Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009"

Transcription

1 Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009 March 2011 The Florida Legislature s Office of Economic and Demographic Research

2

3 Executive Summary Office of Economic and Demographic Research Prior to this year, the Review of Federal Funding to Florida report was published annually by the former Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations (LCIR). However, the LCIR was not funded in the General Appropriations Act, and the Committee ceased operations on June 30, The Florida Legislature s Office of Economic and Demographic Research (EDR) has assumed responsibility for the future publication of this annual report. The purpose of this report is to provide Florida s federal, state, and local officials and other interested parties with a review of federal financial assistance to Florida in fiscal year 2009 using data released by the U.S. Census Bureau in August In particular, it focuses on federal grant expenditures to Florida s state and local governments. This report should be useful for making statistical comparisons among states of various federal agencies funding programs. Additionally, it should be instructive to decision makers working to develop consensus on priorities and strategies for increasing the state s receipt of federal funding. This summary begins with a brief overview of the two major classifications of federal financial assistance provided to states: 1) federal direct expenditures and 2) other financial assistance. Federal Direct to Florida Federal direct expenditures consist of actual funding outlays or obligations of the federal government. These expenditures are reported Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009 by the U.S. Census Bureau in five categories: 1) direct payments for individuals for retirement and disability, 2) direct payments for individuals other than for retirement and disability, 3) grants, 4) procurement contracts, and 5) salaries & wages. In 2009, federal direct expenditures to Florida totaled $176 billion or $9,477 per capita, based on the state s 2009 population estimate of 18.5 million. 1 Florida had the 4 th largest expenditure of all states, unchanged from On a per capita basis, Florida ranked 34 th among the states, up from 35 th. It should be noted that the significant increase in federal direct expenditures to Florida from $150 billion in 2008 to $176 billion in 2009 reflects additional federal stimulus monies made available to states by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), which was signed into law in February Direct payments for individuals for retirement and disability constituted the largest category of federal direct expenditure. This category includes Social Security payments, federal retirement and disability payments, and veterans benefits. Florida s direct payments for retirement and disability totaled $62.3 billion, or $3,360 per capita, and accounted for 36 percent of the state s total federal direct expenditures. Florida had the 2 nd largest expenditure total of the fifty states and ranked 7 th on a per capita basis, both rankings unchanged from All population figures are based on the U.S. Census Bureau s annual population estimates for states prior to the release of revised intercensal state population estimates consistent with the 2010 decennial census. i

4 Considering Florida s large elderly and retiree populations, these rankings should come as no surprise. According to state population projections produced by the U.S. Census Bureau, Florida s elderly population, defined as age 65 years and over, will total 3.4 million in 2010 and account for 8.5 percent of the nation s total elderly population of 40.2 million. The elderly will constitute nearly 18 percent of the state s total population in Relative to other age groupings, the proportion of the states total population defined as elderly is projected to be greater in Florida than in any other state. The next largest category of federal direct expenditure was direct payments for individuals other than for retirement and disability. This category includes such items as Medicare, Excess Earned Income Tax Credits, Unemployment Compensation, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. These payments to Florida totaled $50.7 billion, or $2,733 per capita, and accounted for 29 percent of the state s total federal direct expenditures. Florida had the 3 rd largest expenditure total of the fifty states, unchanged from 2008, and ranked 14 th on a per capita basis, down from 9 th in Federal grant obligations to Florida totaled $32.0 billion, or $1,725 per capita, and represented 18 percent of total federal direct expenditures to the state. Florida had the 4 th largest obligations total of the fifty states, up from 7 th in 2008; and the state ranked 48 th on a per capita basis, up from 50 th in As a result of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, federal grant obligations to Florida increased nearly $12 billion from $20.2 billion in The value of procurement contract obligations totaled $18.5 billion, or $1,000 per capita, and accounted for 11 percent of the state s total federal direct expenditures. Florida had the 6 th largest obligations total of the fifty states, unchanged from 2008, and ranked 29 th on a per capita basis, up from 32 nd in The smallest category of federal direct expenditures to Florida was salaries and wages. Such payments totaled $12.2 billion, or $659 per capita, and accounted for 7 percent of total federal direct expenditures to the state. Florida had the 7 th largest expenditure total of the fifty states, down from 5 th in 2008; and the state ranked 35 th on a per capita basis, unchanged from Other Financial Assistance to Florida Other financial assistance consists of the face value of federal insurance coverage as well as the dollar volume of federal guaranteed and direct loans. Other financial assistance to Florida totaled $498 billion or $26,839 per capita. The state ranked first among the fifty states in both total and per capita assistance due to the significant face value of flood insurance coverage provided to Florida, which constituted 95 percent of total other financial assistance provided to the state. The total amounts of other federal assistance to Florida are summarized below: Face Value of Insurance Coverage Total: $473 billion; Rank: 1 st (1 st in 2008) Per Capita: $25,501; Rank: 1 st (1 st in 2008) Dollar Volume of Guaranteed Loans Total: $22.7 billion; Rank: 4 th (3 rd in 2008) Per Capita: $1,224; Rank: 45 th (41 st in 2008) ii Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009

5 Dollar Volume of Direct Loans Total: $2.1 billion; Rank: 7 th (16 th in 2008) Per Capita: $115; Rank: 36 th (42 nd in 2008) Florida Compared to the Most Populous States The U.S. Census Bureau reported that the federal direct expenditures (i.e., direct payments for individuals for retirement and disability, direct payments for individuals other than for retirement and disability, grants, procurement contracts, and salaries and wages) to the fifty states totaled $3.14 trillion in 2009, up from $2.70 trillion in The combined federal direct expenditures to the seven most populous states of California, Texas, New York, Florida, Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Ohio, totaled $1.30 trillion or 42 percent of the fifty states total. The total federal direct expenditures of the seven most populous states are as follows: 1. California: $346 billion 2. Texas: $227 billion 3. New York: $195 billion 4. Florida: $176 billion 5. Pennsylvania: $136 billion 6. Illinois: $116 billion 7. Ohio: $108 billion However, as illustrated below, the states respective rankings change when controlling for population differences. The per capita federal direct expenditures of these same seven states are as follows: 1. Pennsylvania: $10,936 (1 st in 2008) 2. New York: $9,978 (2 nd in 2008) 3. Florida: $9,477 (4 th in 2008) 4. California: $9,360 (5 th in 2008) 5. Ohio: $9,354 (6 th in 2008) 6. Texas: $9,164 (3 rd in 2008) 7. Illinois: $8,990 (7 th in 2008) Florida s Receipt of Federal Grants Federal grants continue to be significant sources of revenue. Among other things, they are used by state and local governments to provide necessary infrastructure and services to their residents. Federal grant expenditures (i.e., actual outlays) to the fifty states totaled $532 billion in fiscal year Although federal grant obligations to Florida totaled $32.0 billion in 2009, all those monies have not yet been expended. Actual federal grant expenditures to our state and local governments totaled $22.7 billion, or $1,224 per capita. Florida had the 4 th largest federal grants expenditure of the fifty states, unchanged from 2008, and the state ranked 48 th on a per capita basis, down from 46 th. The grant funding received from six federal departments (Health and Human Services, Education, Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Agriculture, and Homeland Security) totaled $21.9 billion and accounted for 96 percent of all grants expenditures to Florida. Summaries of these grant expenditures to Florida, as well as some of the more well-known program categories within these departments, are listed below: Health and Human Services Grants Total: $13.6 billion; Rank: 5 th (5 th in 2008) Per Capita: $732; Rank: 46 th (46 th in 2008) Administration for Children and Families Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009 iii

6 Education Grants Total: $2.2 billion; Rank: 5 th (4 th in 2008) Per Capita: $119; Rank: 40 th (37 th in 2008) Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Office of Vocational and Adult Education Transportation Grants Total: $2.0 billion; Rank: 6 th (4 th in 2008) Per Capita: $110; Rank: 50 th (37 th in 2008) Federal Aviation Administration Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Housing & Urban Development Grants Total: $1.7 billion; Rank: 6 th (8 th in 2008) Per Capita: $93; Rank: 32 nd (30 th in 2008) Community Planning and Development Housing Programs Agriculture Grants Total: $1.4 billion; Rank: 4 th (4 th in 2008) Per Capita: $77; Rank: 39 th (40 th in 2008) Food and Nutrition Services National Institute of Food and Agriculture Rural Development Activities Homeland Security Grants Total: $910 million; Rank: 5 th (3 rd in 2008) Per Capita: $49; Rank: 26 th (18 th in 2008) Domestic Preparedness and Antiterrorism Programs Federal Emergency Management Agency Federal Grants to Florida in Recent Years The following table illustrates the increases in federal grant expenditures to Florida since Federal Grant to Florida Total % Chg. Per Capita 2009 $22.7 billion 9.8% $1, $20.7 billion 3.1% $1, $20.0 billion 4.8% $1, $19.1 billion 0.4% $1, $19.0 billion 4.8% $1, $18.2 billion 5.3% $1, $17.3 billion 14.7% $1, $15.0 billion 13.1% $ $13.3 billion 13.9% $ $11.7 billion 8.0% $ $10.8 billion 10.8% $ $9.8 billion 14.7% $ $8.5 billion 0.7% $ $8.4 billion - $586 Florida s per capita federal grant expenditure increased from $586 in 1996 to $1,224 in However, in spite of the increase in grant expenditures during this time period, the state s per capita rankings remained in the lowest quintile. Conclusion Although this report provides an overview of the various types of federal funding to Florida, the focus is on federal grant expenditures. Despite Florida s low per capita federal grants expenditure, 48 th in 2009, federal assistance to our state, primarily in the form of grant funding, accounted for 35 percent of state government s total direct revenue during the fiscal year, according to the Florida iv Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009

