted proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law and briefs. On June 21, 2010 the [Orphans ] court issued [an order and opinion] denying Appellant s petition for citation sur appeal. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal and a court-ordered Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement of errors complained of on appeal. The court filed a supplemental opinion on August 23, 2010 in response to Appellant s Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement. In re Estate of Bucher, No MDA 2010, unpublished memorandum at 1-3 (Pa.Super. filed June 6, 2011) (internal footnotes omitted). On June 6, 2011, this Court affirmed the Orphans court s decision. The Supreme Court subsequently denied allowance of appeal on January 12, Meanwhile, on July 9, 2009, nine days after Appellant s motion for summary judgment was denied, Appellant filed a separate claim alleging the existence of an oral contract with Decedent, which named Appellant and his wife as the sole beneficiaries of Decedent s estate. On December 10, 2010, - 2 -

3 the Estate filed preliminary objections to Appellant s claim. On December 28, 2010, Appellant filed an amended claim. On April 14, 2011, the Estate filed a motion in limine to preclude Appellant s testimony on the oral contract claim pursuant to the Dead Man s Statute. The Estate filed a petition for adjudication, an inventory, and a first and partial account on February 15, On February 28, 2012, Appellant filed objections to the first and partial account. On May 15, 2012, following a pre-hearing conference, the court ordered Appellant to file a brief in response to the Estate s motion in limine. Thereafter, Appellant filed his response and brief in opposition to the Estate s motion in limine on May 25, The court granted the Estate s motion in limine by order dated September 7, On November 28, 2012, Appellant filed a pre-trial conference memo requesting the court to take judicial notice of his prior sworn testimony and the admitted exhibits from the November 2009 hearing. In response, the Estate filed a second motion in limine and supporting brief regarding Appellant s use of his prior sworn testimony and exhibits. On December 12, 2012, Appellant filed a brief in opposition to the Estate s second motion in limine. The court held a hearing on Appellant s oral contract claim on December 14, Appellant argued he should be permitted to testify on the oral contract pursuant to the Living Witness Rule. The court did not permit Appellant to testify under that rule and granted the Estate s second motion in limine. That same day the court filed its order of adjudication - 3 -

4 denying Appellant s oral contract claim and confirming the Estate s first and partial account. On Monday, January 14, 2013, Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal and on February 5, 2013, he filed a Rule 1925(b) statement of errors complained of on appeal. On March 15, 2013, the court filed a statement pursuant to Rule 1925, in which the court found its September 7, 2012 order granting the Estate s first motion in limine was a final order, thereby making Appellant s notice of appeal untimely. On April 4, 2013, the Estate filed a motion to quash Appellant s appeal as untimely, to which Appellant filed an answer on April 10, The Estate has renewed the motion before this panel. Appellant raises the following issues for our review: WHETHER THE ORPHANS COURT ERRED IN ASSERTING IN ITS PA.R.A.P STATEMENT THAT ITS SEPTEMBER 7, 2012 ORDER GRANTING THE ACCOUNTANT S FIRST MOTION IN LIMINE WAS A FINAL ORDER AND THAT [APPELLANT S] APPEAL OF THIS ORDER IS UNTIMELY? WHETHER THE ORPHANS COURT ERRED AND COMMITTED AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION IN PRECLUDING [APPELLANT] FROM TESTIFYING AND FURTHER IN NOT TAKING JUDICIAL NOTICE OF [APPELLANT S] PRIOR TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS PREVIOUSLY ADMITTED IN THIS PROCEEDING? ASSUMING ARGUENDO THAT JUDICIAL NOTICE IS NOT REQUIRED IN ORDER FOR [APPELLANT S] TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS PREVIOUSLY ADMITTED IN THIS PROCEEDING TO BE CONSIDERED FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING THE CONTRACT TO MAKE A WILL CLAIM, DID THE ORPHANS COURT ERR AND COMMIT AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION IN CAPRICIOUSLY IGNORING THE EVIDENCE - 4 -

5 ALREADY ADMITTED CONCERNING THE CONTRACT TO MAKE A WILL AND IN DISMISSING [APPELLANT S] AMENDED CLAIM? (Appellant s Brief at 5). As a prefatory matter, we address the Estate s motion to quash this appeal. The Estate argues the court s September 7, 2012 order granting the Estate s first motion in limine was a final order under Rule 341(b) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Estate claims this order was final because it disposed of all claims as to all parties. The Estate maintains this order effectively put Appellant out of court on his oral contract claim because he was the only living person who could testify to the alleged oral agreement, and the September 7, 2012 order barred Appellant from testifying. The Estate concludes Appellant s appeal is untimely. We disagree. Rule 341 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure was revised in 1992 to eliminate: appeals as of right from orders not ending the litigation as to all claims and as to all parties. Formerly, there was case law [holding] that orders not ending the litigation as to all claims and all parties are final orders if such orders have the practical consequence of putting a litigant out of court. Billig v. Skvarla, 853 A.2d 1042, 1047 (Pa.Super. 2004) (quoting Pa.R.A.P. 341 Note). Prior to the 1992 revision, there were circumstances where courts recognized an appeal even though it did not end the litigation for all claims and all parties. Id. Nevertheless, the revision to Rule 341 has - 5 -

