Report on a Possible New Plan Design for the Shelby County Retirement System
|
|
- Sandra Stewart
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The experience and dedication you deserve Report on a Possible New Plan Design for the Shelby County Retirement System Prepared as of June 30,
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Item Page No. I Executive Summary 1 II Basic Projection Results 4 III Impact of Benefit Changes on Baseline Projections 9 IV Investment Return Analysis 18 Appendix A Base Actuarial Assumptions and Methods 21 B Capital Market Assumptions and Asset Allocation 25
3 May 7, 2010 Mr. James Martin Shelby County Retirement System 160 North Main Street, Suite 950 Memphis, TN Dear Jim: Presented in this report are the results of a 30 year projection of the Shelby County Retirement System (SCRS). The purpose of the projection was to determine the impact a new Plan Design or new Plan Assumptions would have on the System s financial status. The starting point for the projection was the June 30, 2009 valuation of the SCRS. Membership was projected over a 30 year period from that date and actuarial valuations were performed annually for each of the 30 years to measure the System s funding progress. Progress over intervening years was interpolated from the valuation results. The Executive Summary that immediately follows provides a synopsis of the main projection results. Respectfully submitted, Edward J. Koebel, FCA, EA, MAAA Principal and Senior Actuary EJK:kc S:\Shelby County\Valuation\2009\Plan D and E Study\Shelby New Plan Projection Report Version 3.doc
4 Section I - Executive Summary Due to the June 30, 2009 valuation results and the anticipated employer rate increases expected, the Board of Trustees and the Retirement Task Force committee requested this projection study to determine the long term financial status of SCRS and to ascertain the impact a new plan would have on that status. The current Plan C and the proposed Plan D (General Employees) and Plan E (Public Safety) benefit provisions we analyzed are as follows: Current Plan C Proposed Plan D (General Ees Only) Proposed Plan E (Public Safety Only) Employee Contribution 6% 6% 6% Vesting 7.5 years 7.5 years 7.5 years Retirement Eligibility Normal Early 25 years Age 55 with 7.5 years SSRA (Assumed 67 and Vested) SSRA (Assumed 62 and Vested) Age 55 Age 50 Benefit Multiplier 2.35% 2.00% 2.00% Final Average Earnings 3 years 5 years 5 years (FAE) Maximum Benefit of 82.25% 70.00% 70.00% FAE Survivor Benefit Based on FAE3 Based on FAE5 Based on FAE5 Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) CPI - up to 4% after age 65 CPI - up to 2% after age 65 CPI - up to 2% after age 65 The Retirement Task Force requested the following eight studies to be performed by the actuary and determine the savings that could be expected if the recommendations were implemented: 1. All new members will enter Plans D and E. 2. All current non-vested employees and new employees will enter Plans D and E. 3. All new members continue to enter Plan C with an additional 2% employee contribution from Plan A and Plan C active participants. 4. All new members continue to enter Plan C and the investment rate assumption is decreased from 8.25% to 7.50%. 5. Compare Plans D and E to a Social Security type Defined Benefit Plan. 6. All current non-vested employees and new employees will enter Plans D and E. In addition, all active members (other than Plan B actives) will pay an additional 2% employee contribution and the investment rate assumption is decreased from 8.25% to 7.50%. Page 1
5 Section I Executive Summary 7. All current non-vested employees and new employees will enter a Social Security type Defined Benefit Plan. In addition, all active members (other than Plan B actives) will pay an additional 2% employee contribution and the investment rate assumption is decreased from 8.25% to 7.50%. 8. All current non-vested employees and new employees will enter Plans D and E. In addition, all active members (other than Plan B actives) will pay an additional 2% employee contribution and the investment rate assumption is decreased from 8.25% to 8.00%. Since these new Plans would only be applicable to new members entering SCRS after the change was effective, the impact on System finances takes a long time to develop. The results of this projection study bear that out. The projection of System finances over 30 years requires an assumption regarding future new entrants to SCRS as well as the regular valuation assumptions used to estimate the timing of future events for existing members. As members are assumed to terminate service for any reason, they were replaced with a sufficient number of new entrants to maintain a level active population. Valuations were then performed on the projected active and retired membership for each of thirty years of the study. It should be noted that in our projection and as provided by your office, we used the most updated market value of assets estimate as of March 31, 2010 of around $880 million to estimate the assumed market value of assets for the end of the 2010 fiscal year. This represents an estimated annual investment return of 23% for the period from July 1, 2009 to June 30, The main results from the study (details can be found in the following sections of this report) are noted below. If the Annual Required Contribution (ARC) is made each year according to our projections, SCRS current financial situation will decline initially until all current asset losses are fully recognized in the smoothing period. But once that occurs, the funding ratio will begin to increase and the required contributions will gradually decrease. The new Plan designs have a significant impact on the System s finances. For example if Plans D and E were instituted, the ultimate normal cost rate of the SCRS would decrease from 6.98% to 3.90% and the savings from annual required employer contributions near the end of the projection period would be more than $20 million when compared to the baseline projection results. Increasing the employee contribution by 2% for all Plan A and Plan C active participants will decrease the employer normal cost each year by about 1.84% of pay. Page 2
6 Section I Executive Summary Lowering the investment rate assumption from 8.25% to 7.50% or 8.00% will increase liabilities, normal costs and annual short-term required contributions. See Section IV for an investment return analysis we performed. The Social Security Option Type Plan has a dramatic impact on the System s finances. However, it should be cautioned against having a Plan that develops a negative normal cost. A negative normal cost means that the employee is contributing a higher percentage of his payroll than his benefit will provide in retirement. It must be kept in mind that projections do not purport to show exact numerical results over the entire period under study. They do however provide a good basis for drawing conclusions about the likely position of the System and the relative impact changes over the years will have on System finances. Page 3
