UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C FORM 10-Q

Transcription

1 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended February 9, 2011 or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Transition Period From to Commission file number: Luby s, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (713) (Registrant s telephone number, including area code) (IRS Employer Identification No.) Northwest Freeway, Suite 600 Houston, Texas (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T ( of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act: Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer Smaller reporting company Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No As of March 4, 2011, there were 28,111,146 shares of the registrant s common stock outstanding.

2 Luby s, Inc. Form 10-Q Quarter ended February 9, 2011 Table of Contents Part I - Financial Information Item 1 Financial Statements 3 Item 2 Management s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 16 Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 27 Item 4 Controls and Procedures 27 Part II - Other Information Item 1 Legal Proceedings 28 Item 6 Exhibits 28 Signatures 29 Additional Information We file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10- Q and current reports on Form 8-K. The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at its Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at SEC We are an electronic filer, and the SEC maintains an Internet site at that contains the reports, proxy and information statements, and other information that we file electronically. Our website address is Please note that our website address is provided as an inactive textual reference only. We make available free of charge through our website our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The information provided on our website is not part of this report, and is therefore not incorporated by reference unless such information is specifically referenced elsewhere in this report. 2 Page

3 Part I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements Luby s, Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheets (In thousands, except share data) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 3 February 9, 2011 (Unaudited) August 25, 2010 ASSETS Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 977 $ 2,300 Trade accounts and other receivables, net 2,506 2,213 Food and supply inventories 3,647 3,097 Prepaid expenses 1,413 1,041 Assets related to discontinued operations Deferred income taxes Total current assets 9,534 9,160 Property held for sale 1,077 1,828 Assets related to discontinued operations 13,041 18,419 Property and equipment, net 167, ,040 Intangible assets, net 28,646 29,292 Goodwill Deferred incomes taxes 10,877 9,672 Other assets 1,650 1,737 Total assets $ 232,457 $242,343 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY Current Liabilities: Accounts payable $ 11,974 $ 12,514 Liabilities related to discontinued operations Credit facility debt 36,000 Accrued expenses and other liabilities 17,443 19,007 Total current liabilities 65,714 32,445 Credit facility debt 41,500 Liabilities related to discontinued operations Other liabilities 5,778 6,097 Total liabilities 72,307 80,982 Commitments and Contingencies SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY Common stock, $0.32 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued were 28,611,146 and 28,564,024, respectively; shares outstanding were 28,111,146 and 28,064,024, respectively 9,156 9,140 Paid-in capital 23,433 23,089 Retained earnings 132, ,907 Less cost of treasury stock, 500,000 shares (4,775) (4,775) Total shareholders equity 160, ,361 Total liabilities and shareholders equity $ 232,457 $242,343

4 Luby s, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) (In thousands except per share data) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 4 Quarter Ended Two Quarters Ended February 9, 2011 February 10, 2010 February 9, 2011 February 10, 2010 (12 weeks) (12 weeks) (24 weeks) (24 weeks) SALES: Restaurant sales $ 71,757 $ 50,800 $142,047 $ 99,828 Culinary contract services 3,127 2,959 6,459 6,251 Franchise revenue 1,520 3,021 Vending revenue TOTAL SALES 76,536 53, , ,079 COSTS AND EXPENSES: Cost of food 21,399 13,928 42,259 27,113 Payroll and related costs 25,190 18,108 50,234 36,877 Other operating expenses 16,843 10,834 35,040 22,950 Opening costs Cost of culinary contract services 2,879 2,788 5,864 5,716 Depreciation and amortization 3,983 3,487 8,180 7,041 General and administrative expenses 6,491 5,003 13,004 10,485 Provision for asset impairments, net Net gain on disposition of property and equipment (35) (1,041) (28) (724) Total costs and expenses 76,788 53, , ,642 INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS (252) 499 (2,885) (3,563) Interest income Interest expense (553) (44) (1,171) (172) Impairment charge for decrease in fair value of investments 20 (438) Other income, net Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations (486) 697 (3,493) (3,745) Provision (benefit) for income taxes (275) 556 (1,181) (811) Income (loss) from continuing operations (211) 141 (2,312) (2,934) Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes 928 (563) 741 (1,205) NET INCOME (LOSS) $ 717 $ (422) $ (1,571) $ (4,139) Loss per share from continuing operations: Basic $ (0.01) $ $ (0.08) $ (0.11) Assuming dilution (0.01) (0.08) (0.11) Income (loss) per share from discontinued operations: Basic $ 0.03 $ (0.02) $ 0.02 $ (0.04) Assuming dilution 0.03 (0.02) 0.02 (0.04) Net income (loss) per share: Basic $ 0.02 $ (0.02) $ (0.06) $ (0.15) Assuming dilution 0.02 (0.02) (0.06) (0.15) Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic 28,172 28,121 28,168 28,117 Assuming dilution 28,172 28,127 28,168 28,117