7 Consensus Estimating Conference s Long Term Revenue Analysis (Fall 2009). As the result of lower than normal state revenue collections and the infusion of additional grant funding via the federal stimulus, the share of federal assistance, as a percentage of Florida s total direct revenues, has increased in recent years. Numerous reasons exist for Florida s low per capita federal grants funding; however, three likely explanations are of particular significance. First, many funding formulas are based on outdated population figures or other factors that do not reflect the state s rapid growth in recent decades. Congressional support to revise funding formula inequities may be difficult to obtain if other states stand to lose federal funds under revised formulas that benefit Florida. Second, small state minimums in formula allocations disadvantage more populous states like Florida. Third, Florida may not be aggressively pursuing all federal grant opportunities. Additional explanations include a lack of sufficient state matching funds, federal strings or policy requirements serving as conditions for receipt of federal grants funding, and cutbacks in federal funding. In 2009, Florida s per capita federal grants expenditure was $513 less than the national average (i.e., the national per capita grants expenditure). Historically, Florida s per capita grants expenditures have been consistently less than the respective national average, as illustrated below. Comparison of Florida and National Per Capita Federal Grants Florida National Difference 2009 $1,224 $1,737 ($513) Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year $1,127 $1,480 ($353) 2007 $1,098 $1,429 ($331) 2006 $1,059 $1,354 ($295) 2005 $1,072 $1,329 ($257) 2004 $1,045 $1,357 ($312) 2003 $1,014 $1,294 ($280) 2002 $900 $1,222 ($322) 2001 $811 $1,103 ($292) 2000 $731 $1,008 ($278) 1999 $715 $975 ($260) 1998 $654 $910 ($256) 1997 $580 $830 ($249) 1996 $586 $823 ($237) By taking Florida s expenditure difference in a given year and multiplying it by the respective statewide population, it is possible to calculate the amount of additional federal grant funding that would have been received by Florida had the state s per capita grants expenditures equaled the national average. In 2009, this figure would have equaled $9.5 billion. If the state s per capita grants expenditure had equaled just the national average in each year during the 1996 to 2009 time period, then Florida would have received $71.5 billion more in federal grant funding, as illustrated below. Additional Grant Funding to FL If State s Per Capita Expenditure Equaled National Average Difference Population Funding 2009 ($513) 18,537,969 $9.5 billion 2008 ($353) 18,328,340 $6.5 billion 2007 ($331) 18,251,243 $6.0 billion 2006 ($295) 18,057,508 $5.3 billion 2005 ($257) 17,768,191 $4.6 billion 2004 ($312) 17,385,430 $5.4 billion 2003 ($280) 17,019,068 $4.8 billion 2002 ($322) 16,713,149 $5.4 billion 2001 ($292) 16,396,515 $4.8 billion 2000 ($278) 15,982,378 $4.4 billion 1999 ($260) 15,111,244 $3.9 billion 1998 ($256) 14,915,980 $3.8 billion 1997 ($249) 14,653,945 $3.7 billion 1996 ($237) 14,399,985 $3.4 billion Total $71.5 billion v

8 The Federal Funding chart on the following page shows the relative magnitude of various federal spending programs in Florida. However, in terms of Florida s economy, the infusion of federal direct expenditures has the most immediate impact. While the provision of other financial assistance - particularly the flood insurance portion - is vitally important to Florida s longer term financial health, the real economy benefits most directly from the annual federal spending that transfers into ongoing purchases of goods and services. In this regard, federal direct expenditures were equal to 26.1% of the state s real gross domestic product in Many of the federal dollars directly increase the purchasing power of individuals. Among the states, Florida ranked 9 th and 5 th, respectively, in per capita Social Security payments and Medicare Benefits spending in As the Classification of State Receipts chart on the following page illustrates, the State of Florida is also heavily reliant on federal dollars as well. In terms of the revenues flowing into the state s accounting system, stimulus-boosted federal assistance made up 41.2% (about $28.4 billion) of all state revenues received in fiscal year vi Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009

9 Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009 vii

10 This page was intentionally left blank. viii Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009

11 Table of Contents Page # Introduction...1 Part One: Federal Financial Assistance to Florida...3 A. Introduction...3 B. Data Source...3 C. Federal Financial Assistance to Florida...3 D. Federal Direct for Grants Summary...9 E. Other Financial Assistance Face Value of Insurance Coverage Dollar Volume of Guaranteed Loans Dollar Volume of Direct Loans Summary...12 F. Conclusion...12 Part Two: Federal Direct to Florida Counties...29 A. Introduction...29 B. Data Source...29 C. Geographic Coding of Federal Direct...29 D. Federal Direct by County Federal Direct by Category Per Capita Federal Direct by Category Federal Direct by Category as a Percentage of Total...31 E. Conclusion...31 Part Three: Federal Grants to Florida s State and Local Governments...39 A. Introduction...39 Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009 ix

12 B. Data Sources...39 C. Federal Grants by Department or Agency...40 D. Conclusion...41 Part Four: Florida s Per Capita Federal Grant by Agency as a Percentage of the National Per Capita Expenditure...67 A. Introduction...67 B. Data Sources...67 C. States Per Capita Federal Grant by Agency...67 D. Conclusion...68 Appendix A: Federal Direct by County Geographic Area: Federal Fiscal Years 1998 to Appendix B: Websites of Federal Agencies and Departments x Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009

13 List of Graphs and Tables Office of Economic and Demographic Research Part One: Florida s Federal Direct and Other Financial Assistance Page # Table 1-1: Summary...13 Table 1-2: for...14 Table 1-3:...15 Table 1-4: Grant Obligations...16 Table 1-5: Contract Obligations...18 Table 1-6: Salary and Wage...20 Table 1-7: States Percentage Share of Federal Direct by Category...22 Table 1-8: Face Value of Federal Insurance Coverages...24 Table 1-9: Dollar Volume of Federal Guaranteed Loans...25 Table 1-10: Dollar Volume of Federal Direct Loans...26 Table 1-11: States Percentage Share of Other Financial Assistance by Category...27 Part Two: Federal Direct to Florida Counties Table 2-1: Total by County...32 Table 2-2: Per Capita by County...34 Table 2-3: Total by County Category as % of Total...36 Part Three: Federal Grant to Florida s State and Local Governments Table 3-1: Summary...43 Table 3-2: U.S. Department of Agriculture...44 Table 3-3: U.S. Department of Commerce...45 Table 3-4: U.S. Department of Defense...46 Table 3-5: U.S. Department of Education...47 Table 3-6: U.S. Department of Energy...48 Table 3-7: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency...49 Table 3-8: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services...50 Table 3-9: U.S. Department of Homeland Security...51 Table 3-10: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development...52 Table 3-11: U.S. Department of Interior...53 Table 3-12: U.S. Department of Justice...54 Table 3-13: U.S. Department of Labor...55 Table 3-14: U.S. Department of Transportation...56 Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009 xi

14 Table 3-15: U.S. Department of the Treasury...57 Table 3-16: Total by Federal Agency: Federal Fiscal Years Table 3-17: Per Capita by Federal Agency: Federal Fiscal Years Table 3-18: States Percentage Share of Federal Grant by Agency...64 Graph 3-1: States 2009 Grants Relative to Trend Line...66 Part Four: Florida s Per Capita Federal Grant as a Percentage of the National Per Capita by Agency: Federal Fiscal Years 1996 to 2009 Table 4-1: Summary...69 Table 4-2: U.S. Department of Agriculture...70 Table 4-3: U.S. Department of Commerce...72 Table 4-4: Corporation for National and Community Service...74 Table 4-5: Corporation for Public Broadcasting...76 Table 4-6: U.S. Department of Defense...78 Table 4-7: U.S. Department of Education...80 Table 4-8: U.S. Department of Energy...82 Table 4-9: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency...84 Table 4-10: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission...86 Table 4-11: Federal Emergency Management Agency...88 Table 4-12: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services...90 Table 4-13: U.S. Department of Homeland Security...92 Table 4-14: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development...94 Table 4-15: U.S. Department of Interior...96 Table 4-16: U.S. Department of Justice...98 Table 4-17: U.S. Department of Labor Table 4-18: National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Table 4-19: Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation Table 4-20: Social Security Administration Supplemental Security Income Table 4-21: State Justice Institute Table 4-22: U.S. Department of Transportation Table 4-23: U.S. Department of the Treasury Table 4-24: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs xii Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009

15 Introduction The Florida Legislature s Office of Economic and Demographic Research (EDR) prepared this review of the state s receipt of federal funds. The purpose of this report is to provide Florida s federal, state, and local officials and other interested parties with an overview and analysis of federal financial assistance to Florida. In particular, it focuses on federal grant expenditures to Florida s state and local governments. The EDR reviewed and analyzed federal expenditure data for federal fiscal year 2009 (i.e., October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009) using data obtained from two U.S. Census Bureau publications: Consolidated Federal Funds Report for Fiscal Year 2009 and Federal Aid to States for Fiscal Year 2009, both issued in August These data are collected under the Title 13 of the U.S. Code and summarizes the geographic distribution of federal program expenditures using data submitted by federal agencies and departments. The data have been consolidated and tabulated in a standard format by the U.S. Census Bureau under the auspices of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. Two types of federal financial assistance to states, federal direct expenditures and other financial assistance, are documented in this report. Federal direct expenditures constitute actual outlays or obligations of the federal government. These expenditures are reported by the U.S. Census Bureau in five categories: 1) direct payments for individuals for retirement and disability, 2) direct payments for individuals other than for retirement and disability, 3) grants, 4) procurement contracts, and 5) salaries and wages. In 2009, federal direct expenditures to the state totaled $176 billion or $9,477 per capita. Other financial assistance does not constitute actual outlays but, in large measure, reflects the contingent liability of the federal government via the face value of insurance coverages and the dollar volume of loans made. Other financial assistance to Florida in 2009 totaled $498 billion or $26,839 per capita. This report is divided into four parts and includes two appendices. Part One discusses the types of federal financial assistance to states by addressing the five categories of federal direct expenditure and the three categories of other financial assistance. A series of tables summarize dollar amounts of federal financial assistance to the fifty states collectively, and Florida specifically. In addition, Florida s rankings among the fifty states, the seven most populous states, and the sixteen southern states on the basis of total and per capita funding are included. Part Two summarizes federal direct expenditures to each of Florida s sixty-seven counties as geographic areas by addressing total expenditures by category, per capita expenditures by category, and category expenditures as a percentage of total expenditures. Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year