7 Section II Baseline Projection Results BACKGROUND Regular actuarial valuations measure SCRS present financial position and contribution adequacy by calculating and financing the liabilities created by the present benefit program. This process involves discounting to present values the future benefit payments on behalf of present active and retired members and their survivors. However, valuations do not produce information regarding future changes in the makeup of the covered group or the amounts of benefits to be paid or investment income to be received actuarial projections do. Whereas valuations provide a snapshot of SCRS as of a given date, projections provide a moving picture. Projected active and retired groups are developed from year to year by the application of assumptions regarding pre-retirement withdrawal from service, retirements, deaths, disabilities, and the addition of new members. Projected information regarding the retired life group leads to assumed future benefit payouts. Performing actuarial valuations every year during the projection period generates expected contribution rates and unfunded accrued liability (UAL) amortization periods. Combining future benefit payments with assumed contributions based on periodic valuations of the projected membership and expected investment earnings produces the net cash flow of the System each year, and thus end of year asset levels. Finally, the valuation results permit the development of the funding ratio trend line for the entire projection period. Projections are used for many purposes. Among them are (i) developing cash flow patterns for investment policy and asset mix consideration, (ii) exploring the effect of alternative assumptions about future experience, (iii) analyzing the impact on plan funding progress of changes in the workforce, and (iv) examining the potential effect of changes in benefits on plan financial activity. The latter is the subject of this study. Projection results are useful in demonstrating changing relationships among key elements affecting plan financial activity (e.g., how benefits payable and plan assets will grow in future decades). Projections are not predictions of specific future events and do not provide numeric precision in absolute terms. For instance, cash flow projected to occur 10 years in the future will not be exact (except by coincidence), but understanding the changed relationship between future benefit payout and future investment income can be very useful. SPECIAL ASSUMPTIONS In addition to the regular valuation assumptions used in performing the annual actuarial valuations of SCRS (all assumptions utilized in the projection study are outlined in Appendix A), additional assumptions must be made that are unique to projections. The first of these is what, if any, change in the overall active membership will be anticipated. For this projection study it was assumed that the number of active members would remain static over the 30 year projection period. Page 4
8 Section II Baseline Projection Results But since we assume active members will leave the system through termination, death, disability or retirement, we need to make some assumptions as to the composition of new hires that will replace departing members in order to maintain the membership at a constant number. The new entrant profile we developed was based on the new hires over the 2 year period prior to the projection start date of June 30, 2009 and is split by General Employees and Public Safety Employees. That profile is summarized in the table below. General Employees Age Average Pay Percent Male Weight 24 $30,000 35% 4% 28 31,000 25% 19% 33 35,000 25% 12% 37 35,000 25% 14% 43 32,000 25% 17% 47 38,000 30% 12% 52 38,000 30% 9% 57 41,000 40% 9% 65 40,000 50% 4% Public Safety Employees Age Average Pay Percent Male Weight 24 $30,000 75% 23% 28 30,000 75% 34% 33 30,000 75% 16% 38 30,000 75% 13% 42 30,000 75% 4% 48 30,000 75% 8% 52 30,000 75% 2% For the baseline projection results presented in this section of the report, it was further assumed that the benefit structure as it existed on June 30, 2009 would remain in place for the following 30 years, and that the SCRS assets (with the exception of the gains and losses already scheduled to be recognized in the next 4 years) would earn the assumed return of 8.25% annually, thus generating no further gains or losses over the projection period. Page 5
9 Section II Baseline Projection Results FUTURE MEMBERSHIP The following chart and graph show the headcounts of active participants and retired members over the projection period. The actives are broken down into those existing as of June 30, 2009 and those who are hired after June 30, By the end of a 20-year projection period, we estimate that about 89% of those active employees will have been hired after June 30, And by the end of the 30-year projection period we estimate that about 99% of those active employees will have been hired after June 30, It is estimated that in the year 2022, the number of retirees will begin to outpace the number of active participants. Member Active Existing Employees 6,332 3,917 2, Active New Entrants 0 2,415 3,987 5,664 6,256 Retired 2,749 4,475 5,787 7,337 7,706 Total 9,081 10,807 12,119 13,669 14,038 Page 6
10 Section II Baseline Projection Results CONTRIBUTION PATTERN AND UAL AMORTIZATION PERIOD We have also projected the contribution pattern for the next 30 years. The results below are based on a decreasing amortization period beginning with the maximum allowed under GASB, 30 years, in 2010 and decreasing to 0 in the year At that point the Unfunded Accrued Liability will be paid off and the ultimate contribution pattern will be normal cost only. Contribution Rate Pattern ARC Employer Rate Normal Rate 8.09% 7.56% 7.15% 7.00% 6.98% Unfunded Rate (1.26)% 5.31% 7.21% 4.00% 2.52% Total Employer Rate 6.83% 12.87% 14.36% 11.00% 9.50% Amortization Period 15 years 26 years 21 years 11 years 1 year Page 7
11 Section II Baseline Projection Results Assets, Liabilities and Funding Ratio The summary of assets, liabilities and funding ratios follows for each of the employer contribution rates. ($ in thousands) ARC Basis Actuarial Value $1,052,640 $1,173,159 $1,451,699 $2,433,217 $3,691,882 of Assets Accrued Liability $1,025,867 $1,352,467 $1,715,561 $2,586,990 $3,708,989 Unfunded $(26,773) $179,328 $263,862 $153,773 $17,107 Accrued Liability Funding Ratio 102.6% 86.7% 84.6% 94.1% 99.5% Page 8
12 Section III Impact of Benefit Changes on Baseline Projections INTRODUCTION This section of the report will demonstrate the impact of the new Plan Design structure on SCRS financial position. The new Plans, which are detailed below, were assumed to only apply to new members after June 30, As a result it takes quite a few years for each change to have a meaningful impact on System liabilities and contributions. The New Plan Design analyzed in this section is as follows: Current Plan C Proposed Plan D (General Ees Only) Proposed Plan E (Public Safety Only) Employee Contribution 6% 6% 6% Vesting 7.5 years 7.5 years 7.5 years Retirement Eligibility Normal Early 25 years Age 55 with 7.5 years SSRA (Assumed 67 and Vested) SSRA (Assumed 62 and Vested) Age 55 Age 50 Benefit Multiplier 2.35% 2.00% 2.00% Final Average Earnings 3 years 5 years 5 years (FAE) Maximum Benefit of 82.25% 70.00% 70.00% FAE Survivor Benefit Based on FAE3 Based on FAE5 Based on FAE5 Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) CPI - up to 4% after age 65 CPI - up to 2% after age 65 CPI - up to 2% after age 65 SS Option Plan Employee Contribution 6.20% Vesting 10 years Retirement Eligibility Normal Early SSRA (Assumed 67 and Vested) SSRA (Assumed 62 and Vested) Benefit Maximum 25-50% Survivor Benefit 50% of SS Benefit Cost-of-Living Based on CPI Adjustment (COLA) DC Portion Up to 3% Match in 457 Plan Page 9
