PART IVA: POST-HART *
|
|
- Allyson McGee
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PART IVA: POST-HART * Comment by Michael D Ascenzo Second Commissioner of Taxation On the 23 rd birthday of Pt IVA, the general anti-avoidance provision in the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), the High Court handed down the final chapter in FC of T v Hart. This decision, together with the High Court s previous pronouncements in FC of T v Peabody, FC of T v Spotless Services Ltd, and FC of T v Consolidated Press Holdings Ltd provide substantial guidance on the application of Pt IVA. 1. INTRODUCTION The simple facts of FC of T v Hart are as follows: Under a split loan facility a taxpayer borrowed money, applied part to a private or domestic venture (often, as in this case, the purchase of a principal place of residence), and applied the balance to the acquisition (here the refinancing) of an asset to be used for the purpose of gaining or producing assessable income. The loan agreement provided for the borrower to direct the application of the whole of the periodical payments required under the loan agreement to the satisfaction of that part of the loan used for private or domestic purposes. Interest on the balance of the loan was allowed to accrue and be capitalised and compounded. 1 The Australian Taxation Office ( ATO ) had issued a Public Ruling on this arrangement referred to as a Split Loan in * Part of a speech by M D Ascenzo presented to the Tax Institute of Australia at the QLD State Convention (September 2004). 1 [2004] HCA 26, para 21 (per Gummow and Hayne JJ) ( Hart ). 2 Draft Public Rulings on Split Loan were issued in 1997 (TR 97/D7) and 1998 (TR 98/D7) and the final issued in 1998 (TR 98/22). 357 JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIAN TAXATION
2 PART IVA: POST-HART The issue was litigated as an ATO funded test case before Gyles J in Hart. 3 The split loan issue is important because: the real effect and substance of the arrangement was to make the payment of interest on the capital sum paid in reduction of the residential loan deductible for taxation purposes. 4 Gyles J s approach to the matter was similar to that taken in TR 98/22. Having found that there was no realistic possibility that, if the respondents had not taken up the offer of the wealth optimiser structure, they could have arranged finance, on the terms applicable to the investment part of the loan, Gyles J concluded: These High Court authorities [Spotless Services and Consolidated Press] decide that it is the particular shape, form or structure of the scheme, rather than a general description of the transaction which is under scrutiny. In the present case, to concentrate upon the commercial object or outcome of the transaction as a whole is to focus on a false issue and make the same error as that of the Full Court in Spotless Services. It is appropriate to concentrate upon the narrower scheme propounded by the respondent, explained by reference to the wider transaction. When I consider the matters prescribed by s 177D(b) and, in particular (i), (ii), and (iv), in the light of the findings I have made, the proper conclusion is that, as Beaumont J held in Spotless Services, without taxation benefits the particular form, shape or structure of this transaction made no sense. To take the words of Hill J at first instance in CPH Property (98 ATC 4983 at 5000; (1998) 88 FCR 21 at 42) (approved by the Full Court of the Court and the High Court):... a conclusion would be drawn that the dominant purpose... was to bring about the result that a deduction would be allowed... which, but for the scheme, would have been disallowed ATC Ibid 4725 (per Gyles J); cited in [2004] HCA 26, para 11 (per Gleeson CJ and McHugh J). (2004) 7(2) 358
3 M D ASCENZO Interest incurred in relation to payment of capital in repayment of a residential loan is not deductible and, if claimed, would be disallowed. It is to be concluded that at least Austral and those taking the Wealth Optimiser Loan entered into the scheme for the purpose of enabling the taxpayer entering the transaction to obtain the tax benefit I have identified. I should say that my view would be the same if the wider scheme propounded by the respondent were adopted, as it is the particular shape, form or structure of the scheme which is to be considered. 5 The Full Federal Court allowed the taxpayer s appeal. 6 The Court considered that the relevant scheme was the borrowing of money for use in financing and refinancing the two properties on the terms of the Wealth Optimiser loan facility, 7 and that the dominant purpose of the scheme was to secure the acquisition or retention of the properties rather than the tax benefit. Conti J, who agreed with the approach and reasoning of Hill and Hely JJ on the Pt IVA issue, said: In reaching their respective conclusions, both Hill and Hely JJ identified and applied the approach taken by Full Courts in Eastern Nitrogen Ltd v FC of T 2001 ATC 4164; (2001) 108 FCR 27 and in FC of T v Metal Manufacturers Ltd 2001 ATO 4152; (2001) 108 FCR 150, where the adoption by business enterprises of lease finance transactions instead of money lending transactions in the traditional sense was found to fall outside of the operation of Part IVA, upon the basis that although one of the purposes of the taxpayer in each case was to obtain a tax benefit, the prevailing or most influential purpose of each taxpayer was to obtain a large financial facility on the best terms reasonably available ATC 4708, Hart 2002 ATC 4608 (per Hill, Hely and Conti JJ). 7 Gleeson CJ and McHugh J agreed that it was inappropriate to exclude the fact of the borrowing from the putative scheme because the borrowing was an indispensable part of that which produced the tax benefit: [2004] HCA 26, para ATC 4608, 4627; see also ibid 4624 (per Hill J). 359 JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIAN TAXATION
4 PART IVA: POST-HART In a unanimous decision the High Court disagreed with the Full Federal Court s approach to the application of s 177D of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) to the facts in Hart. 9 Gleeson CJ and McHugh J emphasised the reference in FC of T v Spotless Services Ltd to the particular scheme and that it was the obtaining of the tax benefit which directed the taxpayers in taking steps they otherwise would not have taken by entering into the scheme. 10 They concluded: Let it be assumed that, in the present case, even if the wealth optimiser structure had not been available, the respondents would have borrowed money to buy their new home, and also borrowed money in order to retain their former home as an income-earning investment. The wealth optimiser structure depended entirely for its efficacy upon tax benefits generated by arrangements between the respondents and the lender that had no explanation other than their fiscal consequences. What optimised the respondents wealth was the tax benefit earlier described: not the deductibility of interest as such; but the deductibility of additional interest on loan account 2 contrived by the particular form of the borrowing transaction. 11 Gummow and Hayne JJ held: There could be no doubt in these matters that the terms on which the loan was made available were explicable only by the taxation consequences for the respondents. If the scheme was identified as all the steps leading to, and the entering into, and the implementation of the loan arrangements the manner in which that scheme was entered into strongly suggested that the respondents (each a relevant taxpayer) entered into that scheme for the dominant purpose of obtaining a tax benefit. Further, if the scheme was identified in this way, the respondents, by giving the directions they did, carried out the scheme for that same dominant purpose. But so too, if the scheme is identified more narrowly (as the making of the 9 [2004] HCA 26 (per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow, Haync and Cullinan JJ). 10 Ibid para 17 (per Gleeson CJ and McHugh J) citing FC of T v Spotless Services Ltd (1996) 186 CLR 404, 423 (per Brennan CJ, Dawson, Toohey, Gaudron, Gummow and Kirby JJ) ( Spotless Services ). 11 [2004] HCA 26, para 18 (per Gleeson CJ and McHugh J). (2004) 7(2) 360