16 Part Three focuses on federal grant expenditures to state and local governments. A series of tables provide detailed summaries of grant expenditures to Florida by federal agency. Additionally, Florida s rankings among the fifty states, the seven most populous states, and the sixteen southern states on the basis of total and per capita expenditures are listed. Part Four examines the states per capita federal grant expenditures by agency as a percentage of the national per capita expenditures. The intent is to show how the states fare, relative to the national average, after controlling for population differences. Appendix A summarizes federal direct expenditures by county geographic area by year from 1998 to 2009, and Appendix B lists the websites of federal agencies. In addition to this EDR report, reports were published by the former Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations (LCIR), which summarized federal funding to the state in previous fiscal years. These reports are available via the EDR s website. 1 In addition, the former LCIR published other reports relating to Florida s receipt of federal grants, which are available online. February 2010: Review of Local Government Federal Grant in Fiscal Year March 2009: Local Government Grant Associated with the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Designation. 3 February 2009: Federal Grants to Florida s Local Governments (Updated to Include in 2007). 4 October 2008: Federal Grant by School District. 5 June 2008: Federal Grants to Florida s Local Governments. 6 Furthermore, the former LCIR compiled federal grant expenditures to Florida s county and municipal governments and school districts in fiscal years , which are also available via the EDR s website. 7 1 edr.state.fl.us/content/local-government/reports/index.cfm edr.state.fl.us/content/local-government/data/data-a-to-z/a-f.cfm 2 Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009

17 Part One: Federal Financial Assistance to Florida Office of Economic and Demographic Research A. Introduction This part summarizes the five categories of federal direct expenditures (i.e., direct payments for individuals for retirement and disability, direct payments for individuals other than for retirement and disability, grants, procurement contracts, and salaries and wages) provided to Florida. Three categories of other financial assistance (i.e., insurance coverage, guaranteed loans, and direct loans) are summarized as well. Reported dollar amounts for these other assistance programs represent the face value of insurance coverage or the dollar volume of loans made rather than actual expenditures. B. Data Source The source of the data summarized in this part is the U.S. Census Bureau publication entitled Consolidated Federal Funds Report for Fiscal Year 2009 issued in August This publication presents federal government expenditures or obligations in state, county, and subcounty areas of the United States. Although the Census Bureau s report includes the relevant data for the District of Columbia and U.S. outlying areas, the focus here is on the assistance provided to the fifty states collectively and Florida specifically. The financial activity of all federal government agencies is covered except for those agencies that do not submit data to any of the federal reporting systems that serve as information sources for the Census Bureau s report. As a general guide, the grants and procurement data represent obligated funds, while the direct payments and salaries and wages data represent actual expenditures. C. Federal Financial Assistance to Florida The distribution of federal financial assistance to states in fiscal year 2009 is summarized in Table 1-1 on page 13. Federal direct expenditures to the fifty states totaled $3.14 trillion or $10,253 per capita while other financial assistance totaled $1.84 trillion or $6,016 per capita. Federal direct expenditures to Florida totaled $176 billion or $9,477 per capita, and other financial assistance totaled $498 billion or $26,839 per capita. Federal direct expenditures to Florida constituted approximately 5.6 percent of such expenditures to all fifty states. Florida had the 4 th largest expenditure of all states and the seven most populous states, and the 2 nd largest expenditure of the southern states, after Texas. 1 On a per capita basis, the 1 Based on July 1, 2009 population estimates prepared by the U.S. Census Bureau, the seven most populous states were California, Texas, New York, Florida, Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Ohio. The Census Bureau has classified 16 states in the South region. They are Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia. Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year

18 state ranked 34 th among all states, 3 rd among the most populous states, and 11 th among the southern states. Federal direct expenditures to Florida are summarized below. Direct Fiscal Years: 1998 to 2009 Total Annual Direct % Retirement and Grants Salaries and ,683,926, % 62,292,180,000 50,665,923,000 31,979,435,000 18,530,929,000 12,215,459, ,872,178, % 57,665,378,000 43,869,903,000 20,226,447,000 16,624,628,000 11,485,822, ,090,699, % 55,563,726,000 42,559,403,000 21,410,663,000 15,757,395,000 11,799,512, ,705,330, % 52,697,727,000 41,457,066,000 22,451,928,000 14,829,719,000 11,268,890, ,543,542, % 50,477,147,000 36,566,614,000 22,552,241,000 14,295,825,000 10,661,715, ,933,502, % 48,049,721,000 32,432,424,000 19,609,519,000 11,447,152,000 10,394,686, ,340,816, % 45,191,664,000 30,041,135,000 17,463,096,000 10,898,984,000 9,745,937, ,813,756, % 43,708,769,000 25,960,533,000 16,349,635,000 9,757,199,000 9,037,620, ,998,376, % 42,718,042,000 26,340,488,000 13,665,898,000 8,859,262,000 8,414,686, ,776,373, % 39,747,790,000 24,150,578,000 12,148,635,000 8,594,347,000 8,135,023, ,214,874, % 37,386,160,000 22,163,650,000 11,190,873,000 8,639,271,000 7,834,920, ,557,868,000-36,235,495,000 22,178,648,000 10,319,617,000 7,128,139,000 7,695,969,000 Other financial assistance to Florida constituted 27 percent of such assistance to all fifty states in The state ranked first among all states in both total and per capita assistance due to the significant face value of federal flood insurance coverage. Other federal financial assistance to Florida is summarized below. Total Other Financial Assistance Other Financial Assistance Fiscal Years: 1998 to 2009 Face Value of Insurance Coverages Annual % Dollar Volume of Guaranteed Loans Dollar Volume of Direct Loans ,546,119, % 472,732,970,000 22,690,442,000 2,122,707, ,706,364, % 471,780,472,000 13,832,688,000 1,093,204, ,548,830, % 453,756,808,000 10,247,601, ,421, ,997,596, % 422,486,677,000 8,243,961,000 1,266,958, ,458,072, % 351,202,354,000 8,740,942,000 2,514,776, ,771,772, % 309,479,746,000 12,632,586, ,440, ,033,506, % 282,991,752,000 11,374,305, ,449, ,474,609, % 267,345,522,000 11,225,344, ,743, ,791,017, % 248,107,094,000 9,151,943, ,980, ,365,711, % 232,147,671,000 7,450,040, ,000, ,775,272, % 215,084,475,000 9,977,290, ,507, ,911,710, ,998,958,000 7,400,310, ,442,000 D. Federal Direct As previously mentioned, there are five categories of federal direct expenditures: 1) direct payments for individuals for retirement and disability, 2) direct payments for individuals other than for retirement and disability, 3) grants, 4) procurement contracts, and 5) salaries and wages. Each of these categories is discussed in more detail in the following sections. 4 Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009

19 1. for Office of Economic and Demographic Research disability payments represented the largest category of federal direct expenditure to states. Such payments totaled $870 billion, or $2,839 per capita, and represented approximately 28 percent of total direct expenditures to states. These payments to Florida totaled $62.3 billion, or $3,360 per capita, and accounted for 36 percent of total direct expenditures to the state. Florida had the 2 nd largest expenditure of all states and the most populous states, after California; and the largest expenditure of the southern states. On a per capita basis, Florida ranked 7 th among all states; 1 st among the most populous states, and 6 th among the southern states. As illustrated in Table 1-2 on page 14, this category includes four types of payments: 1) Social Security payments, 2) federal retirement and disability payments, 3) veterans benefits, and 4) other payments. In Florida, Social Security payments accounted for 79 percent of the state s total value of federal retirement and disability payments to individuals. Direct payments for individuals for retirement and disability to Florida are summarized below. for Fiscal Years: 1998 to 2009 Total Payments Annual Federal for Retirement and % Social Security Payments Veterans Benefits Other ,292,180, % 49,366,434,000 8,353,599,000 3,470,789,000 1,101,359, ,665,378, % 45,467,315,000 8,060,059,000 3,065,819,000 1,072,184, ,563,726, % 43,098,922,000 7,896,154,000 3,445,234,000 1,123,416, ,697,727, % 41,324,489,000 7,719,199,000 2,678,816, ,224, ,477,147, % 39,439,895,000 7,621,346,000 2,536,487, ,420, ,049,721, % 36,881,522,000 8,157,046,000 2,142,769, ,384, ,191,664, % 35,335,096,000 7,016,517,000 2,039,259, ,792, ,708,769, % 34,074,375,000 6,988,387,000 1,896,500, ,507, ,718,042, % 33,426,363,000 6,834,374,000 1,733,993, ,312, ,747,790, % 30,816,196,000 6,605,293,000 1,623,798, ,502, ,386,160, % 28,857,201,000 6,279,964,000 1,548,800, ,195, ,235,495,000-27,969,012,000 6,192,051,000 1,383,462, ,972,000 Florida s large elderly population is a primary reason for the state s high per capita expenditure relative to other states. According to state population projections issued by the U.S. Census Bureau, Florida s elderly population (i.e., age 65 years and over) will total 3.4 million by 2010 and account for 8.5 percent of the nation s total elderly population of 40.2 million. In Florida, the elderly will constitute nearly 18 percent of the state s total population in Relative to other age groupings, the proportion of the states total population defined as elderly is projected to be greater in Florida than any other state. 2. These payments represented the second largest category of federal direct expenditure to states. Such payments totaled $753 billion, or $2,457 per capita, and represented approximately 24 percent of total direct expenditures to states. These payments to Florida totaled $50.7 billion, or $2,733 per Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year