13 Section III Impact of Benefit Changes on Baseline Projections BENEFIT CHANGES The following table shows the projected Normal Cost Rates for the employer Normal Cost Rate Baseline Plan 7.56% 7.15% 7.00% 6.98% 1. Plan D&E for New Members 2. Plan D&E for Current Non Vested and New Members 3. Increase Plan A and Plan C Employee Contribution Percentages by 2%* 4. Change Investment Return Assumption to 7.50% 5. Hybrid Social Security Plan** 6. Combine Plan D&E 7.5% (2, 3 and 4) 7. Combine Hybrid SS Plan (3, 4 and 5)** 8. Combine Plan D&E 8.0% (2 and 3) 6.97% 5.90% 4.62% 3.90% 6.06% 5.12% 4.03% 3.73% 5.74% 5.33% 5.17% 5.14% 9.35% 8.99% 8.91% 8.91% 6.10% 4.05% 1.11% 0.00%*** 5.81% 4.81% 3.67% 3.36% 3.56% 1.59% 0.00%*** 0.00%*** 4.72% 3.76% 2.65% 2.35% * Increase in employee contributions would be implemented over 4 years at 0.5% a year. ** In addition, an employer match of up to 3% shall be made to a 457 Plan. *** The Employee Contribution Rate exceeds the total normal rate for this Plan at this year resulting in a negative Employer Normal Cost Rate. However, we are showing a 0% normal cost rate since the employer shall not get a credit from the employee contributing more than the benefit is worth each year. The employer and employee contribution rate could be adjusted periodically to ensure that the contribution would continue to be shared equally and prevent the normal cost from going negative. Page 10
14 Section III Impact of Benefit Changes on Baseline Projections The following tables and graph shows the projected total Annual Required Contribution Rates for each of the scenarios. We have assumed a decreasing amortization period beginning at 30 years in the 2010 fiscal year Annual Required Contribution as a Percentage of Pay Baseline Plan 12.87% 14.36% 11.00% 9.50% 1. Plan D&E for New Members 2. Plan D&E for Current Non Vested and New Members 3. Increase Plan A and Plan C Employee Contribution Percentages by 2%* 4. Change Investment Return Assumption to 7.50% 5. Hybrid Social Security Plan** 6. Combine Plan D&E 7.5% (2, 3 and 4) 7. Combine Hybrid SS Plan (3, 4 and 5)** 8. Combine Plan D&E 8.0% (2 and 3) 12.28% 13.11% 8.62% 6.42% 11.37% 12.33% 8.03% 6.25% 11.05% 12.54% 9.17% 7.66% 16.89% 18.08% 14.18% 12.07% 11.41% 11.26% 5.11% 2.52% 13.76% 13.90% 8.94% 6.52% 11.51% 10.68% 5.27% 3.16% 10.91% 11.58% 7.05% 5.07% * Increase in employee contributions would be implemented over 4 years at 0.5% a year. ** In addition, an employer match of up to 3% shall be made to a 457 Plan. Page 11
15 Section III Impact of Benefit Changes on Baseline Projections Annual Required Contributions ($ in 000 s) Baseline Plan $40,512 $52,781 $55,353 $64, Plan D&E for New Members 2. Plan D&E for Current Non Vested and New Members 3. Increase Plan A and Plan C Employee Contribution Percentages by 2%* 4. Change Investment Return Assumption to 7.50% 5. Hybrid Social Security Plan** 6. Combine Plan D&E 7.5% (2, 3 and 4) 7. Combine Hybrid SS Plan (3, 4 and 5)** 8. Combine Plan D&E 8.0% (2 and 3) $38,655 $48,187 $43,377 $43,641 $35,790 $45,320 $40,408 $42,486 $34,783 $46,091 $46,144 $52,070 $53,166 $66,454 $71,355 $82,048 $35,916 $41,387 $25,714 $17,130 $43,314 $51,090 $44,987 $44,327 $36,231 $39,255 $26,519 $21,481 $34,342 $42,563 $35,476 $34,464 * Increase in employee contributions would be implemented over 4 years at 0.5% a year. ** In addition, an employer match of up to 3% shall be made to a 457 Plan. Page 12
16 Section III Impact of Benefit Changes on Baseline Projections 20.00% Projection of Employer Contribution Rates 18.00% 16.00% 14.00% Employer Rate 12.00% 10.00% 8.00% 6.00% 4.00% 2.00% 0.00% Year Baseline Plan Plan D&E for New Members Plan D&E for Current Non Vested Members Increase Plan A and Plan C Ee Cont 2% Change Investment Return to 7.50% Hybrid Social Security Plan Page 13
17 Section III Impact of Benefit Changes on Baseline Projections 20.00% Projection of Employer Contribution Rates 18.00% 16.00% 14.00% Employer Rate 12.00% 10.00% 8.00% 6.00% 4.00% 2.00% 0.00% Year Baseline Plan Combine Plan D&E (7.5% Investment Return) Combine SS Plan (7.5% Investment Return) Page 14
18 Section III Impact of Benefit Changes on Baseline Projections 20.00% Projection of Employer Contribution Rates 18.00% 16.00% 14.00% Employer Rate 12.00% 10.00% 8.00% 6.00% 4.00% 2.00% 0.00% Year Baseline Plan Combine Plan D&E (7.5% Investment Return) Combine Plan D&E (8% Investment Return) Page 15
19 Section III Impact of Benefit Changes on Baseline Projections Savings in Employer Required Contributions from Baseline Projection 60,000 50,000 40,000 Dollars (000's) 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 (10,000) (20,000) (30,000) Year Plan D&E for New Members Plan D&E for Current Non Vested Members Increase Plan A and Plan C Ee Cont 2% Change Investment Return to 7.50% Hybrid Social Security Plan Combine Plan D&E (7.5% Investment Return) Combine SS Plan (7.5% Investment Return) Page 16
20 Section III Impact of Benefit Changes on Baseline Projections Savings in Employer Required Contributions from Baseline Projection 35,000 30,000 25,000 Dollars (000's) 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 (5,000) (10,000) Year Combine Plan D&E (7.5% Investment Return) Combine Plan D&E (8% Investment Return) Page 17
21 Section IV Investment Return Analysis Background: The assumed investment return is one of the most significant assumptions in the annual actuarial valuation process as it is used to discount the expected benefit payments for all active, inactive and retired members of the divisions. Minor changes in this assumption can have a major impact on valuation results. The investment return assumption should reflect the asset allocation target for the funds set by the Board of Trustees. The current assumption is 8.25%, consisting of a price inflation assumption of 2.50% and a real rate of return assumption of 5.75%. The return is net of all administrative expenses. Past Experience: The assets for Shelby County are valued using a widely accepted assetsmoothing methodology that fully recognizes the expected investment income and also recognizes 20% of each year s investment gain or loss (the difference between actual and expected investment income). The recent experience over the last three years is shown in the table below. Year Ending Actuarial Value Market Value 6/ % 18.34% (5.18) (22.34) Because of the significant variability in past year-to-year results and the inter-play of inflation on those results in the short term, we prefer to base our investment return assumption on the capital market assumptions utilized by the Board in setting investment policy and the asset allocation established by the Board as a result of that policy. This approach is referred to as the building block method in ASOP No. 27. Page 18
