$9,835,000 CITY. Series 2012-A. Series S&P: AA+ + NEW. Series. an item of tax 2012-B WARRANTS 2012-B. York, check. issued, subject

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "$9,835,000 CITY. Series 2012-A. Series S&P: AA+ + NEW. Series. an item of tax 2012-B WARRANTS 2012-B. York, check. issued, subject"

Transcription

1 Ratings: Moody's: Aa2 S&P: AA+ + NEW ISSUE BOOK ENTRY ONLY (See "RATINGS" Herein) ) In the opinion of Bond Counsel based on existing law, and assuming the accuracy of certain representations and certifications and compliance with certain tax covenants, interest on the Series 2012-A Warrants (i) will be excluded from grosss income for federal income tax purposes if the City complies with all requirements of the Internal Revenue Code that must be satisfied subsequent to the issuance of the Series 2012-A Warrants in order that interest thereon be and remain excluded from gross income, and (ii) will not be an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax on individuals and corporations; such interest, however, is included in adjusted current earnings in computing the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on certainn corporations. INTEREST ON THE SERIESS 2012-B WARRANTS IS NOT EXCLUDED FROM GROSS INCOME FOR FEDERAL INCOME TAX PURPOSES. Bond Counsel is also of o the opinion that, under existing law, interest on the Series 2012-A Warrants and Series 2012-B Warrants will be exempt from State of o Alabama income taxation. See "TAX MATTERS" herein for further information and certainn other federal tax consequences arising with respect to the Warrants. $9,835,000 CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA General Obligation Warrants, Series 2012-A $65,150,000 CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA Taxable General Obligation Warrants, Series 2012-B Dated: Date of delivery Due: As shown on inside coverr The Warrants are issuable as fully registered warrants, without coupons, in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, and will initially be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as registered owner and nominee for The Depository Trust Company, Neww York, New York, which will act as initial securities depository for the Warrants. Individual purchases will be made in book-entry form only, and purchasers will not receive certificates representing their interest in the Warrants purchased. Interest on the Warrants due on each interest payment date (each April 1 and October 1, beginning April 1, 2013) will be payable byy check or draft mailed on such interest payment date to the persons who were registered owners of the Warrants on the record date for such interest payment date. The principal of the Warrants and redemption premium,, if any, thereonn shall be payable only upon presentation and surrender of the Warrants at the designated corporate trust office of Regions Bank. THE WARRANTS WILL CONSTITUTE GENERAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA, FOR THE PAYMENT OF WHICH ITS FULL FAITH AND CREDIT ARE IRREVOCABLY PLEDGED. The Warrants do not constitute an indebtedness of the State of Alabamaa or Montgomery County, Alabama, or give rise to a pecuniary liability or charge against the general credit or taxing powers of the State of Alabama or Montgomery County, Alabama. The Warrants are subject to redemption prior to their respective maturities as describedd herein. FOR MATURITY SCHEDULES, SEEE INSIDE COVER This cover page contains certain information for quick reference only. It is not a summary of these issues. Investors must read the entiree official statement to obtain information essential to the making of an informed investmentt decision. The Warrants are offered when, as and if issued, subject to approval off validity by Capell & Howard, P.C., Montgomery, Alabama, Bond Counsel. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the City by its counsel, Davis & Hatcher, L.L.C., Montgomery, Alabama, and for the Underwriters by their counsel, Balch & Bingham LLP, Birmingham, Alabama. It is expected that the Warrants in definitive form will be available for delivery through the facilities of DTC in New York, New York onn or about November 29, STERNE, AGEE & LEACH, INC. FIRST TUSKEGEE CAPITAL MARKETS November 15, 2012

2 Dated: As of their date of delivery $9,835,000 City of Montgomery, Alabama General Obligation Warrants, Series 2012-A Serial Warrants Due: April 1, as shown below Maturity Principal Amount Interest Rate Yield CUSIP No. Maturity Principal Amount Interest Rate Yield CUSIP No $300, % 0.450% M $ 365, % 1.390% c J , % 0.550% M ,280, % 1.570% c J , % 0.670% M ,310, % 1.750% K , % 0.770% J ,335, % 1.890% K , % 0.900% J ,355, % 1.960% K , % 1.000% J ,380, % 2.030% K , % 1.180% c J ,400, % 2.100% K60 All Warrants priced to produce the yield indicated. c Priced to April 1, 2018 optional call date. Dated: As of their date of delivery $65,150,000 City of Montgomery, Alabama Taxable General Obligation Warrants, Series 2012-B Serial Warrants Due: April 1, as shown below Maturity Principal Amount Interest Rate Yield CUSIP No. Maturity Principal Amount Interest Rate Yield CUSIP No $1,090, % 0.480% K $3,735, % 2.150% L ,775, % 0.620% K ,820, % 2.350% L ,995, % 0.740% K ,905, % 2.500% L ,535, % 1.070% L ,000, % 2.700% L ,060, % 1.270% L ,110, % 2.850% M ,140, % 1.570% L ,220, % 3.000% M ,675, % 1.770% L ,090, % 3.150% M43 Term Warrants $10,000, % Term Warrants maturing April 1, 2034; Yield: 3.730% c ; CUSIP: M68 All Warrants priced to produce the yield indicated. c Priced to April 1, 2022 optional call date.

3 CITY OF MONTGOMERY MAYOR Todd Strange CITY COUNCIL Richard Bollinger Charles W. Smith Tracy Larkin David Burkette Cornelius C. C. Calhoun Jon Dow Arch Lee Glen O. Pruitt, Jr. Charles W. Jinright DIRECTOR OF FINANCE E. Lloyd Faulkner BOND COUNSEL Capell & Howard, P.C. Montgomery, Alabama ISSUER'S COUNSEL Davis & Hatcher, L.L.C. Montgomery, Alabama UNDERWRITING GROUP Merchant Capital, L.L.C. First Tuskegee Bank Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc. UNDERWRITERS' COUNSEL Balch & Bingham LLP Birmingham, Alabama PAYING AGENT Regions Bank Birmingham, Alabama

4 NO DEALER, BROKER, SALESMAN OR OTHER PERSON HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE CITY OR THE UNDERWRITERS TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE OFFERING OF THE WARRANTS, OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT, AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH OTHER INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATIONS MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON. THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ANY OFFER TO SELL OR THE SOLICITATION OF ANY OFFER TO BUY, NOR SHALL THERE BE ANY SALE OF THE WARRANTS BY ANY PERSON, IN ANY JURISDICTION IN WHICH SUCH OFFER, SALE OR SOLICITATION IS UNLAWFUL. THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A CONTRACT WITH THE PURCHASERS OF THE WARRANTS. STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT WHICH INVOLVE ESTIMATES, FORECASTS OR MATTERS OF OPINION, WHETHER OR NOT EXPRESSLY SO DESCRIBED HEREIN, ARE INTENDED SOLELY AS SUCH AND ARE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REPRESENTATIONS OF FACT. THE UNDERWRITERS HAVE PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE FOR INCLUSION IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT. THE UNDERWRITERS HAVE REVIEWED THE INFORMATION IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH, AND AS A PART OF, THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES TO INVESTORS UNDER THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS AS APPLIED TO THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THIS TRANSACTION, BUT THE UNDERWRITERS DO NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF SUCH INFORMATION. THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT IS INTENDED TO REFLECT INFORMATION AS OF THE DATE OF THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT. THE DELIVERY OF THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT DOES NOT IMPLY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS CORRECT ON ANY DATE SUBSEQUENT TO THE DATE OF THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT. IN CONNECTION WITH THE OFFERING OF THE WARRANTS, THE UNDERWRITERS MAY OVERALLOT OR EFFECT TRANSACTIONS THAT STABILIZE OR MAINTAIN THE MARKET PRICE OF THE WARRANTS AT LEVELS ABOVE THOSE THAT MIGHT OTHERWISE PREVAIL IN THE OPEN MARKET. SUCH STABILIZING, IF COMMENCED, MAY BE DISCONTINUED AT ANY TIME. THE CITY HAS NO CONTROL OVER THE TRADING OF THE WARRANTS AFTER THEIR SALE BY THE CITY. INFORMATION REGARDING REOFFERING YIELDS OR PRICES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE UNDERWRITERS.

5 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 THE WARRANTS... 2 General Description... 2 Registration, Transfer, Exchange and Replacement... 2 Redemption Prior to Maturity... 3 SOURCE OF PAYMENT AND SECURITY... 4 General... 4 Authority for Issuance... 5 Remedies... 5 SUMMARY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE WARRANT ORDINANCE... 5 Warrant Funds... 5 Provisions for Payment of Warrants... 5 THE FINANCING PLAN... 7 SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS... 7 Series 2012-A Warrants... 7 Series 2012-B Warrants... 8 DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS... 9 BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM THE CITY General Employee Relations Personnel and Retirement System Other Post-Employment Benefits FINANCIAL SYSTEM General Budgetary System Accounting System Governmental Funds Description of Major Sources of General Fund Revenues RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Comparative Statement of General Fund Revenues and Expenditures Summary of the Operating Budget for Fiscal Year ending September 30, Tax Collections DEBT MANAGEMENT General Outstanding Indebtedness Constitutional Debt Limit Direct and Overlapping Debt Debt Ratios Page

6 SALES AND USE TAXATION AD VALOREM TAXATION General Assessed Valuation of Taxable Property Largest Ad Valorem Taxpayers of City Limitations on City's Imposition of Ad Valorem Taxes LITIGATION WARRANTHOLDER RISK FACTORS BANKRUPTCY ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Location Historical Population Business Climate Healthcare Military Community Transportation Agriculture Wholesale Sales Trade Area Employment Statistics Income Levels Major Employers Education Utilities Telecommunications Construction Statistics LEGAL MATTERS TAX MATTERS FEDERAL TAX ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT FEDERAL TAX ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF ORIGINAL ISSUE PREMIUM UNDERWRITING VERIFICATION REPORT CONTINUING DISCLOSURE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS RATINGS APPENDICES FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ii

7 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MISCELLANEOUS APPENDIX A Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the City as of and for the Fiscal Year ended September 30, 2011 APPENDIX B Proposed Forms of Opinions of Bond Counsel iii

8

9 $9,835,000 CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA General Obligation Warrants, Series 2012-A $65,150,000 CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA Taxable General Obligation Warrants, Series 2012-B INTRODUCTION This Official Statement is furnished by the City of Montgomery, Alabama (the "City") in order to provide information to prospective purchasers regarding its $9,835,000 principal amount of General Obligation Warrants, Series 2012-A (the "Series 2012-A Warrants") and its $65,150,000 Taxable General Obligation Warrants, Series 2012-B (the "Series 2012-B Warrants" and together with the Series 2012-A Warrants herein the "Warrants"). The City is a municipal body politic and corporate organized under the laws of the State of Alabama. The Warrants will be issued by the City under the authority of the Constitution and laws of the State of Alabama, including particularly and of the Code of Alabama (1975), as amended, and that certain ordinance and other proceedings adopted by the City in connection with the issuance thereof (herein referred to as the "Warrant Ordinance"). The Warrants will constitute general obligations of the City for the payment of which its full faith and credit are irrevocably pledged. See "SOURCE OF PAYMENT AND SECURITY" herein. The Warrants are being issued by the City for the purposes of (i) advance refunding the following outstanding warrants - the City's Taxable Special Lodging Tax Revenue Warrants (Riverfront Stadium Project), Series 2003A (the "Series 2003A Warrants"), a portion of the Taxable General Obligation Warrants, Series 2005A (the portion being refunded herein the "Refunded Series 2005A Warrants"), a portion of the General Obligation Refunding Warrants, Series 2005B (the portion being refunded herein the "Refunded Series 2005B Warrants"), a portion of the Taxable General Obligation Tax Increment Warrants, Series 2006A (the portion being refunded herein the "Refunded Series 2006A Warrants") and a portion of the General Obligation Warrants, Series 2006C (the portion being refunded herein the "Refunded Series 2006C Warrants" and together with the Series 2003A Warrants, Refunded Series 2005A Warrants, Refunded Series 2005B Warrants and Refunded Series 2006A Warrants herein the "Refunded Warrants") (ii) funding certain capital expenditures and (iii) paying the costs of issuing the Warrants. See "THE FINANCING PLAN" herein. This Official Statement contains brief descriptions of the City, the financing plan, information respecting the use of the proceeds of the Warrants, summaries of certain provisions of the Warrants and the Warrant Ordinance, and a description of certain of the risks associated with an investment in the Warrants. The summaries of the documents herein contained are not complete or definitive, and each and every statement made in this Official Statement concerning any provision of any document or instrument is qualified by reference to such document or instrument in its entirety. The City has covenanted and agreed to undertake certain continuing disclosure pursuant to Rule 15c2-12 of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. See "CONTINUING DISCLOSURE" herein. This Official Statement speaks only as of its date, and the information contained herein is subject to change.

10 THE WARRANTS General Description The Warrants will be issued as fully registered warrants, without coupons, in the denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof. The Warrants shall be issued solely in fully registered form, and shall initially be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as registered owner and nominee for DTC. Payments of principal, interest, and redemption premium, if any, shall be governed by procedures established by DTC (the "Securities Depository"). See "BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM" herein. The Warrants will be dated the date of their delivery, will bear interest from such date payable on April 1, 2013, and semiannually on each October 1 and April 1 thereafter at the rates set forth on the inside front cover hereof and will mature on the dates and in the principal amounts set forth on the inside front cover hereof. The principal of and the interest on any Warrant will bear interest from their respective due dates until paid at the rate of interest borne by the principal of such Warrant prior to maturity. The principal of and the premium, if any, on the Warrants will be payable, with par clearance guaranteed, at the designated corporate trust agency office of Regions Bank, the registrar, transfer agent and paying agent for the Warrants (said bank acting in such capacity, together with any successor thereto, being herein called the "Registrar" or "Paying Agent"). The interest payable on the Warrants on each interest payment date will be paid by check or draft mailed by the Registrar on such interest payment date to the registered holders thereof as of the March 15 or September 15 immediately preceding such interest payment date. If any interest payment date shall fall on a Saturday, Sunday or other date on which the Registrar is not open for business, or on which the Federal Reserve Bank is closed, such payment shall be made on the next following business day. Upon the written request of the registered holder of any Warrants of a single series in an aggregate principal amount of not less than $100,000, the Paying Agent will make payment of interest due on such Warrants upon any interest payment date by wire transfer to an account of such holder maintained at a bank in the continental United States or by any other method providing for payment in same-day funds that is acceptable to the Paying Agent, provided that payment of the principal of and redemption premium (if any) on such Warrants shall be made only upon surrender of such Warrants to the Paying Agent. Registration, Transfer, Exchange and Replacement Subject to the provisions herein with respect to the book-entry system, the Warrants shall be registered as to both principal and interest and may be transferred only on the registry books of the Paying Agent pertaining to the Warrants. No transfer of the Warrants shall be permitted except upon presentation and surrender of such Warrant at the office of the Paying Agent with written power to transfer signed by the registered owner thereof in person or by a duly authorized attorney in form and with guaranty of signature satisfactory to the Paying Agent. The Paying Agent will not be required to register or transfer any Warrant during the period of fifteen (15) calendar days next preceding any interest payment date and shall not be required to transfer or exchange any Warrant during the period of forty-five (45) calendar days next preceding the date for redemption or prepayment of any Warrant. The holder of one or more of the Warrants may, upon request, and upon the surrender to the Paying Agent of such Warrant, exchange such Warrant for Warrants of other authorized denominations of the series, maturity and interest rate and together aggregating the same principal amount as the Warrant so surrendered. Any registration, transfer and exchange of Warrants shall be without expense to the holder thereof, except that the holder shall pay all taxes and other governmental charges, if any, required to be paid in connection 2

11 with such transfer, registration or exchange. The holder of any Warrant will be required to pay any expenses incurred in connection with the replacement of a mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed Warrant. The Warrant Ordinance provides that each holder of the Warrants, by receiving or accepting the Warrants, consents and agrees and is estopped to deny that, insofar as the City and the Paying Agent are concerned, the Warrants may be transferred only in accordance with the provisions of the Warrant Ordinance. The Warrant Ordinance also provides that each transferee of the Warrants takes them subject to all principal and interest payments in fact made with respect to the Warrants. Redemption Prior to Maturity Series 2012-A Warrants. The Series 2012-A Warrants are subject to redemption prior to maturity as provided below. Optional Redemption. The Series 2012-A Warrants, maturing on or after April 1, 2019 will be subject to redemption prior to their maturity, at the option of the City, in whole or in part, on April 1, 2018 and on any date thereafter (in principal amounts of $5,000 and any integral multiple thereof and if less than all of the Series 2012-A Warrants are to be redeemed, those maturities or portions thereof to be called for redemption shall be selected by the City in its discretion, and if less than all the Series 2012-A Warrants of a single maturity are to be redeemed, those to be called for redemption shall be selected by lot), at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of each Series 2012-A Warrant or portion thereof redeemed, plus accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption. Series 2012-B Warrants. The Series 2012-B Warrants are subject to redemption prior to maturity as provided below. Optional Redemption. The Series 2012-B Warrants, maturing on or after April 1, 2023 will be subject to redemption prior to their maturity, at the option of the City, in whole or in part, on April 1, 2022 and on any date thereafter (in principal amounts of $5,000 and any integral multiple thereof and if less than all of the Series 2012-B Warrants are to be redeemed, those maturities or portions thereof to be called for redemption shall be selected by the City in its discretion, and if less than all the Series 2012-B Warrants of a single maturity are to be redeemed, those to be called for redemption shall be selected by lot), at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of each Series 2012-B Warrant or portion thereof redeemed, plus accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption. Mandatory Redemption. Those of the Series 2012-B Warrants having a stated maturity in 2034 shall be subject to mandatory redemption prior to maturity, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount redeemed, plus accrued interest thereon to the redemption date, with those to be redeemed to be selected by the Paying Agent by lot, on the dates and in the principal amounts set forth below: 3

12 PRINCIPAL REDEMPTION DATE * AMOUNT * April 1, 2026 $ 255,000 April 1, ,070,000 April 1, ,110,000 April 1, ,150,000 April 1, ,190,000 April 1, ,235,000 April 1, ,285,000 April 1, ,330,000 April 1, 2034 (final maturity) 1,375,000 The City may, not less than 60 days prior to any such mandatory redemption date, direct that any or all of the following amounts be credited against the Series 2012-B Warrants scheduled for redemption on such date: (i) the principal amount of Series 2012-B Warrants of such maturity delivered by the City to the Paying Agent for cancellation and not previously claimed as a credit; (ii) the principal amount of Series 2012-B Warrants of such maturity previously redeemed (other than Series 2012-B Warrants of such maturity redeemed pursuant to mandatory redemption) and not previously claimed as credit; and (iii) the principal amount of Series 2012-B Warrants of such maturity otherwise deemed paid in full and not previously claimed as credit. General Provisions Regarding Redemptions. Upon any partial redemption of a Warrant, such Warrant shall be surrendered to the Paying Agent in exchange for one or more new Warrants of the same series and maturity and bearing the same interest rate in an authorized denomination of $5,000 or any multiple thereof in fully registered form, without coupons, for the unredeemed portion in principal. Any Warrant or portion thereof which is to be redeemed must be surrendered to the Paying Agent for payment of the redemption price. Notice of any such redemption is required to be given, not more than 60 nor less than thirty (30) days prior to the date fixed for redemption, by United States registered or certified mail to the registered holder of any Warrant called for redemption. After any specified redemption date, the Warrants so called for redemption shall cease to bear or to accrue interest if funds have been deposited with the Paying Agent for the payment thereof and if the redemption notice has been duly given as provided in the Warrant Ordinance. General SOURCE OF PAYMENT AND SECURITY The Warrants will constitute general obligations of the City for the payment of which the full faith and credit of the City will be irrevocably pledged. None of the general revenues of the City that will be legally available for the payment of debt service on the Warrants have been specially pledged for payment of debt service on the Warrants, nor has any lien been placed on such general revenues for payment of debt service on the Warrants. The Warrants are not secured by a mortgage or lien on, or a security interest in, any real or personal property. Information describing the taxes collected by the City and other revenues of the City is set forth below under "FINANCIAL SYSTEM", "RESULTS OF OPERATIONS", "SALES AND USE TAXATION" AND "AD VALOREM TAXATION". 4

