RTD Pass Program Portfolio: The Current State. An Overview of RTD Pass Programs June 6, 2017
|
|
- Christiana Blankenship
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 RTD Pass Program Portfolio: The Current State An Overview of RTD Pass Programs June 6, 2017
2 Outline 1. The Budget 2. Pass Programs By The Numbers 3. Equity
3 The Budget How fare revenue and pass programs fit into the big financial picture
4 The Purpose of Fares Fare revenue is used to offset the cost of operating and maintaining transit services (e.g. bus and rail) and facilities (e.g. bus stops, shelters, Park-n-Rides, maintenance facilities). Fare changes are intended to increase revenue in response to actual or forecasted increases in operation and maintenance costs. An objective is to minimize the ridership loss involved in fare increases. Operating costs are identified and forecasted through: Strategic Budget Plan (SBP) FasTracks Annual Program Evaluation (APE)
5 Purpose of the SBP Provides overall guidance for RTD Base System service delivery, debt, and capital expenditures Six year capital and operating plan Identifies anticipated revenues and expenditures Must be financially constrained (balanced budget) Provides input for other planning efforts DRCOG six-year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) RTD Annual Budget Long-term Financial Plan Aligns with Board top strategic goals for 2018 Fiscal Sustainability Workforce/Human Capital State of Good Repair Incorporates approved performance measures Sets target for development of fund balances 5
6 Overview of the SBP SBP includes only service and projects funded from the Base System 0.6% sales and use tax FasTracks expenses and projects are included in the FasTracks Annual Program Evaluation (APE) financial plan Cost allocation to FasTracks operations for existing corridors and services for annual budget Goal is to combine SBP and APE in one long-range plan going forward 6
7 SBP Development Process SBP capital program used as baseline for current SBP Start with projects approved in SBP Existing projects with costs in future years are rolled into the current cycle SBP Requests for new projects are brought into current cycle SBP Projects are prioritized and evaluated using mission statement criteria and 2018 strategic goals Revenue forecasts updated to incorporate most recent available information.06% sales/use tax + fare revenue + grants Ongoing operating cost forecasts updated to 2017 Budget, using current information and current cost trends 7
8 Annual Program Evaluation (FT) Comprehensive annual evaluation process for the FasTracks program Same time period as SBP Provides overall guidance for FasTracks build-out, service delivery, debt, and capital expenditures Provides input for other planning efforts RTD Annual Budget, Financial Plan Only service and projects funded from FasTracks sources 0.4% sales/use tax + fare revenue + grants Annual update of: Project capital and operating cost estimates to current baseline Revenue estimates to current forecasts Overall plan to current conditions 8
9 Fare Revenue Targets 2016 Financial Plan Forecast Farebox Revenues (thousands of dollars) Year Base FasTracks Total 2018 $117,520 $36,172 $153, $129,272 $44,013 $173, $129,272 $46,061 $175, $129,272 $47,454 $176, $142,199 $53,647 $195, $142,961 $55,146 $198,108
10 Deferred Projects Below is a sample list of projects deferred through the SBP process. Deferred Projects North Boulder Park-n-Ride and Bus Transfer Center I-25 & Broadway Infrastructure Improvements RouteMatch Software Replacement (Access-a-Ride) Support and Service Vehicles (e.g. tow trucks) Parking Mineral Park-n-Ride Bus Wash East Metro Estimated Cost $3.3 million $9 million $2 million $3.8 million $11.2 million $1.6 million
11 Pass Programs by the Numbers An Overview of pass programs including 2016 revenue, distribution and smart card tap data.
12 Current Fare Structure Fare Type Local Bus & Rail Regional Bus & Rail Airport Bus & Rail Cash (includes free one-way transfers) $2.60/$1.30 $4.50/$2.25 $9.00/$4.50 MyRide One-way Trip $2.35/$1.15 $4.25/$2.10 $8.75/$4.35 Day Pass $5.20/$2.60 $9.00/$4.50 Included in Regional Fare Day Pass Book $26/$13 $45/$22.50 Included in Regional Fare 10-Ride Ticket Book $23.50/$11.75 $40.50/$20.25 Included in Regional Fare Monthly Pass $99/$49 $171/$85 Included in Regional Fare ValuPass (Annual) $1,089/$49 $1,881/$935 Included in Regional Fare Legend: Full Fare/Discount Fare 12
13 Base Discount Fare Policy With proof of eligibility, RTD offers a Discount Fare and Free Fare on bus and rail services Discount Fare (Half Fare/50% Discount) 1. Seniors: 65+Years Old (Federal Requirement) 2. Individuals with Disabilities (Federal Requirement) 3. Medicare Recipients (Federal Requirement) 4. Elementary, Middle and High School Students, ages 6-19 Free 1. Children 5 & under 2. Access-A-Ride user and their assistant 3. Active duty members of the U.S. military 4. Law Enforcement and 1st Responders 13