22 Section IV Investment Return Analysis Analysis: The current capital market assumptions and asset allocation are shown in Appendix B. Using stochastic projection results provides an expected range of real rates of return over a 50 year time horizon. Looking at one year results produces an expected real return of 5.73% but also has a high standard deviation or measurement of volatility. By expanding the time horizon, the average return does not change much but the volatility declines significantly. The following table provides a summary of results. Time Span In Years Mean Real Return Standard Deviation Real Returns by Percentile 5 th 25 th 50 th 75 th 95 th % 10.99% % -1.26% 5.73% 13.50% 24.84% % 4.87% -1.82% 2.66% 5.89% 9.19% 14.24% % 3.46% 0.35% 3.58% 5.85% 8.21% 11.76% % 2.42% 2.05% 4.22% 5.90% 7.53% 9.95% % 2.01% 2.66% 4.55% 5.89% 7.27% 9.28% % 1.74% 3.09% 4.69% 5.90% 7.07% 8.76% % 1.55% 3.34% 4.83% 5.91% 6.94% 8.47% The percentile results are percentage of the 5,000 random series that produce returns over the time span shown of less than the amount indicated. Thus for the 10 year time span, 5% of the resulting real rates of return were below 0.35% and 95% were above that. As the time span increases, the results begin to merge. Over a 50 year time span, the results indicate there is a 25% chance that real returns will be below 4.83% and a 25% chance they will be above 6.94%. In other words there is a 50% chance the real returns will be between 4.83% and 6.94%. Administrative Expenses: The investment return is assumed to be net of administrative expenses. The table below compares, for the last three years, the expense levels during the fiscal year to the market value of assets SCRS at the end of the fiscal year (all $ in thousands). FY Ending June 30 Administrative Expenses Market Value of Assets Expense Ratio 2007 $1,289 $1,045, % , , % , , % The increase in expense ratio in 2009 reflects the market loss during that year. We would not expect the expense ratio long term to exceed 0.15% and are recommending that level in setting the net investment return assumption. Page 19
23 Section IV Investment Return Analysis Conclusion: Using the building block approach of ASOP No. 27 and the projection results outlined above, we are recommending a range for the investment return assumption of the 25 th to 75 th percentile real returns over the 50 year time span plus the recommended inflation assumption less the recommended expense ratio. The following table details the range. Item 25 th Percentile 50 th Percentile 75 th Percentile Real Rate of Return 4.83% 5.91% 6.94% Inflation 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% Expenses (0.15)% (0.15)% (0.15)% New Investment Return 7.18% 8.26% 9.29% There is a slightly more than 50% chance that the net return will be 8.25% or more over a 50- year period. A net return of 8.25% is at the 49th percentile. Although not in the center of the recommended range, in our opinion, a 7.50% investment return assumption is reasonable and very conservative. The current average of investment return assumption for all public sector plans is around 8.00%. Page 20
24 Appendix A BASE ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODS INVESTMENT RATE OF RETURN: 8.25% per year. SALARY INCREASES: Age Increase per year % EXPENSES: None. COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENT: 2.50% per year, compounded for Plan A and Plan C. PERCENT MARRIED: 65% of active members are assumed to be married with the male three years older than his spouse. ASSETS: The actuarial value of assets recognizes a portion of the difference between the market value of assets and the expected market value of assets, based on the assumed valuation rate of return. The amount recognized each year is 10% of the difference between market value and expected market value. VALUATION METHOD: Projected Unit Credit actuarial cost method. Page 21
25 Appendix A SEPARATIONS FROM SERVICE: Representative values of the assumed rates of death, disability, withdrawal, service retirement and early retirement are as follows: Plan B Annual Rate of Death* Disability* Withdrawal** Age Male Female Male Female Male Female % 0.017% 0.029% 0.030% 17.95% 57.96% *75% of deaths and disabilities are assumed to be line-of-duty for deputy sheriffs. 10% of deaths and disabilities are assumed to be line-of-duty for general employees. **Assume early retirements occur according to withdrawal rates; ultimate retirements at age 65 for General Employees and age 60 for Deputy Sheriffs. Plan A Annual Rate of Death* Disability* Withdrawal Retirement Age Male Female Male Female % 0.017% 0.029% 0.030% 12.0% 0.0% *90% of deaths and disabilities are assumed to be non-hazardous duty. Page 22
26 Appendix A Plan C Annual Rate of Death* Disability* Withdrawal Retirement** Before 25 years of service After 25 years of service Non- Age Male Female Male Female Public Safety Public Safety % 0.017% 0.029% 0.030% 12.0% % 10.0% % *90% of deaths and disabilities are assumed to be non-hazardous duty. **Assume that the retirement rate for employees with at least 25 years of service increases by 50% in the year following the Transition Period. Page 23
27 Appendix A DEATHS AFTER RETIREMENT: The RP-2000 Mortality Table Projected to 2006 is used for the period after retirement and for dependent beneficiaries. Special rates are used for the period after disability retirement. Representative values of the assumed rates of death after service and disability retirement are as follows: Annual Rate of Death After Service Retirement Disability Retirement Age Male Female Male Female Page 24
28 Appendix B Capital Market Assumptions and Asset Allocation Geometric Rates of Return and Standard Deviations by Asset Class Asset Class Expected Geometric Standard Deviation Rates of Return U.S. Equity Large Cap 9.0% 15.0% U.S. Equity Small Cap 9.2% 20.0% International Equity Developed 9.5% 15.0% International Equity Emerging 12.5% 23.0% Domestic Fixed Income 2.9% 4.0% International Fixed - Developed 3.5% 7.0% International Fixed - Emerging 11.0% 12.0% High Yield/Distressed 8.0% 7.0% Public Real Estate 2.5% 16.0% Private Real Estate 12.5% 11.0% Private Equity 20.0% 23.0% Hedge Funds 10.5% 7.0% Timber 7.5% 11.5% Infrastructure 9.0% 14.0% Cash 0.2% 0.8% Proposed 2010 Long Term Asset Allocation Targets Asset Class Asset Allocation U.S. Equity Large Cap 27.0% U.S. Equity Small Cap 6.0% International Equity Developed 16.0% International Equity Emerging 4.0% Domestic Fixed Income 10.0% International Fixed - Developed 4.0% International Fixed - Emerging 4.0% High Yield/Distressed 6.0% Public Real Estate 0.0% Private Real Estate 0.0% Private Equity 4.0% Hedge Funds 16.0% Timber 2.0% Infrastructure 1.0% Cash 0.0% Page 25
June 7, Dear Board Members:
CITY OF MANCHESTER EMPLOYEES' CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT SYSTEM GASB STATEMENT NOS. 67 AND 68 ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR PENSIONS DECEMBER 31, 2015 June 7, 2016 Board of Trustees City of Manchester
More informationReport of the Actuary on the Valuation of the Georgia Firefighters Pension Fund
Report of the Actuary on the Valuation of the Georgia Firefighters Pension Fund Prepared as of June 30, 2017 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve November
More informationGASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT
GASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT FOR THE VIRGINIA RETIREMENT SYSYTEM PREPARED AS OF JUNE 30, 2014 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve December 3, 2014 Board
More informationEmployees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore
Employees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore Actuarial Valuation Report as of June 30, 2018 Produced by Cheiron October 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Letter of Transmittal... i Foreword...