20 capita, and accounted for 29 percent of total direct expenditures to the state. As illustrated in Table 1-3 on page 15, this category includes nine types of payments. Medicare benefits accounted for 72 percent of other direct payments to the state. Florida had the 3 rd largest expenditure of all states and the most populous states, after California and New York; and the largest expenditure of the southern states. On a per capita basis, Florida ranked 14 th among all states, 4 th among the most populous states, and 2 nd among the southern states. Direct payments for individuals other than for retirement and disability to Florida are summarized below. Total Payments Retirement and Annual % Fiscal Years: 1998 to 2009 Excess Earned Income Tax Credits Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Medicare Unemployment Housing Benefits Compensation Assistance ,665,923, % 36,377,289,000 3,268,128,000 3,378,012,000 2,968,376, ,736, ,869,903, % 33,374,537,000 3,072,116,000 1,680,832,000 1,778,645, ,117, ,559,403, % 29,112,311,000 2,767,719, ,379,000 1,400,154, ,117, ,457,066, % 29,112,311,000 2,649,212, ,728,000 1,684,350, ,147, ,566,614, % 27,948,539,000 2,552,150, ,781,000 1,597,912, ,750, ,432,424, % 24,949,877,000 2,434,876,000 1,113,007,000 1,268,549, ,092, ,041,135, % 22,773,615,000 2,327,127,000 1,447,107, ,926, ,682, ,960,533, % 19,405,735,000 1,998,174,000 1,456,617, ,455, ,366, ,340,488, % 19,580,788,000 1,849,381, ,313, ,726,000 1,209,026, ,150,578, % 17,775,363,000 1,805,597, ,123, ,124,000 1,479,617, ,163,650, % 17,101,933,000 1,734,247, ,262, ,235, ,211, ,178,648,000-17,093,885,000 1,597,677, ,792, ,775, ,931,000 Federal Employees Life and Health Insurance Student Financial Assistance Agricultural Assistance Other ,312,000 1,266,582,000 1,935,162, ,325, ,187,000 1,229,452,000-2,119,017, ,624,000 1,162,245,000-6,634,854, ,656,000 1,043,596,000-5,356,066, ,018, ,165,000-2,275,298, ,589, ,046,000-1,531,387, ,874, ,904,000-1,348,900, ,378, ,399,000-1,236,408, ,889, ,233,000-1,335,133, ,433, ,763, ,556, ,927, ,804, ,030, ,405, ,661, ,522, Grants Grant obligations represented the third largest category of federal direct expenditure to states. These obligations to states totaled $723 billion, or $2,360 per capita, and represented 23 percent of total direct expenditures. These grant obligations to Florida totaled $32.0 billion, or $1,725 per capita, and represented 18 percent of total direct expenditures to the state. As illustrated in Table 1-4 on pages 16-17, Florida had the 4 th largest expenditure of all states and the most populous states; and the 2 nd largest expenditure of the southern states. On a per capita basis, Florida ranked 48 th among all 6 Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009

21 states, 7 th among the most populous states, and 15 th among the southern states. Grant obligations to Florida are summarized below. Grant Obligations Fiscal Years: 1998 to 2009 Annual Total Grant Obligations % ,979,435, % ,226,447, % ,410,663, % ,451,928, % ,552,241, % ,609,519, % ,463,096, % ,349,635, % ,665,898, % ,148,635, % ,190,873, % ,319,617,000 - Due to additional federal grant monies made available to states by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, grant obligations to the fifty states increased 29 percent from $562 billion in 2008 to $723 billion in Between 2008 and 2009, federal grant obligations to Florida increased by $11.8 billion or 58 percent. The funding amount presented here reflects grant obligations to state and local governments as well as non-governmental entities while grant expenditures, which are addressed in greater detail in Part Three of this report, reflects actual outlays to state and local governments only. The amount of grant obligations to Florida in 2009 is $9.3 billion more than the amount of grant expenditures. Clearly, much of Florida s increased grant obligations in 2009 were not expended that same year. 4. contracts represented the fourth largest category of federal direct expenditure to states. Such payments to states totaled $523 billion, or $1,705 per capita, and represented 17 percent of total direct expenditures. These payments to Florida totaled $18.5 billion, or $1,000 per capita, and represented 11 percent of total direct expenditures to the state. As illustrated in Table 1-5 on pages 18-19, Florida had the 6 th largest expenditure of all states, the 3 rd largest expenditure of the most populous states and the 4 th largest expenditure of the southern states. On a per capita basis, Florida ranked 29 th among all states, 4 th among the most populous states, and 9 th among the southern states. This category includes contract awards by the Department of Defense and nondefense agencies. In Florida, contracts awarded by the Department of Defense accounted for 77 percent of total procurement contracts awarded in contract obligations to Florida are summarized below. Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year

22 Contract Obligations Total Contract Obligations Fiscal Years: 1998 to 2009 Annual % Department of Nondefense Defense Agencies ,530,929, % 14,284,963,000 4,245,966, ,624,628, % 12,228,148,000 4,396,480, ,757,395, % 11,926,104,000 3,831,291, ,829,719, % 10,801,789,000 4,027,930, ,295,825, % 10,378,135,000 3,917,690, ,447,152, % 8,385,036,000 3,062,116, ,898,984, % 7,998,672,000 2,900,312, ,757,199, % 6,826,049,000 2,931,150, ,859,262, % 6,615,391,000 2,243,871, ,594,347, % 6,585,902,000 2,008,445, ,639,271, % 6,764,215,000 1,875,056, ,128,139,000-5,442,777,000 1,685,362, Federal salary and wage payments represented the smallest category of direct expenditure to states. Such payments to states totaled $273 billion, or $892 per capita, and represented 9 percent of total direct expenditures. These payments to Florida totaled $12.2 billion, or $659 per capita, and represented 7 percent of direct expenditures to the state. As illustrated in Table 1-6 on pages 20-21, Florida had the 7 th largest expenditure of all states, the 4 th largest expenditure of the most populous states, and the 5 th largest expenditure of the southern states. On a per capita basis, Florida ranked 35 th among all states, 3 rd among the most populous states, and 15 th among the southern states. This category includes salary and wage payments made by the Department of Defense and nondefense agencies. In Florida, the payments made by nondefense agencies accounted for 60 percent of total salary and wage payments. Salary and wage expenditures to Florida are summarized below. Salary and Wage Fiscal Years: 1998 to 2009 Total Annual Salary & Wage % Department of Defense Nondefense Agencies ,215,459, % 4,863,455,000 7,352,004, ,485,822, % 3,966,373,000 7,519,449, ,799,512, % 4,479,815,000 7,319,697, ,268,890, % 4,504,771,000 6,764,119, ,661,715, % 4,290,334,000 6,371,381, ,394,686, % 4,389,685,000 6,005,001, ,745,937, % 4,270,616,000 5,475,321, ,037,620, % 3,776,439,000 5,261,181, ,414,686, % 3,459,163,000 4,955,523, ,135,023, % 3,359,824,000 4,775,199, ,834,920, % 3,421,695,000 4,413,225, ,695,969,000-3,447,180,000 4,248,789,000 8 Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009

23 6. Summary One way to assess how individual states are doing in their fiscal relationship with the federal government is to calculate each state s proportional share for each direct expenditure category. If the state s share for each expenditure category is roughly equivalent to the state s share of the national population, then one measure of equality has been satisfied. The shares for each state are summarized in Table 1-7 on pages The first column lists each state s share of the July 1, 2009 national population. The next column lists each state s share of total federal direct expenditure with subsequent columns listing the states shares for each of the five components of federal spending. Based on the percentages listed, Vermont is the best example of a state that reflects an average performance with a 0.2 percent share of the national population and identical shares for four of the five separate components of federal spending. Florida recorded 6.1 percent of the national population but only 5.6 percent of total direct expenditures. At 7.2 and 6.7 percent, the state s proportional shares for direct payments for retirement/disability and other direct payments, respectively, were well above the 6.1 percent average. However, the state s proportional shares for each of the remaining components were well below the 6.1 percent average with 4.4 percent for grant obligations, 3.5 percent for procurement contract obligations, and 4.5 percent for salary and wage expenditures. This type of analysis may be useful with respect to grant funding since many grant formulas rely on national population, or some variation of it, to distribute funds. Interestingly, among the fifty states, New York had the largest positive percentage difference between its share of the grant obligations (i.e., 8.6 percent) and its share of national population (i.e., 6.4 percent). Florida had the largest negative percentage difference between its share of the grant obligations (i.e., 4.4 percent) and its share of national population (i.e., 6.1 percent). E. Other Financial Assistance The three categories of other financial assistance are: 1) face value of insurance coverages, 2) dollar volume of guaranteed loans, and 3) dollar volume of direct loans. Other financial assistance to Florida totaled $498 billion, or $26,839 per capita. Florida s share constituted 27 percent of such assistance to all states. The state ranked first among the fifty states in both total and per capita assistance due to the significant face value of flood insurance coverage provided to Florida. 1. Face Value of Insurance Coverage The face value of insurance coverage represented the largest category of other financial assistance to states. Such assistance to states totaled $1.29 trillion, or $4,194 per capita, and represented 70 percent of other financial assistance provided to all states. Such coverage in Florida totaled $473 billion, or $25,501 per capita, and represented 95 percent of other financial assistance provided to the state by the federal government. Florida had the largest face value of insurance coverage of the Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year