5 Luby s, Inc. Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity (unaudited) (In thousands) Common Stock Issued Treasury Shares Amount Shares Amount The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 5 Paid-In Capital Retained Earnings Total Shareholders Equity BALANCE AT AUGUST 25, ,564 $9,140 (500) $(4,775) $23,089 $133,907 $ 161,361 Net loss (1,571) (1,571) Common stock issued under nonemployee director plans Common stock issued under employee benefit plans Excess tax benefits from stock options 2 2 Share-based compensation expense BALANCE AT FEBRUARY 9, ,611 $9,156 (500) $(4,775) $23,433 $132,336 $ 160,150

6 Luby s, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) (In thousands) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 6 Two Quarters ended February 9, February 10, (24 weeks) (24 weeks) CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net loss $ (1,571) $ (4,139) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Provision for asset impairments, net of gains and losses on property sales (1,705) (2,267) Depreciation and amortization 8,182 7,288 Impairment charge for decrease in fair value of investments, net of gains 438 Amortization of debt issuance cost Non-cash compensation expense Share-based compensation expense Tax benefit on stock options (2) Deferred tax benefit (1,195) (1,626) Cash provided by operating activities before changes in operating assets and liabilities 4, Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Increase in trade accounts and other receivables, net (293) (478) Decrease (increase) in food and supply inventories (551) 302 Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets (521) 419 Decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities (3,010) (6,277) Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 82 (5,663) CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Proceeds from redemption or maturity of investments 1,414 Proceeds from disposal of assets and property held for sale 7,541 5,768 Acquisition of Fuddruckers assets (265) Purchases of property and equipment (2,985) (1,542) Net cash provided by investing activities 4,291 5,640 CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Credit facility borrowings 88,100 20,100 Credit facility repayments (93,600) (20,100) Debt issuance costs (225) (105) Tax benefit on stock options 2 Proceeds received on the exercise of stock options 27 Net cash used in financing activities (5,696) (105) Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (1,323) (128) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 2, Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 977 $ 754 Cash paid for: Income taxes $ $ Interest

7 Luby s, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) February 9, 2011 Note 1. Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Luby s, Inc. (the Company or Luby s ) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ( GAAP ) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements that are prepared for the Company s Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the period ended February 9, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending August 31, The consolidated balance sheet dated August 25, 2010, included in this Form 10-Q, has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date. However, this Form 10-Q does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for an annual filing of complete financial statements. Therefore, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 25, The results of operations, assets and liabilities for all units included in the disposal plan discussed in Note 7 have been reclassified to discontinued operations in the statements of operations and balance sheets for all periods presented. Note 2. Accounting Periods The Company s fiscal year ends on the last Wednesday in August. As such, each fiscal year normally consists of 13 four-week periods, accounting for 364 days. Each of the first three quarters of each fiscal year consists of three four-week periods (12 weeks), while the fourth quarter normally consists of four four-week periods (16 weeks). Comparability between accounting periods will be affected by varying lengths of the periods, as well as the seasonality associated with the restaurant business. Note 3. Acquisition Luby s, Inc., through its subsidiary, Luby s Fuddruckers Restaurants, LLC ( LFR ), purchased substantially all of the assets of Fuddruckers, Inc., Magic Brands, LLC and certain of their affiliates (collectively, Fuddruckers ) on July 26, 2010 for $63.1 million in cash. LFR assumed $4.3 million of Fuddruckers obligations, real estate leases and contracts. The Company funded the purchase with cash and an expansion of its credit facility. During the first quarter ended November 17, 2010, the Company acquired one additional Fuddruckers location for additional consideration of approximately $0.3 million. The allocation of the purchase price for the acquisition required extensive use of accounting estimates and judgments to allocate the purchase price to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on respective fair values. The purchase price for the Company s acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Fuddruckers and the assumption of certain liabilities is based on estimates of fair values at the acquisition date. Such valuations require significant estimates and assumptions. The Company believes the fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on reasonable assumptions. The fair value estimates for the purchase price allocation for the Company s acquisition are considered final. The trade name primarily relates to Fuddruckers, which the Company believes has an estimated accounting life of 21 years based on the expected use of its assets and the restaurant environment in which it is being used. The value assigned to the trade name will be amortized over the estimated accounting life of 21 years. The trade name represents a respected brand with positive customer loyalty; which the Company intends to cultivate and protect the use of the trade name. The franchise agreements, after considering renewal periods, have an estimated accounting life of 21 years and will be amortized over this period of time. The Company recorded $0.6 million of amortization expense during the first two quarters of fiscal year 2011, which is classified as depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. The full year amortization of the trade name and the franchise agreements is expected to total $1.4 million. Because the value of these assets will be amortized using the straight-line method over 21 years, the annual amortization will be the same total each year. 7