6 ended this principle of practical finality and now requires a formal end to the litigation prior to taking an appeal. Id. Consequently, a Rule 341 final order is an order that actually resolves all claims as to all parties, not an order that has the practical effect of disposing of all claims. Liberty State Bank v. Northeastern Bank of Pennsylvania, 683 A.2d 889, 889 (Pa.Super. 1996) (holding motion in limine was not final order disposing of all claims or all parties). Additionally, Rule 342(a) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure provides: Rule 342. Appealable Orphans Court Orders. (a) General rule. An appeal may be taken as of right from the following orders of the Orphans Court Division: (1) An order confirming an account, or authorizing or directing a distribution from an estate or trust; (2) An order determining the validity of a will or trust; (3) An order interpreting a will or a document that forms the basis of a claim against an estate or trust; (4) An order interpreting, modifying, reforming or terminating a trust; (5) An order determining the status of fiduciaries, beneficiaries, or creditors in an estate, trust, or guardianship; (6) An order determining an interest in real or personal property; (7) An order issued after an inheritance tax appeal has been taken to the Orphans Court pursuant to either - 6 -

7 72 Pa.C.S. 9186(a)(3) or 72 Pa.C.S. 9188, or after the Orphans Court has made a determination of the issue protested after the record has been removed from the Department of Revenue pursuant to 72 Pa.C.S. 9188(a); or (8) An order otherwise appealable as provided by Chapter 3 of these rules. Pa.R.A.P. 342(a). The Note following Rule 342 provides, in relevant part: Subdivisions (a)(1)-(7) list orders that are unique to Orphans Court practice, but closely resemble final orders as defined in Rule 341(b). Subdivision (a)(1) provides that the adjudication of any account, even an interim or partial account, is appealable. Previously, only the adjudication of the final account would have been appealable as a final order under Rule 341. The prior limitation has proven unworkable for estate administration taking years and trusts established for generations during which interim and partial accounts may be adjudicated and confirmed. The remainder of subdivision (a)(1) permits appeals from orders of distribution as Rule 342 always has permitted since its initial adoption. Subdivision (a)(2) is a new placement for orders determining the validity of a will or trust that previously were appealable as interlocutory appeals as of right following the 2005 amendment to Rule 311. See prior Rule 311(a)(8). Subdivision (a)(3) is a new provision that allows an immediate appeal from an order interpreting a will or other relevant document that forms the basis of a claim asserted against an estate or trust. Such orders can include, among other things, an order determining that a particular individual is or is not a beneficiary or determining if an underlying agreement executed by the decedent during life creates rights against the estate. Subdivision (a)(4) addresses trusts and is similar to subdivision (a)(3), but also permits immediate appeals from orders modifying, reforming or terminating a trust since such judicial actions are now permitted under 20 Pa.C.S et seq. Subdivision (a)(5) is intended to clarify prior Rule 342 in several respects: First, an appealable Orphans Court order concerning the status of individuals or entities means an order determining if an individual or entity is a fiduciary, beneficiary or creditor, - 7 -

8 such as an order determining if the alleged creditor has a valid claim against the estate. Second, such orders include orders pertaining to trusts and guardianships as well as estates. Finally, this subdivision resolves a conflict in prior appellate court decisions by stating definitively that an order removing or refusing to remove a fiduciary is an immediately appealable order. Subdivision (a)(6) retains the same language from prior Rule 342. Subdivision (a)(7) permits appeals of an Orphans Court order concerning an inheritance tax appraisement, assessment, allowance or disallowance when such order is issued separately and not in conjunction with the adjudication of an account. Sections 9186 and 9188 of Chapter 72 provide three procedures, outside the context of an accounting, whereby either the personal representative or the Department of Revenue may bring before the Orphans Court a dispute over inheritance taxes imposed. See also In re Estate of Jones, 796 A.2d 1003 (Pa.Super. 2002) (analogizing a petition regarding the apportionment of inheritance taxes to a declaratory judgment petition given that an estate account had not yet been filed). A decision concerning inheritance taxes issued in conjunction with the adjudication of an account would be appealable under subdivision (a)(1). In keeping with the 2005 amendment that added subdivision (2) to prior Rule 342, subdivision (a)(8) tracks subdivision (2) of former Rule 342. Subdivision (2) was adopted in response to In re Estate of Sorber, 803 A.2d 767 (Pa.Super. 2002), a panel decision holding that Rule 342 precluded immediate appeals from orders that would have otherwise been appealable as collateral orders under Rule 313 unless the Orphans Court judge made a determination of finality under Rule 342. Subdivision (a)(8) makes clear that Rule 342, as amended, is still not the sole method of appealing an Orphans Court order and an order not otherwise immediately appealable under Rule 342 may still be immediately appealable if it meets the criteria under another rule in Chapter 3 of these rules. Examples would include injunctions appealable under Rule 311(a)(4), Interlocutory Orders Appealable by Permission under Rules 312 and 1311, Collateral Orders appealable under Rule 313, and an order approving a final accounting which is a true final order under Rule 341. Whether or not - 8 -