24 fifty states and ranked first among the states in both total and per capita insurance coverage. As illustrated in Table 1-8 on page 24, flood insurance accounted for 99 percent of the total face value of all federal insurance coverage provided to the state. The face values of insurance coverages to Florida are summarized below. Total Face Value of Insurance Coverages Annual % Face Value of Insurance Coverages Fiscal Years: 1998 to 2009 Foreign Investment Insurance Flood Crop Life Insurance Insurance Insurance for Veterans Other ,732,970, % 468,567,622,000 2,855,011,000-1,291,834,000 18,504, ,780,472, % 467,050,858,000 3,333,899,000-1,376,388,000 19,328, ,756,808, % 450,322,395,000 3,218,412,000 45,000, ,365,000 27,636, ,486,677, % 417,921,144,000 4,368,404,000 17,364, ,203,000 17,563, ,202,354, % 347,978,543,000 3,009,503,000 35,800, ,831,000 11,676, ,479,746, % 306,582,634,000 2,668,739,000 9,360, ,441,000 46,572, ,991,752, % 280,053,010,000 2,688,462,000 26,967, ,717,000 50,596, ,345,522, % 264,475,634,000 2,632,304,000 21,273, ,773,000 41,538, ,107,094, % 245,623,396,000 2,279,284,000 1,380, ,131,000 23,902, ,147,671, % 229,902,940,000 2,046,118, ,306,000 19,307, ,084,475, % 213,524,683,000 1,272,628, ,402, ,762, ,998,958, ,815,560,000 1,000,273, ,126, Dollar Volume of Guaranteed Loans The second largest category of other financial assistance to states was guaranteed loans. Such assistance to the fifty states totaled $504 billion, or $1,646 per capita, and represented 27 percent of other financial assistance provided to states by the federal government. These loans to Florida totaled $22.7 billion, or $1,224 per capita, and represented 4.6 percent of other financial assistance to the state. As illustrated in Table 1-9 on page 25, Mortgage Insurance for Homes accounted for 54 percent of the total dollar volume of federal guaranteed loans made to the state. Florida had the 4 th largest dollar volume of all states and the 3 rd largest volume of the most populous states and the southern states. On a per capita basis, Florida ranked 45 th among all states, 5 th among the most populous states, and 13 th among the southern states. The dollar volumes of guaranteed loans to Florida are summarized below. Total Dollar Volume of Guaranteed Loans Annual % Dollar Volume of Guaranteed Loans Fiscal Years: 1998 to 2009 Mortgage Insurance for Homes Federal Family Education Loan Program Mortgage Insurance: Condominiums Dept. of Agriculture: Guaranteed Loans Veterans Housing Loans ,690,442, % 12,277,709,000 4,310,680,000 3,915,498, ,178,000 1,025,844, ,832,688, % 8,629,714, ,209,000 2,799,001, ,992, ,907, ,247,601, % 2,838,998,000 3,368,948,000 1,878,479, ,626, ,601, ,243,961, % 2,133,804,000 2,925,623,000 1,825,199, ,771, ,703, ,740,942, % 2,607,483,000 2,858,184,000 1,750,948, ,473, ,005, ,632,586, % 5,621,421,000 2,497,149,000 2,742,847, ,581, ,988, ,374,305, % 7,130,454,000 1,639,424,000 1,085,084, ,632, ,773, ,225,344, % 7,113,378,000 1,639,424, ,673, ,312, ,113, Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009

CAPITOL research. States Face Medicaid Match Loss After Recovery Act Expires. health

CAPITOL research. States Face Medicaid Match Loss After Recovery Act Expires. health CAPITOL research MAR health States Face Medicaid Match Loss After Expires Summary Medicaid, the largest health insurance program in the nation, is jointly financed by state and federal governments. The

More information

Nation s Uninsured Rate for Children Drops to Another Historic Low in 2016

Nation s Uninsured Rate for Children Drops to Another Historic Low in 2016 Nation s Rate for Children Drops to Another Historic Low in 2016 by Joan Alker and Olivia Pham The number of uninsured children nationwide dropped to another historic low in 2016 with approximately 250,000

More information

Total state and local business taxes

Total state and local business taxes Total state and local business taxes State-by-state estimates for fiscal year 2017 November 2018 Executive summary This study presents detailed state-by-state estimates of the state and local taxes paid

More information

The Geographic Distribution of Federal Funds By Edward N. Trevelyan

The Geographic Distribution of Federal Funds By Edward N. Trevelyan FEDERAL AND STATE FINANCES The Geographic Distribution of Federal Funds By Edward N. Trevelyan The U.S. Census Bureau s Consolidated Federal Funds Report is a key source of government spending data, including

More information

Total state and local business taxes

Total state and local business taxes Total state and local business taxes State-by-state estimates for fiscal year 2016 August 2017 Executive summary This study presents detailed state-by-state estimates of the state and local taxes paid

More information

Chapter D State and Local Governments

Chapter D State and Local Governments Chapter D State and Local Governments State and Local Governments contains detailed information on the taxes, revenues, and expenditures of states and localities. The public finances of these two levels

More information

kaiser medicaid and the uninsured commission on An Overview of Changes in the Federal Medical Assistance Percentages (FMAPs) for Medicaid July 2011

kaiser medicaid and the uninsured commission on An Overview of Changes in the Federal Medical Assistance Percentages (FMAPs) for Medicaid July 2011 P O L I C Y B R I E F kaiser commission on medicaid and the uninsured July 2011 An Overview of Changes in the Federal Medical Assistance Percentages (FMAPs) for Medicaid Executive Summary Medicaid, which

More information

April 20, and More After That, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, March 27, First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002

April 20, and More After That, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, March 27, First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org April 20, 2012 WHAT IF CHAIRMAN RYAN S MEDICAID BLOCK GRANT HAD TAKEN EFFECT IN 2001?

More information

$ ,400 25% 5.4. billion. million. U.S. Department of Education (plus Head Start) FUNDING CUT* STUDENTS AFFECTED* million

$ ,400 25% 5.4. billion. million. U.S. Department of Education (plus Head Start) FUNDING CUT* STUDENTS AFFECTED* million U.S. Department of Education (plus Head Start) The failure of the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction to produce a bill identifying budgetary savings of at least $1.2 trillion over ten years (2012-2021)

More information

Union Members in New York and New Jersey 2018

Union Members in New York and New Jersey 2018 For Release: Friday, March 29, 2019 19-528-NEW NEW YORK NEW JERSEY INFORMATION OFFICE: New York City, N.Y. Technical information: (646) 264-3600 BLSinfoNY@bls.gov www.bls.gov/regions/new-york-new-jersey

More information

ECONOMY AT A GLANCE. Figure 1. Leading indices. 1/18 2/18 3/18 4/18 5/18 6/18 7/18 8/18 9/18 10/1811/1812/18 1/19 Mississippi

ECONOMY AT A GLANCE. Figure 1. Leading indices. 1/18 2/18 3/18 4/18 5/18 6/18 7/18 8/18 9/18 10/1811/1812/18 1/19 Mississippi MARCH 2019 V OLUME 77, NUMBER 3 Inside this issue: Mississippi Leading Index, January 2019 National Trends 4 Mississippi Employment Trends Mississippi Population Trends A Publication of the University

More information

Medicaid & CHIP: April 2014 Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations, and Enrollment Report June 4, 2014

Medicaid & CHIP: April 2014 Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations, and Enrollment Report June 4, 2014 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop S2-26-12 Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850 Medicaid & CHIP: April 2014 Monthly Applications,

More information

State Individual Income Taxes: Personal Exemptions/Credits, 2011

State Individual Income Taxes: Personal Exemptions/Credits, 2011 Individual Income Taxes: Personal Exemptions/s, 2011 Elderly Handicapped Blind Deaf Disabled FEDERAL Exemption $3,700 $7,400 $3,700 $7,400 $0 $3,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 Alabama Exemption $1,500 $3,000 $1,500 $3,000

More information

An Introduction to the American Community Survey Health Insurance Coverage Estimates

An Introduction to the American Community Survey Health Insurance Coverage Estimates September 2009 An Introduction to the American Community Survey Health Insurance Coverage Estimates Introduction The American Community Survey (ACS) is a new source of data for health insurance coverage

More information

HOW MANY LOW-INCOME MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES IN EACH STATE WOULD BE DENIED THE MEDICARE PRESCRIPTION DRUG BENEFIT UNDER THE SENATE DRUG BILL?