More informationReport on the Annual Valuation of the Public Employees Retirement System of Mississippi
Report on the Annual Valuation of the Public Employees Retirement System of Mississippi Prepared as of June 30, 2018 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve
More informationGASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT FOR THE VIRGINIA RETIREMENT SYSYTEM
GASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT FOR THE VIRGINIA RETIREMENT SYSYTEM PREPARED AS OF JUNE 30, 2015 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve January 12, 2016 Board
More informationCavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve
Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve May 16, 2018 Dr. L. C. Evans Executive Director Teachers Retirement System of Georgia Suite 100, Two Northside 75
More informationActuarial Section. Actuarial Section THE BOTTOM LINE. The average MSEP retirement benefit is $15,609 per year.
Actuarial Section THE BOTTOM LINE The average MSEP retirement benefit is $15,609 per year. Actuarial Section Actuarial Section 89 Actuary s Certification Letter 91 Summary of Actuarial Assumptions 97 Actuarial
More informationReport on the Annual Basic Benefits Valuation of the School Employees Retirement System of Ohio
Report on the Annual Basic Benefits Valuation of the School Employees Retirement System of Ohio Prepared as of June 30, 2018 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication
More informationActuarial Valuation Report for the Employees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore
Actuarial Valuation Report for the Employees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore as of June 30, 2015 Produced by Cheiron November 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Transmittal Letter... i Foreword...
More informationCavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve. Assumption Previous Current. a select & ultimate rate of 2.25% and 2.
New Mexico Judicial Retirement Fund Annual Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2018 October 25, 2018 The Retirement Board Public Employees Retirement Association Santa Fe, New Mexico Members of the Board:
More informationTEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF GEORGIA REPORT OF THE ACTUARY ON THE VALUATION PREPARED AS OF JUNE 30, 2016
TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF GEORGIA REPORT OF THE ACTUARY ON THE VALUATION PREPARED AS OF JUNE 30, 2016 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve May 10,
More informationCity of Manchester Employees Contributory Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions December
City of Manchester Employees Contributory Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions December 31, 2017 May 10, 2018 Board of Trustees City of Manchester
More informationGwinnett County Retirement System Health Insurance Plan Report of Actuary on the Retiree Medical Valuation. Prepared as of January 1, 2018
Gwinnett County Retirement System Health Insurance Plan Report of Actuary on the Retiree Medical Valuation Prepared as of January 1, 2018 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and
More informationActuarial Section ARLINGTON COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM. Arlington County Employees Retirement System
ARLINGTON COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM Arlington County Employees Retirement System 54 Arlington County Employees Retirement System Actuarial Section 55 Arlington County Employees Retirement System
More informationCavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve
Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve Mr. Robert B. Barnes Deputy Executive Secretary and General Counsel Kentucky Teachers Retirement System 479 Versailles
More informationUniversity of Puerto Rico Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation Report
University of Puerto Rico Retirement System Actuarial Valuation Report As of June 30, 2016 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve May 22, 2017 Retirement
More informationReport on the Actuarial Valuation for Virginia Retirement System
Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Virginia Retirement System Prepared as of June 30, 2017 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve December 20, 2017
More informationUniversity of Puerto Rico Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation Valuation Report
University of Puerto Rico Retirement System Actuarial Valuation Valuation Report As of June 30, 2015 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve April 11, 2016
More informationOhio Police & Fire. Pension Fund. Investigation of Demographic and Economic Experience. Conduent Human Resource Services. Five-Year Period from
Conduent Human Resource Services Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund Investigation of Demographic and Economic Experience Five-Year Period from January 1, 2012 December 31, 2016 October 2017 2135 City Gate
More informationLOUISIANA STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM. ACTUARIAL EXPERIENCE STUDY July 1, 2013 June 30, 2018
LOUISIANA STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACTUARIAL EXPERIENCE STUDY July 1, 2013 June 30, 2018 January 23, 2019 Board of Trustees Louisiana State Employee s Retirement System Post Office Box 44213
More informationCity of San José Federated City Employees Retirement System
City of San José Federated City Employees Retirement System Actuarial Valuation Report as of June 30, 2016 Produced by Cheiron January 11, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Section I Board Summary...1
More informationState Universities Retirement System of Illinois. GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions as of June 30, 2017
State Universities Retirement System of Illinois GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions as of June 30, 2017 November 6, 2017 The Board of Trustees State Universities
More informationSanta Barbara County Employees Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, Produced by Cheiron
Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2013 Produced by Cheiron December 11, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter of Transmittal... i Foreword... ii Section I Executive
More informationCavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve. Assumption Previous Current. a select & ultimate rate of 2.25% and 2.