9 such orders require certification or a further determination of finality by the trial court depends on the applicable rule in Chapter 3. Pa.R.A.P. 342 Note. Instantly, the court s September 7, 2012 order granting the Estate s motion in limine was not a final order. See Pa.R.A.P. 341 and 342. Notwithstanding any practical effect of the order, the subsequent hearing on December 14, 2012, indicates the September 2012 order did not bring a formal end to the litigation. See Billig, supra. Moreover, pursuant to Rule 342(a), Appellant has the right to take an appeal from certain orders of the Orphans court, such as those confirming an account, or determining the status of fiduciaries, beneficiaries, or creditors in an estate. See Pa.R.A.P. 342(a)(1), (a)(5). Therefore, the court s December 14, 2012 order formally denying Appellant s oral contract claim and confirming the Estate s first and partial account is the appealable order in this case. Accordingly, we deny the Estate s motion to quash and simultaneously answer Appellant s first claim on appeal. Next, Appellant argues he had an oral contract with Decedent, the essence of which was Appellant would deed certain real and personal property to Decedent in exchange for Decedent willing his estate to Appellant. Appellant thinks the court should have permitted him to testify to the existence of the alleged oral contract with Decedent pursuant to three exceptions to the Dead Man s Statute. First, Appellant alleges he was - 9 -

10 competent to testify on the oral contract under the discovery waiver rule exception. Appellant maintains his oral contract claim and original will contest claim are two parts of the same proceeding. Therefore, Appellant submits he could testify to events preceding Decedent s death because the court previously found Appellant competent under the Dead Man s Statute to testify in the context of his will contest claim. Second, Appellant contends he was competent to testify under the cross-examination exception to the Statute. Appellant avers the Estate s cross-examination of him in the November 2009 will contest hearing on matters occurring during Decedent s lifetime permits Appellant to testify now to the existence of an oral contract. Finally, Appellant insists he was competent to testify under the Living Witness Rule exception. Appellant avers the court should have allowed him to testify at the December 2012 oral contract hearing to rebut the prior testimony of Decedent s attorney in the November 2009 will contest hearing. According to Appellant, Decedent s attorney testified the deed Appellant conveyed to Decedent was a gift, whereas Appellant claims it was in consideration for the oral contract to make a will. Additionally, Appellant submits the court should have honored his requests for judicial notice of his own sworn testimony and admitted exhibits from the November 2009 will contest hearing under Rule 201(b) and (d) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence

11 Appellant next argues, in the alternative, if his further testimony and judicial notice are impermissible, Appellant has still met the requirements to prove the existence of an oral contract with Decedent. Appellant claims the testimony and exhibits already admitted in the November 2009 will contest hearing established by clear and convincing evidence that Decedent had entered into an oral contract with Appellant to will Decedent s estate to Appellant in consideration for Appellant s conveyance of certain property to Decedent. Appellant concludes the court erred and abused its discretion in denying his oral contract claim. We disagree. Section 2701(a) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes provides: Contracts concerning succession (a) Establishment of contract. A contract to die intestate or to make or not to revoke a will or testamentary provision or an obligation dischargeable only at or after death can be established in support of a claim against the estate of a decedent only by: (1) provisions of a will of the decedent stating material provisions of the contract; (2) an express reference in a will of the decedent to a contract and extrinsic evidence proving the terms of the contract; or (3) a writing signed by the decedent evidencing the contract. 20 Pa.C.S.A. 2701(a). The comment to Section 2701 further provides: It is the purpose of this section to tighten the methods by which contracts concerning succession may be proved. Oral contracts not to revoke wills have given rise to much litigation in a number of states