HOW MANY LOW-INCOME MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES IN EACH STATE WOULD BE DENIED THE MEDICARE PRESCRIPTION DRUG BENEFIT UNDER THE SENATE DRUG BILL? 820 First Street, NE, Suite 510, Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org HOW MANY LOW-INCOME MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES IN EACH STATE WOULD BE DENIED THE MEDICARE

More information

MINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN HAWAII 2013

MINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN HAWAII 2013 WEST INFORMATION OFFICE San Francisco, Calif. For release Wednesday, June 25, 2014 14-898-SAN Technical information: (415) 625-2282 BLSInfoSF@bls.gov www.bls.gov/ro9 Media contact: (415) 625-2270 MINIMUM

More information

Sources of Health Insurance Coverage in Georgia

Sources of Health Insurance Coverage in Georgia Sources of Health Insurance Coverage in Georgia 2007-2008 Tabulations of the March 2008 Annual Social and Economic Supplement to the Current Population Survey and The 2008 Georgia Population Survey William

More information

Medicaid & CHIP: March 2014 Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations, and Enrollment Report May 1, 2014

Medicaid & CHIP: March 2014 Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations, and Enrollment Report May 1, 2014 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop S2-26-12 Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850 Medicaid & CHIP: March 2014 Monthly Applications,

More information

Supporting innovation and economic growth. The broad impact of the R&D credit in Prepared by Ernst & Young LLP for the R&D Credit Coalition

Supporting innovation and economic growth. The broad impact of the R&D credit in Prepared by Ernst & Young LLP for the R&D Credit Coalition Supporting innovation and economic growth The broad impact of the R&D credit in 2005 Prepared by Ernst & Young LLP for the R&D Credit Coalition April 2008 Executive summary Companies of all sizes, in a

More information

How Public Education Benefits from the Federal Income Tax Deduction for State and Local Taxes and Other Special Tax Provisions

How Public Education Benefits from the Federal Income Tax Deduction for State and Local Taxes and Other Special Tax Provisions How Public Education Benefits from the Federal Income Tax Deduction for State and Local Taxes and Other Special Tax Provisions A Background Paper from the Center on Education Policy Introduction Discussions

More information

Budget Uncertainty in Medicaid. Federal Funds Information for States

Budget Uncertainty in Medicaid. Federal Funds Information for States Budget Uncertainty in Medicaid Federal Funds Information for States www.ffis.org NCSL Legislative Summit August 2017 CHIP Funding State Flexibility DSH Cuts Uncertainty Block Grant ACA Expansion Per Capita

More information

Fiscal Policy Project

Fiscal Policy Project Fiscal Policy Project How Raising and Indexing the Minimum Wage has Impacted State Economies Introduction July 2012 New Mexico is one of 18 states that require most of their employers to pay a higher wage

More information

Total state and local business taxes

Total state and local business taxes Total state and local business taxes State-by-state estimates for fiscal year 2014 October 2015 Executive summary This report presents detailed state-by-state estimates of the state and local taxes paid

More information

WikiLeaks Document Release

WikiLeaks Document Release WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RS21071 Medicaid Expenditures, FY2003 and FY2004 Karen Tritz, Domestic Social Policy Division January 17, 2006 Abstract.

More information

How Much Would a State Earned Income Tax Credit Cost in Fiscal Year 2018?

How Much Would a State Earned Income Tax Credit Cost in Fiscal Year 2018? 820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org Updated February 8, 2017 How Much Would a State Earned Income Tax Cost in Fiscal Year?

More information

Issue Brief No Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured: Analysis of the March 2005 Current Population Survey

Issue Brief No Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured: Analysis of the March 2005 Current Population Survey Issue Brief No. 287 Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured: Analysis of the March 2005 Current Population Survey by Paul Fronstin, EBRI November 2005 This Issue Brief provides

More information

MEDICAID BUY-IN PROGRAMS

MEDICAID BUY-IN PROGRAMS MEDICAID BUY-IN PROGRAMS Under federal law, states have the option of creating Medicaid buy-in programs that enable employed individuals with disabilities who make more than what is allowed under Section

More information

Medicaid & CHIP: December 2014 Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations and Enrollment Report February 23, 2015

Medicaid & CHIP: December 2014 Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations and Enrollment Report February 23, 2015 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop S2-26-12 Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850 Medicaid & CHIP: December 2014 Monthly Applications,

More information

STATE AND LOCAL TAXES A Comparison Across States

STATE AND LOCAL TAXES A Comparison Across States STATE AND LOCAL TAXES A Comparison Across States INDEPENDENT FISCAL OFFICE FEBRUARY 2018 Methodology This report uses data from the U.S. Census Bureau, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the U.S. Bureau

More information

THE HOME ENERGY AFFORDABILITY GAP 2017

THE HOME ENERGY AFFORDABILITY GAP 2017 TOTAL US $38,597,642,593 $47,648,609,571 123.4 The Index (2 nd Series) indicates the extent to which the has increased between the base year and the current year. In the total United States this Index

More information

Medicaid & CHIP: March 2015 Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations and Enrollment Report June 4, 2015

Medicaid & CHIP: March 2015 Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations and Enrollment Report June 4, 2015 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop S2-26-12 Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850 Medicaid & CHIP: March 2015 Monthly Applications,

More information

TOP EMPLOYERS ARMY 12.2% NAVY 10.9% AIR FORCE 8.4% JUSTICE 5.9% AGRICULTURE 3.8% OTHER 18.3% CLERICAL

TOP EMPLOYERS ARMY 12.2% NAVY 10.9% AIR FORCE 8.4% JUSTICE 5.9% AGRICULTURE 3.8% OTHER 18.3% CLERICAL Federal Workforce 2019 The federal government employs about 2 million people who provide a wide array of critical services to the American public, from defending our national security to responding to

More information

Total State and Local Business Taxes

Total State and Local Business Taxes Q UANTITATIVE E CONOMICS & STATISTICS J ANUARY 2004 Total State and Local Business Taxes A 50-State Study of the Taxes Paid by Business in FY2003 By Robert Cline, William Fox, Tom Neubig and Andrew Phillips

More information

THE STATE OF THE STATES IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES

THE STATE OF THE STATES IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES THE STATE OF THE STATES IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Richard Hemp, Mary Kay Rizzolo, Shea Tanis, & David Braddock Universities of Colorado and Illinois-Chicago REINVENTING QUALITY CONFERENCE BALTIMORE,

More information

Population in the U.S. Floodplains

Population in the U.S. Floodplains D ATA B R I E F D E C E M B E R 2 0 1 7 Population in the U.S. Floodplains Population in the U.S. Floodplains As sea levels rise due to climate change, planners and policymakers in flood-prone areas must

More information

CRS Report for Congress

CRS Report for Congress Order Code RS21071 Updated February 15, 2005 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Medicaid Expenditures, FY2002 and FY2003 Summary Karen L. Tritz Analyst in Social Legislation Domestic

More information

HAC USDA RURAL DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ACTIVITY. Rural Research Report. Housing Assistance Council FISCAL YEAR 2017 YEAR-END REPORT

HAC USDA RURAL DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ACTIVITY. Rural Research Report. Housing Assistance Council FISCAL YEAR 2017 YEAR-END REPORT USDA RURAL DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ACTIVITY FISCAL YEAR 217 YEAR-END REPORT HAC Rural Research Report Since the 195s. the United States Department of Agriculture has financed the construction, repair, and

More information

Revised November 16, 2007

Revised November 16, 2007 820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org Revised November 16, 2007 LABOR-HHS-EDUCATION BILL WHAT S AT STAKE: The President's

More information

STATE REVENUE AND SPENDING IN GOOD TIMES AND BAD 5

STATE REVENUE AND SPENDING IN GOOD TIMES AND BAD 5 STATE REVENUE AND SPENDING IN GOOD TIMES AND BAD 5 Part 2 Revenue States claim that the most immediate cause of strife in state budgets is current and anticipated drops in revenue. No doubt, a drop in

More information

State Government Indigent Defense Expenditures, FY Updated

State Government Indigent Defense Expenditures, FY Updated U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Revised 10/24/2014 Special Report JULY 2014 NCJ 246684 State Government Indigent Defense, FY 2008 2012 Updated Erinn Herberman,

More information

Kentucky , ,349 55,446 95,337 91,006 2,427 1, ,349, ,306,236 5,176,360 2,867,000 1,462

Kentucky , ,349 55,446 95,337 91,006 2,427 1, ,349, ,306,236 5,176,360 2,867,000 1,462 TABLE B MEMBERSHIP AND BENEFIT OPERATIONS OF STATE-ADMINISTERED EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS, LAST MONTH OF FISCAL YEAR: MARCH 2003 Beneficiaries receiving periodic benefit payments Periodic benefit payments

More information

Tassistance program. In fiscal year 1998, it represented 18.2 percent of all food stamp

Tassistance program. In fiscal year 1998, it represented 18.2 percent of all food stamp CHARACTERISTICS OF FOOD STAMP HOUSEHOLDS: FISCAL YEAR 1998 (Advance Report) United States Department of Agriculture Office of Analysis, Nutrition, and Evaluation Food and Nutrition Service July 1999 he

More information

Basic Economic Security in the United States: How Much Income Do Working Adults Need in Each State?