14 Cash $49,315,763 36% Fare Revenue Breakdown (2016) $138,369,533 Business EcoPass - Individual $26,471,142 19% Monthly Pass $23,700,015 17% MyRide Stored Value $338,264 0% Neighborhood EcoPass $1,045,391 1% Business EcoPass - Master Contracts (6 Contracts) $1,150,679 1% Day Pass Books $1,769,371 1% Nonprofit Program $3,747,563 3% FlexPass (Monthly Pass) $3,789,209 3% 10-Ride Tickets $13,098,850 9% CollegePass $13,943,286 10%
15 Pass Programs Portfolio Summary PASS PROGRAM REVENUE (2016) 1. CollegePass $50,147, EcoPass a) Business EcoPass CollegePass, $13,943,286, 28% FlexPass $3,789,209 8% Nonprofit Program, $3,747,563, 7% b) Neighborhod EcoPass (NECO) c) Master Contract EcoPass 3. Flex Pass 4. Nonprofit Business EcoPass - Individual, $26,471,142, 53% Business EcoPass - Master Contracts (6 Contracts), $1,150,679, 2% Neighborhood EcoPass $1,045,391 2% 15
16 Pass Programs Portfolio Summary Number of Participating Organizations Per Program 1,600 NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS 1,400 1,200 1, Series1 EcoPass - Master Contracts (6 Contracts) 1,579 EcoPass - Individual 751 Nonprofit Program 309 FlexPass 260 Neighborhood EcoPass 55 CollegePass 9 PASS PROGRAMS
17 College Pass COLLEGE PASS (2016) An annual program based on a school year that allows students to utilize all of RTD s regular services including trips to and from the airport The student receives a photo ID smart card CU Boulder and Auraria priced from ridership data (prior to smart card). All other schools per student per semester fees determined by survey. Cost is passed to students via tuitions and fees. Each school determines eligibility - e.g. Some schools may only include full time students. CollegePass $13,943,286 10% Program # of Participants Other Media $124,426,247 90% # of Eligible Passes Revenue Per Pass College Pass 9 200,000 $69.72
18 CollegePass Program Administration Personalize smart cards for students with photo and name RTD provides card stock Track card inventory and card numbers issued to students Create riders and assign cards individually or via bulk Manage riders suspend ineligible students (makes rider inactive) Manage cards suspend or deactivate for ineligible or replacements Coordinate with multiple offices and schools on the campus to obtain the information needed to manage the accounts - time consuming and cumbersome Provide lists to RTD each semester/quarter for account management support Provide enrollment census to RTD each semester/quarter RTD Market Dev. Staff assists coordinators who provide required data
19 EcoPass An annual program based on a calendar year giving employees access to all regular services including Airport Service The employee receives a photo ID smart card Prepaid program some payment plan options available The company and RTD enter into a contract and pricing is determined by the location (SLA) of the company and the total number of employees. Contract minimums apply All full time employees must be included with the option to include or exclude all part time employees Guaranteed Ride Home is included with the EcoPass program Program ECOPASS REVENUE (2016) Other Media $111,898,391 81% Business EcoPass - Individual Participants Business EcoPass - Individual $26,471,142 19% # of Eligible Revenue Passes Per Pass ,953 $234.36
20 SLA (business location) A Outer Suburban B Major Transit Centers C Downtown Denver CBD D DIA and home businesses Contract Minimum Employees Per Year 1-10 $1, $2, $3, $2, $4, $6, $2, $5, $8, $2, $5, $8, Eco Pass Pricing 1-24 employees employees Price Per Employee Per Year ,000-1,999 employees employees 2,000+ employees $98 $85 $75 $64 $60 $209 $189 $173 $160 $151 $532 $493 $470 $459 $434 $544 $522 $483 $470 $445 Important: If the per-person rate for your SLA multiplied by your headcount is LESS THAN the Contract Minimum - the Contract Minimum rate will apply.
21 EcoPass Administration Create new riders individually or bulk Manage riders suspend ineligible employees (makes rider inactive) Manage cards suspend or deactivate for ineligible or replacements Order cards for riders via the smart card web portal (one portal per employer location), or by issuing an authorization form to send the employee to an RTD. Authorize Guaranteed Ride Home trips for employees Headcount Variance Reports mid-year Providing documentation for annual renewals and/or at RTD s request RTD Market Dev. Staff assists coordinators who provide required data
22 Neighborhood EcoPass (NECO) NECO PASS REVENUE (2016) Provides the same benefits to neighborhood residents as the EcoPass does for employees A neighborhood must be represented by either a county or city government or a registered homeowners/neighborhood association There is an annual per household price, prepaid by neighborhoods Any new neighborhoods, or additional blocks to existing neighborhoods after 2009 are surveyed to determine the per household pricing. Program Other Media $137,324,142 99% Participants Neighborhood EcoPass, $1,045,391, 1% # of Eligible Revenue There are 3 pricing zones in Boulder for Passes Per Pass neighborhoods that joined before Neighborhood 55 13,390 $78.07 There are additional rules related to new EcoPass developments and contract minimums.
