Securities Update. By Troy M. Calkins and Kimberly K. Rubel. Timing. Heightened Compensation Committee Independence Standards
|
|
- Norah Lewis
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 September 2012 Securities Update IN THIS ISSUE 1 NYSE and NASDAQ Propose New Compensation Committee Listing Standards NYSE and NASDAQ Propose New Compensation Committee Listing Standards By Troy M. Calkins and Kimberly K. Rubel The Securities and Exchange Commission in June 2012 adopted Rule 10C-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 pursuant to Section 952 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Rule 10C-1 in part requires national securities exchanges to adopt listing standards for public companies addressing the independence of compensation committee members and the use by compensation committees of compensation advisers. Our prior article discussing Rule 10C-1 in detail can be found at com/resources/publications/2012/securities-update- June Tougher Iran Sanctions Approved by Congress May Affect U.S. Parent Companies 6 Why Your Board Needs to Think about Swaps The NYSE and NASDAQ have now proposed amendments to their respective listing standards relating to compensation committees of listed companies pursuant to Rule 10C-1. The full text of the proposed rule changes can be found for the NYSE at pdf?file_no=sr-nyse &seqnum=2 and for NASDAQ at Timing The SEC will accept comments for a 21-day period, after which the SEC will decide whether to approve the listing standards as proposed or require the exchanges to make changes. There are differences between the two proposals, so the SEC also may ask the exchanges to sync up their approaches in some respects. Rule 10C-1 requires the SEC to declare the listing standards effective by July 27, NYSE companies would have to comply with the new standards by the earlier of the first annual shareholder meeting after January 15, 2014 and October 31, NASDAQ companies would have to comply by the earlier of the second annual shareholder meeting after the final rules are issued and December 31, 2014, except that standards relating to the compensation committee s authority to retain independent advisers and responsibility to consider adviser independence would be effective upon final rule approval. Heightened Compensation Committee Independence Standards Rule 10C-1 requires boards to consider both the sources of compensation of a compensation committee member and the member s affiliations with the company.
2 While the Rule permits the exchanges to specify additional factors, neither the NYSE or NASDAQ did so. As required by Rule 10C-1, both exchanges proposed listing standards contain cure periods that allow companies to correct deficiencies under specified limited circumstances. NYSE In addition to general director independence standards, the proposed NYSE listing standards would require the board to affirmatively determine the independence of each compensation committee member considering all factors relevant to determining whether he or she has a relationship with the company that is material to his or her ability to be independent from management in connection with his or her duties as a committee member. The board s consideration must include, but need not be limited to: > Sources of compensation, including any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fees paid by the company to the director. In commentary, the NYSE states that the board should consider whether the committee member receives compensation from any person or entity that would impair his or her ability to make independent judgments about the company s executive compensation. > Affiliations with the company, a subsidiary of the company or an affiliate of a subsidiary of the company. As explained by the NYSE in commentary, the board should consider whether an affiliate relationship places the committee member under the direct or indirect control of the company or its senior management, or creates a direct relationship between the director and senior management members, in each case of a nature that would impair his or her ability to make independent judgments about the company s executive compensation. The NYSE retained commentary to director independence standards noting that ownership of even a significant amount of company stock would not, by itself, preclude finding that a director is independent. While the board must consider these factors, this is not a bright-line test, and the board may find a director independent even though he or she receives a compensatory fee from or has an affiliation with the company, so long as his or her ability to make independent judgments about the company s executive compensation is not impaired. NASDAQ The NASDAQ proposal would require compensation committee members to meet general independence standards and prohibit them from accepting, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fees from the company or any of its subsidiaries, other than board and committee fees and fixed amounts under retirement plans for prior service. Unlike the NYSE, NASDAQ proposes a bright-line test, such that the receipt of any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fees by a director would preclude serving on the compensation committee, the same standard NASDAQ applies to audit committee members. Though not a bright-line test, NASDAQ company boards would also have to consider whether compensation committee members are affiliated with the company, a subsidiary of the company or an affiliate of a subsidiary of the company and whether any affiliation would impair his or her judgment as a member of the compensation committee. In commentary, NASDAQ states that it does not view ownership of company stock in and of itself as a bar to compensation committee service, even if that ownership constitutes control. 2
3 The board is not required to apply a look back in making these determinations, so the prohibition on fees and affiliations that must be considered are limited to those fees received or affiliations that existed during a director s committee service. Compensation Committee Authority and Responsibility The NYSE listing standards currently require compensation committees to have charters, but the charters will need to be amended to reflect the authority and responsibilities of committees as required under these new compensation committee and adviser independence rules, including that the committee has the sole discretion to retain compensation advisers and direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation and oversight of compensation advisers. As now required for NYSE companies, the proposed NASDAQ listing standards would require NASDAQ companies to have an independent compensation committee with at least two members. NASDAQ also proposes to require compensation committees to have a charter that addresses the committee s structure, authority and responsibilities and includes the currently applicable prohibition on the chief executive officer being present during voting or deliberations on his or her compensation. The committee would have to review and assess the adequacy of the charter annually. Compensation Committee Adviser Independence The NYSE and NASDAQ proposed standards would require compensation committee charters to state that the committee must consider conflicts of interest before selecting consultants, counsel or other advisers (other than in-house legal counsel). While compensation committees must consider these factors prior to selecting an adviser, it is important