13 Authority for Issuance The Warrants are being issued by the City under the authority of the Constitution and laws of the State of Alabama, including particularly Sections and of the Code of Alabama (1975), as amended, which authorize any municipality in the State of Alabama to borrow money for any lawful purpose and to issue, without an election, evidences of indebtedness, in the form of interest-bearing warrants, notes or bills payable, maturing not later than 30 years from the date of issue. The Warrants have been authorized to be issued pursuant to the Warrant Ordinance. See "DEBT MANAGEMENT". Remedies The Director of Finance, as Treasurer of the City, is, under existing law, subject to mandamus by a court of competent jurisdiction in the event that he has money available for payment of debt service on the Warrants and does not apply such money as and to the extent provided in the Warrant Ordinance. However, Alabama law provides that necessary and legitimate governmental expenses may be paid by the City before payment of debt service. See "WARRANTHOLDER RISK FACTORS". Warrant Funds SUMMARY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE WARRANT ORDINANCE General. The Warrant Ordinance will provide for the maintenance of special funds for each series of the Warrants, designated the "City of Montgomery Warrant Fund, 2012-A" and the "City of Montgomery Warrant Fund, 2012-B" (collectively, the "Warrant Funds"). Regions Bank will be designated in the Warrant Ordinance as the depository, custodian and disbursing agent for the Warrant Funds. In addition, there is created under the Warrant Ordinance an issuance costs account designated the "2012 Issuance Expense Account". Regions Bank will be designated in the Warrant Ordinance as the depository for the 2012 Issuance Expense Account. The Warrant Funds. The City will be required to transfer to each of the Warrant Funds, on or before the business day next preceding each April 1 and October 1, commencing April 1, 2013, an amount equal to the sum of (i) the semiannual installment of interest that will mature with respect to the respective series of the Warrants on the then next succeeding interest payment date, plus (ii) the principal, if any, of the respective series of the Warrants that will mature or be due for mandatory redemption on the then next succeeding interest payment date. Moneys on deposit in the Warrant Funds are to be used for the payment of the principal of and interest on the respective series of the Warrants. Provisions for Payment of Warrants Provision for Payment the Warrants. (a) If the principal of and interest and redemption premium (if any) on the Series 2012-A Warrants or the Series 2012-B Warrants is paid in accordance with the terms set forth in the Warrant Ordinance, then all covenants, agreements and other obligations of the City to the holders of such series of Warrants shall thereupon cease, terminate and become void and be discharged and satisfied. In the event the Series 2012-A Warrants or the Series 2012-B Warrants are so paid, the Paying Agent shall pay to the City any surplus remaining in the corresponding Warrant Fund. (b) The Series 2012-A Warrants or the Series 2012-B Warrants shall, prior to the maturity or redemption date thereof, be deemed to have been paid within the meaning and with the effect expressed in subsection (a) of this Section if: 5

14 (1) the City and the Paying Agent enter into an appropriate trust agreement under which there shall be deposited, for payment or redemption of such Warrants and for payment of the interest to accrue thereon until maturity or redemption, and any redemption premium thereon, securities that are direct obligations of the United States of America or securities with respect to which payment of the principal thereof and the interest thereon is unconditionally guaranteed by the United States of America ("Federal Securities") and cash or any combination of cash and Federal Securities which, together with the income to be derived from such, will produce monies sufficient to provide for the payment, redemption and retirement of such Warrants as and when the same become due; (2) the City shall have adopted all necessary proceedings providing for the redemption of any such Warrants that are required to be redeemed prior to their respective maturities and shall have instructed the Paying Agent under the aforesaid trust agreement to provide such notices of redemption as are required under the Warrant Ordinance; (3) the City and the Paying Agent shall have been furnished a certificate of a firm of certified public accountants satisfactory to the Paying Agent stating that such trust will produce monies sufficient to provide for the full payment and retirement of such Warrants as and when the principal of and interest and redemption premium (if any) on such Warrants shall come due; and (4) in the case of the Series 2012-A Warrants, the City and the Paying Agent shall have been furnished with an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel to the effect that the creation of any such trust will not result in subjecting to federal income taxation the interest on any of the Series 2012-A Warrants that are to be paid in accordance with such trust. Interest After Payment Due Date. The Warrants, any premium thereon and, to the extent legally enforceable, overdue installments of interest thereon, shall bear interest after the maturity dates thereof or such earlier date as they may be called for redemption, until paid or until money sufficient for the payment thereof shall have been deposited for that purpose with the Paying Agent, at the respective rates borne thereby. Any provision hereof to the contrary notwithstanding, overdue interest shall not be payable to the holder solely by reason of such holder having been the holder on the record date next preceding the interest payment date on which such interest became due and payable, but shall be payable by the Paying Agent as follows: (a) Not less than ten (10) days following receipt by the Paying Agent of immediately available funds in an amount sufficient to enable the Paying Agent to pay all overdue interest, the Paying Agent shall fix an overdue interest payment date for payment of such overdue interest, which date shall be not more than twenty (20) days following the expiration of the ten-day period after receipt of funds by the Paying Agent; and (b) Overdue interest shall be paid by check or draft mailed by the Paying Agent to the persons in whose names the Warrants were registered in the registry books of the Registrar pertaining to the Warrants on the overdue interest payment date. 6

15 Payment of overdue interest in the manner herein prescribed to the persons in whose names the Warrants were registered on the overdue interest payment date shall fully discharge and satisfy all liability for the same. THE FINANCING PLAN The Series 2012-A Warrants are being issued by the City to provide funds for the purposes of (i) advance refunding the Refunded Series 2006C Warrants and (ii) paying the costs of issuance of the Series 2012-A Warrants. The Series 2012-B Warrants are being issued by the City to provide funds for the purposes of (i) advance refunding the Series 2003A Warrants, Refunded Series 2005A Warrants, Refunded Series 2005B Warrants and Refunded Series 2006A Warrants and (ii) paying the costs of issuance of the Series 2012-B Warrants. In order to effect the refunding of the Refunded Warrants, the City will enter into an Escrow Trust Agreement (the "Escrow Agreement") with Regions Bank (the "Escrow Trustee"). The City will deposit, from the proceeds of the Series 2012-A Warrants, the sum of $8,899, into the Series 2012-A Account of the Escrow Fund (the "Escrow Fund") established pursuant to the Escrow Agreement. The City will also deposit, from the proceeds of the Series 2012-B Warrants, the sum of $58,894, into the Series 2012-B Account of the Escrow Fund. Money in the Escrow Fund will be invested in direct obligations of the United States Treasury or other permitted investments (herein referred to as the "Escrow Securities") for the benefit of the holders of the Refunded Warrants and will not be available under any circumstances to pay principal of or interest on the Warrants. The maturing principal and interest on the Escrow Securities, without reinvestment, together with the initial cash balances remaining in each account of the Escrow Fund after purchase of the Escrow Securities, will be sufficient to pay the principal, interest and redemption price maturing or coming due on the Refunded Warrants. Series 2012-A Warrants SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS The estimated sources and uses of proceeds from the sale of the Series 2012-A Warrants are as follows: Sources of Funds Principal amount of Series 2012-A Warrants... $9,835, Net Original Issue Premium... 33, Total... $9,868, Uses of Funds Deposit to Escrow Fund... $8,899, Underwriters' Discount... 72, Costs of Issuance... 25, Capital Projects. 870, Total... $9,868,

16 Series 2012-B Warrants The estimated sources and uses of proceeds from the sale of the Series 2012-B Warrants are as follows: Sources of Funds Principal amount of Series 2012-B Warrants... $65,150, Net Original Issue Premium , Debt Service Reserve Fund from Series 2003A Warrants. 1,479, Total... $66,742, Uses of Funds Deposit to Escrow Fund... $58,894, Underwriters' Discount , Costs of Issuance , Capital Projects.. 7,199, Total... $66,742, [Balance of page intentionally left blank] 8

17 DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS The table below sets forth the debt service requirements on the City's long-term general obligation indebtedness following the issuance of the Warrants and refunding of the Refunded Warrants. Fiscal Year Ending September 30 Other Outstanding Warrants (1)(2) Series 2012-A Warrants Series 2012-B Warrants Total 2013 $15,175,578 $ 365,148 $1,588,776 $17,129, ,315, ,240 3,241,568 22,913, ,627, ,840 4,450,563 21,441, ,796, ,240 6,968,400 25,129, ,311, ,540 7,434,175 25,106, ,238, ,840 7,437,213 25,037, ,062, ,040 4,875,815 23,306, ,481, ,040 4,870,768 23,881, ,575,995 1,434,915 4,875,465 23,886, ,583,695 1,432,915 4,870,695 23,887, ,579,911 1,436,628 4,868,070 23,884, ,227,778 1,433,265 4,870,070 17,531, ,230,356 1,433,875 4,862,935 17,527, ,227,515 1,428,000 4,861,335 17,516, ,143, ,447,619 12,591, ,171, ,446,156 11,617, ,090, ,443,144 11,533, ,006, ,438,581 11,445, ,913, ,437,469 11,350, ,807, ,439,613 8,246, ,697, ,434,819 8,132, ,579, ,428,281 8,008, ,459, ,459, ,337, ,337, ,205, ,205, ,073, ,073, ,936, ,936, ,795, ,795,598 Source: City Finance Department. (1) Assumes an interest rate of 2.50% on the Taxable General Obligation Warrants, Series 2009, which bear interest at a variable rate. Assumes an interest rate of 3.00% on the Taxable General Obligation Warrants, Series 2009B, which bear interest at a variable rate. Reflects the gross amount of interest payable on the General Obligation Recovery Zone Economic Development Warrants, Series 2010-B, without deduction for the forty-five percent (45%) subsidy payment the City expects to receive from the United States Treasury with respect to each interest payment. See "DEBT MANAGEMENT - Outstanding Indebtedness - Long-Term Indebtedness" herein for additional information regarding the City's outstanding indebtedness. (2) Future payments under the City's outstanding capital leases in the approximate aggregate principal amount of $12,500,000 are not included. Does not include operating leases which are funded on a year-to-year basis. Also, does not include amounts payable under the City's line of credit. See "DEBT MANAGEMENT - Outstanding Indebtedness" herein for additional information. 9

18 BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM The information in this section concerning The Depository Trust Company ("DTC"), New York, NY, and DTC's book-entry system has been obtained from sources the City and the Underwriters believe to be reliable, but neither the City nor the Underwriters take responsibility for the accuracy or completeness thereof. There can be no assurance that DTC will abide by its procedures or that such procedures will not be changed from time to time. The Warrants will be issued as fully-registered warrants in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, as registered owner of the Warrants. Purchasers of such Warrants will not receive physical delivery of warrant certificates. For purposes of this Official Statement, so long as all of the Warrants of a series are in the custody of DTC, references to the warrantholder or owner of Warrants of such series shall mean DTC or its nominee. DTC will act as securities depository for the Warrants. The Warrants will be issued as fullyregistered securities in the name of Cede & Co. (DTC's partnership nominee herein "Cede") or such other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. One fully-registered Warrant certificate will be issued for each maturity of each series of Warrants, in the aggregate principal amount of such maturity, and will be deposited with DTC. DTC, the world's largest securities depository, is a limited-purpose trust company organized under the New York Banking Law, a "banking organization" within the meaning of the New York Banking Law, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a "clearing corporation" within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code and a "clearing agency" registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. DTC holds and provides asset servicing for over 3.5 million issues of U.S. and non-u.s. equity issues, corporate and municipal debt issues, and money market instruments (from over 100 countries) that DTC's participants ("Direct Participants") deposit with DTC. DTC also facilitates post-trade settlement among Direct Participants of sales and other securities transactions in deposited securities, through electronic computerized book-entry transfers and pledges between Direct Participants' accounts. This eliminates the need for physical movement of securities certificates. Direct Participants include both U.S. and non-u.s. securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations and certain other organizations. DTC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation ("DTCC"). DTCC is the holding company for DTC, National Securities Clearing Corporation and Fixed Income Clearing Corporation, all of which are registered clearing agencies. DTCC is owned by the users of its regulated subsidiaries. Access to the DTC system is also available to others such as both U.S. and non-u.s. securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies and clearing corporations that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Direct Participant, either directly or indirectly ("Indirect Participants"). DTC has a Standard & Poor's rating of AA+. The DTC Rules applicable to its Direct and Indirect Participants are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. More information on DTC can be found at Purchases of Warrants, in the denomination of $5,000 principal amount or any integral multiple of $5,000 in excess thereof, under the DTC system must be made by or through Direct Participants, which will receive a credit for the Warrants on DTC's records. The ownership interest of each actual purchaser of each Warrant ("Beneficial Owner") is in turn to be recorded on the Direct and Indirect Participants' records. Beneficial Owners will not receive written confirmation from DTC of their purchase. Beneficial Owners are expected, however, to receive written confirmations providing details of the transaction, as well as periodic statements of their holdings, from the Direct or Indirect Participant through which the Beneficial Owner entered into the transaction. Transfers of ownership interests in the Warrants are to be accomplished by entries made on the books of Direct and Indirect Participants acting on behalf of 10

19 Beneficial Owners. Beneficial Owners will not receive certificates representing their ownership interests in Warrants, except in the event that use of the book-entry system for the Warrants is discontinued. To facilitate subsequent transfers, all Warrants deposited by Direct Participants with DTC are registered in the name of DTC's partnership nominee, Cede, or such other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. The deposit of Warrants with DTC and their registration in the name of Cede or such other DTC nominee does not effect any change in beneficial ownership. DTC has no knowledge of the actual Beneficial Owners of the Warrants; DTC's records reflect only the identity of the Direct Participants to whose accounts such Warrants are credited, which may or may not be the Beneficial Owners. The Direct and Indirect Participants will remain responsible for keeping account of their holdings on behalf of their customers. Conveyance of notices and other communications by DTC to Direct Participants, by Direct Participants to Indirect Participants, and by Direct Participants and Indirect Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Beneficial Owners of Warrants may wish to take certain steps to augment the transmission to them of notices of significant events with respect to the Warrants, such as redemptions, defaults, and proposed amendments to the Warrant documents. For example, Beneficial Owners of Warrants may wish to ascertain that the nominee holding the Warrants for their benefit has agreed to obtain and transmit notices to Beneficial Owners. In the alternative, Beneficial Owners may wish to provide their names and addresses to the registrar and request that copies of notices be provided directly to them. Redemption notices shall be sent to DTC. If less than all of the Warrants of a series are being redeemed, DTC's practice is to determine by lot the amount of the interest of each Direct Participant in such Warrants to be redeemed. Neither DTC nor Cede (nor any other DTC nominee) will consent or vote with respect to Warrants unless authorized by a Direct Participant in accordance with DTC's MMI Procedures. Under its usual procedures, DTC mails an Omnibus Proxy to the City as soon as possible after the record date. The Omnibus Proxy assigns Cede's consenting or voting rights to those Direct Participants to whose accounts the Warrants are credited on the record date (identified in a listing attached to the Omnibus Proxy). Principal, redemption price and interest payments on the Warrants will be made by the Paying Agent to Cede or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. DTC's practice is to credit Direct Participants' accounts, upon DTC's receipt of funds and corresponding detail information from the City or Paying Agent, on a payment date in accordance with their respective holdings shown on DTC's records. Payments by Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by standing instructions and customary practices, as in the case with securities held for the accounts of customers in bearer form or registered in "street name," and will be the responsibility of such Participant and not of DTC, the Paying Agent or the City, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Payment of principal, redemption price and interest to Cede (or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC) is the responsibility of the City or the Paying Agent, disbursement of such payments to Direct Participants will be the responsibility of DTC, and disbursement of such payments to the Beneficial Owners will be the responsibility of Direct and Indirect Participants. THE CITY, THE PAYING AGENT AND THE UNDERWRITERS WILL NOT HAVE ANY RESPONSIBILITY OR OBLIGATION TO SUCH PARTICIPANTS, OR TO THE PERSONS FOR WHOM THEY ACT AS NOMINEES WITH RESPECT TO THE WARRANTS, OR TO ANY BENEFICIAL OWNER IN RESPECT OF THE ACCURACY OF ANY RECORDS MAINTAINED BY 11

20 DTC OR ANY DIRECT PARTICIPANT OR INDIRECT PARTICIPANT, THE PAYMENT BY DTC OR ANY DIRECT PARTICIPANT OR INDIRECT PARTICIPANT OF ANY AMOUNT IN RESPECT OF THE PRINCIPAL OR REDEMPTION PRICE OF OR INTEREST ON THE WARRANTS, ANY NOTICE WHICH IS PERMITTED OR REQUIRED TO BE GIVEN TO WARRANTHOLDERS UNDER THE WARRANT ORDINANCE, THE SELECTION BY DTC OR ANY DIRECT PARTICIPANT OR INDIRECT PARTICIPANT OF ANY PERSON TO RECEIVE PAYMENT IN THE EVENT OF PARTIAL REDEMPTION OF THE WARRANTS WITH RESPECT TO LESS THAN ALL OF THE WARRANTS, OR ANY OTHER ACTION TAKEN BY DTC AS REGISTERED WARRANTHOLDER. DTC may discontinue providing its services as depository with respect to the Warrants at any time by giving reasonable notice to the City or the Paying Agent. Under such circumstances, in the event that a successor depository is not obtained, warrant certificates are required to be printed and delivered. The City may decide to discontinue use of the system of book-entry-only transfers through DTC (or a successor securities depository). In that event, warrant certificates will be printed and delivered to DTC. General THE CITY The City is a body politic and corporate and political subdivision of the State of Alabama organized under the laws of the State of Alabama in Since 1975, the City has been governed under a Mayor-Council form of government, which was established pursuant to Act No adopted on August 28, 1973 at a 1973 Session of the Legislature of Alabama. The Mayor is elected in a City-wide vote to a four-year term, and the members of the City Council are elected from each of nine single member districts throughout the City to four-year terms. The City Council elects from among its members a President of the Council who serves at the pleasure of the City Council. The Mayor is charged with the administration of the day-to-day activities of the City, while the City Council exercises legislative powers and institutes policy decisions. The current terms of the Mayor and all nine Council Members end in November The City operates on a fiscal year from October 1 of a calendar year to September 30 of the following calendar year. Employee Relations The City considers relations with its employees to be satisfactory. No employees of the City are represented by labor unions or similar employee organizations. The City does not bargain collectively with any labor union or employee organization. As of September 30, 2012, the City had approximately 2,638 employees. Personnel and Retirement System The City contributes to the Employees' Retirement System of the City of Montgomery, which is a cost-sharing, multiple-employer defined benefit plan (the "Retirement System"). The Retirement System is not in any way related to the State of Alabama's retirement system. The Retirement System was established by the City to provide retirement allowances to City employees and the employees of The City of Montgomery Airport Authority. As of October 1, 2005, the Water Works Board opted out of the Retirement System and has elected to be included under the State of Alabama's retirement system. The employees covered under the Retirement System are broken into two (2) separate groups as follows: (1) Group I most general employees of the City and The City of Montgomery Airport Authority and 12