23 Neighborhood EcoPass Administration Create new riders individually or via bulk Manage riders suspend ineligible residents (makes rider inactive) Manage cards suspend or deactivate for ineligible or replacements Order cards for riders via the smart card web portal, or by issuing an authorization form to send the resident to an RTD outlet rider must be created first- NOTE: all replacements must be done in person Guaranteed Ride Home not included with NECO Providing documentation for annual renewals Manage collection of funds from residents
24 EcoPass Master Contract ECOPASS MASTER CONTRACTS (2016) Master Contract agents may select from three participation options. The minimum Master contract amount per agent is $10,000 per year. Employers and employees may not be charged for the passes. The businesses must be located within defined boundaries that are contiguous Guaranteed Ride Home included with the exception of the CAGID contract covering downtown Boulder Master Contract agent contracts with RTD Master Contract agent manages all employers within its boundaries Business EcoPass - Master Contracts (6 Contracts) $1,150,679 1% Other Media $137,218,854 99% Program Participants # of Eligible Revenue Passes Per Pass Business EcoPass - Master Contracts (6 1,579 8,450 $ Contracts)
25 EcoPass Master Contract Administration Create new riders individually or via bulk must also include the company name in the rider profile as there are multiple companies Manage riders for multiple companies suspend ineligible employees (makes rider inactive) Manage cards for multiple companies suspend or deactivate for ineligible or replacements Issue an authorization form to send the employee to an RTD outlet Master Contract Coordinators choose to not order through the portal due to difficulties with card distribution Share communications with multiple employers CAGID as 1200 companies Providing documentation for annual renewals and/or at RTD s request
26 FlexPass FLEXPASS REVENUE (2016) An annual pass program that can be customized to meet the needs of the FlexPass employer and employees offering up to Other Media (Monthly Pass) three different discounts. Employer can chose one, two or all three $134,580,324 $3,789,209 97% 3% RTD works with companies to select the plan that fits best The company will sign a revolving contract Some or all of the employees may participate (opt-in model) Employees place monthly orders and employers approve each month # of # of Eligible Revenue Per Program Prepaid per monthly order Participants Passes Pass Monthly passes are mailed to employees FlexPass (Monthly Pass) ,693 $ or business prior to the month of usage
27 FlexPass Administration Employees receive a monthly pass - local or regional Each month, employees order through the FlexPass site by selecting the company via a dropdown menu Each month the company approves the order through the FlexPass site Payment is determined by the options selected by the company. It can be shared between employee and employer, a pre-tax payroll deduction can be set up. There are a variety of choices All ordering has a cut off date, if the dates are missed, the orders are cancelled
28 Nonprofit Program NON-PROFIT PROGRAM (2016) Nonprofit and government agencies purchase Day Pass ticket books, 10 Ride ticket books and monthly passes at a 50% Discount Agencies can recover 100% the discount price of media The entire program is capped at $6.8 million face value (the cap was exceeded in 2016) Agencies offer discounted media to income eligible customers only Individuals from households with income 185% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines Non-Profit Program $3,747,563 3% Passes Face Value Net Sales Amount (50%) 10-Ride Tickets $ 2,474,518 $ 1,237,259 Day Passes $ 228,054 $ 114,027 Monthly Passes $4,792,554 $2,396,277 Total $7,495,126 $3,747,563 Other Media, $134,621,970, 97% % of Total Revenue Per Pass/Ticket 33% $9.96 3% $ % $ %
29 Monthly Revenue Per Pass Monthly Revenue Per Pass $ $ $ $ $ $80.00 $60.00 $40.00 $20.00 $0.00 Monthly Revenue Per Pass CollegePass Neighborhood EcoPass - EcoPass - Nonprofit Local Monthly Regional Local Monthly FlexPass Regional EcoPass Master Individual Program Discount Monthly Monthly Contracts Business Discount $5.81 $6.51 $11.35 $19.53 $38.36 $49.00 $85.00 $99.00 $ $ % of Local Monthly Pass Price - $99 % of Regional Monthly Pass Price - $171 EcoPass - EcoPass Master NECO CollegePass FlexPass Nonprofit 19.73% 11.46% 7% 6% 121% 39% 11% 7% 4% 3% 70% 22%
30 Fare Use On-Board Survey* *Fare structure and media changed in 2016
31 Tap Data
32 Barriers to Accuracy The Limitations of Tap Data Based on ridership statistics and customer survey data, we estimate that between 20% and 30% of trips taken with smart cards in were not recorded and/or reported. Barriers to accuracy include: Technological: Equipment and system issues resulted in unsuccessful taps Example: Cards could not be re-charged Administrative: Challenges with data integrity and reporting methodology. Examples: Calculation of transfer value Customer Behavior: A significant portion of passengers did not tap, especially on rail. Example: Customer not aware of the requirement to tap since pass is pre-paid.
33 Overcoming Barriers to Accuracy Technological: Equipment and system issues have been largely resolved. Administrative: Implementation of new reporting system and revised reporting methodology is under way. Customer Behavior: Efforts to improve compliance education, outreach, more inspections, new inspection application.
34 Tap Data College ECO NECO Total Total Recorded Trips 4,876,375 7,272, ,175 12,606,623 Local^ 3,599,789 3,336, ,713 7,244,054 Express^ 632,074 1,872,283 28,731 2,533,088 Regional^ 554,172 1,147, ,425 1,806,669 Airport^ 90, ,166 16,306 1,022,812 Value of Recorded Trips* $ 14,968,263 $31,211,267 $ 1,415,951 $47,595,481 Revenue Received $ 14,639,207 $ 21,220,158 $ 893,874 $ 36,753,239 ^ Classification based on fare level for first boarding * A significant portion of trips was not recorded
35 Tap Data College ECO NECO Total Total Recorded Trips 4,690,622 7,522, ,761 12,708,587 Local^ 3,605,536 3,589, ,206 7,542,979 Express^ 492,440 1,801,369 31,848 2,325,657 Regional^ 499,787 1,149,105 97,283 1,746,175 Airport^ 92, ,493 18,424 1,093,776 Value of Recorded Trips* $ 14,144,279 $ 32,308,862 $ 1,476,436 $ 47,929,576 Revenue Received $ 14,025,492 $ 22,480,301 $ 1,044,758 $ 37,550,551 ^ Classification based on fare level for first boarding * A significant portion of trips was not recorded
36 Tap Data College ECO NECO" Total Total Recorded Trips 4,693,320 7,978, ,726 13,150,856 Local^ 3,641,434 4,528, ,719 8,507,874 Regional^ 955,128 2,586, ,396 3,662,281 Airport^ 96, ,332 20, ,701 Value of Recorded Trips* $ 14,940,768 $ 31,823,290 $ 1,421,046 $ 48,185,105 Revenue Received $ 13,943,286 $ 27,621,821 $ 1,045,391 $ 42,610,498 ^ Classification based on fare level for first boarding * A significant portion of trips was not recorded
37 Data Provided to the Consultant Boarding data from fareboxes by service class, by route, and by time-period (peak/offpeak) on a month by month and annual basis for weekday and weekend services Recent Ridecheck and Standcheck data (observed ridership) for most of RTD s routes will be available on an as-needed basis Recent sales data for all RTD fare media Recent EcoPass sales data and trends System and route maps and schedules RTD s Service Standards Estimates of fare recovery by route - currently available for 2015 Origin/Destination surveys Customer Satisfaction surveys (2017 Survey underway) Fare Study Recommendation (2016), Equity Analysis and final report EcoPass, College, and other fare-related contracts and agreements Smartcard tap data
38 Equity An overview of RTD s view of fare equity
39 Equity The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) requires an equity analysis of any fare change per Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Environmental Justice (E.O ). A fare equity analysis is an evaluation of fare changes for discriminatory effects called: Disparate Impact - a significantly disproportionate percentage of benefits/adverse effects absorbed by minority persons Disproportionate Burden a significantly disproportionate percentage of benefits/adverse effects absorbed by low-income persons. A difference in impact 5% is considered to be significantly disproportionate.