to note that the rules would not limit the committee to selecting only independent advisers. The exchanges propose requiring that compensation committees may select an adviser only after considering the six independence standards specified by the SEC in Rule 10C-1 and, in the case of NYSE companies, any other factors relevant to the adviser s independence. The standards specified in Rule 10C-1 include: > whether the company employing the compensation adviser is providing any other services to the listed company; > the amount of fees the company employing the compensation adviser has received from the listed company, as a percentage of the consulting company s total revenue; > what policies and procedures have been adopted by the company employing the compensation adviser to prevent conflicts of interest; > whether the compensation adviser has any business or personal relationship with a member of the compensation committee; > whether the compensation adviser owns any stock of the company (which the SEC interprets to include stock owned by the adviser and his or her immediate family members); and > whether the compensation adviser or the company employing the adviser has any business or personal relationship with an executive officer of the listed company. 3
4 Neither exchange has proposed additional standards or elaborated on the Rule 10C-1 standards, and no doubt questions will arise. For example What constitutes providing advice to the committee? What types of information constitute advice that triggers the requirement? Since compensation committees are not prohibited from selecting non-independent advisers, a committee could continue to be advised by the company s outside legal counsel. As proposed, the NYSE standards would require a compensation committee to consider the six independence standards with respect to any outside legal counsel, but the NASDAQ standards would only require the committee to do so if it wanted to retain its own independent counsel. Exemptions As proposed, smaller reporting companies listed on NYSE or NASDAQ would not need to comply with the heightened compensation committee independence standards or the requirement to consider adviser independence; however, listed smaller reporting companies would have to have an independent compensation committee with a written charter. None of the new listing standards would apply to controlled companies, limited partnerships, companies in bankruptcy proceedings, open-end management investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and foreign private issuers that disclose in their annual report the reasons that they do not have an independent compensation committee. What Listed Companies Should Do Now Although the listing standards are subject to revision and will not be final for some time, there are several things that a listed company can do to prepare for the new requirements. > Review the applicable proposed standards and update the board and compensation committee regarding the new requirements and when they are expected to apply to the company. > Consider the independence of current compensation committee members under the proposed standards. > Determine how to assess compensation adviser independence, begin collecting conflicts information from advisers, and consider adviser independence under the proposed standards. > Consider updates to D&O questionnaire, compensation committee charter and policies, and proxy statement disclosure that will be necessary under new standards. > If you are a NASDAQ company without a separate independent compensation committee, prepare to comply with the requirement to have one. 4
5 Tougher Iran Sanctions Approved by Congress May Affect U.S. Parent Companies By Joan Koenig and George C. McKann The President signed the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (H.R. 1905) into law on August 10, The legislation will significantly strengthen existing Iranian 1 sanctions and will mandate disclosure of activities that are sanctionable in public company annual and quarterly filings pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act ). Export Regulation Most notably, the statute prohibits transactions by foreign businesses that are owned or controlled by a U.S. parent company, making the Iranian sanctions more like those currently in place with respect to Cuba, where non-u.s. foreign entities are included in the definition of parties subject to U.S. jurisdiction. An important provision in the bill requires the imposition of civil penalties of up to twice the amount of the transaction on U.S. parent companies for the activities of their owned or controlled foreign entities that, if undertaken in the U.S. or by a U.S. person, would violate U.S. sanctions law. That is, if a foreign entity owned or controlled by a U.S. parent enters into an unauthorized transaction with an Iranian party, the penalty will be assessed against the U.S. parent company, not the foreign entity. This expansion of U.S. sanctions must be implemented within 60 days of the enactment of the bill, or October 9, Other than ensuring that owned/controlled foreign entities cease all transactions with Iran by October 9 (or obtain OFAC licenses for such activities, which could not possibly be completed in the time allotted), civil penalties can also be avoided if the U.S. parent divests itself of the foreign entity, or its interest therein, no later than 180 days after enactment of the bill. The extra-territorial application of sanctions is likely to be particularly problematic for several reasons. For example, under existing regulations, uncontrolled, or EAR99, medicines may be re-exported to Iran with no license required under the Export Administration Regulations, so long as they were not specifically destined for export to Iran when they left the U.S. (e.g., they are sold from inventory held outside the U.S.). After October 9, 2012, there is no indication that this regulation will change. After that date, however, non-u.s. companies owned or controlled by a U.S. parent will be largely unable to transact business with Iran at all. Therefore, a U.S. company that sells through an unrelated distributor will be in a better position to continue its status quo than a company that sells through an affiliate. In addition, although it is unlikely that other countries will be as hostile to U.S. sanctions against Iran as they are with respect to sanctions against Cuba, many countries, e.g., Canada and countries in the European Union, are currently subject to blocking legislation that prohibits them complying with a very similar extraterritorial restriction against that country. Given that implementing regulations may take years to be drafted and published, it is difficult to predict whether or how these issues may be resolved. Increased Public Company Disclosure Requirements The bill also requires Exchange Act reporting companies beginning with their first annual or quarterly periodic report filed after February 6, 2013 to disclose information 1 Although Syrian sanctions are also referenced, no substantive changes to the Syrian Sanctions Regulations are required as a result of the bill. 5