5 M D ASCENZO relevant provisions in the loan agreement and the giving of directions under those provisions) the like conclusion would be reached. Both the manner in which that (narrower) scheme was entered into, and the manner in which it was carried out, strongly suggested the conclusion described. It is then important to return, for a moment, to an aspect of the issues discussed earlier concerning the identification of the scheme. The conclusions just described, as being indicated by the manner in which the scheme was entered into or carried out, are indicated by a consideration of how else the loan might have been arranged. They are not conclusions which depend upon identifying the scheme in one of the ways put forward by the Commissioner rather then another. As has already been pointed out, it would be wrong to treat any conclusion drawn from the first of the eight matters mentioned in s 177D(b) as determinative. All eight must be considered. When the remaining seven are examined in these matters it will be seen that either they tend to point to the same conclusion as the manner in which the scheme was entered into or carried out, or they are neutral. None points against the conclusion that the person, or one of the persons, who entered into or carried out the scheme or any part of the scheme did so for the purpose of enabling each respondent to obtain a tax benefit in connection with the scheme. As Hill J rightly pointed out, the form and substance of the scheme (s 177D(b)(ii)) also point to the purpose of a relevant person obtaining a tax advantage. What was one advance, to be repaid by 300 installments, was treated as if it were two separate loans. The only persons obtaining any advantage from the treatment were the respondents. And the only advantages which they obtained depended upon the taxation treatment resulting from the application of payments and accumulation of interest for which the scheme (however identified) provided. It was these results in relation to the operation of the Act (but for Pt IVA) which would be achieved (s 177D(b)(iv)) and these results would improve the financial position of the respondents (each a relevant taxpayer) (s 177D(b)(v)). The only other consequence for them would be the compounding of interest attributable to the investment portion of the loan (s 177D(b)(vii)). No other person (in particular, neither the lender nor the lender s agent) would gain or suffer financially (s 177D(b)(vi)) 361 JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIAN TAXATION
6 PART IVA: POST-HART or sustain any other consequence (s 177D(b)(vii)). And the only connection between the lender, the lender s agent and the respondents was that created by the loan arrangement, apart, of course, from the relationship of marriage between the respondents. 12 Cullinan J agreed: From the matters to which I have referred it is easy to conclude, inevitable in fact that a court do so, that the respondents entered into a scheme for the [dominant] purpose of obtaining a tax benefit. What other purpose or purposes could have made commercial or other sense? 13 It may be that the respondents did wish to make an investment and to change their residence. These were entirely irreproachable and proper objectives. But the means adopted to achieve these results could readily, and should be objectively concluded to be a scheme for the [dominant] purpose of enabling the respondents to obtain a tax benefit, and that is so no matter which of the alternative definitions as to the width of the schemes, within which what occurred here falls, is preferred GUIDANCE ON PART IVA The structure of Pt IVA requires there to be a scheme, a tax benefit and a dominant purpose. 2.1 Scheme and Tax Benefit are Inter-related In Hart the High Court held that the definition of a scheme is very broad as it encompasses not only a series of steps which together can be said to constitute a scheme or a plan but also (by its reference to action in the singular) the taking of but one step. The very breadth of the definition of scheme is consistent with the objective nature of the inquiries that are to be made under Pt IVA Ibid paras Ibid para Ibid para Ibid para 43 (per Gummow and Hayne JJ). Note also ibid para 89 (per Cullinan J). His Honour makes the point that something done which is less than the whole of an arrangement or agreement may be capable of itself being a scheme. This may include for example, (2004) 7(2) 362
7 M D ASCENZO According to Gummow and Hayne JJ the reference in FC of T v Peabody 16 to the circumstances that are incapable of standing on their own without being robbed of all practical meaning must now be understood as having been directed to the issues of procedural fairness which underlay the issue presented in that case. 17 Nevertheless, it is inappropriate to seize upon and isolate one event or a series of events which standing alone may appear to have a complexion which it or they cannot truly bear when other connected events are taken into account. 18 Moreover, the scheme must relate to the tax benefit obtained: in any case a wider or narrower approach may be taken to be the identification of a scheme but it cannot be an approach that divorces the scheme from the tax benefit. 19 The Court explained that the concepts of tax benefit, scheme and scheme to which this Part applies all have their part to play in deciding whether the power given to the Commissioner by s 177F(i) can be exercised... the various terms must be given operation in the interrelated way which s 177F(i) requires. 20 Thus the identification of the tax benefit and the identification of the scheme are interrelated. 21 For example the tax benefit in Hart was not the whole of the interest on the investment part of loan. Rather it was the additional interest that resulted from the special, non-standard features of the arrangement. These features, which defined the wealth optimiser structure and distinguished it from standard financing arrangements was held to be definitive of the scheme in connection with which the tax benefit was obtained: the wealth optimiser aspect of the structure, not divorced from the borrowing, an agreement or undertaking, or a course of action consisting of the giving notice of an election and paymet in accordance with it. 16 (1994) 181 CLR 359 ( Peabody ). 17 [2004] HCA 26, para Ibid para 90 (per Cullinan J). 19 Ibid para 9 (per Gleeson CJ and McHugh J). 20 Ibid para 37 (per Gummow J). 21 Ibid para 6 (per Gleeson CJ and McHugh J). 363 JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIAN TAXATION