Basic Economic Security in the United States: How Much Income Do Working Adults Need in Each State? IWPR R590 October 2018 Basic Economic Security in the United States: How Much Income Do Working Adults Need in Each State? Economic security is a critical part of the overall health and well-being of women,

More information

Determinants of Federal and State Community Development Spending:

Determinants of Federal and State Community Development Spending: Determinants of Federal and State Community Development Spending: 1981 2004 by David Cashin, Julie Gerenrot, and Anna Paulson Introduction Federal and state community development spending is an important

More information

CHAPTER 6. The Economic Contribution of Hospitals

CHAPTER 6. The Economic Contribution of Hospitals CHAPTER 6 The Economic Contribution of Hospitals Chart 6.1: National Health Expenditures as a Percentage of Gross Domestic Product and Breakdown of National Health Expenditures, 2014 U.S. GDP 2014 $3.03

More information

The Economic Impact of Spending for Operations and Construction in 2013 by AZA-Accredited Zoos and Aquariums

The Economic Impact of Spending for Operations and Construction in 2013 by AZA-Accredited Zoos and Aquariums The Economic Impact of Spending for Operations and Construction in 2013 by AZA-Accredited Zoos and Aquariums By Stephen S. Fuller, Ph.D. Dwight Schar Faculty Chair and University Professor Director, Center

More information

a GAO GAO TOBACCO SETTLEMENT States Allocations of Fiscal Year 2003 and Expected Fiscal Year 2004 Payments Report to Congressional Requesters

a GAO GAO TOBACCO SETTLEMENT States Allocations of Fiscal Year 2003 and Expected Fiscal Year 2004 Payments Report to Congressional Requesters GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to Congressional Requesters March 2004 TOBACCO SETTLEMENT States Allocations of Fiscal Year 2003 and Expected Fiscal Year 2004 Payments a GAO-04-518 March

More information

MINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN TEXAS 2016

MINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN TEXAS 2016 For release: Thursday, May 4, 2017 17-488-DAL SOUTHWEST INFORMATION OFFICE: Dallas, Texas Contact Information: (972) 850-4800 BLSInfoDallas@bls.gov www.bls.gov/regions/southwest MINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN

More information

Tassistance program. In fiscal year 1999, it 20.1 percent of all food stamp households. Over

Tassistance program. In fiscal year 1999, it 20.1 percent of all food stamp households. Over CHARACTERISTICS OF FOOD STAMP HOUSEHOLDS: FISCAL YEAR 1999 (Advance Report) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE OFFICE OF ANALYSIS, NUTRITION, AND EVALUATION FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE JULY 2000 he

More information

The Effect of the Federal Cigarette Tax Increase on State Revenue

The Effect of the Federal Cigarette Tax Increase on State Revenue FISCAL April 2009 No. 166 FACT The Effect of the Federal Cigarette Tax Increase on State Revenue By Patrick Fleenor Today the federal cigarette tax will rise from 39 cents to $1.01 per pack. The proceeds

More information

Update: State Budgets in Recession and Recovery

Update: State Budgets in Recession and Recovery Update: State Budgets in Recession and Recovery State revenues have been rebounding for the last six quarters after experiencing a severe decline caused by the Great Recession that ran from December 2007

More information

PUBLIC BENEFITS: EASING POVERTY AND ENSURING MEDICAL COVERAGE By Arloc Sherman

PUBLIC BENEFITS: EASING POVERTY AND ENSURING MEDICAL COVERAGE By Arloc Sherman 820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org Revised August 17, 2005 PUBLIC BENEFITS: EASING POVERTY AND ENSURING MEDICAL COVERAGE

More information

STATE BUDGET TROUBLES WORSEN By Elizabeth McNichol and Iris J. Lav

STATE BUDGET TROUBLES WORSEN By Elizabeth McNichol and Iris J. Lav 820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org Updated May 18, 2009 STATE BUDGET TROUBLES WORSEN By Elizabeth McNichol and Iris J.

More information

Figure 1. Medicaid Status of Medicare Beneficiaries, Partial Dual Eligibles (1.0 Million) 3% 15% 83% Medicare Beneficiaries = 38.

Figure 1. Medicaid Status of Medicare Beneficiaries, Partial Dual Eligibles (1.0 Million) 3% 15% 83% Medicare Beneficiaries = 38. I S S U E P A P E R kaiser commission on medicaid and the uninsured September 2003 A Prescription Drug Benefit in Medicare: Implications for Medicaid and Low- Income Medicare Beneficiaries A prescription

More information

THE HOME ENERGY AFFORDABILITY GAP 2012

THE HOME ENERGY AFFORDABILITY GAP 2012 TOTAL US $38,597,642,593 $38,573,122,158 99.9 The Index (2 nd Series) indicates the extent to which the has increased between the base year and the current year. In the total United States this Index was

More information

CLMS BRIEF 2 - Estimate of SUI Revenue, State-by-State

CLMS BRIEF 2 - Estimate of SUI Revenue, State-by-State CLMS BRIEF 2 - Estimate of SUI Revenue, State-by-State Estimating the Annual Amounts of Unemployment Insurance Tax Collections From Individual States for Financing Adult Basic Education/ Job Training Programs

More information

504 Loan Program Rural Initiative - Waiver of Limitation on Lending Authority

504 Loan Program Rural Initiative - Waiver of Limitation on Lending Authority This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/19/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-15312, and on govinfo.gov Billing Code: 8025-01 SMALL BUSINESS

More information

Papers presented at the ICES-III, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Papers presented at the ICES-III, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Future Developments In the Bureau of Labor Statistics Business Employment Dynamics Data By Kristin Fairman and Sheryl Konigsberg Division of Administrative Statistics and Labor Turnover Bureau of Labor

More information

Highlights. Corrections. Judicial and legal. Police protection. Justice employees by level of government. Employees 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000

Highlights. Corrections. Judicial and legal. Police protection. Justice employees by level of government. Employees 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin Justice Expenditure and Employment in the United s, 2003 Kristen A. Hughes BJS Statistician In 2003 the United

More information

Special Report. Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured EBRI EMPLOYEE BENEFIT RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Special Report. Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured EBRI EMPLOYEE BENEFIT RESEARCH INSTITUTE January 1993 Jan. Feb. Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured Analysis of the March 1992 Current Population Survey Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. EBRI EMPLOYEE BENEFIT RESEARCH

More information

Forecasting State and Local Government Spending: Model Re-estimation. January Equation

Forecasting State and Local Government Spending: Model Re-estimation. January Equation Forecasting State and Local Government Spending: Model Re-estimation January 2015 Equation The REMI government spending estimation assumes that the state and local government demand is driven by the regional

More information

2018 TOP POOL EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION & BENEFITS ANALYSIS REDACTED: Data provided to participating pools

2018 TOP POOL EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION & BENEFITS ANALYSIS REDACTED: Data provided to participating pools 2018 TOP POOL EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION & BENEFITS ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction............................. 3 Anticipated retirement of top executives............. 4 Salary findings...........................

More information

Medicaid & CHIP: October 2014 Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations and Enrollment Report December 18, 2014

Medicaid & CHIP: October 2014 Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations and Enrollment Report December 18, 2014 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop S2-26-12 Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850 Medicaid & CHIP: October 2014 Monthly Applications,

More information

EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Chapter 6: Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation

EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Chapter 6: Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Chapter 6: Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation UPDATED July 2014 This chapter looks at the percentage of American workers who work for an employer who sponsors

More information

Appendix I: Data Sources and Analyses. Appendix II: Pharmacy Benefit Management Tools

Appendix I: Data Sources and Analyses. Appendix II: Pharmacy Benefit Management Tools Appendix I: Data Sources and Analyses This brief includes findings from analyses of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) State Drug Utilization Data 1 and CMS 64 reports for federal fiscal

More information

October 21, cover the rent and utility costs of a modest housing unit in a given local area. 820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002

October 21, cover the rent and utility costs of a modest housing unit in a given local area. 820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org October 21, 2013 TANF Cash Benefits Continued To Lose Value in 2013 By Ife Floyd and

More information

Put in place to assist the unemployed or underemployed.

Put in place to assist the unemployed or underemployed. By:Erin Sollund The federal government Put in place to assist the unemployed or underemployed. Medicaid, The Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Program, and Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)

More information

Data Note: What if Per Enrollee Medicaid Spending Growth Had Been Limited to CPI-M from ?

Data Note: What if Per Enrollee Medicaid Spending Growth Had Been Limited to CPI-M from ? Data Note: What if Per Enrollee Medicaid Spending Growth Had Been Limited to CPI-M from 2001-2011? Rachel Garfield, Robin Rudowitz, and Katherine Young Congress is currently debating the American Health

More information

Dedicated State Tax Revenues A Fifty-State Report

Dedicated State Tax Revenues A Fifty-State Report Budget and Fiscal Research Services and Publications Dedicated State Tax Revenues A Fifty-State Report June 12, 2000 At the request of Philip Morris Management Corp., Fiscal Planning Services, Inc. has

More information

How Would States Be Affected By Health Reform?