6 about their Iran-related activities. This required disclosure will force companies to determine whether they or any of their foreign or domestic owned/controlled entities have: > Engaged in any sanctionable activity described in the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 which pertains to Iranian petroleum resources and products and development of Iranian weapons of mass destruction; > Engaged in any activities prohibited by the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability and Devestment Act of 2010 relating to Iranian financial services transactions and transactions with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps or any of its affiliates or representatives; > Transferred any goods, technologies or services to Iranian parties to commit human rights abuses against the people of Iran; or > Engaged in transactions with Specifically Designated Nationals, designated for involvement in terrorist activities, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, or being part of the Government of Iran (including owned/controlled entities), unless authorized by the Office of Foreign Asset Control of the U.S. Treasury. In each Exchange Act periodic report filed after February 6, 2013 the required disclosure must include, for any action taken during the period covered by the report: > The type and extent of the activity; > The gross revenues and net profits from the activity; and > Whether the company or any of its affiliates intends to continue the activity. In addition to the Exchange Act periodic report disclosure, the Exchange Act reporting company must also file a separate report with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which is then required to post the report on the SEC website and send the report to the President, as well as the House Committees on Foreign Affairs and Financial Services and the Senate Committees on Foreign Relations and Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. The President is then charged with investigating whether sanctions should be imposed on the reporting company. Why Your Board Needs to Think about Swaps By Robin Sampson The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) included a mandate for new clearing requirements for swaps. While these requirements will have the biggest impact on financial institutions that act as counterparties to swaps, there are aspects of the new requirements that will impact all companies that enter into swaps. In particular, as described below, a public company will want to make sure that it obtains specific board approval prior to entering into any swaps under the new regime. The new regulatory structure will require swaps to be cleared through a derivatives clearing organization (DCO), reported to a swap data repository (SDR) or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and executed on a designated 6
7 contract market (DCM) or swap execution facility (SEF), unless the swap has been exempted by CFTC rules. Meeting these new requirements will be burdensome to swap participants. The good news is that final rules published by the CFTC this summer clarify and give form to a relatively broad exemption that will provide a less burdensome alternative for most businesses that use swaps solely to hedge their business risks, as long as those businesses meet the criteria for the end user exception. The end-user exception may be elected if one of the counterparties to the swap (1) is not a financial entity, (2) is using the swap to hedge or mitigate commercial risks (such as interest rate changes or currency fluctuations), (3) notifies the CFTC how it meets its financial obligations associated with non-cleared swaps, and (4) elects not to clear the swap. Financial entity includes any entity that is a swap dealer, major swap participant, security-based swap dealer or participant, commodity pool, private fund, ERISA plan, as well as certain banks, but any bank, savings institution or credit union with total assets of less than $10 billion is not a financial entity for purposes of this rule. Certain foreign entities and certain financing affiliates of non-financial entities may also be eligible for the end user exemption. If at least one party is eligible for the end user exception, the parties may take advantage of the exception by reporting notice of election and the identity of the eligible counterparty to a swap data repository (SDR) or, if no SDR is available, to the CFTC. A reporting counterparty must provide the following information: > whether the electing counterparty is a financial entity but eligible for the exception as a small financial institution or as a financial entity acting as an affiliate of a non-financial entity; > whether the swap for which the end user exception is being elected is used to hedge or mitigate commercial risk; > information regarding how the electing counterparty generally meets its financial obligations with respect to non-cleared swaps; and > if the electing counterparty is a public company, whether its board of directors has approved the decision to enter into swaps that are exempt from the swap clearing requirements. Nothing in the rule prohibits a reporting party from providing the information above on a swap by swap basis, but as a practical matter most companies wishing to rely on the end user exception will prefer to provide this information on an annual basis (an improvement upon the initial proposal, which required notification of each and every swap transaction). The final rule went into effect on September 17, 2012, but reporting obligations will not begin until the swap clearing regimen is put into place. This will occur in stages beginning early in 2013 (with reports from end users not due until at least the third quarter of 2013), and for now, there is not much to do except plan ahead. Each public company that expects to take advantage of the end user exception should make sure that its board of directors (or an appropriate committee of the board) has explicitly approved the use of swaps for hedging or mitigating risk and the use of the end user exception for non-cleared swaps, and identified the means through which the issuer meets its financial obligations with respect to non-cleared swaps. This approval and identification should be scheduled at least annually. 7
8 For more information on matters discussed in this alert, please contact any of the Securities lawyers listed below or your regular Drinker Biddle Corporate & Securities Practice Group contact. James Biehl (609) Howard A. Blum (312) Stephen T. Burdumy (215) Troy M. Calkins (312) William H. Clark, Jr. (215) Scott B. Connolly (215) James M. Fischer (973) Michael B. Jordan (215) Gerald P. McCartin (202) Matthew M. McDonald (215) George C. McKann (312) H. John Michel, Jr. (215) Walter J. Mostek, Jr. (610) F. Douglas Raymond III (215) Kimberly K. Rubel (312) Joseph L. Seiler, III (212) Robert C. Juelke (215) Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All rights reserved. A Delaware limited liability partnership Jonathan I. Epstein and Andrew B. Joseph, Partners in Charge of the Princeton and Florham Park, N.J., offices, respectively. This Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP communication is intended to inform our clients and friends of developments in the law and to provide information of general interest. It is not intended to constitute advice regarding any client s legal problems and should not be relied upon as such. CALIFORNIA DELAWARE ILLINOIS NEW JERSEY NEW YORK PENNSYLVANIA WASHINGTON DC WISCONSIN 8
SEC Adopts Final Conflict Mineral Rules
SEC Adopts Final Conflict Mineral Rules By Troy M. Calkins and Peter B. Wolf September 2012 Client Alert The Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission), on August 22, 2012, adopted a final rule
More informationSecurities Update. March Enjoying Life s Little Perks: the NIC Inc. Enforcement Action. By Matthew M. McDonald and Peter J.