40 Equity Analysis Framework 1. Analysis: Analyze the proposed fare change for impacts absorbed by minority and low-income populations. a) Compare average fare of minority and non-minority rider b) Compare average fare of low-income and non-low-income rider 2. Manage Disparities: Avoid, minimize and mitigate identified disparate impact and disproportionate burden. a) e.g. not raising fares at all, reducing services, etc
41 Questions
RTD Pass Program Portfolio: The Current State. An Overview of RTD Pass Programs June 6, 2017
RTD Pass Program Portfolio: The Current State An Overview of RTD Pass Programs June 6, 2017 Outline 1. The Budget 2. Pass Programs By The Numbers 3. Equity The Budget How fare revenue and pass programs
More informationPass Program Study. Evaluating the Options. November 14, 2017
Pass Program Study Evaluating the Options November 14, 2017 Agenda Modeling Challenges Options B, C & E General Results Comparison of the Options by Component Discussion 2 Modeling Challenges When we dig
More informationAffordable Fares Task Force Recommendations. March 26, 2015
Affordable Fares Task Force Recommendations March 26, 2015 Low income individuals make up a disproportionate amount of RTD users. Percent of RTD riders Percent of individuals in the district Less than
More informationPass Programs, Fare Programs and Fare Policy Analysis. Marla Lien, General Counsel Regional Transportation District, Denver, CO
Pass Programs, Fare Programs and Fare Policy Analysis Marla Lien, General Counsel Regional Transportation District, Denver, CO Types of Discount Fare Programs: Frequency Discounts (multi-ride, monthly
More informationPeer Agency: King County Metro
Peer Agency: King County Metro City: Seattle, WA Fare Policy: Service Type Full Fare Reduced Fare Peak: - 1 Zone $2.75 $1.00* or $1.50** - 2 Zones $3.25 $1.00* or $1.50** Off Peak $2.50 $1.00* or $1.50**
More informationProposed Service Change Title VI Compliance Review
Proposed Service Change Title VI Compliance Review May 2014 Submitted by: Table of Contents 1. Purpose... 3 2. Background... 3 3. Definition of Title VI and Environmental Justice Impact Policies... 3 3.1
More informationEquity Analysis: Honored Citizen Fare Increase DRAFT. Department of Diversity & Transit Equity
Equity Analysis: Honored Citizen Increase DRAFT Department of Diversity & Transit Equity March 23, 2015 Executive Summary: Honored Citizen Increase Equity Analysis In accordance with Title VI of the Civil
More informationReport by Finance and Administration Committee (B) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary
Report by Finance and Administration Committee (B) 01-28-2016 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary Action Information MEAD Number: 201701 Resolution: Yes No TITLE:
More informationUniversity Link LRT Extension
(November 2007) The Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, commonly known as Sound Transit, is proposing to implement an extension of the Central Link light rail transit (LRT) Initial Segment
More informationSOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M Select a draft Sounder fare structure change and fare increase for public review and comment
SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M2007-21 Select a draft Sounder fare structure change and fare increase for public review and comment Meeting: Date: Type of Action: Staff Contact: Phone: Finance
More informationBOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORT To: David Genova, General Manager Date: From: Heather McKillop, Chief Financial Officer GM Date: Board Meeting: October 16, 2018 Subject: ACTION DISCUSSION INFO X RECOMMENDED
More informationSubject: Creation of an Eco Pass
To: Board of Directors Date: April, 2014 From: Anne Muzzini, Director of Planning & Marketing Reviewed by: Subject: Creation of an Eco Pass Summary: The concept of creating an Eco Pass has been reviewed
More informationService and Fare Change Policies. Revised Draft
Revised Draft June 19, 2013 1. INTRODUCTION It is the policy of the Sacramento Regional Transit District (RT) to provide quality service to all customers regardless of race, color, national origin, or
More informationTitle VI Fare Equity Analysis
Pioneer Valley Transit Authority Title VI Fare Equity Analysis Prepared by the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission April 12, 2012 PVTA TITLE VI FARE EQUITY ANALYSIS APRIL 12, 2012 1. CONFORMANCE WITH REGULATORY
More informationPOLICY AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
NUMBER EFF. DATE POLICY AND PROCEDURES MANUAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT Finance/Service Planning TITLE Fare Policy (DRAFT as of 11-13-13) APPLIES TO Development of Fare Structure, General Public SUPERSEDED
More informationDART Fare Structure Programs
DART Fare Structure Programs Budget & Finance Committee November 13, 2018 Joseph G. Costello Senior Vice President, Finance 0 Calendar Date Nov 13 Dec 11 Jan 22 Feb 26 Mar 26 Apr 23 May 28 Jun 18 Jul 18
More information~ NOTICE OF MEETING ~ CAPITAL METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
~ NOTICE OF MEETING ~ CAPITAL METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING 2910 East Fifth Street Austin, TX 78702 ~ AGENDA ~ Executive Assistant/Board Liaison Gina Estrada 512-389-7458
More informationPublic Transit Services Summary of Submitted 2015 Budget From Rates
Public Transit Services Summary of Submitted 2015 From Rates Service Expense 2014 2015 Revised Draft Non Tax Revenue Net Tax Supported Expense Non Tax Revenue Net Tax Supported Increase / (Decrease) Over
More informationFrom: Steve Rudy, Director, Transportation Planning and Operations
To: TIP Notification List From: Steve Rudy, Director, Transportation Planning and Operations Re: Administrative Modifications to the 2012-2017 Transportation Improvement Program Date: April 20, 2011 Based
More information2018 Fare Change Proposal
2018 Change Proposal Metra Board of Directors October 6, 2017 Presented by Lynnette H. Ciavarella Senior Division Director, Strategic Capital Planning Metra Principles (April 19, 2017) Consider regular
More informationTERMS AND CONDITIONS
This agreement ( Agreement ) is made between the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), and an employer, residential community, college or university (hereinafter an Institution ) named on
More informationREGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, COLORADO