8 PART IVA: POST-HART gave the borrowing its distinctive character that constituted the scheme. 22 This outcome in Hart, whether based on the narrower or wider scheme is consistent with the approach taken in FC of T v Consolidated Press Holdings Ltd where the Court found that the interposition of ML6 between ACP and CPIL (UK) resulted in a tax benefit. In Consolidated Press the High Court held: The fact that the overall transaction was aimed at a profit making does not make it artificial or inappropriate to observe that part of the structure of the transaction is to be explained by reference to a s 177D purpose. Nor is there any inconsistency involved, as was submitted, in looking to the wider transaction in order to understand and explain the scheme and the eight matters listed in s 177D Dominant Purpose Taking this practical approach the High Court considered the fundamental, central and critical question to be whether having regard to the eight matters in s 177D(b) it would be concluded that the person, or one of the persons, who entered into or carried out the scheme or any part of the scheme did so for the purpose of enabling the relevant taxpayer (alone or with others) to obtain a tax benefit in connection with the scheme. The inquiry required by Pt IVA is an objective, not subjective, inquiry. 24 Part IVA does not require, or even permit, any inquiry into the subjective motive of the taxpayer or others who entered into or carried out the scheme or any part of it. 2 Rather than asking why the taxpayer acted as they did, the inquiry requires a comparison between the scheme in question and an alternative postulate Ibid para 12 (per Gleeson CJ and McHugh J) ATC 4343, 4360 (per Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, Gummow, Hayne and Callinan JJ) ( Consolidated Press ). 24 [2004] HCA 26, para 37 (per Gummow J). 25 Ibid para 65 (per Gummow and Hayne JJ). 26 Ibid para 66 (per Gummow and Hayne JJ). (2004) 7(2) 364
9 M D ASCENZO The Court has confirmed that the inquiry directed by Pt IVA requires a comparison between the way things are done (the particular scheme) and alternative possibilities, and that the dividing line between ordinary transaction and tax avoidance schemes that came within the purview of Pt IVA is to be found in a consideration of the eight objective matters listed in s 177D(b). For example, Cullinan J focused on the means adopted to achieve what overall was a commercial result. 27 Similarly Gleeson CJ and McHugh J considered that the deductibility of the additional interest on the investment part of the loan was contrived by the particular form of the borrowing transaction, and that it was the obtaining of tax benefits which directed the taxpayers in taking steps they otherwise would not have taken False Dichotomies The presence of a discernable commercial end does not determine the answer to the question posed by s 177D. 29 This is because a particular course of action may be... both tax driven and bear the character of a rational commercial decision. 30 While business transactions are normally influenced by tax considerations, a transaction may take such a form that there is a particular scheme in respect of which a conclusion of the kind described in s 177D is required, even though the particular scheme also advances a wider commercial objective Ibid para 96 (per Callinan J). 28 Ibid para 18 (per Gleeson CJ and McHugh J). 29 Ibid para 16 (per Gleeson CJ and McHugh J); and paras (per Gummow and Hayne JJ). 30 Ibid para 52 (per Gummow and Hayne JJ) citing Spotless Services (1996) 186 CLR 404, 416 (per Brennan CJ, Dawson, Toohey, Gaudron, Gummow and Kirby JJ). 31 [2004] HCA 26, paras (per Gleeson CJ and McHugh J). 365 JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIAN TAXATION
10 PART IVA: POST-HART 2.4 Where to Draw the Line? The application of Pt IVA is sensitive to the facts. Consequently, always the question must be whether the terms of the Act apply to the facts and circumstances of the particular case. 32 The Court noted that tax considerations influence the form of most business transactions and the presence of a fiscal objective does not mean that a person entered into or carried out a scheme for the dominant purpose of obtaining a tax benefit. Gleeson CJ and McHugh J explain it this way: Furthermore, even if a particular form of transaction carries a tax benefit, it does not follow that obtaining the tax benefit is the dominant purpose of the taxpayer in entering into the transaction. A taxpayer wishing to obtain the right to occupy premises for the purpose of carrying on a business enterprise might decide to lease real estate rather than to buy it. Depending upon a variety of circumstances, the potential deductibility of the rent may be an important factor in the decision. Yet, if there were nothing more to it than that, it would ordinarily be impossible to conclude, having regard to the factors listed in s 177D, that the dominant purpose of the lessee in leasing the land was to obtain a tax benefit. The dominant purpose would be to gain the right to occupy the premises, not obtain a tax deduction for the rent, even if the availability of the tax deduction meant that leasing the premises was more costeffective then buying them. 33 Gummow and Hayne JJ make a similar point: The bare fact that a taxpayer pays less tax, if one form of transaction rather then another is made, does not demonstrate that Pt IVA applies. Simply to show that a taxpayer has obtained a tax benefit does not show that Part IVA applies. 34 The solution turns upon the identification, among various purposes of that which is dominant that is the ruling, prevailing or 32 Ibid para 52 (per Gummow J). 33 Ibid para Ibid para 53 (2004) 7(2) 366
11 M D ASCENZO most influential purpose. 35 The conclusion about purpose required by Pt IVA is formulated by reference to, and only by reference to, the eight factors specified in s 177D(b). Hart re-affirms the objective nature of the test. In Spotless Services the manner in which the taxpayer took steps which maximised their after tax return indicated the presence of the dominant purpose to obtain a tax benefit. Similarly in Hart the manner in which the scheme was entered into was only explicable by the tax consequences. Hart again shows the importance of manner, form and substance and timing to the inquiry required by Pt IVA. Generally speaking, a finding as to the dominant purpose of a relevant taxpayer is sensitive to these factors, especially the particular way or means adopted to achieve the desired result. 36 To draw a conclusion about purpose from the eight matters identified in s 177D(b) will require a consideration of what other possibilities existed. 37 For example, as Cullinan J notes in relation to s 177D(b)(ii) the form and substance of a scheme: An aspect of the question to which s 177D(b)(ii) gives rise, is whether the substance of the transaction (tax implications apart) could more conveniently, or commercially, or frugally have been achieved by a different transaction or form of transaction Clear Principles The application of general anti-avoidance rules, whether in legislative form or by way of judicial approaches, will always 35 Spotless Services (1996) 186 CLR 404, 416 (per Brennan CJ, Dawson, Toohey, Gaudron, Gummow and Kirby JJ). 36 Note the purpose of Pt IVA of effectuating a position akin in essence of the views expressed in Newton v FC of T (1958) 98 CLR 1 that a general anti-avoidance provision should apply where is could be predicated from looking objectively at an arrangement that it was implemented in that way so as to avoid tax: Explanatory Memorandum to the Income Tax Laws Amendment Bill (No 2) 1981 referred to in [2004] HCA 26, para 86 (per Cullinan J). 37 [2004] HCA 26, para 66 (per Gummow J). 38 Ibid para JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIAN TAXATION