12 This section requires that either the will must set forth the material provisions of the contract, or the will must make express reference to the contract and extrinsic evidence proving the terms of the contract, or there must be a separate writing signed by the decedent evidencing the contract. Oral testimony regarding the contract is permitted if the will makes reference to the contract, but this provision of the statute is not intended to affect normal rules regarding admissibility of evidence. 20 Pa.C.S.A Comment. See In re Estate of Balter, 703 A.2d 1038 (Pa.Super. 1997) (holding trial court properly applied Section 2701 to appellant s claim against estate alleging oral contract with decedent for diamond ring because appellant failed to satisfy requirements of statute and where will contained no explanation of terms of alleged contract or any express reference to existence of oral contract). Importantly, we can affirm the Orphans court order on any valid basis, as long as the court came to the correct result, [which in this case was to deny Appellant s oral contract claim]. See Wilson v. Transport Ins. Co., 889 A.2d 563, 577 n.4 (Pa.Super. 2005) (citing Boyer v. Walker, 714 A.2d 458 (Pa.Super. 1998) (stating appellate court may affirm order of trial court on any basis if decision is correct); Alco Parking Corp. v. Public Parking Authority of Pittsburgh, 706 A.2d 343 (Pa.Super. 1998), appeal denied, 555 Pa. 725, 725 A.2d 178 (1998) (stating where trial court has reached correct result, its order will be sustained if it can be sustained for any reason)). In re E.M.I., 57 A.3d 1278, 1290 n.6 (Pa.Super. 2012)

13 Instantly, Appellant is unable to prove the existence of an oral contract with Decedent as alleged. None of Decedent s wills contain any provisions of or express reference to any contract with Appellant. Further, Appellant produced no separate writing signed by Decedent and indicating the existence of any contract with Appellant. See 20 Pa.C.S.A. 2701(a). Notwithstanding the timing of the execution of the deed and Decedent s first will, Decedent s first will contained no statement of the material provisions of the alleged contract or made any reference to the deed or any oral contract with Appellant to make a will in exchange for the deed. Neither Decedent s second or third will even mention Appellant s name. To establish his claim, Appellant offered only Decedent s first will, the deed, and Appellant s own oral testimony to connect the two documents. Therefore, Appellant failed to meet the statutory requirements of Section 2701(a) to establish a contract to make a will. See id. Moreover, Appellant s efforts concerning the exceptions to the Dead Man s Statute and his requests for judicial notice of other proceedings serve to demonstrate the very reasons why the legislature created Section 2701 to address contracts in this context. See 20 Pa.C.S.A Comment. Thus, the court s order denying Appellant s oral contract claim was ultimately correct, and we affirm albeit on other grounds. See In re E.M.I., supra. Order affirmed

14 Judgment Entered. Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary Date: 10/28/

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : :

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 IN RE ESTATE OF VERA GAZAK, DECEASED APPEAL OF F. RICHARD GAZAK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 1215 EDA 2017 Appeal from the Decree

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 IN RE: GLADYS P. STOUT, DECEASED : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : : APPEAL OF: PLEASANT VALLEY MANOR : No. 545 EDA 2013 Appeal from

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 JEREMIAH KAPLAN, Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. MORRIS J. KAPLAN, TIMONEY KNOX, LLP, JAMES M. JACQUETTE AND GEORGE RITER,

More information

On October 22, 2012, Appellee filed a praecipe for entry of. default judgment in the amount of $132, That same day, the court

On October 22, 2012, Appellee filed a praecipe for entry of. default judgment in the amount of $132, That same day, the court NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 IN RE: STATE RESOURCES CORP. Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. SPIRIT AND TRUTH WORSHIP AND TRAINING CHURCH, INC. Appellant No.

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellee No MDA 2013

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellee No MDA 2013 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 RAEDELLE FOSTER Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. MICHAEL DOWNEY Appellee No. 1464 MDA 2013 Appeal from the Judgment Entered

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 TAREK ELTANBDAWY v. Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MMG INSURANCE COMPANY, RESTORECARE, INC., KUAN FANG CHENG Appellees No. 2243

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. DAVID ROBERT KENNEDY Appellant No. 281 WDA 2013 Appeal from the

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 ESTATE OF: GAETANO CIUCCARELLI, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DECEASED : PENNSYLVANIA : : : APPEAL OF: FRANK CARUSO, : No. 1251 EDA 2014 : Appeal

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. KYLE KEHRLI Appellant No. 2688 EDA 2012 Appeal from the Judgment

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P ESTATE OF ARTHUR M. PETERS, JR., IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEC D,

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P ESTATE OF ARTHUR M. PETERS, JR., IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEC D, NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 ESTATE OF ARTHUR M. PETERS, JR., IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEC D, PENNSYLVANIA Appellee APPEAL OF: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, No. 1359 MDA