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, COLORADO Series 2004 Lease RTD Active Fleet of the District Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2013 Fixed Route Bus Fleet Number RTD Owned Fixed Route Buses 40' Transit Coaches
More informationTitle VI Service Equity Analysis
Pierce Transit Title VI Service Equity Analysis Pursuant to FTA Circular 4702.1B March 2017 Restructure December 2016 Pierce Transit -- Transit Development Dept. PIERCE TRANSIT TITLE VI SERVICE EQUITY
More informationBOARD OF SUPERVISORS BUSINESS MEETING ACTION ITEM
Date of Meeting: June 7, 2016 # 7 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BUSINESS MEETING ACTION ITEM SUBJECT: ELECTION DISTRICT: Title VI Policies for Transit Service Countywide CRITICAL ACTION DATE: June 7, 2016 STAFF
More informationTotal Operating Activities for FY17 are $56.9 million, an increase of $5.1M or 9.8% from FY16.
FY17 ADOPTED ANNUAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET Valley Metro Rail, Inc. (VMR) is a public non-profit corporation whose members are the cities of Chandler, Glendale, Mesa, Phoenix, and Tempe. VMR plans,
More informationChapter 10 Equity and Environmental Justice
Chapter 10 Equity and Environmental Justice Introduction An important consideration for the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan is its impact on all populations in the Minneapolis-Saint Paul region, particularly
More informationTitle VI Service Equity Analysis: FY2019 Annual Service Plan. Department of Diversity & Transit Equity
Title VI Service Equity Analysis: FY2019 Annual Service Plan Department of Diversity & Transit Equity April 26, 2018 Executive Summary TriMet is proposing to implement several service improvements in fall
More informationREGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, COLORADO AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015
AS OF DECEMBER 31, RTD Active Fleet of the District Fixed Route Bus Fleet: Number RTD Owned- Fixed Route Buses 40' Transit Coaches 620 Articulated Buses 110 Intercity Coaches 175 Mall Shuttles 37 30' Transit
More informationBOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORT To: David A. Genova, General Manager Date: October 9, 2018 From: Heather McKillop, Chief Financial Officer GM Date: October 9, 2018 Board Meeting Date: October 16, 2018 Subject:
More informationVALLEY METRO RPTA FY18 Budget EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
VALLEY METRO RPTA FY18 Budget EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FY18 ADOPTED ANNUAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET Valley Metro Regional Public Transportation Authority (RPTA) provides public transportation services for
More informationFY17 FY16 Valley Metro RPTA Sources of Funds FY17 vs FY16
FY17 ADOPTED ANNUAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET Valley Metro Regional Public Transportation Authority (RPTA) provides public transportation services for Maricopa County located in the metro Phoenix, Arizona.
More informationVALLEY METRO RAIL FY18 Budget EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
VALLEY METRO RAIL FY18 Budget EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FY18 ADOPTED ANNUAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET Valley Metro Rail, Inc. (VMR) is a public non-profit corporation whose members are the cities of Chandler,
More informationFY2017 Budget Work Session
Finance & Administration Committee Information Item IV-B January 14, 2016 FY2017 Budget Work Session Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary Action Information MEAD
More informationPublic Transportation Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.
Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results. Mission Serve Anchorage residents and visitors by providing public transportation that emphasizes quality, safety, cost effectiveness, and economic vitality. Core
More informationMiWay Business Plan and 2015 Budget
MiWay 2015-2018 Business Plan and 2015 Budget Agenda Existing Core Services Vision and Mission Service Delivery Model Service Level Issues and Trends Service Area Information Accomplishments Benchmarks
More informationTEX Rail Fort Worth, Texas Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2012)
TEX Rail Fort Worth, Texas Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2012) Summary Description Proposed Project: Commuter Rail 37.6 Miles, 14 Stations (12 new, two existing) Total Capital Cost ($YOE):
More informationCOOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FY 2004/05 VENTURA INTERCITY SERVICE TRANSIT AUTHORITY (VISTA) CONEJO CONNECTION
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FY 2004/05 VENTURA INTERCITY SERVICE TRANSIT AUTHORITY (VISTA) CONEJO CONNECTION This Agreement is made and entered into by the City of Calabasas (Calabasas) and the Ventura County
More informationTSCC Budget Review TriMet
TSCC Budget Review 2017-18 TriMet 1. Introduction to the District: The Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District (TriMet) boundary covers about 575 square miles of the urban portions of Multnomah,
More informationFederal Assistance 13% Charges for Services 5% Appropriated Fund Balance.5% Other 3% Administration 6% Building Maintenance 3% Other 2%
TRANSIT FUND The Transit Fund is used to account for the operations of the Town s public transit system. Federal Assistance 13% Transit Revenues State Assistance 12% Charges for Services 5% Appropriated
More information2013 STA Passenger Survey Results. Attachment E Title VI Attachment E
2013 STA Passenger Survey Results Attachment E 1 2014 Title VI Attachment E 2013 STA Passenger Survey Results Overview Spokane Transit Authority (STA) conducted its most recent passenger survey in December
More informationFixed Guideway Transit Overview
Fixed Guideway Transit Overview March 13, 2017 House Ways and Means Committee Metropolitan Council Role in Transportation Planning 2 Serves as the region s federally required Metropolitan Planning Organization
More informationBirmingham-Jefferson County Transit Authority P.O. Box Birmingham, AL Phone: (205) Fax: (205)
Birmingham-Jefferson County Transit Authority P.O. Box 10212 Birmingham, AL 35202-0212 Phone: (205) 521-0161 - Fax: (205) 521-0154 Program of Projects For Federal Fiscal Year 2018 (Utilizing FFY 2017 Apportionments)
More informationREGIONAL TRANSIT ISSUE PAPER Page 1 of 3 Agenda Item No.