12 PART IVA: POST-HART involve some element of judgment and perspective in applying the law to the facts. However, not only does Australia have a legislative framework to guide that analysis, but we now also have the benefit of substantial judicial guidance from the High Court about the operation of Pt IVA. The propositions which may now be taken as decided are summarised below: 1. The definition of scheme in s 177A is wide. A scheme could be narrowly defined provided it met the statutory definition of scheme. 39 There is no limitation in the Act that requires schemes to stand on their own feet The concepts of scheme, tax benefit and scheme to which Pt IVA applies are inter-related. Accordingly the definition of scheme must be related to the tax benefit obtained Determining whether a tax benefit has been obtained in connection with a scheme 42 involves a predication (reasonable expectation rather than a possibility) as to the events that would have taken place Part IVA is a last resort measure. If an amount is not included in the assessable income and another provision of the Act operates to counter that scheme by requiring it to be so included, the amount cannot be a tax benefit obtained by the taxpayer concerned, and Pt IVA will be inapplicable The fundamental question is whether having regard to the eight matters listed in s 177D(b) it would be concluded that 39 Consolidated Press (2001) 207 CLR Hart [2004] HCA Ibid. 42 Ibid para 91 (per Cullinan J) considers the word connection to have a wider import than for example result. 43 Peabody (1994) 181 CLR Hart [2004] HCA 26 (2004) 7(2) 368
13 M D ASCENZO the person, or one of the persons, who entered into or carried out the scheme or any part of the scheme did so for the purpose of enabling the relevant taxpayer (alone or with others) to obtain a tax benefit in connection with the scheme The inquiry directed by Pt IVA requires a comparison between the scheme in question and an alternative postulate. The drawing of conclusions about the existence of a scheme, tax benefit and purpose requires consideration of what other possibilities existed Part IVA does not authorise consideration of evidence of the subjective purpose or motivation of a particular person. The subjective state of mind of a person is not a matter listed in s 177D(b) to which regard may be had. Rather the section requires consideration of the eight matters listed in s 177D(b) and not to other matters. The subjective state of mind of a person is not such a matter The reference to dominant purpose in a case where more than one purpose is present is a reference to the ruling, prevailing or most influential purpose The conclusion as to dominant purpose maybe reached not only with respect to the dominant purpose of the taxpayer, it may be reached by reference to the dominant purpose of any other person or persons so long as they are persons who entered into or carried out the scheme or any part of it. 49 Likewise, the purpose of an advisor may be attributed to the taxpayer in an appropriate case Peabody (1994) 181 CLR 359; Spotless Services (1996) 186 CLR 404; Consolidated Press (2001) 207 CLR 235; and Hart [2004] HCA Hart [2004] HCA Consolidated Press (2001) 207 CLR 235; and Hart [2004] HCA Spotless Services (1996) 186 CLR Spotless Services (1996) 186 CLR 404; and Hart [2004] HCA Consolidated Press (2001) 207 CLR JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIAN TAXATION
14 PART IVA: POST-HART 10. It is possible to arrive at the conclusion as to purpose by making a global assessment of the facts, so long as it is clear that the relevant eight factors are taken into account Some of the eight factors (there is clearly some overlap among them) may point one way, others may point in the opposite direction, and some may be neutral: it is the evaluation of these matters, alone or in combination, some for, some against, that s 177D requires in order to reach the conclusion to which s 177D refers There is no inconsistency between a finding that the purpose of a person lay in the pursuit of commercial gain in the course of carrying on a business and a finding that the dominant purpose was to enable the relevant taxpayer to obtain a tax benefit The circumstance that less tax is paid if one form of transaction rather than another is adopted does not necessarily lead to a conclusion that Pt IVA applies. 54 The solution turns up on the identification, among various purposes, of that which is dominant manner, and form and substance are important in this regard Consolidated Press (2001) 207 CLR 235; and Hart [2004] HCA Hart [2004] HCA Spotless Services (1996) 186 CLR 404; Consolidated Press (2001) 207 CLR 235; and Hart [2004] HCA Spotless Services (1996) 186 CLR 404; and Hart [2004] HCA Spotless Services (1996) 186 CLR 404; and Hart [2004] HCA 26. (2004) 7(2) 370
Federal Commissioner Of Taxation V Hart:Did the High Court set the Threshold too Low?
Revenue Law Journal Volume 17 Issue 1 Article 3 September 2007 Federal Commissioner Of Taxation V Hart:Did the High Court set the Threshold too Low? Linda Zeman lindazeman@hotmail.com Follow this and additional
More informationCOMPARING THE GAARS UNDER THE INCOME TAX AND GST SYSTEMS
COMPARING THE GAARS UNDER THE INCOME TAX AND GST SYSTEMS LOUISA HUANG * ABSTRACT Roughly 20 years has passed between the introduction of Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 and Division 165
More informationBEYOND BLATANT, ARTIFICIAL AND CONTRIVED : PART OF THE STORY SO FAR. Taxation Institute of Australia Lecture, Victorian State Library, 13 October 2010
BEYOND BLATANT, ARTIFICIAL AND CONTRIVED : PART OF THE STORY SO FAR Taxation Institute of Australia Lecture, Victorian State Library, 13 October 2010 G.T. Pagone * Trevor Boucher s book Blatant, Artificial
More informationPART IVA: THE GENERAL ANTI-AVOIDANCE PROVISIONS IN AUSTRALIAN TAXATION LAW
PART IVA: THE GENERAL ANTI-AVOIDANCE PROVISIONS IN AUSTRALIAN TAXATION LAW G T PAGONE [This article reviews Australia s principal tax anti-avoidance provision. It examines the perceived defects with s
More information3/8/2015 PS LA 2014/2 Administration of transfer pricing penalties for income years commencing on o... (As at 17 December 2014)
Practice Statement Law Administration PS LA 2014/2 SUBJECT: Administration of transfer pricing penalties for income years commencing on or after 29 June 2013 PURPOSE: This practice statement explains:
More informationTHE LAW AS SET OUT BY MICHAEL CARMONDY, TAX COMMISSIONER Refocus of the income-splitting test case program
THE LAW AS SET OUT BY MICHAEL CARMONDY, TAX COMMISSIONER 2005 Refocus of the income-splitting test case program Background In March 2003 I announced a test case program on how Part IVA - the general anti-avoidance
More informationRevenue Law Journal. Dale Boccabella University of NSW. Volume 15 Issue 1 Article
Revenue Law Journal Volume 15 Issue 1 Article 4 1-1-2005 ATO s Determination on CGT Cost Base Inclusion for Interest Expenditure Denied Deductibility under Split Loans because Part IVA is Flawed and Misleading
More informationPart IVA and mass marketed schemes
[TOM DELANY] University of Southern Queensland The article provides discussion on whether there is a higher level of likelihood that a mass marketed scheme may be captured by the application of the general
More informationBond University Julie Cassidy Deakin University
Bond University epublications@bond High Court Review Faculty of Law 1-1-1996 Are tax schemes legitimate commercial transactions? Commissioner of Taxation v Spotless Services Ltd and Commissioner of Taxation
More informationAll legislative references are to the Tax Administration Act 1994 (TAA 1994) unless otherwise stated.