8 A portion of the acquired lease portfolio contained favorable and unfavorable leases. Acquired lease terms were compared to current market lease terms to determine if the acquired leases were below or above the current rates tenants would pay for similar leases. The favorable lease assets totaled $0.7 million and $0.8 million at February 9, 2011 and August 25, 2010, respectively, and are recorded in other assets and, after considering renewal periods, have an estimated weighted average life of approximately 5.8 years at February 9, The unfavorable leases totaled $2.6 million and $2.9 million at February 9, 2011 and August 25, 2010, respectively, and are recorded in other liabilities and, after considering renewal periods, have an estimated weighted average life of approximately 6.9 years at February 9, The favorable and unfavorable leases are amortized to rent expense on a straight line basis over the lives of the related leases. The following table shows the prospective amortization of the favorable lease assets and unfavorable lease liabilities: August 31, 2011 The Company also recorded an intangible asset for goodwill in the amount of $0.2 million. Goodwill is considered to have an indefinite useful life and is not amortized. Goodwill was $0.2 million as of February 9, 2011 and August 25, Note 4. Fair Value Measurements GAAP establishes a framework for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. Fair value measurements guidance applies whenever other statements require or permit asset or liabilities to be measured at fair value. GAAP establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. These tiers include: Level 1: Defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Non-recurring fair value measurements related to impaired property and equipment consisted of the following: There were no impairments of assets related to discontinued operations during the two quarters ended February 10, As of February 9, 2011 and August 25, 2010, the Company had no assets required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts and other receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and debt approximate fair value based on the short-term nature of these accounts. 8 August 29, 2012 Fiscal Year Ended August 28, 2013 August 27, 2014 August 26, 2015 (In thousands) Favorable $ 130 $ 130 $ 130 $ 130 $ 130 Unfavorable $ 570 $ 448 $ 380 $ 380 $ 228 Level 2: Defined as pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors, and current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Level 3: Defined as pricing inputs that are unobservable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management s best estimate of fair value. Two Quarters Ended February 9, 2011 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Fair Value Measurement Using Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Total Impairments Long-lived assets related to discontinued operations $ 5,218 $ $ $ 5,218 $ (467)

9 Note 5. Income Taxes No cash payments of estimated federal income taxes were made during the two quarters ended February 9, Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using currently enacted rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent future taxable income is expected to be sufficient to utilize those assets prior to their expiration. If current available information and projected future results raises doubt about the realization of the deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance is necessary. Such a valuation allowance was established in the fourth quarter ended August 26, 2009 of fiscal year 2009 through a charge to income tax expense which adversely affected the Company s reported operating results. Management concluded that for the quarter ended November 17, 2010, an increase in the valuation allowance of $0.1 million was necessary. No adjustment was made to the valuation allowance for the quarter ended February 9, The valuation allowance partially offsets the Company s deferred tax assets related to net operating loss carryovers to future years and its carryover of employment tax credits. Management believes that adequate provisions for income taxes have been reflected in the financial statements and is not aware of any significant exposure items that have not been reflected in the financial statements. Amounts considered probable of settlement within one year have been included in the accrued expenses and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The Company does not anticipate any material change in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to occur within the next thirteen four-week periods. Note 6. Property and Equipment The cost, net of impairment, and accumulated depreciation of property and equipment at February 9, 2011 and August 25, 2010, together with the related estimated useful lives used in computing depreciation and amortization, were as follows: February 9, 2011 August 25, 2010 Estimated Useful Lives (In thousands) Land $ 55,468 $ 55,468 Restaurant equipment and furnishings 101, ,118 3 to 15 years Buildings 164, , to 33 years Lesser of lease term or estimated useful life Leasehold and leasehold improvements 27,877 27,516 Office furniture and equipment 6,617 6,322 3 to 10 years Construction in progress , ,181 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (189,365) (182,141) Property and equipment, net $ 167,437 $ 172,040 Note 7. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, Discontinued Operations and Property Held for Sale Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Store Closings The Company periodically evaluates long-lived assets held for use and held for sale whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of those assets may not be recoverable. The Company analyzes historical cash flows of operating locations and compares results of poorer performing locations to more profitable locations. The Company also analyzes lease terms, condition of the assets and related need for capital expenditures or repairs, as well as construction activity and the economic and market conditions in the surrounding area. For assets held for use, the Company estimates future cash flows using assumptions based on possible outcomes of the areas analyzed. If the undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the location s assets, the Company records an impairment loss based on an estimate of discounted cash flows. The estimates of future cash flows, based on reasonable and supportable assumptions and projections, require management s subjective judgments. Assumptions and estimates used include operating results, changes in working capital, discount rate, growth rate, anticipated net proceeds from disposition of the property and if applicable, lease terms. The span of time for which future cash flows are estimated is often lengthy, increasing the sensitivity to assumptions made. The time span is longer and could be 20 to 25 years for newer properties, but only 5 to 10 years for older properties. Depending on the assumptions and estimates used, the estimated future cash flows projected in the evaluation of longlived assets can vary within a wide range of outcomes. The Company considers the likelihood of possible outcomes in determining the best estimate of future cash flows. The measurement for such an impairment loss is then based on the fair value of the asset as determined by discounted cash flows. 9