21 (2) Group II members of the City's Fire Department and Police Department. The Retirement System is administered by a separate nine-member Board of Trustees each of whom is appointed by the City. Under the law authorizing the establishment of the Retirement System, the authority to establish and amend benefit provisions (including cost-of-living increases) is granted to such Board of Trustees. Benefits under the Retirement System are funded through contributions made by both covered employees and the participating employers. Covered employees are required to contribute six percent (6%) of their "earnable compensation" to the Retirement System each payroll period. The participating employers are required to make annual contributions in amounts which, together with contributions of covered employees (and earnings thereon), will be sufficient to permit the payment of benefits as they come due. The participating employers' annual contributions consist of (i) "normal contributions," which are intended to cover the currently accruing cost of benefits not covered by employee contributions, and (ii) "accrued liability contributions" which are intended to cover the cost of benefits not covered by "normal contributions" and employee contributions. The "normal contributions" and "accrued liability contributions" are stated as percentages of the compensation of covered employees. The appropriate accrued liability percentage is determined as provided in the governing act and ordinance, and the appropriate normal contribution percentage is determined annually on the basis of annual actuarial valuation of the assets and liabilities of the Retirement System. As of October 1, 2012, the City's rate of contribution for Group I and Group II employees was 9.29% and 19.48% of annual covered payroll, respectively. The contributions required of the plan members and the City are established, and may be amended by, the Board of Trustees for the Retirement System. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 the City's actual contribution was $13,843,183, which was equal to the City's required contribution for that year. Based on actuarial analysis, the Retirement System determines the value of its assets and the value of the accrued liabilities to make benefit payments. Based on such actuarial analysis, as of the December 31, 2011, the City's unfunded actuarial accrued liability relating to the Retirement System was $163,954,143. [Balance of page intentionally left blank] 13

22 The following table contains certain funding trend information for the Retirement System: Actuarial Valuation Date Actuarial Value of Assets Actuarial Accrued Liability Entry Age Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability Funded Ratio Covered Payroll Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability as of % of Covered Payroll 12/31/2000 $233,055,600 $287,385,009 $ 54,329, % $84,722, % 12/31/ ,121, ,711,835 35,590, % 85,536, % 12/31/ ,239, ,890,307 55,650, % 90,383, % 12/31/ ,199, ,398,748 43,199, % 93,622, % 12/31/ ,211, ,021,708 62,810, % 94,998, % 12/31/ ,138, ,283,025 75,144, % 90,371, % 12/31/ ,557, ,268,711 77,711, % 91,581, % 12/31/ ,139, ,403,756 85,264, % 98,665, % 12/31/ ,305, ,943, ,637, % 99,906, % 12/31/ ,199, ,798, ,599, % 96,313, % 12/31/ ,019, ,662, ,643, % 98,456, % 12/31/ ,508, ,462, ,954, % 99,195, % The following table shows certain contribution information for the Retirement System: Year Ended Annual Required Contribution Actual Contribution Percentage Contributed 12/31/2000 $ 5,282,064 $ 5,282, % 12/31/2001 5,132,879 5,132, % 12/31/2002 5,191,323 5,191, % 12/31/2003 4,564,047 4,564, % 12/31/2004 5,486,264 5,486, % 12/31/2005 5,810,664 5,810, % 12/31/2006 6,822,144 6,822, % 12/31/2007 7,843,686 7,843, % 12/31/2008 8,936,193 8,936, % 12/31/2009 9,572,795 9,572, % 12/31/ ,487,458 10,487, % 12/31/ ,971,544 11,971, % 14

23 As of the January 1, 2012 actuarial valuation date, the entry age (level percentage of pay) cost method was used to determine contributions. The remaining amortization period as of January 1, 2012 was 24 years. The five-year smoothing method is used to determine the actuarial value of assets. A seven percent (7%) rate of return on investments is assumed. Certain other assumptions regarding future employment of covered employees, payroll increases, mortality and other factors have also been made in determining the actuarial valuations. Actuarial assessments are based upon a variety of assumptions, one or more of which may prove to be inaccurate or be changed in the future, and will change with the future experience of the Retirement System. Actuarial assessments are "forward-looking" information that reflect the judgment of those performing such assessments. Other Post-Employment Benefits. The City administers a multi-employer defined benefit healthcare plan (the "Employees' Medical Insurance Plan") for employees of the City and one other participating governmental unit. The plan provides lifetime healthcare insurance for eligible retirees and their spouses through the City's group health insurance plan, which covers both active and retired members. The Employees' Medical Insurance Plan does not issue a publicly available financial report. At September 30, 2012, the plan had approximately 1,465 active participants and 1,682 retired members and beneficiaries. The plan requires monthly contributions ranging from $46 to $206 from active participants. Retirees' or their beneficiaries are required to contribute certain amounts based on level of coverage and date of retirement. The City's annual other postemployment benefit (OPEB) cost is calculated based on the annual required contribution of the employer (ARC). The City has elected to calculate the ARC and related information using the unit credit actuarial cost method. The ARC represents a level of funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal cost each year and to amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities (or funding excess) over a period not to exceed thirty years. The following tables contain certain information regarding the City's OPEB cost, contributions to the Employees' Medical Insurance Plan and actuarial valuations. Fiscal Year Ended Annual OPEB Cost Percentage of Annual OPEB Cost Contributed Net OPEB Obligation 9/30/2009 $19,547, % $32,316,766 9/30/ ,369, % 43,286,771 9/30/ ,687, % 62,273,229 [Balance of page intentionally left blank] 15

24 Actuarial Valuation Date Actuarial Value of Assets (a) SCHEDULE OF FUNDING PROGRESS Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL) Entry Age (b) Unfunded AAL (UAAL) (b-a) Funded Ratio (a/b) Covered Payroll (c) UAAL as a Percentage of Covered Payroll [(b-a)/c)] 9/30/2008 $0 $235,686,390 $235,686, % $104,442, % 9/30/ ,728, ,728, % 103,173, % 9/30/ ,103, ,103, % 105,848, % See Note 13 to the City's audited financial statements included in the CAFR for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 attached hereto as APPENDIX A for additional information regarding the City's OPEB costs and certain assumptions made in connection with the actuarial assessments. Actuarial assessments are based upon a variety of assumptions, one or more of which may prove to be inaccurate or be changed in the future, and will change with the future experience of the Retirement System. Actuarial assessments are "forward-looking" information that reflect the judgment of those performing such assessments. General FINANCIAL SYSTEM The City maintains a financial reporting system providing reports of receipts and expenditures. Internal accounting controls are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance regarding (1) the safeguarding of assets against loss from unauthorized use or disposition, and (2) the reliability of financial records for preparing financial statements and maintaining accountability for assets. Activities of the City are monitored internally on a monthly basis and are audited annually, as required by law, by independent certified public accountants. Budgetary System By applicable law, the City follows the following procedures in establishing a budget: 1. Not later than August 20th of each year, the Mayor submits to the City Council a proposed balanced operating budget for the City's general fund and a capital budget for the fiscal year commencing the following October 1. The operating budget for the general fund includes proposed revenues and expenditures and the means of financing them for the upcoming year. The level of control for the detailed budgets is at the government function category level. 2. Public hearings are conducted to obtain taxpayer comments. The City Council may add to or delete from the budget proposed so long as the budget remains in balance. 3. The budget is legally enacted through passage of a resolution receiving the approving majority vote of five members of the City Council. 16

25 4. The Mayor is authorized to transfer budgeted amounts within the same departments within the general fund; however, any revisions or transfers of appropriations in the general fund from one department, office or agency to another department, office or agency must be approved by the City Council. 5. Budgets are adopted on a modified accrual basis which differs from generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) insofar as encumbrances are included with expenditures. The City's operating budget for its fiscal year ending September 30, 2013, is summarized under "RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Summary of the Operating Budget for Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2013." Accounting System The accounting system of the City is organized on the basis of funds (and account groups under such funds), with each considered as a separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund are accounted for with a separate set of self-balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues and expenditures, or expenses, as appropriate. Government resources are allocated to and accounted for in individual funds based upon the purposes for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. Each of these categories is divided into separate fund types as follows. Governmental Funds General Fund. The General Fund is the primary operating fund of the City. It is used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. As discussed above, the City adopts an annual appropriated operating budget for its General Fund. Debt Service Fund. This fund is used to account for the resources accumulated and payments made for principal and interest on long-term general obligation debt. Although not required by applicable law, the City Council for the City also formally approves a Debt Service budget for the fiscal year. Capital Projects Fund. The Capital Projects Fund accounts for the acquisition and construction of major capital facilities other than those financed by proprietary funds and trust funds. An example of the specific projects accounted for are school construction, recreational facilities and miscellaneous projects. As discussed above, the Capital Projects Fund is annually budgeted pursuant to a capital budget submitted by the Mayor and approved by the City Council. Proprietary Funds. The City also maintains five (5) significant proprietary funds: (i) the Montgomery Zoo Fund which accounts for the operations of the City-owned and operated Zoo, (ii) the Montgomery Area Transit System Fund which accounts for the operations of the public transportation system within the City, (iii) the Lagoon and Gateway Parks Fund which accounts for operations of the City's recreational complexes, (iv) the Montgomery River Boat Fund which accounts for operations of the City riverboat attraction and (v) the Municipal Parking Decks Fund which accounts for the operations of the City-owned parking decks. Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing goods in connection with a Proprietary Funds' principal on-going operations. The principal operating revenues of the proprietary funds are charges to customers for sales and services. Operating expenses for the proprietary funds are the costs of sales and services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. 17

26 Internal Service Funds. The Internal Service Funds account for the operations of the selfinsured medical insurance plan (i.e., Employees Medical Insurance Fund), the workers' compensation plan and the self-insured liability insurance plan (i.e., Liability Insurance Fund) provided to other departments of the City on a cost reimbursement basis. The Liability Insurance Fund accounts for the operations of the self-insured liability insurance fund of the City including general liability, public officials' liability and law enforcement officers' liability. Pension Trust Fund. The Pension Trust Fund accounts for the activities of the Employees' Retirement System of the City of Montgomery, Alabama, which accumulates resources for pension benefits to qualified City employees and the employees of the other participating employers. See "THE CITY - Personnel and Retirement System" herein. Special Revenue Funds. Special revenue funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources (other than special assessments, expendable trusts, or major capital projects) that are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes. The City has established the following Special Revenue Funds: State Gasoline Tax Fund. The State Gasoline Tax Fund accounts for the proceeds received by the City from certain state imposed gasoline taxes. The use of this money is restricted to expenditures related to construction, improvement and maintenance of highways, bridges and streets. Alabama Trust Fund. The Alabama Trust Fund accounts for funds received by the City from the Municipal Government Capital Improvement Fund funded by the State of Alabama's Alabama Trust Fund, which funds are required to be used solely for capital improvements and the renovation of capital improvements determined by the municipal governing body. Riverfront Stadium Fund. The Riverfront Stadium Fund accounts for proceeds received from lodging tax receipts. Two and one-half (2½ percent of total lodging tax collections are earmarked for the fund). Collections from the Montgomery Pro Baseball Club for leasing and concessions sales are also accounted for in this fund. All proceeds are used for capital improvements, repairs, and maintenance on the stadium and debt service payments. Municipal Court Corrections Fund. The Municipal Court Corrections Fund accounts for funds restricted for the municipal court and jail. These funds may be used for capital improvements or operations. Miscellaneous Special Revenue Fund. The Miscellaneous Special Revenue Fund accounts for funding arising from miscellaneous federal and state government sources. Montgomery Area Transit System Grant Fund. The Montgomery Area Transit System Grant Fund accounts for grant funding received primarily from the Federal Transit Administration to be used for the Montgomery Area Transit System. Housing and Urban Development Grant Fund. The Housing and Urban Development Grant Fund accounts for grant funding used for community development block grant programs and housing development action grant programs. 18

27 Description of Major Sources of General Fund Revenues The City's major sources of revenue for its General Fund are as follows: Sales and Use Tax. The City levies and collects sales and use taxes generally parallel to the State sales and use tax, except for the respective rates, consisting of (1) privilege, license taxes on every person, firm or corporation engaged or continuing within the corporate limits of the City or its police jurisdiction in the business of selling tangible personal property at retail, (2) privilege, license taxes on every person, firm or corporation engaged or continuing within the corporate limits of the City or its police jurisdiction in the business of conducting or operating places of amusement or entertainment and (3) excise taxes on persons, firms or corporations storing, using or otherwise consuming tangible personal property within the corporate limits of the City or its police jurisdiction. See "SALES AND USE TAXATION" herein. The proceeds of the City's sales and use taxes are not earmarked or specifically pledged to any outstanding indebtedness of the City and are used for general governmental purposes. Under applicable judicial precedents, sales and use taxes may not be levied at rates that are confiscatory or unreasonable. Further, the rates of any such taxes in the police jurisdiction of the City may not be fixed at rates in excess of one-half the rates levied for like business, sales or uses conducted within the corporate limits of the City. Lodgings Tax. The City levies a lodgings tax at the rate of eight and one-half percent (8.5%) on the gross revenues derived from the renting of rooms or apartments within the City by persons, firms, associations or corporations engaged in the business of operating hotels, motels, tourists courts, tourists cabins, lodging houses and rooming houses renting to transients. The lodgings tax was increased from six percent (6%) to eight and one-half percent (8.5%) effective October 1, The 2.5% increase was pledged to secure the City's Taxable Special Lodging Tax Revenue Warrants (Riverfront Stadium Project), Series 2003A, which will be refunded and no longer treated as outstanding upon the issuance of the Warrants. The remaining portion of the Lodgings Tax (6%) is not earmarked or specifically pledged to any outstanding indebtedness of the City and such remaining portion (as well as the 2.5% portion following refunding of the Series 2003A Warrants) is used for general governmental purposes. Business Licenses and Permits. The City levies license and permit fees on the privilege of engaging in certain businesses and professions within the corporate limits of the City. License and permit fees are computed either as a percentage of gross receipts or as a flat stated amount and in some cases is a combination of both a percentage of gross receipts and a flat stated amount. In addition, the City also charges an issuance fee. The receipts from business licenses and permits are not earmarked or specifically pledged to any outstanding indebtedness and are used for general governmental purposes. Under applicable judicial precedents, business license taxes may not be levied at rates that are confiscatory or unreasonable. Further, the rates of any such taxes in the police jurisdiction of the City may not be fixed at rates in excess of one-half the amount charged for like businesses, trades or professions conducted within the corporate limits of the City or at rates that will yield an amount in excess of the cost of furnishing police and fire protection and other essential services in such police jurisdiction. City Gasoline Tax. The City levies a gasoline tax on the business of selling gasoline to customers, irrespective of the use for which it is sold. These taxes are also levied on motor fuels other than gasoline for use in powering motor vehicles and aircraft. The receipts from this tax are not earmarked or specifically pledged to any outstanding indebtedness and are used for general governmental purposes. 19

28 Ad Valorem Taxes. Property or ad valorem taxes are levied under various provisions of the constitution and statutes of the State of Alabama and may be used only for the purpose or purposes for which they are levied. The City levies a 12.5-mill tax for general municipal purposes, the proceeds of which are deposited in the City's General Fund. Under present law, the rates at which local ad valorem taxes are levied may be increased only after approval by the legislature and a majority vote of the qualified electors of the affected jurisdiction. See "AD VALOREM TAXATION". Except for the tax increment arising within the City's Downtown Tax Increment Financing District which is pledged for the City's Series 2006A Warrants and Series 2006B Warrants, portions of each of which are expected to remain outstanding following the issuance of the Warrants, the City's ad valorem tax receipts are not earmarked or specifically pledged to any indebtedness. See "SOURCE OF PAYMENT AND SECURITY" herein. Rental Tax. The City levies a rental tax on the gross revenues of persons engaged in the business of renting property at a rate of four percent (4%) on rentals of personal property, linens and garments and one and one-half percent (1.5%) on rentals of vehicles, truck trailers and house trailers. The receipts from this tax are not earmarked or specifically pledged to any outstanding indebtedness and are used for general governmental purposes. Charges and Fees for Services. The City also imposes various charges for services such as fees for admittance to the Montgomery Zoo and charges for utilizing the City's public transportation system and recreational complexes. Inter-Governmental Revenues. The City also receives from the State of Alabama and the federal government operating grants and contributions and capital grants and contributions. The grants and contributions refer to revenues restricted for specific programs whose use may be restricted from other operational or capital items. Although such grant money and contributions have historically been made available to the City, no assurance is given nor is any representation made that such grants or contributions will continue to be available. It should be noted that the continued availability of grant contribution monies from both State and Federal governments is dependent upon the ability and willingness of said governmental entities to continue to provide such moneys and contributions for needed programs, and is not assured to continue. See ''RESULTS OF OPERATIONS" for information regarding receipts from the City's major sources of revenue. See also the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2011 attached hereto as APPENDIX A. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS This section of the Official Statement presents certain historical financial information concerning the City. Comparative Statement of General Fund Revenues and Expenditures The table below sets forth revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balance for the City's General Fund for the fiscal years indicated. The information for each of the fiscal years shown was extracted from the audited financial statements of the City for such fiscal years. The audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, are included in the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report attached hereto as APPENDIX A, and audited financial statements for prior fiscal years may be obtained from the City upon request. 20

29 In June of 1999, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board ("GASB") issued Statement Number 34, Basic Financial Statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis for State and Local Governments ("GASB 34"), which substantially revised the financial reporting requirements for state and local governments in the United States, including the City. The City's audited financial statements for the fiscal years ended on or after September 30, 2002 were prepared in accordance with GASB 34. For more information concerning GASB 34, contact GASB, at 401 Merritt 7, Post Office Box 5116, Norwalk, Connecticut , Telephone (203) The City's operating budget for fiscal year ending September 30, 2013 is summarized in the subsection below entitled "Summary of the Operating Budget for Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2013". [Balance of page intentionally left blank] 21

30 Comparative Statement of General Fund Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Fiscal Year Ended September Revenues Taxes $137,828,097 $135,099,339 $127,489,528 $131,837,921 $132,096,729 Licenses and permits 34,973,866 37,878,497 37,845,467 38,203,350 38,894,282 Intergovernmental Revenues 4,640,144 3,783,812 4,628,057 3,782,033 4,060,662 Charges for Services 11,598,277 11,230,500 13,319,163 14,444,392 15,169,455 Fines and Forfeitures 5,574,497 6,817,336 8,648,985 9,834,116 5,499,410 Interest 2,593,274 1,144,300 49,892 16,151 13,633 Miscellaneous revenues 3,467,881 2,767,965 2,488,777 3,490,075 2,821,542 Total revenues 200,676, ,721, ,469, ,608, ,555,713 Expenditures Current: General Government 34,800,385 36,232,930 36,035,732 39,753,028 39,524,223 Public Works 40,189,677 42,497,589 38,659,217 30,688,028 31,322,781 Public Safety 73,792,084 79,562,346 78,897,150 77,948,144 80,669,397 Cultural and Recreational 20,612,254 21,419,153 19,835,274 27,210,590 28,156,292 Debt Service: Principal 2,863,943 3,394,729 4,864,694 4,871,560 4,734,715 Interest 677, , , , ,317 Total expenditures 172,935, ,744, ,888, ,820, ,765,725 Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures 27,740,520 14,977,167 15,581,783 20,787,516 13,789,988 Other financing sources (uses) Proceeds From Sale of Capital Assets 388, , , , ,709 Transfers In 0 296,067 4,035,000 8,660,607 6,539,543 Transfers Out (30,899,390) (33,267,251) (33,085,840) (59,999,537) (29,220,835) Capital Leases 4,715,409 4,923,829 3,657,542 5,966,304 4,332,320 Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) (25,795,381) (27,587,311) (25,278,128) (45,194,755) (17,935,263) Net Change in Fund Balances 1,945,139 (12,610,144) (9,696,345) (24,407,239) (4,145,275) Fund Balance - Beginning 54,169,695 56,114,834 43,504,690 33,808,345 9,389,957 1 Fund Balance - Ending $ 56,114,834 $ 43,504,690 $ 33,808,345 $ 9,401,106 $ 5,244,682 Source: City's CAFRs for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and Restated. 22