New Mexico Magistrate Retirement Fund Annual Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2018 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve October 25, 2018 The Retirement
More informationCity of St. Clair Shores Employees Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions June 30, 2018
City of St. Clair Shores Employees Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions June 30, 2018 September 19, 2018 Board of Trustees City of St. Clair Shores
More informationTulare County Employees Retirement Association
Tulare County Employees Retirement Association Actuarial Valuation Report as of June 30, 2017 Produced by Cheiron November 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Letter of Transmittal... i Foreword... ii
More informationCavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve
Volunteer Firefighters Retirement Fund of New Mexico Annual Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2016 November 17, 2016 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve
More informationC I T Y O F S O U T H F I E L D E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M G A S B S T A T E M E N T N O S. 6 7 A N D 6 8 A C C O U N T I N G
C I T Y O F S O U T H F I E L D E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M G A S B S T A T E M E N T N O S. 6 7 A N D 6 8 A C C O U N T I N G A N D F I N A N C I A L R E P O R T I N G F O R P E
More informationPension Plan of Town of West Warwick Management Summary of 7/1/2013 Actuarial Valuation
Pension Plan of Town of West Warwick Management Summary of 7/1/2013 Actuarial Valuation January 13, 2014 Table of Contents Significant Changes for 2013 2 Participant Information 3 Participant Information
More informationActuary s Certification Letter (Pension Trust Fund)
Actuarial Actuary s Certification Letter (Pension Trust Fund) May 19, 2017 Board of Trustees Texas Municipal Retirement System ( TMRS or the System ) Austin, Texas Dear Trustees: In accordance with the
More informationRETIREMENT PLAN FOR T H E E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T FUND OF THE CITY OF D A L L A S ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R T AS OF D E C E M B E R
RETIREMENT PLAN FOR T H E E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T FUND OF THE CITY OF D A L L A S ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R T AS OF D E C E M B E R 3 1, 2 0 1 3 May 13, 2014 Board of Trustees Employees
More informationJune 19, Compute the City s recommended contribution rate for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2015.
June 19, 2015 The Retirement Board Employees Retirement System Marine City, Michigan Dear Board Members: The purpose of the annual actuarial valuation of the Employees Retirement System as of June 30,
More informationReport on the Actuarial Valuation of the Public Employees Retirement Association of Colorado
Report on the Actuarial Valuation of the Public Employees Retirement Association of Colorado Prepared as of December 31, 2016 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication
More informationArkansas Judicial Retirement System Annual Actuarial Valuation and Experience Gain/(Loss) Analysis Year Ending June 30, 2018
Arkansas Judicial Retirement System Annual Actuarial Valuation and Experience Gain/(Loss) Analysis Year Ending June 30, 2018 Outline of Contents Section Pages Items -- Cover letter A B C D E Valuation
More informationSubject: Actuarial Valuation Report for the Year Ending December 31, 2016
POLICEMEN S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2016 May 5, 2017 Board of Trustees Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund City of Chicago 221 North
More informationFebruary 3, Experience Study Judges Retirement Fund
February 3, 2012 Experience Study 2007-2011 February 3, 2012 Minnesota State Retirement System St. Paul, MN 55103 2007 to 2011 Experience Study Dear Dave: The results of the actuarial valuation are based
More informationO A K L A N D C O U N T Y E M P L O Y E E S ' R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M
O A K L A N D C O U N T Y E M P L O Y E E S ' R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M G A S B S T A T E M E N T N O. 6 7 P L A N R E P O R T I N G A N D A C C O U N T I N G S C H E D U L E S S E P T E M B E R
More informationP O L I C E M E N S A N N U I T Y A N D B E N E F I T F U N D O F C H I C A G O A C T U A R I A L V A L U A T I O N R E P O R T F O R T H E Y E A R E
P O L I C E M E N S A N N U I T Y A N D B E N E F I T F U N D O F C H I C A G O A C T U A R I A L V A L U A T I O N R E P O R T F O R T H E Y E A R E N D I N G D E C E M B E R 3 1, 2 0 1 5 June 10, 2016
More informationReport on the Annual Basic Benefits Valuation of the School Employees Retirement System of Ohio
Report on the Annual Basic Benefits Valuation of the School Employees Retirement System of Ohio Prepared as of June 30, 2011 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication
More informationCITY OF HOLLYWOOD GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2012
CITY OF HOLLYWOOD GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2012 ANNUAL EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section
More informationCity of Cranston Fire and Police Department Pension Plans
City of Cranston Fire and Police Department Pension Plans Actuarial Valuation Report As of July 1, 2012 December 2012 December 11, 2012 Mr. Robert F. Strom Finance Director City of Cranston 869 Park Avenue
More informationSt. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association Actuarial Valuation as of July 1, 2017
St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association Actuarial Valuation as of July 1, 2017 December 21, 2017 Ms. Jill E. Schurtz, Executive Director 1619 Dayton Avenue, Room 309 St. Paul, MN 55104-6206 Dear
More informationMUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN APPENDIX TO THE ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT DECEMBER 31, 2016
MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN APPENDIX TO THE ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT DECEMBER 31, 2016 Summary of Plan Provisions, Actuarial Assumptions and Actuarial Funding Method as
More informationCITY OF MEMPHIS RETIREMENT SYSTEM
CITY OF MEMPHIS RETIREMENT SYSTEM Actuarial Valuation as of July 1, 2011 7/1/2011 6/30/2012 Plan Year November, 2011 November 30, 2011 Mr. Roland McElrath Director, Division of Finance City of Memphis
More informationA R K A N S A S P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M ( I N C L U D I N G D I S T R I C T J U D G E S
A R K A N S A S P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M ( I N C L U D I N G D I S T R I C T J U D G E S ) G A S B S T A T E M E N T N O S. 6 7 A N D 6 8 A C C O U N T I N G A N D
More informationReport on the Actuarial Valuation for Virginia Retirement System. Prepared as of June 30, 2014
R Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Virginia Retirement System Prepared as of June 30, 2014 December 19, 2014 The Board of Trustees Page 2 The promised benefits of VRS are included in the calculated
More informationSan Diego City Employees Retirement System San Diego County Regional Airport Authority
San Diego City Employees Retirement System San Diego County Regional Airport Authority GASB 67/68 Report as of June 30, 2016 Produced by Cheiron November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Letter of Transmittal...