10 The Company recognized the following impairment charges (credits) to income from operations: The net gain for the two quarters ended February 9, 2011 includes the results of normal asset retirements and the sale of one previously closed restaurant property that was held for sale. The net gain for the two quarters ended February 10, 2010 includes the results of normal asset retirements and the sale of an easement right associated with a restaurant property. Discontinued Operations As a result of the first quarter fiscal year 2010 adoption of the Company s Cash Flow Improvement and Capital Redeployment Plan ( the Plan ), the Company reclassified 23 operating stores and one previously closed location to discontinued operations. The results of operations, assets and liabilities for all units included in the Plan have been reclassified to discontinued operations in the statement of operations and balance sheets for all periods presented. Assets related to discontinued operations include food inventory, prepaid expenses, deferred tax assets, unimproved land, closed restaurant properties and related equipment for locations classified as discontinued operations. The following table sets forth the assets and liabilities for all discontinued operations: No impairments related to discontinued operations were recognized in the first two quarters of fiscal year However, in the first two quarters of fiscal year 2011, four properties were further impaired by a total of $0.5 million. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company sold three closed properties and recognized a gain of $1.9 million. One property was sold in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 and a gain of $0.2 million was recognized. The Company also terminated two in-line (strip shopping center) lease agreements in the first quarter of fiscal year As of August 25, 2010, the Company had 23 properties classified as discontinued operations assets. As of August 25, 2010, the asset carrying value of the owned properties was $17.7 million and is included in assets related to discontinued operations. The asset carrying values of the ground leases and in-line leases have previously been impaired to zero. 10 Two Quarters ended February 9, February 10, (24 weeks) (24 weeks) (In thousands, except per share data) Provision for asset impairments $ $ 32 Net gain on disposition of property and equipment (28) (724) $ (28) $ (692) Effect on EPS: Basic (0.02) Assuming dilution (0.02) February 9, 2011 August 25, 2010 (in thousands) Prepaid expenses $ 76 $ 78 Deferred income taxes 126 Assets related to discontinued operations current $ 202 $ 78 Property and equipment $ 12,971 $17,692 Deferred income taxes Other assets 8 10 Assets related to discontinued operations non-current $ 13,041 $ 18,419 Deferred income taxes $ $ 162 Accrued expenses and other liabilities Liabilities related to discontinued operations current $ 297 $ 924 Other liabilities $ 815 $ 940 Liabilities related to discontinued operations non-current $ 815 $ 940

11 As of February 9, 2011, the Company had 17 properties classified as discontinued operations assets. As of February 9, 2011, the asset carrying value of the owned properties was $13.0 million and is included in assets related to discontinued operations. The asset carrying values of the ground leases have previously been impaired to zero. The Company is actively marketing these properties for lease or sale and the Company s results of discontinued operations will be affected by the disposal of properties related to discontinued operations to the extent proceeds from the sales exceed or are less than net book value. The following table sets forth the sales and pretax losses reported for all discontinued locations: The Company incurred zero and $0.7 million in employee settlement costs in the first two quarters of fiscal years 2011 and 2010, respectively. The following table summarizes discontinued operations for the first two quarters of fiscal years 2011 and 2010: Within discontinued operations, the Company offsets gains from applicable property disposals against total impairments. The amounts in the table described as Other include employment termination and shut-down costs, as well as operating losses through each restaurant s closing date and carrying costs until the locations are finally disposed. The impairment charges included above relate to properties closed and designated for immediate disposal. The assets of these individual operating units have been written down to their net realizable values. In turn, the related properties have either been sold or are being actively marketed for sale. All dispositions are expected to be completed within one to three years. Within discontinued operations, the Company also recorded the related fiscal year-to-date net operating results, employee terminations and basic carrying costs of the closed units. Property Held for Sale The Company periodically reviews long-lived assets against its plans to retain or ultimately dispose of properties. If the Company decides to dispose of a property, it will be moved to property held for sale and actively marketed. The Company analyzes market conditions each reporting period and records additional impairments due to declines in market values of like assets. The fair value of the property is determined by observable inputs such as appraisals and prices of comparable properties in active markets for assets like the Company s. Gains are not recognized until the properties are sold. Property held for sale includes unimproved land, closed restaurant properties and related equipment for locations not classified as discontinued operations. The specific assets are valued at the lower of net depreciable value or net realizable value. 11 February 9, 2011 Two Quarters ended February 10, 2010 (24 weeks) (24 weeks) (In thousands, except discontinued locations) Sales $ $ 3,145 Pretax income (loss) 1,002 (1,859) Income tax benefit (expense) on discontinued operations (261) 654 Net income (loss) on discontinued operations 741 (1,205) Discontinued locations closed during the period 0 23 Two Quarters ended February 9, February 10, (24 weeks) (24 weeks) (In thousands, except per share data) Impairments $ (467) $ Gains 2,144 1,575 Net gains 1,677 1,575 Other (936) (2,780) Discontinued operations $ 741 $ (1,205) Effect on EPS from discontinued operations - basic $ 0.02 $ (0.04)