QUESTION WE VE BEEN ASKED QB 12/12 Abusive tax position penalty and the anti-avoidance provision All legislative references are to the Tax Administration Act 1994 (TAA 1994) unless otherwise stated. This
More informationSpotless : A Lesson in Form and Substance but not in Substance over Form
Revenue Law Journal Volume 8 Issue 1 Article 8 January 1998 Spotless : A Lesson in Form and Substance but not in Substance over Form John Azzi Solicitor of the Supreme Court, New South Wales Follow this
More informationDIVIDEND STRIPPING SCHEMES: TOWARDS A BROADER JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION. Abstract
DIVIDEND STRIPPING SCHEMES: TOWARDS A BROADER JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION Abstract At issue before the Full Federal Court in Lawrence v FCT was the scope of the operation of s 177E(1) ITAA 1936, dealing with
More informationCover sheet for: LCR 2018/6
Generated on: 28 September 2018, 09:57:34 PM Cover sheet for: LCR 2018/6 This cover sheet is provided for information only. It does not form part of the underlying document. There is a compendium for this
More informationejournal of Tax Research
ejournal of Tax Research Volume 4, Number 1 August 2006 CONTENTS 5 The International Income Taxation of Portfolio Debt in the Presence of Bi-Directional Capital Flows Ewen McCann and Tim Edgar 25 Coming
More informationInclusion In Cost Base Of Investment Property Of Interest Denied Deductibility Under A Split Loan Because Of Part IVa: Some Follow Up Analysis
Revenue Law Journal Volume 17 Issue 1 Article 9 September 2007 Inclusion In Cost Base Of Investment Property Of Interest Denied Deductibility Under A Split Loan Because Of Part IVa: Some Follow Up Analysis
More informationIddles v Commissioner of Taxation and Macpherson v Commissioner of Taxation: Implications for the Tax Planning Landscape in Viticulture
The Wine Industry - Volume 12, 2010 Iddles v Commissioner of Taxation and Macpherson v Commissioner of Taxation: Implications for the Tax Planning Landscape in Viticulture Nicole Wilson-Rogers and Dale
More informationLEGALLY BINDING SECTION:
Page status: legally binding Page 1 of 11 Product Ruling Income tax: tax consequences for a borrower being charged a discounted home loan interest rate calculated under Loan Reducer Contents LEGALLY BINDING
More informationCase Note. Michele Muscillo * The Lesser of Two Evils: FAI General Insurance Co Ltd v Australian Hospital Care Pty Ltd
Case Note Michele Muscillo * The Lesser of Two Evils: FAI General Insurance Co Ltd v Australian Hospital Care Pty Ltd 1. INTRODUCTION The High Court s decision in FAI General Insurance Co Ltd v Australian
More informationPREDATORY PRICING AND DAWSON PROTECTING THE COMPETITIVE PROCESS, NOT COMPETITORS! INTRODUCTION
2003 Forum: The Dawson Review 283 PREDATORY PRICING AND DAWSON PROTECTING THE COMPETITIVE PROCESS, NOT COMPETITORS! LYNDEN GRIGGS I INTRODUCTION The question is relatively simple to state: under what circumstances,
More informationConstitutional issues raised by South Australia s proposed major bank levy
Constitutional issues raised by South Australia s proposed major bank levy Andrea Beatty and Gabor Papdi, Keypoint Law The South Australian Government has announced its intention to legislate to impose
More informationFEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SVTB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 104 MIGRATION protection visa whether well-founded fear of persecution particular social group
More informationNATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE CONFERENCE
NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE CONFERENCE Fragmenting the Part IVA Lore Applying to Stapled Structures Written and Presented by: Stuart Dall Partner, Pitcher Partners National Division 26 May 2017 Sheraton, Melbourne
More informationTAX IN AN UNCERTAIN ECONOMY Managing Capital Structure
NSW Division 7 November 2008 Swissotel, Sydney TAX IN AN UNCERTAIN ECONOMY Written by/presented by: Andrew Foster Goldman Sachs JBWere Simon Jenner ATIA Ernst & Young Andrew Foster and Simon Jenner 2008
More informationPART IVA - SERIOUSLY FLAWED IN PRINCIPLE
PART IVA - SERIOUSLY FLAWED IN PRINCIPLE By Nabil F Orow * Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ( the Act ) was enacted as a result of legislative and public concern and dissatisfaction
More informationPART IVA AND WASH SALE ARRANGEMENTS WILL IT ALL BECOME CLEAR IN THE WASH? PATRICIA O KEEFE
PART IVA AND WASH SALE ARRANGEMENTS WILL IT ALL BECOME CLEAR IN THE WASH? PATRICIA O KEEFE This paper concerns the recently released Taxation Ruling TR 2008/1 regarding the application of Part IVA of the
More informationGENERAL ANTI TAX AVOIDANCE PROVISIONS IN AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND 1
GENERAL ANTI TAX AVOIDANCE PROVISIONS IN AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND 1 Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners New Zealand Trust Conference, Auckland, 30 March 2012 G.T. Pagone * The role of anti avoidance
More informationJOINT VENTURES ACHIEVING A BALANCE: ASSISTING PRO-COMPETITIVE VENTURES WITHOUT PERMITTING OBVIOUS ANTI-COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOUR
2003 Forum: The Dawson Review 321 JOINT VENTURES ACHIEVING A BALANCE: ASSISTING PRO-COMPETITIVE VENTURES WITHOUT PERMITTING OBVIOUS ANTI-COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOUR BY CAROLYN ODDIE Despite encompassing a wide
More informationProfessional Indemnity Insurance - Claims made and notified policies - Sections 54 and 40(3) of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth)
UPDATE TO CN CONSTRUCTIVE NOTES May 2010 Professional Indemnity Insurance - Claims made and notified policies - Sections 54 and 40(3) of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) The draft reform package
More informationPresent Entitlement totrust Income and the Rule in Upton v Brown
Revenue Law Journal Volume 18 Issue 1 Article 2 12-1-2008 Present Entitlement totrust Income and the Rule in Upton v Brown Darren Catherall dcathera@student.bond.edu.au Follow this and additional works
More informationA Loan by Any Other Name Would Smell So Sweet
Revenue Law Journal Volume 18 Issue 1 Article 3 12-1-2008 A Loan by Any Other Name Would Smell So Sweet John Tretola Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/rlj Recommended
More informationSUBMISSION TO THE AUSTRALIAN TAX OFFICE DRAFT SUPERANNUATION GUARANTEE RULING SGR 2008/D2
SUBMISSION TO THE AUSTRALIAN TAX OFFICE DRAFT SUPERANNUATION GUARANTEE RULING SGR 2008/D2 The Australian Mines and Metals Association (AMMA) on behalf of our member companies welcome the opportunity to
More informationHIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA FRENCH CJ, GUMMOW, HAYNE, HEYDON, CRENNAN, KIEFEL AND BELL JJ PETER JAMES SHAFRON APPELLANT AND AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION RESPONDENT Shafron v Australian
More informationJOINT SUBMISSION BY. Date: 30 May 2014
JOINT SUBMISSION BY Institute of Chartered Accountants Australia, Law Council of Australia, CPA Australia, The Tax Institute and the Corporate Tax Association Draft Taxation Ruling TR 2014/D3 Income tax:
More informationA GST WITH GRRRRRR: LEGISLATIVE RESPONSES TO GST TAX AVOIDANCE IN AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND *
A GST WITH GRRRRRR: LEGISLATIVE RESPONSES TO GST TAX AVOIDANCE IN AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND * ABTRACT GST is a transaction tax and therefore it would be thought it would be hard to avoid. Beyond blatant
More informationIntra-group finance guarantees and loans
DISCUSSION PAPER EXTERNAL JUNE 2008 UNCLASSIFIED FORMAT AUDIENCE DATE CLASSIFICATION FILE REF: 08/7290 Intra-group finance guarantees and loans Application of Australia s transfer pricing and thin capitalisation
More informationCHEVRON AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS JUDGMENT UPDATE ATO WINS FULL FEDERAL COURT DECISION ON CROSS BORDER FINANCING - CHEVRON AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS CASE
CHEVRON AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS JUDGMENT UPDATE ATO WINS FULL FEDERAL COURT DECISION ON CROSS BORDER FINANCING - CHEVRON AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS CASE 28 April 2017 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW In a major Australian
More informationENACTMENT OF A DEDUCTION RULE REGARDING TRAVEL BETWEEN WORKPLACES OR INCOME PRODUCING ACTIVITIES CAN LEAD TO ERRORS
ENACTMENT OF A DEDUCTION RULE REGARDING TRAVEL BETWEEN WORKPLACES OR INCOME PRODUCING ACTIVITIES CAN LEAD TO ERRORS By Dale Boccabella Section 25-100 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) was introduced
More informationBOARD OF BENDIGO REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNICAL AND FURTHER EDUCATION V BARCLAY
BOARD OF BENDIGO REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNICAL AND FURTHER EDUCATION V BARCLAY THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SHANE MARSHALL * & AMANDA CAVANOUGH** I INTRODUCTION On 7 September 2012, the High Court of Australia
More informationSESSION 6: PART IVA: DOMINANT PURPOSE - AN ANALYSIS OF THE EIGHT FACTORS. Anthony Portas, CTA
SESSION 6: PART IVA: DOMINANT PURPOSE - AN ANALYSIS OF THE EIGHT FACTORS Anthony Portas, CTA Overview Overview of Part IVA Introduction to Dominant Purpose Test The 2013 Changes to Part IVA The Dominant
More informationPROCESS: STEP 1: NSW or Cth? If NSW plenary power, subject to excise limitation.