More informationS TAT E U NIVERSITIES R ETIREMENT SYSTEM OF I L LINOIS
S TAT E U NIVERSITIES R ETIREMENT SYSTEM OF I L LINOIS G A S B S T A T E M E N T N O S. 6 7 A N D 6 8 A C C O U N T I N G AND F I N A N C I A L R E P O R T I N G F O R P E N S I O N S J U N E 3 0, 2 0
More informationAnne Arundel County Employees Retirement Plan
Employees Retirement Plan Actuarial Valuation as of January 1, 2017 to Determine the County s Contribution for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2018 36 S. Charles Street, Suite 1000 Baltimore, MD 21201
More informationActuary s Certification Letter (Pension Trust Fund)
Actuarial Actuary s Certification Letter (Pension Trust Fund) May 22, 2015 Board of Trustees Texas Municipal Retirement System ( TMRS or the System ) Austin, Texas Dear Trustees: In accordance with the
More informationFebruary 11, Mr. Tom Mann Executive Director Kansas City Public School Retirement System 4600 The Paseo Kansas City, MO 64110
Mr. Tom Mann Executive Director 4600 The Paseo Kansas City, MO 64110 RE: 2013 Fiscal Impact Response Form Dear Tom: This letter is in response to the Request for Fiscal Note number 1235-01, bill number
More informationSample Notes to the Financial Statements Single Plan Political Subdivision Retirement Plan For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016
Sample Notes to the Financial Statements Single Plan Political Subdivision Retirement Plan For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016 Instructions The Sample Notes to the Financial Statements for the Single
More informationSTATE OF IOWA PEACE OFFICERS RETIREMENT, ACCIDENT AND DISABILITY SYSTEM
STATE OF IOWA PEACE OFFICERS RETIREMENT, ACCIDENT AND DISABILITY SYSTEM Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Certification Letter 1 Executive Summary 1 2 System
More informationPUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. Actuarial Experience Study for the period July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2004.
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA Actuarial Experience Study for the period July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2004 Copyright 2005 THE SEGAL GROUP, INC., THE PARENT OF THE SEGAL COMPANY ALL
More informationACTUARIAL VALUATION OF TOWN OF DAVIE POLICE PENSION PLAN AS OF OCTOBER 1, February, 2014
ACTUARIAL VALUATION OF TOWN OF DAVIE POLICE PENSION PLAN AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2013 February, 2014 Determination of Contribution for the Plan Year ending September 30, 2014 Contribution to be Paid in Fiscal
More informationVirginia Retirement System. Experience Study. For the Four-Year Period
Virginia Retirement System Experience Study For the Four-Year Period July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2016 February 21, 2018 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve
More informationKansas Public Employees Retirement System
Kansas Public Employees Retirement System Valuation Report as of December 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Sections Actuarial Certification Letter Page Section 1 Board Summary 1 Section 2 Scope of the Report
More informationCavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve
Connecticut State Teachers Retirement System Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2016 November 2, 2016 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve Board of Directors
More informationSTATE UNIVERSITIES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ILLINOIS
STATE UNIVERSITIES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ILLINOIS GASB STATEMENT NOS. 67 AND 68 ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR PENSIONS JUNE 30, 2015 November 12, 2015 The Board of Trustees State Universities Retirement
More informationCity of Ann Arbor Employees' Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation and Report June 30, 2018
Actuarial Valuation and Report Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Actuarial Certification... 3 Summary of Report... 4 Comparative Summary of Membership Data... 5 Comparative Summary of Key Actuarial Valuation
More informationF I R E A N D P O L I C E P E N S I O N A S S O C I A T I O N
F I R E A N D P O L I C E P E N S I O N A S S O C I A T I O N COLORADO SPRINGS N E W H I R E P E N S I O N P L A N - F I R E C O M P O N E N T ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R T FOR THE YEAR BEGINNIN G J
More informationMUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN
MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN Summary of Actuarial Assumptions and Actuarial Funding Method as of December 31, 2015 Actuarial Assumptions To calculate MERS contribution requirements,
More informationSan Joaquin County Employees Retirement Association
San Joaquin County Employees Retirement Association Actuarial Valuation as of January 1, 2017 Produced by Cheiron August 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Letter of Transmittal... i Foreword... ii Section
More informationC I T Y O F S T. C L A I R S H O R E S E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M 6 4 T H A C T U A R I A L V A L U A T I O N R E P O R T A S
C I T Y O F S T. C L A I R S H O R E S E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M 6 4 T H A C T U A R I A L V A L U A T I O N R E P O R T A S O F J U N E 3 0, 2 0 1 6 Contents Section Page Introduction
More informationThe Town of Middletown Pension Plan
The Town of Middletown Pension Plan GASB 67 and 68 Information For Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2018 November 2018 Buck 420 Lexington Ave. Suite 2220 New York, NY 10170 November 2018 Mr. Marc W. Tanguay
More informationTOWN OF LANTANA POLICE RELIEF AND PENSION FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014
TOWN OF LANTANA POLICE RELIEF AND PENSION FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014 ANNUAL EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title
More informationTeachers Retirement System of the State of Illinois
Teachers Retirement System of the State of Illinois Preliminary Actuarial Valuation and Review of Pension Benefits as of June 30, 2018 October 16, 2018 Copyright 2018 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights
More informationLaborers & Retirement Board and Employees Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago
Laborers & Retirement Board and Employees Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago Actuarial Valuation Report for the Year Ending December 31, 2017 May 2018 May 2, 2018 The Retirement Board of the Laborers
More informationDecember 19, St. Paul Teachers' Retirement Fund Association 1619 Dayton Avenue, Room 309 St. Paul, Minnesota
ST. PAUL TEACHERS' RETIREMENT FUND ASSOCIATION GASB STATEMENT NOS. 67 AND 68 ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR PENSIONS JUNE 30, 2016 December 19, 2016 St. Paul Teachers' Retirement Fund Association
More informationS TAT E U NIVERSITIES R E T I REMENT SYSTEM OF I L L INOIS
S TAT E U NIVERSITIES R E T I REMENT SYSTEM OF I L L INOIS G A S B S T A T E M E N T N O. 6 7 P L A N R E P O R T I N G A N D A C C O U N T I N G S C H E D U L E S J U N E 3 0, 2 0 1 4 October 10, 2014
More informationCONTENTS. 1-2 Summary of Benefit Provisions 3 Asset Information 4-6 Retired Life Data Active Member Data Inactive Vested Member Data
CITY OF ST. CLAIR SHORES POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM 66TH ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT JUNE 30, 2015 CONTENTS Section Page 1 Introduction A Valuation Results 1 Funding Objective 2 Computed Contributions
More informationThe City of Omaha Police & Fire Retirement System
The City of Omaha Police & Fire Retirement System Actuarial Valuation as of January 1, 2014 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve July 10, 2014 Board
More informationCavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve
Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve January 27, 2016 Ms. Laurie Hacking Executive Director Teacher Retirement Association of Minnesota 60 Empire Drive,
More informationCity of Madison Heights Police and Fire Retirement System Actuarial Valuation Report June 30, 2017