12 At February 9, 2011, the Company had a total of two owned properties and one ground lease recorded at approximately $1.1 million in property held for sale. At August 25, 2010, the Company had three owned properties and one ground lease recorded at approximately $1.8 million in property held for sale. The Company is actively marketing the locations currently classified as property held for sale. The Company sold one property held for sale during the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 resulting in a gain of $35,000. The Company s results of continuing operations will be affected to the extent proceeds from sales exceed or are less than net book value. Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements. Pending Claims Certain current and former hourly restaurant employees filed a lawsuit against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act with respect to the inclusion of certain employees in a tip pool. The lawsuit seeks back wages, penalties and attorney s fees and was conditionally certified as a collective action in October On October 22, 2010, the Company agreed to a court settlement amount of $1.6 million, recognized in general and administrative expenses in the fourth quarter fiscal year The Company has made related payments of $0.6 million as of February 9, 2011, will continue making payments during fiscal year 2011 and expects to complete all payments by the end of calendar year From time to time, the Company is subject to various other private lawsuits, administrative proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. A number of these lawsuits, proceedings and claims may exist at any given time. These matters typically involve claims from guests, employees and others related to issues common to the restaurant industry. The Company currently believes that the final disposition of these types of lawsuits, proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company s financial position, results of operations or liquidity. It is possible, however, that the Company s future results of operations for a particular quarter or fiscal year could be impacted by changes in circumstances relating to lawsuits, proceedings or claims. Construction Activity From time to time, the Company enters into non-cancelable contracts for the construction of its new restaurants. This construction activity exposes the Company to the risks inherent in new construction including but not limited to rising material prices, labor shortages, delays in getting required permits and inspections, adverse weather conditions, and injuries sustained by workers. The Company has no non-cancelable contracts as of February 9, Note 9. Related Parties Affiliate Services The Company s Chief Executive Officer, Christopher J. Pappas, and Chief Operating Officer, Harris J. Pappas, own two restaurant entities (the Pappas entities ) that from time to time may provide services to the Company and its subsidiaries, as detailed in the Master Sales Agreement dated December 9, 2005 among the Company and the Pappas entities. Under the terms of the Master Sales Agreement, the Pappas entities may provide specialized (customized) equipment fabrication and basic equipment maintenance, including stainless steel stoves, shelving, rolling carts, and chef tables. The total costs under the Master Sales Agreement of custom-fabricated and refurbished equipment in the two quarters ended February 9, 2011 and February 10, 2010 were $22,700 and $32,500, respectively. Services provided under this agreement are subject to review and approval by the Finance and Audit Committee of the Company s Board of Directors. Operating Leases The Company leases from an unrelated third party a property that combines both the offices of the Company s Facility Services and Warehouse Operations. The property is approximately 60,000 square feet. In the third quarter of fiscal year 2004, Messrs. Pappas became partners in a limited partnership which purchased a retail strip center in Houston, Texas. Messrs. Pappas collectively own a 50% limited partnership interest and a 50% general partnership interest in the limited partnership. A third party company manages the center. One of the Company s restaurants has rented and occupied space in that center since July of In November of 2006, the Company executed a new lease 12