March 2011 Securities Update Enjoying Life s Little Perks: the NIC Inc. Enforcement Action By Matthew M. McDonald and Peter J. Lively IN THIS ISSUE 1 Enjoying Life s Little Perks: the NIC Inc. Enforcement
More informationNYSE & NASDAQ Proposed Listing Standards: Compensation Committee Independence & the Role of Compensation Consultants and Other Advisers
To Our Clients and Friends Memorandum friedfrank.com NYSE & NASDAQ Proposed Listing Standards: Compensation Committee Independence & the Role of Compensation Consultants and Other Advisers The New York
More informationSEC Approves Changes to NYSE s and Nasdaq s Listing Standards Regarding Compensation Committees and Compensation Advisers
SEC Approves Changes to NYSE s and Nasdaq s Listing Standards Regarding Compensation Committees and Compensation Advisers The Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC ) recently approved rule changes to
More informationRequirements for Public Company Boards
Public Company Advisory Group Requirements for Public Company Boards Including IPO Transition Rules November 2016 Introduction. 1 The Role and Authority of Independent Directors. 2 The Definition of Independent
More informationCustoms Proposes New Regulations to Recognize Use of Statistical Sampling and Allowable Offsets; Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Client Alert October 2009 Customs Proposes New Regulations to Recognize Use of Statistical Sampling and Allowable Offsets; Notice of Proposed Rulemaking By James Sawyer U.S. Customs and Border Protection
More informationMeridian Client Update
VOLUME 3, ISSUE 13R OCTOBER 10, 2012 Meridian Client Update NYSE and NASDAQ Issue Proposed Listing Rules on Compensation Committee Independence Standards Over two years after the enactment of the Dodd-Frank
More informationNew NYSE and NASDAQ Listing Rules Raise the Accountability of Company Boards and Compensation Committees Through Flexible Standards
New NYSE and NASDAQ Listing Rules Raise the Accountability of Company Boards and Compensation Committees Through Flexible Standards By Todd B. Pfister and Aubrey Refuerzo* On January 11, 2013, the U.S.
More informationADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act
ADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act August 5, 2013 CFTC ISSUES FINAL INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE AND POLICY STATEMENT AND EXEMPTIVE ORDER REGARDING CROSS-BORDER APPLICATION OF DODD-FRANK ACT SWAP PROVISIONS On July 12,
More informationNYSE and Nasdaq Propose Listing Standards on Compensation Committees and Advisers
CLIENT MEMORANDUM NYSE and Nasdaq Propose Listing Standards on Compensation Committees and Advisers October 2, 2012 On September 25, 2012, both the NYSE and Nasdaq proposed listing standards to implement
More informationSEC Approves Final NYSE and NASDAQ Compensation Committee Rules
February 5, 2013 SEC Approves Final NYSE and NASDAQ Compensation Committee Rules Companies are required to comply with certain of the new listing standards relating to compensation adviser independence
More informationDoing business in Iran EHSAN HOSSEINZADEH, ATTORNEY AT LAW & PARTNER AT EDUCATED LAWYERS LAW FIRM
Doing business in Iran EHSAN HOSSEINZADEH, ATTORNEY AT LAW & PARTNER AT EDUCATED LAWYERS LAW FIRM Corporate structure in Iran Limited Liability Private Joint Stock Public Joint Stock Foreigner can possess
More informationNew Mandatory Medicare Secondary Payer Reporting Rules Imminent
Medicare Alert April 2009 New Mandatory Medicare Secondary Payer Reporting Rules Imminent By Daniel W. Krane and Kristy M. Hlavenka Section 111 of the Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007
More informationDelaware Supreme Court Affirms Decision on Funds Legally Available for Redemption
Corporate & Securities Alert January 2012 Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Decision on Funds Legally Available for Redemption By Samuel Mason Summary and Facts The Delaware Supreme Court has affirmed a Chancery
More informationModel COBRA Subsidy Notices Issued
Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Client Alert March 27, 2009 Model COBRA Subsidy Notices Issued The U.S. Department of Labor on March 19, 2009, issued model notices and revised FAQs related to
More informationProposed Rules for End-User Exception to Clearing of Swaps
CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP Please feel free to contact us if we can provide further information on these matters. John W. White 212-474-1732 jwhite@cravath.com B. Robbins Kiessling 212-474-1500 bkiessling@cravath.com
More informationFebruary 22, RIN 3038 AD20 -- Swap Data Repositories. Dear Mr. Stawick:
` February 22, 2011 Mr. David A. Stawick Secretary Commodity Futures Trading Commission Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21 st Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20581 Re: RIN 3038 AD20 -- Swap Data Repositories Dear
More informationInternational Trade Alert