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No WDA 2014

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No WDA 2014 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 HELEN LEWANDOWSKI AND ROBERT A. LEWANDOWSKI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF DECEASED HELEN LEWANDOWSKI, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No EDA 2013

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No EDA 2013 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. CRAIG SHELTON BROWN Appellant No. 3514 EDA 2013 Appeal from the

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellee No. 331 MDA 2012

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellee No. 331 MDA 2012 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 PITNEY ROAD PARTNERS, LLC T/D/B/A REDCAY COLLEGE CAMPUSES I IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant v. HARRISBURG AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 482 MDA 2013

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 482 MDA 2013 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. TERRY SIMONTON, JR., Appellant No. 482 MDA 2013 Appeal from the

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 IN THE INTEREST OF: J.R., A MINOR : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : : APPEAL OF: J.R. : No. 3300 EDA 2014 Appeal from the Dispositional

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 IN RE: ESTATE OF WILLIAM F. SCHRADER, A/K/A WILLIAM F. SCHRADER, JR., A/K/A WILLIAM FREDERICK SCHRADER, JR., A/K/A WILLIAM SCHRADER IN THE SUPERIOR

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 FIRST NATIONAL COMMUNITY BANK, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. THE POWELL LAW GROUP, P.C., Appellant No. 1513 MDA 2012 Appeal

More information

2015 PA Super 52 OPINION BY WECHT, J.: FILED MARCH 17, Ronald Locke, executor of the Estate of Virginia A. Cherry, appeals the

2015 PA Super 52 OPINION BY WECHT, J.: FILED MARCH 17, Ronald Locke, executor of the Estate of Virginia A. Cherry, appeals the 2015 PA Super 52 ESTATE OF VIRGINIA A. CHERRY LATE OF HENDERSON TOWNSHIP HUNTINGDON COUNTY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA APPEAL OF: RONALD LOCKE No. 633 MDA 2014 Appeal

More information

2016 PA Super 262. Appellant No MDA 2015

2016 PA Super 262. Appellant No MDA 2015 2016 PA Super 262 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. HENRY L. WILLIAMS, Appellant No. 2078 MDA 2015 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence October 16, 2015 In

More information

2017 PA Super 122. Appeal from the Order May 23, 2016 In the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County Civil Division at No(s): No.

2017 PA Super 122. Appeal from the Order May 23, 2016 In the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County Civil Division at No(s): No. 2017 PA Super 122 BOLLARD & ASSOCIATES, INC. Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. H&R INDUSTRIES, INC. AND HARRY SCHMIDT AND WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. No. 1601 EDA 2016 Appeal from the Order

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. JOHN BRADLEY PETERS, SR., Appellant No. 645 WDA 2012 Appeal from

More information

APPEAL OF: JESSE EVANS, APPELLANT : No. 222 EDA 2014

APPEAL OF: JESSE EVANS, APPELLANT : No. 222 EDA 2014 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37 RAQUEL D. STEVENSON, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF DESIREE STEVENSON, A/K/A DESIREE MELISSA-JANE STEVENSON, DECEASED, v. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 FIRST NATIONAL COMMUNITY BANK, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. THE POWELL LAW GROUP, P.C., Appellant No. 1512 MDA 2012 Appeal

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 JOSEPH P. PROSCENO, III, Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. DEVRY UNIVERSITY, FORT WASHINGTON, PENNSYLVANIA CAMPUS Appellee No.

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 JOANN C. VIRGI, Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. JOHN G. VIRGI, Appellee No. 1550 WDA 2012 Appeal from the Order September

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA John H. Morley, Jr., : Appellant : : v. : No. 3056 C.D. 2002 : Submitted: January 2, 2004 City of Philadelphia : Licenses & Inspections Unit, : Philadelphia Police

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : :

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee v. RAYMOND C. DASILVA, JR., Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 206 MDA 2017 Appeal from

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 PAUL J. PREISINGER IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. HEATHER FOX AND CONSTANCE J. LOUGHNER APPEAL OF: HEATHER FOX No. 18 WDA 2015 Appeal

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 81 MDA 2014

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 81 MDA 2014 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 THOMAS MORGAN, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. 3D METAL WORKS, Appellant No. 81 MDA 2014 Appeal from the Order Entered December

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellee No. 940 WDA 2014

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellee No. 940 WDA 2014 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 TELETRACKING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA FRANK J. GORI, MARK JULIANO, GENE NACEY, LORRAINE NACEY, STEPHEN

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : :

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. EDMUND STARR Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 268 WDA 2018 Appeal from the Judgment