REGIONAL TRANSIT ISSUE PAPER Page 1 of 3 Agenda Item No. Board Meeting Date Open/Closed Session Information/Action Item Issue Date 13 07/27/15 Open Action 07/08/15 Subject: Setting a Public Hearing on
More informationREGIONAL TRANSIT MEMO
REGIONAL TRANSIT MEMO DATE: February 10, 2014 TO: FROM: SUBJ: File James Drake, Service Planner Title VI Analysis of Granite Park Shuttle Pursuant to RT s major service change policy and in accordance
More informationTransit Subsidy. Mission Statement. Mandates
Mission Statement The Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission (PRTC) is a multi-jurisdictional agency representing Prince William, Stafford, and Spotsylvania Counties and the Cities of Manassas,
More informationTransit Development Plan (FY ) Executive Summary
Transit Development Plan (FY 2019-2028) Executive Summary December 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 System Profile... 2 Public Outreach... 4 Key Findings/Direction... 5 Implementation Plan... 6
More informationCalACT Expo Transit Asset Management (TAM) Plan Workshop 49 CFR 625 April 24, 2017
CalACT Expo Transit Asset Management (TAM) Plan Workshop 49 CFR 625 April 24, 2017 Poll Question 2 Today s Presentation Transit Asset Management Context and Background Final Rule Provisions Reduced burden
More informationONBOARD ORIGIN-DESTINATION STUDY
REPORT ONBOARD ORIGIN-DESTINATION STUDY 12.23.2014 PREPARED FOR: ANCHORAGE METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (AMATS) 55 Railroad Row White River Junction, VT 05001 802.295.4999 www.rsginc.com SUBMITTED
More informationTransportation Committee Meeting date: July 24 th, 2017 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of July 26 th, 2017
Business Item No. 2017-154SW Transportation Committee Meeting date: July 24 th, 2017 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of July 26 th, 2017 Subject: Regional Fare Adjustment Recommendations District(s),
More informationMarion County Transit Plan
Marion County Transit Plan Final Summary for BOD Adoption 3/24/16 BACKGROUND: Since 2009, various studies and sustained public involvement under the banner Indy Connect have helped sculpt a detailed plan
More informationOCTOBER FY Monthly Financial and Operational Report. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority
OCTOBER FY 2019 Monthly Financial and Operational Report Rhode Island Public Transit Authority Financial Summary As of September FY 2019 Year to Date Budget Actual Variance % Variance $ 32,562,540 $ 28,304,800
More informationOverview of the 2018 Budget Amendment
It is recommended by the Financial Administration and Audit Committee that the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No., Series of 2018 to amend and appropriate funds for the proposed, to increase the appropriation
More informationImpacts of Transit Benefits Programs on Transit Agency Ridership, Revenues, and Costs
Impacts of Transit Benefits Programs Impacts of Transit Benefits Programs on Transit Agency Ridership, Revenues, and Costs Liisa Ecola, RAND Corporation Michael Grant, ICF International Abstract The federal
More information2017 TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROGRESS REPORT
LAKE COUNTY TRANSIT DIVISION P.O. Box 7800, Tavares, Florida 32778 2440 U.S. Highway 441/27, Fruitland Park, Florida 34731 Telephone: 352.323.5733; Facsimile: 352.323.5755 www.ridelakexpress.com 2017 TRANSIT
More informationBriefing on Fare Structure
Briefing on Fare Structure Budget & Finance Committee January 22, 2019 Joseph G. Costello Senior Vice President, Finance 0 Calendar Date Subject Jan 22 Fare Structure Briefing Feb 26 FY 2018 Operating
More informationTitle VI Approval of Major Service Change, Disparate Impact and Disproportionate Burden
Customer Service and Operations Committee Board Action Item III-A October 10, 2013 Title VI Approval of Major Service Change, Disparate Impact and Disproportionate Burden Page 3 of 42 Washington Metropolitan
More informationDeadline: FRIDAY, June 22nd, 2018 AT 5 PM
2018 PROJECT RAMP is a community foundation that was formed in 2012. The purpose is to give financial assistance to registered RAMP users who find it difficult to personally fund their transportation on
More informationFunding Local Public Transportation
Funding Local Public Transportation I. Metro A. SORTA, early history In 1969 the Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority was established by Hamilton County with Hamilton County as its jurisdiction. In
More informationBalancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City
Balancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City FY 2019 and FY 2020 Operating Budget SFMTA Board Meeting Ed Reiskin, Director of Transportation March 20, 2018 1 Revises Baselines: FY 2019-2020 ($
More informationStrategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets
San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Strategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets Fiscal Year 2019 Fiscal Year 2020 March 2018 SAFETY Goal 1: Create a safer transportation experience for everyone.