International Trade Alert Enactment of Comprehensive Iran Sanctions Act Expands Extraterritorial Reach of the U.S. Embargo on Iran June 29, 2010 OVERVIEW On June 24, 2010, the U.S. House and Senate voted
More informationEXECUTIVE ORDER RE-IMPOSES U.S. SECONDARY SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN
CLIENT ALERT: EXECUTIVE ORDER RE-IMPOSES U.S. SECONDARY SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN August 14, 2018 Introduction On May 8, 2018 President Trump announced that the United States was withdrawing from the Joint
More informationSanctions Compliance American Petroleum Institute March 27-28, 2017
Sanctions Compliance American Petroleum Institute March 27-28, 2017 Alan Kashdan International Trade Department Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP Page 2 I. Introduction Introduction Sanctions are very much in
More informationAML and U.S. Sanctions Laws Recent Developments Anti-Money Laundering Seminar January 24, 2018 Beijing, PRC
AML and U.S. Sanctions Laws Recent Developments Anti-Money Laundering Seminar January 24, 2018 Beijing, PRC Joseph T. Lynyak III, Partner, Washington, DC Lanier Saperstein, Partner, New York Agenda Overview
More informationSenate Adopts New Sanctions Targeting Russia and Iran
Senate Adopts New Sanctions Targeting Russia and Iran June 16, 2017 On June 15, 2017, the United States Senate adopted S.722, incorporating the Countering Russian Influence in Europe and Eurasia Act of
More informationSpecial Challenges in Documenting the Source of Funds for Clients from Transitional Countries
Where, Investor, Are You From? Country Specific Issues Cletus M. Weber (dl), Mercer Island, WA Doreen M. Edelman, Washington DC Robert P. Gaffney, San Francisco, CA Special Challenges in Documenting the
More informationCode Section 162(m) An Overview of Performance-Based Compensation
Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Client Alert October 2008 Code Section 162(m) An Overview of Performance-Based Compensation Code Section 162(m) limits the amount of annual compensation that
More informationHealth Plans: What s Next? Transitioning to Health Care Reform: So You Think You d Like Your Plan To Be Grandfathered
Health Plans: What s Next? Drinker Biddle s Health Care Reform Update for Employee Benefit Plans Transitioning to Health Care Reform: So You Think You d Like Your Plan To Be Grandfathered The grandfathered
More informationU.S. Economic Sanctions Iran Update March 2017
U.S. Economic Sanctions Iran Update March 2017 Presented by Kay Georgi, Arent Fox LLP LA / NY / SF / DC / arentfox.com Iran 2 Iran Key Things to Know about Sanctions Programs Recent changes in US and EU
More informationGovCon OnDemand: U.S. Sanctions on Trade with Iran - Update on Restrictions Applicable to U.S. and Non-U.S. Persons
GovCon OnDemand: U.S. Sanctions on Trade with Iran - Update on Restrictions Applicable to U.S. and Non-U.S. Persons April 20, 2012 John Barker, Partner Washington, DC Baruch Weiss, Partner Washington,
More informationAfter 408(b)(2): Benchmarking Reasonableness
After 408(b)(2): Benchmarking Reasonableness FRED REISH, ESQ. Fred.Reish@dbr.com www.linkedin.com/in/fredreish April 27, 2012 Plan Expenses under ERISA The fiduciary responsibility rule in ERISA 404(a)(1)(A)
More informationInternational Trade Compliance and Enforcement Bulletin
International Trade Compliance and Enforcement Bulletin February 8, 2016 Changes to Iran Sanctions Provide a Few Business Opportunities, but Many Hurdles Authors: On January 16, 2016, the International
More informationSeptember 4, The Honorable David S. Cohen Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence
VIA E MAIL September 4, 2012 The Honorable David S. Cohen Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence The Honorable Adam J. Szubin Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control U.S. Department
More informationSelective OFAC Guideline Relating to the Lifting of Certain U.S. Sanctions Under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) on Implementation Day
Issued on January 16, 2016 Last Updated on December 15, 2016 Selective OFAC Guideline Relating to the Lifting of Certain U.S. Sanctions Under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) on Implementation
More informationGroup Sanctions Policy
Group Sanctions Policy 1. Purpose This Policy provides instruction with regards to the treatment of, and compliance with, sanctions or restrictive measures imposed on countries, territories, entities,
More informationCLIENT UPDATE FINAL CFTC RULES ON CLEARING EXEMPTION FOR SWAPS BETWEEN CERTAIN AFFILIATED ENTITIES
CLIENT UPDATE FINAL CFTC RULES ON CLEARING EXEMPTION FOR SWAPS BETWEEN CERTAIN AFFILIATED ENTITIES NEW YORK Byungkwon Lim +1 212 909 6571 blim@debevoise.com Emilie T. Hsu +1 212 909 6884 ehsu@debevoise.com
More informationImpact on End Users of Swaps
Dodd-Frank One-Year Anniversary: Impact on End Users of Swaps Presented by Daniel N. Budofsky Susan C. Ervin Gabriel D. Rosenberg (Moderator) July 28, 2011 Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP Presenters Daniel N.