More information

2012 PA Super 189 : : NO WDA 2011

2012 PA Super 189 : : NO WDA 2011 2012 PA Super 189 IN RE: ESTATE OF JOHN J. STRAHSMEIER, DECEASED APPEAL OF: CO-EXECUTRICES, ROSE M. REGAN AND LOIS A. PHILLIPS : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : NO. 1286 WDA 2011 Appeal

More information

2018 PA Super 45. Appeal from the Order entered March 29, 2017 In the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County Civil Division at No: CT

2018 PA Super 45. Appeal from the Order entered March 29, 2017 In the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County Civil Division at No: CT 2018 PA Super 45 WILLIAM SMITH SR. AND EVERGREEN MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. BRIAN HEMPHILL AND COMMERCIAL SNOW + ICE, LLC APPEAL OF BARRY M. ROTHMAN, ESQUIRE No. 1351

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. GARY D. WILLIAMS Appellant No. 2428 EDA 2014 Appeal from the PCRA

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P J.A05038/14 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. GERALD F. STRUBINGER, Appellant No. 1993 EDA 2013

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 MARY BUSH Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA THOMAS LAWRENCE v. Appellee No. 1713 EDA 2018 Appeal from the Order Entered April 26,

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No EDA 2012

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No EDA 2012 J-S70010-13 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. RICHARD JARMON Appellant No. 3275 EDA 2012 Appeal

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 TODD M. SOUDERS, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF TINA M. SOUDERS, DECEASED, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant v. TUSCARORA WAYNE

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : :

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. ADAM EUGENE PITTINGER Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 1638 MDA 2017 Appeal from

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. JOHN DOMENICO MARTONE, III, Appellant No. 1636 MDA 2014 Appeal

More information

2015 PA Super 173 OPINION BY GANTMAN, P.J.: FILED AUGUST 19, Appellant, Quawi Smith, appeals from the order entered in the

2015 PA Super 173 OPINION BY GANTMAN, P.J.: FILED AUGUST 19, Appellant, Quawi Smith, appeals from the order entered in the 2015 PA Super 173 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. QUAWI SMITH Appellant No. 1892 EDA 2014 Appeal from the PCRA Order June 27, 2014 In the Court of Common

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. TYREEK DENMARK Appellant No. 722 EDA 2015 Appeal from the Judgment

More information

Appeal from the Order Entered April 18, 2016 In the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County Civil Division at No(s):

Appeal from the Order Entered April 18, 2016 In the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County Civil Division at No(s): 2017 PA Super 285 KAREN ZAJICK, IN HER OWN RIGHT : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF AND AS ASSIGNEE OF ROBERT AND : PENNSYLVANIA ARLENE SANTHOUSE, : APPELLANT : v. : : THE CUTLER GROUP, INC. : : : : No. 1343 EDA

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No WDA 2012

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No WDA 2012 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. FREDERICK MARKOVITZ, Appellant No. 1969 WDA 2012 Appeal from

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. AMIN HALL Appellant No. 834 EDA 2014 Appeal from the Judgment

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee v. KAREEM GEORGE, Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 465 MDA 2013 Appeal from the PCRA

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA v. : : DAVID K. HOUCK, : : Appellant : No. 489 WDA 2015 Appeal from the

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. IRA NEAL GOLDBERG Appellant No. 732 MDA 2014 Appeal from the PCRA

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. WANDA LEVAN Appellant No. 992 EDA 2014 Appeal from the Order entered

More information

2017 PA Super 395. D. ALLEN HORNBERGER IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant

2017 PA Super 395. D. ALLEN HORNBERGER IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant 2017 PA Super 395 D. ALLEN HORNBERGER IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant v. DAVE GUTELIUS EXCAVATING, INC. Appellee No. 103 MDA 2017 Appeal from the Judgment Entered December 19, 2016 In the

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 44 MDA 2013

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 44 MDA 2013 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. WAYNE EUGENE EBERSOLE, JR., Appellant No. 44 MDA 2013 Appeal

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. CHRISTOPHER L. LEISTER, Appellant No. 113 MDA 2015 Appeal from

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 GARY DUNSWORTH AND CYNTHIA DUNSWORTH, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellees v. THE DESIGN STUDIO AT 301, INC., Appellant No. 2071 MDA

More information

v No Wayne Circuit Court

v No Wayne Circuit Court S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S CITY OF DETROIT, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED March 15, 2018 v No. 337705 Wayne Circuit Court BAYLOR LTD, LC No. 16-010881-CZ Defendant-Appellee.