13 agreement with respect to this restaurant along with a relocation into a new space in that center in July of The new lease agreement was approved by the Finance and Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. On November 22, 2006, the Company executed a new lease agreement in connection with the replacement of the existing restaurant with a new prototype restaurant in the retail strip center described above. The new restaurant opened in July 2008 and the new lease agreement provides for a primary term of approximately twelve years with two subsequent five-year options. The new lease also gives the landlord an option to buy out the agreement on or after the calendar year 2015 by paying the unamortized cost of the Company s improvements. The Company is currently obligated to pay rent of $20.00 per square foot ($22.00 per square foot beginning January 2014) plus maintenance, taxes, and insurance during the primary term of the lease. Thereafter, the lease provides for increases in rent at set intervals. The Company made payments of $175,000 and $144,000 in the two quarters ended February 9, 2011 and February 10, 2010, respectively. The new lease agreement was approved by the Finance and Audit Committee and full Board of Directors. Affiliated rents paid for a Houston restaurant property lease represented 3.0% and 5.6% of total rents for continuing operations for the two quarters ended February 9, 2011 and February 10, 2010, respectively. Two Quarters ended February 9, 2011 February 10, 2010 (24 weeks) (24 weeks) (In thousands, except percentages) AFFILIATED COSTS INCURRED: General and administrative expenses professional and other costs $ 29 $ 33 Capital expenditures custom-fabricated and refurbished equipment and furnishings Other operating expenses and opening costs, including property leases Total $ 201 $ 219 RELATIVE TOTAL COMPANY COSTS: General and administrative expenses $ 13,004 $ 10,485 Capital expenditures 2,985 1,542 Other operating expenses and opening costs 35,184 23,102 Total $ 51,173 $ 35,129 AFFILIATED COSTS INCURRED AS A PERCENTAGE OF RELATIVE TOTAL COMPANY COSTS 0.39% 0.62% Board of Directors Pursuant to the terms of a Purchase Agreement dated March 9, 2001, entered into by and among the Company, Christopher J. Pappas and Harris J. Pappas, the Company agreed to submit three persons designated by Christopher J. Pappas and Harris J. Pappas as nominees for election at the 2002 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Messrs. Pappas designated themselves and Frank Markantonis as their nominees for directors, all of whom were subsequently elected. Christopher J. Pappas and Harris J. Pappas are brothers and Frank Markantonis is an attorney whose principal client is Pappas Restaurants, Inc., an entity owned by Harris J. Pappas and Christopher J. Pappas. As amended in June 2004, the Purchase Agreement allows Messrs. Pappas to continue to nominate persons for election to the board which, if such nominees are elected, would result in Messrs. Pappas having nominated three of the then-serving directors of the Company. Messrs. Pappas retain their right for so long as they both are executive officers of the Company. Christopher J. Pappas is a member of the Advisory Board of Amegy Bank, National Association, which is a lender and syndication agent under the Company s revolving credit facility. Key Management Personnel In November 2005, Christopher and Harris Pappas entered into new employment agreements that were subsequently amended in April 2009 to extend the termination date thereof to August Both continue to devote their primary time and business efforts to the Company while maintaining their roles at Pappas Restaurants, Inc. On July 26, 2010, Christopher and Harris Pappas guaranteed the payment of up to $13.0 million of the Company s indebtedness under the revolving credit facility in connection with the expansion of the Company s revolving credit facility that accompanied the Company s acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Fuddruckers. The maximum amount of this guaranty was reduced to $9.5 million on February 28, 2011 and will be reduced to $6.0 million on May 31,

14 On February 1, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the renewal of a consultant agreement with Ernest Pekmezaris, the Company s former Chief Financial Officer. Under the agreement, Mr. Pekmezaris will continue to furnish to the Company advisory and consulting services related to finance and accounting matters and other related consulting services. The agreement was renewed for twelve months at the same monthly rate, expiring on January 31, Mr. Pekmezaris is also the Treasurer of Pappas Restaurants, Inc. Compensation for the services provided by Mr. Pekmezaris to Pappas Restaurants, Inc. is paid entirely by that entity. Peter Tropoli, Senior Vice President, Administration, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company, is an attorney who, in the past, has provided litigation services to entities controlled by Christopher J. Pappas and Harris J. Pappas. Mr. Tropoli is the stepson of Frank Markantonis, who is a director of the Company. Paulette Gerukos, Vice President of Human Resources of the Company, is the sister-in-law of Harris J. Pappas, the Chief Operating Officer. Note 10. Share-Based Compensation Stock Options The Company has an Incentive Stock Plan for officers and employees ( Employee Stock Plans ) and a Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan for non-employee directors. These plans authorize the granting of stock options, restricted stock and other types of awards consistent with the purpose of the plans. Approximately 2.7 million shares were authorized for issuance under the Company s plans as of February 9, 2011, of which approximately 0.9 million shares were available for future issuance. Stock options granted under the Incentive Stock Plan and the Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan have an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company s common stock at the date of grant. Option awards under the Employee Stock Plans generally vest 25% each year on the anniversary of the grant date and expire six to ten years from the grant date. Option awards under the Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan generally vest 100% on the first anniversary of the grant date and expire ten years from the grant date. A summary of the Company s stock option activity for the two quarters ended February 9, 2011 is presented below: Shares Under Fixed Options Weighted-Average Exercise Price Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term Aggregate Intrinsic Value (Years) (In thousands) Outstanding at August 25, ,296,887 $ $ 711 Granted 106, Exercised 7, Forfeited or Expired 34, Outstanding at February 9, ,361,822 $ $ 930 Exercisable at February 9, ,573 $ $ 291 Restricted Stock Restricted stock grants consist of the Company s common stock and generally vest after three years, with the exception of grants under the Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan, which vest when granted because they are granted in lieu of a cash payment. All restricted stock grants are cliff-vested. Restricted stock awards are valued at the average market price of the Company s common stock at the date of grant. 14