More informationSEC Staff Releases Report on Hedge Funds
By Michael P. Malloy Click the image to view our investment management capabilities Michael P. Malloy Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP Philadelphia, PA 215-988-2978 215-988-2757 (fax) Michael.Malloy@dbr.com
More informationJune 8, v1
June 8, 2012 VIA ONLINE SUBMISSION Mr. David Stawick, Secretary Commodity Futures Trading Commission Three Lafayette Center 1155 21 st Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20581 RE: RIN No. 3038-AD18 Comments
More informationInternational Trade & Regulatory ADVISORY
International Trade & Regulatory ADVISORY February 15, 2012 United States Freezes Government of Iran Assets; Chart Summarizing Recent U.S. Sanctions on Iran Effective February 6, 2012, the Obama Administration
More informationClient Alert July 3, 2014
Client Alert July 3, 2014 SEC Adopts Final Rules and Guidance Regarding the Cross- Border Application of Security- Based Swap Dealer and Major Security-Based Swap Participant Definitions Nearly four years
More informationFinal Stock Exchange Rules for Compensation Committees and Advisers
Final Stock Exchange Rules for Compensation Committees and Advisers SEC Approves NYSE and Nasdaq Revised Listing Standards; Board Action Required by July 1, 2013 with Regard to Compensation Committee Authority
More informationCOMMENTARY. Dodd-Frank Derivatives 101: What In-House. The Basics JONES DAY
November 2012 JONES DAY COMMENTARY Dodd-Frank Derivatives 101: What In-House Counsel Needs to Know Now So you are in-house counsel to a company that, either occasionally or on a regular basis, enters into
More informationCo r p o r at e a n d
Co r p o r at e a n d Securities Law Update July 2010 Analysis of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act Executive Compensation, Corporate Governance and Enforcement Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act Affecting
More informationDe r i vat i v e s a n d
De r i vat i v e s a n d Trading Update July 2010 Analysis of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act OTC Derivatives Reform: Wall Street Transparency and Accountability Act of 2010 I. Introduction Title
More informationClawbacks in the Aftermath of Madoff and Other Investment Frauds
Hedge Fund Alert March 11, 2009 Clawbacks in the Aftermath of Madoff and Other Investment Frauds By Bennett W. Lasko Thousands of investors that entrusted money to Bernard Madoff or one of the feeder funds
More informationAdditional U.S. Sanctions with Respect to Iran Signed Into Law on August 10, 2012: The Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012.
Additional U.S. Sanctions with Respect to Iran Signed Into Law on August 10, 2012: The Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012. August 15, 2012 Introduction On August 1, 2012, the U.S.
More informationAdditional U.S. Sanctions with Respect to Iran Signed Into Law on January 2, 2013
Additional U.S. Sanctions with Respect to Iran Signed Into Law on January 2, 2013 January 7, 2013 Introduction On January 2, 2013, President Obama signed into law the Iran Freedom and Counter-Proliferation
More information(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS
7.8.2018 L 199 I/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2018/1100 of 6 June 2018 amending the Annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 protecting against the effects
More informationImplementation of Title VII of Dodd-Frank
SEC Issues Proposed Rules to Mitigate Potential Conflicts of Interest in the Operation of Security-Based Swap Clearing Agencies, Security- Based Swap Execution Facilities and Security-Based Swap Exchanges
More informationSwap Clearinghouses and Markets
Capital Markets 1 Swap Clearinghouses and Markets An objective of Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act is to create a structure and incentives to expand preand post-execution transparency for swaps and security-based
More informationA Director s Guide to the Final Nasdaq Corporate Governance Rules. Table of Contents. Introduction and Use of this Guide.. 3
Table of Contents Introduction and Use of this Guide.. 3 Implementation of New Rules 4 Board of Directors Provisions.... 4 Majority Independent Directors and Independence Definition Executive Sessions
More informationCFTC, SEC Propose to Delay the Applicability of Certain Swap Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act
June 17, 2011 CFTC, SEC Propose to Delay the Applicability of Certain Swap Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act The general effective date for most provisions under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
More informationExpanding The Extraterritorial Reach Of US Sanctions
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Expanding The Extraterritorial Reach Of US Sanctions
More informationAlert Memo. Dodd-Frank Corporate Governance Proposed Rules: Compensation Committee and Adviser Independence
Alert Memo APRIL 11, 2011 Dodd-Frank Corporate Governance Proposed Rules: Compensation Committee and Adviser Independence On March 30, 2011, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC ) released
More informationDemystifying Dodd Frank s Impact on Corporate Hedging
Demystifying Dodd Frank s Impact on Corporate Hedging Overview Section 1: Dodd Frank on Swaps and the End User Section 2: How Companies Can prepare Section 3: What Tools are Available? 2 Section 1: End
More informationAn Excerpt From: K&L Gates Global Government Solutions 2012: Annual Outlook
An Excerpt From: K&L Gates Global Government Solutions 2012: Annual Outlook January 2012 An Update on the U.S. Iran Embargo: A Proliferation of Anti-proliferation Measures The past two years have brought
More informationInterest Rate Risk Management Refresher. April 27, Presented to: Section I. Basics of Interest Rate Hedging?