31 The following table sets forth unaudited revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balance for the City's General Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, Revenues Taxes $135,153,695 Licenses and permits 39,456,369 Intergovernmental Revenues 4,407,714 Charges for Services 14,845,041 Fines and Forfeitures 9,105,630 Interest 3,166 Miscellaneous revenues 2,228,067 Total revenues 205,199,682 Expenditures General Government 40,844,056 Public Works 29,795,194 Public Safety 81,393,815 Cultural and Recreational 29,279,466 Debt Service 5,103,050 Total expenditures 186,415,581 Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures 18,784,101 Other financing sources (uses) Proceeds From Sale of Capital Assets 407,094 Transfers In 5,134,154 Transfers Out (29,756,693) Capital Leases 6,242,540 Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) (17,972,905) Net Change in Fund Balance 811,196 Fund Balance - Beginning 5,255,831 Fund Balance - Ending $ 6,067,027 [Balance of page intentionally left blank] 23

32 Summary of the Operating Budget for Fiscal Year ending September 30, 2013 The following table is a summary of the operating budget for the City's General Fund for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013: Budgeted Revenues Taxes $137,625,464 Business License and Permits 41,754,000 Intergovernmental 5,297,065 Charges for Services 16,005,366 Fines and Forfeitures 10,522,538 Other 1,762,388 Total 212,966,821 Expenditures General Government 42,371,142 Public Safety 81,987,373 Public Works 33,054,502 Cultural and Recreational 29,608,259 Debt Service 4,907,207 Total 191,928,483 Excess (Deficiency) 21,038,338 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Proceeds from sale of assets 1,017,000 Transfers from other funds 3,500,000 Transfers to other funds (30,055,338) Capital leases 4,500,000 Total (21,038,338) Net Change in Fund Balance 0 [Balance of page intentionally left blank] 24

33 Tax Collections The City's collections from its major sources of tax revenue are shown in the table below on a cash basis for the fiscal years indicated: Fiscal year ended September Sales Tax (1) $98,305,775 $94,323,759 $84,412,059 $84,884,050 $89,004,278 $91,297,837 Ad Valorem Tax (2) 28,552,456 30,241,233 31,099,698 31,378,176 30,885,675 30,799,146 Lodgings Tax (3) 5,487,158 5,516,785 5,367,667 5,503,209 5,734,191 6,049,431 Alcoholic Beverage & Tobacco Tax 2,010,110 1,847,019 1,666,154 1,673,261 1,727,910 1,717,802 City Gasoline Tax (4) 5,453,401 5,276,386 5,172,022 5,175,114 5,040,673 4,855,356 Rental Tax (5) 0 0 1,764,595 3,285,666 3,337,930 3,354,828 Source: City Finance Department. (1) Sales tax receipts based on 3.5% general sales tax rate. (2) Includes ad valorem tax on motor vehicles. (3) The amounts shown reflect the total collections of the 8.5% lodgings tax. (4) Reflects collections of the City's gasoline tax, which amounts are deposited in the City's General Fund. Does not include the City's share of certain county and State gasoline taxes received by the City which are restricted as to use and maintained in a special revenue fund. (5) The City instituted a rental tax in 2009 of four percent (4%) for tangible personal property, linens and garments and one and one-half percent (1.5%) for vehicles, truck trailers and house trailers. The tobacco tax receipts are not general fund revenues and are earmarked for capital improvement projects and may not be used to pay debt service on the City's bonds, warrants and other indebtedness. [Balance of page intentionally left blank] 25

34 DEBT MANAGEMENT General The principal forms of indebtedness that the City is authorized to incur include general obligation bonds, general obligation warrants, general obligation bond anticipation notes, revenue anticipation notes, gasoline tax anticipation bonds, and various revenue anticipation bonds and warrants relating to enterprises. In addition, the City has the power to enter into certain leases which constitute a charge upon the general credit of the City and to guarantee obligations of certain public corporations affiliated with the City. In general, the issuance of general obligation bonds requires voter approval, The following types of obligations may be issued or incurred by the City without voter approval: (1) general obligation warrants; (2) general obligation refunding bonds; (3) certain revenue anticipation bonds, warrants and notes; (4) general and special obligation bonds financing street, sidewalk and sewer improvements supported, in whole or in part, by assessments; and (5) capitalized lease obligations that are funded on a "year-to-year basis". The City has never defaulted in the payment of debt service on its bonds, warrants or other funded indebtedness, nor has the City ever refunded any funded indebtedness for the purpose of preventing or avoiding such a default. [Balance of page intentionally left blank] 26

35 Outstanding Indebtedness Long-Term Indebtedness. As of December 1, 2012, the City will have the following long-term indebtedness outstanding (taking into account the issuance of the Warrants and the refunding of the Refunded Warrants): Outstanding Principal Description of Indebtedness Source of Payment Balance Taxable General Obligation Warrants, Series 2012-B General Obligation Warrants, Series 2012-A General Obligation Refunding Warrants, Series 2011 General Obligation Recovery Zone Economic Development Warrants, Series 2010-B General Obligation Warrants, Series 2010-A Taxable General Obligation Warrants, Series 2009B Taxable General Obligation Warrants, Series 2009 General Obligation Warrants, Series 2007B General Obligation School Warrants, Series 2007 General Obligation Warrants, Series 2006C full faith and credit $65,150,000 full faith and credit 9,835,000 full faith and credit 38,760,000 full faith and credit 60,065,000 full faith and credit 41,375,000 full faith and credit 3,001,111 full faith and credit 4,000,001 full faith and credit 365,000 full faith and credit 38,545,000 full faith and credit 7,020,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Warrants, Series 2006B Taxable General Obligation Tax Increment Warrants, Series 2006A full faith and credit and pledge of tax increment receipts full faith and credit and pledge of tax increment receipts 7,495,000 1,685,000 General Obligation Refunding Warrants, Series 2005B Taxable General Obligation Warrants, Series 2005A full faith and credit 710,000 full faith and credit 4,145,000 Capital Leases full faith and credit 12,518,037 (1) Total $294,669,148 Source: City Finance Department (1) Outstanding principal amount only. Excludes operating leases. 27

36 Other Long-Term Liabilities In addition to the outstanding indebtedness listed above, the City has other additional long-term liabilities. Under state and federal laws and regulations, the City is required to place a final cover on its landfill when closed and to perform certain maintenance and monitoring at the landfill site for thirty (30) years after its closure. As a result, and in addition to operating expenditures relating to current activities of the landfill, a liability is recorded in the financial statements of the City based on the future closure and post-closure cost estimates that will be incurred near or after the date the landfill no longer accepts waste. As of September 30, 2012, the estimated liability for landfill and post-closure costs was approximately $6,444,794, and it is estimated that an additional $3,665,206 will be recognized as closure and postclosure care expenses between September 30, 2012, and the date that the landfill is expected to be filled to capacity in Such estimates may be less than the actual costs incurred by the City at the time such activities are required to be undertaken. Any landfill closure costs have been generally liquidated by the General Fund on a current year basis. In addition, the City also recognizes as a long-term liability amounts owed to employees of the City under its policies and procedures for compensated absences. Such compensated absences amounted to $18,882,761 as of September 30, This amount represents the City's allowance to employees to accumulate vacation and sick leave up to certain limits for use in subsequent periods. Also, employees are allowed to receive vacation days up to a certain limit in lieu of receiving overtime pay. In the event of an employee's termination of employment, that employee receives payment of accumulated vacation hours and one-half of accumulated sick leave hours up to certain limits at then current wage rates. The compensated absences are generally liquidated by the General Fund as they occur. Also, the City records as a long-term liability an amount equal to future benefits due employees who were covered by the City's previous pension plan and the City's previous workers compensation and disability plan. Such liability is in addition to any liability relating to the Retirement System. See "THE CITY - Personnel and Retirement." Such benefits are determined based on an employee's years of service and the current hourly rate of pay. Such liability is recorded in the financial statements at the present value of the payments. As of September 30, 2011, the liability for such retirement and workmen's compensation and disability benefits under the previous plans amounted to approximately $8,044,842. Short-Term Indebtedness. The City receives a significant portion of its ad valorem and sales tax revenues for the fiscal year during the period of November through January. In order to match cash flow with spending, the City has an outstanding line of credit that is used to anticipate such future tax revenues. As of October 30, 2012, the outstanding balance on the City's line of credit was $13,500,000. Derivatives Transactions. The City is not a party to any interest rate swaps or other derivatives agreements. Future Debt Issuance. The city plans to incur additional taxable general obligation indebtedness in the aggregate principal amount of $1,120,000 during the 2012 calendar year, with debt service of approximately $75,000 per year beginning in the 2014 fiscal year, for a stream restoration and wetlands park construction project. The City also plans to incur additional general obligation indebtedness during the 2013 calendar year in the approximate aggregate principal amount of $6,000,000 to advance refund a portion of its outstanding General Obligation Tax Increment Warrants, Series 2006B. Constitutional Debt Limit The City's present constitutional debt limit is an amount equal to 20% of the assessed value for ad valorem tax purposes of the taxable property located within its corporate limits. In addition, under 28

37 existing law the following types of indebtedness are not chargeable against the City's constitutional debt limit: (1) tax anticipation notes not exceeding one-fourth of the City's general revenues; (2) bonds or other obligations already issued, or which may hereafter be issued, for the purpose of acquiring, providing or constructing school houses, waterworks and sewers; (3) revenue securities payable solely from the revenues of water, sewer, gas or electric systems; (4) obligations incurred and bonds issued for street or sidewalk improvements, where the costs of the same, in whole or in part, are to be assessed against the property abutting said improvements; and (5) capitalized lease obligations that are funded on a "year-toyear basis." Further, under existing law, the amount of any indebtedness chargeable against the constitutional debt limit is reduced by the amount of an escrow or sinking fund held for the payment of such indebtedness. The following statement reflects the City's legal debt margin after the issuance of the Warrants and the refunding of the Refunded Warrants: City of Montgomery Statement of Legal Debt Margin Assessed value of taxable property as of September 30, 2012 (1) $2,361,544,100 Constitutional debt limit (20% of assessed value) 472,308,820 Total indebtedness 294,669,148 Less debt not chargeable to debt limit (2) (49,225,000) Total indebtedness chargeable against constitutional debt limit 245,444,148 Constitutional debt margin $ 226,864,672 Source: Montgomery County Revenue Commissioner and Montgomery County Judge of Probate. (1) Excludes exempt and abated property. (2) The Series 2007 Warrants and portions of the Series 2005B Warrants, Series 2010-A Warrants and Series 2012-B Warrants are attributable to the construction of schoolhouses and are not included in the City's constitutional debt limit. An amount not less than $49,225,000 is excluded from the City s constitutional debt limit. Amendment No. 772 to the Constitution of Alabama authorizes the counties and municipalities within the State to use public funds for certain purposes intended to further the economic development of such political subdivisions. Amendment No. 772 authorizes any county or municipality to (i) acquire real property, buildings, plants, factories, facilities, machinery and equipment of any kind and to improve and develop such properties for use as sites for industry of any kind or as industrial parks, (ii) lease, sell, grant, exchange or otherwise convey all or any part of any real property, buildings, plants, factories, facilities, machinery and equipment or any industrial park project to any individual, firm, corporation or other entity, public or private, for the purpose of constructing developing, equipping and operating industrial, commercial, research or service facilities of any kind or (iii) lend its credit to, or grant public funds and things of value for the benefit of, any individual, firm, corporation or other entity, public or private, for the purpose of promoting the economic and industrial development of such political subdivision. Amendment No. 772 also authorizes counties and municipalities to issue bonds, warrants, notes and other evidences of indebtedness and to use the proceeds thereof in furtherance of the powers discussed in the paragraph immediately above, subject to the limitation that the aggregate principal amount of obligations issued for such purposes may not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the assessed value of taxable property in such county or municipality. Amendment No. 772 provides that the bonds, 29

38 warrants, notes or other evidences of indebtedness may be secured by the full faith and credit of the issuer or may be limited as to the source of payment. The issuance of bonds, warrants, notes and other evidences of indebtedness pursuant to Amendment No. 772 is not subject to the City's twenty percent constitutional debt limit (discussed above). Direct and Overlapping Debt The following table reflects the direct debt of the City that will be outstanding after the issuance of the Warrants and the overlapping debt of the City and other governmental entities. Debt of the State of Alabama is not included in overlapping debt. For purposes of this table, direct and overlapping debt includes only general obligation debt or debt payable, among other sources, from taxes levied by the City. Pro Forma Direct and Overlapping Indebtedness Principal Balance Percent of Debt Allocable To City City's Allocable Share of Debt Direct Debt General Obligation Bonds, $294,669, % $294,669,148 Warrants and Capital Leases (1) Overlapping Debt (2) 128,015, % 111,966,226 Total Direct and Overlapping Debt $422,684,148 $406,635,374 (1) After giving effect to the issuance of the Warrants and the refunding of the Refunded Warrants. (2) Based on City's 2011 CAFR. Percentage is equal to the portion of the taxable assessed value of property within Montgomery County that is located within the corporate limits of the City. [Balance of page intentionally left blank] 30

39 Debt Ratios The following table sets forth certain debt ratios applicable to the City after issuance of the Warrants: City of Montgomery Debt Ratios After issuance of Warrants 17.22% Population (1) 208,182 Assessed Value of Taxable Property (2)(3) (as of September 30, 2012) $2,361,544,100 Direct Debt and Capital Leases $294,669,148 Direct Debt and Capital Leases Per Capita (4) $1, Ratio of Direct Debt and Capital Leases to Assessed Value (3)(4) 12.48% Direct and Overlapping Debt and Capital Leases (4) $406,635,374 Direct and Overlapping Debt and Capital Leases Per Capita (4) $1, Ratio of Direct and Overlapping Debt And Capital Leases to Assessed Value (3)(4) Source: City. (1) Source: 2011 U.S. Bureau of the Census estimate. (2) Source: Montgomery County Revenue Commissioner and Montgomery County Judge of Probate. (3) Excludes exempt and abated property. (4) Excluding operating leases and defeased indebtedness. SALES AND USE TAXATION Under applicable state law, the City is entitled to impose a privilege and license tax in the form of a sales and use tax generally paralleling, except as to rate, the sales and use taxes imposed by the State of Alabama. The City is permitted to establish its own tax rates and may increase or decrease such sales and use tax rates without any further approval of the Alabama Legislature or any constitutional limitation. However, under applicable judicial precedents, the general sales and use taxes may not be levied at rates that are confiscatory or unreasonable, nor may the rates of any such taxes in a police jurisdiction be fixed at rates in excess of one-half the rates levied for like business, sales or uses conducted within the corporate limits of such municipality. Under the applicable City ordinance, the City levies and collects sales and use taxes consisting of the following: (1) privilege or license taxes on every person, firm or corporation engaged or continuing within the corporate limits or police jurisdiction of the City in the business of selling tangible personal property at retail or engaged within the corporate limits or police jurisdiction of the City in the business of conducting or operating places of amusement or entertainment (sales tax), and (2) excise taxes on persons, firms or corporations storing, using or otherwise consuming tangible personal property within the corporate limits or police jurisdiction of the City (use tax). Effective in the City's fiscal year beginning October 1, 2002, the City's general sales and use tax rates increased from 2.5% to 3.5%. The City also imposes a sales tax at the rate of 1.25% on the sale of automotive vehicles at retail and a use tax on the storage, use or consumption within the corporate limits of the City of automotive vehicles at the rate of 1.25%. The City imposes sales and use taxes on the sale or storage, use or consumption of machinery used in farming operations at the rate of 1.25%. The City also imposes sales and use taxes at a 31

40 rate of 1.75% with respect to sale of or the storage, use or consumption of, machinery used in certain manufacturing and mining operations. The City levies sales and use taxes within its police jurisdiction at rates equal to one-half the rates levied within the corporate limits of the City. General AD VALOREM TAXATION The levy and collection of ad valorem taxes in the State are subject to the provisions of the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, as amended (the "Alabama Constitution"), which, among other things, fixes the percentage of market value at which property can be assessed for taxation, limits the rates of county taxation that can be levied against property, and provides a maximum value for the aggregate ad valorem taxes that can be levied by all taxing authorities on any property in any tax year. The amount of any specific ad valorem tax in the State is computed by multiplying the tax rate by the assessed value of the taxable property. The assessed value of taxable property is a specified percentage (the "assessment ratio") of its fair and reasonable market value or, in certain circumstances, its current use value. Ad valorem tax rates are generally stated in terms of mills (one-thousandth of a dollar) per dollar of assessed value. Thus, for any given ad valorem tax, each mill in the rate of taxation represents a tax on property equal to one-tenth of one percent of the assessed value of such property. The Property Tax Amendment Amendment No. 373 to the Alabama Constitution (the "Property Tax Amendment") requires all taxable property to be divided into the four classes shown below and valued for taxation according to the assessment ratios respectively shown applicable thereto: Class I All property owned by utilities and used in 30% the business of such utilities Class II All property not otherwise classified 20% Class III All agricultural, forest and single family, owner-occupied residential property and historic buildings and sites 10% Class IV Private passenger automobiles and pickup trucks owned and operated by an individual for personal or private use The Property Tax Amendment provides that the owner of Class III property may elect to have such property appraised at its "current use value" rather than its "fair and reasonable market value". In a legislative act implementing the Property Tax Amendment, "current use value" has been defined as the value of such property based on the use being made of it on October 1 of the preceding year, without taking into consideration "the prospective value such property might have if it were put to some other possible use". Assessment Ratio Adjustments. The Property Tax Amendment provides that with respect to local (as distinguished from State) ad valorem taxes, the governing body of any county, municipality or other local taxing authority may, subject to certain criteria established by legislative act, adjust (by increasing or decreasing) the ratio of assessed value of any class of taxable property to its fair and reasonable market value or its current use value (as the case may be), but only if (i) the governing body of such county, municipality or other taxing authority holds a public hearing on the proposed adjustment before 15% 32