PROCESS: STEP 1: NSW or Cth? If NSW plenary power, subject to excise limitation. STEP 2: Characterisation: Determine whether impugned legislation falls within the scope of the subject matter of a relevant
More informationTax Brief. 3 March Stamp Duty Tail Wags CGT Dog? The Facts
Tax Brief 3 March 2005 Stamp Duty Tail Wags CGT Dog? Whilst the High Court decision in Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Dick Smith Electronics Holdings Pty Ltd ( Dick Smith ) involves NSW stamp duty,
More informationWoolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v CDG Pty Ltd
Woolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v CDG Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 16 (High Court of Australia) (relevant to Chapter 5, under heading Products and Structures, after Bryan v Maloney on p 115) In the particular
More informationTAX. General anti-avoidance rules and how they may apply to a personal services business
TAX GENERAL ANTI-AVOIDANCE RULES General anti-avoidance rules and how they may apply to a personal services business This fact sheet contains information on how the general anti-avoidance rules in the
More informationJOINT SUBMISSION BY. Draft Taxation Determination TD 2016/D4
JOINT SUBMISSION BY The Tax Institute, Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand, Tax and Super Australia, CPA Australia and Institute of Public Accountants Draft Taxation Determination TD 2016/D4
More informationAn Analysis of the Concepts of 'Present Entitlement'
Revenue Law Journal Volume 13 Issue 1 Article 9 January 2003 An Analysis of the Concepts of 'Present Entitlement' Anna Everett Bond University Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/rlj
More informationJOINT SUBMISSION BY. Draft Taxation Ruling - TR 2000/D12 Income tax and capital gains tax: capital gains in pre-cgt tax treaties
JOINT SUBMISSION BY THE TAXATION INSTITUTE OF AUSTRALIA, THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS IN AUSTRALIA, CPA AUSTRALIA, THE TAXPAYERS AUSTRALIA Inc. AND NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ACCOUNTANTS Draft Taxation
More informationIt s time for certainty on the debt front
TaxTalk It s time for certainty on the debt front 3 November 2014 Reproduced with the permission of The Tax Institute. This article first appeared in Taxation in Australia, vol 49(4), pp 217-219. For more
More informationTAX ALERT AUSTRALIAN RECENT DEVELOPMENTS - AUSTRALIAN TRANSFER PRICING (TP) RULES: TIME TO STEP UP MARCH 2015
MARCH 2015 AUSTRALIAN TAX ALERT RECENT DEVELOPMENTS - AUSTRALIAN TRANSFER PRICING (TP) RULES: TIME TO STEP UP INTRODUCTION With the Australian Taxation Office's (ATO) escalating focus on international
More informationTHE ROLE OF THE GENERAL ANTI-AVOIDANCE RULE IN AUSTRALIA
Keith Kendall FTIA Senior Lecturer, School of Law La Trobe University Most discussion and debate relating to the legal means of combating tax avoidance in Australia centres, understandably, on Part IVA
More informationProduct Ruling Income tax: TFS Indian Sandalwood Project 2016 Sophisticated Investor Offer 31 December 2016
Page status: legally binding Page 1 of 34 Product Ruling Income tax: TFS Indian Sandalwood Project 2016 Sophisticated Investor Offer 31 December 2016 Contents LEGALLY BINDING SECTION: Para What this Ruling
More informationCase Note September 2007
Case Note September 2007 CGU Limited v AMP Financial Planning Pty Ltd On Wednesday 29 August 2007 Chief Justice Gleeson and Justices Kirby, Callinan, Heydon and Crennan handed down the judgement of the
More informationScargill v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
129 FCR] SCARGILL v MNR FOR IMMIGRATION 259 FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Scargill v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 116 French, von Doussa and Marshall JJ 13
More informationQantas Airways Limited v Christie>> [1998] HCA 18 (19 March 1998)
Qantas Airways Limited v Christie>> [1998] HCA 18 (19 March 1998) Last Updated: 26 March 1998 HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA BRENNAN CJ, GAUDRON, McHUGH, GUMMOW AND KIRBY JJ AIRWAYS LIMITED APPELLANT
More informationRESIDENTIAL PROPERTY, COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND DEREGISTRATION: A CASE STUDY ON HOW THE GST LAW MAY HAVE BEEN MANIPULATED.
Canberra Law Review (2011) Vol. 10, Issue 3 125 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY, COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND DEREGISTRATION: A CASE STUDY ON HOW THE GST LAW MAY HAVE BEEN MANIPULATED. JOHN MCLAREN
More informationPersonal Services Income: where to from here?
Revenue Law Journal Volume 21 Issue 1 Article 7 5-10-2012 Personal Services Income: where to from here? Tom Delany Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/rlj Recommended
More informationRevenue Law Journal. The Interpretation of Taxation Legislation by the Courts - A Reflection on the Views of Justice Graham Hill.