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P J-A19008-13 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 ROY H. LOMAS, SR., D/B/A ROY LOMAS CARPET CONTRACTOR, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. JAMES B. KRAVITZ, ANDORRA

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : :

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : : NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 DONALD C. PETRA v. Appellant PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 505 MDA 2018 Appeal

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. GORDON FISHER A/K/A GORDON DAVID FISHER A/K/A GORDON D. FISHER, INDIVIDUALLY

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. CORDELL DUANE BROADUS, No. 1740 WDA 2012 Appellant Appeal from the PCRA

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF CWABS, INC., ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 ROX-ANN REIFER, Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. WESTPORT INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee No. 321 MDA 2015 Appeal from the Order

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 RONALD FERRARO Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. M & M INSURANCE GROUP, INC. No. 1133 WDA 2016 Appeal from the Order May 12,

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : :

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ROBERT WILLIAMS Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 1631 EDA 2016 Appeal from the Judgment of

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 THE DESIGN STUDIO AT 301, INC. Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. GARY AND CYNTHIA DUNSWORTH, Appellees No. 2070 MDA 2015 Appeal

More information

2016 PA Super 82 OPINION BY MUNDY, J.: FILED APRIL 11, Appellant, Bung Thi Nguyen, appeals from the order dated April 6,

2016 PA Super 82 OPINION BY MUNDY, J.: FILED APRIL 11, Appellant, Bung Thi Nguyen, appeals from the order dated April 6, 2016 PA Super 82 GENERATION MORTGAGE COMPANY Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. BUNG THI NGUYEN Appellant No. 1069 EDA 2015 Appeal from the Order Dated April 6, 2015 In the Court of Common

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COLLEEN M. TRIMMER, Individually; COLLEEN M. TRIMMER, Personal Representative of the Estate of MARK P. TRIMMER, Deceased; DARION J. TRIMMER,

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No WDA 2013

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No WDA 2013 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. TYREE DEMETERIOU ANDERSON, Appellant No. 1518 WDA 2013 Appeal

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Estate of William A. : O Connor, Jr., Deceased : : Appeal of: Judith O Connor, : No. 2119 C.D. 2015 Administratrix of the Estate of William : Argued: April

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 389 WDA 2012

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 389 WDA 2012 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. MARSHA SCAGGS Appellant No. 389 WDA 2012 Appeal from the Order

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 VINCENT R. BOLTZ, INC., Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ESKAY REALTY COMPANY AND S. KANTOR COMPANY, INC., AND ALLEN D. FELDMAN,

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 HALFPENNY MANAGEMENT CO. AND RICHARD CARR, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. JAMES D. SCHNELLER, Appellant No. 2095 EDA 2014

More information

Appeal from the Order Entered April 1, 2016 in the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County Civil Division at No(s): C-48-CV

Appeal from the Order Entered April 1, 2016 in the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County Civil Division at No(s): C-48-CV 2017 PA Super 280 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF CWALT, INC., ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2007-HY6 MORTGAGE PASS- THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : Appellees : No WDA 2012

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : Appellees : No WDA 2012 J-S27041-13 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 MARTIN YURCHISON, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF DIANE LOUISE YURCHISON, a/k/a DIANE YURCHISON, Appellant v. UNITED GENERAL

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Tax Claim Bureau of Lehigh : County 2013 Upset Tax Sale : : Objectors: Noe Gutierrez and : Susana Gutierrez : : Appeal of: Susana Gutierrez, : individually and

More information

2015 PA Super 96 OPINION BY JENKINS, J.: FILED APRIL 24, Appellant Kevin Wyatt appeals from the order of the Philadelphia

2015 PA Super 96 OPINION BY JENKINS, J.: FILED APRIL 24, Appellant Kevin Wyatt appeals from the order of the Philadelphia 2015 PA Super 96 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. KEVIN WYATT Appellant No. 2343 EDA 2014 Appeal from the PCRA Order July 21, 2014 In the Court of Common Pleas

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No EDA 2013

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No EDA 2013 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. RONALD POLLACK, Appellant No. 3000 EDA 2013 Appeal from the Judgment

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : :

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee v. JAIME JONES, Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 1916 WDA 2014 Appeal from the Judgment

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. LAQUAN AMIR BROWN Appellant No. 1560 WDA 2014 Appeal from the

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA JORDAN R. STANLEY v. Appellant No. 1875 MDA 2015 Appeal from the

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No EDA 2013

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No EDA 2013 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. LAURENN HARVIN Appellant No. 2521 EDA 2013 Appeal from the PCRA

More information

2018 PA Super 31 : : : : : : : : :

2018 PA Super 31 : : : : : : : : : 2018 PA Super 31 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. JEFFREY ALAN OLSON, Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 158 WDA 2017 Appeal from the PCRA Order December 22, 2016 In the Court of Common

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Theodore R. Robinson, : Petitioner : : v. : : State Employees' Retirement Board, : No. 1136 C.D. 2014 Respondent : Submitted: October 31, 2014 BEFORE: HONORABLE