41 authorizing the adjustment, (ii) the Legislature adopts an act approving the adjustment, and (iii) a majority of the electors of such county, municipality or other taxing authority subsequently approve the adjustment in a special election. Any adjustment of assessment ratios is subject to the further requirements that the assessment ratio applicable to each class of taxable property must be uniform within the jurisdiction of each local taxing authority and that no class may be assessed at more than 35% or less than 5% of its fair and reasonable market value or current use value (as the case may be). By virtue of the Property Tax Amendment, the Legislature has no power to adjust the assessment ratios pertaining to local taxes except to approve or disapprove an adjustment proposed by a local taxing authority. In addition, the Legislature has placed the following restrictions on the adjustment of assessment ratios: (1) If the total assessed value of all property of a single class located within a taxing authority's jurisdiction exceeds 50% of the total assessed value of all taxable property located within the jurisdiction of such authority, then the assessment ratio with respect to that class of property may be decreased by no more than 5% from the ratio otherwise prescribed for such class; (2) If the total assessed value of all properties of a single class located within the jurisdiction of a local taxing authority is less than 20% of the total assessed value of all taxable property located within such jurisdiction, then the assessment ratio with respect to that class of property may be increased by no more than 5% from the ratio otherwise prescribed for such class; and (3) If the total assessed value of all property of a single class located within the jurisdiction of a local taxing authority exceeds 75% of the total assessed value of all taxable property located within such jurisdiction, then (i) the assessment ratio with respect to that class of property may be decreased by no more than 5% from the ratio otherwise prescribed for such class, and (ii) the prospective assessment ratio for all other classes of property may be increased by no more than 5% from the ratio otherwise prescribed for such classes. The City Council does not have any present plans for any such adjustment. Rate Adjustments. The Property Tax Amendment authorizes any county, municipality or other local taxing authority to decrease any ad valorem tax rate at any time, provided that such decrease will not jeopardize the payment of any bonded indebtedness secured by such tax. The Property Tax Amendment provides that a county, municipality or other local taxing authority may at any time increase the rate at which any ad valorem tax is levied above the limit otherwise provided in the Alabama Constitution, but only if (i) the governing body of such county, municipality or other taxing authority holds a public hearing on the proposed increase before authorizing the increase, (ii) the Legislature adopts an act approving the increase, and (iii) a majority of the electors of such county, municipality or other taxing authority subsequently approve the increase in a special election. The City Council has no present plans for increasing or decreasing any tax levied by the City. Maximum Tax Limitation. The Property Tax Amendment contains a provision which limits the total amount of ad valorem taxes (including all state, county, municipal and other taxes) that may be imposed on any property in any one tax year to an amount not exceeding a specified percentage of the fair and reasonable market value of such property. The percentages applicable to the various classes of property are as follows: Class I... 2% Class II... ½ % Class III... 1% Class IV... 1 ¼% 33

42 If the total amount of tax otherwise payable with respect to a class of property would exceed the maximum tax limit, the millage rate of each separate tax to which such property is subject must be reduced in the same proportion that the millage levied by or for the benefit of each taxing authority bears to the total millage levied by or for the benefit of all applicable taxing authorities. This provision becomes operative as to the several classes of property only if the total tax rate exceeds the following: Class I Class II Class III Class IV 66-2/3 mills 75 mills 100 mills 83-1/3 mills Future millage rate increases made pursuant to the Property Tax Amendment may, in certain municipalities and with respect to certain classes of property, result in the proportionate reduction of the ad valorem tax rate. Additional Exemptions. The Property Tax Amendment exempts from all ad valorem taxes household and kitchen furniture, farm tractors, farming implements when used exclusively in connection with agricultural property, and stocks of goods, wares and merchandise. These categories of property were not generally exempt from ad valorem taxation prior to adoption of the Property Tax Amendment. Ad Valorem Tax Rates The following ad valorem taxes are presently being levied on property located within the City: Taxing Authority Mills State of Alabama 6.5 Montgomery County: General 5.0 Road and Bridge 2.5 Total 7.5 City of Montgomery: General 12.5 School District Taxes: County-Wide 3.5 School District * 6.5 Total 10.0 Total 36.5 * The school district tax is levied in a school district consisting of the corporate limits of the City. Ad Valorem Tax Assessment and Collection Ad valorem taxes on taxable properties within the City, except motor vehicles and public utility and railroad properties, are assessed and collected by the Montgomery County Revenue Commissioner. 34

43 Ad valorem taxes on motor vehicles in the City are assessed and collected by the Montgomery County Judge of Probate, and ad valorem taxes on public utility and railroad properties are assessed by the State Department of Revenue and collected by the State and by the Montgomery County Revenue Commissioner. All property is re-assessed annually for ad valorem tax purposes. Ad valorem taxes are due and payable on the October 1 following the October 1 as of which they are assessed, and they become delinquent on and after the following December 31. Assessed Valuation of Taxable Property The following table contains the assessed value of taxable property (excluding exempt and abated property) in the City for the tax years ended September 30 of the years indicated: Assessed Value of Taxable Property Real Property and Year Business Personal Property Motor Vehicles Total 2012 $2,093,834,360 $267,709,740 $2,361,544, ,114,901, ,440,868 2,362,342, ,149,747, ,899,820 2,381,647, ,210,502,797 N/A * 2,210,502,797 * ,154,678, ,165,360 2,408,843,520 Source: Montgomery County Revenue Commissioner and Montgomery County Judge of Probate. * The assessed value of motor vehicles in the City for the entire fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 was not available. For motor vehicles assessed from June, 2009 through September, 2009, the assessed value was $88,269,600, which compares to $79,836,180, $90,744,248 and $95,957,580 for the same period of 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively. Beginning with the 2004 tax year, property is re-assessed annually for ad valorem tax purposes. Largest Ad Valorem Taxpayers of City As of September 30, 2012, the ten largest ad valorem taxpayers in the City are shown below: Taxpayer Type of Business Assessed Value Real Property Total Taxes Paid In Montgomery County (2) City's Share of Taxes Paid (2) Alabama Power Company Public Utility $56,474,900 $2,061, $703, Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama LLC (1) Automobile Manufacturer 40,628,580 1,142, , BellSouth Communications Inc. d/b/a AT&T Public Utility 21,413, , , NP/I&G EastChase Property Owner LLC Shopping Mall 10,747, , , Wal Mart Real Estate Business Trust Retail 9,920, , , Southern Boulevard Corp. Retail 8,607, , , Alabama Gas Corporation Public Utility 7,866, , , CSX Transportation Inc. Railroad 6,455, , , CSC Distributions Inc. Warehousing 6,390, , , Verandas at Taylor Oaks LLC Apartments 6,358, , , Source: Montgomery County Revenue Commissioner. Excludes all motor vehicles. (1) The taxpayer has been granted an abatement of non-education ad valorem taxes on certain property, including the ad valorem tax levied by the City. Such abatement continues through the October 1, 2015 assessment. (2) Does not include taxes on motor vehicles by the Montgomery County Judge of Probate or the State Department of Revenue. 35

44 Limitations on City's Imposition of Ad Valorem Taxes Based on the limitations imposed by Property Tax Amendment and applicable statutes, the City has imposed the maximum assessment ratios on taxable property and the maximum ad valorem tax rates permitted by law without seeking legislative approval and holding a special election. LITIGATION There is no litigation pending or, to the knowledge of the City, threatened questioning the validity of the Warrants, the proceedings under which the Warrants are to be issued, the source of payment or security for the Warrants provided by the Warrant Ordinance, the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Warrant Ordinance, the organization of the City, or the election or qualification of the City's officers. Recent court decisions have substantially eroded the immunity from tort liability formerly enjoyed by local governmental units in Alabama; however, Chapter 93 of Title 11 of the Code of Alabama (1975), as amended, now prescribes certain limits on the liability of local governmental units for bodily injury or death and for damage or loss of property. The limits are presently $100,000 in the case of bodily injury or death of one person in any single occurrence, $300,000 in the aggregate where more than two persons have claims or judgments on account of bodily injury or death arising out of any single occurrence, and $100,000 for damage or loss of property arising out of any single occurrence. The Alabama Supreme Court has held that the limitations prescribed by Chapter 93 of Title 11 are constitutional. The City is a defendant in several suits and has been notified of various claims against it arising from matters relating to the normal operations of a municipality. The City believes that any liability resulting from these suits and claims will be covered by the City's liability insurance, or by other funds of the City which will be available to discharge such liability, without impairing its ability to perform any of its other obligations. Local governmental units throughout the country increasingly have been subjected to lawsuits many of which claim damages in large amounts for alleged denials of civil rights under the provisions of Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code. While the question is not free from doubt, it should be assumed that existing Alabama statutory limitations on liability for personal injury would not serve to limit liability under Section WARRANTHOLDER RISK FACTORS An investment in the Warrants involves certain risks, which should be carefully considered by investors. Prospective investors should carefully examine this entire Official Statement and their own financial condition in order to make a judgment as to their ability to bear the economic risk of such investment and whether or not the Warrants are an appropriate investment for them. The sufficiency of revenues to pay debt service on the Warrants may be affected by events and conditions relating to, among other things, legislation, population and employment trends and economic conditions in the City and surrounding areas, and the issuance of additional general obligation indebtedness or other indebtedness secured by a pledge of specific taxes, the nature and extent of which are not presently determinable. Holders of the Warrants should be aware that their rights and the enforceability thereof may be subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and other similar laws affecting creditors' rights and the exercise of judicial discretion in appropriate cases, including the law-imposed obligation that the City must first use its taxes and other revenues to pay necessary and legitimate governmental 36

45 expenses before paying debt service on the Warrants. See "SOURCE OF PAYMENT AND SECURITY" and "BANKRUPTCY" herein. No mortgage, lien or security interest is granted to the warrantholders in any property or assets of the City, nor in any funds held or to be held under the Warrant Ordinance. There is no limitation contained in the Warrant Ordinance to prevent the City from issuing additional general obligation indebtedness payable from the revenues of the City for which the full faith and credit are irrevocably pledged, nor is there any limitation in the Warrant Ordinance to prevent the City from issuing indebtedness payable from a specific pledge of taxes or revenues, including taxes and revenues which would otherwise be available to pay debt service on general obligation indebtedness of the City. See "DEBT MANAGEMENT." It is expected that the Series 2012-A Warrants will qualify as tax-exempt obligations for Federal income tax purposes as of the date of issuance. Bond counsel is expected to deliver an opinion with respect to certain aspects of the tax status of the Series 2012-A Warrants. See "TAX MATTERS". The form of that opinion is attached to this Official Statement as APPENDIX B and should be read in its entirety for a complete understanding of the scope of the opinion and the conclusions expressed. A legal opinion is only the expression of professional judgment and does not constitute a guaranty with respect to the matters covered. In addition, the opinion of bond counsel speaks only as of its date, and bond counsel does not undertake to advise warrantholders about subsequent developments. The tax status of the Series 2012-A Warrants could be affected by post-issuance events. There are various requirements of the Code that must be observed or satisfied after the issuance of the Series 2012-A Warrants in order for the Series 2012-A Warrants to qualify for, and retain, tax-exempt status. These requirements include, among others, use of the proceeds of the Series 2012-A Warrants for permitted purposes, use of the facilities financed by the Series 2012-A Warrants for permitted purposes, limitations of investment of bond proceeds, and the rebate of so-called excess arbitrage earnings. Compliance with these requirements is the responsibility of the City. The Warrant Ordinance does not provide for the payment of any additional interest or penalty if a determination is made that the Series 2012-A Warrants do not comply with the existing requirements of the Code or if a subsequent change in law adversely affects the tax consequences of investing in the Series 2012-A Warrants. BANKRUPTCY The undertakings of the City should be considered with reference to the potential impact thereon of the United States Bankruptcy Code, 11 USC, 101 et seq., as amended from time to time (the "Bankruptcy Code"), and other laws affecting debtors and creditors' rights and public instrumentalities generally. In this regard, it should be noted that Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code permits a municipality, political subdivision, public agency or other instrumentality of a state that is insolvent and otherwise eligible for relief under Chapter 9 to file a petition and commence a case in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the purpose of effecting a plan to adjust its debts. The Bankruptcy Code, among other provisions, directs such a Chapter 9 petitioner to file with the court a list of its creditors; provides that the filing of the petition under Chapter 9 operates as a stay of the commencement or continuation of any judicial or other proceeding against the petitioner; directs a petitioner to file a plan for the adjustment of its debts; and expressly permits the petitioner in its plan to modify the right to payment of its creditors. Among other plan provisions, a bankruptcy petitioner has the right to propose to reinstate indebtedness under its plan according to the original maturity schedule of such indebtedness, or to extend the maturity or make other changes to the terms of the debt under its bankruptcy plan in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code. 37

46 In order to confirm a proposed bankruptcy plan for the adjustment of debts, the court must find that the plan is in the best interest of creditors, is feasible, and otherwise complies with the Bankruptcy Code's plan confirmation requirements. The Bankruptcy Code provides that a plan must be accepted in writing by or on behalf of creditors of each impaired class of claims holding at least two-thirds in amount and more than one-half in number of the creditors which have accepted or rejected the plan, subject to the following. Assuming the plan otherwise meets the Bankruptcy Code's confirmation requirements, the plan may be confirmed by the court notwithstanding the negative vote of one or more classes of claims if at least one impaired class of claims votes in favor of the plan, and the court finds that the plan does not discriminate unfairly and is fair and equitable with respect to the dissenting classes of creditors. Prospective purchasers of the Warrants should assume that existing Alabama statutes authorize the City to file petitions for relief under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code. Location ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION The City of Montgomery, the capital of the State of Alabama and county seat of Montgomery County, is located in the central portion of the State. The City lies along the banks of the Alabama River, approximately 95 miles south of the City of Birmingham, Alabama, and approximately 175 miles north of the City of Mobile, Alabama and the Gulf of Mexico. The City covers an area of approximately 158 square miles. Historical The City of Montgomery was incorporated as a city in The City's incorporation resulted from the consolidation of three villages - New Philadelphia, Alabama Town, and the Town of East Alabama. At the time of the merging of these three original villages, the City adopted the name of Montgomery; this name was chosen to honor General Richard Montgomery, a distinguished Revolutionary War soldier. Montgomery became the capital of Alabama in 1846, and in 1861 served briefly as the first capital of the Confederate States of America during the Civil War. The world's first electric street car began operation in Montgomery on April 7, In the early 1900's, the Wright Brothers established a flight school on what is now the site of Maxwell Air Force Base. Population According to the 2010 Census Report, the City was the second most populous city in the State of Alabama. The population trends of the City of Montgomery and Montgomery County since 1950, according to the U.S. Bureau of Census, is shown in the following table. The population estimate for the City of Montgomery and Montgomery County, Alabama, according to the U.S. Bureau of the Census, for calendar year 2011 is also set forth in the following table: 38

47 Year City Montgomery County 2011(est) 208, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,965 Business Climate The City functions as a regional trade center for approximately thirteen surrounding Alabama counties. The City has experienced increasing commercial and industrial growth and is the home of numerous state and federal offices, several colleges and universities and a major military installation. The average annual unemployment rate of 8.0% (not seasonally adjusted) through August 2012 in the Montgomery MSA (an area which includes Autauga County, Elmore County, Lowndes County and Montgomery County), compared to the state average annual unemployment rate of 8.0% (not seasonally adjusted) for the same period. See "ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION - Employment Statistics" below. The City's local economy is diverse with state government, a major military installation, regional government, wholesale/retail trade, agriculture support and manufacturing all playing a part in the City's economic environment. Montgomery's manufacturing base includes: food-kindred products; transportation equipment; textile/apparel; machinery/equipment; printing/publishing; furniture/fixtures; software engineering; and plastics. The information technology industry is also a growing part of the Montgomery area economy, with several companies located in the City. In 2002, the City of Montgomery was selected by Hyundai Motor Company as the location for its first United States auto assembly plant. The plant cost approximately $1.7 billion to acquire and construct and contains approximately 2 million square feet of space, situated on approximately 1,744 acres of land, and includes a stamping facility, a paint shop, a vehicle assembly shop, a two-mile test track and an engine shop. In 2005, the auto assembly plant began production of automobiles. At full operation, the Hyundai plant is capable of producing 350,000 automobiles annually. Both the Hyundai Sonata and the Hyundai Santa Fe sport utility vehicle are produced at the assembly plant. In addition to the location and construction of the assembly plant, over 20 new Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers have located automobile operations in the Montgomery MSA in order to supply the needs of the plant. Healthcare The hospitals located in the City offer comprehensive health care facilities and services, and specialized medical care is available to meet the growing and changing needs of the City and the surrounding service area. There are three acute care hospitals located in Montgomery: Baptist Medical Center East (located adjacent to Auburn University at Montgomery); Baptist Medical Center South located on South Boulevard; and Jackson Hospital, located near downtown, adjacent to I

48 Military Community Maxwell Air Force Base, including its Gunter Annex, along with the Alabama National Guard and other Department of Defense initiatives, generates a significant annual economic impact in the Montgomery area. The area's military population includes officers and enlisted personnel stationed at Maxwell Air Force Base (herein referred to as the "MAFB") and the Gunter Annex, and those attending the many schools at MAFB that comprise the Air University. Air University, established in 1946 at MAFB, provides diversified educational programs that affect the careers of almost every Air Force member. The Air University's mission is to conduct continuing education for officers, enlisted personnel and civilians to prepare them for command, staff, leadership, and management responsibilities. Air University also provides specialized education to meet Air Force requirements in scientific, technological, managerial and other professional areas. Air University is also responsible for research in many areas of aerospace and flight technology. Not only does Air University reach throughout the United States Air Force, but it also provides professional education to leaders of America's allies, and its students come from locations throughout the world. Transportation The City is served by CSX Transportation, which, along with its connections, serves all parts of the South and connects the City with other sections of the United States. In addition to the rail facilities, the City is served by a network of improved highways. Interstate Highway 65 (Chicago to Mobile) and Interstate Highway 85 (Richmond, Virginia, to Montgomery) intersect in the City. Greyhound Bus Lines and Continental-Trailways Bus Lines and more than two dozen motor freight carriers maintain terminals in Montgomery. The City is also currently provided with air service by Delta Connection, USAir Express, and American Eagle with connections to all major cities of the country. The Alabama River offers a nine-foot channel for barge transportation from Montgomery to the Gulf of Mexico through the Port of Mobile. The Alabama State Docks Department maintains a public dock with a 100-ton capacity inside a protected barge turning basin on the Alabama River at Montgomery. Via the Tennessee- Tombigbee Waterway, barge transportation is available between Montgomery and the Great Lakes. Agriculture The City is fortunate in being located in the heart of what is known as the "Black Belt" section of Alabama denoted by its black topsoil rich in nutrients. During the last quarter century this region's agricultural economy has seen a growing diversification of its products of the soil, including cotton, soybeans and corn. The City also serves as a state regional livestock marketing center. Wholesale Sales Due to the City's strategic location in the central area of Alabama, with its means of rail and highway transportation, it also enjoys a large volume of wholesale trade and serves as a distribution center for Big Lots, Inc. Trade Area It is estimated that the normal trade area supporting Montgomery's wholesale and retail establishments embraces approximately 13 surrounding counties with an estimated combined population of more than 600,

49 Employment Statistics The following table sets forth comparative unemployment rates for the Montgomery MSA, Montgomery County, the State of Alabama and the United States for the years indicated: (1) Montgomery MSA 3.4% 3.5% 5.1% 9.4% 9.2% 9.0% 8.0% Montgomery County 3.6% 3.4% 5.2% 9.4% 9.1% 9.1% 8.2% State of Alabama 3.5% 3.4% 5.0% 9.9% 9.5% 9.0% 8.0% United States 4.6% 4.6% 5.8% 9.3% 9.6% 8.9% 8.3% Source: Alabama Department of Industrial Relations; Bureau of Labor Statistics. Not seasonally adjusted. (1) Monthly Average through August Income Levels Per Capita Personal Income. Per capita personal income is the total income of all families and individuals in a given area divided by the total population of the area. The following are estimates of per capita personal income levels in the jurisdictions indicated for 2006 through 2010: Montgomery County $38,160 $37,294 $38,840 $37,398 $36,831 Montgomery MSA 35,682 34,875 36,013 34,466 33,636 State of Alabama 33,504 32,663 33,949 35,528 31,208 United States 39,791 38,637 40,947 39,506 37,725 Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. Median Family Income. The following are estimates of median family income in the jurisdictions indicated for 2008 through 2012: Montgomery MSA $60,100 $59,300 $59,200 $57,700 $56,400 State of Alabama 55,400 54,600 54,100 53,200 51,700 United States 65,000 64,200 64,400 64,000 61,500 Source: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. [Balance of page intentionally left blank] 41