Revenue Law Journal Volume 16, Issue 1 2006 Article 5 The Interpretation of Taxation Legislation by the Courts - A Reflection on the Views of Justice Graham Hill John Tretola Adelaide University, Copyright
More informationPR 2008/25. Product Ruling Income tax: Macquarie Almond Investment 2008 Early Growers (to 15 June 2008) No guarantee of commercial success
Page status: legally binding Page 1 of 26 Product Ruling Income tax: Macquarie Almond Investment 2008 Early Growers (to 15 June 2008) Contents Para LEGALLY BINDING SECTION: What this Ruling is about 1
More informationTHE END OF REDEEMABLE PREFERENCE SHARES
THE END OF REDEEMABLE PREFERENCE SHARES By Tim Neilson In the September/October 1998 issue of the Journal of Australian Taxation, Paul Abbey summarised certain changes to the Corporations Law provisions
More informationejournal of Tax Research
ejournal of Tax Research Volume 4, Number 2 December 2006 CONTENTS 97 Preface Editors Note Binh Tran-Nam and Michael Walpole In Memory of JOHN RANERI 1957-2005 98 Eulogy Bob Deutsch 101 Refocusing on Fundamental
More informationThe Nature of 'Present Entitlement' in the Taxation of Trusts
Revenue Law Journal Volume 4 Issue 1 Article 5 August 1994 The Nature of 'Present Entitlement' in the Taxation of Trusts Stephen Barkoczy Monash University Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/rlj
More informationAn Analysis of GST and Third Party Consideration
Revenue Law Journal Volume 11 Issue 1 Article 4 1-1-2001 An Analysis of GST and Third Party Consideration Peter Edmundson Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/rlj Recommended
More informationREVIEW OF THE DEBT/EQUITY PROVISIONS OF THE INCOME TAX LAW REGARDING CERTAIN AT CALL LOANS
5 May 2004 NV:SG N. Velardi (03) 9607 9382 E-mail: nvelardi@liv.asn.au The Manager Taxation of Financial Arrangements Unit Business Income Division Revenue Group The Treasury Langdon Crescent Canberra
More informationCover sheet for: TR 2017/D8
Generated on: 29 October 2017, 12:02:01 PM Cover sheet for: This cover sheet is provided for information only. It does not form part of the underlying document. - For information about the status of this
More informationPrivatisation and Infrastructure Australian Federal Tax Framework (January 2017 Draft)
Privatisation and Infrastructure Australian Federal Tax Framework (January 2017 Draft) QUALIFICATION THIS DOCUMENT IS A DRAFT. IT IS INTENDED TO GENERATE FEEDBACK FROM STAKEHOLDERS ON THE ISSUES IT RAISES
More informationDecision Impact Statement. Impacted advice. Précis. Brief summary of facts. Roche Products Pty Ltd and Commissioner of Taxation
Decision Impact Statement Roche Products Pty Ltd and Commissioner of Taxation Court Citation(s): [2008] AATA 639 2008 ATC 10 036 70 ATR 703 Venue: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Venue Reference No: NT
More informationUPDATE LITIGATION DECEMBER 2012 HUNT & HUNT LAWYERS V MITCHELL MORGAN NOMINEES PTY LTD & ORS
DECEMBER 2012 LITIGATION UPDATE HUNT & HUNT LAWYERS V MITCHELL MORGAN NOMINEES PTY LTD & ORS SNAPSHOT On 12 December 2012, the High Court of Australia heard the appeal by Hunt & Hunt Lawyers (Hunt & Hunt)
More informationFramework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements
Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements The IASB Framework was approved by the IASC Board in April 1989 for publication in July 1989, and adopted by the IASB in April 2001.
More informationThe Interpretation of Taxation Legislation by the Courts - A Reflection on the Views of Justice Graham Hill
Revenue Law Journal Volume 16 Issue 1 Article 5 1-1-2006 The Interpretation of Taxation Legislation by the Courts - A Reflection on the Views of Justice Graham Hill John Tretola Follow this and additional
More informationAll legislative references are to the Income Tax Act 2007 unless otherwise stated.
QUESTION WE VE BEEN ASKED QB 15/11 INCOME TAX SCENARIOS ON TAX AVOIDANCE 2015 All legislative references are to the Income Tax Act 2007 unless otherwise stated. This Question We ve Been Asked is about
More informationUnit 2: ACCOUNTING CONCEPTS, PRINCIPLES AND CONVENTIONS
Unit 2: ACCOUNTING S, PRINCIPLES AND CONVENTIONS Accounting is a language of the business. Financial statements prepared by the accountant communicate financial information to the various stakeholders
More informationRELIANCE CARPET CO PTY LTD: WAS THE FULL FEDERAL COURT RIGHT? MAHESWARAN SRIDARAN*
RELIANCE CARPET CO PTY LTD: WAS THE FULL FEDERAL COURT RIGHT? MAHESWARAN SRIDARAN* The taxpayer granted an option to a prospective purchaser for the purchase by the latter of a property owned by the taxpayer.
More information22 November Mr Dean Karlovic Private Groups and High Wealth Individuals Australian Taxation Office GPO Box 9977 MELBOURNE VIC 3001
22 November 2013 Mr Dean Karlovic Private Groups and High Wealth Individuals Australian Taxation Office GPO Box 9977 MELBOURNE VIC 3001 Dear Mr Karlovic Tax Ruling TR 2002/14 and Tricare decision We refer
More informationTax Alert April 2010 DIVISION 7A USE OF ASSETS
Tax Alert April 2010 DIVISION 7A USE OF ASSETS The purpose of this Alert is to discuss the proposed changes to the definition of payment in Division 7A of Part III of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
More informationASSISTING YOUR SME CLIENTS EXPAND OVERSEAS - WHAT YOU MUST BE AWARE OF Assisting your SME Clients Expand Overseas What you must be aware of
National Division 25 November 2010 Swissotel, Sydney ASSISTING YOUR SME CLIENTS EXPAND OVERSEAS - WHAT YOU MUST BE AWARE OF Assisting your SME Clients Expand Overseas What you must be aware of Written
More informationCase Note. The Unsettled Safety Net of the Unfairness Discretion: Section 90 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) in Em v The Queen.