15 A summary of the Company s restricted stock activity for the two quarters ended February 9, 2011 is presented in the following table: Restricted Stock Units Weighted-Average Fair Value Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (Per share) (Years) Unvested at August 25, ,189 $ Granted 77, Vested 30, Forfeited Unvested at February 9, ,769 $ Note 11. Earnings Per Share Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and unvested restricted stock for the reporting period. Diluted net income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. For the calculation of diluted net income per share, the basic weighted average number of shares is increased by the dilutive effect of stock options determined using the treasury stock method. Stock options with exercise prices exceeding current market prices that were excluded from the computations of net income per share amounted to approximately 1,009,000 shares for the quarter ended February 10, Due to losses from continuing operations for the quarter ended February 9, 2011 and the two quarters ended February 9, 2011 and February 10, 2010 the denominator for earnings per share assuming dilution is equal to the denominator for basic earnings per share. The components of basic and diluted net income per share are as follows: 15 Quarter Ended Two Quarters Ended February 9, 2011 February 10, 2010 February 9, 2011 February 10, 2010 (12 weeks) (12 weeks) (24 weeks) (24 weeks) (In thousands except share data) Numerator: Income (loss) from continuing operations $ (211) $ 141 $ (2,312) $ (2,934) Loss from discontinued operations 928 (563) 741 (1,205) Net income (loss) $ 717 $ (422) $ (1,571) $ (4,139) Denominator: Denominator for basic earnings per share weighted-average shares 28,172 28,121 28,168 28,117 Effect of potentially dilutive securities: Employee and non-employee stock options 6 Denominator for earnings per share assuming dilution 28,172 28,127 28,168 28,117 Income (loss) per share from continuing operations: Basic $ (0.01) $ $ (0.08) $ (0.11) Assuming dilution $ (0.01) $ $ (0.08) $ (0.11) Loss per share from discontinued operations: Basic $ 0.03 $ (0.02) $ 0.02 $ (0.04) Assuming dilution $ 0.03 $ (0.02) $ 0.02 $ (0.04) Net income (loss) per share: Basic $ 0.02 $ (0.02) $ (0.06) $ (0.15) Assuming dilution $ 0.02 $ (0.02) $ (0.06) $ (0.15)

16 Note 12. New Adopted Accounting Pronouncements ASU codifies SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). ASU eliminates exceptions to consolidating qualifying special-purpose entities, contains new criteria for determining the primary beneficiary, and increases the frequency of required reassessments to determine whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. ASU changes how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting or similar rights should be consolidated and also contains a new requirement that any term, transaction, or arrangement that does not have a substantive effect on an entity s status as a variable interest entity, a company s power over a variable interest entity, or a company s obligation to absorb losses or its right to receive benefits of an entity must be disregarded. The determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity s purposes and design and a company s ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impacts the entity s economic performance. ASU is effective for the Company s 2011 fiscal year, and its implementation had no material affect on the Company s consolidated financial statements. In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No , Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This guidance amends the disclosure requirements related to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements and requires new disclosures on the transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 (quoted prices in active market for identical assets or liabilities) and Level 2 (significant other observable inputs) of the fair value measurement hierarchy, including the reasons and the timing of the transfers. Additionally, the guidance requires a roll forward of activities on purchases, sales, issuance and settlements of the assets and liabilities measured using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 fair value measurements). The guidance became effective for the Company s 2011 fiscal year, and its implementation had no material affect on the Company s consolidated financial statements. Item 2. Management s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Management s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and footnotes for the period ended February 9, 2011 included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and the audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 25, The following presents an analysis of the results and financial condition of our continuing operations. Except where indicated otherwise, the results of discontinued operations are excluded from this discussion. Overview Luby s, Inc. is a multi-branded company operating in the restaurant industry and the contract food services industry. Our primary brands include Luby s Cafeterias, Luby s Culinary Contract Services and Fuddruckers. Also included in our brands are Luby s, Etc. and Koo Koo Roo Chicken Bistro. We purchased substantially all of the assets of Fuddruckers, Inc., Magic Brands, LLC and certain of their affiliates (collectively, Fuddruckers ) in July 2010; accordingly, the first quarter ended November 17, 2010 represents the first full fiscal quarter in which the operations of Fuddruckers branded restaurants are included in our results of operations. As of February 9, 2011, we owned and operated 155 restaurants, of which 95 are traditional cafeterias, 56 are gourmet hamburger restaurants, 3 are upscale fast serve chicken restaurants, and one primarily serves seafood. These establishments are located in close proximity to retail centers, business developments and residential areas mostly throughout the United States. Also as of February 9, 2011, we operated 19 culinary contract service facilities. These facilities are located within healthcare and education settings in Texas and Louisiana. These facilities provide food service options to varied populations including in-hospitalroom patient meal service, retail food-court style restaurant dining, and coffee/snack kiosks. Also as of February 9, 2011, we are a franchisor for a network of 129 Fuddruckers restaurants. The owners of these franchise units pay royalty revenue to us as a franchisor. Accounting Periods Our fiscal year ends on the last Wednesday in August. As such, each fiscal year normally consists of 13 four-week periods, or accounting periods, accounting for 364 days in the aggregate. Each of the first three quarters of each fiscal year consists of three fourweek periods, while the fourth quarter normally consists of four four-week periods. Comparability between quarters may be affected by varying lengths of the quarters, as well as the seasonality associated with the restaurant business. 16