More informationCHERRIOTS 2018 SERVICE PLAN APPENDIX A EQUITY ANALYSIS
CHERRIOTS 2018 SERVICE PLAN APPENDIX A EQUITY ANALYSIS 1. Background... 1 2. Title VI requirements... 1 3. SAMTD Title VI compliance... 2 3.1 Major service changes policy... 2 3.2 Definition of adverse
More informationQUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY
QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY Quality Transportation Overview... 126 Department of Transportation... 127 Traffic Field Operations... 129 Winston-Salem Transit Authority... 131 Quality Transportation Non-Departmental...
More informationCHAPTER 7: Financial Plan
CHAPTER 7: Financial Plan Report Prepared by: Contents 7 FINANCIAL PLAN... 7-1 7.1 Introduction... 7-1 7.2 Assumptions... 7-1 7.2.1 Operating Revenue Assumptions... 7-2 7.2.2 Operating Cost Assumptions...
More informationSteve Cook, Acting Director, Transportation Planning and Operations. Administrative Modifications to the Transportation Improvement Program
To: From: Subject: TIP Notification List Steve Cook, Acting Director, Transportation Planning and Operations Administrative Modifications to the 2012-2017 Transportation Improvement Program Date: May 16,
More informationReport of Independent Accountants on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures
KPMG LLP 2001 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 Report of Independent Accountants on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures Board of Directors Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority: We have performed
More informationTravel Forecasting for Corridor Alternatives Analysis
Travel Forecasting for Corridor Alternatives Analysis Purple Line Functional Master Plan Advisory Group January 22, 2008 1 Purpose of Travel Forecasting Problem Definition Market Analysis Current Future
More informationMONEY ON THE TABLE EXPANDING TRANSIT BENEFITS CITYWIDE A REPORT BY THE RIDERS ALLIANCE. Principal Author: Benjamin Lowe
MONEY ON THE TABLE EXPANDING TRANSIT BENEFITS CITYWIDE A REPORT BY THE RIDERS ALLIANCE Principal Author: Benjamin Lowe 2 TAX SAVINGS FOR RIDERS AND BUSINESSES Federal tax law allows workers to pay for
More informationPuget Sound 4K Model Version Draft Model Documentation
Puget Sound 4K Model Version 4.0.3 Draft Model Documentation Prepared by: Puget Sound Regional Council Staff June 2015 1 Table of Contents Trip Generation 9 1.0 Introduction 9 Changes made with Puget Sound
More informationBusiness Survey Report
Who is TOD in Metro Denver? September 2009 Benchmarking the Evolution of TOD in Metro Denver Business Survey Report Who is TOD in Metro Denver? Business Survey Report September 2009 Acknowledgments Preparation
More informationMoDOT Title VI Workshop Introduction. Prepared by Philips & Associates, Inc., Program Consultants
MoDOT Title VI Workshop Introduction Prepared by Philips & Associates, Inc., Program Consultants November 20, 2013 Administration and Staff Lester Woods, Jr. Director MoDOT External Civil Rights Steve
More informationBy-law being a By-Law to Establish Miscellaneous User Fees for Certain Services Provided by the City of Greater Sudbury;
By-law 2016-31 A By-law of the City of Greater Sudbury to Amend By-law 2015-266 being a By-law to Establish Miscellaneous User Fees for Certain Services provided by the City of Greater Sudbury Whereas
More informationAccess Butler County (ABC) Program Abstract & Definitions
ABC Program Abstract Access Butler County (ABC) Program Abstract & Definitions The Transit Alliance of Butler County (TABC) will purchase products (tickets, vouchers, tokens, etc.) from the Butler County
More informationSALEM-KEIZER TRANSIT 555 Court St. NE Suite 5230 Salem, OR
SALEM-KEIZER TRANSIT 555 Court St. NE Suite 5230 Salem, OR 97301-3980 503-588-2424 Fax 503-566-3933 www.cherriots.org May 15, 2014 To: From: Subject: Salem Area Mass Transit District Budget Committee Allan
More informationIntercity Transit Community Update
Intercity Transit Community Update Mission and Vision Mission: Our mission is to provide and promote transportation choices that support an accessible, sustainable, livable, healthy, prosperous community.
More informationQuarterly Meeting PTD Update October 26, 2016
NC Association of Rural Planning Organizations Quarterly Meeting PTD Update October 26, 2016 Debbie Collins North Carolina s Public Network 2 Public Ridership NC Public Transit Fastest Growing in Southeast
More informationBoard Chair Ron Daily and Members Omnitrans Board of Directors FISCAL YEAR ANNUAL BUDGET EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DATE: May 2, 2018 ITEM # F4 TO: Board Chair Ron Daily and Members Omnitrans Board of Directors THROUGH: P. Scott Graham, CEO/General Manager FROM: SUBJECT: Maurice Mansion, Treasury Manager FISCAL YEAR
More informationJP Morgan Public Finance Transportation Utility Conference
JP Morgan Public Finance Transportation Utility Conference April 18-19, 2018 Presented by: Brenden Morgan Sr. Manager of Debt & Investments Table of Contents I. Overview of the Region and RTD II. Updates
More informationLIGHT RAIL FARE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM EVALUATION AND AUDIT
LIGHT RAIL FARE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM EVALUATION AND AUDIT April 2015 INTRODUCTION Background METRO Fare Payment System Both the METRO Blue Line, which opened in 2004, and the METRO Green Line, which opened
More informationThe DRAFT Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County
The DRAFT Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County 5/31/2012 The Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County I. INTRODUCTION 3 II. TRANSIT STEPS LEADING UP TO THIS PLAN 4 III. PLAN ELEMENTS 5 A.