Interest Rate Risk Management Refresher April 27, 2012 Presented to: Section I Basics of Interest Rate Hedging? What Is An Interest Rate Hedge? Interest rate hedges are contracts between parties designed
More informationU.S. House of Representatives Passes Comprehensive OTC Derivatives Legislation
U.S. House of Representatives Passes Comprehensive OTC Derivatives Legislation House of Representatives Passes in H.R. 4173, the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009, Which Includes Compromise
More informationKey Dodd-Frank Compliance Considerations for End-Users
August 31, 2012 Key Dodd-Frank Compliance Considerations for End-Users Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act ) requires the CFTC and SEC
More informationSEC Re-Proposes Rules Establishing a U.S. Personnel Test for Application of Dodd-Frank Security-Based Swap Requirements
June 15, 2015 clearygottlieb.com SEC Re-Proposes Rules Establishing a U.S. Personnel Test for Application of Dodd-Frank Security-Based Swap Requirements On April 29, 2015, the U.S. Securities and Exchange
More informationThis Webcast Will Begin Shortly
This Webcast Will Begin Shortly If you have any technical problems with the Webcast or the streaming audio, please contact us via email at: webcast@acc.com Thank You! "Global Economic Sanctions: Cross-Border
More informationInternational Trade Practice May 18, 2004
PRESIDENT IMPLEMENTS SANCTIONS AGAINST SYRIA International Trade Practice On May 11, 2004, President Bush issued Executive Order No. 13338 (the Order ) implementing the Syrian Accountability and Lebanese
More informationInvestment Management Developments
May 2009 Investment Management Developments IN THIS ISSUE 1 Eighth Circuit Opinion Underscores the Need for Process in Advisory Contract Reviews 2 Supreme Court Scheduled to Hear Appeal of Jones v. Harris
More informationRe: Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and Certain Interests In, and Relationships With, Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds
Via Internet: www.regulations.gov February 13, 2012 Office of the Comptroller of the Currency 250 E Street, S.W., Mail Stop 2-3 Washington, D.C. 20219 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 20th
More informationGCD. Client Memorandum. SEC Approves NYSE and Nasdaq Rules Governing Shareholder Approval of Equity Compensation Plans
GCD Gardner Carton & Douglas Corporate & Securities Client Memorandum July 2003 SEC Approves NYSE and Nasdaq Rules Governing Shareholder Approval of Equity Compensation Plans Executive Overview The Facts
More informationThe Fiduciary Re-Proposal: The New Definition and Its Consequences
The Fiduciary Re-Proposal: The New Definition and Its Consequences FRED REISH, ESQ. Fred.Reish@dbr.com www.linkedin.com/in/fredreish April 27, 2012 Fiduciary Status for Investment Advice The Department
More informationKey Differences Between the CFTC and SEC Final Business Conduct Standards and Related Cross-Border Requirements
SECURITIES May 26, 2016 Dodd-Frank Implementation Update Key Differences Between the CFTC and SEC Final Business Conduct Standards and Related Cross-Border Requirements By Paul M. Architzel, Dan M. Berkovitz,
More informationADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act
ADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act May 7, 2012 CFTC AND SEC JOINTLY ADOPT FINAL SWAP ENTITY DEFINITION RULES On April 18, 2012, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ( CFTC ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission
More informationDodd-frank implementation update: key differences between the CFTC and SEC final business conduct standards and related cross-border requirements
Dodd-frank implementation update: key differences between the CFTC and SEC final business conduct standards and related cross-border requirements Paul M. Architzel, Dan M. Berkovitz, Gail Bernstein, Seth
More informationThe Impact of Proposed Volcker Rule Regulations on Activities of Non-U.S. Banks Outside of the United States
October 18, 2011 The Impact of Proposed Volcker Rule Regulations on Activities of Non-U.S. Banks Outside of the United States Contents Last week, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the
More informationCorporate and Securities Law Update
Corporate and Securities Law Update NASDAQ Corporate Governance Standards for Listed Companies December 11, 2003 On November 4, 2003, the SEC approved the final version of The NASDAQ Stock Market s corporate
More informationTo Our Clients and Friends Memorandum friedfrank.com
To Our Clients and Friends Memorandum friedfrank.com CFTC Update: CFTC Proposes New Position Limits and Aggregation Rules 1 Introduction On November 5, 2013, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (
More informationU.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 Telephone: (202) 418-5000 Facsimile: (202) 418-5521 www.cftc.gov CFTC Letter 17-27 No-Action
More informationADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act
ADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act January 19, 2012 CFTC FINALIZES RULES ON SWAP DATA RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING AND REAL-TIME REPORTING On December 20, 2011, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ( CFTC or Commission
More informationRelease No ; ; IC-31450; File No. S Disclosure of Hedging by Employees, Officers and Directors
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/17/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-02948, and on FDsys.gov 8011-01p SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
More informationThe Legacy of the Hedge Fund Adviser Registration Rule
The Legacy of the Hedge Fund Adviser Registration Rule By Michael P. Malloy, Joshua B. Deringer and Jillian L. Bosmann This article first appeared in the Summer 2006 issue of The Investment Adviser s Counsel.
More informationOpportunities While Meeting Strict,
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Latest Iran Sanctions: Leveraging New Opportunities While Meeting Strict, Rapidly Changing Requirements WEDNESDAY, MARCH 19, 2014 1pm Eastern 12pm
More informationIntroduction to the Commercial End-User Exception to Mandatory Clearing of Swaps and Security-Based Swaps Under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act
March 2016 Practice Group: Investment Management, Hedge Funds and Alternative Investments Introduction to the Commercial End-User Exception to Mandatory Clearing of Swaps and Security-Based Swaps By Anthony
More informationEconomic Sanctions Procedure
Economic Sanctions Procedure Short description ArcelorMittal and its employees conduct business in more than 60 nations around the world and, accordingly, are subject to various economic sanctions laws.