50 Major Employers The ten largest employers in the Montgomery area, their principal activity and the approximate number of employees of each are as follows: Name Type of Business No. of Employees Maxwell-Gunter Air Force Base Federal Government 12,280 State of Alabama State Government 9,500 Montgomery County Board of Education Public School System 4,524 Baptist Health Systems Hospitals/Clinics 4,300 Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC Automotive Manufacturing 3,500 ALFA Insurance Companies Insurance 2,568 City of Montgomery Local Government 2,500 Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc. Healthcare 1,300 Rheem Water Heaters Water Heater Manufacturing 1,147 MOBIS Alabama, LLC Automobile Parts Supplier 1,017 Source: Montgomery Area Chamber of Commerce (2012); City of Montgomery. Montgomery County Employment by Industry Number Employed % Natural Resources, Mining and Construction 5, Manufacturing 17, Trade, Transportation, Warehousing and Utilities 29, Information 2, Financial Activity 8, Professional and Business Services 20, Education and Health Services 18, Leisure and Hospitality 15, Other Services 7, Government 43, Source: Montgomery Area Chamber of Commerce (July 2012). Education The following table sets forth information concerning the educational levels of residents age 25 and over of the City, the State of Alabama and the United States: Area High School Diploma Bachelors Degree Montgomery 85.1% 30.6% State of Alabama 81.4% 21.7% United States 85.0% 27.9% Source: U. S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 5-Year Estimates,

51 Primary and Secondary. The Montgomery County Board of Education provides public education for all K-12 students in Montgomery County. The Board is governed by seven individuals elected by districts within Montgomery County. Primary sources of revenue for the Board include State, Federal and local taxes. The Montgomery County public school system is comprised of 54 schools, consisting of 4 high schools, 8 junior high / middle schools, 30 elementary schools, 9 magnet schools, 1 special education centers and 2 alternative schools, serving approximately 31,470 students. The school system employs approximately 3,940 full-time administrative, faculty and support personnel. Approximately 19% of the school-age children in Montgomery County attend private schools located in the City's metropolitan area. Higher Education. The City of Montgomery serves as the home to several post-secondary educational institutions with more than 22,000 students enrolled at eight institutions. These universities and colleges are Amridge University, Auburn University at Montgomery, Alabama State University, Troy University (Montgomery Campus), Faulkner University (including the Jones School of Law), Huntingdon College, South University and Trenholm State Technical College. Source: Montgomery Area Chamber of Commerce. Utilities The electricity is distributed to the City and its vicinity by two utilities, Alabama Power Company (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company), and Dixie Electric Cooperative, a member-owned electric cooperative. Natural gas is provided to consumers throughout the Montgomery area by the Alabama Gas Corporation. The Water Works Board supplies water and sanitation services within the City and in certain areas beyond the corporate limits of the City. Telephone service is provided in the City and its vicinity by AT&T and other suppliers. Source: Montgomery Area Chamber of Commerce. Telecommunications A large investment has been made by AT&T and other telecommunications companies in the Montgomery area in telecommunications technology network including digital switching, fiber optics, "self-healing architecture," integrated services digital network and synchronous optical networks which will support asynchronous transmission mode service. Source: Montgomery Area Chamber of Commerce. [Balance of page intentionally left blank] 43

52 Construction Statistics The following table shows the number of permits issued by the City for new commercial construction and new residential construction for the calendar years indicated: Year Commercial Construction Units Residential Construction Units , (1) Source: City Building Department, Annual Building Reports. (1) Reflects permits issued through September 30, LEGAL MATTERS The legality and validity of the Warrants will be subject to approval by Capell & Howard P.C., Montgomery, Alabama, Bond Counsel. Certain legal matters will be passed upon on behalf of the City by its counsel, Davis & Hatcher, L.L.C., Montgomery, Alabama, and for the Underwriters by their counsel, Balch & Bingham LLP, Birmingham, Alabama. It is anticipated that Bond Counsel will render opinions substantially in the forms attached hereto as APPENDIX B. The various legal opinions to be delivered concurrently with the delivery of the Warrants express the professional judgment of the attorneys rendering the opinions as to the legal issues explicitly addressed therein. By rendering a legal opinion, the opinion giver does not become an insurer or guarantor of that expression of professional judgment, of the transaction opined upon, or of the future performance of parties to the transaction. Nor does the rendering of an opinion guarantee the outcome of any legal dispute that may arise out of the transaction. 44

53 TAX MATTERS Series 2012-A Warrants. In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under the Code, as presently construed and administered, and assuming continuing compliance by the City with its covenants (set forth in the Warrant Ordinance and certain certificates of the City) pertaining to certain requirements of federal tax law, the interest income on the Series 2012-A Warrants will be excluded from gross income of the recipients thereof for federal income tax purposes pursuant to the provisions of Section 103(a) of the Code and will not constitute an item of tax preference for the purpose of computing the liability of individuals and corporations for the alternative minimum tax imposed by Section 55 of the Code; such interest, however, is includable in the adjusted current earnings in computing the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on certain corporations. Bond Counsel will express no opinion with respect to the federal tax consequences to the recipients of the interest income on the Series 2012-A Warrants under any provision of the Code not referred to above. In the Warrant Ordinance, the City has covenanted in effect that it will, to the extent permitted by law, comply with the provisions of the Code that constitute conditions to or requirements for (1) the exclusion of the interest income on the Series 2012-A Warrants from the gross income of the recipient thereof for federal income tax purposes pursuant to the provisions of Section 103 of the Code and (2) the exclusion of such interest income from the computation of the alternative minimum tax applicable to taxpayers other than corporations that is imposed by Section 55 of the Code. Bond Counsel is further of the opinion that the interest income on the Series 2012-A Warrants is exempt from present State of Alabama income taxation. The exemption of interest on the Series 2012-A Warrants from present federal and Alabama income taxation does not necessarily result in exemption under the income or other tax laws of any other state or local taxing authority. The laws of the several states and local taxing authorities vary with respect to the taxation of such income, and each holder of Series 2012-A Warrants is advised to consult his own tax adviser in that regard and as to the status of the interest on the Series 2012-A Warrants under state and local tax laws. Although Bond Counsel is expected to render an opinion that interest on the Series 2012-A Warrants is excludable from gross income for federal tax purposes, the ownership or disposition of, or the accrual or receipt of interest on, the Series 2012-A Warrants may otherwise affect a warrantholder's federal, state, local or foreign tax liability. The nature and extent of these other tax consequences will depend upon the warrantholder's particular tax status and the warrantholder's other items of income or deduction. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any such other tax consequences. Bank Qualification of Series 2012-A Warrants. In the Warrant Ordinance the City designated the Series 2012-A Warrants as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" under Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. The Series 2012-A Warrants may be treated by financial institutions (as such term is used in Section 265(b)(5) of the Code) as though they were acquired on August 7, 1986, and a deduction of up to 80% of the interest costs attributable to carrying or purchasing the Series 2012-A Warrants may be allowed to a financial institution holding the Series 2012-A Warrants. Series 2012-B Warrants. INTEREST ON THE SERIES 2012-B WARRANTS IS NOT EXCLUDED FROM GROSS INCOME FOR FEDERAL INCOME TAX PURPOSES. OWNERS OF THE SERIES 2012-B WARRANTS SHOULD CONSULT WITH THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND FOREIGN TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR ACQUISITION, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF THE SERIES 2012-B WARRANTS. 45

54 Owners of the Series 2012-B Warrants should be aware that: (i) the discussion with respect to United States federal tax matters in this Official Statement was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer, (ii) such discussion was written to support the promotion or marketing (within the meaning of IRS Circular 230) of the transactions or matters addressed by such discussion; and (iii) each taxpayer should seek advice based on his or her particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor. This notice is given solely for purposes of ensuring compliance with IRS Circular 230. Bond Counsel is of the opinion that the interest income on the Series 2012-B Warrants is exempt from present State of Alabama income taxation. The exemption of interest on the Series 2012-B Warrants from present State of Alabama income taxation does not necessarily result in exemption under the income or other tax laws of any other state or local taxing authority. The laws of the several states and local taxing authorities vary with respect to the taxation of such income, and each holder of Series 2012-B Warrants is advised to consult his own tax adviser in that regard and as to the status of the interest on the Series 2012-B Warrants under state and local tax laws. Forms of Bond Counsel Opinions. The proposed forms of Bond Counsel's opinions are included in this Official Statement as APPENDIX B. Future Tax Legislation. There can be no assurance that legislation will not be introduced or enacted, after the issuance and delivery of the Series 2012-A Warrants, so as to cause interest on the Series 2012-A Warrants to be or to become included in gross income, in whole or in part, for purposes of federal income taxation or to impose additional requirements as a condition to the exclusion of such interest from gross income. No assurance can be given that the introduction or enactment of any such legislation will not adversely affect the market price for, or marketability of, the Warrants. FEDERAL TAX ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT The initial public offering price to be paid for certain of the Series 2012-A Warrants (the "Original Issue Discount Warrants") is less than the principal amount thereof. Under existing law, the difference between (i) the amount payable at the maturity of each Original Issue Discount Warrant, and (ii) the initial offering price to the public of such Original Issue Discount Warrant constitutes original issue discount with respect to such Original Issue Discount Warrant in the hands of any owner who has purchased such Original Issue Discount Warrant in the initial public offering of the Series 2012-A Warrants. Such initial owner is entitled to exclude from gross income (as defined in Section 61 of the Code) an amount of income with respect to such Original Issue Discount Warrant equal to that portion of the amount of such original issue discount allocable to the period that such Original Issue Discount Warrant continues to be owned by such owner. See "TAX MATTERS" herein for a discussion of certain collateral federal tax consequences. In the event of the redemption, sale or other taxable disposition of such Original Issue Discount Warrant prior to stated maturity, however, the amount realized by such owner in excess of the basis of such Original Issue Discount Warrant in the hands of such owner (adjusted upward by the portion of the 46

55 original issue discount allocable to the period for which such Original Issue Discount Warrant was held by such initial owner) is includable in gross income. Under existing law, the original issue discount on each Original Issue Discount Warrant is accrued daily to the stated maturity thereof and the accrued amount is added to an initial owner's basis for such Original Issue Discount Warrant for purposes of determining the amount of gain or loss recognized by such owner upon the redemption, sale or other taxable disposition thereof. The amount (if any) to be added to basis for each accrual period is equal to (a) the sum of the issue price and the amount of original issue discount accrued in prior periods (if any) multiplied by the yield to maturity (determined on the basis of compounding at the close of each accrual period and properly adjusted for the length of the accrual period) less (b) the amounts payable as current interest during such accrual period on such Original Issue Discount Warrants. The federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership, redemption, sale or other disposition of Original Issue Discount Warrants which are not purchased in the initial offering at the initial offering price may be determined according to rules which differ from those described above. All owners of Original Issue Discount Warrants and Series 2012-B Warrants should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the determination for federal, state, local and foreign income tax purposes of interest accrued upon redemption, sale or other disposition of such Original Issue Discount Warrants and Series 2012-B Warrants and with respect to the federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences of the purchase, ownership, redemption, sale, gift or other disposition of Original Issue Discount Warrants and Series 2012-B Warrants. FEDERAL TAX ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF ORIGINAL ISSUE PREMIUM The initial public offering price to be paid for certain of the Series 2012-A Warrants (the "Original Issue Premium Warrants") is greater than the principal amount thereof. Under existing law, any owner who has purchased an Original Issue Premium Warrant in the initial public offering of the Series 2012-A Warrants is required to reduce his basis in such Original Issue Premium Warrant by the amount of premium allocable to periods during which he holds such Original Issue Premium Warrant, and the amount of premium allocable to each accrual period will be applied to reduce the amount of interest received by the owner during each such period. All owners of Original Issue Premium Warrants and Series 2012-B Warrants should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the determination for federal, state, local and foreign income tax purposes of interest accrued upon redemption, sale or other disposition of such Original Issue Premium Warrant and Series 2012-B Warrants and with respect to the federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences of the purchase, ownership, redemption, sale, gift or other disposition of such Original Issue Premium Warrants and Series 2012-B Warrants. UNDERWRITING Merchant Capital, L.L.C., as senior manager for the Underwriting Group (the "Underwriters"), is purchasing the Series 2012-A Warrants for an aggregate purchase price of $9,795, (which represents the face amount of the Series 2012-A Warrants less an underwriting discount of $72,287.25, plus net original issue premium of $33,271.75) and the Series 2012-B Warrants for an aggregate purchase price of $64,784, (which represents the face amount of the Series 2012-B Warrants less an underwriting discount of $478,852.50, plus net original issue premium of $113,000.00). The initial public offering prices set forth on the inside cover page may be changed by the Underwriters, and the Underwriters may offer and sell the Warrants to certain dealers (including dealers depositing the Warrants into investment trusts) and others at prices lower than the offering prices set forth on the inside cover page. The Underwriters will purchase all the Warrants, if any are purchased. 47

56 VERIFICATION REPORT The arithmetical accuracy of certain computations included in the schedules provided by the Underwriters on behalf of the City relating to (a) computation of forecasted receipts of principal and interest on the Escrow Securities and the forecasted payments of principal and interest to redeem the Refunded Warrants, and (b) computation of the yields on the Series 2012-A Warrants and the related Escrow Securities was examined by The Arbitrage Group, Inc. Such computations were based solely upon assumptions and information supplied by the Underwriters on behalf of the City. The Arbitrage Group, Inc. has restricted its procedures to examining the arithmetical accuracy of certain computations and has not made any study or evaluation of the assumptions and information upon which the computations are based and, accordingly, has not expressed an opinion on the data used, the reasonableness of the assumptions, or the achievability of the forecasted outcome. CONTINUING DISCLOSURE The City will enter into an undertaking (the "Undertaking") for the benefit of the beneficial owners of the Warrants to send certain information annually and to provide notice of certain events to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board ("MSRB") pursuant to the requirements of Rule 15c2-12 (the "Rule") adopted by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended. The Undertaking is summarized below. Annual Report. In the Undertaking, the City agrees, in accordance with the provisions of the Rule, to provide or cause to be provided to the MSRB, not later than 180 days after the close of each fiscal year of the City, commencing with the fiscal year ending September 30, 2012, the following annual financial information and operating data (the "Annual Report"): 1. A statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balance for the City's General Fund for the prior fiscal year. 2. The amount of sales tax, ad valorem tax, lodgings tax, alcoholic beverage and tobacco tax, City gasoline tax and rental tax collected by the City for the prior fiscal year. 3. The outstanding principal amounts of all long-term indebtedness of the City as of September 30 of the prior fiscal year. The City also agrees, in accordance with the Rule, to provide or cause to be provided in a timely manner to the MSRB, notice of any failure to provide or cause to be provided the Annual Report, or any part thereof, as described in this paragraph. Audited Financial Statements. The City agrees to provide or cause to be provided within 180 days after the close of each fiscal year of the City its audited financial statements to the MSRB; provided, however, that if audited financial statements of the City are not available at such time, the City will provide unaudited financial statements within 180 days after the end of the fiscal year and will provide its audited financial statements for such fiscal year when and if available. The audited financial statements of the City so provided will be prepared pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles as applicable to it. Notice of Material Events. The City agrees to provide or cause to be provided, in a timely manner not in excess of ten (10) business days after the occurrence of the event, as required by the Rule, to the MSRB, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events with respect to the Warrants: 48

57 1. principal and interest payment delinquencies; 2. non-payment related defaults, if material; 3. unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; 4. unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; 5. substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; 6. adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701-TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the Series 2012-A Warrants, or other material events affecting the tax status of the Series 2012-A Warrants; 7. modifications of the rights of holders of the Warrants, if material; 8. bond calls, if material, and tender offers; 9. defeasances; 10. release, substitution or sale of property securing repayment of the Warrants, if material; 11. rating changes; 12. bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership, or similar event of the obligated person; 13. the consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving an obligated person or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the obligated person, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action, or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material; and 14. appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material. Form and Method of Filing. All filings to be provided under the Undertaking shall be made by posting such information in electronic format on the MSRB's EMMA system at accompanied by identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB. All such filings shall be made in conformity with the procedures and requirements established by the MSRB in effect at the time of such filing. Additional Information. The City may from time to time choose to provide other information in addition to the information and notices listed above, but the City does not undertake in the Undertaking to commit to provide any such additional information or to update or to continue to provide such additional information or notices once provided. Amendment; Waiver. The City may amend the Undertaking and any provision of the Undertaking may be waived, if such amendment or waiver is supported by an opinion of counsel expert in federal securities laws, to the effect that such amendment or waiver would not cause the undertakings therein to violate the Rule taking into account any subsequent change in or official interpretation of the Rule. 49

58 Beneficiaries and Enforcement. The City agrees that its undertakings pursuant to the Rule set forth in the Undertaking are intended to be for the benefit of the holders of the Warrants and shall be enforceable by such holders. No failure by the City to comply with its obligations under the Undertaking shall constitute an event of default under the Warrant Ordinance. No failure by the City under the Undertaking shall ever subject the City to money damages in any amount or of any type. A failure by the City to comply with an Undertaking must be reported in accordance with the Rule and must be considered by any broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer before recommending the purchase or sale of the Warrants in the secondary market. Consequently, such a failure may adversely affect the transferability and liquidity of the Warrants and their market price. Certain warrants issued by the City are insured by bond insurance companies. The ratings on those bond insurance companies have been downgraded at various times over the past several years. Information about the downgrades was publicly reported. The City may have not filed a notice under the Rule with respect to each such downgrade. The City did not timely file its financial statements for the 2010 and 2011 fiscal years as required under prior undertakings; however, the financial statements for such years were subsequently filed with the MSRB. INDEPENDENT AUDITORS The City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report as and for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, which includes the financial statements of the City for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 attached hereto as APPENDIX A to this Official Statement have been audited by Jackson Thornton & Co., P.C., Montgomery, Alabama, independent certified public accountants, as stated in their report appearing in APPENDIX A to this Official Statement. RATINGS As noted on the cover page of this Official Statement, Standard & Poor's Ratings Services ("S&P") and Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's") have assigned the Warrants ratings of "AA+" and "Aa2", respectively. Any explanation of the significance of these ratings must be obtained from the respective rating agency. The ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold the Warrants. There is no assurance that such ratings will remain in effect for any given period of time or that they may not be lowered or withdrawn entirely if, in the judgment of the rating agency in question, circumstances should warrant such action. Any such downward revision or withdrawal of any rating assigned to the Warrants could have an adverse effect on their market price. Neither the City nor any other party or entity will necessarily undertake any responsibility after the issuance of the Warrants to assure maintenance of the rating or to oppose any revision or withdrawal thereof. APPENDICES The Appendices to this Official Statement contain certain information concerning the City and the Warrants. Such Appendices are an integral part of this Official Statement and should be read in their entirety. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain statements contained in this Official Statement including, without limitation, statements containing the words "estimates," "believes," "anticipates," "expects," and words of similar import, constitute forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the 50

59 City or other entities to which the forward-looking statements relate to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included herein are necessarily based on various assumptions and estimates and are inherently subject to various risks and uncertainties, including risks and uncertainties relating to the possible invalidity of the underlying assumptions and estimates and possible changes or developments in social, economic, business, industry, market, legal, and regulatory circumstances and conditions and actions taken or omitted to be taken by third parties, including customers, suppliers, business partners and competitors, and legislative, judicial, and other governmental authorities and officials. Assumptions to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive, and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond the control of the City. Any of such assumptions could be inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the forwardlooking statements included in this Official Statement will prove to be accurate. Given these uncertainties, prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The City and the Underwriters disclaim any obligation to update any such factors or to publicly announce the results of any revision to any of the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect future events or developments. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Additional information relative to matters set forth in this Official Statement may be obtained from the Director of Finance of the City, Mr. Lloyd Faulkner, (334) or, during the initial offering period of the Warrants, from Merchant Capital, L.L.C., Montgomery, Alabama, Mr. Mike Dunn, (334) MISCELLANEOUS The information contained in this Official Statement does not purport to be comprehensive or definitive. Summaries of certain provisions of the Warrant Ordinance and the Continuing Disclosure Agreement included herein are brief summaries of certain provisions thereof, and do not purport to be complete, and reference is made to those documents for a full and complete statement of such provisions. All references herein to the Warrants are qualified by the definitive form thereof and the information with respect thereto contained in the Warrant Ordinance. All information contained in this Official Statement and the Appendices attached hereto has been obtained from sources which are believed to be reliable; however, no guaranty, warranty or other representation is made by the City respecting the accuracy and completeness of such information. The agreements of the City with the holders of the Warrants are fully set forth in the Warrant Ordinance and neither any advertisement of the Warrants nor this Official Statement is to be construed as constituting an agreement with the purchasers of the Warrants. None of the estimates made in this Official Statement, or the Appendices hereto, whether or not so stated, is to be construed as a representation that such estimates will be realized. In addition, any statements in this Official Statement or the Appendices hereto, involving matters of opinion, whether or not so stated, are intended as such and not as representations of fact. Copies of the Warrant Ordinance are on file at the office of the City Clerk of the City. 51

60 The execution and delivery of this Official Statement by the Mayor of the City have been authorized by the City. CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA By: /s/ Todd Strange Its Mayor 52

61 APPENDIX A Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the City as of and for the Fiscal Year ended September 30, 2011

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156

157

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

168

169

170

171

172

173

174

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

182

183

184

185

186

187

188

189

190

191

192

193

194

195

196

197

198

199

OFFICIAL STATEMENT. $4,650,000 CITY OF MILLBROOK, ALABAMA General Obligation Refunding Warrants Series 2016

OFFICIAL STATEMENT. $4,650,000 CITY OF MILLBROOK, ALABAMA General Obligation Refunding Warrants Series 2016 OFFICIAL STATEMENT NEW ISSUE-Book-Entry Only Ratings: S&P: AA-(Stable) (See RATINGS herein) In the opinion of Bond Counsel based on existing law, and assuming the accuracy of certain representations and

More information

Polk County, Iowa $12,195,000* General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2018A

Polk County, Iowa $12,195,000* General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2018A Polk County, Iowa $12,195,000* General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2018A (Book Entry Only) (PARITY Bidding Available) DATE: Monday, April 23, 2018 TIME: 1:00 P.M. PLACE: Office of the Board of Supervisors,

More information

$4,200,000. Series 2013

$4,200,000. Series 2013 OFFICIAL STATEMENT Rating S&P:"A" NEW ISSUE - Book-Entry Only See "RATING" herein In the opinion of Bond Counsel to the City, assuming continuing compliance by the City with certain covenants set forth

More information

THE AUTHORITY HAS NO POWER TO LEVY OR COLLECT TAXES.