17 Same-Store Sales The restaurant business is highly competitive with respect to food quality, concept, location, price, and service, all of which may have an effect on same-store sales. Our same-store sales calculation measures the relative performance of a certain group of restaurants. To qualify for inclusion in this group, a store must have been in operation for 18 consecutive accounting periods. Our Fuddruckers units will not be included in this measurement until after we have operated them for the required period. Stores that close on a permanent basis are removed from the group in the fiscal quarter when operations cease at the restaurant, but remain in the same-store group for previously reported fiscal quarters. Although management believes this approach leads to more effective year-over-year comparisons, neither the time frame nor the exact practice may be similar to those used by other restaurant companies. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS For the Second Quarter and Year-to-Date Fiscal Year 2011 versus the Second Quarter and Year-to-Date Fiscal Year 2010 Sales Total sales increased approximately $22.8 million, or 42.4%, in the quarter ended February 9, 2011 compared to the quarter ended February 10, 2010, consisting of a $21.0 million increase in restaurant sales, $1.5 million in Fuddruckers franchise revenue, a $0.2 million increase in Culinary Contract sales, and $0.1 million in vending revenue from our Company-operated Fuddruckers units. The $21.0 million increase in restaurant sales included a $1.4 million increase in sales at Luby s Cafeteria-branded restaurants and $19.6 million in sales from Fuddruckers-branded restaurants in the quarter ended February 9, On a same-store basis, restaurant sales at the Luby s Cafeteria restaurants increased 2.7% during the quarter ended February 9, 2011 compared to the quarter ended February 10, The year-over-year same store sales increase of 2.7% in the quarter ended February 9, 2011 compared to a yearover-year decrease of 12.5% in the quarter ended February 10, The improved same store sales is primarily due to improving economic conditions and our focus on local restaurant marketing efforts and limited time offers used to generate customer traffic at the Luby s Cafeteria restaurant units, partially offset by unusual weather that we estimate reduced sales by approximately $0.9 million in the quarter ended February 9, Total sales increased approximately $45.7 million, or 43.1%, in the two quarters ended February 9, 2011 compared to the two quarters ended February 10, 2010, consisting of a $42.2 million increase in restaurant sales, $3.0 million in Fuddruckers franchise revenue, a $0.2 million increase in Culinary Contract sales, and $0.3 million in vending revenue from our Company-operated Fuddruckers units. The $42.2 million increase in restaurant sales included a $3.5 million increase in sales at Luby s Cafeteria-branded restaurants and $38.7 million in sales from Fuddruckers-branded restaurants in the two quarters ended February 9, On a samestore basis, restaurant sales at the Luby s Cafeteria restaurants increased 4.1% during the two quarters ended February 9, 2011 compared to the two quarters ended February 10, The improved same-store sales is primarily due to improving economic conditions and our focus on local restaurant marketing efforts and limited time offers used to generate customer traffic at the Luby s Cafeteria restaurant units, partially offset by unusual weather in the quarter which we estimate reduced sales by approximately $0.9 million in the two quarters ended February 9, The prior year results of restaurants closed as part of our Cash Flow Improvement and Capital Redeployment Plan (the Plan ) have been reclassified to discontinued operations. Cost of Food Food costs increased approximately $7.5 million, or 53.6%, in the quarter ended February 9, 2011 compared to the quarter ended February 10, 2010 due to the inclusion in our operations of the Fuddruckers units acquired in July As a percentage of restaurant sales, food costs increased 2.4%, to 29.8%, in the quarter ended February 9, 2011 compared to 27.4% in the quarter ended February 10, 2010, primarily due to (1) higher food commodity costs, particularly in the areas of beef, seafood, poultry, and fresh produce; (2) adding the all-you-can eat breakfast offer in approximately 70% of our cafeteria units; and (3) offering select menu items at a lower price on a limited time basis to generate customer traffic. Food costs increased approximately $15.1 million, or 55.9%, in the two quarters ended February 9, 2011 compared to the two quarters ended February 9, 2010, due to the inclusion in our operations of the Fuddruckers units acquired in July As a percentage of restaurant sales, food costs increased 2.5%, to 29.7% in the two quarters ended February 9, 2011 compared to 27.2% in the two quarters ended February 10, 2010, primarily due to (1) higher food commodity costs, particularly in the areas of beef, seafood, poultry, and fresh produce; (2) adding the all-you-can eat breakfast offer in approximately 70% of our cafeteria units; and (3) offering select menu items at a lower price on a limited time basis to generate customer traffic. 17