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 932 WDA 2015

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 932 WDA 2015 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ANDRE PACE, Appellant No. 932 WDA 2015 Appeal from the Judgment

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : :

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : : NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 SBA TOWERS II LLC v. Appellant WIRELESS HOLDINGS, LLC AND JEFF MACALARNEY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 325 WDA 2018 Appeal from

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P APPEAL OF: MATTHEW DAVID WEINBERG No EDA 2014

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P APPEAL OF: MATTHEW DAVID WEINBERG No EDA 2014 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 ESTATE OF: ZOE M. WEINBERG, A MINOR IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA APPEAL OF: MATTHEW DAVID WEINBERG No. 1448 EDA 2014 Appeal from the

More information

Ricciardi v. Ameriquest Mtg Co

Ricciardi v. Ameriquest Mtg Co 2006 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-17-2006 Ricciardi v. Ameriquest Mtg Co Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 05-1409 Follow

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : :

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : : NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 KENNETH NEWHOOK v. ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE A/K/A ERIE INSURANCE COMPANY Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 1917 EDA 2017 Appeal

More information

2014 PA Super 105. Appeal from the Order Entered April 15, 2013 In the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County Orphans' Court at No(s):

2014 PA Super 105. Appeal from the Order Entered April 15, 2013 In the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County Orphans' Court at No(s): 2014 PA Super 105 IN RE: ESTATE OF MARY L. BECHTEL, DECEASED IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA LARRY E. BECHTEL, PETITIONER DONALD R. BECHTEL AND MICHAEL T. BECHTEL, RESPONDENTS APPEAL OF: DONALD R.

More information

2010 PA Super 188. OPINION BY FITZGERALD, J.: Filed: October 8, Appellant, Keith P. Main, files this appeal from the judgment of

2010 PA Super 188. OPINION BY FITZGERALD, J.: Filed: October 8, Appellant, Keith P. Main, files this appeal from the judgment of 2010 PA Super 188 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellee : : v. : : KEITH P. MAIN, : : Appellant : No. 392 MDA 2009 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence entered

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL J. DOTSKO v. Appellant No. 2580 EDA 2015 Appeal from the

More information

2016 PA Super 4. Appeal from the Order Dated March 2, 2015 in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County Orphans Court at No(s): X1951

2016 PA Super 4. Appeal from the Order Dated March 2, 2015 in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County Orphans Court at No(s): X1951 2016 PA Super 4 ESTATE OF SUSAN C. MCANDREW IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 2016 PA Super APPEAL OF: JOSEPH C. MCANDREW, JR. No. 830 EDA 2015 Appeal from the Order Dated March 2, 2015 in the Court

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. LUIS RAMOS Appellant No. 2138 MDA 2015 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No WDA 2014

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No WDA 2014 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. SHANE BERNARD VITKA, JR., Appellant No. 1985 WDA 2014 Appeal

More information

PROBATING A VERMONT ESTATE *Rules and statutes are subject to change. This information is intended as a guide only*

PROBATING A VERMONT ESTATE *Rules and statutes are subject to change. This information is intended as a guide only* PROBATING A VERMONT ESTATE *Rules and statutes are subject to change. This information is intended as a guide only* This Summary is designed to help you carry out your duties as an executor or administrator

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CHAMPAIGN COUNTY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CHAMPAIGN COUNTY [Cite as Dibert v. Carpenter, 196 Ohio App.3d 1, 2011-Ohio-5691.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CHAMPAIGN COUNTY DIBERT, : : Appellate Case No. 2011-CA-09 Appellant and Cross-Appellee,

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA PAUL FULLER, MARK CZYZYK, MICHELE CZYZYK, AND ROSE NEALON

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 JEANNIE L. BLOUGH : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. : : DARIN L. MATKOSKEY, : No. 1030 WDA 2016 : Appellant : Appeal from the Order

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ANTHONY BROWN, Appellant No. 2873 EDA 2014 Appeal from the PCRA

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 SABR MORTGAGE LOAN 2008-1 SUBSIDIARY-1, LLC, C/O OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC 1661 WORTHINGTON ROAD #100, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33409 IN THE SUPERIOR

More information

: : : : Appellee : : v. : : MULLIGAN MINING, INC., : : Appellee : No. 970 WDA 2013

: : : : Appellee : : v. : : MULLIGAN MINING, INC., : : Appellee : No. 970 WDA 2013 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37 PLUM PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, INC., IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant v. MINERAL TRADING COMPANY, LLC, JAMES R. CLARKE, JONATHAN LASKO,

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Petition of the Venango County : Tax Claim Bureau for Judicial : Sale of Lands Free and Clear : of all Taxes and Municipal Claims, : Mortgages, Liens, Charges

More information