THE AUTHORITY HAS NO POWER TO LEVY OR COLLECT TAXES. New Issue Book-Entry-Only In the opinion of Gibbons P.C., Bond Counsel to the Authority, under existing law, interest on the Refunding Bonds and net gains from the sale of the Refunding Bonds are exempt

More information

Each Series of Bonds is secured by a pledge of the full faith, credit, and taxing power of the State of South Carolina.

Each Series of Bonds is secured by a pledge of the full faith, credit, and taxing power of the State of South Carolina. NEW ISSUE BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY Ratings: Fitch Ratings: AAA Moody s Investors Service, Inc.: Aaa Standard & Poor s Credit Market Services: AA+ In the opinion of Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP, Special Tax

More information

PRELIMINARY LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM DATED NOVEMBER 1, 2016

PRELIMINARY LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM DATED NOVEMBER 1, 2016 This Preliminary Limited Offering Memorandum and the information contained herein are subject to change, amendment and completion without notice. Under no circumstances shall this Preliminary Limited Offering

More information

NEW ISSUE - BOOK ENTRY ONLY Series 2011-A Bonds: Moody s: Aa2 (stable) Standard & Poor s: AA- (stable)

NEW ISSUE - BOOK ENTRY ONLY Series 2011-A Bonds: Moody s: Aa2 (stable) Standard & Poor s: AA- (stable) NEW ISSUE - BOOK ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: Series 2011-A Bonds: Moody s: Aa2 (stable) Standard & Poor s: AA- (stable) In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing law and assuming the accuracy of certain representations

More information

George K. Baum & Company

George K. Baum & Company NEW ISSUE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATING: S&P: AA SERIES 2010A BANK QUALIFIED In the opinion of Bond Counsel, conditioned on continuing compliance with certain requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,

More information

OFFICIAL STATEMENT $65,130,000 CUYAHOGA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, OHIO GENERAL RECEIPTS REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES E, 2016

OFFICIAL STATEMENT $65,130,000 CUYAHOGA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, OHIO GENERAL RECEIPTS REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES E, 2016 Ratings: Moody s: Aa2 Standard & Poor s: AA- NEW ISSUE In the opinion of Tucker Ellis LLP, Bond Counsel to the District, under existing law (1) assuming continuing compliance with certain covenants and

More information

OFFICIAL STATEMENT CITY OF SYLACAUGA, ALABAMA

OFFICIAL STATEMENT CITY OF SYLACAUGA, ALABAMA OFFICIAL STATEMENT NEW ISSUE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATING: Standard & Poor's Rating: AA+ (stable outlook) See "RATING" herein. [AGC Insured] A+ In the opinion of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Birmingham,

More information

$250,000,000. Taxable Bonds Series $250,000, % Bonds due November 15, 2045

$250,000,000. Taxable Bonds Series $250,000, % Bonds due November 15, 2045 NEW-ISSUE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY Ratings: Standard & Poor s: AAMoody s: Aa3 Fitch: AA(See RATINGS herein) $250,000,000 Allina Health System Taxable Bonds Series 2015 $250,000,000 4.805% Bonds due November 15,

More information

Florida Power & Light Company

Florida Power & Light Company NEW ISSUE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY In the opinion of King & Spalding LLP, Bond Counsel, under existing statutes, rulings and court decisions, and under applicable regulations, and assuming the accuracy of certain

More information

THE BONDS ARE SECURED SOLELY AND EXCLUSIVELY BY THE TRUST ESTATE.

THE BONDS ARE SECURED SOLELY AND EXCLUSIVELY BY THE TRUST ESTATE. NEW ISSUE Book-Entry Only RATING: S&P A- See RATING herein. In the opinion of Hunton & Williams LLP, Bond Counsel, under current law and subject to conditions described herein under TAX MATTERS, interest

More information

PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED, 2017 $ LOS ANGELES COUNTY SCHOOLS POOLED FINANCING PROGRAM POOLED TRAN PARTICIPATION CERTIFICATES

PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED, 2017 $ LOS ANGELES COUNTY SCHOOLS POOLED FINANCING PROGRAM POOLED TRAN PARTICIPATION CERTIFICATES PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED, 2017 NEW ISSUES FULL BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY RATINGS: Series A-1: Standard & Poor s: Series A-2: Standard & Poor s: Series A-3: Standard & Poor s: (See RATINGS herein.) [In

More information

$53,360,000 DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK PRATT INSTITUTE REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2016

$53,360,000 DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK PRATT INSTITUTE REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2016 NEW ISSUE Moody s: A3 (See Ratings herein) Dated: Date of Delivery $53,360,000 DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK PRATT INSTITUTE REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2016 Due: July 1, as shown below Payment

More information

City of Indianapolis, Indiana $20,500,000 Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (GMF-Berkley Common Apartments Project) Senior Series 2010A

City of Indianapolis, Indiana $20,500,000 Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (GMF-Berkley Common Apartments Project) Senior Series 2010A NEW ISSUE - Book-Entry Only RATING: Series A "A+" Series B "BBB+" (S&P) SEE 'RATINGS" herein In the opinion of Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis, Indiana, Bond Counsel, under federal statutes, decisions, regulations

More information

$40,350,000. Student Housing Revenue Bonds (USG Real Estate Foundation IV, LLC Project) Series 2016

$40,350,000. Student Housing Revenue Bonds (USG Real Estate Foundation IV, LLC Project) Series 2016 NEW ISSUE BOOK ENTRY ONLY Rating: Moody s: MIG 1 (See RATING herein) The delivery of the Bonds (as defined below) is subject to the opinion of Bond Counsel to the Issuer to the effect that, assuming compliance

More information

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF RIVERVIEW GARDENS ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF RIVERVIEW GARDENS ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI This Preliminary Official Statement and the information contained herein are subject to completion and amendment. These securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted prior to the time the

More information

The date of this Official Statement is December 1, 2015

The date of this Official Statement is December 1, 2015 NEW ISSUE-BOOK ENTRY ONLY RATING: Moody s: MIG-2 See RATINGS herein) In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing law and assuming continuous compliance with the applicable provisions of the Internal

More information

Preliminary Official Statement Dated July 11, 2018

Preliminary Official Statement Dated July 11, 2018 This Preliminary Official Statement and the information contained herein are subject to completion or amendment. Under no circumstances shall this Preliminary Official Statement constitute an offer to

More information

LAURENS COUNTY, GEORGIA

LAURENS COUNTY, GEORGIA NEW ISSUE (Book Entry Only) RATING: Moody s: A1 See MISCELLANEOUS Rating In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing laws, regulations and judicial decisions, and assuming continued compliance by the

More information

AMERITAS INVESTMENT CORP.

AMERITAS INVESTMENT CORP. REFUNDING ISSUE--BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATING: MOODY'S Aa2 BANK QUALIFIED Official Statement Dated November 20, 2012 In the opinion ofbond Counsel, under existing laws, regulations and court decisions and subject

More information

$18,000,000 General Obligation Bond Anticipation Notes Dated: July 25, 2018 Due: July 24, 2019

$18,000,000 General Obligation Bond Anticipation Notes Dated: July 25, 2018 Due: July 24, 2019 This Preliminary Official Statement and the information contained herein are subject to completion or amendment. Under no circumstances shall this Preliminary Official Statement constitute an offer to

More information

NEW ISSUE BOOK ENTRY ONLY. RATING: S&P: BBB Stable Outlook See: RATING herein

NEW ISSUE BOOK ENTRY ONLY. RATING: S&P: BBB Stable Outlook See: RATING herein NEW ISSUE BOOK ENTRY ONLY RATING: S&P: BBB Stable Outlook See: RATING herein In the opinion of Ballard Spahr LLP, Bond Counsel, interest on the Bonds is excludable from gross income for purposes of federal

More information

PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED OCTOBER 26, 2017

PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED OCTOBER 26, 2017 PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED OCTOBER 26, 2017 This Preliminary Official Statement and the information contained herein are subject to completion or amendment. Under no circumstances shall this

More information

$32,275,000. FHA-Insured Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds (St. John s Meadows Project), Series 2007

$32,275,000. FHA-Insured Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds (St. John s Meadows Project), Series 2007 NEW ISSUE (see RATING herein) In the opinion of Trespasz & Marquardt LLP, Bond Counsel to the Authority, based on existing statutes, regulations, rulings and court decisions, interest on the Series 2007

More information

DENTON COUNTY LEVEE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1

DENTON COUNTY LEVEE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JANUARY 3, 2013 THE DELIVERY OF THE BONDS IS SUBJECT TO THE OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL AS TO THE VALIDITY OF THE BONDS AND OF SPECIAL TAX COUNSEL TO THE EFFECT THAT UNDER EXISTING

More information

OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MAY 14, 2014

OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MAY 14, 2014 OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MAY 14, 2014 NEW ISSUE BOOK ENTRY ONLY RATING: Standard & Poor s: A Stable Outlook See: RATING herein In the opinion of Ballard Spahr LLP, Bond Counsel, interest on the Bonds is

More information

$151,945,000 MONROE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TAX-EXEMPT REVENUE BONDS (THE ROCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL PROJECT), SERIES 2017

$151,945,000 MONROE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TAX-EXEMPT REVENUE BONDS (THE ROCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL PROJECT), SERIES 2017 NEW ISSUE Full Book-Entry Standard & Poor s A- (See Rating herein) In the opinion of Harris Beach PLLC, Bond Counsel to the Issuer, based on existing statutes, regulations, court decisions and administrative

More information

VIRGINIA COLLEGE BUILDING AUTHORITY

VIRGINIA COLLEGE BUILDING AUTHORITY NEW ISSUE BOOK ENTRY ONLY Rating: S&P: A (See RATING herein) Assuming compliance with certain covenants and subject to the qualifications described under TAX MATTERS herein, in the opinion of Bond Counsel,

More information

STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED

STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED REOFFERING CIRCULAR NOT A NEW ISSUE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY On the date of issuance of the Bonds, Balch & Bingham LLP ( Bond Counsel ) delivered its opinion with respect to the Bonds described below to the effect

More information

$344,145,000* JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA Limited Obligation Refunding Warrants, Series 2017

$344,145,000* JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA Limited Obligation Refunding Warrants, Series 2017 SUPPLEMENT to PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JUNE 23, 2017 relating to $344,145,000* JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA Limited Obligation Refunding Warrants, Series 2017 This supplement (this Supplement

More information

Freddie Mac. (See RATINGS herein)

Freddie Mac. (See RATINGS herein) NEW ISSUE-BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATINGS (S&P): AAA/A-1+ (See RATINGS herein) In the opinion of Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation, Bond Counsel, subject to certain qualifications and assumptions described

More information

BOOK ENTRY ONLY. Due: April 1, as shown

BOOK ENTRY ONLY. Due: April 1, as shown THIS COVER PAGE CONTAINS CERTAIN INFORMATION FOR QUICK REFERENCE ONLY. IT IS NOT A SUMMARY OF THIS ISSUE. INVESTORS MUST READ THE ENTIRE OFFICIAL STATEMENT TO OBTAIN INFORMATION ESSENTIAL TO THE MAKING

More information

$8,650,000 Township of Monroe Cumberland County, Pennsylvania General Obligation Bonds, Series of 2011

$8,650,000 Township of Monroe Cumberland County, Pennsylvania General Obligation Bonds, Series of 2011 NEW ISSUE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: S&P: A+ (Stable Outlook) Underlying AA+ (CreditWatch negative) Assured Guaranty Municipal Insured (See RATINGS herein) In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing

More information

EXISTING ISSUES REOFFERED. $127,785,000 DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK CORNELL UNIVERSITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2008 Consisting of:

EXISTING ISSUES REOFFERED. $127,785,000 DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK CORNELL UNIVERSITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2008 Consisting of: EXISTING ISSUES REOFFERED Moody s: Aa1 Standard & Poor s: AA (See Ratings herein) $127,785,000 DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK CORNELL UNIVERSITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2008 Consisting of:

More information

$146,465,000 DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FORDHAM UNIVERSITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2016A

$146,465,000 DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FORDHAM UNIVERSITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2016A NEW ISSUE Moody s: A2 Standard & Poor s: A (See Ratings herein) $146,465,000 DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FORDHAM UNIVERSITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2016A Dated: Date of Delivery Due: July

More information

NEW ISSUE BOOK ENTRY ONLY. RATING: Standard & Poor s: BBB+ Negative Outlook See: RATING herein

NEW ISSUE BOOK ENTRY ONLY. RATING: Standard & Poor s: BBB+ Negative Outlook See: RATING herein NEW ISSUE BOOK ENTRY ONLY RATING: Standard & Poor s: BBB+ Negative Outlook See: RATING herein In the opinion of Ballard Spahr LLP, Bond Counsel, interest on the Bonds is excludable from gross income for

More information

OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MAY 12, 2016

OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MAY 12, 2016 OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MAY 12, 2016 NEW ISSUE BOOK ENTRY ONLY RATING: Standard & Poor s: BBB+ Stable Outlook See: RATING herein In the opinion of Ballard Spahr LLP, Bond Counsel, interest on the Bonds

More information

$280,000,000 State of Connecticut General Obligation Bonds (2005 Series A) SIFMA Index Bonds

$280,000,000 State of Connecticut General Obligation Bonds (2005 Series A) SIFMA Index Bonds CONVERSION TO ADJUSTED SIFMA RATE AND REOFFERING NOT A NEW ISSUE (See RATINGS herein) $280,000,000 State of Connecticut General Obligation Bonds (2005 Series A) SIFMA Index Bonds Date of Initial Issuance:

More information

THE TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY Indiana University Commercial Paper Notes Not to Exceed $100,000,000

THE TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY Indiana University Commercial Paper Notes Not to Exceed $100,000,000 NEW ISSUE RATINGS BOOK-ENTRY ONLY Moody s: P-1 Standard & Poor s: A-1+ (See RATINGS ) In the opinion of Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis, Indiana, Bond Counsel, under existing laws, regulations, judicial decisions

More information

PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS $26,090,000* $103,055,000* WATER AND SEWER UTILITY REVENUE BONDS

PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS $26,090,000* $103,055,000* WATER AND SEWER UTILITY REVENUE BONDS This Preliminary Official Statement and the information contained herein are subject to completion or amendment. These securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted prior to the time the

More information

STIFEL RBC CAPITAL MARKETS

STIFEL RBC CAPITAL MARKETS NEW ISSUES FULL BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY RATINGS: Series A-1: Standard & Poor s: SP-1+ Series A-2: Standard & Poor s: SP-1+ Series A-3: Standard & Poor s: SP-1+ Series A-4: Standard & Poor s: SP-2 (See RATINGS

More information

HAWK S POINT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (Hillsborough County, Florida) $7,120,000*

HAWK S POINT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (Hillsborough County, Florida) $7,120,000* This Preliminary Limited Offering Memorandum and any information contained herein are subject to completion and amendment. Under no circumstances may this Preliminary Limited Offering Memorandum constitute

More information

ADDENDUM TO PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JUNE 19, 2014

ADDENDUM TO PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JUNE 19, 2014 ADDENDUM TO PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JUNE 19, 2014 CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND Relating to $17,465,000* GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2014A (Tax-Exempt) $6,285,000* GENERAL

More information

$21,000,000* TOWN OF LONGMEADOW Massachusetts

$21,000,000* TOWN OF LONGMEADOW Massachusetts New Issue Moody s Investors Service, Inc.: (See Rating ) NOTICE OF SALE AND PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 19, 2017 In the opinion of Locke Lord LLP, Bond Counsel, based upon an analysis

More information

$100,000,000 DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2009C

$100,000,000 DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2009C NEW ISSUE Moody s: Aa1 Standard & Poor s: AAA (See Ratings herein) $100,000,000 DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2009C Dated: Date of Delivery

More information

MATURITY SCHEDULE ON THE INSIDE COVER

MATURITY SCHEDULE ON THE INSIDE COVER NEW ISSUE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY Rating: Standard & Poor s AA+ See RATING herein. In the opinion of Spencer Fane Britt & Browne LLP, Special Tax Counsel, under existing law and assuming continued compliance with

More information

$315,000 CITY OF ARGONIA, KANSAS GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS SERIES 2015

$315,000 CITY OF ARGONIA, KANSAS GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS SERIES 2015 NEW ISSUE BANK QUALIFIED NOT RATED BOOK-ENTRY ONLY In the opinion of Gilmore & Bell, P.C., Bond Counsel, under existing law and assuming continued compliance with certain requirements of the Internal Revenue

More information

NEW ISSUE Book-Entry Only RATING: A- S&P SEE RATING herein.