More informationCommuter Order Model Employer User Guide for Stand Alone Program Fir
Commuter Order Model Employer User Guide for Stand Alone Program Fir A comprehensive commuter benefits program designed to reduce your administration time so you can focus on maximizing participation.
More informationFinancial Report - FY 2017 Year to Date May 31, 2017
Financial Report - FY 2017 Year to Date July 19, 2017 1 Major Highlights Revenue Sales tax remittances received through YTD April 2017 are 4.2% higher than YTD April 2016 Plaza Saltillo lease income budgeted
More informationFY18 Final Results Budget Outlook, FY20-22
FY18 Final Results Budget Outlook, FY20-22 Objectives Provide background necessary for consideration of fiscal pressures that exist prior to electrification Service levels Ridership Member agency funding
More informationTransit Development Plan And 2013 Annual Report. Asotin County PTBA
Transit Development Plan 2014-2019 And 2013 Annual Report Asotin County PTBA Date of Public Hearing: September 10, 2014 Table of Contents Section I: Organization... 3 Section II: Physical Plant... 4 Section
More informationRESOLUTION NO. R Baseline Budget and Schedule, and Approve Gates 5 and 6 for the East Link Extension
RESOLUTION NO. R2015-04 Baseline and Schedule, and Approve Gates 5 and 6 for the East Link Extension MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: Board 04/23/15 Final Action Ahmad Fazel, DECM Executive
More informationMETROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION JUNE 30, 2017 AND 2016
NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION JUNE 30, 2017 AND 2016 Table of Contents Page INTRODUCTION... 1-2 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT... 3-5 MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION
More informationExecutive Summary - Fiscal Year 2016 Valley Metro Rail Preliminary Annual Operating and Capital Budget
Executive Summary - Fiscal Year 2016 Valley Metro Rail Preliminary Annual Operating and Capital Budget Valley Metro Rail, Inc. (VMR) is a public non-profit corporation whose members are the cities of Chandler,
More informationGovernor s FY 2019 Revised, FY 2020 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 9, 2019
Governor s FY 2019 Revised, FY 2020 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 9, 2019 Quasi-public agency Established in 1964 Responsible: Fixed route bus service and Americans with
More informationOverview of Final Circular B Title VI Requirements and Guidelines for Recipients. February 2013
Overview of Final Circular 4702.1B Title VI Requirements and Guidelines for Recipients February 2013 Title VI Prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in Federally funded
More informationPUBLIC TRANSIT OPERATORS in the United States have long known that
Discounting Transit Passes BY CORNELIUS NUWORSOO PUBLIC TRANSIT OPERATORS in the United States have long known that fare hikes do not increase total revenues. Although while fare reductions might boost
More informationRegional Transportation District FasTracks Financial Plan. April 22,
Regional Transportation District FasTracks Financial Plan April 22, 2004 2-1 Executive Summary The Regional Transportation District (the District or RTD ), has developed a comprehensive $4.7 billion Plan,
More informationTransit Subsidy. Mission Statement. Mandates
Mission Statement The Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission (PRTC) is a multi-jurisdictional agency representing Prince William, Stafford, and Spotsylvania Counties and the Cities of Manassas,
More informationAPPENDIX F-1: CATS Baseline Conditions and Needs Assessment
APPENDIX F-1: CATS Baseline Conditions and Needs Assessment Prepared by: As a subconsultant to: January 2016 Appendix F-1: CATS Baseline Conditions and Needs Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION...
More informationAcknowledgments. Special thanks to public- and private-sector financial contributors: Arapahoe County. City of Arvada.
Acknowledgments Preparation of this report has been financed in part through grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration and Federal Highway Administration. Special
More informationWashington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Metro Budget Overview
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Metro Budget Overview February 2011 Metro 10,877 Employees (10,974 budgeted) 1,491 Buses 588 Escalators and 237 Elevators 106 Miles of Track 92 Traction Power
More informationProgram Evaluation and Audit COUNTY CONTRACTOR ADA COST REVIEW DARTS AND SCOTT COUNTY
Program Evaluation and Audit COUNTY CONTRACTOR ADA COST REVIEW DARTS AND SCOTT COUNTY October 27, 2006 Background INTRODUCTION The Metropolitan Council contracts with four County governments (Anoka, Dakota,
More informationRegional Fare Coordination System
Regional Fare Coordination System Financial Statements and Independent Auditors Report for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS MANAGEMENT S
More informationCTA 2007 Contingency Plan
CTA 2007 Contingency Plan JUST THE FACTS RTA Directive Unless the RTA Board makes a determination no later than July 1, 2007, that the funds identified as new transit funding are available for 2007 such
More informationSAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO.: 10. SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DIVISION: Finance and Information Technology BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Approving revisions to the Title VI analysis for the
More informationSOLTRANS BOARD MEETING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS / HANDOUTS December 19, 2013 MEETING HANDOUTS
SOLTRANS BOARD MEETING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS / HANDOUTS December 19, 2013 MEETING HANDOUTS Agenda Item 8 SolTrans Curtola Park and Ride Hub Project Update PowerPoint Presentation Agenda Item 9 SolTrans
More informationFinancial Report Fiscal Year 2018
Financial Report Fiscal Year 2018 Year to Date September 30, 2018 1 Major Highlights Revenue Sales tax remittances received in FY2018 are 6.5% higher than FY2017 Additional $20 million in operating grants
More information