Case Note The Unsettled Safety Net of the Unfairness Discretion: Section 90 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) in Em v The Queen ANNA GARSIA Abstract Em v The Queen was the first time the High Court directly
More informationApportionment of Dual-Purpose Expenses
Revenue Law Journal Volume 23 Issue 1 Article 2 September 2013 Apportionment of Dual-Purpose Expenses Nicholas Augustinos The University of Notre Dame Australia, nicholas.augustinos@nd.edu.au Follow this
More informationSuper and insurance the good, the bad and the ugly Phil Broderick
Super and insurance the good, the bad and the ugly Phil Broderick Beneficial interests in and beneficial ownership of trust property trustees, trusts and beneficiaries Rob Jeremiah Sladen Legal Super and
More informationCAMBODIAN ACCOUNTING STANDARDS (CAS)
CAMBODIAN ACCOUNTING STANDARDS (CAS) 1 - CAS 1 : Presentation of Financial Statements an Audit of Financial Statements 2 - CAS 2 : Inventories 3 - CAS 7 : Cash Flow Statements 4 - CAS 8 : Net profit or
More informationCPA NSW Public Practice Conference 2009
Tax Training Notes CPA NSW Public Practice Conference 2009 1 Family groups and family trust elections... 4 1.1 Timing of election... 4 1.1.1 Retrospectivity in family trust elections... 5 1.1.2 Conferrals
More informationDetailed Alert International Accounting Standards: Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements (1989) Preface
Abstract The Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements sets out the concepts that underlie the preparation and presentation of financial statements for external users. The
More informationTax Brief. 15 May In-house Finance Companies. 1. Background
Tax Brief 15 May 2009 In-house Finance Companies It is no secret that the Australian Taxation Office ( ATO ) has been concerned for some time about the tax issues arising from in-house finance companies
More informationApplying the substance test for withholding MITs
TaxTalk Insights Financial Services Applying the substance test for withholding MITs 24 October 2016 Reproduced with the permission of The Tax Institute. This article first appears in Taxation in Australia,
More informationThe Ongoing Saga of the "Terrible Twins" : Observations on Hepples v FC OF T
Revenue Law Journal Volume 2 Issue 2 Article 1 November 1991 The Ongoing Saga of the "Terrible Twins" : Observations on Hepples v FC OF T Julie Cassidy Bond University Follow this and additional works
More informationWhat is a real risk of forfeiture or a genuine restriction on disposal under the new employee share scheme rules?
1 Introduction The new employee share scheme (ESS) provisions, contained in Division 83A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) (1997 Act), apply from 1 July 2009. The concepts of real risk of forfeiture
More informationFEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SZJGA v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 787 MIGRATION appeal from decision of Federal Magistrate discretion to adjourn hearing on application for judicial
More informationColes Myer Finance Ltd v FCT
Allowable Deductions and Tax Deferral: Coles Myer Finance Ltd v FCT 1. Introduction In Coles Myer Finance Ltd v FCT,l a factually unexceptional case, the High Court considered the operation of the primary
More informationRestructuring for asset protection. Is it genuine?
Restructuring for asset protection Is it genuine? August 2017 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PART IVA ITAA 1936... 4 1 STATUTE OVERVIEW... 4 2 PART IVA: PRACTICAL EXAMPLES... 8 3. DIVISION 7A ITAA
More informationTHE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA SENATE TREASURY LAWS AMENDMENT (COMBATING MULTINATIONAL TAX AVOIDANCE) BILL 2017
2016-2017 THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA SENATE TREASURY LAWS AMENDMENT (COMBATING MULTINATIONAL TAX AVOIDANCE) BILL 2017 DIVERTED PROFITS TAX BILL 2017 REVISED EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
More informationThis is a reissue of BR Pub 10/21. For more information about the history of this Public Ruling see the Commentary to this Ruling.
This is a reissue of BR Pub 10/21. For more information about the history of this Public Ruling see the Commentary to this Ruling. DEDUCTIBILITY INTEREST REPAYMENTS REQUIRED AS A RESULT OF THE EARLY REPAYMENT
More informationTax Brief. 18 June Bamford: Taxation of trusts clarified. Facts
Tax Brief 18 June 2009 Bamford: Taxation of trusts clarified In its recent decision in Bamford v Commissioner of Taxation [2009] FCAFC 66, the Full Federal Court has settled (at least at the level of the
More informationNew Financial Year, New Tax Developments for Inbound Financing
TaxTalk Insights Financial Services New Financial Year, New Tax Developments for Inbound Financing What should Inbound Real Estate Entities look out for? 24 August 2017 In brief Recent changes to the tax
More informationCHILD MAINTENANCE TRUSTS - WHEN AND WHY. Jamie Burreket
CHILD MAINTENANCE TRUSTS - WHEN AND WHY Jamie Burreket Family life is full of major and minor crises -- the ups and downs of health, success and failure in career, marriage, and divorce -- and all kinds
More informationAUSTRALIA S LARGEST TAX CASE REVISITED: A NAIL IN THE COFFIN FOR THE OBJECTIVE APPROACH TO DETERMINING THE DEDUCTIBILITY OF EXPENSES?
AUSTRALIA S LARGEST TAX CASE REVISITED: A NAIL IN THE COFFIN FOR THE OBJECTIVE APPROACH TO DETERMINING THE DEDUCTIBILITY OF EXPENSES? By Eu-Jin Teo * Prior to the introduction of the tax consolidation
More informationWORKING WITH JUDICIAL REVIEW: THE NEW OPERATION OF THE TAKEOVERS PANEL
WORKING WITH JUDICIAL REVIEW: THE NEW OPERATION OF THE TAKEOVERS PANEL EMMA ARMSON * [This article examines the position of the Takeovers Panel in light of the scope for judicial review of its decisions.
More informationHow to Borrow Without Sorrow. How to use your super fund to borrow money to purchase property and not fall foul of the rules
How to Borrow Without Sorrow How to use your super fund to borrow money to purchase property and not fall foul of the rules How to Borrow Without Sorrow 1. Can a Self Managed Superannuation Fund ( SMSF
More informationTHE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
2010-2011-2012 THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (CROSS-BORDER TRANSFER PRICING) BILL (NO. 1) 2012 EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM (Circulated by the authority
More informationPR 2008/58. Product Ruling Income tax: tax consequences of investing in MQ Listed Protected Loan. No guarantee of commercial success
Page status: legally binding Page 1 of 20 Product Ruling Income tax: tax consequences of investing in MQ Listed Protected Loan Contents Para LEGALLY BINDING SECTION: What this Ruling is about 1 Date of
More informationPROFESSIONAL FIRMS AND TAX RISK MANAGEMENT (A Paper authored by Paul Dowd FCA CTA M Tax Tax Counsel, Morse Group)
PROFESSIONAL FIRMS AND TAX RISK MANAGEMENT (A Paper authored by Paul Dowd FCA CTA M Tax Tax Counsel, Morse Group) Taxpayers who derive their income from professional services e.g. accounting, legal, architectural,
More informationFINANCIAL ADVICE AND REGULATIONS
FINANCIAL ADVICE AND REGULATIONS GUIDANCE FOR THE ACCOUNTING PROFESSION FINANCIAL ADVICE AND REGULATIONS 2 DEVELOPED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE MEMBERS IN PUBLIC PRACTICE OF CPA AUSTRALIA AND CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
More informationFramework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements
for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements CONTENTS paragraphs PREFACE INTRODUCTION 1-11 Purpose and status 1-4 Scope 5-8 Users and their information needs 9-11 THE OBJECTIVE OF FINANCIAL
More information