How Would States Be Affected By Health Reform? How Would States Be Affected By Health Reform? Timely Analysis of Immediate Health Policy Issues January 2010 John Holahan and Linda Blumberg Summary The prospects of health reform were dealt a serious

More information

Health Insurance Coverage among Puerto Ricans in the U.S.,

Health Insurance Coverage among Puerto Ricans in the U.S., Health Insurance Coverage among Puerto Ricans in the U.S., 2010 2015 Research Brief Issued April 2017 By: Jennifer Hinojosa Centro RB2016-15 The recent debates and issues surrounding the 2010 Affordable

More information

FARM BILL CONTAINS SIGNIFICANT DOMESTIC NUTRITION IMPROVEMENTS By Dorothy Rosenbaum 1

FARM BILL CONTAINS SIGNIFICANT DOMESTIC NUTRITION IMPROVEMENTS By Dorothy Rosenbaum 1 820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org Revised July 1, 2008 FARM BILL CONTAINS SIGNIFICANT DOMESTIC NUTRITION IMPROVEMENTS

More information

Deteriorating Health Insurance Coverage from 2000 to 2010: Coverage Takes the Biggest Hit in the South and Midwest

Deteriorating Health Insurance Coverage from 2000 to 2010: Coverage Takes the Biggest Hit in the South and Midwest ACA Implementation Monitoring and Tracking Deteriorating Health Insurance Coverage from 2000 to 2010: Coverage Takes the Biggest Hit in the South and Midwest August 2012 Fredric Blavin, John Holahan, Genevieve

More information

ITCA Finance Survey. July 1, 2009 June 30, ITCA Finance Survey Page 1

ITCA Finance Survey. July 1, 2009 June 30, ITCA Finance Survey Page 1 2010 ITCA Finance Survey July 1, 2009 June 30, 2010 2010 ITCA Finance Survey Page 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 4 Demographics of Survey Participants... 7 s Participating in the Survey... 7

More information

Annual Costs Cost of Care. Home Health Care

Annual Costs Cost of Care. Home Health Care 2017 Cost of Care Home Health Care USA National $18,304 $47,934 $114,400 3% $18,304 $49,192 $125,748 3% Alaska $33,176 $59,488 $73,216 1% $36,608 $63,492 $73,216 2% Alabama $29,744 $38,553 $52,624 1% $29,744

More information

SPECIAL REPORT state tax notes

SPECIAL REPORT state tax notes A (Baker s) Dozen Years of State and Local Government Capital Investment by Ronald C. Fisher and Robert W. Wassmer Ronald C. Fisher Robert W. Wassmer Ronald C. Fisher is a professor in the Department of

More information

Rural Policy Brief. Brief No DECEMBER health.uiowa.edu/rupri/

Rural Policy Brief. Brief No DECEMBER health.uiowa.edu/rupri/ RUPRI Center for www.banko Rural Health Policy Analysis Brief No. 2017-7 DECEMBER 2017 http://www.public- health.uiowa.edu/rupri/ Rural-Urban Enrollment in Part D Prescription Drug Plans: June 2017 Update

More information

Table 1 - Special Fund Disbursements for FY

Table 1 - Special Fund Disbursements for FY Table 1 - Special Fund Disbursements for FY 2018-19 Primary Agency Fund Name Available Agriculture Agricultural Conservation Easement $41,617 Racing 62,995 State College Experimental Farm 0 Attorney General

More information

Update: Obamacare s Impact on Small Business Wages and Employment Sam Batkins, Ben Gitis

Update: Obamacare s Impact on Small Business Wages and Employment Sam Batkins, Ben Gitis Update: Obamacare s Impact on Small Business Wages and Employment Sam Batkins, Ben Gitis Executive Summary Research from the American Action Forum (AAF) finds regulations from the Affordable Care Act (ACA)

More information

Executive Summary. 204 N. First St., Suite C PO Box 7 Silverton, OR fax

Executive Summary. 204 N. First St., Suite C PO Box 7 Silverton, OR fax Executive Summary 204 N. First St., Suite C PO Box 7 Silverton, OR 97381 www.ocpp.org 503-873-1201 fax 503-873-1947 Growing Again: An Update on Oregon s Recovering Economy By Jeff Thompson February 26,

More information

WHAT A 25-CENT FEDERAL GAS TAX INCREASE WOULD LOOK LIKE IN EACH STATE

WHAT A 25-CENT FEDERAL GAS TAX INCREASE WOULD LOOK LIKE IN EACH STATE FEBRUARY 2018 WHAT A 25-CENT FEDERAL GAS TAX INCREASE WOULD LOOK LIKE IN EACH STATE MARY KATE HOPKINS, DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL AFFAIRS, AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ALAN NGUYEN, SENIOR POLICY ADVISER, FREEDOM

More information

How Does the Tax Burden of New Mexico Compare?

How Does the Tax Burden of New Mexico Compare? November, 2006 How Does the Tax Burden of New Compare? Background One way of assessing the extent to which a state is being taxed too much or too little is by comparing that state with others, or with

More information

Medicaid & CHIP: August 2015 Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations and Enrollment Report

Medicaid & CHIP: August 2015 Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations and Enrollment Report DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop S2-26-12 Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850 Medicaid & CHIP: August 2015 Monthly Applications,

More information

A Briefing on Georgia s Budget FY14-FY15. Dr. Carolyn Bourdeaux Andrew Young School of Policy Studies at Georgia State University

A Briefing on Georgia s Budget FY14-FY15. Dr. Carolyn Bourdeaux Andrew Young School of Policy Studies at Georgia State University A Briefing on Georgia s Budget FY14-FY15 Dr. Carolyn Bourdeaux Andrew Young School of Policy Studies at Georgia State University 20,000 18,000 Georgia's State Tax Revenues 1984-2014 In FY14, Georgia is

More information

Capital Gains: Its Recent, Varied, and Growing (?) Impact on State Revenues

Capital Gains: Its Recent, Varied, and Growing (?) Impact on State Revenues Professors David L. Sjoquist and Sally Wallace of Georgia University argue that the impact David of L. fluctuations Sjoquist and in Sally capital Wallace gains taxes of Georgia on state budgets University

More information

Medicaid & CHIP: October Monthly Applications and Eligibility Determinations Report December 3, 2013

Medicaid & CHIP: October Monthly Applications and Eligibility Determinations Report December 3, 2013 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop S2-26-12 Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services Background Medicaid

More information

Commonfund Higher Education Price Index Update

Commonfund Higher Education Price Index Update Commonfund Higher Education Price Index 2017 Update Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION: THE HIGHER EDUCATION PRICE INDEX 1 About HEPI 1 The HEPI Tables 2 HIGHER EDUCATION PRICE INDEX ANALYSIS

More information

JANUARY 30 DATA RELEASE WILL CAPTURE ONLY A PORTION OF THE JOBS CREATED OR SAVED BY THE RECOVERY ACT By Michael Leachman

JANUARY 30 DATA RELEASE WILL CAPTURE ONLY A PORTION OF THE JOBS CREATED OR SAVED BY THE RECOVERY ACT By Michael Leachman 820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org January 29, 2010 JANUARY 30 DATA RELEASE WILL CAPTURE ONLY A PORTION OF THE JOBS CREATED

More information

Cassidy-Graham Would Deeply Cut and Drastically Redistribute Health Coverage Funding Among States

Cassidy-Graham Would Deeply Cut and Drastically Redistribute Health Coverage Funding Among States 820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org August 24, 2017 Cassidy-Graham Would Deeply Cut and Drastically Redistribute Health

More information

17. FEDERAL INVESTMENT

17. FEDERAL INVESTMENT 17. FEDERAL INVESTMENT Federal investment is the portion of Federal spending intended to yield long-term benefits for the economy and the country. It promotes improved efficiency within Federal agencies,

More information

DATA AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

DATA AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY Q3 2010 DATA AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 2010 Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA). All rights reserved, except as explicitly granted. Data are from a proprietary paid subscription

More information

Aiming. Higher. Results from a Scorecard on State Health System Performance 2015 Edition. Douglas McCarthy, David C. Radley, and Susan L.

Aiming. Higher. Results from a Scorecard on State Health System Performance 2015 Edition. Douglas McCarthy, David C. Radley, and Susan L. Aiming Higher Results from a Scorecard on State Health System Performance Edition Douglas McCarthy, David C. Radley, and Susan L. Hayes December The COMMONWEALTH FUND overview On most of the indicators,

More information

AZ, DE, FL, MD, MO, NY

AZ, DE, FL, MD, MO, NY MSIS Table Notes Tables 1, 1a Enrollment General notes Enrollment estimates are rounded to the nearest 100. Spending data in MSIS do not include Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) payments. "Enrollees"

More information

State Corporate Income Tax Collections Decline Sharply

State Corporate Income Tax Collections Decline Sharply Corporate Income Tax Collections Decline Sharply Nicholas W. Jenny and Donald J. Boyd The Rockefeller Institute Fiscal News: Vol. 1, No. 3 July 26, 2001 According to a report from the Congressional Budget

More information

Spring 2011 State Forecast

Spring 2011 State Forecast Spring 2011 State Forecast Cement Update Market Intelligence Group Ed Sullivan Dave Zwicke Vice President & Chief Economist Manager, Sr. Economist 847.972.9006 847.972.9192 OHIO Gross State Product & Income

More information

Federal Employees Retirement System: Summary of Recent Trends

Federal Employees Retirement System: Summary of Recent Trends Federal Employees Retirement System: Summary of Recent Trends Katelin P. Isaacs Analyst in Income Security January 11, 2011 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and

More information

MASS LAYOFFS DECEMBER 2012 ANNUAL TOTALS 2012

MASS LAYOFFS DECEMBER 2012 ANNUAL TOTALS 2012 For release 10:00 a.m. (EST) Friday, January 25, 2013 USDL-13-0106 Technical information: (202) 691-6392 mlsinfo@bls.gov www.bls.gov/mls Media contact: (202) 691-5902 PressOffice@bls.gov MASS LAYOFFS DECEMBER

More information

Measuring the Recession: An Impact Index

Measuring the Recession: An Impact Index Measuring the Recession: An Impact Index October 2009 65 Broadway, Suite 1800, New York NY 10006 (212) 248-2785 www.centerforsocialinclusion.org 1 Executive Summary Across America people have been hit

More information

Undocumented Immigrants are:

Undocumented Immigrants are: Immigrants are: Current vs. Full Legal Status for All Immigrants Appendix 1: Detailed State and Local Tax Contributions of Total Immigrant Population Current vs. Full Legal Status for All Immigrants

More information

Cost-Effectiveness Acceptability Curve

Cost-Effectiveness Acceptability Curve Figure 2.1 Cost-Effectiveness Acceptability Curve 100% 90 80 95% confidence Probability Cost-Effective 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Societal perspective $0 $25 $50 $75 $100 $125 $150 $175 $200 Ceiling value

More information