More informationTHE DODD-FRANK ACT & DERIVATIVES MARKET
THE DODD-FRANK ACT & DERIVATIVES MARKET By Khader Shaik Author of Managing Derivatives Contracts This presentation can be used as a supplement to Chapter 9 - The Dodd-Frank Act Agenda Introduction Major
More informationWhat s Next? Health Plans: Drinker Biddle s Health Care Reform Update for Employee Benefit Plans
Health Plans: What s Next? Drinker Biddle s Health Care Reform Update for Employee Benefit Plans IRS Proposed Regulations Provide Additional Guidance For Compliance With the Employer Shared Responsibility
More informationWhat End-Users of Derivatives Need to Know About the Dodd-Frank Act
What End-Users of Derivatives Need to Know About the Dodd-Frank Act Prepared By: The Securities and Futures Regulation Group Many companies, both large and small, enter into over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives
More informationIn January the Securities and Exchange Commission
February 7, 2003 I NVESTMENT M ANAGEMENT A LERT SEC Adopts Financial Expert Regulations In January the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC ) adopted final regulations implementing public disclosure
More informationSwap Execution Facility Requirements
CFTC Proposes Rules for SUMMARY The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the CFTC ) has proposed rules setting forth requirements for Swap Execution Facilities ( SEFs ). 1 SEFs are a new type of regulated
More informationUS OTC derivatives reforms Impact on UK and other non-us asset managers. Second update October 2013
US OTC derivatives reforms Impact on UK and other non-us asset managers Second update October 2013 Table of contents Important notes 1. Dodd Frank decision tree 2. What is regulated as a swap? 3. When
More informationCFTC and SEC Issue Final Swap-Related Rules Under Title VII of Dodd-Frank
CFTC and SEC Issue Final Swap-Related Rules Under Title VII of Dodd-Frank CFTC and SEC Issue Final Rules and Guidance to Further Define the Terms Swap Dealer, Security-Based Swap Dealer, Major Swap Participant,
More informationInterest Rate Risk Management Refresher. April 29, Presented to: Howard Sakin Section I. Basics of Interest Rate Hedging?
Interest Rate Risk Management Refresher April 29, 2011 Presented to: Howard Sakin 410-237-5315 Section I Basics of Interest Rate Hedging? 1 What Is An Interest Rate Hedge? Interest rate hedges are contracts
More informationUnited States Fashion Industry Association Export Control Compliance & OFAC Sanctions
United States Fashion Industry Association Export Control Compliance & OFAC Sanctions July 23, 2014 Standard Disclaimer You (and each of your employees, representatives, or other agents) are expressly
More informationMAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DIFFERENCES PURSUANT TO NYSE LISTED COMPANY MANUAL SECTION 303A.
MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DIFFERENCES PURSUANT TO NYSE LISTED COMPANY MANUAL SECTION 303A.11 March 28, 2018 MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT
More informationU.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 Telephone: (202) 418-5000 Facsimile: (202) 418-5521 www.cftc.gov CFTC Letter 15-24 No-Action
More informationINTRODUCTION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY S OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL (OFAC) November 1, 2017
INTRODUCTION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY S OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL (OFAC) November 1, 2017 Outline OFAC Overview Legal Authority Jurisdiction Sanctions Programs Designation Process
More informationADOPTING THE AUGUST 2012 ISDA PROTOCOL FOR DODD FRANK SWAP REQUIREMENTS
ADOPTING THE AUGUST 2012 ISDA PROTOCOL FOR DODD FRANK SWAP REQUIREMENTS Thompson & Knight Notes on the ISDA August 2012 DF Protocol (the Protocol ) I. Introduction 1 The Protocol is the first of a planned
More informationCross-Border Regulatory and National Security Client Alert:
August 3, 2017 CONTACT Dara Panahy Partner +1-202-835-7521 dpanahy@milbank.com Bijan Ganji +1-202-835-7543 bganji@milbank.com Lafayette Greenfield +1-202-835-7564 lgreenfield@milbank.com Santiago Zalazar
More informationRequest for Relief Relating to Aggregation Provision in Final Block Trade Rule
17 C.F.R. Part 43 Mr. Richard Shilts Director, Division of Market Oversight 1155 21st Street NW Three Lafayette Centre Washington, DC 20581 Re: Request for Relief Relating to Aggregation Provision in Final
More informationKERNS, PITROF, FROST & PEARLMAN, L.L.C.
KERNS, PITROF, FROST & PEARLMAN, L.L.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 333 WEST WACKER DRIVE SUITE 1840 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60606 DIRECT DIAL: 312-261-4552 TEL. 312-261-4550 E-MAIL: epitrof@kpfplaw.com FAX: 312-261-4565
More informationOn July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank
S k a d d e n, A r p s, S l a t e, M e a g h e r & F l o m L L P & A f f i l i a t e s If you have any questions regarding the matters discussed in this memorandum, please contact the following attorneys
More informationHRS Insight Human Resource Services
HRS Insight Human Resource Services 11/08 April 4, 2011 SEC Releases Proposed Rule on Listing Standards for Compensation Committees Authored by: Charlie Wheeler, Brandon Yerre and Kamal Chakravarti The
More informationU.S. Economic Sanctions: Current Landscape, Recent Activity, and New Developments
U.S. Economic Sanctions: Current Landscape, Recent Activity, and New Developments Speaker Meredith Rathbone Associate Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Lex Mundi member firm for Washington D.C. mrathbone@steptoe.com
More informationEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PROVISIONS IN THE DODD-FRANK U.S. FINANCIAL REGULATORY REFORM BILL
June 30, 2010 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PROVISIONS IN THE DODD-FRANK U.S. FINANCIAL REGULATORY REFORM BILL To Our Clients and Friends: On June 30, 2010, the U.S. House of Representatives
More informationANNEX ANNEX. to the COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /...
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 6.6.2018 C(2018) 3572 final ANNEX ANNEX to the COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... amending the Annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 of 22 November 1996 protecting
More informationDodd-Frank Title VII Update: Where Are We Today and Where Are We Going? Ten Important Issues Facing Derivatives Users
Dodd-Frank Title VII Update: Where Are We Today and Where Are We Going? Ten Important Issues Facing Derivatives Users Nov 07, 2011 Top Ten By James M. Cain This resource is sponsored by: Where Are We Today?
More informationAGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury. SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury s Office of Foreign Assets
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/23/2016 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2016-30968, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Office of
More information