NEW ISSUE Book-Entry Only RATING: A- S&P SEE RATING herein. NEW ISSUE Book-Entry Only RATING: A- S&P SEE RATING herein. In the opinion of Jones Walker LLP, Bond Counsel to the Authority (as defined below), under existing law, including current statutes, regulations,

More information

Raymond James & Associates, Inc.

Raymond James & Associates, Inc. NEW ISSUE - FULL BOOK-ENTRY Ratings: S&P - AAA Moody's - Aaa Fitch - AAA Financial Guaranty Insured In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing law interest on the Series 1997-D Warrants (i) will be

More information

City of Lago Vista, Texas (Travis County, Texas)

City of Lago Vista, Texas (Travis County, Texas) THIS PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN ARE SUBJECT TO COMPLETION AND AMENDMENT. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THE PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO

More information

OKLAHOMA COUNTY FINANCE AUTHORITY Educational Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds (Crooked Oak Public Schools Project) $7,660,000 $390,000

OKLAHOMA COUNTY FINANCE AUTHORITY Educational Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds (Crooked Oak Public Schools Project) $7,660,000 $390,000 NEW ISSUE - Book Entry Only RATING: S&P A- In the opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Series 2013A Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes, and is not an item of tax preference

More information

OFFICIAL STATEMENT CITY OF VESTAVIA HILLS, ALABAMA $9,605,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION WARRANTS SERIES 2014

OFFICIAL STATEMENT CITY OF VESTAVIA HILLS, ALABAMA $9,605,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION WARRANTS SERIES 2014 OFFICIAL STATEMENT Ratings: Fitch: AA+ Moody s: Aa1 (See "RATINGS" herein) New Issue-Book-Entry Only Maynard, Cooper & Gale, P.C., Bond Counsel, is of the opinion that, under existing law and upon the

More information

$4,395,000 SOUTHERN COLUMBIA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT (Columbia and Northumberland Counties, Pennsylvania) General Obligation Bonds, Series of 2017

$4,395,000 SOUTHERN COLUMBIA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT (Columbia and Northumberland Counties, Pennsylvania) General Obligation Bonds, Series of 2017 OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MAY 31, 2017 New Issue Book-Entry Only Rating: S&P AA (Stable Outlook) A (Underlying) (Stable Outlook) MAC Insured In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing statutes, regulations

More information

$39,110,000 * BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISE REVENUE AND REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS SERIES 2013

$39,110,000 * BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISE REVENUE AND REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS SERIES 2013 This Preliminary Official Statement and the information contained herein are subject to completion or amendment. These securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted prior to the time the

More information

$338,925,000 JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA Limited Obligation Refunding Warrants, Series 2017

$338,925,000 JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA Limited Obligation Refunding Warrants, Series 2017 NEW ISSUE - BOOK- ENTRY ONLY OFFICIAL STATEMENT RATINGS: S&P: AA (stable outlook) Fitch: A (rating watch negative) (See RATINGS herein) In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing law, interest on the

More information

consisting of: $7,800,000 * TAXABLE ENTERPRISE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2011B $1,855,000 * ENTERPRISE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2011C

consisting of: $7,800,000 * TAXABLE ENTERPRISE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2011B $1,855,000 * ENTERPRISE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2011C This Preliminary Official Statement and the information contained herein are subject to completion or amendment. These securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted prior to the time the

More information

BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS OF MOBILE COUNTY

BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS OF MOBILE COUNTY NEW ISSUE-BOOK ENTRY ONLY OFFICIAL STATEMENT S&P: AA- Moody s: A1 See RATING herein In the opinion of Maynard, Cooper & Gale, P.C., Bond Counsel, under existing law and upon the conditions and under the

More information

NEW ISSUE Book-Entry Only RATING: S&P A- See RATING herein.

NEW ISSUE Book-Entry Only RATING: S&P A- See RATING herein. NEW ISSUE Book-Entry Only RATING: S&P A- See RATING herein. In the opinion of Peck, Shaffer & Williams LLP, Bond Counsel, based upon an analysis of existing laws, regulations, rulings and judicial decisions

More information

$11,855,000 TOWNSHIP OF CRANBERRY Butler County, Pennsylvania General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series of 2012

$11,855,000 TOWNSHIP OF CRANBERRY Butler County, Pennsylvania General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series of 2012 OFFICIAL STATEMENT New Issue BOOK-ENTRY ONLY Bond Rating: Moody s Investors Service, Aa2 (See BOND RATING herein.) In the opinion of Bond Counsel, based upon an analysis of existing laws, regulations,

More information

NEW ISSUE BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY. Dated: Date of Delivery. Due: October 1, as shown on the inside front cover

NEW ISSUE BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY. Dated: Date of Delivery. Due: October 1, as shown on the inside front cover NEW ISSUE BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY Dated: Date of Delivery RATING: S&P: AAA (See CREDIT RATING herein) In the opinion of McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC, Bond Counsel to the Authority (as defined herein), pursuant

More information

Boenning & Scattergood Inc.

Boenning & Scattergood Inc. NEW ISSUE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY Rating: Standard & Poor s: AA (Stable Outlook) (See Rating herein) In the opinion of Gibbons P.C., Bond Counsel to the Authority, assuming continuing compliance by the Authority

More information

1,440,000 CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA WATERWORKS AND SEWER SYSTEM REVENUE REFUNDING AND IMPROVEMENT BONDS SERIES 2016

1,440,000 CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA WATERWORKS AND SEWER SYSTEM REVENUE REFUNDING AND IMPROVEMENT BONDS SERIES 2016 NEW ISSUE; BOOK-ENTRY ONLY Ratings: Moody s: Aa3 Standard & Poor s: AA(See Ratings herein) In the opinion of Bond Counsel to the City, under existing statutes and court decisions and assuming continuing

More information

$102,395,000 DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK PLEDGED ASSESSMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2010A (FEDERALLY TAXABLE)

$102,395,000 DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK PLEDGED ASSESSMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2010A (FEDERALLY TAXABLE) NEW ISSUE Moody s: Aa2 S&P: AA Fitch: AA+ (See Ratings herein) $102,395,000 DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK PLEDGED ASSESSMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2010A (FEDERALLY TAXABLE) Dated: Date of

More information

City Securities Corporation

City Securities Corporation NEW ISSUE--BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: Moody s: Aaa Standard & Poor s: AA+ See RATINGS herein. In the opinion of Ice Miller LLP, Bond Counsel, conditioned on continuing compliance with the Tax Covenants (as

More information

$10,000,000 TOWNSHIP OF CHELTENHAM Montgomery County, Pennsylvania General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series of 2015

$10,000,000 TOWNSHIP OF CHELTENHAM Montgomery County, Pennsylvania General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series of 2015 NEW ISSUE BOOK ENTRY ONLY RATING: Moody s: Aa2 Underlying (See RATING herein) In the opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Series 2015 Bonds is not includable in gross income for purposes of federal

More information

PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MAY 23, 2018 TOWNSHIP OF MONROE IN THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX STATE OF NEW JERSEY

PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MAY 23, 2018 TOWNSHIP OF MONROE IN THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX STATE OF NEW JERSEY This is a Preliminary Official Statement deemed final by the Township within the meaning of and with the exception of certain information permitted to be omitted by Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange

More information

CITY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO

CITY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO THIS PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN ARE SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OR AMENDMENT IN A FINAL OFFICIAL STATEMENT. Under no circumstances shall this Preliminary Official Statement

More information

Town of Stonington, Connecticut $20,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Issue of 2017

Town of Stonington, Connecticut $20,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Issue of 2017 This Preliminary Official Statement and the information contained herein are subject to completion and amendment. These securities may not be sold nor may an offer to buy be accepted, prior to the time

More information

$16,545,000 CITY OF ALACHUA, FLORIDA Capital Improvement Revenue and Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016

$16,545,000 CITY OF ALACHUA, FLORIDA Capital Improvement Revenue and Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016 NEW ISSUE FULL BOOK-ENTRY See "RATINGS" herein In the opinion of bond counsel, assuming compliance by the City with certain covenants, under existing statutes, regulations, and judicial decisions, the

More information

Series B "BBB-" (S&P) SEE 'RATINGS" herein

Series B BBB- (S&P) SEE 'RATINGS herein NEW ISSUE Book Entry Only RATING: Series A "A-" Series B "BBB-" (S&P) SEE 'RATINGS" herein In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing statutes, regulations, rulings and judicial decisions, and assuming

More information

NEW ISSUE - BOOK-ENTRY ONLY

NEW ISSUE - BOOK-ENTRY ONLY NEW ISSUE - BOOK-ENTRY ONLY NOT RATED In the opinion of Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P., Bond Counsel, under existing law (i) assuming continuing compliance with certain covenants and the accuracy of

More information

$2,160,000 CITY OF WELLINGTON, KANSAS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS SERIES 2013

$2,160,000 CITY OF WELLINGTON, KANSAS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS SERIES 2013 NEW ISSUE BANK QUALIFIED RATING: S&P A BOOK-ENTRY ONLY In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing law and assuming continued compliance with certain requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,

More information

Taxable Student Fee Bonds Series V-2

Taxable Student Fee Bonds Series V-2 New and Refunding Issue Book-Entry-Only Ratings: Moody s: Aaa ; S&P: AA+ See RATINGS In the opinion of Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis, Indiana, and Coleman Stevenson & Montel, LLP, Indianapolis, Indiana,

More information

$9,750,000* WILKES COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT (GEORGIA) General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2011

$9,750,000* WILKES COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT (GEORGIA) General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 This Preliminary Official Statement and the information contained herein are subject to change, completion or amendment without notice. The Series 2011 Bonds may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted

More information

$8,095,000 BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG IN THE COUNTY OF SUSSEX STATE OF NEW JERSEY GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2011 Consisting of

$8,095,000 BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG IN THE COUNTY OF SUSSEX STATE OF NEW JERSEY GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2011 Consisting of This is a Preliminary Official Statement deemed final by the Borough within the meaning of and with the exception of certain information permitted to be omitted by Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange

More information

RBC Capital Markets, LLC

RBC Capital Markets, LLC OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JUNE 21, 2017 THE DELIVERY OF THE BONDS IS SUBJECT TO THE OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL AS TO THE VALIDITY OF THE BONDS AND OF SPECIAL TAX COUNSEL TO THE EFFECT THAT UNDER EXISTING LAW

More information

$8,220,000 Albany-Dougherty Inner City Authority Revenue Refunding Bonds (Dougherty County, Georgia Public Purpose Project), Series 2010

$8,220,000 Albany-Dougherty Inner City Authority Revenue Refunding Bonds (Dougherty County, Georgia Public Purpose Project), Series 2010 NEW ISSUE (Book-Entry Only) RATINGS: Standard & Poor s: AA- See MISCELLANEOUS - Ratings herein. In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under current law and subject to conditions described in the Section herein

More information

PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JANUARY 17, 2012

PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JANUARY 17, 2012 This Preliminary Official Statement and the information contained herein are subject to completion, amendment or other change without notice. The Bonds may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted

More information

$330,890,000 CITY OF CHICAGO

$330,890,000 CITY OF CHICAGO NEW ISSUE GLOBAL BOOK ENTRY RATINGS: See RATINGS herein. In the opinion of Co-Bond Counsel, under existing law, if there is continuing compliance with certain requirements of the Internal Revenue Code

More information

PRELIMINARY LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM DATED AUGUST 18, 2016

PRELIMINARY LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM DATED AUGUST 18, 2016 This Preliminary Limited Offering Memorandum and the information contained herein are subject to completion or amendment. Under no circumstances shall this Preliminary Limited Offering Memorandum constitute

More information

$38,505,000 The Monmouth County Improvement Authority (Monmouth County, New Jersey) Governmental Pooled Loan Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016

$38,505,000 The Monmouth County Improvement Authority (Monmouth County, New Jersey) Governmental Pooled Loan Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016 MONMOUTH COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY New Issue - Book-Entry Only MCIA Dated: Date of Delivery OFFICIAL STATEMENT $38,505,000 The Monmouth County Improvement Authority (Monmouth County, New Jersey) Governmental

More information

$16,820,000 CITY OF BRISTOL, VIRGINIA Taxable General Obligation Public Improvement Refunding Bonds Series 2014

$16,820,000 CITY OF BRISTOL, VIRGINIA Taxable General Obligation Public Improvement Refunding Bonds Series 2014 BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: Moody s: (Enhanced) A1 (Underlying) A3 S&P: (Insured) AA (Underlying) A (See Ratings herein) In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under current law interest on the Bonds is includable

More information

$14,355,000 CITY OF LEWISTON Maine

$14,355,000 CITY OF LEWISTON Maine This Preliminary Official Statement and the information contained herein are subject to completion or amendment. Under no circumstances shall this Preliminary Official Statement constitute an offer to

More information

SAMCO Capital Markets, Inc.

SAMCO Capital Markets, Inc. OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED APRIL 15, 2015 THE DELIVERY OF THE BONDS IS SUBJECT TO THE OPINION OF SPECIAL TAX COUNSEL TO THE EFFECT THAT, UNDER EXISTING LAW AND ASSUMING CONTINUING COMPLIANCE WITH COVENANTS

More information

PHILADELPHIA AUTHORITY FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT. $55,500,000 Revenue Bonds (Philadelphia Performing Arts Charter School Project) Series of 2013

PHILADELPHIA AUTHORITY FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT. $55,500,000 Revenue Bonds (Philadelphia Performing Arts Charter School Project) Series of 2013 BOOK ENTRY ONLY Dated: Delivery Date RATING: Standard & Poor s: BB (stable outlook) In the opinion of Bond Counsel, assuming continuing compliance by the Authority, the Borrowers and the School with certain

More information

$11,315,000 MAHANOY CITY SEWER AUTHORITY Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania Guaranteed Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series of 2016

$11,315,000 MAHANOY CITY SEWER AUTHORITY Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania Guaranteed Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series of 2016 OFFICIAL STATEMENT BOOK-ENTRY ONLY Rating: Insured: AA (Stable Outlook) AGM Insured In the opinion of Stevens & Lee, P.C., Reading, Pennsylvania, Bond Counsel, assuming continuing compliance by the Authority

More information

$9,630,000 BROCKTON HOUSING AUTHORITY (BROCKTON, MASSACHUSETTS) Capital Fund Housing Revenue Bonds, Series 2017

$9,630,000 BROCKTON HOUSING AUTHORITY (BROCKTON, MASSACHUSETTS) Capital Fund Housing Revenue Bonds, Series 2017 NEW ISSUE - BOOK ENTRY ONLY (See RATING herein) In the opinion of Harris Beach PLLC, Bond Counsel to the Authority, based on existing statutes, regulations, court decisions and administrative rulings,

More information

$3,825,000* SUMMIT AT FERN HILL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

$3,825,000* SUMMIT AT FERN HILL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT This Preliminary Limited Offering Memorandum and the information contained herein are subject to completion or amendment. Under no circumstances shall this Preliminary Limited Offering Memorandum constitute

More information

FINAL OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED DECEMBER 10, $21,642,000 TOWN OF TEWKSBURY Massachusetts GENERAL OBLIGATION MUNICPAL PURPOSE LOAN OF 2009 BONDS

FINAL OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED DECEMBER 10, $21,642,000 TOWN OF TEWKSBURY Massachusetts GENERAL OBLIGATION MUNICPAL PURPOSE LOAN OF 2009 BONDS NEW ISSUE Standard & Poor s Ratings Services: AA- (See Rating ) FINAL OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED DECEMBER 10, 2009 In the opinion of Bond Counsel, based upon an analysis of existing law and assuming, among

More information

OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED OCTOBER 25, 2010 TAX-EXEMPT RECOVERY ZONE FACILITY REVENUE BONDS

OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED OCTOBER 25, 2010 TAX-EXEMPT RECOVERY ZONE FACILITY REVENUE BONDS OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED OCTOBER 25, 2010 NEW ISSUE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY Rating: 2010 Series A Bonds (Standard & Poor s): A 2010 Series B Bonds: Not Rated (See RATING herein) In the opinion of Bond Counsel,

More information

The Depository Trust Company A subsidiary of The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation

The Depository Trust Company A subsidiary of The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation The Depository Trust Company A subsidiary of The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation Book-Entry-Only Institutional Certificate of Deposit (Master Note and/or Global Certificates) Program Letter of

More information

PRELIMINARY LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM DATED JANUARY 3, 2018 NEW ISSUE - BOOK-ENTRY ONLY LIMITED OFFERING

PRELIMINARY LIMITED OFFERING MEMORANDUM DATED JANUARY 3, 2018 NEW ISSUE - BOOK-ENTRY ONLY LIMITED OFFERING This Preliminary Limited Offering Memorandum and the information contained herein are subject to completion or amendment without notice. These securities may not be sold nor may an offer to buy be accepted

More information

PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MARCH 28, NEW ISSUE BOOK ENTRY ONLY Ratings: S&P AA+ Moody s Aa2 See RATINGS herein

PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MARCH 28, NEW ISSUE BOOK ENTRY ONLY Ratings: S&P AA+ Moody s Aa2 See RATINGS herein PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MARCH 28, 2012 This PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN ARE SUBJECT TO COMPLETION AND AMENDMENT IN A FINAL OFFICIAL STATEMENT Under

More information

OFFICIAL STATEMENT $9,405,000 UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 443 FORD COUNTY, KANSAS (DODGE CITY) GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS SERIES 2013

OFFICIAL STATEMENT $9,405,000 UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 443 FORD COUNTY, KANSAS (DODGE CITY) GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS SERIES 2013 OFFICIAL STATEMENT NEW ISSUE BANK QUALIFIED BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATING: See "Bond Ratings" herein In the opinion of Gilmore & Bell, P.C., Bond Counsel, under existing law and assuming continued compliance

More information

$12,955,000 WATER AND SEWER REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2006 of HARVEST-MONROVIA WATER, SEWER AND FIRE PROTECTION AUTHORITY, INC.

$12,955,000 WATER AND SEWER REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2006 of HARVEST-MONROVIA WATER, SEWER AND FIRE PROTECTION AUTHORITY, INC. NEW ISSUE - BOOK-ENTRY ONLY Rating: S&P: AAA XLCA Insured OFFICIAL STATEMENT In the opinion of Bond Counsel, Walston, Wells & Birchall, LLP, interest on the Series 2006 Bonds is presently, under Section

More information

$2,975,000 CITY OF CELINA, TENNESSEE General Obligation Bonds, Series 2016

$2,975,000 CITY OF CELINA, TENNESSEE General Obligation Bonds, Series 2016 NEW ISSUE BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY REVISED OFFICIAL STATEMENT (SEE INSIDE COVER FOR EXPLANATION) Ratings: S&P: AA (MAC) A underlying KBRA: AA+ (MAC) (See MISCELLANEOUS-Rating herein) In the opinion of Bond Counsel,

More information

CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA

CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA FULL BOOK-ENTRY ONLY NEW ISSUES NOT BANK QUALIFIED Moody s: Aa2 Standard & Poor s: AA See Ratings herein Assuming the City s continuing compliance with certain covenants, in the opinion of McNair Law Firm,

More information

OFFICIAL STATEMENT. Rating: Standard & Poor s: A+ Due. Interest Rate Yield CUSIPs 2017 $ 385, % 0.70% AU $ 250, % 2.

OFFICIAL STATEMENT. Rating: Standard & Poor s: A+ Due. Interest Rate Yield CUSIPs 2017 $ 385, % 0.70% AU $ 250, % 2. NEW ISSUE Book-Entry-Only OFFICIAL STATEMENT Rating: Standard & Poor s: A+ (See MISCELLANEOUS-Rating ) In the opinion of Bond Counsel, based on existing law and assuming compliance with certain tax covenants

More information