City of Madison Heights Police and Fire Retirement System Actuarial Valuation Report June 30, 2017 Table of Contents Page Items -- Cover Letter Basic Financial Objective and Operation of the Retirement
More informationCITY OF FORT COLLINS GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF JANUARY 1, Prepared by:
ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF JANUARY 1, 2005 Prepared by: Patricia Ann Kahle, F.S.A., E.A. Principal and Consulting Actuary and Joel E. Stewart, E.A. Associate Actuary May 2005 1099 Eighteenth Street, Suite
More informationCity of Manchester Employees Contributory Retirement System GASB Statement No. 74, Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefit Plans Other Than
City of Manchester Employees Contributory Retirement System GASB Statement No. 74, Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefit Plans Other Than Pension Plans December 31, 2017 May 18, 2018 Board of
More informationMIDLAND COUNTY RETIREE HEALTH CARE PLAN
MIDLAND COUNTY RETIREE HEALTH CARE PLAN TWENTY THIRD ACTUARIAL VALUATION DECEMBER 31, 2015 August 12, 2016 The Retiree Health Plan Board Midland County Midland, Michigan Dear Board Members: Submitted in
More informationGASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT
GASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT FOR THE KANSAS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM MEASUREMENT DATE: JUNE 30, 2017 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve October
More informationACTUARIAL SURS2015. Letter of Certification. Actuarial Report. Analysis of Funding. Tests of Financial Soundness
ANALYZING ACTUARIAL Letter of Certification Actuarial Report Analysis of Funding Tests of Financial Soundness SURS2015 The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015 Letter
More informationWyoming Retirement System Actuarial Experience Study As of December 31, 2016
Wyoming Retirement System Actuarial Experience Study As of December 31, 2016 January 10, 2018 Board of Trustees Wyoming Retirement System 6101 Yellowstone Road Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002 Subject: Results
More informationARKANSAS JUDICIAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM GASB STATEMENT NOS. 67 AND 68 ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR PENSIONS
ARKANSAS JUDICIAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM GASB STATEMENT NOS. 67 AND 68 ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR PENSIONS JUNE 30, 2016 November 21, 2016 The Board of Trustees Arkansas Judicial Retirement System
More informationSeptember 15, Mr. Randall Blum Deputy Finance Director City of Eastpointe Eastpointe, Michigan Dear Mr. Blum:
September 15, 2011 Mr. Randall Blum Deputy Finance Director Eastpointe, Michigan 48021 Dear Mr. Blum: This report contains the results of an actuarial valuation of the liabilities associated with retiree
More informationST. PAUL TEACHERS RETIREMENT FUND ASSOCIATION A CTUARIAL V ALUATION
ST. PAUL TEACHERS RETIREMENT FUND ASSOCIATION A CTUARIAL V ALUATION AS OF J ULY 1, 2015 December 7, 2015 Ms. Jill E. Schurtz Executive Director 1619 Dayton Avenue, Room 309 St. Paul, MN 55104-6206 Dear
More informationReport on the Actuarial Valuation of the Health Insurance Credit Program
Report on the Actuarial Valuation of the Health Insurance Credit Program Prepared as of June 30, 2014 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve December 19,
More informationRespectfully submitted,
June 25, 2016 County of Jackson 120 W. Michigan Ave. Jackson, Michigan 49201 Attention: Mr. James Latham, Finance Officer This report contains the results of an actuarial valuation of the liabilities associated
More informationReport on the Actuarial Valuation of the Public Employees Retirement Association of Colorado
Report on the Actuarial Valuation of the Public Employees Retirement Association of Colorado Prepared as of December 31, 2017 June 18, 2018 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience
More informationJuly 30, The Retirement Board City of Taylor Police and Fire Retirement System Taylor, Michigan
July 30, 2018 The Retirement Board Retirement System Taylor, Michigan Dear Board Members: The purpose of the annual actuarial valuation of the Retirement System as of June 30, 2017 is to: Compute the liabilities
More informationArkansas Judicial Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions June 30, 2017
Arkansas Judicial Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions June 30, 2017 November 13, 2017 Board of Trustees Arkansas Judicial Retirement System Little
More informationSample Notes to the Financial Statements Single Plan Political Subdivision Retirement Plan For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018
Sample Notes to the Financial Statements Single Plan Political Subdivision Retirement Plan For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Instructions The Sample Notes to the Financial Statements for the Single
More informationSeptember 30, Results of 2009 Experience Study
M I N N E A P O L I S E M P L O Y E E S RETIREMENT FUND ACTUARIAL EXPERIENCE STUDY AS OF JUNE 30, 2009 September 30, 2009 Mr. Brian Lokkesmoe Board President Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund 800 Baker
More informationCavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve
Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) of New Mexico Annual Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2018 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve October
More informationGeneral Employees Retirement Plan
Freiman Little Actuaries, LLC Phone 321 453 6542 4105 Savannahs Trail Fax 321 453 6998 Merritt Island, FL 32953 City of Rockledge General Employees Retirement Plan Actuarial Valuation as of October 1,
More informationCITY OF WALTHAM CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT SYSTEM. Actuarial Valuation Report. January 1, 2008
CITY OF WALTHAM CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT SYSTEM Actuarial Valuation Report January 1, 2008 City of Waltham Contributory Retirement System TABLE OF CONTENTS Page REPORT SUMMARY Highlights 1 Introduction
More informationCity of Grand Rapids Police and Fire Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions Measurement
City of Grand Rapids Police and Fire Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions Measurement Date: December 31, 2017 GASB No. 68 Reporting Date: June
More informationArkansas State Police Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions June 30, 2017
Arkansas State Police Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions June 30, 2017 November 13, 2017 Board of Trustees Arkansas State Police Retirement
More informationSample Notes to the Financial Statements Single Plan Political Subdivision Retirement Plan For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015
Sample Notes to the Financial Statements Single Plan Political Subdivision Retirement Plan For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015 Instructions The Sample Notes to the Financial Statements for the Single
More informationJACKSONVILLE POLICE & FIRE PENSION FUND Review of Actuarial Assumptions. October 1, 2006 through October 1, 2011
October 1, 2006 through October 1, 2011 Prepared by: Pension Board Consultants, Inc. 195 14 th Street, Suite 2307 Atlanta, Georgia 30309 (404) 892-9798 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Proposed 10/1/11 Changes....
More informationCopyright 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Water and Power Employees Retirement Plan of the City of Governmental Accounting Standards (GAS) 67 Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2016 This report has been prepared at the request of the Board
More informationTOWN OF COHASSET, MASSACHUSETTS OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM
TOWN OF COHASSET, MASSACHUSETTS OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM ACTUARIAL VALUATION as of July 1, 2016 FINANCIAL REPORTING AND DISCLOSURES UNDER GASB 45 and GASB 74 as of June 30, 2017 KMS Actuaries,
More information